Women in A Celtic Church PDF
Women in A Celtic Church PDF
Women in A Celtic Church PDF
3
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the Universitys objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide in
Oxford New York
Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogot Buenos Aires Cape Town
Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi
Kolkata Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi
Paris So Paulo Shanghai Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw
and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan
Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University Press
in the UK and certain other countries
Published in the United States
by Oxford University Press Inc., New York
Christina Harrington
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
Database right Oxford University Press (maker)
First published
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced,
stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means,
without the prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press,
or as expressly permitted by law, or under terms agreed with the appropriate
reprographics rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction
outside the scope of the above should be sent to the Rights Department,
Oxford University Press, at the address above
You must not circulate this book in any other binding or cover
and you must impose the same condition on any acquirer
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data
Harrington, Christina.
Women in a Celtic Church : Ireland / Christina Harrington.
p. cm.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
. Women, CelticReligious lifeIrelandHistory. . Women in
ChristianityIrelandHistory. . Celtic ChurchHistory. . Ireland
Church historyTo . I. Title.
BR.C H .''dc
ISBN ---
Typeset in Baskerville by
Jayvee, Trivandrum, India
Printed in Great Britain
on acid-free paper by
T.J. International Ltd.,
Padstow, Cornwall
Acknowledgements
Contents
Abbreviations x
, ,
Introduction
, ,
Introduction
Bibliography
Maps
Index
List of Maps
Figures
Christian religious women in the early Middle Ages have been the subject of a
steady flow of work over the past century. The first major work was Lina
Eckensteins general introduction, Women Under Monasticism: Chapters on
Saint-Lore and Convent Life between AD and AD , which put medieval female
religious life in the period onto the map for the English-speaking world.1 It was
among German scholars, though, that the subject really took off, and the two
questions which preoccupied them were the organization and importance of
the double monastery, and the meaning of the different categories of women
religious mentioned in the early medieval sources. On the latter, K. H. Schfer
concentrated in a book, defining all early medieval nuns as canonesses;
he was rebutted within two years by A. H. Heineken, who demonstrated by
contrast their great variety. In the s M. Parisse took up the problem of
canonesses and was followed in the s by Andrea Hodgson; Anglo-Saxonists
too have addressed it.2 As for the issue of the double house, Hilpisch published
his influential book on the subject which laid down the classic position in
English: this was that the double house (by which is generally meant a
monastery with both monks and nuns but headed by an abbess) was essentially
a nunnery with worker-monks to perform male-only tasks. Mary Bateson and
A. Hamilton Thompson reiterated and perpetuated this model, but it received
a devastating critique by Andrea Hodgson in the s.3
1
Cambridge, .
2
K. H. Schfer, Die Kanonissenstifter im deutchen Mittelalter: Ihre Entwicklung und innere Einrichtung im Zusam-
menhang mit dem altchristlichen Sanctimonialentum (Stuttgart, ). A. H. Heineken, Die Anfange der schsischen
Frauenklster (unpub. Phil. Diss.; Gttingen, ), , . For this part of the historiographic
overview I am indebted to Dagmar Schneiders, Anglo-Saxon Women in the Religious Life: A Study of
the Status and Position of Women in an Early Medieval Society (unpub. PhD thesis; Cambridge, ),
. M. Parisse, Les chanoinesses dans lEmpire germanique (ee sicles), Francia (), .
3
S. Hilpisch, Die Doppelklster; Entstehung und Organisation (Mnster, ). M. Bateson, Origin and
Early History of Double Monasteries, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society (), .
A. Hamilton Thompson, Double Monasteries and the Male Element in Nunneries, Appendix to
The Ministry of Women: Report Commissioned by a Committee Appointed by the Archbishop of Canterbury (London,
), , as well as his Northumbrian Monasticism, in Bede: His Life, Times and Writings (Oxford,
), , at .
4
S. Wemple, Women in Frankish Society: Marriage and the Cloister to (Philadelphia, ).
5
A. Hodgson, The Frankish Church and Women, from the Late Eighth to the Early Tenth Century:
Representation and Reality (unpub. PhD thesis; University of London, ), . For critiques of
method and of the use of evidence upon which the theory depends see, in addition to Hodgsons thesis,
J. Nelson, Women and the Word in the Earlier Middle Ages, in W. Shiels and D. Wood (eds.), Women
in the Church (Studies in Church History ; Oxford, ), .
6
K. Leyser, Rule and Conflict in an Early Medieval Society: Ottonian Saxony (London, ).
7
E. Hlawitschka, Beobachtungen und berlegungen zur Konventsstarke im Nonnenkloster
Remiremont whrend des .. Jahrhunderts, in G. Melville (ed.), Secundum regulam vivere: Festschrift fur
P. Norbert Backmund (Windberg, ), . J. Martindale, The Nun Immena, in Shiels and Wood,
Women in the Church, .
English nunneries.8 Change over time also concerns the Anglo-Saxonists: the
English Benedictine reforms of the tenth century seem to have seriously
diminished female religious life, but there is little agreement as yet as to the ex-
tent or cause of the apparent plummet. Here, too, one can see the trend towards
small-area, focused case studies in the work, say, of Stephanie Hollis.9
For regions such as Italy and Spain, only recently have early medieval reli-
gious women begun to receive attention.10 The explosion of early twentieth-
century German writing failed to prompt church scholars to look to women as
a subject, so at present the state of study is much less developed. Returning to the
Irish case, we find that it, like Italy and Spain, is a latecomer to the field. Much
can be learnt from the Frankish and Anglo-Saxon precedents, not least in the
sorts of questions that may usefully be asked of Ireland. Indeed, there must be
some comparability of queries if we shall ever be able to make informed gener-
alizations about the West as a whole, even if that conclusion is that one cannot in
fact generalize. Were there different grades or sorts of religious women? To
what extent were they creatures of their families political ambition? How often,
if ever, were they strictly enclosed? Did women under vows ever continue to
control wealth? Did powerful abbesses owe their power to royal or noble status
rather than ex officio? Did the number of female houses decline over time? Were
female houses more vulnerable to dissolution than male ones? Were double
houses anything other than nunneries with male workers attached? In this study
of Irish holy women, even where adequate answers cannot be provided, these
issues will be broached.
upon the subject of nuns, but have been treated without regard to them. Bring-
ing women religious into scholars consideration of wider ecclesiastical matters
is a logical next step. The main questions tackled in this field of scholarship
merit consideration as well.
The first of these is a traditional assumption about the Irish church, namely
that it was part of The Celtic Church, a group of national churches which
were sufficiently homogeneous in structure, liturgy, practice, and outlook to
merit being classed together as a single unit. This view was demolished in the
course of the s and s, as various historians pointed out that there were
variations among Celtic societies and their churches, and noted that regional
variation existed among churches in the West generally. Thus the standard view
at present is that in the early middle ages there was not a Celtic cultural unity,
and, further, no such thing as The Celtic Church.11 The most obvious prac-
tical implication is that evidence from other Celtic areas can no longer be
applied to Ireland, and, conversely, that conclusions about Ireland cannot be
extrapolated to the other Celtic areas, whether in ecclesiastical or other matters.
Another strand in the historiography concerns Irelands monasticism.
Ireland was one of the earliest places outside Egypt where it flourished, indeed
the Irish took their monasticism to numerous places across northern Europe in
the course of the sixth and seventh centuries. Historians of the early twentieth
century called the early Irish a monastic church, for it had no diocesan
structure and the power-brokers were abbots, not bishops as was the norm else-
where. This thesis was modified to acknowledge first that the very earliest
period of Christianity there (i.e. fourth and fifth centuries) had apparently been
diocesan, and secondly that bishops did continue to hold some spiritual powers
even after the ascendancy of monasteries and abbots in the sixth century.12
Within the general subject of Irelands monasticism there are a number of aux-
iliary topics which have commanded attention. One of these concerns change
over time, namely that monasticism, having flourished and gained strength over
the course of the sixth century, had become highly secularized, in some cases
at least, by the eighth. The trend continued, the Cli D movement notwith-
standing, through to the twelfth. Secularized in this context means that many
abbots no longer lived the monastic life; that monasteries were at times involved
in the dynastic wars of their patrons; that many churches (monastic and other-
wise) were controlled by laymen simply for gain. In this period in the case of male
houses, there was sometimes a division of abbatial tasksone abbot would
become the monastic estates manager, while another would lead the monks in
11
W. Davies, The Myth of the Celtic Church, in N. Edwards and A. Lane (eds.), The Early Church in
Wales and the West: Recent Work in Early Christian Archaeology, History and Place-names (Oxbow Monograph
Series ; Oxford, ), , with references.
12
On early diocesan structure followed by a rise in monastic power, the work of Kathleen Hughes is
important; for the continuing powers of bishops see Sharpes and Etchinghams work particularly
their interpretation of the text Riaghail Phtraic.
their religious life. The question remains to be asked: what happened in female
housesdo we ever have a female lay abbot or estates manager? Was the head
of religious life always female, or could it ever be male? With regard to dynastic
rivalries, do we ever find female houses going to war as male houses sometimes
did? And did ruling families attempt to control female establishments by differ-
ent means than they did male ones? Or were the tactics essentially the same?
Lay-controlled churches and monasteries are known across early medieval
Europe under the term proprietary church or eigenkirche. The extent and
meaning of this trend as it developed in Ireland has come under recent question,
with challenges to the idea that such establishments were products of simple
economic self-interest, were usually short-lived, and failed to provide pastoral
care to their communities.13 It remains to be explored whether any of these as-
sumptions apply to female houseswhether they were set up by men or by
women. That is to say, were female houses more likely to be proprietary? Were
they more likely to be short-lived? Did female houses ever provide pastoral care
to the community? Is there any evidence that nuns of small houses ever
controlled their own finances?
Another monastic question centres on the monastic federations (called
paruchiae by scholars of the generation of the s and s). These networks of
hegemony were formed by leading churches such as Armagh, Iona, and
Clonmacnois; scholars inquire into the means by which these were extended,
the extent and kind of obligations the tributaries owed to the head house, and
the ways the federations bolstered their wealth and prestige. Promoting a patron
saint was a political act; by doing so a monastery hoped to attract more
dependent houses, more visiting pilgrims, and more wealth. If the dynasty that
supported or owned a monastery was successful, the success was attributed in
part to the saint, and this included success in war. Saints who gave their protgs
success on the battlefield were sure to gain new adherents in such a war-ridden
society as early Ireland.
The female saint who has received the most attention is, unsurprisingly,
Brigit. She was remembered as the founder of Kildare, a very wealthy and
successful double-monastery with a confederation of dependent churches.
Numerous hymns and poems praising her survive, and even in the twelfth cen-
tury the visiting English aristocrat Gerald of Wales saw fit to describe the
monastery. In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, the era in which
the search for survivals of pre-Christian religion was respectable in academe,
Brigit was treated foremost as a Christianized goddess, a figure who may have
had no historical reality as a human mortal. Scholarly and popular works of
c. portray her as an ideal of Christian female domesticityshe pro-
duced food, was kind to animals and hung her cloak on a sunbeam; alternatively
they ignore her altogether. The questions which remain to be answered centre on
13
J. Blair and R. Sharpe (eds.), Pastoral Care Before the Parish (Leicester, ).
the way in which the gender of the saint affected the cult. Did the Irish treat female
saints differently from male ones? Were monasteries with female patron saints
politically disadvantaged? Did female saints have attributes distinctly feminine?
The last area of Irish ecclesiastical historiography which bears mentioning in
an introduction concerns asceticism. The early Irish saints, i.e. the missionaries-
cum-monastic founders of the fifth and sixth centuries, have enjoyed a long repu-
tation as great ascetics. Probably since the Bollandists published their great
volumes of Lives they have been known for their feats of self-mortification. The
well-known examples are their long fasts, their standing in freezing rivers, their
extended vigils and, above all, their avoidance of women. Even when academics
identified eighth-century secularization, they continued to hold as highly as-
cetic the early period, c.. The modern reputation is due largely to
writers of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, often male clerics, who
scoured the Lives for anecdotes which proved the early church to be exception-
ally admirable in religious terms. It is true that the Irish had in the early middle
ages something of a reputation, at least in some places at some times, but the
modern writers exaggerated the degree of male asceticism in the Lives, particu-
larly the avoidance of women. The Lives written before the tenth century
almost never speak of the early male saints avoiding the opposite sex: it is a later
topos. Thus it is useful to consider the hagiographers ideas on female impurity,
the extent to which male ecclesiastics perceived nuns as a threat, and the
possible reasons for the shift in tone in the Lives in the tenth century.
inent school of thought at the time, according to which all societies were ori-
ginally matriarchal and/or goddess-worshipping, becoming increasingly patri-
archal over time. The evolutionary model made famous by Sir James Frazer
in his Golden Bough, asserting that pre-Christian Europe had matriarchal roots
and a primal religion of the worship of a single Great Goddess, was
widespread in academe.14 Among Irish scholars the most prominent scholar
embracing such an approach was the prodigious editor, translator, and archae-
ologist, R. A. S. Macalister, though there were others.15 By finding evidence
which looked as though it denied the applicability of this stage-progression
model to Ireland, Binchy and Thurneysen changed the direction of Irish schol-
arly approach to the pre-Christian past: they ended any possibility of Irish
scholarship going down the road of seeing the past in matriarchal terms, and they
indirectly threw into question suppositions about the common methodology
of the day, namely using folklore and myth as survivals of the pagan era.
Never universally accepted, survivalism had long been on the point of ex-
tinction among Celticists in the s when of all the extant early medieval texts
only the sagas and law tracts were held to have an identifiable pre-Christian
stratum. This seemed at the time reasonable, as the Irish did have a long trad-
ition of oral learning and classical authors had observed that Continental Celts
at least did not commit important matters to writing; by the s, though, it
was agreed that even the sagas could not be used as evidence for the pre-
Christian era because anthropologists showed that even oral societies drastic-
ally change stories and histories in their retellings over even a few decadesand
the Irish tales purported to describe an era not just a few decades earlier, but
to years previous. It was increasingly realized, too, that the saga writers
were influenced by literary models, so they may have been modelled largely on,
say, Homer. The last serious survivalist work in the academic community was
Kenneth Jacksons study of the Ulster Cycle, Window on the Iron Age (), which
was received with harsh criticism for its methodology. Since then, only the law
tracts, written down c., are treated as reflectors of pre-Christian society, be-
cause it is recognized by anthropologists that customary law (which the Irish
tracts record) changes extremely slowly, though increasingly there is suspicion
that the earlier and later strands, which Binchy claimed he could identify,
might not be so clearly delineated, and also that the influence of Christian
values on the texts is more pervasive than previously recognized.
In a few corners of academe the twin bastions of late-Victorian anthropology,
survivalism and presumed pagan matriarchy, live on. There was Jan de Vriess
14
R. Hutton, The Neolithic Great Goddess: A Study in Modern Tradition, Antiquity (), ,
which contains a thorough outline of the historiography of this thesis among archaeologists and, to a
lesser extent, historians.
15
R. A. S. Macalister, Archaeology of Ireland (nd edn.: London, ), ; H. J. Massingham,
Through the Wilderness (London, ); J. MacCulloch, The Celtic and Scandinavian Religions (London,
), .
Keltische Religione, published in , which saw in the early Irish church the last
traces of a European-wide matriarchy and vestal priestess cults. It was followed
by Jean Markales Les Femmes des Celtes (), also a work scholarly in ambition if
not in achievement, which like de Vriess book claimed to show that Celtic
women enjoyed great status until Christianity eroded their position, and indeed
that goddess-worshipping matriarchy was Irelands original socio-religious
structure. Fifteen years after Markale, Mary Condren published The Serpent and
The Goddess: Women, Religion and Power in Celtic Ireland.16 Her early Irish church was
one in which Brigit-the-Goddess was transmogrified into Brigit-the-Saint, in
which male church authorities gradually edged out the peaceful and woman-
centred values of the previous religion until, by the twelfth century, Ireland was
as violent and patriarchal as anywhere else in Europe. She, like de Vries and
Markale, followed the Cambridge Ritualist school of thought which was certain
that Europe was originally matriarchal and goddess-worshipping, that in the
Iron Age it was partially patriarchal, and that Christianity completed the patri-
archalization. The chronology of Condrens transitions is inconsistent and hard
to follow because her rules of evidence differ from those of the modern main-
stream scholars: she follows the Ritualists rules, under which goddess-oriented
or matriarchal elements in texts must, by force of evolutionary logic, be older
than those showing worship of male deities, violence, and male rule. The Serpent
and the Goddess has influenced popular histories such as Peter Berresford Elliss
recent Celtic Women, for whom Condren is an oft-cited source, most significantly
an authority for the fact that Ireland was originally a goddess-worshipping
matriarchy and for the basic view of the early Irish church as one in which the
dying embers of goddess-worship can be perceived.
Mainstream Irish scholarship, having abandoned the evolutionary model,
has produced much very good and interesting work on early medieval women.17
Philip OLeary has written on the honour of women in the tales. Queen Medb
has been fascinatingly reassessed by a number of historians, who have argued
that she appears to be an anti-heroine, representing as a female war-leader an
inversion of the proper cosmic order. Among the more recent developments in
the study of Irish law of women are an increasing understanding of the terms of
marriage law and, with one article now published on the subject, the study of
the law as it applied to females in the professions. This tradition of work, largely
legal and literary, has implications for the study of religious women. Historians
concerned with Irish female status will want to know whether there are changes
over time in nuns status which may or may not correspond with the increased
status of wives. Were nuns treated at law like married women, for after all they
16
San Francisco, .
17
e.g. P. OLeary, The Honour of Women in Early Irish Literature, riu (), ;
M. N Brolchin, Women in Early Myths and Sagas, Crane Bag (), ; P. Ford, Celtic
Women: The Opposing Sex, Viator (), .
were betrothed if not actually married to Christ? Were they classed with profes-
sional women? Were they treated as ecclesiastics or as laity? Turning from the
legal questions to those raised by the study of the literature, it may well be asked
whether religious women, like those women in the tales and other narrative
texts, were able to give increased honour to the men in their families through
their wealth, eminence, spiritual power (in the women of the myths it is beauty
rather than holiness). Did laymen look toward the religious women in their kin-
dreds to enhance their own status? Are any strong female religious women ac-
tually perhaps anti-heroines as was Medb? Where are religious women in the
cosmic order? By rounding out our picture of early Irish women to include those
who lived the religious life, the complex and nuanced landscape of early Irish
gender is appreciated all the better.
When one mentions the phrase early Irish holy women to the non-academic
enthusiast of things Celtic, it conjures up exciting images of pagan priestesses,
amazonian warriors, powerful goddesses, and Christian saints; it prompts
phrases Celtic matriarchy, Culdee Christians, and above all Celtic
Christianity. The general reader is presented with a veritable industry of Celtic
spirituality which has literary, religious, and ethnic dimensions.
Popular writing, so scorned by scholars, has created a situation in which most
intelligent non-specialists hold out-of-date views about early Christian Ireland,
especially about the status of its women and the nature of its religion. The fact
that this could be the case for so popular a subject as early Ireland is curious,
and demands some explanation. The cause, at the simplest level, is a divergence
between popular and scholarly writing on matters Celtic which has been in-
creasing since the Edwardian period. The abyss between the Ivory Tower
dweller and the Waterstones Bookshop browser has never been wider. There
was a time when cutting-edge academic work was read by the man on the street:
and that time was about . Then, much Irish scholarship was pub-
lished in book form, rather than being more focused on journal articles as it is now.
The style of much of it was sufficiently accessible for the layman. Moreover,
its discoveries were of common interest, because at the time there was a great
popular interest in ancient religion, in matters of sex and gender, and in ancient
mythology. Furthermore, the survivalist method, in which traces of the distant
past were sought in the contemporary customs, was inherently attractive to the
ordinary reader. The subject also touched upon the literary fashions of the day:
the Irish Literary Revival was happening and folklore studies were in their as-
cendancy. It was this era which produced J. Bonwicks Religion of the Ancient Celts
(London, ) and G. Stokess Ireland and the Celtic Church (London, ), along
with studies alleging continuities from paganism to the near-present, such as
This dichotomy has had a practical impact on some niches of modern reli-
gious life. Celtic spirituality has been going in one form or another for the
whole of the twentieth century, and the image of the Celtic religious woman
features in all of them. The various groups whose worship, liturgy, and theology
is defined thus are built upon those very same translations and Victorian-era in-
terpretations, in two ways most noticeably: in their beliefs that the early Irish
church was characterized by a great many survivals from the pagan period, and
that the Celtic character was inherently more mystical than its Anglo-Saxon or
Roman counterpart. The Celtic temperament was then classed as feminine,
poetic, imaginative, mystical in contrast to the Anglo-Saxon, which was mas-
culine, logical, rational, a belief seen in Fiona Macleods The Immortal Hour and
in the writings of H. J. Massingham. In very few areas of modern life is scholar-
ship so influential on so many peoples daily religious lifebut it is Victorian
scholarship, not contemporary work.
The modern Celtic Christianity movement is not an organized one, but rather
consists of groups within established churches across various denominations. It
speaks to those for whom none of the available contemporary versions of
Christianity offer full satisfaction in their current form. A prime example in the
British Isles is the Celtic Christian retreat centre on Iona, founded in by the
Revd George Macleod, which has its own liturgical forms, worship groups, and
literature. In the south of England, Glastonbury boasts the thorn tree said to
have been planted by Joseph of Arimathea and the Chalice Well centre, built
around a well which yielded in a goblet said to be that used by Christ in the
last supper: Celtic Christian pilgrims abound all year round.18 In America the
Celtic Christian movement is transmitted in large part by the school led by the ex-
Dominican mystic Matthew Fox, best known for his book Original Blessing.
Todays Celtic Christians believe that native pre-Christian Celtic culture lent
the earliest insular Christianity a particularly beneficent quality, one worth re-
viving today. The key qualities attributed to it are an incarnational attitude to
God and Christ, i.e. a sense that God is in all aspects of nature and is rightly
sought there, and that God may be addressed intimately; a Thoreau-like
return-to-nature mysticism is attributed to those saints who inhabited such
18
Glastonbury became a Celtic Christian centre in when a local clergyman, John Goodchild
helped some young people discover in a local holy well a chalice which he claimed had been proved by
experts to be the chalice used by Christ at the last supper. Though the chalice had been planted there by
the vicar himself, he disguised the fact successfully enough for Glastonbury to become famed for some-
thing more than the alleged burial place of King Arthur and Guenevere, for more than the thorn-tree
planted by Joseph or Arimatheathat is, for being the resting place of the Holy Grail. The buildings sur-
rounding the well were formed into a spiritual retreat (P. Benham, The Avalonians (Glastonbury, ),
).
untamed islands as Iona or Skellig Michael. There is a fondness for the early
medieval tales in which the pagan Irish are alleged to have foretold the coming
of Christ to these islands, and some go so far as to believe that in some way the
Celts were prepared for the new religion and thus welcomed it. Another pur-
ported result of the intermixing of native Celtic religion with the New Religion
was a deep reverence for the divinity in women, which was expressed in their es-
pecial devotion to St Brigit as well as to the Virgin Mary. Brigit, as cited in early
Irish texts and in later Scottish folklore, is the Mary of the Gaelstheir own
Blessed Virgin. Brigit, too, is in some legends the midwife of Christ, an Irish-
woman present at the messianic events in Palestine.19 Kildare, the site of Brigits
church, is a modern Celtic Christian centre for pilgrims and spiritual retreat.20
Their historical assumptions are manifestly derived from those of an earlier era:
i.e. that the nature of Celts was emotional, mystical and thus possessing femi-
nine qualities, and that that native Celtic spirit had survived into its early
church.
Todays academics can be derisive of modern Celtic Christianity, but it must
be remembered that such Christians rely heavily upon the writings of their own
early twentieth century leaders and the authorities the latter had cited. They
presume in good faith that older works ought to be valid still. Beyond that, the
conclusions of Frazerians appear commonsensical. At the turn of the year ,
Celtic Christians are often as frustrated with the academics as the academics are
with them. But lest scholars believe that they themselves have no remaining con-
nection with predecessors who held such views, they would do well to remem-
ber the Introduction of Charles Plummers volume, Irish Saints Lives, still
the standard edition and translation of many Irish Lives. It is a hundred-page
listing of pagan survivals in the Lives, framed absolutely according to Vic-
torian principles of the nature cult school.
19
A. Duncan, The Elements of Celtic Christianity (Shaftesbury, ); I. Bradley, The Celtic Way (London,
); E. de Waal, The Celtic Vision (London, ); M. Maher (ed.), Irish Spirituality (Dublin, ); E.
Toulson, The Celtic Alternative (London, ); J. Mackey (ed.), An Introduction to Celtic Christianity (Edin-
burgh, ).
20
M. Minehan, Kildare Today: Continuing the Brigidine Tradition, in P. Clancy (ed.), Celtic
Threads: Exploring Our Celtic Heritage (Dublin, ), , and P. Clancy, Brigit, Muire na nGael: The
Eternal Feminine in the Celtic Tradition, ibid. .
21
On the development of the movement, C. Spretnak (ed.), The Politics of Womens Spirituality: Essays
on the Rise of Spiritual Power within the Feminist Movement (Garden City, NJ, ).
22
Hutton, Neolithic Great Goddess, with references.
-,
The third group of non-specialists who take an interest in the religious women
of early Ireland are modern pagans, and most especially those who practice a
revived druidism. Several sociological studies in the US assert that paganism is
the fastest growing spiritual path in North America, and in the UK it is esti-
mated that there are about , pagans.24 The origins of the revival lie at the
turn of the century, with middle-class people of the sort active in the Folklore
Society, well educated, schooled in the classics featuring alluring gods like Pan
and Venus, people enamoured of the idea of a rural fertility cult. Frazers pro-
gression of evolutionary stages made sense to them, but the part that appealed
was not the first, Goddess-only phase, but the era when men and women per-
formed a sacred marriage as equals. Following Frazer, Harrison, Yeats, and
others, they pieced together a picture of a period when the Goddess of nature,
whose primary symbol was the moon, mated with a God of Nature who was
represented as divine a king or a horned Pan-figure; the result, theologically,
was a fertility-oriented nature pantheism. In the s and s, a few individ-
uals pieced rituals together and gave groups of interested friends encourage-
ment in getting started.25
23
Criticizing the Great Goddess thesis generally, L. Motz, Faces of the Goddess (Oxford, ); E. Klein,
Feminism Under Fire (Amherst, NY, ); D. Patai and N. Koertge, Professing Feminism: Cautionary Tales from
the Strange World of Womens Studies (New York, ); Hutton, Neolithic Great Goddess. Criticizing
feminists adoption of Bachofens religious stages of development, S. Binford, Myths and Matriarchies,
in Spretnak, Politics of Womens Spirituality. Feminist criticisms of the matriarchy thesis: M. Massey,
Feminine Soul: The Fate of an Ideal (Boston, ); J. Bamberger, The Myth of Matriarchy: Why Men Rule
in Primitive Society, in M. Rosaldo and L. Lamphere (eds.), Woman, Culture and Society (Stanford, ),
; S. Tiffany, The Power of Matriarchal Ideas, International Journal of Womens Studies , no.
(), .
24
On paganism in Britain, G. Harvey and C. Hardman (eds.), Paganism Today (London, );
G. Harvey (ed.), Contemporary Paganism (New York, ). On paganism in the United States, M. Adler,
Drawing Down the Moon (Boston, ).
25
For the most recent, and definitive study of modern paganism, see R. Hutton, The Triumph of the
Moon (Oxford, ) which treats the role of Frazer, Harrison, and many of the other authors mentioned
in this section. On the current Celtic manifestations, see Marion Bowmans work, especially Cardiac
Celts: Images of the Celts in Contemporary British Paganism (in Harvey and Hardman, Paganism Today,
) and Contemporary Celtic Spirituality (in A. Hale and P. Payton (eds.), New Directions in Celtic
Studies (Exeter, ), ).
26
On the belief in magic by modern British pagans in the late twentieth century, T. Luhrmann,
Persuasions of the Witches Craft (Oxford, ).
27
L. Spence, The Mysteries of Britain: Secret Rites and Tradition of Ancient Britain (London, ), .
In modern scholarship most if not all of the connections Spence made are con-
sidered too tenuous to be asserted, and look profoundly dubious. For all that, his
survivalist, folklorist, and heavily pagan approach was alive and well in the
s in the neo-pagan journals of Britain and the United States.
Because scholars are prone to scoff at Celtic Christians, religious feminists, and
modern pagans, it bears reiterating that a spiritual movements validity is not
dependent on the historical accuracy of its origin myths; Judaism and
Christianity have both managed very well in spite of the Bibles highly unlikely
version of very early history. Nor is it cause for academic triumphalism, for
scholars should be chastened to remember that the current situation has arisen
because somehow the Victorians and Edwardians managed to reach the man
in the street in a way more recent generations, including theirs, have not. If the
non-specialist still holds old views, todays scholars must bear the lions share of
the blame.
A few words about the sources and their problems may be helpful. The main
point to make is that those relevant to early Irish religious women are wide-
ranging in type and form. For the earliest church, covering the fifth and sixth
centuries, there are the two texts of St Patrick, the Confessio and the Epistola, and
the early penitentials, which are priests guides to the penances to be set for a
wide variety of sins committed by the faithful. For the seventh to ninth centuries
useful material is found in the Lives written in those centuries, the Irish laws, the
canons of the Collectio Canonum Hibernensis, rules and monastic customs, annals,
martyrologies, some biblical exegesis, hagiographic poetry, hymns, litanies, and
there is even one fragment of a consecration rite. For the tenth- to twelfth-
century period there are a great many Lives in both Irish and Latin, legal
glosses, glosses on hagiographical poems and on the martyrologies, theological
tracts, and apocryphal texts.
Though plentiful, the material presents a variety of difficulties. To begin with,
the sources are extremely patchy over time: material of one sort may be rela-
tively abundant in one period but scarce or absent in another; the legal evidence
is a case in point. Furthermore the evidence is discontinuous, so while one may
make observations about, say, the provision of sick-maintenance for virgins in
the eighth century, there is no material on it for any time earlier or later. Then
there is the perennial problem of dating the texts, which in the case of early
medieval Ireland is particularly acute. Many texts, or sections thereof, are of un-
known or disputed date, and scholarly estimates can vary by up to two hundred
years. An historian using a multitude of texts in a wider analysis relies heavily on
the current state of scholarly estimates and analyses of editors. Richard Sharpes
seminal work on the Hiberno-Latin Lives, published in his Medieval Irish Saints
Lives, now allows some texts: (those in what he denotes the ODonoghue group,
abbreviated ), to be placed in the seventh- or eighth-century period. Sharpe
also identified the texts of a copyist-redactor working c., identified as D,
whose habits of copying included making few changes to his exemplars; thus
Latin Lives which are D texts can safely be assumed to be very close to their ex-
emplars, which must, in turn, have been composed no later than the twelfth
century. The plethora of versions of anonymous Lives of Irish saints can lead to
confusion, so references identify those which are texts and D texts, whilst
others are identified by manuscript origin, so as to minimize the problems of
identification. The bibliography also lists Lives individually with these tags.
There are also problems of genre. Some source difficulties are particular to
type: laws are by nature normative and prescriptive, and there is often an ab-
sence of evidence concerning their application. They may reflect more theory
than practice, and so are best interpreted primarily as indicators of attitude and
philosophy. Lives pose particular problems as they purport to describe events of
the past and can be formulaic and at worst are riddled with standard topoi. It is
now agreed that they reflect their authors own environment much more than
they do that of the imagined past. Theological tracts are inherently theoretical
and are not directly descriptive of the context in which they were written. Genre
is, in other words, always an issue.
The sources also present difficulties due to the terminology they use for reli-
gious women. There are numerous words for nun in early medieval texts from
Ireland, both in Irish and Latin. In the Latin there are not only sanctemonialis,
puella sancta, famula, and filia, but also the unadorned term virgo and the simple
puella. In the Irish one finds not only caillech, noeb-ingen, noeb-hag, but also the un-
embellished terms g and ingen. Some pose difficulties due to the breadth of
meaning of the word: for example, ingen which in a non-religious context means
simply girl or daughter but in a religious sense means nun or religious vir-
gin. In the Lives even so exalted a saint as Brigit is sometimes addressed A ingen
by those making supplications to her. In Latin texts the same problem is faced,
with the term puella being applied equally to female saints, normal mortal nuns,
junior nuns, and non-religious girls. Another problematic term is caillech,
literally veiled one. It derives from caille, meaning veil, in turn derived from
pallium, the Latin for cloak. Pallium was the common term for a womans veil up
to the seventh century in the West. In Ireland caillech was applied to both nuns
and old women on account of the fact that both were veiled. When the reader
of an Irish text comes across the word, determining its sense is not easy, espe-
cially in poetry, where there has been much controversy over its interpretation.28
28
M. N Dhonnchadha, Caillech and Other Terms for Veiled Women in Medieval Irish Texts, igse
(), .
Finally, a few notes on editorial conventions. Among editors of Old and Middle
Irish texts there have been a variety of systems for denoting grammatical
changes in word forms. Because the sets of rules vary greatly, almost to the point
of being particular to the individual editor, regularization would involve
29
Comainmnigud Noem Herend so ss (D. Brosnan, Archivium Hibernicum, or Irish Historical Records
(Maynooth, ), , at ).
correction. Hence the Irish quotations in this book are presented in the form
in which they appear in the edition used. The apparent lack of consistency
which results is none the less necessary given the linguistic tradition of the field.
Church and river names in the early middle ages very often survive into the
present in a modernized form, so it is most common for editors to use the more
familiar style; I have followed this practice and extended it, partially translating
into English the names of other geographical features for the benefit of the
reader unfamiliar with Old and Middle Irish (Mag Breg is presented, for ex-
ample, as the Plain of Brega); the Irish or Hiberno-Latin form is given in
parentheses. Personal names are even more problematic in early Ireland. Most
saints have two, if not three names: the name at birth normally gives way to a
name in religion; the latter, however is often replaced in texts with a diminutive
form or another nickname, but the practice is inconsistent. Thus for example,
St Carthach was nicknamed Mochuda; some Lives call him by one name,
others by the other. Lives written in Latin normally Latinize the formal name.
Readers foraying for the first time into the hagiographical texts will do well to
have to hand the guide to the Lives in the back of Richard Sharpes Saints Lives,
which cross-references formal Irish, Latin, and nicknames, giving the saints
feast days to clarify even the most troubling identity problems. Where relevant
in this study, alternate names are given in the notes and bibliography. Many
saints names live on in modern Ireland, but among scholars a form of Old Irish
spelling is normally retainedexcept for the case of Patrick and Columba,
whom to call Ptraic and Colum Cille would be an affectation. This practice
has been followed. The reader unfamiliar with rules of pronunciation is unlikely
to recognize Coemgen as Kevin, but this is probably the most extreme ex-
ample, and it is hoped that accessibility has not been sacrificed.
PA RT O N E
Sometime in the latter half of the fifth century, a British missionary living in
pagan Ireland wrote in a letter which survives to this day, The sons and daugh-
ters of the Irish kings are giving themselves to be monks and virgins of Christ
I cannot count their numbers. The author was Patrick, latterly the patron saint
of Ireland.
To this missionary, this fact was important enough to him to be repeated
twice in his memoirs. It is with these two writings, the Epistola and the Confessio,
that the history of Christian female religious in Ireland commences, though we
know Patrick was not the first missionary working there. Patricks proud an-
nouncement lets us know that as early as his day the pagan Irish were seeing
their young women converts to the new religion doing such things as renoun-
cing marriage, shunning sex, and idealizing poverty. They must have seemed
unimaginably peculiar.
The ideal starting-point of a study of Irish religious women, rather than to
simply march forward in time from Patrick, would be to consider the native
society into which Christianity obtruded: the pagan religion, the status of
women, and the roles of female religious professionals. Against such a back-
ground we could more fully appreciate the following, Christian periodthe
powers religious women enjoyed, the strictures they had to follow, the way
secular society regarded them, and how their nunneries were treated. This pro-
cedure, which has been extremely valuable in the study of early Christianity
in the late antique world and in Germanic areas, is well-nigh impossible for
Ireland because the sources are so limited. The Irish left no texts from the
pre-Christian centuries. Patrick is not only our first Christian writing from
Ireland, he is the first person of any religion to leave a surviving narrative text.
The classical authors, so useful for studying Celtic society elsewhere, are
simply absent when it comes to Ireland. No travelling Greek left a first-hand ac-
count of his travels, and no Roman armies attempted to extend their empire
there. For Gaul and Britain the Romans left colourful accounts telling of the
native society, its religion and the womens activities in it, but for Ireland,
nothing.
The Irish themselves did leave ogam stones, but these, rather than being
records of ancient mysticism or magic as commonly believed, are simply brief
memorial notices from the fifth to seventh centuries , the period during
Christianization. In fact, ogam script itself was only developed in this period,
and it was based on the Latin alphabet. The writing of documents commenced
in real volume in the seventh century when Irish society was almost wholly
Christianized; all the writers were Christian and all were probably churchmen.
These authors were unfortunately uninterested in writing the history of their
pagan past. They did compose a handful of short annal entries for years pre-
dating the fifth century, but mostly they wrote biblical commentary, prayers,
hymns. The earliest saints Lives, dating to the seventh century, contain a few
anecdotes purporting to describe certain features of pagan Ireland, but only a
few, and a further problem is the fact that these texts were at least partially mod-
elled on non-Irish exemplars. The sagas and tales of native heroes of the pagan
past, which do feature accounts of the pagan past, are also problematic, for they
too are Christian compositions and their descriptions of the pagan religion are
far from contemporary.1
For all this, the early medieval Irish portrayals of the its past are still worth
noting at the outset of a study of Christian female religious, for at the very least
they shed some light on how the early Christian Irish imagined the role of the
female in religion in the old dayswhat they thought the virgins, holy widows
and other Christian professae had replaced. And, within extremely cautious
bounds, we can make very general statements about gender in pre-Christian
Irish religion and society.2 Firstly there is the issue of deities. Our earliest wit-
ness is Patrick, and he made only one observation: they worship the sun. All
other signs, however, point to a religion with a pantheon of goddesses and gods,
made up of extremely localized cults. Irish political units were very small, and
other Celtic areas (and Germanic ones, for that matter) seem to have been simi-
larly composed. Few indeed were pan-Celtic god names, and even with these
the archaeological record suggests that different areas associated different at-
tributes to them. Many deities were associated with natural features in the land-
scape; rivers appear to be especially linked to female deities. A link between
goddesses and water is seen in also in Celtic Britain and Gaul at such places as
Bath and Burgundys Fontes Sequanae. The Irish gave some goddesses war attrib-
utes, of which the prime example is the figure of the Morrigan who appears in a
range of early medieval Irish writings; in these, in the form of maiden, hag, or
1
The earliest were written down in the th or th cent., and many as late as the th and th. For the
non-specialist the most accessible translations are in J. Gantz (trans.), Early Irish Myths and Sagas (Har-
mondsworth, ), T. Cross and C. Slover (trans.), Ancient Irish Tales (London, ), and T. Kinsella
(trans.), The Tin (Oxford, ).
2
For a concise survey of the problems of goddess-worship and gender in religion in Iron-Age Ireland
and the British Isles, with references, see R. Hutton, Pagan Religions of the Ancient British Isles: Their Nature
and Legacy (Oxford, ), ch. .
scald-crow, she helped or hindered warriors in battle and she made prophecies
about the future.3 Sources from elsewhere suggests war goddesses were a wider
Celtic phenomenon, as in the accounts of Boudiccas revolt, in remains around
Rennes, and in the iconography of some continental Celtic coins.4 Irish god-
desses in the later Irish texts sometimes appear in triplicities, e.g. the three
Brigits, the three goddesses who gave their names to Ireland, and the three
Machas; some think Celts generally triplified their goddesses, but this is not a
fully accepted theory. A divine couple presiding over fertility, a god-and-goddess
pairing, is also found in some Celtic areas: outside Ireland there are Celtic sculp-
tural representations, and in Ireland there are the Middle Irish tales which do
suggest something of the sort: a royal candidate caused the Stone of Destiny at
Tara to cry out if she accepted him; the female figure Sovereignty mates with a
mortal king, though it must be remembered that these stories are from the
eleventh century and reflect political preoccupations of that century.5 Other
goddesses were associated with particular wild animals, a phenomenon not
particular to goddesses, but two birds, in Ireland at least, have particularly
strong associations with the female deities: the crow and the crane.6
We can learn virtually nothing about Irish Iron-Age goddesses from sculp-
tural remains. The abstract stone heads and roughly-hewn inscribed monu-
ments which remain cannot be firmly dated; perhaps they were erected in the
years before Christianization, but they could be from the fifth to seventh cen-
turies. Given this, it is hard to know what to make of the fact that all are either
androgynous or male. Sheela-na-gigs are now dated to the twelfth century
Romanesque period, and have been demonstrated to be very Christian
creations; it did become a good-luck practice for the people (all of whom were
Christian) to touch them, and it is that last fact which made scholars think for a
while that they had roots in the pagan era. Unlike many ancient societies, the
pre-Christian Irish left very few representations which are identifiably female.
The existence of Irish female deities does not of itself tell us that women were
powerful in pagan society. The evidence from Ireland does not support Jean
Markales assertion that there was between the sexes an equality in which each
could feel comfortable.7 In fact, all the evidence which survives shows that Ire-
land on the eve of Christianization was patriarchal and had been so indefinitely.
Patrick when a slave had a male slave-owner, and the other authority figures he
3
For scholarly treatments of the war goddess in the early middle ages, see M. Herbert, Transmuta-
tions of an Irish Goddess, in S. Billington and M. Green (eds.), The Concept of the Goddess (London, ),
; and J. Carey, Notes on the Irish War Goddess, igse (), .
4
Green, Celtic Goddesses, . See also, importantly, Hutton, Pagan Religions, with references.
5
For an older view see P. MacCana, Aspects of the Theme of King and Goddess in Irish Literature,
tudes Celtiques (), , , and tudes Celtiques (), . More recent, and treat-
ing the political context, is M. Herbert, Goddess and King: the Sacred Marriage in Early Ireland, in
L. Fradenburg (ed.), Women and Sovereignty: Cosmos (), .
6
Bird references: Green, Celtic Goddesses, .
7
Quoted in P. Berresford Ellis, Celtic Women: Women in Celtic Society and Literature (London, ), .
mentions are also male; young women, in contrast, he portrays as being forced
into arranged marriages by their fathers. The Irish law tracts (written in the
early eighth century and generally understood to represent native Irish society
in broad outline) also show men as dominant: women had lower honour prices
than men, and were normally unable to speak or act for themselves in business
or law unless supervised by a male head, such as a father or guardian. A
study showed that womens authority within marriage actually improved
during the Christian centuries;8 at the end of the seventh century the abbot of
Iona formulated a statute to protect women (along with priests and children)
from being abused and forced to participate in warfarethe abbot claimed the
pagans had had this evil custom which he was finally eradicating.9 In the sagas,
desirable women are sometimes sassy and outspoken but never coarse or over-
bold; women were not leaders with the exception of Queen Maeve or Medb of
Connaught, who went to war against Ulster, but recent scholarship has shown
her to be an anti-heroine. In spite of all this, Irish women were not without
status. They had legal rights, were entitled to compensation when their honour
was damaged, could sue their husband for dishonour, could instigate divorce
proceedings, and were known to enter professions.
If we know little about women in pagan Ireland, we know even less about
women in Irish pagan religion. The Victorians and Edwardians were more con-
fident than todays scholars, as they felt safe in presuming that a universal neo-
lithic matriarchy underlay the later paganism, and felt equally certain that
modern folklore and medieval romances could be used in the project of recon-
structing womens role in Celtic paganism. It does seem evident that in pre-
Christian Ireland some women had been recognized as religious professionals
associated with druids. Druids were the priestly caste whose activities, from
what can be inferred, involved magical rites, prophecy, eulogizing, satirizing,
judging, blessing, and cursing. They appear to have served in the households of
tribal kings and been involved in political matters as advisers to them. In eighth-
century law, women in a range of high-status professions were accorded a high
level of autonomy and legal competence, and the list included some who per-
formed druid-like activities: female miracle-workers, female war-mediators, fe-
male druids, and female poets (the fili were a profession derivative of druidry
with very high status and quasi-magical powers attributed to them). Females en-
gaging in druidic arts are found in early medieval tales including The Wooing of
Etain where a queen Fuamnach used magic against her rival, having learnt it
8
D. Binchy et al. (eds.), Studies in Early Irish Law (Dublin, ), henceforth abbr. SEIL. Robin Chap-
man Stacey has cast doubt on the means by which the chronology was formulated: language which
seems earlier may in fact be simply more high flownwith two forms of composition due to the fact that
much law was conducted in quasi-ritual, poetic performances. Thus it is safest to say the tracts contain
both harsher and more generous versions of the marriage laws.
9
Cin Adomnin (K. Meyer (ed. and trans.), Cin Adamnin: An Old Irish Treatise on the Law of Adamnn
(Anecdota Oxoniensa ; Oxford, ) ).
from her druid father. That women were associated with magic is seen in the oft-
cited prayer in which the petitioner implores the Christian god to save him from
the spells of women, smiths, and druids. Most explicitly, the law tracts also refer
to female druids (ban-drui ) and their status and obligations. For all this, the signs
suggest that females were the exception in that profession. In the Irish tales,
druids are male; in the earliest saints Lives they are also male; in the Roman
sources describing druidism elsewhere (i.e. Britain and the Continent) they are
male too, the only exception being from an area in central Europe which had
women called dryades. In a small-scale society like early Ireland, those few
women who did become druids probably did so through family connections.10
In mythological fragments from the eighth century onwards are scraps on one
goddess, Brg or Brigit, adviser to the great judge Sencha, and on the doings of
the Tatha D Dannn, a mythological race renowned for their druidic arts.
These few bits, all late and none from the pagan era itself, have drawn the at-
tention of a great range of scholars who have speculated on the relationship be-
tween the semi-druidical goddess Brigit and the same-named saint.
It has been suggested repeatedly for over a century, to the point of its becom-
ing a folk truth, that Ireland had female druidical colleges in the pagan period.
Most Victorian scholars were inclined to believe that all-female druid centres
not only existed, but that they were subsequently transformed into nunneries.
M. Brenan in his Ecclesiastical History of Ireland () asserted plainly that Kildare
was a female druidic college.11 The views attractiveness remained strong to
T. F. ORahilly in the s, Jan De Vries in the s, Jean Markale in the s,
and Mary Condren in the s.12 The history of the idea of Kildare as a druidic
college or pagan temple has long been on the wane. It did survive in academe
into the twentieth century, but diminished as scholars increasingly shied away
from a historiography of survivalism.13 As a result of the plethora of older schol-
arly claims for the druidical pre-history of Irelands female monasteries, popu-
lar writers consistently describe Kildare in particular as a thinly-Christianized
pagan priestess centrea portrayal particularly popular among neo-pagans
and feminists.
The historians who put forward this interpretation did so on several grounds.
First there was precedent: Celts did have all-female sanctuaries according to the
classical writers Pomponius Mela (describing an island off Brittany) and Strabo
(describing an island of priestesses in the Loire).14 How this proved their exist-
ence in pagan Ireland was tenuous. Brenan, for instance, was convinced by the
10
For dryades, with full quotes from the sources Vopiscus and Lampridus, see T. Kendrick, The Druids:
A Study in Keltic Prehistory (London, ), , .
11
J. MacCulloch, Religion of the Ancient Celts (Edinburgh, ), ; M. Brenan, Ecclesiastical History of Ire-
land ( Dublin, ), .
12
T. F. ORahilly, Early Irish History and Mythology (Dublin, ), ; Condren, Serpent and Goddess,
.
13
MacCana, Celtic Mythology, .
14
Pomponius Mela, Chorog. book , ch. ; Strabo, Annals, book , ch. .
fact that Brigits saints Lives say she had eight companions, making up a party
of nine, and this happened to be the same as the number of Celtic priestesses on
Pomponiuss island. Then there was the matter of the perpetual flame kept at
Kildare, assumed to have been a survival from pagan times.15 It was first and
most famously reported by the twelfth-century traveller Gerald of Wales in his
topographical account of Ireland. According to him, it was in a special enclos-
ure, tended by a rota of nuns so that it never went out, and men might not enter
the enclosure or approach it. Geralds description of it implies that he thought
the perpetual fire to go back to Brigits own day. Though the Kildare flame will
be returned to in a future chapter, some points are relevant here. That the
classical writers give no accounts of Celtic priestesses or divineresses elsewhere
(and certainly not in Ireland) tending a sacred fire might have given pause but
did not, for it was a universal assumption of the evolutionists that any devotion
to elements of nature must, perforce, have pagan roots. MacCulloch was one
author who found a Celtic parallel in the flame at the temple of Sulis Minerva in
Bath, which led to his supposition that Brigit was the same deity as Sul and was
the Irish Minerva.16 Superficial similarities with the Roman vestal cult implied
to some that that cult had made its way to Ireland, or that female vestal cults
were part of the common Indo-European heritage.17 The Kildare flame, and the
other minor traces which were employed to prove the existence of Irish womens
druidical centres, appear much less persuasive to the modern scholar. The
classical accounts are now recognized as deeply problematical and quite pos-
sibly fictitious, the regional variety among Celtic societies is now appreciated
(preventing us from extrapolating the Bath evidence to Kildare), and fires are no
longer seen as proof of fire-worship. Most damningly, the late date of the fires
first recorded existence is of supreme importance, for the modern scholar is
trained against presuming long-term survivals. The early saints Lives of Brigit
(and the late ones, for that matter) say nothing of a druidic background to the
site; in fact, they give the impression that the site itself was insignificant, because
Brigit settled in two other places first, and the actual process of setting up the
Kildare settlement receives no attention. Turning to archaeological evidence
we find that there has never been an excavation at Kildare to search for a pre-
Christian layer which might demonstrate settlement there during the late Iron
Age. The notion, then, though not disproved, by contemporary standards has
no evidence in its support.
Beyond these few points, little can be added on the subject of native Irish reli-
gion and the role of women in it. Women could be active in at least some aspects
of religion, including some magic and possibly other roles as well, though what
these may have been we cannot surmise on the basis of the material we now have.
15
E. MacNeill, Celtic Ireland (Dublin, ), ; ORahilly, Early Irish History, ; Brenan, Ecclesiastical
History, ; MacCulloch, Celtic Religions, .
16
J. MacCulloch, Celtic and Scandinavian Religion (London, ), .
17
e.g. ORahilly, Early Irish History, esp. , .
It was into Irish pagan society, so scarcely perceptible, that Christianity first took
root. The earliest settlements, by all reasoning, must have been on Irelands
Eastern coast. When this took place is not certain, but it probably occurred
shortly after the Roman Empire, deeply established in southern and central
Britain, converted to Christianity in the earlier fourth century. At that time
there was some contact of various sorts between western (Romanized) Britain
and eastern Ireland. There were raids, so Irelands earliest Christians might
have been Britons captured by pagan Irishmen and taken back to Ireland. Ire-
lands first Christians might alternatively have been Christian British emigrants
who had moved to Ireland voluntarily to escape the disruptions of late Roman
Britain. Or, they might have been Irish people who had converted while visiting
Britain. Yet another possibility is that they were a conclave of Irish who had
been converted by very early British missionaries who had come across the Irish
Sea to them. Whatever their origins, the Christians of Ireland were numerous
enough by to require their own bishop.18
Popular esoteric ideas on the earliest Celtic church are more exciting than
this, of course. The insular Celtic world (Scotland, Ireland, and Britain) has
since the Enlightenment occasionally claimed a very early church, a church
with the antiquity and thus authority of the church of Jerusalem. The British
legends of Joseph of Arimathea are the best-known contemporary claim, and
hinge on the supposed early arrival and mission of one man (the said Joseph) to
Britain shortly after Christs crucifixion; he allegedly established a church
which had none of the faults, variously defined, that by contrast arose in the
Roman ecclesiastical institutions. This early-established church is most often
cited in the current day by Celtic Christians, who like to mention not only
Josephs thorn tree (still growing in Glastonbury) but also the words placed in
the mouth of a sixth-century British literary figure Taliesin by a later author,
which appear to support the claim: Christ the Word was from the beginning
our teacher, and we never lost his teaching. Christianity in Asia was a new thing,
but there was never a time when the druids of Britain held not its doctrines.19
The esoteric account of early insular Christianity, though attractive, is unsup-
portable. The earliest Irish Christians in Ireland were not, from what we can
tell, semi-druidical in their reverence for naturenor were they adherents of a
church that pre-dated that of the Roman Empire. Their Christianity seems to
have come from Wales and Britain, yes, but a Wales and Britain that was Chris-
tian because of, and not independently from, the Christianization of the Roman
Empire.
18
According to the Gaulish chronicler Prosper of Aquitaine, in this year Pope Celestine sent Bishop
Palladius to the Irish believing in Christ.
19
I. Bradley, The Celtic Way (London, n.d.), .
Mercifully for the historian, Patricks Confessio includes discussions of the con-
version of women and the conduct of female converts, so it is possible to speak
of women converts to Christianity as early as the fifth century. There are two
other relevant sources as well, The First Synod of St Patrick (most commonly
and henceforth abbreviated Pa), and the Penitential of Finnian. All three have
many concerns other than women religious, and the relevant parts are frustrat-
ingly brief. Pa is a body of church canons which, though attributed to a synod
of Patrick, cannot be presumed to have links with him, nor to have been as early
as the fifth century. The Penitential of Finnian is the earliest datable penitential
tract, authored in the sixth century. From these scraps one can make a few ten-
tative statements about the types of profession which had reached Ireland at
that time, as compared to the varieties of female religious life elsewhere in
Europe. Observations may be made about the ethos surrounding the lifestyles
such female religious were to follow, as the material sheds a few rays of light on
the sources behind the early Irish conception of female sanctity.
20
Confessio, ch. . (A. Hood (ed. and trans.), Patrick: His Writings and Muirchs Life (London, ),
). On the Confessio on mission, see M. Herren, Mission and Monasticism in the Confessio of
Patrick, in D. Corrin, L. Breatnach, and K. McCone (eds.), Saints, Sages and Storytellers: Celtic Studies in
Honour of Professor James Carney (Maynooth Monographs ; Maynooth, ), .
mention the widows and the continent. But it is the women kept in slavery who suffer
especially; they even have to endure constant threats and terrorization, but the Lord has
given grace to many of his handmaidens, for though they are forbidden to do so, they
resolutely follow his example.
Patrick encouraged vows of chastity. In doing so he was typical of his age, and
typical of the church leaders in the Christian West. The topos of the virgin who
converts to the ascetic life of Christianity was transmitted across the West in a
variety of texts. Jerome and Augustine wrote of young women who struggled
with their families to undertake the virginal profession. Both Church Fathers
and uncanonical Christian writers saw celibacy as an ontological status that
raises humans to semi-divine status.21 There was a widespread and long-lasting
belief that those who lead a life of virginal perfection in the present life attain to,
or even surpass, the angelic mode of existence.22 Ambrose put it that in holy
virgins we see on earth the life of the angels we lost in paradise.23 They looked
to the Bible for confirmation of this view and found:
The children of this world marry and are given in marriage: but they that shall be ac-
counted worthy of that world and of the resurrection from the dead shall neither be mar-
ried nor take wives. Neither can they die any more: for they are equal to the angels and
are children of God, being the children of the resurrection.24
The female virgins semi-divine status posed a problem. The Bible was very
clear that women by nature were inferior to men. Church Fathers wrestled with
the paradox, and in the end came to a set of theological solutions; these empha-
sized that even as a holy virgin a woman had to obey male authority just as did
other women. Some young women wanted to become virgins but their fathers
forbade it, they admitted. They should use persuasion rather than disobedience
to further their cause.
Patrick, then, is a far cry from patristic orthodoxy on gender when he praises
the noble daughters for disobeying their parents in refusing to marry, and when
he lauds the female slave for disobeying her owner.25 How can one understand
the encouragement he gives to women to contravene social authority? On one
level, he was emphasizing that he converted people from all social classes, that
he was carrying on the egalitarian spirit of Christianity. But more than that, he
stresses that women, even the most repressed of them, could and should resist
21
E. Clark, Introduction to John Chrysostom, On Virginity, Against Remarriage, repr. in id.,
Ascetic Piety and Womens Faith, Essays on Late Ancient Christianity (Studies in Women and Religion ;
New York, ), , at .
22
J. Bugge, Virginitas: An Essay in the History of a Medieval Ideal (Archives internationales dhistoires des
ides, series minor, ; The Hague, ), . He later adds, Medieval monastic literature is shot through
with the idea that the monk in his cloister leads a life that is essentially in anticipation of the angelic life
in heaven. The notion prevails from the earliest days of Egyptian monachism down to the twelfth cen-
tury and beyond (p. ).
23
Ambrose, De institutione virginis, ch. (PL . ).
24 25
Luke : . Cf. Matt. : , Mark : . Confessio, ch. .
male authority if it interfered with their undertaking ascetic Christianity: let the
slave woman defy her master, the noblewoman her parents.26 The solution to
Patricks seeming heresy lies in an examination of his models. He, rather than
looking to the Fathers, seems to be looking to a different genre which dealt with
the female virgin. The stories of the martyr saints, contained in the Apocryphal
Acts and in a range of Christian legends compiled and circulating across the
West in the mid-fifth century, were filled with stories of disobedient virgins in-
spired by a male apostolic missionary. By that time they had popular currency
across Europe: they were copied widely and were well-known.27 The Christian
holy women of the Acts resist their pagan male guardians, usually their fathers
and fiancs, but sometimes their husbands, to keep their virginity. Most often
they go to their death, or are willing to do so, to keep their Christian virginal vow.
Another angle on Patricks passage on virgins is highlighted by his mention of
the slave women. Slave women were, for Patrick, worthy of especial mention; he
made a point of saying that women slave converts also pursued the Christian life
even in the face of great opposition. He made no mention of male slaves, even
though he himself had been one, suggesting that he is here using women to
think with. Two reasons for this are possible. Firstly, the topos of the female
Christian slave was to be found in the apostolic romances, particularly strongly
in the martyrdom of Perpetua, for example, and Patrick may have known of the
story. Or he may have been making a rhetorical point about the power of his
proselytizing. It was a universal belief in late antiquity that the female sex was
physically and spiritually as well as socially weaker than the male. Furthermore,
due to their biological constitution, as then understood, they were more sexual.
Thus when the Christian faith gave women strength generally, and strength to
resist sex in particular, it was a way of giving credit to the supernatural power of
the new faith. Patrick used the example of the slave woman to show that his
missionary activity had brought even the weakest in Irish society to the new such
that theyeven the slave womengained both strength of character and
strength over their female sexuality. Patrick comes across as a man who wishes
to convince his reader that he, like the apostles of the Acts, had virgin martyrs
among his followers, and that his missionary powers were great enough to in-
spire even the powerless to a steadfast adherence to Christ.
26
The account shares a certain amount of common ground, in this respect, with such virgin martyr
accounts as that of Perpetua and Felicitas, a pair of female Roman martyrs who died togetherone was
a noble lady, and the other her servant woman.
27
One of the most evident proofs of the widespread dissemination is the abundance of reluctant-
bride topoi in local saints legends across the Christian West. Augustine in the fourth century found it
necessary to remind his readers that they were non-canonical: De natura et origine animae, ch. (as cited in
D. Elliott, Spiritual Marriage: Sexual Abstinence in Medieval Wedlock (Princeton, ), ). On fifth-century
dissemination, E. Junod and J.-D. Kaestli, LHistoire des Actes Apocryphes des aptres du II au IX sicle: le cas des
Actes de Jean (Cahiers de la Revue de thologie et de philosophie ; Geneva, ), , which also outlines
the evidence for this argument.
Patricks texts leave hints about how the monastic profession generally de-
veloped in Ireland, the interpretation of which have been debated for decades.28
It is a matter relevant to the study of women in the earliest Church, because
women are traditionally classed as being part of the monastic movement. In the
passage quoted above, Patrick recounts helping a woman become a virgin dedi-
cated to God. Preceding that passage he had written: sons and daughters of
Irish under-kings are seen to be monks and virgins of Christ ( filii Scottorum et
filiae regulorum monachi et virgines Christi esse videntur), and later speaks of Irish
Christian brethren and virgins of Christ and religious women ( fratribus Christ-
ianis et virginibus Christi et mulieribus religiosis).29 As indicated earlier, what he pro-
posed, indeed encouraged, for women was a lifestyle absolutely typical of
Western Europe in his day. The formal office of the virgin had arisen early and
gradually in the Christian Mediterranean. As early as the second century some
young women were preserving their virginity as private dedications to God. By
the late third century, the consecrated female virgin was already a well-
established member of the Christian community, and virginity had already come
to mean a permanent and special state, not an ephemeral condition preceding
marriage.30 By the late fourth century . . . virginity and widowhood were . . . now
professions for which a solemn pledge was taken.31 By the fifth century it had
acquired a complex of connotations: personal sacrifice, apotheosis, spiritual fe-
cundity, and marriage to God.32 Living arrangements, and the regimen or rules
by which the virgin might live, coalesced more slowly than the vow and the dedi-
cation, and were subject to much more regional and temporal variation. When
Patrick was writing, the critical feature of the holy virgin was her vow of chastity.
Sometimes this was accomplished during a veiling ceremony. An early descrip-
tion survives from the fourth century, where Jerome describes a rite in which the
virgin, witnessed by her companions, presented herself to her bishop and he, in
turn, placed a veil over her with words of commendation. Though we have no
way of knowing, it is likely that Patrick in the fifth century was performing a
similar, simple ceremony for his virgins.
Scio quod ad imprecationem pontificis flammeum virginalem sanctum operuerit caput;
et illud apostolicae vocis insigne celebratum sit: Volo autem vos omnes virginem castam
exhibere Christo.33
28
D. Dumville, The Floruit of St. PatrickCommon and Less Common Ground, in Dumville,
Saint Patrick, , at .
29
Confessio, chs. , . Epistola, ch. (Hood, ). The Epistola adds enumerare nequeo.
30
J. McNamara, Muffled Voices: The Lives of Consecrated Women in the Fourth Century, in
J. Nichols and L. Shank (eds.), Distant Echoes: Medieval Religious Women, i (Kalamazoo, Mich., ), .
31
Clark, Introduction, .
32
For an in-depth study, L. Legrand, The Biblical Doctrine of Virginity (London, ).
33
Jerome, Ep. , ch. (PL , cols. ).
I am aware that the bishop has with words of prayer covered her holy head with the vir-
gins bridal-veil, reciting the while the solemn sentence of the apostle: I wish to present
you all as a chaste virgin to Christ.
It is noteworthy that a woman could become a holy virgin without any formal
consecration, or could become one before a formality took place: she could
take a vow alone and without permission, and it would be binding and valid.
Canonically, the virginal dedication was like marriage: it was only necessary for
the participants to consent; there need be no priest or ceremony.34 Unilateral
vows of virginity were definitely in practice across the West, as the synodal
legislation attests. For much of the West, the woman who took the vow was
bound by her decision in that its manifestation was a change of dress, the most
common means by which she announced her new status to the world. For
example, chapter of the council of Barcelona () clarified the rule on rape: if
a man raped a woman who dressed herself as a virgin it was very serious, and not
like raping a lay woman. The same canon also stressed that if the victim chose
to stay with her attacker (suitor, perhaps?) she received a severe penance, i.e. she
could not renounce her identity as a nun. In Spain, at least, the self-dedication
of virgins continued into the seventh century and as late as that their unilateral
adoption of the veil constituted an irrevocable dedication to chastity: a council
of Toledo had spelled out that a woman who had herself taken to wearing the
Christian virgins costume had no more right to give up the virgins life than the
one who had been formally consecrated.35 Innocent, though, in his decretal of
did distinguish between the self-dedicated and the ritually consecrated; if a
virgin left her vocation to marry, she could reconcile herself to God through
penance if she were self-dedicated, but if she had been ritually consecrated she
was condemned to permanent excommunication.36 There were attempts to in-
stitutionalize the process by which one became a virgin, due in no small part to
the problems and confusion. In Spain, for example, in a council ruled
that a woman undertaking to become a virgin was required to take a public pact
to that effect.37
In Ireland, we have some early synodal legislation, but it sheds no light on the
matter, save to say that a virgins vow was irrevocablethe means by which she
took it are not elucidated. However, it is reasonable to surmise that in Ireland,
as elsewhere, no formal rite was required. Our earliest witness to the veiling of
religious women dates from the earliest Lives of St Brigit, namely the Life by
Cogitosus and the Vita I: those two attest to both the self-dedicatory option and
34
R. Metz, Le statut de la femme en droit canonique mdival, Recueils de la Societ Jean Bodin
(), , at .
35
Toledo (), ch. ; III Carthage (), ch. in the Collectio Hispana.
36
Decretal of Innocent, chs. (PL , col. ).
37
Concilium Eliberitanum, ch. (PL . ). Jos Fernandez Caton considers the text to indicate a
public contract, and therefore to represent a new departure from previous commitments to chastity,
which had been private (Manifestaciones asceticas en la iglesia hispano-romano del siglo IV (Len, ), ).
senior ecclesiastical figures then. As for the sixth century, when monasteries
grew in number and when we may presume with some certainty that the first
female communities were established, we can hardly assume that the bishops
maintained anything like organized power over virgins. They appear not to
have had organized control over anything else whether it be dioceses, mission-
ary activities, or education.42 We do best to envision virgins in a variety of situ-
ations, supervised by any one of a number of type of supervisors, or none. The
earliest Lives, which the next chapter covers in great depth, would appear to
bear this out: one finds virgins under the authority of senior females, monks,
priests, bishops, and under no ones authority but their own. Just as Irelands
overall ecclesiastical situation had an ad hoc quality to it during this period, so too
must this part of it.
reaction similar, but also the insistence on separation afterward.45 It was doubt-
less inspired by overseas synods, but is noticeably milder, as normally such a
woman had no option of penance. The synod of Mcon (), was being ex-
ceptionally generous when it allowed that an exceptionally remorseful ex-nun
could serve a long, hard penance under a bishop.46 Some continental synods
tried to stop the problem from happening in the first place, as did the council of
Agde (), which forbade the veiling of religious women before the age of
forty, on the grounds that they were less likely to abandon the vocation.47 The
Irish canonists, though, made no preventative legislation and the penalty is
comparatively light: Pa excommunicated the woman only until she changed
her ways. It insisted upon penance, but did not specify its duration; the phrasing
does not suggest that this penance would keep the woman from the altar for as
long as, say, seven or ten years. She was excommunicated until she changed (donec
convertatur). Even if this ruling is as late as the seventh century (some have sug-
gested that many entries in the text may be from then), the notion itself was def-
initely in Britain in the sixth. One finds the sixth-century British churchman
Gildas excoriating the ruler Maglocunus for going back on monastic vows, vows
which made his subsequent marriage illegal. It may be recalled that Gildas had
contact with, and influence on, Finnian and Columbanus in Ireland.48 Else-
where, too, the impermanence issue had been the matter of legislation and
rules.
Finnians Penitential, written either at Moville or at Clonard, is dated firmly
to the sixth century. It also deals with the issue of the fallen virgin:
Si mulier maleficio suo partum alicuius perdiderit, dimedium annum cum pane et aqua
peniteat per mensura et duobus annis abstineat a vino et a carnibus et sex quadragissi-
mas <ieiunet> cum pane et aqua. Si autem genuerit, ut diximus, filium et manifestum
45
e.g. Orleans (), ch. .
46
In Gaul: Arles (), ch. , self-vowed girls who subsequently married were excommunicated
and had to undergo penance; Venice (), ch. , those vowed to God who married were excommu-
nicated on grounds of adultery; Tours (), ch. , holy virgins and widows were excommunicated on
grounds of adultery; Mcon () ch. , a nun who married was normally excommunicated for life;
Edict of Clothar (), ch. , marriage was forbidden to girls who had vowed themselves to God. In
Spain: Braga (), ch. , the devota who married was anathema, receiving absolution only on her
deathbed; Barcelona (), ch. , ordered excommunication for girls who dress as virgins but then
marry. The four extant early British synods did not address the issue, i.e. Synod of the Grove of Victory,
Synod of North Britain, Gildass Preface on Penance, and Excerpts from a Book of David (all in Bieler,
Irish Penitentials). Early ecclesiastical councils: Chalcedon (), ch. (PL . ) rules that virgins and
monks who marry are to be penalized with full excommunication, though a bishop may show lenience
at his discretion. Innocents Decretal (), chs. , offers forgiveness through penance to self-
dedicated virgins who marry but denies it to those ritually consecrated (PL , col. ). Ancyra (),
ch. follows the church fathers in calling marrying virgins bigamists (PL . ); see also Gangra (),
chs. (PL . ).
47
Agde (), ch. .
48
Gildas, De Excidio Britanniae, ch. (M. Winterbottom (ed.), Gildas: The Ruin of Britain and Other Works
(Arthurian Period Series ; London, ), ). For the influence of Gildas on Finnian and Colum-
banus, see Sharpe, Gildas as a Father of the Church, in M. Lapidge and D. Dumville (eds.), Gildas: New
Approaches (Studies in Celtic History ; Woodbridge, ), .
peccatum eius fuerit, vi. annis, sicut iudicatum est de clerico, et in septimo iungatur
altario, et tunc dicimus posse renovare coronam et induere vestimentum album debere
et virginem nuncupare. Ita clericus qui cecidit eodem modo in septimo anno post la-
borem penitentie debet accipere clericatus officium sicut ait scriptura: Septies cadit iustus
et resurgit, id est post <septem> annos penitentie potest iustus vocari qui cecidit et in oc-
tavo non obtinebit eum malum, sed de cetero seruet se fortiter ne cadat.49
If a woman destroys by magic the child she has conceived of somebody, she shall do
penance for half a year with an allowance of bread and water, and abstain for two years
from wine and meat and fast for the six forty-day periods with bread and water. But, as
we have said, she bears a child and her sin is manifest, six years, as is the judgement in
the case of a cleric, and in the seventh year she shall be joined to the altar, and then we
say her crown can be restored and she may don a white robe and be pronounced a vir-
gin. So a cleric who has fallen ought likewise to receive the clerical office in the seventh
year after the labour of penance, as the Scripture says, Seven times a man falleth and
riseth, that is, after seven years of penance he who fell can be called just and in the eighth
year evil shall not lay hold on him, but for the remainder [of his life] let him preserve
himself carefully lest he fall.
The woman regained her status as a virgin (a vowed virgin) by, it seems, a re-
enactment of her original consecration; not only was she joined to the altar
(the normal phrase signifying the end of penitential status) but she again wore a
white robe. The male cleric was permitted, for his part, to receive the clerical
office in his seventh year of penance for sin.50 If a cleric lapsed but once and in
secret, he did not lose his office even temporarily, according to chapter of
Finnian. The seventh-century Penitential of Cummean simply reiterated Finn-
ians chapter , saying that the penance for a virgin who commits fornication
was the same as that of a cleric: a year on bread and water if no child was pro-
duced, and seven years of the same if one was.51 It is worth digressing to com-
ment on the restoration of virginity, the other feature of this entry. The idea of
coronam renovare baffles the modern imagination, and those patristic authorities
who wrote about it considered it an impossibility, though they did speak in gen-
eral terms about the ability of a lapsed virgin to expiate completely her sin.
Finnian, in the latter tradition, is betraying a deep belief in the efficacy of
penance. The ruling for the reinstatement of clerics has precedents in the late
antique Mediterranean writers Fulgentius, Cassian, and Caesarius of Arles, and
it looks very much as though Finnian believed that virgins should be treated in
an equivalent manner. This tells us something interesting about how virgins
were placed within the church structure, as well as the extraordinary efficacy
which the Irish ascribed to acts of penance.
49
Penitential of Finnian, chs. (Bieler, Irish Penitentials, ). From the context I think it is clear
that Finnian has used mulier initially to describe the vowed virgin who has lapsed, and that it is not ordin-
ary laywomen who have their virginity restored.
50 51
Ibid. Ch. , item .
, :
The ethos apparent in the earliest Irish material, fragmentary as it is, suggests
that religious virgins were not held back from participating in missionary activ-
ity. There is evidence against an ethos of strict enclosure in Ireland, and there
are no extant regulations constraining such activities.52 And, in the Lives of the
seventh century (as well as later ones), female saints and their virgins are por-
trayed as active in converting the Irish pagans. The earliest known missionaries
in Ireland were foreign (mostly British), but in the sixth century we begin to get
a swell of reported native Irish missionaries, remembered as saints and por-
trayed in the Lives as leaders of monks and often attributed with episcopal
status. Their obits grace the pages of the early entries of the annals, though
sometimes the notices were placed there retrospectively. A number of Irish
women are counted among the Irish missionary saints of the early sixth century.
The annals of Ulster record (retrospectively) the obits of saints Brigit ( ,
, ), Ita ( ), and Monenna ( ), who are reported as the
foundresses of the nunneries of Kildare, Killeedy, and Killevy respectively.
These women served as evangelists to their own people; whether they modelled
themselves on a British inspiration to do so we cannot know, for no record sur-
vives of female missionaries going from Britain to Ireland.53 All early Lives show
Irish protagonists as spending much time travelling, spreading the Christian
message and founding churches.54 Together this material gives the strong im-
pression that women were integrally involved in the spread of the new religion.
Virgins
In Confessio, chapter , after relating the tribulations of virgins, Patrick adds:
nihilominus plus augetur numerus . . . praeter viduas et continentes. Women at various
stages of life, he informs us, were undertaking religious professions of virginity,
widowhood, and continence within marriage. By expressing it in this way,
Patrick was betraying his familiarity with a standard late antique schema of
human classification called the threefold scale of perfection. The scale of
52
Whereas in Spain and Gaul the restrictions in the legislation are numerous, and the absence of
them in Ireland, I would argue, is significant, in light of the other, positive, indications in the extant
sources.
53
Ch. of the th-cent. Additamenta to Trechn mentions two British Christian women, mothers of
missionaries, who travel in Ireland; however, they are not described as missionaries themselves (Bieler,
Patrician Texts, ).
