FSSC V4.1
FSSC V4.1
FSSC V4.1
1
CERTIFICATION 22000
FSSC 22000 Version 4.1
ISO 22000:2005 FOOD SAFETY SECTOR SPECIFIC PRE REQUISITE ADDITIONAL SCHEME
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PROGRAMS (PRPS) REQUIREMENTS
REQUIREMENTS REQUIREMENTS
The International Standard specifies the requirements for a food safety management
system that combines the following generally recognized key elements to ensure food
safety along the food chain, up to the point of final consumption as
22000:2005
FSMS System management
HACCP principles.
HACCP Stands for
Hazard Analysis
and Critical Control Point
It takes
HACCP is a
preventative
food safety
approach to
program.
food safety.
It is designed
to minimize
the risk of
food safety
hazards
HACCP
Seven Principles of
HACCP
1. Conduct Hazards Analysis
2. Determine the Critical Control Points
3. Establish Critical Limits
4. Establish Monitoring System
5. Establish Corrective Action
6. Establish Verification Procedures
7. Establish Documentation
PRE REQUISITE PROGRAM
PRPs are “procedures, including Good Manufacturing
Practices, that address operational conditions providing
the foundation for the HACCP system.”
Example:
• Supplier control
• Cleaning and sanitation
• Personal hygiene
• Training
OPERATIONAL PRE REQISITE
PROGRAM
Types:
• Physical
• Chemical
• Biological
1) Management of services
2) Product labelling
3) Food defense
4) Food fraud prevention
Additional 5) Logo use
requirements 6) Management of allergens (for categories C, I and K only)
7) Environmental monitoring (for categories C, I and K only)
8) Formulation of products (for category DII only)
9) Management of natural resources (for category A only).
Food Defense
Food Defense
approach tries to
- Who might want
answer the
to attack us?
following key
questions:
- What is the
- How might they
potential public
do it?
health impact?
- How can we
prevent this from
happening?
Establish Establish a Food Defense team
Conduct Conduct a Threat Assessment, identify and evaluate potential threats and vulnerabilities
Document the threat assessment, mitigation measures, verification and incident management procedures in a Food Defense Plan
Document supported by the Food Safety Management System
Develop Develop an effective training and communication strategy and implement the Food Defense Plan.
• Copies of
popular foods • Expiry,
• Not produced
with acceptable
safety assurances
FOOD Provenance
(unsafe origin)
• Toxic Japanese
FRAUD Star Anise
labelled as
Counterfeiting Mislabelling Chinese Star
Anise
• Sale of excess
• Melamine added
to enhance
Grey Market unreported
product
protein content Unapproved Production/
• Use of Enhancement Theft/
unauthorised
additives (Sudan Diversion
Dye)
The extortionist
The extremist
The opportunist
Cases related to Food fraud
Milk was diluted with water, sometimes dirty water, In 2013, Horse meat was substituted for beef in burgers
and coloured with chalk or plaster for economic gain in England, France and Greece.
during middle ages.
Malicious contamination
Espionage:
In July 2014, a women was charged in USA with attemping to steal patented U.S seed technology for use in
china.
Counterfeiting:
In 2013, enforcement officers seized 9000 bottles of fake Glen’s Vodka from an illegal factory.
Cyber Crime:
In 2014, Fraudsters phone restaurants claiming there is a problem with their card payments system, the
restaurant is then told to redirect any card payments to a phone number provided by the fraudster and
involved in scam.
Establish Establish a Food Fraud Mitigation Team
Document the vulnerability assessment, mitigation measures, verification and incident management procedures in a Food Fraud
Document Mitigation Plan supported by the Food Safety Management System
Develop Develop an effective training and communication strategy and implement the Food Fraud Mitigation Plan
Evaluate Risk
Record Findings
1 2
Shall assess and report on conformity Two audits per year of which one will
with all Scheme requirements be “Unannounced”
including the use of marks and
references to certification.
Minor Non conformity
CAP(Corrective Action Plan) should Corrective action(CA) should be A Major Non conformity will be
be given within 3 months after audit. implemented within 12 months after raised if CA is not completed.
audit.
Major Non conformity
CAP(Corrective Action Plan) should Corrective action(CA) should be A Critical Non conformity will be
be given within 14 days after audit. implemented within 14days after raised if CA is not completed
audit
Critical Non conformity
Certificate is immediately
CAP should be submitted
suspended for maximum
within 14 days
of 6 months