Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 41 views

    Millard Harman v. David Bunch, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Millard Burton Harman appealed a district court order granting summary judgment to defendants David A. Bunch and Kenneth Droddy. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    Millard Harman v. David Bunch, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    41 views2 pages
    1) Millard Burton Harman appealed a district court order granting summary judgment to defendants David A. Bunch and Kenneth Droddy. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-01-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 11-1748

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    1) Millard Burton Harman appealed a district court order granting summary judgment to defendants David A. Bunch and Kenneth Droddy. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    41 views2 pages

    Millard Harman v. David Bunch, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1) Millard Burton Harman appealed a district court order granting summary judgment to defendants David A. Bunch and Kenneth Droddy. 2) The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment to the defendants for the reasons stated in the lower court's opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 11-1748

    MILLARD BURTON HARMAN,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    v.
    DAVID A. BUNCH; KENNETH DRODDY,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Richmond.
    James R. Spencer, Chief
    District Judge. (3:10-cv-00759-JRS-DWD)

    Submitted:

    January 9, 2012

    Decided:

    January 24, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Scott Gregory Crowley, Sr., CROWLEY & CROWLEY, Richmond,


    Virginia, for Appellant.
    William F. Etherington, Leslie A.
    Winneberger, BEALE, DAVIDSON, ETHERINGTON & MORRIS, P.C.,
    Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Millard

    Burton

    Harman

    appeals

    the

    district

    order granting summary judgment to Appellees.


    the record and find no reversible error.

    courts

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.

    Harman v. Bunch,

    No. 3:10-cv-00759-JRS-DWD (E.D. Va. June 16, 2011).

    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately

    presented

    in

    the

    materials

    before

    the

    court

    and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like