Parformance - Based Comparision of UPQC Compensating Signal Generation Algorithms Under Disstorted Supply and Non Linear Load Conditions
Parformance - Based Comparision of UPQC Compensating Signal Generation Algorithms Under Disstorted Supply and Non Linear Load Conditions
Parformance - Based Comparision of UPQC Compensating Signal Generation Algorithms Under Disstorted Supply and Non Linear Load Conditions
Abstract The recent growth in the use of power electronic with these problems, the shunt active power filters (SAPF)
converters which are considered as nonlinear loads have were employed in combination with passive filters [1]-[2], but
problems of drawing non sinusoidal current and reactive power this method does not reduce the voltage harmonics at the PCC.
from source which in turn pollutes the power quality. This paper In other words, even though harmonic currents are
presents the power quality problems and methods for its
successfully compensated by SAPF, the voltage at PCC will
correction. Two control strategies (p q instantaneous power
theory and d q synchronous reference frame theory) have been not be a sinusoidal. In order to deal with current and voltage
used to extract reference currents for active power filters (APF), harmonic problems simultaneously, the most sophisticated
to solve power quality problems, have been evaluated and their mitigating device i.e. unified power quality conditioner
performances are compared under distorted supply and non- (UPQC) has been developed [2]-[3]. To ensure both the load
linear load conditions. These theories are used to implement the voltage and the supply current sinusoidal, the UPQC has a
control algorithm of a Unified Power Quality Conditioner combination of series and shunt active power filters sharing a
(UPQC) which compensates the harmonic current, harmonic common dc link. The two active power filters (APFs) have
voltage and load unbalance. This paper implements the three different functions; where the series APF is operated as a
phase shunt and series active power filters to compensate current
controlled voltage source to suppress and isolate voltage
and voltage harmonics. The evaluation of UPQC performance is
validated using MATLAB/Simulink showing the comparisons for harmonics, meanwhile shunt APF acts as a controlled current
above two algorithms, and is proved as the efficient way to source to compensate the current harmonics [3].
address power quality issues. This paper presents a comprehensive analysis of UPQC
using two (p - q and d - q theory) algorithms for derivation of
Keywords Active filters, harmonic compensation, reference signals. These reference signals are then compared
instantaneous power and synchronous reference frame theory, with sensed three phase input signals in a hysteresis controller
power quality, total harmonic distortion (THD), UPQC. for generation of switching signals. The basic configuration of
the UPQC is presented in section II. In section III, the control
I. INTRODUCTION algorithms of series and shunt active filters are presented. A
In a modern power system due to the wide use of nonlinear comparative analysis of simulation results is presented in
loads such as adjustable speed drives, electric arc welders, and section IV. Finally, section V concludes the results.
furnaces it has become necessary to establish criteria for
II. POWER CIRCUIT CONFIGURATION OF UPQC
limiting power quality problems. These problems cause
reduction in system efficiency, poor power factor,
maloperation of electronic equipments and reduction in
equipment mean life time. The nonlinear load injects the
harmonic current into the networks and consequently distorts
the voltage waveform at the point of common coupling (PCC).
This distorted voltage waveform affects other loads connected
at PCC. To avoid this problem and to protect the loads from
distortion, the harmonic components of the voltage and
current must be compensated. Conventionally, passive LC
filters were used to mitigate harmonic currents and to improve
power factor [1]. However, passive filters have many
disadvantages such as fixed compensation, large size, Fig. 1 Basic UPQC configuration
resonance problems and bulk passive components. To cope
978-1-4673-6322-8/13/$31.00 2013
c IEEE 38
Fig. 1 shows a basic system configuration of general UPQC synchronous reference frame variables (d,q,0) whose direct (d)
consisting of two voltage source inverters: one acts as a series and quadrature (q) axes rotate in space at the synchronous
APF and the other as shunt APF, which are connected back to speed given by e = 2fs , where fs is supply frequency. If is
back through dc link capacitor. The series APF which is the transformation angle, then the voltage transformation from
connected between the source and PCC using three single a-b-c to d-q-0 frame is calculated as:
phase series transformers has the capability of compensating
the voltage harmonics, voltage flicker and improving voltage
regulation [4]. A small rated capacity capacitor filter is =
(1)
connected across the secondary of each series transformers to
eliminate the high switching ripple content in the series APF
injected voltage [5]. The shunt APF has capability of
suppressing the current harmonics, compensating reactive
power, negative sequence current and regulation of the dc link
= (2)
voltage between both APFs [4]. The shunt APF is connected
through a small rated capacity inductive filter in order to
eliminate the high switching ripple content in the shunt APF
injected current. The implemented control algorithm mainly
consists of the generation of three phase reference voltages at
load terminals and the reference source currents. Control
strategies to generate the reference signals of the voltage and
current of UPQC have been developed to mitigate the
harmonic voltage and currents [2]-[7]. The most common are
the instantaneous power (p - q) theory [6], modified p - q
theory [7], and synchronous reference frame (d - q) theory [8].
The source side instantaneous real and imaginary power Fig. 4 DC link voltage control system
components can be calculated by using (4) and (5). The
instantaneous real and imaginary powers include both
oscillating and average components given by (6). Average Too much increase in proportional gain (Kp) leads to
components of p and q consist of positive sequence instability in DC voltage control system and reduction in Kp
components ( and ) of source current. The oscillating decreases the responding speed of control system. Integral
components ( and ) of p and q include harmonic and gain (KI) of controller corrects the steady state error of the DC
negative sequence components of source currents [10]. In voltage control system. If this gain value is selected large, the
order to reduce neutral current (for 3-phase , 4-wire system), resulted error in steady state is corrected faster and increase in
is calculated by using average and oscillating components
its value ends in overshoot in system response.
of imaginary power and oscillating component of the real
power; as given in (7) if both harmonic and reactive power
IV. SIMULATION RESULTS
compensation is required. The , and are the reference
currents of shunt APF in --0 coordinates. These currents are The model of UPQC under proposed control algorithm is
transformed into three phase a-b-c coordinates as given by (8). developed in MATLAB/Simulink software as shown in Fig. 5,
The reference currents are calculated in order to compensate where the performance of the UPQC is evaluated in terms of
harmonic and reactive currents in the load. These reference current and voltage harmonic mitigation under distorted load
source current signals are then compared with sensed three- current and source voltage conditions. A 3-phase diode bridge
phase source currents, and the errors are processed by rectifier with RL load acts as nonlinear load which is
connected to AC mains to demonstrate the effectiveness of the
(b)