MBA - Edinburgh University Notes
MBA - Edinburgh University Notes
MBA - Edinburgh University Notes
Resource
Development
Dr. Stephen Gibb
The courses are updated on a regular basis to take account of errors, omissions and recent
developments. If you'd like to suggest a change to this course, please contact
us: comments@ebs.hw.ac.uk.
Human Resource Development
Dr. Stephen Gibb PhD
Stephen Gibb is a visiting fellow at Edinburgh Business School. He has degrees in Human Communication
and Human Resource Management from Sheffield Hallam University, and obtained his PhD at Strathclyde
Business School. He has lectured in HRM and Learning and Development since moving from the UK civil
service some 15 years ago. He is the author of a popular UK textbook on Learning and Development and
has published many articles in the field, with special interests in the development of coaching and
mentoring systems. He is a Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development.
First Published in Great Britain in 2006.
© Stephen Gibb 2006
The rights of Dr. Stephen Gibb to be identified as Author of this Work has been asserted in accordance
with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved; no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise
without the prior written permission of the Publishers. This book may not be lent, resold, hired out or
otherwise disposed of by way of trade in any form of binding or cover other than that in which it is
published, without the prior consent of the Publishers.
Contents
Course x
Rationale
Module 1 Introduction to Human Resource Development 1/1
Index I/1
relevant and engaging. Only by testing ideas and approaches that challenge their
prior knowledge and experience, and applying these to a new situation, can learners
‘construct’ sound new knowledge.
Hands-on activities and observations of a real organisational world provide the
best source of experiences to facilitate such constructions. In lieu of that, this course
is styled to combine coverage of processes, practices and perspectives that draw on
both the practicalities and the more academic analysis of HRD at work. Models,
concepts, text references and illustrations are available as resources, but learners
should always treat these as the results of others’ observations and speculations, not
as authoritative conclusions. Such references are actually the ‘constructions’ by
others of the current understanding of the world around us, and are open to
challenge and change.
The aim of adopting such an approach is to avoid the pitfalls of providing an
introduction to managing HRD at work that is either too practically oriented and
prescriptive, or insufficiently set in the wider context of performance and organisa-
tional management. The result is a course for students that both introduces the core
elements of the HRD processes at work and analyses these in the context of
contemporary practices and perspectives. My goal was to bring together these
aspects of HRD at work. In the spirit of constructivism, I have not tried to provide
the last word on HRD at work; instead I have tried to provide a course that will
energise you and provide you with some practical ideas and frameworks to help
address the kinds of HRD problems found in most organisations.
Learning Objectives
By the end of this module you will be able to:
define the key concepts associated with HRD in work organisations;
describe a model of the core process of HRD;
identify and analyse five major practices associated with HRD in modern work
and organisations;
evaluate the connections between the HRD process and the contemporary
performance management concerns of organisations.
Work-related learning
Management and
Vocational On-job and
professional
education off-job training
development
Observe
Review Plan
Act
Exercise 1.1
What might cause problems with the smooth management of this HRD process?
Think of a few issues.
HRD is the part of people management that deals with the process of facilitating,
guiding and coordinating work-related learning and development to ensure that
individuals, teams and organisations can perform as desired. A young new recruit to
a manufacturing company and an older, senior manager assuming a new leadership
role in a large multinational bank have different learning needs, which present
distinctive challenges. Nevertheless the HRD process involved will have some
common, core features. Coming to know core parts of the HRD process, and being
able to deal with them effectively, is a significant part of HRM in work organisa-
tions. And the nature of organisational learning needs will be distinctive, varying
with the strategy, structure and culture of the organisation. The ability to analyse
these is also a significant part of general HRM.
capabilities and desired behaviours. Definitions of these are given in Box 1.1
below.
Box 1.1: Basic definitions ____________________________________
Conceptualising the various elements involved in performing work roles that
can be learned and developed.
