Ed Rushman

From Ballotpedia
Jump to: navigation, search
BP-Initials-UPDATED.png
This page was current at the end of the individual's last campaign covered by Ballotpedia. Please contact us with any updates.
Ed Rushman
Image of Ed Rushman
Elections and appointments
Last election

June 7, 2022

Education

Associate

Long Beach City College

Bachelor's

Kaplan University

Graduate

Long Beach State University

Personal
Birthplace
Covina, Calif.
Religion
Catholic
Profession
Manager
Contact

Ed Rushman (independent) ran for election to the U.S. House to represent California's 46th Congressional District. He lost in the primary on June 7, 2022.

Rushman completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. Click here to read the survey answers.

Rushman was a 2018 independent candidate for the same seat. He completed a Verify More background check on March 26, 2018. Click here to read the results.

Biography

Ed Rushman was born in Covina, California. Rushman earned an associate degree from Long Beach City College, bachelor's degree in business from Kaplan University, and master's degree in business administration from Long Beach State University. His career experience includes working as a technical manager, project manager, and professional services leader.[1]

Elections

2022

See also: California's 46th Congressional District election, 2022

General election

General election for U.S. House California District 46

Incumbent Lou Correa defeated Christopher Gonzales in the general election for U.S. House California District 46 on November 8, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Lou Correa
Lou Correa (D)
 
61.8
 
78,041
Image of Christopher Gonzales
Christopher Gonzales (R)
 
38.2
 
48,257

Total votes: 126,298
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House California District 46

The following candidates ran in the primary for U.S. House California District 46 on June 7, 2022.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Lou Correa
Lou Correa (D)
 
49.1
 
37,311
Image of Christopher Gonzales
Christopher Gonzales (R)
 
15.6
 
11,823
Image of Michael Ortega
Michael Ortega (D) Candidate Connection
 
12.3
 
9,311
Image of Mike Nguyen
Mike Nguyen (R)
 
12.1
 
9,162
Image of Felix Rocha
Felix Rocha (R) Candidate Connection
 
9.3
 
7,084
Image of Ed Rushman
Ed Rushman (Independent) Candidate Connection
 
1.7
 
1,264

Total votes: 75,955
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

2020

See also: California's 46th Congressional District election, 2020

General election

General election for U.S. House California District 46

Incumbent Lou Correa defeated James Waters in the general election for U.S. House California District 46 on November 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Lou Correa
Lou Correa (D)
 
68.8
 
157,803
Image of James Waters
James Waters (R) Candidate Connection
 
31.2
 
71,716

Total votes: 229,519
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House California District 46

Incumbent Lou Correa and James Waters defeated Pablo Mendiolea, Ed Rushman, and Will Johnson in the primary for U.S. House California District 46 on March 3, 2020.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Lou Correa
Lou Correa (D)
 
58.2
 
60,095
Image of James Waters
James Waters (R) Candidate Connection
 
27.4
 
28,302
Image of Pablo Mendiolea
Pablo Mendiolea (D)
 
9.0
 
9,257
Image of Ed Rushman
Ed Rushman (Independent) Candidate Connection
 
3.2
 
3,288
Image of Will Johnson
Will Johnson (Independent) Candidate Connection
 
2.3
 
2,380

Total votes: 103,322
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

2018

See also: California's 46th Congressional District election, 2018

General election

General election for U.S. House California District 46

Incumbent Lou Correa defeated Russell Lambert in the general election for U.S. House California District 46 on November 6, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Lou Correa
Lou Correa (D)
 
69.1
 
102,278
Image of Russell Lambert
Russell Lambert (R)
 
30.9
 
45,638

Total votes: 147,916
(100.00% precincts reporting)
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Nonpartisan primary election

Nonpartisan primary for U.S. House California District 46

Incumbent Lou Correa and Russell Lambert defeated Ed Rushman and Will Johnson in the primary for U.S. House California District 46 on June 5, 2018.

Candidate
%
Votes
Image of Lou Correa
Lou Correa (D)
 
62.2
 
43,700
Image of Russell Lambert
Russell Lambert (R)
 
32.4
 
22,770
Image of Ed Rushman
Ed Rushman (Independent)
 
3.3
 
2,313
Image of Will Johnson
Will Johnson (Independent)
 
2.0
 
1,425

Total votes: 70,208
Candidate Connection = candidate completed the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection survey.
If you are a candidate and would like to tell readers and voters more about why they should vote for you, complete the Ballotpedia Candidate Connection Survey.

Do you want a spreadsheet of this type of data? Contact our sales team.

Withdrawn or disqualified candidates

Campaign themes

2022

Video for Ballotpedia

Video submitted to Ballotpedia
Released Jan 31, 2022

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection

Candidate Connection

Ed Rushman completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2022. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Rushman's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I've made a career of doing what needs to be done, raising a family here while doing it. I've done every job there is in information technology, in many kinds of businesses, small and large. In the past couple of decades, I've specialized in the recovery of failed or failing projects, drawing on my experience in people, process, and technology, and earned a couple of degrees on the way so I'd understand business better, as well as economics conferences and other events to learn more about how everything works, not just information systems. I've listened to, and learned from, a lot of people from all over the country, and the world.

When no one is really fixing a problem, I look for someone with a real solution and if I can't find anyone, I ask a lot of questions and develop a solution with everyone's perspectives taken into account. I've done this a lot, and most of the time it works. When I fail, I figure out why and carry that lesson forward.