54
These include Cogitosus Life of Brigit, the Memoirs of Trechn, and an anonymous Life of
Brigit, often called the Vita I.
perfection had its origins in gnosticism but became widespread in late antique
intellectual circles of all religious and philosophical persuasions. Essentially it
said that there were three grades of spirituality, and each grade was defined by
the degree of asexuality it demonstrated.55 There were a few variations on the
specific membership of the grades, but the essential feature of the top grade was
that it consisted of those who were furthest removed from attachment to the
world and sexuality. The lowest grade consisted of those closest to, or still en-
gaged in, a sexual life; the middle grade was made up of those in some interme-
diate state, usually those who had been sexually active but had given it up.56
Christian thinkers very early on adopted the system as a way of describing the
three levels of status available to Christian believers. This they did by bolting it
on to Jesuss parable of the sower. In the parable, as it appears in Matthew :
and Mark : , the word of God was seed which fell (respectively) upon
hard, thorny, and good earth. Christian converts were all good earth because
they accepted the seed (the Word) and nourished it within themselves; but their
fruitfulness varied, for some brought forth more, and some less, fruit.57
In late antiquity the scale was a mainstay of Christian thought on sexual
questions.58 In the second century Tertullian and Irenaeus had launched the
typology by dividing mankind into three categories, spirituals, psychics, and
materials.59 Cyprian, interpreting the seed parable in the third century, as-
serted that the hundredfold were martyrs, and the sixtyfold virgins.60 Thus the
three levels of parabled fertility were joined onto the three levels of sexual re-
nunciation among Christians: virgins, widows, and the married. Jerome wrote
at length on these three types in his Adversus Iovinianum, the purpose of which was
to defend the principle that virgins, widows, and the married were ranked in
holiness, refuting Jovinian who had dared to suggest they might all be equal in
the eyes of the Lord. He also employed it in Commentarium in Mattheum and in his
Epistola .61 Augustine, too, used and defended the hierarchy.62 For the
Fathers, and indeed for most of Western Europe, it was a device by which
authors discussed the nature of virginity, and female virginity in particular. This
55 56
Bugge, Virginitas, . Ibid.
57
But he that received the seed upon good ground is he that heareth the word and understandeth
and beareth fruit and yieldeth the one and hundredfold, and another sixty, and another thirty (Matt. :
); and some [seed ] fell upon good ground and brought forth fruit that grew up and increased and
yielded, one thirty, another sixty, and another a hundred . . . And these are they who are sown upon the
good ground: they who hear the word and receive it and yield fruit, the one thirty, another sixty, and an-
other a hundred (Mark : , ).
58
On the threefold schema see M. Bernhards, Speculum virginum: Geistigkeit und Seelenleben der Frau im
Hochmittelalter (Cologne, ).
59
Irenaeus, Adversus haereses bk. I, ch. (PG . ). Tertullian, Adversus Valentianos, chs. .
60
Cyprian, De habitu virginum, written c. , ch. .
61
Adversus Iovinianum, bk. , ch. . Jerome also uses it in Commentarium in Mattheum, bk. , on Matt. :
, and throughout Ep. .
62
Augustines three tracts, De sancta virginitate, De bono viduitatis, and De bono coniugali are framed on the
schema, and aimed to rebut Jovinian. For use of the parable, see De sancta virginitate, ch. , and De bono
coniugali, ch. .
was its most common use, though it was on occasion used by writers wishing to
stress that even the married are acceptable in Gods eyes, in spite of their lack of
sexual renunciation.63 Only in one type of situation were the attributions al-
tered: in times of persecution. In such periods Christian writers placed martyrs
among the hundredfold.64 As the world of late antiquity gave way to that of the
early middle ages, the schema remained useful and was widely employed, both
in Ireland and in other parts of the West, in its normal form, in which the vir-
gins are the hundredfold, widows the sixtyfold, and the married the thirtyfold.
It received its widest circulation, probably, in Jeromes famous Epistola to
Eustochium on female holy life, where he speaks of virgins having the crown
and widows having the second degree of chastity.65 Patrick, then, knew it and
used it, which informs us that he was familiar with patristic ideas on the correct
relationship between sexual activity and spiritual ranking, and that his high valu-
ation of chastity was framed by Western ecclesiastical thinking. We might add
that it survived in use in Ireland long after Patrick. The sixth-century Peniten-
tial of Finnian says of married people:
Si cum bonis operibus expleant matrimonium, id est cum elimosinis et mandatis Dei im-
plendis et vitiis expellendis, et in futuro cum Christo regnabunt cum sanctum Abraham
et Isaac et Iacob Iob Noe omnibus sanctis, et tunc accipiant xxxm fructum quem Salva-
tor in evangelio enumerans et coniugiis deputauit.66
If with good works they fulfil matrimony, that is, with alms and by fulfilling the commands
of God and expelling their faults, and in the life to come they shall reign with Christ, with
holy Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Job, Noah, all the saints; they shall receive the thirtyfold
fruit which the saviour in the Gospel, in his account, has set aside for married people.
In the seventh century the threefold scale continued in use. In the Second
Synod of Saint Patrick (henceforth Pa) the chapter entitled De Tribus Seminibus
Evangeliorum runs:
Centissime episcopi et doctores, quia omnibus omnia sunt; sexagissimum clerici et
viduae qui contenentes sunt; xxxmi layci qui fidelis sunt, qui perfecte Trinitatem cre-
dunt. His amplius non est in messe Dei. Monachus vero et virginis cum centissimis
iungamus.67
The hundredfold are the bishops and teachers, for they are all things to all men; the
sixtyfold are the clergy and the widows who are continent; the thirtyfold are the layfolk
who are faithful, who perfectly believe in the Trinity. Beyond these there is nought in the
harvest of the Lord. Monks and virgins we may count with the hundredfold.
63
Two good studies of virginitas are Bugge, Virginitas, and L. Legrand, The Biblical Doctrine of Virginity
(London, ).
64 65
Bugge, Virginitas, , with patristic references. Jerome, Ep. , ch. .
66
Penitential of Finnian, ch. .
67
Pa, ch. . Note: Bieler inserted et after viduae, to make the line read clerici et viduae <et> qui con-
tenentes sunt; given that the thirtyfold are mentioned separately immediately after this, and given the
patristic basis of the schema, I disagree with his interpolation.
The seventh-century Liber Angeli or Book of the Angel and the eighth-century
litany Ateoch frit also contain formulations of the threefold scale.68 Whenever it
appears it is a witness to a line of thinking in which the virgin was the equal of
the bishop and the monk, was lower than no one, and was higher than everyone
else. This principle goes back to Patrick, where it was first expressed on Irish soil,
with especial reference to women.
Holy Widows
Patrick proclaimed that among his Christian Irish were widows and continentes,
sexually continent Christians. This boast cannot be taken at face value to mean
that there were professed Christian widows in his day, as he was employing a
rhetorical formula when speaking of them. The early penitentials ( Finnians,
Columbanuss, and Cummeans) do not mention holy widows at all. Nor do the
canons of Pa or for that matter the later Pa. The earliest appearance of a holy
widow is in the Vita I of Brigit, in which the young saint was said to have been
cared for by such a woman, who lived on her own near to Brigits parents home.
It is clear that vowed widows did exist in Ireland from the seventh century,
though there is much about them we cannot know. It is sufficient to simply note
here that the very prominent evidence of widows in Gaul and Spain in these
early centuries did not translate into an equal prominence in Ireland. Possibly
there were holy widows as early as the sixth century, but no textual trace sur-
vives; or possibly such widows were included in the legislation under the general
heading of virgines (as was the case in a few late antique sources); or there may not
yet have been in Ireland any formal status accorded to widows dedicating the re-
mainder of their lives in chastity to Christ.
married people, and their solutions took the form of restrictions on when, how,
and how often they could have sex.69
Most of the Christian Irish anti-sex rules for married people centre on
those occasions when it was religiously inappropriate: i.e. holy days and reli-
gious periods such as Lent. Since sex was considered anti-spiritual in its effect
on the human psyche, it was deemed inappropriate, if not ritually unclean, to
engage in it at holy times. In addition, a married persons penance for some
sins, such as rape, included a prohibition against sexual relations with the
spouse.70
In Gaul in particular there was a great enthusiasm for promoting the chaste
marriage, to the extent that it became something of a standard formula in hagio-
graphic and eulogistic writings. It seems there was no parallel in Ireland.
Patrick praised continentes but continence in contemporary Western literature
could refer to those who followed a regime of limited sexual activity. Neither
Irish canonists and penitential authors, nor seventh-century hagiographers,
take up the theme of the married couple who, inspired by God, forsake all sex-
ual activity and live as spiritual brother and sister. In Finnian full marital
chastity is put forth as a permanent proposition for couples in only two specific
situations. The first was in the case of barrenness:
Si qui<s> habuerit uxorem sterilem non debet demittere uxorem suam propter
sterilitatem suam, sed ita debet fieri, ambo manere in continentiam suam, et beati sunt si
permanserint casti corpore usquequo iudicaverit Deus illis iudicium verum et iustum.71
If anyone has a barren wife, he shall not turn away his wife because of her barrenness,
but this is what shall be done: they shall both dwell in continence, and blessed they are
if they persevere in chastity of body until God pronounces a true and just judgement
upon them.
The second type of celibate marriage of which Finnian spoke of is clerical mar-
riage, a distinct topic in itself.
Priests Wives
Patrick and other missionaries worked to increase the number of priests in the
Irish countryside, as a clergy was essential to the survival and growth of Chris-
tianity. A man, to be eligible for ordination, did not need to be single at this
time in the West, and by all accounts most priests were married. In Ireland as
elsewhere there is much we cannot know about the wives of priests. Finnians
69
J. Lynch, Godparents and Kinship in Early Medieval Europe (Princeton, ), . See also P. Payer,
Early Medieval Regulations Concerning Marital Sexual Relations, Journal of Medieval History (),
.
70
e.g. Penitential of Finnian, chs. , .
71
Ibid., ch. . Cf. Penitential of Cummean, ch. , item (Bieler, Irish Penitentials, ).
Penitential, the earliest Irish witness to the priests wife, does however indicate
that the Irish approach to the wife of the cleric can be placed well within the
Western Christian tradition of the day:
Si quis fuerit clericus diaconis uel alicui<us> gradus et laicus ante fuerit <et> cum filiis
et filiabus suis et cum clentella habitet et redeat ad carnis desiderium et genuerit filium
ex clentella propria sua, ut dicat, sciat se ruina maxima cecidisse et exsurgere debere;
non minus peccatum eius est ut esset clericus ex iuventute sua et ita est ut cum puella
aliena pecasset, quia post votum suum peccaverunt et postquam consecrati sunt a Deo
et tunc votum suum inritum fecerunt. III. annos peniteant cum pane et aqua per men-
sura et alios .iii. abstineant se a vino et a carne et non peniteant simul sed separantur, et
tunc in vii anno iungantur altario et accipiant gradum suum.72
If anyone is a cleric of the rank of deacon or of any rank, and if he formerly was a lay-
man, and if he lives with his sons and daughters and with his mate, and if he returns to
carnal desire and begets a son with his own mate, as he might say, let him know that he
has fallen to the depths of ruin and ought to rise; his sin is not less than it would be if he
were a cleric from childhood or he sinned with a strange girl, since they have sinned after
their vow and after they were consecrated to God, and then they have made void their
vow. They shall do penance for three years on an allowance of bread and water and
shall abstain for three years more from wine and meat, and they shall not do penance to-
gether, but separately, and then in the seventh year they shall be joined to the altar and
shall receive their rank.
The Irish were typical in giving the wife a special name and status. In Gaul there
were women called in canonical legislation presbyterissae and episcopae, and it is
generally agreed that the terms refer to the wives of presbyters and bishops re-
spectively.73 Though these terms appear very infrequently indeed, and it is not
appropriate to ascribe to these women clerical powers of the presbyterial and
episcopal offices, the fact of the special terminology is worth noting. For in Ire-
land, too, the name of the priests wife was an issue in this same period. The lan-
guage which Finnian applies merits note. It is clear that the clentella is the clerics
wife: by eschewing uxor or coniunx the author shows, I believe, that the post-
ordination relationship was not one of normal marriage. But why did the Irish
use clentella, which seems to be unique in the West as a term for the priests wife?
Bieler convincingly argued that it is a Latinization of the Old Irish ban-chle,
female companion or partner.74 Columbanus adopted Finnians term, correct-
ing it to clientela, but Gildas and the early Irish canonist of Pa did not, using uxor
instead. Kathleen Hughes noted this and used the fact to argue that the canons
were, like Gildass text, earlier than Finnians Penitential: uxor must be earlier
than clentella, she argued, because the former implied to her full marriage where
72
Penitential of Finnian, ch. .
73
B. Brennan, Episcopae: Bishops Wives Viewed in Sixth-Century Gaul, Church History
(), .
74
Bieler, Irish Penitentials, .
the latter distinguishes against it. Furthermore, she asserted, ascetic standards
rose in the sixth century.75 But an earlier date for the canons is not necessitated
by the use of uxor. The canonists, if writing in the seventh century, may simply
have been relying on Gildas rather than Finnian and Columbanus for their ter-
minology. Another possibility is that Finnians term for the clerics wife was not
universally adopted: clerical marriage (with full sexual union) certainly did con-
tinue. Yet another possibility is that the Irish canonical writers were following
the lead of Gaulish and other Western canons which continued to use uxor for
priests wives (including chaste ones) with no hesitation whatsoever.76 Mirn N
Dhonnchadha has recently argued this point about clentella in Finnian, drawing
on parallels with the Bigotian Penitential:
Christian thinking promoted the idea of equality of both partners in marriage and,
more to the point here, in a celibate union. The terms uxor and coniunx would have been
inappropriate for a former wife in such a union. Since cle in the sense of wife is not
attested in Old Irish, I suggest that cle in the sense of fellow, companion may have
funcioned as the source for clientella, diminutive of clienta.77
Turning to the main thrust of Finnians injunction, the insistence on clerical
celibacy fits well into what was happening at the time in Western Christendom
generally. Though it is absolutely clear that the vast majority of priests remained
married with children right through the early middle ages, at the time Finnian
was writing there was, in Gaul and North Africa, a concern among church
authorities to try to promote celibacy for the clergy. The fact that Finnian in
Ireland was promoting the same thing suggests he may have been in touch with
wider Western authorities and, as an ascetic himself, would certainly have en-
dorsed the campaign.
A brief digression will suffice to illustrate the details of this trend. A vow of
chastity for clerics was required for the first time in at Carthage. A cam-
paign for clerical celibacy was escalating in the West in the sixth century.78
Gregory of Tours, for example, romantically exalts the chastity of the marriages
of the bishop Riticius of Autun and bishop Amator of Auxerre, along with those
of other clerics.79 From about it was a standard idea that a man who was
already married could become a priest, but not vice versa, although this was not
75
The early [th-cent.] Irish church certainly required monogamy from all its clergy, but it may have
made no serious attempt to impose complete continence. This was the work of the ascetics of the later
sixth century (Hughes, Church, ).
76
On different grounds from those treated here, recent scholars have been less convinced of an early
th-cent. date for the canons, with Richard Sharpe (for example) arguing strongly for a th-cent. date.
77
M. N Dhonnchadha, Caillech and Other Terms for Veiled Women in Medieval Irish Texts, igse
(), , at . This article also demonstrates convincingly that caillech was a term used for
wives in many contexts in texts across several centuries in early medieval Ireland.
78
Barstow, Married Priests, .
79
Liber in Gloria Confessorum, chs. , (B. Krusch (ed.), MGH, Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum , part
(Hanover, ), ).
universally (or even widely) adhered to.80 The married man could be ordained
providing he and his wife agreed to live together chastely.81 In fact, it was for-
bidden for a cleric to abandon his wife; thus insisted the Apostolic Canons in the
fourth century, Leo I in the fifth and Gregory the Great in the sixth. Subsequent
canonical collections such as the Dionysio-Hadriana, Hispana, Regino of Prm,
and Burchard of Worms continued along the same line.82 Some councils tried
to keep a strong hold on how the couple lived together by stipulating separate
bedrooms, or, failing that, separate beds, and sometimes by threatening degrad-
ation or deposition if lapses occurred.83 It was not until the eleventh-century
reforms that priests were told to send their wives away, and then there was ex-
tensive resistance.84
Finnians passage hints that the vow of the husbands ordination involved
both the man and his wife. In his edition, Bieler changed post votum suus to post
votum suum on account of the plural verb.85 If he is correct that the original mean-
ing was indeed plural, and I think he is, we can say that in yet another respect
Finnian is taking precedents from other areas of the Christian West. In some
areas the wife had a part herself in her husbands ordination ceremony: the
Council of Orange ( ) stipulated that a clerical wife had to take a vow of
chastity known as a conversio. The Council of Agde ( ) stressed the mutual-
ity of marriage and required the wifes consent, insisting that the ordination
could take place only if both had been equally changed ( pariter conversi fuerint);
the wife then might receive a special blessing and would thenceforth wear
special clothing.86 It seems most likely that in Finnians sixth-century Ireland
wives at least took a vow of celibacy together with their husbands as part of the
ordination rites. This seems even more likely when we consider that in subse-
quent centuries the priests living companion was sometimes termed caillech
the standard term for nun which literally means veiled one.87
If Finnians entry implies that clerical couples lived in the same household,
then so too does a canon in Pa, which insists that a priest make sure his wife
veils her head, because it is he who is made responsible for making sure his
80
Conciliar legislation and papal rulings of the th and th cents. are both numerous and inconsistent
on this subject, and thus I here generalize. For a detailed treatment of legislation see C. Frazee, The Ori-
gins of Clerical Celibacy in the Western Church, Church History (), , esp. at .
81
But at least two councils insisted on actual separation: Lyons ( ), ch. . Gerona ( ). The
Council of Agde also requires the woman to enter a convent.
82
Elliott, Spiritual Marriage, . The apostolic canons were a popular apocryphal collection from the
second half of the th cent., which was translated into Latin c. and included in the Dionysiana, which
in turn served as a source for the influential Carolingian Hadriana.
83
Auxerre ( ), ch. ; Orleans ( ), ch. ; Tours ( ), ch. .
84
For example, the Council of Bourges in required priests to send away their wives, and the rul-
ing aroused a great deal of controversy.
85
My translation of suus throughout this passage has been prompted by the plural forms of the verb.
It is, then, implied that both husband and wife had to take vows of virginity on the formers ordination.
(Irish Penitentials, ).
86 87
Chs. , . Discussion in Barstow, Married Priests, . N Dhonnchadha, Caillech.
Deaconesses
In the Christian church in Gaul there were women called deaconesses, whose
ecclesiastical function was to assist in preparing female converts in their cate-
chism and to assist during their baptismal rites. The canonical legislators during
this era were concerned to eradicate the office. There is no evidence that this of-
fice ever existed in Ireland: it is not referred to in the contemporary texts dis-
cussed above nor in any later sources.
The new religion must have looked quite odd to the majority of the non-
converted population, what with its single male deity, its idealization of chastity,
and its dedication to following the religious customs of faraway lands. The
position of women in the new religion may not have been profoundly different
from what it was in the old one, in that, while the majority of leaders were male
and official rites were conducted by men, there were still roles for women and
high status was still available to exceptionally gifted females.
As for the possibilities in the new religion itself, from Patricks own writing it
seems clear that even in his own day, with virtually no institutions in place, Irish
women could dedicate their virginity to God. In this Ireland was a later reflec-
tion of what had been the case earlier in Gaul and still earlier in Egypt and
Syrianamely that the female virginal office got going well before coenobitic
communities were established for them. As elsewhere, the profession was
supposed to be permanent, and penalties were issued for those who lapsed. The
88
Pa, ch. : Quicumque clericus ab hostiario usque ad sacerdotem sine tunica visus fuerit atque turpitudinem ventris
et nuditatem non tegat, et si non more Romano capilli eius tonsi sint, et uxor eius si non velato capite ambulaverit, pariter a
laicis contempnentur et ab ecclesia separentur.
Somehow between Patricks era and c. there came into existence places
where consecrated women could live in community under an abbess. At the
turn of the seventh century, many doubtless still lived in their home environ-
ments, as they had in Patricks day, but many did not. In the course of the fifth
and sixth centuries hundreds of churches and monasteries were established, so
that by c. there existed across Ireland small womens churches and a hand-
ful of flourishing nunneries. This chapter considers how these places came into
existence, looking in particular at the role of those great evangelizing women
founders who subsequently were revered as saints, as well as at those male mis-
sionaries who helped devout female Christians to establish the small churches at
which so many lived. The sources are limited, consisting of archaeological re-
mains and, of written material, only saints Lives. Nevertheless, a picture
emerges, albeit an incomplete one.
There do exist, and have been excavated, archaeological remains of early, small
ecclesiastical sites. In almost all cases, the earliest levels (fifth and sixth centuries)
are not churches but cemeteries.1 It seems that in many places which became
churches, the first Christian activity on the site was burial, and later, above the
burials, were built first shrines, then churches. Charles Thomas emphasized
this, and it has become a well-known model of development for such sites.2 In
1
Excavation can reveal that such churches if built (say) in the late th century, are likely to be sited
unwittingly and directly above burials of the th or even th century (C. Thomas, Celtic Britain (London,
), ). Scholars such as Nancy Edwards see the rise of saints cults as a th-cent. phenomenon. (See
N. Edwards, The Archaeology of Early Medieval Ireland (London, ), , where she also suggests that
enclosures and valla round ecclesiastical sites arose no earlier than the th cent.). Charles Thomas shows
in his work on slab shrines and other special graves a conviction that from the earliest days the saint was
an instrumental figure in ecclesiastical site development (C. Thomas, Early Christian Archaeology of North
Britain (Oxford, )).
2
Thomas, Celtic Britain, .
this model, the earliest construction is a burial ground, with one of the burials
being a special grave identifiable by a surround of some sort. The special grave
was subsequently built up by a small shrine (sometimes a slab-shrine) and later
by an actual wooden church building; the latter often dug into some of the other
early graves, presumably unwittingly.
But where are the first-generation churches and monasteries, those which
the hagiography insists were constructed during the lifetime (and under the
auspices) of such missionaries as Patrick, Ita, Monenna, Brigit, and a host of
other male saints? Quite simply, if they exist they have not been found, or they
have not been identified as such. Archaeologists note that near some of the early
burial grounds are found residential huts, whose residents have so far remained
uncertain. One is forced to wonder, though, if perhaps the dwellers of these
primary-level huts were saints, i.e. holy people, ascetics, monks, and virgins.
Perhaps these are the small places founded by Patrick, Mathona, and their like.
Until archaeologists identify these places, there will remain a dichotomy
between the archaeological and the historical portraits of this phase of ecclesi-
astical development.
The success of Thomass model and the general historical emphasis on the
diocesan structure of the early church are two factors which have combined to
make archaeologists tend to label early burial grounds as lay or community
cemeteries, even when they also feature an oratory and/or dwellings. This is
even more the case when a female burial is amongst those in the primary level.
Thomas wrote in in The Early Christian Archaeology of North Britain:
At this stage of development, particularly in remoter regions, it is not of course always
possible to distinguish at once between an enclosed developed cemetery (with a stone
chapel and a handful of little round huts) and a small eremitic monastery. Only a care-
ful excavation could produce the evidence to satisfy a purist as to this fine distinction; the
presence or absence of lay persons (women and children) buried in the cemetery.3
By presuming that any female remains are, by definition, remains of a member
of the laity, Thomas overlooks burials of vowed virgins, holy widows, and eccle-
siastical families.4 Certainly the presence of an infants remains would suggest
that a cemetery served the laity, but the mere presence of a female is not such an
indicator.
One particularly interesting case is that of Church Island, off the west coast of
Co. Kerry in the southern part of Dingle Bay. It is an ecclesiastic site whose earli-
est level consists of a residential dwelling, an oratory, and a few graves among
which is a female burial.5 The excavator dated the burials to probably the sixth
3
Thomas, North Britain, .
4
On identification problems see also A. Hamlin, The Early Irish Church: Problems of Identifica-
tion, in N. Edwards and A. Lane (eds.), The Early Church in Wales and the West (Oxbow Monograph ;
Oxford, ), .
5
Excavated by Professor M. J. OKelly in . See M. OKelly, Church Island near Valencia,
Co. Kerry, PRIA C (), .
If the usable material remains are scanty, so too are the written ones. The saints
Lives of this century are the only substantial, possibly useful, textual source for
the foundation of female houses. They pose problems, of course. A hagiog-
rapher, even when writing during the lifetime of a saint, did not aim to write his-
tory but rather to demonstrate Gods power. Moreover, storytelling devices
were employed to enhance the plot, and entire episodes were sometimes copied
wholesale from extant texts. The structure of saints Lives was largely formulaic,
too, many early medieval ones owing a large debt to Jeromes, Cassians, and
Athanasiuss Lives of early Church Fathers. Moreover the political agendas un-
derlying the writing of most Lives meant that the facts were skewed to elevate
the status or wealth of the institutions of which the saint was patronusually the
6
Thomas, North Britain, .
7
OKelly, Church Island, ; Thomas, North Britain, ; Edwards, Archaeology, .
8
Historians can learn something from the anthropologists idea that women are good to think. That
is to say, women have diverse, and opposed meanings inscribed upon them, and lend themselves to such
multiple interpretations in ways that men do not. It is no coincidence that favourite subjects of Christian
monastic spirituality should be the bride/soul/Church of the Song of Songs and the composite image of
Mary, virgin-mother, sinner/saved (Nelson, Women and the Word, in Shiels and Wood, Women in the
Church, ).
9
M. McNamara, The Apocrypha in the Irish Church (Dublin, ; repr. with corrections, );
E. G. Quin, The Irish Glosses, in P. N Chathin and M. Richter (eds.), Irland und Europa: Die Kirche im
Frmittelalter (Stuttgart, ), ; M. Herbert and M. McNamara, Irish Biblical Apocrypha: Selected
Texts in Translation (Edinburgh, ).
10
L. Bieler, The Celtic Hagiographer in L. Bieler, Ireland and the Culture of Early Medieval Europe,
ed. R. Sharpe (Variorum Reprints; London, ), . The Cogitosus Life exists in some primary
manuscripts, including two th-cent. manuscripts from northern France (Reims Bibl. Mun. MS and
Paris BN Lat. ) and two northern French copies of the th and th cents. The standard edition is
J. Colgan, Triadis thaumaturgae acta (Louvain, ), . A less satisfactory edition is that in PL .
. An English translation is published by S. Connolly and J.-M. Picard, Cogitosus Life of
St Brigit, JRSAI (), .
11
R. Sharpe, Vitae S. Brigitae : The Oldest Texts, Peritia (), , at .
12
An early date was proposed by M. Esposito and has been defended by Sharpe; see M. Esposito, On
the Earliest Latin Life of St. Brigid of Kildare, PRIA C (), ; id., On the Early Latin Lives
of St. Brigid of Kildare, Hermathena (), ; and Sharpe, Vitae S. Brigidae. For arguments
years, the debate has been furthered by Richard Sharpe and Kim McCone.13
Though there are other points, the dating debate has hinged on how the text
treats the relationship between Kildare and Armagh; as the two churches were
at odds for much of the seventh century. Brigits Vita I must date either from
before the worst of the conflict or after it, not least because Patrick accords to
Brigit equal status in a particularly fulsome passage. Sharpes and Espositos
position is in many ways the more attractive, especially in light of the Latinity,
but the case for the eighth century is a strong one.The text survives in about
twenty-five Continental manuscripts, and the manuscript tradition goes back to
the ninth century, the oldest and most authoritative manuscript being of
possibly southern German provenance.
The remaining two Lives are not of Brigit but of Patrick. The Memoirs of
Trechn, found solely in the Book of Armagh, recount the activities, primarily
the travels, of Patrick; appended to it are charter-like addenda, traditionally
called the Additamenta. Trechn aimed to build up Armaghs claim to
episcopal supremacy, so he attributed to Patrick the foundation of hundreds of
churches whose actual origins may have had nothing to do with him.14
Muirchs Life of Patrick casts the saint as a powerful magus overcoming the
native pagans; no virgins appear in it.15 It is necessary to mention also an
eleventh-century Latin Life of the virgin saint Monenna, foundress of Killevy in
south-west Ulster (Ir. Cell Shlibe Cuillin) by one Conchubranus.16 Mario
Esposito claimed that identifiable sections of it are verbatim copies of a seventh-
century exemplar which he dated to between and .17 The argument
is attractive, but insufficiently secure to warrant using the allegedly early
chapters except as provisional supplementary evidence.
It is from this handful of material, then, that the historian must assemble a
favouring a later date see F. Briain, Brigitana, ZCP (), ; Bieler, The Celtic
Hagiographer, ; K. McCone, Brigit in the Seventh Century: A Saint With Three Lives?, Peritia
(), . Also see D. hAodha, The Early Lives of St Brigit, County Kildare Archaeological Society
Journal (), . For a brief summary of the debate see R. Sharpe, Medieval Irish Saints Lives:
An Introduction to Vitae Sanctorum Hiberniae (Oxford, ), .
13
Sharpe, Vitae S. Brigitae; McCone, Brigit. Sean Connolly in his translation of Cogitosus says the
Vita I is almost a century later than Cogitosus Life which (following Bieler) he puts at shortly after
(Cogitosus Life of St Brigit, ).
14
There is a discussion of the text in Kenney, no. , giving it the dates ; also discussed in
L. Bieler, ed. and trans., The Patrician Texts in the Book of Armagh (Scriptores Latini Hiberniae : Dublin,
), , with dating on .
15
Muirch, Life of Patrick, ed. and trans. in A. Hood, Patrick: His Writings and Muirchs Life (London,
), ; also in Bieler, Patrician Texts, .
16
Conchubranus Life is found in a single manuscript, Cotton Cleopatra A.ii, ed. and trans. USMLS,
The Life of Saint Monenna by Conchubranus, Seanchas Ard Mhacha, . (), ; . (),
; . (), . It was also edited by M. Esposito in PRIA C (), .
17
The Sources of Conchubranus Life of St Monenna, English Historical Review (), ; for his
dating of the exemplar, see . Seventh-cent. passages were identified as those which, inter alia, refer to
Ireland as Scotia rather than Hibernia, and partly by identifying as contemporary an appended abbess-list
of which the final name was that of an abbess of the early th-cent.
picture of how womens communities came into existence in the course of the
sixth and very early seventh centuries.
The first thing to say is that the Lives consistently claim churches and monaster-
ies were founded by peripatetic missionary leaders; they are also consistent in
saying that these leaders tended to found numerous places rather than just one.
They tend to report that places were established on lands donated for the pur-
pose, normally by local magnates and on lands of their kindred. In Muirchs
Life for example, Patrick travelled extensively requesting land for churches.18 In
Trechns memoirs, he travelled almost continuously with brief stops to bap-
tize, ordain, and establish churches.19 It has been said that the geographical
areas in which missionary-founders worked can be roughly deduced from the
locations of their alleged foundations, but a problem lies in the fact that a place-
name or legend can be generated by later devotion. Moreover, saints were
sometimes credited with founding places by mother-churches trying to extend
claims over them, a trick seen most clearly in Trechn.20 For all this, no one
challenges the idea that the basic method of foundation was peripatetic. Exag-
gerated claims are thought to be just that: exaggerations, not inventions out of
whole cloth of a foundation method which had never existed.
It is against this background that the foundations of holy virgins must be seen.
In short, the seventh-century Lives depict womens places as being founded in
the same way. Within this, one finds both women founding autonomously and
men founding places for them. It is to these two means, both involving the ubi-
quitous topos of saintly wandering, that we now turn.
18
Muirchs Life of Patrick, book , chs. , ; book , chs. , , .
19
Trechn, Memoirs, chs. , , , , , , , (Bieler, Patrician Texts,
).
20
A. Firey, Cross-Examining the Witness: Recent Research in Celtic Monastic History, Monastic
Studies (), , at . For a study focusing on popular devotion, see P. Riain, St. Finnbarr:
A Study in a Cult, Journal of the Cork Historical and Archaeological Society , no. (), .
Cogitosuss Life of Brigit, for example, though it says little on the surrounding
context of the saints miracles, does refer obliquely to Brigits missionary travels
in chapter .
In these accounts, the female foundress is not reliant on her immediate
family. Indeed, the parents are often seemingly absent. Occasionally the Lives
mention parents as being financially supportive to the womans foundation
activity, but when this is so, the family is not given particular praise or credit.
Brigits Vita I exemplifies this particularly well. When she was to be consecrated,
Brigit travelled on her own initiative to the region of the U Nill, taking three
girls with her, where she received the veil along with eight other virgins.
Immediately after the ceremony the parents of the other girls encouraged her to
set up a community:
Tunc et aliae virgines octo acceperunt velamen simul cum sancta Brigita. Et illae vir-
gines cum suis parentibus dixerunt, Noli nos relinquere sed mane nobiscum et locum
habitandi in his regionibus accipe. Tunc mansit cum illis sancta Brigita.21
Then the other eight virgins accepted the veil as had holy Brigit. And these virgins with
their parents said, Do not leave us but stay with us and accept a place to live in these
parts. Then saint Brigit stayed with them.
The role of Brigits own parents in this is nil, and Brigit is portrayed as
possessing the authority necessary to accept in her own right the land and other
resources offered by the virgins parents. Indeed the role of the parental donors
is somewhat perfunctory, as though once the requisite resources were gained,
the saint could herself establish the community. In short, the important person
here is Brigit, not the parents. A similar tone is found in the Cogitosus Life,
which recounts how Brigit supposedly founded Kildare. The monastery was
founded out of public demand, it says, with people of both sexes pledging their
vows to Brigit.22 Thus a seventh-century churchman imagined that in the
century preceding him a holy women, a consecrated nun, could have developed
a national following and built herself a large monastery for followers of both
sexes. He relates this without explaining to his readers how a nun could have
acquired the land or the temporal authority to do so. Consecrated women
mentioned in passing are also attributed with the ability to found places on their
21
Ch. . The th-cent. Life of Brigit, Bethu Brigte, gives another account of her first place and does
mention parents; in ch. , Brigits father, finally persuaded to let her take the veil, says Take the veil,
then, my daughter, for this is what you desire. Distribute this holding to God and man (Gaib-siu tra calle,
ammo ingen, ar is ed taccobar. Fodail dano in trebad-sa do Dia duiniu). Some time later she did so, but had to
travel with two other maidens through unsafe territory to get to the bishop who would perform the rite.
Ch. relates that post haec obtuilit pleps locum ubi nomine Ached hI in Saltu Avis. Illic aliquantulum temporis
manens, tres viros perigrinos ibi manere cogebat obtulit eis locum (D. hAodha, Bethu Brigte (Dublin, ) ).
22
Cogitosuss Preface to his Life of Brigit, ch. : Haec ergo egregiis crescens virtutibus, et per famam bonarum
rerum ad eam de omnibus provinciis Hiberniae innumerabiles populi de utroque sexu confluentes, vota sibi voventes, volun-
tarie suum monasterium, caput pene omnium Hiberniensium Ecclesiarum, et culmen praecellens omnia monasteria Scoto-
rum, cuius parochia per totam Hibernensem terram diffusa, a mari usque ad mare extensa est, in campestribus campi
Liffeim, supra fundamentum fidei firmum construxit.
description is uneven. The Life of Brigit by Cogitosus, for example, gives very
little on the life of Brigits nuns, and Trechn, concentrating as he does on
Patricks foundation activities, also says little about the nature of nuns commu-
nities. By far the richest early source on this subject is Brigits Vita I. It is the only
text indubitably pre-dating the ninth century that gives extensive incidental in-
formation on the female community; it concentrates on the activities of Brigit
in the world, and frequently mentions the band of religious who made up the
saints familia. In it is described a loose group of dedicated people engaged
mainly in strengthening Christianity in a country still largely pagan. The group,
as portrayed in this Life, was made up of the saint, her dedicated virgins, a char-
ioteer, and sundry foster-daughters and girl students. Bishops and clerics were
sent for, to come to the virgins and preach the word of God and perform the eu-
charist.28 At some point the community did gain a permanent resident priest
and then a bishop.29 Life in the nunnery as described by the Vita I, and by Co-
gitosus for that matter, doubtless resembles more the time of writing than this
early phase, but the basic idea is unlikely to be far wrong in broad outline.
The amount of travel is extraordinary, as was mentioned at the opening of
this chapter. It is relevant because the hagiography gives the impression that
being a holy Christian woman in these early days consisted essentially of
leading an itinerant Life, studying under male saints, and then founding one or
more monasteries. Altogether in the Vita I Brigit moved no less eighteen times,
and covered all five provinces. Some of her stays were at existing churches, as in
chapter when she received pilgrims at a certain churchcum autem esset
Brigita in aecclesia quadam et cum sedisset iuxta ianuam loci illius . . . Other examples
include mention of the church where she was (aeclesia in qua illa erat);30 and the
phrases such as after this holy Brigit came Mag Breg; when Brigit lived in
another place;31 elsewhere the reader is informed after this Brigit came with her
maidens to Campum Clioch and she lived there in some place ( post haec venit
sancta Brigita cum puellis suis in campum Clioch et habitavit ibi in quodam loco).32 The
hagiographer did clearly consider that holy women other than Brigit could have
churches of their own, as in chapter where Brigit visited St Lassair at her
church.33
Trechns scanty coverage of female monasticism is nevertheless consistent
with the portrait found in the Vita I.34 According to the memoirs, holy virgins
lived at churches, groups of virgins seem to have been small and ad hoc, men and
women might be resident at churches together, travel was permitted to women
as it was to men, and it seemed to have a missionary purpose; and finally, women
28
e.g. chs. , .
29
He is found as a member of the community also in ch. of Cogitosuss Life.
30 31 32
Ch. . Ch. . Ch. .
33
Eodem tempore hospitabatur sancta Brigita in aeclesia Sanctae Lasrae. Lassar donated (obtulit) herself and her
place to Brigit in this anecdote.
34
See esp. Trechn, Memoirs, chs. , , , , , , , , and its Additamenta, chs. , .
were perfectly capable of being the spiritual leaders of foundations which the
author calls churches, aeclesiae.
35
Bieler, The Celtic Hagiographer, .
have done is not prominent in the text of the Life. It must be wondered why, if
Martin was a model for Brigit, the author did not make her a missionary like
him. The anecdotes of her interactions with pagans are strikingly different from
those of Sulpiciuss Martin. The Dialogues too have some possible contributions
to Brigidine material: locked doors open magically in the palaces of hostile
kings, both saints have converse with heavenly beings whilst in their cells,
dropped vessels do not break, church buildings identify sinners in the saints
presence, food miracles are performed, adversarial kings are confronted. As for
travel, the Dialogues have Martin travelling to the Holy Land, tales are
recounted of holy wandering anchorites in the desert, and Martin himself visits
monasteries in a peripatetic manner resembling what we find in the Brigidine
Lives and in Trechn. But on the sexes, the portrayal is mixed. Martin has
female devotees in the village of Claudiomagnus, but he firmly insisted that a
man living the eremitical life should send his wife to a nunnery, and another part
of the text cites Jerome in advocating strict separation of virgins from monks and
clerics. Martin also praised a virgin who was so strict about shielding herself
from the male gaze that she turned even him from her door. In the Dialogues
Martins travels, like those of Brigit, do involve preaching to pagans, interacting
with authorities, and spreading the teaching of the holy life, but there are no
mixed-sex prayer meetings or extended visits, and there is no account of friend-
ship between the saint and any women.
Cassian, an acknowledged important source for the regulation of the reli-
gious life in Ireland, may also have contributed to the Brigidine material, but he
is far from providing a model. A short tale of shoes brought into the monastery
by a newcomer in book of the Institutes looks very much like one in Brigits
Vita I. On travelling around Cassian is distinctly disapproving, and there is no
hint of an idea of founding churches through wandering. On malefemale con-
tact, he lectures at several points against monks and clerics subjecting them-
selves to sexual temptation; for all that, he is careful not to advocate the
shunning of the opposite sex: in the tale of Abbot Paul the abbot did so and was
punished by God with complete paralysis, to be nursed in all things by holy
virgins.36 One suspects that Cassians main contribution to the Irish churchs
attitude on gender was his message of monastic self-examination rather than
condemnation of the opposite sex, and his failure to advocate the enclosure of
religious women.
To sum up, the Irish did not get their blueprint of female sainthood from any
of the popular models just described. There is simply too much apostolic travel,
missionary work, leadership, and inter-sex collaboration. It was instead another
genre that provided the model for that distinctive combination of activities
which characterize Irish female saintly behaviour. The Apocryphal Acts and
martyr stories showed holy Christian women as wandering and travelling in
36
Institutes, book , ch. (PL . ).
their religious life; as learning their religion from a peripatetic male apostle; as
being themselves teachers and witnesses for a wider pagan community; and as
melodramatically avoiding the marriage bed. These texts, which purported to
relate the acts of the apostles but whose contents failed to be deemed canonical
and thus officially approved by church authorities, were in wide circulation
across the West from even before Patricks era. As was seen in the last chapter,
they influenced him. They travelled as individual tracts and even more piece-
meal too, as individual stories in a range of manuscripts, including books of re-
ligious miscellanea and florilegia. The stories have long been known to have been
in Ireland by the seventh century if not before: their traces are found in male
Lives as much as womens ones, including Muirch and Trechn; the fact that
they were about apostles spreading Christianity into a pagan world made them
attractive to the Irish, who viewed their missionaries in apostolic terms.37
Devout Christian women travelling and wandering are central themes in
many of them, most prominently in the Acts of Paul and Thecla, the Acts of
Peter, the Martyrdom of Agapetae and her Companions, and the Romance of
Xanthippe and Polyxena; it is an attendant feature in the Acts of John and the
Acts of Peter. Related to this is the stock plot feature of the woman learning her
religious vocation from a male apostle who was also a dear friend, a feature in
stories of Brigit, Monenna, and in fact all the Irish foundress saints, whether
written in the seventh century or the twelfth. In the apocrypha, Maximilla
learned from Andrew in his Acts, Drusiana from John in his, and Perpetua from
Paul in Perpetuas Story. Xanthippe, like Brigit, visited a number of apostles,
Paul, Philip, and Andrew. Thomass and Peters Acts both report that they
were visited by numerous women and virgins for guidance and teaching. Thecla
was renowned for her devotion to Paul, and Polyxena also followed him for
some time.
The Apocryphal Acts created and popularized the topoi of the reluctant
bride and the reluctant wifein which fiances and wives shun the marriage-
bed with extreme and sometimes histrionic gestures. Holy martyrs and female
paragons of this sort are reported in the Acts of Andrew, of John, of Thomas, of
Paul and Thecla, of Peter, and in the Romance of Xanthippe and Polyxena. In
Ireland Brigit is the most famous such bride, for her two earliest Lives (Cogito-
sus and the Vita I ) relate that she destroyed one of her eyes to put off a suitor. The
Acts promote an image of an independent chaste woman saint in another way
as well, as an inspiration to conversion to the as yet unconverted pagans. Those
who were martyred inspired conversion through their brave deaths; but a few
others, such as Thecla, were evangelizers: Paul told Thecla to go and teach the
word of God, which she did, and by the time she died naturally in old age, she
had enlightened many with the Christian message. Thecla is in this way (as well
37
On the Continent, interestingly, these same models were also present but did not lead to peripatetic
female saints in the Lives of the Merovingians and Carolingians ( J. Smith, The Problem of Female
Sanctity in Carolingian Europe, c., Past and Present (), ).
The above discussion places the imagery surrounding the foundress of Kildare,
saint Brigit, in the wider Christian tradition of the Apocryphal Acts. It is much
more common for historians to frame her in native Irish terms, as a Christianized
goddess, and her church, Kildare, is even seen by some as owing features to this
background. Among non-specialists her pagan origins are expressed with even
more certainty. To understand why the equation has been so frequently made
between the pagan goddess and Christian saint, and why Kildare has looked to so
many like a thinly-disguised temple of priestesses, requires a consideration of the
various pieces of evidence in turn. A full exposition of the evidence and its
interpretations could fill a monograph in itself, so it is here merely summarized.
As was mentioned in the previous chapter, we know very little about the
pagan goddess of the name Brg or Brigit in Ireland, owing to a lack of evidence,
written and archaeological. Because no one has ever dug underneath Kildare
to see if there is a pre-Christian temple site, even the presumed cult centre, if
there was one, is not known to exist. The earliest evidence for the goddess is in
the Irish vernacular law tracts, written down c., which contain a few little
legal stories in which Brg is the daughter, wife, or mother of the legendary judge
Sencha of the distant Irish past. According to these she sat by Senchas side as he
made pronouncements on law, and on occasion intervened to correct or
contradict him.41 Nowhere in this material is she equated with the saint of the
41
Di Chetharslicht Athgabla [On the Four Divisions of Distraint], CIH ..;
..; ..; also, with trans., ALI i. ; ii. . Din Techtugad [On Legal
Entry], CIH ..; also, with trans., ALI iv. .
almost-identical name. Then in the tenth century the compilers of Sanas Cormaic
(Cormacs Glossary) included an entry on Brigit calling her the goddess
worshipped by poets, adding that she had two sisters of the same name who were
patronesses of smithcraft and healing respectively, and that her name was de-
rived from bri-sagit, fiery arrow.42 It is uncertain whether they equated the deity
Brigit with the saint Brigit, but it is impossible that the saint was unknown to
them; for some reason they chose not to make explicit their understanding of the
relationship between the two. It is with Sanas Cormaic that we find the first
explicit link made between this goddess and the element of fire, in the word bri.
McCone has convincingly shown that the three arts it claims Brigit supervised
healing, smithcraft, and poetrywere in early Ireland all associated with fire.43
The authors of the saints Lives of Brigit seem to have been aware of the
same-named goddess, though they never say so explicitly: all of her Lives give
Brigit a druid father figure, so she is made into a member of the druid class, the
same class as poets and judges. The hagiographers do not carry through the
parallels, though, for the saint is not portrayed as a judge, nor a law-maker, nor
a poet; she has no noticeable interest in smithcraft, and her healing miracles are
not very physician-like. The only significant overlap is the motif of fire and light,
but the references can all be attributed to common motifs and have equivalents
in male Irish Lives. Another association between Saint Brigit and fire would in
the twelfth century be reiterated by Gerald of Wales, but that too was not
specific to her.
McCone has pointed out that another saint, the virgin Lassair, also has a fire
name, from lassar, flame. In his view Brigit, like Lassair, was a goddess who be-
came a saint in Christian times; both succeeded in the new religions because
their attributes could be harmonized with those of the Christian God, for the
Bible is filled with light and fire imagery.44 The fire element in the name, then,
betokens a goddess origin, for him, in spite of the insignificance of fire and its at-
tendant crafts in the early texts from Brigits cult. While one may reserve judge-
ment on McCones conclusions, it is more important to recognize that his
argument has gone back to first principles, where other writers have generally
just repeated the Victorian truism.45
Where there is overlap between goddess Brigit and saint Brigit, however, is in
the patronage of women, an association evident not only in these centuries but
also as late as the twelfth. In the early eighth century Brigit the goddess was
42
Sanas Cormaic [Cormacs Glossary], ed. K. Meyer, Sanas Cormaic. An old Irish glossary, compiled by
Cormac a Cuilennin . . . Edited from the copy in the Yellow Book of Lecan (Halle, ).
43
K. McCone, Pagan Past and Christian Present in Early Irish Literature (Maynooth, ), .
44
Ibid., . See also id., An Introduction to Early Irish Saints Lives, The Maynooth Review
(), at .
45
For contemporary examples of the solar-cult approach combined with the Frazerian method,
applied to Brigit, see Condren, Serpent and Goddess, ; J. De Vries, Keltische Religion (La religion des Celtes,
trans. L. Jospin (Paris, ), ; P. Berresford Ellis, Celtic Women: Women in Celtic Society and Literature
(London, ), .
associated in the law tracts with womens rights, and later, in the tale Cath Maige
Tuired (The Battle of Moytura) and the prose Dinnshenchas (Lore of Places), the
goddess Brg was named as the originator of certain types of womens outcry
and of keening, a particularly female type of mourning cry. The saints feast day
fell in Imbolc, the official start of spring in the native Irish calendar. Cormacs
Glossary has an entry on imbolc, defining it as the time the sheeps milk comes,
but does not identify the festival with Brigit.46 Care of sheep was a specifically
womens activity in early Ireland, and there are stories of Saint Brigit shepherd-
ing and making dairy products, but it must be remembered that the girl, as the
daughter of a slavewoman, is portrayed doing what non-noble girls would do
normally.47 Nowhere, in fact, is Imbolc said to be the festival of the goddess
Brigit, and beyond that, the goddesss attributes do not include sheep care. It is
only the connection to women that is marked.
Finally, in Brigits pagan origins one must mention her parentage: in the Lives
the druid father is sometimes cited as proof that she was a transformed goddess.
Admittedly he was treated rather sympathetically even in the versions where he
failed to convert to Christianity. For all this, though, the greatness of Brigit lay
largely in her success in persuading people to abandon their religion and join
Christs, and she had little to do with either druids or their arts.
The popular belief in Kildare having been a pagan centre depends upon saint
Brigit being either a Christianized version of that goddess or an eponymous
high-priestess of her cult, and that, as discussed above, is far from established. It
also depends, less directly, upon the existence in pagan times of female druidic
enclavesa point treated in the previous chapter and shown to be equally
tenuous. The reports of Kildares vestal flame and the question of its allegedly
pagan antecents have a bearing on how one approaches the Christianity prac-
tised there in its first centuries. If one believes that it was a transmogrified druidic
centre it is reasonable to ask, were the devotions practised semi-druidical?
Were the nuns more like priestesses than orthodox Christian devotae? For this rea-
son the key piece of evidence for this model must be addressed, i.e. the supposed
perpetual flame at Kildare, the alleged sign of surviving fire worship or vestal
devotion. There is no mention of it in any of the three early Lives of Brigit,
namely the Vita I, Cogitosus, or the ninth-century Bethu Brigte. It is hard to im-
agine that it could be overlooked in all three Lives. It is, in fact, absent from all
other Lives, from annals, from the martyrologies and their glossesall sources,
in fact, until Gerald of Wales, a visitor in the twelfh century, almost years after
the alleged pagan-Christian transition took place. There is no doubt that Gerald
was referring to a genuine, existent perpetual flame, for it is confirmed in other
sources, in particular in a twelfth- or thirteenth-century gloss on a Middle Irish
46
E. Hamp, Imbolc, oimelc , Studia Celtica (), .
47
e.g. L. De Paor, Ireland and Early Europe (Dublin, ), .
tale, and in Anglo-Norman documents for the year . Today at Kildare there
are the ruins of a smallish stone building called the fire-house, in which the fire
was known to be kept through the fourteenth century at least, for a fyre house is
mentioned in a close roll.48 The fire-house itself may not be very ancient,
certainly not dating to the pre-Christian era; it may have been built as late as the
tenth century, or, if it was built in earlier centuries, it may have previously had a
different use. That the fire was a vestal one also needs considering. Gerald did
say that only nuns were allowed to tend the fire, and this may have been the case,
but Kildare did have monks and clerics on its premises in his day as in earlier
centuries. Nor was the presence of a perpetual fire unique to Kildare: in the
twelfth and thirteenth centuries seven others are mentioned in the hagiography,
all of them at male monasteries.49 The inescapable conclusion is that such flames
in Ireland were not especially associated with women and appear rather late in
the historical record. The reasons for their existence were probably Christo-
theological: the luminary imagery of Christian deity was as ubiquitous in Ireland
as it was elsewhere in the West. Why they appeared suddenly in the twelfth
century is a question not ventured here.
A third piece of evidence some cite for pagan survivals at Kildare is its great
oak tree, first encountered in the late twelfth or early thirteenth century when it
was added to Brigits Vita I by the redactor identified by Richard Sharpe as D
as he wrote out what was to become the Vita IV.50 The tree is not mentioned in
any earlier source, but appears to have really existed in Ds day, for he saw it as
explaining the origin of the name of Kildare, Cell Dara.51 For nineteenth-
century scholars such as Healy, the implication of the oak tree, the druidic cult,
and the Kildare legend was obvious. Kildare was built in a druidic oak grove
and the great tree was venerated even in Christian times.52 This assertion, rest-
ing on this same constellation of evidence, is found in the late twentieth century,
too, though not in academic writing.53 The true origins of the name of Kildare
are almost certainly the building material of the church, i.e. oaken church, sug-
gested by both annal entries and archaeology.54
48
Close Roll, Dublin, Jan. : orders a grant of royal protection to the priorissa et conventus de Fyre-
house de Kildaria.
49
The following are listed in PVSH vol. , cxl: Ciarn of Clonmacnois, D text, ch. ; Ciarn of Sai-
gir, D text, ch. ; Irish Life of Moling, ch. ; Latin Life of Berach, ch. ; Latin Life of Maedc, ch. .
50
This Life of Brigit, the Vita IV, is edited in Sharpe, Saints Lives, , with the redactors alter-
ations in italics. On the redactor and the identification of his alterations, ibid. .
51
Vita IV, book , ch. : For there was a very tall oak tree there which Brigit loved very much, and
blessed, of which the trunk still remains. No one dares cut it with a weapon, but whoever can break off a
part of it with his hands deems it a great advantage, hoping for the help of God by its means; because
through St Brigits blessing many miracles have been performed by that wood.
52
J. Healy, Insula Sanctorum et Doctorum: Irelands Ancient Schools and Scholars (Dublin, ), .
53
Condren, Serpent and Goddess, .
54
On the sacred trees, see D. Binchy, An Archaic Legal Poem, Celtica (), ; A. T. Lucas,
The Sacred Trees of Ireland, JCHAS: Journal of the Cork Archaeological and Celtic Society (), ;
A. Watson, The King, the Poet and the Sacred Tree, tudes Celtiques (), .
55
B. Wailes, Dun Ailinne: An Interim Report in D. Harding (ed.), Hillforts: Later Prehistoric Earthworks
in Britain and Ireland (New York, ); B. Wailes, Irish Royal Sites in History and Archaeology,
Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies (), .
56
Sln seiss, a Brigit [Sit Safely, Brigit, or To St. Brigit], final stanzas (D. Greene and F. OConnor
(eds. and trans.), A Golden Treasury of Irish Poetry, AD to (London, ), ). Originally ed., with
commentary, by K. Meyer, Hail Brigit: An Old-Irish Poem on the Hill of Alenn (Halle, ).
The Irish hagiographers of the seventh and eighth centuries, in their portrayal
of the earliest Christian female communties, perpetuate a trend encountered in
the previous chapter, in that they silently rejected notions that Gods virgins
should be enclosed, non-travelling, and subservient to the male clerics. For their
models they looked more to the Apocryphal Acts, and were probably influenced
by native values and ideas of gender roles, though these are indeterminable. For
the Irish, the consecrated virgin was considered able to participate in the apos-
tolic work of spreading Christianity and of founding churches and monasteries.
When the texts refer to places which had a female founder, the founding was
done either by a woman acting on her own with male backing (usually a bishop,
male kin, or magnate) or else by a male ecclesiastic on the womans behalf. Text-
ual evidence suggests that the earliest churches sometimes developed into cult
centres and cemeteries after the death of the leader, whether male or female. As
for the idea that female saints were modelled on pagan Irish goddesses, an exam-
ination of the apparently most likely case, that of Brigit, is inconclusive.
The hagiographical texts which give us the impressions described in this
chapter are, of course, retrospective. They contain a variety of distorting fea-
tures, of which the most significant are those created by the genre itself and those
prompted by ecclesiastic rivalry of the authors. It would be unwise to rely upon
these sources for accuracy of detail; nonetheless, they are unlikely to be very
wide of the mark on the broad outline of social relations and behaviour. In the
next chapters, which deal with the seventh to ninth centuries, these hagio-
graphical sources become contemporary evidenceevidence for the attitudes
and general organization of womens monasticism in their authors own day.
PA RT T WO
These topics all raise questions concerning the connections between Ireland
and elsewhere in the West at the same time. For instance, can the according of
legal status to abbesses and holy women be traced to non-Irish sources? Were
there precedents in non-Irish Christian texts for the variety of female profes-
sions? The question of Continental and patristic influence thought on Irish
ideas of female sanctity remains important in this era as it was in the preceding
centuries. Scholarship of recent years has taught historians to guard against
automatically attributing unusual social features to Irish nativism. Between
Ireland and Britain, and Ireland and the Continent, the flow of ideas was
greater than used to be thought. Imports certainly included texts on female
sanctity, female religious profession, and female sexuality. However, it looks very
much as though the Irish continued to be selective in adopting patristic, English,
and Continental notions, especially those which treated holy women.
The popular notions of Ireland in the seventh, eighth, and ninth centuries
have many significant differences from those of modern academe. Generally,
Ireland is framed as a place where a romantic, holistic Celtic Christianity held
on in spite of external Romanizing pressures coming from Englanda conflict
of spiritual cultures epitomized in the meeting on church practice at the Synod
of Whitby held in . Though for scholars the significance of Whitby is now
seen in a very different light, the old interpretation hangs on in popular belief.
In this schema, the British church lost its Celtic distinctiveness as a result of the
synod, but the Irish one did not; the latter flourished until the English arrived in
the twelfth century. The Celt is classed as a romantic, the Anglo-Saxon and
Roman a rationalist, and, as an extension of this (an inheritance from the old
evolutionary school) the Celt is said to be more imaginative, intuitive, and thus
feminine-positive, whereas the Englishman and the Roman, being more lo-
gical and concrete, is more oppressive. The linking of gender to these values has
the effect of reinforcing the evolutionistic presumption that the Irish and other
Celtic Churches must have valued women more highly. Numerous proponents
of Celtic Christianity see in Augustine of Hippos tormented psyche the com-
mencement of a Roman Christian misogyny, one which was promoted in the
British Isles by Augustine of Canterbury and his successors.1 H. J. Massingham
spoke for many of this school when he wrote, it is possible that the fissure be-
tween Christianity and nature, widening through the centuries, would not have
cracked the unity of western mans attitude to the universe.2 The implication is,
as well, that this applies also to the fissure between the male and female sexes
and, by extension, to the masculine and feminine parts of the Jungian-styled
psyche. The Celtic Christian vision of the early Irish church has other elements,
too: it is seen as being profoundly peaceful and uncompromised by secular
1
A. Duncan, Elements of Celtic Christianity (Shaftesbury, ), ; Bradley, Celtic Way, .
2
C. Bamford and W. Marsh, eds., Celtic Christianity: Ecology and Wholeness (Lindisfarne, ) , quot-
ing from Massinghams The Tree of Life.
Sources
Despite the fragmentary and scanty research tradition on Irish nuns, analysis is
made possible thanks to the many decades of work on male monasticism,
church organization, ecclesiastical authority, and pastoral care. So too is the
task made feasible by the work of the historians who have edited, analysed, and
dated many of the texts containing key evidence for women.
Sources for this period are relatively abundantit is easier to gain a sense of
the Irish Church in the seventh to ninth centuries than in the centuries either
before or after, and so, unsurprisingly, women in the Irish Church are most
abundantly attested in these centuries too. A fair number of extant texts illumin-
ate numerous aspects of female piety. Among the relevant texts from the sev-
enth century are the two early Lives of Saint Brigit, Muirchs Life of Patrick,
Trechns memoirs of Patrick, the Liber Angeli from Armagh, several theo-
logical tracts, glosses, verses from Bangor, and contemporary annals. From the
3
Bradley, Celtic Way, .
, ,
eighth century are annals, copious legal texts in Irish, the Hiberno-Latin law
text Collectio Canonum Hibernensis, a handful of Latin Lives of male Irish saints,
some religious poetry, and an abundance of hymns (a number of which are dedi-
cated to female Irish saints). From the ninth century we have the story of
Liadain and Curithir, the customs and rule of Tallaght, a metrical rule from
Bangor, the Triads, the martyrologies of Oengus and Tallaght, and an Irish Life
of Brigit (Bethu Brigte). However, as is to be expected, there is less on nuns than on
monks and clerics, and less evidence on female houses than for male monaster-
ies and churches. The evidence is made more difficult to use because some of
the material contains terminological ambiguities. Furthermore, that evidence
which is not shrouded in ambiguity often appears to contradict commonly-held
notions about female monasticism, and some sources appear to contradict
others about even general matters on the life of consecrated women. But the
contradictions can be approached, and often resolved, by understanding that
both gender relations and ecclesiastical relations were complex in this period;
the evidence defies facile generalization.
Kildare
Kildare, it hardly needs to be said, is Irelands most famous female house and it
would be a boon to scholars if the remains of this illustrious and large monastery
1
See M. Herity, The Layout of Early Christian Monasteries, in N Chathin and Richter, Irland und
Europa, ; Edwards, Archaeology, .
, ,
North door
Brigit
Women, including
Abbess and Nuns
Dividing wall
Altar
Tranverse wall
Men
Conlaed
South door
N
After Thomas
North door
Transverse wall
Brigit Abbess and
Nuns
Dividing wall
Congregation Altar
Bishop,
Monks
Monks,and
and
Conlaed Priests
South door
After Radford
had survived. Sadly, no trace of the early medieval church survives and the
foundations lie under the modern cathedral. Todays tourist can see in the
grounds a few stone high crosses, a round tower, and the sunken foundations of
a stone building called the fire-house. The present remains give little sense of
what Kildare must have been like in the early middle ages. In those centuries it
would have looked much as Clonmacnois or Glendalough still do: a town of huts,
oratories, and other small buildings surrounded by an enclosure, beyond which
were fields and tenants dwellings. One seventh-century resident, Brigits hagiog-
rapher Cogitosus, described it as it was in his own day: a thriving townlike
settlement with many inhabitants and boasting pilgrims flocking in from all over
Ireland.2 The termonn of a monastery represented a boundary within which fugi-
tives could claim sanctuary, and Kildare was no different in considering its
boundary a dividing line between the realms of secular authority and ecclesias-
tical jurisdiction. Because of this fact, some people came to Kildare to avoid vio-
lence, retribution, or court summonses, just as they went to other churches for
the same purpose.3 Kildare was organized around its large oak church building
which supposedly had been built in Brigits day. For masses, the women and
men would come together in this great edifice.4 This was different from the
practice at the monastery of Armagh in the same period, which also had both
male and female residents; there, men and women worshipped in separate
churches within the termonn.5 The church at Kildare had from the beginning
been an oaken structure, giving the name to the communityCell Dara,
church of oak, and it continued as such, since the annals entries continue to
speak of the church building as the derthaig (oak-house).6 It cannot be known
whether the nuns shared a single dormitory or had separate huts. Since there
was a population of monks, they too must have had living quarters of some sort
but these too escape the view of the historian. The abbess, we presume, lived in
her own little house, as this would be normal for abbatial heads. For a while at
least Kildare had a house of the elders/scholars which was headed in the
eighth century by a female religious.7
Politically, Kildare has a special place in Irish history. Certainly it was power-
ful, for its abbesses were recorded in the annals for over a six-hundred-year span
and it was an episcopal centre from as early as the sixth. But it is in the seventh-
century that it entered the national arena, for it was then that it undertook to try
to become the archiepiscopal church of all Ireland, that is to say, the head of all
Irish churches.8 In making national claims, Kildare joined in the highest levels
2
Cogitosus, Life of Brigit, ch. .
3
Ibid., Introduction and ch. ; Vita I of Brigit, ch. . On ecclesiastical boundaries and sanctuary,
see W. Davies, Protected Space in Britain and Ireland in the Middle Ages, in B. Crawford (ed.), Scotland
in Dark Age Britain (Aberdeen, ), .
4
Cogitosus, Life of Brigit, ch. .
5
On Armagh, Liber Angeli, ch. . The Liber Angeli [Book of the Angel], ed. and trans. in Bieler,
Patrician Texts, ; also in Hughes, Church, .
6 7 8
AU . AU . Brigit died AU or .
, ,
of Church politics and economic power, and it became one of what Richard
Sharpe has called the great churches, those not necessarily the oldest, which
achieved power and wealth and which made extensive claims over the trad-
itional churches of local and distant regions. Their networks are the so-called
monastic-type paruchiae of the textbooks.9 It is in this context that Cogitosuss
Life of Brigit was written. Kildare had wide responsibilities and privileges. In
the s the predominant figure was ed Dub, son of Colmn king of the Lein-
stermen (the Laigin); as bishop of Kildare he claimed jurisdiction over all the
Leinstermen, while the monastery itself, under its abbess, was laying claim to a
wide network of around thirty churches. It was in direct rivalry with Armagh for
supra-episcopal status for most of the seventh century.10 The resolution of the
competition has been dated variously to the seventh or earlier eighth century,
but whatever its date, it was a compromise in which Kildare was conceded su-
premacy in her paruchia (whose exact boundaries or constituents are uncertain),
and Armagh was ceded authority over other areas.11 In fact, neither church en-
joyed the power of an archbishopric, and the issue fell by the wayside until the
twelfth century. The mutual concessions were very much part of the writing of
the period c., though: they were expressed in a typically Irish way, that is to
say, by framing the agreement in pseudo-historical conversations between the
personages involved, here Patrick and Brigit. One example, from the final para-
graph of the Armagh tract Liber Angeli, relates the following:
Inter sanctum Patricium Hibernensium Brigitamque columpnas amicitia caritatis in-
erat tanta, ut unum cor consiliumque haberent unum. Christus per illum illamque vir-
tutes multas peregit. Vir ergo sanctus Christianae virgini ait: O mea Brigita, paruchia
tua in provincia tua apud reputabitur monarchiam tuam, in parte autem orientali et
occidentali dominatu in meo erit.12
Between saint Patrick and Brigit, the pillars of the Irish church, there existed such
friendship of charity that they were of one heart and one mind. Christ performed many
miracles through him and her. The holy man therefore said to the Christian virgin,
O my Brigit, your paruchia will be deemed to be in your province in your dominion, but
in the eastern and western part it will be in my dominion.
An eighth-century prayer praising Brigit, presumably composed at Kildare,
9
R. Sharpe, Churches and Communities in Early Medieval Ireland: Towards a Pastoral Model, in
J. Blair and R. Sharpe (eds.), Pastoral Care Before the Parish (Leicester, ), , at .
10
Armaghs aggrandizement and rivalry with Kildare: L. de Paor, The Aggrandisement of Armagh,
Historical Studies (), ; McCone, Brigit; Sharpe, Vitae S. Brigitae, with references on the dat-
ing of the Vita I; R. Sharpe, Armagh and Rome in the Seventh Century, in N Chathin and Richter,
Irland und Europa, .
11
Proposed date of the resolution: mid-th cent. (de Paor); end of the th (Bieler and Sharpe); earlier
part of the th (McCone).
12
Liber Angeli, ch. . This paragraph is not necessarily part of the Liber Angeli itself, and both the con-
tent and the manuscript would suggest that it is later, either an addition or a free-standing note. I am in-
debted to Herold Pettiau who cautions that the presentation of the text in Bielers edition differs
significantly from that of the original manuscript.
gives a similar portrayal of the resolution: Brigit is one of the columns of the
Kingdom with Patrick the Pre-eminent, and calls her the saint of Leinster.13
The Vita I, a Kildare document, shows a good friendship between the two saints
but one in which Patrick is acknowledged as an elder by Brigit; she goes to see
him as a great man of the church, but she does perform miracles before him,
and assists him in clearing the name of one of his clerics.14 It is on the strength of
the portrayal of this relationship that the text has been dated to either before the
rivalry with Armagh began, or after the settlement. It is deemed impossible that
Kildare could have produced such a happy picture of cooperation at the time
when it was trying to show that Brigit had supremacy over the whole of Ireland
but Patrick did not. One very late witness to the division of power decided be-
tween Kildare and Armagh may be found in the eleventh-century commen-
taries added to the poem Brigit B Bithmaith, which claim that Brigit and Patrick
divided out the kingship of Ireland between them, so that it is she who is the
head of the women of Ireland and he who is head of the men.15
Kildare was always involved in secular politics. Brigit had been a member of
the leading Leinster kindred of her day, the Fothairt, and they had close ties to
Kildare both early on and also even after they lost their hegemony of the region.
Though they were replaced in regional predominance by the U Dnlainge dyn-
asty by the seventh century, one Fothairt branch, the Fothairt Airbrech, sup-
plied the abbess Sebdann (obit ) and her relative Duirc (obit ); it is highly
likely that many of the other clerics of Kildare, whose origins are unprovable,
also belonged to the Fothairt.16 The U Dnlainge took over control of Kildare
as part of their wider hegemonization of Leinster. They infiltrated and then
came to dominate the offices of the monastery; they were fully in control by the
seventh century, and in fact a member of that dynasty was probably abbot in
Cogitosuss day. This kindred remained in power for the next five centuries, and
in the ninth century, Kildare effectively was their dynastic capital of Leinster.17
Kildares relics, so important for its secular claims, consisted of the bodies of
saint Brigit and her fellow, Bishop Conlaed, which were entombed in the main
church. After the early eighth century Kildare is less abundantly attested. We
cannot, for example, know to what extent there may have been a loss of monas-
tic life there during the eighth to tenth centuries. Signs of secularization include
battles, killings, and burnings of the community; its abbot and bishop holding
an abbacy elsewhere as well; and a possible fatherson succession of the
abbacy.18 On the other hand, the composition of praise poems in the eighth
13
Brigit B Bithmaith [Brigit Ever-Excellent Woman] (Thes. Pal. ii. ). On its dating to the eighth
century on linguistic grounds, see McCone, Brigit, .
14 15
Vita I of Brigit, ch. . Thes. Pal. ii. .
16
M. OBrien (ed.), Corpus Genealogiarum Hiberniae (Dublin, ), ; D. Corrin, Early Irish
Churches: Some Aspects of Organization, in id. (ed.), Irish Antiquity: Essays and Studies Presented to Professor
M. J. OKelly (Cork, ), , at .
17
OCorrin, Churches, .
18
Attacks: e.g. AU , , and . Dual abbacy: AU reports that Cellach son of Ailill was
, ,
century, of Brigits Irish Life in the ninth century, and the annal obits of scribes
and scholars, makes it evident that Kildares scriptorium remained active at a
high level.19 It also continued to have all three offices, bishops, abbots, and
abbesses, and the eminence of all of them was was sufficiently high to warrant
their deaths being reported in the annals.
Whether because of religious eminence in the monastic life, or because of
political power, Kildare appears confident in the eighth and ninth centuries.
Brigits cult spread to the Continent.20 Triumphal poems and hymns to the saint
were composed in Ireland, most notably the eighth-century poems Christus in
Nostra Insula, Sln Seiss, and the ninth-century N Car Brigit. Kildares prom-
inence is also evidenced by Brigits recurring presence in the Lives of other
saints, both male and female.21 The place survived repeated Viking raids and
attacks, and remained a major power into the later period.
Killeedy
The Munster monastery of Killeedy (Ir. Cell te or Cluain Credail) is another of
the well-known womens monasteries with a long life. Today few remains can be
seen at this southern hamlet, some forty-five miles south-west of Limerick in the
countryside at the foot of the Mullagharick mountains. The most detailed por-
trait of the monastery and its nuns is the late Life of Ita, which purports to de-
scribe the church in her own day, but clearly may refer more to the place as it
was in the authors own era, or may indeed not apply to reality at all except to
witness the historical fantasies of a twelfth-century writer.22 What is under no
dispute, however, is the places political connections; it was continuously associ-
ated with the U Conaill Gabra, the people of saint Ita, the foundress and first
abbess.23
In the ninth-century Martyrology of Oengus, though, Ita is present: it calls
her the white sun of Munsters women, Ita the devout of Cluain Credail
abbot of Kildare and Iona; AU for called Lechtnan son of Mochtigern, bishop of Kildare and
princeps of Ferns. Fatherson succession: possibly in AU reporting the obit of abbot Forannn, and
AU reporting the obit of abbot Cathal son of Forannn. On dual abbacy of Cellach, cf. M. Herbert,
Iona, Kells and Derry: the History and Hagiography of the Monastic Familia of Columba (Oxford, ), .
19
e.g. AU .
20
e.g. th-cent. metrical life of Brigit, D. N. Kissane, Vita Metrica Sanctae Brigidae : A Critical Edition,
PRIA C (). On date and authorship see Sharpe, Saints Lives, , who argues, with Wade and
Colgan but against Kissane, that it was composed by Donatus of Fiesole. For Brigidine material copied
and composed in the Carolingian empire in the th cent., see Sharpe, Vitae S. Brigitae, . Also,
D. Riain-Raedel, Aspects of the Promotion of Irish Saints Cults in Medieval Germany, ZCP
(), .
21
In the Latin Lives of the th or th cent. (Sharpes collection in the Codex Salmanticensis) she
appears in the Lives of Ailbe, text, chs. , and of ed mac Bricc, text, ch. .
22
Life of Ita, ch. (PVSH ii. ). On the date of Itas Life, Sharpe is of the opinion that the re-
dactor D, working in the th cent., used a th-cent. examplar (Saints Lives, ).
23
AU .
(in gran bn ban Muman / Ita Chluana credal ), which suggests that Killeedy had a
regional importance at that time.24 The ninth-century Martyrology of Tallaght
also mentions her among its saints.
Three brief textual mentions suggest that monks joined the community at
Killeedy some time before the tenth centurypossibly long before then. There
is a legend that male abbots had headed the place since Itas death: in the notes
of the Martyrology of Oengus dated to the tenth or eleventh century, Ita became
angry with her nuns and declared that no nun (caillech) would ever take her suc-
cession.25 In the Annals of the Four Masters for the years and one finds
obits of two abbots of Killeedy, namely Cathasach and Finnachta, and no
abbesses are recorded in any of the annal collections. Since the word for abbot
used in these two entries is abb Cill Ite, one could argue that these were actually
monastic heads, but in fact the term is known to have been used occasionally for
monastic managers. John Ryan in his history of Irish monasticism took these
two entries to mean that the place had become a monastery of men and had no
more nuns there, i.e. that it had shifted from being a womens place to being one
for men.26 This is almost certainly not the case, because there is a ninth-century
or later hymn written in which the nuns in the choir are addressed directly, and
there is no known dependent house, to which we could attribute it:
Canaid cir, a ingena, dfiur dliges for csucn;
att na purt tasacn, ca beith im ucht sucn.27
Sing a fitting harmony, maidens, to the legal recipient of your tribute.
Little Jesus is at home on high, even though he be in my bosom.
It seems most likely that at time the hymn was composed either both sexes were
present at the monastery headed by an abbot, or there were only nuns but they
were supervised by an abbot. Dagmar Scheiders study of Anglo-Saxon houses
in this same period shows how a womens monastery could come to have a male
abbot without there being a change in the composition of the inmates. Citing
the case of Lyminge in the Dialogi Ecgberti, she notes that if a particular family
dynasty controlled the church and always provided the head of a community
(a mixed one, in the case of Lyminge), it was possible for the family give the
headship to a male rather than a female.28 Perhaps this is what happened in the
case of Killeedy.
24
Martyrology of Oengus, Jan. (W. Stokes, Flire Oengusso Cli D: The Martyrology of Oengus the Culdee
(Henry Bradshaw Society ; London, ).
25 26
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Jan. Ryan, Irish Monasticism, .
27
sucn, final stanza. Irish text from E. Quin, The Early Medieval Irish Poem sucn, Cambridge Me-
dieval Celtic Studies (), , . Quin notes that the language is substantially Old Irish (p. ). Murphy
dated the text to about (Early Irish Lyrics: Eighth to Twelfth Century (Oxford, ), , at ) but David
Greene and Frank OConnor put it at c. (A Golden Treasury of Irish Poetry, A.D. to (London,
), ).
