Implementation of the Nigerian Civic Education Curriculum to

develop Effective Citizenship in Young Learners: Stakeholders

Perspectives

A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy

by

Samuel Olayinka Idowu B.Ed., M.Ed., LL.B., B.L

College of Business, Arts and Social Sciences,

Department of Education,

Brunel University, London

November, 2015

1
 Abstract

Independent Nigeria is confronted with a plethora of citizenship (socio-political) issues

and problems which various informal citizenship advocacy programmes have been unable
to resolve. Also, sundry formal school programmes like social studies curriculum used to
develop effective citizenship failed due to implementation lapses. This failure led to the
severing of citizenship issues from social studies to form a new subject called civic
education.

Thus, this research was conducted to appraise the effective implementation of the school
civic curriculum at the basic and senior secondary levels in Lagos and Ogun states, in the
south-western geo-political zone of Nigeria. Three sets of stakeholders who are key civic
curriculum implementers were selected as participants: twenty-nine teacher educators at
colleges and universities; two hundred and ninety-eight civic teachers and five hundred
and seventy learners at basic and senior secondary levels. Open and closed questionnaires
and focus group discussion were administered on these participants.

The study adopted an ethno-nationalistic, critical and global citizenship theoretical

framework to underpin the study. This was because the issue and activity based
curriculum objectives were to develop effective citizenship along nationalistic (political)
citizenship with the marginal intent of developing critical/global (apolitical) citizenship.

The study showed that classroom civic curriculum implementation focused more on
learners' knowledge constructions with less emphasis on developing skills and
dispositions due to inadequate school extracurricular programmes. In line with the
objectives, teachers focus more on political knowledge at the expense of
nongovernmental (apolitical) issues. The above findings were due to the inadequate
recruitment of civic teachers leading to personnel improvisation which entailed seconding
teachers lacking civic content knowledge and pedagogical skills to teach the subject.
Also, the study showed eclectic pedagogical classroom practices whereby teachers mixed
active (learner-based) pedagogies with didactic (teacher-based) teaching style to
implement classroom civic education. The study also found that focus on knowledge
construction and teacher-centred pedagogies reflected inadequate and/or irregular
training which resulted in civic teachers' self-empowerment to improve their content
knowledge and teaching skills. Teachers lacked mediation tools like textbooks and other
teaching aids to properly implement civic content in the classroom. Evidently,

i
implementation lapses that hindered social studies objectives are also a barrier to effective
implementation of civic education curriculum in our schools.

ii
 Dedication

This thesis is dedicated to:

The Almighty God who abided with me throughout this programme

My late Mother: Florence Ajoke Nurata Idowu

My wife: Olubukola and

My girls: Erioluwa and Inioluwa.

iii
 Declaration

I hereby declare that this Thesis is the result of my independent investigation, except
where I have indicated my indebtedness to other sources.

I hereby certify that this Thesis has not already been accepted in substance for any other
degree, nor is it being submitted concurrently for any other degree.

I hereby give consent for my Thesis, if accepted, to be available for photocopying and for
inter-library loan, and for the title and summary to be made available to outside
organisations.

Signature: …………………………………………………………………………
Samuel Olayinka Idowu (Candidate)

Date: ………20/2/17………

Signature: ………………………………………………………………………….
Dr Deborah Jones (Supervisor)

Date: ……22/2/17…………..

Signature:……………………………………………………...

Professor Paul Cooper (Supervisor)

Date: ……26/2/17…………..

iv
 Acknowledgements

The steadfast love of the LORD never ceaseth, HIS mercy never comes to an end. They
are new every morning, great is thy faithfulness O LORD (Lam 3:22-23).

Let us think of education as the means of developing our greatest abilities,

because in each of us there is a private hope and dream which, fulfilled, can be
translated into benefit for everyone. (John F. Kennedy Proclamation 3422 -
American Education Week, July 25, 1961

To God be the glory for the great miracles and wonders performed in this year of
miraculous completion of projects in the Redeemed Christian Church of God. Obviously
without the King of Kings and the Lord of Lords, it would have been impossible to
complete this thesis. He started the good work and completed it. I can now sing: "now
that the battle is over I am more than a conqueror".

I sincerely express my profound gratitude to my current supervisors; Dr Deborah Jones

(Reader in Education), Professors Paul Cooper and Ian Rivers for yielding to God’s
instructions and call to guide me when all hopes of completion were almost lost while
writing this thesis. Indeed, you are role models and a source of inspiration to me. My
PhD journey could have been mission impossible but for God's timely intervention using
the two of you to keep me going. Thus, my deepest gratitude to you both for this
uncommon advice, mentoring and support which restored hope, confidence and
motivation to complete the thesis. I remember feeling empowered and ready to go on after
my first visit to your office, Professor Cooper, and the next meeting with you and
Professor Rivers. Since then, I never looked back. Also, I appreciate the contributions of
Professor R. M. Brooks, Drs H. Dismore and H. Mendick my initial supervisors and also
Christine Preston who proof read this thesis to raise it to its current standard.

I wholeheartedly thank my wife Bukola, my girls, Eri and Ini for being there for me. You
all showed unbelievable resilience, patience and understanding when I was not there for
you. The love from God and you all kept me going, especially during the turbulent period
of uncertainty. My deepest gratitude goes to you my baby girls because you encouraged
me to always strive to reach for the best while giving me your steadfast and total support
and commitment. It is a rare privilege and great honour to have you all as my family. You
are the most patient, enduring and supportive family in the world.

v
I sincerely appreciate the constant prayers of my father Pastor L. O. Idowu, sister, S. O.
Oshiwusi; immeasurable and relentless support of my junior brothers Engr. O. A. Idowu,
Dr W. O. Idowu (Associate Professor) and especially M. O. Idowu (Germany).

I am indebted to Professors Tunde Samuel and Oguntoye, former Provosts, Michael

Otedola College of Primary Education, Noforija, Epe, Lagos state, Nigeria, and to
TECTFund, Nigeria, through whom I got the scholarship and study leave for this
programme. I also thank Professors S. F. Ogundare, B. Ogunyemi, and S. Ajiboye. Drs
E. Alademerin, Bolaji Stephen and F. Ojetunde. Also, I thank Messrs A. A. Adebayo, W.
Salau, O. A. Ogunlari, Jimoh Saaka and Oyibojaboh, P. O (MOCPED ICT centre) and
Mrs A Emanuel, T.O. Olabode, Onabajo for the diverse assistants throughout the PhD
programme.

I would like to thank all the lecturers, basic and senior secondary civic teachers and all
the students that voluntarily participated in this study. I am also grateful to Sam Efunbajo
and his wife, Fadeyi Akinjide, Muyiwa Adesanya, Kayode Ogunwale. I am particularly
grateful to the family of big Debo, Ronke, Victor and Elizabeth Ogunade, Austin and his
wife, Pastor Gbemiga whom the Lord used to provide shelter (accommodation) when I
was thrown out into the cold at the last minute of this PhD journey. I also thank Mrs
Okene, Olaonipekun Adeyemi, Sola Shodeinde-Adesina,

The word of God says: "And by a prophet the LORD brought Israel (Samuel Olayinka
Idowu) out of Egypt, and by a Prophet was He preserved" (Hosea 12:13). I am indebted
to Late Prophet Michael Olutayo Salawu (General Overseer, CAC Revival Centre
Worldwide), Prophet (Baba) Adesina, Prophets Olaoluwa Ibilola (Australia), Pastors
Samuel Adebola Gray, Olufemi Samuel Emanuel, Tobi Okunsanya, Tunde Longe, Segun
Ikusika, Olalekan Israel Ogooluwa and Prophetess Afolabi. God used you to open the
closed doors. I appreciate your immeasurable spiritual contributions to my life and the
successful completion of this programme.

vi
 Table of Contents
Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... i
Dedication ............................................................................................................................... iii
Declaration .............................................................................................................................. iv
Acknowledgements.................................................................................................................. v
List of Tables ......................................................................................................................... xiii
List of Figures .........................................................................................................................xiv
List of Abbreviations ..............................................................................................................xiv
Chapter 1................................................................................................................................ 15
1.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 15
1.1 Background to the study .................................................................................................. 16
1.1:2 The Way Out: ................................................................................................................ 17
1.1:2(a) Informal citizenship advocacy programmes ............................................................. 17
1.1:2(b) Social Studies to Civic Education .............................................................................. 18
1.1:3 Civic Education Curriculum Programme ....................................................................... 19
1.2 Research Questions ......................................................................................................... 20
1.3 Research process ............................................................................................................. 21
1.4 Outline of Thesis .............................................................................................................. 22
Chapter Two: Literature Review ............................................................................................ 23
2.0 Theoretical Setting on Civic Education Classroom Implementation ................................ 23
2.1 Civic Education ................................................................................................................. 23
2.2 Social Studies Education and Civic Education .................................................................. 23
2.2:1 Social Studies Education ............................................................................................... 24
2.2:2 Civic Education: Origin, Definitions, rationale and impacts.......................................... 25
2.2:2(a) Origin and Definition of Civic Education ................................................................... 25
2.2:2(b) Rationale for Civic Education.................................................................................... 26
2.2:2(c) Civic Education Impacts on Effective Citizenship Components ................................ 27
2.2:2(c) i Civic Knowledge Impact .......................................................................................... 28
2.2:2(c) ii Civic Disposition Impacts ....................................................................................... 28
2.2:2(c) iii Impact of Civic Skills (Participation/Engagement) ................................................ 29
2.2:2(c) iv Relationship between Civic Knowledge and Civic Participation ........................... 30
2.3 Citizenship and Citizenship Theories................................................................................ 31
2.3:1 Citizenship Conceptualisations ..................................................................................... 31
2.3:2 Citizenship Theories ...................................................................................................... 33
2.3:2(a) Ethno-nationalistic (Citizenship) Initiation Theory ................................................... 34

vii
2.3:2(b) Critical (Citizenship) Reformation Theory ................................................................ 35
2.3:2(c) Global (post-national) Citizenship Theory ................................................................ 36
2.3:2(d) Inequality/Stratification roles of schools ................................................................. 37
2.4 Effective Citizenship Development .................................................................................. 38
2.4:1 Political (ethno-nationalistic) Citizenship ..................................................................... 38
2.4:2 Nongovernmental (Critical/Global) Citizenship ............................................................ 38
2.4:3 Holistic Integration Approach and Effective Citizenship Development ........................ 39
2.4:3(a) Effective citizenship Conceptualised ........................................................................ 39
2.4:3(b) Rationale for Holistic Integration Approach............................................................. 39
2.5 Civic Education Pedagogical Theories .............................................................................. 42
2.5:1 Social Constructivist Theory .......................................................................................... 42
2.5:1(a) Socio-Cultural Learning............................................................................................. 43
2.5:1(a) i Collaborative learning ............................................................................................. 43
2.5:1(a) ii Teacher scaffolding ................................................................................................ 43
2.5:1(a) iii Mediation tools ..................................................................................................... 44
2.5:2 Transformative learning theory .................................................................................... 45
2.5:3 Reflective inquiry Perspective....................................................................................... 45
2.6 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 46
Chapter Three: ....................................................................................................................... 48
Nigeria's Educational Policy and Programme Implementation in Perspectives .................... 48
3.0 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 48
3.1 Nigeria's Political Developments ..................................................................................... 48
3.2 Nigeria's Educational Policy and Programme in Perspectives ......................................... 49
3.2:1 Conceptualising and Developing Education Policy and Programmes........................... 50
3.2:2 Nigeria's Education System and Policy Reforms ........................................................... 50
3.2:2(a) Traditional Education ............................................................................................... 51
3.2:2(b) Islamic Education...................................................................................................... 51
3.2:2(c) Pre-independent (Colonial) Education ..................................................................... 52
3.2:2(d) Post-independent (indigenous) Educational Trends ................................................ 53
3.2:3 Problems of Education Policies in Nigeria .................................................................... 55
3.2:3(a) Over-politicisation of Education ............................................................................... 55
3.2:3(b) Stakeholders' non-involvement in curriculum reforms ........................................... 56
3.2:3(c) Curriculum Implementation Lapses .......................................................................... 57
3.3 Nigeria's Policy/Programme Documents' Implementation: the stance Literature ......... 58
3.3:1 Civic Education Policy Documents Perspectives ........................................................... 59

viii
3.3:2(a) Conceptualising Civic Education Objectives ............................................................. 59
3.3:2(b) Policy/Programme Documents and Literature on Civic Education Objectives ........ 60
3.3:3 School Resources .......................................................................................................... 61
3.3:3(a) Policy Document on (Human Resources) Civic Teachers’ Recruitment ................... 61
3.3:3(a) i Human Resources - Availability/Recruitment of Teachers ..................................... 62
3.3:3(a) ii Personnel Improvisation ........................................................................................ 63
3.3:3(b) Teachers’ Continuous Professional Development ................................................... 64
3.3:3(b) i Self/Group-Directed Professional Development ................................................... 67
3.3:3(c) Instructional Materials/Resources............................................................................ 68
3.3:3(c) i Provision of Text books and Other Instructional Materials .................................... 69
3.3:3(c) ii Self - published text ............................................................................................... 70
3.3:3(c) iii Other instructional materials ................................................................................ 70
3.4 Classroom pedagogical practices ..................................................................................... 71
3.4:1 Traditional teacher-based Pedagogy ............................................................................ 72
3.4:2 Participatory/Interactive Pedagogy .............................................................................. 73
3.5 Civic (Education) Curriculum Implementation ................................................................. 74
3.5:1 Conceptualising Civic Education Curriculum................................................................. 74
3.5:2 Civic Curriculum Implementation in Nigeria ................................................................. 75
3.5:3 Civic Education Curriculum as a School Subject in Nigeria ........................................... 76
3.5:4 Objectives of Civic Education ........................................................................................ 78
3.5:5 Civic Education Curriculum Content ............................................................................. 78
3.6 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................ 79
Chapter Four:
Research Methodology .......................................................................................................... 80
4.0 The Introduction .............................................................................................................. 80
4.1 Epistemological Stance: Social Constructionism or Social Constructivism ...................... 80
4.2 Research Design ............................................................................................................... 90
4.3 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Typologies.......................................................... 91
4.3:1 Multimethod Research Design ..................................................................................... 92
4.3:2 Multimethod Concurrent and Sequential Explanatory Design ..................................... 94
4.3:3 Triangulations ............................................................................................................... 95
4.3:4 Limitations of Triangulations ........................................................................................ 97
4.4 Quantitative (Survey) Research ....................................................................................... 98
4.5 Variables in the Quantitative Analysis ............................................................................. 99
4.6 Choosing the Population ................................................................................................ 100

ix
4.6:1 Sample and sampling procedure ................................................................................ 101
4.7 Research Instruments .................................................................................................... 103
4.8 Validity, Reliability and Pilot Study ................................................................................ 105
4.9 Data Collection ............................................................................................................... 107
4.10 Quantitative Data Analysis ........................................................................................... 109
4.11 Qualitative Data Collection Process ............................................................................. 111
4.11:1 Focus Group Discussions........................................................................................... 111
4.11:2 Sampling Strategies................................................................................................... 111
4.11:3 Participants ............................................................................................................... 112
4.11:4 Procedures for Data Collection ................................................................................. 114
4.11:5 Preparation and Issues for Discussion ...................................................................... 114
4.11:6 Focus Group Discussions Trustworthiness................................................................ 116
4.11:7 Problems and Limitations of Focus Group Discussion .............................................. 120
4.12 Thematic Analysis ........................................................................................................ 121
4.13 The Roles of Research Assistants within the Study Context ........................................ 122
4.14 Ethical issues and considerations ................................................................................ 124
4.15 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 126
Chapter Five ......................................................................................................................... 127
Perceived Civic Programme Objectives Knowledge Emphasis ............................................ 127
5.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 127
5.1. Civic objectives over emphasising civic knowledge construction................................. 128
5.1:1 Civic Objectives’ undue emphasis on knowledge (cognitive domain) components... 128
5.1:2 Civic Objectives emphasising political (political) citizenship knowledge.................... 130
5.1:3(a) Emphasis on dispositions and participatory skills .................................................. 132
5.1:3(b) Symbiotic Links among Citizenship Components ................................................... 133
5.1:3(c) Participating in nongovernmental citizenship ........................................................ 134
5.2 Contending Implementation Issues within the school system ...................................... 135
5.3 Civic content classroom implementation impact on knowledge transmission ............. 137
5.3:1 Transmitting political citizenship knowledge ............................................................. 137
5.3:2 Problem of transmitting political citizenship knowledge ........................................... 140
5.4 Perceived Civic Content Impact on nongovernmental Citizenship ................................ 142
5.4:1 Critical citizenship via intellectual and participatory activities................................... 142
5.4:2 Developing nongovernmental Citizenship through Experiential Learning ................. 146
5.5 Demographic/Control Variables’ Test of Significance ................................................... 150
5.6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 151

x
Chapter 6.............................................................................................................................. 153
Perceived School Resources Implementation Impact ......................................................... 153
6.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 153
6.2 Civic Education Teachers' Recruitment and Improvisation ........................................... 154
6.2:1 Problem of Recruiting Qualified Civic Education Teachers......................................... 154
6.2:2 Improvisations as a Stopgap Measure ........................................................................ 158
6.2:3 Ineffective civic teaching as an aftermath of Personnel ............................................. 161
6.2:3(a) Teachers’ Excess workload ..................................................................................... 161
6.2:3(b) Large Civic Classroom Size ...................................................................................... 162
6.3 Relevant insights on civic education curriculum............................................................ 165
6.3:1 Civic teachers’ dearth of curriculum insights.............................................................. 165
6.3:2 Initiating curriculum insights within a deprived professional environment............... 169
6.3:2(a) Group (Initiated) professional development .......................................................... 170
6.3:2(b) Individually (Initiated) Professional Development ................................................. 170
6.3:3 Perceived In-Service Training Impact.......................................................................... 171
6.4 Mediating learning through Instructional Material: ...................................................... 176
6.4:1 Quality of civic textbooks ............................................................................................ 176
6.4:2 Adequate Civic Textbooks Provisions ......................................................................... 177
6.4:3 Perceived alternative access to Civic Textbooks......................................................... 179
6.4:4 Perceived provision of other instructional Materials ................................................. 181
6.5 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 183
Classroom Pedagogical Practices Impacts ........................................................................... 184
7.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 184
7.1:1 Perceived Impact of Open Classroom Discussion as a Pedagogical Tool.................... 187
7.1:2 Perceived Impact of Dramatisation as a Pedagogical Tool ......................................... 189
7.1:3 Perceived Impact of Game Simulation as a Pedagogical Tool .................................... 190
7.2 Perceived impracticability of interactive classroom pedagogical tools ......................... 193
7.2:1 Civic Teachers directed (Leading) classroom discussion ............................................ 193
7.2:1(a) Who leads Classroom Discussion (LCD)? ................................................................ 194
7.2:1(b) Classroom Group Discussion (CGD) ........................................................................ 197
7.3 Constraints on the non-usage of active participatory/interactive pedagogies ............. 201
7.3:1 Problem of School Timetable ...................................................................................... 202
7.3:2 Rowdy/Disorderly Civic Classroom ............................................................................. 202
7.3:3 Learners Lacking Interest in Active Pedagogical Classroom Participation.................. 203
7.4 Developing Effective Citizenship through the Interactive Learning Theories................ 204