I've run twice before. It's tough without a party to do the legwork, doing the door-to-door myself, but it's a great experience and nearly everyone I meet encourages me.

  • Free Congress from big money and Party politics, starting with the 46th district
  • Represent the people so well that voters will reject partisan politics
  • Bring respectful discourse, real teamwork in the office and with all I encounter

Legislation should be entirely about what is good for the Nation and not about obligations to special interests or Party. It should not be about personal gain in wealth or power. It is a sacred duty to the people, and should be pursued with that as the highest principle. People in our district struggle to reconcile protections for the poor with protections for unborn children, and the response from Democrats this year was to back abortion to birth. Money drives elections, and neither the wealthy Democratic nor Republican donors understand the values of the common people. Our district has a lot of hard working people, many are immigrants, who brought ancient values with them that they thought America respected, only to be told their values are backward and wrong . The Dream Act - Congress has put this off for nearly two decades, and is a prime case of partisan politics. Dreamers are political pawns to use at election time. Hostages. This is a humanitarian necessity, and 800,000 Dreamers serve in our military, pursue education, and work, paying taxes and living like the rest of us. We must resolve this while developing a more sustainable immigration policy that will not put us in this position again. There is massive public support, but Congress will not act.

Above all, I'm passionate about government working for all the people, not just serving the most powerful, those who can pay to have their ideals promoted. Government should not be a tool for domination.

I appreciate Abraham Lincoln's ability to work with opposing forces in a divided and difficult time. Dorothy Day for her practicality, getting past a rough beginning and doing what she could to help. Martin Luther King, Jr. for stirring hearts to love, and never taking the easy path of anger and hate.

I've grown into my views over time and expect to continue growing, and there are hundreds of books, essays and films, as well as personal encounters that have shaped me. I don't really have a political philosophy, I find it restrictive. But I find the ideas of solidarity, subsidiarity, and distributionism interesting, and will consider these where appropriate, but only to the degree they serve the Nation's best interests in the long term. In The Lord of the Rings, the last book, The Return of the King, there was a chapter, The Scouring of the Shire, that expresses it. We desire a simple freedom and long to be free of those who seek only power over others. We must defend our way of life with the least force possible, treat one another with respect. But when our freedom is at stake, all of us must rise to drive out the threat. It may only take one voice to turn the tide. Perhaps it will be mine.

Basic life and work experience, how those of us with no power or wealth live, the experience of doing difficult work because we need to make a living, trying to protect our children from a world gone mad, from marketing, from being used for profit or political gain. Clearly, there should be integrity in all things political, fiduciary responsibility. The ability to identify any attempts at undue influence and the strength to resist even debatable advantages offered from anyone. The proven ability to analyze proposed laws and budgets, to effectively manage congressional staff toward that end, leading and inspiring a spirit of public service. To ask the right questions and consider every action, every word carefully, and yet be decisive and bold, able to go against the tide. And inspiring the next generation of public servants.

Experience in decades of leadership at work and home have taught me patience, initiative, and to take the long view. I'm strong in analysis. Working with so many people from so many countries, and having very diverse friendships, taught me respect and understanding. I've learned to make things happen when agreement seemed impossible and to work with horrible people by building consensus among the hardworking, ordinary people like me. To find the things we all hold in common, find a kind of collective strength in that, and move forward. The ability to find the root cause of a problem and solve it with teamwork and process improvement. My knowledge in technology and science is quite good, making it easier to evaluate proposed legislation touching on those areas.

Bringing our District 46 values and concerns to bear on congressional action, ensuring that my vote represents the will and best interests of the people here, not a Party, bringing the voice of the people to the National forum. Listening to everyone, considering all the views, every side, then making decisions based entirely on the good of the people in the long term. In my work career, I've put my customers, my clients and my teams before myself. I'll do the same in office. Communicating bill and budget facts and analysis to the people frequently and working in committees to produce quality legislation, considering unintended consequences and the sustainability of solutions, reviewing proposals and plans, asking questions and questioning answers. On the most difficult issues, maintaining professionalism and respect for others, including those who are not respectful. Keeping the sanctity of all life, respect for nature and right relations with the rest of the world in mind for every decision.

That I spread the ideals I've already stated to a number of other legislators and gave hope to our young people such that many of them pursue their education with service in mind, and make good personal decisions that prepare them well for a life of public service in whatever form they deem fitting. That I left the office unstained by personal gain and with a strong staff ready to work with the next Representative.

I couldn't pick a favorite, I've learned from so many great books. The Bible, The Art of War by Sun Tzu, The Lord of the Rings, The Romance of the Three Kingdoms by Luo Guanzhong, Moby Dick, Late Antiquity by Peter Brown, Grant's Memoirs, and I especially enjoyed Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin.

What I get from each varies, but they find their way into the way I lead and sometimes I might quote them in some writing or a talk. I absorb ideas from many sources and constantly.

It brings the concerns of the local community to the National forum. It ought to be the voice of every American, not only the rich and powerful. Each Representative should embody the values and aspirations of the District's people.

Not if that is most of their experience. I'd prefer to have people with a couple of decades working for a living. There is much to be gained from working for others, a humility, if we are willing to learn it. It depends entirely on the person. Clearly, experience has not been working well for the Nation lately, but that doesn't make it bad.

Partisanship. The whole impeachment is partisan and trying to reverse an election. Party members excuse wrongs by their own and condemn the same in the opposition. There should be no room for that. People vote by party, and at least in our district, independents don't vote for independent candidates, but by their former party.

