1-s2.0-S2405609X17301410-main
1-s2.0-S2405609X17301410-main
1-s2.0-S2405609X17301410-main
com
ScienceDirect
Karbala International Journal of Modern Science 3 (2017) 185e190
http://www.journals.elsevier.com/karbala-international-journal-of-modern-science/
Abstract
In this work, a novel ionic liquid based dispersive liquideliquid microextraction (IL-DLLME) method has been developed for
spectrophotometric copper determination in natural waters. The method is based on the extraction of Cu(II) in the form of a
complex with 3-dimethylamino rhodanine and determination using spectrophotometry. In the IL-DLLME, 3-dimethylamino
rhodanine and Triton X-100 were used as chelating agent and anti-sticking agent. 1-Heptyl-3-methylimidazolium hexa-
fluorophosphate and ethanol were selected as extractive and disperser solvents, respectively. The following experimental conditions
were optimized: pH 3.0, 5 106 mol L1 complexing reagent, centrifuge for 1 min at 5000 rpm. The method is linear in the range
from 2.2 to 12.2 mg/mL with a correlation coefficient (R2) of 0.9968 and a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.81 mg/mL. The proposed
method was successfully applied to the determination of Cu(II) in water samples.
© 2017 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of University of Kerbala. This is an open access article
under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kijoms.2017.09.002
2405-609X/© 2017 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of University of Kerbala. This is an open access article under
the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
186 Y. Çaglar, E.T. Saka / Karbala International Journal of Modern Science 3 (2017) 185e190
All the reagents that used were bought from Merck 3. Results and discussion
(Darmstadt, Germany) and SigmaeAldrich (Tauf-
kirchen, Germany) and all in analytical purity. The ionic 3.1. Optimization of IL-DLLME procedure
liquids were bought from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany),
abcr (Karlsruhe, Germany) and Carl Roth (Karlsruhe, 3.1.1. Effect of the disperser solvent type and volume
Germany). The certified reference materials (TMDA 70) A suitable disperser solvent must be miscible with
was supplied from the National Water Research Institute, both the aqueous and organic phases [21e24]. There-
Environment Canada. Ultra pure water from Sartorius fore, acetone, acetonitrile, ethanol and methanol were
(Arium-Pro) was used through the study. A stock stan- tested as nominees of disperser solvent. Based on the
dard solution of copper ion (Cu II) at a concentration of obtained results (Fig. 1), ethanol was selected as
1000 mg L1 was prepared from Cu(NO3)2$3H2O in disperser solvent and used for further experiments.
water. Copper working solution (50 mg/mL) was ob- The IL-DLLME efficiency when using varied vol-
tained through sequent dilution of the standard stock umes of ethanol ranging from 300 to 1500 mL was
solution. The complexing agent, 3-dimethylamino rho- studied. Based on the obtained results, 750 mL of
danine solution (5 106 M), was used by dissolving an ethanol was selected as optimal.
proper supply of agent in methanol on a daily basis. The
required pH values for the extraction of copper was 3.1.2. Effect of the extraction solvent type and volume
adjusted using citric acid, sodium hydroxide, hydrogen In this work, chloroform, dichloromethane, 1-
chloride tampon (Certipur Merck). butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate ([C4-
Y. Çaglar, E.T. Saka / Karbala International Journal of Modern Science 3 (2017) 185e190 187
prepared from nitrate salts and the anion solutions from water collected from the Black Sea in Giresun
sodium, potassium and ammonium salts. The tolerable (Turkey), the lake water collected from Sera Lake in
limit of each interferent was taken as a relative error Trabzon (Turkey), the stream water collected from
not exceeding ±5%. The concentration of the analyte Hars‚it Stream in Giresun (Turkey) and tap water
ions used during experiment was 3.32 mg/mL. Ac- collected from our laboratory were passed through a
cording to the data, the anions (NO3 , 800 mg/mL; 0.45 mm filter and acidified to pH 2.0 with HCl to avoid
Cl, 706 mg/mL; ClO4 , 678 mg/mL; SO4 2 , 590 mg/ adsorption of metal ions on the flask walls. Then all
mL; PO4 3 , 300 mg/mL; H2 PO4 , 612 mg/mL) did not natural waters were stored in the dark at 4 C
interfere more than the cations (Ca2þ, 406 mg/mL; until preconcentration procedure. The suggested
Mg2þ, 378 mg/mL; Co2þ, 192 mg/mL; Cr3þ, 270 mg/ method was performed to extract of Cu(II) from these
mL; Ni2þ, 345 mg/mL; Cd2þ, 367 mg/mL; Zn2þ, natural waters. The results obtained for three deter-
408 mg/mL, Fe3þ 349 mg/mL). The most of the inter- mination of each samples are shown in Table 2. The
fered ions are Agþ (53 mg/mL), Mn2þ (67 mg/mL) and recovery values ranged from 99.33 to 100.00%.