xi
7.5 Active Pedagogical Practices and Test of Significant Difference ................................... 205
7.5:1 Participants (Civic Teachers/ Learners) and Active Pedagogical Practices ................. 206
7.5:2 Participants’ School Location and Active Pedagogical Practices ................................ 206
7.5:3 Participants’ Gender and Active Pedagogical Practices .............................................. 207
7.5:4 Teachers’ Years of Teaching Experience and Active Pedagogical Practices ............... 208
7.6 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 209
Chapter 8:............................................................................................................................. 211
Strengths, Limitations, Recommendations and Conclusions ............................................... 211
8.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 211
8.1 Synopsis (Overview) of the Study .................................................................................. 211
8.2 Summary of the Findings ............................................................................................... 212
8.3 Implications of Research Findings .................................................................................. 215
8.4 Implication for policy and practice ................................................................................ 218
8.5 Research contributions .................................................................................................. 219
8.6 Theoretical Contribution ................................................................................................ 221
8.7 Limitations and Strengths .............................................................................................. 222
8.7:1 Limitations .................................................................................................................. 222
8.7:2 Strengths ..................................................................................................................... 224
8.8 Recommendations ......................................................................................................... 225
8.9 Suggestions for further research ................................................................................... 226
8.10 Conclusion .................................................................................................................... 226
References ........................................................................................................................... 228
Appendices........................................................................................................................... 281

xii
 List of Tables

Table 1 Summary of the Various Aspects of the Research Methodology and the
Research Timeline: May 2012 to February 2013 ............................................................ 90
Table 2 on the Relationship between the Research Questions, Variables and
Questionnaires ................................................................................................................. 98
Table 3 Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of Instruments ................................................... 105
Table 4 Participants for the Pilot Study ........................................................................ 106
Table 5 Breakdown of Participants for the Focus Groups in two States ...................... 113
Table 6 a-c shows civic experts’ perceived appropriate/most appropriate civic objectives
to develop civic knowledge, dispositions and participatory skills ................................ 129
Table 7 showing Perceived Civic Curriculum Content Impacts on Political Citizenship
Knowledge .................................................................................................................... 138
Table 8 showing Perceived Civic Curriculum Content Impacts on Nongovernmental
(Community) Citizenship Issues ................................................................................... 144
Table 9 shows the Test of Significant on young learners’ civic curriculum knowledge
....................................................................................................................................... 150
Table 10 Recruitment of Qualified Civic Teachers ...................................................... 157
Table 11 Regularity of in-service training for civic education teachers ...................... 164
Table 12 In Service Training Content Impacts ............................................................. 168
Table 13 Impacts of In-Service Training ...................................................................... 172
Table 14 Quality of civic textbooks .............................................................................. 175
Table 15 Adequacy of Civic textbooks ......................................................................... 178
Table 16 Perceived provision of other instructional Materials ..................................... 182
Table 17 Showing Acceptable and Popular Active Classroom Pedagogies ................. 186
Table 18 Impracticable Active Classroom Pedagogies ................................................. 199
Table 19 shows the Test of Significant on participants’ perceptions of active
pedagogical practices .................................................................................................... 206
Table 20 Test of Significant on school locations and active pedagogical practices .... 206
Table 21 Test of significant on gender’s perceptions of active pedagogies ................. 208
Table 22 Teachers’ Years of Teaching Experience and Active Pedagogies ................. 208

xiii
 List of Figures

Figure 1 Recruitment of Qualified Civic Teachers .... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Figure 2 Regularity of in-service training for civic education teachersError! Bookmark
not defined.
Figure 3 Content of Professional (In Service Training) Development of TeachersError!
Bookmark not defined.
Figure 4 Impacts of in-service training ...................... Error! Bookmark not defined.
Figure 5 Quality of civic textbooks............................ Error! Bookmark not defined.
Figure 6 Adequacy of instructional (Text) material ................................................. 178
Figure 7 Perceived provision of Other Instructional Materials . Error! Bookmark not
defined.
Figure 8 Acceptable and Popular Active Classroom Pedagogies ............................ 186
Figure 9 Impracticable Active Classroom Pedagogies ............................................ 199
Figure 10 Teaching Experience and Active Pedagogies .......................................... 209

List of Abbreviations

CEQ- Civic Experts Questionnaire

CGD- Classroom Group Discussion
CLQ- Civic Learners’ Questionnaire
CTQ- Civic Teacher’s Questionnaire
DV- Dependent Variable
ECD- Effective Citizenship Development
IV- Independent Variable
LCD- Leading Classroom Discussion
NGC - Nongovernment Citizenship
OCD- Open Classroom Discussion
PC - Political Citizenship
PPP - Classroom Pedagogical Practices
PSR - School Resources

xiv
 Chapter 1

1.0 Introduction

This chapter starts with a synopsis of Nigeria to familiarise non-Nigerian readers with
basic facts on the study location in order to offer better insight on issues discussed in the
thesis. The Federal Republic of Nigeria is a 'multinational state,' consisting of about two
hundred and fifty ethnic nationalities with Hausa-Fulani, Igbo and Yoruba as the main
groups. Nigeria, as the world’s thirty-second largest country, is sited on the West African
Gulf of Guinea and equals the size of Venezuela, is nearly twice the state of California
and one-third of Western Australia (Omolade, 2006; Williams, 2008; Sofadekan, 2012;
Bolaji, 2014).

As a boy, I learnt that the name 'Nigeria' was given by Flora Shaw- the wife of Lord
Lugard, the then Governor-General. Nigeria was derived from two words, 'Niger’ and
‘area' implying the geographical land and people around the area of the river Niger (Meek,
1960). Geographically, Nigeria is situated alongside the West African coast, and is
enclosed to the north by the Republics of Chad and Niger, to the west by Benin Republic,
to the east by Cameroon and to the south by the Atlantic Ocean. Demographically, it is
the most populous Black nation in the world with an estimated population of over
168,000,000 people occupying a land mass of 923,768 square kilometres (NPC, 2012;
World Bank, 2013). As a former British colony, English is the official lingua franca to
communicate in government and education inter alia. The populace contains a large
number of Muslims and Christians while a small minority practise African traditional
religion.

Despite gaining political independence in 1960, this multinational state still faces a
plethora of citizenship (socio-political) issues hindering nation building and national
development. These issues include grasping the reality of its nationhood and not just a
mere geographical expression (Awolowo, 1947), or a gathering of tribes (Soyinka, 1963
in Anyaoku, 2011) or a casual, denigrated mechanism amalgamated by the Niger Delta
crude oil, and a seeking of a common, national identity (Osundare, 2011). Also,
appointing political officeholders based on zoning rather than merit deprived competent
citizens the chance to exhibit patriotic zeal through public and political service. Besides,
ethnic affiliation and loyalty permeate all parts of our national life. These and other issues

15
discussed below led to nurturing democratic spectators instead of active players able and
willing to engage in our polity (Ehrlich, 2000).
In tackling these issues, past governments initiated informal citizenship advocacy
programmes and formal school programmes such as integrated social studies and civic
education via educational reforms. Albeit these citizenship advocacy programmes are
briefly examined below, nevertheless, this study's main focus is whether implementation
of these school programmes achieved their purposes.

I examine this because generally, implementation is an issue militating against attaining

policy and programme goals in Nigeria. In fact, the1955 free primary education in
Western region and national universal primary education in 1976 and also 1982 6-3-3-4
reforms failed due to implementation lapses. Specifically, the inept style of implementing
school programmes like social studies was why the subject failed to turn its objectives
into practical realities in learners. The perceived failure of social studies led to reviewing
its curriculum under a new reform called Universal Basic Education. A major outcome
of the review was disarticulating the citizenship content to become a distinct subject
curriculum called Civic Education. This subject was initiated to focus mainly on
stimulating and reforming learners' socio-political knowledge, disposition and skills in
accordance with a national philosophy of sound and effective citizenship. Therefore, as a
teacher educator, I explore the impacts of translating civic programme intents into
classroom implementation to develop learners’ citizenship knowledge, dispositions and
skills.

1.1 Background to the study

This section expounds on the underlying citizenship issues raised above and the inability
of diverse informal and formal programmes implemented up till 1999 failed to address
the issues. I argue that the 1999 government rethink on how best to develop sound and
effective citizenship led to initiating civic education to mediate a civic mission in schools.

1.1:1 Citizenship issues/problems within Nigeria’s context

As stated above, fifty-five years after political independence Nigeria has been unable to
achieve sustainable nation building and development. This is due to issues such as ethnic
polarisation, long years of military rule and low levels of civic dispositions among other
factors.

16
Studies reveal that coercing diverse ethnic-nationalities into a federation called Nigeria
led to ethnocentrism, polarisation and ongoing insurgency. Both majority and minority
ethnic nationalities have been agitating for some degree of autonomy thus creating a set
of centrifugal forces which constitute a major barrier to the continuous corporate
existence of Nigeria as a unified nation (NERC, 1983 in Okam et al, 2011). In fact, a
comparative study of ethnic affinities among African students showed Nigerian students
identified more with their ethnic nationalities than students of other countries. Also, a
former Education Minister (a Professor of political science) warned that Nigeria could
lose its sense of nationhood due to the constant focus on ethnic affinity (Klieberg &
Zavalloni in Okam, 2001; Okam, et al, 2011; Adeniran, 2009 in Jekayinfa et al, 2011).
This implies an inability to develop a feeling of national identity, pride and unity ensuing
from perpetual inter-ethnic and religious insurgency and secession threats.

Unending inter-ethnic and religious insurgency and secession threats, intolerance of

political oppositions leading to imprisonment and assassination, non‐credible and
contentious elections, among others led to military incursion into political governance.
Scholars claim that military rule via coups d’etat caused the demise of the democratic
system and citizenship ethos in the then newly independent Nigeria with the conviction
that such military intervention will address above stated national issues. But, as will be
discussed in Chapter 3, 26 years of military rule created adverse impacts instead of the
expected positive changes on citizenship development (Aluko, 1998; Falade, 2007). Such
negative impacts included a lack of civic values, corruption, avoidance of civic duties,
disobeying laws, human rights abuse, dishonest acts in governance, cultism and
examination malpractices in our citadels of learning. Also, there was apathy and decline
in citizenship commitment depicting citizens as passive, naïve and blithe to public affairs
(Eya, 2003, Iyamu & Otole, 2003; Bello-Imam & Obadan, 2004; Falade, 2007).

1.1:2 The Way Out:

1.1:2(a) Informal citizenship advocacy programmes

Addressing the issues mentioned above and to instil national consciousness, integration,
identity and values, led to successive military and democratic governments evolving
different citizenship advocacy programmes as solutions. These programmes involved the
Jaji Declaration (1977), Ethical Revolution and establishing a Centre for Democratic
Studies (1982-83), ‘War Against Indiscipline (WAI) (1984-85)’, Mass Mobilization for

17
Social and Economic Recovery (MAMSER) 1986-93, ‘War Against Indiscipline and
Corruption (WAIC)’ (1994-99)’ and ‘national rebirth (1999-2007). Though these
programmes were novel initiatives which involved all socialising agents with an intent to
entrench in, and adequately equip citizens with anticipated effective civic and citizenship
culture, the programmes failed because they ended with the administration that initiated
them as well as using indoctrination, coercion and propaganda as a means of enforcing
obedience. Considering the magnitude of citizenship issues, coercion and government
media propaganda were unsuitable methods to use to develop a new civic culture. Even
the political bureau set up in 1987 identified the exposure of Nigerians to deceptions,
manipulations and propaganda leading to low levels of citizenship literacy or even
perpetual ignorance on crucial national issues by the political class (Gana, 1987; Falade,
2007).

1.1:2(b) Social Studies to Civic Education

Simultaneously with the above advocacy programmes, the government still believed in
the efficacy of formal education as a veritable mechanism to achieve reform objectives
(Etzioni, 1993; National Policy on Education, 2004). Such reforms involved
implementing formal curriculum to mediate socio-political initiation and transformation.
That is, using the schools to bring about citizenship (socio-political) initiation and
reformation of society despite the fact that schools also perpetuate socio-political
stratification and inequalities leading to imbalance in society. As discussed in Chapter 2,
realising the former roles led to introducing social studies as a multi/interdisciplinary
school subject which studies man in his diverse environments. Social studies was initiated
with the intent to guide learners to construct knowledge, develop dispositions and skills
about man in his diverse settings from an integrated view (Okobiah, 1985; United States
National Council on Social Studies, 1992; Muyanda-Mutebi, 1994; Ogunyemi, 2011).

Fifty-two years of teaching the subject could still not attain effective citizenship goals as
evidenced in persistent ethnic affinity, corruption, etc. Though its failure was attributed
to the unwieldy scope which makes the school and classroom implementation process
difficult, the actual failure could be due to a false hope that schools could clear up a
societal mess yet, it would be naive to overlook a poor implementation process as a
contributory factor to the inability to actualise curriculum content (Adesina, 1986;
Omoyale, 1998; Fafunwa, 2004; Bolaji, 2014).

18
As discussed in Chapter 3, poor implementation involved using inexpert teachers who
use didactic pedagogies to focus on knowledge attainment while ignoring dispositions
and skills domains (SaliaBao, 1981; Okam, 2005). It also involved inadequate provision
of instructional materials as well as irregular or lack of continuous professional
development on the epistemology and ontology inherent in the subject curriculum
(Mezieobi, 1993; Okam, 1996; Lat, 1998). From studies, less than 20% of teachers used
analytical methods in the instructional content delivery. In actual fact, most classroom
implementation process lacked interactive or participatory pedagogies like open climate,
leading discussion, group presentations, dramatisation, role-play, simulation, critical
thinking and problem-solving (Okam, 2002; Ogunyemi, 2005; Akyeampong, 2009;
Hardman et al, 2010). This showed the social studies teaching has been ineffective thus
leading to perpetual growth of social disorder, decline in young peoples' civic and
political insights, literacy and skills. Thus, there is a lacuna in literacy and grasp of
Nigeria's political system and institutions (Mansaray & Ajiboye, 2000; Ajiboye, 2002;
Kerr et al, 2002; Zaman, 2006; Falade, 2007).

Instead of the failure of social studies to develop effective citizenship resulting in critical,
systematic and prudent situational analysis to address implementation lapses, its unwieldy
scope, which makes it pay less attention to citizenship issues was used as the reason for
a presidential fiat to disarticulate citizenship content, thus making social studies a victim
of constant curriculum illiteracy and over-politicisation of education as will be discussed
in Chapter 3 (Kosemani, 1984; Ogunyemi, 2006, 2009; Obebe, 2007; NERDC, 2007).

1.1:3 Civic Education Curriculum Programme

From the above, the failure of social studies necessitated a review of the totality of civic
learning experiences young learners required via classroom implementation in the
teaching and learning of citizenship issues. This review integrated abstract and practical
extra and co-curricular activities in consonance with current global realities. Accordingly,
the review resulted in initiating activity and issues based separate civic subject objectives
and content as will be discussed in Chapter 3. The new civic objectives and content
designed by the state, as the sole definer of citizenship goals, gave more attention to
nationalistic values like civic duties and participation which requires absolute national
loyalty, identity, integration and obedience to state values. Its focus is on citizen rights
and autonomy, yet not the right to question loyalty or patriotism and be critical of state
policies as will be discussed in Chapter 2.

19
Successfully implementing this citizenship content as designed in the curriculum to
achieve civic objectives in the school requires adequate school resources and relevant
pedagogies. The impacts of these implementation indices on civic content learning are
hardly explored in most extant studies. Instead, focii of these studies (ICSS/IEA)
underline external sociological and demographic factors which constantly report the
deviation and disparity in young learners’ civic learning. Although demographic factors
can be vital to both policymakers and classroom teachers because such information offers
better understanding of the learners, the impact of adequate school resources coupled with
effective pedagogy to assess implementation of civic learning should also be a crucial
area of study as stated by Peterson:

I believe we need different kinds of research–quantitative and/(or) qualitative...

classroom focused and teacher driven as well as researcher driven. I think we can
best do this by developing a research...for civic learning...teaching practices and
their influence on learning. This element is missing from the ICCS study. ... We
want to know what educational practices make a difference in...our students –
what helps them to learn to the best of their ability (Peterson, 2010 quoted in
Kennedy, 2010).
To understand the impact of civic curriculum content on effective citizenship
development, I explored whether: university/colleges of education lecturers perceived
civic objectives as appropriate, what civic teachers think about school resources
provided,which pedagogies are practiced during classroom implementation and how
learners perceived civic content impacts on their citizenship development. Hence, I
explored how civic programme objectives translate into classroom implementation both
in teaching and learning using the curriculum content to guide learners construct
knowledge, develop dispositions and skills to analyse national issues and problems which
impact upon their daily lives as Nigerians.

A realistic and constructive look at the findings and suggestions of this study by
curriculum planners and developers and policy makers could guide in enriching civic
curriculum programmes in order to meet the desires of our founding fathers regarding the
national goal of developing sound and effective citizenship. Also, I expect that this study
could evoke more research on attaining civic education programme objectives.

1.2 Research Questions

Civic values are deteriorating among young learners in the Nigerian society due to the
school curriculum not implemented with conscious efforts to help young learners

20
construct knowledge and develop dispositions on civic issues. Although the school,
through the civic curriculum, performs a crucial function it is obviously not the only
agency for socio-political development. Though this study focuses on the school
implementation of civic curriculum, it should not be construed as isolating the school and
the civic curriculum as the main agency for mediating civic participation in Nigeria.