Taking the "for sale" sign off our government. Voters have come to accept political donations as normal, and don't seem to consider that politicians enrich themselves, their children, and supporters.

Non-State actors are still rising: powerful corporations with data on nearly every American and much of the world, terrorists, cartels, and the wealthiest and most powerful individuals. China is widening its influence with money and tightening its grip on Hong Kong, eyeing Taiwan and noting our weakness. Russia is working to rebuild the U.S.S.R.

We are increasingly divided and too many are profiting (or hope to profit) from this. We don't really know who is driving the direction of the country, but it isn't us.

I tend to make any group I'm part of work better. That's really been key for my career. Anything science or technology, of course, but I'd do well in healthcare or budgeting, too. There seems to be very little understanding of any of these on Congress so far, and technology companies can get away with pretty much anything in this situation. And they are getting away with a lot: privacy violations, manipulating elections, and forming public opinion according to their ideals.

Yes, it allows better accountability, although voters don't exercise this as well as they should. Office holders who fail to represent us well are reelected anyway because voters just vote on party. That needs to change.

Our issues are in the people we elect, not the term. Bad politicians will always find a way around rules, moving from one office to another. Let's get better people in and then make changes as needed.

I can't think of anyone in the past hundred years that I would want to emulate. There may have been some great people, but I'm trying to do the right thing for where we are now.

Many in our District are immigrants, and all their stories are powerful. One neighbor is from Syria, driven here because his religion is persecuted there, but he misses his family and homeland. He says some of the areas of California remind him of home and it makes him sad. He is doing his best to make a home here for his wife and child.

Another from Pakistan, here for more than a decade, asks me what happened to our country. He feels that all the good he saw before is gone, that the society if falling apart. His views are quite conservative.

Both are concerned that we are moving toward the corruption and political violence of their home countries, what they were trying to escape. The impeachment in particular strike one of them this way, especially with some who misunderstand it calling for the military to remove the President without a trial. It worries me, too.

Compromise is a tradeoff, a lose-lose proposition. In my career managing projects, I've found it better to optimize, to find the win-win. It requires that everyone involved wants the best and isn't in it for themselves, so Congress will be a challenge.

It's a high priority. We have a responsibility to spend tax revenues for the good of the people, not to reward donors and supporters.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.



2020

Video for Ballotpedia

Video submitted to Ballotpedia
Released January 5, 2020

Candidate Connection

Ed Rushman completed Ballotpedia's Candidate Connection survey in 2019. The survey questions appear in bold and are followed by Rushman's responses. Candidates are asked three required questions for this survey, but they may answer additional optional questions as well.

Expand all | Collapse all

I've made a career of doing what needs to be done, raising a family here while doing it. I've done every job there is in information technology, in many kinds of businesses, small and large. In the past couple of decades, I've specialized in the recovery of failed or failing projects, drawing on my experience in people, process, and technology, and earned a couple of degrees on the way so I'd understand business better, as well as economics conferences and other events to learn more about how everything works, not just information systems. I've listened to, and learned from, a lot of people from all over the country, and the world.

When no one is really fixing a problem, I look for someone with a real solution and if I can't find anyone, I ask a lot of questions and develop a solution with everyone's perspectives taken into account. I've done this a lot, and most of the time it works. When I fail, I figure out why and carry that lesson forward.

I'm decisive, persistent, and adaptable. I do research and use data to make good decisions. I respect truth. And I love our country, all our people.

  • Free Congress from big money and Party politics, starting with the 46th district
  • Set a new expectation for Congress so that better people than me will come forward and serve
  • Bring respectful discourse, real teamwork in the office and with all I encounter

Legislation should be entirely about what is good for the Nation and not about obligations to special interests or Party. It should not be about personal gain in wealth or power. It is a sacred duty to the people, and should be pursued with that as the highest principle. People in our district struggle to reconcile protections for the poor with protections for unborn children, and the response from Democrats this year was to back abortion to birth. Money drives elections, and neither the wealthy Democratic nor Republican donors understand the values of the common people. Our district has a lot of hard working people, many immigrants, who brought ancient values with them that they thought America respected, only to be told their values are backward and wrong . The Dream Act - Congress has put this off for nearly two decades, and is a prime case of partisan politics. Dreamers are political pawns to use at election time. Hostages. This is a humanitarian necessity, and 800,000 Dreamers serve in our military, pursue education, and work, paying taxes and living like the rest of us. We must resolve this while developing a more sustainable immigration policy that will not put us in this position again. There is massive public support, but Congress will not act.

Above all, I'm passionate about government working for all the people, not just serving the most powerful, those who can pay to have their ideals promoted. Government should not be a tool for domination.

I appreciate Abraham Lincoln's ability to work with opposing forces in a divided and difficult time. Dorothy Day for her practicality, getting past a rough beginning and doing what she could to help. Martin Luther King, Jr. for stirring hearts to love, and never taking the easy path of anger and hate.

I've grown into my views over time and expect to continue growing, and there are hundreds of books, essays and films, as well as personal encounters that have shaped me. I don't really have a political philosophy, I find it restrictive. But I find the ideas of solidarity, subsidiarity, and distributionism interesting, and will consider these where appropriate, but only to the degree they serve the Nation's best interests in the long term. In The Lord of the Rings, the last book, The Return of the King, there was a chapter, The Scouring of the Shire, that expresses it. We desire a simple freedom and long to be free of those who seek only power over others. We must defend our way of life with the least force possible, treat one another with respect. But when our freedom is at stake, all of us must rise to drive out the threat. It may only take one voice to turn the tide. Perhaps it will be mine.