28
Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women, .
, ,
Killevy
In the north-east of Ireland near Carlingford Lough and the modern town of
Newry was another of the long-lived important womens monasteries Killevy,
(Ir. Cell Shlibe Cuilinn, lit. Church of Slieve Gullion). Saint Monenna (obit
) founded the place at the northern foot of the mountain after first establish-
ing a place named Faughart a little way to the south. Today at the very pic-
turesque site there are the remains of two adjacent rectangular church
buildings; the western one is was built before the twelfth century, the eastern one
is possibly from the thirteenth. Formerly there was a round tower, but now its
ruins are imperceptible. The territory, northern Louth and southern Armagh,
was that of Monennas people, the Conaille Muirthemne, and her sites were on
kindred land, in the broader sense at least. The political connections with the
dynasty at least into the seventh century are evident from the known names
of its first fifteen abbesses and its links in the early eleventh century from the
annals; those in the twelfth are implied in the saints Life by Conchubranus
(Ir. Conchobar).
The early references to Killevy are patchy. It is not mentioned in those Lives
we know were early, but there do survive a couple of seventh- or eighth-century
Killevy hymns praising the foundress and, with it in the manuscript, a list of the
first fourteen abbesses.29 Annal entries mention the death of abbess Conainge in
/. In the ninth century it was alluded to in the Martyrology of Oengus
which sites Monenna, a pillar of the Church at Slieve Gullion.30
Were there just women at Killevy, or men too? Monks may have been present
in the seventh century: a mysterious reference in one of the two hymns to Mon-
enna opens with the phrase, Audite Fratres. Who were the brothers being called
to listen? Apparently brothers of the monastery of Killevy, for it is that house
which produced the texts. No later material suggests the presence of brothers at
the place, but this single reference appears to indicate them.
The monastery of Killevy itself is not described in any meaningful way until
the twelfth century.31 The absence of a surviving early Life, however, does not
necessarily mean that we have no seventh-century hagiography. The twelfth-
century Life by Conchubranus is a crudely assembled jumble of chapters and it
may have a seventh-century strand.32 Jane Stevenson in the s followed
29
The two hymns are Audite sancta studia and Audite fratres, in the BM Cotton Cleopatra Aii. Kenney
considered that they were from the th, or possibly th cent., and were probably composed at Killevy
(Kenney, no. . Esposito, Conchubrani Vita, apps. A and B, , ). The two hymns are followed
in the manuscript by the List of Abbesses of Clonbroney, ibid., app. C, . The martyrology of Oengus
( July) refers to her place on the mountain of Cuilenn.
30
Martyrology of Oengus, July.
31
The anonymous Life in the Codex Salmanticensis is edited in Heist, . There is a third Life of
Monenna, compiled by Geoffrey, abbot of Burton-on-Trent from to . For brief discussion of the
various versions, see Kenney, no. , and Sharpe, Saints Lives, .
32
Esposito, Sources. My disagreements with Esposito concern some chapters which appear to be
from something like the th cent., not as late as others which look very th-cent. in nature. Like Esposito
Esposito in principle at least and added the supposition that the two early hymns
and abbess-list (which appear together with it in the manuscript) were associ-
ated textually with a now-lost early exemplar.33 In the allegedly seventh-century
chapters, Killevy has links with Kildare in Leinster, Armagh in Ulster, and
Bishop Ibars Beggary Island in Wexford Harbour in the south-east.34 No
monks are mentioned as part of Monennas familia except her brother Ronn.
The anonymous Life (the Darerca Life) looks to at least one scholar to have
undergone little change in its twelfth-century rewriting and is not directly de-
rived from Conchubranuss text.35 Monennas first establishment, Faughart, is
there portrayed as a great church attracting crowds.36 Killevy, however, is de-
scribed much as it is in the Conchubranus Life.37 Again there is no reference to
monks, but nothing actually saying they were not present. In terms of ecclesias-
tical networks, it too asserts links with Kildare and Beggary but also mentions
Moville (through saint Finnian).
Clonbroney
The nunnery of Clonbroney (Ir. Cluain Brnaig) was in north-central Ireland in
what is now Co. Longford, a few miles east of the modern town of that name.
According to one source it had been founded in the fifth or sixth century by two
sisters named Emer, but in others this achievement was attributed to a virgin
named Funech or Fainche/Fuinche.38 Despite its early origins it achieved
prominence only in the eighth century under abbess Samthann. In her later
Life stories of building and expansion at the church are prominent, and she
comes across as a powerful force in the physical expansion of the settlement.39
We know that Samthann left Clonbroney a legacy of eminence because the Irish
annals (which record only the deaths of important people) register not only her
own death but those of her successors, whereas before her, annalists did not
I think that chapters were cut and pasted together without internal alteration, as is evidenced by lapses
in continuity and sense between chapters and the variances in terminology and style between chapters
which are nevertheless consistent within themselves.
33
J. Stevenson, Irish Hymns, Venantius Fortunatus and Poitiers, in J.-M. Picard, Ireland and
Aquitaine (Dublin, ) , at , where she also confirms the dating of the two hymns to the th cent.
on linguistic grounds.
34
Conchubranus, Life of Monenna, book , chs. ; book , ch. . Beggary is Ir. Bc riu, lit.
Little Ireland.
35
Sharpe thinks it may either share a common ancestor or be derived from it through an intermedi-
ary (Saints Lives, ).
36
Life of Darerca, ch. .
37
Chs. .
38
Emer as foundress: Tripartite Life of Patrick (W. Stokes (ed. and trans.), The Tripartite Life of Patrick,
with Other Documents Relating to that Saint, vols. (Rolls Series ; London ), i. . The text is not or-
ganized by chapter headings, so citations follow page numbers of this edition. Funech/Fainche as
foundress: Life of Samthann, ch. .
39
AU reports the death of its abbess Forblaith daughter of Connla, dominatrix Cluain Brnaig; for
it relates the death of Ellbrig, abatissa Cluain Brnaig.
, ,
bother with the place. The earliest mention of the place is in a hagiographic
anecdote which probably was initially recorded before Samthanns lifetime.
The Latin Life of St Cainnech shows connections between Clonbroney and
Cainnechs Aghaboe (Ir. Achad B): Cainnech and some followers stayed for a
time at Clonbroney which is described as being a place without buildings or
shelter in the saints day; later in the Life he performs a miracle for one of the
monks of Clonbroney.40 It comes across in this as a small place, poor, with monks
as well as nuns, and no mention is made of an abbess. Samthann achieved some-
thing like national eminence in her own lifetime, or very nearly thereafter. She
was celebrated in a poem attributed to ed Alln which appears in an annal
entry of the year .41 The first substantial appearance of Clonbroney is in the
Customs of Tallaght, a ninth-century cle D document which contains an anec-
dote praising Samthann as a great soul-friend (i.e. spiritual confessor) of leading
churchmen. This suggests there was a friendly relationship between Clon-
broney and Tallaght, though it hints at an earlier period of trouble between the
two houses.42 Not only did the annal entries continue to appear for centuries
after Samthanns lifetime, in the tenth and twelfth centuries, but other signs
abound of the places continued importance.43 From the Middle Irish period the
monastery of Kilbarry (Ir. Cluain Coirpthe) claimed links to Samthann: in the
founder Berachs Life she attended an ecclesiastical council important to his
career, and the two cooperated to perform a miracle for the king of Brefne, ed
Dub son of Fergna. Kilbarrys hagiographer made the association between
Samthann and that king exceptionally close, for ed says O Samthann, let me
put my head on your breast, O nun, that I may sleep.44 Her Latin Life is the only
detailed source on Clonbroney, but unfortunately it is late. It does not mention
monks as part of the community but neither does it specify that there were none,
though the monastery is called a monastery of virgins.45 Politically the Life
links Clonbroney with a host of male institutions across Ireland through stories
of visits between inmates in the saints timeAghaboe, Iona, Granard, De-
venishas well as associating it with local secular authorities. Also a connection
with a nunnery called Ernaide is asserted.46 The Martyrology of Gorman (also
from the twelfth century) calls for the commemoration of Funech as the
churchs foundress and of Samthann as its celebrated virgin. For all its apparent
40
Latin Life of Cainnech, text, chs. , (Heist, ). It is unclear whether the monach was
meant to be a regular monk or a monastic tenant: Irish terminology is ambiguous.
41
ATig, AFM ; Martyrology of Tallaght, notes on Dec. (R. I. Best and H. J. Lawlor, The Mar-
tyrology of Tallaght, from the Book of Leinster and MS in the Royal Library, Brussels (Henry Bradshaw
Society ; London, ) ).
42
Customs of Tallaght, ch. (E. Gwynn and W. Purton, The Monastery of Tallaght, PRIA C
(), ).
43
A. Gwynn, and R. Hadcock, Medieval Religious Houses, Ireland (London, ), .
44
Irish Life of Berach, chs. , (BNE i. ; Eng. trans. ii. ).
45
Life of Samthann, ch. , monasterium virginum.
46
Ir. Ernaide is used for (at least) three womens houses: Gobnats Ballyvourney in Munster, Urney
in Eastern Donegal near the Mourne River, and Slieve Gorey in modern Co. Cavan (see Onomasticon).
prominence in the twelfth century, annal entries for the place die out after this
save for occasional, ambiguous, late sixteenth-century references, which sug-
gest that endowed hereditary courtships continued there until at least that
date.47
Cloonburren
The important and long-lived nunnery at Cloonburren (Ir. Cluain Bairenn) in
Co. Roscommon lay on the west bank of the Shannon opposite the large
monastery of Clonmacnois. It almost wholly eludes the scrutiny of the histor-
ian. Virtually nothing is known about the monastery or its nuns as there is no
47 48
Gwynn and Hadcock, Religious Houses, . Vita I of Brigit, ch. .
49
Latin Life of Colmn of Lynally, text, ch. (Heist, ).
50
List of Nuns Subject to St Brigit (in OSullivan, Book of Leinster, vi., at ).
, ,
extant Life of its foundress, Cairech Dergan. None of the Lives of other saints
(early or late) mention either the place or the foundress. The traces, though, are
there. It is mentioned a few times in the Annals of Ulster: in to report the
death of Scannlaige of Cloonburren, in to tell of its burning, and in at
the death of its abbess Lerben. The ninth-century Martyrology of Oengus in-
cludes its foundresss feast day and that of one of her virgins, Mugain, whose af-
filiation with the place is established by a gloss on her entry.51
In the tenth century, another clue appears: Cloonburrens abbess was
recorded as also having been the abbess of Clonbroney. This link may tell us a
bit about the places wider political relations: it is possible that it had an affili-
ation with Clonbroney during this period, but this is hardly certain.52 It is evident
that Cloonburren survived into the eleventh century, when the obit of an ere-
nagh (managerial abbot) named Fiagha is reported. These small pieces of evi-
dence may signify a decrease in the size or rigour of the monastic life there, but
they are too fragmentary to support such a conclusion. The place may not have
lasted through the twelfth century: Gwynn thought it had ceased to exist before
.53 The twelfth-century Martyrology of Gorman calls for the remembrance
of three of its members: the foundress Cairech Dergan, the virgin Mugain, and
one mysterious Gubsech.54 None of these, nor the place itself, figures in any of
the late Latin Lives, which makes one suspect that Cloonburren was a non-
competitor, if indeed still present, in the game of ecclesiastical politics by the end
of the twelfth century.
the Church itself in the form of its confessors or soul-friends. What were these
special rules? As was usual across Europe in this era, Irish monastics lived, not
under the Benedictine rule, but under rules devised by their founders or other
leading figures. Whilst several of these survive, none is from a female house. The
rules under which nuns in these large monasteries lived, then, cannot be exam-
ined but only inferred. A glance through those that do survive is instructive only
in a general way, because practices varied from place to place, and because they
were written for men.
Two female Lives specifically refer to their nuns rules, though sadly without
detailing their contents. The first story, in a supposedly early chapter in
Conchubranuss Life of Monenna, makes it clear that the rule was guarded by
the saint, who was the houses foundress and first abbess. It is also probable that
the nuns of Killevy believed the saint had formulated the houses rule, as this was
normal in early Ireland. After saint Monenna died, the story goes, the nuns car-
ried on without her, but she returned to them in a vision and chastised them for
letting their discipline slip: Do you forget the fixed rule?56
The second story, from the Vita I of Brigit, is somewhat different, for it tells in-
stead of the origin of the monasterys rule. In this tale, Brigit had a vision of what
was happening in Rome: she saw and heard masses being performed before the
relics of Peter and liked their form so much she sent wise men to travel there to
bring back the ordo missae and the universa regula, so she could implement them at
Kildare.57 This they did, and the abbess then instructed Kildare to follow the
Roman example. The story indicates that Kildare at that time was closely ally-
ing itself with Roman practice and may even have followed a rule which came
from there. Such a stance was a political one at this time, for the Irish Church
was divided as to how far it would follow Rome in such matters as monastic
tonsure, episcopal ordination rites, and Easter dating. The family of Iona,
famously, took the regionalist or Hibernensis position and represented it at the
Synod of Whitby in . There is no explicit evidence about which side Kildare
took in the controversy, so this little tale may be the strongest hint we have on the
matter. Clearly the Kildare familia was announcing to the world that it looked to
Rome for explicit guidance on how monks should live and how ecclesiastical
rites should be carried out. Though this is significant for our understanding of
Kildares politics, it is the content of the ordo missae and universa regula of Rome
56
Conchubranus, Life of Monnena, book , ch. , where it is referred to as statuta regula.
57
Vita I of Brigit, ch. . The story about the origin of Kildares ordo and regula is absent from Cogito-
suss Life and Bethu Brigte, but reappears in a variant form in the th or th century. In the later versions
the story has changed: the messengers failed to retain Romes rule of Peter and Paul but stopped off on
the way home at Plea, a submarine place in the Otherworld. There they got Pleas rule and a beautiful
bell, both of which they did bring back to Brigit. The bell, writes the glossator, is still at Kildare and the
rule is the one Kildare follows, i.e. the Placentine rule, not the Roman. Late versions of the story: glosses
on stanza of the hymn N Car Brigit (Thes. Pal. ii. , at ; also in J. Bernard, and R. Atkinson
(eds. and trans.), The Irish Liber Hymnorum (Henry Bradshaw Society ; London, ), ii. , at
). Another version is in the glosses of Martyrology of Oengus for Feb.
, ,
which would allow us to better understand its monastic practices. But unfortu-
nately in the seventh and eighth centuries there was no monastic rule in Rome
commonly called universal. It is just possible that the author of the Vita I meant
the Benedictine rule, but it is much more likely he meant regula in the more
general sense, to refer to the ways of doing things in Rome; those were certainly
being promoted as universal in the eighth century if not in the seventh.
The office or opus Dei is the heart of monastic religious life. Day and night a
community gathers to sing a set round of psalms, hymns, and prayers. If the of-
fices at the large womens houses were anything like those at Irelands male
monasteries, and they most probably were, they followed the same sort of sched-
ule. Jane Stevenson has teased out from fragmentary evidence that the offices
themselves were largely typical of the West, but in Ireland ad matutinam was
the longest and most important, and there was some variation in the cursus
psalmorum.58 A monastic rule or a cursus psalmorum from a nunnery would be im-
mensely valuable, but as none survives we can only note the incidental men-
tions.59 The fullest such mention, which may be early, relates a miracle which
occurred once in the oratory (oratorium) at Killevy after the sisters had said
matins: at the end of the prayers, the abbess signalled for silence with a knock,
then announced that one of the sisters who had lapsed had to confess.60 It would
seem from this and other stories that it was in the oratory that a communitys
head would address the nuns on matters of communal importance, including
discipline, and that a normal time to do so was (as in this story) at the end of the
office after the final prayers.
The disciplines of the religiously enthusiastic are a favourite theme in saints
Lives everywhere, and the Irish were no different. We hear that Brigit used to
pray all night standing in a cold pond, for example, and that Ita loved many se-
vere fasts.61 Of course chastity was enjoined on every woman vowed to God,
and there were abundant techniques to help those struggling with lust. One
slightly unusual method is reported in Brigits Vita I, where one nun who suf-
fered greatly with lust burnt her feet severely to stop its torments.62 More nor-
mal was the prescription of fasting to reduce blood-flow. The Irish believed in a
correlation between the amount of blood in a persons veins and the degree of
lust they experienced. Thus the ninth-century Customs of Tallaght relate the
instructive story of the virgin Copar who was prescribed fasting for her lust
problem. She abstained until until no blood came out when she was pricked.63
58
The Irish hours were ad secundam (mod. Prime), a.m.; ad tertiam ( Terce), a.m.; ad sextam (Sext),
noon; ad nonam (None), p.m.; ad vesperitam (Vespers), p.m.; ad initium noctis ( Nocturn), p.m.; ad medium
noctis ( Nocturn), midnight; ad matutinam (Lauds/Matins), a.m. (Stevenson, Introduction,
pp. xlivxlviii, at p. xliv).
59
Adomnn, Life of Columba, book , ch. .
60
Conchubranus, Life of Monenna, book , ch. , a th-cent. chapter according to Esposito.
61
Vita I of Brigit, ch. ; Martyrology of Oengus, Jan.
62
Vita I of Brigit, ch. , relating the lust of the prioress Darlugdatha.
63
Customs of Tallaght, ch. .
Nuns were told, via the Lives and probably in their oral teaching too, that great
saints were naturally low on blood: Samthann proved her pure motive in offering
to be a mans soul-friend by jabbing her cheek and showing that no blood would
come out of the pin-prick wound, no matter how hard it was squeezed.64
Some sisters, however, succumbed to carnal temptation. According to the
penitentials, sexual lapses were to be dealt with by penance. The Old Irish Peni-
tential (a ninth-century tract) prescribed one year on bread and water for cler-
ics and nuns who lost their virginity, with the duration raised to four years if a
child was produced. This penitential also made it clear that homosexual lapses
in the monastery might also occur, both men with men and, significantly,
women with women. For this sin it prescribed two years of penance.65 The
penance which had been prescribed in the earlier Penitential of Cummean was
similar: clerics and virgins were expiated from a single episode of fornication by
a year on bread and water; if the act produced a child by a seven-year exile.66
The saints Lives, too, attest to the problem of sexual lapses. In these sources
this sin was dealt with by the abbess, as were all infractions of the rule. In all the
extant Lives, the errant nun was given the opportunity to expiate her sin
through penance within the community. Importantly, veiled women were not
driven out on account of their lapses. In fact, when they showed contrition the
saints were known to magically remove the offending foetuses. This was the
happy reward for the pregnant nun who presented herself to Brigit in Cogito-
suss Life, just as it was for the lapsed virgin who made her way to the great abbot
Cainnech.67 Patricks followers were not immune to the problem: according to
saint Ailbes seventh- or eighth-century hagiographer one of Patricks virgins
became pregnant and it was Ailbe who stepped in to help identify the father.
This story bears some resemblance to the slightly earlier one which emanated
from Kildare. In that version, it was Brigit who stepped in to help Patrick: she
cleared from blame one of Patricks clerics who had been accused by a nun
(quadam virgo) of being the father of the womans baby.68
One discordant voice in this portrait of tolerance speaks out from the Life of
Ailbe. Once when the saint was travelling a couple made the mistake of getting
caught copulating in his proximity and, as was the custom of that place, they
were condemned to death and executed, but Ailbe mercifully revived them.69
64
Ibid., ch. . Cf. Vita I of Brigit, ch. .
65
Old Irish Penitential, ch. , item , the terms used for the cleric and nun mac-cleirich and mac-
caillech, which I take to mean those who were virgins at the time they took their vows, and item .
Cf. Riagail Phatraic on the monk sinning with a nun.
66
Penitenital of Cummean, ch. , item (Bieler, Irish Penitentials, ).
67
Cogitosus, Life of Brigit, ch. ; Latin Life of Cainnech, text, ch. (Heist, ).
68
Latin Life of Ailbe, text, ch. (Heist, ). Cf. Vita I of Brigit, ch. . Perhaps the scribes of
these two texts used these stories as a way of slyly insulting Armagh whilst appearing to pay it a compli-
ment. At the times of writing, relations between the monasteries may have been tense but friendly on the
surface.
69
Latin Life of Ailbe, text, ch. .
, ,
This is just the sort of story which is quoted in generalist books as proof that the
early Irish Church was characterized by a ruthless asceticism. Given its unique-
ness, this little episode deserves closer examination. The transgressors were re-
ligious people, but it does emphasize that they were near the saint. Written
probably in the latter half of the eighth century, this text was composed in a
world of increased ecclesiastical secularity, when some abbots were married,
when plunderers sometimes raided churches, when pilgrims flocked to see relics
in large numbers, and when relics themselves were carried around the country-
side on revenue-collecting circuits of mother churches. It seems to me that this
anecdote is a warning to the laity to respect the relics of the saint, when visiting
it at its shrine or when brought to their region on circuitan interpretation
which looks even more feasible when one recalls Ailbes more moderate
reaction to his Lifes account of the sinning nun in saint Patricks retinue.
The most daring modern interpretation of nuns sexual habits, however, is
that recently put forward by the popular historian Peter Berresford Ellis, writing
about Kildare:
We seem to be left in little doubt that Brigid had a lesbian relationship with another
member of her community. She certainly shared her bed with Darlughdacha, whose
name means daughter of the sun-god Lugh. It is recorded once that Darlughdacha had
the temerity to look appraisingly at a passing young warrior. As a punishment, Brigid
made her walk in shoes filled with hot coals. As Darlughdacha became Brigids succes-
sor as abbess at Kildare, one presumes that, after this penance, she dutifully returned to
Brigids bed. One could also argue that Brigids sexual inclinations become clear in that
she maimed herself rather than marry a male but was content to share her bed with a fe-
male over whom she displayed signs of intense jealousy.70
This story, from the Vita I, is badly misconstrued by Ellis. To paraphrase the
Latin, Darlugdacha greatly desired a man, and he her, and they arranged to
meet. On the night of the assignation she was in one bed with Brigit but rose
secretly once the saint was asleep; on the way she desperately prayed to God
for help to stop her; inspired, she stilled her lust by burning her feet in coals. She
returned to her bed, and next day Brigit praised her fortitude.71 The jealousy
and the punishment which Ellis sees are clearly not part of the story. The only
contentious passage is the one saying the two women spent the night in one bed
(in uno lectulo). Quite apart from the fact that the Life from which this passage
70
Ellis, Celtic Women, p. .
71
Vita I of Brigit, ch. : Sancta Brigita habebat quandam alumnam nomine Darlugdacha quae alio die non bene
custodiens oculos suos vidit alium virum et concupivit eum et ipse similiter amavit eam. Tunc ergo haec virgo in quadam nocte
conduxit illum virum et illa nocte erat ipsa virgo in uno lectulo cum sancta Brigita. Cum autem paulisper dormiret sancta
Brigita, surrexit virgo et cum processit de lectulo inruit in eam mira perturbatio cogitationum et magnum inenarrabileque cer-
tamen habebat in corde, id est inter timorem et amorem; timebat enim Deum et Brigitam et vehementissimo igne amoris viri
urebatur. Oravit ergo Dominum ut adiuvaret eam in magna angustia. Tunc inveniens a Deo bonum consilium, implevuit
duos ficones suos carbonibus ignis et intinxit duos pedes in eos, et sic factum est ut ignis ignem extingueret, dolor dolorem vin-
ceret atque retro in suum lectulum reversa est. Haec autem omnia sensit Brigita sed tamen tacuit, ut puella paulisper
temptaretur et ut probaretur.
is taken was written at least a century after Brigits death, there is a topos in Irish
literature in which a favourite shares, or longs to share, a bed with the king, with-
out any apparent sexual implications involved: it was a sign of favouritism, and
this would appear to be an echo of that, especially as the Vita I repeatedly praises
not only Brigits chastity but also her non-sexual nature. Most condemning of all
to Elliss interpretation, the Irish church knew well about homosexual activity in
monasteries, including among women, and explicitly outlawed it as fornication,
as has already been noted. In light of all the evidence, it is not possible to accept
Elliss claim that Kildare was a place of openly-admitted lesbian liaisons,
though it certainly would be noteworthy if such an interpretation could be
sustained.
early days.76 This has implications for the date of the Vita I. In Rome the ordines
of the grand stational masses were changed in the late seventh century, c.,
and the changes were made in Gaul in the early eighth. This would place the
Vita I in the eighth century. Such a date looks increasingly likely when one fac-
tors in the account of Romes universal Rule: Rome was pushing for the univer-
salization of its practices at this time.77 Whenever it was written, however, the
story does imply relatively good communications between Kildare and the
Holy See. On the subject of masses at Kildare, it is worth noting that the annals
note a change in custom there in the mid-eighth century. On account of a
bishops murder in at the altar of the great church at the hand of a priest,
from that time forward no priest performed a mass there in the presence of a
bishop.78
Like all women, nuns were able to receive the host except when menstruat-
ing. This stipulation, normal in the West, is found in three normative texts of our
period, the fullest of which is in the Rule of the Cli D :
Galar mistae bis for ingenaib eclasa, saire a figle doib oiret bis foraib, maiten acas fescor,
acas brochn do denam doib amtheirt, secip aimsir, fobith dlegar airmitiu in galair sin.
Nis tiagat din do laim ind ar omande [read: immundae] sunt in illo tempore.79
During their monthly illness which is upon virgins of the church, they are free from their
vigils while it is on them morning and evening; and let gruel be made for them at tierce.
Whatever time it happens, that illness is to be attended to. They shall not go to the hand
[i.e. receive communion] then, because they are unclean during that time.
In Frankia in the ninth century, not only could women not take communion,
they could not even enter a church during their monthly periods. Looking at
England, Schneider noted that the early Anglo-Saxon church did not have a
horror of menstruation, but she observes a trend towards increased harshness
over time, caused, she asserts, by the Carolingian reforms. According to Bede,
Gregory had stipulated that women during their periods could enter churches,
and so far as it is possible to tell, the Irish, at least those at Tallaght, took his pos-
ition rather than that of the Franks.80
76
Stevenson, Introduction, pp. lviiilxx.
77
Vogel, Medieval Liturgy, nos. and . M. Andrieu, Les Ordines Romani, vols (Louvain, ),
ii, pp. xxixxxxvi.
78
Recounted in AU, with fuller version in ATig and .
79
Rule of the Cli D in the Leabhar Breac (W. Reeves, On the Culdees. Transactions of the Royal Irish
Academy (), here at p. ); text discussed in Kenney, no. . It is also found in another version of the
Rule, ch. , worded almost identically (Rule of the Cli D in a Franciscan, Dublin MS, ed. and trans.
E. Gwynn, The Rule of Tallaght, Hermathena , nd supplemental vol. (), , here at p. ).
Old Irish Penitential, ch. , unnumbered item at the end of the chapter: Banscala intan bis a ngalar mistae
foraib ni tiagat do sacarbaic (women do not go to the sacrament when their monthly illness is upon them).
80
Gregory as reported in Bede, Historia Ecclesiastica, book , ch. . Frankia: Hodgson Frankish
Church, ; England: Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women, , with comments on the authenti-
city of the ruling attributed to Gregory. But note pregnant womens impurity in Ireland, such that at least
some felt they should not enter churches: Latin Life of Ailbe, text, ch. .
Another issue for a nunnery was that of mass in the absence of a priest. There
was in the West the known practice of reserving the host, whereby a priest would
leave consecrated bread and wine with nuns, so that they could celebrate a mass
without his presence. This would have been a boon to small female commu-
nities served only by visiting clerics, and it would permit nuns, whose priest
might perform a consecration only on Sundays, to take communion daily as part
of their devotions. In Anglo-Saxon England it appears that some nunneries
made use of the practice, but no Irish sources mention it, whether to acknowledge,
attest, or condemn it.81
Much as one would like them to, no Irish sources permit us to make com-
parisons with many contemporary Frankish and Anglo-Saxon practices.82 With
regard to women touching altar items, elsewhere there was a prohibition of
women washing the altar cloths, but the only Irish evidence is from the Irish
Lives, in which female saints handle such things as chalices, chrismals, and
patens. Whether this extended to mortal nuns of the seventh to ninth centuries
is a matter of speculation. In the masses, Irish women did not take a deaconal or
subdeaconal role. One seventh-century Irish gloss explained a biblical refer-
ence to deaconesses (diaconissa) as a foreign ancient custom; nor are they indi-
cated in any surviving texts. The well-known case of Lavocat and Catihern,
Breton priests assisted in the mass by women, was evidently not typical of
practice in Ireland, at least not one visible to the modern scholar.83
one must look beyond the Brigidine material in any attempt to glimpse actual
practice. The Annals of Ulster in noted a female religious who headed the
house of the most venerable or holy of Kildare: Condal daughter of Murchad,
abbess of the elders house (abatissa tighe sruithe). The eighth-century Life of
Ailbe appears to provide some further confirmation, for one anecdote in that
Life centres on an unruly male student (alumpnus) being raised and instructed by
a group of religious virginsthe virgins are anonymous, the boy is likewise un-
named, and the fact he is with women goes unremarkedall of which would
suggest that such a situation was hardly unusual.86 Later Lives, dating from the
tenth to twelfth centuries, contain numerous claims that male saints had been
taught in their childhood by famed holy virgins: in these, boys are fostered and
taught their basic schooling by the virgins, but are sent to a male teacher as they
reach puberty.87 The compilers of the Collectio Canonum Hibernensis, working
c., must only have been trying to stop nuns teaching grown men when they
reiterated the Pauline injunctions against women speaking in church and teach-
ing religious matters.88 The fostering tradition was to remain strong for a long
time yet.
Claustration?
Claustration, the practice of enclosing nuns and separating them from contact
with men, had an important role in the theory, if not the practice of female sanc-
tity from Jeromes day and before. In the course of the Middle Ages it came to
be a predominant indicator of nunhood, distinguished in the later medieval
period from the unenclosed women in tertiary orders. But in the early Middle
Ages such a notion was often unenforced, or even unstressed among writers, as
a range of writers on early medieval religious women, particularly those of the
Wemple school, have noted. At its simplest we can summarize the Irish position
by saying that to have enclosed Gods brides away from the world seems not to
have crossed their minds in this period any more than it had in the fifth and sixth
centuries. This was so in spite of the existence of Continental, late antique, and
patristic textual exhortations to do so, whose presence in Ireland by the seventh
century is well attested and whose wide dispersion by the ninth is undoubted.89
Apparently the only group to advocate strict enclosure was the Roman party in
the Irish church. This faction, in existence from the sixth to the eighth centuries,
is largely imperceptible, but generally speaking it preferred the Roman ways of
86
Latin Life of Ailbe, text, ch. .
87
e.g. Brendan, fostered by Ita, then sent to Erc of Slane.
88
Hibernensis, book , chs. .
89
The participation of nuns in pastoral care can at least partially explain many unusual and enig-
matic features concerning nuns, for example the legal equivalency between nuns and clerics (not just
monastics) in many law texts, and the residence of nuns at local churches. These phenomena will be
treated in depth in subsequent chapters.
doing things when Irish custom differed. The Romani are most famous for argu-
ing against the Hibernenses (the opposing, pro-regionalism faction) on the date of
the Irish Easter. On the issue of women religious no great controversy arose and
their position is preserved only in a canonical collection assembled c.:
Romani dicunt: Decet mulieres, sicut fragilitatis sexum acceperunt, districte semper vi-
vere sub manu pastoralis regiminis; virgines habitu virginitatis ornatae sine omnium vi-
rorum conspectibus segregentur, et sic vivant usque ad mortem; penitentes vero
obedientiae subditae sint, et quanto expertae sunt fragilitatem, tanto fieri cautiores
debent.90
The Romani say: it behoves women, as they accepted the fragility of their sex, to live en-
gaged under the hand of a pastoral regime; virgins adorned with the clothing of virgins
are to be segregated from the view of men, and to live thus until death; penitents are to
be subjected to obedience, and the more they have experienced weakness, the more
they should be kept secure.
The Romani position was articulated in the face of a widespread reality which
was considerably different. In fact, this one is the only such exhortation to claus-
tration in Ireland before the eleventh century.
The Vita I of Brigit shows the nunnery to be more like a quasi-pastoral mis-
sion centre staffed in large part by women. For example, Brigit provided beer for
the eighteen churches of her area (in circuitu oppidorum Medi ).91 At holy feasts the
people were accustomed to come to the church.92 Brigit was rightly accused of
regional/familial favouritism by two British invalids, who complained that she
healed only people of her own genus. Significantly, she corrected this shortcoming
of hers and henceforth helped all comers, regardless of their regional or family
background.93 The people of Leinster called her back from Connaught to Leinster
when she had been away for too long.94 Brigit had dealings with local rulers: one
king came to celebrate Pentecost with her95 and another came to be blessed by
her.96 There is also general involvement by the nuns in the concerns of lay
people in ways not specific to the region or diocese. The foundress arranged
baptisms,97 bargained for the release of hostages, and supervised penance.98
Guests were welcomed to the hospicium, and for the ill there was the hospitalium
90
Hibernensis, book , ch. (H. Wasserschleben, Die irische Kanonensammlung (Leipzig, ) ). This in-
junction is of especial interest because in hagiography the nun is hardly shut away from the view of men
but rather is often portrayed as working side by side with men of the Church.
91
Vita I of Brigit, ch. . These passages refer not to Kildare, however, but to the Fothairt
AirbrechMag Telach axis; Kildare comes in only in the last section of the Life.
92
Ibid., ch. . Sharpe noted that in this early version the people came customarily, but in the later,
th-cent. D redaction, they were invited to attend, a change implying that in the th cent. such a custom
was current and needed no explanation, whereas later it would have not made sense so required change.
Such changes, according to Sharpe, are typical of the D redactor (Sharpe, Saints Lives, p. ).
93
Vita I of Brigit, ch. .
94
Orta est magna questio apud Laginenses de absentia sanctae Brigitae, miseruntque nuntios ad eam in regiones Con-
nachtorum ut ad suam gentem rediret (ibid., ch. ).
95 96 97
Ibid., ch. . ibid., ch. . Ibid., ch. .
98
Ibid., chs. , . For receiving confession and supervising penance, see chs. , .
, ,
(to which, amazingly enough, Brigit sent one barren couple to have sex to con-
ceive a child).99 Brigit even appears to have helped out the local farmers: she
rode her chariot around their field to bless it, presumably for a good crop.100
There is some hint that nuns were especially given to looking after the ill and
dying: nuns of another region went to the homes of the sick to sit by their beds,
praying and keeping vigil. Elsewhere it is related that Brigit and her virgins did
the same at Easter time, visiting the homes of the ill to pray for them there. The
Old Irish Penitential treats the matter of nuns who attend the dying and keen
over them, and the cle D teachings of the eighth-century Saint Maelruain
speak of a special recitation of the Song of Solomon over the dying and
just-dead, in which the part of the male was seen to be the Christian soul and the
part of the woman to be the spirit of the Holy Church, Lady Ecclesia. If women
were ever performers of these readings over male clerics, it would constitute an
enactment of the metaphor in a very vivid way.101
In providing services to the laity of the region the nuns had regular contact
with men. They are found engaging with both laymen as mentioned above and
also with ecclesiastics and other males in the monastic familia. In the Vita I there
is no suggestion that regular monks (as distinct from monastic tenants, called
manaig) lived at Kildare, but the familia did include other sorts of males: a sacerdos
who also served as chariot-driver, married lay dependents,102 a slave who gave
himself and his family in perpetuity to her,103 and mowers of the agricultural
land.104 There was a resident bishop, Conlaed, but he was not considered a sex-
ual threat to either the abbess or the nuns. By the end of the Life, Conlaed had
actually become a member of the household and thus made Kildare an epis-
copal church.105 Earlier the nuns had relied for preaching and the mass upon
Bishop Mel, episcopus noster, who lived at his own place,106 and also upon
Patrick.107 In none of the anecdotes of the Vita I is there any concern with keep-
ing the nuns away from these men. There was no concern about temptation
arising from contact between the sexes, nor was there any suggestion that such
contact might impede the nuns spiritual vocations. On the contrary, they are
shown interacting in amicable and relaxed ease. Visits by groups of monks or
clerics from other places are recounted with enthusiasm, and are reported as
lasting for three days and nights or up to a week. During these visits the word of
God was preached and there was much celebration. Hospitality was of course
to be provided by the hosting house, a difficult feat in times of poverty, but one
99 100
Vita I of Brigit, chs. , , . Ibid., ch. .
101
Ibid., chs. , . The Old Irish Penitential, ch. , item , set penances for the penitent nun (caillech
aithrigi ) or chief wife (ctmuintir) who lamented for those she tended, if they died (D. Binchy, The Old Irish
Penitential, in Bieler, Irish Penitentials, ; also E. Gwynn (ed.), An Irish Penitential. riu (),
). For the suggestion that women had a special role in tending the dying, see also the Life of Ita, ch.
, where Coemgen asked Ita to be the one who, at his death, would close his eyes and mouth. On the
passage in the teachings of Maelruain, see McCone, Pagan Past, p. .
102 103 104
Vita I of Brigit, ch. . Ibid., ch. . Ibid., ch. .
105 106 107
Ibid., ch. . Ibid., ch. . Ibid., ch. .
essential to the event. Thus in chapter , Bishop Celln stayed with Brigit for
some days aliquantis diebus, and upon leaving asked her to bless his chariot. In
chapter , Brigit sent for Patrick to come and preach the word of God, where-
upon he with his disciples and she with her maidens came together as one
(ille cum suis discipulis et illa cum suis puellis in unum convenerunt). Then Patrick
preached for three days and nights. Even more striking is the fact that the nuns
travelled extensively, the author showing no apparent concern to reassure the
reader that they were keeping their vow to avoid the world. In the Vita I the
theme is absolutely pervasive and more than half the life appears to take place
during wanderings of the saint and her virgins to Limerick, Connaught, Meath,
and Armagh. One passage illustrates it particularly well.
Alio post tempore sancta Brigita iter agebat per campum Tethbe sedens in curru. Tunc
illa vidit quendam maritum cum sua uxore et tota familia et cum multis pecoribus lab-
orantes et portantes onera gravia [qui] in ardore solis lassi fuerunt. Tunc Brigita miserta
erat illis deditque eis equos currus sui ad onera portanda. Illa autem remansit iuxta viam
sedens cum puellis suis, dixitque illis Brigita, Fodite sub cespite propinquo, ut erumpat
aqua foras. Venient enim aliqui qui habent escas et sine potu sitiunt. Tunc foderunt et
erumpit fluvius. Post paulolum per eandem viam venit alius dux cum multa turba pedi-
tum et equitum et ille audiens quod sancta Brigita de equis fecit, obtulit duos equos ei in-
domitos, sed statim domiti facti sunt quasi semper essent sub curru. Post haec venerunt
per eandem viam discipuli et famila sancti Patricii episcopi dixeruntque ad sanctam
Brigitam, Nos in via laboramus; cibum habemus sed potum deest. Tunc comites Brig-
itae dixerunt, Nos vobis preparavimus potum fluminis aquae; predixit enim sancta
Brigita vos futuros esse. Tunc omnes comederunt et biberunt in commune, gratiam
agentes Deo et Brigitam glorificantes.108
Another time Saint Brigit travelled through the plain of Tethbae sitting in her chariot.
Then she saw a married man with his wife and family, along with many flocks, working
and carrying heavy burdens; in the heat of the sun they were exhausted. Then Brigit
pitied them and gave them her chariots horses to carry their burdens. She stayed by the
side of the road sitting with her girls, and they said to Brigit, Dig under this nearby
hillock, so that water will gush out. Then some people will come who have food and will
be without drink. Then they dug and there burst forth a spring. After a little while along
the road came a ruler with a great crowd of soldiers and horses and he, hearing what
holy Brigit did with the horses, gave two unbroken horses to her, but they were quickly
made tame almost as soon as they were under the chariot. After this there came along
this road the disciples and household of holy bishop Patrick and they said to Saint Brigit,
We shall labour in the road; we have food, but we lack drink. Then Brigits companions
said, We have prepared for you a drink of spring water; Brigit predicted your arrival.
Then they all ate and drank together, giving thanks to God and glorifying Brigit.
Cogitosuss Life is the other seventh-century source treating Kildare in depth.
He confirms the portrait outlined in the Vita I, in relation to both the pastoral
mission and the involvement with male ecclesiastics. In fact, he addressed even
108
Ibid., ch. .
, ,
more explicitly the relationship between the two sexes. He wrote that Brigit had
called upon Bishop Conlaed in order that he might govern the church with her
in the office of bishop and that her Churches might lack nothing as regards
priestly orders.109 It was necessary, he wrote, for the abbess to have male clerics
to hand so that she could better and more easily provide for the needs of the lay
people nearby, as well as the needs of her own nuns. He portrayed Brigit and her
community as offering quasi-pastoral services: the poor and needy, he related,
used to come to her in droves on account of her famed generosity towards the
poor.110 She also interceded before a king on behalf of a layman at his trial for
theft, preached to heathens to convert them to Christianity, and chastised and
received the confession of a wicked layman who subsequently repented of his
evil ways.111 The normalcy of this state of affairs for Cogitosus is in itself worthy
of mention. It was not strange to him that a womans community might take in
such a bishop, or that a bishop would willingly join such a place. Nor was it
strange for him that a womens house should take an active role in organizing
religious life in its region.
The closeness of the sexes at Kildare is evidenced by Cogitosuss description
of its main church in his own day. He gave a detailed picture of the building at
which the monks and nuns both worshipped, and at which gathered the many
other people of both sexes who together made up the familia. Seating in the
church building was organized in sections. Each grade of believer had its par-
ticular place. The church, he wrote, was of an awesome height and adorned
with paintings. The interior was divided by board walls into three chapels, with
one wall stretching width-wise in the east of the church, pierced by two doors,
one at either end. These led into the sanctuary, where the altar was located and
in which the eucharist was celebrated. Through one door to the sanctuary pro-
ceeded the high bishop, the monastic chapter, and those appointed to the sa-
cred mysteries (summus pontifex cum sua regulari scola et his qui sacris deputati sunt
misteriis). Through another proceeded the abbess with her nuns and faithful
widows (abatissa cum suis puellis et viduis fidelibus) to partake of the eucharist. Another
interior wall ran along the length of the church and met the crossing wall. The
church had two portals, the one on the right being that for the priests and other
males (sacerdotes et populus fidelis masculini generis sexus); the door on the left was for
the nuns and the women faithful (virgines et feminarum fidelium congregatio). Two re-
constructions of the church have been attempted by modern scholars, both of
which are equally possible given the ambiguities in Cogitosuss description.112
And so, Cogitosus tells us, in one vast basilica, a large congregation of people
of varying status, rank, sex and local origin, with partitions placed between
109 110
Cogitosus, Life of Brigit, Preface. Ibid., chs. , , .
111
Ibid., chs. , , , , , .
112
C. Radford, The Earliest Irish Churches, UJA (), , and Thomas, Early Christian Ar-
chaeology, , .
them, prays to the omnipotent Master, differing in status, but one in spirit.113
The significance of both sexes worshipping together in a single church can
hardly be overemphasized in any examination of attitudes to gender in this era.
The nuns of Kildare by the time of Cogitosus probably represented a numerical
minority in the overall Kildare population. One wonders how separated they
were from the monks and other males in daily life, for although we know they
worshipped jointly in the same church as the men (albeit in separate sections),
this does not tell us how members of the opposite sex interacted in other con-
texts or in daily dealings. But even though we do not know this, we can note that
Cogitosus was not threatened by female sexuality, for he stressed not the sep-
aration of the sexes but their coming together.
There is a ninth-century Life of Brigit, Bethu Brigte which, though it does not
make any references to Kildare at the time of the texts composition, does sug-
gest that a relaxed attitude to female claustration continued. It follows the Vita I
in portraying active, non-enclosed nuns engaged in the care of the lay commu-
nity and (as in both the Vita I and Cogitosus) strongly linked to the male ecclesi-
astical establishment. If Kildare had experienced a dramatic increase in
claustration between the seventh and the ninth centuries, one would see some
shift in the portrayal of nuns travelling and their reception of visitors; Bethu Brigte
implies that this had not occurred.
Killevys nuns, as portrayed in the early sections of Monennas Life were
portrayed in similar terms: they were providers of care to the laity, and were
well-travelled and much-visited. Throughout the Life, the foundress and her
maidens are often travelling, and Monenna visits neighbours to be fed by
them, receiving hospitality and in return providing miracles; likewise the laity
are shown as visiting the monastery and there admitting sins and receiving
penances. Other Lives of this early period, such as those in Sharpes
ODonoghue group in the Codex Salmenticensis, show much the same thing.
Given that we see no evidence of nuns being shut away from either male ec-
clesiastics or laymen in these centuries, the Irish nunnery can look un-monastic.
As has been hinted, a similar claim has been made about Irish male monaster-
ies in Ireland for the same period. Significantly, there was no terminological dis-
tinction between places for those dedicated to the regular or devotional life and
places established to provide for pastoral needs. Nor did the terms for an eccle-
siastical establishment convey its wealth, size, regularity of observance, or
degree of pastoral care provided; equally there is no linguistic distinction
indicating male, female, or mixed houses.114 The Irish seem not to have
113
Cogitosus, Life of Brigit, ch. : Et sic in una basilica maxima populus grandis in ordine et gradibus et sexu et
locis diversus interiectis inter se parietibus diverso ordine et uno animo omnipotentem orat dominatorem.
114
That is not to say other information cannot be gleaned from the terms describing ecclesiastical
places; see A. MacDonald: Notes on Terminology in the Annals of Ulster, , Peritia (),
, and his Notes on Monastic Archaeology and the Annals of Ulster, in D. Corrin
(ed.), Irish Antiquity: Essays and Studies Presented to Professor M. J. OKelly (Cork, ), . Similar
, ,
separated, even mentally, the places where a monastic life was lived from those
responsible for providing pastoral care. As Thomas Charles-Edwards has ob-
served, It is extremely difficult, and perhaps wrong in principle, to try to draw
a sharp line between monastic and non-monastic churches.115
If the pastoral focus accounts for some if not all of the un-monastic quality of
male houses, then we may have the key to understanding the ethos behind the
non-enclosure and the high level of contact with the male sex at nunneries. If the
nuns house, like the male monastery, played an important role in local care,
then their participation in the effort would mean they had to be involved with
men of the church and laity, and their raison dtre was not impeded by such
contact.
earlier Lives are significantly less domestic in their activities, and this may well
be due to the needs of a society on the edge of conversion, where an all hands
on deck attitude prevailed. Little work has been done on the extent to which
nunneries tended the laity beyond the nuns personal families, but it certainly
warrants further study. Small snippets in the Frankish sources may be signifi-
cant. Regino of Prm recommended that unwanted babies be left at churches,
presumably to be raised in monastic environments.118 Monasteries, including
nunneries, served as boarding schools, and oblation was well-known. As for en-
closure, according to the Regula Cuiusdam Patris ad Virgines, a seventh-century
rule, nuns would work outside the monastery in teams of three or four for full
days at a time.119 For all this, though, there are signs of difference from Ireland,
in some cases at least. Firstly, late Merovingian and earlier Carolingian hagio-
graphy does not show the patterns of nuns travel and malefemale interaction
that we see in the Irish material of the same period.120 Secondly, there is a sense
of retreat from the world, even before the Carolingian reforms, in such a Life as
that of Balthild, where the abbess saint was preparing to enter her newly-built
monastery of Chelles but was delayed by the Neustrians who were loathe to lose
her, so great was their love for her.121 It seems too, that even a saint such as
Fursey who had an active partnership with the woman Gertrude lived in a
world where monks and nuns did not worship together, even on great occasions:
when Fursey died his body, on its way to the graveyard, was taken through the
nuns church to give the nuns an opportunity to see it.122 It is probably still too
early for generalizations about female sanctity in Frankia, because for such a
large area there were certainly regional and temporal variations; detailed small-
scale studies must precede such a work if it is to rest on secure footing, and such
studies are as yet few in number.123 Though the Frankish material is very differ-
ent from the contemporary Irish, it may be that behind the veil of the sources,
some parts of the Frankish reality were not dissimilar to the Irish with regard to
nuns in large houses and their community relations.
In England at this period, parallels with Ireland are much more apparent.
English monasteries, including double houses, have long been recognized as
having been centres of pastoral care.124 Sarah Foot writes, a number of those liv-
ing in monasteries were in clerical orders, but there is no evidence that pastoral
118
Hodgson, Frankish Church, .
119
Cited in Wemple, Women, .
120
For patterns in Merovingian and Carolingian female hagiography, see Smith, Problem, with ref-
erences. For discussion and translations of late Merovingian Lives, see P. Fouracre and R. Gerberding,
Late Merovingian France: History and Historiography (Manchester, ).
121
Life of Balthild, ch. .
122
Additamenta Nivalense de Fuilano, in Fouracre and Gerberding, Merovingian France, .
123
e.g. Martindale, The Nun Immena, in Shiels and Wood (eds.), Women and the Church, .
124
Though it is thought that some were places of retreat from the world. The minster thesis is a
large, on-going subject in Anglo-Saxon ecclesiastical history, and understanding is developing
continually.
, ,
work was restricted to priests and deacons.125 In other words, their nuns have
been found providing services to the laity beyond their families and the royal
court. Monastics of both sexes prayed for the souls of the king and his people,
and both male and female saints were expected to intercede for particular indi-
viduals; the neighbouring community would come to the church, Foot thinks,
on feast days and at burials. Schneider went further on the latter point, envi-
sioning the laity as present to receive healing, to visit shrines, to visit nuns on
their deathbeds, to seek sanctuary as fugitives, to seek spiritual advice, and to
visit friends. Some houses, if not all, had a visitors hospice where such people
would stay.126 This is generally the view of Nicholson, too, who wrote that for
women in Bedes day, it was no use entering a monastery to get away from men
and doubtful whether anyone really wanted to.127 Though the English Lives do
not have the peripatetic quality so characteristic of Irish ones, nuns do go out
from their houses, Schneider demonstrated: like monks they sometimes ab-
sented themselves for indeterminate periods to travel and undertake visits,
though (unlike Ireland) there was some pressure for stabilitas. In addition, she
says, nuns were known to teach outside the institution, something not evidenced
in Ireland.128 Schneider postulated that the double house, wherein men and
women live in proximity to each other, resulted in the almost total absence of
gynophobic writing among churchmen in early Anglo-Saxon England. Nichol-
son, like her and like Foot, saw the origins of female prominence in the early
Church as lying in native secular society: Men and women worked together in
the secular world and proceeded to do likewise in the cloister.129 In the study of
English nunneries there is a perceived watershed, with changes, as in Frankia,
attributed to ecclesiastical reform. Schneiders periodization is the most articu-
lated version of a model generally accepted. She formulated an early period
(c. ) in which double monasteries were the most important political
and cultural centres in their respective kingdoms, followed by a scarcely-
sourced transitional period (c. ), in which few new nunneries were
founded and many disappeared; from the mid-eighth century, double houses
seem to her to have lost their independence from bishops. During the second
period, she thinks, there was a coexistence of various living arrangements for
nuns, without one taking precedence over another, including religious women
living on their own and women attached to male houses.130 Foot, like Schneider,
125 126
Foot, Parochial Ministry, . Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women, .
127
J. Nicholson, Feminae Gloriosae : Women in the Age of Bede, in D. Baker (ed.), Medieval Women
(Studies in Church History, Subsidia ; Oxford, ), , at .
128
Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women, .
129
Nicholson, Feminae Gloriosae, ; Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women generally but esp. ;
S. Foot, Veiled Women (forthcoming, ) in which it is a general thesis.
130
Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women, throughout, but for a clear, abbreviated summary see .
She has a third, late period, which she dates from onward, when Benedictinism prevailed; she sees
in this a loss of power for nunneries (and their inmates), believing reformation came from without rather
than from within as some have suggested.
has placed the cause of this watershed not with the Benedictine or Cluniac
reforms (as others have), but with the earlier Carolingian reforms.131 After the
changes, whenever and however they occurred, Anglo-Saxonists agree that
nunneries were neither as pastoral, nor as open, as they had been in the earlier
centuries.132
The Irish situation, then, though sharing numerous similarities with England
if not so evidently with Frankia, is hardly peculiar in the openness of its female
communities. As will become evident in the following chapter, Irish holy women
were not confined to these large institutions, so any attempt at comparison with
other Western societies must take into account the full range of milieux in which
they lived.
131
Foot, Veiled Women.
132
Interestingly, Schneider claims that even into the th cent. there were womens houses in England
which were not Benedictine, so the changes were apparently not universally applied (Schneider, Anglo-
Saxon Women, ).
1
K. Hughes and A. Hamlin, The Modern Traveller to the Early Irish Church (London, ), .
2
Ed. Riain, Corpus Genealogiarum. The manuscripts in which these appear include the Book of
Leinster, Bodl. Rawl. B, the Book of Ballymote, the Great Book of Lecan, and BM Addit. .
Riains dating, pp. xvixviii.
3
Riain, Corpus Genealogiarum, . For an earlier edition see Brosnan, Archivium Hibernicum,
. Text discussed in Kenney, no. .
4
Riain, Corpus Genealogiarum, . The version in the Book of Leinster is in R. Best et al., The Book
of Leinster, vols. (Dublin, ) vi. .
5
Riain, Corpus Genealogiarum, . Book of Leinster version in Book of Leinster, vi. .
6
List of Nuns Subject to Saint Brigit, Riain, Corpus Genealogiarum, . Also in Book of Leinster, vi.
. Discussed in Kenney, no. : this document gives a list of nuns subject to Brigit, and of their
churches.
Virtually unmentioned in the voluminous scholarly literature of Irish monasti-
cism is the fact that many male monasteries had nuns in their familiae. As a re-
sult, the researcher comes upon the many documentary references to this effect
with no small amount of surprise. Perhaps the older generation of Irish histor-
ians failed to take up these references in part because they fly in the face of the
traditional image of the early Irish church as an ascetic Celtic church, whose
monks were so holy (so the stereotype goes) that they avoided contact with fe-
males. Gwynn and Hadcock, writing Monastic Houses in , clearly knew of the
phenomenon, for they mapped and indexed the male monasteries which had
nuns and, according to their reckonings, very many fell into this category. These
two authors, however, offered no analysis, explanation, or comment on their
findings.7 Lisa Bitel in Womens Monastic Enclosures briefly remarked on the
phenomenon of nuns at male houses as part of an observation that many
womens enclosures were dependencies of male houses, a point she made in sup-
port of her argument that female foundations were economically weak as the
early Irish church was generally misogynist, a view largely unaltered in Land of
Women.
The evidence on the subject is substantial enough to reward study, and what
emerges from the material is extremely interesting. The most noteworthy fea-
ture is the writers lack of preoccupation with gender. Whilst the nuns who lived
at male monasteries were doubtless housed separately, they were not demon-
ized nor was their sexuality a topic on which ecclesiastical writers focused.
Women and men are described as living together at Armagh almost insepar-
ably; Tallaghts monks were encouraged to go to speak to the monasterys nuns
even though the monks might suffer lust in doing so. The evidence for this period
simply does not support Bitels claim that nuns outside nunneries became a
threat to society, and male monastic society in particular.8
In the seventh- to ninth-century period, there are approximately fifty refer-
ences to nuns who were residents of male monasteries. Residence requires
some explanation. In some cases, a female church had its own name but was at
the male monastery; in such cases there can be problems in determining the de-
gree of affiliation between the nuns community and the monastery to which it
was attached, especially in those cases where the holy women lived at some dis-
tance from the men. In such cases it is not always possible to determine whether
the nuns community was integral to the monasterys administrative structure
and ruled by its abbot, or was simply within its jurisdiction or monastic feder-
ation. Of course there were differing levels and types of affiliation. And just as
7
The vast majority of all such references are in the chapter on womens establishments, though the
map enclosed in the jacket of the book lists many more places as having adherents of both sexes. For this
no explanation is offered.
8
Bitel, Womens Enclosures, .
, ,
there were various sorts of affiliation, so too do the texts show that the degree of
contact between monk and nun also varied from place to place. In identifying a
group of nuns as being at a mens monastery, I include those which were within
the administrative structure and which were physically within its bounds or
locale. Included in the discussion below are monasteries at which women were
reported only as temporary members, that is to say, students. This is because
there would have been a constant female presence, transient though it may
have been.9
Nuns at Armagh
Armagh (Ir. Ard Macha) in Ulster south of Lough Neagh was allegedly founded
by saint Patrick, though this is by no means certain, and it achieved island-wide
fame only in the seventh century when its leaders attempted make it into the
archiepiscopal church for the whole of Ireland. It was wealthy and powerful,
and remained so, and thus is unsurprisingly the best-attested of the monasteries
which had nuns, though its function as an episcopal see means that to call it sim-
ply a monastery is somewhat misleading. A seventh-century text, the Liber Angeli,
says that at Armagh, from its founding up to the authors day, Christians of both
sexes lived together in religion, almost inseparably, but worshipping in different
churches; the women included holy virgins.10 Although the nuns attended
church with the penitents and married people rather with the clerics and an-
chorites, it is of central importance that the author emphasized that the sexes
lived almost inseparably. The nuns and other devout women belong to (adher-
ent) Armagh. It would be most normal, based on what is known of sanctuary
boundary-setting, to presume that the church of the northern area (the womens
church) lay within the monasterys boundary or termonn. Noting the language,
which appears actually to boast of the closeness of the male and female
communities, it might just be that the author was attempting to compete in this
regard with Kildare, which was Irelands foremost, if not its only double
monastery. The two houses were in competition for archiepiscopal status dur-
ing this period, and the text is part of Armaghs propaganda for that position, so
perhaps serving both men and women was a selling-point of which Kildare
boasted, and the author wished to offer Armagh as an equal in that respect.
Such a suggestion is, admittedly, is no more than speculation.
In the seventh or eighth century another writer, the hagiographer of St Ailbe,
imagined that in the fifth century nuns had been part of Patricks community,
telling the story of an ancilla in Patricks retinue who became pregnant by one of
his chariot-drivers.11 Later texts report two specifically womens churches at
Armagh, Temple Brigid and Tempul-na-ferta (church of the graves), the latter
9
The Lives of Monenna and Finnian show this educational role of nuns quite strongly.
10
Liber Angeli, ch. . 11
Latin Life of Ailbe, text, ch. .
claiming to have the relics of Patricks sister Lupait.12 The notes on the Mar-
tyrology of Oengus, dating to the tenth or eleventh century, say that actually
within the precinct boundary of Armagh was a Cell-na-Noebingen, church of
the holy virgins,13 and to the east of Armagh a place called Cell-na-nIngen,
church of the virgins. The Tripartite Life of Patrick, written some time in the
tenth- to twelfth-century period, also mentions the Cell-na-nIngen in the east of
Armagh, which apparently boasted the relics of two female peregrinae.14 It also
tells of a virgin (ingen) who set up at a place called Cengoba which must have
been adjacent to the monastery as a monk came every night from Patricks place
to bring her ration of food.15
In the latter churches, it can hardly have been known what sort of inhabitants
there were during the seventh, eighth, and ninth centuries because the virgins
might be old relics rather than living inhabitants: that is to say, the ingena of
Cell-na-nIngen might be the remains in the graveyard. Given the thaumatur-
gical importance of the relics, even those buried in a grave, this is a possibility. At
many other places, however, a church of virgins did refer to living nuns, and so
it may well be that it was so at Armagh as well.
12
Gwynn and Hadcock, Religious Houses, .
13
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Oct.
14
Tripartite Life of Patrick (Stokes, Tripartite Life, i. ). Appears in the text as Coll-na-nIngen.
15 16
Ibid. Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Oct.
, ,
maccaildidi do bith hi farrad ni cian huaib imbat. Andand donetarrat maccobar n
mimradad tre faicsin no ac acaldaim mbanscl ma atrocuil am menme nad cometesta
d ceith folam deit ni fil brg laisiom hisind accobar sin. Is fochric immurgu ma gabthair
tairis andand mbis a foindel inda menmain commr fri mimradud a timtasad for calae
feib dorrontar tuidecht lgind n a scrutain fris menme isind aurnaigti. Nicon
aorsusa laisiom commas pende ara faoendel sin indda menman. Fobithin ncomr
imbisom ifus eitir.17
Devout young nuns he thinks it right to go and converse with and to confirm their faith,
but without looking upon their faces, and taking an elder in your company: and it is right
to converse with them standing on the slab by the cross in front of the hostel, or in the
retreat where they live. And the elder who goes with you, and the senior nun who lives
in the company of the young nuns, should be present and not far from you, where they
are. When ill desires or ill thoughts overtake you, through seeing women or in converse
with them, it is not to be indulged by you even as an idle thought, then he considers that
such desire is not great matter; it is meritorious, however, if a man gets clear of it.
Thus, contact was good, but care had to be taken by the monks to minimize the
chances of an attack of lust. The monks were not to look at the nuns, but this ad-
vice is clearly given for the mens own sakes and not because the nuns were be-
lieved to be temptresses. The nuns of Tallaght were considered part of the
overall community, for there are stipulations concerning them in the rule for
monks, such as that, mentioned above, stipulating that during their monthly
periods nuns were free from some vigils and got a special gruel at tierce. That
notice, incidentally, not only informs us of their inclusion in the membership
of Tallaght familia, but also shows that nuns were sympathetically accom-
modated.18
The martyrologies also show evidence of women there: they commemorate
two holy women Cemsa and Crna, virgins of Tallaght, on February, and
the anniversary of the translation of the virgin Scath of Fert Scthes relics
there from Munster, September, was a feast.19
At the same time, the other cli D monastery, Finglas (on the site of what is
now another Dublin suburb) also had a nuns residence. The Customs of
Tallaght relate the story of a nun (caillech) who approached Finglass abbot,
Dublitir, to ask if she could stay in its nuns enclosure (les callech).20 He rudely re-
fused, and his confessor bishop, standing nearby, intervened to order him to
give her the requested permission, plus a cow and a cloak in recompense for his
17
Customs of Tallaght, ch. .
18
Rule of the Cli D in the Leabhar Breac (in Reeves, at . As the chapters are not numbered, ref-
erences are by page number of this edition).
19
For the former two: Martyrology of Gorman. For the last: martyrologies of Tallaght, Oengus, Gor-
man, and Donegal, with Martyrology of Tallaght, adventus reliquiarum Scethi filiae Mechi ad Tamlachtain. Fert
Scithe in the Muscraige tri Maige has been identified with mod. Ardskeagh, Co. Cork (Onomasticon).
20
Customs of Tallaght, ch. . Gwynn and Purton give les as hostel, but it is better translated, with
Dictionary, as the space about a dwelling-house enclosed by a bank or rampart or enclosure in the sense
of a defined area in the monastic settlement.
unkind words. Since the nun had waited to speak to Dublitir in a field that was
over the stile on the other side of the monks garden (asind gurt . . . tarsa ceim isind
faichti ), it suggests that nuns were not permitted inside one of Finglass inner
enclosures.
According to several authors the monastic church of Kells (Ir. Caenannus) in
Meath also had resident nuns. Little is known about its foundation, but it was
flourishing in the seventh century when Trechn located the nun Comgella at
a church next to it. In it was taken over by the monastic community of Saint
Columba, which moved there from Iona on account of Viking attacks. It was a
Columban foundation when the later writer of Patricks Tripartite Life repeated
the story.21 A tenth- or eleventh-century writer stated that a church called within
the Kells precinct, Tech-na-mBretan, or the church of the Britons, might have
been the home of four female saints.22 Another writer of roughly the same era
stated categorically that a holy nun named Lachair had lived at Elgraige
chapel within the precinct of Kells (i Termon Cenansa).23
In Ossory, in what is modern Co. Laois, was the monastery of Aghaboe
(Ir. Achad B), founded by saint Cainnech (obit c.). A seventh- or eighth-century
Latin Life says it had a nun living nearby who came to the abbot when she found
herself in difficulty.24 Another Life says Cainnech ministered to (ministrabat) a re-
ligious woman who once hit one of his boy students whilst he accompanied her
on her milking chores. What does this mean? That she lived nearby? That she
lived at his church? We cannot know more than that the writer imagined the
nun to be near enough to Cainnech for his boys to tag along at her daily work.25
One ninth-century love story portrays a broken-hearted poetess as living out
her days at the midlands monastery of Clonfert on the River Shannon as a nun
under its famously ascetic abbot Cummean Fota (obit ).26
For some places the only evidence of female presence, or female relics, is from
the tenth century or later. Late male saints Lives report affiliated nuns commu-
nities at Clones, Seirkieran, Monasterboice, Daigs Inishkeen, Edergole, and
Lismore.27 Of course, it would be immensely helpful to know whether there
really were women at these places before the tenth century, but until such time
as untrammelled texts or archaeology fill in the gaps in the evidential record,
further conclusions cannot be drawn.
21
Trechn, Memoirs, ch. ; Stokes, Tripartite Life, i. . On the site of Kells, see A. Simms with K.
Simms, Kells (Irish Historic Towns Atlas ; Dublin, ), and H. Roe, The High Crosses of Kells (Kildalkey,
).
22
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Oct.
23
Martyrology of Tallaght, notes on Apr.
24
Latin Life of Cainnech, text, ch. . A version of the episode, also placing the nun, now a small
group of nuns, next to Aghaboe, is in the Life of Samthann, ch. .
25
Latin Life of Colmn of Lynally, text, ch. .
26
Liadain and Curithir, ed. and trans. K. Meyer, Liadain and Curithir: An Irish Love Story from the Ninth
Century (London, ), paras. .
27
See below, Ch. .
, ,
28
Life of Ciarn of Seirkieran, D text, chs. , , (PVSH, i. ).
29
Life of Abbn, D text, ch. (PVSH, i. ).
30
Latin Life of Ruadn, text, ch. (Heist, ).
31 32
Sharpe, Churches, . Ibid. .
The mother-churches were surely communities of priests and other clergy, some of
whom may have been monks living under vows; the communal life may well have in-
cluded the regular singing of the office, but it did not exclude priests from pastoral ac-
tivity. In recognizing that such churches were communities (Lat. familia or populus, Ir.
muintir), it is all too easy to lapse into the phrase monastic community and so to
monastery, but we must avoid exaggerating the distinction between regular and secu-
lar communities.33
Sharpe did not address the situation of an episcopal church which was also a fe-
male community, but it is evident that a few female communities claimed to
have had a bishop as a member in their earliest days, as was seen in the above,
and at least one of the churches included by Sharpe in this category was founded
by a nun: the free church of Tawnagh on the eastern shore of the Unshin River
south of Sligo on the site of the modern village of Riverstown.34 Whatever the
extent of the pastoral care it provided, we know that it could boast free status
and a bishop. According to Trechn its foundress was a nun, a woman named
Mathona who had been a nun to Patrick and Ruadn before she left them to
found the place; the two saints then placed bishops at the church. Mathona
made a solemn compact with the successors of Ruadn. This compact probably
did not put the church in Ruadns paruchia, at least as far as Armagh was con-
cerned, for it was claiming it by including it in the Memoirs. At the time
Trechn was writing the church was held by Clonmacnois ( familia Cluain).35
The Additamenta to Trechn outline how three nuns acquired property at
Tawnagh (presumably the same place), then alienated to Armagh. Using a mari-
tal portion and the proceeds of the sale of a hand-made cloak (significantly a
piece of movable property that had not been inherited) the nun acquired some
land and with her companions gave (immransat) to the paruchia of Armagh the
lands of Tawnagh, Tr Gimmae, and Muine Bachaile.36 An unidentified
Tawnagh, possibly this one, was remembered at the turn of the twelfth century
for its virgins Ascla and Lucn, commemorated in the Martyrology of
Gorman.37
The episcopal church of Aghagower (Ir. Achad Fobuir) in rocky western Con-
naught was initially inhabited by a brother and sister in religion named
Senachus and Mathona, according to Trechn. Patrick, he alleged, conse-
crated the place for Mathona and said to the pair, There will be good bishops
here, and from their seed blessed people will come forth forever in this see.38
Finally, at Glentogher (in Inishowen) there was a church in the seventh century
33
Ibid. .
34
Ibid. . The place has been identified as mod. Riverstown, ten miles south of the town of Sligo.
35
Trechn, Memoirs, ch. .
36
In The Cowherds Brake, the latter three places are identified as being adjacent: Muinae
Buachaele is iuxta Tir Gemmae et Tamlach (Bieler, Patrician Texts, ).
37
Martyrology of Gorman for Jan. Lucn is also commemorated in the notes of the same day in
the Martyrology of Oengus.
38
Trechn, Memoirs, ch. .
, ,
which was believed to have been first inhabited by a man and woman together:
a bishop and his sister of the Corcu Theimne people.39 This church may have
been small in Trechns day, but it was sufficiently rich or important for him to
claim it formally as part of the paruchia of Armagh.
A few domnach churches, those which originally were episcopal and often car-
ried on as such, were known to be associated with women; these churches, ac-
cording to such ideals as those posited in Riagail Phtraic, were charged with the
provision of pastoral care. Donaghmore in Morett appears in the eighth- or
ninth-century Notulae in the Book of Armagh. It was given, the text indicates,
to Mugain and Fedelm, two virgins identified in the Martyrology of Oengus as
the daughters of Ailill.40 Another, Maynooth, appears in the Notulae with the
name Erc who, according also to slightly later material, had been a holy woman
of that place.41 Finally, the martyrologies commemorate the virgins Segnat of
Donoughkerny and B of Donnybrook, two otherwise unknown holy women
whose dwellings, or final resting places, were at domnach churches.42
The presence of nuns at the communities inhabiting episcopal churches as
defined by Sharpe, and at domnach churches would locate them at known, long-
standing centres of pastoral care. It is uncertain if the holy women named above
represent more of a female presence than a burial in the churchyard, but it may
be that vowed women continued in service at these places, and evidence may
come to light of a more determining nature. More than this we cannot say, apart
from adding that in late hagiography a number of bishops were said to live with
virgins.43
The process of understanding the small local church in early Ireland is in its
early stages, and to consider nuns in this context one must first take a short his-
toriographical detour. Irelands early small churches, of which there were hun-
dreds if not thousands, are attested in martyrologies, Lives, and lists; about most
of them nothing more than a name, and possibly a location, is known. Trad-
itionally they have been seen through one of two lenses. The first, the product of
39
Trechn, Memoirs, ch. , where the place is called Mag Tochui or Tochuir.
40
Notulae in the Book of Armagh, no. , where it appears as Domnach Mr Maige Rto; the pres-
ent location is Morett in the eastern midlands.
41
Notulae in the Book of Armagh, no. ; Martyrology of Oengus, Oct., also commemorates Erc
of Domnach Mr, glossed as Mag [L]uadat. Mag Luadat is the same as Mag Nuadat, hence
Maynooth (the place-name is treated in some depth in Onomasticon).
42
Segnat, Dec.; B, Sept. Domnach Ceirne is located on the east coast, either just north of
Dublin or at the mouth of the Boyne, according to Onomasticon. Domnach Brocc is Donnybrook, Dublin.
43
There is a genre in poetry and hagiography relating to the earliest phase of the Irish Church, of the
virgin who dwells with the sainted bishop. Most of these stories are from the and th cents., but there
is earlier material on sexually active bishops. See below, Ch. .
44
e.g. Ryan, Irish Monasticism.
45
Indeed, one may suspect that some churches were merely family estates which were turned into
church establishments with little change either in function or appearance apart from a little church or
graveyard and the ministrations of a priest if he were available ( Corrin, Early Irish Churches,
).
46
Ibid. .
, ,
with their deaths. Only in the few cases where a substantial grant of land was obtained
by some gift could a perpetual monastic community have been founded.47
The model, in slightly different form, is presented elsewhere as well.48 The thesis
meets some opposition from the evidence in Ireland. As the following discus-
sion shows, many small holy womens sites served the wider laity, had collegial
connections to church officials, and survived for centuries in ecclesiastical use.
A solution to the problem can be found in an alternative understanding of the
small church, namely that put forward by Sharpe in Churches and Commu-
nities. To him it seemed more likely that small local churches were used for eccle-
siastical purposes over the long term, rather than being returned to secular use
by their proprietors. Secular families could have hereditary interests in, or con-
trol over, the property of the churches, but the bishop held control over the
church itself. Bishops had considerable control over small foundations (what-
ever their origins), and Riagail Phtraic is cited as a central piece of evidence for
this.49 The bishop was responsible for making sure that the churches were prop-
erly staffed with clergy and financed by the landowning family, so that pastoral
care would reach the laity through them. Church authorities could force the
proprietary family to make contributions to the churchs upkeep and through
the bishop, the Church ensured that small churches did not cease being used for
religious purposes. Thus a proprietary church may well have served the laity of
a community, and may well have been regarded as a sort of parish church.
The significance of private control of churches has been emphasised by Professor
Corrin, who has drawn attention to the many churches mentioned in association with
particular families by the secular genealogies. This pattern . . . is in no way peculiar. Nor
should one assume that private ownership prevented a wider pastoral ministry: the
church which a lord regarded as his eclais dthaig hereditary church may well have been
perceived as the proper church of his kinsmen and all their clients; in other words, it
served the local community.50
Womens situations can be fitted easily into this scenario. The proprietary
church at which the heiress was established could become a feature in the local
landscape; the people of the area might become accustomed to visiting it either
for masses arranged by the local bishop, or simply to ask for prayers and spir-
itual assistance from the nuns. If this did indeed occur, it resolves the apparent
conflict of model: we can see such places, then, in both their proprietary context
and in the role of providers of spiritual care. There was no clear distinction
between monastery and church, and it is plausible to think that the Irish would
47
Hughes, Sources, .
48
The Irish law of inheritance probably explains the discrepancies between the large number of holy
women and the tiny number of womens houses. We should imagine a lot of small establishments for
women at any one time, but they must have broken up on the death of the woman who had provided the
endowment (Hughes and Hamlin, Modern Traveller, ).
49 50
Sharpe, Churches, ; see also Etchingham, Bishops. Sharpe, Churches, .
58
In K. Meyer, The Triads of Ireland (Royal Irish Academy Todd Lecture Series ; Dublin, ),
at .
59 60 61
Vita I of Brigit, ch. . Ibid., chs. , . Trechn, Memoirs, chs. , .
62
The process by which Sharpe dated the body of Lives (the ODonoghue group texts, abbreviated
) to this -year span is laid out at length in his Medieval Irish Saints Lives, with conclusions on .
63
Latin Life of ed mac Bricc, text (Heist, ): unnamed female communities, chs. , , ,
and womens community at Druimm Ard, chs. , .
64
Ibid., chs. , .
65
Ibid., ch. . Plummer noted that there are many Drum Ards but this one might be mod. Drumard
in Banagh, Donegal.
