Instant Download Food Analysis Laboratory Manual 3rd Edition S. Suzanne Nielsen (Auth.) PDF All Chapter
Instant Download Food Analysis Laboratory Manual 3rd Edition S. Suzanne Nielsen (Auth.) PDF All Chapter
Instant Download Food Analysis Laboratory Manual 3rd Edition S. Suzanne Nielsen (Auth.) PDF All Chapter
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/food-
analysis-laboratory-manual-3rd-edition-s-
suzanne-nielsen-auth/
textbookfull
More products digital (pdf, epub, mobi) instant
download maybe you interests ...
https://textbookfull.com/product/food-chemistry-a-laboratory-
manual-2nd-edition-miller/
https://textbookfull.com/product/microbiological-examination-
methods-of-food-and-water-a-laboratory-manual-second-edition-
silva/
https://textbookfull.com/product/data-analysis-for-business-
decision-making-a-laboratory-manual-2nd-edition-andres-fortino/
https://textbookfull.com/product/preclinical-manual-of-
prosthodontics-3e-3rd-edition-lakshmi-s/
The Algorithm Design Manual 3rd Edition Steven S.
Skiena
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-algorithm-design-manual-3rd-
edition-steven-s-skiena/
https://textbookfull.com/product/archaeologist-s-laboratory-the-
analysis-of-archaeological-evidence-2nd-edition-eb-banning/
https://textbookfull.com/product/laboratory-manual-for-
biology-i-2nd-edition-lalitha-jayant/
https://textbookfull.com/product/laboratory-manual-for-
introductory-geology-4th-edition-allan-ludman/
https://textbookfull.com/product/spectroscopic-methods-in-food-
analysis-1st-edition-adriana-s-franca/
Food Science Text Series
S. Suzanne Nielsen
Food Analysis
Laboratory Manual
Third Edition
Food Science
Text Series
Third Edition
The Food Science Text Series provides faculty with the leading teaching tools. The Editorial Board has
outlined the most appropriate and complete content for each food science course in a typical food science
program and has identified textbooks of the highest quality, written by the leading food science educators.
Series Editor Dennis R. Heldman, Professor, Department of Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering,
The Ohio State University. Editorial Board; John Coupland, Professor of Food Science, Department of Food
Science, Penn State University, David A. Golden, Ph.D., Professor of Food Microbiology, Department of Food
Science and Technology, University of Tennessee, Mario Ferruzzi, Professor, Food, Bioprocessing and
Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University, Richard W. Hartel, Professor of Food Engineering,
Department of Food Science, University of Wisconsin, Joseph H. Hotchkiss, Professor and Director of the
School of Packaging and Center for Packaging Innovation and Sustainability, Michigan State University,
S. Suzanne Nielsen, Professor, Department of Food Science, Purdue University, Juan L. Silva, Professor,
Department of Food Science, Nutrition and Health Promotion, Mississippi State University, Martin
Wiedmann, Professor, Department of Food Science, Cornell University, Kit Keith L. Yam, Professor of Food
Science, Department of Food Science, Rutgers University
Food Analysis
Laboratory Manual
Third Edition
edited by
S. Suzanne Nielsen
Purdue University
West Lafayette, IN, USA
S. Suzanne Nielsen
Department of Food Science
Purdue University
West Lafayette
Indiana
USA
v
vi Preface and Acknowledgments
I am grateful to the food analysis instructors much appreciated. Special thanks go to Baraem
identified in the text who provided complete labora- (Pam) Ismail and Andrew Neilson for their input
tory experiments or the materials to develop the and major contributions toward this edition of the
experiments. For this edition, I especially want to laboratory manual. My last acknowledgment goes to
thank the authors of the new introductory chapters my former graduate students, with thanks for their
who used their experience from teaching food analy- help in working out and testing all experimental pro-
sis to develop what I hope will be very valuable cedures written for the initial edition of the labora-
chapters for students and instructors alike. The input tory manual.
I received from other food analysis instructors, their
students, and mine who reviewed these new intro- West Lafayette, IN, USA S. Suzanne Nielsen
ductory chapters was extremely valuable and very
Contents
Preface and Acknowledgments v 4.6 t-Scores 58
4.7 t-Tests 59
4.8 Practical Considerations 61
Part 1 Introductory Chapters 4.9 Practice Problems 62
4.10 Terms and Symbols 62
1 Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures 3
1.1 Introduction 5
1.2 Precision and Accuracy 5 Part 2 Laboratory Exercises
1.3 Balances 6
1.4 Mechanical Pipettes 7 5 Nutrition Labeling Using a Computer
1.5 Glassware 9 Program 65
1.6 Reagents 16 5.1 Introduction 67
1.7 Data Handling and Reporting 18 5.2 Preparing Nutrition Labels for Sample
1.8 Basic Laboratory Safety 19 Yogurt Formulas 67
5.3 Adding New Ingredients to a Formula
2 Preparation of Reagents and Buffers 21 and Determining How They Influence
2.1 Preparation of Reagents of Specified the Nutrition Label 68
Concentrations 22 5.4 An Example of Reverse Engineering
2.2 Use of Titration to Determine in Product Development 69
Concentration of Analytes 24 5.5 Questions 70
2.3 Preparation of Buffers 25
2.4 Notes on Buffers 30 6 Accuracy and Precision Assessment 71
2.5 Practice Problems 31 6.1 Introduction 72
6.2 Procedure 73
3 Dilutions and Concentrations 33 6.3 Data and Calculations 74
3.1 Introduction 34 6.4 Questions 74
3.2 Reasons for Dilutions
and Concentrations 34 7 High-Performance Liquid
3.3 Using Volumetric Glassware Chromatography 77
to Perform Dilutions 7.1 Introduction 79
and Concentrations 34 7.2 Determination of Caffeine in Beverages
3.4 Calculations for Dilutions By HPLC 79
and Concentrations 34 7.3 Solid-Phase Extraction and HPLC Analysis
3.5 Special Cases 40 of Anthocyanidins from Fruits
3.6 Standard Curves 41 and Vegetables 81
3.7 Unit Conversions 44
3.8 Avoiding Common Errors 45 8 Gas Chromatography 87
3.9 Practice Problems 46 8.1 Introduction 89
8.2 Determination of Methanol and Higher
4 Statistics for Food Analysis 49 Alcohols in Wine by Gas
4.1 Introduction 50 Chromatography 89
4.2 Population Distributions 50 8.3 Preparation of Fatty Acid Methyl
4.3 Z-Scores 51 Esters (FAMEs) and Determination
4.4 Sample Distributions 54 of Fatty Acid Profile of Oils by Gas
4.5 Confidence Intervals 55 Chromatography 91
vii
viii Contents
xi
1
part
Introductory Chapters
1
chapter
Laboratory Standard
Operating Procedures
Andrew P. Neilson (*)
Department of Food Science and Technology,
Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,
Blacksburg, VA, USA
e-mail: andrewn@vt.edu
Dennis A. Lonergan
The Vista Institute,
Eden Prairie, MN, USA
e-mail: dennis@thevistainstitute.com
S. Suzanne Nielsen
Department of Food Science, Purdue University,
West Lafayette, IN, USA
e-mail: nielsens@purdue.edu
S.S. Nielsen, Food Analysis Laboratory Manual, Food Science Text Series, 3
DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-44127-6_1, © Springer International Publishing 2017
