2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。（注：打开编辑页面后，您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表，请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部（在本行后）”；您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士（除了顶部）”。
）
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 01:15:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Courtyard of colorful paper lanterns and shadow patterns at Bulguksa temple Gyeongju South Korea.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Courtyard of colorful paper lanterns and shadow patterns at Bulguksa temple Gyeongju South Korea.jpg
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:34:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Place Jeanne d'Arc in Neufchateau (2).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Place Jeanne d'Arc in Neufchateau (2).jpg
Support Satisfying composition, well framed, and the patterns in the pavement are cool. The grey-blue light wouldn't normally work but for greyish stone architecture I think it actually works quite well. Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:35:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Polynesian flying fox (Pteropus tonganus) in flight Taveuni.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polynesian flying fox (Pteropus tonganus) in flight Taveuni.jpg
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and recropped 4x3.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and recropped 4x3.jpg
Info The 2024 Fall Equinox in Chicago fell on September 22 and both September 22 and 23 were days in which the sunrise and sunset on east-west streets occurred in the middle of the street (days known as Chicagohenge).-TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support On WP:FPC, I believe that I did not prioritize the diffraction spike in the uses until after a lot of people had decided it was not intriguing based on the wrong set of uses. Hoping for better luck here focusing on what I feel is a splendid diffraction spike.TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see anything beautiful here : Landscape, architecture, lights... In addition, cars are distracting and the crop isn't very good. This is quite dark. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Sebring12Hrs, I am not sure how to read crop isn't very good in a way that would help me improve this submission or future compositions. Is it possible you could be a little more instructive as I aspire to be better.-TonyTheTiger (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:04:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Finnish Air Force BAE Hawk Mk.66 HW-361 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Finnish Air Force BAE Hawk Mk.66 HW-361 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg
Info Night falls around the Piz S-chalambert (View from Val Sinestra at ~6.18 pm). A fairly simple photo, but I like the evening light. All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Great light, nice subject, the tree on the right is not helping but my main concern is que level of detail, it's pretty noisy Poco a poco (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Green fields below Yugar (elevation 3,850 m (12,630 ft)), on the left bank of the Tsarap (elev. 3,820 m (12,530 ft)), are a refreshing contrast in this stark, tree-less terrain. Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 21:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Bigorski Monastery, N. Macedonia (2).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bigorski Monastery, N. Macedonia (2).jpg
Oppose The compo is good but the subject isn't charming, the burnt areas and the modern look of the building doesn't make it an FP to me, and yes, the resolution is rather low. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info The Zagedan lakes are of ancient glacial origin. They are surrounded by rock formations in a mountain cirque, a typical ancient glacial landform in the Caucasus Mountains. The glacier retreated about 11,000 years ago, leaving behind the landscape we see today. Karachay-Cherkessia, Western Caucasus. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Info The rugged, rocky shores of the second Zagedan lake in a mountain cirque, with the sun setting behind the steep walls, leaving the last rays of direct sunlight (penumbra, almost complete eclipse). Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Support I think the grey sky will mean that people struggle to warm up this one, but I like it. I appreciate how it breaks compositional rules by not really having much of a sky at all. The clear, bright reflections in the water are nice. Cmao20 (talk) 00:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is how the bare sunlight, obscured by fog and cloud, looks to the naked eye. The highlights, tone mapping and colors look natural to me. In fact, I suspect the colors might be a little oversaturated with this profile. The sky turned white, but I just checked and there is nothing to recover there, a big bright sunspot under fog covering most of the sky and only some irregular circular side patterns on the left, seemingly not coming from any cloud structure. It’s just dense, shadeless, formless cloud fog lit with diffuse sunlight in the valley behind the wall, with nothing to recover or reveal. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you Cmao20 for cross-referencing it to another entry. What I like about this picture is its mood and contemplative atmosphere. The other one is flashy, good for a quick glance or two. But this one is different and seems to captivate more if you take time. But it only works in dim environments. I looked at it again tonight, when everything around was dark and silent, and it again took me back to that late evening, lonely glacial cirque, with the sun fading and everything around rapidly getting darker and colder. With all the rocks and sediments of ancient geology, piled and scattered, huge and small, exposed and submerged, testimony to eons of erosion, weathering and terraforming, and the evening lake with its reflections on the surface, and the silence. I actually prefer this to the other for its soothing, meditative effect. Eye candy is one thing, soul is another. Maybe it's like introversion vs. extrospection. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 22:29:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Big Ben Elizabeth Tower London 2023 01.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Big Ben Elizabeth Tower London 2023 01.jpg
