Of For: New Proof Giorgi's Theorem Concerning The Problem Elliptic Differential Equations
Of For: New Proof Giorgi's Theorem Concerning The Problem Elliptic Differential Equations
Of For: New Proof Giorgi's Theorem Concerning The Problem Elliptic Differential Equations
-
for all real PI, ' -,f i n , El, * * ., t,, ;Z being a positive constant. This problem
has been solved under various differentiability assumptions on u, mainly by
E. Hopf [l, 21. From the point of view of direct methods of calculus of
variations it is desirable to require only that 24 has Lebesque measurable first
derivatives for which
In a recent paper [4] de Giorgi succeeded for the first time to establish the
analytic character of the extremal under the assumption (2). Previously such
a result had been obtained for n = 2 by Morrey [3], but his proof could not
be generalized to higher dimensions. Simultaneously with [4] J. Nash [5]
solved the corresponding problem for parabolic equations by a completely
different approach.
The essential theorem in [4] concerns the Holder continuity of weak
solutions of linear elliptic differential equations which will be formulated
below. In this note we want to give a new derivation of this result. The
key lies in two theorems which are proven in Section 4. It was our aim to
derive these two theorems from a simple general principle which consists in
estimating the square integrals of convex functions f ( u ) of a solution %.
Theorem 1 will be obtained by such estimates applied to the powers f(u)
= Iujp, p 2 1, and for Theorem 2 it suffices to take log+ u-l. In Section 5
457
458 J. MOSER
TI
i.e.,
(4) s, (4zt auzvx =0
(7)
and which are of compact support.
9 3. It is well known that the weak solutions v = u of (4) satisfy an
inequality
(17’)
0 < yv IyL1
which implies
KV
YY IYo *
v4w
Since the left-hand side tends to the essential maximum of zP, Theorem 1 is
established.
The following theorem represents a Harnack type inequality which
refers to non-negative solutions u. The assumption that .u is not identically 0
is expressed by the requirement that the set in 1x1 < r, where u > 1, has at
least the measiire c;’rn with an appropriate constant c,, > 0:
(19) m{u > I : 1x1 < Y ) > c,‘r’”.
THEOREM 2. Let u 2 0 be a solution of (4) in 1x1 < 2r satisfying ( 1 9 ) .
T h e n there is a constant c > 0 dePending on n and 1 only such that
r
~ ( z>)c-1 in 1x1 < --.
2
Proof:3 Using a procedure similar to that by which we derived inequality
(8) for all ZI = f ( u ) ,when f 2 0 is a convex function, we now derive
(20)
or with y = q2, where r] again is a function of compact support in 1x1 < 2r,
we find
J-(9Vz)2d” 5 AJqZ(v,, av,)dx 5 %AJI(??,> a??vz)ldx
5 212 (jq:dx)” (1 (qvz)Zdx)%,
and with a new c
1 s
(r]vz)2dx5 c q:dx.
Choosing for q a function which is piecewise linear in 1x1 and equal to 1 in
1x1 < Y , one obtains (20).
We apply (20) t o
v = f ( u ) = Max {--log ( u + E ) , O), O<E<l.
Then
h = Max (-(~c+E), -1)
is obviously convex and v is defined because u > 0. Since by (19) v = 0
on a set of measure > c g l i n , Lemma 2 with K = 1 and ( 2 0 ) yields
Y-” jlZl
< r v2dx 5 ~ r 1,~
xl<r
- ~< c3.
v:dx
on p *: Let
o ( p ) = Max u(z)-Min a(%),
1x1 <P 1x1< P
o ($) 5 M ( 2 - c - - l ) = o(p)(1-(2c)-l)
where cc = -*log (1- (2c)-I) = c.;' For every r 5 6 one can find an in-
teger fit 2 0 such that p = 4mr lies in
which gives
if 1x1 < 6 lies in 52'. Now let Q" consist of those points x in 0 for which the
sphere of radius 26 about x lies in Q. Then the sphere of radius 6 about x
lies in SZ' and we have for any two points x,y in a''
Izl(x)-zl(y)I 5 o(/z-y/) 5 C d - ( n / 2 ) - " I X - y / @
if lx--yl 5 6. On the other hand if Ix-yl > 6, one has trivially
5
6. PROOF OF LEMMA 2. Although the methods in the following proof
are not new, we add it for the sake of completeness. A recent proof of
Sobolev's inequalities can be found in lecture notes of L. Nirenberg (held at
Pisa 1958) which were not available to the author.
Proof: Let 1x1 < p and y range over any subset N of 1x1 < p with a
measure m ( N )> colp". Introducing polar coordinates for y with the center
x we define (y-x( = r ; y = x + r t , where 151 = 1. The proof is based on
the mean value theorem and the use of the Holder inequality:
or
u p f b p I( a + b ) ~5 2"-1(up+bP)
for u 1 0, b 2 0, which follows immediately by comparing l+xp and
( l + x ) p for x 2 0. Holder's inequality yields
so that
Bibliography
[l] Hopf, E., Zum ana1ytische)z Charakter der Losungen reguliirer zweidimensionaler Vartalions-
probleme, Math. Z., Vol, 30, 1929, pp. 404-413.
[?: Hopf, E., obey dett funktionalen, insbesondere den analytisrhen Chavakfer der Losi4nge)i
elliptischer Differentialgleichungen zweiter Ordnung, Math. Z . , \'d. 34, 1932, pp.
194-233.
468 J . MOSER
[3] Morrey. C. R . , On the solutions of quasilinear elliptic partial differential equations, Trans.
.-\mer. Math. SOC., Vol. 43, 1938, pp. 12G166.
[4] De Giorgi, E., Sztlla differeniiabilita e l'analiticita delle esfvcnzali degli integrali multipli
regolari, Mem. Accad. Sci. Torino. C1. Sci. Fis. Mat. Nat., Ser. 3, Vol. 3, 1957,
pp. 25-43.
[5] Nash, J., Continuity of solutions of parabolic and elliptic equations, Amer. J . Math., Vol. 80,
1958, pp. 931-953.
[GI Bers, L.. and Nirenberg, L., On linear and non-linear elliptic boundary value pvoblems in the
plane, Xtti Convegno Intern. Equaz. Deriv. Parziali, Trieste, 1954, pp. 141-167.
[7] Stampacchia, G., Contributi alla regolarizzazione delle soluzionc dei probleini a1 contorno per
equazioni del second0 ordine ellitticlze, Ann. Scuola Norm. Super. Pisa, 5'01. 12, 1958,
pp. 223-2.15.
[8] Sobolev, S., S z t v un thPovdme d'analyse fonctionnelle. Mat. Sbornik, Vol. 4, 1938, pp. 471-496.
[9] Xorrey, C. n., Second order elltptic equations in several variables and Holder continuity,
Math. Z., Vol. 72, 1959, pp. 146-164; also Univ. of California, Dept. of Math.,
Tech. Rep., 1959.
[I01 Stampacchia, G., Problemi al contorno ellittici con dati disrontinui dotati di solztzioni
Holderiane, Universita di Genova. Feb., 1960.
[ l I ] Nirenberg, L., O n elliptic partial diffevential equations, Ann. Scuola Norm. Super. l'isa,
Ser. 3, Vol. 13, 1959, pp. 1-48.