Pb2þ (105 mg/mL).
3.6. Comparison with other dispersive liquideliquid
3.3. Analytical performance microextraction methods
The analytical characteristics of the proposed pro- The linear range, LOD and RSD, % obtained by the
cess were determined under the optimized experi- developed DLLME method were compared with other
mental conditions. The LOD calculated as 3 times the DLLME methods combined with different analytical
SD of the blank (n ¼ 11). The LOQ calculated as 10 techniques in the literature. The results are given in
times the SD of the blank (n ¼ 11). The enhancement Table 3. Stanisz et al. (2014) used sodium dieth-
factor, calculated using the slope ratio of the two yldithiocarbamate (DDTC) as complexing reagent and
calibration curves of the analyte with and without obtained a better limit of detection than this work's
preconcentration. The figures of merit of the intro- detection limit, but this method required the use of an
duced method are summed up in Table 1. additional chemical (LiNTf2) to start metathesis reac-
tion. The method developed by Shariati and Golshekan
3.4. Analysis of certified sample (2011) using neocuproine as ligand has low limit of
detection. However, their method used chloroform as
To validate of the developed IL-DLLME procedure extraction solvent and an additional chemical (hy-
integrated with UVeVis. spectrophotometry, TMDA droxylamine hydrochloride) as reducing agent of
70 (Cu2þ concentration, 399 ± 21.2 mg/L) was used as
Cu(II). The method developed by Skrlíkov a et al.
certified reference material. According to t-test, there (2011) using 1,3,3-trimethyl-2-[5-(1,3,3-trimethyl-1,3-
is no considerable difference between the results. dihydroindol-2-ylidene)-penta-1,3-dienyl]-3H-indo-
Calculated Student's t value (0.02) was less than the lium (DIDC) as chelating reagent has very low limits
theoretical value (0.07) at a 95% confidence level. of detection, but this method uses an extra solvent
(tetrachloromethane) as auxiliary solvent. Farajzadeh
3.5. Analysis of natural waters et al. (2008) using 8-hydroxyquinoline as ligand
require an extra step to evaporate the sedimented phase
After the developed process passed the accuracy test before measurement. Khani et al. (2011) used thio-
that was done using the certified reference material, the benzophenone (TMK) as ligand and required a home-
process was performed to the natural waters. The sea made microsample unit. Acar and Kara (2014) using
Table 1
The analytical characteristics of the proposed method for copper Table 2
determination under the optimized conditions. Analytical results for determination of Cu(II) in natural waters.
Table 3
Comparison of some reported methods with present work.
Procedure Analytical technique Linear range (mg/L) LOD (mg/L) RSD (%) Ref.
DLLME FAAS 50e2000 3.00 5.1 [32]
IL-DLLME FAAS 2e50 0.45 3.3 [33]
DLLME UVeVIS 1e200 0.33 4.0 [27]
DLLME UVeVIS 0.02e0.09 0.005 1.3e5.4 [30]
DLLME FO-LADS 2e70 0.34 <1.3 [34]
DLLME-SFO FAAS 2e600 0.69 e [35]
In-situ IL-DLLME ET-FAAS 20e150 1.8 7.0 [23]
IL-DLLME UVeVIS 2.0e12.0a 0.83a 1.09 This work
a
mg/mL.
4-phenyl-3-thiosemicarbazide and Ezoddin et al. [2] C.N. Sawyer, P.L. McCarty, G.F. Parkin, Chemistry for Envi-
(2010) using 4-benzylpiperidineditiocarbamate potas- ronmental Engineering, fourth ed., McGraw-Hill, New York,
1996, p. 634.
sium salt (4-BPDC) used CCl4 and chloroform which [3] L. Feng, Y. Zhang, L. Wen, Z. Shen, Y. Guan, Colorimetric
are classical organic extraction solvents, respectively. determination of copper (II) ions by filtration on sol-gel
The proposed method used an ionic liquid as extraction membrane doped with diphenylcarbazide, Talanta 84 (3)
solvent and like Stanisz et al. (2014) and Khani et al. (2011) 913e917.
(2011). The RSD, % of this work was found lower than [4] C. Pfeiffer, R. Mailloux, Excess copper as a factor in human
diseases, J. Orthomol. Med. 2 (3) (1987) 171e182.
those of other methods. [5] Y. Yamini, J. Hassan, M.H. Karbasi, Solid phase extraction of
copper and cupron on octadecyl silica cartridge and its deter-
4. Conclusion mination with atomic absorption spectrometry, Microchim.
Acta 148 (3e4) (2004) 305e309.
