Cognitive Linguistics 6
Cognitive Linguistics 6
Cognitive Linguistics 6
the mind?
• If they are distinct, then how do they interact?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VmNHLlQzdCw
TAKING A STEP BACK –
DISEMBODIED
COMPUTATIONALISM
DISEMBODIED
COMPUTATIONALISM
(FUNCTIONALISM,
RATIONALISM)
EXPERIENCE
Synesthesia = „perceive together” – it is e.g. when you hear music, but you see shapes. Or you hear a word or a
name and instantly see a color. Synesthesia is a fancy name for when you experience one of your senses
through another. For example, you might hear the name "Alex" and see green. Or you might read the word
"street" and taste citrus fruit.
THE MIRROR NEURON SYSTEM (MNS)
An experiment conducted on
macaque monkeys has shown
that there is a cluster of
neurons that fires not only
when the monkey grasps a
banana, but also when it saw
the researcher perform the
same action.
Mirror neurons
and language
Conceptual
Conceptual integration theory
Image schemas
metaphor theory (conceptual
blending)
Image schema
UP-DOWN SCHEMA
A lot of everyday objects and experiences are categorised as specific examples of the
schematic concept CONTAINER: bathroom cabinets and toothpaste tubes, bed-covers,
clothing and rooms, states like sleep, stupor and daze.
CONTAINER SCHEMA
INSIDE
OUTSIDE
CONTAINER SCHEMA - OUT
LM – Landmark (i.e.
background)
LM TR
TR – trajector (object
undergoing
movement/transformation)
• Image schemas are pre-conceptual in origin => they are directly grounded in embodied experience:
they relate to and come from sensory experience.
• Image schemas are concepts => the first concepts to emerge in the human mind.
• Image schemas are fundamental to our way of thinking and we are not consciously aware of them.
• An image schema can give rise to more specific concepts => lexical concepts.
• Image schemas derive from interaction with and observation of the world.
• Image schemas are inherently meaningful => Embodied experience is inherently meaningful in the
sense it has predictable consequences.
• Image schemas are analogue representations deriving from experience => image schemas are not
stored in our mind in the form of words but in the form of memory or physical experience, they are
recorded in memory.
• Image schemas can be internally complex =>
the CONTAINER schema consists of interior, boundary and exterior elements
SOURCE-PATH-GOAL schema consists of a starting point or SOURCE, a destination or GOAL and
a series of contiguous locations in between which relate the source and goal.
Consequences? Different components can be referred to.
• Image schemas are not the same as mental images.
Mental image is what you see when you close your eyes and imagine something. Mental images are very
detailed and involve visual memory.
Image schemas are schematic and more abstract; you can’t close your eyes and see them.
• Image schemas are multi-modal => they derive from different sensory experience, they are not
specific to one sense.
• Image schemas are subject to transformations.
Imagine a herd of cows up close – close enough to pick out the individual cows. Now imagine yourself
moving back until you can no longer pick out individual cows. What you perceive is a mass. There is a
point at which you cease making out individuals and start perceiving a mass. (Lakoff 1987: 428) =>
COUNT and MASS schema reflected in grammar as count and mass nouns.
• Image schemas can occur in clusters or networks of related image schemas.
IMAGE SCHEMAS ARE
PRECEPTUAL (ANALOG)and
MULTIMODAL
• We know now that embodied experience determines and delimits the range and nature of concepts that can
be represented. As a next step, we can examine how these concepts are encoded and externalized in
language.
• Leonard Talmy – „one of the ways that language reflects conceptual representation is by providing
structural meaning, also known as schematic meaning. This kind of meaning relates to structural
properties of referents (the entities that language describes) and scenes (the situations that these entities
are involved in). Talmy also argues that this schematic meaning is directly related to fundamental aspects
of embodiment.”
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mZFUEO45WnE
Semantic structure
• According to Talmy the conceptual structuring system is based upon a limited number of large-scale schematic
systems.
• Various schematic systems collaborate to structure a scene that is expressed via language.
• There are four key schematic systems identified by Talmy: (1) the ‘Configurational System’; (2) the ‘Perspectival
System’; (3) the ‘Attentional System’; and (d) the ‘Force-Dynamics System’.
The Configurational System
• Structures the temporal and spatial properties associated with a scene, such as the division of a scene into parts and
participants.
a) When the sheep all died, we e) I read that book twenty years ago.
moved out of the farm. f) The house is 10 meters wide.
b) The house is (exactly) 10 meters g) The sheep all died in six weeks.
away from the farm.
h) She read the book in two days.
c) The sheep kept dying.
i) She kept reading the book.
d) The house seems to go on and on.
The Perspectival System
• Specifies the perspective from which one ‘views’ a scene.
• Includes schematic categories that relate to the spatial or temporal perspective point
from which a scene is viewed, the distance of the perspective point from the entity
viewed, the change of perspective point over time and so on.
• specifies how the speaker intends the hearer to direct his or her attention towards the entities that participate in a
particular scene (window of attention)
• Path windowing: allows language users to window (focus attention on) subparts
• of the trajectory associated with the motion of an object.
SOURCE-PATH-GOAL
The Force-Dynamics System
• Relates to the way in which objects are conceived relative to the exertion of force.
• https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_kl42b9B9yA