Disgraced
Disgraced
Disgraced
Disgraced
by Ayad Akhtar
by Ayad Akhtar
Brief overview of the play
Introduction and its significance
Ayad Akhtar
• an American playwright,
novelist, and screenwriter of
Pakistani heritage
•atheist with Muslim
background
Other works:
•"TheWho & The What"
•"The Invisible Hand"
•"Junk: The Golden Age of Debt“
•"American Dervish"
Premiered and staged
January 2012
Chicago's American Spring 2012
Theatre Company London’s Bush Theatre
in 2012
New York's Lincoln
Center
Awards
• Obie Award
Amir Kapoor/Abdullah
Emily Hughes Kapoor
o
• Jory is an African-
• Emily and Amir’s antagonist
American lawyer
• Jewish and married to Jory
• an art curator who’s working with Emily • a colleague of Amir
• the husband of Amir’s work colleague Jory. • married to Isaac
Isaac Jory
Plot summary Scene 1
Racism
unconscious racism
So, there you are, in your six-
hundred-dollar Charvet shirt, like
Velázquez’s brilliant apprentice-
slave in his lace collar, adorned in
the splendours of the world
you’re now so clearly a part of...
And yet..
(Scene 3, p. 46)
Themes
Islamophobia
institutional hostility
enormous prejudice
Velázquez's Moor
represents the tendency of
Westerners to regard Eastern
cultures patronisingly or
exploitatively
The resemblance between
the two paintings indicates
her perception of Amir (and,
by extension, his Muslim
culture) as being different
from her own white American
culture, just as Velázquez's
former slave was an alien to
European culture.
“The work broadly asks whether Americans – or, by Critical
extension, members of other western societies – must
renounce their “other” cultural identities to gain
Reception
mainstream acceptance. Its concerns are as specific to
Australia as they are to the US, as attacks from Pakistan to
Paris to Brussels make locally born Muslims the target of
suspicion, and reduce debate to simplistic binaries:
patriotism versus tribalism.”
Juliet Wittman, an investigative reporter and critic with a passion for theater, literature, social
justice and food. Westword
Impact
But actually I believe that the colonization of the mind is the most
effective way upon Muslims in the west who accept it, partly because
the colonizer planted deep in the mind of the colonized that they are
inferior to them. Therefore many Muslims denied their heritage to get
accepted. As with other colonized people, Muslims were victims of the
colonial process in almost every sense.
Discussion questions
What does the author want to say by the scene
where Amir hits his wife?