Thus, civic education is needed in our educational institutions to develop civic

dispositions and skills essential to functioning, effective citizens ready and willing to
contribute meaningfully to the political process. Therefore, the study assessed whether
civic curriculum content could offer young learners appropriate and relevant civic and
citizenship knowledge, dispositions and skills to solve problems and make decisions
regarding the national citizenship (socio-political) issues and problems adversely
affecting our country. Hence the overarching question for this study is: “What is the
impact of the school and classroom implementation process of civic curriculum content
on developing effective citizenship in Lagos and Ogun states, Nigeria presently?” To
answer this, I explore the following research questions:
1a. Do civic experts perceive civic curriculum intents (objectives) as appropriate to
construct civic knowledge, develop dispositions and skills in young learners?
1b Do young learners perceive that civic curriculum content impacts on their civic
knowledge, dispositions and skills development? (Chapter 5)
2. Do civic teachers perceive school resources as adequate to develop civic knowledge,
dispositions and skills in young learners? (Chapter 6)
3. Which classroom pedagogies do civic teachers employ to develop civic knowledge,
dispositions and skills in young learners? (Chapter 7)

1.3 Research process

I engaged firstly in sequential exploratory research in which a questionnaire survey

(quantitative) was administered and later focus group discussions (qualitative) were
organised independently to underpin survey data. Through this I give detailed information
on issues which a survey alone could not offer on stakeholders' perceived civic objectives
aptness and classroom civic content implementation impacts on developing knowledge,
dispositions and skills. To attain this, I divided the study into three phases which involved
(a) administering an open and closed questionnaire to lecturers teaching socio-political
(citizenship) related courses in universities and colleges of education in Nigeria to assess
whether civic programme objectives are knowledge, dispositions and skills based. I

21
analysed the data gathered statistically and thematically. Also, I administered a
questionnaire to civic teachers and later organised focus group discussions for them for
in-depth explanations of issues on recruitment, training and instructional materials for
civic content classroom implementation. The third level involved a young learners'
questionnaire and focus group on civic content impact and possible classroom
implementation issues on pedagogies and instructional materials availability.

1.4 Outline of Thesis

This thesis comprises eight chapters. Chapter 1 discusses background issues and problems
leading to the re-introduction of civic education curriculum and its impacts on young
learners. Also, I examine the research process and delineate the thesis chapters. Chapter
2, offers theoretical framework which involved adapting and integrating various
citizenship models to develop effective citizenship theories related to my study. From
these theories, I define effective citizenship and examined civic pedagogical practices
underpinning classroom civic implementation. Chapter 3, examines literature from the
Nigerian perspective by first acquainting readers with the country of my research setting.
Also, I examine relevant academic literature relating to the Nigerian education system,
curriculum implementation and civic education curriculum objectives and content.
Moreover, I consider extant studies on civic objectives, school resources and pedagogical
practices. In Chapter 4, I describe my research methodology, data collection and analyses.
I discuss ethical issues surrounding the data collection. In Chapter 5, I discuss the results
along with relevant literature on whether twenty-nine civic experts perceive civic
programme objectives as appropriate to mediate knowledge construction, dispositions
and skills development. Also, I examine data underpinned with literature on whether
young learners perceive civic content classroom implementation as guiding their
knowledge construction, dispositions and skills development. Chapter 6 presents data and
literature on how civic teachers perceive the recruitment of teachers, continuous
professional development and instructional materials provision to enable the teaching of
civic education. In Chapter 7, I focus on whether classroom implementation regarding
pedagogical practices had an impact on civic education content to develop young learners'
knowledge construction, dispositions and skills development. In Chapter 8, I present the
implications of my study and propose recommendations based on the research evidence
gathered. Moreover, I elucidate on the research contributions to knowledge and propose
future directions for research.

22
 Chapter Two: Literature Review

2.0 Theoretical Setting on Civic Education Classroom Implementation

I present in this chapter the theoretical basis of the study on classroom implementation of
civic instructions to construct knowledge, develop dispositions and skills as indices of
effective citizenship development in Nigerian learners. In doing this, I start with how
civic education emerged from social studies, examine its definitions and rationale as well
as impact on learners’ knowledge, dispositions and skills. Also, I put citizenship in the
proper context of literature on what constitutes effective citizenship in the citizenship
theories. Furthermore, I discuss effective citizenship as the overall goal of school civic
education. Lastly, I examine civic education pedagogical theories involving social
constructivism, transformative learning and reflective inquiry to underpin classroom
implementation.

2.1 Civic Education

This section present civic education as the major issue of interest used to initiate and/or
reform learners' knowledge, dispositions and skills on the state political system. However,
since citizenship issues which constitutes the major content of civic education, emerged
from integrated social studies, my discussion of civic education starts by first clarifying
the link between the two in Nigeria. Also, I examine the definitions, rationale for, and
civic education impacts on learners’ knowledge, dispositions and skills to discover on
which domain or component it impacted more.

2.2 Social Studies Education and Civic Education

Civic education has been an area of global academic learning and research interest due to
growing classroom implementation in the school system of developing and transitional
democracies. It is implemented globally by these countries to initiate, sustain and/or
reform learners' knowledge and skills to exhibit loyalty and patriotism, obedience and/or
critical citizenship vital to engaging in local, national and global activities. Since
citizenship issues, which are a major content of civic education, was hitherto an integral
part of the Nigerian integrated social studies then, it is pertinent to expound how civic
education emerged from social studies.

23
2.2:1 Social Studies Education

The foundation for the implementation of Social Studies education started as an

experiment at Aiyetoro Comprehensive High School in 1963. This experiment was a
partnership programme between the (then) Western Regional Government, the Ford
Foundation and the University of Washington, USA. However, the 1977-1998 education
policies, depicted Social Studies education (as stated in Chapter 1) as a multi/inter
disciplinary curriculum designed to develop learners’ knowledge, dispositions and skills
on the diverse environment of man. Thus it became a core subject at the Junior Secondary
School (JSS) level and its content comprising man in relation to environmental issues like
population, geographical/physical, science, technology and political issues-democracy,
human rights, governance, inter alia for effective citizenship (Muyanda-Mutebi, 1994;
Priestley, 2009; Ogunyemi, 2010, 2011). Its goal was based on the stance articulated by
the United States National Council on Social Studies to mediate learners' acquisition of
skills to make rational decisions for public good within their democratic system (National
Council for Social Studies, 1992).

Nevertheless, a review of the educational policy in 2004 led to a focus on contemporary

local and global issues such as drug abuse, youth unemployment and restiveness,
HIV/AIDS education, environmental education, family life education, children/women
trafficking, and peace and conflict resolution among other issues. The review was to guide
learners to develop the skills to adapt to ecological dynamics as well as appreciating the
diverse cultures, history and basic issues that make them humans (Nigeria Educational
Research and Development Council, 2007; Ogunyemi, 2011).

Contrasting the two (1998 and 2004) education policy versions revealed that citizenship
issues which have been part of integrated social studies philosophy for over forty-one
years was evidently severed from the latter (2004) version. The severance was attributed
to the unwieldy scope of the social studies curriculum making classroom implementation,
especially the citizenship goals and content questionable and ineffective (Obebe, 2007;
Nigeria Educational Research and Development Council, 2007, p.v). In actual fact, such
severance, discussed in Chapter 1, was more of curriculum politics than a result of in-
depth inferences based on research (Ogunyemi, 2007, 2010, 2011).

24
Some social educators perceived civic and citizenship education as synonymous with
social studies due to the belief, especially in the United States, that the basic goal of social
studies curriculum is educating young learners on citizenship issues. Therefore, effective
citizenship development is the basis of social studies education (Votz and Nixon, 1999;
Heafner, 2008). To these educators, social studies impact on learners involves instilling
democratic citizenship principles, enhancing cultural literacy, inducing care for deprived
peoples, upholding social justice, tolerance, inter alia. This reflects the multi-disciplinary
scope of social studies used as a school programme to equip learners for effective
citizenship participation in local, national and global affairs (Heafner, 2008). A well-
conceived social studies is a veritable programme to attain citizenship and civic education
goals through an issue and activity based curriculum.

2.2:2 Civic Education: Origin, Definitions, rationale and impacts

The goal of post-independent government in Nigeria has been to achieve national interests
through educational policies and programmes. One such programme was reintroducing
school civic education in 2006 as a state tool to develop effective citizenship via learners'
interactions with, and guidance of a more knowledgeable person. However, the reality of
school civic education alone achieving this is questionable considering the enormous
tasks for the school to shoulder the responsibility of other socialising agents. Hence,
school curriculum implementation should be weighed pari-pasu with societal practices
involving other socialising agents since school acquired knowledge may conflict with
learners' daily experiences and interactions with other socialising agents.
Notwithstanding, this study focuses mainly on the school and classroom civic curriculum,
arguably depicted as a potent instrument to instil knowledge, skills and dispositions which
are indices of effective citizenship to enhance learners' interactions and participation in
the community (Dewey (1996 [1916]; Waldschmitt, 2010). Thus, this section reviews
civic education as an area of academic study to discover why it was initiated and its
implementation impacts on learners' citizenship development while its curriculum intents
and content are discussed in Chapter 3.

2.2:2(a) Origin and Definition of Civic Education

Civic education, initially known as 'civics’ originated from ‘civic’ and ‘civitas’ meaning
‘a citizen’ and ‘city-state’. It is an altruistic and moralistic term which initiates discussions
of citizenship (socio-political) issues within the public (polis) domains of the state. From

25
the classical Greek period it was a tool to inculcate socio-political culture by infusing
loyalty to collective interests and participation in state matters as hallmarks of effective
citizenship (Morris, 1997; Gleiber, 2003; Po, 2004). Traditionally, civic education is used
to provide insights into political traditions, principles, institutions and engaging in the
political system of the state (Janowitz 1983, 1994; Niemi and Junn 1998; Kanaev 2000;
Burkingham, 2006). Also, it has been used to construct and exercise knowledge and skills
regarding rights and obligations in order to participate in the public life of the society
(Branson, 1998; Lewis, 2007; Aroge, 2012). It is an organised body of human knowledge
involving individual and group membership rights, duties, institutions, practices and
actions linked with citizenship of a state (Shah, et al, 2002; Gold cited in Meron, 2006;
Gelaneh, 2012). Overall, I contend civic education depicts the link which young learners
should have with the current political system of the state.

As portrayed in the civic curriculum objectives, Nigerian government intent involves

using the subject as a tool to develop knowledge and skills regarding voting,
governmental roles, citizens' rights, duties, values, ecological activism, community
services and social networking for future citizenship engagement. Yet, lack of
extracurricular programmes could hinder required experiential learning while in school
(National Policy on Education, 2004; Miles, 2006; Falade, 2007; Lopez et al, 2006;
Ogunyemi, 2005, 2011). So schools need to induce experiential learning because
participation in state prescribed political citizenship needs to be complemented due to a
gradual change in young peoples’ interests towards nongovernmental citizenship
activisms. Thus, confining achieving citizenship development to school could be the
likely rationale for reintroducing civic education.

2.2:2(b) Rationale for Civic Education

Generally, many developed and transitional democracies like Nigeria are facing various
citizenship (socio-political) issues involving young peoples' apathy towards civic
activities like voting in elections; moral deficit due to anti-social behaviours and
inadequate interest in political engagement which could result in the failure of democracy
(Hébert & Sears 2001; Bennett 2008; Osler & Starkey 2003). The Nigerian context
revealed presidential concern for the youths who require serious transformation to
become effective citizens. This overwhelming citizenship trend required introducing a
particular school subject by which young learners could develop traits of effective

26
citizenship. Thus, the rationale for a civic education curriculum raises questions on
whether the civic curriculum initiative was perceived from a parochial policy priority
issue and/or a basic theoretical question of whether school civic education could develop
links between young people and the state (Hébert & Sears 2001; Federal Ministry of
Education, 2007, p. v; House of Commons Education and Skills Committee, 2007;
Jekayinfa, Mofoluwawo, & Oladiran, 2011; Olla, 2013; O’Sullivan, 2014). The
perspectives for the purpose of civic education determines the expectation of the state on
the roles of civic education to initiate or reform young learners’ citizenship development.
That is, whether to instil patriotism, obedience, national identity or rights vital to questioning
obedience and loyalty to the state. Still, it is vital to know from extant literature whether civic
content has impacts on learners' knowledge, dispositions and skills as indices of effective
citizens.

2.2:2(c) Civic Education Impacts on Effective Citizenship Components

Extant literature perceives civic education as a formal intervention device to mediate

learners' literacy, dispositions and behavioural changes. Thus, I review relevant studies
on civic instructions impacts to explore the study’s research questions (RQ 1(b)) stated
in Chapter 1.

Before the 1990s, consensus among political researchers revealed trivial impacts of civic
content on learners’ citizenship development. Classroom civic instructions rarely justify
learners’ socio-political growth (Ehman, 1980; Langton & Jennings, 1968; Somit,
Tannenhous, Wilke, & Cooley, 1958). However, post 1990s studies revealed positive
civic instruction impacts on citizenship development of young learners in England and
other countries (National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 1997; Niemi &
Junn, 1998; Dudley & Gitelson 2002; Kerr et al, 2002; International Association for the
Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), 2002). These results reveal the relevance
of exposure to civic instruction and thus justify widening the scope of studies to emerging
transitional democracies like Nigeria. Despite the positive findings in the recent studies,
there are still some negative results depending on which citizenship components are
explored vis-à-vis civic instructions exposure.

27
2.2:2(c) i Civic Knowledge Impact

Despite most extant studies showing civic instructions positive impact on civic
knowledge, there were few instances of negative impact. Studies in developing
democracies (Zambia and South Africa) show civic instructions positive impact on
learners' citizenship knowledge (Bratton et al, 1999; Finkel & Ernst, 2005). Also, separate
studies conducted in Britain, Sweden and Argentina showed similar positive impacts on
citizenship knowledge (Denver & Hands, 1990; Westholm, Lindquist & Niemi, 1990;
Morduchowicz et al, 1996). The same positive impacts were shown in the IEA study of
young learners in 27 countries. The result depicts good citizenship knowledge of issues
about political rights and identifying vital democratic institutions.

However, some studies showed young learners in England had challenges on their
knowledge of democracy, government and elections issues. This was due to citizenship
education just being introduced (Kerr, 2002; International Association for the Evaluation
of Educational Achievement (IEA), 2002). Also, another study by Finkel, (2002) showed
civic instructions lacked impact on civic knowledge.

Overall, most studies from the 90s confirmed civic instructions instilling citizenship
knowledge in young learners could be due to less difficulty in inculcating knowledge
based issues in the civic classroom (Patrick & Hoge, 1991; Niemi & Junn, 1998; Po,
2004). This means civic classes could exert effects on knowledge of citizenship issues
learnt provided there is more curriculum time and relevant classroom active pedagogical
practices (Slomczynski & Shabad, 1998; Finkel & Ernst, 2005). Moreover, Finkel &
Ernst posited that classroom civic instructions could be aided by other socio-political
agents like exposure to mass media and the family frequently discussing politics or being
involved in active politicking (Finkel & Ernst 2005).

2.2:2(c) ii Civic Disposition Impacts

This involves internalising citizenship knowledge and skills acquired by young learners.
Though studies are indecisive about civic instruction impacts on dispositions, yet Almond
& Verba (1963) in their study declared that civic instruction is crucial to developing
citizenship dispositions.

However, the IEA study reported participating young learners' moderate dispositions
(trust) level towards government-based institutions and revealing more positive

28
dispositions towards nongovernmental activities (Kerr et al, 2002; Dalton, 2000; Clark &
Hoffman-Martinot, 1998). This positive disposition of most participating IEA learners to
nongovernmental activities showed the acceptability of the new civic culture branded by
less hierarchy and more individual decision-making. (Kerr et al, 2002; IEA, 2002).

Also, studies in Dominican Republic, Poland, and South Africa indicate that civic
instructions merely influenced dispositions. That is, civic content has a trivial impact on
dispositions regarding beliefs in political institutions, politicians, tolerance, trust,
efficacy, civic duty and institutional trust (Finkel, 2002; United States International
Development (USAID), 2002; Finkel & Ernst, 2005). This is because developing
dispositions requires lots more preparation and expertise from teachers. Developing
dispositions involves a gradual process that starts from internalising knowledge.
Moreover, not all civic knowledge constructions are developed into dispositions. This
justified why civic content impact is trivial on civic dispositions (Patrick & Hoge, 1991;
Denver & Hands, 1996; Niemi & Junn, 1998; Po, 2004; Falade, 2011).

In comparing civic knowledge and dispositions impacts, civic researchers agreed that
civic content is yet to change the perceived trivial civic dispositions impact due to positive
impact being more evident on civic knowledge (literacy) construction as against
developing dispositions (Ferguson, 1991; Morducowicz et al, 1996; Slomczynski &
Shabad, 1998).

2.2:2(c) iii Impact of Civic Skills (Participation/Engagement)

Although few studies explored the impact of civic instruction on civic skills acquisition,
yet results inferred more positive civic instruction impact on learners’ civic skills. For
instance, studies in Britain and Senegal disclosed that adult learners exposed to civic
instructions showed an interest in membership of civic groups involving village
associations and other community projects, voting in elections and being averse to
dictatorship (Bynner & Hammond, 2004; Field, 2005; Kuenzi, 2005). Also, studies
showed that civic instructions overtly impacted on citizenship knowledge and
participation in countries like Kenya, Nigeria, Dominican Republic and South Africa
(Finkel, 2002; Finkel & Ernst, 2005; Finkel & Smith, 2011; Collier & Vicente, 2011).
Similarly, in Zambia, civic instructions impact more on learners’ citizenship knowledge,
dispositions (values) and voter registration participations without affecting voting in
national elections (Bratton et al, 1999; Milner, 2002).

29
From these few studies, it was discovered that civic instructions offered learners the
knowledge and skills to explore citizenship issues and problems (Field, 2005; Tor, 2009).
Exposure to civics also enhances a deeper understanding of issues which invariably foster
intellectual and participatory skills.

2.2:2(c) iv Relationship between Civic Knowledge and Civic Participation

In this study, I reviewed literature on whether civic knowledge underpinned participation

by ascertaining the link between civic knowledge and civic (intellectual and participatory)
skills. From studies effective citizenship participation requires civic knowledge
construction and acquiring relevant skills (Patrick, 2002; Comber, 2003).