1.1 Introduction 1.6 Reagents
1.2 Precision and Accuracy 1.6.1 Acids
1.3 Balances 1.6.2 Distilled Water
1.3.1 Types of Balances 1.6.3 Water Purity
1.3.2 Choice of Balance 1.6.4 Carbon Dioxide-Free Water
1.3.3 Use of Top Loading Balances 1.6.5 Preparing Solutions and Reagents
1.3.4 Use of Analytical Balances 1.7 Data Handling and Reporting
1.3.5 Additional Information 1.7.1 Significant Figures
1.4 Mechanical Pipettes 1.7.2 Rounding Off Numbers
1.4.1 Operation 1.7.3 Rounding Off Single Arithmetic
1.4.2 Pre-rinsing Operations
1.4.3 Pipetting Solutions of Varying Density or 1.7.4 Rounding Off the Results of a Series
Viscosity of Arithmetic Operations
1.4.4 Performance Specifications 1.8 Basic Laboratory Safety
1.4.5 Selecting the Correct Pipette 1.8.1 Safety Data Sheets
1.5 Glassware 1.8.2 Hazardous Chemicals
1.5.1 Types of Glassware/Plasticware 1.8.3 Personal Protective
1.5.2 Choosing Glassware/Plasticware Equipment and Safety Equipment
1.5.3 Volumetric Glassware 1.8.4 Eating, Drinking, Etc.
1.5.4 Using Volumetric Glassware to 1.8.5 Miscellaneous Information
Perform Dilutions and Concentrations
1.5.5 Conventions and Terminology
1.5.6 Burets
1.5.7 Cleaning of Glass and Porcelain
Chapter 1 • Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures 5
with its accuracy of ± 0.02 g would introduce approxi- with the vessel. The mass of the vessel must be
mately 0.1 % error, which would often be acceptable. known so that it can be subtracted from the
Actually, since a difference in weight (0.20 g) is being final mass to get the mass of the dried sample or
determined, the error would be approximately 10 % ash. Therefore, make sure to obtain the mass of
and thus unacceptable. In this case, an analytical bal- the vessel before the analysis. This can be done
ance is definitely required because sensitivity is by either weighing the vessel before taring the
required in addition to accuracy. balance and then adding the sample or obtain-
ing the mass of the vessel and then the mass of
1.3.3 Use of Top Loading Balances the vessel plus the sample.
2. The accumulation of moisture from the air or
These instructions are generalized but apply to the use
fingerprints on the surface of a vessel will add a
of most models of top loading balances:
small mass to the sample. This can introduce
1. Level the balance using the bubble level and the errors in mass that affect analytical results, par-
adjustable feet (leveling is required so that the ticularly when using analytical balances.
balance performs correctly). Therefore, beakers, weigh boats, and other
2. Either zero the balance (so the balance reads 0 weighing vessels should be handled with tongs
with nothing on the pan) or tare the balance so or with gloved hands. For precise measure-
that the balance reads 0 with a container that ments (moisture, ash, and other measurements),
will hold the sample (empty beaker, weighing weighing vessels should be pre-dried and
boat, etc.) on the weighing pan. The tare func- stored in a desiccator before use, and then
tion is conveniently used for “subtracting” the stored in a desiccator after drying, ashing, etc.
weight of the beaker or weighing boat into prior to weighing the cooled sample.
which the sample is added. 3. Air currents or leaning on the bench can cause
3. Weigh the sample. appreciable error in analytical balances. It is
best to take the reading after closing the side
1.3.4 Use of Analytical Balances doors of an analytical balance.
4. Most balances in modern laboratories are elec-
It is always wise to consult the specific instruction
tric balances. Older lever-type balances are no
manual for an analytical balance before using it.
longer in wide use, but they are extremely
Speed and accuracy are both dependent on one being
reliable.
familiar with the operation of an analytical balance. If
it has been a while since you have used a specific type
of analytical balance, it may be helpful to “practice”
1.4 MECHANICAL PIPETTES
before actually weighing a sample by weighing a
spatula or other convenient article. The following Mechanical pipettes (i.e., automatic pipettors) are
general rules apply to most analytical balances and standard equipment in many analytical laboratories.
should be followed to ensure that accurate results are This is due to their convenience, precision, and accept-
obtained and that the balance is not damaged by able accuracy when used properly and when calibrated.
improper use: Although these pipettes may be viewed by many as
1. Analytical balances are expensive precision being easier to use than conventional glass volumetric
instruments; treat them as such. pipettes, this does not mean that the necessary accuracy
2. Make sure that the balance is level and is on a and precision can be obtained without attention to
sturdy table or bench free of vibrations. proper pipetting technique. Just the opposite is the
3. Once these conditions are met, the same proce- case; if mechanical pipettes are used incorrectly, this
dure specified above for top loading balances is will usually cause greater error than the misuse of glass
used to weigh the sample on an analytical volumetric pipettes. The proper use of glass volumetric
balance. pipettes is discussed in the section on glassware. The
4. Always leave the balance clean. PIPETMAN mechanical pipette (Rainin Instrument
Co., Inc.) is an example of a continuously adjustable
1.3.5 Additional Information design. The proper use of this type of pipette, as recom-
mended by the manufacturer, will be described here.
Other points to be aware of regarding the use of bal- Other brands of mechanical pipettes are available, and
ances are the following: although their specific instructions should be followed,
1. Many analyses (moisture, ash, etc.) require their proper operation is usually very similar to that
weighing of the final dried or ashed sample described here.
