POSIVA 97 56e - Working Report - Web PDF
POSIVA 97 56e - Working Report - Web PDF
POSIVA 97 56e - Working Report - Web PDF
Arne Lislerud
Tamrock Corporation
Pauli Vainionpaa
December 1997
POSI.VA OY ·
Mikonkatu 15 A, FIN-00100 HELSINKI , FINLAND
Te l. +358-9-2280 30
Fa x +358-9 - 2280 3719
Working report 97-56e
Arne Lislerud
Tamrock Corporation
Pauli Vainionpaa
December 1997
~£mm©~~
~-
RAISE BORERS
December 9, 1997
Client: Posiva Oy
Mikonkatu 15 A
00100 HELSINKI
Authors:
~~ /./s/.7},
Arne Lislerud
9~
Pauli Vainonpaa
Working reports contain information on work in progress
or pending completion .
ABSTRACT
One part of the development of the basic KBS-3 concept and other alternative disposal
concepts for spent nuclear fuel has been the development; evaluation of the suitability of
different excavation techniques such as raiseboring. Raiseboring has been used to
excavate shafts since the 1970's and has proved to be an effective mechanical
excavation method to excavate holes with circular shape in hard rock with little
excavation disturbance to the surrounding rock. Raiseboring has also been used to
excavate horizontal tunnels in hard rock. Similar tunnels but of different size and
different underground environment have been proposed for use in the KBS-3 concept
instead of the Drill and Blast or the tunnel boring (TBM) to excavate the deposition
tunnels and in the MLH concept to excavate the long horizontal deposition holes.
This report presents the principles of horizontal raiseboring, case studies, a proposed
method for boring horizontal deposition tunnels in KBS-3 concept and deposition holes
in MLH concepts. The equipment is designed by TRB - Raise Borers Ltd. Finally
performance prognosis for the proposed method based on the described equipment is
given for the different main rock types at the three different candidate sites selected for
more detailed site investigations in 1992.
TIIVISTELMA
ABSTRACT
TIIVISTELMA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 INTRODUCTION TO RAISEBORING 4
2.1 THE MAIN STEPS IN RAISEBORING OPERATION 4
6 PERFORMANCE PROGNOSIS 35
8 REFERENCES 39
1
1 INTRODUCTION
Plans for the final disposal of spent nuclear fuel in Finnish crystalline
bedrock were comprehensively reported in 1992. The technical plans are
presented in report YJT -92-31E (TVO 1992a); the results of preliminary
investigations at five candidate sites are contained in report YJT -92-32E
(TVO 1992b). In parallel with the development and assessment of the basic
concept, the suitability of alternative concepts for the disposal of spent fuel
in the Finnish bedrock were studied in 1989 - 1991. A more comprehensive
evaluation of alternative canister and repository designs was carried out in
SKB's PASS project between 1991 and 1992 (SKB 1992). Since 1993, the
focus of research and development on encapsulation and disposal
technologies has been on further development of the KBS-3 repository
designs, see Figure 1-1. The interim reports on encapsulation, disposal
technologies and repository designs for the basic KBS-3 concept are
presented in (Posiva 1996) and (Riekkola & Salo 1996).
Figure 1-1. KBS-3 type Basic Concept for the final repository for spent fuel
(TVO 1992a).
2
Bentonite
Canister
One part of the development of the basic KBS-3 concept and other
alternative disposal concepts has been the development and evaluation of
the suitability of different excavation techniques such as raiseboring for the
excavation of the repository. Raiseboring has been used since the 1970's to
excavate shafts and has proved to be an effective mechanical excavation
method to excavate holes with circular shape in hard rock with little
excavation disturbance to the surrounding rock. A new technique based on
raiseboring type rotary crushing and removal of cuttings by vacuum flushing
was developed and demonstrated (Autio & Kirkkomaki 1996) for the boring
of deposition holes. Raiseboring is also a potential technique for the
excavation of shafts other than the investigation shaft down to the
repository. Raiseboring has also been used to excavate horizontal tunnels in
hard rock. Similar tunnels but of different size and different underground
environment have been proposed for use in the KBS-3 concept instead of
Drill and Blast or tunnel boring (TBM) to excavate the deposition tunnels,
see Figure 1-2, and in the MLH concept, see Figure 1-3, to excavate the long
horizontal deposition holes. The Finnish design variation for the VLH-
concept (Autio 1992) was also based on the use raiseboring.