This claim was confirmed by the IEA study which showed learners' exposure to civic
issues in school enhanced their civic knowledge and fostered engagement in community
programmes (Torney-Purta, 2002; Comber, 2003). Also, other studies indicated that civic
instructional programmes improve (by showing positive impacts on) civic and political
knowledge, engagement and dispositions (Kurtz et al, 2003; Centre for Information and
Research, 2003). A study explicating democracy via individual dispositions linked
effective engagement to civic literacy (Almond & Verba, 1963). Another study finding
indicated that constructed political knowledge determines the extent of civic and political
participation. In other words, civic and citizenship knowledge leads or contributes to
political action and participation. So, I infer that the quality of knowledge constructed by
learners on the political system determines the extent of participation in articulating
public policy issues (Delli Caprini & Keeter, 1996; Dudley & Gitelson 2002).

This nexus was based on the notion that only well-informed citizens make government
accountable and responsive because such informed citizens influence government
through expression of views (Bratton & Liatto-Katundu, 1994; Halpern, 2005). Through
civic literacy citizens were empowered to participate in sustaining the political system. In
fact, indifference to civic participation like voting could be due to lack of insight on the
functions of government and rights of individuals, among others (Popkin & Dimock,
1999; Milner, 2002). However, Torney-Purta, (2002) argued that isolating civic literacy
could be inadequate to determine civic and political engagement of young learners.

30
From the above, studies reveal the ongoing debate on the perceived civic instruction
impact on learners’ participation. The inconsistent nature of the findings is due to existing
studies exploring diverse forms of civic curriculum (formal and informal) among
different groups of participants (young or adult learners) in different countries (developed
or developing or transitional democracies). Nonetheless, this equivocal debate justifies
need for further study in order to discover the kind of civic curriculum programmes
necessary to sustain effective democratic citizenship development (Riutta, 2007).

The impacts discussed above show that the diverse citizenship theories, philosophies and
orientations which constitute civic content form the basis of learners' initiations and/or
reformation (transformation) regarding the political system, thus reflecting the link
between citizenship and civic education discussed below.

2.3 Citizenship and Citizenship Theories

In this section, I first conceptualise citizenship because it establishes the content of civic
education. Also, the contested nature of citizenship makes it inextricably linked with
diverse ideologies, thus it is vital to examine relevant citizenship theories linked to
citizenship in this study. Moreover, it is expedient to examine the theoretical stance of
Nigerian citizenship shown in Nigeria's civic education programme objectives and
content to examine a part of my first research question on civic content impact on
learners’ citizenship development.

2.3:1 Citizenship Conceptualisations

Citizenship is a normative and descriptive concept essential to political philosophy. It is

an eclectic and disputed concept thus it is hard to have global consensus on its actual
meaning (Heater, 1991; McLaughlin, 1992; Steenbergen, 1994; Beiner, 1995; Carr &
Hartnett, 1996; Garcia, n.d). Its eclectic and polysemic traits make its manipulation in a
formal school curriculum possible by nation-states and ideological groups to entrench
what schools should inculcate in their civic mission of developing effective citizenship
(Ignatieff, 1995; Crick, 1998; Faulks, 2000).

Though I conceptualised citizenship diversely yet it connects the state and citizens
regarding rights and duties which is susceptible to perpetual rethinking due to changes in
the state (Turner, 1990; Janoski, 1998; Abdi et al, 2006; Quaynor, 2012). Also, it is an
unwieldy and classical humanist expression revised to tally with diverse social

31
dispositions (Frazer & Gordon, 1998). These conceptualisations depict citizenship as an
issue involving a state since prerogatives (rights/duties) could only be conferred and
exercised in relation to the state (Giddens, 1994; Oliver & Heater, 1994; Etzioni, 1995;
Marshall & Battomore, 1998).

Primordial (ancient) citizenship entails participating in the public domain (diverse sectors
of the state) by a politically active and moral being detached from those in the private
domain (Kartal, 2002). Though citizenship was initially branded by exclusivity in the
public participation, it later extended from political rights to conferring civil and social
rights.

Thus, modern citizenship consists of a legal status which bestows rights and obligations
on such membership; political competence to perform prescribed roles requiring making
choices in the political field to manifest qualities of effective citizenship (Leca, 1992;
Cohen 1999; Kymlicka & Norman 2000; Carens 2000). Such effective citizenship, in this
era, included exercising formal social membership attracting a set of de facto (political)
and de jure (legal) rights and duties (Giddens, 1994; Faulks, 2006a; Bellamy, 2013). That
is, political and legal provisions to promote equality in exercise of rights and duties
conferred. Equality of rights was due to political community membership which endows
discrete identity showing the link between rights, equality and identity. These combined
traits showed effective citizenship as applying rights which defines the degree of
socio/political activities based on citizenship identity (Marshall & Bottomore, 1998;
Carens 2000).

Awareness of citizenship rights and obligations gradually developed from civil to

political and finally extended to social rights (Marshall, 1950). Social rights cover access
to education, health, welfare, security and social heritage. Civil rights cover rights against
discrimination, free speech, press, assembly. Political rights entail the right to vote
democratically (Marshall, 1992, 1965; Bellamy, 2013).

Citizenship, though universalistic, is more utopian due to differences in evolution which

was based on social class and ethnic formation among states. These rights, evolved via
diverse process of positivist (and not natural) laws (Giddens, 1982; Mann, 1987). Overall,
common citizenship traits in these conceptualisations includes civil, political and legal
rights, identity (moral views) and skills to actively engage in public life (Heater, 1990;
Porter, 1996; Cogan, 2000).

32
Evidently, various conceptualisations justify my assertion on the inability to propose a
single suitable definition because citizenship traits change. These changes are due to
globalization, migration, economic change, different philosophical beliefs from which
citizenship evolved, changing concepts and the gradual demise of the nation-state (Po,
2004; Faulks, 2006a; Giddens, 1982).

However, the above diverse perceptions revealed common traits incorporated into the
three components of effective citizenship development, that is, citizenship knowledge,
dispositions and skills explored in this study. An effective citizenship process requires
learners constructing knowledge on their legal (status) rights and obligations as citizens,
develop dispositions on their legal status through identifying moral values (which
involves shared character traits as against ethical principles which involved rules of
conduct within the community) engrained in citizenship, and lastly, engage in public
affairs based on the competencies acquired (Habermas, 1994; Osler & Starkey, 2005;
Leydet, 2006).

From the above explanations, citizenship involves a series of issues which could be
subsumed into rights, corresponding duties and obligation of an individual by virtue of
his or her membership of a nation-state. Guiding learners to understand citizenship entails
constructing knowledge on rights and duties granted by the state, or other bodies as proof
of membership. This indicates an existing bond (evolving via social contract) between
the state and citizens. By this, the state confers civil, political and legal prerogatives to
uphold identity and duty. These elements characterised existing citizenship theories
discussed below.

2.3:2 Citizenship Theories

In this section, I discuss diverse citizenship theories relevant to classroom civic

implementation reflected in the Nigerian civic education objectives. These theories
underpin my discussion (in Chapter 5) of data analysed to answer a part of my first
research question (RQ1b). This is to ascertain which theory is prevalent when civic
teachers implement (teach) civic content in the classroom. Also, these theories reflect
various implementing patterns on the civic mission of schools as designed by the state in
the school curriculum. Such civic missions mainly involve training learners ‘to know,
care and act’ showing that citizens are made and not born (Bank, 2001; Levine, 2005).
Also, civic content instructions mediate knowledge, understanding, skills and dispositions

33
required to articulate citizenship issues for diverse forms of engagement (Lipset, 1959;
Almond & Verba, 1963; Bowles & Gintis, 1976).

However, civic education content consists of diverse theories advocated by social

education scholars. These involved Hahn's cross-national study on cognitive development
and citizenship (political) culture and socialisation. Barr and others classified the social
studies curriculum content as involving citizenship transmission, citizenship as social
science, and reflective enquiry. Gifford, while surveying the UK's citizenship trends
proposed a national and global citizenship content. Moreover, Benavot's cross-national
and longitudinal study on diverse contexts of schools' impact on political identity
formation proposed the modernisation and institutionalisation theories (Barr et al, 1977;
Benavot, 1996; Hahn, 1998; Gifford, 2004; Zaman, 2006; National Alliance of Civic
Education, 2007). Literature on civic republican, communitarian and liberal democracy
conform to this study of citizenship theories. However, I group these theories based on
shared features depicted by extant literature and studies (Zaman, 2006; Olla, 2013) to
evade any form of repetition of theories. Thus, the above theories are collected into three
groups perceived as relevant to civic classroom implementation in this study. These
involve ethno-nationalistic, critical and global citizenship theories.

2.3:2(a) Ethno-nationalistic (Citizenship) Initiation Theory

In this theory, school civic education content developed learners' knowledge, dispositions
and skills basic to exhibiting common identity, patriotism, loyalty and sense of belonging
to the state political system (Johnson, 2010). Effective citizenship involved infusing
knowledge on Nigeria's pre/post independent political and constitutional history; the
founding fathers' (nationalists) roles in the agitations for political independence. Also, it
imparts knowledge of the constitution, political sovereignty, legitimacy, rights and duties,
the federal system, structure and function of government, obedience to laws, among other
issues. This is based on the notion that, furnishing young learners with basic citizenship
literacy means training them for future participation in political development. This is in
conformity with the communitarians and civic republican citizenship which uses civic
education to induct and initiate learners to enhance civic duties and participation. This
theory underlines civil and political duty and participation as basic civic virtues that
citizens should possess (Heater, 1999; O’Sullivan, 2014). Citizens should be alert to their
duties as well as participation as an ethical obligation and failure of which makes them
unqualified for citizenship position (Heater, 1999).

34
Therefore, civic education is a critical tool to impart civic traits of duties and values of
participation by instilling into learners the grundnorm (constitution) of the state as
proposed by Aristotle (Aristotle, 1948 1337aII; Aristotle, 1955; O’Sullivan, 2014) to
produce effective citizens obedient to the laws by performing their duties. Even Rousseau
reiterated that school civic curriculum should develop in learners positive dispositions
which stress participation as the basic duty of learners to state values as the hallmark of
sound and effective citizenship (Heater, 1999; NPE, 2004).

However, such nationalistic knowledge only develops commitment to the state but
restricts a global grasp of issues and learners' participation. Also, it depicts teachers as
content transmitters (conveyers) to learners (recipients) thus inducing passive and naive
citizenship (Barr et al, 1977; Meyer, 1977; Hahn, 1998; NACE, 2007). From the above,
transmitting or initiating state ideology is to develop young learners to play passive roles
as mere consumers of received knowledge. Also, this theory breeds elitism which limits
a particular group of people from meaningful citizenship involvement due to the
foundation of citizenship inequalities (discussed below) inbuilt in the formal school
system. So, participation may not be meaningful unless such citizen belong to a particular
class within the political system (Heater, 1999; Tor, 2009; O’Sullivan, 2014). Advocating
absolute patriotism/loyalty to state via duty and participation could weaken citizens'
freedom, rights and autonomy which mediates sincere scrutiny of state policies. To
Rousseau, absolute commitment, patriotism and loyalty should be constant since
compliance is a sine qua non (condition precedent) to having true autonomy in the state
(Heater, 1999; O’Sullivan, 2014).

The school civic curriculum was used to construct ideology in Prussia (Germany) and
France, imbibe capitalism in the United States and socialism/communism in the former
Soviet Union in the 19th and 20th Centuries (Lott, Jr, 1999; Cantoni, et., al 2014).
Although Nigeria lacks a particular state based citizenship ideology, yet, as stated in
Chapter 1, civic curriculum goals projected more ethno-nationalistic goals in order to
achieve national identity and integration.

2.3:2(b) Critical (Citizenship) Reformation Theory

Though Nigeria's civic education stressed ethno-nationalistic citizenship, however, it is

not impossible for teachers, as reflected in the questionnaire, to engage in teaching critical

35
citizenship to provide academic insights. This makes it pertinent to examine the theory
underpinning critical citizenship pattern.

Global school reforms leading to activity and issue based citizenship altered curriculum
training from conventional ethno-nationalistic roles of schools to current critical
citizenship views. According to the modernisation theory, schools play a reformative and
transformative role by developing learners' critical citizenship outlooks, via the new
model of knowledge and skills, that foster articulating national issues instead of ethnic
interests (Benavot, 1996; Johnson, 2010; Zaman, 2006).

This theory agrees with liberal citizenship principles of enhancing learners’ zeal, thoughts
and insight to question socio-political issues adversely affecting the state. Citizenship
issues are discussed to induce dialogue with others and appropriately query political
leadership. Learners are expected to acquire and engage in intellectual and participatory
(voice expression) skills on diverse citizenship issues. However, this requires an open
classroom climate for free and critical questioning of social disparity and paradoxes. That
is, a more interactive and participatory classroom implementation which depicts teachers
(facilitators) and learners as partners-in-progress fostering meaningful participation. But,
implementing this seems more utopian due to the difficulty of teachers mediating
learners’ criticism of the state which designed the curriculum and manages and finances
the school system (Giroux, 1980; Ginsburg, 2001; Levine, 2005; NACE, 2007; Tor,
2009).

2.3:2(c) Global (post-national) Citizenship Theory

The current civic education objectives identified exposing young learners to global
citizenship issues involving millennium development goals and emergent contemporary
issues. This points to the need for civic curriculum content to mediate young learners'
knowledge, disposition and skills regarding nongovernmental citizenship in which young
people globally are showing more interest and subsequent engagement (Bennett, 2007,
2008; Nina, 1997). Global, in contrast to ethno-nationalistic theory focuses on
cosmopolitan citizenship. This is a major shift from interest on nation building sentiments
to promoting supranational citizenship which enlarge learners' knowledge across national
boundaries. It involves training young learners to engage in global activities as a way of

36
recognising their multiple citizenship identity in their locality, state, regional and global
institutions (Johnson, 1990; Delanty, 2000; Stromquist & Monkman, 2000).

However, the reality of initiating and/or reforming through school civic curriculum
implementation in the Nigerian context could be difficult due to socio-political vices such
as corruption, increased ethnic and religious insurgencies, advanced fee fraud for which
Nigeria has become notorious, as well as other vices which remain prevalent. For the
school to achieve the citizenship goals requires the larger society and other socialising
agents ensure good governance, social and national security and rectify the structural
inequity in the federation which are outside the scope of the school (Adamolekun &
Kincaid, 1991; Marizu, 1998; Akinyele, 2001; Ukiwo, 2003, 2007; Badmus, 2006;
Okeahialam, 2013).

Also, non-realisation of effective citizenship based on these theories might not be due to
civic content ineptitude but the political class lacking the will to sustain school civic
implementation by providing resources which mediates, for instance, extracurricular
(experiential) learning making it difficult for learners to match school learning experience
with their daily activities (Okeahialam, 2013). Even if these theories are practicable in
young people it is essential to pay equal attention to other socialising agents. Besides, the
political class promotes and perpetuates social stratification and inequalities by denying
the lower classes the opportunity to catch up via the school formal curriculum considered
by the education policy as an instrument for socio-political change. The lower class is
prevented from appreciating the values of education and the right to education for political
advantage (Okeahialam, 2013).

2.3:2(d) Inequality/Stratification roles of schools

Though not a focus of this study, I am aware that schools foster citizenship stratification
via assigning diverse socio-political status to citizens along class and gender disparity. It
is the factory where social hierarchy, dominance and respect for authority are simulated
with intent to initiate citizens into agreed adult status. Alas, this socio-political inequality
role of school opposes the idea of schools developing human capital by acquiring
knowledge and skills to boost effective citizenship (Bowles & Gintis 1976; Cantoni, et.,
al., 2014). Since education is to create positive change in knowledge leading to
engagement, thus using schools to induce inequalities underpins the view that not all
schooling is education. Such schooling lacks vision, integrity, interest and the fortitude

37
to make thing happen but instead promotes examinations for the purpose of earning
qualification (Dore, 1976; Nie et al, 1996). Besides inducing inequality, this section
showed that schools could develop effective citizenship via initiation and/or reformation.
But, in the next section, the question to be answered, based on the theories above, involves
what effective citizenship entails.

The citizenship theories discussed above showed that effective citizenship is not limited
to a particular pattern but is in diverse forms which for the purpose of this study, are
subsumed into political (ethno-nationalistic) and nongovernmental (critical/global)
citizenship participation. Upon these two norms I conceptualise effective citizenship
development in the next section.

2.4 Effective Citizenship Development

2.4:1 Political (ethno-nationalistic) Citizenship

Political citizenship involves engaging effectually in traditional political activities to have

a sense of civic obligations to political institutions via popular participation (Nina, 1998;
Bennett, 2007, 2008). Such participation includes obedience to law, membership of
political parties, paying taxes, articulating and discussing political issues, learning about
basic workings of government institutions, membership of civil or political groups as well
as making voting choices (Kerr et al, 2002; IEA, 2002; Bennett, 2003, 2007, 2008, 2011;
Dalton, 2008; Feezell et al, 2013). Though studies are inconclusive there is evidence of
low participation in political citizenship activities among young people due to not just a
high level of distrust in politicians but the political system (Inglehart, 1990; Kerr et al,
2002; Bimber, 2003). Other studies posit gradual rebuffing of diverse dimensions of
politics in their daily activities by displaying political isolation rather than apathy (Davies,
1994; Buckingham, 2000; MORI, 2002; Henn et al, 2005).

2.4:2 Nongovernmental (Critical/Global) Citizenship

Nongovernmental citizenship is a new generational shift in civic and citizenship

engagement patterns. It entails individual self-expression, personalised politics over
participation in formal hierarchical political institutions. Also, it involves being
independent, assertive and simultaneously showing concern for others (Bimber, 2012;
Zukin et al, 2006; Dalton, 2008; Loader, 2007; Bennett, 2007, 2011). As stated above, it
might be due to young peoples’ weakened sense of political duties by being apolitical in

38
their community. It entails participation in human rights activities, ecological activism,
community volunteering, collaborative programmes, service learning and non-violent
protests (Kerr et al, 2002; Dalton, 2008). From the two citizenship categorisations above,
effective citizenship development could involve engaging in political and/or apolitical
civic and citizenship activities which are discussed below.

2.4:3 Holistic Integration Approach and Effective Citizenship Development

Citizenship theories and categorisations revealed their unique traits which learners could
holistically develop to become effective citizens. Since these traits are highlighted in the
civic education objectives, I propose the development of these traits in learners via
holistic integration rather than distinct individualised civic learning. But, I first define
effective citizenship and then the rationale for holistic integration is discussed below.