Cognitive capacities: the foundations of intelligence, conceptualised as the
processing and possession of information in the brain and higher-order neuro-
logical abilities
Capabilities: the practical abilities involved in work roles, either inherent in
the person or developed through practice
Desired behaviours: from motivation to ‘social skills’, enabling social interac-
tion, mediated by the affective; can be conceptualised variously as attitudes,
values or ‘emotional intelligence’ (EI)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
These three elements of performance are needed in every work role, from the
simplest of roles to the most complex and demanding: from cleaning operatives to
brain surgeons. They are required in every organisation, from the most basic, small
organisation to the most complex and technologically sophisticated multinational
firm. We shall explore these three aspects of HRD more fully in subsequent
modules on the HRD process, as they feature in understanding how to identify
HRD needs, plan HRD experiences, and deliver and evaluate HRD. At this stage
some preliminary discussion to elaborate upon these elements and their role in
HRD is appropriate.
Modular Unidimensional
Halpern’s cognitive capacities (2002): Anderson and Krathwohl (2001)
degrees of complexity
Modular Unidimensional
Deductive reasoning and argument Apply
Analysis Analyse
Thinking as hypothesis testing Evaluate
Likelihood and uncertainty Create
Decision-making
Problem-solving
Creative thinking
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Exercise 1.2
Consider the matrix below, with jobs listed alongside increasing levels of
thinking skills complexity. For each job indicate the extent to which the different
kinds of thinking skill are either ‘not required’, ‘present’ or ‘critical’.
Personal
secretary
Work team
leader
Astronaut
Nurse
Finance
director
Fast food
server
But the concepts of both knowledge and understanding are themselves complex
and multifaceted, and the way they are obtained is also complex. Knowledge and
understanding may be ‘know what’ or ‘know how’. Knowledge and understanding
may be manifested in simple forms, such as making sense of a message, or they may
require the use of analytical and higher-order neurological abilities, demonstrated in
activities such as problem-solving, decision-making and creativity. Developing and
enhancing knowledge and understanding cannot always precede individual and
organisational performance. Knowledge and understanding may be gained from
experience. It is a cliché that any new entrant to a work role is told ‘Forget what
they told you in college/training; we’ll show you how the work actually gets done.’
But it is a cliché because it happens. We shall revisit this split between formal learning
and the nature of actual performance in later modules, as it represents a real
challenge for the HRD professional.
Effective performance can also involve having and using tacit knowledge and
understanding. These represent ‘knowing how’ without being able to articulate that
for yourself or others. You can do something very well, but you do not know
consciously how you go about achieving that level of performance; you just do it.
From neurological study of the brain to continuing analysis of the nature of the
mind and knowledge, the nature and modelling of cognitive capacities, and how to
enhance them, continue to exercise and animate HRD both in theory and in
practice.
1.4 Capabilities
To perform to the standards expected in employment, individuals and organisations
require more than certain levels of knowledge and understanding; they require
capabilities. A person may have a high IQ, and a fully functioning brain, but still
not be able to do what the work entails. Capabilities are the practical skills or
competence that people and organisations need to achieve the required perfor-
mance.
In the past, governments have conducted skills surveys, and have produced in-
formation on skills shortages and skill gaps. But the terminology is evolving, with
workforce development, lifelong learning and other terms replacing the notion of
skills.
Capabilities are the practical abilities involved in a work role. They are either
inherent in the person or developed through practice. They may be considered at
three levels, outlined in more detail in a later module: underpinning capabilities,
intermediate capabilities, and overarching capabilities. Examples of underpinning
capabilities would be literacy and honesty. Examples of intermediate capabilities
would be communication and motivation. Examples of overarching capabilities
would be teamworking and customer orientation.
Here we prefer to use the concept of capability rather than the concepts of non-
cognitive skill or competence. The main reason for this is that these other concepts
have unhelpful associations. With non cognitive-skill, or simply skill, one associa-
tion is that to be skilled is to be able to do something basic, to an adequate or good
standard. A skill is then a discrete and simple building block of performance, which
exists or is absent. But to be skilled can also mean to be an expert. Skill is then a
complex of many things, associated with expertise and a comprehensive and
authoritative level of ability. This dual sense of ‘skill’ can be misleading (is a skills
shortage a shortage of simple building blocks, or a shortage of expertise?), when the
real issue is often a lower level of concern.
