3 Gonzales Vs Laurel
3 Gonzales Vs Laurel
3 Gonzales Vs Laurel
ROMUALDEZ, J.:
library
In connection with the evidence, our attention was
called to an irreconcilable conflict between the
transcript of an answer of the witness Primitivo L.
Gonzalez, presented by the appellant as "Annex 1" to
his motion filed in this court (fol. 16 of the Rollo), and
the official transcript, in that while said answer is "
Yes, sir," according to the transcript of the appellant,
it is " Certainly, that is not true," according to the
official transcript of the stenographic notes attached
to the record. But it is to be noted that at the
continuation of the hearing held on a subsequent
date, in which said witness Primitivo L. Gonzalez was
examined on this contradiction, he said in the course
of the rebuttal evidence of the applicant: " No, sir. I did
not answer in that way. I did not take her hand to make
her sign. I did not by any means answer that question
to that effect. I very well remember that fact, because
it affects much the probate of the will." (Fols. 56 and
57 of transcript and documentary evidence.) chanrobles virtual law library