8 A.P. Neilson et al.
1. 4
Accuracy and precision of PIPETMAN 1. 5
Recommended volume ranges for mechani-
table mechanical pipettes table cal pipettors
5. Borosilicate glassware is not completely inert, meniscus should be tangent to the calibration mark.
particularly to alkalis; therefore, standard solu- There are other sources of error, however, such as
tions of silica, boron, and the alkali metals (such changes in temperature, which result in changes in the
as NaOH) are usually stored in polyethylene actual capacity of glass apparatus and in the volume of
bottles. the solutions. The volume capacity of an ordinary
6. Certain solvents dissolve some plastics, includ- 100 mL glass flask increases by 0.025 mL for each 1°
ing plastics used for pipette tips, serological rise in temperature, but if made of borosilicate glass,
pipettes, etc. This is especially true for acetone the increase is much less. One thousand mL of water
and chloroform. When using solvents, check (and of most solutions that are ≤ 0.1 N) increases in
the compatibility with the plastics you are volume by approximately 0.20 mL per 1 °C increase at
using. Plastics dissolved in solvents can cause room temperature. Thus, solutions must be measured
various problems, including binding/precipi- at the temperature at which the apparatus was cali-
tating the analyte of interest, interfering with brated. This temperature (usually 20 °C) will be indi-
the assay, clogging instruments, etc. cated on all volumetric ware. There may also be errors
7. Ground-glass stoppers require care. Avoid of calibration of the adjustable measurement appara-
using bases with any ground glass because the tus (e.g., measuring pipettes), that is, the volume
base can cause them to “freeze” (i.e., get stuck). marked on the apparatus may not be the true volume.
Glassware with ground-glass connections Such errors can be eliminated only by recalibrating the
(burets, volumetric flasks, separatory funnels, apparatus (if possible) or by replacing it.
etc.) are very expensive and should be handled A volumetric apparatus is calibrated “to contain”
with extreme care. or “to deliver” a definite volume of liquid. This will be
indicated on the apparatus with the letters “TC” (to
For additional information, the reader is referred contain) or “TD” (to deliver). Volumetric flasks are cali-
to the catalogs of the various glass and plastic manu- brated to contain a given volume, which means that the
facturers. These catalogs contain a wealth of informa- flask contains the specified volume ± a defined toler-
tion as to specific properties, uses, sizes, etc. ance (error). The certified TC volume only applies to
the volume c ontained by the flask and it does not take
1.5.3 Volumetric Glassware into account the volume of solution that will stick to
the walls of the flask if the liquid is poured out.
Accurately calibrated glassware for accurate and pre- Therefore, for example, a TC 250 mL volumetric flask
cise measurements of volume has become known as will hold 250 mL ± a defined tolerance; if the liquid is
volumetric glassware. This group includes volumet- poured out, slightly less than 250 mL will be dispensed
ric flasks, volumetric pipettes, and accurately cali- due to solution retained on the walls of the flask (this is
brated burets. Less accurate types of glassware, the opposite of “to deliver” or TD, glassware discussed
including graduated cylinders, serological pipettes, below). They are available in various shapes and sizes
and measuring pipettes, also have specific uses in the ranging from 1 to 2000 mL capacity. Graduated cylin-
analytical laboratory when exact volumes are unnec- ders, on the other hand, can be either TC or TD. For
essary. Volumetric flasks are to be used in preparing accurate work the difference may be important.
standard solutions, but not for storing reagents. The Volumetric pipettes are typically calibrated to
precision of an analytical method depends in part deliver a fixed volume. The usual capacities are
upon the accuracy with which volumes of solutions 1–100 mL, although micro-volumetric pipettes are also
can be measured, due to the inherent parameters of the available. The proper technique for using volumetric
measurement instrument. For example, a 10 mL volu- pipettes is as follows (this technique is for TD pipettes,
metric flask will typically be more precise (i.e., have which are much more common than TC pipettes):
smaller variations between repeated measurements)
than a 1000 mL volumetric flask, because the neck on 1. Draw the liquid to be delivered into the pipette
which the “fill to” line is located is narrower, and above the line on the pipette. Always use a
therefore smaller errors in liquid height above or pipette bulb or pipette aid to draw the liquid
below the neck result in smaller volume differences into the pipette. Never pipette by mouth.
compared to the same errors in liquid height for the 2. Remove the bulb (when using the pipette aid,
larger flask. However, accuracy and precision are often or bulbs with pressure release valves, you can
independent of each other for measurements on simi- deliver without having to remove it) and replace
lar orders of magnitude. In other words, it is possible it with your index finger.
to have precise results that are relatively inaccurate 3. Withdraw the pipette from the liquid and wipe
and vice versa. There are certain sources of error, off the tip with tissue paper. Touch the tip of the
which must be carefully considered. The volumetric pipette against the wall of the container from
apparatus must be read correctly; the bottom of the which the liquid was withdrawn (or a spare
Chapter 1 • Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures 11
beaker). Slowly release the pressure of your fin- standard for laboratory glassware. Class A glassware
ger (or turn the scroll wheel to dispense) on the has the tightest tolerances and therefore the best
top of the pipette and allow the liquid level in accuracy and precision. These flasks are rated
the pipette to drop so that the bottom of the TC. Therefore, volumetric flasks are used to bring
meniscus is even with the line on the pipette. samples and solutions up to a defined volume. They
4. Move the pipette to the beaker or flask into are not used to quantitatively deliver or transfer sam-
which you wish to deliver the liquid. Do not ples because the delivery volume is not known. Other
wipe off the tip of the pipette at this time. Allow types of glassware (non-Class A flasks, graduated
the pipette tip to touch the side of the beaker or cylinders, Erlenmeyer flasks, round-bottomed flasks,
flask. Holding the pipette in a vertical position, beakers, bottles, etc., Fig. 1.1b) are less accurate and
allow the liquid to drain from the pipette. less precise. They should not be used for quantitative
5. Allow the tip of the pipette to remain in contact volume dilutions or concentrations if Class A volu-
with the side of the beaker or flask for several metric flasks are available.
