Chap 19
Chap 19
Chap 19
INTERNATIONAL
BUSINESS
A MANAGERIAL PERSPECTIVE
Chapter 19
International Accounting and Taxation
1
Prentice
Prentice
Hall ©Hall
2002©International
2002 International
Business
Business
3e 3e
Chapter Objectives
After studying this chapter you should be able to:
2
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Chapter Objectives (cont.)
After studying this chapter you should be able to:
3
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Mr. Anchovy Was Wrong
4
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Mr. Anchovy Was Wrong
(cont.)
• By merging with existing accounting firms, the
Big Five have gained quick access to many
domestic markets as well as to the existing
client bases of the acquired firms.
• That doesn’t mean, however, that the
managers of the Big Five can afford to relax.
They must manage their explosive growth,
maintain the quality of services they offer their
clients, and keep their employees happy.
5
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
The Roots of Differences in
Accounting
• A country’s accounting standards and
practices reflect the influence of legal,
cultural, political, and economic factors.
• The difference between common law and
code law is one example.
• A country’s accounting system may reflect its
national culture. The detailed accounting
procedures laid down by the French
government mirror France’s statist tradition.
6
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
The Roots of Differences in
Accounting (cont.)
• Capital markets may also affect national accounting
standards. U.S. firms have historically raised capital
by relying on public investors. U.S. accounting
standards therefore emphasize the provision of
accurate and useful information to help outsiders
make appropriate investment decisions.
• Most Japanese firms have large debt-to-equity ratios
by Western standards. Thus Japanese accounting
standards are geared toward meeting the needs of
the firm’s lenders and keiretsu partners, both of which
already have privileged access to the firm’s financial
records, rather than those of outside investors.
7
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Differences in Accounting
Practices
8
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Impact on Capital Markets
9
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Impact on Corporate Financial
Controls
• National differences in accounting procedures
also complicate an MNC’s ability to manage
its foreign operations.
• In practice, there is no uniform answer to the
question of which currency to use for
performance evaluation: some MNCs choose
the host currency and others the home
currency, but most appear to use both.
10
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Efforts at Harmonization
11
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Efforts at Harmonization (cont.)
13
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Accounting for Transactions in
Foreign Currencies
• Under the existing flexible exchange-rate
system, it is very likely that the exchange rate
will change between the time a firm enters
into an international transaction and the time
it receives payment or pays for the goods,
services, or assets in question. In accordance
with FASB Statement 52, issued in 1981,
U.S. firms must account for such international
transactions by using the two-transaction
approach in their financial statements.
14
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Foreign Currency Translation
15
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Foreign Currency Translation
(cont.)
17
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Transfer Pricing
18
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Transfer Pricing (cont.)
A transaction is said to be
‘at arm’s length’ if the terms
are what two unrelated firms
would have agreed upon.
20
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Tax Havens
22
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Taxation of Foreign Subsidiary
Income
• In general, for U.S. tax purposes, a U.S. parent
corporation does not need to include the earnings of
its foreign subsidiaries in reporting its profits to the
IRS.
• The deferral rule in the U.S. tax code allows such
earnings to be taxed only when they are remitted to
the parent in the form of dividends.
• A controlled foreign corporation (CFC) is a foreign
corporation in which U.S. shareholders—each of
which holds at least 10 percent of the firm’s share—
together own a majority of its stock.
23
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Taxation of Foreign Subsidiary
Income (cont.)
• According to U.S. tax code, the income of CFCs is
divided into two types:
– Active income
– Passive income (also called Subpart F income)
• The U.S. government, by treating active and
passive earnings of foreign subsidiaries
differently, is walking a fine line between
stimulating U.S. firms’ international business
activities and limiting their ability to evade U.S.
taxes through the creation of subsidiaries in tax
havens.
24
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Tax Credits
25
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Tax Treaties
27
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e
Chapter Review (cont.)
• International businesses are also challenged in
dealing with various countries’ taxation policies.
MNCs try to maximize their after-tax profitability by
taking advantage of tax breaks and avoiding punitive
taxes.
• Like many countries, the United States offers
favorable tax incentives to encourage its firms to
participate in international business.
• Because of the revenue needs of governments,
international businesses often find themselves in
conflict with foreign governments.
28
Prentice Hall © 2002 International Business 3e