66
Latin Life of Ailbe, text, ch. .
, ,
saint fasted against a king on behalf of his religious sister (soror religiosa) resulting
in the king leaving her a locus.67 In the Life of Colmn, the virgin Camna gained
the help of the saint in freeing her people from a wicked king, and when this was
achieved they found a small church prepared for Camna (invenerunt cellulam
quamdam paratam apud sanctam Camnam).68 One Life at least speaks to the outward-
looking ethos which could propel women: in Monennas Life (in a part of un-
certain date) the saint sends off one of her maidens to return to her native land
to build hermitages and find the lost multitude.69
The majority of incidents in the Lives involving nuns explicitly mention their
communities or speak of them as a group, so it is exceptional for a nun to be
mentioned without reference to her familia. Given that in all these tales the lack
of resources is an issue speaks of an inability of the woman to rely upon her ger-
mane family. This militates against an image of women being supported by the
wealth of their families whilst indulging in religion as a lifetime hobby. Rather, it
suggests that at the time that these stories were written some religious women
lived on their own or in very small groups at churches, and that their economic
ties and personal identities were not taken primarily from their families but from
their ecclesiastical status.
As a note to the consideration of small, now-unknown churches, it must be
pointed out that they were not a particularly female phenomenoncontrary
to what might be inferred from Hughess summary. The martyrologies and their
glosses are filled with names of places of male saints about which nothing re-
mains other than the name and, presumably, some long-buried ruins. So too the
Lives of the eighth and ninth centuries, where we hear, for example, of a reli-
gious man named Mo-celloc, who lived in some locus, having with him just two
vacas and uno vitulo.70 Another mentions the place of the sons of Garbe, where
there was a holy man who loved God.71 It is important to remember that the in-
significant small place housing a few followers of the religious life is not, pace
Hughes, a gender-specific institution.
Elsewhere in Europe there are signs of similar situations. In England, though,
the work of Sarah Foot suggests that very many religious women lived on land
not designated as ecclesiastical and thus invisible in charters; it is evident that
religious women were often very much involved in land disputes. In Frankia, re-
ligious women are also to be found on family land, in informal, short-term
occupations of property for religious purposes. It is hoped that in future
more research will permit more meaningful comparisons between Ireland and
elsewhere on the subject, but at present there is insufficient groundwork to
allow it.
67
Latin Life of Cainnech, text, ch. .
68
Latin Life of Colmn of Lynally, text, ch. .
69
Conchubranus, Life of Monenna, book , ch. .
70
Latin Life of Finn, text, ch. (Heist, ).
71
Ibid., ch. .
Small Churches with Womens Relics: the Martyrology of Oengus as a Case Study
The Martyrology of Oengus, composed in a cle D context in the early ninth
century, commemorates some holy people on the various days of the year;
about half are saints of late antiquity; half are Irish, and two are Anglo-Saxon.
Of the total, just over ten per cent (about ) are women, thirty of them Irish.
These thirty Irish females, then, were sufficiently important to the author to
warrant formal commemoration in the liturgical calendar.
Who were they? Frustratingly, but significantly, half are identified by just their
first names. Some are famous, associated with either a monastery or a well-
known Patrician legend: such are Brigit, Monenna, Fainche, Gobnat, Brg, and
Cairech Dergan. But who were Muirgen, Scre, Ercnait, Curufin, Fled, and
Ernach? That Oengus entered their names, and did so without so much as an ad-
jective to help identify them, implies that c. his audience knew very well who
they were and, more importantly, that he cared more about them as relics and
cemetery-church sites than as female relatives of powerful men of Irish society.
One of the identifiable saints is Car daughter of Duib-re, who in the martyr-
ologys main text is given two whole lines to herself as a fair sun, a fresh cham-
pion (cain gran, greit nua), and glossed as being of the Muscraige Tire, and of
Conaires race (sl Conairi ) in Mag Escat. The Muscraige Tire were the most im-
portant tribe in North Munster, and were located in the rich lands east of Lough
Derg.72 Car does appear in hagiography, in the ODonoghue Life of Fintn
(a seventh- or eighth-century text), where he gives her his church Tech Taille
meic Segeni.73
The second saint identified by her parentage is the daughter of Feradach.
The glossators, who usually made a guess if not a positive identification, did not
attempt to make one here: quite probably between the ninth and the tenth cen-
tury knowledge about this holy woman and her burial site died out completely.
In the case of Mac Iairs four daughters, the glossators evident uncertainty
produced more rather than less comment.74 Three of their names are given:
Nassan, Beoan, and Mellan; or else they are Dairblinn, Dairmil, Cel, and
Comgall. Locating them was an even greater challenge. The father, Mac Iair,
was either British or Irish; the girls were at one of the two Tallaghts, or they were
at Kells; either they were at a church named Tech-na-mBretan, or at one of
those called Cell-na-nIngen. Evidently, the glossators were trying to lay out all
the possibilities provided by a handful of legends about at least two groups of
maidens and their father. It would appear that the four daughters with their as-
sociation with Tallaght may have belonged to the eighth century; the fact that
by the tenth century scribes struggled to firmly identify them further suggests
72
Stokes did not identify Mag Escat. On the Muscraige Tire, see Corrin, Ireland, .
73
Latin Life of Fintn alias Munnu, text, ch. (Heist, ). Tech Taille, mod. Tihelly, is just
south of the monastery of Durrow, and both are under five miles north of Tullamore, Co. Offaly.
74
Martyrology of Oengus, Oct.
, ,
that their influence was powerful for a short timein their lifetimes and shortly
thereafterbut that in the long term they were essentially insignificant.
The daughters of Ailill, who were east of the Liffey, posed the later glos-
sators problems as well.75 They identified them as Mugain and Fedelm, the
daughters of Ailill mac Dunlaing, king of Leinster. These two appear in the
Patrician Notulae in the Book of Armagh as belonging to a different church
altogether.76 The Oengus glossators authoritatively placed them at Cell-Ingen-
Ailella in the east of the Leinster plain of Mag Lifi.
Sinech, daughter of Fergna, who was a fragment of the stone (blog don lig), is
the fifth of Oenguss maiden saints identified by her patronym, but helpfully he
also mentioned that she was of the place Cruachan Maige Abna.77 The glos-
sators agreed that this place was Cruachan Maige Abna in Eogangacht of
Cashel, identified by Best and Lawlor as the modern Crohane in Slievardagh in
Co. Tipperary.78 Her father, though, was a mystery to the glossators, and they
suggested Oengus may have meant that Sinech was not daughter of Fergna
(ingen Fergna) but rather simply a good maiden, ingen [ f ]Ergna.79
Thus it appears that these women, in spite of being identified by a patronym,
were remembered more for their burial placestheir churchesthan for their
genealogies or natal kindred connections. The latter point can be tested further
by looking at the other entries of female Irish saints in the Martyrology of Oen-
gus, those identified in the main text by their church rather than patronym.
After all, if a woman was identified by her location in the main body of the mar-
tyrology, perhaps the glossator would concentrate on her geneaology to com-
plement the total available information. Five women are in this group. Taking
the cases in turn the answer becomes evident, and it again points toward a pri-
mary identification with church site, not family.
Monenna of Killevy has a number of glossators comments: her churchs lo-
cation, her former name, the origin of her nickname, a poem about her and
then, finally, her genealogy.80 Saint Ita is glossed with a similar list of informa-
tion: her churchs location, the origin of her name, a poem about her, and then
her genealogy.81 Samthanns entry is glossed similarly, with a church location
and a genealogy, given last. In the whole of the glosses, these three and Brigit are
the only women who are given a genealogy. Only Brigits genealogy comes first
rather than last in the gloss.82 The other, minor saints identified by Oengus by
75
Martyrology of Oengus, Dec.
76
Notulae in the Book of Armagh, item , where Mogain and Fedelm, identified by Bieler as daugh-
ters of Ailill, are said to be in Domnach Mr, Maige Reto.
77
Martyrology of Oengus, Oct.
78
Best and Lawlor, Martyrology of Tallaght, .
79
She is one of the two little-known ones (the other is Scath) among five female saints mentioned in
a litany in the Stowe Missal, suggesting that Cruachan Maige Abna had a connection with Tallaght
and/or the other cle D churches. (Stowe Missal, folio v; ed. G. Warner, The Stowe Missal, vols.
(Henry Bradshaw Society ; London, ), here at ).
80 81 82
Martyrology of Oengus, July. Ibid., Jan. Ibid., Feb.
patronym are the small handful discussed earlier: in these the glossators evidently
did not know who even the fathers were. There were only two other female
saints whom Oengus mentioned with their churches. One was Sinchell of
Killeigh (Ir. Cell Achid Drumfota), who may have been a male but the glossators
thought female, and he/she is glossed with a location of the church in Offaly, and
a little poem saying she lived to age ; nothing is said about her kindred.83
And finally, what of the fifteen other Irish women saints remembered by
Oengus the Culdee, those whom he identified simply by their forenames? Did
the glossators identify their kindreds and genealogies? For what were they re-
membered in the long term? Were they eminent as heads of communities, or as
individuals? Fainche (alternatively Fuinche or Funech), was the foundress of
Clonbroney, but the glossators presented two possibilities for her identity:
Fainche the Rough from Lough Erne, who was in Toorah (Tath Ratha in U
Echach Ulad); this was the daughter of Carell, who was from Ross Airthir.
Stokes identified Ross Airthir as modern Rossorry in Co. Fermanagh, and
Tath Ratha as Tooraah, also in that county.84 The place, if it did house other
religious women or men, did not produce any others of sufficient eminence to
be mentioned in any martyrologies. Its near-anonymity suggests that this
Fainche may have been either on her own or in a small group, though the
church she left behind did remain known at least until the glossators time. The
other identity proposed was Fainche of Clonkeen in Eoganacht of Cashel, now
Clonkeen in Tipperary.
The glossators knew of two women who might have been the next holy
woman Oengus commemorated, Muirgen.85 One was a daughter of Aidn who
was in Leinster near the River Barow (Ir. Belach Gabrin, now Gowran Pass
near Kilkenny) a place which also boasted the relics of saints Enda and
Lochan.86 But they also thought she might be the legendary Murgein who was
drawn from Ulsters Lough Neagh and baptized by saint Comgall.
Oenguss virgin Ernech left the glossators with two possible identities, too: a
Connaught woman or an Ulster maiden of the name: the former was known at
Dn in Carrage Ae, the latter at Duneane (Dn d n in Dalrada). As for the
maiden Scre, she left a church known to the glossators and identified by them,87
but her parentage was either unknown or unimportant to them, for it goes un-
mentioned. The place, however, had been the head of at least a small monastic
federation in the seventh century.88
83
Ibid., March. Killeigh was very near the male monastery of Lynally; the modern hamlet of
Killeigh is four miles south of Tullamore.
84 85
Stokes, Flire, . Martyrology of Oengus, Jan.
86
Ibid., notes on Dec. The relics were said to be in a church there called Cell maic Cathail. But
the church of the virgin is not identified, so may have been this one or another.
87
Martyrologies of Oengus and Gorman, Mar.; Stokes, Flire, . There are two churches called
Cell Scre: one in Meath, at the present village of Kilskeery, and another, seeming the less eminent just
west of the large church of Clogher; it is in present-day Kilskirry a few miles east of Lough Erne.
88
Trechn, Memoirs, ch. . According to the text her familia owned the church Cell Bile in
, ,
Similiarly Oenguss virgin Fled was glossed as the virgin of Tech Fleide
(lit. Fleds church) located in the lands of the U Garchon tribe in the Wicklow
region of Leinster, and Fled herself was allegedly the daughter of a Leinster king.
In spite of her alleged royalty, however, the glossators had nothing to say about
her parentage beyond this. In these two cases, there was an eponymous church.
Neither of these made a big mark on the ecclesiastical world, for no other known
saints or eminent figures emanated from them. What were they in Oenguss
day: functioning local churches, or ruins on private land?
Was the legacy of these women ongoing small communities, laity-serving
chapels, or merely tiny cemeteries with a miracle-working grave? These are the
imponderables which beset the search for information not only on Fled and
Scre, but also on the others whose places were neither large nor famous. But
there are implications to be drawn from these entries on the holy women as a
whole. Firstly, that in the ninth century it was not simply abbesses and early
foundresses of large monasteries who were considered important enough to re-
member as saints. Furthermore, we cannot know when these women lived, but
the indication from the daughters of Mac Iair and Samthann is that a few whom
Oengus considered important lived as late as the eighth century. Thirdly, they
were remembered more for their burial placestheir churchesthan for their
genealogies or natal kindred connections. From the point of view of the martyr-
ologist, what really mattered about these women (and men) was where their
churches were, or where they had lived. Given that Irish society as a whole was
deeply obsessed by genealogy and kinship, this is somewhat surprising. The an-
swer lies, I think, in the predominance, in this situation, of the burial site of the
saint, which was also their main relic: in Irish, after all, the single term reilic con-
tains the two meanings, both of cemetery and of relic in the modern sense. It
is evident that what survived in the collective memory about holy virgins was
not their family connections but the place in which they had lived and died. In
their own day the property of their dwelling may have been proprietary (either
their kindreds or their own), but in the centuries afterward people of the wider
community knew of the sitechurch, house or cemeteryas a holy one. It was
not just for her family, for example, for whom the fields on which Fled had lived
were called Tech Fleide. It was Tech Fleide for everyone, including the
glossators of the martyrologies.
Council of Nicaeas stipulation that a woman might not live with a priest unless
she was a close female relative, a rule evidently rarely heeded in the Christian
West generally, including Ireland.90 Berrad Airechta, a law tract from the early
eighth century, implies this when it asserts that the fees of a priest for baptism or
communion are immune from claim . . . unless the priest has given them to his
nun (caillech) or to a son born after he entered the priesthood.91
Similarly, a short legalistic poem in the notes to the martyrology of Oengus
says that a baptism is worthless if performed by a priest who has just come from
the bed of his nun. The scholia themselves were written in the tenth or eleventh
century, but the language of this ditty may be slightly earlier:
Sacart ic denam comna ic baisded, bec a tarba
ni con tic baisted de iar taistel a cailligi.92
A priest, practising coition, small is his profit in baptizing;
baptism comes not from him, after visiting his nun.
Whether these veiled ones (as caillech literally means) were consecrated virgins,
or priests wives, or both simultaneously, is uncertain. These partners, indeed,
may have sometimes been the caillecha ringing the bell or announcing the
canonical hours, mentioned in the earlier section above. But the fact that the
word caillech is used is significant; it makes it quite clear that one type of female
religious life consisted of being a priests live-in companion, or resident col-
league, at a church. It is possible that the nun-companion to the local priest
mentioned in these three texts is the later successor to the priests companion of
the earlier penitentials, which refer to the priests uxor and clentella.93 In this I am
in agreement with N Dhonnchadha, who reached the same conclusion, using
other texts, including Berrad Airechta and a poem on saint Cuchuimne.94
90
Hibernensis, book , item b, of the text says: Clericus cum extraneis mulieribus non habitet.
91
Berrad Airechta, ch. , corresponding to CIH . (trans. R. Stacey, Berrad Airechta: An Old Irish
Tract on Suretyship, in T. Charles-Edwards, M. Owen, and D. Walters (eds.), Lawyers and Laymen: Stud-
ies in the History of Law (Cardiff, ), , at ). This text is also cited as part of N Dhonnchadhas
demonstration that caillech also meant clerics spouse, Caillech, .
92
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Oct. .
93
For uxor see Pa, ch. , and for clentella see Penitential of Finnian, ch. (both in Bieler, Irish Peniten-
tials, at and respectively).
94
N Dhonnchadha, Caillech, .
95
Female hermit: Conchubranus, Life of Monenna, book , ch. . British male anchorite: lived in
the extremes of Fintns monastery, making carts for the brothers (Latin Life of Fintn, text, ch. ).
, ,
even more intriguing than the priests companions, because they lived outside
the protective sphere provided by a community of other women, however few,
by a male clerical partner, or by a houseold of blood relatives. Such women ad-
mittedly appear almost exclusively in the Lives, so perhaps the poor solitary
nun is no more than an Irish hagiographical topos, but if it is, that in itself is in-
structive as to ecclesiastical mores and to the perception of the place of religious
women in the wider landscape.
In an early Life of Brigit, a virgin who lived on her own had trouble providing
a sufficient feast for the visiting saint. Sharpe notes that the redactor D, when
copying the Life in the late twelfth or early thirteenth century, changed the ori-
ginal so that the woman was living in a small grouppresumably customs had
changed. Sharpe imagined that the woman in Brigits Vita I lived her own home,
as she had only one calf; and this is clearly the case. But beyond this, it implied
she was genuinely isolated. Her one animal was all the food the nun could pro-
cure. I would argue that had the hagiographer envisioned her living at a rela-
tives homestead or rth, he would not have been able to write the anecdote as he
did, for it was unthinkable that the nuns lay family would not lay on a feast for
Brigit.96
Then there is the tale of the virgin Scath of Ardskeah (Ir. Fert Scthe). She
asked St Ailbe for two beasts for her agricultural work and for a set of gospels for
her devotions, and was also evidently on her own. Her need for beasts should
prevent us from thinking the author imagined her in a familial setting with
access to family resources.97 She did not after her death have a reilic or relic-
burial at her own place, for we know Oenguss cle D church celebrated the
translation of her relics from her place in Munster to Tallaght, and her inclusion
in the Tallaght familia is confirmed by the fact that as early as the eighth or ninth
century she was one of only two minor female saints remembered in its Litany
of the Saints.98 Another example is the virgin Columba, related in the Life of her
brother, Cainnech. She too evidently lived on her own, with a young boy alump-
nus, for once the boy died there was no one to do the little chores associated with
greeting guests.99 An unnamed sancta femina who lived by the sea is reported
in eds Life; when falsely accused by the local king she turned to the saint for
help; no family came to her aid and the hagiographer portrays her as being on
her own.100
Though there has been little study of them there were religious women else-
where, in Frankia, who lived alonebut the role of their families in supporting
them may have been considerable. Such were the women mentioned by the
Council of Friouli ( ), and they continued to exist through the ninth
96
Vita I of Brigit, ch. ; cf. Vita IV, book , ch. ; Sharpe, Saints Lives, .
97
Latin Life of Ailbe, text, ch. .
98
The other saints mentioned are Brigit, Ita, Samthann, and the little-known Sinech (Stowe Missal,
folio v).
99
Latin Life of Cainnech, text, ch. . 100
Latin Life of ed, text, ch. .
century. They lived under a binding vow of chastity, dressed in a black vestment,
but without having been veiled. At the turn of the tenth century religious
widows were added to their number, so legislation applied to them also.101
If Hughes was right and the majority of women lived on lands ceded to them for
but a lifetime or who, in the eigenkirche model, were living within the economy of
their secular families, we should expect to find some sources locating them
there. Though it seems absolutely reasonable that many would have lived in
such a manner, accounts of this are very thin on the ground. When historians of
England or the Continent have considered this issue in their own areas of study,
they have relied upon charters, a particularly useful type of source for this mat-
ter. Ireland in this period, however, produced no real body of charters, so one
must rely upon other sources, with their attendant imperfections. The Lives are,
of necessity, the first port of call, for they are at least abundant. Incredibly, those
of this period yield only three possibly useful anecdotes.
The first is from the Life of Columba, written by Adomnn of Iona. The little
story concerns the virgin Mogain, daughter of Daimne (obit ) who lived at
Clochar macc nDaimni, the stony place of the sons of Daimne. This royal
Ulster site at modern Clogher, Co. Tyrone, was a ring fort in use from prehis-
toric times through the ninth century. The well-known church of Clogher, of
unknown foundation date, was about half a mile north of it. Adomnn tells that
Mogain used to walk to and from the church, presumably Clogher, to perform
the opus Dei or monastic office. Mogains house is not described. Was it within
the enclosure of her brothers cashel, or outside it? Did she perform the office in
a small oratory on the site, alone or with a single priest? Alternatively, was she
associated with the church up the road which, we know, had a male monastic
community? The answers, as Sharpe notes, are imponderables. Mogain was
imagined either as a home-dwelling virgin, or else as one attached to a male
community.102
In Colmns Life, written in the seventh or eighth century, the virgin Camna
was envisioned as living in her family region, for she came to the saint for his
help in liberating her tribe ( gens), which had been taken into servitude by king
Brendan mac Cairbri. We cannot speculate, given the lack of other detail in
the anecdote whether the writer imagined her within a family economic unit, or
as self-supporting.103 She was, however, involved with the welfare of her natal
kindred.
101
Hodgson, Frankish Church, , with references.
102
Adomnn, Life of Columba, book , ch. (A. and M. Anderson, Adomnns Life of Columba
(Edinburgh, )). Comments in R. Sharpe, Life of Columba ( New York, ), .
103
Latin Life of Colmn of Lynally, text, ch. .
, ,
The third anecdote, the richest, is from Conchubranus long and often amus-
ing Life of Monenna. The Life is in general too late to be of use, but this story is
located in two chapters which Esposito (perhaps rightly) claimed were whole-
sale blocks of seventh-century material. After Monenna received the veil from
Patrick, it says, her religious education was to continue: With the blessing of
Bishop Patrick she returned to her parents home with whom she stayed, but
apart from thembecause the house plunges people into destruction.104 How-
ever, until Espositos thesis has been confirmed, this anecdote, rich though it is,
cannot be used with safety as seventh-century evidence.
The Irish virgin who lived on family territory must remain, for the forseeable
future, an unknowable figure. There is no comparing these fragments with the
much more abundant material from England. For there, sufficient evidence
exists to make a very strong case that a vast majority of vowed religious women
lived on land, or in properties, which were not alienated from private family or
individual ownership, that is to say, not designated officially as church land:
this is the thesis of Sarah Foots study, Veiled Women. Moreover, the charters show
nuns wrangling over, receiving, and transmitting property. It has been specu-
lated, doubtless correctly, that in such an environment a small religious com-
munity would be somewhat insecure, though its actual existence would be
threatened only if the new owner acquired the land on which the house or church
stood, and was able to close it down as an ecclesiastical centre. In England it ap-
pears that that was the case. Even losing other holdings would jeapardize a small
communitys viability, as it would deprive the nuns of the income.105 The charter
sources make this scenario much more visible than it is in Ireland, but it seems
undoubted that to some extent this kind of instability did bedevil small female
communities there as well, though perhaps the situation was not as extreme, nor
the treatment of religious life so offhand, as in England. Frankia too, had small
female communities in this period, which legislation tried with scant success to
put under episcopal authority. There, too, the diversity of living situations is said
to be similar to what is found in Ireland, particularly for canonesses.106
The portrayal of the Irish monastic landscape outlined in this chapter appears
to fly in the face of the received stereotype of Ireland as an ascetic Isle of Saints,
a place where the monks were so holy they never looked upon womankind. This
notion appears both in the popular literature on early Ireland and even swayed
Lisa Bitel, one of very few contemporary historians to consider gender issues in
104
Conchubranus, Life of Monenna, book , ch. .
105
See Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women, with references; also Foot, Veiled Women.
106
Hodgson, Frankish Church, , with references.
107 108
See Bitel, Womens Monastic Enclosures. Vita I of Brigit, ch. .
109
Sharpe, Saints Lives, , .
110
Life of Lugaid alias Molua, text, ch. (Heist, ). 111
Ibid., ch. .
, ,
are, there one finds the devil. But in this same Life Molua also assists women,
and sexually active women at that: on his travels he helps a queen in a painful
childbirth safely deliver her child. Moluas hagiographer was not necessarily
contradicting himself in this tale, for the saint may not have had face-to-face
contact with the woman; nevertheless, the presence of the story shows that the
author was comfortable portraying his saint performing a midwifery miracle,
one which aids women giving birth to the fruit of their sexuality.112 Perhaps there
is something in the fact that the hagiographer attributed Moluas rabid separ-
atism to the saints struggle with lust; after all, the writer could have said that it
was caused by the evil nature of women, and he (only just) stops short of that.
What is strongest about this message, though, is not the nature of the female sex
but rather the promotion of the single-sex community. The message from the
hagiographer relates less to monks meeting women in the world than it does to
the proper set-up of a monastery. A monastery, it implies, should be a place free
of sexuality, even from the temptation of sexual sin. A holy man of God might
come face to face with a queen in distress, but he should not face temptation in
the place where his monks live. It may be recalled that in the era this was writ-
ten mens monasteries were not always headed by celibate abbots. At Clonfert-
mulloe, though, this hagiographer emphasized, asceticism and celibacy were a
priority. In putting across his message he did something unusual for an Irish
cleric of this time, but which foreshadowed future trends: he projected the
sexual sin onto the female sex.
One version of the ninth-century Rule of the Cli D contains the same say-
ing, attributing it instead to Coemgen.113 The Cli D did not in practice actually
avoid contact with women, and there was a womens hostel and a womens
church at Tallaght. As mentioned earlier, the Customs of Tallaght encouraged
monks to undertake collegial visits with the nuns, though guarding their eyes
while they did so. Tallaghts nuns were central enough to the community to be
mentioned in the Rule, as was seen above, and to stress that they ought to be
visited.
Equally fixed in the general imagination is the idea that people who had active
sex lives, however licit they might be, were not to be found within the precincts
of early Irish monasteries, yet we find occasional references to lay couples living
temporarily at monasteries while they undertook a period of intensive religious
instruction. The most memorable illustration is in the ninth-century love story
Liadain and Curithir, a story which has caused scholars no little perplexity.
112
Life of Lugaid alias Molua, text, ch. .
113
Rule of the Cli D in a Franciscan, Dublin MS (ed. Gwynn, at ).
Set in the early seventh century, it relates the fate of a pair of lovers, poets by pro-
fession, who decided to go to Clonfert to submit to the spiritual direction of
St Cummean Fota (obit ). The saint housed both the man and the women
within his monasterys bounds, in an arrangement whereby they could speak to
each other but not see each another. The author seems to have envisioned the
lovers in adjacent huts, for he says that when Curithir went walking around the
gravestones, Liadain would be shut in her cell, and whenever she went out he
would be closed in his.114 It initially seems unlikely that a man and a woman,
even temporarily in the religious life, were in the ninth century housed in adja-
cent cells, unless it was in guest-house premises. Nonetheless, the ninth-century
writer imagined such a set-up existing. More significantly and more generally,
he implied that dual-sex residence at male houses was a time-honoured practice
going back to the days of great ascetic saints like Cummean. In fact one can go
a step further and say that the author could tell the story he did precisely be-
cause in his own day, too, both men and women could join a predominantly
male house like Clonfert.
Tallaght in the same century had married couples under what looks like a
very similar weekly regime. Its Customs specify three points during the week
when they may have sexual intercourse, and they stay (and sleep) in what is evi-
dently some part of the monastery, for the times of joining and separating are
governed by the monastic office. The course prescribed for a wedded couple
under spiritual directions is as follows: from prime on Monday until matins on
Wednesday they may have sexual intercourse and meals; then for the next
twenty-four hours they must abstain and fast; they again have licence to indulge
from Thursday matins until Friday matins ; then they are to live separately for the
next three days and nights over the Sabbath period. On Sunday and Sunday
evening they may have a meal but not have sex.115 Cummeans regime is by far
the harsher, making the reform Culdee house look mild by comparison.
To imagine that the majority of nuns lived secluded lives in large all-female nun-
neries is to ignore the weight of evidence which places many nuns in other set-
tings. The distinction between monastery and church in early medieval Ireland
is not a clear one, and perhaps not a useful one. There were residential churches
serving the laity, at which ascetics sometimes lived; and there were monasteries
at which only a minority of the residents followed a regular, monastic life. Nuns
are clearly present in many of the establishments in this diverse and eclectic ec-
clesiastical environment. All indications are that they were not walled up, either
proverbially or literally. Although in the eighth- and ninth-century texts we see
114 115
Paras. . Customs of Tallaght, ch. .
, ,
beginnings of concern for scandal, Lives do not begin to promote strict female
claustration, nor do most of them make a point of mentioning strict sex separ-
ation as a virtue. Given that nuns were located in, among other places, laity-
serving churches and nunneries serving outlying populations, one may con-
clude that the ease between the sexes in the Church related in part at least to
Irish monasticisms pastoral outlook, in the female as well as the male sphere.
Lisa Bitel attempted to prove that misogyny and distrust of women were char-
acteristic of the early medieval Irish church. Using the exceptional anecdotes of
Molua and Coemgen, but mostly later hagiographic tales, she generalized that
male saints and their weaker brothers feared nuns, tolerating them only so long
as they remained inside their enclosures.116 This was evidently not the case, es-
pecially for the seventh, eighth, and ninth centuries. The contemporary evi-
dence suggests by contrast that the Irish church was at this time largely
unconcerned about consecrated women, and was not focused on their sexu-
ality. This would change noticeably around the tenth century. Moluas ditty
about women, sheep, and the devil is a proverbial cloud on the horizon. More
such clouds come rolling across the skies of this landscape as the centuries
progress, and we shall return to them in a later chapter.
Because nuns were apparently in such a wide variety of locales, one must con-
clude that the small, private, and short-lived communities Hughes envisioned
cannot be called the only, or even the main, alternative to the large nunneries.
The sources make it clear that smaller establishments housing nuns were not al-
ways marginal or transient, nor were they necessarily sheltered from the lay
populace any more than large places might be. Nuns were eminently visible in
society by virtue of living in a wide variety of places which were at the centre of
Church activity: not only at laity-serving nunneries, but also at male monaster-
ies, important churches, hermitages, and those local churches providing the
eucharist for the local populace.
116
Bitel, Womens Monastic Enclosures, .
If the living situations of Irish religious women were diverse, so too were the
grades and varieties of their profession. There were two, possibly three, grades
of female monastic: the virgin, the widow/penitent, and the priests wife, in
addition to the peregrina or religious pilgrim. Some religious women acquired a
special status in law, achieving a high degree of law-worthiness, and were
deemed as equivalents to bishops and presbyters. Their high legal and ecclesi-
astical status is understandable in the context of the theological ideas which lay
behind the idea of their offices. The virgin and penitent widow in particular car-
ried a complex of symbolisms which, though grounded in the Western tradition,
reflected a particularly Irish take on them.
Before turning to discussions of each of the grades of nunhood in early Ire-
land, though, it is as well to digress to consider the means by which women
would decide to enter the church, and the reasons why they might do so. Such
decisions, in Ireland, were taken not by women alone but rather by their male
guardians with the input of other men in the kindredjust as in decisions on
contractual marriage. The fact that nuns were highly regarded and could com-
mand great respect would make such an option attractive for not only a woman
but also her family, of course, but there were pragmatic aspects to consider.
In early medieval Ireland, women were an integral part of their kindreds and an
important tool in their strategies for economic well-being.1 The matter of taking
up the religious life thus had serious implications for the immediate family and
wider relatives. It was of particular relevance for the derb-fine (certain kindred),
which was all those descended from a common great-grandfather, and more
technically, was the body of men who administered and handled the property
and affairs of the group. Men inherited property from the kin land, and could
pass it on to their heirs but could not alienate it. In contrast, women could not
1
As explored most fully by Charles-Edwards, Kinship.
, ,
inherit kin land, but only movable goods, unless their father had produced no
sons. In such a circumstance the heiress, as she was called, did get a portion of
kin land but only for her use during her lifetime, and after her death it returned
to the common stock of the derb-fine. Heiresses were probably no more than one
in five women, given the roughly twenty per cent occurrence of nuclear families
with only daughters. Women who married in a formal contract, however,
passed out of the responsibility of the kindred, and became largely the responsi-
bility of their husbands. Those women who did not marry, or who had less
formal marriages, remained largely or exclusively the responsibility of their
natal kin, making them somewhat of a burden on its collective resources.
One question which must be asked, given the power of the kindred in shap-
ing and guiding a noble womans life, was why she would be allowed to forego
marriage and take up life as a holy virgin. Several things would appear to mili-
tate against it, most importantly the fact that women were so useful in cement-
ing family alliances. As Thomas Charles-Edwards has put it, a womans
expected role in kinship was that of a principal bonding agent.2 Another was
more the monetary consideration, for a bridegroom purchased his bride from
her family with a bride-price. There appears to have been no equivalent pay-
ment by monasteries to families of incoming nuns, so a womans male relatives
forfeited the bride-wealth windfall if she took a heavenly rather than a worldly
spouse. In the case of Brigit, as told by her hagiographers, this was a major rea-
son the saint had so much objection to her vocation. Her brothers, angrily dis-
appointed at the prospect of losing out on the bride-price if she became a virgin,
tried to force her to marry a noble suitor. As is well known, she thwarted them
by plucking out her eye or, in other versions, getting a horrible eye disease, thus
making herself undesirable to mortal men. Not all women were as strong-willed
as Brigit, and the vast majority were, like most early medieval people in the
West, identified strongly with their family and its interests, so widespread
teenage rebellion cannot account for the flowering of Irish female monasticism.
The advantages to kindreds in having some of their women as brides of
Christ are nowhere made explicit, so any answers must be deduced tentatively
from surviving material on other, related topics and from cautious comparisons
with elsewhere. The question could easily be the subject of an entire mono-
graph, so a few suggestions are simply offered here. Firstly, there is the matter of
alliances. At times it would certainly have proved advantageous for a kindred
to strengthen its links with local church hierarchies, given their political and
economic power. To insert a woman into an ecclesiastical familia could best be
done, in many instances, by making her a religiousshe could then be co-opted
into the church familia whilst at the same time bringing honour, prestige, and
protection of a sort to her natal kindred, much as if she had married into it. If
the family was ambitious, as were the U Dnlainge in Leinster who succeeding
2
Charles-Edwards, Kinship, .
in taking over Kildare, they could use women in their strategies to infiltrate a
monasterys leading offices and subsequently share in the wealth of the places
income from tributes and renders. If a family was going to place a woman in an
extant institution, the ideal would be for her to become its abbess, by hook or by
crook, though it could prove very difficult if the place was run by an unrelated
family group.
Then there were economic considerations. Though it was customary for
bridegrooms to provide bride-wealth, Charles-Edwards has identified a trend
among the nobility towards payments going the other way, namely dowries,
where the flow of wealth went from the brides family to the new husband.3
Thus as time went on during this period, the loss of income to a womans kin-
dred resulting from her entering a monastery possibly diminished, and in some
cases her failing to marry could have produced a saving. When entering a
monastery, though a woman doubtless brought some wealth with her, there is
no evidence to suggest that a dowry was required, though one cannot of course
argue from silence. It may have been a cheaper option than marrying her. In the
absence of charters it is impossible to trace the transfers and negotiations over
property by secular and ecclesiastical families, but from what we know of Irish
maneouvring for status and wealth, these few observations seem secure enough.
Demographics may have played a role in why families allowed some of their
women not to marry; if there were more women than men of marriageable age,
then there would have been too many women for too few husbands. Whether
this was the case seems impossible to determine, though it is feasible that a good
number of adult males were unavailable for marriage, either because they were
vowed to celibacy, or because they were simply absent through having been
killed in battle. Given that from the eighth century many of the men in the
church were married, not only most priests but some bishops and abbots, and
given that the number of celibate monks and anchorites (anchoritae) is unknown,
it is impossible to guess even the proportion of unmarried churchmen. Ireland
did have another way to deal with any imbalance in the sexes. This was a form
of polygamy, which was not only legal but apparently widespread: in addition to
a principal wife (ctmuinter) a man might take a concubine spouse (adaltrach) or
two. Thus, if a derb-fine had an excess of women compared to the number of suit-
able husbands, it could encourage the surplus female relatives to try to become
a rich mans adaltrach rather than join the church. Why they might not do this,
though, is that in becoming an adaltrach a woman would consign herself for life
to having a quite low status, probably lower than if she became a nun, and her
status would reflect at least indirectly upon her family.
Certainly families must have considered the religious life for women with
more interest given the range of options, the varieties of profession, and flexibil-
ity in living arrangements, which they could work with. If a woman was entered
3
Ibid. .
, ,
4
The Irish use of the threefold schema has also been observed by N Dhonnchadha, Caillech, .
5
PL . , at .
6
Plummer, Irish Litanies, ; discussion and dating in Kenney, .
7
A Muire Mr, in Plummer, Irish Litanies, at (there titled Litany of the Virgin). Dating
according to Stokes; discussion in Kenney, no. .
8
Audite Sancta Studia, stanzas and ; Audite Fratres Facta, stanza . Both hymns dated to th or
th cent. Discussion of texts in Kenney, no. .
9
Christus in Nostra Insula, stanza ( J. Bernard and R. Atkinson (eds. and trans.), The Irish Liber Hymno-
rum, i (Henry Bradshaw Society ; London ), ). Dated to th or th cent. Discussion of text in
Kenney, no. .
, ,
N Car Brigit run, I have found not [ Brigits] like save Mary (ni far a set ached
Maire). And elsewhere in the same hymn the writer says
Fail d chaillig i rrichid ncosngur dom dchill,
Maire ocus sanctBrigit for fessam dn db linaib10
There are two nuns in heaven, who I do not fear will neglect me,
Mary and Saint Brigit: may we be under the protection of them both.
Possibly inspired by the deep importance of kinship in Irish society, the likening
to, and pairing with, the Virgin Mary could be expressed in explicitly familial
language. In the Martyrology of Oengus, Monenna is called sister of great
Mary.11 The placing of virgins at the pinnacle of a spiritual hierarchy, with
Mary as their patroness, was reflected also in their dress and veil, which, unlike
elsewhere in the West, was white in colour. It recalled to mind the white garb of
heavenly beings and angels who presided in heaven with Christ and who might
deign to visit the living in visions, and to give guidance or prophecy. Not only do
the sources report angels dressed in white, but so too the virgins when they ap-
pear in visions. To cite but two examples, in the Vita I Brigit apppeared thus to a
magus, and a hymn to Monenna says she fulget in albis / stolis claris candidis.12
Virgins were also the brides of Christ, the king of heaven. Conjoined to the
celestial ard-r or high king, they had the honour of being spouses of the most
powerful ruler of Creation. In Ireland, the idea that the dedicated virgin was the
bride of Christ was widespread. Of course, Mary is the first and foremost virgin
bride of Christ, and she is described as such in a seventh-century poem from
Bangor as nuptiis quoque parata regi domino sponsa.13 That all dedicated virgins were
Christs brides is seen first in the seventh century, in Trechns memoirs. Patrick
says to two pagan princesses: ego vero volo vos regi caelisti coniungere dum filiae regis
terreni.14 In Brigits Vita I the consecration of an unnamed aspiring nun is described
in marital terms: filia liberata a carnali sponso colligata est Christo, sicut vovit in corde
suo.15 The bridal motif is found also in a seventh- or eighth-century hymn in
praise of Monenna, Audite Sancta Studia, likely to have been composed at Killevy.
It opens with a praise of God: Deum deorum dominum / autorem vite omnium / regem
et sponsum virginum. It calls Monenna very dignified spouse of God, sponsa Deo dig-
nissima, and later states that sponsum sequitur ubique.16 Another poem to her con-
tains the stanza Celestis virgo / intrans cum melodia / obviam sponso / cum electo oleo.17
10
Discussion and dating of the poem to the th cent. in Kenney, no. .
11
Martyrology of Oengus, July.
12
Hibernensis, book , ch. , pallium a palliditate dictum; Vita I of Brigit, ch. ; Audite Fratres Facta,
stanza .
13
From the Versiculi Familiae Benchuir, stanza , in P. ODwyer, Mary: A History of Devotion in Ireland
(Dublin, ), . See also Kenney, no. , who dated it to the th cent. Carney dated it to c.
(PRIA C, ). The poem is actually describing the rule of Bangor, but uses Marian imagery through-
out making a metaphorical point.
14 15 16
Trechn, Memoirs, ch. . Vita I, ch. . Stanzas , , and .
17
Audite Fratres Facta, stanza . For other examples see N Donnchadha, Caillech, .
The Irish picked up on the marital theme from normal Western ideas.
Legrand, who studied the doctrine of virginity in depth, wrote it is the allegory of
marriage . . . which accounts best for the Pauline and Christian doctrine of
virginity.18 The association between virginity and marriage to God was taken up
by other Christian writers very early on. Precedents for the analogy were set by
the Old Testament, in which Israel was frequently called the bride of Yahweh;
New Testament authors, following this tradition, came to call the new Church,
Ecclesia, the bride of Christ.19 In the New Testament Matthew and Paul show the
beginnings of a bridal analogy for the individual in relation to Christ, thus intro-
ducing the virginity/marriage image to individuals. It is Paul who most explicitly
formulated a Christian linkage between virginity and marriage to Christ:20
For I am jealous of you with the jealousy of God. For I have espoused you to one hus-
band, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. But I fear lest, as the serpent se-
duced Eve by his subtlety, so your minds should be corrupted and fall from the simplicity
that is in Christ.21
The marital theme as a spiritual metaphor was taken up avidly both within and
without canonical circles in the early church. Among canonical writers, Tertul-
lian in the third century is the first known author to designate the Christian vir-
gin as the bride of Christ: he portrayed Christ specifically as the bridegroom of
virgins and holy women dedicated to chastity. In the fourth century, Athanasius
asserted that virgins were customarily called brides of Christ, while Ambrose
stated that a virgin was one who gives her hand in marriage to God.22 Cyprian
applied the bridal idea almost exclusively to female virgins in his De habitu
virginum, warning them to avoid dressing so as to attract mortal men.23 Jerome,
too, used the bridal imagery for Christian virgins in his letter to Eustochium, for
example where he says Let the seclusion of your chamber ever guard you; ever
let the bridegroom sport with you within. If you pray you are speaking with your
spouse.24 Thus, the conclusion to be drawn is that the Irish were indeed citers
of patristic orthodoxy at times, but selectively: as a rule, they quote the exhort-
ations which are positive and affirming of the nun rather than those restrictive
ones demanding her enclosure.
The virgin was also spiritually fertile, in contrast to the sexually active woman
who was physically fertile.25 The three-grade schema contains these implications,
18
Legrand, Biblical Doctrine, .
19
OT references: Hosea : ; Joel : ; Isaiah : ; Jeremiah : ; Ezekiel : . Discussion of
Old and New Testament parallels in Legrand, Biblical Doctrine, .
20
Legrand, Biblical Doctrine, .
21
Cor. : . In the Book of Armagh this passage is underlined and the word Brigit is added in the
top margin of the page, folio v.
22
Bugge, Virginitas, . Tertullian, De oratione, ch. (ed. G. Diercks, CCSL . ); Athanasius,
Apologia ad Constantium, ch. (PG . ); Ambrose, De virginibus I, ch. .
23 24
Cyprian, De habitu virginum. Jerome, Epistola , ch. (PL . ).
25
Discussed in depth in Legrand, Biblical Doctrine, ch. .
, ,
for in it the virgin bears the most fruit, the hundredfold. So too was Mary the
archetype of virginal fertility, having given birth to God in the person of Christ.
As one seventh-century Irish poem expressed it, Mary was virgin most fruitful,
and yet an inviolate mother (virgo valde fecunda; haec, et mater intacta).26 In Irish
sources altogether the idea that exemplary virgins were, like Mary, spiritually
fruitful was held both directly and indirectly. The indirect association is ex-
pressed in the topos of the Irish saint who suckles the infant Christ as would a
mother, most famously expressed in the (probably) early tenth-century poem
sucn, written in the voice of St Ita.27
The above demonstrates that the Irish believed that dedicated virgins could
transcend female weaknessthose who did might be female saints, their suc-
cessors the abbesses, or female ascetics. This conviction is evidenced not solely
through the symbolic language of poetry, however. It manifested in the real
world. It is in the legal texts that it is most apparent that consecrated women, or
some of them, were considered so different from laywomen that they had an au-
thority in law usually reserved for men. It was the virginal nuns who held the
highest status, not only in the theologians threefold schema, but also in Irish
law. It was these who enjoyed some legal autonomy. This of course reinforced
the nuns identification with the Virgin Mary. But holy women shared in Marys
position as mother of Christ even more explicitly than this. Brigit, in N Car Brigit
is called mother of my great king (mathair mo rurech) and unique mother of the
Son of the Great King (enmathair Maicc Rg mir).28 An Irish exegetical note sug-
gests that it may have been an interpretation of a biblical passage which lay at
the root of this rather literal expression of the idea; the seventh-century Exposi-
tio Quattuor Evangeliorum glosses Luke : (blessed art thou among women and
blessed is the fruit of thy womb) with the comment dum non sola Maria mater
Christi est.
Some Irish virgins were fruitful like Mary in a literal way. These were the al-
leged holy-virgin mothers. Reported in hagiographic texts, their conceptions
are usually described in the context of the life story of the child produced, who
was invariably a male who grew up to become a great monk or cleric. There are,
unsurprisingly, only a few. Beccnat, mother of saint Fnn, was one such; when
she was bathing in Loch Lein a salmon of red-gold swam up against her so that
it became her husband and as a result like the Son of the Virgin was Fnn
Camm born to her.29 Another was Cred (also called Trea), mother of the male
saint Bithne; she was unwittingly impregnated by eating some cress she had
picked which, unbeknownst to her, had upon it the fresh semen of a Peeping
Tom who had been spying on her from a tree. We know that Cred was a holy
virgin (not just a secular virgin) from two references in the anecdote: first, the
26
Versiculi Familiae Benchuir (ODwyer, Mary, ).
27
An excellent discussion, with bibliography of the scholarly literature and main debates, is that in
E. Quin, The Early Irish Poem sucn, Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies (), .
28 29
Lines , . Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Apr.
well was within the walled bounds of a church, and secondly, a poem is quoted
which describes Cred with her dear church (cona caimcill ).30
The Irish also exalted the woman of God for her ability to transcend the limi-
tations of her sex, according her epithets associated with military heroes, for
they were seen as people who were engaged in combat with evil forces. The
hymn Brigit B Bithmaith (dated to the seventh century) contains actual military
elements: May Brigit deliver us past throngs of devils: may she break before
us the battles of every plague. May she destroy within us the taxes of our flesh
(ronsira Brigit sech drungu demne: rorina reunn cathu cach thedme. Dirodba indiunn ar colno
csu).31 Another says Brigit achieved victory over her adversaries when tempted
by the sons of Satan and furthermore donavit illi maximam Deus virtutum gratiam.32
N Car Brigit shows Brigit not as a soldier of Christ per se, but as a military-
spiritual ally:
Donfair co claidiub thened don chath fri alla cara. Ronsndat a nnebitge hi flaith
nime sech pana. Ria ndul la haingliu don chath recam in neclais for rith.33
May she help us with a fiery sword for the battle against dark flocks. May her holy
prayers protect us into heavens kingdom past pains. Before going with the angels to the
battle let us come to the Church speedily.
Brigit is not exceptional in being cast in this way. The Martyrology of Oengus
is particularly rich in military imagery, applying it to numerous virgins: a fresh
champion was Car, crucified was the body of Agatha, pure champion, ten
shapely holy virgins with the passion of a manly host.34 Other women in the
Martyrology of Oengus are also described as being with a host (slg), a word
which has the ambiguous implications of both military hosts and angelic hosts.35
This dual meaning of course mirrors the late antique association between mili-
tary spirituality and the vita angelica. Like other early medieval writers, these
Irish authors found no inconsistency in giving military descriptions of virgins in
the same texts which also call the same women brides of Christ; the readers
were able, we presume, to absorb the multiplicity of metaphors without diffi-
culty, although the modern reader can find the juxtapositions somewhat jarring.
Bugge observed that in both male and female monasticism, monastic virginity
takes on a profound metaphysical significance: it becomes far more than bodily
integrity, but a symbol, in some way, of the invincibility of the soul which re-
nounces contact with matter and that monasticism drew its picture of the
perfect Christian life along martial lines in imitation of the angels military
prowess.36
30
Ibid., notes on May.
31
Quote from Thes. Pal. ii. . Discussion and dating in Kenney, no. .
32 33
Audite Sancta Studia. N Car Brigit, lines .
34
Martyrology of Oengus: Jan., Feb., Feb.
35
e.g. ibid., Mar. For use of slg for a host of angels, see the Preface, verse .
36
Bugge, Virginitas, , .
, ,
37
E. Johnston, Transforming Women in Irish Hagiography, Peritia (), , at .
38 39
Vita I of Brigit, ch. . Audite Fratres Facta, stanza .
40
Cantemus in Omni Die (Bernard and Atkinson (eds.), Liber Hymnorum, i. ). Text discussed in
ODwyer, Mary, , and Kenney, no. .
41
Vita I of Brigit, ch. .
42 43
Audite Sancta Studia. Christus in Nostra Insula, stanzas and .
44
Vita I of Brigit, ch. ; Latin Life of Coemgen, D text, ch. (PVSH i. ).
45
Jerome invokes the commandment with regard to chastity rather than fasting, but notably juxta-
poses with the reference to the wearing of a leather girdle, the material of the Irish zonae. Ep. , ch. :
God says to Job: Gird up thy loins as a man. John wears a leather girdle. The apostles must gird their
loins to carry the lamps of the Gospel.
Consecration Rites
Virgins were consecrated in rites performed by bishops, and three accounts
from early Ireland survive. The earliest of these is in Brigits Vita I, probably
from the seventh century.47 In this account several virgins were presented to the
bishop, the priest Maccaille announcing, Ecce sanctae virgines foris sunt quae volunt
velamen virginitatis de manu tua accipere. The text relates that the bishop consecrated
Brigit first, placing a veil on her head with speeches and readings; then, with her
head bent in submission, she touched the wooden base of the altar (lectis ora-
tionibus Brigida capite submisso pedem altaris ligneum in manu sua tenuit). The other vir-
gins then received the veil in the same manner. It is unclear whether the
touching of the base of the altar was part of the ceremony or a chance action on
Brigits part. Her parents seem to have been present, because after the cere-
mony they offered her some land, though in Cogitosuss shorter account of the
same event there is no mention of parental permission or presence. The attitude
of the woman is also given: the girl was to be kneeling humbly and offering her
virginal crown to almighty God (genua humiliter flectens et suam virginalem coronam
Domino omnipotenti offerens).48 In the ninth-century Bethu Brigte, Brigits consecra-
tion ceremony was performed by a bishop, but here there is mention of another
person, a minister, one of whose tasks in the ceremony was to hold the veils.49
46
Irish Life of Adomnn, ch. ; Audite Sancta Studia, stanza ; Christus in Nostra Insula, stanza .
47 48
Vita I of Brigit, ch. . Cogitosus, Life of Brigit, ch. .
49
Ch. . There are similar descriptions from later Lives. Itas late Life mentions who performed the
, ,
From these sparse indications, it would seem that the Irish consecration of vir-
gins was roughly standard in relation to other parts of Western Christendom
in the same period. This impression is corroborated by the one other known
source directly relating to the consecration rite, a ninth-century St Gall manu-
script fragment found in by a Dr Keller of Zrich. Kenney dated the frag-
ment to the tenth century or earlier and Keller himself dated it, on the basis of
the manuscript, to the early ninth.
Permaneat ad prudentibus qui . . . virginibus vigilantia. . . . adferte copuletur . . . per
dominum nostrum Jesu Christum . . .
Oremus, fratres carissimi, misericordiam, ut euntum bonum tribuere dignetur huic
puellae N. quae.
Deo votum candidam vestem perferre cum integritate coronae in resurrectione vitae
aeternae quam facturus est; orantibus nobis, prestet Deus . . .
Conserva, domine, istius devotae pudorem castitatis dilectionem continentiae in factis,
in dictis, in cogitationibus; per Christe Jesu, qui cum patre vivis . . .
Accipe, puella, pallium candidum quod perferas ante tribunal Domini.50
As in Cogitosus, there is both a white veil and a white garment. The term
pallium was used, from the fifth century in the West, to refer to a holy virgins veil;
it remained the normal term until around the time of the Missale Francorum, so in
this respect the Irish terminology is standard.51 What is unusual, however, is
what the virgin received in the rite. In Frankia holy virgins received a veil, a ring,
and a torques or crown; in England they were given a veil and ring: the Irish vir-
gin received a dress but no ring.52 The formal presentation of the dress, further-
more, is not found in the Roman pontificals. As mentioned previously, the
colour the Irish virgin wore was distinctive, too, in comparison with other parts
of the West, where veil and dress were normally black rather than white.53
Cogitosus is among the several sources who specified the colour of the veil as
also being white.54
In the Zrich fragment there have been noted similarities to the consecration
in the Gallican use, but the wording of all but the last few lines is different. In this
text, as in the Gallican and unlike the Roman, the officiants speech is addressed
to the others present, identified as fratres. The Gallican version begins Faventes,
ceremony and the fact that its central act was the acceptance of the veil: ab ecclesiasticis viris consecrata est, et
velamen virginitatis accepit.
50
Untitled entry, Archaeological Journal (), . Printed in F. Warren, The Liturgy and Ritual of the
Celtic Church (nd edn., with introduction and bibliography by J. Stephenson; Woodbridge, ), .
Discussed in Kenney, no. , under The Zrich Fragments.
51
Hodgson, Frankish Church, .
52
Ibid., , ; Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women, .
53
Hodgson, Frankish Church, , with references. At the Irish monastery of Bobbio in northern
Italy, however, the virgin received a white dress with her veil (E. Lowe (ed.), The Bobbio Missal (London,
), at ).
54
Cogitosus, Life of Brigit, ch. : caeleste intuens desiderium et pudicitiam et tantum castitatis amorem in tali vir-
gine, pallium album et vestem candidam super ipsius venerabile caput inposuit.
dilectissimi Fratres; in the Roman rite the equivalent speech is addressed to God
(Respice, Domine, propitius super has famulas tuas).55 Mohlberg found that three of the
four prayers have counterparts in Continental texts, and as for the fourth, Sims-
Williams has determined that it uses a peculiarly Irish phraseology.56
In Irish texts, both in this fragment and in the numerous hagiographical ac-
counts, the person who performs nuns consecrations is always male and, where
identified, is of episcopal grade. There is no suggestion here, as there is elsewhere,
that abbesses, perform the rite, though it cannot be ruled out as a possibility.57
An anomaly to be noted in both the Latin and Irish legal texts is the sheer
paucity of references to nuns, which is striking, in contract with the coverage
given to every other conceivable type of person or entity; the laws cover all sorts
of women, even rare ones (e.g. female druids), and there are thousands of refer-
ences to clerics and monks.58 One possible explanation is that nuns were so few
in number that mention in legal texts was not felt to be warranted, but this idea
can be eliminated in the light of the very large number of nuns mentioned in
such texts as the Lives and martyrologies. Another is that nuns were so segre-
gated that their rules were not sufficiently mainstream to warrant inclusion in
the laws; but since nuns were clearly not enclosed and had much interaction
with both ecclesiastics and laypeople, this too seems extremely unlikely. The
most plausible explanation for this curious lacuna (though by no means a
satisfactory one) is that nuns were governed by a combination of the normal
rules for either Church members and those for women generally.
55
M. Duchesne, Christian Worship: Its Origin and Evolution ( London, ), .
56
P. Sims-Williams, Thought, Word and Deed: An Irish Triad, riu (), .
57
e.g. in Frankia, Admonitio Generalis (); in England, an th-cent. fragmentary Life (Schneider,
Anglo-Saxon Women, ).
58
On the usefulness of these texts for ecclesiastical matters, see Sharpe, Some Problems; L. Breat-
nach, Canon Law and Secular Law in Early Ireland: the Significance of Bretha Nemed, Peritia (),
; G. Mac Niocaill, Christian Influences in Early Irish Law, in N Chathin and Richter, Irland
und Europa, ; D. Corrin, Irish Law and Canon Law, ibid. ; D. Corrin, L. Breatnach,
and A. Breen, The Laws of the Irish, Peritia (), .
The laws have long been used in studies of the social position of Irish lay women, e.g. in SEIL: Power,
Classes of Women, ; D. Binchy Family Membership of Women, ; D. Binchy, The Legal
Capacity of Women with Regard to Contracts, ; M. Dillon, The Relationship of Mother and
Son, of Father and Daughter, and the Law of Inheritance with regard to Women, . More recently:
D. Corrin, Women in Early Irish Society, in M. MacCurtain and D. Corrin (eds.), Women in Irish
Society: the Historical Dimension (Dublin, ) ; C. McAll, The Normal Paradigms of a Womans Life
in the Irish and Welsh Law Texts, in D. Jenkins and M. Owen (eds.), The Welsh Law of Women: Studies Pre-
sented to Professor Daniel A. Binchy on his Eightieth Birthday (Cardiff, ), . On married women specifi-
cally, D. Corrin, Marriage in Early Ireland, in A. Cosgrove (ed.), Marriage in Ireland (Dublin, ),
; Kelly, Guide, ; D. Corrin, Women and the Law in Early Ireland, in M. ODowd and S.
Wichert (eds.), Chattel, Servant or Citizen: Womens Status in Church, State and Society (Historical Studies ;
Belfast, ), ; B. Jaski, Marriage Laws in Ireland and on the Continent in the Early Middle Ages,
in C. Meek and K. Simms, The Fragility of her Sex? (Dublin, ), ; Charles-Edwards, Kinship, passim.
, ,
For the ecclesiastical and theological status of nuns as reflected in social pre-
rogative and identity, the early eighth-century Collectio Canonum Hibernensis is an
important text. It is admittedly problematic, because it is difficult to assess its rele-
vance to its own time. For the most part it imports material from earlier, often
foreign, sources without alteration; thus, as Sharpe observed, one must nat-
urally pause before accepting any statement as directly relevant to the Irish
church at the beginning of the eighth century. But equally one ought not reject
any section as irrelevant or inconsistent without showing why it was included.
Inconsistencies are not, however, due to the text being of antiquarian nature
and containing legislation at least in part redundant (as Hughes had suggested),
but because it was a living text compiled in an environment in which some di-
versity prevailed, even on important issues.59 The Hibernensis gives a definition
of the nun, the caillech or palliata:
Pallium a palliditate dictum, hinc et palliata sive Pallas Dea, quae et Minerva, cuius tem-
plum pallidum est, cuius sacerdotes virgines erant palliatae, hoc est velatae; hinc mutata
specie eodem nomine perseverante, licet in novo ad palliatas, hoc est velatas censeri
permissum est.60
Pallium [veil ] is named from paleness, this and palliata or Goddess Pallas who is Min-
erva, whose temple is white, whose priests and virgins are palliatae, that is, veiled; this, in
mutated form perseveres with the same name, [thus] it is permitted nowadays that the
pallium-wearers, that is to say, the veiled women, may be esteemed.
The authors also state explicitly that nuns are to be greatly honoured because
they have transcended the fragility of their gender:
Palliatae, hoc est velatae, magno honore habeantur, quia sexum, hoc est fragilitatem
vincunt, et se mundi actibus abdicant.61
Pallium-wearers, that is the veiled women, are to have much honour, because they con-
quer their sex, that is to say, their fragility, and they withdraw from the world through
their actions.
This conquest has more to do with the spirit than the body: Hibernensis follows
Jerome in asserting that a nun remained pure if she had been raped against her
willher purity was a spiritual state which physical violation could not mar;
as the chapter headed De eo, quod non inficiat sanctaemoniales vi obprimi states, the
bodies of holy women are not soiled, except by will.62
59
Sharpe, Some Problems, . Hibernensis is now used as a living text by scholars examining ec-
clesiastical structure and offices, e.g. Charles-Edwards, Pastoral Role of the Church.
60
Hibernensis, book , ch. , citing Sinodus Hibernensis as its source. It is worth mentioning here that it
is from palliatae that the Irish derived their word caillech, which literally means veiled one. Regarding
Hibernensis, see Hughes, Church, . Hughes felt it was antiquarian and could not be used as a living
text (Church, , cf. ), but Sharpe successfully defends its currency in Some Problems, .
61
Hibernensis, book , ch. , citing Sinodus Romana as its source.
62
Ibid., book , ch. : Corpus sanctarum mulierum non vis maculat, sed voluntas . . . non ita amittitur
Hibernensis also links the status of nuns to the grades of the Church, a concept
normally associated with the Churchs men, and clearly articulates the idea that
in the female religious profession there were two grades, that of the virgin and
that of the widow or penitent. It cites Augustine for a division into virgins
and widows, Jerome for a division into virgins and penitents: the first is similar
and comparable to bishops, the second to the grade of presbyters, i.e. seniors
( primum genus episcopis simulatur et comparatur, II gradus presbiteris, hoc est senioribus).63 By
stating that nuns were equivalent either to bishops or to presbyters, Hibernensis
is rendering explicit a very important notion which is found obliquely in other
material of the period. Furthermore, by specifying that the second type of nun
had to be under the hand of a pastor for her whole life, the text implies that the
virginal nun did not. In other words, the virgin could enjoy a level of autonomy
which, although not specified here, is in some way comparable to that of a
bishop.
The application of grades to nuns is interesting because the grades, after all,
are those of the clergybishops, presbyters, deacons, and so forth, as described
at length in this text and others. Monastics might be laymen or holders of a
grade ( fer grid ), meaning that they were also clerics. Donnchadh Corrin
observed that the monastic who is a grade-holder is more closely identified with
the Church than is the lay monastic; when an abbot parts from his church his
separation arrangements vary depending on this factor; he takes less with him if
he is also a fer grid, a priest. In other words, those who hold a grade are more
tightly bound or married to the Church.64 The same language is used for nuns,
i.e. nuns are holders of a grade: some Middle Irish notes refer to a penitent
grade sought by a nun from a priest, for example.65 Furthermore, the language
of ceremonial inauguration is often the same: the Irish term ordain is used for
consecration of nuns as well as the inauguration of abbesses.66
There are other indications in the literature which suggest some ecclesiastical
equivalence between nuns, monks, and clerics. Hibernensis tends to accord nuns
the kind of privileges given to male clerics. Its burial regulations, governed by
considerations of status and sanctity, permitted religious women to be buried
with honour near the altar of a church. It cites Gregory on the rulings about the
burial of nuns, stressing that the virginity of a nun is a more important consid-
eration in the decision to bury her near the altar than even her stultiloquium.67
corporis sanctitas violata, animi puritate manente, etiam corpore oppresso; sicut amittitur corporis sanctitas violata animi
puritate, etiam corpore intacto.
63
Ibid., book , ch. .
64
Ibid., book , ch. . Discussion in Hughes, Church, ; see also Corrain, Early Irish
Churches, , who thinks the analogy of marriage is a very good one, as the separation rules are
remarkably close to the secular rules governing divorce.
65
th- or th-cent. gloss on N Car Brigit (Thes. Pal. ii. ).
66
e.g. Gilla Easpuic, De Statu Ecclesiae on ordination of abbesses (PL . , at ).
67
Hibernensis, book , ch. , entitled De eo, quod non prodest malis sepeliri in locis sanctis: Quedam femina
sanctemonialis in ecclesia sepulta iuxta altare, pars eius una igni consumpta visa est, pars intacta permansit, id est inferior,
quia ipsa mulier virgo fuit, tamen stultiloquium non vitavit. Cf. Gregory, Dialogi.
, ,
Equivalence is not restricted even to the Latin material. One vernacular law
tract specifies that the evidence of a nun may be accepted against that of a cleric,
because both parties are in orders, are holders of grades.68 Another classes
nuns, with clerics, among those who are governed by the Church: they are both
bound by the Church subject to their soul-friends.69
In arguing that the Irish mentality included nuns into the corporate body of
ecclesiastics, and that virgins were equivalent to male counterparts and might
be so esteemed, we are not losing sight of the very real differences which the
Irish specified between nun and cleric or monk. It is very clearly spelt out, for ex-
ample, that women could not receive sacerdotal office. Citing Isidore, the chap-
ter in Hibernensis reiterates the biblical injunction against women speaking or
teaching in church, and against trespassing into areas of the sacerdotal office
reserved for men.70 So although sharing an equivalence of sorts, the nuns of
Ireland were very clearly not clerics.
68
Gbretha Caratniad, ch. (CIH , at .; German trans. in R. Thurneysen, Aus dem
Irischen Recht III. Die falschen Urteilssprche Caratnias, ZCP (), , at ). See also
Kelly, Guide, .
69
Crus Bscnai (in CIH at ; with trans. in ALI iii. ).
70
Hibernensis, book , ch. , entitled De mulieribus vel feminis non accipientibus ullum virile vel sacerdotale of-
ficium. It says: Feminis in ecclesia loqui vel docere non permittitur; sed nec contingere vel conferre ullius virilis muneris aut
sacerdotalis officii sortem sibi vindicare.
71
Cain Lnamna, ch. , entitled Lnamnas Eicne (CIH ..; also R. Thurneysen, Cin
Lnamn, in SEIL, , at ; also ALI ii. , ).
and the other extant references to mac-caillech suggest that it actually refers to a
virginal nunin this and other instances. The word prefix mac, meaning son
or boy, is seemingly illogical at first glance. There is, however, a parallel term
for the male, mac-clerich, which appears somewhat more frequently in Irish ma-
terial: it is normally treated as young cleric or novice; however if it is trans-
lated as a virginal cleric, one who was in orders before becoming sexually
experienced, such passages are rendered more comprehensible.72 This, I would
suggest, is the basic term, from which the female one was formedthe mac pre-
fix coming to connote virginity generally and thus being grafted unchanged
onto the caillech term. The argument in favour of interpretating the mac-caillech
in this way is strengthened by a passage an eighth-century penitential tract,
De Arreis. In the section on the appropriate commutations for the cleric, monk,
mac-caillech, and laywoman, the authors make a set of parallels, in which the
layman is said to differ from the cleric in the same manner as the laywoman dif-
fers from the mac-caillech. Even more persuasive is the appearance of the word
ban-maicc, used in a ninth-century text to refer to female holy virgins; when Oen-
gus called Romula, Curufin, and Sabina ban-maicc he meant not woman-boys,
the literal translation, but female virgins.73 It is then, as virginal nuns, that one
reads the setting of penances in the Old Irish tract on commutations:
Amal file tra deochair etir laechu clerchu, etir maccaillecha laechesa, imtha samlaid
deochair etir a saethar pennainn. Ata dano etir na harraib ata cora do denum doib.
Arra na n-athlaech na athlaiches ctumus, feis i n-uiscib, feis for nenaid, feis for
blaescaib cn, feis la marb i-ndeirc, uair nad bi coimtig laech n laeiches nad bi cuit oc
marbad duini. Ate immorro arra ata cire do clerchib do c[h]aillechaib acht anti dib
marbas duine, mani dentar ar imt[ h]ormach fochraice .i. feiss doib i n-ecailsib uaraib
n a cubachlaib deirritib oc figlib oc ernaigthib cen cumsanud .i. cet suide, cet lige, cet
cotulta . . .74
As there is a difference between laymen and clerics and between virgin-nuns and lay-
women, so too there is a difference between the kind of mortifications due from them, as
well as between the kind of commutations which may properly be performed by them.
First, commutations proper for former laymen and women: spending the night in water
or on nettles or on nutshells, or with a dead body . . . On the other hand there are com-
mutations which are proper for clerics and nuns except such of them as have slain a man
(who are required to perform the first kind) unless (a commutation of the first kind) be
performed for the purpose of increasing ones reward: spending the night in cold
churches or remote cells while keeping vigils and praying without respite, i.e. (without)
leave to sit or lie down or sleep.75
72
There are many such references, but see e.g. the Stowe Missal (Warren, Stowe Missal, , ) where
the best and holiest kind of cleric is deemed the mac-clerich.
73
Martyrology of Oengus, July.
74
De Arreis, chs. (ed. K. Meyer, An Old-Irish Treatise De Arreis, Revue Celtique (), ,
at ).
75
De Arreis, chs. (trans. D. A. Binchy, The Old-Irish Table of Commutations in Bieler, Irish Peni-
tentials, , at ; Meyer, An Old Irish Treatise De Arreis, ).
, ,
It follows that there was some semblance of equivalence perceived between the
cleric on the male side and the mac-caillech on the female side. One notes that
further down in the same passage the author has reverted to a looser term for
nun, the simple caillech. The passage does not make much sense if we interpret
mac-caillech as a novice nun, just as the above section of Cin Lnamna is less com-
prehensible for doing so.
There is nothing to my knowledge in the edited legal corpus which comments
on the nun per se as plaintiff, but presumably a nun would have needed a super-
iors backing to instigate a legal case, unless perhaps if she were of very high re-
ligious statusan abbess or an anchoritic holy woman with semi-saint status.
Free women could be plaintiffs, and numerous rules survive about the notice
they had to serve, the limitations on distraint they had to observe, and the situ-
ations in which they could stand surety. One hagiographic tale has a nun as a
plaintiff. A tenth- or eleventh-century anecdote in the Martyrology of Tallaght
tells of the nun (caillech) Lachair of Kells bringing a complaint to a king when
his son stole her special cow. The king condemned the prince to death.76 The
judge is here a king rather than a legal judge, but even so it is noteworthy that
there is no mention of a male advocate for the nun, and the word of the nun was
taken over the word of a prince. Whether or not nuns in reality usually brought
cases or made testimony against laymen, at least one later hagiographer was
happy to portray them doing so.
The validity of a persons testimony is another means of assessing status. One
must note first that the norm in Irish law was for the testimony of women to be
considered invalid, either outright or unless supported by a man. Hibernensis in
one place denies the testimony of women altogether: testimonium feminae non
accipitur, sicut apostoli testimonium feminarum non acceperunt de resurrectione Christi.77
Elsewhere the text expresses the view that women can give testimony, but only
with the approval of their (male) superior: mulier si iurando se constrinxerit maritusque
aut si pater eius una die tacuerit, voti rea erit.78 The ambiguity in law is evidenced else-
where too; one vernacular tract says that a womans evidence is always invalid;
another says it is valid, providing her superior concurs.79 A nun was not just a
woman, but also a monastic: monastics too had limitations on their ability to
give testimony. Monks needed the approval of their abbatial head when they
were witnesses.80 It is therefore safe to infer that most nuns would have needed
76
Martyrology of Tallaght, notes on Apr. Fergus Kelly discusses the material which deals with
kings roles as law-enforcers (Guide, ).
77
Hibernensis, book , ch. , citing Sinodus Hibernensis.
78
Ibid., book , ch. , entitled De iuramento non solvendo, citing Lex.
79
Kelly points out that Heptad places a total bar on female testimony, but notes that elsewhere one
finds the view that women could bear witness in civil law in the context of their capacity to requisition
.
land (Din Techtugad ) and to take rent or fines (Di Chetharslicht Athgabla), at least from other women: (Kelly,
Guide, , ).
80
Monastics also needed a superior in order to be witnesses, at least as a general rule. Hibernensis, book
, ch. , citing Sinodus Hibernensis, says: Iuramentum filii aut filiae nesciente patre, iuramentum monachi, nesciente
abbate, iuramentum pueri et iuramentum servi non permittente domino irrita sunt.
secular judge but to a synod of church authorities.85 In the Vita I version the nun
complained she had been made pregnant by one of Patricks bishops; in Bethu
Brigte, the nun accused the bishop of having raped her. In both versions the
bishop denied the accusation, and the synod did not know how to resolve the
issue, as it was a case of her word against his. It is noteworthy that the nuns com-
plaint is portrayed as being taken seriously, and her word is not dismissed as in-
valid on account of her being a woman. In the end Brigit miraculously revealed
incontrovertible proof that the nun was lying, and she set the nuns penance.
The legal sources contain special stipulations for certain types of high-status
nuns. For example, the sick-maintenance of holy women abundant in miracles
was handled differently from that of ordinary women. A womans testimony
was valid, according to Hibernensis, providing she was a domina and/or a virgo
sancta. These cases are discussed in the following chapter as they may well be
most relevant to abbesses or other nuns of very high office, in which cases the
specific privileges can be better thought of as belonging not so much to their vir-
ginal status as to their position in a monastery, church, or community. Another
angle on this must be mentioned as well. Irish law made special provision for
women who were members of professions, giving them extra autonomy ap-
proaching that of men in some situations, as has been demonstrated in a study
of the status of those in the secular sphere.86 The ultimate origins of such an at-
titude, whereby those females who hold power and greater responsibility are en-
titled to a legal position accordingly higher than they would have otherwise,
must lie in native Irish culture: it appears that the Irish allowed for, and recog-
nized, the exceptional woman.
The legal material, offering as it does a way into the social organization of
Irish society in this period, demonstrates that as far as the lawyers were con-
cerned there were numerous sorts of holy women, or nuns at least. It also makes
it clear that nuns formed a segment of the female population who were gov-
erned by special considerations, though the texts are not always clear how these
worked. What is evident, though, is the conviction that, sometimes at least, nuns
could transcend the more normal female legal incompetence.
91
Di Astud Chirt Dligid (CIH ..; also ALI v. , at ). For a superior translation
see Power, Classes of Women, .
92
Discussed in M. N Dhonnchadha, The Lex Innocentium: Adamnans Law for Women, Clerics and
Youths, , in ODowd and Wichert, Chattel, .
93
Ch. , with the Latin of the original uncorrected (K. Meyer (ed. and trans.), Cin Adamnin: An Old
Irish Treatise on the Law of Adamnn (Anecdota Oxoniensa ; Oxford, ) ).
94
Cin Adomnin, chs. .
, ,
95
e.g. Vita I of Brigit, ch. .
of these is in the Annals of Ulster for the year , where there is a report of a
man who after his wifes demise, observed the strictest continence ( feadhbhacht)
until the day of his own death.96 This secondary meaning is evidenced also in
the late antique world, where vidua can also refer to a woman who has professed
religious continence but who might not have been bereaved. Since the Irish
were voracious readers of patristic literature, it is not too surprising that they
should have taken it over. However, before we can understand the Irish widows
profession we must take into account the late antique Christian concepts which
informed it.
96
This secondary use is evidenced as late as the th cent.
97
See discussion in B. Witherington, Women in the Earliest Churches (Society for New Testament Stud-
ies ; Cambridge, ), . Also discussed in S. Davies, Revolt of the Widows: The Social World of the
Apocryphal Acts (Carbondale, ), . Also discussed in O. Sthlin, Chra, in G. Friedrich (ed.),
Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (Grand Rapids, ), ix. , at .
98
He speaks of a virgin of less than years being enrolled with the widows, and mentions that ap-
parently married women and even mothers and teachers of children were being elected to an order
either of widows or virgins. See Sthlin, Chra, , and Davies, Revolt, .
99 100
Clark, Introduction to John Chrysostom, . Davies, Revolt, .
, ,
Throughout these early centuries vidua could refer to any woman who had for-
mally renounced sexual activity after having participated in connubial rela-
tions. To qualify as a widow ones spouse need not have died; he might be
abandoned. Tertullian, for example, wrote of pagan priestesses who renounced
their husbands and lived in strict viduitas. In late antique hagiography and in the
Apocryphal Acts the technical term widow might often apply to a woman,
virgin or widow, particularly dedicated to continence and Christian piety.101
Widowhood implied a pledge of continence, a resolution to be faithful to Christ
rather than to a partner in an earthly marriage.102 Furthermore, the Apoc-
ryphal Acts obliquely encourage women to leave their husbands and become
religious widows.
