Mary Lincoln Final
Mary Lincoln Final
Mary Lincoln Final
PAGES 5 I I TO 542
513
Senate committee charged with looking into the matter reported out
all the objections, but added, "There are some other facts bearing
upon this subject which it is probably not needful to refer to, but
which are generally known and the evidence to part of which is in
possession of the committee." 5 Senator Richard Yates, Republican
of Illinois, brought the allegation as close to the surface as possible
on the floor of the Senate:
There are recollections and memories, sad and silent and deep, that I will
not recall publicly, which induce me to vote against this bill. Amid all the
perils of life, amid its devastation, amid good and evil report, a woman
should be true to her husband. . . . I shall not go into details. Mr. Lincoln's
memory is sweet to me. God Almighty bless the name and fame of Abraham
Lincoln!"6
Mary Lincoln had already been publicly denounced for bribery, spying, extortion, profligacy, and stealing,7 so the only possible accusation
left was adultery.
Contemporary gossip about her unfaithfulness was plentiful.8 Abraham Lincoln's biographer, William H. Herndon, reported to his coauthor Jesse Weik, "You know that Mrs. Lincoln is charged with
unchastity and the like."9 Even an admirer, Mrs. Lincoln's aide-decamp Benjamin Brown French, wrote in his diary, "She is a most
singular woman, and it is well for the nation that she is no longer
in the White House. It is not proper that I should write down, even
here, all I know!" 10 In December 1881 and January 1882 the same
coded words could be heard when the matter of an increase in the
pension to $5000 per annum came up in Congress. Senator John
Ingalls of Kansas opposed the bill: "From information in my possession, which I do not care to communicate to the Senate, I am satisfied
5. Ibid., p. 24.
6. The Congressional Globe: Containing the Debates and Proceedings of the Second Session FortyFirst Congress ...,?.
and J. Rives and George A. Bailey, eds. (Washington, D.C.: Office
of the Congressional Globe, 1870), 9 July 1870, p. 5397.
7. Baker, (n. 2), Mary Todd Lincoln, see index under "Confederate sympathies charged
to," "criticism of," "unpopularity of," pp. 420-22.
8. Michael Burlingame, The Inner World of Abraham Lincoln (Urbana: University of Illinois
Press, 1994), pp. 291-92. Baker, (n. 2) Mary Todd Lincoln, p. 184.
9. Emanuel Hertz, The Hidden Lincoln. From the Letters and Papers of William H. Hemdon
(New York: Viking Press, 1938), p. 220.
10. Benjamin Brown French, Witness to the Young Republic. A Yankee's Journal, 1828-1870,
eds. Donald B. Cole and John J. McDonough (Hanover, N.H.: University Press of New
England, 1989), p. 479.
this measure is not one that ought to pass for the relief of Mrs.
Lincoln."11 The Pension Committee reporting on the bill seemed to
distinguish between Mrs. Lincoln's financial and personal matters:
"While the committee have made as close inquiry into her pecuniary
affairs as they have deemed to be consistent with a decent respect
for Mrs. Lincoln and for the memory of the great dead . . . they
would not be understood to have prosecuted their search into her
private affairs with the minute diligence of a detective."12 If any
sympathy was to be engendered on behalf of Mrs. Lincoln, it would
have to come from the medical examination. The physicians' report
was, therefore, crucial to passage of the pension bill.
For Mary Lincoln an increase in pension was not simply a pecuniary
matter: she had income from her bonds, about $8000 a year, although
not enough to live grandly. Money would also be a balm to her
"shriveled self-esteem," showing respect for the widow of Abraham
Lincoln.13 True to form, Mary Lincoln lobbied for her increase, even
from the confines of her medical hotel, through people who were
susceptible to her still considerable charm and persuasiveness.
