Philosophical Methods 2
Philosophical Methods 2
Philosophical Methods 2
CAL
METHODS
Natural Sciences
1. How do we know what 2. How we can find out 3. How can we differentiate
we claim to know? what we wish to know? truth from falsehood?
Induction
Method
• Using a specific
observation to form a
general conclusion
Deduction Method
• Using a general premise to form a
specific conclusion
LOgic – greek word "logike"
First philosopher to devise a Truth exists when the minds Provides us with accepted
logical method representations "ideas" scientific proofs of universally
correspond with things in valid propositions or
objective world statements
Various Ways of
Categorizing
Philosophical
Subdisciplines
a. Ancient
Philosophy
• refers to the mode and
systems of philosophizing
dominant in the 6th century
B.C.E. until roughly the 4th
century CE
Cosmocentric View
(kosmos – world )
• Ancient philosophers
wondered about the world
(origin of the universe)
• "arche" - (Greek for starting
point)
• "Where all did the things come
from?"
b. Medieval
Philosophy
• refers to the dominant
philosophical/theological
thought from the 5th to the
15th century C.E., after
which comes the modern
period of philosophy (from
the 16th to the 20th
centuries).
Theocentric View
(Theos-God)
We encounter a break from Recalls and reexamines The richer the experience,
our everyday concerns and experience in order to the more reflective it
It is a discontinuity, or a
from our everyday life. It is a understand and comprehend possibly makes us, and the
jarring disturbance, in our
discontinuity, or a jarring the experience. In this sense, more reflective the human
experience.
disturbance, in our the experience transforms person, the richer their
experience itself into reflection.. experience.
Primary and
Secondary Reflection
Primary and Secondary
Reflections are
concepts from the work
of Gabriel Marcel, a
Christian Existentialist
1. Primary reflection breaks the
unity of experience and is the
foundation of scientific inquiry
Husserl speaks of this breaking up of experience (or analysis) as the natural attitude.
Husserl’s natural attitude referred to the scientific attitude predominant during his time
and carried to the extreme to become scientistic (the belief that only science is
authoritative and all other viewpoints are invalid).
It is the instrument of scientific knowledge (which is not necessarily scientistic); it understands its
objects by abstraction, which implies breaking them into constituent parts. This type of reflection is
interested in definitions and technical and methodical solutions to problems. Its answers and
judgments are objective (derived from the Latin obiectu, literally “to throw against”).
It is interested in what is outside of me or before me; it dissects the experience into parts. It
dissolves the unity of the experience by emphasizing the parts rather than approaching it as a
whole.
Edmund mathematician
who established
Husserl
the school of
phenomenology
PHENOMENOLOGY
THE ULTIMATE
SOURCE OF ALL
PHILOSOPHY OF MEANING AND VALUE
EXPERIENCE IS THE EXPERIENCE OF
HUMAN BEINGS
Example:
• A biologist examining a frog or a slide
containing cells of allium cepa. Instead of
understanding the frog or onion as a whole,
the biologist dissects the frog into organs and
systems and compartmentalizes the onion
into mitotic cell division phases. As a result,
specific details are brought to the fore while
clouding the frog or the onion as a whole.
While the example provided is
simplistic, it does capture the
nature of primary reflection—
the dissolution of the whole into
parts
It recuperates the unity of the original experience. For phenomenologists,
secondary reflection is the instrument of philosophical reflection.
2. Secondary It’s concerned with that which is in me, which I am, or with those areas where the
distinctions “in me” or “before me” tend to break down; it attempts to recuperate
reflection-is the unity of the original experience. This is the attempt to see the parts in relation
to the whole—to interpret the parts with the whole in sight. Philosophical
reflection is interested in secondary reflection, which is not contrary to primary
synthetic; it reflection; it just refuses to accept primary reflection as final and definite.