The widows profession received a boost during the Churchs debates on re-
marriage. Many Christian thinkers believed that marriage was literally forever,
and at the resurrection couples would be reunited. In this view, people who re-
married after the death of their spouse were perforce committing adultery. So
bereaved wives were encouraged to take a vow not to remarry but instead to
dedicate the remainder of their lives to God.103 We should not be surprised,
then, to find the chaste widow in the popular threefold schema of the faithful. In
late antique texts the widow was the sixtyfold fruit, enjoying the sixtyfold reward
of heaven, located as she was between the hundredfold virgin and the thirtyfold
married Christian. Jerome said that the widows reap the sixtyfold reward be-
cause they are placed in a position of difficulty and distress, on account of their
depression and the greater difficulty in resisting the allurements of pleasure
once experienced.104 The heavenly reward for the widow was quite exalted: she
will be honoured on earth by men and she will receive eternal glory from God
in heaven and those widows who have served uprightly will be magnified by
the archangels.105
101 102
Davies, Revolt, . Ibid.
103
Tertullian, De exhortatione castitatis, ch. (E. Kroymann, CCSL . ). Also, the Apostolic Con-
stitutions, ch. , as cited in Sthlin, Chra, . See also Clark, Introduction to John Chrysostom, .
104
Jerome, Adversus Iovinianum, book , ch. .
105
Didascalia book , ch., as quoted in Sthlin, Chra, .
says that the sixtyfold are the clergy and widows who are continent: clerici et vid-
uae qui continentes sunt.106 Widows appear in the threefold schema also in the
seventh-century Expositio quattuor evangeliorum, which says that the sixtieth fruit
are the order of widows, who are persevering in the Lord ( fructus sexagisimus
ordinem viduarum, perseverantium in Domino). It is worth noting that the author says
ordo viduarum, treating widows as an order. These two texts show familiarity with
the spiritual rewards offered the religious widow and with what was expected of
such a widow, namely continence and perseverance in a religious life.
In the seventh century the writings of Isidore of Seville were transmitted very
quickly to Ireland, and it may well be from Isidore that the Irish gained some of
their concepts of widowhood. In his De ecclesiasticis officiis, Isidore dedicated a
chapter to the widow (situated between chapters on virgins and married Chris-
tians) and discussed the biblical and patristic sources which treat the profession,
stressing the irreversibility of a widows vow of continence:
Praedicat autem idem apostolus damnationem habere viduas quae post propositum
continentiae nubere cupiunt: cum enim, inquid, luxoriatae quia primam fidem irritam
fecerunt, id est quia in eo quod primo voverant non steterunt.107
This same apostle predicts to have damnation those widows who after their promise of
continence desire marriage; when, then, he says, they are harlots it is because they made
their first vows void, that is, because they did not stay in that state which they first vowed.
Thus by the time it arrives in Ireland, and at the time we first see evidence of it
there, the profession of widowhood was both theologically contextualized and
liturgically formalized. The late eighth-century litany Ateoch Frit asks for the pro-
tection of virgins, widows, and the lawfully wedded (in that order).108 The late
eighth-century Stowe Missal, possibly from Tallaght, contains petitions for all the
officers of the Church, including one pro integritate virginum et continentia viduarum.109
It is known that women could separate from their living husbands in order to
enter religious life in monasteries, and in those circumstances they would have
had the widows grade. Columbas Life recounts a story in which a woman so
hated the connubial act with her husband that she asked permission from the saint
to leave him and enter a monastery. In such cases it would be normal for the
spouses permission to be sought. Indeed Irish biblical glosses do stress that both
women and men require their partners agreement to abandon the marital bed.110
106
Pa, ch. . Bieler thought that the line must have had an extra et after viduae, rendering the mean-
ing clerics and widows and those who are continent; however, I have translated it without the insertion.
Expositio quattuor evangeliorum (PL . , here at ).
107
Ch. (C. Lawson (ed.), De ecclesiasticis officiis, CCSL (Turnhout, ), ).
108
The word used for widow is fedb; emphasis mine. Nom Churim ar commairge also called Litany of the
Virgins (Plummer, Irish Litanies, ). Textual discussion in Kenney, no. . Ateoch Frit (Plummer, Irish
Litanies, ).
109
From the section on the Mass (Warner, Stowe Missal, ii. ).
110
Adomnn, Life of Columba, book , ch. . Eighth-cent. Wrzburg Glosses on the Pauline Epis-
tles, Cor. : : she cannot practice continence unless the husband pleases, i.e. unless it be agreeable to
, ,
The dedicated widow formed the second grade in some formulations of the
two grades of holy women. Hibernensis, cited earlier, speaks of two levels of nuns,
and says the lower must think of Anna, the traditional patroness of widows.
Cogitosuss seventh-century Life of Brigit affirms this further, where the descrip-
tion of the church at Kildare mentions there is a door to the sanctuary reserved
for the abbess and her nuns and faithful widows (abbatissa cum suis puellis et viduis
fidelibus).111 Cogitosuss remark joins with others in other Lives to confirm the
reality of the widows profession. In the Vita I of Brigit, for example, Brigit was
taken as a young girl to a religious synod by religiosa quaedam vidua with the per-
mission of her father. The widow lived near to Brigits fathers house, we are
told.112 In the ninth-century Bethu Brigte, the same story is related, but with the
widow now called a senior holy nun (senior caillige craibdigi ). These remarks
certainly confirm that the Irish writers of this century were familiar enough with
holy widows to include them without much ado into their hagiographic tales,
and could, in the case of Bethu Brigte, imagine them attending a synod.
Widow as Penitent
On the theological level the widow presents numerous complexities. The glory
of the religious widow, her exalted status on the heavenly plane and the
Churchs approval gained for her continence, were accompanied in Ireland by
another, more dubious connotation. In Ireland, widows were seen to have links
with, or in fact to be, penitents, people in especial need of Gods forgiveness.
Mirn N Dhonnchadha has demonstrated this interchangeability, citing
these and other examples. Legal and ecclesiastical writers were clearly working
in a long tradition which made loose associations between widowhood and the
renunciation of sexual activity, which was in turn associated with the notion of
being a penitent.113 The seventh-century Liber Angeli, for example, uses widows
and penitents interchangeably. In the description of Armagh, the author men-
tions three categories of religious people who belong to it. In this place, it says,
tres ordinibus adherent: virgines et poenitentes [et] in matrimonio ligitimo aeclessiae
servientes.114 Thus the middle grade, usually of widows, is here again made up of
penitents. The Hibernensis passage on the two grades of nun, cited earlier, says
the second grade, penitents comparable to presbyters, should take their inspir-
ation from the biblical widow Anna and, presumably unlike virgins, must remain
under the hand of a pastor for the whole of their lives.115 Elsewhere it classifies
the two explicitly as the virgines habitu virginitatis ornatae and the penitentes. In this
the husband, i.e. let the husband not boast this time in his power for he, too, cannot practice continence
or copulate unless the woman pleases (Thes. Pal. i. ).
111 112 113
Ch. . Vita I of Brigit, ch. . N Dhonnchadha, Caillech, , .
114
Bieler, Irish Penitentials, . Here I agree with Bielers interpolation of et, since the text goes on to
refer to these as three orders. See also N Donnchadha, Caillech, .
115
Book , ch. .
formulation, the penitent takes the second level of nunhood. To cite a final
source, a gloss on the vernacular legal text Crus Bscnai says of the bonds bind-
ing members to the church, that penitent nuns and pilgrims (o ailithrib ocus o cail-
lecaib aitrige) are bound by a promise (tarngaire) they have taken; this shows that
penitent nuns belonged to an order of sorts, and had joined it by taking a formal
oath.116
Why and how could the Irish have come to associate the dedicated holy
widow with the reformed penitent harlot? N Dhonnchadha proposes that it
was because many who took up the order of penitent were in fact widowed
women, often elderly women, and thus the term evolved connotations of widow-
hood. In that case one should not overstress the penitential nature of the pos-
ition. The penance implied by the term caillech aithrige should not be overplayed
if the root of aithrige connotes departure from a former way of living more than
it does penance for former sinfulness. Caillech, meaning veiled person, can have
uxorial and marital connotations. So for her, these women are more to be seen
as conversae from marital, i.e. lay life, who have adopted dedicated celibacy.117 My
own study of the texts leads me to agree strongly with much of this view. The
nuns who are interchangeably called widows and penitents are best seen as
gaining their designation from their departure from the life of the laity and the
sexuality which, for the Irish, characterized it.
Certainly it is right that the grade of penitent did not always have connota-
tions of former lasciviousness, and N Dhonnchadha astutely observed a pas-
sage supporting this in the notes on the Martyrology of Oengus, which date
from the tenth or eleventh century. The gloss explains how Brigit was conse-
crated: seeking to have the order of penitence ( grada aithrige) conferred upon her,
Brigit went with seven other nuns in search of Bishop Mel. Finding him, she was
introduced as the famous nun (caillech arderc) of Leinster, and he agreed to confer
the orders of penitence upon her.118 Although these notes are dated from be-
yond the period under consideration here, it is important to mention them be-
cause they show that at that time, if not earlier, people could imagine an already
pious, chaste woman actively seeking out the formal conferring of an order of
penitence. Because Brigit is definitely universally accepted to have been a virgin
and someone who did not have a sinful life, we have to consider that taking the
order of penitent nun was seen in the glossators day as a pious undertaking
rather than an imposed punishment.
The term widow was not, however, incorporated into the terminology of
the order of penitents. Rather, I see it as being the other way around. Viduitas or
fedbacht from the outset meant a state enjoyed by those who renounced the lay
life. This is amply demonstrated in the late antique precedents. Furthermore,
116
Crus Bscnai at CIH and ALI iii. . For discussion of ailithir and caillech aithrige, see
N Dhonnchadha, Caillech, . Hibernensis, book , ch. .
117
N Dhonnchadha, Caillech, .
118
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Feb. See also N Dhonnchadha, Caillech, .
, ,
some texts allude to the particularly sexual cast of the previous life, and do so in
strong, even condemnatory tones. The key text is a dramatic passage in the law
tract Di Astud Chirt Dligid, which dates from the seventh or eighth century. The
tract itself is a long text containing a wide variety of legal material, and within
the section on honour-prices of various sorts of women, widows are covered.
The passage under consideration links the holy widows profession to that of the
converted, penitent harlot.
Fedb, aindir, be carnna, doranidar setaibh oige diarub la fo fuiristar, acht ro pennead a
nilpeacta ciarob iar nilar comleachta.119
A widow, a non-virgin, a wanton, are paid dire [honour-price] in chattels of virginity
(i.e. receive the same honour-price as a virgin), if they abide by goodness [virtue], even
should it be after many cohabitations, provided that they have done penance for their
many sins.
The widow here is defined as a formerly dishonourable woman who had given
up her carnal ways and done penance for them. We may note parenthetically
that an eleventh- or twelfth-century gloss on the above passage specifies that the
penance was to be done according to the directions of a confessor, a phrase
which emphasizes the involvement of ecclesiastical officers. Both the tract and
its gloss use the term b carnna to describe the woman; Power has translated it as
wanton. It is here glossed as a woman who sleeps with numerous men in one
night; in another text, the word is defined as meaning merdrech ( Irish equivalent
to the Latin meretrix, i.e. harlot), and another says that the b carnna is the worst
type of woman there is.120
The idea of the widow as a woman reformed from a sexual, even harlotlike
existence, is found elsewhere in Irish sources as well. The eighth-century Irish
litany Ateoch Frit speaks of widows as penitents, whose patroness is Mary Mag-
dalene: I entreat Thee by all holy virgins throughout the whole world, with the
Virgin Mary thine own holy Mother; I entreat Thee by all penitent widows
( fhedbai aithrigecha) with Mary Magdalene; I entreat Thee with all the people of
lawful marriage, with Job the suffering, on whom came many trials. As the se-
quence indicates a use of the threefold schema, it is notable, and unusual, that
widows are specified here as penitent widows, as this is not seen in patristic for-
mulations. It is significant that Mary Magdalene is given as their patroness in
Ateoch Frit, and not the usual widow Anna. In Augustines De bono coniugali, one
reads of the married chastity of Susannah, the good of the widow Anna, and the
excellence of the Virgin Mary. Isidore of Seville in De ecclesiasticis officiis specified
that widows should think of Anna, and virgins of Mary.121 Anna appears in the
Bible in Luke : , speaking in the temple about Jesus to all who looked for
119
Di Astud Chirt Dligid, section on the fedb, as cited in Power, Classes of Women, ; an older
edition and translation is in ALI v. .
120
Power, Classes of Women, .
121
Augustine, De bono coniugali, ch. (PL . ); Isidore, De ecclesiasticis officiis, chs. , .
122
On Anna: And there was one Anna, a prophetess . . . She was far advanced in years and she had
lived with her husband seven years from her virginity. And she was a widow until fourscore and four
years, who departed not from the temple, by fastings and prayer serving night and day. On Magdalen
as harlot in Gregory the Great, and dissemination of the identification with prostitute and adulteress:
S. Hoskyns, Mary Magdalen: Myth and Metaphor (New York, ), , , .
, ,
we can conclude with certainty that the Irish mentally associated widowhood
with the repentance of sexual activity and even of sexual promiscuity.
The search for illumination of the religious widow leads inevitably to a study
of other wanton women who come to the religious life. The very famous and
enigmatic poem in Irish, the Lament of the Caillech Birre, deals with exactly
that. This poem of uncertain date essentially consists of the lament in the voice
of an old woman, who calls herself the caillech Birre, the nun or old woman of
Beare.123 Controversy has raged over whether the old woman is meant to be un-
derstood as a nun, because there is no incontrovertibly monastic material in it;
on the other hand, there are semi-religious references, and caillech means nun
so often in Irish texts of the period that a non-religious use of the word strikes
one as odd. hAodha thinks that the caillech is indeed a nun, but one who took
up religion late in life, as does N Dhonnchadha.124 If this is the case, and I think
it is, then she is a woman who would qualify as a holy widow/penitent nun. Fur-
thermore, the poem has even those veiled allusions to former sexuality which
are also seen in Di Astud Chirt, namely the promiscuity.
The poem, long and descriptive, is quite rich in suggestive information. The
caillech is a formerly beautiful woman of the secular world, now living in poverty
in a church. She mourns the passing of her resplendent youth, remembering
dressing in finery, embracing kings, and wearing coverings of many colours
upon her head. Now, her many years of beauty are gone because wantonness
has spent itself ; she is too thin to wear even a ragged shift, covers her head with
a white veil (caille finn), and drinks watery whey among withered old women (eter
sentainni crna).125 She is, she says, in the darkness of a wooden church (dorchae
derthaige), a sad comparison with her former feasting by bright candlelight.
We should note that the caillech is nowhere in the poem described as a widow.
Though she may not have been a religious widow, she does fit even more closely
into a category of religious woman, the ex-laywomen or athlaeches. This is the
female equivalent of an athlaech, literally an ex-layman, but more fully it means
a man who has become a cleric (presumably at an age later than normal).126
The eighth-century tract on penance, De Arreis, is one of the few texts, if not the
123
Donncha hAodha dates the text to c., Murphy thought it was from the late th or early
th cent., and Meyer thought it was from the th (ed. and trans. D. hAodha, Lament of the
Old Woman of Beare, in D. Corrin, L. Breatnach, and K. McCone (eds.), Saints, Sages and Storytellers:
Studies in Honour of Professor James Carney (Maynooth, ), ).
124
N Dhonnchadha, Caillech, .
125
The commentaries on Cin Adomnin, possibly somewhat later, state that penitent nuns wear white
garments with black borders; the th- or th-cent. Stowe Missal, like the earlier penitential, attests to the
penitent receiving a white garment at their rite of reconciliation (Warren, Stowe Missal, ); so this
white veil was probably typical.
126
Royal Irish Academy, Dictionary of the Irish Language (compact edn.; Dublin, ) under athlaech.
Textual citations as given there. For a related example, in the th-cent. story of Liadain and
Curithir, a poet becomes a pupil of a saint, living in the monastery; he is referred to as an ex-poet (athces),
presumed by Greene and OConnor to be a play on athlaech, ex-layman (Greene and OConnor, Golden
Treasury, ).
only, one, which deal specifically with the female version, the ex-laywoman.
The text mentions appropriate commutations for the cleric, monk, mac-caillech
(young-nun), and laywoman; it then goes on to those appropriate for ex-laymen
and ex-laywomen.127
The ex-laywoman, having come to the Church later in life, was likely to have
had less religious and ascetic training.128 The Customs of Tallaght (dated to
the ninth century) a story in which an athlaech tells a monk (mac bethad, lit. son of
life) I do not understand your continual singing of the Beati and the Canticle of
Mary. From this one infers that such a person would often have little knowledge
or understanding of religious practices, even though living in a monastic
context.129
Other sources containing evidence on the athlaech link them with penitence.
In one law tract there is a reference to ex-laymen who renounce their sins
(athlaich fristongat dia pecthaib).130 Elsewhere, penitent is equated to an ex-layman
and ailithrigh.131 Given all of this, it is not surprising that there is some suggestion
that the athlaech was ineligible for some ecclesiastical offices.132 If we apply this to
the caillech Birre, it is not difficult to imagine her as an ex-laywoman, living out
a worldly life until, in her old age, she turned to the Church to support her in her
final days, but harbouring no moral regrets about her sumptuous and sexual
past.
It is perhaps in this context that we should consider the annal entries that
praise kings and queens for dying in penance. The Annals of Ulster tell, for
example, of Eithne daughter of Bresal of Brega, queen of the kings of Tara (obit
) who deserved to obtain the heavenly kingdom, having done penance;
Gormlaith daughter of Donnchad (obit ) who died after repentance;
Flann daughter of Dungal, queen of the king of Tara (obit ) who fell
asleep in penance; Eithne daughter of ed (obit ) who died truly peni-
tent on the feast of Martin; and Gormlaith daughter of Flann son of Mael
Sechnaill (obit ) who died in penitence. Perhaps these queens ended
their days attached to the church, like the caillech of Beare, guaranteed support,
piety, and a place in heaven, having made a commitment such as is alluded to in
Crus Bscnai, and supervised at least indirectly, as is suggested in Hibernensis.
sources survive for both, unlike in Ireland, so much more can be said about the
latter and the distinctions between the two. The canoness, for example, received
at her consecration only a veil rather than the ring and crown which the virgin
received, and there were in the ninth and tenth centuries both regular and
canonical abbesses.133 In England, Bede is a relatively early witness to the fact
that in monasteries there the holy virgins were but one type, and that highest
level, of females who lived under the vow. They were distinguished from those
who entered religion in later life.134 It is only in the post- period though, that
English sources clearly show the distinct grades of nuns found earlier on the
Continent, namely the virginal or regular nun and the canoness. In that later
era, though, the English material refers to the vowed widow, not as a canoness
but as a third type. Though the evidence on the last is indirect, Schneider found
they could be found living at nunneries or in minster churches, as well as
alone.135
For Ireland probably even more than England and Frankia, we shall never
fully understand the conceptual boundaries distinguishing the professions of
widows, penitents, and ex-laywomen. The sources suggest a certain amount of
fluidity, and perhaps evolution over time. It is evident that the female profession
was often thought to consist of two tiers, the upper being that of the virgin and
the lower being this less clearly-defined grade of late-comers, old women or
pious humble women. The upper tier, that of the virgin, seems to have been ac-
corded a great deal of legal status and autonomy. The women of the lower tier,
according to Hibernensis, were always under the direct guidance of a pastor, right
up until death. They may have been bound by a different sort of vow than vir-
gins, if we correctly understand Crus Bscnai. What is quite clear, however, is
that being a penitent nun or a holy widow involved formal links to the ecclesias-
tical hierarchy and to Church authorities, having made a formal promise and
undertaken to wear a veil as part of that new life.
Much more basically, however, these professions and the women who lived
them were fully Christian. To scholars familiar with the early medieval period,
this is a point so obvious it appears silly to make it, but it is worth stressing for the
benefit of those whose background may lie in the more feminist or folkloristic
school of thought. Yes, some were of special status if they were deemed miracle-
workers and held in special esteem by their communities; yes, some did provide
direct care to laypeople, including at their deaths; yes, some were treated as suf-
ficiently exceptional to enjoy legal autonomy. For all this, though, just as Kildare
was no vestal temple, these vowed holy women were not priestesses. There is the
obvious fact that Irish pagan religion, almost imperceptible though it is, had not
normally included women in its priesthood. But in the Christian era too, nuns
133
Hodgson, Frankish Church, , .
134
Schneider,Anglo-Saxon Women, , citing Bede, Historia ecclesiastica, book , chs. , ,
(C. Plummer, Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum (Oxford, ) ).
135
Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women, , , .
were not even quasi-priests. They did not administer sacraments, or even ap-
pear to help doing so as deaconesses.136 There were in these early Christian
centuries Irish poetesses, female druids, and women in other post-druidic pro-
fessions, but none of the associated activitiesjudging, satirizing, composing
poetry, and suchlikeappear among nuns duties. Only magic in the broadest
sense did they have in common, but even this, among the nuns, is framed in such
Christian-miraculous terms, and owes such great debts in the texts to patristic
and Continental models, that it cannot be treated as evidence that the Irish nun
was essentially a pagan priestess in a veil.
136
Inspite of the well-known early case of two priests in Brittany, Lavocat and Catihern, who were
chastised for using female assistants in the mass, this was not apparently a pan-Celtic practice, nor even
necessarily one common in Brittany. For the classic discussion see L. Duchesne, Lavocat et Catiherne,
prtres bretons du temps de Sta Merlaine, Revue de Bretagne et de Vende (), ; J. Loth, Un An-
cien Usage de Lglise Celtique, Revue Celtique (), . Ellis has misinterpreted the original text
as indicating that the women themselves performed the mass (Celtic Women, ), whereas it actually
states that they helped distribute the chalice.
The highest level a nun could achieve in Ireland was the office of abbess and,
like other female professions, it was imbued with symbols and metaphors. It is
the understanding of this office which is the main subject of this chapter, but
against its background must also be examined the other types of exceptional
nuns which the Irish acknowledged. These were women who, though we can
perceive them but dimly, gained many of the honoursand even elements of
the legal statusof abbesses, without being heads of monasteries. They seem to
have earned their status through pilgrimage, holiness, miracle-working, or ser-
vice to their wider communities. In the highest echelons of the female religious
profession there was the same trend toward diversity and flexibility which have
already been seen in the living arrangements and grades of nunhood.
The sources of material on Irish abbesses are extremely patchy, and the overall
quantity of evidence quite slim. The Irish left no guiding or prescriptive texts on
this office; there is no surviving correspondence such as is found in Anglo-Saxon
England and which proves so illuminating for the abbesss position there. There
is a small but important quantity of legal material in which are found occasional
notes concerning abbesses rights and privileges; there is a large amount of
hagiography containing anecdotes about abbesses; and there are annal entries
for abbesses of the most famous houses. These supply little in terms of genealogy,
making it difficult to build up an understanding of the relationships between the
office of the abbess and local ruling kindreds. They are nevertheless useful in
studying dynastic politics and ecclesiastical office in specific establishments.
This examination is not, however, dedicated to analysing specific families as
they relate to churches but rather the perceived powers accorded to abbesses
and the evidence for their realization. For this purpose, the bulk of useful refer-
ences is to be found in the saints Lives. These, considered in tandem with legal
writings, yield sufficient clues about the understanding of the office to allow
some observations to be made. In female saints Lives, the characterization of
the foundress serves repeatedly to restate the holy ideal not only for the ordinary
-
nun, but also for the abbess, since in Ireland the major female saints were
abbesses. As the spiritual heir of the foundress saint, the abbess was supposed to
manifest at least in part her patrons virtues and be in her own lifetime a role
model in the religious life. The Lives also offer insights into the practicalities of
an abbesss duties, both to her own nuns and also to the outside world. Thus
the foundress formed the prototype for the abbesss role, both spiritually and
practically.
Abbess as Governor
Although there are no extant prescriptive texts instructing abbesses how to
carry out their responsibilities, there do exist guidelines for abbots. Hibernensis
tells abbots they should reject certain types from the monastery and details the
sins warranting a monks excommunication.1 The abbot is the governor of the
monastics: non oportet monachos fieri sine gubernatione, nisi tantum una hora, ne ventus dis-
cordiae et dissensionis disperdat ecclesiam. The abbot is to be obeyed, and harsh pun-
ishments are prescribed for disobedience. For the female side of monasticism,
one presumes that either there were separate texts for abbesses which do not
survive, or else such guidance was adapted from the instructions applying to the
male monastic sphere. In her community of nuns, the abbess too was the super-
visor and governor, domina and mother. In the female Lives, the abbess is the
person who is directly responsible for ensuring the monasterys survival. She
decides if the community is to move location. She procures food and beer in
times of scarcity, and organizes help in fending off attackers in times of danger.
It is she, for example, who asks for charitable help from clerics, monasteries, and
other nunneries when her own community runs into difficulty. Cogitosuss Life
of Brigit, of which several chapters take place after Brigits death and in Cogito-
suss own lifetime, shows that at the very large community of Kildare some of
the worldly duties had devolved on to male officers. Thus, some time after Brigit
had died, it was the male prior who organized the carving of a large millstone
and the erection of a new church door.2 It is not surprising that this should have
evolved at larger places, especially those with political prominence, but at
smaller places it is logical to presume that such things would have continued to
be the concern of the abbess herself.
Decisions on who joined the familia were within the abbesss remit: it was she
who approved the intake of novices and the adoption of fosterlings and aban-
doned babies. She was responsible for the maintenance of the moral standard
and adherence to the rule. Then there were matters of discipline, and in
the Lives the abbess appears as inspector, judge, and setter of punishments.3 Her
1 2
Hibernensis, book , chs. , . Cogitosus, Life of Brigit, chs. , .
3
For just two early examples of many which span the centuries of hagiography, see the Vita I of
Brigit, ch. , and Bethu Brigte, ch. .
, ,
jurisdiction, however, was over not just her nuns but also the many males in the
familia: boy fosterlings, household staff, male penitents, and men who farmed
the land as clients or dependents.4 The hagiography shows the founding abbess
discovering misdemeanours, extracting confessions, and setting penances to
these people as well as to the nuns. We must remember that the abbess, if she was
also the controller of the temporalities, as she is in the Lives, was the domina of all
these people.
4
One especially interesting example of male dependents is the th-cent. hymn N Car Brigit which
refers to a male vassal of hers (a hathig) (Thes. Pal. ii. ). Another clear example of a male dependent is
Itas brother-in-law, Life of Ita, ch. .
5 6 7
N Car Brigit, stanzas , . Sln Seiss, a Brigit, stanzas , , . Bethu Brigte, ch. .
8
Section , Of the Refusal of Hospitality to Persons of Ecclesiastical Rank (Bieler, Irish Penitentials,
); also found in Hibernensis, book . This is a sharp contrast with the rule of Caesarius of Arles for
his nuns, ch. of which expressly forbids extending hospitality to male ecclesiastics.
-
either poverty or famine; in the female Lives, the poor community is normally a
female house. The abbess had somehow to feed the guests with meat, dairy
products, and ale to drink. When the guests arrived, she ceremoniously washed
their feet9 and ordered the preparation of the feast and/or sleeping quarters.
There was a often a mutual blessing between the abbess and the head ecclesia-
stic of the visiting party, and there was also what the hagiographers describe as
rejoicing.
The ideal abbess was a provider of abundance to all the religious superiors
who came to her community. A poem attributed to St Brigit from the tenth or
eleventh century, shows her as the giver of hospitality: the feast she provides is
one of spiritual nourishment, and her overlord is none less than Christ and the
hosts of heaven.10 Hospitality was a Christian virtue and Brigit its exemplar, just
as Monenna was treated as an exemplar of the discipline of fasting.11 Lisa Bitel
has maintained that womens houses were guesthouses for travelling bishops
and abbots. Abbesses had to scurry to find food and drink for their important
guests, for the lives often mention a communitys lack of provisions for hospitality.12
Certainly the Lives do include many stories of impoverished nuns praying for a
food or ale miracle in order to be able to provide the requisite hospitality for ar-
riving bishops or abbots but the hagiography does not single out nuns in this re-
spect.13 In many anecdotes clerics give assistance to abbesses and their nuns, as
in Brigits Vita I, where during a food shortage the abbess went to a bishop to ask
for bread for her familia, and the bishop gladly gave her some.14 Nor was this as-
sistance a one-way thing: Brigits Vita I, for example, shows the abbess saint as-
sisting a male hermit community with property difficulties.15 It is misleading to
gender the structure of the ecclesiastical hospitality networks.
The Lives also repeatedly give examples of abbesses receiving hospitality,
from laymen and clerics and nuns. Roughly speaking, they refer to the hospital-
ity due to abbesses just about as frequently as that due to male ecclesiastics. And
sometimes the people who had to feed the abbess had little food with which to
do so. In the Vita I, for example, Brigit visited a poor religious woman who fed
her with her last cow,16 and in Bethu Brigte the nuns of St Lassair were unable to
provide enough food to feed both Brigit and Patrick, who by unfortunate coin-
cidence arrived at the same time, both requiring hospitality. Such stories
9
For examples of ritualized foot-washing see Bethu Brigte, chs. , .
10
Ropadh maith lem [St. Brigits Alefeast], ed. and trans. D. Greene, St. Brigids Alefeast, Celtica
(), . This poem is believed to exist in a sole manuscript, Brussels , , written by Mchel
O Clirigh. Text discussed and dated by Greene in Celtica; see also Kenney, no. .
11
There has been a tendency to see Brigits hospitality miracles as remnants of a former existence as a
pagan goddess in Ireland, but her hospitality is not in fact exceptionalmost saints provide hospitality
and perform food multiplication miracles. Brigits reputation as excelling in this activity is found in a
later poem which named the Irish saints and their specialities, Nom Churim ar Comairge, discussed in a later
chapter.
12 13
Bitel, Monastic Enclosures, , . e.g. Vita I of Brigit, chs. , .
14 15 16
Ibid., ch. . Ibid., ch. . Ibid., ch. .
, ,
demonstrate not an oppression of female religious but rather their full member-
ship in the web of hospitality provision and mutual assistance. This formed a
fabric of social cohesion and multiple relationships which, admittedly, could
place a heavy burden on the poorer households in Irish society, whether they
were religious or lay, male or female.
On the basis of this evidence, one might naturally come to the conclusion that
even an abbess was thus legally incompetent. There are, however, some power-
ful counter-indications. Female patron saints were expressly believed to have
been heads themselves: Cogitosus, writing in the seventh century, said of
Brigit, all things were permitted to her because she was a living and most
blessed member attached to the supreme head (Nam cum ipsa esset vivum et felicis-
simum summi capitis membrum, potenter omnia, quae desiderabat, operabatur).19
Acknowledging that Brigit was not always typical, we can also note the re-
markable level of authority and autonomy attributed to other saint-abbesses in
the Lives, discussed at length in earlier chapters. Firstly, the Irish understood the
saints power to continue as a living presence at a monastery. The saints office
was understood to be bequeathed as an inheritance to the current abbess or
abbot, who was traditionally called comarba which means literally heir or suc-
cessor.20 The inheritance of this role can be thought of as a threefold one: spir-
itual, social-ecclesiastical, and legal. On the spiritual level, the abbess had a link
with the foundress through visions, links whose immediacy was emphasized by
the presence of relics of the foundress kept on the site and revered by residents
and pilgrims. Ecclesiastically and socially she, like the foundress, was a virgo
sancta (in theory at least) and had obligations such as that of providing hospital-
ity. Her patronesss headship formed part of the body of privileges she inherited.
Hibernensis gives two exceptions to the rule of female incompetence: the lady of
authority (domina) and the holy virgin (virgo sancta).
Non est dignus fideiussor fieri servus, nec peregrinus, nec brutus, nec monachus, nisi
imperante abbate, nec filius, nisi imperante patre, nec femina, nisi domina, virgo
sancta.21
It is not proper that a surety should be a slave, nor pilgrim, nor imbecile, nor monk with-
out his abbots supervision, nor a son without the supervision of his father, nor a women
unless she be a lady [or?] a holy virgin.
The phrasing here leaves the relationship between domina and virgo sancta am-
biguous, but the other recension of the text reads nec femina nisi domina, nec virgo
Christiana and so it seems most likely that the compilers were intending to enu-
merate two sorts of women.22 The passage suggests that the virgo sancta is unlike
the monk in that she is not obliged to gain the permission of a superior in order
to stand surety. It also accords an indirect equivalency between the holy virgin
and the domina, who is perhaps best understood as an heiress. Heiresses had a
19
Ch. .
20
Although from the th cent. this title was sometimes held by a lay abbot, i.e. the person controlling
the churchs temporalities.
21
Kelly, Guide, . Hibernensis, book , ch. .
22
Hatton MS (folio r). Welsh Law, which had a source in common with Hibernensis, reads neque
femina, nisi domina fuerit principalis debitoris (Lat. Red. A .); Huw Pryce has written that the Hibernen-
sis source may well have given virgo as a separate item rather than in apposition to the femina nisi domina
(Early Irish Canons and Medieval Welsh Law, Peritia (), , at ).
, ,
strong position in law; for example, they had an equal or overriding say in fi-
nancial and contractual matters within their marriages when they married men
of equal or lesser means.23 The sort of women to whom the compilers referred
were certainly not the ordinary nuns, dedicated virgins though they might have
been; the ordinary nun was the female equivalent of a monachus, who would have
required the permission of an abbess or some other superior to stand surety. The
holy virgin referred to in Hibernensis was much more likely to be an abbess.
Heiress of a holy founding saint, she was in her own way a holy woman out of
the ordinary, even if she was not herself a miracle-worker. Domina could be used
for abbesses as well as secular women of authority: domina is a form of address for
abbesses in the Lives, and in the Vita I Brigit is even called domina ecclesiae.24 In
addition, dominatrix through the eighth century was the term used in the Kildare
and Clonguffin abbess obits of the annals of Ulster.25 Though abbesses may
have drawn their authority from the headship inherited from their patron saint,
in many cases they may have possessed it by virtue of being heiresses in the
worldly sense: many if not all came from noble families. Quite probably Hiber-
nensis, by speaking of the autonomy of a virgo sancta rather than using a term
linked to an office (such as abatisa or comarba), meant to give legal capacity to emi-
nent female hermits, who will be discussed later.
The sources do show ordinary abbesses (i.e. ones who are not also founding
saints) acting autonomously. The early Vita I of Brigit tells of a religious virgin
who travelled outside her own region to collect donations, and with them pur-
chased land (emit agros). The unnamed virgin is not the saint of the Life, so there
was no need for the hagiographer to exaggerate her authority. In the charter-
like Additamenta to Trechns Memoirs, religious women bequeath land to
one another.26 In the spiritual sphere too abbesses seem to be considered as
heads: one may recall that, according to Hibernensis, as a virgo the abbess could be
compared to a bishop (episcopis simulatur et comparatur).27
Also important to the argument that abbesses were heads is the fact that
they were confessors or soul-friends, those without whom people were deemed
proverbially headless. Ryan noted this in the s and gave this explanation:
In Ireland at all times the anamchara or spiritual guide who heard such confessions was
probably a priest, empowered to give the penitent sacramental absolution, though con-
fession to a distinguished senior who was not a priest might be practised on occasion as a
penitential exercise. In monasteries for women, confession of the latter type to the
abbess, for purposes of guidance, might be recommended or even exacted.28
23
Binchy, Legal Capacity of Women, .
24
Vita I of Brigit, ch. . On the term domina in Frankia, there used for abbesses and queens, see
Hodgson, Frankish Church, .
25
AU , , , , (Kildare), and (Clonguffin). The latter place (Ir. Cluain Cuifthin) is
otherwise little known, though its site is identified with the modern village of that name directly across
the river Boyne from Clonard in Meath.
26 27
Additamenta to Trechn, ch. . Hibernensis, book , ch. .
28
Ryan, Irish Monasticism, .
-
29
Jonas, Latin Life of Columbanus, book , ch. (B. Krusch, MGH, Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum, iv
(), ).
30 31 32
Chs. , . Ch. . Customs of Tallaght, ch. .
33
For discussion of attributes, with references, see PVSH i., p. clxxvi.
, ,
her baculus in her right hand.34 In a later (tenth- or eleventh-century) gloss she
blessed a wood with it, to tame a wild boar.35 It would appear that this was not a
Brigidine peculiarity, or it did not remain one, for the holy abbess Samthann in
her late Life was said to have had one also. In one episode she struck an unre-
pentant man with her bachall to try to talk some sense into him; in another she
used it to encourage some branches blocking the road to grow away from the
path; in a third the bachall, which had become misshapen, miraculously re-
gained its original form whilst being ensconsed in gold and silver by a king with
whom she had good relations.36 Monenna, according to her hagiographer
Conchubranus, had a bachall which she left as a relic, not to her community of
Killevy in Ulster but to another land.37 If Irish abbesses used the bachalls as
their actual staffs of office, and it seems probable that they did (male saints
bachalls were held by abbots), then the abbesses wielded a mark of authority
which was the same in kind as their male counterparts.38
eighth century is dominatrix. That is how we hear described the Kildare abbesses
of the eighth century: Sebdann daughter of Corc, Affraic, and Marthu daugh-
ter of Mac Dubain. After the eighth century we find abatisa again, or (after )
comarba. We cannot know if it is meaningful that Kildares male monastic
heads are called abbas during the eighth, when the female title goes over to domi-
tissa. At other monasteries there is a shift in terminology too, during the eighth
century: dominatrix is the term applied to Conlaith of Clonguffin who died in ;
at Clonbroney we hear of abbess Forblaith, daughter of Connla (obit ) who
was called dominatrix; the leader who died five years later, Ellbrg, was called
abatissa. Was Ellbrg (the abatissa) the successor of Forblaith (the dominatrix), or the
holder of a different type of post? It seems most likely, given the absence of evi-
dence to the contrary, that she was the successor, but taken with the other ex-
amples this suggests that dominatrix could be used in the eighth century as the
female equivalent to the male term princeps. Collectively, these examples more
than anything serve to illustrate the point that the fluidity and evolution of ter-
minology for monastic rulership were as active in the female sphere as in the
male. It may be more than coincidental that the abbess in England in this period
was equivalent to a secular lord, according to Dagmar Schneider, who notes
that they received from their dependents a sworn oath of allegiance like the one
a lord received from a retainer, and that in office they fulfilled many of a secular
lords duties.41
The office of coarb (an anglicization of comarba) was one which underwent
change over the eighth century in some areas. The term literally means heir
and applied to the heir of the patron saint. As discussed above, in the seventh
century it was a synonym for the abbot or abbess, and that person had respon-
sibility for both the spiritual and temporal facets of their inheritance. This in-
cluded the churchs rights of property and jurisdiction, as well as overseeing the
religious life of the place. With the changes evident from the eighth century, the
term coarb began to be used at some large churches for a person who held a
new role: controller of the churchs temporalities. Possibly the term moved over
to this post because, conveniently, it was neutral in its ecclesiastical significance.
At some monasteries or churches the controller of temporalities (whatever
their name) and/or the abbot might also be an ordained bishop, and in those in-
stances the temporal powers were combined with the powers of episcopal juris-
diction. Bishops, though not normally powerful in themselves, did have certain
privileges: they were the principal judges in ecclesiastical cases and exercised
spiritual discipline within the tath, and according to Ragail Phtraic (the Rule of
Patrick) they were also the confessors of secular lords and heads of churches in
their designated regions.42 At womens houses this potent combination of au-
thority could not come together in a single person, because an abbess, whatever
41
Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women, , .
42
Charles-Edwards, Pastoral Care, .
, ,
else she could do, could not be a bishopusually, at least. In one absolutely extra-
ordinary circumstance the abbess did claim exactly this power and authority: in
the tenth or eleventh century the abbesses of Kildare claimed episcopal powers
through a retrospective claim that Brigit herself had been ordained as a
bishop.43 Only at Kildare could so audacious a claim be sustained. There had
long been claims that Brigit had equal honour to Patrick, that she ruled the
women of Ireland as he ruled the men; this new claim suggests that even bolder
claims were felt necessary at this time.44 One may speculate that perhaps the
Kildare authorities were concerned about the strength of their leadership struc-
ture. Maybe they felt that a strengthening could be achieved by fusing the epis-
copal and coarbial authorities, as had long been common practice at male
houses. Other womens churches had to make do with affiliated bishops or, even
less desirably, to come under the care of one who was based elsewhere.
In those large churches where the managerial function had been separated
from the office of abbot, the coarbships became more temporal over time; for
example, at Armagh in the tenth and eleventh centuries the office was heredi-
tary in a group of families and was negotiated and passed on in a fashion simi-
lar to a royal office. Where these great coarbships existed, they functioned on
the basis of property and political rights.45 Monastics of such large churches
were supervised by another person, one who would live in the holiest part of the
civitas and who would often hold an alternative title.46
Some female houses acquired a male who controlled their temporalities.
This person might be called coarb but more usually was called an erenagh be-
cause the female head was the saints heiress and thus the traditional coarb. The
records leave traces of a few male erenaghs at the large, traditionally female
churches, but in two cases at least the development of the managerial position
seems not to have involved any diminution of the abbesss authority. The first
was Cloonburren on the Shannon which had a female erenagh, a banairchin-
nech,in the lady Lerben (obit ), according to the Annals of Ulster. The other
was Kildare.
That complex and changing institution was clearly one in which the abbess
was prominent over the long term. Supposedly at Kildare there was a bishop co-
ruling with the abbess from Brigits day: Cogitosus describes him as being in
charge of the male side of things.47 The seventh-century annals show abbots
there too, such as Oengus and ed Dub (obit , who was also a bishop).
Erenaghs of Kildare itself are visible in the Annals of Ulster from the seventh
43
See discussion in Johnston, Transforming Women.
44
The th-cent. Book of the Angel calls Brigit and Patrick the two pillars of the Irish (Hughes, Church,
); so too does a th-cent. hymn, Brigit B Bithmaith, which calls them the two pillars of sovereignty of
the Irish church. The th-cent. gloss on this line in the hymn says that as the pillars divide a house, the
two have divided Ireland between them, so that Brigit is head of Irelands women, and Patrick of its
men (Thes. Pal. ii. ).
45 46 47
Sharpe, Some Problems, . Ibid. . Cogitosus, Life of Brigit, Preface.
-
century to the late ninth. Muiredach, who died in , was princeps of Kildare
and also king of Leinster, and the annals of the Four Masters relate the deaths
in and of the abbot of Kildare and the rioghdamhna of Leinster (abb Cille
Dara rigdamna Laigean).48 The relative power of the three officeserenagh,
abbess, and bishopis impossible to discern, but in the seventh century Cogit-
osus had claimed that there was parity between the bishop and the abbess.
Gwynn and Hadcock thought the bishops after Conlaed may have been subor-
dinate to the jurisdiction of the abbess, noting that in some periods Kildare had
more than one bishop.49 The title of coarb of Brigit remained with the abbesss
office throughout the centuries up to the twelfth rather than going to the abbot,
erenagh, or princeps; moreover, whereas the Annals of Ulster report obits of only
seven bishops and one superior, they report fifteen Kildare abbesses.
Killeedy in the south-west merits special attention as an enigmatic example
of male headship at a successful female house, one thought to have been
founded by a woman at that. In the notes to the Martyrology of Oengus and in
one of her Lives, Ita is said to have decreed that no nun would ever succeed her,
i.e. have her coarbship (ni gba caillech tre bithu mo chomarbus).50 In the ninth century
at least Killeedy was headed by an abbot, an ab.51 If a male abbot did take over
the rulership of the church and its property shortly after the foundresss lifetime,
then its nuns were over centuries headed by a male superior, at least in regards
overall rulership. Thomas Charles-Edwards has demonstrated that ab need not
mean a spiritual supervisor of monastics but could signify an overall head of a
monastery. This may be significant in view of the Martyrology notes reference
to Itas coarbship going to a man. It could be that the woman who supervised
Killeedys nuns was called by another name and possessed little or none of the
more worldly authority which abbesses might enjoy. The same or similar situ-
ation could well have been found at other communities of religious women. In
those male monasteries which had nuns attached to them, the women were
headed by a senior nun who, it seems, would not have possessed the title of
abbess or coarb; at Tallaght in the ninth century, for example, the head of the
nuns was called the senoir caildidi.52
Caution warns against presuming that the extent of secularization was uni-
form in Ireland during the eighth and ninth centuries: even at large churches
the influence of temporal practice could vary widely. There was a significant
difference in the level of degeneracy between Slane and Iona in the eighth and
ninth centuries, for example. When it came to smaller monastic communities,
secular elements may not have taken root as deeply, or they may have tended to
operate differently. These places were less likely, it seems, to have a secular
48
AFM , ; NB dates in this text are up to three years out.
49 50
Gwynn and Hadcock, Religious Houses, . Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Apr.
51
AFM , . Ryan takes this to signify that Killeedy had become, by that time, a male monastery
(Irish Monasticism, ).
52
Customs of Tallaght, ch. .
, ,
53
Irish Life of Bairre of Cork, ch. .
-
well have become a more frequent occurrence for abbesses to be placed into
their positions by their families, regardless of whether they had a spiritual call-
ing or administrative skill.
54
D. Crinn, Early Medieval Ireland, (London, ), .
55
Vita I of Brigit, ch. .
56
Cin Lnamna gloss (in SEIL ; also in ALI ii. ). The gloss is in Middle Irish and was probably
written after .
, ,
57
List of Abbesses of Killevy.
58
F. J. Byrne, Comarbai Brigte, in T. W. Moody and F. J. Byrne (eds.), A New History of Ireland, ix. Maps,
Genealogies, Lists (Oxford, ), ; A. Smyth, Celtic Leinster: Towards an Historical Geography of Early
Irish Civilization AD (Blackrock, ).
59
The brother was ed Dub (obit ), abbot and bishop of Kildare; the nephew was Oengus (abbot
of Kildare), son of Felans other brother ed Finn. Crinn thinks it began earlier than Felan,
Ireland, . For the most current proposed genealogical trees of the U Dnlainge, see Crinn, Ireland,
.
60 61
Johnston, Transforming Women, . e.g. Stokes, Tripartite Life, i. .
62
Hodgson, Frankish Church, , where she also suggests that in the th cent. abbesses and ab-
bots were ordained with the same rite, and notes that there were two types of abbesses, the regular and
the canonical, the latter being the head of canonesses rather than regular nuns.
63
Tripartite Life (in Stokes, Tripartite Life, i., at ).
-
rather than a person designated as coarb or abbot ( Ir. ab), but it is impossible to
draw conclusions from this as the use of these terms was not standardized. In the
earlier period, under discussion here, it would make sense to imagine that the
abbesss ordination ceremonies would normally be performed by the nearest, or
most closely related, bishop, who might well be located at an affiliated male
house. Bishops in this period often lived at such establishments.
Kildare is a special case with regard to the ordination of its abbesses, for a
longstanding legend had it that Brigit had been ordained as a bishop, and that
her exceptional status was passed on to the later generations of abbesses.64 It
may be that this legend had an effect on the actual ceremony of inauguration at
Kildare. A tenth- or eleventh-century glossator on a hymn wrote that because
Brigit had been ordained a bishop her successor is always entitled to episcopal
orders and the honour due a bishop (is dosen dliges comarba Brigte do gres grad n-
epscuip fuirri honoir epscuip) and the abbess is clearly the person meant by coarb
or successor.65 It was always applied to a female, a woman we presume was the
abbess. If it is actually so that the abbess also gained episcopal status, in addition
to the coarbial mantle, her inauguration ceremony must have been very in-
teresting indeed.
Abbesses at Synods
Usually in the West only bishops attended synods, but in Ireland others were
present, as evidenced in the letter of from the pope-elect to a gathering
made up of not only bishops but priests and doctores as well. In the s the Synod
of Mag Leni was attended by non-bishops as had been, allegedly, the Synod of
Tailtiu.66 Although Brigits Lives show consecrated women attending synods,
the abbess of Kildare was not a guarantor of the document produced by the
synod in which promulgated the law of Adomnn, Cin Adomnin; it was
the abbot.67 This does not mean she was powerless, or even inactive at the as-
sembly. The extant anecdotes of religious women at synods, both of which are
admittedly from Brigits Vita I, do have them present and active. Comparisons
may be made with the synod of Whitby, where abbess Hild not only participated
but led a party in the debate; abbesses also proved to have attended other
synods in England though they almost never signed royal charters.68
Scholars looking at Frankish and English nuns have become well aware that
abbesses who were prominent in ecclesiastical and secular politics owed their
64
Discussed in Johnston, Transforming Women, .
65
Gloss on the hymn N Car Brigit (Thes. Pal. ii. ).
66
T. Charles-Edwards, paper delivered to the Celtic Seminar, spring .
67
This was Forandn, who served as its abbot for the years . See M. N Donnchadha, The
Guarantor List of Cin Adomnin, Peritia (), .
68
Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women, .
, ,
eminence much more to their royal status than to their ecclesiastical grade. This
was doubtless the case in Ireland, not only for the office of abbess but also for the
high-status classification of other types of religious women whom vernacular
law treated with esteem, who are discussed below. The Frankish and English
abbesses are much better attested, in terms of their genealogies and social net-
works, than their Irish counterparts, so whilst this truth is demonstrable by ex-
ample in those societies, for Ireland it is to be accepted by inference from wider
political trends and from what we know about how Irish society worked in gen-
eral. Abbesses as a group were unlikely to have had equal status in practice, if
they even had it in theory. Their levels of actual power must have varied enor-
mously, given that status in Ireland was linked not just to office but to wealth,
and that there must have been hundreds of heads of proprietary churches of
both sexes. The abbess of a small, poor place was much less likely to have been
present at the promulgation of cna or other ecclesiastical gatherings than, say,
the abbess of Kildare. In other words, the holding of abbatial office was likely to
have been necessary but not sufficient, the other qualifications being wealth and
royal birth. Such a model is presented as only the most likely option, but there
may be more than fiction in the Vita I s portrayals of holy women, including
widows, attending synods as a matter of course.69
69 70
Vita I of Brigit, ch. . Smyth, Female Sanctity, esp. at .
71
For the dating of the Customs of Tallaght, see Kenney, no. .
72
PVSH, i., p. lxxxvii; Kenney, no. .
-
73
Life of Samthann, ch. , names Funech as the foundress. The account in the Tripartite Life says it
was founded by two princesses named Emer (Stokes, Tripartite Life, i. ).
74
Life of Samthann, chs. , , , .
75
She is daughter of Dimrn, son of Ferdomnan, son of Dchu, son of Fiacc, son of Trichem, son of
Fiacc, son of Imchad (Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Dec.).
76
ATig .
, ,
to another part of the country, to take a very important message to a holy man
she admired greatlythe author was uncertain whether this was Maelruain,
the head of Tallaght, or alternatively Fer d Chrch, abbot of Armagh.77 Her
message was this: he was her favourite amongst the clerics of the desert, and she
wished to ask him whether he received the confession of women. If he did,
would he be her soul-friend? The pedlar took the message. The holy man, on
hearing that he was Samthanns favourite, gave thanks to God; but then hearing
Samthanns question about soul-friendship to women he blushed down to his
breast, made three genuflections, and remained silent for a long time. Tell her,
he said finally, that I will seek counsel from her (atbertsom apur siu friesi tra olsesem
conimthisi comarli hude). The pedlar returned to Samthann and reported the
clerics reply. When she heard it, she pricked herself in the cheek with the
needle of her brooch. Out of the wound came no blood, but only two filaments
of milk. She squeezed harder, and after a time there came out a tiny droplet of
water. After Samthann had managed to emit the drop onto her fingernail, she
held it up and spoke. So long, she pronounced, as there is this much juice in
his body, let him bestow no friendship nor confidence upon womankind (asberts
tra airet bs iarum ols a cutrumesi do sg inda curpsom ni be mundteras indda taobatu d fri
banscala).78
As mentioned in an earlier chapter, the reduction of blood in the body of an
ascetic symbolized the reduction of lust.79 The author was making a point when
he contrasted the deep blushing cheeks of the cleric against the pale cheek of
Samthann who did not issue blood even when stabbed with a needle. She was
spiritually superior, having transcended sexual desire and its physical manifest-
ation (the rushing of blood in the body); the cleric, abbot though he may have
been, acknowledged this when he replied that he would take her counsel. The
story culminates with her judgement on him: he may not be a soul-friend of
women. This judgement, and indeed the whole tale, does seem to be one which
reflects particularly poorly on the male cleric but remarkably well upon the fe-
male saint. It was feasible, in the ninth century, for a holy woman to gain suffi-
ciently high esteem for her decisions to be heeded in leading monasteries. Nor
was Samthann the only one: the Customs of Tallaght also relate the pious ex-
ample given by a certain unnamed nun (caillech) whose incessant repetition of
the Lords prayer inspired the reforming abbot Maelrain to incorporate its fre-
quent use into his own spiritual practice and into the liturgical practice of his cle
D community.80 But Samthann was exceptional even against a background
where there were many women of holiness and eminence. It is perhaps unsur-
prising that later abbesses of Clonbroney were be described as Samthanns
coarbs, in the light of the spiritual and temporal inheritance she left.81
77
Fer d Chrch, abbot of Armagh, obit (Hughes, Church, ).
78 79
Customs of Tallaght, ch. . This is made explicit in ibid., ch. .
80
Ibid., ch. .
81
AU , the obit of Cocrich, comarba of Samthann of Clonbroney.
-
The example of Samthann is the most extensive piece of evidence proving that
some of the hundreds of thousands of Irish nuns of the seventh to ninth centuries
actually achieved the status of saint. Samthann is the most famous, and the only
one whose identity we can name, locate, and date. But others, anonymous,
emerge hazily from other texts, and their presence reminds us that in this era
other nuns too could become esteemed holy women. Apart from the mention of
the holy caillech who repeated the Paternoster so ceaselessly, there are few
narrative accounts of women who were deemed eminent and sagagious but not
heads of nunneries.
Prescriptive Texts
The prescriptive texts make provisions for such exceptional women, often call-
ing them hermitess or pilgrim (bandeorad D, lit. female exile of God), or holy vir-
gin virgo sancta or bang). From the law tract Bretha Crlige we learn that holy
women were so special that they received sick-maintenance in a manner re-
served for people of indispensable importance to the community.82 The text says
these women had their payment assessed by a judge in proportion to their worth
and their property, if they counted themselves not dependent on a husband.83
Two sorts of women so categorized were holy women. The first was the woman
who turns back the streams of war. We know she was a religious, for she is
glossed as the abbess of Kildare or the abellteir, one who turns back the many
sins of wars through her prayers (ut est bancomarba cille dara .i. in banaibellteoir .i.
impodus imad peccad na cocad for cula trena hirnaigthi).84 Donnchadh Corrin in
Women in Early Irish Society considered this claim possible, at least for
abbesses of important monasteries like Kildare; he noted that the abbot of Ar-
magh, for example, could act as an intermediary in negotiating peace between
warring kingdoms.85 But whether her intervention took place on the spiritual or
the practical level, the holy womans role was doubtless inspired by traditions re-
garding foundress saints: Brigit, for example, gets involved in military conflicts,
mainly in their resolution and prevention, and later female Lives have many ex-
amples of this too.86
Bretha Crlige also makes special sick-maintenance provision for the woman
abundant in miracles. She too receives a payment for illegal injury, rather than
being taken away to be nursed, and is glossed as the female virgin, i.e. the
82
Bretha Crlige: CIH ..; also D. Binchy (ed. and trans.), Bretha Crlige, Eriu (),
. Comments and partial trans. in Kelly, Guide, , , , .
83 84
Binchy, Bretha Crlige, . Ibid. ; Kelly, Guide, .
85
In Mac Curtain and Corrin, Women in Irish Society: the Historical Dimension (Dublin ), .
86
Also in later hagiography: Conchubranus, Life of Monenna, book , ch. ; Latin Life of Enda,
chs. .
, ,
female holy hermit (in banogh .i. in ban deorad de).87 Why is the virgin not to be
nursed outside the tath? The section of Bretha Crlige which deals with the male
hermit whose miracles are granted (deorad de ernidter ferta), answers the question.
The glossator asks rhetorically, Whence is to be procured a holy hermit who
works miracles? (can toagar deora[d] de dogni firta?).88 Holy hermits, then, regard-
less of sex, were not to be taken away for nursing on account of their irreplace-
able rarity. Whilst the extent to which the provisions of sick-maintenance law
were actually implemented is uncertain, what is significant here is the evidence
provided by the text for the existence in this period of both male and female
miracle-working hermits and for the high esteem they enjoyed.
As was already mentioned, the ability to stand surety without authorization
was denied to legal incompetents: insane people, children, monastics, and fe-
males. The two exceptions in Hibernensis, the virgo sancta and the domina, imply
strongly that there were holy women who, unlike ordinary monastics, were
legally competent to act without authorization from a supervising head. Al-
though the extent to which the texts provisions were actually applied is uncer-
tain, it is a document designed for the present, and this rule is neither foreign nor
obviously derivative. Hibernensis also accorded holy women special privileges re-
garding burial. A femina sanctemonialis might be buried within a church or with a
holy man of equal rank, and St Benedict and his holy sister are cited as prece-
dents for this, with the remark that in death they were rewarded with corporeal
proximity and spiritual union, as they had been of one mind during their life-
times.89 Interestingly enough, Cogitosus reports that in his own day the bodies
of Brigit and her contemporary, Bishop Conlaed, were both entombed by the
altar in the church at Kildare.90 With regard to property, too, autonomous ac-
tion is evidenced in law and practice. Hibernensis supported women gaining con-
trol over land, doubtless in the context of their being able to dedicate it to
ecclesiastical purposes, when it cited the Old Testament example of Caleb and
his daughter Axa: Caleb gave his part to Axa, because she asked him for it. It
went on to cite the example of Jacob who gave a hereditatem to Dinah, who was a
dedicated widow.91 There may well have been some men, or kindreds, who did
endow property inheritances on women, though these are imperceptible; there
is, nevertheless, the intriguing reference in the ninth century to the kings
daughter who allegedly bestowed land on St Fursey.92 The nuns in the Addita-
menta to Trechn dealt autonomously in property, it is remembered, but the
lands they were transferring were clearly not inheritances but acquisitions
which were theirs alone according to even vernacular law.93
To summarize, both vernacular law and canons provided for holy women
87
Quoted and discussed in Kelly, Guide, . I follow Kellys translation of deorad D, literally exile of
God, as hermit whilst aware that it also means pilgrim.
88 89
Bretha Crlige, ch. (ed. D. Binchy). Hibernensis, book , chs. .
90 91
Cogitosus, Life of Brigit, ch. . Hibernensis, book , ch. .
92 93
Customs of Tallaght, ch. . Additamenta to Trechn, ch. .
-
who, though not abbesses, were still largely legally autonomous and/or who re-
ceived special treatment at law on account of an importance gained through
means other than holding the abbatial office.
Peregrinae
The Lives of the seventh, eighth, and ninth centuries refer to women going on
pilgrimage at numerous points, with little comment. The term peregrinatio is used
almost synonymously in the Vita I of Brigit, for example, for going on a visit to
another monastery or church in a different part of the country. Monenna, for
her part, was called a peregrina in a seventh-century hymn.94 Jonas of Bobbios,
Life of Columbanus, written on the Continent, contains the most vivid short
episode involving female pilgrimage: it was allegedly an Irish peregrina who ini-
tially encouraged Columbanus to make his great journey to the Continent; but
for the fact she was a women, she said, she would have gone abroad rather than
confine her wanderings to Ireland.95 There is no indication, however, that there
was disapproval for women being peregrinae, whether going abroad, as some of
the female saints allegedly did, or within Ireland itself. Most of the anecdotes on
female pilgrimage are late, but these are as laissez-faire about the practice as
those in the seventh- to ninth-century window under consideration here.96
Certainly the Irish had plenty of positive examples from the early church:
Egeria whose travels were written down and circulated; Palladiuss Historia
Lausiaca which related the extensive wanderings of the holy Melania the Elder,
and even Jeromes beloved Paula, whose peregrinations were not inconsider-
able. As has been discussed at length in an earlier section, Irish ecclesiastics
differed from their English and Frankish counterparts in that they did not
legislate against women going on pilgrimage, with the one implicit exception of
the anomalous rule in Hibernensis.97
As peregrinatio became formalized, the exile for God or Deorad D acquired
high status on account of his sacrifice of homeland.98 This formalization,
94
Audite Fratres, stanza .
95
Jonas, Life of Columbanus, book , ch. (B. Krusch, MGH, Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum, iv (),
).
96
e.g. Second Irish Life of Ciarn of Seirkieran, ch. , where Brendan of Birrs mother, Mansenna,
wished to go into exile to Oiln Doimle, probably mod. Inis Doimle or Little Island, in the Suir near
Waterford. She was advised against it because the saint could perceive that the place designated for her
resurrection (and thus her death) was at Tallaght (BNE i. ; Eng. trans., ii. ). The Third Irish
Life of Coemgen, ch. , tells of the death and revival of two nuns who had come on pilgrimage to him
(BNE i. ; Eng. trans., ii. ).
97
Hibernensis, book , ch. , which instructs that they be kept cloistered and out of mens sight.
Hodgson, Frankish Church, , with references; Schneider, Anglo-Saxon Women, ,
arguing for mixed views and citing, among others, Boniface and Alcuin.
98
T. Charles-Edwards, The Social Background to Irish Peregrinatio, Celtica (), . Also on
peregrinatio, K. Hughes, The Changing Theory and Practice of Irish Pilgrimage, Journal of Ecclesiastical
History (), .
, ,
though not much evidenced in the Lives, is abundantly clear in the law tracts,
both for men and for women, as is evidenced in the tract discussed above refer-
ring to the ban-deorad D. There are to my knowledge no narrative accounts of
these formalized, high-status pilgrims, either for men or women, so the nature
of their lives must remain opaque.
A few points will have become apparent. In the seventh- to ninth-century era
there lived a number of women whose perceived holiness resulted in their being
exalted to the point of achieving recognition as saints. Some were held in such
high esteem by their local communities that Irish law made special provision for
them. Abbesses continued to run many monasteries, and although the abbatial
office underwent changes and was partially supplanted with lay abbacies and
coarbships, it is clear that in a few cases at least the office of the abbess remained
highly sought after, as in the case of Kildare. Considering the matter of high-
status religious women from a broader perspective, that of wider attitudes to
sanctity and gender, we may note the high regard with which female holy
women could be held, a fact made apparent in some of the hagiographic texts
of this era. It is surely of significance, for example, that some perceived Ireland
to be spiritually held up by two pillar saints, one of whom was female. Likewise,
we would be foolish to ignore the influence of female holy women upon male
monastics and laypeople, as is evidenced by the textual material on Samthann
who was held up as a paragon in her own lifetime to the monks in the cle D
movement.
The warm treatment of exceptional holy women survived into the succeed-
ing centuries. The eleventh and twelfth centuries brought some changes to Ire-
lands ecclesiastical and religious atmosphere, and at that time the beginnings of
new, separatist, attitudes about female sanctity are evident in the hagiographic,
apocryphal, and literary texts. Although the evidence suggests that a nun could
still achieve a level of moral authority so high that her teachings might be
thought worthy to serve as guides to clerics, new pressures and developments
were soon to emerge.
PA RT T H R E E
The tenth to twelfth centuries were ones of great change for the Irish church.
Through the ninth and tenth centuries, the Vikings made a notable impact on
the church in general and on monasteries in particular. Many smaller places dis-
appeared, for only the wealthiest and largest could withstand repeated attacks.
The very strong lay influence, evidenced by such things as lay abbacies and
hereditary clerical offices, began to come under criticism from reform efforts
within Ireland, and then later from outside it.1 During the twelfth century Con-
tinental orders came into Ireland to supersede the native Irish monasticism, and
a territorial parish structure was instituted.2 The end of the native Irish church
is traditionally placed by scholars in the twelfth century, and with good reason
this dating has remained unchanged over a century in which the historiography
has overturned many older ideas.
Among the non-specialists with a keen interest in early Christian Ireland the
twelfth century is the watershed, too, for this very reason. Modern Celtic Chris-
tians see the changes of the twelfth century as the end of their Golden Age, and can
portray the arrival of such features as dioceses, Romanesque architecture, and
Continental monastic orders as signs of mystical spirit giving way to the bur-
eaucratic: With its massive stone cathedrals built to last centuries, the Norman
church had a more settled and established feel than the essentially provisional
Celtic Christian communities with their wattle and daub huts for worship, ever-
itinerant monks and bishops who regularly retreated to hermits cells.3
The first time, to our knowledge, that the Irish church insisted upon the
celibacy of men in orders was at the turn of the twelfth century, at the first synod
of Cashel, held in .4 In spite of this, the Irish appear to have had little inter-
est in the matter; the issue had nothing of the explosive power it did on the Con-
tinent, and there was little effort put into enforcing it. The abbacy of Armagh,
for long a hereditary post, did as a result of this synod become one requiring
celibacy,5 but the surviving evidence suggests that married priesthood carried
1
e.g. Herbert, Iona; also T. Fiaich, The Church of Armagh Under Lay Control, Seanchas Ard
Mhacha (), . See also the accusations of St Bernard in his Life of St Malachy, ch. .
(ed. and trans. H. Lawlor, St Bernards Life of St Malachy of Armagh (London, )).
2
A. Gwynn, The Twelfth-Century Reform (Dublin, ); J. Watt, The Church in Medieval Ireland (Gill
History of Ireland ; Dublin, ); G. Carville, The Occupation of Celtic Sites in Medieval Ireland by the Canons
Regular of St Augustine and the Cistercians (Kalamazoo, Mich., ).
3
Bradley, Celtic Way, .
4
A. Gwynn, The First Synod of Cashel, IER (), ; (), . See also Hughes,
Sanctity and Secularity, , and Flanagan, Irish Society, .
5
Cellach son of ed took holy orders when he assumed office in , and in received orders as
a noble bishop, uasalespoic, according to the Annals of the Four Masters (Flanagan, Irish Society, ).
, ,
situations which lay them open to suspicion of sexual scandal. Women per se are
more of a topic than they ever were in preceding centuries, and one finds more
explorations of such emblems of the female sex as Eve, the Virgin Mary, and
Herods women. Texts such as M Eba Ben (a poem in the voice of Adams wife)
and the Saltair na Rann (an account of Genesis) take up the issue of the female
sex, but tend to betray a remarkable level of compassion for even that most
culpable of women in the whole of the Christian tradition.
As the reforms dawned on the horizon, Ireland in large part continued to
treat the female sex with a regard, bolstered theological and ecclesiastically,
which was increasingly at odds with the general trends elsewhere in the West, a
position which it evidently knew made it a target of criticism.
The Irish sources for this period are extremely uneven. The legal material con-
sists of glosses on the classical eighth-century texts rather than main texts per se;
there are few theological tracts and, importantly, virtually no contemporary
texts describing in present-day terms such things as clerical issues or monastic
life. Instead, a veritable mountain of more challenging texts presents itself to the
historian. First to be mentioned is the hagiographic and devotional material; it
consists of the very many Latin and Middle Irish saints Lives (many of which
were edited by Charles Plummer and W. Heist) and a fascinating Life of Patrick
known as the Tripartite Life or the Vita Tripartita. On the poetry side, there are
scores of litanies, hymns, lyrical verses, and other poems on religious themes.
Glosses too are vast in number and include hagiographic notes, rhymes, and
stories; some of the most interesting are those appended to the martyrologies of
Oengus and Tallaght and to such earlier poems and hymns as N Car Brigit.
The shortcomings of the material are considerable, for all their volume.
Little, for example, can be said about womens legal or canonical status, or about
the monasteries and monastic life. The Lives are of little use as evidence for
monastic practice at the time of their composition, as they purport to describe a
world which existed half a millennium earlier. That said, it is possible to explore
in considerable depth such topics as female sanctity, female sin, clerical celibacy,
sex segregation, and the notion of ritual impurity. The remaining chapters,
therefore, will concentrate on the areas about which the texts are most reveal-
ing, namely mentalities and attitudes.
The later saints Lives are many, numbering approximately eighty, and are lo-
cated in two main collections, the Kilkennensis and the Salmanticensis, both of
which are described and analysed in depth by Richard Sharpe in his Medieval
Irish Saints Lives. The female Lives of this period contain the bulk of the evidence
on nuns and female sanctity. So a few words on their composition and manu-
script survival are warranted.
, ,
Beatha Lasrach, the Life of Lassair, is a late Middle Irish Life, most probably
initially composed in the twelfth century. It is from the Stowe MS B IV I, fos. b
to a, copied and the language modernized by David ODuigenan in . It
is unfinished, and the scribes note shows that the conclusion was missing in the
manuscript.8
The Latin Life of Samthann exists in one form only, and was deemed by Kenney
to be late and brief ; it probably dates from the twelfth or thirteenth century. It
is in the Codex Insulensis collection, which exists in three manuscript forms; the
earliest dates between the late thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries.9 Plum-
mers edition, collated from all three, shows little variation amongst them and
no major additions or omissions.10 Dorothy Bray believes it is the work of a sin-
gle author or redactor, citing the consistency of the style and language and the
order in support of this assertion; furthermore, only once does the chrono-
logical progression seem to falter. She proposes that the Life was composed only
shortly before the Codex Insulensis was compiled, and considers that possibly
the original Life was redrafted expressly for inclusion in the collection.11
The Latin Life of Ita exists in three recensions. One manuscript (Bodl. Rawl. MS
B, fos. v) is Austrian, from the twelfth century, c. . Plummer,
for his edition, used a manuscript in the Dublin collection (Codex Kilkennensis,
fos. vv), written probably around c.. The third manuscript (Bodl. MS
) dates from the fourteenth century, and is a short epitome made by John of
Tynemouth. Although Kenney believed that all versions went back to a seventh-
century original, Sharpe finds this unlikely.12 The Kilkennensis version contains
a reference to an individual whose son still lives; if this were true, noted Kenney,
it would place the original text of the passage to not later than the mid-seventh
century; so on this basis Kenney opted for dating some passages to the seventh
century. It must be remembered, however, that such touches of verisimilitude
were on occasion manufactured out of whole cloth by hagiographers.13
The Life of Monenna by Conchubranus exists in a sole manuscript (BL MS
Cotton Cleopatra A ii), which Esposito dated to the first half of the twelfth cen-
tury; the Life itself he thought originally composed between and . The
author was an Irishman, possibly a cleric of Kildare, who had visited Killevy,
had seen the relics of the saint, and had journeyed there several times on foot.14
8
L. Gwynn (ed. and trans.), Beatha Lasrach riu (), .
9
The definitive in-depth study of the major collections of saints Lives, including the Insulensis and
Kilkennensis collections and the Codex Salmanticensis, is Sharpe, Saints Lives.
10
Plummers own introduction to the text is in PVSH i., pp. lxxxviiviii, and the edition itself is in
ii. .
11
D. Bray, Motival Derivations in the Life of St Samthann, Studia Celtica (), , at
.
12 13
Sharpe, Saints Lives, . Kenney, p. lxxiii.
14
Edited first by Mario Esposito in PRIA C (), , and more recently by the Ulster Society
for Medieval Latin Studies in Seanchas Ard Mhacha . (), ; . (), ; . (),
. Her anonymous Life in the Codex Salmanticensis is edited in Heist, . For descriptions of
the two texts, see Kenney, no. .
Esposito attempted to render the text usable to the historian, believing that the
redactor interposed unaltered whole chapters of a seventh-century vita.15
The Latin Life of Darerca, also called Monenna. In this Latin Life Monenna is
called by her original name, Darerca. It is in the well-known fourteenth-century
manuscript, Codex Salmanticensis (Brussels no. , fos. rv), which con-
tains mostly male Lives. The text itself is of uncertain date; Zimmer placed it
later than the tenth century; Kenney considered that it is not older than the
twelfth century, and quite possibly is not much older than the Codex. Sharpe
believed that the Lives in the codex, including this one, were essentially faithful
to their older sources, and he was of the view that the exemplar for this was
dated to the seventh century.16
The Burton-on-Trent Lives of Monenna/Modwenna. There are two other versions
of the Life of Monenna, compiled by or under Geoffrey, abbot of the Benedic-
tine Abbey of the Blessed Mary and Saint Modwen, Burton-upon-Trent, from
to ; BL MS Lansdowne , fos. vv, and BL MS Cotton
Tiberius E i, fos. vv. Both are English and deeply problematical, and so
have not been used.
The Homily on the Life of Brigit in the Leabhar Breac. Not, strictly speaking a Life,
but it very much resembles one. This Middle Irish homily appears with two
others, on Patrick and Columcille, in the fifteenth-century codex, the Leabhar
Breac. Like the other, it was collated in or later, but the date of actual com-
position is uncertain. Stokes, who edited this and the other two homilies in the
manuscript, noted the frequent use of infixed pronouns and the many Old and
Early Middle Irish verbal forms but did not propose a date, and Richard Sharpe
has recently reiterated the uncertainty involved in any such attempt.17
The Homily on the Life of Brigit in the Book of Lismore has a great deal of similarity
to that in the Leabhar Breac, but the overlap is not complete, for each has a
anecdotes the other lacks.18
Brigits Vita IV, largely copied from her Vita I, is the work of a redactor
working c. who has been studied by Richard Sharpe. It is a testament to the
continued interest in Brigit, but its usefulness to the historian lies mostly in what
can be learnt from it about the redactor, D. Sharpes work on D has shown
the latter to be a copyist who made few changes in his exemplars, apart from
adding the occasional Biblical quote, clarifying sentence, or minimization of
saints sexual impropriety such as inducing miraculous abortions.
One male Life must be mentioned individually, namely the Tripartite Life of
Patrick. This long text, written in a combination of Irish and Latin, is found in a
15
Esposito, Sources.
16
Sharpe, Saints Lives, , with references. Johnston, Transforming Women, .
17
In W. Stokes (ed. and trans.), Three Middle Irish Homilies on the Lives of Saints Patrick, Brigit and Columba
(Calcutta, ), ; linguistic forms, p. viii. On dating, see Sharpe, Saints Lives, .
18
Homily on the Life of Brigit in the Book of Lismore, in W. Stokes (ed.), Lives of the Saints from the
Book of Lismore (London, ), .
, ,
19
D. Dumville, The Dating of the Tripartite Life of St Patrick in Dumville, Saint Patrick, .
The dating of the text hinges on linguistic forms. In the process by which proposed dates have been
reached for this text the element of circularity is very considerable (Dumville, Dating, ).
20
Sharpe, Saints Lives, .
21
N. Patterson, Brehon Law in Late Medieval Ireland: Antiquarian and Obsolete or Traditional
and Functional? Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies (), .