Support Excellent quality and very impressive with good light, vivid colours, the bits of pollen all over the body of the wood bee, etc. – Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can tell you that, even with no wind, bumble bees are extraordinarily difficult to capture like this. The focus-stacking software actually compensates for the flower moving in the wind or the photographer moving. The skill here is in capturing a moment when the bee was still. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Charles is right. I took 12 series of 20 pictures, one of which was usable. The fact that the camera can take over 100 pictures per second is very helpful. Of course I also used a tripod..--Ermell (talk) 15:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support per Aristeas' and Charles' points. Extraordinary and very difficult image, and, what's more, a very good composition. Cmao20 (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's mysterious on the site. We were there several times and two photo sessions were in almost complete darkness. Only a few parts are lit, including the interior of the bunker, which can be seen in the photo. --XRay💬14:59, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good light, quality and composition. The pattern is a bit reminiscent of some of our great pictures of traditional Korean and Japanese architecture.--ArildV (talk) 10:52, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Personally, I like the lighting and the cloudy sky in this northwest view of the Doberan Minster. From this location, the building appears clear only in winter, as the leafy trees obscure the view too much in summer. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 07:45, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and tranquil scenery with nice light emphasizing the facade of the Minster. This place can be very crowded, so it’s great to see the Minster without an irritating host of tourists. – Aristeas (talk) 10:17, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Let me say a few words about the photo. Photographic art is always a matter of different opinions, but I would still like to nominate a photo here. It is a photo from a series of several photos. In each case, the basis was an illuminated Ferris wheel. The chaotic-looking image was created through the interplay of several shooting techniques: ICM (Intentional Camera Movement) and multiple exposures. The camera was moved in one direction on each of the 5 exposures, but in 5 different directions. The combination of the rotational movement of the Ferris wheel, the play of colors of the Ferris wheel and the linear movement of the camera results in this image. Although this type of shot produces similar photos, the result cannot actually be recreated or controlled. This is a special feature of the ICM technique. -- XRay💬07:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Great colours but I miss an outstanding composition. I wonder whether a more close up photo that more prominently features the textures on the rusted metal would be more interesting Cmao20 (talk) 02:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: You write under this photo (nothing special). I think this is an assumption. It should be: (I find nothing special about this photo). Another voter may look at this photo very differently. When I look at the photo, I see an economically written-off object that has been embraced by nature over the years. It has become one with the environment. The earth colours merge seamlessly into each other. Art and nature have met each other by chance here. How beautiful can it be?--Famberhorst (talk) 17:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 11:47:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:003 Greater flamingo close-up in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:003 Greater flamingo close-up in the Camargue Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Alte Kirche St. Salvator (Pellworm) 17.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alte Kirche St. Salvator (Pellworm) 17.jpg
Question Somehow the asymmetric left/right crop bothers me because the church is quite symmetric. It’s clear that you do not want to crop the candelabrum at the right. Any chance to add a little more space at the left to achieve symmetry? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The sunspot is fine for me, but I fully agree with Aristeas's point. This is an image that demands symmetry and it just isn't satisfying at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric, and it’s nice to discover the three kangaroos. Looks a little bit soft at first glance, but it’s just the mist which necessarily creates a soft impression. – Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 01:28:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:004 Greater flamingos walking in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:004 Greater flamingos walking in the Camargue during mating season Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg
Info Large milkweed bug (Oncopeltus fasciatus). Despite the name, this fellow is about 13mm long. No FPs in this family, it seems (Lygaeidae). all by — Rhododendritestalk | 20:48, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good photo of that small creature. Please use just the gallery page link without a section anchor. If this photo gets promoted, I will add a section for the Lygaeidae family and move the photo to that section. – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Tiddis, Numidia, Algeria - 52573537881.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Tiddis, Numidia, Algeria - 52573537881.jpg
Info An emission nebula in the constellation of Cassiopeia. No FPs of this nebula. Not a NASA photo, amateur astrophotography by a Commons user - always makes it more impressive to me, that we have users who can make content of NASA-level quality. created by Cpayoub - uploaded by Cpayoub - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:28, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 15:13:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Collared lory (Vini solitaria) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Collared lory (Vini solitaria) on octopus tree (Heptapleurum actinophyllum) Colo-I-Suva.jpg
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 05:53:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Sunset over the Tumuli Park in Gyeongju Historic Site Wolseong District South Korea.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunset over the Tumuli Park in Gyeongju Historic Site Wolseong District South Korea.jpg