2.4:3(a) Effective citizenship Conceptualised

Effective citizenship is the degree of knowledge, dispositions and skills developed by

learners to engage in diverse citizenship activities at local, national and global levels. It
involves learning and demonstrating diverse citizenship traits through actual participation
in ecological activism, community service and showing interest in state activities
(Andrews et al, 2008; Okeahialam, 2013). A broader view of effective citizenship
involves mediating learners’ knowledge, ability and dispositions to participate
constructively within a multicultural milieu in order to confront personal and collective
problems inter alia, in that setting (Reimers, 2006). From these definitions, I perceive
effective citizenship as young learners’ conceptions of how to improve quality of life,
through involvement in formal and informal activities with the overall goal of
contributing to Nigeria's citizenship growth. It is young learners’ views of what needs to
be done as effective citizens. This recognises the need to complement the patterns of
citizenship participations by extending from the political to involve nongovernmental
citizenship (Kerr et al, 2002; Bennett, 2007; Dalton, 2008).

2.4:3(b) Rationale for Holistic Integration Approach

Outlining the traits of the citizenship theories exposed the need to bridge the gaps among
the theories. Thus, developing effective citizenship requires synthesizing the traits of both
theories which underpin the stance of Bennett, (2007, 2008), Bennett, et al, (2011),
Janoski, (1998) and 1968 Mombasa declaration discussed below.

39
The rationale for proposing a holistic integration of civic theories into an integrated civic
curriculum content is based on the 1968 Mombasa declaration that individualised civic
learning is a legacy of the colonial past which makes learning out of immediate (historical,
geographical and political) milieu. Thus there is a growing dissatisfaction concerning the
perceived isolation of Nigeria’s civic learners from their traditional civic culture due to
imported foreign citizenship theories which could not be adapted to suit peculiarities of
the Nigerian milieu. Therefore, holistic integration of civic norms underpins Nigerian
indigenous education which fosters a sense of belonging via active participation in
developing citizenship norms consistent with the Nigerian context (Fafunwa, 2004; Ocitt,
1994; Mutebi 1994; Ssekamwa, 1997; Tiberondwa, 2001; Mugimu & Nakabugo, 2009).
Such holistic integration modifies the foreign citizenship content (concepts and issues) of
industrialised nations to fit into our setting by re-designing the civic curriculum. Imported
civic contents are contextualised by using either exotic or foreign expressions which
hardly reflects Nigerian citizenship values. Abolishing this requires re-designing civic
curriculum in the context of Nigerian values, practices and norms to develop civic
learners to fit into extant citizenship and economic milieu (Fafunwa, 1974; Makinde,
1979; Fadeiye, 2005).

Also holistically integrating traits of citizenship theories into the civic content could
mediate in Nigerian learners a more balanced effective citizenship. This is because
Nigeria lacks a particular citizenship philosophy which the school system could impose
on learners, then it is better to expose learners to diverse citizenship philosophies rather
than compelling them to absorb a particular norm. Although Nigeria's civic objectives
seem to stress nationalistic citizenship norms, yet, traits of global and critical citizenship
are implanted in the objectives. Developing these norms in learners creates basic literacy
to exercise their autonomy on whether to engage in particular citizenship norms in future.

From the global perspective, projecting a citizenship norm above the other is needless
since young people still show an interest in political activities despite engaging in
nongovernmental (apolitical) citizenship in countries like Nigeria, China, Vietnam,
Zimbabwe, India, Iran and Indonesia (Bennett, 2007, 2008; Welzel & Alexander, 2008).
In the United States, over 23 million Millennia's voted for President Obama in the 2008
election. Similar experiences of massive youth participation in elections of Chile and
Argentina shows the overwhelming interest in political citizenship (Hais & Winograd,
2008; Barrionuevo, 2011). As shown in a study, this is the age when young people

40
develop interest in these citizenship traits. Failure of young people to develop interest in
political activities at this age means they are unlikely to engage in such activities in adult
years (Goodman et al, 2011).

Moreover, integrating citizenship norms provides a balanced relationship between critical

and global norms agitating for citizens' rights and autonomy and a nationalistic (civic
republican or communitarian) stance on civic duty and participation (Esping-Anderson,
1990; Kohlberg, 1992; Ellison, 1997; Tor, 2009). This approach resists citizens' duty to
promote group and state activities at the expense of right to engage in nongovernmental
citizenship. Rather, it equalises groups and individual rights and duties via collaborative
and competitive relationships (Warren, 1992; Singer, 1993; Janoski, 1998). Thus,
integrated civic curriculum is an effective style to equip learners on how to examine
problems like corruption, ethnic polarisation, among others facing Nigeria. Also, the
curriculum’s flexibility enriches the discussion of emergent global citizenship issues
through a teacher's open classroom climate during civic instruction. However, studies
show that integrated civic curriculum requires regular training which enables teachers to
guide learners to critically and rationally examine civic issues and problems. Such
training is imperative due to the incorporation of relevant concepts from diverse
disciplines into civic content in order to enrich the curriculum (Dan, 2010; Oluniyi &
Olufemi, 2013; Kutu, 2013).

In addition, didactic (teacher-centred) teaching styles associated with a single-subject

curriculum could hardly guide learners' effective citizenship knowledge construction.
Conversely, civic integration connects knowledge, dispositions and skills from diverse
civic learning experiences holistically. This curriculum style needs active pedagogical
classroom practices involving open classroom, group discussion and collaborative
learning (like fieldwork, simulation, and dramatisation) which are highly effective in
engaging learners (Muijs & Reynolds 2001; Watkins, Carnell & Lodge 2007). Evidently,
holistic integrated civic curriculum requires that learners develop knowledge by
constructing meaning to civic concepts through classroom interactive activities and
consensus as a result of using social constructivist, transformative learning and reflective
inquiry theories discussed in the next section.

41
2.5 Civic Education Pedagogical Theories

I discussed above theories underpinning citizenship and subsumed them into two
categories of effective citizenship and used that to define effective citizenship. It is
equally vital to examine how civic education curriculum implement these citizenship
theories in the classroom in order for learners to translate knowledge into skills and
dispositions. Translating civic objectives into classroom implementation depends on
school resources provided and more importantly classroom pedagogies used (Nemerow,
1996; Porter, 1993; Print, 1999, Print et al, 2002). Thus, while school resources provision
is discussed in Chapter 3, theories underpinning these study learning pedagogies are
discussed below.

To this end, I examine learning theories like social constructivism, transformative and
reflective inquiry which posited that practicing curriculum content should be a vital part
of the learning process. Underpinning this stance is the notion that best training in civic
education usually involved pedagogies which induce classroom interactive activities and
engagement intended to guide citizenship knowledge constructions and skills acquisitions
(Hughes & Sears 2006; Olla, 2013).

2.5:1 Social Constructivist Theory

Generally, constructivism describes the active involvement of civic learners in

constructing knowledge instead of being inert recipients (Fosnot, 1996; Doolittle &
Hicks, 2003; Williams & Chinn, 2009). There are diverse constructivist models including
social constructivism which examines learning from the contexts of constructing
knowledge from social interactions and consensus. Civic learners have the chance to
express their views and thus create common insights into civic issues during classroom
interactions (Bodrova & Leong, 2012; Gauvain, 2008). The leading educational theorists
and advocates were Lev Vygotsky, Kenneth Gergen inter alia. These theorists viewed
group interaction as the root of knowledge, that is, knowledge is constructed when
learners team up to engage in discussing citizenship issues (Bakhtin, 1984; Prawat &
Floden, 1994; Gergen, 1995).

So, social constructivism posits that learning process entails learners' active knowledge
construction occurs via interactive activities with the milieu. Such interactions involve
peer group, a more knowledgeable person in the milieu as well as the socio-cultural
setting (Vygotsky 1978). Applying social constructivism to civic classroom teaching

42
enables learners to experience citizenship practice within the contexts of their daily
actions, particularly in the school via extracurricular programmes. Learners have the
chance to construct knowledge and engage in interactive activities with peers in the
classroom as a group of learners to strengthen prior knowledge attained from non-
classroom interactions.

2.5:1(a) Socio-Cultural Learning

One of such social constructivists learning theories perceived as relevant to develop

effective citizenship in this study is the socio-cultural theory which is based on
collaborative learning, teacher scaffolding and mediation tools.

2.5:1(a) i Collaborative learning

Collaborative learning entails constructing knowledge via dialogue complemented by

instructional activities. Such activities which learners engage in are transformed into
personal knowledge due to using related instructional styles (like discussion, role play,
simulation) to guide knowledge construction (Swain, 2009; Lantolf, 2009). Socio-cultural
learning entails engaging in classroom interactive activities through which learners
construe their world. This mediates creativity and initiative in learners via
interactive/participatory activities which leads to constructing civic knowledge
(Stetsenko & Arievitch, 1997; Palincsar, 1998).

2.5:1(a) ii Teacher scaffolding

Teachers facilitate learning by creating a ‘Zone of Proximal Development’ (ZPD) which

entails civic interactive activities guided by a more knowledgeable person to help learners
construct what they hitherto lack ability to develop alone (Vygotsky 1986). The ZPD is
developed via scaffolding, that is, previous citizenship experiences are further developed
into new concepts constructed in school through guided instructions (Bruner, 1986).

Scaffolding is the process of social interactions involving knowledgeable (teacher or

classmate) persons guiding learners to shape learning activities to develop pre-existing
citizenship knowledge. The civic teacher evolved desired pedagogical practices and other
resources to guide learning via interactive activities to help internalise citizenship
knowledge co-constructed in the civic classroom by young learners (Rogoff, 1990;
Donato, 1994; Wertsch, 1979a; Yu, 2004; Bonk & Cunningham, 1998; Gredler, 2008;
Kao, 2010). Young learners' comprehension of citizenship issues to construct new

43
knowledge requires initial instructional guidance by a more knowledgeable person. This
contextual interactive activity requires a civic teacher demonstrating classroom learning
instructions (Wood et al, 1976; Yu, 2004). Overall, classroom civic learning is guided by
a qualified civic teacher with adequate mediation tools (instructional resources) for
interactive and participatory learning leading to learners constructing citizenship
knowledge (Newman & Holzman, 1993).

2.5:1(a) iii Mediation tools

For this theory, civic learning is mediated by learning tools which include language
(dialogue) and other (instructional) resources to make learning more meaningful (Haas,
1996; Bonk & Cunningham, 1998; Lantolf, 2000; Ormrod, 2004; William & Burden,
2009; Westbrook et al, 2013). Mediation entails meaningful classroom learning processes
and activities transforming thoughtless actions into higher mental processes through the
use of instructional materials (Minick, 1987; Bonk & Cunningham, 1998; Kao, 2010). It
requires using instructional devices involving human (teachers/peers), material resources
and teaching practices to mediate civic learning via developing abilities to solve
citizenship problems. These tools improve civic learning through selecting and shaping
learning experiences presented. Also, these tools empower civic learners with basic
competence and dispositions to become self-directed learners. More importantly, instead
of unidirectional and passive knowledge input, mediators foster interaction among
learners, resources and tasks context to make them active learners in co-constructing civic
knowledge (Stetsenko & Arievitch, 1997; Kao, 2010). These tools rely on social
interactions and joint activities like dialogue among civic learners (Mitchell & Myles,
2004). Therefore, developing effective citizenship requires instructional (tools) resources
and strategies to aid classroom learning activities among learners (Lantolf, 2009; Lantolf
& Thorne, 2006; Stetsenko & Arievitch, 1997; Kao, 2010).

The social constructivist learning style is applicable to the ‘transformational’ curricula

which stresses learner's personal and social development stated in the preface to Nigeria’s
civic education curriculum document. It is a learning process which involves civic
learners and teachers joint collaborative exploration with the goal of analysing citizenship
(socio-political) issues in order to change the existing system (Evans 2006b; Olla, 2013).

44
2.5:2 Transformative learning theory

This learning theory was initiated by Jack Mezirow (1990) in adult education in the course
of exploring the retraining of women returning to work after maternity leave. It involves
emotional and cognitive development of learners regarding their knowledge, dispositions
and behaviours (Biesta & Miedema 2002; Olla, 2013). Also, transformative learning
entails learners' analysis of their diverse perspectives which then changes their
perceptions of local, national and global citizenship issues (Cranton 2002 in Olla, 2013).

The delineation of transformative learning reflects part of the Nigerian school civic
curriculum objectives (in Chapter 3) which induce acquiring and learning to use the skill,
dispositions and knowledge which prepare learners to be competent and responsible
citizens throughout their lives. Also, another part of the curriculum reiterated the need to
promote the understanding of the inter-relationship between men and women, the
government and society (Nigeria Educational Research and Development Council, 2007).
Transformative learning theory, in trying to attain civic objectives, could guide learners
construct knowledge which is applied in order to develop into a responsible (effective)
citizens (Biesta & Miedema, 2002; Olla, 2013). For Nigerian learners to construct
knowledge, develop dispositions and acquire skills requires critically examining their
own citizenship ideas in relation to that of others through collaborative learning (Cranton,
2002; Hans 2006).

Critical analysis of citizenship issues is inbuilt in both transformative and social

constructivist classroom civic teaching to help Nigerian learners grasp the import of
examining issues via dialogue and reflective inquiry (discussed below) which underpin
participatory and interactive learning (Brockbank & McGill, 1998; Sockman & Sharma,
2008).

2.5:3 Reflective inquiry Perspective

Reflective inquiry involves young learners acquiring knowledge and skills to explore,
analyse and discuss socio-political issues with intent to solve problems and make
decisions. Through such inquiry young learners explore personal and social values,
identify issues in the context of their experience and relate such social-political issues to
daily activities. Similar to the social constructivist classroom, the civic teacher is expected
to guide learners to construct social reality instead of coercing a set of knowledge and

45
skills. In line with a transformative theory both teacher and learners are active participants
in the classroom learning via content discussion to enhance their competences as effective
critical citizens (Barr, 1977; Giroux, 1980). Despite offering more effective roles to
teachers and learners, it’s unable to justify how developing critical citizenship could
stabilise and sustain Nigerian citizenship practice.

However, the main problem is ascertaining the extent of using these learning theories
(social constructivist, transformative and reflective enquiry) in Nigerian civic classroom
teaching (Falade, 2007). Studies on classroom pedagogies showed that most civic
teachers still use didactic teaching involving citizenship knowledge transmission and
recitation which induce rote learning and memorisation. Though knowledge transmission
and recitation induce understanding of citizenship concepts, it hardly provides
opportunities to put these concepts into practise via experiential learning in the
school/classroom. As discussed in Chapter 3, adequate and regular civic teachers'
professional development could be a recipe for classroom implementation of civic
curriculum (Evans 2006b; Schugurensky & Myers 2003).

Other international studies confirmed that relative or non-implementation of these

learning theories in the civic classroom is not limited to Nigeria (Wendy, 2003; Evans,
2006b; Olla, 2013). These studies showed that most civic classroom implementation
depicts integrating knowledge transmission and transactional leaning which relates to
constructing knowledge on citizenship issues stated in the curriculum objectives, instead
of engaging in critical analysis which leads to change.
Conventional (teacher-based) pedagogies like textbooks, recitations, and worksheets are
common in the civic classroom (Torney-Purta et al, 2001; Wendy, 2003; Davies & Issitt,
2005; Clausen et al, 2008). However, practicing reflective/critical citizenship pedagogies
like open classroom discourse, simulation, group discussion is determined by civic
teachers’ self-efficacy (Arnot et al, 1996; Olla, 2013).

2.6 Conclusion

My literature reviews distinguished civic education from social studies education in

Nigeria. Also, I discussed civic education being the field of interest in this research and
the theoretical framework underpinning its content implementation in the classroom to
answer research questions stated in Chapter 1. The citizenship theories discussed as bases
of civic education boosted the understanding of diverse patterns of effective citizenship

46
traits involving patriotism, identity, duty, participation and rights/autonomy. The
citizenship theories form the basis for critical analysis of how civic curriculum, as a
school subject, is being implemented in Nigeria. Moreover, I examined theoretical
perspectives of civic education pedagogies due to the complexity of civic and citizenship
education. But these interactive learning theories involving social constructivism,
transformative and reflective inquiry share common traits like manifesting via divers
pedagogical components involving dramatisation, open classroom discussion, simulation,
role play and group discussion. Other traits include collaborative inquiry, reflective
citizenship thinking and dialogic interactions among learners during civic classroom to
develop effective citizenship. Employing these learning theories via pedagogical
components could expose learners to experiential learning in the practice of effective
citizenship both inside and outside of the school.

47
 Chapter Three:

Nigeria's Educational Policy and Programme Implementation in

Perspectives

3.0 Introduction

In chapter 1, I presented a picture of a multinational state called Nigeria, besieged with

plethora of citizenship issues. Overcoming these issues led to disarticulating citizenship
content (to form a distinct school subject called Civic Education) from the hitherto school
Social Studies which failed to achieve effective citizenship development due to
implementation lapses. In chapter 2, I discussed citizenship theories underpinning
relevant to this research and categorised these theories into political and nongovernmental
citizenship norms. I integrated the two norm to conceptualised effective citizenship
development for this study and provide rationale for such holistic integration. Also, I
proposed relevant interactive learning theories to implement the subject in the classroom.

Since politics is an integral part of human activities which includes education, I start this
chapter with Nigeria's political journey linking it to the educational trends. I then examine
educational policy and programme reforms starting with expounding the meaning of
policy and distinguish it from programme. I put in perspective Nigeria's educational
policy reforms and trends and the major setbacks like the implementation lapses. Besides,
I examine civic curriculum implementation in relation to objectives actualisation,
available resources and classroom pedagogical practices.

3.1 Nigeria's Political Developments

Nigeria's journey to becoming a multinational state began through her connection with a
group of European (Christian) missionaries and subsequent colonisation by the British
government. The Scramble and Partition of Africa during the Berlin Conference (1884
to1885) under Otto von Bismarck of Germany led to the ceding of the area of Nigeria to
the British colonialists (Griffiths, 1986). But, this reached a climax in 1914 when the
Northern and Southern protectorates were amalgamated (termed the mistake of 1914) by
the British government, headed by Lord Lugard, to form a multinational state called
'Nigeria'.

Politically, Nigeria gained political independence and republican status from Britain on
1st October, 1960 and 1963 respectively. Presently, Nigeria operates a three-tier federation

48
involving 6 geo-political zones, 36 states, 774 local government regions and a federal
capital territory, (formally Lagos) Abuja. Post-independent Nigeria started her political
journey with a parliamentary government similar to British Westminster (Afigbo, 1991).
Between 1979 and 1984, 1993 and 1994 and 1999 till present, Nigeria has been operating
the United States presidential system of government. Nigeria has experienced 24 out of
its 54 years of political independence under diverse military dictatorships.