3
/ Deposition Tunnel
I '
Central
Side funnel
Canister
2 INTRODUCTION TO RAISEBORING
Raiseboring is a well established full face excavating method. In full face
methods the whole cross section of the hole is bored to the final diameter
with no use of explosives.
Site preparation:
- The pilot bit is connected to the starter sub (see Chapter 3 for details)
with a check-valve and the sub is connected to the first stabilizer.
- Connect flushing hoses.
In pilot hole drilling, flushing medium is used to bring the cuttings up from
the hole. The alternatives for flushing are the use of compressed air, water, a
mixture of air and water, or mud.
- When the pilot bit breaks through, the pilot bit and some stabilizers from
the drill string are removed.
- The rock face at the break-through point should be as close to 90 degrees
as possible. In most cases the rock face has to be trimmed straight and
made perpendicular to the pilot hole.
- The reamer head is attached to the drill string and the thread connection
between the stem and the stabilizer is made up with the correct torque.
Reaming:
Reaming is started with a low rotation speed and low reamer force until the
collaring is completed. When the machine is rotating the cutterhead and
pulling it against the face; the rock is broken by tungsten carbide inserts on
freely rotating cutters mounted on the reamer head. Most of the premature
cutter and stem failures are caused by poor collaring, i.e. too high feed force
and rotation speed have been utilized in this stage.
When the reamer head is boring with the whole diameter, net advance rates
can be brought to normal levels, i.e. 0.5 to 2.0 meters per hour depending on
diameter and rock mass conditions.
6
- With modern machines, the reaming is carried out all the way to the
machine. If the head has to be lowered, it may mean an additional week's
work.
- The reamer head is fastened with a chain to a beam placed above the raise
and the thread connection of the stem is opened.
- Machine and base plate are dismounted and transported to the next hole.
- The possible uncut edge (for inclined holes) is sliced away and the
reamer head can be lifted away from the top of the raise.
7
Two unlined near-horizontal tunnels for a combined small hydro power plant
and fresh water supply for local fish farmers at Vinje0ra were raisebored by
Astrup H0yer A/S from October 1986 to May 1987.
1:20
Figure 3-1. The power plant tunnels are shown on the sketch above.
8
Operational Data
Rock Type
Quartz 28%
Plagioclase 31%
Orthoclase 37%
Amphibole 0.5%
Calcite 1.0%
Mica 1.5%
Chlorite 1.0%
9
The pilot hole for the first tunnel was drilled from mid October till the
beginning of December. The pilot hole drilling was delayed due to two
wrecked pilot bits and remaining metal fragments from the bits on the hole-
bottom. The last wreckage occurred only 15 m from break-through. During
the 7 remaining work days before the Christmas Holidays, 145 meters of
tunnel were reamed. The next tunnel section of 315 m was reamed in 10
days after which the cutters were changed from within the tunnel. The
remaining 225 m were reamed in 5 days.
Pilot hole deviation was monitored in stages using a gyro for the first 200 m.
After this, a compressed air system was used for measuring bit altitude. Bit
feed force and rotary speed settings for the following pilot hole section were
determined by the bit altitude deviation. The vertical deviation of the pilot
hole was crucial (water levels), and on break-through totaled 0.60 m for
Tunnel I. The horizontal deviation was pronounced; but of no significance
to the power plant design. It totaled 25 m.
4.5
4.0
-
..c
......
E 3.5
-
a.
0 3.0
a:
s:::::
0 2.5
:;:::;
-cu
loo.
