High Standard T3
Initially the pistols were not to exceed 7-inches (17.7cm) in overall length and be no heavier than 25 ounces (0.7kg) unloaded. The military requested that the pistols use a blowback action and have a folding trigger guard to allow use with thick gloves. An initial request for the pistols to incorporate a ‘squeeze charger’ system were quickly dropped.
The US Army approached several companies to submit bids to develop the new pistol. High Standard, Colt and Harrington & Richardson all submitted bids, while Ithaca declined to bid and Harrington & Richardson’s bid was turned down. The military accepted Colt and High Standard’s bids and contracted them to begin development of the new pistols. The Ordnance Corps designated High Standard’s submission the T3 and Colt’s the T4.
Several batches of the T3 were made each with incremental improvements. The position of the safety and magazine releases were altered with each iteration of the T3. The prototype and first batch of pistols had heel magazine releases while the second batch placed the magazine release on the frame. The first prototype High Standard pistol (see image #1) did not yet have the pivoting trigger guard which would become standard in the later experimental models. The second batch of pistols had a thicker trigger guard than the first set and a repositioned enlarged safety (see images #5 & #6).
In June 1948, High Standard submitted the first batch of three T3 test pistols. The T3 had a frame made from 75ST aluminium and a steel frame. It used a straight blowback action but had annular grooves cut into its chamber which caused the cartridge case to expand, in theory slowing the rearward travel of the slide and the opening of the breach. This was believed to mitigate some of the gun’s sharp recoil impulse. Otto-Helmuth von Lossnitzer, technical director of Mauser Werke, designed this system. Interestingly, at least one, presumably blowback, prototype had a slide-mounted muzzle break, possibly in an attempt to prevent the breech opening too early in the cycle. This feature seems to have been subsequently abandoned.
To fulfil the military’s specification for firing while wearing gloves George Wilson designed a pivoting trigger guard which neatly folded into a recess in the frame. In addition to allowing the user to operate the pistol while wearing thick gloves High Standard’s design also incorporated a spring-loaded plunger. This plunger was pushed into place against the trigger when the user pivoted the trigger guard into the open position and latched to the pistol’s frame. The plunger impinged against the trigger making the trigger pull heavier. in theory this would compensate for the operators lack of sensitivity caused by their gloves.
Figures from George Wilson’s patent for the T3′s Pivoted trigger-guard (source)
The first batch of T3s used a double action trigger and had a single stack magazine holding 7-rounds - on par with the M1911A1. Testing of this first batch of pistols took place at the Aberdeen Proving Ground in May 1949. Several failures occurred and testing identified a number of problems. One pistol's hammer broke due to inadequate heat treatment which left it brittle. A number of failures to feed also occurred with cartridges upending in the breech. High Standard rectified with the addition of a guide shelf at the top of the chamber to guide the cartridge into the chamber.
In April 1950, High Standard were paid $20,000 (approximately $200,000 today) for a second batch of three improved pistols. These were to meet the Ordnance Corps' revised specification which allowed the weapons to weight up to 29 ounces and requested a 13-round minimum magazine capacity. The second batch of T3s abandoned the annular chamber grooves and had a redesigned frame to take the larger magazines. The Springfield Armory tested the new batch of pistols in March 1951, the 75ST aluminium frames suffered a series of failures at stress points - probably due to the enlarging of the frame. The Ordnance Corps recommended that High Standard make the frames from heat treated 14ST aluminium, reinforce and weak points in the frame. High Standard designed the second batch's controls to be more similar to the M1911 and the trigger was redesigned for a better double action pull. Interestingly, High Standard independently developed the annularly grooved chamber and submitted a spare barrel and recommended the Ordnance Corps test it.
In April 1951, a preliminary report noted the second batch of refurbished T3s were unsatisfactory, suffering 19 failures in 150 rounds. The hammer of one pistol broke and the Ordnance Corps recorded further failures to feed. The army returned the pistols to High Standard. High Standard refurbished the pistols and a second test at Springfield was held in September. Testing officers recorded seven failures with further misfeeds and discovered stress fractures in all three of the pistols.
The army ordered a third batch of pistols with the design reverting back to a single stack magazine holding 8 or 9 rounds.This was a reversion to the first batch of T3s which had fared better in testing. Despite this, during testing in November 1952, the pistols suffered numerous failures and an excessive number of malfunctions. During an endurance test the magazine release broke 35-rounds into the test and the slide stop malfunctioned. The second pistol’s hammer cracked and suffered extraction problems. The pistols were again returned to High Standard to fix these issues. A final trial took place in March 1953, however, the pistols were again found to be unsatisfactory and the Ordnance Board officially cancelled the T3 programme.
In his book, Random Shots, Ray Rayle recalls that in the summer of 1955, the US Army prepared a solicitation pamphlet to release to manufacturers on the 4th July. The pamphlet was to announce the Army’s plan to adopt a new 9x19mm handgun with the successful design winning an award of $150,000. While initial testing had taken place and the designs from Colt and High Standard had shown initial promise, the Army wanted to examine pistols from manufacturers around the world. Rayle explains that the launch of the pamphlet and the official pistol trials program were cancelled when the Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics refused the $150,000 of funding on the grounds that sidearms were seldom used and that existing stores of M1911A1s were more than adequate.
Images: 1 2 3 4 5 6
‘Pivoted trigger-guard for firearms’, US Patent #3106795, G.A. Wilson, 15/08/63, (source)
High Standard T3 pistols in the Springfield Armory’s Collection: 1 2 3 4
US Military Automatic Pistols 1945-2012, E. S. Meadows, (2013)
My thanks to Nathaniel F for his help accessing Meadow’s book.