A novel IL-DLLME procedure coupled to UVeVis [6] D. Alkan, M. Kara, Preconcentration and separation of cop-
per(II) with solvent extraction using N,N0 -bis(2-hydroxy-5-
spectrophotometry situated on the creation of a com- bromo-benzyl) 1,2 diaminopropane, Microchem. J. 71 (2002)
plex of Cu(II) with 3-dimethylamino rhodanine was 29e39.
successfully improved for the enrichment and specifi- [7] A. Tobiasz, S. Walas, A. Soto Hernandes, H. Mrowiec, Appli-
cation of Cu(II) in natural waters. To the best of our cation of multiwall carbon nanotubes impregnated with 5-
knowledge, this is the first work reporting the intro- dodecylsalicylaldoxime for on-line copper preconcentration
and determination in water samples by flame atomic absorption
duction of the 3-dimethylamino rhodanine as chelating spectrometry, Talanta 96 (2012) (2012) 89e95.
reagent to the IL-DLLME coupled with UVeVis [8] Y. Gao, P. Wu, W. Li, Y. Xuan, X. Hou, Simultaneous and se-
spectrophotometry. The use of UVeVis spectropho- lective preconcentration of trace Cu and Ag by one-step
tometry for determination of Cu(II) showed some displacement cloud point extraction for FAAS determination,
benefits such as simplicity, low cost and short analysis Talanta 81 (2010) 586e590.
€
[9] E. Alver, A. Demirci, M. Ozcimder, Microextraction methods,
time. Moreover, the use of an ionic liquid that named Sigma J. Eng. Nat. Sci. 30 (2012) 75e90.
as ‘green solvent’ as extraction solvent in place of a [10] M. Rezaee, Y. Assadi, M.R. Milani Hosseini, E. Aghee,
toxic inorganic solvent provided environmentally F. Ahmadia, S. Berijani, Determination of organic compounds
friendly procedure. in water using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, J.
Chromatogr. A 39 (2006) 89e102.
[11] A. Bidari, E.Z. Jahromi, Y. Assadi, M.R. Milani Hosseini,
Acknowledgments Monitoring of selenium in water samples using dispersive
liquid liquid microextraction followed by iridium-modified tube
We are thankful for the financial support of the Unit graphite furnace atomic absorption, Microchem. J. 87 (2007)
of the Scientific Research Projects of Giresun Uni- 6e12.
versity (Fen-Bap-A-200515-72). [12] M. Gharehbaghi, F. Shemirani, M. Baghdadi, Dispersive liquid
liquid microextraction and spectrophotometric determination of
cobalt in water samples, Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 88 (7)
References (2008) 513e523.
[13] P. Liang, H. Sang, Determination of trace lead in biological and
[1] T.W. Lin, S.D. Huang, Direct and simultaneous determination water samples with dispersive liquid liquid microextraction
of copper, chromium, aluminum and manganese in urine with a preconcentration, Anal. Biochem. 380 (1) (2008) 21e25.
multielement graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometer, [14] P. Liang, L. Peng, P. Yan, Speciation of As (III) and As (V) in
Anal. Chem. 73 (17) (2001) 4319e4325. water samples by dispersive liquid liquid microextraction
190 Y. Çaglar, E.T. Saka / Karbala International Journal of Modern Science 3 (2017) 185e190
separation and determination by graphite furnace atomic ab- [25] L. Ranjbar, Y. Yamini, A. Saleh, S. Seidi, M. Faraji, Ionic liquid
sorption spectrometry, Microchim. Acta 166 (1e2) (2009) based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction combined with
47e52. ICP-OES for the determination of trace quantities of cobalt,
[15] K. Shrivas, N.K. Jaiswal, Dispersive liquid-liquid micro- copper, manganese, nickel and zinc in environmental water
extraction fort he determination of copper in cereals and samples, Microchim. Acta 177 (2012) 119e127.
vegetable food samples using flame atomic absorption spec- [26] K. Kocot, B. Zawisza, R. Sitko, Dispersive liquid-liquid
trometry, Food Chem. 141 (2013) 2263e2268. microextraction using dietilditiyokarbamat as a chelating
[16] S.Z. Mohammadi, D. Afzali, Y.M. Baghelani, Ligandless- agent and the dried spot technique fort he determination of Fe,
dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of trace amount of Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Se and Pb by energy-dispersive X-ray fluo-
copper ions, Anal. Chim. Acta 653 (2009) 173e177. rescence spectrometry, Spectrochim. Acta Part B 73 (2012)
[17] C. Wu, B. Zhao, Y. Li, Q. Wu, C. Wang, Z. Wang, Development 79e83.
of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction based on solidifica- [27] S. Shariati, M. Golshekan, Dispersive liquid-liquid micro-
tion of floating organic drop fort he sensitive determination of extraction of copper ions as neocuproine complex in environ-
trace copper in water and beverage samples by flame atomic mental aqueous samples, Acta. Chim. Slov. 58 (2011)
absorption spectrometry, Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 32 (2011) 311e317.