As stated in Chapter 1, Nigeria, under military rule, experienced citizenship (socio-

political) problems regarding human rights abuses through retroactive laws and the
abandonment of various democratic attempts via frequent coup d’etat. As is the global
trait of military rule, citizens were deprived of rights, experienced injustices and
subverted the rebirth of virile and sustainable democratic citizenship culture in the
country (Moja, 2000; Farayola, 2007; Bolaji, 2011). The implications of long years of
military rule is that citizens born in the 1960s, the period of political independence have
witnessed more military (dictatorship) regimes than democratic governance. Thus, those
citizens became used to domineering tendencies which made popular democracy and
sovereignty strange. We cultivated more autocratic dispositions than democratic ideals
and values (Aluko, 1998; Falade, 2006). Prolonged military rule discarded 'participatory
citizenship’ involving school-based political education as a pre-condition to develop
effective citizenship (Falade, 2006; Faulks, 2006).

Unfortunately, our education system was in serious jeopardy, lacking required political
will and school resources because military through authoritarian rule usurped and
monopolised state machinery involving resources allocation through policy reforms to
manipulate educational (curriculum) issues. Thus, as stated in chapter 1, making
education (curriculum) design to continually depend on politics (Tyler, 1949; Wheeler,
1967; Doll, 1978; Ogunyemi, 2009). However, before going into curriculum politics, it is
important to conceptualise education policy and programmes and put in context Nigeria's
educational policy trends.

3.2 Nigeria's Educational Policy and Programme in Perspectives

The philosophy (national goals) of a state guides diverse policy design including
educational policy and programme and Nigeria is not an exception to this parlance. Thus,
it is vital to examine educational trends which has affected the school system in

49
developing effective citizenship development in Nigeria. But, I start with defining policy
and programmes.

3.2:1 Conceptualising and Developing Education Policy and Programmes

Globally, governments have enlarged education tasks to the extent that virtually all facets
of education sector are guided by policy and programme enactment. This led to various
studies exploring the policy and programme intents translated into classroom
implementation. Exploring how policy and programme intent were translated into
actualisation reveals diverse insights, practices and devices used to enhance education in
our changing polity (Cooper et al, 2008; Murphy et al, 2008; Plank et al, 2009). From the
above premise, I view policy as a dynamic issue/activity/value-based government action
plan to solve identified problems to actualise changes in the polity. From the citizenship
outlook, it reveals the government’s concrete intents, dispositions and actions to change
current citizenship (socio-political) issues via universal basic education reform (Cochran
& Malone, 1999; Naidu, 2005; Lennon, 2009). A programme is the actions implemented
to actualise specific policy intents. It involves translating policy goals, proposals and
mandates into actions with results (reality) via execution to solve specific problems.
Specifically, it entails evolving civic curriculum classroom execution to tackle effective
citizenship problems (Horn & Meter, 1975; Henry, 2006; Ejere, 2011; Bolaji, 2014).
Educational policy and programmes are developed from diverse ideological beliefs and
goals initiated by individuals, a political group or a state. Policy and programme emanates
through a sequential and gradual process intended to attain national development. Thus,
I argue that designing civic curriculum was due to identified democratic (socio-political)
citizenship issues after the twenty-four years of military dictatorship discussed above.
These policy and programme intents and objectives are encapsulated in the National
Policy on Education (NPE) (2004), Universal Basic Education scheme and civic
education curriculum discussed below.

3.2:2 Nigeria's Education System and Policy Reforms

Nigeria's founding fathers through the national policy on education (NPE, 2004)
perceived education as an instrument 'par excellence’ to achieve the national goals which
included a free and democratic society; a just and egalitarian society; a united, strong and
self-reliant nation; a great and dynamic economy; and a land full of bright opportunities
for all citizens (NPE, 2004, p. 4). However, successive governments' education policy

50
reforms are consistently determined by historical, socio-political, economic and religious
trends relating to diverse ethnic nationality groups which make-up Nigeria. Also, each
policy reform has discrete structure basic to mediate knowledge and skills required for
effective citizenship development necessary for continued existence of the groups
(Sofadekan, 2013; Bolaji, 2014). Based on this, Nigeria operated a diverse educational
system which involved traditional, Islamic and a western pattern of education as
discussed below.

3.2:2(a) Traditional Education

Prior to Islamic and western education being introduced in Nigeria, each ethnic
nationality group had an undocumented and more flexible informal system of education.
It involved the teaching and learning process of the indigenous people whereby young
and adult learners develop literacy, dispositions, and skills in the absence of conventional
syllabus and scheme of work outside the usual school milieu. There were the seven
cardinal goals of traditional education and from which effective citizenship development
emphasises social responsibility, job orientation, political engagement, religious and
moral values (Adesina, 1988; Lawal, 1999; Bolaji, 2004). Native education stressed
functionalism whereby the curriculum was based on immediate societal requirements.
Learners were prepared and inducted into effective citizenship participation after they had
developed character, inculcated respect for elders, developed a sense of belonging which
enabled them to engage actively community affairs and show obedience to those in
authority. In fact, effective citizenship entails fostering morals, manners, conformity to
authority and respect for the customs, conventions, rules (laws) of his group, absolute
loyalty and patriotism to group beliefs, values and practices. Its informal nature showed
that parents, siblings and the whole community were involved in imparting curriculum
content to both young and adult learners from birth through to old age (Taiwo, 1980;
Fafunwa, 1991; Sofadekan, 2013).

3.2:2(b) Islamic Education

Islamic education entails transmitting religious tenets through classroom teaching and
learning process in line with the injunctions of the Quran. The curriculum goal involved
the school indoctrinating young learners with knowledge, dispositions and skills to
engage in adult Muslim life which enables learners to confess Islam as their religion as
well as their way of life. The curriculum content is to develop learners’ scholarly

51
achievements and quality by teaching about the Qur’an in Arabic via recitation and
memorising chapters (Taiwo, 1980; Fafunwa, 1991). Islamic schooling has three phases
which involved elementary, interpretation and advanced stages which guide learners to
develop basic knowledge of Islamic education and beliefs. The second phase is the Ilm
School where young learners recite and construe the Qur’an and its notes in line with their
intelligence level. Learners engaged in secular subjects involving Arabic grammar,
Literature, and poetry, Islamic law, the Hadith and Tafsir. The last phase involved
specialising along a professional study in astrology, mysticism, law, theology and
medicine (Taiwo, 1980; Sofadekan, 2012).

3.2:2(c) Pre-independent (Colonial) Education

Initially, western education emerged in Nigeria via missionaries to aid conversion to

Christianity. However, the colonial government intervened in the control of education by
enacting the 1882 Education Ordinance. Educational policies were initiated to cater for
the interest and immediate needs of the government in the colony. There was hardly any
concern to educate the native people despite the missionaries’ request (White, 1996). The
British government found only Grammar Schools with a curriculum entirely lacking any
form practical content essential for science development in Nigeria. The content lacked
relevance to the local needs thus educating young Nigerians out of their environment
(Fafunwa, 1991; Taiwo, 1980; Falola & Heaton, 2008; Williams, 2008; Sofadekan,
2012). Also the education policy initiated in the colony remarkably differs to the level
and principles of education operating in Britain. That is, colonial territories' educational
goals differed from that operating in Britain. Nigeria's first university started in 1948, 34
years after the amalgamation of the Southern and Northern protectorates into one Nigeria
and 89 years after opening the Church Missionary Society (CMS) Grammar School (in
Lagos) as the first Nigerian secondary grammar school (Kelly, 1979; Ajibola, 2008; Kuye
and Garba, 2009).

However, missionaries were not allowed by the colonial government to open missions
and schools in the Muslim North in order to not disturb the religious-political structure
on which the colonial administration was based. This government decision led to the
educational imbalance among the three regions still evident today in Nigeria (Clarke,
1978; Csapo, 1983; Tibenderana, 1983; Ozigboh, 1988; Pittin, 1990; Aluede, 2006).
Upon attaining political independence in 1960, colonial educational structure was

52
criticised by indigenous educationists, founding nationalists and politically conscious
Nigerians because, according to late Professor Babs Fafunwa:

"the current educational structure rather than initiating positive values in Nigeria
however, tends to isolate him from the socio-cultural and political milieu...the
system educates the learners out of his milieu" (Fafunwa, 1974, pg. 194).
The opposition and agitation against colonial pattern of education meant to train
Nigerians to serve the interest of the British government (Fafunwa, 1974; Akinlaye, 1981)
opened a new trend in the post independent Nigeria discussed below

3.2:2(d) Post-independent (indigenous) Educational Trends

The pattern of colonial education discussed above revealed that prior to independence,
Nigeria lacked clear cut policies on the development of socio-political institutions leading
to effective citizenship. This resulted in extensive concerns that colonial education was
inadequate to attain our national goals among which was effective citizenship. Thus the
agitations for curriculum change rooted in Nigerian citizenship values. This was to meet
the aspirations of the newly-autonomous multinational state which required integrating
diverse multi-ethnic traits with the needs of the (then) modern era. The founding fathers
perceived indigenous education as the main avenue to develop new citizenship (socio-
political) order (Ijaduola, 1998; Woolman, 2001; Fafunwa, 2004).

This led to Nigeria’s participation in the social studies Mombasa Conference of 1968 in
Kenya, where the need for effective citizenship for nation building was stressed. The
conference agreed on indigenising effective citizenship to suit each country’s contextual
factors via social studies. As stated in Chapter 1, the subject was to mediate learners'
skills, dispositions and knowledge development on political issues involving democracy,
fundamental human rights, good governance) and nongovernmental (multiculturalism,
drug, child/women abuse and trafficking, social injustice, environmental and population
issues) vital to global citizenship. The philosophy underpinning the development of
effective citizenship via social studies in Nigeria was based on articulated views that the
subject could guide learners to make informed and logical decisions for the benefit of
their community as citizens of diverse ethnic nationalities (Akinlaye, 1981; Contreras,
1990; NCSS, 1992; Muyanda-Mutebi, 1994; Adeyemi, 1998; Idowu, 2001; Ogunyemi,
2011).

53
In pursuing the above, several conferences, workshops inter alia were organised from
1969 to 1973. These were National Curriculum Conference, National Primary Education
Curriculum workshop 1971, the Teacher Education Curriculum workshop 1972, the
Secondary Education Curriculum workshop and seminar on National Policy on
Education, 1973.

The 1969 National Curriculum Conference agreed on developing an indigenous education

curriculum opposed to the colonial legacy. Hence, a new national education philosophy
evolved to equip learners for the task of nation-building (Fafunwa, 2004; Taiwo, 1980;
Akinlaye, 1981; Woolman, 2001). The underlining point of that conference was stated in
the keynote address delivered by the (then) Chief Federal Adviser on Education, Dr. S. J.
Cookey, recognizing how imperative citizenship development was by declaring that:

I agree with those who say that citizens are made, not born, and... those who
believe that citizenship can be taught. If the understanding and practice of
citizenship among Nigerians is a true measure of the Nigerian educational system,
then our system has failed woefully… We have not yet begun to think of Nigeria
as one and of each one of us as intrinsically part of the Nigerian society. This has
been the tragedy of our past, and now is the opportunity to remedy the defects of
the past (Cookey, 1972: xxxi).
As discussed in chapter 2, achieving nation-building in most developing countries like
Nigeria has led to erroneously perceiving the schools as state agent to develop patriotic,
loyal and passive citizenship instead of guiding young learners to develop and exercise
their autonomy to question loyalty and patriotism to the state.

The 1973 seminar articulated the proposals agreed in earlier conferences, seminars and
workshops to become Nigeria's official National policy on Education (Taiwo, 1980;
Fafunwa, 2004; Illo & Bolaji, 2007; Osokoya, 2010).

In 1976, the military regime introduced six years of free and compulsory Universal
Primary Education (UPE) similar to the one initiated in the Western region by late
Premier Obafemi Awolowo in 1955. UPE was consistent with rights of Nigerian child to
functional education and knowledge at stated in Article 28 of the United Nations
Convention on Rights of the Child (UNCRC, 1990; Fafunwa, 2004; Ajibola, 2008).

From 1960 to 1982, Nigeria operated 6-5-4, signifying 6 years of primary education, 5
years of secondary and 4 years of higher education across the three tiers respectively. A
follow-up to the 1969 Curriculum Conference was the first post-independent education
system involving the 6-3-3-4. That is 6 years of primary education, 3years of Junior

54
Secondary School (JSS), 3 years of Senior Secondary School (SSS) and 4 years of higher
education. The implementation for the entire country did not start until 1982 due to
operational issues (National Policy on Education, 1981, 1998; Omotayo, Ihebereme,
&Maduewesi, 2008; Ajibola, 2008; Uwaifo & Uddin, 2009).

In acknowledging its support for UNESCO’s ‘Education for All’ (EFA) goals by 2015,
the democratic government at the federal level introduced the Universal Basic Education
(UBE) scheme with a new (9-3-4) educational policy in September, 1999. This supplanted
both the 1976 UPE and 1982 6-3-3-4 system (Nwagwu, 2002; Obioma, 2005; Obioma &
Ajagun, 2006b; Omokhodion, 2008). This initiative involves firstly 9 years (6-16yrs)
integrating primary and junior secondary into a continuous system of schooling referred
to as lower basic (primaries 1-3), middle basic (primaries 4-6) and upper basic (junior
secondary) which is free and compulsory for Nigerian learners. This implies effective
citizenship is a developmental programme which requires sequencing knowledge based
on learners' level and ability to develop gradually from known to unknown, simple to
complex, narrow to broader knowledge. The civic content acquaints them with more
complex aspects of effective citizenship as they transit from lower to middle and upper
basic and senior secondary levels (Muller, 2000; Sifuna, 2000; Kutu, 2010).

Evidently, there were inconsistencies in educational policy formulation and this became
an issue making the development of effective citizenship unrealisable. Post-independent
education development leading to the return of civic education shows that current
educational practices contradict the envisaged policy goals highlighted above. In addition,
using the school system to attain national goals contradicts present realities indicating
that, arguably, the standard is high but education quality is low and the sector is in crisis
(Moja, 2000; Bolaji, 2011, 2014; Ajibola, 2008). This is ascribed to three issues: over-
politicising education, non-involvement of stakeholders and policy/programme
implementation problems as discussed below.

3.2:3 Problems of Education Policies in Nigeria

3.2:3(a) Over-politicisation of Education

Politics covers the diverse sectors of Nigeria including the education sector hence
attaining nation-building via education is mostly politically inspired. Arguably,
curriculum design and implementation in Nigeria are educational actions affected by
political processes (Woolman, 2001; Musa, 2005; Ho & Alviar-Martin, 2010; Ogunyemi,

55
2010). Therefore, the Nigerian civic curriculum process intended to develop young
learners' effective citizenship, inter alia, was undoubtedly exposed to manipulation by
political classes (Westheimer & Kahne, 2004; Kahne & Middaugh, 2008). Consequently,
curriculum politics is inevitable in education and attempting to make education apolitical
is unrealistic. As stated in chapter 1, politics was the underlining issue which truncated
developing effective citizenship through social studies education. Individual and sectional
political interest overrule national interests in social studies policy paradoxes thus
changing negatively the fortunes of Nigerian social studies education (Adedipe, 1985;
Ogunyemi, 2010, 2011).

Outright rejection of (instead of modifying) colonial education, though based on

nationalistic sentiments by the founding fathers in the 1950s and 1960s was actually due
to politicisation of education (Ivowi, 1984; Woolman, 2001; Ogunyemi, 2010, 2011). In
fact, the issue of politicisation of education ,1980s and 1990s, led to diverse policies
which included proposed equal educational opportunities for the gifted, education of
women and nomadic/fishermen education. Also, political parties manipulated education
via slogans and manifestos such as ‘free education at all levels’ and ‘qualitative
education’ as part of programmes to obtain votes from vulnerable electorate (Awokoya,
1981; Ogunyemi, 1998, 2010; Bolaji, 2014).

3.2:3(b) Stakeholders' non-involvement in curriculum reforms

Another issue involves non-participation of stakeholders in the design and formulation of

civic curriculum programme. Civic curriculum development entails a gradual progression
process of developing components like content, materials and methods with intent to
impact knowledge, dispositions and skills via the school to learners (Nicholls & Nicholls,
1977; Onwuka, 1996; Oloruntegbe, 2003; Orukotan, 2006; Oloruntegbe & Daramola,
2007).

Whereas, literature showed that developing curricula (programme) should involve inputs,
processes and outputs of education sector stakeholders. Regrettably, the general trend is
non-involvement of stakeholders (teachers, students and parents) in the process of
curricula design either by seeking their views or direct participation. A study avowed that
85% of teachers confirm non-involvement in designing their subject curriculum (Yigzaw,
1982; Gauteng Department of Education, 1996; Carl, 2002; Obayan, 2002). An exception
to this trend showed that civic curriculum development in Australia and South Africa

56
involved stakeholders' collaborative efforts (Gauteng Department of Education, 1996;
Nunan, 1989). However, most studies agreed on stakeholders' non-involvement in
curricula development. Curricula implemented in Nigerian's classrooms are centrally
developed by the Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (NERDC),
established by the Federal government. Just like Nigeria, most curricula design in
transitional democracies operates top-down superficially imposed administrative
decisions which make stakeholders beneficiaries rather than active participants in
curricula development (Ramparsad, 2001; Zhao et al, 2002; Beggs, 2004; Beswick, 2009;
Ogunyemi, 2010; Oloruntegbe, 2011).

Yet, not partaking in civic curriculum design could be the reason for teachers' casual
outlook to classroom implementation. This isolation shows utter disregard for locally-
driven (grassroots) collaborative civic curriculum design which gives such reforms wide
national approval (Nomdo, 1995, Saban, 1995). So, stakeholders (as implementers) lack
commitment towards implementing such policy leading to poor application and low
performance as the outcome (MoE, 1999; Obayan, 2000; Okebukola, 2004; Ivowi, 2004;
Ajayi, 2007; Omokhodion, 2008; Edho, 2009).

