2. 按照编辑页面上的说明进行操作并保存页面。（注：打开编辑页面后，您在上方看到的“LIST OF NOMINATIONS (Put your nominations to the TOP of this section (after this comment))”大意为“这里是候选图片列表，请将您的提名提交到本节的顶部（在本行后）”；您在下方看到的“DO NOT ADD NEW NOMINATIONS ABOVE THIS LINE, BUT ON TOP”大意为“不要在本行上方添加新的贴士（除了顶部）”。
）
Support I love this wonderful late fall/early winter scene. Some of the trees are still showing their last reddish-brown leaves, the first snow is shining on the ground and the higher treetops, and the warm morning sun bathes the eastern (left) slope of the mountain in a glowing, warm light that emphasizes the contours. The contrast with the bluish shadows on the western (right) slope of the mountain lends depth to the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 19:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful and very interesting view, but the verticals seem to be leaning in. Wouldn’t the photo profit from a perspective correction? – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The problem with the new version is that reducing the contrast doesn't do much good because the detail in the shadows is already gone. It can't be recovered just from the JPEG. So you just end up turning dark black shadows into dull grey shadows. Cmao20 (talk) 17:05, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry. The original photo was taken by Carsten Nebel, so IMHO only small changes should be made by other users (see COM:OVERWRITE. Dear Ratekreel, if you want to make such substantial edits (which are obviously not uncontroversial), it would be much more polite and respectful to the original creator to upload the edited photo under a new filename and to link to the original photo with the {{Derived from}} template. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2024 at 05:10:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:MK-07628-33 Gantheaume Point (Broome).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:MK-07628-33 Gantheaume Point (Broome).jpg
Info Front view of a female boxfish (Ostracion cyanurus), Ad Dimaniyat Islands, Oman. Ostracion cyanurus has a maximum published total length of 15 centimetres (5.9 in) and is found in the Western Indian Ocean where it occurs in the Red Sea and around the Arabian Peninsula into the Persian Gulf as far east as eastern Iran. This species is found in areas where there is a moderate growth of coral at depths between 5 and 50 metres (16 and 164 ft). Ostracion cyanurus is a solitary species which remains in the vicinity of shelter. The apparent lack of smaller males may mean that this species is protogynous (sequential hermaphroditism). If the bluetail trunkfish senses danger is releases a toxin called pahutoxin, or ostracotoxin, into the water as a defence. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've read that it can kill other fishes and even themselves but if you ask me about the impact on humans, I cannot tell you. This fish is in the menu of countries like Singapore and I've read concerns about that (in the case the toxin is generated just prior to the dwath of the fish) but I've no details. Poco a poco (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
According to FPC rules, sets can be used to showcase "a sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. Examples: diagrams illustrating a process, steps of a dance, metamorphosis of an insect, maps/drawings/photos of the same subject over the years (frame of view should be more or less the same)".
These pictures are litterally steps of a dance all part of the courtship display of the greater flamingo. The courtship display moves are not infinite. A good proportion of the courtship display steps are included in this one so "adding 10 more" wouldn't be possible. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 18:32, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The FPC rules explicitely say that it could be different times of the day. So the picture number 2 is perfectly adequate. Also, I could have chosen this image as image number 2 but I prefer the actual one because you better see the movement being done with the feets splashing the water. This is wildlife and not human choreography. The animals do their courtship display and you can't ask them to do it just for the camera. Since they are often packed you will many times find yourself having other distracting flamingos in front of the one doing one of the steps of the courtship display. So waiting to have one subject isolated enough from the others to have a perfect capture of the courtship display step needs some time that can't be avoided.
According to your article there are 11 courtship display moves. According to the information displayed on big signs in the Camargue there are less moves. In any case the moves that I posted on this set are the main ones that you will see. If you really want to see the preening you can see it here but I won't add it as it's less representative of the courtship display. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:06, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Several pictures could become FP, but I also don't think this selection meets the criteria of a set. The compositions are too different from each other. Some birds are alone while others are in group. The "passage of time" is not explicit. Moreover, the bird in "Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings" has the feet cropped out, while in a set all the pictures should be FP-level. I would recommend to renominate some images separately -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your comment Basile. Eventhough the usual set nomination we see on FPC has similar composition across the images, FPC rules never asked for it. All the image needs is to fulfill two conditions : 1) "group of images that are thematically connected in a direct and obvious way, they can be nominated together as a set" ; 2) fall into at least one of the following types : a) Faithful digital reproductions of works notable in their own right, which the original author clearly intended to be viewed as a set ; b) a sequence of images showing the passage of time. They could depict frames of a moving/changing object or a static object during different times of day or different seasons. ; c) A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints, preferably taken under the same lighting conditions when possible ; d) A group of images which show all possible variations of a particular class of object.