Cl,)
s:::::
2.0
--
Cl,)
a. 1.5
0
Cl,)
cu 1.0
a:
0.5
0.0
0 (X) I"-- lO C\1 0 (X) I"-- <0 ..q- C') .,- 0 0) I"-- <0 lO C') C\1 .,-
C\1 lO (X) .,- ..q- <0 0) C\1 lO (X) .,- ..q- <0 0) C\1 lO CO .,- ..q-
.,- .,- .,- .,- C\1 C\1 C\1 C') C') C') C') ..q- ..q- ..q- lO lO
Reaming - Tunnel 11
4.5
4.0
-
..c
......
E 3.5
-
a.
0 3.0
a:
s:::::
0 2.5
:;:::;
cu
loo.
(i) 2.0
s:::::
Cl,)
-
a. 1.5
-0
Cl,)
cu 1.0
a:
0.5
0.0
0 CO I"-- <0 lO ..q- C\1 .,- 0) I"-- <0 lO C') C\1 .,- CO <0 ..q- C\1
C') lO CO .,- ..q- I"-- 0 C') lO CO .,- ..q- I"-- 0 C') lO (X) .,- ..q-
.,- .,- .,- C\1 C\1 C\1 C\1 C') C') C') ..q- ..q- ..q- ..q- lO lO
Figure 3-3. The overall performance of the pilot hole drilling and reaming
of Tunnel//.
11
Table 3-3. Net penetration rates for the reaming of Tunnel I and at Rod
#310.
After manufacturing the first Rhino 1000 E; this machine was tested by
making a 62 meter long horizontal tunnel of diameter 2134 mm. The tunnel
was bored in Tamrock Test Mine in 1973. For this prototype machine
Tamrock also manufactured the first Tamrock 10" drill string. The reamer
head was manufactured by Tamrock for Smith cutters. The head was
specially designed for horizontal boring. There were special wings welded on
the reamer to lead the cuttings behind the head. Four cutters were placed as
rollers supporting the head against the tunnel wall. A special block was
attached behind the reamer for the scraper system used to bring the cuttings
out of the tunnel. The machine with the original drill string is still in
operation.
Table 3-5. Drilling data from the horizontal hole in the Tamrock Test
Mine. (Pilot drilling)
4. In-Hole Tools
Bit- Make and Type Dresser
Diameter 12-114 "
Bit L~fe
Stabilizers - Make and Type Tamrock, integr. six-rib
Diameter 12-"
Number and Location four, 32 m, 51 m, 61-62 m
Drill Rods- Make and Type Tamrock 6ft
Diameter 10"
Wall Thickness 1-1;4 "
Figure 3-4. Principle of reaming and the cutterhead used at Tamrock test
mine.
Graphite 37%
Chlorite 34%
Serpentine 29%
14
r - - - - K . / 0 4 ._
.5M _ _ _ _ I 0 4.0M
The technique has been used for power and communication cabling,
sewerage and water pipelines. A growing requirement is the diversion of
river courses in roadworks and hydro schemes.
Directional diamond drilling along a proposed line can be carried out using a
steerable corebarrel, the Vie Drill Head from Devico A/S, Norway. For the
critical positional surveying during this phase, a Maxibor in-hole surveying
device from Reflex Instrument AB is used. This non-magnetic device
measures the small changes in direction over each 3 m length of hole. Once
completed, the directional pilot holes are then reamed up in two or three
phases to the final diameter using a horizontal raiseboring system.
width and could be grouted as they were encountered; assisting both further
drilling and the final stability of the tunnel.
Raise boring
Once the pilot bit had broken through, a Tamrock Rhino 600 raiseboring rig
was set up to ream the hole in two passes. The first pass used a 12-1;4 "
raisebore pilot roller bit with a unique guidance section that followed the
0 56 mm directionally controlled core hole. It was run on standard 10" raise-
bore rods which were also used for the final back-reaming. For back-
reaming, a specially assembled cutterhead by Drill con was fitted to the 10 "
rods at the break-through reaming the 12114 " hole to its final 1.8 m diameter.
The finished tunnel required no further stabilization and has no final lining.
Sewage and drinking water are piped separately inside and the tunnel itself
carries storm water.