The impetus for the 1882 bill seems to have originated with Robert
Todd Lincoln, Mary's only surviving son, who had effected some
reconciliation with his mother after the birth of a granddaughter he
named for her. Robert had achieved a successful corporate law practice. In February 1881 he was appointed Secretary ofWar by President
Garfield, who was assassinated a few months later. Although President
Chester Arthur eventually removed every one of Garfield's cabinet
officers but Robert, his tenure remained uncertain well into 1882.14
The last thing Robert needed was another embarrassing public quarrel
with his mother. In 1867, for instance, he was enraged by his mother's
clumsy and failed attempt to raise money by selling her old clothing
and jewelry in a public showroom.15 In 1875, after Mary evinced
some truly bizarre behavior (to which we will return), Robert brought
11. Congressional Record. Senate, 47th Cong., 1st sess., 15 December 1881, p. 136.
12. Ibid., Senator Henry W. Blair, New Hampshire, 24 January 1882, p. 578. An allegation
of embezzlement, the "pecuniary affairs," was made privately by Senator David Davis who
presided over the Senate when the pension bill came up in 1881-1882. See "New evidence
surfaces against Mrs. Honest Abe," Illinois State Journal-Register, 20 April 1994, p. 1.
13. Baker, (n. 2) Mary Todd Lincoln, "pecuniary," pp. 294, 316, 351; "self-esteem,"
"persuasion," p. 367.
14. John S. Goff, Robert Todd Lincoln. A Man in His Own Right (Norman: University of
Oklahoma Press, 1969), pp. 120-23.
15. Ibid., p. 99.
515
her to court in the well-publicized "insanity trial," and she was ordered
into a private mental asylum.16
A real issue in 1875 was her habit of carrying tens of thousand of
dollars in bills and negotiable securities pinned to her undergarments;
this coupled with her manic buying sprees made Robert fear the
worst.17 People took sides in the long-running dispute between
mother and son. Battles were fought in the newspapers over whether
her confinement was justified, and again in November 1881 over
whether she was well off or nearly bankrupt, with the inference that
the well-to-do son was or was not properly attentive to his sick
mother's needs.18 Modern biographers also account Robert either as
a caring son of a deeply troubled and mortifyingly embarrassing
mother, forced against his intensely private nature to testify openly
against her; or as an ungrateful opportunist concerned only to protect
his inheritance.19
Robert worked behind the scenes to have his mother's pension
increased, surely hoping this would avert a new public furor. According to Mary Lincoln's physician Dr. Sayre, in a 23 November 1881
interview with the New York Times, the effort began in mid-October
when Robert's wife, Mary Harlan Lincoln, spoke to the influential
financier Cyrus Field at Yorktown Heights in New York. The centennial of the surrender of the British was being held there on 1719
October, some ten miles from Field's estate in Irvington; Robert
Lincoln and his wife attended, along with President Arthur and other
notables.20 Field was just the man to approach. The previous summer
16. Mark E. Neely and R. Gerald McMurty, The Insanity File: The Case of Mary Todd
Lincoln (Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1986). The entire story is richly
told here in the context of nineteenth-century laws on commitment.
17. Ibid., p. 101.
18. Neely and McMurty, (n. 16) Insanity File, pp. 16, 73. Compare these salvos three
days apart: "MRS. LINCOLN IN WANT. SICK AND UNABLE TO OBTAIN MUCHNEEDED ATTENTIONS," (New York Times, 23 November 1881), versus "it is absurd
to say that she is in a state of suffering on an income of over $5,000 per year. . . . The case
is a sad one, but is so through the unfortunate mental hallucinaoons of the principal subject
of it, rather than from any shortcomings or faults of Mr. Lincoln's friends," ("Mrs. Lincoln's
Pecuniary Condition," Daily Illinois State Journal, 26 November 1881, editorial page).
19. Baker, (n. 2) Mary Todd Lincoln, accuses Robert of "duplicity" in his mother's financial
affairs (pp. 27980, 317, 321, 325) and of railroading her into the asylum (pp. 323-25); in
the final paragraph of the biography Baker writes: "Two years later Robert Lincoln inherited
his mother's money. . . . and so was enriched by $84,035" (p. 369). Neely and McMurty
(n. 16) Insanity File, arc more solicitous of Robert's concerns over his mother's aberrant
behavior, as is Goff (n. 14) Robert Todd Lincoln.
20. "On the Way to the Festival . . . ," New York Times, 18 October 1881, p. 1, col. 4;
"Laying the Cornerstone," ibid., 19 October, p. 1, col. 7.