Basic life and work experience, how those of us with no power or wealth live, the experience of doing difficult work because we need to make a living, trying to protect our children from a world gone mad, from marketing, from being used for profit or political gain. Clearly, there should be integrity in all things political, fiduciary responsibility. The ability to identify any attempts at undue influence and the strength to resist even debatable advantages offered from anyone. The proven ability to analyze proposed laws and budgets, to effectively manage congressional staff toward that end, leading and inspiring a spirit of public service. To ask the right questions and consider every action, every word carefully, and yet be decisive and bold, able to go against the tide. And inspiring the next generation of public servants.

Experience in decades of leadership at work and home have taught me patience, initiative, and to take the long view. I'm strong in analysis. Working with so many people from so many countries, and having very diverse friendships, taught me respect and understanding. I've learned to make things happen when agreement seemed impossible and to work with horrible people by building consensus among the hardworking, ordinary people like me. To find the things we all hold in common, find a kind of collective strength in that, and move forward. The ability to find the root cause of a problem and solve it with teamwork and process improvement. My knowledge in technology and science is quite good, making it easier to evaluate proposed legislation touching on those areas.

Bringing our District 46 values and concerns to bear on congressional action, ensuring that my vote represents the will and best interests of the people here, not a Party, bringing the voice of the people to the National forum. Listening to everyone, considering all the views, every side, then making decisions based entirely on the good of the people in the long term. In my work career, I've put my customers, my clients and my teams before myself. I'll do the same in office. Communicating bill and budget facts and analysis to the people frequently and working in committees to produce quality legislation, considering unintended consequences and the sustainability of solutions, reviewing proposals and plans, asking questions and questioning answers. On the most difficult issues, maintaining professionalism and respect for others, including those who are not respectful. Keeping the sanctity of all life, respect for nature and right relations with the rest of the world in mind for every decision.

That I spread the ideals I've already stated to a number of other legislators and gave hope to our young people such that many of them pursue their education with service in mind, and make good personal decisions that prepare them well for a life of public service in whatever form they deem fitting. That I left the office unstained by personal gain and with a strong staff ready to work with the next Representative.

I couldn't pick a favorite, I've learned from so many great books. The Bible, The Art of War by Sun Tzu, The Lord of the Rings, The Romance of the Three Kingdoms by Luo Guanzhong, Moby Dick, Late Antiquity by Peter Brown, Grant's Memoirs, and I especially enjoyed Team of Rivals by Doris Kearns Goodwin.

What I get from each varies, but they find their way into the way I lead and sometimes I might quote them in some writing or a talk. I absorb ideas from many sources and constantly.

It brings the concerns of the local community to the National forum. It ought to be the voice of every American, not only the rich and powerful. Each Representative should embody the values and aspirations of the District's people.

Not if that is most of their experience. I'd prefer to have people with a couple of decades working for a living. There is much to be gained from working for others, a humility, if we are willing to learn it. It depends entirely on the person. Clearly, experience has not been working well for the Nation lately, but that doesn't make it bad.

Partisanship. The whole impeachment is partisan and trying to reverse an election. Party members excuse wrongs by their own and condemn the same in the opposition. There should be no room for that. People vote by party, and at least in our district, independents don't vote for independent candidates, but by their former party.

Taking the "for sale" sign off our government. Voters have come to accept political donations as normal, and don't seem to consider that politicians enrich themselves, their children, and supporters.

Non-State actors are still rising: powerful corporations with data on nearly every American and much of the world, terrorists, cartels, and the wealthiest and most powerful individuals. China is widening its influence with money and tightening its grip on Hong Kong, eyeing Taiwan and noting our weakness.

We are increasingly divided and too many are profiting (or hope to profit) from this. We don't really know who is driving the direction of the country, but it isn't us.

I tend to make any group I'm part of work better. That's really been key for my career. Anything science or technology, of course, but I'd do well in healthcare or budgeting, too. There seems to be very little understanding of any of these on Congress so far, and technology companies can get away with pretty much anything in this situation. And they are getting away with a lot: privacy violations, manipulating elections, and forming public opinion according to their ideals.

Yes, it allows better accountability, although voters don't exercise this as well as they should. Office holders who fail to represent us well are reelected anyway because voters just vote on party. That needs to change.

Our issues are in the people we elect, not the term. Bad politicians will always find a way around rules, moving from one office to another. Let's get better people in and then make changes as needed.

I can't think of anyone in the past hundred years that I would want to emulate. There may have been some great people, but I'm trying to do the right thing for where we are now.

Many in our District are immigrants, and all their stories are powerful. One neighbor is from Syria, driven here because his religion is persecuted there, but he misses his family and homeland. He says some of the areas of California remind him of home and it makes him sad. He is doing his best to make a home here for his wife and child.

Another from Pakistan, here for more than a decade, asks me what happened to our country. He feels that all the good he saw before is gone, that the society if falling apart. His views are quite conservative.

Both are concerned that we are moving toward the corruption and political violence of their home countries, what they were trying to escape. The impeachment in particular strike one of them this way, especially with some who misunderstand it calling for the military to remove the President without a trial. It worries me, too.