Total costs for the unlined Brerum tunnel were well under£ 1000/m. One
advantage identified, was the ability to have continuous cores taken
throughout the directionally controlled core-pilothole drilling.
17
ROMSAS, OSLO
Relative Hole RPM ROP Torque Force Bit Net Force Cutter Cutter
Rod Length Percentage on Bit Torque Penetration T1 Coeff. Constant
# (m) (m/h) (%) (kN) (kNm) (mm/rev) (kN/bit) k c
I 29 .0 40 2.20 62 183.9 16.1 0.92 194.9 0.9960 1.0402
2 30.5 46 1.25 62 145.4 16.1 0.45 246.6 1.2597 1.8718
3 32.0 46 1.85 70 222.5 18.2 0.67 290.5 0.9294 1.1352
4 33.6 45 1.80 68 222.5 17.7 0.67 291.6 0.9028 1.1057
5 35.1 45 1.95 70 222.5 18.2 0.72 276.4 0.9294 1.0936
6 36.6 46 2.90 70 214.8 18.2 1.05 207.8 0.9627 0.9392
7 38.1 45 1.50 72 145.4 18.7 0.56 215.2 1.4628 1.9626
8 39.7 46 1.60 70 161.0 18.2 0.58 231.6 1.2844 1.6869
9 41.2 50 1.95 72 145.4 18.7 0.65 193.8 1.4628 1.8144
lO 42.7 45 1.95 72 145.4 18.7 0.72 180.6 1.4628 1.7213
11 44.2 45 1.70 75 145.4 19.5 0.63 198.0 1.5238 1.9204
12 45.8 45 1.40 76 137.7 19.8 0.52 213.4 1.6305 2.2643
13 47.3 51 2.05 48 183.9 12.5 0.67 240.2 0.7711 0.9420
14 48.8 50 2.48 50 175.8 13.0 0.83 199.6 0.8402 0.9241
15 50.3 50 2.80 50 175.8 13.0 0.93 184.1 0.8402 0.8697
16 51.9 50 2.10 50 175.8 13.0 0.70 223.0 0.8402 1.0042
17 53.4 49 2.85 50 136.8 13.0 0.97 139.7 1.0797 1.0966
18 54.9 49 2.70 52 175.8 13.5 0.92 186.1 0.8738 0.9118
19 56.4 49 2.10 52 156.5 13 .5 0.71 195.9 0.9816 1.1614
20 58.0 49 2.23 52 156.5 13.5 0.76 188.2 0.9816 1.1270
21 59.5 50 2.50 52 152.7 13 .5 0.83 172.4 1.0060 1.1020
22 61.0 48 2.50 52 183.9 13.5 0.87 202.1 0.8353 0.8966
23 62.5 44 2.25 53 183.9 13 .8 0.85 204.6 0.8514 0.9222
24 64.1 34 2.35 60 214.8 15.6 1.15 195.5 0.8252 0.7688
25 65 .6 34 2.50 62 191.4 16.1 1.23 167.1 0.9569 0.8644
26 67.1 33 1.87 64 164.2 16.6 0.94 170.6 1.1514 1.1848
27 68 .6 36 0.90 60 138.0 15.6 0.42 247.4 1.2844 1.9898
28 70.2
29 71.7 37 1.25 62 145.4 16.1 0.56 213.3 1.2597 1.6787
30 73.2 37 1.52 62 176.2 16.1 0.68 226.8 1.0395 1.2562
31 74.7 33 1.45 62 153.1 16.1 0.73 188.5 1.1963 1.3980
32 76.3 34 2.00 64 176.2 16.6 0.98 178.5 1.0730 1.0837
33 77 .8
34 79.3 36 1.44 62 214.8 16.1 0.67 281.5 0.8527 1.0443
35 80.8 29 1.80 65 175.9 16.9 1.03 172.0 1.0916 1.0733
36 82.4 34 62 16.1
37 83 .9 30 1.35 64 145.4 16.6 0.75 176.2 1.3003 1.5015
38 85.4 20 1.26 75 161.0 19.5 1.05 155.8 1.3761 1.3430
39 86.9 34 1.12 68 130.2 17.7 0.55 194.2 1.5429 2.0822
40 88.5 9 1.20 53 13.8 2.22
41 90.0 9 0.80 1.48
18
---
. c 2,50
E
c..
