Alleged Violations IACHR
Alleged Violations IACHR
Alleged Violations IACHR
Home > Get Informed > Custody and Abuse > Legal Documents > Petition To Inter American Commission On Human Rights
join email list
Privacy Published on October 06, 2008
Alleged Violations of the Declaration of the
Duties and Rights of Man
While state courts are responsible for custody cases, the federal
Legal Documents government is responsible to ensure that their judicial systems
operate in accordance with the Organization of American States
Petition To Inter American Declaration of the Rights and Duties of Man . The specific articles
Commission On Human Rights the petitioners claim have been violated are:
IACHR Press Release.
Article I. Every human being has the right to life, liberty and the
Full Text of IACHR Petition. security of his person.
Interview with Dianne Post, J.D.
Alleged Violations of the The courts place the children directly in danger without regard to their right to
Declaration of the Duties and life, liberty or security of person. In addition, often the arrangements made
Rights of Man for visitation are unsafe to the mother as well.
Claudine Dombrowski Photos of
Abuse
Article II. All persons are equal before the law and have the
rights and duties established in this Declaration, without
distinction as to race, sex, language, creed or any other factor.
The gender discrimination both in the courts in general and in custody cases
in particular has been known, studied and proven for years. The gender bias
studies in the 1980’s showed bias that has never been corrected. The
studies of custody have shown that it is a complete myth that women get
custody over men or that men are disfavored in family court. It is such a
pervasive myth that years of litigation and proof has not shaken it - to the
harm of the victims of violence.
Litigants, especially mothers, who report child abuse are punished with jail or
the loss of custody of their children. The protective parents are in a Catch
22 situation. If they do not protect their children, they are charged with
failure to protect and the child protection agencies take their children. If they
do act to protect, the courts put the children directly into the arms of the
abuser.
Article V. Every person has the right to the protection of the law
against abusive attacks upon his honor, his reputation, and his
private and family life.
Often the protective parents who report abuse are labeled mentally ill or
diagnosed with such imaginative syndromes as parental alienation or
munchhausen’s by proxy. Often they are ordered into counseling or in the
case of one petitioner, taken to the mental hospital.
Article VI. Every person has the right to establish a family, the
basic element of society, and to receive protection therefor.
By separating the protective parents from their children for no valid reason,
the parent is denied the right to establish a family. Some of these petitioners
have not seen their children for six years. Every single petitioner was denied
contact with their child for some period of time though none was ever proven
to have harmed them.
Article VII. All women, during pregnancy and the nursing period,
and all children have the right to special protection, care and
aid.
The lack of due process in family court is legion. Ex parte hearings and
communications, decisions without hearings, refusal to admit the mother,
refusal to admit evidence of violence is rampant in the cases and violates the
most basic principles of due process. Little attention or time is given to these
decisions that shape a child’s life forever.
The gender bias studies of the 1980’s showed that courts are not competent
when dealing with women. Unfortunately, things have not improved. In spite
of training, legislation and lobbying, judges continue to ignore statutes that
mandate no custody to abusers. The petitioners have tried to hold the
judges accountable by appeal or disciplinary procedures, all to no avail.
The many children who are put directly into harms way by being placed with
an abuser or molester are deprived of their liberty. When courts ignore
evidence of violence, they are not following pre-existing law. It is
commonplace for judges to completely ignore state statutes that mandate
that custody will not go to a perpetrator thereby violating state law as well as
putting children in danger.
These petitioners have tried to protect their children. It is the courts that
have prohibited them. The cost to both child and parent is overwhelming
and devastating.
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Donate | Privacy | Terms & Conditions | Site Map