This document outlines an assignment for an education course. Students must (1) design two strategies to develop metacognitive skills and explain their rationale, (2) describe two activities to develop higher-order thinking through questioning and explain how they align with the curriculum, and (3) choose two activities from the PEEL database to promote thinking and questioning skills, explaining their choices and applicability. The assignment must be in MS Word with subheadings, citations, and a reference list, keeping quotes to a minimum. It will be assessed on designing effective activities, providing a supported rationale, and professional writing and communication skills.
This document outlines an assignment for an education course. Students must (1) design two strategies to develop metacognitive skills and explain their rationale, (2) describe two activities to develop higher-order thinking through questioning and explain how they align with the curriculum, and (3) choose two activities from the PEEL database to promote thinking and questioning skills, explaining their choices and applicability. The assignment must be in MS Word with subheadings, citations, and a reference list, keeping quotes to a minimum. It will be assessed on designing effective activities, providing a supported rationale, and professional writing and communication skills.
Original Description:
Assessment for effective communication in NSW public schools
This document outlines an assignment for an education course. Students must (1) design two strategies to develop metacognitive skills and explain their rationale, (2) describe two activities to develop higher-order thinking through questioning and explain how they align with the curriculum, and (3) choose two activities from the PEEL database to promote thinking and questioning skills, explaining their choices and applicability. The assignment must be in MS Word with subheadings, citations, and a reference list, keeping quotes to a minimum. It will be assessed on designing effective activities, providing a supported rationale, and professional writing and communication skills.
This document outlines an assignment for an education course. Students must (1) design two strategies to develop metacognitive skills and explain their rationale, (2) describe two activities to develop higher-order thinking through questioning and explain how they align with the curriculum, and (3) choose two activities from the PEEL database to promote thinking and questioning skills, explaining their choices and applicability. The assignment must be in MS Word with subheadings, citations, and a reference list, keeping quotes to a minimum. It will be assessed on designing effective activities, providing a supported rationale, and professional writing and communication skills.
Due Date: 5pm, Friday April 4 Week 7 (ONLINE) Assignment Type: Teaching and learning strategies to promote thinking and questioning Word Count: 1350 words Weighting: 33%
MARKING CRITERIA: In this assignment you will be assessed on your ability to:
Design teaching and learning activities to promote student acquisition of thinking and questioning skills
Provide a well-supported rationale or explanation with evidence of your reading and engagement with the modules material, key ideas, and concepts
Write with clarity, accuracy, and demonstrate appropriate and professional written and communication skills
Assignment Outline: You are required to complete the following three (3) tasks (450 words each):
(i) Outline two (2) teaching and learning strategies that you could use in your classroom to assist your students to develop metacognitive skills. Write a brief rationale to explain your thinking behind the design of these strategies, and why you think they would be effective in promoting metacognition. (450 words in total).
(ii) Explain how thinking-focussed questions help students to develop higher order thinking skills. Briefly describe two (2) practical teaching and learning activities you could use in your classroom to assist students to ask thinking-focussed questions. Preferably, these two (2) activities would align with your curriculum specialisation(s), however, they can be of a more general nature if you wish. (450 words in total).
(iii) Drawing from the Project for Enhancing Effective Learning (PEEL) data-base, choose two (2) PEEL teaching activities you could use to promote good thinking and questioning skills in your classroom. Preferably choose activities that align with your curriculum specialisation(s), [but they can be of a more general nature if you wish]. Explain why you have chosen these PEEL ideas, and how applying them into your classroom would promote your students thinking and questioning skills, (and also your own questioning skills as a teacher, if relevant to the PEEL idea you have chosen). Please include a copy of the PEEL activities you have chosen as an appendix to your assignment. (450 words in total, plus appendix). 2
Assignment Format:
The assignment will be presented in one document in MS word format The three (3) questions should be clearly indicated by subheadings For this assignment you are required to cite your sources in-text and provide a reference list. As each response has a 450 word limit it is strongly recommended that you keep direct quotes to a minimum, paraphrasing instead There will be one appendix containing the two PEEL activities (this may affect the Turnitin reading, but this will be taken into account).
Grade
Descriptors High Distinction
Outstanding design of teaching and learning activities to promote student acquisition of thinking and questioning skills Excellent ability to provide a well-supported rationale/explanation Exceptional demonstration of clear, accurate, and professional written and communication skills
Distinction
Very effective design of teaching and learning activities to promote student acquisition of thinking and questioning skills Distinctive ability to provide a well-supported rationale/explanation Highly competent demonstration of clear, accurate, and professional written and communication skills
Credit
Effective design of teaching and learning activities to promote student acquisition of thinking and questioning skills Sound ability to provide a rationale/explanation Good demonstration of clear, accurate, and professional written and communication skills
Pass
Satisfactory design of teaching and learning activities to promote student acquisition of thinking and questioning skills Satisfactory ability to provide a rationale/explanation Adequate demonstration of clear, accurate, and professional written and communication skills
Fail
Unsatisfactory design of teaching and learning activities to promote student acquisition of thinking and questioning skills Unsatisfactory ability to provide a rationale/explanation Inadequate demonstration of clear, accurate, and professional written and communication skills