0 2,00
n::
s:::::
0
~
1,50
.......ns
Cl)
s:::::
Cl)
c.. 1,00 ,_
.....
0
....ns
Cl)
n:: 0,50
0,00
---
.c
c..
E 3,5
4,0
... ...
0 3,0
n:: 1-- t---
~
s::::: r-
2,5
~
0
...ns r-
- ~
-
- r-
... 1 - - 1--
...
-
r-
-
'---------- -
s:::::
Cl) ...
c.. 1,5 - 1- 1-- 1-- - - I- - 1- - 1- - 1- - 1- - 1- 1-- - 1-- - I- -
.....
0
....nsCl) 1,0 - 1- - 1-- - 1- - - I- - I- - I- - 1- - 1- i- - 1-- - 1-- -
a::
0,5 - - - - - - - 1- - - - - - 1- - - - - 1- - 1-- - 1--
0,0 I T I T T T
0
m
Hole Depth (m)
Relative Hole RPM ROP Force Reamer Net Force Force Force Cutter Cutter
Rod Depth on Torque Penetr. on on Tl Coeff. Const.
Reamer Cutter Row
# (m) (m/h) (kN) (kNm) (mm/rev) (kN/c) (kN/row) (kN/row) k c
99.1 10.0 3.5 412.9 36.0 5.83 206.5 45.9 14.1 0.4194 0.1736
2 97.6 18.0 1.7 393.6 36.0 1.57 196.8 43.7 32.3 0.4399 0.3507
3 96.1 18.0 1.8 354.2 31.5 1.67 177.1 39.4 28.0 0.4278 0.3313
4 94.6 17.5 2.0 392.7 29.3 1.90 196.4 43.6 28.4 0.3589 0.2600
5 93.0 18.0 2.2 302.9 31.5 2.04 151.5 33.7 20.9 0.5002 0.3505
6 91.5 18.0 3.3 354.2 29.3 3.06 177.1 39.4 18.7 0.3979 0.2276
7 90.0 18.0 2.2 393.2 29.3 2.04 196.6 43.7 27.2 0.3584 0.2511
8 88.5 18.0 2.8 470.7 31.5 2.59 235.4 52.3 27.7 0.3219 0.1999
9 86.9 18.0 3.5 470.7 31.5 3.24 235.4 52.3 23.9 0.3219 0.1788
10 85.4 18.0 4.2 432.2 31.5 3.89 216.1 48.0 19.4 0.3506 0.1778
11 83.9 18.0 2.2 392.7 27.0 2.04 196.4 43.6 27.1 0.3307 0.2317
12 82.4 18.0 2.2 392.7 27.0 2.04 196.4 43.6 27.1 0.3307 0.2317
13 80.8 18.0 2.4 392.7 27.0 2.22 196.4 43.6 25.6 0.3307 0.2218
14 79.3 18.0 3.4 470.7 27.0 3.15 235.4 52.3 24.3 0.2759 0.1555
15 77.8 18.0 2.2 451.4 27.0 2.04 225.7 50.2 31.2 0.2877 0.2016
16 76.3 18.0 3.4 470.7 27.0 3.15 235.4 52.3 24.3 0.2759 0.1555
17 74.7 18.0 2.7 392.7 22.5 2.50 196.4 43.6 23.7 0.2756 0.1743
18 73.2 21.0 3.3 431.7 36.0 2.62 215.9 48.0 25.2 0.4011 0.2479
19 71.7 18.0 2.2 431.7 22.5 2.04 215.9 48.0 29.8 0.2507 0.1756
20 70.2 18.0 2.1 490.5 22.5 1.94 245.3 54.5 35.0 0.2206 0.1582
21 68.6 40.0 4.5 392.7 40.5 1.88 196.4 43.6 28.7 0.4961 0.3623
22 67.1 18.0 2.4 494.0 22.5 2.22 247.0 54.9 32.2 0.2191 0.1470
23 65.6 24.0 3.0 494.0 31.5 2.08 247.0 54.9 33.6 0.3067 0.2125
24 64.1 30.0 4.2 494.0 18.0 2.33 247.0 54.9 31.2 0.1753 0.1147
20
The rock surface has to be cleared and cleaned for the concrete foundation~
the base plate positioned on the concrete and bolted to the rock. Normally,
the base plate is locked against movement to the wall and in the case of
large cutterhead diameters, turnbuckles should be used to support the
machine to the wall.