By all accounts much of female religious life was little affected by the changes of
the tenth, eleventh, and early twelfth centuries. The structure of the professions,
for example, seems unchanged. The two types of nun, the virgin and the peni-
tent-widow, continued to exist. Two litanies from the earlier Middle Irish period
compiled in the Liber Hymnorum attest to this, as one was for use by religious vir-
gins, the other for holy widows. Virgins at their veiling continued to be enrobed
in white, as late as c., for redactor D, working on Brigits Life, added to his
exemplar (the Vita I ) the specification that white had been the colour of Brigits
garment at her consecration.1 The commentaries from (probably) the eleventh
century on Cin Adomnin speak of the penitent nuns who wear a white garment
with a black border. This comment on their dress is to my knowledge the only
one in the Irish corpus and as such is quite notableit seems reasonable to
think that this had been the standard garb for them in earlier centuries as well.2
The second tier of the nuns profession looks largely the same as well. Holy wid-
ows continued to appear in hagiography: one Irish Life, for example, specified
that Ciarns fostermother had been a holy widow, a feadhbh craibtech, and hagio-
graphical glosses claimed that Brigit had originally sought the order of peni-
tence ( grd aithrige) from the bishops she visited as a maiden.3 Hagiography also
continued to portray religious women who were pilgrims and solitary hermits.4
In England, during the reforms of the tenth and eleventh century, a new nun
term appeared, mynecena, meaning a female monk and connoting holiness; the
older general term, Pauline Stafford observes, was often used in a new way, de-
noting nuns of a status below that of the mynecena. According to Staffords analy-
sis, monks were ranked above priests as mynecena were ranked above nunnas.5
This appears to have no parallel in Ireland.
1
Vita IV of Brigit, book , ch. . Noted by Sharpe, Saints Lives, .
2
White veil (caille finn) of penitent widow in Lament of the Caillech Birre; white veil with black bor-
der specified for penitent nuns in the (probably) th-cent. commentary on Cin Adomnin. For a possible
patristic precedent on the use of a garment with a border stripe by not-quite virginal nuns, see Jerome,
Ep. , ch. : their robes have but a narrow purple stripe, it is true.
3
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Feb.; glosses on the hymn N Car Brigit.
4
Third Irish Life of Coemgen, ch. ; Life of Darerca, ch. (Heist, ).
5
P. Stafford, Gender, Religious Status and Reform in England, Past and Present (), ,
at .
, ,
was so successful as a student that she eventually became an abbess herself in her
native land.8 Kildares longstanding excellence as a centre of learning is attested
by centuries of obits of scholars and, in this period, by Gerald of Waless story
about Kildares beautiful Gospels which were said to have been written out
during the foundresss lifetime at an angels dictation, with Brigit praying, and
the scribe imitating.9
Direct evidence of female literacy is provided by two prayers for salvation in
the twelfth-century collection known as the Liber Hymnorum. Though both are in-
teresting, the first provides the stronger case for actual private reading. A Slinicidh
is a Middle Irish litany addressed to the saviour of the human race written in
the first person singular, by a woman who ended her petition with the wish
that I may merit a place of rest among the religious widows in the unity of the
heavenly church in the presence of the Trinity (Gorro airillnigher sosad cumsantach
etir na fedbaib iresachaib i noentaig na hecalsa nemdai, i frecnarcus na Trinoti ).10 The
nature of the prayer may reflect the status of the petitioner as a widow-penitent,
for it is focused on seeking forgiveness from sins committed in the world. The
widow praised Christ as physician of illness and misery, and outlined his incar-
nation through the Virgin Mary, his crucifixion and salvation of humanity from
hell, his ascension into heaven and his future presiding at Judgement. She went
on to seek forgiveness for her sins, and asked for the seven cardinal virtues to
counteract the seven deadly sins, concluding this penultimate section by asking
additional protection against lust. The Litany is found in four manuscripts:
Bodleian Rawlinson MS B.; Brussels MS ; BM Additional MS , ;
BM MS Egerton . There are some variations among the copies, in general a
sign of individual use in private devotions, according to Plummer.11 Without
further work on the manuscripts, it is not possible even to guess as to provenance,
though Clonmacnois was tentatively proposed by Plummer. This prayer was
read, learnt, and used by at least a handful of Irish nuns of the widow-penitent
gradethe actual reading and personal use by several distinct individuals being
evidenced in the fact that the different copies all have slight personalizations.
The other prayer, Impide Maire, appears immediately after A Slinicidh in three of
the same four manuscripts, which led some scholars to think it was a second part
of it. Plummer thought not, for it is composed in the first person plural whereas
A Slinicidh is in a singular voice.12 He was certainly correct, because it is evident
8 9
Life of Darerca, ch. . Gerald of Wales, Topographia, book , ch. .
10
Plummer translated fedbaib iresachaib as faithful widows, but I would argue for religious widows;
see Dictionary on ires, demonstrating that it connotes religion in an organized sense, and a persons rule or
manner of life, as much as it does personal faith.
11
A Slinicidh (O Saviour): Kenney, no. , Litany to the Saviour and the Saints, part . Discussed in
Plummer, Irish Litanies, pp. xvixvii; edition and trans. based on Rawlinson MS in Plummer, Litanies,
, under the title Litany of the Saviour; edition based on the Brussels MS by K. Meyer, Otia
Merseiana, ii. .
12
Impide Maire: Kenney, no. , Litany to the Saviour and the Saints, part : it seems to be comple-
mentary to part one, but may be separate. MSS: Bodleian Rawlinson MS B.; Brussels MS ;
, ,
that the collective prayer was written for nuns of the virginal grade. The nuns
prayed not to forsake their marriage to their noble espoused bridegroom Jesus
Christ so that in heaven we may sing the song that only virgins sing, that we
merit the crown of eternal glory (coro canam an canntaic nd canat achd oigh, coro air-
illnigem coroin na glire suthaine). Like the widows litany, this one addressed the
problem of sexual urges in a significant location, in this case very near the out-
set: praying for purification of the senses it commenced with asking God to sub-
due our fleshly lusts and to check our unfitting thoughts (do troethad ar tol collaide,
do cossc are nimraitiud nanairches), but there was no suggestion of a worldly past. As
with the private widows litany, there are minor variations among the three MS
versions, indicating its actual use, though perhaps not individual use.
As for nuns legal and ecclesiastical status in these centuries little can be said,
for there is almost nothing on them in the glosses on the vernacular law tracts,
which would be the main source for such an investigation. One is reduced to
such observations as the fact that Irish Lives portrayed female saints other than
Brigit as delegates at early synods, such as the virgin Cainnle who attended a
church council at which she had a vision which was of great help to the assem-
bly.13 Almost as unsatisfactory, for all that it is contemporary, is the mystifying
remark by the Cin Adomnin commentator: Now, after the coming of Adomnn,
no good woman is deprived of her testimony, if it be bound by righteous deeds
(Iar tachtain do Adamnn, hifecta n gatar forgall ar domun degmn, md i ngnmaib fraib
forsither). Evidently the legal competence of at least some women was perceived
to have improved. If women were in fact able to use good deeds to establish
their worthiness then the proportion of women able to give testimony would
have increased since the day of the writing down of the classical vernacular
tracts at the turn of the eighth century. However, in the absence of more on the
subject, no conclusions may be drawn with safety.
The matter of enclosure appears not to change: in all the extant material holy
women are evidently as peripatetic as they wish to be, and there are no percep-
tible pressures for them to stay within the confines of the convent. Not only are
the later Lives of the major female saints as full of travel and wandering as the
earlier ones, but equally incidental mentions in the other texts make it evident
that for less exalted nuns the monastery or church was more a sanctified place
at which to do Gods work than a haven from the outside world.
In England in this era there was an upsurge of queenly involvement in
monasteries, a subject on which Pauline Stafford has written in some depth.14
The role of the queen in the English reforms was not paralleled in Ireland: there
abbesses overseeing and vouching for their nuns. There is continuity in that they
too show them acting as heads, i.e. in a manner similar to fathers to their
daughters, or male relatives to women kin. In the Latin Life of Enda, for ex-
ample, the abbess of Clonbroney is cenn caillech, head of nuns. Abbesses in the
saints Lives also act like fathers in the arrangement of marriages: at the age of
marriage, the laws assert, a head could give a girl either to a husband or to the
Church, and only a special category of girls were given the right to choose for
themselves which life they would follow. The right to choose between marriage
and a life in the Church is the prerogative of the woman of choice or b togai,
who is allowed to decide herself whether to marry or be a nun (tic di co aos togai na
togai .i. in co fer theis fa inngaba chaille).19 In three relevant hagiographic anecdotes
a sainted abbess arranges the marriage of one of her girls. In the Latin Life of
Mochoemg, the abbess involved is Ita. Her sister Ness wanted to be a nun, but
Ita insisted on giving her to a man in marriage, comforting her with the assur-
ance that a wonderful child would be born from the union. Here Ita acts like a
head and does not give her sister the choice of which husband she is to have:
Ipse honorificus artifex in lignis et lapidibus erat, audax in militia. Ipse amavit quendam
pulcram feminam multum pudicam, ingenuam, de Mumenia, videlicet de gente na
nDesi, que erat soror sanctissime virginis Ythe. Ipsa femina vocabatur Ness; que volebat
vivere in castitate in evum, sicut sancte virgines que antea virum nesciebant. Set sancta
virgo Yta, sua soror, eam dedit Beoano in uxorem, egregio artifici.20
This same honoured man was an architect in wood and stone, and brave in warfare. He
loved a beautiful woman, very modest and refined, from Munster, of the Dsi people,
who was the sister of the very holy virgin Ita. This woman was called Ness, and she
wished to live permanently in chastity like the holy virgins who never before knew a man.
But the holy virgin Ita, her sister, gave her to Beoan, the eminent architect, as his wife.
The same principles are found in the story as it is related in the Latin Life of Ita.
In this version, however, marriage is arranged by the abbess as part of a finan-
cial arrangement.
Quidam bonus artifex, qui erat homo honorabilis de provinchia Connachtorum, in ex-
ilio ad terram Mumenensium venit. Et audiens beata Yta famam artis eius, rogatus est
ab ea, ut ageret sibi edificia. Ille vero artifex quesivit sibi uxorem a sancta Yta et agrum
ad habitandum. Et beatissima Yta dedit ei sororem suam, et agrum in quo maneret. Et
ille cum omni devotione edificia in monasterio sancte Yta agebat.21
A good architect, who was an honourable man from the province of Connaught, came
in exile to the land of Munster. And Ita, hearing of the eminence of his work, asked him
to make some buildings for her. This architect asked Ita for a wife and for fields on which
to live. And the blessed Ita gave him her sister and land on which to stay. And he with all
devotion constructed buildings at Itas monastery.
19
This was the b togai, the woman of choice, discussed in Power, Classes of Women, .
20 21
Latin Life of Mochoemg, D text (PVSH ii. ), ch. . Life of Ita, ch. .
, , ,
In the Latin Life of Enda, a young nobleman came from battle to the monastery
of his sister Faenche, the abbess of Rossory in Fermanagh near Lough Erne
(Ir. Ross Airthir). He made a deal with her whereby he would do what she asked
providing she gave him one of her girls to marry.22 She went to one of her fos-
terlings and asked the girl which husband she preferred, God or the man,
whereupon the girl chose God by dying on the spot. Faenche then proceeded to
talk Enda out of marriage and sex altogether while showing him the girls
corpse.23 By deciding which girl to select and making her choose between that
particular suitor and lifelong chastity, the abbess acted like a head in the laws.
She did, however, treat the girl like a b togai, a girl who could at least choose the
Church if she wanted to.
The headship of abbesses was not always this extreme in its resemblance to
the behaviour of a legal head, but the supervisory role is stressed very heavily
in the later hagiography, as it was in the earlier. In the Lives of this period, an
abbesss freedom to oversee her nuns as she saw fit is seemingly unhindered by
any male authority. And what do they actually do? Responsible for practical up-
keep of the nuns, they arrange the procurement of food and beer in times of
shortage, and ask for assistance in the form of supplies from other monasteries
and nunneries at such times. They supervise the physical structure of the
monastery, arrange building and construction, and sometimes negotiate pay-
ment for the builders and architect. They also procure other, more ecclesi-
astical resources: the holy abbess Scath of Ardskeagh sent for a scribe from a
mens house, and the abbot dispatched the scribe to the nunnery to do what she
requested: write out the text of the four evangelists for the nuns.24 In another
Life, an abbess sent a nun to take a holy book to another nunnery. Abbesses in
these later Lives also supervised the taking on of fosterlings, accepted aban-
doned babies, and received childrens parents when they visited. This is very
much the sort of thing seen in earlier Lives. In the hagiography there were rum-
blings but no revolution in church authors views of abbesses. Whatever was
happening in practice for women of the church at this time, they still inhabited
a mundus wherein female sanctity was believed to have the potential to wield
significant power.
Political events and trends at monasteries are evidenced primarily by the annals,
the entries of which are fuller in this era than before. In some cases, affiliations
with particular dynasties or kin-groups are perceptible, but not always. The
22
Martyrology of Oengus, Jan.; Martyrology of Gorman Jan.; AFM , which must refer to a
re-foundation.
23
Latin Life of Enda, chs. .
24
Latin Life of Ailbe, D text, ch. (PVSH i. ). Scath is there misprinted as Scletha.
, ,
annals are not on their own a good indicator of a female establishments success,
because failure to register the deaths of abbesses may reflect scribal regionalism
or other habits. For this reason it is worth noting also the presence of any re-
mains at the site of the monastery and evidence of rebuilding during the twelfth
century.
Relics, too, are worth noting. They had really started to come into their own
in the eighth century in Ireland, and are prominent from that time onwards.
Items belonging to a churchs founding saint were kept in elaborate metal reli-
quaries and, like relics elsewhere in the West, Irish ones were used in political
and social life. Oaths were sworn on them, they were taken on circuits for the col-
lection of revenue, they were taken into battle, and they were brought to assem-
blies (oenachs).25 They continued to be instruments of healing, blessing, and
cursing: they might be carried around people, objects, or buildingsclockwise
or deosil to bless, anti-clockwise to curse.26 The relics which survive most, and
which appear in the texts to have been most esteemed by later generations, were
saints bells and croziers (bachalls); significantly, neither of these were exclu-
sivelyor even particularlyassociated with men. Female saints items, includ-
ing bells and bachalls, evidently survived, for the texts of this period refer to them
being venerated, and furthermore venerated by both sexes. As for their use, no
less than male saints relics they were deemed effective in battle for defeating en-
emies. Lassairs hagiographer, for example, suggests indirectly that her hand-
bell, which went by the name Ceoln Lasrach, was still in existence at the time
he was writingand the author of the extant texts exemplar lived in the twelfth
century.27 Female relics were considered as worth collecting as mens, and their
power was in no way less than that of male saints. This is illustrated, for example,
in the way in which the hagiographer describes Drumlanes great collection,
allegedly bequeathed to it by Maedc, in particular its large ornate reliquary:
Fccbaim fos Clocc an deilcc, clocc na ttrath i nDruim Lethan, an mionn oirderc il-
cumhachtach ele .i. mo minister maisech m ir-fhertach, no bodh ar aistter i ngach
ionad accam, ina bfiul n do thasaibh na naomh na nuasal-aithreach .i. taisi Steafain
mairtir, Laurint, Clemint, ina bfiul mudhorn Martan, cuid dfolt Maire, maille le
morn do thaisibh na naomh na naomh-ogh archena, arna comhroinn arna comh-
brecadh eter an Bric an menister; ir as aire adberar an Bhrec fra, comhmbrecadh
taisedh na naomh na naomh-ogh a noinfeacht.28
25
On relics, C. Doherty, The Use of Relics in Early Ireland, in N Chathin and Richter, Irland und
Europa, ; A. T. Lucas, The Social Role of Relics and Reliquaries, JRSAI (), .
26
Out of date in terms of interpretations, but rich in specific textual references is PVSH i.,
pp. clxxiiiclxxx; similarly S. Ferguson, On the Ceremonial Turn Called Desiul, Proceedings of the Royal
Irish Academy, second series, (). The clockwise circumambulation remained important in Celtic
modern folk custom, and thence was adopted into the rites of revived paganism, adopting the Irish term
deosil (G. Gardner, Witchcraft Today (London, ), ; S. Farrar, The Witches Way (London, ), ,
passim).
27
Irish Life of Lassair (Gwynn, Beatha Lasrach, , ).
28
Second Irish Life of Maedc, ch. (BNE i. ; Eng. trans., ii. ).
, , ,
I further leave The Bell of the Brooch and The Bell of the Hours to Drumlane, to-
gether with the other illustrious and potent relic, that is, my beautiful wonder-working
reliquary, which travelled with me everywhere, in which are relics of the saints and
patriarchs, i.e. relics of the martyr Stephen, Lawrence, and Clement, and the ankle of
Martin, and some of the Virgin Marys hair, and many other remains of saints and
women-saints besides, which had been divided between the Brecc and the reliquary;
and this is why the name Brecc was given to it, because of the variegated arrangement
together of the relics of the saints and women-saints which had been united and made
fast in it.
For this collector the relics of female saints were not different, distinct, or of less
value than those of males. He twice used the phrase saints and women-saints
in the short passage as part of the boast of the reliquarys abundance of holy re-
mains. At the monasteries of women as much as men, the relics of virgins were
preserved, taken on circuit, and used to attract devotees and pilgrims.
Large, well-endowed nunneries in England appear to have suffered in the
tenth and eleventh centuries, on account of the changes brought about by the
Benedictine reforms there. Numerous Anglo-Saxonists point out the the ab-
sence of records from female houses in this period, in contrast with the abun-
dant evidence for the earlier centuries. In Ireland the sources show unbroken
continuity, though Irelands nunneries faced the challenge of Viking attacks
rather than the likes of Aelfric and Dunstan. The cult of female saints remained
equally strong, suffering no apparent waning such as has been noted in other
parts of the West in this era.
Cloonburren
Though Cloonburren was very near two of Irelands major ecclesiastical cen-
tres, Clonmacnoise and Clonfert on the River Shannon in the rich midlands, it
is unmentioned in any annals. It may well have disappeared as a religious com-
munity, though there is a small chance it did carry on as such, given that the
place is mentioned in as a site, where soldiers had been placed to defend it,
of a battle between two dynasties.
29
Carais Pattraic (Patrick Loved, or Cuimmns Hymn) on the virtues of many Irish saints, ed. and
trans. W. Stokes, Cuimmns Poem on the Saints of Ireland, ZCP (), .
, ,
and Donegal, and was given extensive glosses in the earlier ones of Oengus
and Tallaght.
Killevy continued to exist long after the arrival of English settlers and was not
dissolved until .30 Not only does the early church still stand, but it does so
along with the medieval stone church which superseded it.31 In the annals, we
hear that it was attacked by Vikings in , and that in Donnchadh Ua
Donncain, king of Fermoy, and Cinaeth mac in Geirrci, king of the Conaill, fell
in a duel there.32 In the twelfth and thirteenth centuries saint Endas church
claimed an ancient friendship with the foundress. The Martyrology of Oengus
glosses claim links between Killevy and various male houses by calling Mo-
nenna the foster mother of Ciarn of Clonmacnois and of Laissrn the Happy
of Iona and Laissrn the Great of Min. The first Laissrn, of Iona, might refer
to the abbot of that name who died in . The second is unknown unless it
means to refer to Laissrn of Devenish.33 In the thirteenth century it is men-
tioned in the Latin Life of Enda of Aran, with the Life claiming a tie between the
saints two institutions.34
Monennas relics, too, were evident in this period, for in her Life she be-
queathed to the place her leather garment, hoe, and other tools, but specified
that her body and bachall were to go elsewhere. The former relics are men-
tioned as early as the seventh century, in the two hymns to the saint, so perhaps
they were genuine.35
Ballyvourney
Though there is no surviving Life of St Gobnat, her monastery deep in south-
ern Munster has left remains and relics, indicating that worship at the site and
devotion to the saint were continuous.36 The remains, south-west of the village,
consist of a round beehive hut with traces of early iron-working (now called
30
It attracted a bit of antiquarian attention in the th cent., with two articles on the foundress ap-
pearing in Irish journals. While of scant historical value, one of them provided some sketches of the ruins
of the nunnery as they appeared in the s: G. Reade, Cill-Sleibhe-Cuillinn, Journal of the Historical
Association of Ireland (forerunner of JRSAI ) rd ser., (), .
31 32
Latin Life of Enda, ch. . AU ; ATig .
33
Conchubranus, Life of Monenna, book , ch. . Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Sept. The text
is unclear whether the Molaisse at Iona is the same one as that of Min, but it appears not to be. The short
poem making up the gloss runs: Morthrecheng nd donae / moNinn nall cech gena / in H Laissrn sona / la Lais-
srn mor Mena. If the writer intended the second Laissrn to be the founder of Devenish he was confused:
Min is the river Main which enters Lough Neagh, whereas the island monastery of Devenish is in Lough
Erne. Obit of Laissrn of Iona: AU .
34
Latin Life of Enda, ch. (PVSH ii. ).
35
Conchubranus, Life of Monenna, book , ch. ; Life of Darerca, ch. ; hymns Audite Fratres and
Audite Sancta Studia.
36
Gobnat is said to have been patron saint of bee-keepers. Harbison, Pilgrimage, ; D. Harris,
Saint Gobnet, Abbess of Ballyvourney, JRSAI (), , with map and site photos. In Journal of
the Cork Historical and Archaeological Society () see D. hEaluighthe, St Gobnat of Ballyvourney,
; M. J. OKelly, St Gobnats House, ; and F. Henry, Decorated Stones at Ballyvourney,
Cork, .
, , ,
Killeedy
Mentions of Killeedy are absent from the annals, but the evident abundance of
anecdotes on the saint more than suggests its continued existence. There was
enough of a church there for it to be rebuilt in the Romanesque period, and the
latter building remained standing until burning down in the early nineteenth
century.37 No sources to my knowledge refer to Itas relics, either in these cen-
turies or earlier, but the present church, rebuilt over its Romanesque predeces-
sor, contains a grave claiming to be the saints.
Looking at the tenth and eleventh-century Middle Irish Lives of male saints,
one finds that Ita and her monastery have really come to prominence in two of
them. In one of the Lives of Brendan, such a close relationship between the two
is so fulsomely asserted that there must have been extremely cordial relations
between the houses of Clonfert and Killeedy.38 In the Second Irish Life of
Maedc, the male saint performed a miracle for Ita whilst in the neighbour-
hood on a visit to his confessor Molua mac Oiche, an episode which may repre-
sent a claim by Maedcs monastery (Ferns) for some sort of tax from Killeedy.39
Other hagiographers were keen to claim that their patron had known Ita, the
great fosterer: such claims were made as well, though in less depth, in Lives of
Carthach, Mchoemg, and Cummean.40 In these Killeedy is noted for its fos-
tering of both young boys and girls, though there is no mention of monks in the
familia. There may be a connection between the introduction of male leaders
(and possibly monks) to the monastery and the seeming rise of prominence
of the topos of the place as a fostering centre for boys, but the evidence is far too
imperfect to speculate on the matter. The fostering topos remains strong in the
twelfth- and thirteenth-century Latin Lives of the Plummer collection and
figures strongly in the relevant twelfth-century glosses on the Martyrology of
Oengus.41 A poem on the characteristic virtues of the saints indicates that Ita
37
Lord Killanin and M. Duignan, The Shell Guide to Ireland (London, ), ; Hamlin and Hughes,
Modern Traveller, .
38
First Irish Life of Brendan, chs. , , , , (BNE i. ; Eng. trans., ii. ).
39
Second Irish Life of Maedc, chs. , .
40
Latin Life of Maedc, D text, ch. (PVSH ii. ); Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Nov.,
on Cummean; Latin Life of Carthach alias Mochuda, D text, ch. (PVSH i. ); Latin Life of
Mochoemc, D text, chs. , , , . From the th cent.: First Latin Life of Brendan, chs. , , ,
, (PVSH i. ).
41
Ita and Killeedy, in the late Latin Lives of Brendan (Vita I Sancti Brendani ), Carthach, and
Mochoemg. Ita as Mochoemogs teacher, Latin Life of Mochoemg, chs. . Cummean Fota also
said to have been fostered by her. Life of Maedc (Wales Translation) mentions Killeedy, ch. . Ita as
fostermother of Brendan, probably in early lost Lives of Brendan; earliest extant reference in late Life
, ,
was remembered above all for her fostering and humility.42 The fact that the Ita
glosses are particularly rich in hagiographical minutiae may have some signifi-
cance as to the relations between Killeedy and Tallaght at that time. In the
twelfth or thirteenth century Killeedy itself was keen to show how well-
connected it was: the Life of Ita portrays the monastery as a house of nuns which
was well connected with numerous houses: Glendalough, Clonfert, Clonmac-
nois, Iona, as well as with a house of virgins at Cuscraids Derry (Daire Cus-
grid) somewhere in Munster.43
which is a conflation of the th-cent. Voyage (which does not mention Ita) and a now-disappeared
Life.
42
Carais Pattraic [Patrick Loved or Cuimmns Hymn], ed. and trans. W. Stokes, Cuimmns Poem
on the Saints of Ireland, ZCP (), .
43
Life of Ita, chs. , , , , , , , .
44
Martyrology of Gorman, Nov.: Ioain Lassar lommnn, glossed with the name of the monastery:
Achaidh Beithe. Latin Life of Colmn, D text (PVSH i. ). Plummer notes the absence of the anecdote
in this later version, PVSH ii. .
45
Ed. L. Gwynn, Beatha Lasrach, Eriu (), . A th-cent. original composition in the
opinion of the editor, who said the th-cent. copyist probably modernised a late Middle Irish original,
which would date the exemplar to the th cent. (Gwynn, ).
46
Killanan and Duignan, Shell Guide, ; Archdall, Monasticon, ii. .
47
Irish Life of Lassair (Gwynn, Beatha Lasrach, ).
, , ,
Her Life also makes Lassair the patroness of the church of Kilronan (Ir. Cill
Ronin), no longer in existence, which was located in the lake district by Lough
Arrow and Lough Key on the RoscommonSligo border. It claims that she
spent her life with her father Ronn as a companion, and it was she who blessed
it in his name when they settled there on his patrimony.48 The Life itself appears
to have been composed at Kilronan: most of the events take place there, and it
is the one place really prominent in the text; it was for Kilronan that Lassair set
her great tax on the surrounding lands. It survived into the later middle ages, for
as late as the fourteenth century it still existed in name at least: the Annals of
Clonmacnois mention that one David Macdowgennan, who was McDermotts
chief chronicler, was Cowarb of Virgin saint Lassar who was buried in its
churchyard.49
Lassair is absent from the body and notes of the Oengus Martyrology, but a
gloss on the Martyrology of Gorman names her in association with a church
called Aghavea ( Ir. Achad Beithe). Aghavea is named in Lassairs Life as her first
foundation, but little is known about this place, for it does not appear in any
other sources.
The disjunction of the earlier and later material makes it look very much as if
there were two phases to this cult, separated by some centuries. There is also no
certainty that the earlier Lassair with assocations to Kildare and Lynally is the
same person as Lassair daughter of Ronan, the protagonist of the later Lives
and patroness of the churches described above. The former is not identified by
patronym, and the latter had no church in the Tethbae region.
Clonbroney
Clonbroney in Longford, the nunnery so impressively brought to fame under
abbess Samthann, continued as a major female house. The death of abbess
Cocrich ingen Unonn in was recorded in the annals, as was that of Caillech
Domnhaill ingen Naoneanaig in , banabb and comarba Samthainne.50 Stories
from this era about abbess Samthanns life, collected in later centuries in the
Annals of the Four Masters and in this period in the martyrological scholia, in-
clude one about her indirect involvement with a local war, at the outset of which
she allegedly composed a short rhyme, which was dutifully copied. A poem in
honour of her, allegedly composed by the great ed Alln, is also reproduced in
both these collections. A genealogy, significantly, is included, which further sug-
gests the continued political significance of the place into at least the eleventh
century.51 Saint Berachs Life, written in this later era, made a point of claiming
a connection with Samthann, in an episode where she cooperated with him in
48
Ibid. (Gwynn, Beatha Lasrach, , for Molaisse; passim for Ronn). The site is in the barony of
Boyle in the northernmost part of Co. Roscommon (Onomasticon).
49 50
AClon . AClon ; AFM .
51
Samthann fri Soillsi Sainmand, in AFM and Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Dec.
, ,
52
Irish Life of Berach, ch. .
53
Vita IV of Brigit, book , ch. ; on ballaun stones see Edwards, Archaeology, , .
54
Discussed in L. Barrow, Round Towers of Ireland ( Dublin, ).
55
AU , ; N Car Brigit scholia; Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Nov.
56
The main source for the rediscovery of Down is Gerald of Wales, Topographia, book , ch. . The
redactor of Brigits Vita IV, D, whose intended audience was Anglo-Norman rather than native Irish,
made changes in the account so as accommodate the events of he wrote that Brigit had gone to
Ulster to die, as Sharpe notes in his edition (Vita IV of Brigit, chs. , ). Equally implausible is the
alleged grave of Brigit, Brigits Bed, at St Patricks Purgatory on Lough Derg: others graves on the site
were claimed to be of Patrick, Columba, Molaisse, Brendan, Dabhec, and Catherine of Alexandria.
, , ,
visible today, and it is treated as the centre of a surviving Irish vestal cult by many
pilgrims of the more neo-pagan and feminist-matriarchal varieties. The per-
petual fire and older ethnographers interpretations of it were touched upon in
an early chapter, but here the building itself deserves some remark. Many who
believe in a functioning survivalism of Goddess-worship here claim that the
building itself, or an earlier layer of it, dates from the pre-Christian era, and that
it was in fact a temple.
There are three factors vitiating this interpretation. Firstly, the fire itself does
not appear in the textual record until the twelfth century, but notably neither
does the enclosing building, though it is evidently a pre-twelfth century con-
struction. Secondly, not only did several male-founded churches have perpetual
fires, but two we know each had a fire-house: the monasteries at Cloyne and
Molaisses Inishmurray, excavation of the latters floor confirming it had been a
hearth.57 Neither of these was among those recorded in the twelfth century as
being a place of a perpetual fire. This would suggest either that such fires and
their containing building were so common that they were rarely mentioned, or
else that the fire-houses were secular rather than religious buildings and the fire,
perpetual or otherwise, was a practical rather than a religious oneserving as
a need-fire or a metal-working building. A final point to be made is that the date
of the Kildare fire-house is architecturally identifiable with the early Christian
period, not the late Iron Ageuntil and unless such buildings are excavated and
shown to have pagan-era precursors under their foundations they, like the fires
they contained, are best interpreted as a part of general Christian monastic life
in Ireland.
In political terms, Kildare is the most fully attested of the female houses in this
later period, just as it was in the earlier. By the tenth century it had long been
dominated by Leinsters U Dnlainge dynasty, which had replaced the declin-
ing Fothairt. The latter did continue their links, though, up to the eleventh
century at least: one branch, the U Chlduib, supplied two abbesses, Muirenn
(obit ) and Eithne (obit ), and another, the Fothairt Airbrech, supplied
the abbess Sebdann (obit ) and her relative Duirc (obit ). Many of its other
clerics, whose origins are unprovable, may also have belonged to the Fothairt.58
In this era Kildare, like so many other church centres, was treated as a military
site as much as a sacred one, by the U Dnlainge and everyone else.59 The
Scandinavian kingdoms in Dublin and Waterford frequently ravaged it in the
wider context of hegemonic aspirations. The U Dnlainge themselves acted
out some of their internecine conflicts at Kildare. It was their infighting
which prompted an extraordinary event in , one which outraged even the
57
Killanin and Duignan, Shell Guide, , , .
58
M. OBrien (ed.), Corpus Genealogiarum Hiberniae (Dublin, ), ; Corrin, Early Irish
Churches, .
59
Covered in considerable depth in A. Smyth, Celtic Leinster: Towards an Historical Geography of Early Irish
Civilization AD ( Blackrock, ).
, ,
hardened: one faction of the dynasty attacked and raped the incumbent
abbess in order to disqualify her and cement their own takeover. The Annals of
Tigernach give the fullest account, explaining that Gill Comgaill mac Donn-
Cuan mac Dunlaing raped (saraigh) the coarb of Brigit and afterwards resided
in Kildare; Murchad mac Dunlaing retaliated by dragging him out by force and
killing him on the spot where he had committed the outrage.60 This event not
only illustrates the political value of control of the church but also the continued
centrality of the abbesss office, symbolically at least, to the notion of its
headship. Some ninety years later, in , U Failghe and the U Faelin slaugh-
tered each other, on the site, in a struggle for control over the coarbship.61 Just
four years later, in the U Chennselaig moved in and seized Kildare in a
manner that leaves no doubt as to the continuing importance of the abbesss
office.62
Teach n-abadh Cille Dara do ghabhail dibh gCeinnselaigh for chomarba mBrighdi,
ocus a loscad, ocus bladh mhr don chill, ocus sochaide do marbad ann, ocus an caillech
fin do breith a broid, opcus a tabairt a leabaidh fir.
The abbatial [ lit. abbots] house of Kildare was captured by the U Chennselaig from
the coarb of Brigit, and burnt, along with a large part of the establishment [ lit. Church];
and a great many were killed there, and the nun herself was dragged off as a prisoner and
put into a mans bed.
Ecclesiastically, few comments can be made about the place. Kildares regula
in the tenth to twelfth centuries was the mysterious Placentine rule. Its le-
gendary origins are recounted in two long glosses, according to which it ori-
ginated in a church beneath the Ictian sea and was fetched up by a young
Kildare boy who went overboard a ship bound for Rome.63 Evidently Kildare
needed to explain why it no longer followed the Roman customs. Placentia is
obviously the modern city of Piacenza in northern Italy, the town nearest the
Columbanian monastery of Bobbio, which may be of some significance. The
church of Piacenza was noted in the Lombard period for its strenuous independ-
ence in matters of liturgy and custom, and so it may well be that the Kildare
legend had its roots in fact.64 More than this one cannot say, as Italian sources
provide no ready solutions, any more than do the Irish ones. In ecclesiastical
terms Kildares status was destroyed at the Synod of Kells in when the Irish
church was granted formal independence from the English by the papacy and
Armagh was made the metropolitan See.65 In spite of that Brigit continued to be
an important figure. Her relics continued to circulate and in Lives she remained
60 61
ATig; AU . AU .
62
AU, C version, ; Annals of Loch C, . The U Chennselaig are also mentioned in th-cent.
Kildare hagiographic scholia on N Car Brigit.
63
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Feb.; glosses on N Car Brigit.
64
The church of Piacenza: R. Schumann, Le fondazioni ecclesiastiche e il disegno urbano di
Piacenza tra il tardo romano () e la Signoria (), Bolletino storico piacentino (), .
65
Flanagan, Irish Society, , esp. .
, , ,
eminent: in the late Latin Life of Tigernach, for example, the writer boasted
that Brigit had sponsored Tigernach in baptism, had named him, and had had
him elevated to episcopal orders.66 Not only did her Irish cult survive, but she
lived on in Continental churches as well. The saints authority outlived that of
her establishment.
66
Latin Life of Tigernach, chs. , (PVSH ii. ).
67 68
See also Byrne, Comarbai Brigte. Martyrology of Oengus, Feb.
69
Thes. Pal. ii. . Also Bernard and Atkinson, Irish Liber Hymnorum, ii. .
70
Colmns Hymn, Stokes and Strachan, Thes. Pal. ii. . Also in Bernard and Atkinson, Irish
Liber Hymnorum, , ; they felt the language to be consistent with an th-cent. date (p. xxxvi).
, ,
Ibi episcopus Dei gratia inebreatus non cognovit quid in libro sui cantavit. In gradum
enim episcopi ordinavit Brigitam. Haec sola, inquid Mel, ordinationem episcopalem
in Hibernia tenebit virgo.71
The bishop being intoxicated with the grace of God there did not recognize what he was
reciting from his book, for he consecrated Brigit with the orders of a bishop. This virgin
alone in Ireland, said Mel, will hold the episcopal ordination.
This story says that Brigit alone shall have this honour. Yet, when the story then
appears in later versions, the honour, or at least its status, is to be enjoyed by the
abbesss successors. Brigits Lismore Life, concludes the episode with the words
therefore the men of Ireland from that time to the present day give the honour of
the bishop to the successor of Brigit (conidh anoir espuic doberat fir Eirenn do comarba
Brigte o sin ille).72 A similar claim is made in the notes to the Martyrology of Oengus:
Rob ail didu do Brigit aithrige do tabairt furri, co rocht co Bri Eli moirseser caillech im-
mailli fria o ro chuala epscop Ml . . . Cid dia tancatar na caillecha? ol epscop Ml. Do
thabairt grad n-aithrige for Brigit, ol Mac cailli. Iarsin ro hirlegait grada for Brigit .i.
grada epscoip dano dorat epscop Ml fuirri conid annsin rogab Mac cailli caille for a
cinn. Conid desin dligis comarba Brigte grada epscuip do thabairt fair.73
Now Brigit was fain to have the orders of penitence conferred upon her; so she went to
Bri Eile, accompanied by seven nuns, since she heard that bishop Mel was there . . .
Why have the nuns come?, asked bishop Mel. To have the orders of penitence con-
ferred upon Brigit, says Mac Caille. Thereafter the orders were read out over Brigit,
and bishop Mel bestowed episcopal orders upon her, and it is then that Mac Caille set a
veil upon (her) head. Hence Brigits successor is entitled to have episcopal orders
conferred upon her.
The glosses on the poem N Car Brigit relate an almost identical version of the
story, in which Brigit again seeks the penitential grade from Mel, and he agrees
to grant it, but also gives her the episcopal ordination. Mel asks the reason for
the nuns arrival, to which he is told
Do thabairt grad aithrige, ar Mac caille. Dober sa on, ar epscop Ml. Iarsein tra do-
erlegait grada fuirri, is grad epscuip dorala do epscop Ml do thabairt for Brigit, cia-
rbo grad athrige nama rop ail disi fin; is andsein rochongaib Mac caille caille uas cind
Brigte, ut ferunt periti; is dosen dliges comarba Brigte do gres grad n-epscuip fuirri hon-
oir epscuip.74
To have the order of penitence conferred, said Mac Caille. I will confer it, said bishop
Mel. So thereafter the orders were read out over her, and it came to pass that bishop
Mel conferred on Brigit the episcopal order, though it was only the order of penitence
that she herself desired. And it was then that Mac Caille held a veil over Brigits head,
ut ferunt periti. And hence Brigits successor is always entitled to have episcopal orders and
the honour due a bishop.
71
Bethu Brigte, ch. .
72
Johnston, Transforming Women, , Homily on Brigit in the Book of Lismore, ch. .
73 74
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Feb. Notes on N Car Brigit.
, , ,
This episcopal consecration story first appeared in the ninth century; it is com-
pletely absent from the earlier Cogitosus and Brigits Vita I, the source for Bethu
Brigte. What is of most interest in the N Car Brigit version is the explicit assertion
that the subsequent Kildare abbesses were admitted to the grade or status of
bishop. They were entitled to have episcopal orders/status (grda epscuip / grd
n-epscuip) bestowed upon them, and were due, the honour of a bishop (honoir
epscuip). Kildares political importance underlies these claims, of course and, in
the case of the Lismore version at least, so too did ecclesiastical reforms.75 The
extraordinary political and dynastic significance of Kildare, with its female and
male heads, came to an end with the synod of Kells-Mellifont. But between the
ninth century and , there was an extraordinary female authority, in terms of
the ecclesiastical hierarchy as well as political realities, in the Kildare abbess.
In the legal material, too, it appears that the Kildare abbess enjoyed an un-
usually exalted status. A later gloss in the law tract Cin Lnamna, in the section
on Lnamnas icne (forced or secret couplings) says that if a mac-caillech (virginal
nun) is raped, one half of her honour price is paid to the tanist successor of
Brigit (tanaist comarba Brigti ). Thurneysen interpreted the tanist to be the prioress
of Kildare.76
If Kildares authority did increase at this time, with a linked magnification of
Brigits cult to include claims that she was in some way head of the whole islands
nuns, this would represent an important change in the widespread balance of
ecclesiastical power across Ireland. Additionally, holding the status of bishop
might well have given the abbess a supervisory authority over abbesses of sub-
sidiary female communities. According to a leading churchman of the early
twelfth century, those who held the grade of bishop could ordain abbesses (Ordi-
nat episcopus abbatem, abbatissam, sacerdotem et caeteros sex gradus).77 It looks very much
as if Kildare was asserting that its abbess had an authority over abbesses of other
female communities, whether or not they belonged to Kildares federation or
paruchia. One may wonder if at Kildare the abbess enjoyed the power of selec-
tion, or veto, concerning clergy in the monastery or even throughout the wider
network. Unfortunately, the law tracts and their attendant glosses are frus-
tratingly unforthcoming and offer no further elaboration on this case (or even
very much on the power of abbesses generally).
Brigidine Relics
There is no doubt about the abundance of Brigidine relics in this period, a
strong sign of her cults influence and Kildares political prominence in general
75
Johnston, Transforming Women, .
76
The main text of this chapter of the tract is ed. and trans. into German in SEIL, ALI ii. gives a
less satisfactory ed. and trans., but does also translate the glosses. R. Thurneysen, Cin Lnamna, in
SEIL , at .
77
Gilla Easpuic, De Statu Ecclesiae (PL , at ).
, ,
terms. The scholiast on the poem N Car Brigit mentioned a veil placed on
Brigits head by the bishop Mac Caille before she was presented to Mel for her
consecration rite, adding, that would be the veil that is venerated (comad e sen
caille foraithmentar ). The same story appears in the twelfth century as well, adding
that the site was Moin Faithnig, mod. Croghan, five miles north-west of the
town of Tullamore, the same site as appears in the earliest Lives; it too, speaks of
a veil there (that may be the veil which is commemorated there, cumad esin caille
foraithmentar sunn).78 Another relic in existence at this time was the beam which
supported the altar at Brigits consecration. Brigit had been touching it during
the rite, and afterwards it had ceased to age and had miraculously avoided de-
struction in spite of the church being burnt down around iteither once or
three times, depending on the version. The beam is also mentioned as an extant
relic in Bethu Brigte, which says its wood at some point had been miraculously
transformed into acacia, the wood of the ark of the covenant, which added a
Biblical dimension to the relics cult. The acacia appears only once in the Bible,
in Exodus : (arcam de lignis setim compingite), and the beams ability to survive
fires may have been associated, in peoples minds, with that Old Testament
account of the ark.79 Like other relics and their legends, this relic is not particu-
larly gendered or femininethe ark of the covenant was not especially associ-
ated with women but rather the chosen people as a whole.
Another Brigidine wood relic was a wonder-working oak tree at Kildare. It is
reported in the early thirteenth-century Vita IV, at which time pieces of the
stump were much sought after.
Illa iam cella scotice dicitur Killdara, latine vero sonat cella quercus. Quercus enim al-
tissima ibi erat quam multum sancta Brigida diligebat, et benedixit eam; cuius stipes
adhuc manet, et nemo ferro abscindere audet, et pro magno munere habet qui potest
frangere manibus aliquid inde, sperans per illud Dei auxilium, quia multa patrata sunt
miracula per illud lignum per benedictionem beate Brigide.80
This church is called in Irish Killdara, in Latin oak church. For there was a very tall
oak tree there which Brigit loved very much, and blessed, the trunk of which still re-
mains. No one dares chop at it with a weapon, but whoever can break off a part of it with
by hand considers it a great advantage, hoping for the aid of God by its means; [this is]
because many miracles have been performed by that wood, through Brigits blessing.
This passage shows the relatively recent origin of the oak trees significance, as
it was based on a failure to understand the real, much more mundane origin of
the name of the placenamely, the wood from which the church building had
originally been built. It is worth reiterating, lest one should still be tempted to
78
N Car Brigit, scholia; Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Feb.
79
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Feb., where the location cited is Fir Tulach. Bethu Brigte, ch. ;
commentary hAodha, Bethu Brigte, , who noted that Grosjean further suggested that the supposed
imperishability of the beam through fire may have owed a debt to an ancient commentary on Exodus.
80
Vita IV of Brigit, book , ch. . This paragraph, Sharpe has demonstrated, was actually written by
the early th-cent. redactor who inserted it in the text he was copying (Sharpe, Saints Lives, ).
, , ,
link the oak tree with a Brigidine pagan past, that the oak tree was not even men-
tioned in earlier Lives. Moreover, in the twelfth century a fashion for wonder-
working trees appears to have sprung up, for suddenly hagiography is full of
them. Ruadns monastery Lothra had one, as did the new Columban church
at Derry, and in one hears of a yew allegedly planted by Patrick himself.81
Brigits body was miraculously, if dubiously, discovered in with those of
Patrick and Brigit in Down by an Anglo-Norman, De Courcey, an event which
cemented the formulation of the three as Irish national saints. The translatio rite
was attended by papal legates and was conducted with great pomp but never-
theless failed to impress the Irish annalists any more than the finding, for they
unanimously fail to report it.82
: MIRACULA MINIMA?
It has been claimed that the miracles and achievements of female saints, as re-
lated by their later hagiographers were mostly domestic, small, or of a house-
keeping nature. Lisa Bitel in proposed that female saints miracles were
considered inferior to those of male saints and that they themselves held a lower
esteem than males among the dominant powers in Ireland.83 This view is un-
sustainable. Female saints continued to be attributed with real power relevant
for male petitioners as well as females, for political groups as well as individuals.
Hagiographers at male monasteries were exceptionally keen in this period to
claim their patron had been a friend of Brigits. Brendan, ed, Ailbe, Maedc,
Mochoemg, Tigernach, and Monenna were all claimed to have had links with
her.84 Among mortals, abbesses continued to be portrayed with powers often as-
sociated with male leaders and foster-mother abbesses continued to be re-
garded with great esteem. Lives went on relating stories of male saints visiting
nunneries and tutoring virgins.
The cult of Monenna is perhaps a particularly striking case. The following of
this saint reached even as far as England, as is evidenced in a collection of
material on her at Burton-on-Trent dating to the second quarter of the twelfth
81
Cf. Hamlin and Hughes, Modern Traveller, ; Irish Life of Ruadn, ch. (BNE i. ; Eng.
trans., ii. ).
82
The enshrined relics remained at Down until when they were desecrated. Brigits head was al-
legedly rescued and taken to Neustadt, Austria, whence it travelled in to the Jesuit Church in Lis-
bon. One of her feet made its way to a Brigidine church in Cashel, and in was among the possessions
of the archbishop there. One of her slippers was venerated in the later middle ages, too: the National Mu-
seum owns a slipper reliquary from Lochrea dated to , which had been used as a swearing relic. For
an anachronistically-inserted account of the event, attributed to a date over a century later, AFM .
83
Bitel, Womens Monastic Enclosures, .
84
Irish Life of Brendan, ch. ; Latin Life of ed, D text, ch. (PVSH i. ); Latin Life of Ailbe,
D text, ch. ; Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Apr., on Tigernach; Latin Life of Maedc, D text,
ch. ; Latin Life of Mochoemg, D text, ch. ; Life of Darerca, chs. , . The Brigidine presence
continued into the th cent.: First Latin Life of Brendan, ch. ; Latin Life of Tigernach, chs. , .
, ,
century.85 Her wide influence is also exalted in her two Lives. In the Life by
Conchubranus, where we are told that she lived on the boundary of the Eastern
provinces which she claims for herself on the West and North.86 In her own day,
he asserts, her authority and her possession of lands had been confirmed, after
some dispute involving the local king Glunelath and Saint Coemgen, a rival for
the monastery and its property. Significantly, the Life recounts a settling of this
quarrel and a reconciliation between Monenna and Coemgen. Further, she was
responsible for the kings conversion to holy ways and for his nephews becom-
ing clerics.87 Monenna, it goes on to relate, travelled with her virgins to England
and to Scotland, where she founded churches near Edinburgh and on the river
Trent, and numerous others in Scotland. After a supposed journey to Rome, the
saint also founded a church at the foot of Mount Calvus.88 At she lay dying
(Conchubranus says it was in Scotland), Monenna was visited by various
chiefs, who pleaded with her not to die and thus leave them as orphans.89 They
made her offerings to do what she wished with, if she would but ask God to let
her live another year, for they were certain that God would not refuse what she
asked.
Et appropinquante novissimo die et audita infirmitate eius in populo maximum contulit
omnibus luctum. Veneruntque ad illam visitandam Conagal qui erat rex Scotie in illo
tempore et Rotheri et Cobo et Bollan et Choilli et omnis maiores natu populi cum cetera
multitudine usque adpropinquantes monasterii loca. Miserunt itaque episcopum
Ronam fratrem Monenne ad illam ponentes verba hec in ore eius: Obsecramus te
propter consanguinitatem nostramnam et ipse rex matrem habuit Conalneamet
germanitatem quam habemus et in carne et in Deo ut etiam uno anno nobiscum
maneas et quasi orphanos nos in isto anno non derelinquas. Credimus enim et scimus
quia quecumque Dominum rogaveris sine dubio ab illo impetrabis.90
As her last day drew near and people heard of her illness, it caused everyone great sor-
row. And there came to visit her Conagall, who was king of Scotland at that time, and of
Rotheri Cobo, Bollan and Choille, and all the elders of the people with the rest of the
multitude drawing close to the precinct of the monastery. So they sent to her bishop
Ronn, Monennas brother, entrusting him with this message: We beg you, by the ties
of our blood (for the kings mother was also of the Conaille) and because of our relation-
ship both in the flesh and in God, that you stay with us for one year more and not leave
us like orphans in that year. For we know that whatever you ask from the Lord you will
undoubtedly receive from him.
85
The USMLS editors suggest that Monenna might have actually founded an English monastery
there in the th cent., though they offer no more than conjectural evidence for the suggestion (USMLS,
Life of Monenna, part , ).
86 87 88
Book , ch. . Book , chs. . Book , chs. .
89
Cf. Life of Darerca, ch. : O domina, per nostram te obsecramus consanguinitatem (ibi namque multi de eius
gente inerant, ipse etiam rex Eugenius ex parte matris Conallensis erat) perque eam quam carne et anima tenemus affinitatem
supplicamus quatenus saltem unius anni curriculo nobiscum in terris cohabitare digneris. Ne ergo hoc anno morte tua nos or-
phanos esse concedas. Nos etenim certi sumus quia, quicquid a Deo postulaveris, statim obtinebis.
90
Book , ch. .
, , ,
Monenna refused because, she says, Peter and Paul had already arrived to col-
lect her to take her to Christ. But in reward for their coming to her, she gave the
men her leather garment, her sheepskin, and her utensils, which they should
carry into battle to attain victory: victoriam per hec habere Dominus vobis promitit.
They should not, she added, go to war against other peoples beyond the bounds
of their lands unless compelled by a greater force, lest the wrath of the Lord
come upon them.91 Certainly this is no domestic, small-time saint speaking. Mo-
nennas anonymous Life in the Codex Salmanticensis also claims major cultic
importance for the saint, for in it she was sought out by many people that she
might intercede on their behalf.92
Frequent visits to Monennas nunnery by ordinary lay folk are related, and it
claimed greatness as an educational centre: she was a pia magistra of such note
that a nun came from Britain to study psalms and books with her, staying at a
hospice near to the saint.93 Both Lives of Monenna also emphasize her rigorous
pursuit of monastic ideals, likening her to John the Baptist.94 Her authority is re-
peatedly emphasized: throughout both Lives she autonomously and unilater-
ally founds monastic houses and hermitages, in some cases overcoming
opposition from local rulers. In the Life from the Codex Salmanticensis, Mo-
nennas brother Herbeus helps her overcome one particular ruler, yet here as
elsewhere it is Monenna who makes all decisions concerning the foundation
and the community. There is no authority over her to which Monenna must an-
swer. Indeed it is hard to overstate her power to conduct herself as she chose, or
the esteem accorded to her by the laity, in this text.
Monenna negotiated with a local king for the release of hostages (when her
plea for their release was refused, she used miraculous powers to set them free
nevertheless) and she intervened in the politicking of the Connactenses and the
Techuatenses, dealing with the kings over hostages.95 She was visited by a queen,
whose infertility she cured, and by a magister who sought advice on how to pray.96
Although she was poor in spirit and possessions ( pauper erat spiritu et rebus), the
hagiographer insists that her lack of land and property was deliberate: her ex-
tremely holy asceticism made her refuse the donations of land and goods that
people offered to her. One wonders, of course, if in the redactors day the
monastery was in a relatively poor position and this represents an attempt to
portray Monenna as powerful nevertheless.
91
Monennas proviso, namely that success will only be guaranteed when the bearers are defending
their own lands and not invading those of others, echoes the peace-keeping tone of abbess saints in lives
of the earlier centuries.
92
Life of Darerca, ch. : Ipsa itaque, degens in latebris, virtutum splendore in cunctis Hybernie partibus fuit cele-
bris. Hinc progressu temporis ab omnibus in circuitu regionibus nobilis matrone eius presentiam adire solebant, genibus in
terram flexis petentes ut eius colloquiis uterentur vel orationibus Deo commendarentur. Preterea virginum Christi numerus co-
tidie crescebat; et non solum de propinquis, verum etiam de remotis regionibus, elemosinis frequenter missis grex Christi
pascebatur.
93 94
Ibid., ch. . Ibid., ch. .
95 96
Ibid., chs. , , . Techuatensis, ie. the people of Tethbae. Ibid., chs. , .
, ,
97 98 99
Life of Darerca, ch. . Ibid., ch. . Ibid., chs. , .
100 101 102
Ibid., ch. . Ibid., ch. . Samthann called domina: Life of Samthann, chs. , .
103
In modern terms this territory, of roughly square miles, is bounded on the east by the River
Unshin, on the west by the River Shannon, on the north and west by Tirerril, on the south by the River
Boyle.
, , ,
Whosoever of the men of the everlasting world refuseth my tribute,
he shall have no posterity after him, but hell thereafter from me.
I, Lassair Ronns daughter, I bless the land with purity,
joyous success for its men in field of valour and conflict.
I bless its good women, for they are fairest of form,
and I bless their noble hosts: lasting be their fortune.104
To those who refused tribute Lassair literally gave hell. Among female saints,
her curse is unique, but not so the scope and tone of the authority she claimed.
Did people really believe that female saints affected political and military out-
comes? It would seem so. In , the Anglo-Norman invader Strongbow, much
hated by the Irish annalists, died of an infected wound shortly after raiding
monasteries, including Kildare. So great was Brigits perceived spiritual power
that as he lay dying he believed he saw himself being killed by the saint herself;
so report the Annals of the Four Masters. The Ulster annals report, tout court,
that Brigit and Columba were responsible for his very welcome death.105
Just as a female saint was an appropriate object of supplication for noble
males of all grades, for she could offer warriors protection in warfare and rulers
favourable outcomes in political and military events, so too might she be suppli-
cated by holy men. The glossator to the poem Brigit B Bithmaith related a story
in which Brendan, having been attacked by a sea monster which would only re-
treat when Brigits name was invoked, went to the saint to learn why the creature
had honoured her beyond all other saints (co fessad cid ara tarat in beist in mare onoir
do Brigit sech na nebu archena).106 She told him that since she had put her mind on
God she had never taken it from Him, at which Brendan exclaimed By God,
nun, it is right for the monsters that they honour you rather than us! A gloss on
a later stanza of the poem placed Brigit on a par with Patrick as pillars of Chris-
tianity in Ireland: as there are wont to be two pillars in the world, so Brigit and
Patrick in Ireland (amal bte da cholba i ndomun sic Brigit ocus Patraic i nHerenn).107 In
one Irish Life, Brendan visited Brigit and asked her advice on spiritual matters,
acknowledging her superiority as an intercessor for miracle-working.108
In the later Lives, as in the earlier Vita I, females were on occasion involved in
Church affairs, including the settlement of disputes. The Life of Berach relates
how, in a disagreement involving a holy man and a druid, both men and women
of the Church were called upon to help settle the matter:
[ Tunc vir Dei et] magus presentiam illorum iudicum adeunt, cupientes diffinitivam au-
dire ab eis sententiam. Iudices quoque timentes offendere partes, viros sanctos petunt
sibi assessores, scilicet sanctum Finnianum et Ultanum, et sanctas virgines Samtannam
et Athracteam, cum aliis prelatis, virginibus, ac viris sanctis. Magus vero demonibus
104 105
Irish Life of Lassair (Gwynn, Beatha Lasrach, ). AFM; AU .
106
The poem, with glosses, Thes. Pal., ii. . The story appears, in a more abbreviated form, in the
glosses to N Car Brigit.
107 108
Thes. Pal. ii. . See above. First Irish Life of Brendan, ch. .
, ,
immolat, nomina deorum suorum invocans, ut eum in suo certamine contra tot sanctos
viros ac sanctas defendant.109
Then the man of God and the druid came to their presence, desiring to hear a definitive
sentence from them. The judges, fearing to offend the parties, ask holy men to be asses-
sors, namely Finnian and Ultn, and the holy virgins Samthann and Adrochta, with
other prelates, virgins and holy men. The druid sacrifices to the demons, invoking the
names of his gods, that they defend him in his contest against all the holy men and
women.
The fact that some saints were female did not prevent their cults from becoming
extensive in this era. Their sex seems to have been no hindrance to their acqui-
sition of a celebrated status, for indeed they could become so famous and
sought-after that everyone wanted their own patron, even if male, to have been
associated with them. For all this, the period did witness changes. The authors
of the tenth to twelfth centuries were markedly more self-conscious about sex
than those of the preceding three hundred years. Traces of anxiety about the
Churchs women, and laywomen, began to emerge, with monks sometimes ex-
pressing thoughts on what might be the proper theological and physical rela-
tionship between a monk and the female sex. This is reflected in changes,
though not revolutionary ones, in attitudes to female saints: it appears that there
was a questioning in some quarters of the authority and power of female saints
or holy women. What alerts us to this new element is a handful of anecdotes in
these later Lives.
The most notable is in that of Ita, which dates from the thirteenth century:
Alio tempore sanctus Luchtichernus et sanctus Lasreanus, abbates, dixerunt ad in-
vicem: Eamus visitare famulam Dei, sanctam Ytam. Tunc quidam adolescens stulte et
insipienter dixit eis: Quid est vobis, sapientibus et magnis viris, ire ad anum illam ve-
tustam? Increpantes illum sancti, dixerunt ei: Male loquutus es, frater; iam enim
prophetissa Dei noverit quod tu dixisti.110
Another time St Luchtichernus and St Lasrn, abbots, said to each other, Let us go visit
the maiden of God, saint Ita. Then a youth stupidly and foolishly said to them, Why
would you, wise and great men, go to that old woman? The holy men, rebuking him,
said to him, You have spoken badly, brother, for already that prophetess of God knows
what you said.
The youth accompanied the pair and came to Ita that she might bless them,
ut benediceret eos. When the group arrived, she spoke to the youth, asking somewhat
sarcastically, Cur venisti ad anum vetustam, cum dixisti, quid prodesset sanctis venire ad me?
He did penance, and the trio stayed with Ita for some days, celebrating and
sharing in spiritual things. Now this anecdote has no precedents in earlier hagi-
ography. Earlier Lives contain no apparent trace of questioning the import-
ance of female saints, or the value of visiting them. The hermit who, in Brigits
109 110
Latin Life of Berach, ch. . Life of Ita, ch. .
, , ,
Vita I, wished to avoid going to Brigits community, was said to have done so for
ascetic reasons rather than out of a sense that she was, as a woman, unworthy.
This episode is the herald of an Irish marginalization of female monastics; it is,
though, only the beginnings of such a trend. Significantly, in this case Itas hagi-
ographer uses the story, and very possibly included it in the first place, in order
to reinforce her importance and power. He acknowledges that there is a chal-
lenge, and he says that she meets it and proves herself. This, as we shall see in a
future section, is a typical Irish resolution or handling of challenges posed by
the suspicious, the scorning, and the separatists.
Minor female saints appear in abundance in this era, in lists, genealogies, and
later martyrologies. These are often the mothers, sisters, and aunts of male
saints, which is significant.111 As Dorothy Africa showed through her examin-
ation of a specific genealogical text, such female relatives were employed by
genealogists of the eleventh and twelfth centuries who aimed to aggrandize par-
ticular monasteries and dynasties: they used female kinship to establish rela-
tionships between given male saints and other pertinent saints, or between those
male saints and ancestors of secular lineages with which they wished to be
affiliated.112
The use and purpose of the lists of minor saints is partially explained by this
analysis. Up to a third of the names on the lists and martyrological scholia of
female saints followed the simple forename, e.g. Fled, not with a patronym but
a church name, e.g. Fled of Tech Flide. Such mentions could serve no direct
genealogical purpose. They could, however, be used as adjunct material in the
creation of genealogies: if in his newly-extended genealogy the male saint had
become related to Fled, the genealogist could handily check whether claims
could be advanced on Tech Flide.
A particularly rich example is found in a short text in the MS BM Bibl.
Reg. .D.IX. It lists the disciples and relatives of Columba, giving the names of
his twelve disciples and his female relatives. The list of women gives information
useful to any Columban genealogist: his mother Eithne was the daughter of
Mac Nave; his first blood-sister Cuimne was the mother of the sons of Mac
Diciul (named MErnocc, Cascene, Meldal, and Bran, the last being buried at
111
Lists include: Ingenrada Noeb hErenn ( List of the Daughter Saints of Ireland); Comanmand Noebag
Herend (List of the Same-named Virgin Saints of Ireland); Brigitae Sanctae Subiectae (List of Those Subject
to Saint Brigit); Disciples and Relatives of St Columba (see below, n. ); The Mothers of Irish Saints;
Secht n-lngena Dalbronaig (the Seven Daughters of Dalbroney); Clann Darerca (the family of Darerca).
112
D. Africa, The Politics of Kin: Women and Pre-eminence in a Medieval Irish Hagiographical
List (PhD Thesis; Princeton, ) on The Mothers of Irish Saints, a list in the Book of Leinster,
analysing the use of female kinship claims in the promulgation of the cults of Brigit, Columba, and
Patrick.
, ,
Derry); his second blood-sister Mincholeth was the mother of the sons of Enan
(one of whom was called Calmaan); his third blood-sister Sinech was the mother
of the men MocuCein in Cuile Water, i.e. Aidan the monk (buried in Cuile
Water) and Chonrii MocuCein (buried in Daurmaig). Last in the list is his
grandmother ToCummi MocuCein, who rather confusingly is identified as
the ToCummi MoccuCein who grew truly old and finished his (? her) life as a
presbiter sanctus in Iona.113
Members of a religious familia could be counted in the extension of claimed ties
of kinship and hence privilege, and women were brought into the alleged house-
holds of founding saints. Here, the genealogists project of establishing wider net-
works of affiliation overrode any possible concessions to extremist anchorites
ascetic virtue of avoiding the opposite sex. Elsewhere the Columban familia
claimed that a virgin Ercnait had been the saints dressmaker, her name truly
Ercnait, embroideress, that is to say, cutter and sewer of clothing to Colum-
cille and his disciples. This was supposedly the same Ercnait who was credited
with founding the church of the virgin saint Coch, Cell Chca.114 Patrick, too,
added three women to his retinue: numerous eleventh- and twelfth-century texts
have a list of people in religion with the saint which includes his three embroi-
deresses, named as Lupait, Erc daughter of Dre, and Cruimthiris in Cen-
goba.115 Bairres Irish hagiographer listed the women who had attended his
patrons school at Edergole on Gougane Barre Lake at the head of the River Lee
in western County Cork. These were his own sister Crothru daughter of Conall,
three un-named daughters of Mac Carthainn, Coch of Ross Banagher, Mo-silln
of Rathmore, Scothnat of Clonbec, Lassair of Achad Durbcon, and finally the
three daughters of Lugaid, namely Dune, Erc, and Brigit of Ernaide.116 All, it is
insisted, had subsequently given their churches to God and Bairre in perpetuity.
Like the earlier ones, the later Lives of male saints mention holy women who
had lived at small churches and been buried there. Thus we learn of the holy,
noble and honourable virgin Midabair, who used to bless at Bumlin on the
Plain of A west of the River Shannon in Roscommon. We also hear of a princess
Patrick had converted and her holy woman tutor, buried in the cemetery at
Cechtumbair of Druim Dubain, near Clogher in Ulster.117 The Meath church
of the virgin Scre (Kilskeer) remains in the record, but now as part of the
113
Disciples and Relatives of St Columba (Thes. Pal. ii. ); Kenney, no. (i).
114
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Jan. Cell Chuaca may be modern Kilcock, Co. Kildare.
115
Tripartite Life (Stokes, Tripartite Life, ); see also Stokes, Tripartite Life, i., p. cxxvii, for full ref-
erences to this list in the Leabhar Breac, Egerton , Book of Leinster, Book of Lecan, and AFM .
116
Bairres school Edergole (Etergabail on Lough Irce) was shown to be at this site, not Addrigoole,
by Plummer, BNE, ii. . Some of the churches are identifiable, of which all are southern: Cochs Min-
ster (Mainister Coinche) in Ross Banagher (Ir. Ros Bendchuir) is identified with Rossmanagher town-
land north-west of Limerick; Rathmore is on the south coast near Sherkin Island; Clonbec is thought to
be in Tipperary; Ernaide presumably refers to the southern place going by that name, Ballyvourney on
the Sullane River in Cork, ten miles west of Macroom. Achad Durbcon is not known, but other texts
place it in Cork along the River Lee, the Muscraige Mittine.
117
Irish Life of Berach, ch. .
, , ,
Columban federation; at some point, a late Life tells us, an important assembly
was held there.118 The glosses on the martyrologies also add to the number of
known female saints.119
For all that their memories, and their names upons the lists recording them,
were pawns of political machinations, these less-known femalesor at least
most of themwere also genuinely regarded as having the power of interces-
sion and thus were saints in the functioning sense of the word. Thus the
genealogical-pawn thesis is only a partial one. At the very least they were peti-
tioned by passing visitors to their grave sites, as these places were places of divine
power, and the holy dead effective intercessors. But more than this, I think, was
the due of many of them. The martyrologies, attest, at bottom that they were
formally, liturgically commemorated on their feast days. An eleventh-century
Irish lorica prayer addressed invokes the protection Irelands virgins, and most
of those named are almost unknown except for their presence in the notes of one
of the martyrologies.120 In this little-known prayer the petitioner calls upon over
a dozen Irish virgins: Coch, Midnat, Scre, Sinche, Caite, Cuich, Coemill,
Craine, Coipp, Cocnat, Ness, Derbfalen, Becnat, Car, Crone, Caillann, Locha,
Luaithrenn, Rond, Ronnat, Rignach, Sarnat, Segnat, and Sodelb, as well as the
better-known Brigit, Monenna, Lassair, and Samthann. The individual who
used this prayer believed these now-unknown female saints could provide pro-
tection from demons and evil men, sickness and lies, cold and hunger, the
plague of the tempestuous doom, and the evil of hell with its many monsters.
For him as for many others, these long-dead women were much more than
names on an ever-changing family tree, more than historical links between
monasteries. They were agents of spiritual power.
In sum, nun, nunnery, and female saint were all flourishing in the tenth- to
twelfth-century period. The female houses, large and small, continued to exist.
The nuns professions appear to have continued much as before. Female saints,
major and minor, continued to be petitioned by worshippers of both sexes. The
changes of these centuries are, against this background, initially invisible. They
become more apparent, however, when the scholars gaze turns to the question
of relations between the sexes within monastic life, and concentrates particu-
larly on the chronology in the hagiographical corpus.
118
Irish Life of Columba, ch. . Columba when at Kells, turned to the south-west and predicted with
a smile the grafann of Cell Scre at which fifty sons of Life would be born in one night. The church is also
mentioned in the charters in the Book of Kells.
119
e.g. in the notes to the Martyrology of Oengus the virgins Bronach, Cumman the Little, and Aiche
(who raised the dead) appear for the first time.
120
Nom Churim ar Commairge, Plummer, Irish Litanies, .
In both male and female Lives of these later centuries, the normal course of
events remained as it was in the earlier ones. Monks, clerics, and nuns interact
in close proximity on account of friendship, collaboration, and mutual support:
such arrangements neither scandalized nor puzzled the redactors. In the canon
of male Lives, Maedc of Fernss second Irish Life is typical: nuns are mentioned
neutrally, simply that the saint once took a plough team as alms on a visit to
some holy virgins of distinguished chastity.1 Equally typical is the story from an-
other male Life in which a nunnery borrowed the use of a scribe from a mens
house.2
The female Lives portray much the same thing. Samthanns Life in particu-
lar is characterized by extensive contact between monks and nuns. The nun-
nery received visitors from male monasteries and gave them hospitality:
brothers from Iona brought wool to them, and a cleric came to Samthann to
consult with her about going on pilgrimage. Likewise, Samthann went visiting
to mens monasteries; Granard is mentioned in this context.3 Samthann per-
sonally organized the carpenters and builders working at the monastery and ne-
gotiated the release of prisoners with the local king. Her prioress Nathea also
undertook such responsibilities; in fact, Nathea is said to have gone with the
builders to the woods and to Connaught, to get the proper wood for building.4
No explanation or cautions were given by the hagiographer about either the
1 2 3
Ch. . Latin Life of Ailbe, D text, ch. . Life of Samthann, chs. , , .
4
Ibid., going into the woods, ch. ; Nathea travelling to Connaught, ch. .
journey or the going into the forest with these men; no remark was made on the
fact of a nun travelling with or working closely with males.
In her Life, Lassair travelled to see parents, to set up churches, and to visit
other ecclesiastics, and there is no suggestion that her late redactor had any con-
cerns about her extensive involvement with men. Typical is the passage in
which Lassair set out to find her father who had just converted to the religious
life and was staying with MacConall some distance away; here as often else-
where the virgin was very much in the company of men:
Iarsin ceileabhrais Lasair do chlircibh an bhaile rainic roimpe a ccen tsa tsiubhail
otha sin go tigh Mic Conaill Espag Aodhin na cuidechta dream eile do chlircibh
an bhaile.4A
Then Lassair bade adieu to the clerics of the hamlet and set forth walking from there to
the house of Conalls son, together with Bishop Aodhn and also a company of clerics of
the hamlet.
Just as the person who wrote Lassairs life was unflustered to imagine her on the
road amidst a band of priests, so were other authors. Monennas Life is virtually
a travelogue of her wanderings with her virgins, and a homily on Brigit recounts
a miracle which occurred once when Brigit was with her virgins at Armagh.5
Likewise, Monennas Life, quite typically, has clerics visiting her in friendship:
Patrick and Monenna, it seems, were friends, if indeed that is the implication of
the chapter which begins, Quadam die contigit quod octo presbiteri missi a sancto Patri-
cio episcopo venissent ut visitarent sorores in deserto positas et maxime Monennam abbatis-
sam.6 Ita and Coemgen were alleged to have had a particularly close affectionate
relationship, according to Itas Life, for the saint was called by a dying Coemgen
to come to his monastery: sanctus abbas Comhganus, cum sciret sue remuneracionis
tempus advenire, rogata est a se sancta Ita, ut veniret ad eum.7 In this era, as in earlier cen-
turies, sex did not preclude affectionate ties which could be expressed by visits
undertaken over long distances.
was a womens church about metres from the monasterys round tower. Its
ruins still remain, and one can see that it was situated in a square raised enclos-
ure and that it was rebuilt, or built, in the twelfth century, for there are remnants
of the chancel and north door in twelfth-century architectural style.9 That there
may have been a handful of Benedictine nuns in the twelfth century just might
be plausible, given a former English presence in the form of one holy man
Cellach the Saxon of Glendalough whose ethnic identity was partly English,
though somewhat confused in the description, he was not English, but was
Irish, as he had come from the English to the Irish.10
Armagh for its part became a pilgrimage destination and retirement home
for queens par excellence. There in died Derbforgaill daughter of Domhnaill
mic meic Lochlainn, king of Ireland, who was wife of Connaughts King Toird-
elbaich Ua Conchobhair.11 It had an oratory Recles Brigti, which was one of
only two church buildings to survive the Armagh blaze of .12
The Columban community promoted abbot Adomnn (floruit c.) as a
saint. His Life was written c., and he also appears in the Middle Irish com-
mentaries on his law of , as a saviour of Irish women. In these later com-
mentaries, women were enjoined to give renders to Columbas church whenever
his relics were brought to their area on circuit, in gratitude for his promulgating
his Law of Innocents: queens should give horses, penitent nuns garments, and
lesser women items appropriate to their wealth and status.13 Confusingly, how-
ever, Adomnns Life appears to denigrate the female sex, commencing as it
does with a little homily stressing the idea that women are unsuitable for the
rigours of the religious life; it cites the biblical figure of Wisdom whose com-
mandment, men, gird up your loins, was said to use the word vir rather than
homo to indicate that Wisdom meant to speak to the male sex in particular;
according to the hagiographer, it was as though Wisdom were saying I do not
speak to women because they who are of unstable mind cannot at all under-
stand my words.14 This sort of contradiction in attitude to the female sex, as will
be discussed below, is characteristic of Irish writing of this period. Women
appear to be very much present in the Columban federation, in other evidence:
two Columban houses of this era, Derry and Iona, have traces of female
burials.15 Derry (Ir. Dire) acquired in the twelfth century a female erenagh,
9
H. Leask, Glendalough (Dublin, n.d.); H. Leask, Irish Churches and Monastic Buildings, vols. (Dundalk,
), i. ; Killanin and Duignan, Shell Guide, .
10 11
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Oct. AFM .
12
AU, AFM . The other was the Teampull-na-Ferta, the church of the relics. The Brigit church
was located thirty yards north-east of the present St Malachys Church in Chapel Lane (Killanin and
Duignan, Shell Guide, ). On the site, see C. Brown and A. Harper, Excavations at Cathedral Hill,
Armagh, UJA (), .
13
Cin Adomnin, ch. (Irish Introduction to the core Latin text).
14
Irish Life of Adomnn (Betha Adomnin), ch. (M. Herbert and P. Riain, Betha Adamnain: the Irish
Life of Adamnan (Irish Texts Society ; London, ) ). On date, background, and purpose of the text see
also Herbert, Iona, .
15
R. Reece, Excavations on Iona, (London, ).
16 17
AFM . AFM , .
18
She was a deeply generous patron: at Mellifonts establishment she presented the abbey with
ounces of gold, a gold chalice for the high altar, and with furnishings for sixty other altars. She retired to
Mellifont in old age and died there in . A few remains of the Romanesque nave-and-chancel struc-
ture survived to modern times; T. Westropp, A Description of the Ancient Buildings and Crosses at
Clonmacnois, Kings County, JRSAI (), ; C. Manning, Clonmacnoise (Dublin, ), ,
; Leask, Irish Churches, i. .
19
Latin Life of Carthach, D text, ch. : et illa sancta virgo se cum cellula sua sancto Mochutu [i.e. Carthach]
obtulit, in quo loco monasterium sanctimonialum est hodie in civitate Less Mor . . . Egregia iam et sancta civitas est Less
Mor, cuius dimidium est assilum in quo nulla mulier audet intrare.
20
Ibid.
21
The remains at Clones are considerable and feature both early and Romanesque ruins; see
W. Wakeman, On the Ecclesiastical Antiquities of Cluain-Eois, JRSAI (), ; Killanin
and Duignan, Shell Guide, .
22
Latin Life of Tigernach, ch. .
23
Latin Life of Daig, ch. (Heist, ). Religious women in general figure especially prominently
in this brief Life. A few ruins of the monastery, which is some seven miles north-east of Carrickmacross,
are still visible, including the base of a round tower.
, ,
from the time the place was founded.24 Bairre of Corks Irish Life claimed that
his island monastery of Etergabil (mod. Edergole) had, or had had, a school
which taught many virgins.25 Seirkieran claimed to have, or have had, an adja-
cent womens community which Ciarn had founded and put under his mother
Liadains direction.26
Other male monasteries contain remains suggesting a female community in
the early medieval period. At Offalys Lemanaghan (Ir. Lath Manchin) there
is a semi-ruined church said to be of Manchns mother; it is south-east of
Manchns church along a walkway through a marsh, and is surrounded by a
small enclosure.27 The remains of Molaisses monastery on Inishmurray in
Donegal Bay include two chapels to the south-east of the main enclosure,
namely Reilic-na-mBan and Teampall-na-mBan (the womens cemetery, and
the womens church) with a nearby cross pillar; significantly, in the central sub-
enclosure is an oratory known as Teampall-bhFear (the mens church) where
until recently only men were buried.28 Inishglora, an island off the Mayo coast,
had a community allegedly founded by Brendan: its ruins consist of a stone en-
closure, a few cross-slabs and pillars and three chapels, one of which is known as
Teampall-na-mBan.29 A womans church is also found on Inchcleraun in the
northern part of Lough Ree, known primarily for its male inhabitants: sources
remembered its early saint Diarmait, its saint Snach (obit AFM ), and one of
its lectors.30 Carrickmore in Co. Tyrone (Termon-cumaing) had a womens
cemetery: a twelfth-century church attests to a small community there, and it
subsequently became a parish church.31
24
Latin Life of Daig, ch. : in monasterio quoque sanctarum virginum filiarum Fintani, virginem quandam, nocte
adventus eius defunctam, vite restituit. Quapropter virgines monasterium suum eius successorumque ipsius dominatui
tradiderunt. There are three Fintns who were abbots, but Heist considered that this one was Fintn alias
Munnu, the abbot of Taghmon (Ir. Tech Munnu, in modern Co. Wexford); the others are the abbots
of Clonenagh (Ir. Cluain Ednech, Co. Laois) and Doon (Ir. Dn Blesci, Co. Limerick) (Heist, ). There
is also, however, a Fintn associated with the very nearby Clonkeen, Co. Louth, of which some eight
members are remembered in the martyrologies: perhaps it was nuns of this place instead who were
subject to Inishkeen.
25
Irish Life of Bairre of Cork, ch. .
26
Latin Life of Ciarn of Seirkieran, D text, chs. , (PVSH i. ). The womens community is
also in the Second Irish Life of Ciarn, ch. , which according to Sharpe may be based on the same ex-
amplar as D. The First Irish Life is derived from D (BNE i. ; Eng. trans., ii. ).
27
Manchn was said to be a pupil of Decln, Latin Life of Decln, D text, ch. (PVSH ii. ) but
there is to my knowledge no account of his mother. Cf. the adjacent female communities supervised by
the mothers of other male saints (Hughes and Hamlin, Modern Traveller, ).
28
Hughes and Hamlin, Modern Traveller, ; Killanin and Duignan, Shell Guide, .
29
Hughes and Hamlin, ; Killanin and Duignan, .
30
Hughes and Hamlin, ; Killanin and Duignan, ; Martyrology of Gorman, Jan., Apr. On
the site, F. Bigger, Inis Clothrann, Lough Ree: Its History and Antiquities, JRSAI th ser. (),
.
31
A. Hamlin, A Womans Graveyard at Carrickmore, Co. Tyrone, and the Separate Burial of
Women, UJA (), .
:
Within the essentially continuous mundus of positive nonchalance about rela-
tions between the sexes, though, incipient changes become apparent. The Life
of Molua, dating from the late eighth or earlier ninth century, foreshadowed
what becomes in the tenth, eleventh, and twelfth centuries a more frequent
tone. Interspersed among the stories of monks and nuns assisting and visiting
members of the opposite sex are found incongruous messages; these apparent
interpolations are the clues which betray the new preoccupations.When voiced,
they centre on monastic arrangements, namely the proper proximity between
monks and nuns, monks and laywomen, and nuns and laymen.
One way in which this manifests is in statements about the holy saint herself,
or himself, to the effect that he or she personally had followed a separatist
policy. Conchubranuss Life of Monenna exemplifies this clearly. A long text, it
is filled with interactions between the female saint and numerous laymen, all of
which Conchubranus relates without ado. One passage, however, makes a
claim which stands out: Monenna, Conchubranus announces halfway through
the text, avoided the male sex.32 Qualifying himself, he adds that when, in the
course of her work, she had to deal with men she covered herself:
Narrant ergo certissime de sancta Monenna postquam de peregrinatione Roma re-
vertens in terram venerat sue cognationis sancte sexum virilem numquam intueri. Sed
quando necessitas proficiscendi alibi cogebat infermos visitare aut vinctos precibus sive
muneribus solvere vel captivos redimire illam affirmant in nocte procedere; si autem ne-
cessitas cogeret facie operta pallio homines contraire vel appellare semper volens iu-
nioribus exemplum relinquere ne per fenestras ullatenus sineret mortem ad animam
intrare.33
Now they say very definitely of saint Monenna that after she had come to the land of her
holy kin on her return from her pilgrimage to Rome she never looked upon the male sex.
But they say that when the need to go forth somewhere caused her to visit the sick or re-
lease prisoners by prayers or gifts or redeem captives, she would go out by night; but if
need compelled, she would face or address men with her face covered by a veil, ever
wishing to leave and example to the younger so as not to allow death to enter the soul in
any way through the windows.
The bald assertion stands alone and uncorroborated by either the tone or con-
tent of the rest of the Life, especially her death scene in which various noblemen
and kings come to her deathbed. Nevertheless, the point was considered import-
ant enough to Conchubranus for him to stress it to his readers. Its tone and
phrasing, combined with its apparent disjunction, suggests that sex-separation of
monks and nuns was a relatively new issue in his day. It is, it could be argued, a
parenthetical insertion whose purpose is to caution the nuns listening to the tale.
32 33
Book , ch. . Book , ch. .
, ,
34
Homily on Brigit in the Leabhar Breac (Stokes, Three Irish Homilies, ).
35
A slightly different interpretation is made of gender preoccupations in this Life, based on the anec-
dote of Orbile, is made by Johnston, Transforming Women, .
36
The consecration and education of Monenna are recounted in book , chs. and , and all subse-
quent quotes in this paragraph are from these chapters.
placed her under a virgin named Athea, after which he entrusted her to another
pious priest (alius religiosus presbiter) to teach her the psalms and always to nurture
her in divine studies (in divinis studiis semper nutriret). After this formative period
Monenna returned to her parents home, to carry on under the instruction of
the priest. She then wished to withdraw from the world, but as there were no
convents for virgins at this time, she achieved this aim by taking her female fol-
lowers with her to the holy Bishop Ibar. There, he wrote, she spent much time
under the direction of the holy bishop in the service of God, in the strict rule of
holy discipline, in severe but just abstinence of life and in great constancy of vigil
and reading (ubi multum temporis in Dei servitio et disciplinarum sanctarum stricta regula
et dura vite sed recta abstinentia, in vigiliarum et lectionis assiduitate nimia sub illius episcopi
potestate transegit). Thus Conchubranus was satisfied to write that a young virgin
would be away from her parental home under the supervision of male clerics
during the time of religious education.
Lassairs hagiographers, too, claimed that their saint had been tutored by a
male saint, Molaisse, at whose establishment were found both boys and girls.
Molaisse taught wisdom and learning (laighinn lainegna), and Lassair had ex-
celled at these so that within three months she had overtaken those who had
been there two years.
One redactor of Ciarns life, who related that this male saint educated a vir-
gin in a one-to-one tutoring arrangement, evidently had some concern about
it. His version tells that Ciarn as a young man, while living at Finnians
monastery, was entrusted with the education of a princess who had come to the
monastery after dedicating her maidenhood to God; Ciarn was assigned to
read the psalms with her, which he did. However, the hagiographer notes care-
fully, during the whole of her time there the young man would not look upon the
princess, but only at her feet (ni fhaca tra Ciaran do curp na hingine cein batar immale
acht a traighthi nama).37
For the hagiographers of this period, the anecdotes of adjacent schools for
boys and girls in monasteries occasionally caused concern. Unlike their prede-
cessors of the ninth century and earlier, they would sometimes remark that
the proximity of boys and girls could prove problematic. But even when these
redactors write down the episodes where the monastic school was the venue
of sexual sin among the students, they never blame the institutional structure
itself, but rather the individuals shortcomings.38 The mixed-sex monastic
school, or tales thereof, remained in the hagiographic record, then, without
being condemned.
37
Homily on the Life of Ciarn in the Book of Lismore, lines (W. Stokes, Lives of the Saints from
the Book of Lismore (London, ), , ).
38
Carthachs lapse as a student with a young virgin, described below.
, ,
Foster-mothers
In this era male saints were portrayed, more than ever before, as being related
to female saints through the bonds of fosterage. Many were said to have been
fostered and educated by nuns. To cite but a few examples, Mochoemg was
said to have studied twenty years with Ita, and Brendan spent his first five years
with her. Brigit tended Tigernach, and Lassair took on an unnamed youth who
wanted to receive learning and instruction. Through the period, the esteem for
the foster-mother remains strong, and there is no apparent anxiety about monks
being in contact with the virgins who raised them. Indeed, devotion to ones vir-
ginal foster-mother is considered a virtue, and Lives often mention saints going
in adulthood to visit and care for these women. The first Irish Life of Ciarn of
Seirkieran, for example, relates how the saint faithfully returned to visit his
foster-mother Cuinche (a holy widow), to give her communion and pray with
her, even though it was a long way from his monastic community; and his
second Life says he used to go and plough for her.39
Even after their charges had grown up, virgin foster-mothers offered advice
and spiritual guidance, and good foster-sons followed it. In the poem A Chrnoc,
a monk addresses the virgin with whom he spent his childhood, lauding her
with words your advice is ever prompt (erlam do chomairle chir) and admits, if I
followed your teaching I should safely reach stern God (dia seichmis cech da do dn
ro-seismis sln co Da ndan).40 In a similar vein Brendan, returning from one of
his voyages, dutifully went to his own foster-mother. Ita on one occasion scolded
him: Ah, dearly beloved son, why did you go on your journey without first
taking counsel from me?41 But Ita comes across with the most breathtakingly
paradoxical advice, for when Brendan was a young man about to leave her to go
out in the world for the first time, she had counselled, Do not learn of women
or of virgins, lest you be reproached in regard to them (na dena foghlaim ag
mnaibh na acc oghaibh; na derntar hcnach friu. Imtigh si olsi teiccemaidh laech
suaitnidh soicenelach duit foran slicchid ).42 In the Latin Life, this advice was formu-
lated in a wry rhyming couplet: noli enim discere a virginibus, ne scandalum incurras ab
hominibus.43 So Brendan was to ignore the counsel of women, including virgins,
yet he dutifully carried on visiting his virgin foster-mother and was rightly
reproached for failing to ask her advice on religious matters. Both hagi-
ographers were inconsistent beyond this, for in other episodes of these two Lives
Brendan sought counsel from the virgin Brigit on several occasions, and he met,
aided, and counselled other women. Like its equivalents in other Lives, this
anecdote promoting female-avoidance sits somewhat uneasily amidst a wealth
of other stories where male saints have easy relations with women.
39
First Irish Life of Ciarn, chs. .
40
Greene and OConnor, Golden Treasury, . Text discussed in Kenney, no. . The poem is
commonly agreed to be a double entendre addressing a psalter as though it were a woman; see below, Ch. .
41 42 43
First Irish Life of Brendan, ch. . Ibid., ch. . First Latin Life of Brendan, ch. .
the most shockingly severe response, fails to condemn Lupait: the anecdote con-
cludes by saying that Patrick buried her and sang her requiem, and she rose to
heaven on the spot; she persuaded Patrick not to condemn the man and his off-
spring, so that that race (the U Faelin and the U Duib Dare) was eligible to
enter heaven, though they would always be a sickly stock.44 Elsewhere the Tri-
partite Life recounts another episode on the theme: a holy virgin named Ercnait
daughter of Dre, who was madly in love with the holy man Benignus, died of
an illness. Benignus came and raised her from the dead with the help of some
Patrician relics, and after she sprang up alive it was evident that a miracle had
happened, for now she just loved Benignus spiritually. It is as obvious as it is sur-
prising that in the eyes of Patricks hagiographer Ercnaits sainthood was un-
compromised by her having fallen in love.
As has already been demonstrated, the Lives of this era continue to show
nuns travelling and undertaking journeys for a variety of reasons. Even junior
nuns were shown doing this: for example, Lassair, when a young nun and a pupil
of Molaisse, got his permission to go home to see her parents, and did so.45 Yet
for one hagiographer journeys did become an occasion for worry. The redactor
of Itas Life tells of the abbess Rychenas visit to Killeedy over a matter concern-
ing a foster-son: when Rychena is about to set off for home, Ita warns the nun
that she ought to travel back with a bishop as her chaperone, lest she be over-
come by demons. Ancilla Dei, iter tuum prosperum non esset, nisi episcopus tecum veniret,
quia multum demones insidiantur nostro sexui.46 Here for the first time a nun travelling
alone is described as being at risk from her own weakness, presumedly of
sexual lust.
The Life of Samthann has two cases of fornicating nuns. In the first anecdote
two nuns lived next to the monastery of the abbot Cainnech; as the result of a
diabolical temptation, one became pregnant: erant due moniales iuxta monasterium
Kynnechi abbatis, quarum una diabolica suggestione concepit, et postea peperit filium. To
avoid the damage this would cause to the reputation of the monastery, the two
nuns decided to take the baby to Samthann, having heard of the great saint.
Samthann took pity on the nun and undertook the fostering of the child at her
place, and raised him herself.47 A second episode of sexual exploits took place
amongst Samthanns own community. A monk entered the precinct and, as a
result of gazing on a particularly beautiful nun, fell in love with her, and she re-
sponded. Having arranged to meet the monk outside the walls of the nunnery
to elope with him, the nun got permission to leave on an errand and met
her lover. The affair was aborted by a miraculous if brutal intervention on
the saints part, and the monk swore never to visit a nunnery again: itaque
44
The political agenda of the episode is self-evident, but this discussion concentrates on its form of ex-
pression (Stokes, Tripartite Life, i. ); on Benignus (Ir. Benn) and Ercnait, whose church is here spec-
ified as Tamlacht B in Ulster (possibly mod. Taulagdarn near Armagh), ibid. .
45
Irish Life of Lassair (Gwynn, Beatha Lasrach, ).
46 47
Life of Ita, ch. . Life of Samthann, ch. .
vexacio dans sibi intellectum, ad monasterium virginum se nunquam iterum venturum cum
iuramento promisit.48
The Leabhar Breac homily on Brigit has but one sexual episode, and it is
hardly a scandal. It recounts that the saint met a demon at a nunnery she was
visiting, and asked him why he had come among our nuns (dixit brigit fria demon.
cid diatanacaise chucainde inarcaillechu). He replied that it was because he was ac-
companying one of the virgins, so Brigit instructed this virgin to perform the
sign of the cross over her eyes, whereupon she saw the demon, repented, and
was healed of the devil of gluttony and lust that had dwelt in her company
(dorgne ing athrige iarsin. rohictha dondemon cras ocus etraid bi inacomitecht).49
A story in two versions, both written during this era, relates that St Carthach
as a student at Seirkieran fell in love with a girl in the womens community, and
she with him, so they arranged a tryst. In the first, the two did not consummate
their desire thanks to a last-minute attack of fear of God, after which they separ-
ated without saying a word. The girl was blinded by the event and the text goes
on to moralize (in what may be an addition by redactor D) that this punish-
ment was fitting: since the girl had been blinded morally in her sin she was then
blinded physically in her rescue from it. Carthach was punished too, though
only in the sense that he performed a penitential pilgrimage.50 In the second
version the couple did make love and a child was conceived, and the baby was
to grow up to be known as Molua mac Ochae. It related that Ita allegedly com-
posed the following rhyme on the matter:
Ticfa Carthach cugaib fer co n-arthrach creidim
berthar mac do Carthach (.i. Molua mac Ochae) nocha marthar etir.51
Carthach will come to you, a man with the appearance of belief
A son will be born to Carthach (i.e. Molua mac Ochae); he is not at all magnified.
As in earlier Lives, male saints sometimes produced miraculous abortions for
pregnant nuns, as a reward for their contrition. In a variation on this compas-
sionate response, one saint instead pronounced that the child would be born,
but shame would still be averted because it would grow up to be the monasterys
abbot.52 The incidence of saint-induced abortions does decline, and there is rea-
son to believe that redactors of the twelfth and thirteenth century edited some
of them out of the narratives.53
48 49
Ibid., ch. . Homily on Brigit from the Leabhar Breac (Stokes, Three Irish Homilies, ).
50
Ciarn of Seirkieran, D text, ch. ; it also appears in the derivative Latin Life of Ciarn of
Seirkieran in the Codex Salmanticensis, ch. (Heist, ).
51
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Mar.
52
Miraculous abortions: Latin Life of Ciarn of Seirkieran in the Codex Salmanticensis, ch. .
Abbatial successor: Latin Life of Bite, ch. (PVSH i. ).
53
As did redactor D in some cases (Sharpe, Saints Lives, ).
, ,
Another change is also evident. A new topos is that of the woman who attempts
to seduce the monk or cleric. The rise of this subject in ecclesiastical writing is
hardly surprising, given the events and trends in England and the Continent. In
England, the Benedictine reforms were proceeding apace, influencing not only
writing but practice. On the Continent, from the eleventh century the papal re-
forms, one of whose platforms was reform of the clergy to a celibate norm, were
also creating a stir. Both movements framed women as clerics seducers.
Although some later male Lives promoted separation of monks from all
females (including nuns) this feature is neither consistent nor preoccupying.
One of the Lives of Coemgen illustrates particularly well just how closely the
writers of this period could juxtapose the message of sexual asceticism on the
one hand, and the nonchalance of friendships with nuns on the other. It relates
that Coemgen used to work in the fields with his brothers in a place visible to the
women of the neighbourhood. One ardent young woman watching the monks
became smitten when she saw the saint. Filled with uncontrollable desire for
him, she gave frantic chase with the intention of ravishing him. He managed to
beat her off with stinging nettles and thus saved his virtue, but having defended
himself Coemgen neither cursed her nor ran away. Instead he talked with her
and persuaded her to become a nun, whereupon she promptly took the veil and
promised her virginity to God and to Coemgen. Thereafter, we are told, the
woman served Coemgen loyally: illa autem iuvencula deinceps prudens et sancta virgo
effecta est, que sancta monita beati Coemgeni diligenter servabat.54 It is significant that
Coemgen did not treat his passionate admirer as an envoy of the devil; rather,
his reaction recalls Trechns seventh-century memoirs which had mentioned
calmly that the virgin Comgella had been a nun to Cethiacus. Perhaps more
surprisingly, this author goes on to say this maiden diligently served Coemgen,
and, given the ambiguity of the language, it is possible that he meant to imply
that she lived with him. This type of legend was not unique, for other saints were
said to have virgins attending to their close needs as was noted earlier in the le-
gends that Patricks three embroidresses were in orders with him.55
The instruction to show compassion towards lusty women is found in another
of Coemgens Lives as well. This tells of the monk Berchn who went on a mis-
sion from Glendalough to the monastery of Abbot Cronn. On the journey
Berchn came across a woman wanting to accompany him to his destination; he
agreed and they went together. Then she was seized with love for him, for he
was handsome, so she set about seducing him, finding an excuse to undress in
front of him. Just as Berchn was about to succumb, he pulled away and began
54
Latin Life of Coemgen, D text, ch. .
55
Their names are given as Lupait, Erc the daughter of Dare, and Cruimthiris in Cengoba (Stokes,
Tripartite Life, i. ); Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Jan.
beating her with his bachall. This event was seen clairvoyantly, from a distance,
by the two abbots Coemgen and Cronn, and their respective responses launch
the moral of the story. Cronn cheered him on, encouraging him in his beating
the strumpet (impudica) so manfully, but Coemgen had the spiritually superior
response. He told him to have mercy: O fili carissime Berchane, indulgens parce, et
noli miseram flagellare. Berchn obeyed Coemgen, and the result was the hagi-
ographers ideal: the woman repented, took the monk to where he was going,
and changed her ways, doing penance and magnifying the Lord.56
There are other stories which encourage the would-be seducer of monks or
clerics to think of God instead, to love God instead, or even to marry God in-
stead. In fact, this is the Irish standard response. In a Life of Carthach the saint
healed a princess, Flandnait, of her withered arm, and at this her exultant
father, King Cuanu of Fermoy, said she could marry any man she chose, of all the
royal males of Munster. She replied, I choose no man other than the one who
healed my arm. Carthach, rather than running away, took advantage of her
desire. Give her to me and I shall give her to the Son of God, who healed her,
he said. This was done and she established with her inheritance (hereditatem) a
church on the River Blackwater in Fermoy.57 A similar act is reported in
Carthachs Irish Life: being so extraordinarily handsome, it relates, he attracted
the passionate, irrepressible love of no less than thirty maidens. In distress he
prayed to God about themasking that their love should turn into a spiritual
love ( guidhis Da imn seirc sin do thinntodgh hi sierc spiritalta). God obliged, and
Carthach made then all into nuns (caillecha) who served God until death.58
The Temptation of a Confessor is a little story found in several manuscripts,
dated to the twelfth century or just possibly the thirteenth.59 In it a woman has a
monk for her confessor and attempts to seduce him. First she simply propos-
itions him. This does not work: the monk tells her that he is vowed to God since
youth and has never known a woman. She should, he says, approach instead her
husband if she is lacking sex, for it is right that he, and not himself, be ap-
proached that way. And besides, he adds, he is just a poor monk serving God,
and it is not suitable for him to be sleeping with her. It is nothing personal, of
course. Upset, the woman threatens to make a scene and accuse him of sexual
harassment unless he gives in; if he does sin with her, though, she will give him
all manner of gifts and wealth. Seemingly caught by the threat, the monk agrees
to have sex with her. All right, he says, inviting her to follow him into a walled
56
Latin Life of Coemgen, D text, ch. .
57
Latin Life of Carthach, D text, ch. ; Irish Life of Mochuda, ch. . Flandnaits place is called
Cluain Dallain at Feic.
58
Irish Life of Carthach alias Mochuda, ch. (BNE i. ; Eng. trans., ii. ).
59
Foscl ar Bannscail (Short Tale of a Woman), also sometimes called The Temptation of a Confes-
sor, in the Leabhar Breac, Bodl. Rawl. B., BM Egerton , and Bib. Nat. Fonds celtique I. Kenney, no. .
This loose translation based on Vendryess edition, J. Vendryes, Trois historiettes irlandaises, Revue
Celtique (), ; also, H. Gaidoz (ed. and trans.), La tentation dun confesseur, Jqtpsdia
(), .
, ,
garden adjacent to the monks quarters where he says they will make love.
When the two step out, however, the woman is astonished to discover the gar-
den filled with people. Wandering about among the trees and flowers are mem-
bers of royal and noble families, including her own husband. She blushes deep
red:
Why have we come here, with all these people around us? And why did you not know
this great crowd would be here?, she asks.
I knew they would be here. Indeed it was I who opened the doors for them all.
Quick, let us leave immediately, she says.
Not until we have done what we came for.
Thats impossible! Not with all these people around us, who would be staring at us!
And truly, when you give me life from East to West, I simply shant be able to do it,
out of modesty and discretion, what with all these people surrounding me as they are.
Alas, noble lady, he replies, they are as nothing compared to the other witnesses
who will see you if you do the deed.
What do you mean?, she asks.
Look up, he says. The woman raises her eyes towards the sky, and behold what she
sees: the doors and windows of heaven open, and Christ himself is carrying his bleeding
cross on his back, with his sacrificial wounds and sores. Mary surrounded by virgins is at
another window. The apostles, angels, and nine orders of heaven and all the others look
down at the monk and the woman where they stand.
Do you see, noble lady?
I certainly do. And the woman falls to the ground and begins to weep and beat her-
self, repenting of her sins.
It is a sad thing, noble lady, that you were ashamed to commit a sin in the presence
of a crowd of people, but you didnt mind the presence of the Lord and the nine orders
of heaven whilst committing this act against Gods will. Me, I dont mind at all the
presence of anyone, living or dead, being around me at my misdeeds as much as I mind
a single angel of the Lords family. So get up, noble lady. Take your husband as your
consoler and do penance for this evil action you have attempted. And as for me, he went
on, I shall give up dealings with women so long as I live.
The woman turned to penitence so assiduously that she succeeded in becoming a
master of devotion (si chrabhaigh), so that after her death they went together up to
heaven.
In much the same spirit, though without the twist at the end, is a poem of
the tenth(?) century commonly known as Daniel a Liathaides Reply to a
Woman.60 The narrator, Daniel a Liathaide, was the confessor, and the
woman a lady who came to him regularly. As the poem opens, he has evidently
just received a sexual proposition from her: the poem itself is his reply. As in the
60
A Ben, Bennacht Fort [O Woman, A Blessing on You or Sell Not Heaven for Sin]. Kenney, no. .
K. Meyer (ed. and trans.), Daniel a Liathaides Advice to a Woman, riu (), . Also,
Murphy, Early Irish Lyrics, . Meyer thought it might possibly date from as early as the th cent., and
Murphy agreed. The supposed author, Daniel a Liathaide, abbot of Lismore, died in according
to the Annals of the Four Masters.
other texts discussed, the holy man does not harangue his would-be seductress
as a demon or harlot, but instead urges her to change her mind. Significantly,
Daniel sends her away with not a curse, but a blessing: O woman, a blessing on
you! Do not speak! Let us meditate on the doom of eternal judgement! . . . In
Gods safeguard go to your house, And take a blessing from me, O woman.
If a sexually-minded approach from a woman ideally required a firm but po-
lite refusal from a holy man, then an innocent approach demanded even more
strongly a chivalric response. This is the explicit message in the Lismore Homily
on the Life of Brendan. Written in Middle Irish and dating to the eleventh or
twelfth century, it recounts that once, when the young Brendan was sitting alone
on his chariot, singing his psalms, a full-grown girl jumped up on the chariot
and attempted to play with him. He responded by beating her severely; his fos-
terer Bishop Erc saw the entire transaction and harshly rebuked Brendan, mak-
ing him do penance for behaving so cruelly to the blameless maiden.61 The
episode recalls one in Cassians Conlationes, the moral of which was also the
importance of regarding women as fellow-members of humanity.62
In sum, the Irish were evidently responding to issues of celibacy, seduction,
and clerical relations with women in a way which was subtle and complex, and
their new attitude to the female sex cannot be classed as either avoidance or as
demonization. In fact, as will be discussed in the following two chapters, the
Irish handling of these issues was markedly different from that of English and
Continental ecclesiastical writers in other ways too. There is still, however, the
issue of the single-sex male hermitage to consider.
This chapter began with an enumeration of examples in which men and women
were portrayed in the later Lives as living together at monasteries, and these are
important to bear in mind when exploring the exceptions. Indeed there had
long been places at which men dedicated to God had lived apart from women:
in Brigits early Vita I and the (probably) late-eighth or early-ninth century Latin
Life of Molua we encountered the male-only hermitage which refused them. In
this later period we also meet several such places, and they seem to be increasing
in number. Moreover, when they did mention them, hagiographers now went on
to offer some justification as to the motive and the theological basis for their pol-
icy of segregation. For those who wanted to maintain an all-male environment,
women of the laity rather than those of the church were the target of any abuse,
61
Homily on the Life of Brendan mac Finnlug, lines (Stokes, Lismore Lives, , ).
62
Cassian, Conlationes, book , ch. , in which Abbot Paul ran away from women because he
confused the avoidance of familiarity with the opposite sex (a virtue) with hating the very form of that
sex (a sin) (PL . ).
, ,
yet even lay women were attacked in the Lives by the monks only when they en-
croached onto the proscribed territory. In all Lives with such episodes, elsewhere
in the same text the monks and saints gladly succour lay women in need.
Among the writers whose texts survive, it seems that the desire to separate
nuns from monks, when it did arise, was rooted not in misogyny but in a sense of
propriety. The reason for separation, the Lives imply, is not that there is any-
thing wrong with the nuns themselves, but rather that people might think there
was sexual misconduct going on. In the the Irish Life of Daig, for example, vir-
gins were part of the Inishkeen community, but for some reason the abbot of
Clonmacnois was scandalized when he heard it, and sent a messenger to voice
his disapproval, but the latter on his arrival was placated by miracles wrought by
the virgins. In spite of their vindication, Daig sent the nuns away to various
monasteries of their own.63
A late Life of Senn explores the justifications of a mixed-sex monastery
more explicitly and with greater eloquence. Furthermore, it does something the
much earlier Brigidine Vita I and the Lives of Daig and Carthach did not do,
namely deal directly with the theological issues such exclusion raises, teasing out
some of the deeper issues of gender, sexual temptation, and ritual purity. In it,
the holy virgin Canair of Bantry on the south-west coast was drawn by a vision
to Senns hermitage on Scattery Island, at the mouth of the Shannon river.64
She travelled north on pilgrimage to get there, and when she came to the edge
of the river she walked across the water to the island. From the surface of the
water just off the shore she spoke with the saint, who had come out to meet her.
First she introduced herself, saying she was seeking hospitality from him and
wished to receive the sacrament from him. He replied by offering her hospital-
ity at an adjacent island where the nuns stayed who lived under his rule, and
agreeing to give her the eucharist from his hand. She replied that she wanted
to stay not on the nearby isle but on his island. At this, Senn explained that they
did not have women on this particular island. The refusal prompted Canairs
remarkable speech:
Cid dia ta latsa sin? ol Canair. Ni messa Crist, ar ni lugha thainic do thathcreic ban
ins do thathcreic fher. Ni lugha roces ardaigh ban ins ardaigh fher. Robhatar mn oc
umaloid oc timterecht do Crist dia aps[t]alaib. N lugha, dano, thiaghuit mn isin
bhflaith nemhdha inait fir. Cidh, dano, arna gebhthasa mn cucat at indsi?65
How can you say that?, said Canair. Christ is not worse than you. Christ came to re-
deem women no less than men. No less did he suffer for the sake of women than for men.
Women have served and administered to Christ and his Apostles. Indeed, no less than
men do women enter the heavenly kingdom. Why then shouldnt you take women on
your island?
63
Latin Life of Daig, ch. .
64
On the site (Ir. Inis Cathaig) see Leask, Irish Churches, . .
65
Irish Homily on the Life of Senn in the Book of Lismore, lines (Stokes, Lismore Lives,
).
Senn thereupon told Canair she was stubborn. He would nevertheless offer
her a place at the shore of his island, on the brink of the wave, though he was
afraid she would be washed away. Canair took up his offer, came ashore, re-
ceived the eucharist from Senn, and then died and went straight to heaven.
Lisa Bitel, Kathleen Hughes, and Ann Hamlin have all cited the above ex-
tract from Senns Life as evidence for an Irish suspicion of women and, in
Bitels case, for a belief that women were impure. But such a conclusion is insuf-
ficient. It loses sight of the fact that Canair, even though not admitted, was
deemed neither lustful nor unworthy because of her sex.66 The saint was clearly
acting properly in offering the female pilgrim hospitality and a personal admin-
istration of the eucharist. It is explicit that the saint, and probably his other
monks too, attended to the nuns nearby, and that they were under his care; his
only stipulation was that she should not come onto one particular island, and on
even this he gave in to her. That Senn was not a shunner of women is con-
firmed by the Lifes later episodes, which recount that when he knew he was
soon to die he was determined to visit for one last time his sister and also the
group of nuns who lived under his rule.
Misogyny was on the upsurge, though, and we can see that progression in
what happened to the story of Canair as it was recounted in the thirteenth-
century. Senns thirteenth-century poetic Life recounts the same encounter,
and by then assertion that women were impure went unchallenged:
Et ecce adest angelus, qui elevatam protinus
Deo devotam feminam transportavit in insulam.
Cui presul: Quid feminis commune est cum monachis?
Nec te nec ullam aliam admittemus in insulam.
Tunc illa ad episcopum: Si meum credis spiritum
posse Christum suscipere, quid me repellis corpore?
Credo, inquit, hoc optime, sed nulli umquam femine
huc ingressum concedimus, esto salvet te Dominus.
Redi iterum ad seculum, ne sis nobis in scandalum.
Etsi es casta pectore, sexum habes in corpore.
Spero, ait, in Dominum quod prius meum spiritum
de hac carne eiiciat quam me reverti faciat.
Nec mora, reddit spiritum diemque claudit ultimum.
A fratribus insolite celebrantur exequie.
Sic sancti patris precibus utrumque complet Dominus,
et id quod virgo dixerat et id quod sanctus voverat.67
And behold an angel approaches, who raised her up at once and transported the
woman, dedicated to God, onto the island. The bishop said to her, What do women
have in common with monks? We shall admit neither you nor any other [woman] onto
the island. The said she to the bishop, If you believe that my spirit can receive Christ
66
Bitel, Womens Enclosures, ; Hughes and Hamlin, Modern Traveller, .
67
Latin Life of Senn, ch. .
, ,
into it, why do you repel me in the flesh? I believe this completely, he said, but we have
never allowed access here to any woman, so be it, may the Lord save you. Return again
to the world, lest you be to us a source of scandal. Even if you are chaste in heart, you
have sex in your body. I have faith in the Lord, she said, that he shall cast out my spirit
from this flesh before he makes me turn back. Without delay he restored her spirit and
closed her final day. An exceptional funeral was celebrated by the brothers. Thus with
the prayers of the holy father, the Lord fulfils each of the two [requests], both what the
virgin had said and what the saint had vowed.
Only in this version does Senn say anything like even if you have no lust in
your heart you still have sex in your body. Neither hagiographer, however,
wished his readers to feel they could justify demonizing women dedicated to
God, even if they themselves lived at a place which refused residence to nuns, for
Christ had redeemed women as much as he had redeemed men. Even if a male
house had a God-given right to turn away nuns, it should nevertheless be re-
membered that womens spirits too can receive Christ. The danger of scandal,
combined with the argument of traditional practice, was deemed a valid reason
for segregation in the eleventh and twelfth centuries: misogyny was not.
All-Male Cemeteries
Senns Scattery Island is but one of several places, recounted in the texts of this
period, where females could not go. If they alighted on these sites, which were
often islands, they would die, go mad, or humiliate themselves. This trope is a
new one.
Adomnns tenth-century Life mentioned that the saints were offended by
the burial of a pregnant woman on Tory Island off the west coast of Donegal.68
Gerald of Wales spoke of an island in a north Munster lake which no woman or
female animal could enter without immediately dying: this has been proved
many times by instances of dogs and cats and other animals of the female sex.
A similar island, possibly the same one, was recorded earlier in verse by the
Irish-born eleventh-century bishop Patrick of Dublin.69 St Fchns church and
rock-cut mill in Fore (Co. Westmeath) was also a place no woman could enter.70
Though Fore is not an island, two other places Fchn allegedly founded are,
68
Irish Life of Adomnn, ch. . On the place, Ir. Traig Island, see D. Kelly, The Crosses of Tory
Island, in Smyth, Seanchas, , with references. The saint of this place, Ernaine, is commemorated in
the Martyrology of Donegal, Aug.
69
Bishop Patrick, Verses, verse , De insula quadam satis admiranda, on which female birds do not land
(A. Gwynn (ed. and trans.), The Writings of Bishop Patrick, (Scriptores Latini Hiberniae ;
Dublin, ), ).
70
Fore, Co. Westmeath, near present-day Castlepollard, was an early monastery founded by
St Fchn, alias Mo Fhca, renowned for his harsh asceticism. It was large and wealthy enough to suffer
repeated Viking attack. Some ruins, including those of the graveyard, can still be seen. Fore is still a pil-
grimage site today; and monastic ruins remain, with the early church still standing, with a chancel added
c.; there is also a plain stone cross and a nearby holy well (Leask, Irish Churches, i. with plans; Kil-
lanin and Duignan, Shell Guide, , ; Harbison, Pilgrimage, ).
i.e. Omey Island and Hish Island in Cleggan Bay, Co. Galway.71 The grave of
St Critn, alias Mac Rustaing in Russagh (Ir. Ross Ech) in Westmeath must
be the most memorable of the lot, however, for no woman could approach it
without losing her dignity. As one scribe elucidated in a little ditty:
Lighe maic Rustaing raidhe i Ros ech cen imnaire,
mar atchi cach ben baighid briaghid ocus banghairidh.72
Mac Rustaings grave in Russagh, you say without shame
if she sees it, every women talks, farts, and laughs aloud.
Bishop Patrick of Dublin wrote a short poem on this or another such grave, for
the effect on women of the grave he describes was the same; in his account,
though, the un-named owner of the grave was not a saint but a man who had
raped many good women.73
The sudden rise in popularity of this type of folklore was arguably, due to the
new atmosphere emanating from the Continent, in which women might be
derided, combined with the native tradition of the anchoritic male-only retreat.
It fed into the rising interest in wonders which so characterized the twelfth
century as a whole. The origin and meaning of these sites may lie in an earlier
use by anchorites who had taken the vow not to have contact with women. Re-
calling the episode of the anchorite in Brigits early Vita I serves to highlight the
usefulness of island dwellings for such hermits and may indicate a long-standing
general preference among them. Presumably when they died they were buried
on their islands or in their hermitages, and the tradition of excluding the female
sex would continue long after there ceased to be an eremitic community on the
sites. It seems likely that in the tenth, eleventh, and twelfth centuries the rule
blocking females from single-sex anchoritic retreats survived in folk custom.
71
Gerald of Wales, Topographia, book , chs. , ( J. Dimock, Topographia Hibernica et Expugnatio
Hibernica (Rolls Series; London, ).
72
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Sept. Russagh is mentioned in AFM , , . Critn
appears in the story Aislinge maic Conglinne, ch. (K. Meyer, Aislinge maic Conglinne (London, ) ).
73
Bishop Patrick, Verses, verse , Continet hec hominis.
, ,
If the Irish attitudes were increasingly mixed on the subject of men and women
sharing space in the religious life, this ambivalence is nowhere clearer than in
one new and most extraordinary type of narrative. It both epitomizes the issues
and reveals the underlying common lines of thinking and rationalization. There
is no better way to introduce it than by example. The tale below is embedded in
the notes to the Martyrology of Oengus, and makes up part of the extensive
scholia. Holy Saint Scothne of Tisscoffin, the tenth- or eleventh-century writer
explains, had had rather unusual nocturnal habits.
No laigdis dano da ingin chorrchchecha immi cach n-aidchi comad mide in cath d
fri Demon, cor himraided a ailiugud trit-sin. Co tainic Brnaind dia derbad, co nder-
bairt Scoithin: Loighed am lepaidsea in cleirech anocht, ar se. O ro siacht iarum co
huair chumsanta and tecait na hingena issin tech a raibe Brenaind a n-utlaige do gris-
saig ina caslaib, n ro loisc in teine iat, doirtid i fiadnaisi Brnaind tiagait issin lep-
aid chuice. Crd so? ol Brnaind. Is amlaid dogniam cach n-aidchi, ar na hingena.
Loighit im Brnaind, n choemnacair sidhe cotlad etir lasin lscoth. Is anforbthe sin, a
cleirig, ar na hingena: int bis sunn cach n-adchi n mothaig n etir. Cid ti nach eirge
isin dabaig, a cleirig, damad usuaidhe duit? Is minic athaigis in cleirech .i. Scothn.
Maith, tra, ol Brnaind, is cair duind in derbad so, is ferr int seo itamni. Doniat a n-
aentaid a cotach iarsin, scarait feliciter.1
Now two maidens with pointed breasts used to lie with him every night that the battle
with the Devil might be the greater for him. And it was proposed to accuse him on that
account. So Brendan came to test him, and Scothne said, Let the cleric lie in my bed
tonight. So when he reached the hour of resting the girls came into the house in which
was Brendan, with their lapfuls of glowing embers in their chasubles; and the fire burnt
them not, and they spill the embers in front of Brendan and go to bed. What is this?,
asks Brendan. We do this every night, say the girls. They lie down with Brendan, and
nowise could he sleep for longing. That is imperfect, O cleric, say the girls: he who is
here every night feels nothing at all. Why do you not go into the tub [of cold water] if it
be easier for you? Often the cleric, even Scothne, visits it. Well, says Brendan, it is
wrong to make this test, for he is better than we are. Thereafter they make their union
and their covenant, and they part happily.
The Irish consort stories have perplexed historians for nearly a hundred years,
and the discussions have so far produced no plausible explanation. In
T. Olden published an article, On the Consortia of The First Order of Irish
1
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Jan.
, ,
Saints, which argued that the Irish practised syneisactism throughout the
whole of the early medieval period.2 The publication of a book entitled
Virgines Subintroductae saw the assertion restated, with the author Hans Achelis
going so far as to assert that the Celtic Church was actually characterized by the
practice, but he, unlike Olden, believed that it had died out there by the sixth
century.3 Kuno Meyer in stated his conviction that syneisactism had
reached and had survived in Ireland, on the basis of an Irish monastic poem
seemingly written by a monk to a consort nun.4 Louis Gougaud followed
Meyers view.5 But these three scholars were in a minority. Even at this early date
most historians preferred to say that the texts did not reflect actual Irish prac-
tice. When they did concede that the actuality was possible, they took Acheliss
line, namely that it had died away very quickly. Literary discussions have since
appeared about individual texts, notably the poem A Chrnc, but these have not
taken on the question of Irish syneisactism as a whole, and neither the debate
(minor though it is) nor the body of texts on which it rests have been studied in
the succeeding years.
There is, however, one partial exception. In Roger Reynolds treated the
matter in a short article published in the Harvard Theological Review, in which for
the first time many of the relevant texts were brought together and considered
in the light of their wider Christian context.6 He concluded that it was indeed
likely that female consorts lived with holy men in early medieval Ireland. In-
deed, far from being a Celtic skeleton-in-the-closet, Celtic syneisactism repre-
sented one of the most primitive aspects of Christianity to survive in medieval
Western Europe.7 Reynoldss article did not explore the dating of the Irish texts
on which he built his case, but it did bring as many as possible together so they
could be seen as a corpus. Their number and their presence across a variety of
sources, combined with the panoply of late antique and European references to
the same practice, were sufficient to convince him that the Irish were indeed
participating in the practice.
Reynolds was surely right to draw scholarly attention to the fact that consort
relations have a real and meaningful history in Christianity, and that the Irish
accounts must be seen in their broader historical context. But his argument was
flawed in two ways. First, he did not distinguish other sorts of malefemale
monastic association ( joint journeys, opposite-sex students, etc.) from syneisac-
tism per se, whose definition bears repeating: the situation in which female
2
T. Olden, On the Consortia of The First Order of Irish Saints, PRIA (), .
3
H. Achelis, Virgines Subintroductae (Leipzig, ), see esp. , .
4
K. Meyer, An Crng: Ein altirisches Gedicht an eine Syneisakte, Sitzungberichte der kniglich preussis-
cher Akademie der Wissenschaften (), .
5
L. Gougaud, Mulierum Consortia: tude sur le syneisaktisme chez les asctes celtiques, riu (),
.
6
R. Reynolds, Virgines Subintroductae in Celtic Christianity, Harvard Theological Review (),
, at .
7
Reynolds, Virgines Subintroductae , .
Christian ascetics . . . lived together with men, although both parties had taken
the vow of continence, and were animated with the earnest desire to keep it.8
He also included without distinction texts referring to married clergy, which is a
different albeit related matter; thus his data was skewed, containing as it did in-
applicable evidence. The second problem with the article is that he did not (and
in some cases could not, given the state of scholarship at the time), consider the
dates of the sources.
Reynoldss imprecise typology and inattention to chronology shaped his con-
clusions. When one considers the relevant material in relationship to when it
was written, a different set of conclusions about consorts in Ireland becomes
more convincing. It is now evident that all the texts which self-consciously ad-
dress the practice of syneisactism per se date from the tenth century or later. We
know too that in Ireland all along it had not been unusual for consecrated
women to live in proximity to monks and clerics, and that these relations might
be marital or proto-maritalto wit, a clerics female companion was sometimes
called caillech, and in the ninth century the virgin Perpetua was remembered as
St Peters coniunx. Considering this, it becomes apparent that for some reason
Irish religious writers in the tenth, eleventh, and twelfth centuries drew upon the
topos of the virgo subintroducta, which they knew from patristic literature and pos-
sibly, post mid-eleventh century, from Continental reformist writings. Their de-
liberate engagement with this motif strongly suggests there was pressure,
located possibly within Ireland as well as outside it, to remove clerics and monks
from the presence of their women intimates.
The Scothne story follows a more general pattern: at its most basic, the holy
mans spiritual power is proved to doubters by his ability to successfully go to
sleep while between two naked virgins. Scothne can thus handle the tempta-
tion, but Brendan, who doubts him, cannot. Brendan must therefore abandon
the temptation and must not live with female companions. The moral of the
story? Those clerics who cannot maintain chastity, or even peace of mind, whilst
sharing quarters with women, need to live separately. It is important to note also
what is not said; the author makes no criticism of the women involved. The vir-
gins are no seducing harlots, no new Eves holding up apples of sinful lust. Nor is
St Scothne criticizedhaving transcended his own lust, he need not
shun women, nor need he change his living arrangement into one which is sex-
segregated.9
8
Clark, Subintroductae, .
9
Johnston sees these females as liminal figures, embodiments of a symbolic female sexuality which
the church perceived as dangerous, a view with which I in large part disagree (Transforming Women,
).
, ,
Patricks Tripartite Life contains another such story. Bishop Mel, although he
does not practise the ascetic gymnastics which Scothne undertakes, is found to
be living with a woman. Though called siur (sister) the woman here is probably
not a blood relative.10
Olaili aimsir atchas doPatraic cin doepscop Mel fria fiair, tre comrorcoin in-
daescarsluaig, ar nobitis in aentegdais oc ernaigthe frisinCoimdi[d]. Otconnairc epscop
Ml Patraic chucai da cairiugud do Ardachad, dochaid epscop Ml do aclaid etrache
for a fer flechod. Otchas do Patraic gabail bratn do fonninnassin, roridi Patraic in-
derbruscc nairdirc ar aroi (.i. ar na immaire) adclaiss linne. Forts Ml du thocad,
ar ni fortachtaig[i] Da nach mifhir meirb, id est, non temptabis Dominum Deum
tuum. Dodechaid dano siur epscuip Ml, ocus tene lea innacasa[i]l. Rofitir Patraic nat-
bi cin, eturra, dicens: Seorsum viri [et] seorsum feminae, ne occasionem dare infirmis
inveniemur, et ne nomen Domini per nos blasfemaretur, [quod] absit a nobis. Et sic re-
licit eos, .i. Bri (.i.mons) Leith eturru: sisi in Druimm Chea fri Br leith indar, eissium
friss anair inArddachud.11
At a certain time Patrick was told, through the error of the rabble, that Bishop Mel had
sinned with his kinswoman [sister], for they used to be in one habitation a-praying to the
Lord. When Bishop Mel saw Patrick coming to him, to Ardagh, in order to reproach
him, Bishop Mel went to angle in the furrows whereon rain had poured. When Patrick
was told that he was catching salmon in that wise, Patrick uttered the renowned proverb
On his field, i.e. on the ridges he angled for salmon. I will help Mel to luck, for God
assists not a feeble ignorant man i.e. thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy God. Then
bishop Mels kinswoman [sister] came having fire in her chasuble [And her raiment was
not injured. Then] Patrick knew that there was no sin between them, saying, Let men
and women be apart, so that we may not be found to give opportunity to the weak, and
so that by us the Lords name be not blasphemed, which be far from us! And thus he left
them, with Bri Leith between them. She in Druim Chea, to the west of Bri Leith. He is
in the east of it, in Ardagh.
The virginity of Mels consort is demonstrated symbolically by the fact that
she can carry coals in her skirt or apron: the author is alluding to Proverbs
: , which deals with lust for women generally: For the price of a harlot is
scarce one loaf: but the woman catches the precious soul of a man. Can a man
hide fire in his bosom, and his garments not burn? Or can he walk upon hot
coals, and his feet not be burnt? This symbolism had been utilized by patristic
authors in their own discussions of consort relationships: Jerome had used it
in his diatribe against clerical consorts of his own day (see below).12 The
10
The term siur could be used for those related by the Christian faith rather than by blood; the term
derb-siur (true sister) was sometimes used by writers to specify blood-sisters. Stokes translated it as
kinswoman, though the literal and better translation is sister. Olden held that the siur came to mean a
sister living in consortium, an interpretation which is not maintainable (On the Consortia, ).
Nonetheless, as Reynolds has observed, the Irish used sister to mean consort in their phrasing of the
third canon of the Council of Nicaea (Virgines Subintroductae , ).
11
Tripartite Life (Stokes, Tripartite Life, ). Gwynn and Hadcock tentatively located Druim Chea
at a site only about five miles to the west of Ardagh in Co. Longford (Religious Houses, ).
12
Jerome, Ep. , ch. .
Irish knew Jeromes Epistolae by the seventh century, in which the analogy is
made between coals and lust, and Jerome had the view that in fact it was im-
possible to carry coals in ones lap and not be burned. It is evident that the Irish
were very familiar with the passage, and its applications, by the time the Tripar-
tite Life was written. But here the symbolism has a different twist, and the
harlot overtones are left aside; instead, the carrying of hot coals shows that the
accused is innocent of lust. Mel and his sister, though innocent of fornication
and even of lust, are instructed to live separately. Indeed, henceforth, all holy
men and women must do so. The reason? To avoid scandal. The author ac-
knowledges that saintly men and women are capable of living together without
sin, but the danger of scandal makes it impracticable.
There is an underlying sense in these two Middle Irish texts that the male
female proximities of the past were to be considered admirable, not degenerate.
Irelands saints of the fifth and sixth century, they suggested, had been able to
mingle, love, and share quarters with women without diminution of their holi-
ness, or indeed their reputations. But, they seem to say, times are changing and
those days are gone. This conclusion was also drawn by the redactor of Daigs
Life, who also used the image of the burning coals. This saint, the story goes,
had taken on the care and supervision of a group of holy virgins who wished to
live under his rule. The abbot of Clonmacnois heard of this and, scandalized,
sent inspectors to investigate Inishkeen, as he suspected illicit relations between
them. The burning coals vindicated them.
Post hec, divulgata beati Daygei per totam Hyberniam sanctitate, confluxerunt
undique ad eum sancte virgines, ut sub eius regula degerent: quedam Cannea; alia
Lassara, sancti Daygei soror; alia Dalvina. Hoc audiens Cluonensis abbas, nomine
Oenu, ad beatum misit Daygeum, ut eum de susceptione virginum obiurgaret. Ille
autem, nunciorum presciens negotium, monialibus ut humiliter illis ministrarent
precepit. Quarum quedam in sinu suo ignem sine ulla vestis lesione, quedam aquam
velut in vase firmissimo, ad eos portavit. Quod hospites videntes, penitentiam egerunt.
Beatus autem Daygeus moniales illas versus septentrionem ducens, in diversis locis
diversa monasteria, in quibus cum aliis virginibus seorsum Deo servirent, eis prout de-
cuit construxit.13
After the sanctity of Daig was proclaimed across all Ireland, there gathered to him from
all over holy virgins wishing to live under his rule: one was Cannea, another was Daigs
sister Lassair; another was Dalvina. Hearing this the abbot of Clonmacnois, named
Oenu, sent to blessed Daig, to correct him from receiving/fostering virgins. He, then,
foreknowing the business of the messengers, told the nuns to minister to them humbly.
One of them carried fire in her breast without any burn to her clothes, one [carried]
water to them as though it were in a solid container. The guests, seeing this, did penance.
Then holy Daig leading them [the virgins] to the west, built various monasteries in di-
verse places for them to serve God with other virgins, as was seemly.
13
Latin Life of Daig, ch. .
, ,
The Irish writers knew well the familiar canon of stories about the historical
saints who had such close friendships with nuns and they knew other aspects of
the Irish tradition which accepted close malefemale relationships in the
Church. By picking up and utilizing a long-extant motif in the Christian canon,
some churchmen were attempting to find an inner reconciliation for themselves
and their changing community.
Another anonymous writer of this period, the author of the Catalogus
Sanctorum Hiberniae or Catalogue of Irish Saints, also saw the issue in terms of a
decline in the level of sanctity amongst clerics. During Christianitys initial
period in Ireland (up to ), he writes, the men in the Church were so holy
that women were permitted to administer, minister, and consort with them
without it posing any danger of temptation. The first order or age of
Christianity in Ireland had been characterized by close malefemale relations
in the Church:
Primus ordo catholicorum sanctorum erat in tempore Patricii. Et tunc erant episcopi
omnes clari et sancti et Spiritu Sancto pleni, CCCL numero, ecclesiarum fundatores. . . .
Et mulierum ministrationem et consortia non respuebant, quia super petram Christum
fundati, ventum tentationis non timebant.14
The first order of catholic saints was in Patricks time. At that time they were all bishops
famed and holy and filled with the holy spirit, in number, founders of churches . . .
and they did not reject the ministration and consort of of women because, founded on
the rock of Christ, they did not fear the blasts of temptation.
The male saints of the second era, the ordo sanctior (), fled the ministra-
tions and company of women and excluded them from their monasteries
(mulierum quoque consortia ac administrationes fugiebant, atque a monasteriis suis eas ex-
cludebant).15 The Catalogus, a tenth-century pseudo-history of the Irish Church, is
patently and egregiously inaccurate on other matters, and historians now dis-
miss it as useless: it avers that the early Church was unified under the leadership
of Patrick, celebrated one mass, had one tonsure, and celebrated one Easter.
Nor do the sources indicate that in the later sixth century the Irish drove nuns
out of the monasteries. Nevertheless, as an indicator of gender ideas at the time
of composition, the Catalogus is singularly useful. We note that the author asserts
that early male saints had consorted with women. Now he could have gained
this view from seventh- and eighth-century saints Lives, which speak casually of
close relationships between male saints and holy virgins. Alternatively, as with
his assertions on other items of the early Church, he may have been more purely
14
Catalogus Sanctorum Hiberniae, recension U, ch. (P. Grosjean, Edition et commentaire du Catalogus
Sanctorum Hiberniae, Analecta Bollandiana (), , , at ).
15
Catalogus, S recension, ch. . The A recension is very similar: abnegabant mulierum ministrationem, separ-
antes eas a monasteriis (Grosjean, Catalogus, , ). The assertion that in this era men ejected women
from their monasteries is not attested in the Lives or in any other source.
16
J. Carney, Medieval Irish Lyrics (Dublin, ), .
Kuno Meyer in argued the case for the poems application to a real consort
nun, and for a tenth-century composition date.17 In this he was followed by
Louis Gougaud. James Carney refuted this interpretation repeatedly, and most
strongly in in Old Ireland and Her Poetry, in which he dated the poem
later than had previous scholars, to about , and this date, he argued, made
the poems composition too distant in time from the Council of Nicaea to speak
of actual contemporary syneisact practice.18
Reynolds, writing in the sixties, astutely observed that Carneys criticisms did
not take into account other late Irish references to syneisactism, such as the Vita
Tripartita and the story of Scothne.19 He presumed that the contemporary Contin-
ental sources described actual practice, and that it was therefore absolutely rea-
sonable to conclude that A Chrnc spoke of Irish syneisactism in the poets own day.
Reynolds was unaware, however, that Continental uses were allegorical not literal
(as will be shown below) and that the other Irish examples were inspired by litera-
ture, not practice. Bearing this in mind, one may not join in Reynoldss conclu-
sions, but one is unlikely to agree with Carney in dismissing the consort theme in
A Chrnc as no more than a donnish joke. Certainly there was some joking going
on, as Carney suggested, but it was black humour aimed at those who would
force clerics to shun their caillecha: the Irish did not hesitate to voice their dislike
and disagreement to the Englishmen who attempted to persuade them to change
their practices. In addition, the Irish scholarly mind was traditionally engaged in
wordplay and clever puns, and it did not cease to engage in it when matters of the
church were being considered. A good example is the correspondence between a
leading reformer in England, Archbishop Lanfranc of Canterbury, and an Irish
churchman. During a heated debate conducted by correspondence on the issue
of child baptism, Lanfranc attempted to make the Irish institute it and met
resistance. Bishop Domhnall Ua Hennas response included a series of pertin-
ent puzzles and riddles. Lanfrancs return letter scaldingly derided the Irishmans
theology, and said of the riddles: When we were children that amused us; but the
administration of a diocese has led us to renounce such games.20 Surely the dou-
ble entendre in Chrnc is another such game which, like Ua Hennas riddles,
was a sardonic commentary on a deadly serious issue.
The writers of the Irish consort texts drew on patristic and conciliar antecedents.
The virgin consort had been a formally acknowledged personage in the early
17
Meyer, An Crnc (), ; id. (ed. and trans.), Selections from Ancient Irish Poetry (London, ),
; An Crng: Ein altirisches Gedicht, .
18
J. Carney, A Chrnc, Cubaid do Chel, Eigse (), ; id., Old Ireland and her Poetry in
R. McNally (ed.), Old Ireland (), , at . Carneys position is discussed in Greene and
OConnor, Golden Treasury, . For earlier comments on the text, see Kenney, no. .
19 20
Reynolds, Virgines Subintroductae, . Bethell, English Monks, , with references.
, ,
21
E. Clark, John Chrysostom and the Subintroductae, in id. (ed.), Ascetic Piety and Womens Faith: Essays
on Late Ancient Christianity (Studies in Women and Religion ; New York, ), , at .
22
Irenaeus, Adversus haereses, ed. W. Harvey, vols. (Cambridge, ), book , ch. .
23
Pseudo-Clement, Ep. ; Tertullian, De exhortatione castitatis, ch. ; De monogamia, ch. . Cyprian,
Ep. . Cited in E. Clark, Jerome, Chrysostom and Friends: Essays and Translations (Studies in Women and
Religion ; New York, ), .
24
Clark, Chrysostom and the Subintroductae, .
25
Council of Nicaea, canon (G. Alberigo (ed.), Conciliorum oecumenicorum decreta (Freiburg, ), ).
26
Clark, Jerome, Chrysostom, .
participating in, this lifestyle: if you want to have men live with you, then you
ought not to choose virginity but proceed on to matrimony, for it is far better to
marry in that fashion than to be a virgin in this.27 Addressing men in his second
treatise, Chrysostom accuses the men of bad motives.28 Jerome (c.) also
took the practitioners of religious cohabitation to task. His Epistle is prob-
ably the most scathingly eloquent piece written on the subject, which also serves
to describe what exactly the practice consists of:
Unde in Ecclesias Agapetarum pestis introiit? Unde sine nuptiis aliud nomen uxorem?
Imo unde novum concubinarum genus? Plus inferam: unde meretrices univirae?
Eadem domo, uno cubiculo, saepe uno tenentur et lectulo, et suspiciosos nos vocant, si
aliquid aestimemus. Frater sororem virginem deserit, caelibem spernit virgo ger-
manum, fratrem quaerit extraneum, et cum in eodem proposito esse se simulent,
quaerunt alienorum spiritale solatium, ut domi habeant carnale commercium. Istius
modi homines Salomon in Proverbiis spernit, dicens Alligabit quis in sinu ignem et vestimenta
eius non comburentur? Aut ambulabit super carbones ignis, et pedes illius non ardebunt ?29
How comes this plague of the dearly beloved sisters to be in the church? Whence come
these unwedded wives, these novel concubines, these harlots, so I will call them, though
they cling to a single partner? One house holds them and one chamber. They often occupy
the same bed, and yet they call us suspicious if we fancy anything amiss. A brother leaves his
virgin sister; a virgin, slighting her unmarried brother, seeks a brother in a stranger. Both
profess equally to have but one object, to find spiritual consolation from those not of their
kin; but their real aim is to indulge in sexual intercourse. It is on such people that Solomon
in the book of proverbs heaps his scorn. Can a man take fire in his bosom, he says, and his
clothes not be burned? Can one go upon hot coals and his feet not be burned?
Jeromes writings on the subject influenced subsequent literature through the
early Middle Ages. Three features he mentions here recur throughout later
writings: the concept of the sister who is not a blood relation, the word
stranger, and the reference to Proverbs : . Other Christian writers who
engaged in this holy war included Gregory Nazianzen (), Gregory of
Nyssa (c.), Basil of Caesarea (c.), Eusebius of Emesa, and Pseudo-
Cyprian,30 along with a variety of synods and councils.31
27
On the Necessity of Guarding Virginity, ch. .
28
See esp. his Introduction and Refutation Directed Against Those Men Cohabiting with Virgins,
ch. : There are certain men who apart from marriage and sexual intercourse take girls inexperienced
with matrimony, establish them permanently in their homes, and keep them sequestered until ripe old
age, not for the purpose of bearing children (for they deny that they have sexual relations with them) nor
out of licentiousness (for they claim they keep them inviolate). If anybody asks the reason for their prac-
tice they have plenty and start rehearsing them; however I myself think that they have not found a single
decent, plausible excuse . . . (trans. Clark, Jerome, Chrysostom, ).
29
Jerome, Ep. , ch. .
30
Gregory Nazianzen, Epigrams . Gregory of Nyssa, On Virginity. Basil of Caesarea, Ep. .
Eusebius of Emesa, Homilies , , and . Pseudo-Cyprian, De singularitate clericorum. All cited in Clark,
Jerome, Chrystostom, .
31
Pierre de Labriolle cites some twenty-four councils and synods between and that forbid
clerics to live with unrelated women (Le mariage spirituel dans lantiquit chrtienne, Revue Historique
(), , at ).
, ,
This rsum of the patristic literature serves not only to illustrate the wide
base of writing which informed the Irish authors, but also to show that the sub-
ject was a serious one, a struggle in which the question at stake was the very na-
ture of the clergy. These writings had been the propaganda of the Church
Fathers pushing for ascetic separation among the ordained and the monastic.
At the time of writing, they had not yet won the theological battle, though in the
long term theirs became the official Christian position. The passage in
Proverbs on the coals in the clothing was clearly meant rhetorically: no one can
carry them without being burnt, and it was in this way that the passage was nor-
mally interpreted in the West during the fourth-century controversies. After
that time its use died out almost completely. The only exception I know is an in-
stance that foreshadows the Irish use: Gregory of Tourss case of the Gaulish
bishop Simplicius (obit ) and his wife, who proved the chastity of their mar-
riage by standing in front of a crowd for an hour with coals in their unburnt gar-
ments.32 When the Irish composed stories about the domestic arrangements of
their saints, it was upon the imagery used in the material of these fourth- and
fifth-century controversies that they drew. It seems reasonable to conclude it
was because it spoke to issues they faced in their own day.
Related to the theme of cohabitation is that of ascetic challengethe act of
placing oneself in a situation of great sexual temptation in order to test or proves
ones spiritual mastery. This topos, too, is traceable to the very early Church. The
anonymous Similitudes of Hermas speaks of an ascetic spending the night
with beautiful virgins as a brother not a husband.33 This image was called upon
but very rarely, the early medieval West embracing for its asceticism instead the
language of withdrawal, the desert, and the monach or solitary one. It is found
in Cassians Conlationes, which seems to be the direct source of the image for the
Irish writers of this period, since it appears to be wholly absent from Western
writings, including Irish ones, of the intervening centuries. Cassians tale is that
of the holy man Paphnutius who, after subduing many demons and achieving
great holiness, was one day burnt by a little fire. This prompted self-questioning,
for he wondered why he could still be burnt by a physical flame after he had
overcome so many spiritual fires of temptation. At this the Lord appeared and
suggested that he had not overcome the deeper roots of his carnal emotions, and
if he wished to test it he should undertake the following experiment: Go, take a
naked and most beautiful virgin, and if while you hold her you find that the
peace of your heart remains steadfast, and that carnal heat is still and quiet
within you, then the touch of this visible flame also shall pass over you gently and
without harming you as it did over the three children in Babylon.34 Paphnutius
was chastened and of course did not try the dangers of the experiment divinely
shown to him, but asked his own conscience and examined the purity of his
32 33
Gregory of Tours, Gloria Confessorum, ch. . Similitudes, chs. .
34
Cassian, Conlationes, book , ch. .
heart. The experiment was never meant to be tried: it was a rhetorical sugges-
tion. Elsewhere Cassian is very clear that to his mind chastity is not strength-
ened by temptation, for he specifically addresses the matter and rules against
it.35 The Irish of this time, however, made their early saints take up this rhetori-
cally-set test in a literal way, and made them pass it with flying colours, just as
they did with the biblical test of the burning coals.
35
Ibid., book , ch. .
36
Frazee, Origins of Clerical Celibacy, . J. Mansi (ed.), Sacrorum Conciliorum nova et amplissima
collectio (Paris, ), v. , .
37
De gestis pontificum Anglicorum, ch. (ed. N. Hamilton, in Rolls Series; London, ).
38
Gerald of Wales, Gemma ecclesiastica, book , ch. (trans. J. Hagen, The Jewel of the Church (Leiden, )).
39
Marbod of Rennes, Epistola (PL . , at ), cited in Elliott, Spiritual Marriage, .
, ,
Christian apocrypha in which the practice was demonstrated and praised, and
they had a long tradition of using conjugal language to describe virgin-friendships;
we may again recall the ninth-century Oengus describing the Roman virgin
Perpetua as St Pauls coniunx. The topos of the saint living in consortium rose in Ireland,
as it did elsewhere, because it was useful in highlighting the issues of clerical
marriage, cohabitation, and celibacy, as well the matter of monastic friendships
between the sexes. This indeed seems the most feasible explanation for their
roughly simultaneous appearance, and is pursued in the next chapter.
The Continental preoccupation in the eleventh and twelfth centuries with an-
cient consort practices was part and parcel of the campaign to make clerics re-
nounce even their chaste wives; how then did the Irish Church deal with the
matter of the married priest?
Apart from the consort stories in the hagiography, the source material for
Irish clerical marriage and celibacy is minute by comparison with the quantity
extant for the Continent or even for England. But among that small amount,
the consort topos does figure, and that evidence is both telling and significant. It
suggests that the attitudes of the Irish towards priests wives mirrored those held
towards nuns: a rising anxiety about scandal, a new concern about sex, but an
enduring affection for women generally and a respect for those great holy men
of the past who had cherished them.
Two extant texts from this period deal explicitly with clerical marriage. Thus
it seems safe to say that the subject per se was not a major concern in the tenth,
eleventh, and twelfth centuries much more than it was in earlier times. Never-
theless, at least some Irish in this period considered a priests celibacy or lack of
it important. A poem contained in the (tenth- or eleventh-century) notes to the
Martyrology of Oengus informs us:
Sacart ic denam comna ic baisded, bec a tarba
ni con tic baisted de iar taistel a cailligi.42
A priest, practising coition, small is his profit in baptizing;
baptism comes not from him, after visiting his nun.
In addition to urging clerical celibacy, the poem also raises the issue of ritual pur-
ity, a question affecting both priests who were married and those who were sup-
posed to be celibate. Asserting the invalidity of the baptism of the priest lately
risen from the bed of his sexual partner, the poem suggests that its Irish author ad-
hered to the belief (learned rather than popular) that it was inappropriate for
clergymen to rush from the fleshly passions of the marriage bed to officiate at the
42
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Oct., relating to a priest named Odrn.
, ,
sacred rites. The notion of the clergys ritual defilement through marital inter-
course had, in earlier centuries, given rise to many councils which strove to coerce
married clerics into abstinence. Penances and punishments, including excom-
munication, were meted out for those who continued sexual activities.43 The en-
forcement of this prohibition was neither uniform nor successful, Brundage
observes, and it was extremely common in rural areas across the West for the care
of the parish to pass from father to son for generations.44 Certainly this was as true
of Ireland as elsewhere, and more so if one believes the fulminations of the likes of
St Bernard, who claimed Ireland was being especially errant in this regard.45 The
existence of married clergy in Ireland is well evidenced and is not disputed
throughout the early medieval period and even into the post- era.
A curious but very important feature of the Martyrology poem is its use of the
term caillech (lit. veiled one) for the priests sexual companion. The parallels
with the eighth century Berrad Airechta text should be noted, for there the sexual
companion ( possibly wife) of the priest is also called his caillech, his nun, and
there her rights are acknowledged, but it was expected that the marriage was to
be chaste once the husband was in orders. As Mirn N Dhonnchadha has
shown, there is a long history of the priests partner caillech, and it is also the stand-
ard Irish term for nun which is equally used for consecrated virgins and female
saints (Brendan addresses Brigit A chaillech, O nun, for example).46 It is possible
that at this time priests partners like that in this poem enjoyed the legal rights
accorded wives by Irish law but that their status also had a religious quality.
Evidently the Irish themselves in this period did not draw those distinctions
between wife and nun that the twentieth century does. The very fluidity of lan-
guage demonstrates it. Though the parameters around these relationships re-
main unclear to us, it is of course likely that the Irish at the time knew perfectly
well their position and status: we simply do not have an appropriate categoriz-
ing system, nor do we have the details that would allow us to draw one. Instead
we are tempted to try to put these women into one or the other of two boxes, nei-
ther of which is appropriate.
We should note that, while the poem says that a priest who had sex with his
caillech could not administer valid sacraments, the caillech was of no concern to
the author; he did not interest himself in condemning her. The last chapter ex-
plored the attitudes to nuns in the later Lives of the saints and found them to be
somewhat more concerned about sex than earlier ones, but still free from any
demonization of even the sexually lapsing ones. In Ireland, those who were
companions to clerics, too, escaped the lashes of condemnation, at least those
evidenced in the surviving sources.
43
J. Brundage, Law, Sex, and Christian Society in Medieval Europe (London, ), . In particular he
cites the Second Council of Toledo ( ), the Council of Lrida (), and the Council of Orleans
(), and the Visigothic laws.
44 45
Brundage, Law, Sex, . Bernard of Clairvaux, Life of St Malachy, esp. books , .
46
N Dhonnchadha, Caillech. Scholia on the poem Brigit B Bithmaith.
The second text on clerical wives to be considered is doubtless the most vivid
and moving illustration of this point. Arise, O Kings Daughter (Eirigh, a Ingen an
Rgh) is a Middle-Irish poem in which Cormac, bishop-king of Cashel, sends
away his wife Gormlaith, daughter of Flann mac Maele Sechnaill, because he
has decided to adopt an ascetic single life as befits his office.47 Cormac calls upon
the memories of saints of earlier days who resisted sexual temptation in order to
strengthen his resolve in sending his wife away from their shared home. It is a
long poem, and only a selection of the relevant stanzas is repeated here.
[] irigh a ingen an rgh n bd haigneadh a n-imsnmh
at bean ele it aghaidh a blcorcra banamail.
[] As bean at com chrdh ecclas D d ndntar dn;
acus smaintigte ele ima ndnta aithrige.
[] Do smainius Bairre Badach ga fuil in t-aignedh allach,
dr ob an rgain rebaigh, ingen Dngail dUb Eanaigh.
[] Do smainius Carn Clana, mr d crbadh at-chala,
dr ob Aillinn ingin Broin is fo cgaibh ro codail.
[] Do smaineas in crbad cir Scuithn Slibe Mairge mir,
luigedhgrdh D fo-dera, s iter aindrib uchtgeala.
[] Do smainius Colum Cille ar grdh rgh na frinne,
dr obb s, gr mr a cil, ingena ille Aedin.
[] Do radus-[s]a ingin Floinn meic Maoil tSeachloinn meic Domnaill;
tugus tr cht mb mbennach na connradh, na ctcheannach.
[] Tugus fichit uingi ir acus fichit corn comil,
nochon featur a deimin in neoch rug aim dinnelaibh.
[] Dar in anmain at im chorp, nocha dearnus-sa ra dulc
acht mad npg re n-irge do dnamh na harmrghe.
[] Do gabus tr cacta psalm i tipraid Locha na Tarb,
ticfadh rim, manbadh mighe, adailge na hnpigi.
[] Do-gn-sa do dil co bog, air n tusa ramh ro ob,
is fris do-gantar do dil re Cearball mac Muireagin.
[] Nochar cuvaidh dingin Flainn, minar ro-indigh-si fo coim,
in corp ma fuil an t-inar go nglana Da a cuid cinad.
[] Mithig duit-si feis ra fer, a ingen, luchair lingeal,
tuccus mighi do Da dil, gab imat acus righ.48
47
According to the AClon, Cormac was indeed married to Gormlaith, but she was married to two
other kings as well, at least one of whom came after Cormac. This story, i.e. Cormacs renunciation of
his wife, finds no confirmation in AU, but Gormlaiths obit in (AU ) says that she died in peni-
tence as did many queens; Cormacs death is listed as taking place in battle in (AU ). It is of
course irrelevant whether the historical Cormac indeed sent away his wife in order to embrace a more
ascetic life appropriate for a bishop. See most recently on her marriages N Dhonnhadha, On Gormfh-
laith; also D. Crinn, Three Weddings and a Funeral: Rewriting Irish Political History in the Tenth
Century, in Smyth, Seanchas, .
48
M. N Dhonnchadhas edition and translation, used here, On Gormfhlaith. Previously published
in Irish with short commentary by A. Von Hamel, Poems from the Brussels MS , Revue Celtique
(), . Translated poorly into English with brief comments by Sen OFalin, Revue
Celtique (), 9.
, ,
[] Arise, O kings daughter, let your mind not be perplexed
There is another woman in rivalry with you, O red-lipped womanly one.
[] The woman who torments me is Gods church, for whom poetry is composed,
and other thoughts too for which penance should be done.
[] I thought about victorious Bairre, on him of the lofty mind,
When he turned down the the spirited queen, the daughter of Dngail U Eanaig.
[] I thought about Ciarn of Cluain [Clonmacnois], much have I heard of his piety,
when he turned down Aillenn, the daughter of Bran; it was under her breasts he slept.
