Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 8 views

    Hendrickson v. in The 20th Judicial District VA, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of John David Hendrickson's complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) for being frivolous and for failing to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Hendrickson v. in The 20th Judicial District VA, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of John David Hendrickson's complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) for being frivolous and for failing to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-02-23 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-2291

    Original Title

    Hendrickson v. In the 20th Judicial District VA, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of John David Hendrickson's complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) for being frivolous and for failing to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    8 views2 pages

    Hendrickson v. in The 20th Judicial District VA, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued an unpublished opinion affirming the district court's dismissal of John David Hendrickson's complaint. The district court had dismissed the complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B) for being frivolous and for failing to state a claim. The Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision to dismiss the complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-2291

    JOHN DAVID HENDRICKSON,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    IN THE 2OTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, LOUDOUN COUNTY
    COURTS; IN THE 19TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, FAIRFAX
    COUNTY COURTS; JANELLE DAWN WALKER; SARA KATHERINE DARNELL;
    MICHELLE DOE,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
    Claude M. Hilton, Senior
    District Judge. (1:09-cv-00563-CMH-IDD)

    Submitted:

    February 18, 2010

    Decided:

    February 23, 2010

    Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    John David Hendrickson, Appellant Pro Se. Christina Nicole


    Gilliam,
    Assistant
    Attorney
    General,
    Richmond,
    Virginia;
    Alexander Francuzenko, COOK, KITTS & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax,
    Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    John
    order

    David

    dismissing

    Hendrickson
    his

    appeals

    complaint

    the

    pursuant

    district
    to

    28

    courts
    U.S.C.

    1915(e)(2)(B) (2006) for being frivolous and for failing to


    state a claim on which relief may be granted.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Hendrickson v. In

    the 20th Judicial Dist. of Va., No. 1:09-cv-00563-CMH-IDD (E.D.


    Va. Sept. 25, 2009).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like