Note: Ballotpedia reserves the right to edit Candidate Connection survey responses. Any edits made by Ballotpedia will be clearly marked with [brackets] for the public. If the candidate disagrees with an edit, he or she may request the full removal of the survey response from Ballotpedia.org. Ballotpedia does not edit or correct typographical errors unless the candidate's campaign requests it.



2018

Ballotpedia survey responses

See also: Ballotpedia's candidate surveys
Candidate Connection

Ed Rushman participated in Ballotpedia's candidate survey on January 26, 2018. The survey questions appear in bold, and Ed Rushman's responses follow below.[2]

What would be your top three priorities, if elected?

1) Free Congress from big money and Party politics, starting with the 46th district

2) Improve legislative quality and communication with our district's people
3) Bring respectful discourse, real teamwork in the office and with all I encounter[3][4]

What areas of public policy are you personally passionate about? Why?

Legislation should be entirely about what is good for the Nation and not about obligations to special interests or Party. It should not be about personal gain in wealth or power. It is a sacred duty to the people, and should be pursued with that as the highest principle. Respect for people and the environment, consistently. We are killing too many people, in abortion, war, executions, euthanasia. In particular, most people of the 46th District do not agree with the incumbent's position of abortion on demand all the way to birth, his vote against the Pain-capable Unborn Child Protection Act or his vote against allowing doctors to provide care to a newborn child who survived an abortion. In fact, the people of the district have had to vote for death many times because there was no pro-life candidate offered who did not support death or cruelty in some other way. People struggle to reconcile protections for the poor with protections for unborn children, and the response from Democrats was a demand to ""change their religion"" or get out. But money drives elections, and the abortion industry donated more than four million dollars for the 2016 campaign. The Dream Act - Congress has put this off for more than a decade, and is a prime case of partisan politics. When Democrats had the majority, they did not pass this, and they did not press hard enough in 2017 because Dreamers are political pawns to use at election time. Hostages. This is a humanitarian necessity, and 800,000 Dreamers serve in our military, pursue education and work, paying taxes and living like the rest of us. We must resolve this while developing a more sustainable immigration policy that will not put us in this position again. There is massive public support, but Congress will not act.Cite error: Invalid <ref> tag; invalid names, e.g. too many[4]

Ballotpedia also asked the candidate a series of optional questions. Ed Rushman answered the following:

Who do you look up to? Whose example would you like to follow, and why?

I appreciate Abraham Lincoln's ability to work with opposing forces in a divided and difficult time. Dorothy Day for her practicality, getting past a rough beginning and doing what she could to help. Martin Luther King, Jr. for stirring hearts to love, and never taking the easy path of anger and hate.[4]
Is there a book, essay, film, or something else you would recommend to someone who wants to understand your political philosophy?
I've grown into my views over time and expect to continue growing, and there are hundreds of books, essays and films, as well as personal encounters that have shaped me. I don't really have a political philosophy, I find it restrictive. But I find the ideas of solidarity, subsidiarity, and distributionism interesting, and will consider these where appropriate, but only to the degree they serve the Nation's best interests in the long term. In The Lord of the Rings, the last book, The Return of the King, there was a chapter, The Scouring of the Shire, that expresses it. We desire a simple freedom and long to be free of those who seek only power over others. We must defend our way of life with the least force possible, treat one another with respect. But when our freedom is at stake, all of us must rise to drive out the threat. It may only take one voice to turn the tide.[4]
What characteristics or principles are most important for an elected official?
Basic life and work experience, how those of us with no power or wealth live, the experience of doing difficult work because we need to make a living, trying to protect our children from a world gone mad, from marketing, from being used for profit or political gain. Clearly, there should be integrity in all things political, fiduciary responsibility. The ability to identify any attempts at undue influence and the strength to resist even debatable advantages offered from anyone. The proven ability to analyze proposed laws and budgets, to effectively manage congressional staff toward that end, leading and inspiring a spirit of public service. To ask the right questions and consider every action, every word carefully, and yet be decisive and bold, able to go against the tide.[4]
What qualities do you possess that you believe would make you a successful officeholder?
Experience in decades of leadership at work and home have taught me patience, initiative, and to take the long view. I'm strong in analysis. Working with so many people from so many countries, and having very diverse friendships, taught me respect and understanding. I've learned to make things happen when agreement seemed impossible and to work with horrible people by building consensus among the hardworking, ordinary people like me. To find the things we all hold in common, find a kind of collective strength in that, and move forward. The ability to find the root cause of a problem and solve it with teamwork and process improvement. My knowledge in technology and science is quite good, making it easier to evaluate proposed legislation touching on those areas.[4]
What do you believe are the core responsibilities for someone elected to this office?
Bringing our District 46 values and concerns to bear on congressional action, ensuring that my vote represents the will and best interests of the people here, not a Party. Listening to everyone, considering all the views, every side, then making decisions based entirely on the good of the people in the long term. In my work career, I've put my customers, my clients and my teams before myself. I'll do the same in office. Communicating bill and budget facts and analysis to the people frequently and working in committees to produce quality legislation, considering unintended consequences and the sustainability of solutions, reviewing proposals and plans, asking questions and questioning answers. On the most difficult issues, maintaining professionalism and respect for others, including those who are not respectful. Keeping the sanctity of all life, respect for nature and right relations with the rest of the world in mind for every decision.[4]
What legacy would you like to leave?
That I spread the ideals I've already stated to a number of other legislators and gave hope to our young people such that many of them pursue their education with service in mind, and make good personal decisions that prepare them well for a life of public service in whatever form they deem fitting. That I left the office unstained by personal gain and with a strong staff ready to work with the next Representative.[4]
What is the first historical event that happened in your lifetime that you remember? How old were you at the time?
The assassination of President John F. Kennedy. I was very young, but remember the motorcade on our black and white TV.[4]
What was your very first job? How long did you have it?
Through an accidental contact at five years old, I was offered the opportunity to work a few years on television commercials, shows and one film. My mother was an exceptional coach for professionalism and work ethic, and the lessons learned there have benefited me ever since. Show up on time, know the work, obtain coaching in the subject matter as needed, and remember who you work for.[4]
What is your favorite book? Why?
Too many to mention, of great variety. The Lord of the Rings by Tolkien, The Gathering Storm, by Churchill, The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, by Douglas Adams come to mind first.[4]
What qualities does the U.S. House of Representatives possess that makes it unique as an institution?
It's similar to the English House of Commons, and provides a balance between popular opinion and the long view, strategic thinking of the Senate. It ought to be the voice of every American, not the rich and powerful.[4]
Do you believe that it’s beneficial for representatives to have previous experience in government or politics?
Not if that is most of their experience. There is much to be gained from working for others, a humility, if we are willing to learn it. It depends entirely on the person. Clearly, experience has not been working well for us, but that doesn't make it bad.[4]
What do you perceive to be the United States’ greatest challenges as a nation over the next decade?
To free Congress from slavery to business and special interests, and the divisiveness that results. To reform our dealings with other countries, approaching everyone with quiet strength and absolute fairness, being open and honest in our dealings and leading by example.[4]
If you are not a current representative, are there certain committees that you would want to be a part of?
I tend to make any group I'm part of work better. That's really been key for my career. Anything science or technology, of course, but I'd do well in healthcare or budgeting, too.[4]
What are your thoughts on term limits?
Our issues are in the people we elect, not the term. Bad politicians will always find a way around rules. And this is a major constitutional change.[4]
What process do you favor for redistricting?
It should not be partisan, just a logical and natural division that respects communities and does not create excessive changes in representation.[4]