517
communicate your views and those of friends I have suggested and others,
and I will at once move in the matter. . . . If the article enclosed correctly
states Mrs. Lincoln's condition, please return it to me, and I will use it in
the House."27
On 30 December, Springer again wrote Edwards:
My Dear Sir: Your letter of 9th was duly reed. Rev. Mr. Miner [Mary
Lincoln's courier and go-between], formerly of Springfield, called on me
a few days ago, and gave me full particulars of Mrs. Lincoln's condition.
He returned to Princeton & will go to New York & procure statements
from Mrs. Lincoln's physicians & attendants & forward to me. As soon as
the Committee for auditing the expenses of Prest. Garfield's sickness, and
for recommending an allowance to Mrs. Garfield shall become reported,
it will be an auspicious time to bring forward a measure for the relief of
Mrs. Lincoln I will do this at the proper time, after consulting Judge
[David] Davis, & others here.28
Instead, the bill for Mrs. Lincoln's relief preceded that for Lucretia
Garfield (which by then was accompanied by requests concerning
Mrs. John Tyler and Mrs. James Polk). The Lincoln bill passed both
houses of Congress on 24 and 26 January, while the latter bill was
not approved until 27 and 29 March.29 The dramatic findings in the
doctors' examination lent credibility and urgency to the pursuit. At
the same time, the physicians deftly avoided any diagnostic implications that would have revived old hatreds.30
WHAT THE PHYSICIANS FOUND
Nothing involving Mary Lincoln could be free from politics or sensational gossip, her illness and the physicians' examination included.
The letter sent to Congressman Springer is given as follows:
New York, January 1, 1882.
Dear Sir: We have this day made at your request a careful medical examination of Mrs. Mary T. Lincoln, widow of the late President Abraham Lincoln,
at present residing at No. 39 West Twenty sixth street, this city.
27. Letters from manuscript collection of William M. Springer, Box 1, Folder 4, Chicago
Historical Society.
28. Ibid.
29. Congressional Record, (n. n ) , pp. 578, 705-6, 2281, 2374.
30. Ibid., p. 653: "Mr. SPRINGER. If any gentlemen in the House desires any further
explanation of the necessity for the passage of this bill I will make it. (Cries of'Oh, no; it
is not necessary.")"
519
521
feel me and see how hot I am," when, in fact, said the correspondents,
no wound or elevated temperature could be detected.47 The physicians' letter proposed that Mrs. Lincoln's neurological illness began
as a consequence of a fall, which took place in December 1879. Her
own statements suggest that the lightning pains began as much as ten
years earlier. She had suffered from typical migraine headaches perhaps
from 1840 on,48 but in 1869, for the first time, she also mentioned
pain in her limbs and spine:
13 November I have been suffering for three days, with neuralgic
headaches, pain in my limbs &&. . . . 14 November To day, my wrists even,
pain with neuralgia . . . . 16 December I passed a sleepless, miserable
nigh . . . with great & burning pain in my spine. . . . 2 January 1870Today,
I am suffering so much with my backat times I am racked with pain
. . . such pain in all my limbs. . . . 11 FebruaryA fearful cold, appeared
to setde in my spine & I was unable to sit up, with the sharp, burning
agony, in my back. I now have a plaster from my shoulders down the whole,
extent of the spine. . . . The Dr says, this present trouble, arises more from
a distressed agitated mind, than a real local cause, but says of course there
is a great tendency to spinal disease.49
After a respite from such symptoms, Mrs. Lincoln endured a prolonged episode of pain and was confined to her room for several
months.50 Dr. Willis Danforth, a homeopathic surgeon in Chicago,51
began to visit Mrs. Lincoln in November 1873 and regularly thereafter
for nearly a year. He later testified at her 1875 "insanity trial" (as
paraphrased by a reporter):
She seemed possessed with the idea that some one was working on her
head, taking wires out of her eyes (particularly the left one), at times taking
bones out of her cheeks and face, and detaching steel springs from her jaw
bones . . . at other times she imagined her scalp was being lifted by the
same invisible power and placed back again . . . she did not often experience
i
47. "Mrs. Lincoln's Health . . . ," New York Times, 22 July 1881, p. 3, col. 6; " M R .