seconds. Remove the pipette. There will be a For transferring a known volume of a liquid sam-
small amount of liquid remaining in the tip of ple for a dilution or concentration, the “gold standard”
the pipette. Do not blow out this liquid with the providing maximal accuracy and precision is a Class A
bulb, as TD pipettes are calibrated to account glass volumetric pipette (Fig. 1.2a). These pipettes are
for this liquid that remains. rated “to deliver” (TD), which means that the pipette
will deliver the specified volume ± a defined tolerance
Note that some volumetric pipettes have calibra- (error). The certified TD volume takes into account the
tion markings for both TC and TD measurements. volume of solution that will stick to the walls of the
Make sure to be aware which marking refers to which pipette as well as the volume of the drop of solution
measurement (for transfers, use the TD marking). The that typically remains in the tip of the pipette after
TC marking will be closer to the dispensing end of the delivery (again, you should not attempt to get this
pipette (TC does not need to account for the volume drop out, as it is already accounted for). Therefore, for
retained on the glass surface, whereas TD does account example, a TD 5 mL pipette will hold slightly more
for this). than 5 mL but will deliver (dispense) 5 mL ± a defined
Measuring and serological pipettes should also be tolerance (the opposite of TC glassware). It is impor-
held in a vertical position for dispensing liquids; how- tant to note that volumetric pipettes are used only to
ever, the tip of the pipette is only touched to the wet deliver a known amount of solution. Typically they
surface of the receiving vessel after the outflow has should not be used to determine the final volume of
ceased. Some pipettes are designed to have the small the solution unless the liquids dispensed are the only
amount of liquid remaining in the tip blown out and components of the final solution. For example, if a
added to the receiving container; such pipettes have a sample is dried down and then liquid from a volumet-
frosted band near the top. If there is no frosted band ric pipette is used to resolubilize the solutes, it is
near the top of the pipette, do not blow out any remain- unknown if the solutes significantly affect the volume
ing liquid. of the resulting solution, unless the final volume is
measured, which may be difficult to do. Although the
effect is usually negligible, it is best to use volumetric
1.5.4 Using Volumetric Glassware
glassware to assure that the final volume of the result-
to Perform Dilutions
ing solution is known (the dried solutes could be dis-
and Concentrations
solved in a few mL of solvent and then transferred to a
Typically, dilutions are performed by adding a liq- volumetric flask for final dilution). However, it is
uid (water or a solvent) to a sample or solution. acceptable to add several solutions together using vol-
Concentrations may be performed by a variety of umetric pipettes and then add the individual volumes
methods, including rotary evaporation, shaking together to calculate the final volume. However, using
vacuum evaporation, vacuum centrifugation, boil- a single volumetric flask to dilute to a final volume is
ing, oven drying, drying under N2 gas, or freeze still the favored approach, as using one measurement
drying. for the final volume reduces the uncertainty. (The
For bringing samples or solutions up to a known errors, or tolerances, of the amounts added are also
volume, the “gold standard” providing maximal added together; therefore, using fewer pieces of glass-
accuracy and precision is a Class A glass volumetric ware lowers the uncertainty of the measurement even
flask (Fig. 1.1a). During manufacture, glassware to be if the tolerances of the glassware are the same.) For
certified as Class A is calibrated and tested to comply example, suppose you need to measure out 50 mL of
with tolerance specifications established by the solution. You have access to a 50 mL volumetric flask
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM, and a 25 mL volumetric pipette, both of which have
West Conshohocken, PA). These specifications are the tolerances of ± 0.06 mL. If you obtain 50 mL by filling
12 A.P. Neilson et al.
a b c d e
1. 1
Class A volumetric flask (a) and other types of non-Class A volume measuring glassware: graduated cylinder
figure
(b), Erlenmeyer flask (c), beaker (d), and bottle (e)
the volumetric flask, the measured volume is Information typically printed on the side of the
50 mL ± 0.06 mL (or somewhere between 49.94 and pipette or flask includes the class of the pipette or
50.06 mL). If you pipette 25 mL twice into a beaker, the flask, whether the glassware is TD or TC, the TC or TD
tolerance of each measurement is 25 mL ± 0.06 mL, and volume, and the defined tolerance (error) (Fig. 1.3).
the tolerance of the combined volume is the sum of the Note that the specifications are typically valid at a
means and the errors: specified temperature, typically 20 °C. Although it is
rare that scientists equilibrate solutions to exactly
( 25 mL ± 0.06 mL ) + ( 25 mL ± 0.06 mL ) = 20 °C before volume measurement, this temperature is
50 mL ± 0.12 mL = 49.88 − 50.12 mL assumed to be approximate room temperature. Be
aware that the greater the deviation from room tem-
This additive property of tolerances, or errors, com- perature, the greater the error in volume measure-
pounds further as more measurements are combined; ment. The specific gravity (density) of water at 4, 20,
conversely, when the solution is brought to volume 60, and 80 °C relative to 4 °C is 1.000, 0.998, 0.983, and
using a volumetric flask, only a single tolerance factors 0.972. This means that a given mass of water has lower
into the error of the measurement. density (greater volume for given mass) at tempera-
Other types of pipettes (non-Class A volumetric tures above 20 °C. This is sometimes seen when a volu-
glass pipettes, adjustable pipettors, automatic pipet- metric flask is brought exactly to volume at room
tors, reed pipettors, serological pipettes, etc., Fig. 1.2b) temperature and then is placed in an ultrasonic bath to
and other glassware (graduated cylinders, etc.) are less help dissolve the chemicals, warming the solution. A
accurate and less precise. They should not be used for solution that was exactly at the volume marker at
quantitative volume transfers. Pipettes are available room temperature will be above the volume when the
(but rare) that are marked with lines for both TC and solution is warmer. To minimize this error, volumes
TD. For these pipettes, the TD line would represent the should be measured at room temperature.
volume delivered when the drop at the tip is dispensed Volumetric glassware (flasks and pipettes) should
and TC when the drop remains in the pipette. be used for quantitative volume measurements during
Chapter 1 • Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures 13
a b c d e
1. 2
Class A volumetric pipette (a) and non-volumetric pipettes: adjustable pipettors (b), reed pipettor (c), serological
figure
pipettes (d)
a b
1. 3
Image of the label on a Class A volumetric flask pipette (a) and Class A volumetric pipette (b)
figure
14 A.P. Neilson et al.
for graduated cylinders of the same volume. Therefore, salt solution is concentrated tenfold (10X), the volume is
volumetric transfer pipettes and volumetric flasks are decreased to 9 mL (either by reducing to 9 mL or drying
preferred for dilutions and concentrations. For exam- completely and reconstituting to 9 mL, tenfold or 10X
ple, a 1000 mL Class A volumetric flask has a tolerance lower than 90 mL), and the final concentration is 3.1 ppm
of ±0.015 mL (the actual TC volume is somewhere salt (tenfold or 10X more than 0.31 ppm). Although ten-
between 999.985 and 1000.015 mL), while a 1000 mL fold or 10X was used for these examples, any value can
graduated cylinder has a tolerance of ± 3.00 mL (the be used. In microbiology, values of 10X, 100X, 1000X, etc.
actual TC volume is somewhere between 997 and are commonly used due to the log scale used in that
1003 mL). This is a 200-fold larger potential error in the field. However, less standard dilutions of any value are
measurement of 1000 mL! Finally, tolerances for non- routinely used in analytical chemistry.
Class A glassware are much broader than for Class A, The last terminology system for dilutions and
and thus Class A should be used if available. concentrations involves ratios. This system is some-
what ambiguous and is not used in the Food Analysis
1.5.5 Conventions and Terminology text or lab manual. This system refers to dilutions as
“X:Y,” where X and Y are the masses or volumes of the
To follow the analytical procedures described in this
initial and final solutions/samples. For example, it
manual and perform calculations correctly, common
may be stated that “the solution was diluted 1:8.” This
terminology and conventions (a convention is a stan-
system is ambiguous for the following reasons:
dard or generally accepted way of doing or naming
something) must be understood. A common phrase in 1. The first and last numbers typically refer to the
dilutions and concentrations is “diluted to” or “diluted initial and final samples, respectively (there-
to a final volume of.” This means that the sample or fore, a 1:8 dilution would mean 1 part initial
solution is placed in a volumetric flask, and the final sample and 8 parts final sample). However,
volume is adjusted to the specified value. In contrast, there is no standard convention. Therefore, an
the phrase “diluted with” means that the specified “X:Y” dilution could be interpreted either way.
amount is added to the sample or solution. In this latter 2. There is no standard convention as to whether
case, the final mass/volume must be calculated by add- this system describes the “diluted to” or
ing the sample mass/volume and the amount of liquid “diluted with” (as described above) approach.
added. For example, suppose you take a 1.7 mL volume Therefore, diluting a sample 1:5 could be inter-
and either (1) dilute to 5 mL with methanol or (2) dilute preted as either (1) diluting 1 mL sample with
with 5 mL methanol. In the first case, this means that the 4 mL for a final volume of 5 mL (“diluted to”) or
sample (1.7 mL) is placed in a volumetric flask and (2) diluting 1 mL sample with 5 mL for a final
methanol (~3.3 mL) is added so that the final volume is volume of 6 mL (“diluted with”).
