Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Walt Disney Yen Financing-Kelompok 1

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25

The Walt Disney Company’s Yen

Financing
Pembimbing : Dr. Alexander Suwinto Johan, S.E., M.M.

Kelompok 1 :
Angelica Joanna Charity Kamalo (117221041)
Arya Adi Bramasta (117221042)
Debora Eunike (117221044)
Michelle Ruth Natalie (117221049)
Walt Disney’s Relationship with Tokyo Disneyland

● Had been open for about many years


● Operated by separate company
● Sends royalty receipts to Walt Disney in ¥ (Yen)
○ → About ¥8 billions recently
Problems facing Walt Disney

● ¥8 billions in royalty receipts received in current year


● Face exchange rate risk into dollars
● ¥ (Yen) has recently lost value against the dollar, so each ¥ (Yen) translates into fewer
dollars when Walt Disney exchanges them
● Specifically, ¥229,78/$ to ¥248/$ in recent period
● Strong growth in royalty receipts (denominated in ¥ (Yen)) projected (10-20% per
year)
Disney’s Current
Debt Load
Possible Solution (1. Foreign Exchange Forwards)
(+)
● Very common hedging instrument
● Can be executed at a fairly low cost for maturities extending 2 years
(-)
● Longer maturities have higher costs (higher bid-ask spreads)
● Dealers don’t like making any transactions of any substantial size very far into the future
● Bank foreign exchange forwards would use up more of Disney’s already heavily-drawn
bank credit lines, since the bank would treat the forward contracts as part of their overall
exposure to Disney. This might inhibit Disney’s further use of letters of credit to back up its
commercial paper.
Possible Solution (2. Currency Futures & Options)

(+)
● Futures contracts and put options on Yen are readily available

(-)
● Standard future contracts and options tend to have maturities that are less than one
year
● Options have premiums up front that must be paid
● Contract sizes are small relative to Disney’s annual exposure of ¥8 billion or more
Possible Solutions (3. Balance Sheet Hedges)
(+)
● Having a liability denominated in Yen would create a use for the Yen royalties (interest
and/or principal payments)
(-)
● Difficult to obtain such liabilities
● Domestic Yen Bonds - Foreign companies had difficult time issuing in Japan in 1980’s;
also cumbersome process (1-3 months)
● Euroyen Bonds - Japanese Foreign Minister regulated the use of Yen in international
finance transcations. Only AA or better companies could issue (Disney was rated A-)
● Conventional term yen loan - This one is possible (they already have one outstanding)
Possible Solutions (4. Currency Swap into Yen)

Using Existing Dollar Debt


● Problem - current dollar debt mature in 18 months and 44 months
● $50 million of the longer-maturity note had already been swapped into yeen
Using New Debt
● This is what Goldman Sach offers them - a ECU-denominated bond (new debt) that can
be swapped into a Yen liability
● The money raised through the new debt can be converted into dollars and used to pay
down short-term debt
Swab Mechanics
Two Viable Options

1. Yen Term Loan


2. Currency Swap using New Debt

Analysis Plan:

- See what the cost is for each Debt Instrument


- See which cost is cheaper
- if the swap is cheaper, we’ll see how Disney benefits, how the Frendi Utility benefits
and how the Sap bank benefits
The Yen Term Loan
(in the bottom of the page 4)

● ¥15 billions ten-year loan, with principal repaid at final maturity. Interest of 7,50% paid semi-annually
and front-end fees of 0,75%
● “All-in cost for Disney borrowing in Yen:
○ Solve for YTM (Yield to Maturity) of a bond with the following features:
■ Par = 100
■ Price = 100 - 0,75
■ Coupon = 100*0,075/2 = 3,75
■ N = 10 x 2 = 20
Rate = 3,804% x 2 = YTM = 7,608% (Bond Equivalent Yield);
= (1,03804^2)-1 = 7,75% (Annual Equivalent)
The Goldman Sachs Plan:

New Debt (exhibit 6)


- ECU 80 million, with sinking fund
- 10 year Eurobonds @ 100,25% of par
- 9,125% annual coupon
- 2% underwriting fees
- $75,000 additional fees
Currency Swap:
- Swap into a Yen Liability
Goldman Plan

What is the “all in” cost for Disney Borrowing in ECU (The Euro ECU bond - pays
annually)?
- Expenses: $75,000 X (ECU 1/$742) = ECU 101,078.17
- Fees: 2.00% of par. So Price minus fees is 100.25% - 2.00% = 98.25%
- (80 million ECUs) X (9825) - 101.078 + 78.499 million ECUs
- Annual coupon payments: (80 mill) X (9.125) = 7.300 million ECUs
- 10- year amortization
- Sinking fund stats in year 6
Disney Cash Flows

IRR = 9.4727%

Exhibit 6
Interest Rate Differentials
The Motivation for the French Utility

● Wants to swap them into ECU liabilities to match with its European currency
receivables
● Rated AAA
● French Utility already has Yen Bonds on its balance sheet
French Utility
Cost of Debt

Exhibit 8
Interest Rate Differentials
The Swap
Exhibit 7
Disney’s Benefit
Exhibit 7

The semi-annual IRR is 3,446%


→ this means that the swap is
allowing Disney to borrow “in Yen”
at a 6,89% Bond Equivalent Yield
(APR) or 7,01% Annual Equivalent
(EAR).
French Utility’s Benefit
Exhibit 7

The French Utility had an existing loan →


so it didn’t actually swap principal
payments. The (14.445,153) is actually
(14.591,73) based on a 6,83% EAR yield.
This makes the 80.000 ECUs actually
79,29 ECUs which results in an IRR for
column C of 9,35%. This is slightly better
than the 9,37% it could have borrowed
ECUs at.
Interest Rate Differentials
Bank’s Benefit
Exhibit 7
Bank’s Benefit in ECUs (in millions)

● Year 0 → 0,005
● Year 1-6 → 0,05
● Year 7 → 0,04
● Year 8 → 0,03
● Year 9 → 0,02
● Year 10 → 0,01
Outcome

● Disney did go ahead with the ECU Bond and the Swap into the Yen Liability
● The Yen actually rose over the next few years, prompting critics to second-guess
Disney’s decision to hedge its yen royalty stream
● Disney remained firm in its decision to hedge its royalties and issued Swiss Franc and
Australian Dollar notes, both swapped into Yen Liabilities

You might also like