In this case the thematical connection is obvious : it's the courtship display. As for the categories it can fall both in category b) and d). None of the above rules explicitely require to have the exact same composition on each image. On the opposite, for all categories it is possible to imagine different compositions across the images. I also personnaly think it's more interesting in a case like this one to have different compositions to have more diversity.
As for the birds, they were all photographed while being in a group. I just waited patiently the perfect moment to have subjects a bit on the edge of the group in order to have an unobstructed view without disturbing elements in the middle of the frame.
As for this picture having cropped feet I understand it would have been preferable to have uncropped feet but the movement is so quick (1 to 2 seconds) and you're often looking at something else that the time needed to point at the right direction don't always let enough time to zoom out. I also feel that the perfectly centered flamingo has a wow effect that overweights the cropped feet. Anyway, if you think it's a better one, I just removed that picture and replaced it with this one that has uncropped feet -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak) and staying static
Walking all together as a group in the same direction while turning head left and right every 1 to 2 seconds while singing (mostly with closed beak)
Pointing head to the sky and spreading wings
Kissing
Mix of different moves: singing while turning their head from left to right + pointing head to the sky and spreading wings + a kiss
Info Here's an alternative version with similar composition across the images, all photographed at the same place in a small 30 minutes window. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:09, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2024 at 01:08:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Wooden staircase steps in the forest of Hallasan Park Eorimok Trail at dusk on Jeju Island in South Korea.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wooden staircase steps in the forest of Hallasan Park Eorimok Trail at dusk on Jeju Island in South Korea.jpg
Info Interior view of the main domes of the Blue Mosque, Istanbul, Turkey. The officially known as Sultan Ahmed Mosque is one of the most iconic and popular monuments of Ottoman architecture. It was constructed between 1609 and 1617 during the rule of Ahmed I and remains a functioning mosque today. It is decorated with thousands of Iznik tiles and painted floral motifs in predominantly blue colours, which give the mosque its popular name. The Blue Mosque, included in the UNESCO World Heritage Site list in 1985, was built next to the former Hippodrome and stands across from the Hagia Sophia, another popular tourist site. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Beautiful bird but we have seen sharper ones presented at FPC recently. However, I think it has a good claim to be our best photo of this species. JJ Harrison has a photo of the same bird but it would need a bit of work to become FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Charlesjsharp, yes this is the picture I meant, I think it's very good but I think it needs some work around the beak to really be suitable for FP, it looks like some selective denoising has taken place but it has left a rough transition. Cmao20 (talk) 18:51, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Morning view on old castle bridge in Kamianets-Podilskyi, Ukraine. The light in lanterns is turned off, there is only light from the low sun that has recently risen. --Rbrechko (talk) 09:42, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Like the lyrical quality of this image. Suggest you add your comment about the lantern light as useful information in the image description. --GRDN711 (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2024 at 01:15:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Courtyard of colorful paper lanterns and shadow patterns at Bulguksa temple Gyeongju South Korea.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Courtyard of colorful paper lanterns and shadow patterns at Bulguksa temple Gyeongju South Korea.jpg
Oppose Great scenery but I think the composition feels quite unbalanced. I'd like to see less of that dull hill and more of what's on the left of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Similar to this FP, but the time of day gives the castle a totally different appearance; the existing FP may have higher educational value, but this photo has a more interesting mood and is IMHO more impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 17:01, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 12:34:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Place Jeanne d'Arc in Neufchateau (2).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Place Jeanne d'Arc in Neufchateau (2).jpg
Support Satisfying composition, well framed, and the patterns in the pavement are cool. The grey-blue light wouldn't normally work but for greyish stone architecture I think it actually works quite well. Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Cmao20 on composition and light/colours. For me, this square somehow resembles a theater set, the framing gives it a special impressiveness. – Aristeas (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 16:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:35:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Polynesian flying fox (Pteropus tonganus) in flight Taveuni.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Polynesian flying fox (Pteropus tonganus) in flight Taveuni.jpg
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:27:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and recropped 4x3.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:20240920 53rd Street Hyde Park Chicago near equinox stacked rotated and recropped 4x3.jpg
