Motion To Vacate Orders Blank
Motion To Vacate Orders Blank
Motion To Vacate Orders Blank
Judge:________________________
Petitioner
Case Number:
Respondent
MOTION TO
VACATE THE FOREIGN SUPPORT ORDER
comes before this court Pro Per in the form of this Revised
Motion to Vacate the Support Order, dated , , as it has been “Null and
respectively. Attempts & Conspiracy to defraud the u.s. federal gov't (See 18 USC sec'n 371 &
42 USC sec'n 654). The False Claims Act (falsi crimen) 31 USC sec'n 3729) (See also Executive
order 13520).
Respectfully Submitted
______________________________
Signature line
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
STANDARDS OF REVIEW
Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F 945, Miller vs. U.S. , 230 F. 486,489, Supreme Court Ruling there
can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of Constitutional
Rights.
Davis v. Wechsler, 263 US 22, 24. The assertion of Federal Rights, when plainly and
reasonably made, is not to be defeated under the name of local practice.
Jenkins v. McKeithern 395 U.S. 411, 421 (1969), Picking v. Pennsylvania R. Co. 151 F.2d
240, and Haines v. Kerner, 92 S. Ct. 747 (1969). Pro se pleadings are to be considered
without regard to technicality. Pro se litigants pleadings are not to be held to the same high
standards of perfection as lawyers.
Sperry v. State of Florida ex re. The Florida Bar, 373 U.S. 379, 83 S. Ct. 1322, 10 L.Ed. 2d
428 (1963). Where proceeding is administrative in nature, non-lawyers are authorized to
provide representation.
Warnock v. Pecos County, 88 F.3d 341 (5th Cir. 07/08/1996), Ex parte Young, 209 U.S.
123, 155-56, 52 L. Ed. 714, 28 S. Ct. 441 (1908); Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 664, 39
L. Ed. 2d 662, 94 S. Ct. 1347 (1974); Brennan v. Stewart, 834 F.2d 1248, 1252 (5th Cir.
1988). The Eleventh Amendment does not protect state officials from claims for prospective
relief when it is alleged that state officials acted in violation of federal law.
Howlett v. Rose, 496 U.S. 356 (1990). Federal Law and Supreme Court Cases apply to State
Court Cases.
Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622 (1980), was a case decided by the United States
Supreme Court, in which the court held that a municipality has no immunity from liability
under Section 1983 flowing from its constitutional violations and may not assert the good
faith of its officers as a defense to such liability.
Meyer v. Nebraska 262 U.S. 390, 399, 401 (1923). This fundamental right includes a
fundamental constitutionally protected liberty interest in ongoing “companionship and
society” with the child, and this includes protection of the relationship between the parent
and child even if the child is in state custody.