Verify More background check

Rushman completed a Verify More background check on March 26, 2018. Read the results below:

71Republic interview

Rushman participated in the following interview with 71Republic. The interview questions appear bolded, and Rushman's responses follow below.

What inspired you to pursue a career in politics and run for Congress?

I am not pursuing a career in politics. I am risking a great career leading tech teams to take on politics for a time. John Adams left his farm to found this nation and was away longer than he intended. In the Roman Republic, farmers left the fields to defend their families, then returned. It was the shift to professional soldiers that brought the end of their Republic, and professional politicians threaten ours. 2016 was an awful year for many of us; some lost friends. In prior years, we had to choose between a Democrat and a Republican, neither of whom held a position we fully agreed with, but in 2016 we had no choice at all. Both candidates held views most of the 46th District found repugnant. We saw again that money and party matter most; no one has clean hands. Sure we would not have a better choice this time, I had to run so my neighbors and friends would have a real choice and could vote with a clear conscience.[4]
—Ed Rushman (2018)[5]

What inspired you to run as an independent over either of the two parties that compose the duopoly of American politics?

As an independent, I can be free of so many things. Parties become institutions, and even 3rd parties often imitate the big two. I don’t want to make it about money. My only loyalty is to this District, this nation. I can serve best by being free.[4]
—Ed Rushman (2018)[5]

What are the three pillars of your campaign? In other words, what are the three most important stances and policy issues to you?

1) We need to stop killing people. Abortion, war, executions, euthanasia, police shootings, murders: most people do not want these. In particular, people of the 46th District do not agree with the incumbent’s position of abortion on demand all the way to birth, his vote against the Pain-capable Unborn Child Protection Act, or his vote against allowing doctors to provide care to a newborn child who survived an abortion. Repeatedly, the people of the district have not had the option to vote for a pro-life candidate who did not support death or cruelty in some way. People struggle to reconcile protections for the poor with protections for unborn children. We want a consistent respect for life, not this Party obsession with forcing people to choose life for one group of people at the cost of others. As many as a quarter of Democrats reject abortion completely. That twenty-five percent will now have someone to vote for in 2018.

2) The Dream Act – Congress has put this off for more than a decade and is a prime case of partisan politics. When Democrats had the majority, they did not pass it, and they did not press hard enough in 2017 because Dreamers are political pawns to use at election time. This is a humanitarian necessity, and 800,000 Dreamers serve in our military, pursue education and work, paying taxes and living like the rest of us. We must resolve this while developing a more sustainable immigration policy that will not put us in this position again. There is massive public support, but Congress will not act.

3) A more rigorous approach to budget approval in line with the values of the people of this District. There is far too much waste, and this is not surprising with businesses and special interests flooding Washington with money and gifts. We should evaluate every line in the budget, every program, every long-term commitment according to the good of the people, the real good, the good that doesn’t bring some problem down the line that requires more funding to fix. Every problem has come from someone else’s solution. I’m not talking balanced budget, small government, or any ideology. It’s simply doing it the way that a nation of this size and vitality requires, putting in the same effort I would (and have) for an employer or client. Do what is right with little waste and zero corruption and influence. I’ve taught cost management classes. It’s simpler if you don’t owe a debt to big donors.[4]

—Ed Rushman (2018)[5]

According to recent studies, when factoring in the cost of living, California has the highest poverty rate in America. As a representative, how would you fight the poverty problem in California and America?

