Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 0 views

    Order Directing Answer: Supreme Court OF Nevada

    Uploaded by

    documents
    Picon Press - “Emblematic” of County Manager Eric Brown’s Recent Behavior - Part 1 of 1

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Order Directing Answer: Supreme Court OF Nevada

    Uploaded by

    documents
    0 views3 pages
    Picon Press - “Emblematic” of County Manager Eric Brown’s Recent Behavior - Part 1 of 1

    Original Title

    24-34925

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Picon Press - “Emblematic” of County Manager Eric Brown’s Recent Behavior - Part 1 of 1

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    0 views3 pages

    Order Directing Answer: Supreme Court OF Nevada

    Uploaded by

    documents
    Picon Press - “Emblematic” of County Manager Eric Brown’s Recent Behavior - Part 1 of 1

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THESTATE OF NEVADA

    THE NEW YORK TIMES COMPANY; No. 89347


    CABLE NEWS NETWORK, INC.; THE
    ASSOCIATED PRESS; NATIONAL
    PUBLIC RADIO, INC.; WP COMPANY
    LLC; REUTERS NEWS & MEDIA INC.;
    FILE
    AND AMERICAN BROADCASTING SEP 2 11 2024
    COMPANIES, INC.,
    Petitioners,
    vs.
    THE SECOND JUDICIAL DISTRICT
    COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA,
    IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF
    WASHOE; THE HONORABLE DAVID
    A. HARDY, DISTRICT JUDGE; AND
    THE HONORABLE EDMUND
    GORMAN, JR., PROBATE
    COMMISSIONER,
    Respondents,
    and
    THE DOE 1 TRUST, DOES 1
    THROUGH 9,
    Real Parties in Interest.

    ORDER DIRECTING ANSWER

    This original emergency petition for a writ of mandamus or, in


    the alternative, prohibition, challenges a district court order sealing records
    and closing access to proceedings in a trust matter. Having reviewed the
    petition, it appears that an answer may assist in resolving this matter.
    Accordingly, real parties in interest, on behalf of respondents, shall have 28
    days from the date of this order to file and serve an answer, including
    authorities, against issuance of the requested writ. Petitioners shall have
    14 days from the date that the answer is served to file and serve any reply.

    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA

    I947A .140..40
    In the petition, petitioners ask this court to, among other
    things, arrest the district court proceedings pending resolution of this writ
    petition and until the court access issues are resolved. Real party in interest
    Doe 9 has filed an opposition to any stay of the district court proceedings, to
    which real party in interest Doe 1 Trust has filed a joinder. Having
    reviewed the materials before us, we decline to stay the district court
    proceedings at this time.
    It is so ORDERED.

    Stiglich Herndon

    Lee

    PICKERING, J., with whom CADISH, C.J., and BEI,L„ agree,


    concurring in part and dissenting in part:

    I agree with ordering an answer but would also order a stay.

    Cadish Bell

    2
    cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge
    McLetchie Law
    Holley Driggs/Las Vegas
    Solomon Dwiggins, Freer & Steadman, Ltd.
    Maupin, Cox & LeGoy
    Snell & Wilmer, LLP/Reno
    Robison, Sharp, Sullivan & Brust
    Greenberg Traurig, LLP/Las Vegas
    K. Michael Leavitt
    Rodriguez, Horii, Choi & Cafferata LLP
    Washoe District Court Clerk

    SUPREME COURT
    OF
    NEVADA

    3
    l947A .saWn,

    You might also like