Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Irregularities Policy

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 4

POLICY NUMBER: WATF02PO

NAME: IRREGULARITIES POLICIES

SUMMARY

POLICY AIM To enable a positive relationship between teachers, parents and learners.
Strive to create a supportive and honest learning environment for learners
and other role players
ORIGINATOR / AUTHORITY Originated by Mr Matthew Ridgway
Operational Head
Authority Mr Vernon Rorich
Executive Head

DISTRIBUTION/APPLICABILITY Applies to Waterstone College High School


Control Operational Head
Applicable from 01 January 2016

POLICY HISTORY

REV # Brief Description Date Pages affected Headmaster Executive Head


Promulgated/
Revised
001 First draft

002 Second Draft


WATERSTONE COLLEGE

IRREGULARITIES POLICIES

PREAMBLE

• This Policy regulates formal relations among Educators, Learners and parents in relevant
areas of interaction – in the classroom, on the sports fields, or any other such place set
aside for the use of any or all of the parties mentioned below.
• The policy is intended to dovetail with the Life Orientation learning area, and to
exercise control over the conduct of learners at Waterstone College
• The basic principles of law apply : the right to life, civil liberty, property and dignity
• The principles of fairness and justice applies in the application of this code
• Where allegations of breaking the law are made to any party, the matter will be referred
to the South African Police, and formal legal procedures followed
• Any person who knowingly breaks the rules and regulations laid down in this code is
liable to the procedures of disciplinary hearing, ruling, judgement, censure and sentence
• The policy is further intended to correspond with and subscribe to the Copy Laws of
South Africa
• This policy aligns itself to the Constitution of the Republic South Africa ,Act 108 of 1996,
and to the South African Schools Act , 1996 ( Act 84 of 1996)

DEFINITIONS

• “Learner” one who is a scholar enrolled at the College in a specified grade


• “Educator” a professional person who instructs, educates at the College
• “Irregularity” any behaviour that breaches any rule, etiquette, custom or ethical
conduct relating to any examination, including the determination of marks for any
aspect of the examination, whether or not the behaviour results in the integrity of the
examination being undermined.
• “Examination” any assessment that is conducted by the school that is counted in the
final results including final written examinations, all components of the school-based
assessment, practical, oral or performance assessments that are included in determining
the final result of a learner.
THE POLICY

1. Structure that deals with Irregularities


Any irregularity must be dealt with using the school’s applicable internal procedures. The Operational
Head, or a person appointed by him, is responsible for the investigation of any irregularity and, if
necessary, the conduct of a hearing. Should the outcome of the hearing have any bearing on the integrity
of the final results of the school, the incident must be reported in full to the IEB (in the case of final Matric
exams) or to the Executive Head (all other forms of assessment). The IEB / Executive Head will use this and
any other information considered relevant by the IEB/ Curro Holdings, in determining the IEB / Curro
Holdings response to the irregularity.

Irregular behaviour detected by the IEB must be dealt with by the relevant person/s in the IEB using
applicable procedures. Depending on the nature of the irregularity, the IEB may refer the matter to the
school to be dealt with at the school level using its applicable internal procedures.

2. Detection and reporting of irregularities


At any time before the examination is written, during the writing of the examination or during marking,
after the marking session or in the resulting process, if any person suspects that there may have been an
irregularity of any sort, no matter at what point during the process this may have taken place and no
matter by whom, the alleged irregularity must be reported in writing to the Operational Head, together
with any other relevant information or evidence. The report must outline the nature of the alleged
irregularity and how the person became aware of it. The Operational Head, or a person appointed by him,
will determine whether the reported action constitutes an irregularity and will bring the matter to
conclusion as appropriate.

3. Investigations
The Operational Head will conduct or oversee the conduct of an investigation into an alleged irregularity.
During an investigation, he may request additional information relevant to the investigation and may make
use of the expertise of persons not employed by the school. After examining all reports from the
investigation, the Operational Head, together with those who have conducted the investigation, if
applicable, will decide on whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed to a hearing of the matter. If it
appears, following complete investigation, that there is insufficient evidence to indicate any irregularity,
the matter will be dismissed and the person alleged to have committed an irregularity will be informed of
this fact. If it appears that there is sufficient evidence indicating that an irregularity has taken place, a
formal disciplinary procedure against the person accused of the irregularity will commence, in accordance
with the school policy on disciplinary hearings.

You might also like