Abraham Lincoln . . . ," ibid., 4 August 1881, p. 3, col. 5.
48. Justin G. Turner and Linda L. Turner, Mary Lincoln. Her Life and Letters (New York:
Alfred A. Knopf, 1972), pp. 36, 176, 408-9.
49. Ibid., pp. 522-24, 527, 534-35, 539-40, 546 (emphases in original).
50. "Clouded Reason . . . ," Chicago Tribune, 20 May 1875, p. 1, col. 3. See also "Mrs.
Abraham Lincoln," New York Times, 18 October 1874, p. 9, col. 2: "She has been confined
to her room for the past five months by a severe illness, from which she is now just
recovering."
j l . Egbert Cleave, Cleave's Biographical Cyclopaedia of Homeopathic Physicians and Surgeons
523
pain, but at times was sensitive of a cutting sensation; this continued for some
time . . . he at length discontinued his visits, the patient having improved in
health, and did not see her again for several weeks; saw her again in March,
1874; continued to visit her up to September, most of the time daily . . .
a general indisposition and debility appeared to pervade her systemthe
same condition of affairs which he had noticed in his first visits, cutting,
scraping, and removing bones from her face and wires from her eyes.32
Danforth's testimony at Mary Lincoln's trial helped convince jurors
that she was incompetent to handle her financial affairs. But compare
her colorful imagery with clinical descriptions of the pain of tabes
dorsalis from two modern textbooks of neurology:
The lancinating or lightning pains (present in over 90 percent of cases) are,
as their name implies, sharp, stabbing, and brief, like a flash of lightning.
. . . They may come in bouts lasting several hours or days. . . . They are
more frequent in the legs than elsewhere, but roam over the body from
face to feet, sometimes playing persistently on one spot "like the repeated
twanging of a fiddle string."
Patients verbalize these sensations in simile and metaphor, e.g. "As if my
flesh were pierced with a hot needle. . . . like your bones being crushed."53
We may also trace Mary Lincoln's difficulties with vision as far
back as 1872 and to events that suggested madness. She had introduced
gas lighting to her house in Springfield,54 and again in the White
House,55 but in 1872 her nurse said Mary Lincoln "thought gas was
an invention of the devil and would have nothing but candles in her
room. At other times she insisted on the shades being drawn and the
room kept perfectly dark."56 Springfield physician Thomas W Dresser,
son of Reverend Charles Dresser who had married the Lincolns,57
noted in 1889 that,
Among the peculiarities alluded to, one of the most singular was the habit
she had during the last year or so of her life of immuring herself in a
j2. "Mrs. Lincoln's Insanity . . . ," Illinois State Register, 21 May 1875, P-'> c 0 ' -
53. Raymond D. Adams and Maurice Victor, Principles of Neurology, 5th ed. (New York:
McGraw Hill, 1993), p. 625; H. Houston Merritt, Raymond D. Adams, and Harry C.
Solomon, Neurosyphilis (New York: Oxford University Press, 1946), p. 247.
54. R u m P. Randall, Lincoln's Sons (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1955), p. 86.
55. Ishbel Ross, The President's Wife Mary Todd Lincoln. A Biography (New York: GP
Putnam's Sons, 1973), p. 127.
56. E. Foy and A. E. Harlow, "Clowning through life," Collier's Weekly, 25 December
1926, pp. 15-16, 30.
57.J.T. Hickey, "A family album. The Dressers of Springfield," J. HI. State Hist. Soc.,
1982, 75. 309-20.
perfectly dark room and, for light, using a small candle-light, even when
the sun was shining bright out-of-doors. No urging would induce her to
go out into the fresh air.58
Compare these observations to the description of the visual problems
in tabes dorsalis in the 1891 textbook: "The defects of vision are
commonly worse in bright light, so that the patient sees better after
sunset."59 The simplest explanation for Mary Lincoln's aversion is that
she had a large Argyll Robertson pupil, unreactive to light, and thus
could not tolerate any glare. Failure of sight came only near the end
of her life, as shown by handwriting samples in which her writing
becomes quite large (Fig. 1).
Mary Lincoln very likely had ataxia with relative preservation of
motor power. Locomotor ataxia is caused by degeneration of that
portion of the spinal cord that controls sensation. Thus persons
afflicted cannot feel where their feet are. Asked to stand with eyes
closed, the patient sways violently and falls over (Romberg's sign).
On walking, the patient tends to lift the foot in an exaggerated
manner, bringing it down flat with a stamp. As the classic textbooks
inform us: "This would make walking downstairs especially troublesome."50 "The use of a stick, or leaning upon the arm of a friend, has
an extraordinary effect in steadying his movements."61 Mrs. Lincoln's
examining physicians noted exactly this combination, while the hostile press remarked cynically that she professed "to be unable to even
go down stairs" although she could walk.62 Her letters in the spring
and summer of 1880 to her grand-nephew indicate that it was probably
not so much loss of power that affected her walking but considerable
back pain. Mrs. Lincoln was able to walk, albeit with assistance, even
up to the day before her death.63
The question is often asked whether Mary Lincoln really was
insane. Given the wide spectrum of classifiable mental and character
58. T.W. Dresser, letter, 3 January 1889, in William H. Hemdon and Jesse W. Weik,
Hemdon's Lincoln: Tltc True Story of a Great Life. . . . (Chicago: Belford-Clarke Co., 1890),
vol. 3, 4343511. See also New York Times, 22 July 1881 (n. 47): "In the afternoon it has
been Mrs. Lincoln's habit to darken her room as much as possible. She has declined to use
gas except when visitors called, and has preferred to obtain what little light she needed
from ordinary candles, or from tapers floating in water."
59. Fagge and Pye-Smith, (n. 35) Principles, p. 529.
60. Osier, (n. 46) Principles, pp. 843, 917.
61. Fagge and Pye-Smith, (n. 35) Principles, p. 525.
62. New York Times, 22 July 1881, (n. 47).
63. "Obituary . . . ," Chicago Tribune, 17 July 1882, p. 2, col. 4.
525
Fig. 1. Letters written by Mary Lincoln: first and last pages of 14 January 1880
and all three pages of 21 March 1882, indicating deterioration of eyesight (courtesy
and with permission of the Illinois State Historical Library, Old State Capitol
Building, Springfield).
(continued)
Fig. 1. Continued.
527
^
j y #
Sy&.J/
'?\1y%Xir(v*{\:^?*'
Fig. 1. Conrinued.
(continued)
Fig. 1. Continued.
529
66
early March and peaked on 1 April. She was released from the asylum
after less than four months. In a second trial in 1876, unopposed by
Robert, the jury declared her "restored to reason."67
THE D O C T O R S ' DILEMMA: CAUSES OF TABES DORSALIS
AS K N O W N AT T H E E N D OF
l88l
gth, 18S1 (London: J.W. Kolckmann, 1881), vol. 2, 336-39 (Sayrc); vol. 3, 89-95 (Knapp).
73. McHenry, (n. 33), Garrison's History, pp. 426, 402.
74. Hertz, (n. 9), Hidden Lincoln, p. 128.
75. Ibid., p. 259.
76. Ibid., p. 233. Lincoln had one other risky exposure when his friend, Joshua Speed,
recommended Lincoln seek relief with a prostitute in 1839 or 1840.
77. T. Gjestland, "The Oslo study of untreated syphilis. An epidemiologic investigation
of the natural course of the syphilitic infection based upon a re-study of the BoeckBruusgaard material," Acta Derm.-Venereol., 1955, 35, supplement 34.
531
Dr. Danforth indicated privately to a juror after the insanity trial that
he believed that "it was a case of dementia, or degeneration of brain
tissue,"82 and when Dr. Dresser concluded that "the trouble was really
a cerebral disease,"83 neither was diagnosing syphilis but distinguishing
her illness as dementia paralytica, an organic mental illness, rather than
one purely psychological; melancholia, or mania in the terms of that
period. In the 1880s and 1890s syphilis was considered only one
cause among several of dementia paralytica, and GPI was not firmly
associated with syphilis until 1913.84 The story that an autopsy was
done on Mrs. Lincoln showing cerebral deterioration85 seems to have
originated with an early twentieth-century Lincoln biographer, W.E.
Barton, who mistook Dresser's clinical opinion for anatomic fact.86
Despite diligent searches of the Sangamon County records and Barton's own materials, we have been unable to find any evidence for
an autopsy.
Given such unpalatable choices to explain Mrs. Lincoln's condition
to Congressexposure to the elements, venery, or syphilisthe four
physicians settled on another theory of the time, that an injury to
the spine could cause tabes dorsalis. This theory became notorious
in the 1860s and 1870s as the condition known as "railway spine."87
Early railroads were distressingly dangerous with derailments, sudden
jolts, and too-rapid turns on curves, producing many severe or fatal
injuries to limbs, spines, and heads. Other injuries, such as falls from
a height or off a horse were also covered by the rubric. John Eric
Erichsen, who corresponded with Dr. Sayre, published his series of
cases of railway spine in 1866 (reissued in 1875).88 It was already well
82. Lyman J. Gage, letter to William E. Barton, 20 January 1921. Barton Collection,
Mary Todd Lincoln Scrapbook (call no. E457.25.M4 Line), Joseph Regenstein Library,
University of Chicago.
83. Dresser (n. 58).
84. Anonymous, Book review of Charles R. Drysdale's Syphilitic Insanity,Journal ofNervous
and Mental Disease, 1880, 7, 748; Osier, (n. 46) Principles, pp. 914-15; McHenry, (n. 33)
Garrison's History, p. 402.
85. Vidal, (n. 80) United States, p. 692.
86. W.E. Barton, The Life ofAbraham Lincoln (Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company,
1925), p. 420: "The attending physician made a post-mortem examination, and issued a
statement that for years she had been the victim of a cerebral disease."
87. T. Keller, "Railway spine revisited: Traumatic neurosis or neurotrauma?" J. Hist.
Med. Allied Set., 1995, 50, 507-24.
88. New York Academy of Medicine Archives; Sayre file no. 118, letter from John Eric
Erichsen, 5 October 1874; John E. Erichsen, On Concussion of the Spine. Nervous Stiock and
Other Obscure Injuries oftlie Nervous System in Their Clinical and Medico-Legal Aspects (London:
533
known that acute trauma to the spine could produce instant paralysis,
or paralysis and loss of sensation hours or days later due to delayed
swelling of the cord. What Erichsen mainly described were fiftythree cases with a variety of neurological and psychological sequelae,
including five compatible with tabes dorsalis, coming on months or
even years after a trivial jarring, such as landing heavily on one's feet.
His thesis was that a distant blow caused "molecular derangement"
in the spine. Another author postulated that "injuries at a distance
may over-excite the cord, and lead to the development of tabes."89
No author ever presented evidence that the classic eye signs of
tabes dorsalis were a feature of "railway spine." Argyll Robertson
himself wrote, "I am not aware that a variation in the size of the
pupil has been noticed in any of the many cases of spinal injury or
concussion of the spine resulting from railway accidents."90 Erichsen
made no mention of pupils unreactive to light in his cases.91 The
presence of deficits originating in the brain in tabes dorsalis could not
be easily accounted for by spinal cord injury, whether by association or
anatomic causation. Thoughtful authors soon recognized that many
cases of "delayed" tabes dorsalis were simply a coincidence or that
medico-legal claims inspired many of the maladies.92 Gowers made
no mention of the connection at all in his 1879 lectures on diseases
of the spinal cord.93 In 1881 the occurrence of true tabes dorsalis
after injury was considered by one authority as "comparatively rare"
and in 1884 by another as "very rare and only in the predisposed."94
Althaus concluded in 1884 that "In the vast majority of cases of
locomotor ataxy syphilis is the cause of the complaint."95 In 1892
Erb calculated the association of injury and tabes dorsalis as 0.3 percent
of cases.96 Sir William Osier dismissed it entirely,97 a judgment that
89. J. Althaus, "Two lectures on sclerosis of the spinal cord," Br. Mcd.J., 1884, /, 893-96,
985-88, 1035-39, P-IO3790. Argyll Robertson, "On an interesting series of eye-symptoms," (n. 37) p. 701.
91. Enchsen, (n. 88), p. 247.
92. J. Althaus, "Remarks on lateral and posterior sclerosis of the spinal cord," Br. Mcd.J.,
1878,11,685-87; Anonymous, "Proceedings of the Boston Medical Society for Improvement.
Concussion of the spine so-called," Boston Mcd. Surg.J., 1880, 102, 132-35.
93. Gowers, (n. 70) Medical Times, p. 684.
94. R.M. Hodges, "So-called concussion of the spinal cord," Boston Mcd. Surg.J., 1881,
104, 361-365, p. 362; C.L. Dana, in "New York Neurological Society stated meeting 11
November 1884," J. Nervous Mental Dis., 1885, 12, 35-37, p. 37.
95. Althaus, (n. 89), p. 1039.
96. Erb, (n. 32), pp. 526-27.
97. Osier, (n. 46) Principles, p. 984.
535
It is clear that Sayre assembled the team he needed for the delicate
task. Of the four physicians, William Henry Pancoast (1835-1897)
104. Adams and Victor, (n. 53) Principles of Neurology, pp.1136-37.
105. M.N. Swartz, "Neurosyphilis," in Holmes et al., (n. 78), pp. 231-46, p. 240.
106. Chicago Tribune, (n. 63).
107. " . . . many pounds . . . ," Turner and Turner, (n. 48), Mary Lincoln, pp. 690, 694.
". . . her disease . . . ," New York Times, 4 August 1881, (n. 47). ". . . running waters . . . ,"
W.A. Evans, Mrs. Abraham Lincoln. A Study of Her Personality and Her Influence on Lincoln
(New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1932), p. 342; ". . . boils . . . ," Chicago Tribune, (n. 63).
108. D.M. Kunhardt, "An old lady's Lincoln memories," Life, 9 February 1959, pp.
5760. "Her fingers swelled up so she had to take off her wedding ring." "Awaiting the
Burial . . . ," Daily Illinois State Journal, 18 July 1882, p. 6, col. 2.
109. T.D. Pryce, "Diabetes with ataxia," Br. Med.J., 1887, /, 883; Loewenfeld, (n. 41),
p. 238.
537
was the most junior, fifteen years younger than Sayre, a surgeon and
professor of anatomy at Jefferson Medical College of Philadelphia, a
position he obtained with help from Sayre when his more famous
father Joseph Pancoast stepped down from the post. The younger
Pancoast wrote almost nothing of professional value, was a bit of a
dandy, and ignored elementary antisepsis in the age of Listerism.110
His only memorable achievement was acknowledged posthumously,
the first known instance of donor insemination to achieve pregnancy.111 Pancoast wrote Sayre several endearing letters as if from a
nephew to an uncle.112 He could be relied on.
Hermann Knapp (18321911) was a pioneer of scientific ophthalmology, someone who undoubtedly could hold his own in a modern
academic health center. After achieving professorship at Heidelberg
he emigrated to the United States, founded the New York Ophthalmic and Aural Institute, as well as the still-extant journal, the Archives of
Ophthalmology. He wrote more than 300 scientific papers and invented
several procedures and instruments for eye surgery. "The character
of Hermann Knapp was absolutely free from jealousy or envy. . . . A
salient trait of the doctor was generosity."113 His obituary referred to
Knapp as "a staunch friend."114
Knapp did not achieve full professorship at New York University
in mid-1882, so on 1 January of that year he was still academically
junior to Sayre. How Knapp managed their relationship is suggested
by a letter from Knapp that Sayre included in his textbook of lectures,
intended to show Knapp s approval of a rather bizarre claim of surgical
success. A patient had been referred by Knapp to Sayre in 1875
because his foreskin could not be retracted over the glans, a longstanding complaint. The man also had partial loss of vision due to
110. A.C. Morgan, "Reminiscence of William Henry Pancoast," manuscript 701 in R.
Hirsch, ed., A Catalogue of the Manuscripts and Archives of the Library of the College of Physicians
539
Fig. 2. Photograph of Dr. Lewis A. Sayre (courtesy New York University Medical
Center, Frederick L. Ehrman Medical Library, New York City, 61e 003.C.i).