Also, teachers were hardly engaged in any form of training to acquaint them with the new
curricula despite as sole implementers of curricula reforms (Thaman, 1988; Schnidt &
Pramwat, 2006; Oloruntegbe, 2011). Nigerian government has never done enough to
sensitise the citizens about various curricula programmes. Citizens are hardly aware of
policies initiated for their development. However, denying stakeholders active
engagement in curricula planning and design is a step to implementation lapses (Eminue,
2005).

3.2:3(c) Curriculum Implementation Lapses

The education sector encounters policy changes like the wind vane with every successive
government due to poor implementation process. Though Nigerian bureaucrats are
recognised experts in policy planning and design, the act of translating such policies to
action is hindered by implementation lapses. The poor performance of education policies
(UPE 6-3-3-4, inter alia) in attaining targets were due to the implementation process
involving lack of funding ensuing in deficient instructional material, inadequate qualified
teachers, irregular teacher training and classroom implementation lacking active
pedagogical practices (Moja, 2000; Ajibola, 2008; Ejere, 2011; Bolaji, 2014). Recent

57
evidence shows that implementation problems leading to discarding UPE are being
experienced under UBE policy. The Education for All (EFA) Regional overview reported
the state of affairs in sub-Saharan countries, with Nigeria as one of the countries in serious
danger of not meeting the targets of Universal Basic Education (EFA, 2000; Ejere, 2011).
Based on the Education for all Development Index (EDI) of less than 0.8, Nigeria is
among 16 countries in sub-Saharan Africa furthest from meeting EFA targets. Also, in
the Global Competitiveness report (2009-2010), the level of primary education in Nigeria
was ranked 132 out of 133 countries surveyed (Ejere, 2011). Evidently, lapses in the
process of implementing education policies and programmes caused poor performance
and the inability to attain specific goals in Nigeria.

Conversely, a unique trait of the UBE scheme is using the school civic curriculum to
develop citizenship knowledge, dispositions and skills required to attain national goals
(NERCD, 2007; Mukhongo, 2010; Okeahialam, 2013). Government belief in engaging
the school confirms Etzion's claim of the school as state agent to implement civic
curriculum in the classroom to develop effective (socio-political) citizenship in learners
(Csapo, 1981; Bray & Lee, 1993; Etzion, 1993; Morimoto, 1997). However, to what
extent has the implementation of school based civic curriculum achieved its goals in
young learners requires examining below policy documents and possible adherence to
them during classroom implementation.

3.3 Nigeria's Policy/Programme Documents' Implementation: the stance

Literature

In the last section, I conceptualise education policy and programme and relate it pre and
post independent education trends in Nigeria. Also, I found that apart from
inconsistencies leading to frequent changes in education policy and programmes,
implementation lapses, among others, is the bane of policy actualisation. This section
discusses what provisos policy and programme documents make and what extant
literature and studies say on classroom civic curriculum implementation (regarding civic
objectives, school resources and pedagogical practices) because the two set out
implementation measures. Also, I use both documents and extant literature and studies to
underpin (or otherwise) my results in Chapters 5 to 7. This helps me to translate into
workable blueprints existing policy and programmes making it possible to explore
whether civic curriculum objectives developed learners' effective citizenship via civic
curriculum implementation.

58
3.3:1 Civic Education Policy Documents Perspectives

As stated in Chapter 1, the first official policy document for education in Nigeria is the
National Policy on Education (NPE). It is designed to reveal the government contract
with Nigerians. The National Policy on Education was first published in 1977 and
subsequently revises in 1998 and 2004. In complying with the dynamics of social
demands for educational change, the first edition undergone changes. The document
states the five national goals which forms the basis of our nation building process: a free
and democratic society; a just and egalitarian society; a great and dynamic economy and
a land full of bright opportunities for all citizens (NPE, 2004, p.1). Also, the NPE defines
the process of using education as a tool par excellence to attain national goals like, inter
alia, developing effective citizens. It is the reference point for school curricula
programmes such as civic education. The second policy document called the UBE
implementation guideline/strategy was specifically designed to execute the new
education reforms called the Universal basic Education scheme (UBE). According to the
Jomitien Declaration (1990) and action plan on 'education for all' and the New Delhi
Declaration (1991) for the E-9 countries, basic education involves education using the
school instructional styles, inter alia, for the overall development of young learners'
potentials (FMoE, 1999). The third document is the Civic Education Curriculum
programme designed to underpin the classroom implementation of the above two policy
documents (NPE and UBE). It covers divers units such as objectives, resources,
pedagogy, discussed below.

3.3:2(a) Conceptualising Civic Education Objectives

One of the issues likely to determine the pattern of civic instructions in this study is
developing appropriate (well defined) civic objectives. I examine this issue because it
affects the use of other civic curriculum components like content, teaching aids and
pedagogies in classroom civic learning. For civic objectives to elicit proper feedback from
the implementers requires them being stated in clear and measurable terms. This helps
implementers to know societal expectations and the discretion open to them (Horn &
Meter, 1975; Ejere, 2011).

Studies on citizenship curriculum claim that planning, designing and actualising civic
curriculum starts with stating well defined objectives due to its impact on other
components. Objectives link other components as content, pedagogy (methodology),

59
instructional resources and evaluation. Conceptually, civic objectives are the intended
knowledge, actions and dispositions aimed and applied to relevant instructional settings.
Civic objectives are the expected instructional/behavioural changes shown by learners
due to classroom civic learning to develop effective citizenship (Tyler, 1948; Wheeler,
1976; Okobiah, 1986; Ali, 2004). Well stated objectives are characterised by: (i) being
learner-centred which expounds instructional activities that learners engage in with(out)
scaffolding during and after civic lessons. (ii) focusing on developing civic learners'
effective citizenship (cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains) components. That
is, focusing on the three learning domains instead of stressing one above the others
(Curzon, 1990; Ololobou, 2010; Ahmad, 2011; Falade, 2011; Philip-Ogoh, 2011). In view
of this, I explore whether civic objectives, presently implemented, are knowledge,
dispositions and skills based to develop civic learners' effective citizenship.

3.3:2(b) Policy/Programme Documents and Literature on Civic Education

Objectives

The effective citizenship development goal in the NPE evolved from the national goals
stated above. Attaining these goals requires developing effective citizens using the civic
curriculum to engage in social constructivist (learner-centred) teaching and learning
activities for optimal development (S.1 (4d), S.1 (9d) & (9f), NPE, 2004). Also, the UBE
implementation guideline proposed that effective citizenship, at the basic education level,
involved learners developing knowledge, skills and dispositions allowing them to
discharge their civic/citizenship obligations efficiently and competently. Civic learners
are to develop ethical, moral and civic dispositions and skills required for life-long
learning for active community participation. Similarly, the civic curriculum document
underlined skills (intellectual and participatory) acquisition by civic learners to act
independently when dealing with various social and personal issues. Evidently, the three
documents focused on knowledge, dispositions and skills acquisition as basic to
developing civic learners' effective citizenship.

Extant studies show most Nigerian civic classroom implementation focuses more on
cognitive (knowledge) objectives at the expense of affective (dispositions) and
psychomotor (skills) domains. Evidence of overemphasis on knowledge in the social
studies and civic objectives is revealed in studies on the domain-focus of social studies
(civic education) objectives in Nigeria. A study shows that 99.43% of civic objectives for

60
the upper basic level (JSS 1-3) are knowledge-based while 0.567% are affective
(dispositions) laden and the psychomotor (skills) domain is absent (Mansaray &
Ogunyemi, 1994; Ifegbesan, 2008; Falade, 2011; Philip-Ogoh, 2011; Ahmad, 2011).
Unsurprisingly, the civic curriculum currently implemented suggests that most civic
objectives are stated in cognitive terms using words such as identify, explain, mention,
differentiate and list showing the curriculum as inducing knowledge constructions to the
detriment of disposition and skills.

However, unduly stressing knowledge domain indicated it is examination oriented

thereby impeding effective civic practice in the school and community (NPE, 2004; Po,
2004; Okam, 2008). The absence of dispositions and skills based issues in the civic
objectives limits learners’ chances of gaining experiential learning by practicing
knowledge construction, whereas active citizenship needs integration of the three civic
components discussed. So, focusing on the cognitive component over and above
dispositions and/or skills could lead to a pedagogical flaw hindering effective citizenship
development (Bruer, 1993; Shanker, 1997). However, achieving the objectives requires
adequate school resources provision discussed in the next section.

3.3:3 School Resources

I examined statutory policy documents and literature on civic curriculum objectives being
the goal translated into classroom implementation using school resources. In this section,
I classify school resources as human (teachers’ recruitment and training) and material
resources. Statutory documents (NPE and UBE guidelines) stated that a nation's schools
cannot rise above their teachers' quality and thus stress the need to improve teacher
education. Also, teachers should be involved in educational (curricula) planning,
development and implementation because past reforms failed due to neglecting the
"teacher factor". Based on this, I examine what statutory documents and literature says
on teachers' recruitment, training development and the provision of instructional
materials.

3.3:3(a) Policy Document on (Human Resources) Civic Teachers’ Recruitment

The National Policy for Education says persons qualified to teach civic education should
possess appropriate and relevant academic and professional certification (NPE, 2004, pp
26-7). This was underpinned by UBE guidelines stating that teachers recruited should
display a wide variety of innovation and creativity. So, I appraise extant studies and

61
literature on whether qualified civic (classroom curriculum implementers) teachers were
recruited in conformity with statutory documents standards.

3.3:3(a) i Human Resources - Availability/Recruitment of Teachers

Human resources refers to effective coordination of civic teachers' activities towards

attaining civic objectives. As stated above, recruitment involves engaging academically
and professionally qualified persons to translate civic objectives into classroom
implementation within the school system. It is a person legally certified as qualified to
guide learners to develop civic knowledge, dispositions and skills within a formal
instructional context (Awanbor, 1998; Adepoju & Fabiyi, 2007; Okecha, 2008). In this
study, recruitment entails employing new or improvising (seconding/drafting) teachers to
teach civic education.

However, studies lacked consensus on teacher recruitment status towards implementing

civic education. Some studies indicated high teacher recruitment for subjects including
civic education due to the Federal Teachers’ Scheme (FTS) introduced in 2006 as an
avenue to provide teachers for the implementation of basic education. Others studies,
although not denying such recruitment, insisted that recruitment of inadequately qualified
civic teachers affected 85% of the states in Nigeria. This hindered quality of the delivery
of civic education (Federal Ministry of Education, 2005; Adenipekun, 2006; Adepoju &
Fabiyi, 2007; DFID, 2008; EFA Fast Track Initiative, 2009; Obanya, 2010; Ejere, 2011;
Okoro, 2011; Reuben et al, 2012; Tsafe, 2013). Underpinning this was a study of six
(Bayelsa, Ondo, Katsina, Kwara, Plateau, and Gombe) states showing only Kwara was
nearest to the required 1 teacher per 35 learners specified in the NPE. Also, a personnel
audit shows that basic education ideally requires 966 308 teachers but only 627 550
teachers are available with 368 613 (55.2%) professionally qualified thus there is still a
requirement for about 597 695 teachers (Adeyemi 2007; UBEC, 2009). The recruitment
shortfall is due to inaccurate data for planning and reductions in education budgets leading
to underfunding of teacher training institutions. Also, teachers' pay package and lack of
promotion opportunities meant poor job motivation. There is disparity regarding working
conditions (salaries, fringe benefits, promotion, etc) between teaching and other
professions (Adelabu, 2005; Global Campaign for Education, 2006; Omokhodion, 2008;
Obayan, 2010; Ejere, 2011). This puts off qualified persons from taking up a teaching job
leading to personnel improvisation as a stopgap.

62
3.3:3(a) ii Personnel Improvisation

The problem of inadequately qualified teachers established above led to personnel (civic
teacher) improvisation by government and school administrators. Improvisation involved
seconding teachers lacking the requisite specialist academic qualifications. Conceptually,
it entails accessing teachers hitherto recruited to teach related (social studies) or unrelated
subjects (as role substitute) to implement classroom civic curriculum (Weick, 1993a;
Crossan & Sorrenti, 1997; Onifade, 2004; Mendonça, et al, 2007). I applied ‘personnel
improvisation’ in this study (as used in other fields) to explain government resolve to
augment teacher shortage (Brown & Eisenhardt, 1998; Moorman & Miner, 1998b).

Improvisation, in this study, raises the debate on whether these teachers possess the
requisite civic content knowledge and teaching skills to implement civic education.
Studies posit that specialist teachers are better than teachers not formally certified
(Darling-Hammond, 1999; OECD, 2010). Evidently, civic education (specialist) teachers
have good content knowledge and teaching skills for better efficiency than non-specialists
(Adeyinka & Koloi, 2007).

The first of such improvisation measures was the federal government recruiting post-
secondary school leavers (para-teachers) as a makeshift for teacher shortfall. They were
trained via a Pivotal Teacher Training Programme (PTTP) for 18-months and sent to the
classroom. Inadequate subject knowledge (specialisation) and teaching skills made it
difficult for them to teach civic education. Consequently, teachers select themes based on
difficulty level, adopt didactic (recitation) pedagogies-copy-work, dictation and lecturing
due to lack of professional skills (Mangwat, 2001; Obinna, 2002)

The other teacher improvisation measure involved school administrators drafting in

teachers with teaching skills but lacking civic content knowledge. Studies showed most
Nigerian states have many of these improvised teachers. For instance, Balyesa State has
5,202 teachers where only 2,246 (43%) are qualified -592/11% with a bachelor’s degree
and 1654/31% with NCE, the minimum qualification to teach at basic school (Jekayinfa,
2007). Another study argued that of the 575,068 basic school teachers, 282,000 lack either
certification, and/or specialisation to teach a specific subject (Theobald et.al., 2007;
Adeyemi 2007; Sam, 2009). This study was confirmed by international reports showing
most basic school civic teachers lacked curriculum content knowledge expertise. Only
25% of the school teachers in sub-Saharan Africa surveyed have pedagogical skills

63
(United Nation Education, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO), 2004, 2006).
From the above I observe that implementation of civic reforms involves high numbers of
teachers lacking professional certification and/or civic content knowledge and
specialisation.

This trend is dire because teachers’ acquired teaching quality, knowledge and skills are
related to enhanced achievements in the civic learners’ classroom (Interstate New
Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium, 1995; Darling Hammond; Lu, 2005).

Improvisation could lead to filling civic classrooms with inexpert teachers constituting a
threat to the intellectual, moral, and emotional growth of learners. Even the organisational
theory stated that untrained teachers constitute a menace to the school due to poor skills
leading to causing serious errors (Fafunwa, l991; Mangwat, 2001; Bolman & Deal, 2003).

Also, improvisation could lead to lack of motivation for most Nigerian teachers whose
commitment, passion and enthusiasm to the profession have been weakened. Supporting
this, a study of teachers in the South-West Zone of Nigeria agreed that teachers were
unmotivated due to a delay in paying salaries, among other factors. This resulted in
regular strike actions, absenteeism, low teacher performance output which put in jeopardy
the implementation of the classroom civic programme (Anyaegbu, Christman & Jingpu,
2004; Adelabu, 2005). Again, organisational theorists assert that since teachers’ skills,
attitude and commitment are crucial to developing effective citizenship, government
sincerity to satisfy teachers’ needs could raise their output. Maslow expounded the order
of needs to include, inter alia, physiological, self-esteem and self-actualisation. These are
basic needs for teachers to expect from their jobs (Maslow, 1954; McGregor, 1960;
Bolman & Deal, 2003). From whatever perspective, recruitment could seriously effect
civic implementation which involves teachers’ poor performance due to excess workload,
large class size, poor planning and preparation.

3.3:3(b) Teachers’ Continuous Professional Development

Developing effective citizenship requires not just providing certified civic teachers but
confirming their continuous professional development (CPD). The statutory documents
(NPE and UBE guidelines) proposed reinforcing teachers with general, basic and
systematic hands-on practical skills. This enables them to effectively perform their duties
and also caters for the pre-service teacher education deficit through in-service training as
an integral part of CPD (NPE, 2004). Such in-service training should stress classroom

64
collaboration (team-work), dialogue, inquiry and content knowledge. Based on these
documents, I appraise literature on whether civic teachers acquire regular training on new
teaching skills as stated in Chapter 1.

In this study, continuing professional development is the experiential skills, knowledge,

and pedagogical competences acquired by civic teachers to constantly sustain their
professional and academic efficiency in order to guide young learners to develop effective
citizenship and realise teachers' self-actualisation. It is experiential because knowledge
results from acquiring diverse experiences; however, experience alone is inadequate to
explain teachers’ adoption of new skills (Steffy, 1987; Vonk, 1991; Bell & Gilbert, 1996;
Harland & Kinder, 1997). This shows that enhancing competence in teaching civic
education requires regularly acquiring new civic knowledge, skills, and dispositions. CPD
comes in diverse forms involving workshops and regular inductions initiated and planned
by the state/local government education board to develop new and serving civic teachers.
Selected civic teachers are exposed to current information and skills by experts on
citizenship issues. Also, CPD involves career-long training via teachers enrolling
individually for distance learning/sandwich programmes on a part-time basis
(Mohammed, 2006; Yusuf, n.d.). Also, CPD could involve civic teachers’ initiatives to
empower themselves through self or group directed professional development activities
using information and communication technology (ICT).

The above mentioned CPD, if properly utilised, has diverse positive impacts amongst
which is to enhance teachers’ self-efficacy, their confidence, beliefs and ability to perform
effectively. (UNESCO, 2005; Global Campaign for Education, 2006). Self-efficacy
involves civic teachers’ beliefs in their abilities to coordinate classroom learning activities
in order to attain civic curriculum objectives. Teachers' confidence in their ability helps
them to employ new instructional strategies to stimulate young learners’ interest. Thus,
acquiring new training involves knowledge of citizenship norms and pedagogical
practices enabling civic learners to develop skills for public service (Bandura 1997;
Slepkov, 2008; Colbert, Brown, Ghoi, & Thomas, 2008). These studies show the impact
of CPD on civic teachers’ pedagogical skills, content knowledge and classroom self-
efficacy (Adeyinka, 2001; Adeyinka & Koloi, 2007). CPD, if properly utilised, could
instil more commitment in teachers as a crucial dynamic for schools’ successful
implementation of civic education. CPD could trigger commitment, passion and
enthusiasm as part of the ethical and moral virtues civic teachers need to display in

65
classroom practice in order to impact effective citizenship in young learners (Huberman,
1993; Firestone, 1996; Louis, 1998; Tsui & Cheng, 1999; Yadav & Bhardwaj, 2013).
Through professional development teachers develop commitment, emotional attachment,
passion and enthusiasm through which teaching is perceived as a calling thus assuming
the status of parents (in loco parentis) to the young learners (Pollard and Tann, 1987;
Anonymous, 2004; Adeyinka & Koloi, 2007). Conversely, lacking commitment and
passion is reflected through absenteeism, improper and inadequate planning and
preparation for civic teaching which affects the quality of classroom effectiveness thus
hindering effective citizenship (Nacino–Brown et al, 1982; Abari, 2004).