Info The 2024 Fall Equinox in Chicago fell on September 22 and both September 22 and 23 were days in which the sunrise and sunset on east-west streets occurred in the middle of the street (days known as Chicagohenge).-TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support On WP:FPC, I believe that I did not prioritize the diffraction spike in the uses until after a lot of people had decided it was not intriguing based on the wrong set of uses. Hoping for better luck here focusing on what I feel is a splendid diffraction spike.TonyTheTiger (talk) 09:27, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see anything beautiful here : Landscape, architecture, lights... In addition, cars are distracting and the crop isn't very good. This is quite dark. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
User:Sebring12Hrs, I am not sure how to read crop isn't very good in a way that would help me improve this submission or future compositions. Is it possible you could be a little more instructive as I aspire to be better.-TonyTheTiger (talk) 21:52, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2024 at 09:04:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Finnish Air Force BAE Hawk Mk.66 HW-361 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Finnish Air Force BAE Hawk Mk.66 HW-361 Royal International Air Tattoo 2024 01.jpg
Info Night falls around the Piz S-chalambert (View from Val Sinestra at ~6.18 pm). A fairly simple photo, but I like the evening light. All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:26, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Great light, nice subject, the tree on the right is not helping but my main concern is que level of detail, it's pretty noisy Poco a poco (talk) 17:01, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Funny enough I like (besides the special evening light) exactly that silhouette of a tree at the right; somehow it makes the composition special to me. The dark areas are rather noisy, yes, but because they have rightly been kept dark this does not degrade the overall impression too much. – Aristeas (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info Green fields below Yugar (elevation 3,850 m (12,630 ft)), on the left bank of the Tsarap (elev. 3,820 m (12,530 ft)), are a refreshing contrast in this stark, tree-less terrain. Zanskar, Ladakh, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 04:49, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2024 at 21:57:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Bigorski Monastery, N. Macedonia (2).jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bigorski Monastery, N. Macedonia (2).jpg
Oppose The compo is good but the subject isn't charming, the burnt areas and the modern look of the building doesn't make it an FP to me, and yes, the resolution is rather low. Sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Info The Zagedan lakes are of ancient glacial origin. They are surrounded by rock formations in a mountain cirque, a typical ancient glacial landform in the Caucasus Mountains. The glacier retreated about 11,000 years ago, leaving behind the landscape we see today. Karachay-Cherkessia, Western Caucasus. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:35, 8 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Info The rugged, rocky shores of the second Zagedan lake in a mountain cirque, with the sun setting behind the steep walls, leaving the last rays of direct sunlight (penumbra, almost complete eclipse). Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 01:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC).[reply]
Support I think the grey sky will mean that people struggle to warm up this one, but I like it. I appreciate how it breaks compositional rules by not really having much of a sky at all. The clear, bright reflections in the water are nice. Cmao20 (talk) 00:48, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This is how the bare sunlight, obscured by fog and cloud, looks to the naked eye. The highlights, tone mapping and colors look natural to me. In fact, I suspect the colors might be a little oversaturated with this profile. The sky turned white, but I just checked and there is nothing to recover there, a big bright sunspot under fog covering most of the sky and only some irregular circular side patterns on the left, seemingly not coming from any cloud structure. It’s just dense, shadeless, formless cloud fog lit with diffuse sunlight in the valley behind the wall, with nothing to recover or reveal. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you Cmao20 for cross-referencing it to another entry. What I like about this picture is its mood and contemplative atmosphere. The other one is flashy, good for a quick glance or two. But this one is different and seems to captivate more if you take time. But it only works in dim environments. I looked at it again tonight, when everything around was dark and silent, and it again took me back to that late evening, lonely glacial cirque, with the sun fading and everything around rapidly getting darker and colder. With all the rocks and sediments of ancient geology, piled and scattered, huge and small, exposed and submerged, testimony to eons of erosion, weathering and terraforming, and the evening lake with its reflections on the surface, and the silence. I actually prefer this to the other for its soothing, meditative effect. Eye candy is one thing, soul is another. Maybe it's like introversion vs. extrospection. --Argenberg (talk) 19:00, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2024 at 22:29:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Big Ben Elizabeth Tower London 2023 01.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Big Ben Elizabeth Tower London 2023 01.jpg
Weak oppose Great colours but I miss an outstanding composition. I wonder whether a more close up photo that more prominently features the textures on the rusted metal would be more interesting Cmao20 (talk) 02:33, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: You write under this photo (nothing special). I think this is an assumption. It should be: (I find nothing special about this photo). Another voter may look at this photo very differently. When I look at the photo, I see an economically written-off object that has been embraced by nature over the years. It has become one with the environment. The earth colours merge seamlessly into each other. Art and nature have met each other by chance here. How beautiful can it be?--Famberhorst (talk) 17:45, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I disagree with you. If a photo is clearly out of focus, then that is the case, because everyone can see that. If you find the photo (Nothing special), then that only applies to you and there may be other opinions about it. Then I think you should mention that it is (your opinion). Otherwise you are doing the photographer an injustice.