5 mL total. In the second case, the sample (1.7 mL) is
combined with 5 mL methanol, and the final volume is Because of these ambiguities, the ratio system is
6.7 mL. As you can see, these are very different values. discouraged in favor of the “X-fold” terminology.
This will always be the case except when one of the vol- However, ratio dilutions still appear in some litera-
umes is much larger than the other. For example, if you ture. If possible, it is recommended that you investi-
were working with a 10 μL sample, diluting it “to 1 L” gate to clarify what is meant by this terminology.
or “with 1 L” would result in final volumes of 1 L and Another factor to consider is that liquid volumes
1.00001 L, respectively. It is important to understand the are often not strictly additive. For example, exactly
differences between these two conventions to perform 500 ml 95 % v/v ethanol aq. added to 500 ml distilled
procedures correctly and interpret data accurately. water will not equal 1000 ml; in fact, the new volume
Another common term in dilutions/concentrations will be closer to 970 ml. Where did the missing 30 ml
is the term “fold” or “X.” This refers to the ratio of the go? Polar molecules such as water undergo different
final and initial concentrations (or volumes and masses) three-dimensional intermolecular bonding in a pure
of the sample or solution during each step. An “X-fold solution versus in a mixture with other solute or chemi-
dilution” means that the concentration of a sample cals such as ethanol. The difference in bonding causes
decreases (and typically the volume increases) by a an apparent contraction in this case. As well, addition of
given factor. For example, if 5 mL of an 18.9 % NaCl solu- solute to an exact volume of water will change the vol-
tion is diluted tenfold (or 10X) with water, 45 mL water ume after dissolved. To account for this effect, volumet-
is added so that the final volume is 50 mL (tenfold or 10X ric glassware is used to bring mixed solutions up to a
greater than 5 mL) and the final concentration is 1.89 % final volume after initial mixing. When two liquids are
NaCl (tenfold or 10X less than 18.9 %). Conversely, an mixed, the first liquid is volumetrically transferred into
“X-fold concentration” means that the concentration of a a volumetric flask, and then the second liquid is added
sample increases (and typically the volume decreases) to volume, with intermittent swirling or vortexing to
by the stated factor. For example, if 90 mL of a 0.31 ppm mix the liquids as they are being combined. For mixing
16 A.P. Neilson et al.
solids into solvents, the chemicals are first placed in a “ultrapure” grades. The purity of these materials
volumetric flask, dissolved in a partial volume, and required in analytical chemistry varies with the type
then brought to exact volume with additional solvent. of analysis. The parameter being measured and the
sensitivity and specificity of the detection system are
1.5.6 Burets important factors in determining the purity of the
reagents required. Technical grade is useful for mak-
Burets are used to deliver definite volumes. The more
ing cleaning solutions, such as the nitric acid and
common types are usually of 25 or 50 ml capacity,
alcoholic potassium hydroxide solutions mentioned
graduated to tenths of a milliliter, and are provided
previously. For many analyses, analytical reagent
with stopcocks. For precise analytical methods in
grade is satisfactory. Other analyses, e.g., trace
microchemistry, microburets are also used. Microburets
organic and HPLC, frequently require special “ultra-
generally are of 5 or 10 ml capacity, graduated in hun-
pure” reagents and solvents. In methods for which
dredths of a milliliter division. General rules in regard
the purity of reagents is not specified, it is intended
to the manipulation of a buret are as follows:
that analytical reagent grade be used. Reagents of
1. Do not attempt to dry a buret that has been lesser purity than that specified by the method should
cleaned for use, but rather rinse it two or three not be used.
times with a small volume of the solution with There is some confusion as to the definition of the
which it is to be filled. terms analytical reagent grade, reagent grade, and
2. Do not allow alkaline solutions to stand in a buret, ACS analytical reagent grade. A review of the litera-
because the glass will be attacked, and the stop- ture and chemical supply catalogs indicates that the
cock, unless made of Teflon, will tend to freeze. three terms are synonymous. National Formulary
3. A 50 ml buret should not be emptied faster than (NF), US Pharmaceutical (USP), and Food Chemicals
0.7 ml per second; otherwise, too much liquid Codex (FCC) are grades of chemicals certified for use
will adhere to the walls; as the solution drains as food ingredients. It is important that only NF, USP,
down, the meniscus will gradually rise, giving a or FCC grades be used as food additives if the product
high false reading. is intended for consumption by humans, rather than
for chemical analysis.
It should be emphasized that improper use of
and/or reading of burets can result in serious calcula- 1.6.1 Acids
tion errors.
The concentration of common commercially available
acids is given in Table 1.8.
1.5.7 Cleaning of Glass and Porcelain
In the case of all apparatus for delivering liquids, 1.6.2 Distilled Water
the glass must be absolutely clean so that the film of
Distilled or demineralized water is used in the lab-
liquid never breaks at any point. Careful attention
oratory for dilution, preparation of reagent solu-
must be paid to this fact or the required amount of
tions, and final rinsing of washed glassware.