I would like to free our dysfunctional nation from the grip of big money and partisan politics with the expectation that it will position us to better care for everyone. We can do things that make sense, and at the right levels, if we take self-interest out of the equation. I like the idea of subsidiarity. Some issues of poverty need to be addressed locally, but safety nets can best be put in place at the state or national level. The city of Anaheim is dealing with a concentrated homeless population in a fresh way, and I’d like to see what we can learn from their approach. Again, we’ve never tried to deal with this outside partisan politics and ideological posturing. I’d like us to try.[4]
—Ed Rushman (2018)[5]

The War on Drugs has created a lot of tension in California, due to its statewide legalization. Given Attorney General Jeff Sessions recent actions, where do you stand on this issue?

It may go to the Supreme Court eventually, and while I think legalization is unhealthy for the country, the marketing from those who benefit was fierce, with a lot of social pressure. The state wanted the tax dollars. California is so fiscally irresponsible that the state legislature is hungry for every tax dollar they can get, like a bad friend that lives off everyone until they all leave him. And businesses are leaving. Toyota in Torrance was briefly a client of mine, and I have friends who worked there. It was an awful thing when they decided to move to Texas, putting distance between friends, causing children who grew up here to have to move to new schools, putting stress on marriages where spouses have to decide which one must give up his/her job to stay together. Driving away jobs while increasing spending is not sustainable.[4]
—Ed Rushman (2018)[5]

Sanctuary cities have become a hot-button issue for the American political scene, as it seems the Trump Administration has launched a political “war” on California’s policy. How do you plan to tackle this issue in Congress?

As I’ve said before, problems come from someone else’s solutions. Sanctuary cities are a solution for poorly crafted immigration policy, and cities have arrogated federal-level policies to themselves. I don’t see how this could survive a Supreme Court challenge, should the Court take it up.

We need to build a sustainable immigration policy free of partisan concerns. Earlier in American history, we had no policy, and it’s grown organically, with spasms of paranoia and racism in the past, and we really haven’t come up with a sensible, consistent policy. There was a more generous 1986 law under President Reagan, and a pullback under President Clinton in 1996. The winner-takes-all approach between two ever-more-opposed political parties results in a kind of policy whiplash, as we are tossed back and forth according to power shifts. Law enforcement is caught in the middle, sometimes being told to ignore the law. This is not a sustainable position, it erodes respect for law, law enforcement, and is driven more by emotion and media than reason or governance. I will work for a reasonable, sustainable policy that is created with change in mind, including mechanisms that can come into play when there are international/global upheavals that create floods of refugees. We need a consistent policy that can be enforced and yet meets the demands of compassion and defense of the innocent.[4]

—Ed Rushman (2018)[5]

If someone was interested, how would they get involved with your campaign?

They can contact me via https://www.rushman.org/help and https://www.rushman.org/contact-me, post URLs on social media and spread the word. They can print the flyers on the help page and pass them out. I’d be glad to have people Snapchat, tweet and Instagram with #Rushman2018. The word needs to spread broadly, even outside the District, so that the voters I don’t have the money to reach hear about me. In walking neighborhoods, every person is excited. If the news of my campaign took off, I believe the majority would choose a capable independent without the taint of government experience. Social media is our best bet, along with talking it up at school and among friends.[4]
—Ed Rushman (2018)[5]

Do you have any concluding remarks for readers and potential voters in California?

Legislation should be entirely about what is good for the Nation and not about obligations to special interests or Parties. It should not be about a personal gain of wealth or power. It is a sacred duty to the people and should be pursued with that as the highest principle.

It is in everyone’s best interest to get me into Congress, not just the 46th District’s. We’ve dismissed independent candidates for a long time, and by electing me, we can encourage better candidates. The House is the best point of entry for a nonpartisan breakthrough. We need everyone’s help to make this happen. I’ll talk to anyone, to any group. We have to make this work or admit we like it as it is. I don’t, that’s why I’m running.[4]

—Ed Rushman (2018)[5]

Independent Voter Network article

Rushman published the following article on the Independent Voter Network.

I’ve never been a fan of politics. There are some great things out there, books and movies I enjoy, the occasional leader who does or says something worthwhile, but there is always a reserve, some part of myself I hold back. Mistrust, perhaps, or just knowing from history that even the best leaders have their limits. It’s been an interesting life, I worked with a few stars as a child, met a few politicians, been held at gunpoint a few times, loved and lost, and considered politics but it never went anywhere. Deep trust or commitment has proven elusive.

But something changed in 2016, I realized there was no one trustworthy running the parties. For the second time, a party left me, and with both gone, I felt politically homeless, disenfranchised. No political organization seemed good, both seemed lacking in common decency, both appeared desperate and yet unwilling to take an honest look at themselves. Each seemed to define itself as an opposite of the other. I felt alone in this since the media showed people enthusiastic about their parties.

In searching for a way forward, I met a number of people with better views of politics, and through our conversations things came into focus. They felt politically homeless as well, and were trying to do something about it. They encouraged me to run for something; they believed in me. When I began to float the idea with less politically minded friends, they were enthusiastic, too. I should say that most of my friends are much younger then me, some are people I rock climb with, others from our parish, some from work. They felt the same, they had no real choices, the political situation was hopeless, the partisanship getting worse, the divisions more pronounced.

My interests tend to be national and global, possibly because I’ve done work with people from all around the world, and since our Representative seemed a poor match for our district, the House seemed a good choice for me.

The district is about a quarter unaffiliated, a quarter Republican, and half Democrat, so given the level of dissatisfaction it seemed possible. It’s not an easy thing for me to knock on a neighbor’s door to ask for nomination signatures, much less those farther away from home, and it was a surprising experience. These were Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, and many with no affiliation. They were 18 to 80, men, women, some from other countries. And yet they were all overjoyed that I was running, like I was a hero. I expected them to see this as a hopeless cause, given the district is rated ‘safe Democrat’, and yet they smiled and signed, called other family members to come to the door and sign. When I went out for dinner or to the store, I’d sometimes pitch the server or cashier if they weren’t busy and got the same treatment. Yes, there were two out of that crowd that believed strongly in the system as it is, but all the rest were strong supporters.

And I’m running for those strong supporters. Whenever I meet a new person and tell them I’m running, their eyes light up or they tell me how dissatisfied they are with things, or simply say “this is what we need” after seeing my flyer or hearing my story. Hearing their support revives my spirits and reminds me why I’m doing this.

I’ve got a powerful message that’s unlike anyone else running in Orange County. It’s everything neither party is. It’s what I’ve been searching for. “Be the change,” they say.

We wish for political leaders who inspire us, but in my case, it’s the people who inspire me. In a few weeks, the county voters guide will be in the hands of more than a million voters. I’ve paid the costs out of my own pocket: it’s not my way to ask for donations, and I want this to be the voters’ campaign.

If they like what they read, if it moves them, they’ll vote or me. I hope they will tell people about it. I’ve contacted the media, as I should, but there is not much interest, except some highly motivated writers seeking independent candidates to interview, and that’s gone well.

The people will decide. If they vote for me, it won’t be due to campaign spending, to political consultants or marketing experts, it will be a free choice, a real choice, not the lesser of two evils.

I don’t want to use the same methods as the millionaires, the well-connected people I’m running against. I’m doing what I believe to be right and if voters send me to the House it will be proof it’s possible. Then more will come. If not, perhaps someone will see my attempt and do better.

Someday, someone will get through, especially if the dissatisfaction keeps growing, if the politically homeless keep growing. The two parties are doubling down on their strategies while their members drift away, especially the young. It’s only going to take one independent in the House to change everything. I hope it’s in 2018.[4]

—Ed Rushman (2018)[6]

Political philosophy

Rushman provided the following description of his political philosophy to Ballotpedia:

I believe that an independent candidate with strong skills earned in the workforce, free of donations or party affiliation can best represent this District. I live here, and 2016 was an awful year for many of us. In prior years, we had to choose between a Democrat and a Republican, neither of whom held a position we fully agreed with, but in 2016 we had no choice at all. Both candidates held views most of the 46th District found repugnant. We saw again that money and party matter most; no one has clean hands. Sure we would not have a better choice this time, I had to run so my neighbors and friends would have a real choice and could vote with a clear conscience.[1][4]
—Ed Rushman, 2018

He added:

Ed and Carol Rushman have been married 36 years and raised their six children in Southern California, the last ten+ years in this District. Ed has volunteered all those years, working with our young people in parish youth programs.

A lifelong learner, Ed earned his AA, BS and Masters while working and raising a family. His career has required him to grasp the way many kinds of industries work and his teamwork with people of many cultures has brought a more direct understanding of the issues common to all people, and a greater appreciation of what America has to offer the world, especially as seen by immigrants and guest workers.

He managed retail stores for a national chain, then moved into information systems, managing systems and projects for various companies, taking on challenging roles as needed, then moving to the next when complete.

Ed plays various sports with family and friends, rock climbs or hikes in Joshua Tree, Yosemite or other wild locations when he gets a chance.[1][4]

—Ed Rushman, 2018

See also


External links

Footnotes

  1. 1.0 1.1 1.2 Information submitted on Ballotpedia’s biographical information submission form on January 30, 2018
  2. Note: The candidate's answers have been reproduced here verbatim without edits or corrections by Ballotpedia.
  3. Ballotpedia's candidate survey, "Ed Rushman's responses," January 26, 2018
  4. 4.00 4.01 4.02 4.03 4.04 4.05 4.06 4.07 4.08 4.09 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 4.16 4.17 4.18 4.19 4.20 4.21 4.22 4.23 4.24 4.25 4.26 4.27 Note: This text is quoted verbatim from the original source. Any inconsistencies are attributable to the original source.
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 5.5 5.6 5.7 71Republic, "Fight for Independence – Independent Ed Rushman for Congress," February 8, 2018
  6. Independent Voter Network, "Ed Rushman: Two-Party System Left Me “Homeless,” so I Decided to Run for Congress," March 6, 2018


Senators
Representatives
District 1
District 2
District 3
District 4
District 5
District 6
Ami Bera (D)
District 7
District 8
District 9
District 10
District 11
District 12
District 13
District 14
District 15
District 16
District 17
Ro Khanna (D)
District 18
District 19
District 20
District 21
Jim Costa (D)
District 22
District 23
District 24
District 25
Raul Ruiz (D)
District 26
District 27
District 28
Judy Chu (D)
District 29
District 30
District 31
District 32
District 33
District 34
District 35
District 36
Ted Lieu (D)
District 37
District 38
District 39
District 40
Young Kim (R)
District 41
District 42
District 43
District 44
District 45
District 46
District 47
District 48
District 49
District 50
District 51
District 52
Democratic Party (42)
Republican Party (12)