METHODS AND APPROACHES OF STUDYING HUMAN DEVELOPMENT
A) OBSERVATION MATHOD OBSERVATION
◼ Observation of human behaviour is a
much-used data collection technique. ◼ “It is the perception of an individual behaviour under natural conditions by other individual.” ◼ “It involve the systematic recording of observable phenomena or behaviour in natural setting.” ◼ It can be undertaken in different ways. TYPES OF OBSERVATION
◼ Its purpose is to learn the perspectives held by
participants of the study. ◼ In qualitative observation there are multiple perspectives within any given setting. ◼ The observer needs to know what these varied perspectives are and in understanding the relationship among them. ◼ Participant observation always takes place in community settings, in locations believed to have some relevance to the purpose of observation. ◼ The observer takes part in the situation he or she observes. ◼ For example, a observer poses as an employed teacher of a school and observes school procedures ‘from within’. ◼ According to Fetterman, participant observation "combines participation in the lives of the people being studied with maintenance of a professional distance that allows adequate observation and recording of data". ◼ The method is distinct because the observer approaches participants in their own environment (natural setting) rather than having the participants come to the observer. ◼ The observer engaged in participant observation tries to understand and analyse the life for an “insider” while remaining, inevitably, an “outsider.” ◼ While in these community settings, a observer makes careful, objective notes about what he sees and records all accounts and observations as field notes in a field notebook. ◼ Informal conversation and interaction with members of the study population are also important components of the method and should be recorded in the field notes in detail. ◼ The data obtained through participant observation serve as a check against participants’ subjective reporting of what they believe and do. ◼ Participant observation is also useful for gaining an understanding of the ◼ (i) physical, social, cultural and economic contexts in which study participants live, ◼ (ii) the relationships among and between people, contexts, ideas, norms and events and ◼ (iii) people’s behaviours and activities in terms of what they do, how frequently, and with whom. In addition, the method enables researchers to develop a familiarity with the cultural milieu that will prove invaluable throughout the project. ◼ Observing and participating are integral to understanding of the human experience. NON-PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION
◼ Non-participant or direct observation is one where data
are collected by observing behaviour without interacting with the participants. ◼ The observer watches the situation and the subjects of his or her study, with or without their knowledge, openly or concealed, but does not participate or take an active part in the situation under scrutiny. ◼ Non-participant observation is observation with limited interaction with the people one observes. ◼ This data collection strategy results in a detailed recording of the communication and provides the researcher with access to the nuances of talk (e.g. intonation) as well as body language (eg. facial expression, eye gaze). ◼ Even a great observer cannot record these aspects in detail. ◼ Non-participant observation may provide limited insight into the meaning of the social context in which education takes place. ◼ Non-participant observation is used most routinely by psychologists studying children and animals. USES OF OBSERVATION
◼ There are a variety of reasons for using observation as a
data collection technique. Some of these reasons include the following : ◼ When the nature of the observation question to be answered is focused on answering a ‘how’ or ‘what’ type of question. ◼ When the topic is comparatively unexplored and little is known to explain the behaviour of people in a particular setting. ◼ When understanding the meaning of a setting in a detailed way is important. ◼ When it is important to study a phenomenon in its natural setting. ◼ When self-report data (asking people what they do) is likely to be different from actual behaviour (what people actually do). One example of this seen in the difference between self-reported versus observed data on teacher performance. ◼ When implementing an intervention in a natural setting, observation may be used in conjunction with other quantitative data collection techniques. BENEFITS OF OBSERVATION
▪Immersion and prolonged involvement in a setting can
lead to the development of rapport and foster free and open communication with participants. ▪It provides direct information about behaviour of individuals and groups. ▪Observation fosters an in depth and rich understanding of a phenomenon, situation and/or setting and the behaviour of the participants in that setting. ▪Observation is an essential part of gaining an understanding of naturalistic settings and its participants ' ways of seeing. ▪Observation can provide the foundation for theory and hypothesis development. ▪It provides good opportunities for identifying unanticipated outcomes. ▪It allows for insight into contexts, relationships and behaviour. ▪It can provide information previously unknown to researcher that is crucial for further research design, data collection and interpretation of other data.