Also, skill was often referred to as expertise in tangible, physical and observable
actions: being highly skilled was associated with being an expert in complex physical
activities. A craftsman who wielded tools was skilled; a dancer who could complete
complex steps was skilled. Nowadays, in economies dominated by knowledge- and
service-based industries, much performance at work depends on less tangible skills
such as information-handling and interpersonal relations. To classify these as being
skills is legitimate for some uses but questionable for others.
This is why the concept of competence has become widely used as an alterna-
tive to skills, and many organisations have created sets of competence descriptions
for their workforces. Competence in this sense was defined as comprising the key
attributes desired and expected of superior performers. It involved setting out a list
of core qualities and standards by which all staff in an organisation might be
evaluated or appraised, equally and consistently. Many questions have been raised
about the validity of the concept of competence. We consider competence as a
foundation for an HRD strategy in a later module. Rather than enter that controver-
sy here, we prefer to use the term ‘capability’.
Exercise 1.3
Think again of the occupations in the matrix below. Where do they sit on the
capabilities continuum – that is, from needing only the possession of underpin-
ning capabilities to requiring advanced and overarching practical abilities
acquired through extensive practice?
Capabilities continuum
Personal
secretary
Work team
leader
Astronaut
Nurse
Finance
director
Fast food
server
Exercise 1.4
Refer again to the work roles you identified above as being at the opposite ends
of the cognitive and capabilities continua. How might the performance of people
in these roles be influenced by the affective side, and how would that affect
performance in a social context?
Personal
secretary
Work team
leader
Astronaut
Nurse
Finance
director
Fast food
server
The concept of performance has been used several times in this module already.
HRD has to be set in the wider context of performance management, which,
according to one view, refers to the means of getting better results from the
organisation, teams and individuals by understanding and managing performance
the actual state of HRD, and about its potential to realise the hopes and aspirations
of individuals and organisations. To convince individuals and organisations to
commit themselves to HRD, we need advocates who can give a balanced and
professional view – who can reflect critically on HRD, using what the human
sciences have to offer; on the problems of HRD strategies in organisations; on how
National Vocational Education and Training (NVET) policy is made; on the
potential of e-learning; and on how to connect HRD with the theory and practice of
knowledge management.
Coaching/mentoring 59.4%
Formal education 49.6%
Conferences 43.4%
Non-electronic open 34.7%
learning
CD-ROM 28.9%
Video 26.1%
Intranet 23.7%
Other computer 22.7%
Action learning 14.7%
Internet 16.5%
Audio-based 8.4%
Extranets 7.4%
If we look at HRD service delivery in the shape of the techniques used in organ-
isations (see Table 1.2), the typical approach is to use internal and external off-the-
job training. For example, Table 1.3 shows that HRD at work is dominated by the
delivery of short courses, typically of 1–3 days’ duration. When organisations use
external, off-the-job HRD interventions, these are also usually 1–3 day courses (see
Table 1.4). These are the basic and most frequently used means of delivery.
This overview of survey data shows that HRD at work in organisations typically
involves five major kinds of practice for facilitating, guiding and coordinating
learning. Their management is the key to developing effective performers in work
and organisations. They are:
1. on-the-job learning experiences at the workplace;
2. organisation-based short training courses;
3. external short courses or learning events;
4. e-learning – either computer-based or in a ‘learning centre’;
5. ‘learning partnerships’, such as coaching or mentoring.
Table 1.4 Training approaches used regularly for external training (%)
Up to 3-day courses 82
Up to 1-day courses 79
Day release 69
Residential training 63
Evening classes 55
Distance/open learning 42
Computer-based learning 24
Outdoor training 24
Coaching/mentoring 12
Video-based learning 9
Learning resource centres 6
Action learning sets 7
Read the cameos of good and bad experiences in Boxes 1.4 and 1.5. Think
about the kinds of issues raised, and then list examples from your own experi-
ence of each method, and what makes the good effective and the bad ineffective,
in the table below.