Support The geometric shapes of the foreground, indeed, and also their contrast with the natural irregular shapes of the trees in the middle ground and of the mountains in the background. – Aristeas (talk) 10:50, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2024 at 21:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Cesenatico - Chiesa di San Giacomo Apostolo - Vista notturna - 2024-09-21 20-07-45 001.JPGCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cesenatico - Chiesa di San Giacomo Apostolo - Vista notturna - 2024-09-21 20-07-45 001.JPG
Comment I don't like this camera model card pulled here in Featured Pictures. It doesn't make sense. It encourages contributors to submit images of worse quality and remove EXIF. As long as photographer submits 18 Mpix photos from their Canon 60D, the images are ok, Featured worthy. God forbid the photographer uses the same lens in Canon 5Ds. Submitting full resolution 51 Mpix? Quality is bad, can't be Featured. Decreasing resolution to 30 Mpix to compensate average lens quality? You shouldn't decrease resolution, can't be Featured. Cropping a subject from a 51 Mpix image to create an 18 Mpix photo, because photographer can afford only one lens? It can't be Featured, because your camera is capable of 51 Mpix.--Tupungato (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CommentTupungato has a point here. I would always encourage fellow photographers to upload their photos in full resolution, but to be just we must judge high-resolution photos a bit differently. People sometimes think that taking photos with the newest cameras is much easier because the AF is so much better; but AF is not everything, actually it’s much more difficult to take pin-point sharp photos with today’s high-resolution cameras, especially when we talk about landscape or architecture photos where every detail matters. Lenses which appeared flawless on 12 or even 24 MPix cameras reveal significant aberrations and unsharp borders on 42, 50 or 62 Mpix cameras, also because the latter often drop the traditional on-sensor anti-alias filter which used to hide many fine details and defects; focussing needs more care, because even the slightest field curvature will visibly influence the final results; stopping down to ƒ/11 etc. becomes problematic because diffraction shows its effect very early. A practical solution, proposed by various users, is that we judge low-resolution or downscaled photos rather strictly (if somebody provides only about 6 Mpix, these 6 Mpix should be pin-point sharp and there should be no visible CAs, no noise etc.); be a bit more relaxed with 12 to 24 Mpix photos; and forgive some slight softness, small CAs, a little bit of noise etc. with photos > 36 Mpix. Of course there are exceptions – e.g. difficult wildlife photos often require significant cropping, so we must understand and accept that, too. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Normally prominent street lights are a big problem in such photographs, but here the two big lights have been successfully included in the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That bit of vegetation on the right in the middle of the water should be cropped out, but this is a good composition and there is potential here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose A nice scene, but I find the tree in the foreground to be fighting [compositionally] with the hill in the background. I wonder if it would make a nicer shot to be a bit to the right and stepping back a bit. — Rhododendritestalk | 21:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Problem of composition in my view, and the lake itself is not out of ordinary. Cut off tree at the left, branches in the shadow hiding the mountains, flat water and midday light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding – excellent composition, beautiful light and colours. The surroundings appear a bit soft, especially the bushes and trees look somewhat mushy, but that’s probably unavoidable due to the small sensor of the drone camera. – Aristeas (talk) 09:19, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful contrast between the fine natural structures and vivid green of the trees and the gray geometric shape of the fort. – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support nice one, but I think the picture would be better if author stepped back a little. Perspective correction here is borderline — if it would be a bit more building would look unnatural even while all verticals would be vertical. Красныйwanna talk?20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose There are some interesting elements like the balcony and also the bricked building, but the compo with that grey wall doesn't really work for me. I also expect a minimum of information in every FP nomination to understand what we are looking at Poco a poco (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Only 1,772 × 2,819 pixels, the resolution is quite low, considering this section aims to select the finest pictures of the website. The subject itself is not spectacular. I believe there are a lot of similar covers on Commons in better conservation state. About the restoration, it has gone too far in my opinion, distorting the original document a little too much (even though the weird line has now been removed) -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:03, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Removing the library stamp is OK, but reconstructing the damaged document not so IMO. More to the point, ordinary old book cover and resolution, so not FP. Yann (talk) 15:10, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support For me, the composition with the mountain in the distance works. The landscape and the cloudy sky emphasize the striking beauty of the mountain. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace You're right, I can download it at this resolution on my mobile phone (but apparently not on my computer). Please rename the file -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:04, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2024 at 10:52:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Madrid cathedral 2020 - view from the dome.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Madrid cathedral 2020 - view from the dome.jpg
