The document is a daily lesson log from an 11th grade English class taught by Ms. Jeralyn B. Patay on November 13, 2016. The objectives were for students to understand how context affects a written text and to write a 1000-word critique of a selected text based on its claims, context, and properties. Students would learn about how context during a text's development, including hypertext and intertext, can influence its meaning and interpretation. The lesson involved reviewing claims, discussing intertextuality and hypertext, identifying the context of a speech by President Quezon, and having students work in groups to create a Wiki entry inspired by the speech.
The document is a daily lesson log from an 11th grade English class taught by Ms. Jeralyn B. Patay on November 13, 2016. The objectives were for students to understand how context affects a written text and to write a 1000-word critique of a selected text based on its claims, context, and properties. Students would learn about how context during a text's development, including hypertext and intertext, can influence its meaning and interpretation. The lesson involved reviewing claims, discussing intertextuality and hypertext, identifying the context of a speech by President Quezon, and having students work in groups to create a Wiki entry inspired by the speech.
The document is a daily lesson log from an 11th grade English class taught by Ms. Jeralyn B. Patay on November 13, 2016. The objectives were for students to understand how context affects a written text and to write a 1000-word critique of a selected text based on its claims, context, and properties. Students would learn about how context during a text's development, including hypertext and intertext, can influence its meaning and interpretation. The lesson involved reviewing claims, discussing intertextuality and hypertext, identifying the context of a speech by President Quezon, and having students work in groups to create a Wiki entry inspired by the speech.
The document is a daily lesson log from an 11th grade English class taught by Ms. Jeralyn B. Patay on November 13, 2016. The objectives were for students to understand how context affects a written text and to write a 1000-word critique of a selected text based on its claims, context, and properties. Students would learn about how context during a text's development, including hypertext and intertext, can influence its meaning and interpretation. The lesson involved reviewing claims, discussing intertextuality and hypertext, identifying the context of a speech by President Quezon, and having students work in groups to create a Wiki entry inspired by the speech.
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2
School Campalanas National High School Grade: 11- Titanium
Daily Teacher Ms. Jeralyn B. Patay Learning Reading & Writing
Lesson Log Area: Date / November 13, 2016/ 7:30-9:30 A.M. Quarter: 3 Time: I.OBJECTIVES A. Content Standard The learner understands the relationship of a written text and the context in which it was developed. B. Performance Standard The learner writes a 1000-word critique of a selected text on the basis of its claim/s, context and properties as a written material. C. Learning Competencies/Objectives Identifies the context in which a text is developed (EN11/12RWS-IVac-7) a. Hypertext (EN11/12RWS-IVac-7.1) b. Intertext (EN11/12RWS-IVac-7.2) II. CONTENT Context of Text Development III. LEARNING RESOURCES Textbooks, TG, CG A. References 1. Teacher’s Guide Pages 2. Learner’s Materials pages pp.22-23, 28 3. Curriculum Guide: p.2 4. Additional Materials from Learning Resources B. Other Learning Resources IV. PROCEDURES A. Reviewing previous lesson or presenting Review students about the characteristics of a good claim and the three different the new lesson types of claim. B. Establishing a purpose for the lesson Explain to students that at the end of the lesson, they will be able to transform the context of the speech into hypertext. C. Presenting Examples/instances of new *Have students explain this statement: A text is neither written nor read in a lesson vacuum; its meaning and interpretation are affected by a given set of circumstances. *Process students’ answers. D. Discussing new concepts and practicing Discuss about intertextuality and give specific example. new skills #1 E. Discussing new concepts and practicing *Introduce to students what hypertext is and how it differs from intertext. new skills #2 *Give specific example for a better understanding of the topic. F. Developing mastery In groups, identify the context in developing the speech of President Quezon by (Leads to Formative Assessment) answering the questions: 1. When was the work written? 2. What were the circumstances that produced it? 3. What issues does it deal with? G. Finding Practical applications of *Have students present their work by group. concepts and skills *Discuss and process their answers. H. Making generalizations and abstractions *Direct students to give the difference between hypertext and intertext. about the lesson *Have them think of another example of intertextuality. Tell them to share this example with the class. I. Evaluating Learning *Have them do the activity in groups of five. Let students read the full speech of President Quezon again. After they have read and researched on the text, instruct them to create a Wiki entry inspired by President Quezon’s speech. They are to decide which aspect of the speech they find interesting (e.g., traits of Filipinos, values education in schools) and then come up with text describing that aspect. Tell them to link together relevant pictures, videos or music that would make the readers interested. (see page 28 of the LM) *Remind them to present their output in the class. J. Additional activities for application or Research Activity: remediation 1. What is assertion? 2. How does it differ from claim? V. REMARKS VI. REFLECTION A. No. of learners who earned 80% on the formative assessment B. No. of Learners who require additional activities for remediation C. Did the remedial lessons work? No. of learners who have caught up with the lesson. D. No. of learners who continue to require remediation E. Which of my teaching strategies worked well? Why did these work? F. What difficulties did I encounter which my principal or supervisor can help me solve? G. What innovation or localized materials did I use/discover which I wish to share with other teachers? Inspected by: