This document discusses definitions and classifications of postpartum hemorrhage. It begins by defining postpartum hemorrhage as blood loss above 500 ml after 20 weeks of gestation, according to the WHO. It then discusses purposes of classification, which are to determine management urgency, assess prognosis, and allow effective communication. Current classifications include those based on timing (primary vs secondary PPH), quantification of blood loss, change in hematocrit, rapidity of blood loss and volume deficit. The document outlines various classification systems and notes pitfalls in relying solely on measured blood loss or hematocrit.
This document discusses definitions and classifications of postpartum hemorrhage. It begins by defining postpartum hemorrhage as blood loss above 500 ml after 20 weeks of gestation, according to the WHO. It then discusses purposes of classification, which are to determine management urgency, assess prognosis, and allow effective communication. Current classifications include those based on timing (primary vs secondary PPH), quantification of blood loss, change in hematocrit, rapidity of blood loss and volume deficit. The document outlines various classification systems and notes pitfalls in relying solely on measured blood loss or hematocrit.
This document discusses definitions and classifications of postpartum hemorrhage. It begins by defining postpartum hemorrhage as blood loss above 500 ml after 20 weeks of gestation, according to the WHO. It then discusses purposes of classification, which are to determine management urgency, assess prognosis, and allow effective communication. Current classifications include those based on timing (primary vs secondary PPH), quantification of blood loss, change in hematocrit, rapidity of blood loss and volume deficit. The document outlines various classification systems and notes pitfalls in relying solely on measured blood loss or hematocrit.
This document discusses definitions and classifications of postpartum hemorrhage. It begins by defining postpartum hemorrhage as blood loss above 500 ml after 20 weeks of gestation, according to the WHO. It then discusses purposes of classification, which are to determine management urgency, assess prognosis, and allow effective communication. Current classifications include those based on timing (primary vs secondary PPH), quantification of blood loss, change in hematocrit, rapidity of blood loss and volume deficit. The document outlines various classification systems and notes pitfalls in relying solely on measured blood loss or hematocrit.
A. Coker and R. Oliver INTRODUCTION Conventionally, the term postpartum hemor- rhage is applied to pregnancies beyond 20 weeks gestation. Although bleeding at an earlier gestational age may have a similar etiology and management to postpartum hemorrhage, these are usually referred to as spontaneous miscarriages. There has been no significant change in the definitions or classification over the past 50 years; this does not reflect the advances made in medical and surgical treatment over this period 1 . A widely used definition currently is that proposed by the World Health Organiza- tion (WHO) in 1990 as any blood loss from the genital tract during delivery above 500 ml 2 . The average blood loss during a normal vaginal delivery has been estimated at 500 ml; however, around 5% of women would lose greater than 1000 ml during a vaginal birth 36 . Cesarean deliveries are associated with an aver- age estimated blood loss of 1000 ml 7 . There is, therefore, a degree of overlap in the acceptable range of blood loss for vaginal and Cesarean deliveries. PURPOSE OF CLASSIFICATION Classification of postpartum hemorrhage is desirable for the following reasons. First, due to the rapidity of disease progression, there is an overriding clinical need to determine the most suitable line of management. The urgency of intervention depends on the rate of the patients decline or deterioration. The second reason for classification is to assess the prognosis. This may help to deter- mine the immediate, medium and long-term clinical outcome. Therefore, a prognostic classi- fication will guide the degree of aggressiveness of the intervention, especially as management may involve more than one clinical specialty. It will also help to decide on the optimal site for subsequent care, for example in a high- dependency unit or intensive care unit, if such exist in the hospital. The third reason is to allow effective communication based on standardization of the estimate of the degree of hemorrhage, thus stan- dardizing differing management options. The initial assessment is usually made by the staff available on site, and these are often relatively junior medical or midwifery personnel. They, in turn, have to assess the severity of bleeding and summon help or assistance as required. Thus, a standardized easily applicable working classifi- cation facilitates effective communication and obviates inter-observer variation. CLASSIFICATIONS IN USE Conventional temporal classification Traditionally, the classification of postpartum hemorrhage has been based on the timing of the onset of bleeding in relation to the delivery. Hemorrhage within the first 24 h of vaginal delivery is termed either early or primary postpartum hemorrhage, whereas bleeding occurring afterwards, but within 12 weeks of delivery, is termed late or secondary postpartum hemorrhage 8 . Secondary postpartum hemorrhage is less common than primary postpartum hemorrhage, affecting 13% of all deliveries. In both cases, the true blood loss is often underestimated due to the difficulty with visual quantitation 9,10 . 11 33 Z:\Sapiens Publishing\A5211 - Postpartum Hemorrhage\Make-up\Postpartum Hemorrhage - Voucher Proofs #T.vp 30 August 2006 14:19:07 Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Classification based on quantification of blood loss Amount of blood lost Blood loss at delivery is estimated using various methods. These range from the less modern methods of counting blood-soaked pieces of cloth or kangas used by traditional birth attendants in rural settings, to more modern techniques such as calculating the blood loss by subtraction after weighing all swabs using sensitive weighing scales 11 . The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM) describes postpartum hemor- rhage as a blood loss of 500 ml or more for a vaginal delivery and 750 ml or more in associa- tion with Cesarean delivery 12 . Change in hematocrit The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists advocates the definitions of either a 10% change in hematocrit between the ante- natal and postpartum periods, or a need for erythrocyte transfusion 13 . Rapidity of blood loss In attempts to overcome these inconsistencies, the classification of postpartum hemorrhage has also been based on the rapidity of blood loss. Severe hemorrhage has been classified as blood loss > 150 ml/min (within 20 min, causing loss of more than 50% of blood volume) or a sudden blood loss > 15002000 ml (uterine atony; loss of 2535% of blood volume) 14 . Volume deficit A form of standardized classification described by Benedetti considers four classes of hemor- rhage 15 (Table 1). The class of hemorrhage reflects the volume deficit, and this is not neces- sarily the same as the volume of blood loss. Class 1 The average 60 kg pregnant woman has a blood volume of 6000 ml at 30 weeks ges- tation. A volume loss of less than 900 ml in such a woman will rarely lead to any symptoms and signs of volume deficit and will not require any acute treatment. Class 2 A blood loss of 12001500 ml will begin to manifest clinical signs, such as a rise in pulse and respiratory rate. There may also be recordable blood pressure changes, but not the classic cold clammy extremities. Class 3 These are patients in whom the blood loss is sufficient to cause overt hypotension. The blood loss is usually around 18002100 ml. There are signs of tachycardia (120160 bpm), cold clammy extremities and tachypnea. Class 4 This is commonly described as massive obstetric hemorrhage. When the volume loss exceeds 40%, profound shock ensues and the blood pressure and pulse are not easily record- able. Immediate and urgent volume therapy is necessary, as this quantity of blood loss can be fatal secondary to circulatory collapse and cardiac arrest. Classification based on causative factors The causes of postpartum hemorrhage can also form a basis of classification (Table 2). Causes of primary postpartum hemorrhage Primary postpartum hemorrhage is traditionally considered as a disorder of one or more of the four processes: uterine atony, retained clots or placental debris, genital lesions or trauma, and disorders of coagulation. An aide memoire is the four Ts: tonus, tissue, trauma and thrombin. Uterine atony alone accounts for 7590% of cases of postpartum hemorrhage. 12 POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE Hemorrhage class Acute blood loss (ml) Percentage lost 1 2 3 4 900 12001500 18002100 2400 15 2025 3035 40 Table 1 Benedettis classification of hemorrhage 15 34 Z:\Sapiens Publishing\A5211 - Postpartum Hemorrhage\Make-up\Postpartum Hemorrhage - Voucher Proofs #T.vp 30 August 2006 14:19:07 Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen Classification based on clinical signs and symptoms Any bleeding that results in or could result in hemodynamic instability, if untreated, is considered as postpartum hemorrhage (Table 3). PITFALLS OF CURRENT CLASSIFICATIONS The drawbacks of a classification based solely on blood loss or hematocrit include the fact that this is a retrospective assessment and may not represent the current clinical situation. To a certain extent, any classification is of limited use to a clinician faced with active and continuous bleeding. The change in hematocrit depends on the timing of the test and the amount of fluid resuscitation previously administered 16 . It could also be affected by extraneous factors such as prepartum hemoconcentration, which may exist in conditions such as pre-eclampsia. Where the diagnosis is made by a clinical estimate of blood loss, there is often signifi- cant underestimation. The WHO definition of 500 ml is increasingly becoming irrelevant, as 13 Definitions and classifications Causes of primary PPH Tonus (uterine atony) Uterine overdistention: multiparity, polyhydramnios, macrosomia Uterine relaxants: nifedipine, magnesium, beta-mimetics, indomethacin, nitric oxide donors Rapid or prolonged labor Oxytoxics to induce labor Chorioamnionitis Halogenated anesthetics Fibroid uterus Tissue Impediment to uterine contraction/retraction: multiple fibroids, retained placenta Placental abnormality: placenta accreta, succenturiate lobe Prior uterine surgery: myomectomy, classical or lower segment Cesarean section Obstructed labor Prolonged third stage of labor Excessive traction on the cord Trauma Vulvovaginal injury Episiotomy/tears Macrosomia Precipitous delivery Thrombin (coagulopathy) Acquired during pregnancy: thrombocytopenia of HELLP syndrome, DIC (eclampsia, intrauterine fetal death, septicemia, placenta abruptio, amniotic fluid embolism), pregnancy-induced hypertension, sepsis Hereditary: Von Willebrands disease Anticoagulant therapy: valve replacement, patients on absolute bedrest Causes of secondary PPH Uterine infection Retained placental fragments Abnormal involution of placental site Adapted from Wac et al. Female Patient 2005;30:19 Table 2 Classification of postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) according to causative factors 35 Z:\Sapiens Publishing\A5211 - Postpartum Hemorrhage\Make-up\Postpartum Hemorrhage - Voucher Proofs #T.vp 30 August 2006 14:19:07 Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen most healthy mothers in the developed world can cope with a blood loss of less than 500 ml without any hemodynamic compromise. Classifications based on the need for blood transfusion alone are also of limited value as the practice of blood transfusion varies widely according to local circumstances and attitudes to transfusion of both patients and physicians 17 . The clinical application of such a classifica- tion may, in addition, be limited because of inherent individual differences in response to blood loss. Hemodynamic compensation depends on the initial hemoglobin levels prior to onset of bleeding, and these vary among healthy individuals. For these reasons, reliance on a classification solely based on the amount of blood loss and without consideration of clinical signs and symptoms may lead to inconsistency with management. NEED FOR A CLINICAL AND PROGNOSTIC CLASSIFICATION Universally, guidelines on the management of postpartum hemorrhage have reiterated the importance of accurate estimation of blood loss, and the clinical condition of the hemorrhaging patient. This was further emphasized in the 19881990 Confidential Enquiries into Mater- nal Deaths in the United Kingdom (CEMD) 18 and reiterated in the 19911993 report as a list of six bullet points, the first being accurate estimation of blood loss 19 . The ideal classification of postpartum hem- orrhage should take into consideration both the volume loss and the clinical consequences of such loss. The recorded parameters should be easily measurable and reproducible. This will help in providing an accurate and consistent assessment of loss, which can readily be com- municated and incorporated into most labor ward protocols. PROPOSED CLASSIFICATION The 500 ml limit as defined by WHO 2 should be considered as an alert line; the action line is then reached when the vital functions of the woman are endangered. In healthy women, this usually occurs after the blood loss has exceeded 1000 ml. We propose a classification (Table 4) wherein the volume loss is assessed in conjunc- tion with clinical signs and symptoms. We pro- pose this classification as being mainly useful in fully equipped hospitals and obstetric units. It is not being proposed for full implementation in areas which are resource-poor. Our adaptation of a previously described classification 15 will fulfil most of these criteria. This guideline adopts a practical approach whereby a perceived loss of 5001000 ml (in the absence of clinical signs of cardiovascular instability) prompts basic measures of monitor- ing and readiness for resuscitation (alert line), whereas a perceived loss of > 1000 ml or a smaller loss associated with clinical signs of shock (hypotension, tachycardia, tachypnea, oliguria or delayed peripheral capillary fill- ing) prompts a full protocol of measures to resuscitate, monitor and arrest bleeding. 14 POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE Blood loss Blood pressure (mmHg) % ml Signs and symptoms 1015 1525 2535 3545 5001000 10001500 15002000 20003000 normal slightly low 7080 5070 palpitations, dizziness, tachycardia weakness, sweating, tachycardia restlessness, pallor, oliguria collapse, air hunger, anuria Adapted from Bonnar J. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000;14:1 Table 3 Symptoms related to blood loss with postpartum hemorrhage 36 Z:\Sapiens Publishing\A5211 - Postpartum Hemorrhage\Make-up\Postpartum Hemorrhage - Voucher Proofs #T.vp 30 August 2006 14:19:08 Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen References 1. El-Refaey H, Rodeck C. Post partum haemor- rhage: definitions, medical and surgical manage- ment. A time for change. Br Med Bull 2003;67: 20517 2. World Health Organization. The Prevention and Management of Postpartum Haemorrhage. Report of a Technical Working Group, Geneva, 36 July, 1989. Unpublished document. WHO/ MCH/90.7. Geneva: World Health Organiza- tion, 1990 3. Pritchard JA, Baldwin RM, Dickey JC, Wiggins KM. Blood volume changes in pregnancy and the puerperium. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1962;84: 127182 4. Newton M. Postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966;94:71117 5. De Leeuw NK, Lowenstein L, Tucker EC, Dayal S. Correlation of red cell loss at delivery with changes in red cell mass. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1968;100:1092101 6. Letsky E. The haematological system. In Hytten F, Chamberlain G, eds. Clinical Physiology in Obstetrics, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991: 275 7. Baskett TF, ed. Complications of the third stage of labour. In Essential Management of Obstetrical Emergencies, 3rd edn. Bristol, UK: Clinical Press, 1999:196201 8. Alexander J, Thomas P, Sanghera J. Treatments for secondary postpartum haemorrhage. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2005, Issue 3 9. Gahres EE, Albert SN, Dodek SM. Intrapartum blood loss measured with Cr 51-tagged erythro- cytes. Obstet Gynecol 1962;19:45562 10. Newton M, Mosey LM, Egli GE, Gifford WB, Hull CT. Blood loss during and immediately after delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1961;17:918 11. Prata N, Mbaruku G, Campbell M. Using the kanga to measure post partum blood loss. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2005;89:4950 12. National Centre for Classification in Health. Australian Coding Standards. The International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification (ICD-10-AM). Sydney, Australia, 2002 13. American College of Gynecologists and Obstetri- cians. Quality Assurance in Obstetrics and Gynecol- ogy. Washington DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, 1989 14. Sobieszczyk S, Breborowicz GH. Management recommendations for postpartum hemorrhage. Arch Perinatal Med 2004;10:1 15. Benedetti T. Obstetric haemorrhage. In Gabbe SG, Niebyl JR, Simpson JL, eds. A Pocket Companion to Obstetrics, 4th edn. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2002:Ch 17 15 Definitions and classifications Hemorrhage class Estimated blood loss (ml) Blood volume loss (%) Clinical signs and symptoms 0 (normal loss) < 500 < 10 none ALERT LINE 1 5001000 < 15 minimal ACTION LINE 2 12001500 2025 urine output pulse rate respiratory rate postural hypotension narrow pulse pressure 3 18002100 3035 hypotension tachycardia cold clammy tachypnea 4 > 2400 > 40 profound shock Need observation replacement therapy Replacement therapy and oxytocics Urgent active management Critical active management (50% mortality if not managed actively) Table 4 Proposed classification. Adapted from Benedetti 15 37 Z:\Sapiens Publishing\A5211 - Postpartum Hemorrhage\Make-up\Postpartum Hemorrhage - Voucher Proofs #T.vp 30 August 2006 14:19:08 Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen 16. Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, et al., eds. Conduct of normal labor and delivery. In Williams Obstetrics, 21st edn. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001:3205 17. Schuurmans N, MacKinnon C, Lane C, Etches D. Prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Canada 2000;22:27181 18. Hibbard BM. Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom, 19881990. London: Her Majestys Stationery Office, 1994 19. Anonymous. Report on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths in the United Kingdom, 19911993. London: Her Majestys Stationery Office, 1996 16 POSTPARTUM HEMORRHAGE 38 Z:\Sapiens Publishing\A5211 - Postpartum Hemorrhage\Make-up\Postpartum Hemorrhage - Voucher Proofs #T.vp 30 August 2006 14:19:08 Color profile: Generic CMYK printer profile Composite Default screen