Types and Approaches To Leadership
Types and Approaches To Leadership
Types and Approaches To Leadership
Naga City
LEADERSHIP
1.TRAIT
APPROACH
2.BEHAVIOURAL
APPROACH
3.SITUATIONAL
APPROACH
TRAIT APPROACH
Keith davis has summarized four of the
major traits which might have an impact
on successful organizational leadership.
They are:
Intelligence
Social maturity and breath:
Inner motivation and achievement
drives
Human relations attitude
Intelligence: Research has shown
that generally a leader has higher
intelligence than the average
intelligence of the followers. However
the leader cannot be exceedingly much
more intelligent than his followers
Social maturity and breath: Leaders
tend to be emotionally stable and
mature and to have broad interests and
activities. They have an assured,
respectful self concept
Inner motivation and achievement
drives: Leaders have relatively intense
motivational drives of the achievement
type. They strive for intrinsic than
extrinsic rewards.
Human relations attitude: Successful
leaders recognize the worth and dignity
of their followers and are able to
empathize with them. According to
research studies leaders possess
consideration and are employee centered
rather than production centered.
BEHAVIOURAL APPROACH
Autocratic
Participative or supportive
Instrumental or instrumental
supportive
Autocratic: An autocratic leader is one
who commands and expects compliance.
He is dogmatic and positive and leads by
his ability to withhold or give rewards
and punishments.
Participative or Supportive: The
participative or supportive leadership
behaviour is based on the assumption that
people essentially want to participate, want
to accomplish and will work well if general
supervision is employed and where they
are allowed to use their own initiative and
support is given while accomplishing their
task.
Instrumental or Instrumental
Supportive: Instrumental behaviour of
leadership emphasizes the leaders role as
a manager in the rational aspects of
management namely planning, organizing,
controlling etc.
SITUATIONAL APPROACH
Transactional Leaders
Clarify
the role and task requirements of
subordinates
Initiate structure
Provide appropriate rewards
Displayconsideration for subordinates
Meet the social needs of subordinates
Charismatic Leaders
The ability to inspire
Motivate people to do more than
they would normally do
Tend to be less predictable than
transactional leaders
Create an atmosphere of change
May be obsessed by visionary ideas
Transformational Leader
Similar to charismatic leaders
Distinguished by their special ability to bring
about innovation and change by
Recognizing followers’ needs and
concerns
Helping them look at old problems in new
ways
Encouraging them to question the status
quo
TEAM LEADER
Leadership is increasingly taking place within a
team context. The role of team leader is
different from the traditional leadership role.
The challenge for most managers is learning
how to become an effective team leader. There
are four basic team leadership roles: team
leaders are liaisons with external constituencies,
troubleshooters, conflict managers and coaches
LEADERSHIP STYLES
Autocratic
Democratic
Laissez Faire
AUTOCRATIC LEADER
An Autocratic leader will not
entertain any suggestions or
initiative from subordinates. Under
this type of leadership, one person
decides for the whole group. An
autocratic leader does not trust
anybody.
Merits:
Ithelps to make quick decisions
Inefficient and insincere workers can
easily be identified
Demerits
It kills initiatives for work and results in
frustration among workers.
It often gives scope for conflicts
between the leader and his followers
PARTICIPATIVE/DEMOCRATIC
LEADER
A democratic leader can win the cooperation of his
group and can motivate them effectively and
positively.
Merits
The decision finally made is mutually accepted.
It improves the job attitudes of the sub-ordinate staff.
Demerits
this leadership is suitable only if the subordinates are
all capable of making worthwhile suggestions.
It may, sometimes be very difficult to evolve a
solution that is acceptable to everyone.
LAISSEZ FAIRE/FREE REIN LEADER
A free rein leader will leave the group entirely to
itself such as a leader allows maximum freedom to
subordinates.
Merits
The superior subordinate relationship is found to be
very good.
Highly efficient subordinates, can make use of the
freedom given to them to excel.
Demerits
Control may become difficult As the leader does not
involve himself at all in the activities.
The subordinates are deprived of the expert advice
and moral support of their leader.
Other Leadership Styles
Functional Leader
Institutional Leader
Paternalistic Leader
FUNCTIONAL LEADER
A functional leader is one who is
an expert in a particular field of
activity. Such a leader always
thinks of the task he has
undertaken and spends most of
his time finding out ways and
means of doing it better.
Merits
The very presence of an expert is beneficial to the
followers and the organisation.
the subordinates can certainly enrich their job
knowledge and skill.
Demerits
The functional leader will not be able to go down to
the level of an average worker and offer any help.
Misunderstandings may also arise between the
leader and his followers.
INSTITUTIONAL LEADER
An institutional leader is one
who has become a leader by
virtue of his official position in
the organisational hierarchy. An
institutional leader may not be
an expert in his field of activity.
Merits
He has official authority to act.
He may initiate action against a subordinate
who is shirking duties.
Demerits
He will not be in a position to offer proper
guidance to his followers because he may
not be an expert in his field of activity.
Although the leader has the official right to
demand performance from his followers, he
may not have the moral right
PATERNALISTIC LEADER
A paternalistic leader takes care of his
followers in the way the head of the family
takes care of the family members
Merits
He assumes a paternal role to protect his sub-
ordinates.
He is always ready to provide the necessary
physical amenities to the sub-ordinates
Demerits
He is not in a position to offer intellectual help to
his followers.