829e835. [28] X. Wen, Q. Yang, Z. Yan, Q. Deng, Determination of cadmium
[18] N. Jalbani, M. Soylak, Ligandless ultrasonic-assisted and ionic and copper in water and food samples by dispersive liquid-
liquid based dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of copper, liquid microextraction combined with UV-vis spectrophotom-
nickel and lead in different food samples, Food Chem. 167 etry, Microchem. J. 97 (2011) 249e254.
(2015) 433e437. [29] M. Arvand, E. Bozorgzadeh, M.A. Zanjachi, Sh Shariati,
[19] T.S. Seeger, F.C. Rosa, C.A. Bizzi, V.L. Dressler, E.M.M. Flores, Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of Fe(II) and Cu(II)
F.A. Duarte, Feasibility of dispersive liquid-liquid micro- with diethyldithiocarbamate and their simultaneous spectro-
extraction for extraction and preconcentration and of Cu and Fe photometric determination using mean centering of ratio
in red wine and determination by flame atomic absorption spectra, J. Anal. Chem. 69 (2014) 243e247.
spectrometry, Spectrochim. Acta Part B 105 (2015) 136e140.
[30] J. Skrlíkova, V. Andruch, I.S. Balogh, L. Kocurova, L. Nagy,
[20] D. Cıtak, M. Tüzen, Separation and determination of copper in Y. Bazel, A novel, environmentally friendly dispersive liquid-
bottled water samples by combination of dispersive liquid- liquid microextraction procedure for the determination of cop-
liquid microextraction and microsample introduction flame per, Microchem. J. 95 (2011) 40e45.
atomic absorption spectrometry, J. AOAC Int. 96 (2013) [31] M. Baghdadi, F. Shemirani, Cold-induced aggregation micro-
1435e1439. extraction: a novel sample preparation technique based on ionic
[21] G. Kandhro, M. Soylak, T.G. Kazı, E. Yılmaz, Enrichment of liquids, Anal. Chim. Acta 613 (2008) 56e63.
copper as 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol complex by the combi- [32] M.A. Farajzadeh, M. Bahram, B.G. Mehr, J.A. J€onsson, Opti-
nation of dispersive liquid-liquid micro-extraction/flame atomic mization of dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction of copper
absorption spectrometry, J. AOAC Int. 97 (2014) 205e210. (II) by atomic absorption spectrometry as its oxinate chelate:
[22] E. Stanisz, A. Zgola-Grzeskowiak, In situ metathesis ionic application to determination of copper in different water sam-
liquid formation dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction for ples, Talanta 75 (2008) 832e840.
copper in water samples by electrothermal atomic absorption [33] R. Khani, F. Shemirani, B. Majidi, Combination of dispersive
spectrometry, Talanta 115 (2013) 178e183. liquid-liquid microextraction and flame atomic absorption
[23] E. Stanisz, A. Zgola-Grzeskowiak, H. Matusiewicz, Generation spectrometry for preconcentration and determination of copper
of volatile copper species after in situ ionic liquid formation in water samples, Desalination 266 (2011) 238e243.
dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction prior to atomic ab- [34] M. Ezoddin, F. Shemirani, M.R. Jamali, Fiber optic linear array
sorption spectrometric determination, Talanta 129 (2014) detection spectrophotometry in combination with dispersive
254e262. liquid-liquid microextraction for preconcentration and deter-
[24] F.Y. Meng, Y.Q. Wei, H. Lu, X.T. Zhou, J.X. Liu, G. Li, mination of copper, J. Anal. Chem. 65 (2010) 153e158.
J.Y. Hou, Chelatometric dispersive liquid-liquid micro- [35] D. Kantürer Acar, D. Kara, A new dispersive liquid-liquid
extraction followed by capillary electrophoresis for the analysis microextraction method for the preconcentration of copper
of total and water soluble copper in Rhizoma coptidis, Chin. using 4-phenyl-3-thiosemicarbazide and FAAS deduction,
Chem. Lett. 24 (6) (2013) 506e508. Water Air Soil Pollut. 225 (2014) 1864e1872.