Like all really great men, Lewis A. Sayre bulked high from many points of
view; which is as much as saying that he had good friends and good enemies,
and probably enjoyed his enemies as much, or more, than he enjoyed his
friends. . . . It was always a proud day for me when he would drive up to
my house in his open carriage, handsome pair of black horses, and coachmen
in livery."117
Sayre had an international reputation as an inventor of several orthopedic instruments and procedures and was knighted by King Charles
XV of Sweden. He was most proud of his plaster of paris jacket, the
"apparatus" referred to by Clymer, used to treat various curvatures and
deformities of the spine by traction. He defended all his procedures
vigorously, even contentiously." 8 Sayre was more than a bigger-thanlife surgeon. He made some truly bizarre claims of cure of an assortment of neurological and psychiatric conditions with his plaster of
paris jacket and also by circumcision of males and females. He contended that irritation of the genital area could somehow produce
"inflammation at a distance" of the spinal cord, a theory he first
explored in his graduation thesis from medical school in 1842.119 In
a paper presented at a meeting of the New York Neurological Society
(Meredith Clymer presiding), he claimed the cure by circumcision
of seven children with conditions apparent to us as autism, mental
retardation, and cerebral palsy. His clinical description of one child,
a five-year old, is incredible even by the relatively relaxed scientific
standards of the day:
Sept. 20, 1873, the following case was sent to me for idiocy, and on account
of her inability to stand. . . . When she attempted to stand, the limbs crossed
so far that the nates nearly touched the floor, and she looked idiotic. . . .
In horizontal posture, after a few moments, her entire countenance changed
to that of intelligence. After a short time she began to talk, and talk sensibly.
Put her in the erect posture again, she soon assumed the same look of
idiocy and lost the power of speech immediately. . . . The clitoris was very
117.J. Ridlon, "Master surgeons of America," Surg. Gyuecol. Obstet., 1932, .5.5, 385-87.
118. Transactions, (n. 72), vol. 4, 173-76. New York Neurological Society, "Report of
the proceedings of the Society at its stated meetings November and December, 1881, and
January 1882," J. Nervous Mental Dis., 1882, 9, 164-69 (meenng of 1 November 1881).
119. Lewis A. Sayre, "An inaugural thesis on irritation of the spinal marrow and ganglia
of the sympathetic nerve" (Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1842; from the
archives).
541
red and much enlarged, the slightest friction upon it throwing her into a
peculiar spasm.120
Within nine months after circumcision, claimed Dr. Sayre, the child's
spastic gait was cured. The response of the Neurological Society to
the presentation was muted: a one-paragraph summary out of six
pages in the society's journal covering the meeting.121
Regardless of the medically dubious conclusion of the doctors'
report, it was after all Sayre's emphatic beliefs and dominant personality that finally accomplished what was needed for his patientan
increase in Mrs. Lincoln's hard-won pension.
WHAT DID DR. SAYRE REALLY SUSPECT?
were also being treated by Sayre around the time he was responsible
for Mary Lincoln's care.
In his October 1880 interview Sayre had concluded that Mrs.
Lincoln's "condition was serious, but not by any means hopeless,
under proper treatment," and yet he sent her home to her sister in
Springfield untreated.124 A year later he declared, "The period for
active treatment of the disease had long since passed. . . . Her kidney
disease is relieved now, and the main danger to be feared is spinal
sclerosis."125 Yet, despite his apprehension, he did not apply his orthopedic device but referred her for hydro-and electrotherapies at Miller's
Hotel.
Why didn't Sayre treat Mary Lincoln with his celebrated device,
the plaster of paris jacket? He used it in cases of trauma to the spine
with neurological sequelae (his diagnosis in Mary Lincoln's case), and
even for the deformity of Pott's disease, tuberculosis of the spine,
which he believed was due instead to a concussive trauma.126 One
must wonder if Sayre did think that Mary Lincoln suffered syphilitic
tabes dorsalis, a condition not treated with the plaster jacket.