solution will not be delivered. The method of clean-
ing should be adapted to both the substances that
are to be removed and the determination to be per-
formed. Water-soluble substances are s imply 1. 8
Concentration of common commercial
washed out with hot or cold water, and the vessel is table strength acids
finally rinsed with successive small amounts of dis-
tilled water. Other substances more difficult to Molecular
remove, such as lipid residues or burned material, weight Concentration Specific
may require the use of a detergent, organic solvent, Acid (g/mol) (M) gravity
nitric acid, or aqua regia (25 % v/v conc. HNO3 in Acetic acid, glacial 60.05 17.4 1.05
conc. HCl). In all cases it is good practice to rinse a Formic acid 46.02 23.4 1.20
vessel with tap water as soon as possible after use. Hydriodic acid 127.9 7.57 1.70
Material allowed to dry on glassware is much more Hydrochloric acid 36.5 11.6 1.18
difficult to remove. Hydrofluoric acid 20.01 32.1 1.167
Hypophosphorous acid 66.0 9.47 1.25
Lactic acid 90.1 11.3 1.2
1.6 REAGENTS Nitric acid 63.02 15.99 1.42
Perchloric acid 100.5 11.65 1.67
Chemical reagents, solvents, and gases are available Phosphoric acid 98.0 14.7 1.70
Sulfuric acid 98.0 18.0 1.84
in a variety of grades of purity, including technical
Sulfurous acid 82.1 0.74 1.02
grade, analytical reagent grade, and various
Chapter 1 • Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures 17
Ordinary distilled water is usually not pure. It may 1.6.4 Carbon Dioxide-Free Water
be contaminated by dissolved gases and by materi-
Carbon dioxide (CO2) dissolved in water can interfere
als leached from the container in which it has been
with many chemical measurements. Thus, CO2-free
stored. Volatile organics distilled over from the orig-
water may need to be produced. CO2-free water may
inal source feed water may be present, and nonvola-
be prepared by boiling distilled water for 15 min and
tile impurities may occasionally be carried over by
cooling to room temperature. As an alternative, dis-
the steam, in the form of a spray. The concentration
tilled water may be vigorously aerated with a stream
of these contaminants is usually quite small, and
of inert gas (e.g., N2 or He2) for a period sufficient to
distilled water is used for many analyses without
achieve CO2 removal. The final pH of the water should
further purification. There are a variety of methods
lie between 6.2 and 7.2. It is not advisable to store CO2-
for purifying water, such as distillation, filtration,
free water for extended periods. To ensure that CO2-
and ion exchange. Distillation employs boiling of
free water remains that way, an ascarite trap should be
water and condensation of the resulting steam, to
fitted to the container such that air entering the con-
eliminate nonvolatile impurities (such as minerals).
tainer (as boiled water cools) is CO2-free. Ascarite is
Ion exchange employs cartridges packed with ionic
silica coated with NaOH, and it removes CO2 by the
residues (typically negatively charged) to remove
following reaction:
charged contaminants (typically positively charged
minerals) when water is passed through the car- 2NaOH + CO 2 ® Na 2 CO 3 + H 2 O
tridge. Finally, filtration and reverse osmosis remove
Ascarite should be sealed from air except when water
insoluble particulate matter above a specific size.
is being removed from the container.
1.6.3 Water Purity
1.6.5 Preparing Solutions and Reagents
Water purity has been defined in many different ways,
The accurate and reproducible preparation of labora-
but one generally accepted definition states that high
tory reagents is essential to good laboratory practice.
purity water is water that has been distilled and/or
Liquid reagents are prepared using volumetric glass-
deionized so that it will have a specific resistance of
ware (pipettes and flasks) as appropriate.
500,000 Ω (2.0 μΩ/cm conductivity) or greater. This defi-
To prepare solutions from solid reagents (such as
nition is satisfactory as a base to work from, but for more
sodium hydroxide):
critical requirements, the breakdown shown in Table 1.9
has been suggested to express degrees of purity. 1. Determine the amount of solid reagent needed.
Distilled water is usually produced in a steam- 2. Fill the TC volumetric flask ~ ¼–½ full with the
heated metal still. The feed water is (or should be) soft- solvent.
ened to remove calcium and magnesium to prevent 3. Add the solid reagent (it is best to pre-dissolve
scale (Ca or Mg carbonate) formation. Several compa- solids in a beaker with a small amount of liquid,
nies produce ion-exchange systems that use resin- and then add this to the flask; rinse the smaller
packed cartridges for producing “distilled water.” The beaker thoroughly and also put the rinses into
lifespan of an ion-exchange cartridge is very much a flask).
function of the mineral content of the feed water. Thus, 4. Swirl to mix until essentially dissolved.
the lifespan of the cartridge is greatly extended by using 5. Fill the flask to volume with the solvent.
distilled or reverse osmosis-treated water as the incom- 6. Cap and invert the flask ~10–20 times to com-
ing stream. This procedure can also be used for prepar- pletely mix the solution.
ing ultrapure water, especially if a low flow rate is used
and the ion-exchange cartridge is of “research” grade. Note that it is not appropriate to simply combine
the solid reagent with the final volume and assume
that the final volume does not change. This is particu-
larly true for high % concentrations. For example, 1 L
1. 9 of a 10 % aqueous NaOH solution is correctly made by
table
Classification of water purity filling a 1 L flask with ~25–500 mL water, adding 100 g
NaOH, mixing until dissolved, and diluting to 1 L. It
Maximum Approximate
conductivity concentration of
would be incorrect to simply combine 100 g NaOH
Degree of purity (μΩ /cm) electrolytes (mg/L) with 1 L water, as the dissolved solid will take up some
volume in solution. (Note that solid NaOH is difficult
Pure 10 2–5 to dissolve, requires a stir bar, and is exothermic,
Very pure 1 0.2–0.5 releasing heat upon dissolution; therefore, do not han-
Ultrapure 0.1 0.01–0.02
dle the glass with bare hands.) Additionally, if a stir
Theoretically pure 0.055 0.00
bar is used, make sure to remove this after the solution
18 A.P. Neilson et al.
is dissolved but BEFORE diluting to volume. Note that 2. Zeros before a decimal point with other preced-
sonication is preferred to using a stir bar in a volumet- ing digits are significant. With no preceding
ric flask. digit, a zero before the decimal point is not
The following similar procedures are used to pre- significant.
pare reagents from two or more liquids: 3. If there are no digits preceding a decimal point,
the zeros after the decimal point but preceding
1. Determine the total volume of the final reagent.
other digits are not significant. These zeros only
2. Obtain a TC volumetric flask (if possible) equal
indicate the position of the decimal point.
to the final volume.
4. Final zeros in a whole number may or may not
3. Use TD volumetric glassware to add the correct
be significant. In a conductivity measurement
amount of the liquids with the smallest
of 1000 μΩ/cm, there is no implication that the
volumes.
conductivity is 1000 ± 1 μΩ/cm. Rather, the
4. Dilute to volume with the liquid with the larg-
zeros only indicate the magnitude of the
est volume, gently swirling during addition.
number.
5. Cap and invert the flask ~10–20 times to com-
pletely mix the solution.
A good measure of the significance of one or more
zeros before or after another digit is to determine
Note that a TC volumetric flask should be used
whether the zeros can be dropped by expressing the
whenever possible to bring the solution to final vol-
number in exponential form. If they can, the zeros are
ume. For example, the correct way to prepare 1 L of a
not significant. For example, no zeros can be dropped
5 % ethanol in water solution is to use a 50 mL TD
when expressing a weight of 100.08 g is exponential
pipette to dispense 50 mL ethanol into a 1L TC flask
form; therefore the zeros are significant. However, a
and then fill the flask to volume with water. It would
weight of 0.0008 g can be expressed in exponential
be incorrect to simply combine 50 mL ethanol and
form as 8 × 10−4 g, and the zeros are not significant.