[] I have thought also of the great piety of Scthn of Slaibh Maircc Mir,
who used to lie (God willed it in his love) between the white breasts of women.
[] And I thought about Columcille, who for the love of the King of Truth
denied, for all their great fame, Aidans lovely daughters.
[] I married the daughter of Flann son of Mel Sechnaill,
I paid a hundred horned cattle in covenant, as a bride-price, for her.
[] I gave twenty ounces of gold and twenty drinking horns,
I do not know the exact amount of possessions she took from me.
[] By the soul in my body, I have done nothing wrong with her,
except for a little kiss before rising to say matins.
[] I recited thrice fifty psalms in the well of Loch na Tarbh,
That kiss would have a hold over me were it not for my virginity.
[] I will make a match for you easily, for you are not one who ever refused;
The one with whom your match will be made is Cerball mac Muirecin.
[] It was improper for Flanns daughter; she wore my wedding tunic secretly;
that body which my tunic covers, may God cleanse it of its sins.
[] The time is come for you to love another man, O radiant shining maiden;
I have given my virginity to dear God; come, clothe yourself, and arise.
Though his poem is ascribed to the tenth-century Cormac, the language dates
it to the twelfth or thirteenth century. Its most recent editor feels the focus on
Cormac makes preferable a twelfth-century date.49 The theme of clerical separ-
ation from the spouse would strengthen that inclination. The poets error in the
queens lineage could be used as an argument for a later date, but for the fact
that the error is a very easy one to make, even in the twelfth, given Gormlaiths
genealogy.50
It is the treatment of the wife which is so unexpected, especially for those
scholars more familiar with the writings of this era composed by the likes of
Peter Damian. This piece is less surprising in the context of other Irish texts, but
its exalted language of love nevertheless cannot fail to grip the historian. The
king-bishops wife is a good maiden (ingen fal), and he has thoughtfully arranged
a new marriage for her, to another man. The poet focuses on the moment when
the man is in the process of sending away his wife, because he can no longer live
49
For N Dhonnchadhas observations and comments on the dating of the text on linguistic and
politico-historical grounds, see On Gormfhlaith, . The poems first editor made no attempts to date
it apart from commenting that on the basis of the linguistic forms it could not be as old as the th cent.
50
I am grateful to Ann Connon for this observation.
with her and also remain on good terms with God. The message is that Cormac
is the ideal married cleric; though he struggles, he nevertheless sends his wife
away. Chaste marriage is not adequate, only actual separation will do.
Cormacs recollection of the consort-keeping saints (Mel, Scothne, and
others) shows that the poet made an association between clerical marriage and
chaste consortium, the practice of syneisactism. Though he invokes Scothne,
modelling his life on that saints consortium is (paradoxically) unacceptable;
Scothne had not sent his consorts away, it will be recalled. With all its contra-
dictions, the example helps reconcile him to the right course of action. Cormac
is here voicing a new moral code in which duties to God were now to preclude
the producing of heirs and the enjoyment of privileges of power, but acknow-
ledging the emotional wrench involved.
A Chrnc, as we saw earlier, was not frivolous just because it was clever. Simi-
larly we can perhaps look at the funny side of Eirighthe man leaving his wife is
recalling erotic imagery, stanza after stanza, to give him strength to leave the
marital bed. For all that, the poet did not necessarily see it in a light-hearted
manner. But certainly the issues of politics and proper clerical behaviour were
not, for the Irish, subjects which had to be handled only in tracts and essays or
not at all. By the twelfth century, the Irish were certainly aware of their bad repu-
tation amongst the papal reformers. Some wanted to go along with the changes
in clerical behaviour; others were not so keen. Even those who favoured sex
separation could deploy the very language and symbolisms central to the
reform in a subversive way.
If the changes in Irish material are best explained as a response, albeit an am-
bivalent and resistant one, to reform ideas flourishing beyond its shores, there
are further enquiries to be made. First there are the reforms themselvesthe
language, imagery, and methods used, a few points of which have already been
encountered. Then there is the vexed question of transmission, for it is com-
monly asserted that Ireland was largely insulated from overseas movements; in
fact it is standard to say that the Gregorian reforms only reached Ireland in the
twelfth century, and the English Benedictine reforms are generally thought to
have made no impact on Ireland at all. If the first two issues can be explained
satisfactorily, the final question remains: does the thesis work, in a broader way,
for Irish writing on the female sex as a whole?
1
Sermon of Ariald (d. ), a clerical leader of the Patarene reform movement in Milan, cited in
Elliot, Spiritual Marriage, .
, ,
sex. Christopher Brooke, who has covered this subject well, commented, At the
heart of the movement lay the notion that women were a temptation and a
danger.2 On the Continent the eleventh century certainly did see the rise of a
misogyny, and it is recognized that this era saw a clerical and monastic flight
from womankind. Historians see this trends roots in the reformers determin-
ation to eradicate clerical marriage and concubinage.3 Dyan Elliott wrote of the
eleventh-century clerical reforms, It is inevitable that with a campaign which
aimed at nothing less than completely purging a male clergy of their female
companions, women in general would become the enemy.4
But in the earlier Benedictine reform, at least in England, we see it too.
Aelfric was a great disseminator of the tenth-century reform ideas. His homilies,
scrutinized by Katie Cubitt, point out women as a sexual danger, and even cross
the line into misogyny.5 Another was the fact of human weakness, including that
of monks and clerics. Frailty was highlighted and, with scaremongering tactics,
reformers could argue that lapses by religious men were preventable only by
shunning women. This technique was employed in both reforms. In the earlier
English reform movement, for example, we can note with Cubitt an addendum
to the movements key text, the Regularis Concordia, saying that no male might
enter a female house.
Englands tenth-century reformers aimed to accomplish a number of things,
perhaps most notably to limit the ecclesiastical power of the laity, though
scholars have made historians revise the old view that nobles were being simply
attacked. For all its monastic focus, the leadership of the movement was heavily
episcopal: Dunstan, Aethelwold, and Oswald were all bishops, and this fact
gave the programme a strong pastoral element, most clearly seen in the second
generation of the movement. As a result there were implications for the secular
clergy as well. As Cubitt summarized, The Benedictine ideal in the hands of the
bishops was to inform all aspects of religious life.6 One such aspect was clerical
celibacy. Aethelwold commissioned a pastoral letter from Aelfric which at-
tempted to impose the celibacy of the monks on his parochial clerics, and used
satire to try to shame them into changing. Cubitt pointed out another, sharper
2
C. Brooke covers this subject in his Medieval Idea of Marriage (Oxford, ), , quote from .
Important also is his Gregorian Reform in Action: Clerical Marriage in England, , Cambridge
Historical Journal (), , . Others writing on this subject include J. Russell, Dissent and Reform
in the Early Middle Ages (Berkeley, ), esp. ; Barstow, Married Priests; J. McNamara, The Herren-
frage: The Restructuring of the Gender System, , in C. Lees (ed.), Medieval Masculinities: Regard-
ing Men in the Middle Ages (Medieval Cultures ; Minneapolis, ), ; M. Dortel-Claudot. Le prtre
et le mariage: volution de la lgislation canonique des origines au XII sicle, Lanne canonique (),
.
3
G. Duby, The Three Orders: Feudal Society Imagined, trans. Arthur Goldhammer (Chicago, ).
4
Elliot, Spiritual Marriage, .
5
C. Cubitt, Virginity and Misogyny in Anglo-Saxon England, paper delivered March to the
York Centre for Medieval Studies Thirtieth Anniversary Quodlibet Conference on Virginities: Post-
Classical to Counter-Reformation.
6
Cubitt, Reforms, .
7
Cubitt, Virginity and Misogyny.
8
Regularis Concordia, ch. ( T. Simons, Regularis Concordia (London, ) ). Flanagan, Irish Society, ,
with references.
9
Flanagan has argued that the earlier Anglo-Saxon see at Canterbury was not attempting to interfere
in the Irish Church, but she did find it plausible that Cnut might have felt Dublin to be part of his
Anglo-Danish empire, as Bethell had suggested (Flanagan, Irish Society, ch. , esp. at ).
10
D. Bethell, English Monks and the Irish Reform, Historical Studies (), , at , with
references.
11
Ibid. , with references.
12 13
Hughes, cited in ibid. . Ibid. .
, ,
The propagandist of the aims and methods of the Gregorians, who gained
increasing force from the middle of the eleventh century, included the theolo-
gian Peter Damian, who was a great promoter of clerical celibacy. No one was
more passionate about the matter than he, and he reserved his especial wrath
for the clerics wife. He famously addressed them with, I speak to you O the
clerics charmers, Devils choice tidbits, expulsion from paradise, you virus of
the mind, you sword of souls, you wolfbane to drinkers, you poison to compan-
ions, you substance of sin, you occasion of death. . . . And so come, hear me
whores, prostitutes, lovers, wallowing pools of greasy hogs, chambers of filthy
spirits . . .
Although this tone is far from anything found in Ireland, the Irish did know
much of what was happening in Rome and its ecclesiastical environs. After
, in particular after , the links were strong. From Lanfranc of Bec
was in the seat of the see of Canterbury, and he was an active promoter of the
next wave of reforms originating from Rome. As Archbishop of Canterbury he
took to consecrating Irish bishops, a practice of which Irish kings demonstrably
approved. And as for direct connections with Rome, Germany, and France,
these were greater than has often been realized. Scholarship owes a great debt
to Aubrey Gwynn for starting to correct a serious misapprehension inadvert-
edly created by Kenney, namely that Ireland had little to do with European
movements until the twelfth century. His many articles repeatedly demonstrate
that it was very much in touch with ecclesiastical matters in England, Germany,
France, and Rome in the tenth and eleventh centuries. To cite but a few ex-
amples, a number of Irish kings went on pilgrimage to Rome in the decades up to
the s.14 Probably it was in the late eleventh century there was established a
community of Irish monks in Rome, whose membership is recorded in a single
manuscript a short letter from Gregory VII himself to Terdelvacus, king of
Ireland, and all the archbishops, bishops, abbots, nobles, and other faithful Chris-
tians who dwell in Ireland in the s, inviting them to consult him directly on
matters of the church on which they might be seeking guidance. In addition to
Rome, the German parts of the Empire also had extensive contact with Ireland,
a point which is relevant given the conflict and debate which the reforms gener-
ated there. The Irish scholar David Scotus, for example, was in the Emperor
Henry Vs retinue during his famous expedition to Rome in .15 The con-
nections were longstanding: Irish scholars had been at Charlemagnes court
in the ninth century; under the Ottonians in the tenth Irish monks had set up
communities at Metz, Cologne, Verdun, Fulda, and Ratisbon; and during the
14
Flanagan, Irish Society, , with references.
15
For all these events and foundations, see A. Gwynn, The Irish Church in the Eleventh and Twelfth Cen-
turies, ed. G. OBrien (Dublin, ), , , with references.
twelfth there was a group of Irish monasteries subject to the Irish community
of St James at Ratisbon.
Peter Damian must have been read in Ireland by the twelfth century, if not
earlier, because, among other things, he was one of the sources for the Middle
Irish litany, A Muire Mr. In spite of the model he provided them, the Irish pro-
duced no rival to Peter Damian as a polemicist for isolating the churchs men
from women. In fact, by the middle of the twelfth century, the English and the
Western churches in general saw Ireland as no longer the insula sanctorum but
rather an insula barbarorum: its marriage customs were uncanonical, its baptismal
practices were non-conformist, and in general its practices were lax.
That was the view we see in a wide range of sources including the correspond-
ence with the papacy and with the English archbishops of Canterbury,
Bernard of Clairvauxs Life of Malachy, and Gerald of Waless Topographia.
Not only had the Irish church failed to produce a reforming propagandist of the
forcefulness of Peter Damian or the effectiveness of Lanfranc, it had failed
even to keep up with the reforms. The reformers knew what the Irish situation
was, and they misliked it.
There is a great deal of truth in Dyan Elliots assertion about the reforms, that
women in general would become the enemy.16 It is true that attitudes con-
cerning the relations between clerics and monks on the one hand, and women,
including nuns, on the other, do not exist in a vacuum. There is likely to be a res-
onance between them and their wider beliefs about women. If the conclusions
made in the previous chapters are valid, the contemporary literature on the
theology of womanhood generally should corroborate and mirror those seen in
the more limited sphere of the ecclesiastical domain. Furthermore, they may
add to our understanding of the context in which the female monastics and
clerical consorts lived and pursued their vocations.
The literature in which the Irish generalize about womankind took its theme
from the Bible for the most part. In Christian writing, woman traditionally car-
ried a typological value, so women of the Bible were often used as starting-points
for exploration of various aspects of femaleness. In medieval Ireland, as else-
where, female biblical characters served as bonnes penser, goods to think with,
and this included thinking about gender and its contours. In Ireland, a few
only were really taken up: these are Eve and Mary, John the Baptists nemesis
Herodias, and the queen of the great king Solomon. Irish mentalities concern-
ing womanhood come to life in these women.
16
Elliot, Spiritual Marriage, .
, ,
17
F. Henry, Irish Art During the Viking Invasions, AD (London, ), plates , , .
18
De Mirabilibus Sacrae Scripturae, book , ch. (PL . ). This Irish text in three books is falsely
22
Saltair na Rann, lines (F. Kelly et al., Adam and Eve Story, vols. (Dublin, ) ).
23 24 25
Lines . Lines . Lines .
poet explains, it was a difficulty for the excellent woman, her mind was in
doubt.26 Adam, still standing neck deep in the water doing penance, sees his wife
approach with the Devil (whom he recognizes as such) and is furious and horri-
fied. Realizing that Eve has been led astray, he asks what possessed her to get out
of the river without Gods command, and tells her the true identity of the angel
beside her. At his outburst she falls to the ground. Lucifer, Devil, why are you
persecuting us?, she cries, and goes on for the next thirty lines to protest his
campaign against them. It was not they who cast him out of heaven, nor took
away his wealth, nor deposed his sovereignty; his argument was with God, not
them. It was, she tells him, his own rebellion and vainglory that is to blame. So
why was he attacking them, having robbed them of their purity and put them
into error?27 Though it is not specified, it is presumed that they finished their
penance. They subsequently went out into the world and begat their children
and lived out their long lives.
This section of the Saltair has been recounted here in such detail because it
brings to life an Irish authors understanding of Eves character and thus the rela-
tionship between women, original sin, and the essence of femininity. First to
be noted is the description of Eve at her creation: she is the fair mother of all fu-
ture generations, and is praised as such. Motherhood enjoys high esteem, and
Eve partakes of that. She is beauteous, too, another quality the Irish held in high
regard. When it comes to the Fall, the absence of a sexual tone here also requires
note: Adam and Eve do not sin carnally, nor is the forbidden knowledge por-
trayed as being sexual. Eve is not a wilful temptress; she was deceived. Eve does
give Adam the apple, but she does so out of a rather dim-witted conviction that
it would be a good thing for him and her both. At no point does she wish harm
to her husband. She is not his scheming nemesis but rather his beautiful and
cherished helpmate, whose nave stupidity causes repeated tragedy but whose
devoted loyalty is deeply touching. When Adam briefly loses his temper at Eve
she becomes overwrought with sorrow. In his turn Adam is heroically steadfast
towards her; never does he turn against her, but rather he does his best to help
them get out of their predicament together.28
The sympathetic treatment accorded to Eve is remarkable. She receives no
special punishment from God, nor is there any special curse upon future gener-
ations of women to pay for her transgression. The women of the future are in no
way, it suggests, going to share in her particular guilt. Indeed, Eves desperate
self-reproach can elicit in the modern reader a feeling of compassion, and it is
hard to imagine it not having a similar effect on the early medieval reader as
26 27
Ibid., lines . Ibid., lines .
28
In the Anglo-Saxon version also stupidity is Eves overriding shortcoming. See e.g. R. Finnegan,
Eve and Vincible Ignorance in Genesis B, Texas Studies in Literature and Language (), ; A.
Renoir, Eves I.Q. Rating: Two Sexist Views of Genesis B, in H. Damico and A. Olsen (eds.), New Read-
ings on Women in Old English Literature (Bloomington, Ind., ), ; J. Vickery, The Vision of Eve in
Genesis B, Speculum (), .
, ,
well. The notion of shared responsibility, the man taking at least partial blame
for his womans deeds, suggests an Irish notion of honour and responsibility.
One may recall that the law texts insist that every woman has a head who is re-
sponsible for her actions. Perhaps this is part of the underlying moral in the
sequence of the fall.
In the Saltair, Eve is the mouthpiece of a form which recurs in Irish texts writ-
ten in a womans voice, namely the lament. When she berates herself for her and
Adams downfall and then, at greater length, when she despairingly reproaches
the Devil for undoing them, Eve is a shedder of tears for the way of the world.
She is also, like other Irish female literary figures, a voice of outraged justice. Eve
eloquently takes the Devil to task for making her and Adam pay for his own mis-
fortune. Ireland at this time gives women the role of the lamenter, and gives
woman also a voice against injustice. The famed Lament of Deirdre, for ex-
ample, contains both heartbreaking sorrow and outspoken criticism, as does The
Massacre of the Innocents, written as though spoken by the infants mothers,
and the poem Eves Lament. In this regard Eve resembles the sorrowing
woman, not a Jezebel.
The Saltair and the prose Creation and Fall quite closely resemble the Vita
Adae which inspired them. It is interesting that the Irish were drawn to adopt a
female-friendly interpretation of Genesis, and that in adapting it they did not
make it more misogynistic (as did one German writer, Lutwin, who wrote a ver-
nacular version).29 In fact when the Irish author did depart from the Latin story
it was never to magnify blame or criticism of Eve. The Saltair in particular is dis-
tinctly more laudatory of Eve than the Latin Vita Adae. The latter does not treat
the Creation, commencing instead immediately after the expulsion from Para-
dise, and the Liber Mosis was not followed in the episodes under consideration
here. The Saltairs account of the creation of Eve, then, is to the best of our
knowledge a wholly Irish composition. It was an Irishman who composed that
lengthy and loving description of the new-sprung woman: noble, prudent,
bright, fair, modest, shapely, excellent, famous, and of fair complexion. He
gushes unabashedly that from the day of womans creation man would be
completely at her disposal.30
Once the story progresses to the expulsion, it is possible to compare the Latin
original and the Irish variant. Though it deals sympathetically with Eve, the Vita
Adae at no point has any similar speech, or any equivalent to the eulogy in the
Irish version, so it was almost certainly the Irish who interspersed the laudatory
adjectives we see in their version (beloved Eve, modest Eve of bright form,
and so forth).
There is an interesting divergence also at the point at which the disguised
Devil comes to Eve standing in the Tigris. In the Latin version, he tells her:
Dominus . . . misit me, ut educerem vos de aqua et darem vobis alimentum. In the Irish, by
29 30
Kelly et al., Adam and Eve, ii. . Saltair na Rann, lines .
contrast, the Devil explicitly tells her that God has had pity on her; thus he is
made to imply that God has considered her penance sufficient: your strong
king has sent me on a journey, it is from him I have come to show pity on you
(do r rad rom fad for fecht, ad tnac dott airchissecht).31 This textual change has the
effect of making Eve seem more devoted to her task; she is here clearly not leav-
ing off her penance simply because she wants something to eat. Murdoch sees
in this passage that the Devil makes Eve believe she has overdone the penance
or at least that she has done enough. Overall, in fact, his opinion was that the
Irish version places a stronger emphasis on redemption through penance than
others do.32 An additional point may be made, namely that there is a gendered
angle to this message: womankind too achieved redemption.
The Irish and Latin texts diverge at another point of the encounter by the
river. In both versions Eve is said not to recognize Satan. But the Saltair alone ex-
pands on this, adding it was a difficulty for the excellent woman, her mind was
in doubt (don banscil febdai b hairc, bae a menmai i cumtabairt ).33 Eves state of mind
is not described in the Vita Adae, and only rarely in any other vernacular version
(Anglo-Saxon, Slavic, etc.). Only Lutwin, noted Murdoch, addresses himself to
Eves state of mind in his German version. But Lutwin had at this point di-
gressed into a misogynistic homily which named other weak and evil women of
the Bible. Comparing the Irish and the German versions, Murdoch observes
the two texts . . . are entirely different in spirit.34 This difference in spirit high-
lights the fact that vernacular writers of different backgrounds could and did
twist the tone of this apocryphal story to make it more closely resemble their
own views of womankind. The Irish variant was the kindest one of the lot. It is
only partially rivalled by the somewhat sympathetic Anglo-Saxon version,
known as the Genesis B, whose content is compared against the others in
Murdochs commentaries in volume two of Adam and Eve.
A prose version of the section on the creation and fall is found in RIA MS ,
the Leabhar Breac, and the Yellow Book of Lecan. It is extremely similar to the
Saltair, both in content and tone. The creation of Eve, however, is glossed over in
this version and she only comes to the fore as she meets the serpent. Nor is she
given the illustrious epithets accorded to her in the poem, but is still very much
the nave: she tells Adam that she was aware of no harm resulting from eating
the apple until she saw herself naked. This author, too, made it clear that Eve is
not to take too much of the blame: at the interrogation by God, Adam tells God
it is all Eves fault and he pleads that if he has violated Gods command it was the
woman bestowed on him who tempted him. God does not accept the excuse,
saying that Adam will now be punished, and his children after him, for his fail-
ure to acknowledge his guilt. Though man might try to pass the buck God will
not accept this, and will castigate those who try to avoid their responsibility.
31 32
Lines . Kelly et al., Adam and Eve, ii. , .
33 34
Saltair na Rann, lines . Kelly et al., Adam and Eve, ii. .
, ,
Another Irish text of this period delves into the nature of womankind through
the character of Eve, and thus gives another view of attitudes to the female sex
in a theological or ontological sense. M Eba Ben (I am the Woman Eve) is a
poem inspired by Genesis apocrypha and dated by Meyer to around the late
tenth or early eleventh century.35 Structured as a dramatic monologue in verse,
it seems at first glance to contradict the spirit we encountered in the Saltair. The
poet places into Eves mouth a most woeful self-excoriation for her sin and for
its effect on humankind. But quite rightly, scholars have treated the poem as a
lament, nicknaming it Eves Lament. She is here, as she is in the Saltair, and as
Deirdre is in the tales, a tragic figure.
M Eba, ben Adaim uill; m ro shraig su thall;
me ro thall nem ar mo chloinn; cir is m do-chid sa crann.
Ropa lemm rched dom rir, olc in mthoga rom thr;
olc in cosc cinad rom chrn; fo-rr, n hidan mo lm.
M tuc in d-uball an-as, do-chaid tar cumang mo chras;
in cin marat sain re l, de no scarat mn re bas.
N bad eigred in cach d, n bad geimred gaethmar gl,
n bad iffern, n bad brn, n bad oman, minbad m.
I am Eve, the wife of noble Adam; it was I who violated Jesus in the past;
it was I who robbed my children of heaven; it is I who by right should
have been crucified.
I had heaven at my command; evil the bad choice that shamed me;
evil the punishment for my crime that has aged me; my hand is not pure.
It was I who plucked the apple; it went past the narrow of my gullet;
as long as they live in daylight women will not cease from folly on
account of that.
There would be no ice in any place; there would be no bright and windy winter;
there would be no hell, there would be no grief, there would be no terror
but for me.36
But for Eves bad choice (olc in mthoga rom thr) there would be no winter, no
hell, no grief, no terror, no sorrow, writes the poet. In spite of this damning
blame, the poem is intended to cause the reader to pity Eve, for she voices a
heavy world-weary sorrow which is once poignant and existentiala universal
lament for the pains of life. These texts show what looks to be a typical Irish
view, namely that Eve has a pivotal role in the grand drama of the sacred history
of the world. The Irish acknowledged her as their prime mother, and as such the
Saltair praises her greatly. At the same time she was the one who brought upon
her beloved children the pains of life and the agonies of the fallen world. Eve
35
Kenney, no. .
36
Greene and OConnor, Golden Treasury, , which in turn is based on the edition of Kuno
Meyer, riu (), .
was humanitys mother, whose torment at her own evil folly was both heroic
and saddening.
Neither the Saltair nor M Eba Ben links Eves fall to carnal, sexual lust. Eves
sin was not a sexual one, and the primary weakness of her daughters is not of the
concupiscent variety. When we turn to see if biblical women other than Eve
were epitomized for the Irish sinfulness of sex, we are similarly disappointed.
Mary Magdalen, the biblical repentant harlot, was largely ignored by the Irish.
In one of the extremely rare instances when she is mentioned she is remembered
not for her harlotry but rather for her weakness and her tears of penance. The
Middle Irish ( probably tenth-century) poem A Prayer for Tears contains a line
in which the poet cries that, alas, even a little stream of tears is not forthcoming
onto his cheek as thou gavest a flood of tears to the weak, wretched woman
( feib tucais in linn don banscil thimm thraig). The woman in question is glossed as
Mary Magdalen. She is weak, wretched, and repentant, indeed characterized
by many of the same traits Eve is accorded. As with Eve, the sexual angle is not
taken up.37 This is very much in tune with what was observed in the hagiog-
raphy concerning attitudes to nuns and clerics. There we saw that the nun was
not painted a sexual temptress, nor were clerics or monks imaged as being
victimized by voracious female lust. It must be said that Moluas early hagiog-
rapher had seen the threat of women in sexual terms: that saint, it will be
recalled, had problems finding a place to settle away from women.38
Women in this later theological material suggest that womans greatest hin-
drance to spiritual virtus was her propensity to folly. Eve in the lament says fool-
ishness is the legacy she bestows on womankind for as long as they live in
daylight: in cin marat sain re l, de no scarat mn re bas.39 In the Saltair, the same trait
is at the root of Eves first taking of the apple. And so too is it responsible for her
cutting short her penance in the river Tigris, for which Adam reproaches her
with
Cia rot brathaig, a ben bith,
rot rathaig narbsat frgaith,
don-rat fri snm saethraich seis,
rot bathig, rom baethigeis!40
Who betrayed you, foolish woman, who perceived that you were not truly wise,
who has put us into painful torment?he deceived you, you deceived me.
37
K. Meyer (ed. and trans.), Four Religious Poems, riu (), . Mary Magdalen is
treated in the glosses to the Martyrology of Oengus, which relate the story of the oil, her forgiveness by
Christ, and the upbraiding given to Christ by a Pharisee for allowing a harlot near him (Martyrology of
Oengus, notes to July).
38
Life of Lugaid alias Molua, text, ch. .
39
Bes: normally foolishness, levity, but also referring to incapacity at law; in a few later texts it is
found with the meaning of lust or wantonness, but I think that in this instance the sexual connotation is
not at the fore, if present at all.
40
Saltair na Rann, lines .
, ,
This view, too, is in line with the material relating more specifically to nuns, to
the women in the ecclesiastical establishment of the time. The later female saints
Lives, concerning themselves as they did with the highest possible attainment
of women, agree. One episode in the Life of Monenna in particular is of interest
in this light. The Life makes no suggestion that women are impure or salacious,
but they can be, it says, prone to weakness and foolishness. One of Monennas
virgins saw a vision and, frightened, came to her in a trembling state.
Cui sancta Monenna clementer respondit: Signa diligenter tuum cor. Forsitan bes-
tiarum vel demonum horrorem invenistis que omnia desertis solent accidere et sexum
feminarum potest modicum commovere.41
St Monenna calmly replied, Make the sign of the cross over your heart; perhaps you
came upon horrible beasts or devils, all of them things which tend to turn up in lonely
placesand a little thing can upset a woman.
Despite the propensity to folly, woman is deemed capable of deep feeling, of
touching loyalty, and of that very important thing, motherhood. For this she is
honoured, and whatever her idiocies, womankind is not to be shunned. The two
Eve texts avoid any suggestion that man should renounce woman. It may be
that Eve is repeatedly falling into acts and oversights of an innocently imbecile
nature, but man should emulate Adam and forgive womanly foolishness; to
harm her would anger God. He must needs be a good head and not shirk his
duty of looking after her, and with male help and her own commitment, a
woman repenting of folly can achieve real insight and wisdom. Man and
woman must stick together and share the burden of living in a fallen world.
41
Conchubranus, Life of Monenna, book , ch. .
of course closer in nature to Eve than to Mary, but they could reach up beyond
their natural state through divine grace and the application of ascetic will.
This pattern does not fit for Ireland. There the cult of the Virgin rose in the
seventh century, earlier than almost anywhere else in Western Christendom.42
At that time, as Marian devotion began to flourish, the evidence of the volumin-
ous sources makes it clear that there was no nosedive in womens status or theo-
logical position. However, in the later period, the era under discussion in this
chapter, one can only just barely perceive an escalation in Marys already-
established cult. As evidenced in the sources from the tenth to twelfth centuries,
the Marian cult says little about the nature of womankind per se. Rather Mary
represents all that is best about women: beauty, nobility, honour, modesty. This
alone is hardly good fodder for incisive analysis. It is hard to put a finger on what
the Irish Mary reveals about the Irish understanding of womankind. Only a few
general points may be made which may indirectly shed some light on the
matter. At this time Mary was considered one of, if not the, most powerful of
intercessors. According to the apocryphal account of the Virgins assumption,
Transitus Mariae, she even intercedes with Christ to grant respite to those in
hell.43 Prayers and litanies to her abound. Marys womanhood offered no ob-
stacle in Irish eyes to her enjoyment of a high celestial status. She was believed
to be a powerful spiritual ally, and reverence for her was clearly deep-felt and
widespread.
The litany A Muire Mr (O Great Mary) represents the sole known case of the
Virgin Mary being contrasted to Eve. Found in the Leabhar Breac, this Middle
Irish text is of uncertain date: Stokes attributed it to the twelfth century, a date
with which Carney was inclined to agree.44 It recites the Virgins many epithets,
and her power seems limitless. She is paragon of women, queen of the angels,
lady of heaven, mother of the eternal glory, mother of the church in heaven and
earth, beauty of virgins, lady of nations, breast of infants, handmaid of God,
mother of Christ, spouse of the Lord, queen of the world. She is beauteous as a
dove, lovely as the moon, as elect as the sun. The epithet of interest here is the
one that calls Mary the repulse of Eves reproach (dichor aithisse Eua). It is a Con-
tinental import, almost certainly. This and almost all the other invocatory titles
in the litany have been shown to derive from Continental sources, namely from
Peter Damian, Anselm (both eleventh-century), and from pseudo-Anselm and
pseudo-Ildephonsus (dates uncertain). Perhaps significantly, the litanist was not
even well versed in earlier Irish poems on the Virgin.45
42
The earliest known devotions to her are evidenced in the Versiculi Familia Benchuir in the Antiphony
of Bangor, dated to c..
43
Transitus Mariae, ch. ( St John Seymour, Irish Versions of the Transitus Mariae, Journal of
Theological Studies (), ). For more on this text see McNamara, Apocrypha, no. .
44
Discussion of dating in ODwyer, Devotion to Mary, .
45
G. C. Meersseman, The Acahistos Hymn (Freiburg, ), ; ODwyer, Mary, . Given the
sources, a th-cent. date for the litany seems most reasonable; however, it may be that Anselm and
Damian in turn used earlier sources, which the Irish litanist was himself using.
, ,
For the Irish, Mary was a redeemer of Eves sin only in a very inexplicit way.
This was in the sense that she encouraged women to go beyond their innate
foolishness which, according to the Eve texts, was Eves legacy to them. In the
Transitus Mariae, a prose tale most probably composed in the twelfth century re-
lating the death of the Virgin, she is shown living with a group of virgines of
whom she was the spiritual mother.46 As death drew near, a great fear seized
the virgins and they pleaded with her not to leave them, for when she had gone
the Devil might overtake them.47 She was their protector against him: she was the
shepherd, they the sheep. This reinforces the role of Mary as the protector of
virgins, but implies that women, even virgins, are weak in the face of diabolical
threat. They are weak, but Mary is strong. The Virgins reply is as telling as the
pleading of the girls, for she tells them sternly and tersely, Be quiet and do not
disobey God. Mary, the patroness of virgins, speaks with the voice of sensible
clarity.
46 47
Transitus Mariae, chs. . Ibid., ch. .
Liber Flavus Fergusiorum, and five other manuscripts.48 In some Irish versions
the story is changed and Johns death is requested by the two daughters of
Herodias, named as Salvisa (or Salia) and Neptis. The wickedness of the girls
deed is repeatedly stressed. In a late Middle-Irish poetic version of the story
John enquires who is going to actually behead him: Which of you undertakes to
behead me for evil women? (Cich ocaib gabas do lim mo dchennad do drochmnib? )49
The notes to the Martyrology of Oengus, which also refer to the death of John,
offer the most vivid expression of how the women tricking Herod into executing
John are expressions of evil womanhood. The worlds women, save a few of
them, burn in the fire of doom: to speak of them is unmeet after the murder of
John (Mn in domuin acht mad bec dib, i tinid brathat breoid: labra fru nocha techta,
indegaid echta Eoin).50 John is a martyr to womanly evil.
The story of John turns on its head the widespread notion that women are
weak and foolish, and instead obliquely suggests that they can have a cunning
power on account of mens love for them. Such a view is expressed even more
strongly in another short Irish apocryphal story, the probably ninth-century
The Power of Women. This story was popular enough to have been copied
into several collections, including the Book of Leinster and the Yellow Book of
Lecan.51 Like many others it uses biblical characters, here the great king
Solomon and his wife.
One day a tribal king held a great feast for the great king Solomon, which
he attended and everyone got very drunk. Before going to bed Solomon set
three faithful retainers to guard him, fearful as he was of being attacked in the
night. To pass the time the guards play a game, each to suggest what was the
most powerful thing in the world. One suggests wine, for it is wine which
gladdens the host till they be without reason, without sense (Air is f n romedair is
slag combtar cen chond, chen chill ). The second says no, it is the power of the ruler.
Strongest of men is the sovereign. Senior of creatures is man. It is his power
which has made us be without drunkenness, without sleep though we are here
drinking wine (Tressa flath feraib. Sruithiu dilib duine. Is a chumachtae sidi do-nrigni-
ni cen mesca cen chotlud ce no-n fil oc o[u]l fina). The third man, whose name was
Nemiasserus, said no, the greatest power is the power of women and the next
day he would prove it. The next day the three were in the company of
Solomon and his queen and their retinue. They related their conversation to the
48
For full manuscript details of all Irish versions see McNamara, Apocrypha, no. . The Leabhar
Breac version is in Bernard and Atkinson, Passions and Homilies, , . The story is virtually the
same as that in Acta Sanctorum ( edn.), under June, v. .
49
The poem commencing Abstaln, adba na rg, ed. B. Cuv in Two Items from Irish Apocryphal
Tradition, Celtica (), .
50
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Aug.
51
Textual and manuscript details in McNamara, Apocrypha, no. B. The text was originally edited
with an English trans. by K. Meyer, Anecdota from Irish Manuscripts : the Book of Leinster p. a,
Gaelic Journal (Irisleabhar na Gaedhilge) (), . Also ed. J. Pokorny, A Historical Reader of Old Irish
(Halle, ), , . Meyer identified it as a garbled version of Esdras : .
, ,
company. Various men chimed in with their opinion. One thought it wine,
another the sovereign. The queen suddenly struck Solomon, knocking his
crown off his head so it fell on the floor, and said, What, am I without power
then?
A mmarbad! ol cch. Do-sn-cai in r sechae. Tibid ind rgain. La sodain tibid in r
fochtir. Niloitfider in ben, ol in r. A sin ille, ol Nemiasserus, is trn a chumachtae
sin. Is fir ol in r. Is tressa cumachtae mn, old[a]s cach cumachtae. Ol is in[n]a tun
biid di a Satain comaitechtae timgaire chumachtai conacumangar a aithber forrae
cachadnae di ulc.
Her death!, cried everyone. The king looked at her sideways. The queen smiled.
Thereupon, suddenly the king smiled too. The woman will not be harmed said the
king. From that, then said Nemiasserus, strong indeed is her power. It is true said the
king. The power of women is greater than any other power, because in her brow is her
companion Satan, so she cannot be reproached for whatever she does of evil.
With that line, the little story ends. The power of women, then, lies in mens soft
spot for them, for the love and indulgence extended to them. In their adoration
of women men make promises to them, binding themselves to womens wills.
This view is seen more widely in other literature such as in the tales of the Tin,
where men are sometimes impelled, through love or through vows arising from
love, into performing dangerous or tragic courses of action. Furthermore, here
we are given a theological explanation of sorts: it is a sort of devilish power that
women have that makes men so soft-hearted towards them, that dissipates their
rage against them. Without being too heavy-handed about it, the author of the
tale of Solomons wife attributes mens inability to recriminate against the
female sex to the Devil.
The four characters discussed epitomized womankind for the Irish authors.
Eve, Mary, Herodias, and Solomons wife are about the only ones utilized in this
way, even though in other areas authors used many more as bonnes penser, as
goods to think with, on sexual issues. In Ireland one finds no lyrical exegeses on
many of the other obvious candidates. Delilah, for example, received little at-
tention, and Mary Magdalen similarly drew little interest at this time, though
she had earlier been linked with the grade of repentant widows. Nor are there
useful commentaries on such women as Sarah, Raab, or any of the other female
characters the Bible presents and which medieval writers in other regions used
as fodder on which to chew over concepts of gender and sexuality. This absence
in the Irish material goes back long before the commencement of the late period
under consideration here, back in fact to the very beginning of such writings
in the seventh century. It seems the Irish never took up this practice of using
52
Martyrology of Oengus, notes on Aug.
, ,
their female companions would inevitably make the latter the enemy, then a
cautious movement towards that same end portrayed women thus only partially
and only sometimes.
: DE STATU ECCLESIAE
One theological piece of this period, however, does explicitly address the ques-
tion of womens role in Gods great scheme of humanity, and, within that, their
role within the church. This early twelfth-century text, De statu ecclesiae, written
by Gilbert (Gilla Easpuic), bishop of Limerick, to all intents and purposes vindi-
cates the position argued in the last three chapters. In particular, it confirms that
for a leading cleric of that day, women were important enough to include ex-
plicitly in a schema describing Christian society, a schema whose Continental
version (received by the bishop) omitted them. It is with an examination of this
text, and its wider implications, that we conclude our treatment of women in the
tenth to twelfth centuries.
On the Continent, the first half of the eleventh century saw the growth of a
concept of a society which was to be influential in shaping the mentalities sur-
rounding social order. According to this model, society should be seen as being
made up of three distinct types of person, between whom there should be clear
and meaningful boundaries. There were those who pray, those who fight, and
those who plough: oratores, bellatores, and aratores. This schema, witnessed in a
range of writing but owing a great deal to the formulation of Adalbero of Laon,
was explored in detail by Georges Duby in The Three Orders. It heralded and en-
couraged real social changes, the most important of which was the creating of a
sharp division separating the laity from clergy.53 In this project the promulgators
of the three-order cosmology emphasized that the critical factor distinguishing
the order of those who pray was the absence of sexual activity. The promoters
aimed to create a general social acceptance of the idea that clerics were sexually
chaste, and lay people were not, and indeed to inculcate a general belief that
God had created the human race in this manner.54 One is therefore not sur-
prised to learn that the three-order social model was one of the instruments in
the campaign for the abolition of clerical marriage.
A second important feature of this model has to do more directly with its im-
pact on women. Some historians at least have seen it as a creation which had a
very negative effect on them. Duby himself observed that this formulation
leaves out women entirely. He asserts that the threefold hierarchy of believers
53
Duby, Three Orders, esp. . See also Adalbero of Leon, Carmen ad Robertum regem (C. Corozzi
(ed. and trans.), Pome au roi Robert (Paris, ) ); C. Corozzi, Les fondaments de la tripartition sociale
chez Adalbron de Laon, Annales E.S.C. (), ; R. I. Moore, Family, Community and Cult
on the Eve of the Gregorian Reform, TRHS th ser. (), , esp. .
54
On the demarcation of clergy and laity, see Duby, Three Orders, , , , .
(virgins, widows, and the married) of the Latin Church underwent a change in
the centuries leading up to the eleventh, which gave rise to a three-way division
of the social sphere: the older classic model had included women, but this
new version betrayed, he felt, an increased marginalization of womankind.55 It
corresponded to the clergys flight from women in their drive to develop a celi-
bate priesthood, although, Duby points out, the Gregorian ideology did not
adopt the trifunctional postulate.56
In all this it is important to remember that the new functional schema is not
framed in a gendered way and women were excluded only by implication. This
is because a leading Irish reformer of the twelfth century, one with ties to both
Rome and England, subverted both these objectives (i.e. eliminating clerical
celibacy and marginalizing women) when presenting the cosmology to the
Irish. Gilbert of Limerick (obit ) was consecrated as bishop in about in
Ireland under the auspices of the powerful high king Muirchertach Ua Briain.
His appointment was met with approval by Anselm, who was Archbishop of
Canterbury, a leading reformer, and a personal acquaintance of Gilberts
they had met in Rouen.57 The Irish reforming Synod of Cashel of was held
under the auspices of Ua Briain, and some five years after the synod, the
method of selection of the archbishopric of Armagh was changed.58 Gilbert
subsequently presided over the next reform synod, Rith Bressail in , in the
capacity of papal legate. He wrote De statu ecclesiae some time between and
, at a time when he was exceptionally influential in the Irish Church.59 In
this tract on the structure of church and society, he reiterated the three-order
schema in a modified, indeed more complex form. In it the general pyramid
of the three orders, a standard diagrammatic description, contained two
sub-pyramids. It was in that context that he introduced his assurances about the
inclusion of the female sex:
Ex quibus superiores in pyramide oratores intellege; et quia quidam ex eis coniugati
sunt, ideo viros et feminas nominavimus. Sinistrales vero in pyramide aratores sunt, tam
viri quam feminae. Dextrales quoque bellatores sunt, viri atque feminae. Nec dico fem-
inarum esse officium orare, arare aut certe bellare; sed tamen his coniugatae sunt atque
subserviunt, qui orant, et arant, et pugnant. Nec seiunctas ab Ecclesia putamus prae-
senti, quas Christus cum matre sua collocat in coelesti.60
The highest of these in the pyramid are understood to be those who pray, and since some
of these are married, therefore we have nominated men and women. Indeed, on the left
55 56 57
Ibid. . Ibid. . Flanagan, Irish Society, .
58
Flanagan suggests that the Irish may have held Cashel in response to what they saw happening to
Anselm in England. They knew and appeared to like Anselm: in he had requested (but not insisted)
that Irish ecclesiastics seek recourse to Canterbury when they had issues to resolve; he had consecrated
the bishop of Dublin and had written to the high king about the need to observe canon law in regard to
marriage and episcopal consecrations: Flanagan, Irish Society, . For a fuller treatment of the synod see
Gwynn, First Synod of Cashel.
59 60
Kenney, no. . Gilbert, De statu ecclesiae (PL . ).
, ,
in the pyramid are those who plough, as many men as women. Those on the right are
those who fight, men and women. I am not saying that it is an official duty of women to
pray, plough or certainly [not] to fight, but they are married to, and serve under, those
who pray and plough and fight. Nor do we think of them [i.e. women] as separated
from the present church, whom Christ placed in heaven along with his own mother.
First and most striking is his explicit inclusion of women in the category of
those who pray and, indeed, are there as wives of clerics; in that alone he under-
mined the model as a tool for promoting clerical celibacy. On the second issue,
that of the general exclusion of women from the cosmology, Gilbert was equally
subversive, though probably unwittingly. For him women have an important
place in the divine plan: they were linked with the grace and divinity of the Vir-
gin Mary, the personage through whom female sanctity was most strongly em-
bodied, and this place, to his way of thinking, needed to be made explicit. To my
knowledge, the only version of the model which explicitly mentions the female
half of the population was the Irish one, and it is almost certainly unique in
including wives of those who pray. It may be that Gilbert as a reformer did
promote a stricter boundary between the laity and those in orders, but we can-
not simply say that the structure of society, as he envisioned it, reflected a cler-
ical flight from women, either as part of a drive to develop a celibate priesthood
or for any other reason. Though we do not see in Gilbert any evidence of a
doctrine of separation, in all respects his writings are considered orthodox. So
while he promoted an orthodox Western-style Church in De statu he was not pre-
occupied with separating nuns from monks, nor clerics from consorts. If he was
copying a non-Irish source for this section, and it appears he was, it is then rea-
sonable to surmise that the native Irish ecclesiastical mundus influenced him.
Certainly the other textual evidence from that era would support such a notion:
his writing falls within a pattern which is by now familiar. The evidence of this
text is important to an argument which asserts that women of the Irish Church
were not marginalized or shunned, even in the reform era of the twelfth century,
and in the eyes of one of its most influential reformers, one who had extensive
contacts with both England and Rome.
crisis of sorts; at its crux was the question how can men redefine manhood to
prove womens incapacity to carry out professional responsibilities?61 Ireland
does not fit exactly the patterns described by McNamara or by Duby. The litera-
ture of the tenth to twelfth centuries which elucidates the Irish understanding
of the female sex shows other changes, bearing some resemblances but with im-
portant differences. Women were liable to have certain sorts of shortcomings,
but the Irish saw this as no cause to demonize them. The treatment of such char-
acters as Eve, Mary, Herodias, and Solomons queen, used as exemplars of fe-
maleness, shows this clearly and repeatedly, though the amount of extant
material is admittedly small. Newly ascendant notions about the right ordering
of society, which elsewhere saw women marginalized, in Ireland were adapted
to include women and to restate their value and their centrality in the corporate
entity of the human community. Irish views show a consistent pattern: woman-
kind as a whole, though prone to folly and capable of scheming evildoing, was
not made into the enemyeither of the male sex generally or of the clergy in
particular. We saw earlier that even the clerics wife, much maligned elsewhere,
could in Ireland be the object of a sort of love poem, as in the Cormac verses. As
for Irelands nuns, they, like its laywomen, for the most part escaped being cast
as diabolical sexual snares for men.
The Irish holy women of the tenth to twelfth centuries enjoyed the company
of their brothers more than is to be expected. The ecclesiastical writers of Lives
continue to portray them as partners of clerics and monks in the business of
bringing Gods grace, redemption, and miraculous wonders to humankind;
and it is in Ireland that male saints hagiographers insistently claim that their
protagonists met (for example) the great Brigit or the great Ita. On those occa-
sions when nuns and other religious women were to be separated from the
monks with whom they had previously enjoyed fraternal contact, the justifica-
tions, when given, normally centred around the need to avoid rumours of scan-
dal, rather than around supposed feminine evil. The process was gentler and
more respectful than one might have expected, given the reputation of Ireland
among some contemporary medievalists as a place of strict asceticism as regards
sex. In Ireland, a separatist such as Senn, dwelling on an all-male island, could
be challenged (in his own Life, no less) by a pilgrim nun demanding, Women
have served and administered to Christ and his Apostles. Indeed, no less than
men do women enter the heavenly kingdom. Why then shouldnt you take
women on your island? Ireland gave us the author of Moluas sardonic line
ubi fuit mulier, ibi peccatum; ubi vero peccatum, ibi erit dyabolus, but it also gave us
Conchubranus, who cited Corinthians to write of Monenna that the Lord did
not disdain to act through her because in Christus . . . neque masculus neque femina
sed omnia in omnibus Christus.62
61
McNamara, Herrenfrage, .
62
Conchubranus, Life of Monenna, book , ch. .
Bibliography
A Ben, Bennacht Fort [O Woman, A Blessing on You, or Sell Not Heaven for Sin], ed.
and trans., K. Meyer, Daniel a Liathaides Advice to a Woman, riu (),
. Also in Murphy, Early Irish Lyrics, .
A Chrnc, ed. J. Carney, A Chrnc, Cubaid do Chel, igse (), . Also in
Greene and OConnor, Golden Treasury, ; (ed.), K. Meyer, An Crnc, ZCP
(), ; Meyer, Selections from Ancient Irish Poetry, .
A Muire, min maith-ingen [O Mary, Kind and Gentle Maid], in Plummer, Irish Litanies,
.
A Muire mr [O Great Mary], in Plummer, Irish Litanies, .
A Slinicidh [O Saviour] in Plummer, Irish Litanies, .
Abstaln, adba na rg [Abstaln, the dwellings of the kings], ed. B. Cuv, Two Items
from Irish Apocryphal Tradition, Celtica (), .
Adalbero of Laon, Carmen ad Robertum regem, ed. and trans. C. Corozzi, Pome au roi Robert
(Paris, ).
Adomnn, De locis sanctis, ed. D. Meehan, Adamnans De Locis Sanctis (Scriptores Latini
Hiberniae ; Dublin, ).
Life of Columba alias Columcille [Latin], ed. and trans. A. and M. Anderson,
Adomnns Life of Columba (Edinburgh, ). Also in R. Sharpe (trans.), Life of Columba,
with introduction (New York, ).
Aislinge maic Conglinne [Mac Conglinnes Dream], ed. and trans. K. Meyer, Aislinge maic
Conglinne (London, ).
Ambrose, De institutione virginis, PL . .
De virginibus, PL . .
De virginitate, PL . .
Annals of Clonmacnois, ed. and trans. D. Murphy, The Annals of Clonmacnoise (Dublin, ).
Annals of the Four Masters, ed. and trans. J. ODonovan, Annals of the Kingdom of Ireland
by the Four Masters, vols. (nd edn.: Dublin, ).
Annals of Inisfallen, ed. and trans. S. MacAirt, The Annals of Inisfallen (Dublin, ).
Annals of Tigernach: Continuation, trans. W. Stokes, The Annals of Tigernach: The
Continuation, , Revue Celtique (), , , .
Annals of Ulster, ed. S. MacAirt and G. MacNiocaill, The Annals of Ulster, vols. (Dublin,
/).
Antiphony of Bangor, ed. F. E. Warren, The Antiphony of Bangor, vols. (Henry Bradshaw
Society , ; London, /).
Ateoch Frit [I entreat Thee, or Litany of Jesus], in Plummer, Irish Litanies, .
Athanasius, Apologia ad Constantium, PG . .
Audite fratres facta, ed. M. Esposito, Conchubrani Vita Sanctae Monennae, appendix B, PRIA
C (), .
Audite sancta studia, ibid., appendix A, .
Augustine, De bono coniugali, PL . .
De sancta virginitate, PL . .
Augustinus (the Irish Augustine), De mirabilibus sacrae scripturae, PL . .
Basil of Caesarea, Epistolae, trans. R. Deferrari, St Basil: Letters, vols. (Loeb Classical
Library; Cambridge, Mass., /).
Bede, Historia ecclesiastica, ed. C. Plummer, Historia Ecclesiastica Gentis Anglorum (Oxford,
).
Berrad Airechta [The Shearing of the Court, on suretyship], CIH .., trans.
R. Stacey, Berrad Airechta: An Old Irish Tract on Suretyship, in T. Charles-Edwards,
M. Owen, and D. Walters (eds.), Lawyers and Laymen: Studies in the History of Law
(Cardiff, ), .
Bernard of Clairvaux, Life of St Malachy of Armagh, ed. and trans. H. Lawlor,
St Bernard of Clairvauxs Life of St Malachy of Armagh (London, ).
Bethu Brigte. See Life of Brigit [Irish and Latin].
Blathmac, Maire mthair in maic bic [Mary Mother of the Little Boy], ed. and trans.
J. Carney, Two Old Irish Poems, riu (), , at . Also in J. Carney (ed.),
The Poems of Blathmac son of C Brettan, together with the Irish Gospel of Thomas and A Poem
on the Virgin Mary (Irish Texts Society ; Dublin, ), .
Tair Cucum, A Maire bod [Come to Me, Loving Mary, or To Mary and Her Son],
ibid. .
Bobbio Missal, ed. E. Lowe, The Bobbio Missal (London, ).
Book of Armagh, ed. J. Gwynn, Liber Ardmachensis: The Book of Armagh (Dublin, ).
Book of Leinster, ed. R. Best et al., The Book of Leinster, formerly Lebar na Nachongbala,
vols. (Dublin, ).
Bretha Crlige [On Blood-lying], CIH ... Also ed. D. Binchy, Bretha
Crlige, riu (), .
Bretha im Fuillema Gell [Judgements on Pledge-interests], CIH ... Also in
ALI v. .
Bretha Nemed didenach [The Last Bretha Nemed ], CIH . Also ed. E. Gwynn, An Old
Irish Tract on the Privileges and Responsibilities of Poets, riu (), , .
Bretha Nemed Tosech [The First Bretha Nemed ] CIH . Also in L. Breatnach, The
First Third of Bretha Nemed Tosech, riu (), .
Brigit b Bithmaith [Brigit Ever-Excellent Woman], in Thes. Pal. ii. .
Brigitae Sanctae Subiectae [List of Those Subject to Saint Brigit], Riain, Corpus
Genealogiarum, . Book of Leinster version: Book of Leinster, vi. .
Caesarius of Arles, Rule for Virgins, ed. and trans. M.-J. Delage, Sermons au Peuple
(Sources chrtiennes ; Paris, ), .
Cin Adomnin [The Law of Adomnn], ed. and trans. K. Meyer, Cin Adamnin: An Old
Irish Treatise on the Law of Adamnn (Anecdota Oxoniensa ; Oxford, ).
Cin Adomnins Guarantor List, ed. M. N Donnchadha, The Guarantor List of Cin
Adomnin, Peritia (), .
Cin Lnamna [The Law of Connections], CIH ... Also ed. and trans.
R. Thurneysen, in Binchy et al. (eds.), Studies in Early Irish Law, .
Cantemus in omni die [or Cuchuimnes Poem on the Virgin Mary], in Bernard and
Atkinson, Irish Liber Hymnorum, i. .
Carais Pattraic [Patrick Loved, or Cuimmns Hymn], ed. and trans. W. Stokes,
Cuimmns Poem on the Saints of Ireland, ZCP (), .
Catalogus Sanctorum Hiberniae, ed. P. Grosjean, Edition et commentaire du Catalogus
Sanctorum Hiberniae, Analecta Bollandiana (), , .
Christus in nostra insula [or Ultns Hymn], in Bernard and Atkinson, Irish Liber
Hymnorum, i. .
Ps.-Clement, Epistolae ii ad virgines PG . .
Cogitosus, Life of Brigit [ Latin], ed. J. Colgan, Triadis thaumaturgae acta (Louvain, ),
. Also in PL . ; trans. S. Connolly and J.-M. Picard, Cogitosus Life
of St Brigit, JRSAI (), .
Collectio Canonum Hibernensis, ed. H. Wasserschleben, Die irische Kanonensammlung
(Leipzig, ).
Columbanus, Epistola I, ed. and trans. G. Walker, Sancti Columbani Opera (Scriptores
Latini Hiberniae ; Dublin, ), .
Conchubranus, Life of Monenna [Latin], ed. M. Esposito, Conchubrani Vita Sanctae
Monennae, PRIA C (), . Also ed. and trans. Ulster Society for
Medieval Latin Studies (USMLS), The Life of Saint Monenna by Conchubranus,
Seanchas Ard Mhacha: . (), ; . (), ; . (), .
Comanmand Noebag Herend [The Same-Named Virgin Saints of Ireland], Riain,
Corpus Genealogiarum, . Also in Brosnan, Archivium Hibernicum, .
Concilium Eliberitanum, PL . .
Cormac, Glossary, ed. W. Stokes, Cormacs Glossary, translated and annotated by the late John
ODonovan (Calcutta, ).
Crus Bscnai [The Regulation of Proper Behaviour], CIH ..; ..;
... Also in ALI iii. .
The Creation and Fall from the Leabhar Breac, in Herbert and McNamara, Irish
Biblical Apocrypha, .
Clann Darerca [The Family of Darerca], in Book of Leinster, vi. .
Crth Gablach [Branched Purchase], CIH ... Also ed. D. Binchy, Crth Gablach
(Medieval and Modern Irish Series ; Dublin, ); trans. E. Mac Neill, Crth
Gablach, PRIA C (), .
Cummean, Penitential, in Bieler, Irish Penitentials, .
Customs of Tallaght, ed. and trans. E. Gwynn and W. Purton, The Monastery of
Tallaght, PRIA C (), .
Cyprian, De habitu virginum, PL . .
Pseudo-Cyprian, De singularitate clericorum, ed. G. Hartel (CSEL , part ; Vienna, ).
Damian, Peter, Opera, PL and .
De Arreis [Old Irish Table of Commutations], ed. and trans. D. Binchy. The Old-Irish
Table of Commutations, in Bieler, Irish Penitentials, . Also ed. K. Meyer,
An Old Irish Treatise De Arreis , Revue Celtique (), .
Di Astud Chirt Dligid [On the Confirmation of Right and Law], CIH ...
Also in ALI .
Di Chetharslicht Athgabla [On the Four Divisions of Distraint], CIH ..;
..; ... Also in ALI i. ; ii. .
Din Techtugad [On Legal Entry], CIH ... Also in ALI iv. .
Dre Text [untitled Honour-Price Text], ed. and trans. R. Thurneysen, Irisches Recht, Aus
den preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften ( Jahrgang, ), . Also in D. Binchy
et al., (eds.), Studies in Early Irish Law, .
Disciples and Relatives of St Columba, in Thes. Pal. ii. .
Egeria, Peregrinatio, trans. G. Gingras, Egeria: Diary of a Pilgrimage (New York, ).
Eirigh, a Ingen an Rgh [Arise, O Kings Daughter], ed. M. N Dhonnchadha. On
Gormfhlaith Daughter of Flann Sinna and the lure of the Sovereignty Goddess, in
A. Smyth (ed.), Seanchas: Studies in Early and Medieval Irish Archaeology, History and
Literature in Honour of Francis J. Byrne (Dublin, ), . Also ed. A. Von Hamel,
Poems from the Brussels MS , Revue Celtique (), ; trans.
S. OFalin, Eirigh, a Ingen an Rgh, Revue Celtique (), .
Estu mihi sanitas (ed.) F. Warren, The Antiphony of Bangor (Henry Bradshaw Society ;
London, ), ii. .
Expositio quattuor evangeliorum, PL . .
Eusebius of Emesa, Sermons, ed. E. Buytaert, Eusbe dmse: Discours conservs en latin
(Spicilegium Sacrum Lovaniense ; Louvain, ).
Finnian, Penitential, in Bieler, Irish Penitentials, .
First Synod of St. Patrick, in Bieler, Irish Penitentials, .
Foscl ar Bannscail [Short Tale of a Woman or The Temptation of a Confessor], ed.
and trans. J. Vendryes, Trois historiettes irlandaises, Revue Celtique (), .
Also H. Gaidoz (ed. and trans.) La tentation dun confesseur. Jqtpsdia (),
.
Geoffrey of Vendme, Epistolae, PL . .
Gerald of Wales, Topographia Hibernica, ed. J. Dimock, Topographia Hibernica et Expugnatio
Hibernica (Rolls Series; London, ). Trans. J. OMeara, Topography of Ireland
(Dundalk, ).
Gemma ecclesiastica, trans. J. Hagen, The Jewel of the Church (Leiden, ).
Grard de Cambrai, Gesta episcoporum cameracensium, MGH , part .
Gilbert of Limerick (Gilla Easpuic), De statu ecclesiae, PL . .
Gildas, De excidio Britanniae, ed. and trans. M. Winterbottom, Gildas: The Ruin of Britain and
Other Works (Arthurian Period Series ; London, ), .
Fragments of Lost Letters, ibid. .
Gregory of Nazianzus, Epigrammata, PG . .
Gregory of Nyssa, On Virginity, ed. M. Abineau, Grgoire de Nysse: Trait de la virginit
(Sources chrtiennes ; Paris, ).
Gregory of Tours, Liber in gloria confessorum, ed. B. Krusch, MGH, Scriptores rerum
Merovingicarum , part (Hanover, ), .
Gbretha Caratniad [The False Judgements of Caratnia], CIH . Also ed. and trans.
R. Thurneysen, Aus Dem Irischen Recht III. Die falschen Urteilssprche Carat-
nias, ZCP (), .
Homily on the Life of Brendan mac Finnlug in the Book of Lismore [Irish], in Stokes,
Lives of the Saints, , .
Homily on the Life of Brigit in the Book of Lismore, ibid. , .
Homily on the Life of Brigit in the Leabhar Breac [On the Life of Saint Brigit], in
Stokes, Three Middle Irish Homilies, .
Homily on Life of Ciarn of Clonmacnois in the Book of Lismore [ Irish], in Stokes, Lives
of the Saints, , .
Homily on the Life of Senn in the Book of Lismore, ibid. .
Impide Maire [Litany of the Virgin and All Saints], in Plummer, Irish Litanies, .
Ingenrada Noeb Herenn [List of the Maiden Saints of Ireland] Riain, Corpus
Genealogiarum, . The Book of Leinster version: The Book of Leinster, vi. .
Irenaeus, Adversus haereses, ed. W. Harvey, vols. (Cambridge, ).
Isidore of Seville, De ecclesiasticis officiis, ed. Christopher Lawson (CCSL ; Turnhout, ).
sucn [Little Jesus], ed. and trans. E. Quin, The Early Medieval Irish Poem sucn,
Cambridge Medieval Celtic Studies (), . Also in Greene and OConnor, Golden
Treasury, ; Murply, Early Irish Lyrics, , ; Carney, Medieval Irish Lyrics, .
Jerome, Adversus Iovinianum, PL . .
Commentarium in Mattheum, ed. D. Hurst and M. Adriaen (CCSL ; Turnhout, ).
Epistola [To Eustochium], PL . .
Epistola [To Furia], ibid. .
Epistola [To Demetria], ibid. .
John Cassian, Conlationes, PL . .
Institutes, PL . .
John Chrysostom, Instruction and Refutation Directed Against Those Men Cohabit-
ing with Virgins, in E. Clark, Jerome, Chrysostom, and Friends: Essays and Translation
(Studies in Women and Religion ; New York, ), .
Jonas, Latin Life of Columbanus, ed. B. Krusch, MGH, Scriptores rerum Merovingicarum, iv
(), .
Lament of the Caillech Birre, ed. and trans. D. hAodha, Lament of the Old
Woman of Beare, in D. Corrin, L. Breatnach, and K. McCone (eds.), Saints, Sages
and Storytellers: Studies in Honour of Professor James Carney (Maynooth, ), . Also
in Greene and OConnor, Golden Treasury, .
Liadain and Curithir, ed. and trans. K. Meyer, Liadain and Curithir: An Irish Love Story
from the Ninth Century (London, ).
Liber Angeli [Book of the Angel], in Bieler, Patrician Texts, . Also in K. Hughes, The
Church in Early Irish Society (London, ), .
Liber de ordine creaturarum, PL . .
Life of Abbn of Moyarny [Latin], D text, PVSH i. .
Life of Adomnn of Iona [ Irish], ed. and trans. M. Herbert and P. Riain, Betha
Adamnain: the Irish Life of Adamnan (Irish Texts Society ; London, ).
Life of ed mac Bricc [ Latin], text, Heist, .
Life of ed mac Bricc [ Latin], D text, PVSH i. .
Life of Ailbe of Munster[ Latin], text, Heist, .
Life of Ailbe of Munster [Latin], D text, PVSH i. .
Life of Bairre of Cork [Irish], BNE i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Berach [ Latin], PVSH i. .
Life of Berach [ Irish], BNE i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Brendan I [Irish], BNE i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Brendan [ Latin, Vita I Brendani ] PVSH i. .
Life of Brendan [ Latin; Vita II Brendani, a latinization of an Anglo-French poem], PVSH
ii. .
Life of Brigit [Latin] by Cogitosus. See under Cogitosus.
Life of Brigit [Latin; Vita I Brigitae], ed. J. Colgan, Triadis thaumaturgae acta (Louvain, ),
. Also trans. S. Connolly, Vita Prima Sanctae Brigitae, JRSAI (),
.
Life of Brigit [Irish and Latin; Bethu Brigte], ed. and trans. D. hAodha, Bethu Brigte
(Dublin, ).
Life of Brigit[Latin; Vita IV Brigitae], ed. Sharpe, Saints Lives, .
Life of Brigit[Latin, Metrical; not Irish], ed. D. N. Kissane, Vita Metrica Sanctae Brigidae:
A Critical Edition, PRIA C ().
Life of Brigit in the Book of Lismore, see under Homily.
Life of Brigit in the Leabhar Breac, see under Homily.
Life of Bite of Monasterboice [Latin], PVSH i. .
Life of Cainnech of Aghaboe [ Latin], text, Heist, .
Life of Carthach alias Mochuda of Lismore in the Codex Salmanticensis [Latin], Heist,
.
Life of Carthach alias Mochuda of Lismore [ Latin], D text, PVSH i. .
Life of Carthach alias Mochuda of Lismore [Irish], BNE i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Carthach alias Mochuda of Lismore, The Expulsion of Mochuda [Irish], BNE
i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Ciarn of Clonmacnois [Latin], D text, PVSH i. .
Life of Ciarn of Clonmacnois in the Book of Lismore [ Irish], see under Homily.
Life of Ciarn of Seirkieran [Latin], D text, PVSH i. .
Life of Ciarn of Seirkieran, I [ Irish], BNE i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Ciarn of Seirkieran, II [Irish], BNE i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Ciarn of Seirkieran in the Codex Salmanticensis [Latin], Heist, .
Life of Coemgen of Glendalough [Latin], D text, PVSH i. .
Life of Coemgen of Glendalough, I [Irish], BNE i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Coemgen of Glendalough, II [Irish], BNE i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Coemgen of Glendalough, III [Irish], BNE i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Colmn of Lynally [ Latin], text, Heist, .
Life of Colmn of Lynally [ Latin], D text, PVSH i. .
Life of Columba alias Columcille of Iona [Latin], see Adomnn.
Life of Columba [ Irish], ed. and trans. M. Herbert. Betha Coluim Cille, in Herbert,
Iona, Kells, . Also ed. and trans. A. Kelleher, Betha Coluimba Chille, ZCP
(), .
Life of Daig mac Cairill of Inishkeen [Latin], Heist, .
Life of Darerca alias Monenna of Killevy [Latin], Heist, . Also trans., The Life of
St Darerca, or Moninna, the Abbess, in L. de Paor, Saint Patricks World, .
Life of Decln of Ardmore [ Latin], D text, PVSH ii. .
Life of Enda of Aran [Latin], PVSH ii. .
Life of Finn of Kinnity [ Latin], text, Heist, .
Life of Fintn of Clonenagh [Latin], text, Heist, .
Life of Fintn alias Munnu of Taghmon [Latin], text, Heist, .
Life of Ita of Killeedy [Latin], PVSH ii. .
Life of Lassair of Cell Lasrae [Irish; Beatha Lasrach], ed. L. Gwynn, Beatha Lasrach,
riu (), .
Life of Lugaid alias Molua of Clonfertmulloe [ Latin], text, Heist, .
Life of Lugaid alias Molua of Clonfertmulloe [Latin], D text, PVSH ii. .
Life of Maedc of Ferns (formally named ed, but that name not used) [Irish], BNE
i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Maedc of Ferns, II [ Irish], BNE i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Maedc of Ferns [Latin], D text, PVSH ii. .
Life of Maedc of Ferns in the Cotton MS [ Latin], The Wales Translation, PVSH
ii. .
Life of Melania the Younger, ed. D. Gorse, Vie de Sainte Mlanie (Sources chrtiennes
; Paris, ). Also trans. E. Clark, The Life of Melania the Younger (New York,
).
Life of Mochoemg (formally named Comgallus, but that name not used) [Latin], D
text, PVSH ii. .
Life of Moling alias Dairchellus of St Mullins [Latin], D text, PVSH ii. .
Life of Moling alias Dairchellus of St Mullins in the Codex Salmenticensis [Latin],
Heist, .
Life of Monenna alias Darerca of Killevy [Latin, Anonymous], see Life of
Darerca.
Life of Monenna alias Darerca of Killevy [ Latin]. See Conchubranus.
Life of Patrick [Latin and Irish; The Tripartite Life of Patrick, or Vita Tripartita] ed. and
trans. W. Stokes, The Tripartite Life of Patrick, with Other Documents Relating to that Saint,
vols. (Rolls Series ; London, ).
Life of Patrick [Latin]. See Muirch.
Life of Ruadn of Lorrha [Latin], text, Heist, .
Life of Ruadn of Lorrha [Irish], BNE i. ; Eng. trans.: ii. .
Life of Samthann of Clonbroney [ Latin], PVSH ii. .
Life of Senn of Scattery Island in the Book of Lismore [Irish], see under Homily.
Life of Senn of Scattery Island [ Latin], Heist, .
Life of Tigernach of Clones [ Latin], PVSH ii. .
List of Abbesses of Killevy, Esposito, Conchubrani Vita, Appendix C, PRIA C
(), .
Marbod of Rennes, Epistolae, PL . .
Martyrology of Gorman, ed. and trans. W. Stokes, Flire hi Gormain (Henry Bradshaw
Society ; London, ).
Martyrology of Oengus, see Oengus the Culdee.
Martyrology of Tallaght, ed. R. I. Best and H. J. Lawlor, The Martyrology of Tallaght,
from the Book of Leinster and MS in the Royal Library, Brussels (Henry Bradshaw
Society ; London, ).
M Eba Ben [I Am Eve, or Eves Lament], ed. and trans. K. Meyer, Eves Lament,
riu (), . Also in Greene and OConnor, Golden Treasury, .
Mothers of Irish Saints, in OSullivan, ed., Book of Leinster, vi. .
Muirch, Life of Patrick [Latin], in Hood, Patrick, . Also in Bieler, Patrician Texts,
.
N Car Brigit [Brigit Loved Not, or Broccns Hymn], in Thes. Pal. ii. . Also in
Bernard, and Atkinson, Irish Liber Hymnorum, ii. .
Nom churim ar commairge [I Place Myself Under the Protection, or Litany of the
Virgins], in Plummer, Irish Litanies, .
Oengus the Culdee, Martyrology of Oengus, ed. W. Stokes. Flire Oengusso Cli D: The
Martyrology of Oengus the Culdee (Henry Bradshaw Society ; London, ). Earlier
version: On the Calendar of Oengus (Dublin, ).
Old Irish Penitential, trans. D. Binchy, The Old Irish Penitential, in Bieler, Irish
Penitentials, . Also ed. E. Gwynn, An Irish Penitential, riu (), .
Pais Eoin Bautist [The Passion of John the Baptist], in Atkinson, Passions and Homilies
, .
Palladius, The Lausiac History, trans. R. Meyer, The Lausiac History, by Palladius
(Warminster, ).
Patrick [Saint Patrick], Confessio, in Hood, Patrick, .
Epistola, ibid. .
Patrick [ Bishop of Dublin], ed. and trans. A. Gwynn, The Writings of Bishop Patrick,
(Scriptores Latini Hiberniae ; Dublin, ).
Pelagius, Expositions on the Thirteen Epistles, ed. A. Souter, Pelagius Expositions of
Thirteen Epistles (Texts and Studies ; Cambridge, ).
The Power of Women, ed. and trans. K. Meyer, Anecdota from Irish Manuscripts, :
the Book of Leinster, p. a, Gaelic Journal (Irisleabhar na Gaedhilge) (), .
Also in J. Pokorny, A Historical Reader of Old Irish (Halle, ), , .
A Prayer for Tears, ed. and trans. K. Meyer, Four Religious Poems, riu (),
.
Ropadh maith lem [I Should Like, or St Brigits Alefeast], ed. and trans. D. Greene,
St. Brigids Alefeast, Celtica (), .
Rule of the Cli D in the Leabhar Breac, ed. and trans. W. Reeves. On the Culdees,
Transactions of the Royal Irish Academy ().
Rule of the Cli D in a Franciscan Dublin MS, ed. and trans. E. Gwynn, The Rule of
Tallaght, Hermathena , nd supplemental vol. (), .
Rule of Patrick [Ragail Phtraic], ed. and trans. J. OKeeffe, Ragail Ptraic: The Rule
of Patrick, riu (), .
Rule of Tallaght, ed. and trans. E. Gwynn, The Rule of Tallaght, Hermathena ,
second supplementary vol. (), .
Saltair na Rann [ Psalter of the Quatrains], ed. and trans. W. Stokes, The Saltair na Rann: a
collection of Early Middle Irish Poems (Anecdota Oxoniensia , pt. ; Oxford, ). Also
ed. and trans. (in part) F. Kelly, B. Murdoch, and D. Greene, The Irish Adam and Eve
Story, vols. (Dublin, ).
Sanas Cormaic [Cormacs Glossary], ed. K. Meyer, Sanas Cormaic: An old Irish glossary,
compiled by Cormac a Cuilennin . . . Edited from the copy in the Yellow Book of Lecan (Halle,
).
Secht n-Ingena Dalbronaig [The Seven Daughters of Dalbroney], in OSullivan, ed., Book
of Leinster, vi. .
Second Synod of St. Patrick, in Bieler, Irish Penitentials, .
Sen D [Colmns Hymn], in Thes. Pal. ii. . Also in Bernard and Atkinson, Irish
Liber Hymnorum, ii. , .
Sln seiss, a Brigit [Sit Safely, Brigit, or To St Brigit], in Greene and OConnor, Golden
Treasury, . Originally ed., with commentary, by K. Meyer, Hail Brigit: An
Old-Irish Poem on the Hill of Alenn (Halle, ).
Stowe Missal, ed. G. Warner, The Stowe Missal, vols. (Henry Bradshaw Society ;
London, ).
Teagasg Maoil Ruain [Teaching of Mael Ruain]. See Rule of Tallaght.
Tertullian, De oratione, ed. G. Diercks, CCSL . .
De exhortatione castitatis, ed. E. Kroymann, CCSL . . Also PL, .
De monogamia, ed. E. Dekkers, CCSL . . Also PL, .
Trechn, Memoirs, with Additamenta, in Bieler, Patrician Texts, .
Transitus Mariae, ed. St John Seymour, Irish Versions of the Transitus Mariae, Journal
of Theological Studies (), .
Triads, ed. K. Meyer, The Triads of Ireland (Royal Irish Academy Todd Lecture Series ;
Dublin, ).
Tripartite Life of Patrick. See Life of Patrick.
Versiculi Familiae Benchuir, in P. ODwyer, Mary: A History of Devotion in Ireland (Dublin,
), .
William of Malmesbury, De gestis pontificum Anglorum, ed. N. Hamilton (Rolls Series;
London, ).
Killevy
Faughart
Kildare
Aran Islands
Airdconis
Beggary Island
Identified site
Unidentified site
Armagh
Plain of A Teltown
Ardagh
Geashill
Plain
Kildare
Mt re
U Labraithe
Plain of Cashel
Feman
Plain of
Clach
Identified site
Unidentified site
Urney
(?)
Cenl
Coirpre
(?) Ernaide
(Nr Slieve Gorey)
Granard
Clonbroney
(?)
Ballyvourney
Clonmacnois
Glendalough
U CHONAILL
Killeedy
DISI