Support Panorama of the views from the dome of the Almudena Cathedral in Madrid. Pictures taken here at sunset are rare, since the regular visiting hours end before, and only limited, city hall-sponsored visits are allowed during the evening. -- Fernando (talk) 10:52, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is a lot of colour noise but I think it's forgiveable because of very high resolution, perfect composition (beautifully centered), nice light, and as you say difficulty of taking the photo; any improvement you can make would be appreciated though Cmao20 (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Improved version at SwissTransfer: I took the liberty of removing the color noise, as well as significantly reducing the general noise without affecting the sharpness. If you/the community like the result, please feel free to use it for an update :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much for the update! I am very happy that I was able to help solve technical quality issues :) Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 15:10, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support the perspective correction looks good in the middle, but it radically warped the shape and degraded the quality of the buildings in the background on the left and right. was the image scaled up with that version, too? If so, it would be better to do the noise correction before trying to scale it up (otherwise we wind up with some big noise). Still weakly supporting because the light and perspective is special. — Rhododendritestalk | 22:40, 4 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Please, reduce the noise, on both sides. It's a great picture but I don't understand why that cannot be improved, it is not FP-worthy IMHO. Will happily change to support when done Poco a poco (talk) 19:59, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Updated version available at SwissTransfer (2): Pinging @Fernando: The denoising should have been done before rescaling to avoid its potentiation on the sides. I re-edited it as best I could. If you are satisfied with the result, please feel free to use it for an update. Thanks to Poco and Rhododendrites for their helpful comments. Best regards, -- Radomianin (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
InfoQal'at al-Bahrain, Karbabad, Bahrain. The archaeological site, also known as the “Fort of Bahrain”, was the capital of the Dilmun civilization and a place of consistent human settlement and occupation from c. 2300 BC to the present. A Portuguese fort stands today atop the site and it became a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2005. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 13:53, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info: the Ameca River, forming the natural border between the states of Jalisco and Nayarit, taken from a window of a commercial aircraft; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:02, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yes, if the picture was shot from the window of a commercial aircraft, it should be mentioned somewhere on the file page. Currently poor categorization and description for a FP nomination. -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:42, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Moving with archers defending livestock scene.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moving with archers defending livestock scene.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2024 at 15:28:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Tagetes2.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tagetes2.jpg
Oppose Sorry but IMO this is a QI not an FP. Beautiful flower and nice colours but not sharp enough for a photo of a large flower. Cmao20 (talk) 13:14, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
跳转至评选区
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose I don't see anything beautiful here : Landscape, architecture, lights... In addition, cars are distracting and the crop isn't very good. This is quite dark. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Great light, nice subject, the tree on the right is not helping but my main concern is que level of detail, it's pretty noisy Poco a poco (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment Thank you Cmao20 for cross-referencing it to another entry. What I like about this picture is its mood and contemplative atmosphere. The other one is flashy, good for a quick glance or two. But this one is different and seems to captivate more if you take time. But it only works in dim environments. I looked at it again tonight, when everything around was dark and silent, and it again took me back to that late evening, lonely glacial cirque, with the sun fading and everything around rapidly getting darker and colder. With all the rocks and sediments of ancient geology, piled and scattered, huge and small, exposed and submerged, testimony to eons of erosion, weathering and terraforming, and the evening lake with its reflections on the surface, and the silence. I actually prefer this to the other for its soothing, meditative effect. Eye candy is one thing, soul is another. Maybe it's like introversion vs. extrospection. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Strong support per Aristeas' and Charles' points. Extraordinary and very difficult image, and, what's more, a very good composition. Cmao20 (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Neutral Somehow unsharp or high JPG compression. -- -donald- (talk) 07:32, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Question Somehow the asymmetric left/right crop bothers me because the church is quite symmetric. It’s clear that you do not want to crop the candelabrum at the right. Any chance to add a little more space at the left to achieve symmetry? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak support Beautiful, but per Ermell. I think this one is okay because it's nearly sharp and quite high resolution Cmao20 (talk) 02:26, 8 November 2024 (UTC)
Done Thank you Mounir Neddi (talk) 20:33, 5 November 2024 (UTC)
Request A description in English would be appreciated. Captions, too. And more than one category -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
(Talk me in spanish, english or italian) 02:01, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
Delist and replace -- Yann (talk) 17:18, 2 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_flight_Taveuni.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
_–_Constable_(Male).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Double-banded_Judy_WLB.jpg){kind=link}
_09.jpg){kind=link}
,_islas_Ad_Dimaniyat,_Omán,_2024-08-13,_DD_69.jpg){kind=link}
_17.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Plain_Tawny_Rajah_WLB.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_on_octopus_tree_(Heptapleurum_actinophyllum)_Colo-I-Suva.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_flight_Taveuni.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_09.jpg){kind=link}
_17.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