For John an in-organisation course was poor. The materials used were out of
date, and there was only one facilitator delivering the course with a limited
style. The pre-course objectives were unclear, and there was not a mix of
thinking and doing on the course. There was no time for delegates on the
course to mix, and the facilities were cramped and uncomfortable. There was
limited connection to his work role, and no follow-up after the workshops.
For Jim an ineffective course was one with a senior manager delivering a course
on a specific topic relevant to his job as a senior civil servant: ‘drafting for
ministers’. The course had been promised for a number of years, but was
delayed time and again. This constant delay meant that training on the topic
became a source of ridicule, which was vented against the senior manager, who
eventually did come to deliver the course. His behaviour further annoyed the
trainees: he was late for the course at the start, was ill prepared, allowed
himself to be interrupted by phone calls during the course, and delivered
confusing information. He constantly ‘lost the thread’, resulting in attendees
feeling they had learned nothing. The delayed course had been worse than no
course at all.
For Lorraine an ineffective learning experience was attending a one-day course
(in house) on basic employment law, delivered by an employment lawyer. The
course content was devised in house, but was aimed at managers with no HR
background, so as an experienced HR person she found the course to be of
little use.
For Mike an ineffective experience was when his company got a new computer
system. A course was given on using this. A lot of information was rushed or
missed, as the trainer felt the trainees ought to know it anyway. The trainer was
unfamiliar with the materials, and jumped about from subject to subject. The
trainees felt they could not ask questions as there was no time, and because
they were afraid of looking stupid. It left them with no confidence at all about
using the system, and having no faith in the trainer.
For Simon ineffective learning was in the use of the front-of-house computer
system. This was learned on the job, with reference to a training manual. He
learned how to do each task, but often not until he had made a mistake, and he
then had to phone a very expensive help-line to fix it. A few hours with some-
one trained in the system would have helped him to learn the basics.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
1.10 Conclusion
Few taking this course are likely to question the conclusion that HRD is an integral
part of effective business and management. The good news is that most practition-
ers – though not all – equate investment in HRD with effective and improved
individual and organisational performance. Like HRM generally, HRD is always
being called upon to demonstrate its relevance to the business drivers and to
financial criteria, especially among strategists and the guardians of organisational
finances. The evidence on these issues is still being debated. Underlying these
concerns is the belief that, although HRD is a necessary condition for success, it is
not a sufficient condition for effective performance or success. Let’s look at an
example of this problem.
Box 1.6: A company with good HRD can fail __________________
Motorola, the USA-based major multinational manufacturer of, among other
things, mobile phones, established a large plant in a town in a European country.
This town was in an area recovering from the decline of traditional manufactur-
ing industries. The plant was employing around 3000 people manufacturing
mobile phones. Local people thought this was an industry of the future, part of a
new high-technology knowledge economy. Consistent with its reputation as a
leading innovator and employer of excellence, Motorola invested heavily in
training and development, with some of the best systems, facilities and training
professionals in the country. The plant was very successful, and consistently
more productive than other European plants. Yet when economic troubles hit
the electronics and telecom sectors in 2001 the company had to review its
operations. It accepted that the plant in this town was efficient, with a loyal and
skilled workforce. But it elected to close it in favour of retaining European
production at another plant in a different country. Although the plant had a
model skilled workforce, other factors entered the equation, and the net result
was total closure. This large, single job loss was just like those the town had
experienced with the loss of the old manufacturing industries.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The argument that is encountered time and again is that HRD at work has to be
embedded in the performance management systems of an organisation, and where
this is the case, it seems to pay off. HRD is an integral part of dealing with strategic
threats and opportunities by building on internal strengths and overcoming weak-
nesses. Linking HRD to the key strategic drivers of organisation can deliver the
promised returns of HRD at work, and those who can manage HRD are to be
valued and play a major role in success.
Exercise 1.6
Consider again the effective and ineffective profiles of methods you completed.
What do these examples suggest about the management of the HRD process:
that is, about assessing needs, planning events, professional delivery, and
effective evaluation?
Review Questions
Multiple-Choice Questions
References
Anderson, L.W., Krathwohl, D.R. (eds) (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing:
A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.
Halpern, D.F. (2002) Thinking Critically about Thinking Critically, 4th edn. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.