JSIR 69(5) 368-372
JSIR 69(5) 368-372
JSIR 69(5) 368-372
A facile spectrophotometric method is proposed for determination of Colchicoside (COLSID) in bulk and in dosage forms
using ceric ammonium sulphate (CAS). Method involves addition of a known excess of CAS to COLSID and determination of
residual CAS with a fixed amount of either Azure B (AB), measuring absorbance at 633nm or Safranin O (SO), measuring
absorbance at 519 nm. Calibration graphs are linear over 25.00-50.00 µgml-1, 22.00-38.00 µgml-1 and apparent molar absorptiv-
ity is calculated to be 2.28 x 104 l mol-1 cm-1 and 2.77 x 104 l mol-1 cm-1 for CAS-AB and CAS-SO respectively. Method is
successfully applied to assay of COLSID in pharmaceutical formulations.
Keywords: Azure B (AB), Ceric ammonium sulphate (CAS), Colchicoside (COLSID), Safranin O (SO)
2.5
Absorbance
1.5
0.5
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Concentration, µg/ml
2.5
2
Absorbance
1.5
0.5
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
T im e ( m in )
Concentration, µg/ml
2.3
2.1 a
1.9
Absorbance
1.7
1.5
1.3
1.1
b
0.9
0.7
0.5
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
)
Time, min
Fig.1—Calibration curve for: a) COSID-Azure B system; b) COLSID- Safranin O system; c) A graph of change in absorbance with time
(a, COLSID- Azure B system; b, COLSID- Safranin O system)
Absorbance of each solution was measured at 519 nm up to volume with distilled water. Above solution was
(Fig. 1b). analyzed according the proposed procedures.
Scheme 1
2.5 c
b
Absorbance
1.5
1
a
0.5
0
400 450 500 5 50 600 650 700 750
Wavelength, nm
Fig. 2—Absorption spectra for: a) COLSID + CAS + Azure B; b) COLSID + Azure B; c) Azure B
1 .4
c
1 .2
1
b
Absorbance
a b s o rb a n c e
0 .8
0 .6
a
0 .4
0 .2
0
0 1 00 2 00 3 00 4 00 5 00 6 00 7 00
Wavelength, nm
Fig. 3—Absorption spectra for: a) COLSID + CAS + safranin O; b) COLSID + safranin O; c) safranin O
guidelines13 as LOD =3.3 × σ/S and LOQ = 10 × σ/S, Analytical results are considered to be satisfactory for
where σ is standard deviation of y-intercept of regression level of concentrations examined (Table 2).
lines (standard deviation of response) and S is slope of
calibration curve. Linearity was evaluated by calculation Interference Study
of regression. Sensitivity of proposed methods is To investigate effect of excipients and fillers on
determined by calculating sandell’s sensitivity (µg/cm2/ measurements, standard addition method was carried
0.001 Abs unit), which can be defined as smallest weight out. It was observed that talc (70 mg), starch (40 mg),
of substance that can be detected in column of unit cross glucose (65 mg) and lactose (55 mg) did not interfere in
section. measurements.