950 mL water, since complex physical properties gov-
Significant figures reflect the limits of the particular
ern the volume of a mixture of liquids, and it cannot be
method of analysis. If more significant figures are
assumed that two liquids of different densities and
needed, selection of another method will be required
polarities will combine to form a volume equal to the
to produce an increase in significant figures.
sum of their individual volumes. If the final volume is
Once the number of significant figures is estab-
not a commonly available TC flask size, then use TD
lished for a type of analysis, data resulting from such
glassware to deliver all reagents.
analyses are reduced according to the set rules for
The use of graduated cylinders and beakers
rounding off.
should be avoided for measuring volumes for reagent
preparation.
1.7.2 Rounding Off Numbers
Rounding off numbers is a necessary operation in all
1.7 DATA HANDLING AND REPORTING analytical areas. However, it is often applied in chemi-
cal calculations incorrectly by blind rule or prema-
1.7.1 Significant Figures turely and, in these instances, can seriously affect the
The term significant figure is used rather loosely to final results. Rounding off should normally be applied
describe some judgment of the number of reportable only as follows:
digits in a result. Often the judgment is not soundly 1. If the figure following those to be retained is
based and meaningful digits are lost or meaningless less than 5, the figure is dropped, and the
digits are accepted. Proper use of significant figures retained figures are kept unchanged. As an
gives an indication of the reliability of the analytical example, 11.443 is rounded off to 11.44.
method used. Thus, reported values should contain 2. If the figure following those to be retained is
only significant figures. A value is made up of signifi- greater than 5, the figure is dropped, and the
cant figures when it contains all digits known to be last retained figure is raised by 1. As an exam-
true and one last digit in doubt. For example, if a value ple, 11.446 is rounded off to 11.45.
is reported at 18.8 mg/l, the “18” must be a firm value, 3. When the figure following those to be retained
while the “0.8” is somewhat uncertain and may be is 5 and there are no figures other than zeros
between “0.7” or “0.9.” The number zero may or may beyond the 5, the figure is dropped, and the last
not be a significant figure: place figure retained is increased by 1 if it is an
1. Final zeros after a decimal point are always sig- odd number, or it is kept unchanged if an even
nificant figures. For example, 9.8 g to the near- number. As an example, 11.435 is rounded off to
est mg is reported as 9.800 g. 11.44, while 11.425 is rounded off to 11.42.
Chapter 1 • Laboratory Standard Operating Procedures 19
“Many voices there are in Nature’s choir, and none but were
good to hear
Had we mastered the laws of their music well, and could read
their meaning clear;
But we who can feel at Nature’s touch, cannot think as yet
with her thought;
And I only know that the sough of the pines with a spell of its
own is fraught.”
Music is a language—a species of soft, dreamy speech which
makes up for its lack of definiteness and precision by a beauty and
harmony which can best be described as divine. Indeed, the ancient
Greeks made music an all-inclusive term for the higher conceptions
of life. Dancing, poetry, and even science were supposed to be
under its sway, while the revolution of the heavenly bodies created
that “music of the spheres” which entertained the gods.
It would be better for mankind if this sentiment were more popular
today. It is a narrow notion which confines the idea of musical
harmony to the sounds produced by certain man-made instruments.
Art which is restricted to workings in oil may be very pleasing but it is
also very much limited. Music which is only interpreted on a violin or
a piano falls far short of its grandest possibilities. To certain minds,
the sighing of the wind through a Pine forest is more exquisitely
expressive than a hundred breath-blown symphonies. When men
cannot agree as to what is music among the sounds produced by
their self-created instruments, dare they lightly ignore the many
pleasing sounds which accompany the operations of Nature?
To an American ear, Chinese singing sounds like squealing and a
Fiji concert like a vociferous boiler factory. Yet a Chinaman or a Fiji
Islander will leave our grandest operatic efforts in disgust, though he
may be pleased with the preceding orchestral tunings. Where are we
to set the standard? Is it not safest to fall back on Nature for our
truest conceptions?
The real sublimity of Nature lies in her vocalism. A soundless
world would be greatly lacking in charm. The endearing noises of the
woods and the fields often become so familiar that we fail to notice
their individual merits. Yet they are there. Their sudden cessation
would leave a terrible and unbearable gap. The woods are filled with
gaily costumed feathered minstrels. The meadows are great emerald
stages of song and fancy. The very grass roots are filled with little
insect-fiddlers who chirp cheerfulness. Wind, water and rain all
furnish a grand and beautiful accompaniment.
Nature sings in the inharmonic scale, that is, a scale which takes
in all intervals. Between the piano notes “C” and “D” lies a great
space. They only represent halting points in the ascent of sound.
Just as in the spectrum there are a hundred variations of shade
between blue and green, so the cultivated human voice can hint at a
hundred intervals between “C” and “D”. Nature uses all the tiny
shades of sound there are, and certain humans have followed suit.
To the Arabians, water “lisps in a murmuring scale.”
Occasionally, Nature uses the diatonic scale familiar to our
western civilization. When the wind unites its vibrations into the long
shrill note we call the whistle, it is playing according to our musical
rules. Water, when falling perpendicularly from a great height also
gives forth a long, steady note. Even the rhythmical quality so
essential to good music is not lacking in such phenomena as rain
pattering on dry leaves. This sound has proved unusually appealing
to many people. The Mexicans sometimes attempt to imitate it by
means of clay rattles.
Not only does the countryside continually sing a great symphony,
but each region has its own acoustic properties. While large cities
maintain a discordant and incessant roar, the country is filled with
soft and pleasing voices. Birds, animals, water and wind give forth
quaint musings of the most soothing nature. Once in a while the
woods go on a musical jag and every instrument becomes
discordant. Under the influence of the bright moonlight, the
inhabitants of the South American jungles sometimes seem to go
mad. The hoarse roars of the Tiger mingle with the piercing shrieks
of Parrots and the shrill wailings of Monkeys, while the croaking of
Bull Frogs and the dismal hoot of Owls is deafening. Jaguars scream
as they chase Monkeys through the tree-tops.
The various members of the plant kingdom are the principal
instruments upon which the wind plays. Without the obstruction
offered by plants, trees, rocks, and houses, we should not hear the
wind at all. The trees, because of their size and exposed positions,
are most noted as plant-musicians, but the grasses and herbs are
also very susceptible to the caressings of the wind.
Who has not heard and gloried in the music of the Pines? The
sharp needles of these big conifers seem unusually fitted for esthetic
expression. They are the Aeolian harps of the woods. During a
storm, they sing in a mighty chorus of acclaim. At such a time, the
breaking of many small branches sounds like the snapping of
overstrained violin strings.