All machine components are brought to the work site and prepared for
boring. The machine itself must be positioned and adjusted to the desired
alignment for the hole. A storage must be build for the drill rods including a
rod handling device.
Pilot drilling flushing pumps, hoses and water reservoir must be circuited
together for water circulation.
Pilot hole drilling is started carefully and with low penetration rates. When
the first stabilizer is drilled in, then the drilling rate can be increased to
approx. 1 meter/hour. The "rope effect" of the drill string must be
understood in order to control the horizontal pilot hole drilling orientation
successfully. The assembly at the "hole-bottom" is larger in diameter than
the rest of the drill string. The weight of the rods therefore have a tendency
to force the "hole-bottom" assembly upwards. This phenomena can be used
to steer pilot hole drilling.
When the feed pressure is increased, the bit drills upwards. If the feed
pressure is decreased due to the weight of the stabilizers, the pilot bit drills
downwards. In long holes, even in the short 62 meter hole at the Tamrock
Test Mine, stabilizers were used also along the drill string in addition to the
ones straight after the pilot bit.
22
5 MACHINES- HORIZONTAL
RAISEBORING
The basic Rhino machine design is already suitable for horizontal operation:
The recommended machine for the 1.68 meter diameter deposition holes is
the Rhino 418 H with modified mounting and transportation equipment.
3160
BORER UNIT
- WHILE BORING 3 160 1 730 3 775 11 000
- IN TRANSPORT 3 685 1730 1 515 10 000
GEARBOX 1 365 1 590 1 430 4 000
FRAME 1 200 1 730 3 685 3 300
BASE FOOT 2000 1 444 395 570
HYDRAULIC CYLINDER 1 975- 720 310 900
2 129
TURNBUCKLE (90- 54) 2 510 140 76
DRILL ROD MANIPULATOR 1 500 1 370 600 490
HYDRAULIC POWER UNIT 2000 1 370 830 1 000
top part
HYDRAULIC POWER UNIT 2000 1 370 930 2 375
lower part, 132 kW without hydraulic oil 1700
OPERATOR'S CONSOLE 900 800 1 230 120
TOOL BOX 1 000 760 870 110
with special tools 350
24
S927. 4
Table 5-4. Dimensions and Weights of the Standard Rhino 2006 DC.
BORER UNIT
- WHILE BORING 2 600 2005 3 805- 5 400 25 600
- IN TRANSPORT 3 755 1935 2050 23 000
Drill String
Drill rods, stabilizers and pilot sub are called with one name in raiseboring,
drill string.
Drill Rods
For different machine sizes there are different drill rod. The present standard
drill rod sizes are listed in the table below.
c B
- - - - - ---.----.-- .... ~
F E
Thread A B c D E F Weight
DI-22 mm mm mm mm mm mm mm kg
Stabilizers
The stabilizer diameter is the same as the pilot bit diameter and for 10" rods
280 mm or 11" bit and stabilizers are selected due to the horizontal boring.
c
8
Thread A B c D E F Weight
DI-22 mm mm mm mm mm mm mm kg
Pilot sub
The pilot sub is the connecting piece between stabilizers and the pilot bit.
The male thread is standard DI-22 and size according to the stabilizer thread
and the female thread is standard API for pilot bit.
Also a check-valve is mounted inside the pilot sub. The valve prevents the
flushing media and the cuttings from going up the stabilizers during the
periods when the flow is off.