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Out of focus" is a subjective opinion too. We all are individuals. Each person shares subjective reviews. Some people write "no wow", some people write "too ordinary", some people write "I miss something", etc. To help the photographers to face negative feelings, we usually write "sorry" as a courtesy formula. Here the subject looks like a standard pipe. These conventional objects are not rare in the countrysides of the world. The dead branches are not spectacular either. They make the composition cluttered. And I think the top-down view is not uncommon, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:43, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2024 at 09:10:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Alte Kirche St. Salvator (Pellworm) 17.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Alte Kirche St. Salvator (Pellworm) 17.jpg
Question Somehow the asymmetric left/right crop bothers me because the church is quite symmetric. It’s clear that you do not want to crop the candelabrum at the right. Any chance to add a little more space at the left to achieve symmetry? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The sunspot is fine for me, but I fully agree with Aristeas's point. This is an image that demands symmetry and it just isn't satisfying at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 02:30, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Personally, I find this a little unfortunate because a chandelier is now cut off on the left and disturbs the picture. Certainly a question of taste and a consideration that is debatable. But I don't know if it's a good idea to change the picture after it's already been voted on - my pro referred to the version that was put to the vote at the time. I still like the picture but changed to neutral --Superbass (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CommentSuperbass describes exactly my problems. Now there is a cutoff at left and (and this is my problem I can't solve) I uploaded a new version in the middle of this voting. How can we handle this? How was this handled with other images? Switch back to the previous version? Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 10:05, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The best way to proceed depends on the importance of the changes to the image.
If one changes an image during the process of voting and the changes are very minor and uncontroversial (e.g., some dust spots have been fixed), we usually add a simple comment to the nomination saying that this or that has been fixed.
If the changes are of intermediate importance, e.g. when the crop has been changed a little bit (like in this example) or when the exposure has been changed to a small degree, we usually add a comment and ping all previous voters to inform them about the change (the {{Ping}} template is useful for that purpose).
If the changes are more important, e.g. when there has been a big change of the crop or a new development from the raw image file, or when one wants to propose a different exposure from the same photo session, it is advisable to upload that new version as a new file (under a new filename) and to add it to the nomination as an ‘Alternative’ image (see the “Formal things” box at the head of this page).
If one wants to propose a completely different photo (even of the same subject), a separate nomination is necesssary.
Thank you. So I'd suggest, @Dirtsc uses the version he/she prefers and briefly notifies those who voted while another version was visible. So far, no one seems to be taking the change as an opportunity to vote pro instead of con or vice versa. Superbass (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sorry, my question about the possibility to improve the symmetry was not meant to spoil the nomination; it was just a question or suggestion. Personally I would still be happier about this photo of a very symmetric interior if the photo was completely symmetric, too (by the way, this is not my hobby horse, but a common idea often expressed on this page). But I agree that the photo is also attractive as it is, especially, as Moroder has rightly emphasized, the light spot brings some magic into the scene. – Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ermell, the sun spot doesn't bring magic to this scene in my opinion. (and by the way, horizontal PC would be welcome, horizontal lines aren't parallel and I think they should in a symetric composition) --Benji22:46, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2024 at 18:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Tiddis, Numidia, Algeria - 52573537881.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bull's head from the Mithraeum, Tiddis, Numidia, Algeria - 52573537881.jpg
Comment I don't like this camera model card pulled here in Featured Pictures. It doesn't make sense. It encourages contributors to submit images of worse quality and remove EXIF. As long as photographer submits 18 Mpix photos from their Canon 60D, the images are ok, Featured worthy. God forbid the photographer uses the same lens in Canon 5Ds. Submitting full resolution 51 Mpix? Quality is bad, can't be Featured. Decreasing resolution to 30 Mpix to compensate average lens quality? You shouldn't decrease resolution, can't be Featured. Cropping a subject from a 51 Mpix image to create an 18 Mpix photo, because photographer can afford only one lens? It can't be Featured, because your camera is capable of 51 Mpix.--Tupungato (talk) 14:22, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