Almost any tree located on a cliff or on the edge of a mountain,
becomes a musician of the first order. It is apt to take on the
sorrowful tendencies of solitude. The weepings, wailings,
murmurings, groanings, sighs and whispers of the universe vibrate
through its branches. It would seem as if such a tree were trying to
express many mysterious wonders of which man has little
knowledge.
The trees are not altogether dependent upon their leaves for their
music. The barren branches of fall and winter sing in a most
attractive way. Their dry and discarded leaves litter the ground and
carry on crackly songs of their own, or sing as they play tag in whirls
of wind. The Elm is a pleasing autumn singer and the Willows, when
covered with ice, rattle their twigs like a minstrel’s bones. As the
winter wind hums around the Cottonwood Trees, it rocks the seed
balls in their natural cradles with a sighing, crooning sound. This is
the way the Tree sings to her babies! When the wind soughs through
a hollow tree, it produces a ghostly sound suggestive of a mourning
or dying person. A current of air rubbing two boughs together causes
a scrunching sound which sends the shivers up one’s back.
It is reasonable to believe that every tree and plant has its own
individual voice as set in motion by the wind. A Nature-lover does not
have much difficulty in distinguishing a great many. The desert Sage
whistles in the wind; the Cedar laughs in the storm; the air rustles
through a Wheat field; an agitated Sugar Cane or Corn field gives
forth a sound like tinkling glass. The noise produced by a high wind
in the Southern Smilax has been likened to a harp struck at random.
The bursting pods of the Witch Hazel pop gently and the seeds fall
among the dead leaves like so many buck shot; the Oxalis sends
forth its seed-babies with the crack of a pistol shot. Members of the
Bean family moan in the breeze like plaintive violins. The Squirting
Cucumber gurgles not unlike certain frogs. The Sunflower is a
professional drummer who rattles his seeds about in his pods. The
Rattlesnake Iris holds its seed-capsule in such a way that it gives an
excellent imitation of the warning noise of the reptile for which it is
named. Catalpa pods snap like horse-whips, but Cat-Tails sigh like
small reed instruments.
Early man gained more inspiration and pleasure from the music of
the plants than his wiser but more worldly successors. It is said that
the idea for the first flute was obtained by listening to the wind sigh
through the Reeds on the shore of a lake. The first stringed
instrument was probably a fibre accidentally stretched across a
hollow shell. The classic Aeolian harp consisted of a wooden frame
containing a thin sounding-board over which were stretched a
number of strips of cat-gut. If placed before a half-open window so
that an air current strikes it sideways, it gives forth a great volume of
harmonious notes in several octaves. This is a clear case of catching
the music of the wind. In a cruder, less harmonious way, the
Japanese glass tinklers of our day do the same thing. The humming
of telegraph wires and the strange chirping of a wireless instrument
are also a kind of singing.
All the plants are not expert musicians, which explains why they
often seek to make up for their own deficiencies by hiring numerous
birds and insects to make melody for them. These musicians are
employed in the truest sense of the word and receive their pay in
food, shelter and protection. In the air and on the ground, by day and
by night, they sing and fiddle for their hosts. The broad leaves of the
Water Lily (Victoria Regia) are veritable music schools of Frog
practice. Every voice from croaking bass to youthful tenor is heard!
Every tree has its Frogs and Birds—every bush and shrub
innumerable insect warblers.
The birds are the plants’ vocalists. Their songs and delightful
twitterings are among the most familiar things in Nature. The music
of the large body of insect-instrumentalists is carried on in such
obscure places, and often so far down among the very roots of the
plants, that a considerable investigation of their methods may not be
amiss. They are especially active after sundown.
The common Grasshoppers form a great corps of violinists. A
large vein on the inside of their thighs makes an ideal bow. It is
roughened not with resin but by a hundred minute spines. When this
vein is rubbed to and fro on the serrated veins of the insect’s wing-
cover, a shrill tone is produced. Sitting on its haunches, the
Grasshopper saws away with both hind legs at a great rate. The
interesting discovery has been made that the velocity of the strokes
increases with the temperature. Grasshoppers in large swarms emit
a low roar.
The Locust is a near relative of the Grasshopper. His music is
produced by scraping one wing across the other. The Cricket uses
the same method. When he is a house species, he fiddles in a
higher tone. The gold-green Muskback Beetle is an exquisite
violinist. His instrumental methods are most peculiar. His sharp
breast acts as a bow which he draws across a small group of veins
on his wing covers. The resulting music is so faint as to be almost
inaudible.
To Bees, Wasps, Hornets, Flies and Mosquitoes we may ascribe
reed instruments. They depend upon the rapid vibration of their tiny
wings to get their effects. The respiration openings distributed over
the body of a Bee, by giving resonance to the tone, aid in the
process and turn the whole insect’s body into a small clarionet. The
drowsy buzz of the honey-gatherer is only attained by swinging its
wings at the rate of four hundred vibrations a minute. People who
have good ears for music have observed that the ordinary Bee
drones his song out on G sharp. The House-Fly is credited with
singing at F with a preliminary grace note on E. Everyone is familiar
with the high thin plaint of the Mosquito.
There are many drummers in the insect orchestra. The Cicada
operates a small kettle drum. On the front of its body, a tough
membrane is stretched over a small cavity. When set in motion by a
special muscle, it gives out a surprisingly agreeable sound. The
Greeks enjoyed this music so well that they often caged the Cicada
much as they would a bird. In the hatching time of the seventeen-
year variety, the energetic drumming of thousands of the insects
rises into a scream which is far from melodious. Under such
conditions, the noise can be heard for half a mile. Travelers tell of a
giant South American species which produces a drumming which is
as loud as a locomotive whistle. An uncanny drummer is the “Death
Watch Beetle.” It uses its head for drumsticks and when in the wood
of furniture often plays a tattoo with considerable skill. Superstitious
people, for no apparent good reason, sometimes insist this is a
warning of impending death. Even the pretty little Butterfly on
occasion is a drummer. With hooks on its wings, it makes a sharp
crackle, not unlike one of the weird noises sometimes used by
human “traps.” Beetles play the bones.
The Bamboo Tree is sometimes the possessor of a whole corps of
intelligent and efficient drummers. They attach themselves to the
under side of the leaves, from which vantage-point they strike them
with their heads whenever their services are required. An Ant of the
Sumatran species keeps wonderful time. Though spread out over a
number of square yards of leaf space, a group of these tiny
creatures will start and stop tapping at the same instant.
Perhaps in some far-distant age, mankind will begin remotely to
understand the significance of the music of the plant world and its
allies. We have no right to say that the plants are not true musicians.
While we may only understand their system of harmony in part, we
can realize it contains hidden beauties just as the presence of
microscopic organisms in the world is indicated by their effects rather
than by actual perception.
CHAPTER IX
Science in the Plant World