1. Special care has to be taken to clean the boring face. The best way to
clean the face is to spray water from special nozzles on the head to the
rock face. This water is normally provided to the head through the drill
string.
29
2. The muck has to be moved from the face and from the bottom of the hole
to behind the cutterhead. If this muck removal is not effective, the gage
cutters will recut the muck in the hole invert. This muck actually acts like
solid rock when hit by a gage cutter, causing excess stresses to the
cutterhead, to the stem and to the rest of the drill string.
Normally the head is equipped with wings to push the wet muck behind
the head.
Large diameter reaming heads are often equipped with a stabilizing system,
i.e. rollers on the gage of the he'ad support ageinst the hole wall. This will
diminish the load and wear on stabilizers and it will also help to keep reamer
in alignment with pilot hole.
Muck removal
The first part of mucking is already taken care by the cutterhead, which has
jet nozzles for flushing the face and scraping wings to transport the muck
behind the head.
Inclined holes:
If there is any inclination, water flow can be used for mucking. Water
brought to the head through the drill string will flush the cuttings out
from the hole. For large diameter holes or in more shallow angles
additional water can be pumped through the annulus between the pilot
hole and the drill rods or it can be provided with a separate hose which
follows the head.
In absolutely horizontal holes, the "on the head" arrangements are same.
Flushing the rock face with spray nozzles and the wings on the head to
move the muck from the rock face to the back of the reamer.
Suction systems can be used for mucking as one alternative. Water and
the attashment wings first bring the muck behind the head. From there the
suction system takes over. The suction nozzle is formed to follow the
wall of the hole. It is attached to the head, so that it follows the head
where the scraper wings bring out the cuttings.
The suction pipe should be extendible while the head advances. Suction
pump and the settling arrangement is located outside the hole.
31
3. Screw conveyor
4. Belt conveyor
The head can also be designed in such a way that the wings do not only
push the muck behind the head, but the lift it up and dump it from the
upper position. The dumping position is the start of the belt conveyor.
The whole belt system is towed by the head. Extension belts are used as
required as the head advances.
This method is as follows; the reamer head tows a plug which seals the
hole. Down in the plug there is a hole and a hose out from the hole.
Flushing water is lead through the string and additional pressured air
added in the annulus between the pilot hole and the drill rods.
The water cleans the face, wings move the muck behind the head and
then the over-pressure drives the muck through the pipe.
6. Loader
When the hole is large enough, even a LHD can be used for mucking.
LHD 's were used in the Leister Mine.
Water or mud is the recommended flushing media for pilot hole drilling.
Air, which can be used in vertical applications, would not transport the
cuttings very well: cuttings would fall to the bottom of the hole and the air
flow through the top part of the hole.
Traditional pilot drilling of short holes (50 to 100 meters) usually results in
1 to 2% accuracy. H improved accuracy is required, it can be achieved using
the steerable core drilling device.
The work begins with site preparation. The foundation has to be built so that
both rigs, core drilling machine and raiseboring machine, can drill with
same ax1s.
The drilling procedure begins with a 56-72 mm core drilled guide hole using
a VIC DRILL Head, that can be steered and a standard core drill. The small
core guide hole can be drilled with high accuracy. Normally the deviation of
horizontal holes is less than 0.5 %even when the holes are longer than 300
meters.
When guide hole has been drilled through with core drilling, the core drill is
replaced with a raiseborer. The raiseborer drills a 0 229-327 mm pilot hole.
The pilot bit is equipped with a guide bar which follows the small guide
hole. It is recommended to have guide rods (core drilling rods) in the whole
length of the hole. This prevents the guide hole from collapsing and guide
rod failures can be detected right away (potential deviation).
The learning curve is also one way to achieve accurate holes. It can be used
when the amount of holes to be drilled is substantial. The first hole is drilled
in a professional way recording all machine parameters (included in Rhino
machines) and also recording all other events and changes during drilling.
When in the same rock the next hole is drilled using exactly the same
procedure; the hole will make exactly the same path or the hole can be
turned to hit the target by compensating the deviation by adjusting machine
parameter settings.