CommentTupungato has a point here. I would always encourage fellow photographers to upload their photos in full resolution, but to be just we must judge high-resolution photos a bit differently. People sometimes think that taking photos with the newest cameras is much easier because the AF is so much better; but AF is not everything, actually it’s much more difficult to take pin-point sharp photos with today’s high-resolution cameras, especially when we talk about landscape or architecture photos where every detail matters. Lenses which appeared flawless on 12 or even 24 MPix cameras reveal significant aberrations and unsharp borders on 42, 50 or 62 Mpix cameras, also because the latter often drop the traditional on-sensor anti-alias filter which used to hide many fine details and defects; focussing needs more care, because even the slightest field curvature will visibly influence the final results; stopping down to ƒ/11 etc. becomes problematic because diffraction shows its effect very early. A practical solution, proposed by various users, is that we judge low-resolution or downscaled photos rather strictly (if somebody provides only about 6 Mpix, these 6 Mpix should be pin-point sharp and there should be no visible CAs, no noise etc.); be a bit more relaxed with 12 to 24 Mpix photos; and forgive some slight softness, small CAs, a little bit of noise etc. with photos > 36 Mpix. Of course there are exceptions – e.g. difficult wildlife photos often require significant cropping, so we must understand and accept that, too. – Aristeas (talk) 10:45, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support Normally prominent street lights are a big problem in such photographs, but here the two big lights have been successfully included in the composition. – Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment That bit of vegetation on the right in the middle of the water should be cropped out, but this is a good composition and there is potential here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose A nice scene, but I find the tree in the foreground to be fighting [compositionally] with the hill in the background. I wonder if it would make a nicer shot to be a bit to the right and stepping back a bit. — Rhododendritestalk | 21:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Problem of composition in my view, and the lake itself is not out of ordinary. Cut off tree at the left, branches in the shadow hiding the mountains, flat water and midday light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 17:07:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:56-216-0041 Tarakaniv Fort RB 24.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:56-216-0041 Tarakaniv Fort RB 24.jpg
Support Beautiful contrast between the fine natural structures and vivid green of the trees and the gray geometric shape of the fort. – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:14:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:Общественная баня в Тюмени.jpgCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:Общественная баня в Тюмени.jpg
Weak support nice one, but I think the picture would be better if author stepped back a little. Perspective correction here is borderline — if it would be a bit more building would look unnatural even while all verticals would be vertical. Красныйwanna talk?20:49, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose There are some interesting elements like the balcony and also the bricked building, but the compo with that grey wall doesn't really work for me. I also expect a minimum of information in every FP nomination to understand what we are looking at Poco a poco (talk) 14:57, 9 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2024 at 13:13:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Featured picture candidates/File:VNovgorod TradeArcades 4959.JPGCommons:Featured picture candidates/File:VNovgorod TradeArcades 4959.JPG
跳转至评选区
Info created by Mounir Neddi - uploaded by Mounir Neddi - nominated by Mounir Neddi -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Support -- Mounir Neddi (talk) 21:43, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Comment Beautiful and very interesting view, but the verticals seem to be leaning in. Wouldn’t the photo profit from a perspective correction? – Aristeas (talk) 19:17, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Oppose Amazing mood and good composition but IMO oversharpening and JPEG artefacts preclude it from FP. Cmao20 (talk) 17:06, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. Thank you Aristeas for reminding me of COM:OVERWRITE. Ratekreel (talk) 17:00, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak support Beautiful bird but we have seen sharper ones presented at FPC recently. However, I think it has a good claim to be our best photo of this species. JJ Harrison has a photo of the same bird but it would need a bit of work to become FP. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Weak oppose Nice species but the level of detail is not what I expect here Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Strong support Superb and striking motif and composition. A potential Picture of the Year candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 16:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 12:36, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
Done @Ermell: Thanks for pointing this out. Please see the new version. --Tagooty (talk) 03:24, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Neutral: The patch of sunlight brings the necessary asymmetry to the photo --Superbass (talk) 07:22, 7 November 2024 (UTC) changed to neutral after uploading new version --Superbass (talk) 09:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Question Somehow the asymmetric left/right crop bothers me because the church is quite symmetric. It’s clear that you do not want to crop the candelabrum at the right. Any chance to add a little more space at the left to achieve symmetry? Just asking, – Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 7 November 2024 (UTC)
Request A description in English would be appreciated. Captions, too. And more than one category -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:33, 4 November 2024 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_islas_Ad_Dimaniyat,_Omán,_2024-08-13,_DD_98.jpg){kind=link}
_Tiritiri_Matangi_2.jpg){kind=link}
_71.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_flight_Taveuni.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_09.jpg){kind=link}
_17.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Plain_Tawny_Rajah_WLB.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Tiritiri_Matangi_2.jpg){kind=link}
_71.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_in_flight_Taveuni.jpg){kind=link}
_03.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_09.jpg){kind=link}
_17.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