33
Figure 5-8. Pilot bit with the core hole guide bar.
Machines for the large diameter holes can be standard Rhino. All features
required in horizontal boring are already included in the machine.
has to fit in and operate in the hole diameter. The benefits of the round,
uniform shape can be used. Accurate and fast positioning of the machine can
be done by supporting the boring station to the round tunnel walls with
hydraulic jacks. There is no need for using bolts to attachment the unit to the
rock. This will make production faster (set up time is minimized) and also
save money when bolts and concrete are not reguired.
If the deposition holes are made to a vertical position from the tunnel, then
less modifications to the machine is required. All the equipment needed for
downwards blind boring should be built into one integrated machine. To
solve the logistic problems, this machine should be self propelled and carry
everything onboard. Transportation of the muck by the vacuum process
should be a separate unit due to the large capacity requirement.
Special considerations
6 PERFORMANCE PROGNOSIS
The performance estimates shown in Figures 6-1 and 6-2 and Tables 6-3 and
6-4 are made using the present machine models (Table 6-2) and Sandvik
reamer heads and cutters as the base for the calculations (Appendix 1). The
main rock types considered at the three investigation sites were Quartz
Diorite Gneiss, Quartz Diorite, Granodiorite and Micagneiss. The properties
of these are shown in Table 6-1.
Table 6-1. Properties of the main rock types at the three investigation
sites.
10,0
1
Rhino 41BH f
I I I
I I I Granodiorite
-
---
Quartz Diorite y = 0.0003x 1·69
..£: - y = 0.0005x 1·61
E /
c:
~J¥
0 1\
:;:; 1\
-m
'-
Q)
c:
Q)
1,0
I) 7
,_
riTT
Hf
7
7
I
-
a.
0 v"
I/
I
"
-
7
Q)
m
0::: I--
Micagneiss
//
"" ~
0,1 I
10 100 1000
Force on Reamer (tonnes)
10,0
J Rhino 2006 DC :
l I
Quartz Diorite Quartz Diorite
---
.c
E
c::
y = 9E-05x 1.64
\.
Gneiss
y = 6E-07x 2·34
0
+=a:s "\ I
-loo
1,0 r---- "\. ~ /
Cl)
c:: r----- Granodiorite ~J
//. ...
-
Cl)
0..
r-----
r----- y = 6E-05x 1.71
r----
1-t-
-• I//
~I
I
I
-0
Cl)
a:s
a:
I
I
Micagneiss
/
/
I
ij
y = 2E-05x 1·84
11
0 ,1
10 100 1000
Force on Reamer (tonnes)
One of the main limitations of the method, which also reduces its flexibility
when compared to Drill and Blast is the need for access to both ends of the
tunnel. Although the performance of the method was estimated, overall field
performance is very dependent on the efficiency of the removal system for
cuttings, which could not be estimated reliably on the basis of the presented
case studies.
39
8 REFERENCES
Autio, J., Saanio, T., Tolppanen, P., Raiko, H., Vieno, T. & Salo, J-P.
1996. Assessment of alternative disposal concepts. Report POSIV A-96-09,
Posiva Oy, Helsinki.
Riekkola, R. & Salo, J.-P. 1996. Final repository for spent nuclear fuel.
Technical research and development in the period 1993 - 1996. Work report
TEKA-96-09, Posiva Oy, Helsinki (In Finnish).
Posiva 1996. Final disposal of spent nuclear fuel in the Finnish bedrock,
Technical research and development in the period 1993- 1996. Report
POSIV A-96-14, Posiva Oy, Helsinki (In Finnish).
TVO 1992a. Final disposal of spent nuclear fuel in the Finnish bedrock.
Technical plans and safety assesment. Report YJT-92-31E. Nuclear Waste
Commission of Finnish Power Companies, Helsinki. 136 p.
TVO 1992b. Final disposal of spent nuclear fuel in the Finnish bedrock.
Preliminary site investigations. Report YJT-92-32E. Nuclear Waste
Commission of Finnish Power Companies, Helsinki. 322 p.
Appendix 1. 1I 8