The positive impacts of diverse forms of CPD discussed above are crucial to a successful
realisation of civic curriculum and effective citizenship considering that pre-service
teacher education seems insufficient in equipping teachers with current civic content
knowledge and new active pedagogies (Moja, 2000, Nkwanga & Canagarajah, 1999).
This is because the teacher education programme stressed theoretical knowledge and had
a superfluous emphasis on paper qualifications without acceptable benchmarks for
certification. Pre-service teacher education hardly equipped prospective teachers with
current instructional pedagogies like critical thinking and interactive and participatory
styles to develop learners’ effective citizenship. Teacher education qualifications
obtained are ineffective and thus require critical appraisal to improve teacher training as
standard to measure civic curriculum implementation (Ango et al, 2003; Theobald et al,
2007; Akyeampong, et al, 2009).

Despite the positive impacts of CPD and the inadequacy of pre-service teacher education
discussed above, I thought that the government would encourage teachers, in particular
civic teachers, in diverse CPD as outlined above. But available literature (studies) argued
that most teachers were unable to have much opportunity to engage in any professional
development due to funding. Teachers personally pay for programmes involving their
professional upgrading due to lack of government funding (UNESCO, 2001; Global
Campaign for Education, 2006; Okoro, 2011). Most provisions made for teachers’ CPD
are only documented but not implemented (Ayo, 2004). Some civic teachers did not
attend workshops of any sort whatsoever for over 3 years due to lack of awareness of such
workshops and refusal of school heads to release such teachers. The Nigerian government
rarely placed much importance on the continuing professional development of teachers.
I argue that teacher training effectiveness ends when they finish the pre-service teacher

66
education programme because they rarely have opportunities to acquire new content
knowledge and pedagogical skills via CPD once in employment (Ayo, 2002; Mohammed
2006).

3.3:3(b) i Self/Group-Directed Professional Development

Due to the government failure to train teachers and the realisation that teaching is
becoming more demanding, the need for personal staff development arises. This is
because, irrespective of the thoroughness of the teacher education programmes, they will
still suffer from deficiency occasioned by the demands of social change (Creed, 2001;
USAID, 2001). In Nigeria such demands involve acquiring ICT skills, by integrating
technology into civic content via curriculum reforms. Such reforms involve obtaining
new pedagogies to change from teacher to learner-based teaching. Thus, teachers require
new content literacy and teaching skills to sustain their job competence. It creates
awareness on current societal demands and research on new instructional processes (Ayo,
2004; Ololube, 2006; Rebore, 2007; Okoro, 2011).

Thus, my study looked at whether civic teachers engage in self or group-directed

professional development and the likely impacts, if any. However, I highlight some
possible impacts like professional identity, career development, content (theoretical)
knowledge, pedagogical skills, professional networking and benefits accruing to civic
teachers/learners and inquiry form of teaching instead of canonical views of curriculum,
textbook-based or recitation (McDermott, 1990; Bybee, 1993; little, 1993; Arons, 1989;
Mushayikwa & Lubben, 2009). These impacts are classified into two groups involving
teachers’ professional efficacy as advocated by the social cognitive theories (Bandura,
1997) discussed above and teachers’ classroom efficacy involving content knowledge and
professional skills. The second group is more relevant to this study because they explore
whether civic teachers receive any new training on content knowledge, teaching skills
and the impact of such training on their civic classroom pedagogical practices (in section
3.4:3) to develop effective citizenship.

Evidently, inadequate in-service training of civic teachers by government led to self or

group directed training in order to update their expertise (USAID, 2001; Van Eekelen et
al, 2006; Theobald et al, 2007; Mushayikwa & Lubben, 2009; Ejere, 2011). This
inadequacy was added to teachers’ inability to reflect on existing skills and knowledge in
order to acquire current active participatory and interactive skills (Adepoju & Fabiyi,

67
2007; Hardman et al, 2008; Eddy & Akpan, 2009; Santcross, et al, 2009; Okoro, 2011).
Based on this, I say teachers' inadequate CPD had an adverse impact on classroom civic
implementation leading to constant use of recitation (teacher talking) pedagogy instead
of participatory/interactive activities. Classroom activities are based on recitation
(teachers’ questions which elicit short retort) instead of classroom dialogue among
teachers and learners (Institute of Education University of Ibadan, 2001; Akyeampong,
et. al., 2009). Invariably, inadequate CPD could have counter impacts on instructional
materials discussed below.

3.3:3(c) Instructional Materials/Resources

Actualising civic reforms could be mediated, inter alia, by exposure to teaching aids. The
NPE emphasised developing new teaching materials like civic textbooks, Information and
Communication Technology (ICT) facilities and non-text materials to aid the
implementation processes (S. 11(100f), (101d, e & f)). In view of this policy proposal, I
examine extant studies and literature on whether adequate provision of instructional
materials to teach civic education have impacts on effective citizenship development.

The impact of instructional resources in developing social, community and conventional

citizenship in and out of civic classroom teaching and learning compels its exploration in
this study. Generally, teaching requires learners having opportunities to use various
senses aided by technological instructions replacing conventional face to face classroom
activities. Using instructional materials is part of social constructivist mediating tools
(Chapter 2) of changing from teacher to learner-based teaching guided by civic teachers
during classroom activities and engaging civic teachers and learners in collaborative and
cooperative interactive learning (Larson, 2001; Lane, 1994). Since verbalization is not
enough for effective teaching then teaching materials become the means by which
citizenship knowledge is constructed by civic learners. Thus, it is essential for civic
teachers to adopt these mediation artefacts as part of the social constructivist learning
(Ikerionwu, 2000; Jimoh, 2009; Akao, 2010; Okobia, 2011).

Classroom civic implementation requires using textual (reading and non-reading)

materials and audio-visual (electronically and non-electronically operated) materials,
(including audio tape recorders, video tape recorders, etc), individually or collectively in
any civic classroom (Osakwe and Itedjere, 1993; Ezegbe, 1994; Aduwa-Ogiegbaen and
Imogie, 2005). These materials stimulate classroom efficiency and enrich the quality of

68
civic lessons thus integrating these materials reinforces classroom interactions via
exposure to diverse learning experiences individually or in groups (Momoh, 1980;
Moronlola, 1982; Popoola, 1990; Okobia, 2011).

Studies shows mixed debates on the impact of teaching materials on civic

implementation. While some teachers think such materials have an impact on classroom
implementation others are unable to take advantage of these materials. This was due to
environmental contexts where social amenities such as electricity, among others, deprive
them of the technology-based material thereby undermining implementation in both
urban and peri-urban areas (Garuba, 2003; Bolick et al, 2003; Kadzera, 2006; Abdo &
Semela, 2010; Jotia & Matlale, 2011; Dahar & Faize, 2011). Without doubt, Nigeria lacks
quality civic education implementation in schools due to inadequate teaching material
provision such as texts books and other materials.

3.3:3(c) i Provision of Text books and Other Instructional Materials

Generally, adequate quality textbooks and information technology facilities, inter alia, is
critical to effective citizenship actualisation. Various literatures showed negative trends
which were reiterated by the (then) Federal Minister for Education, that existing amenities
like teaching materials were deteriorating if not totally absent (Nkwanga & Canagarajah,
1999; Moja, 2000; USAID, 2001; Theobald et al, 2007; Hardman et al, 2008; Ikoya &
Onoyase, 2008).

Specifically, effective civic actualisation is impeded by insufficient textbooks, recurring

revision of approved text and poor textbook policy. The World Bank reported that less
than 1% of basic schools have adequate textbooks, with extreme disparities between
urban schools, and with 80% of peri-urban schools lacking any textbooks whatsoever.
Other studies reported an average of 77% of civic learners in both urban and peri-urban
schools lackingcivic text books (Nkwanga & Canagarajah, 1999; Moja, 2000, 2008;
Ogungbesan, 2012).

This negative trend led to the UBEC Intervention Fund created in 2005 to provide
textbooks in four core subjects, excluding civic education, to schools (UBEC, 2006;
Theobald et al, 2007). Regrettably, available (civic) texts are generally of poor learning
quality, are in disorder and deficient in applicability both in knowledge and teaching skills
(Theobald et al, 2007; Akyeampong, et al, 2009; Danmole, 2011). This shows that the

69
most available instructional materials (confirmed in a study of some schools in Edo state)
to implement social studies /civic education are textbooks and chalkboards. Most civic
teachers are restricted to using textbooks and chalkboards as the only available
instructional aids (Okobia, 2011).

However, it should be noted that the adequacy of textbooks enhances knowledge as

reflected in achievement tests. Studies confirmed in countries such as Uganda and
Nicaragua, among others, that young learners show positive achievement in subjects
where textbooks are adequately provided in schools. Thus, textbook availability (along
with other indicators) is a significant determinant of school achievement (Heyneman, et
al, 1978; Heyneman & Jamison, 1980; Heyneman & Loxley, 1983; Fuller, 1987; Fuller
& Clarke, 1993; Moulton, 1994). However, providing just textbooks without other
instructional materials may not help civic learners develop values and skills of effective
citizenship. More importantly, providing such textbooks in just four core subjects by
governments which excluded civic education, implies civic teachers and learners are to
search for approved textbooks from self-publishing authors.

3.3:3(c) ii Self - published text

Self - published text involves an author’s active participation in virtually all stages and
processes of textbook production involving publishing, distribution and marketing (Ike,
2004; James, 2011). Similar to Kenya and Tanzania, Nigeria’s book industry is more
private sector driven without strict adherence to rules on a textbook’s content and quality
(Rotich, 2000; Rotich, 2004; Nwogu & Akinde, 2007; James, 2011; Kira & Bukagile,
2013).

3.3:3(c) iii Other instructional materials

Other instructional materials such as charts, diagrams, posters, pictures, or maps which
could be produced locally at low cost are inadequate. Regardless of the fact that audio-
visual materials like televisions, computers and video recorders help to practicalise the
teaching of civic education, there is either inadequate or complete absence of these
materials in both urban and rural schools (Inyang-Abia, 1992; Arisi, 1998; Ekpo, 2001;
Garuba, 2003; Jimoh, 2009; Okobia, 2011; Okoro, 2011). This study views textbooks
usage and other relevant teaching materials to implement civic education as trivial and
inadequate in our schools.

70
Despite huge government investment in providing instructional materials, yet it is far
from international minimum benchmarks. Even where funds are provided for these
materials, such funds are either misappropriated or mismanaged. Thus, funds designated
for quality and successful implementation of education reforms are not prudently utilised
(Theobald, Umar, Ochekpe & Sani, 2007; Jaiyeoba, 2007; Ejere, 2011). Also, inadequate
provision of instructional materials could be due to the high cost of developing and
upkeep of such materials, reluctance of teachers to improvise, lack of civic resource
rooms for storage of instructional materials. Limited time allocated to the subject in the
school timetable and lack of expertise on the part of the teachers to operate these materials
(including information technology) might have resulted in the inability to apply computer
and other devices in the teaching of civic education (Garuba, 2003). The issue of deficient
and poor utilization of instructional materials in teaching civic education is not limited to
Nigerian schools. Studies showed countries like Botswana, Ethiopia, Malawi and
Pakistan have similar situations (Jotia & Matlale, 2011; Abdo & Semela, 2010; Kadzera,
2006; Dahar & Faize, 2011).

Evidently, availability of visual, auditory and audio-visual aids are a vital device which
help in constructing citizenship knowledge, values and skills. Their absence could
undermine quality civic programme implementation which makes effective citizenship
development difficult in our schools (Omokhodion, 2008; Adepoju & Fabiyi, 2009;
ESSPIN, 2009; Ejere, 2011). Providing and using these classroom teaching technologies
makes learning more interesting and a less stressful experience for Nigerian teachers
(Jimoh, 2009; Okobia, 2011).

Civic curriculum quality implementation urgently requires the use of instructional

resources. Alternatively, the reality of inducing learner-based classroom activities
requires improvising and importing ICT as a vital device to aid pedagogical practices in
civic classroom implementation discussed in the next section.

3.4 Classroom pedagogical practices

In 2.5:1, I stated that my background as a teacher educator compels the need to explore
classroom pedagogies. I should know the teaching styles mediating effective citizenship
in Nigeria's developing democracy. Meanwhile, both NPE &UBE documents state that
teachers can improve curriculum implementation via regular exposure to new teaching
styles. Through training, teachers are exposed to changing pedagogies which enhance

71
their enquiry and creativity skills. These documents reveal the civic mission of
developing effective citizenship requires new pedagogies coupled with quality resources,
both human and material. Thus, I appraise extant literature on which pedagogies enhance
effective citizenship.

I explore, using empirical studies, whether active modern or traditional or eclectic

(mixed) pedagogies has impact and which is more predominant during classroom civic
learning. Empirical studies depict pedagogy as a complex, ambiguous and disputed term.
It involves deliberate civic teacher initiated classroom interaction and activity to mediate
civic learners' interactive and participatory activities in and out of the classroom (Watkins
& Mortimer, 1999; Cogill, 2008; Westbrook, et al, 2013). It is the curriculum content
(citizenship issues) which civic teachers guide learners to practice through the classroom
implementation process to construct citizenship knowledge (Leach & Moon, 1999;
Bernstein, 2000; Alexander, 2001, 2003; Kennedy, 2010). From the above, civic
pedagogy is the diverse components of learning theories (2.5) manifesting during
classroom implementation activities involving learners’ active participation mediated by
the teacher to attain curriculum objectives (intents).

Civic pedagogy is basic to any reform efforts at equipping civic learners with effective
citizenship skills, knowledge and dispositions. Nevertheless, there are mixed debates on
the relevant pedagogical (teaching) styles which are the most successful at instilling
effective citizenship in learners. The IEA and other studies on citizenship training argued
for and against traditional teacher-based and participatory learner-laden pedagogies.

3.4:1 Traditional teacher-based Pedagogy

Traditional (teacher-led) methods emphasise factual knowledge and a more didactic

teaching style. This teaching style entails memorising and regurgitating civic concepts by
learners (Dewey, 1938; Sifuna, 2000; Teague, 2000; Mellor & Elliot, 1996). Consensus
among studies on Nigeria's classroom pedagogical practices revealed more reliance on
traditional (teacher) based (lecture, memorisation and recitation) teaching (Hardman et
al, 2008). A study of 20 schools in 10 different northern states in Nigeria showed the
prevalence of recitation teaching involving chalk-talk, routine choral question and answer
(Akyeampong, et al, 2009).

72
3.4:2 Participatory/Interactive Pedagogy

Conversely, participatory/interactive methods area more reformist-based style of

teaching about resolution of national/global citizenship issues. These involve using
discourse, dialogue and inquiry for a more radical and critical assessment of citizenship
issues (Mellor & Elliot, 1996). Since effective citizenship content is developmental in
nature then the content should be developed from known to unknown, simple to complex,
concrete to abstract as civic learners move from lower to higher basic. Attaining this
requires civic teachers using participatory, activity-based styles like role play, group
work, dramatisation, simulation, open classroom climate, inter alia. This develops critical
thinking skills to enhance learners’ literacy about their social contexts. Through critical
thinking learners develop analytical, reflective and independent traits advocated by
liberals. These traits are derived via civic classroom dialogue on national and global
citizenship issues (Ukpokodu, 1997; Reich, 2002; Woolman, 2001 Asimeng-Boahene,
2007; Mukhongo, 2010).

Though, studies above showed Nigerian teachers practice didactic and recitation
approach, yet, teachers still showed interest in using participatory/interactive teaching
styles. Studies further showed that though most teachers perceived group work as vital
and the majority claimed to use group work regularly, actually just one teacher used it
across 42 lessons. Likewise, classroom interactions and discourse analysis shows vocal
responses were mainly used by teachers. Many teachers claimed to use choral responses
rarely or not at all. From these studies teacher-centred pedagogy is mainly used in core
subjects (including civic education) in Nigerian schools. Also, it is interesting to discover
that teachers are aware of better practice but do not implement it (Ango et al, 2003;
Hardman et al, 2008; Akyeampong et al, 2009). The above findings show our schools are
developing passive learners who may find it difficult to engage in critical citizenship.
This is consistent with literature (2.5:3) which alluded to relative or non-implementation
of these learning theories in the civic classroom is not limited to Nigeria (Wendy, 2003;
Evans, 2006b; Olla, 2013). This could be due to teachers' low quality and standards due
to recruiting inexpert teachers simultaneously lacking adequate training in relation to
these interactive theories discussed (2.5) above.

The IEA and other studies pertaining to England and Hong Kong reveal that citizenship
education is mostly implemented via eclectic pedagogy integrating both teacher (taking
notes, teachers talk, engage in textbooks and worksheets) and learner pedagogies (role

73
play, debates, group works) to develop civic learners’ effective citizenship (Kerr et al,
2002; IEA, 2002; Kerr, 2005; Kennedy, 2010).

Other studies show that civic learning using participatory pedagogies like open
classrooms, collaborative learning, role play and simulation have more impact on
learners’ citizenship literacy (Nemerow, 1996; Porter, 1993; Print, 1999, Print et al,
2002). This learning style aids critical citizenship through dialogue, exchange of views
and expression to develop dispositions and skills which inspire active community
participation (Blankenship, 1990; Hahn, 1998; Niemi and Junn, 1998; Hess, 2001;
Torney-Purta, Lehmann, Oswald, and Schulz, 2001). That is, it is vital to de-emphasise
classroom teacher-based instructions and stress more learner-activity based instructions
which induces critical thinking during classroom learning. Overall, this study views the
need for eclectic pedagogical styles which entails combining teacher and learner-
pedagogies during the classroom civic implementation discussed below.

3.5 Civic (Education) Curriculum Implementation

3.5:1 Conceptualising Civic Education Curriculum

As stated in 1.2, the basic philosophical underpinning Nigeria’s curriculum actualisation

involves developing learners’ effective citizenship. Attaining this needs consistent civic
curriculum review in order to integrate new citizenship norms. Modern human activities
have become technologically advanced as to require appraisal of curriculum
conceptualisation in order to develop effective citizenship via civic curriculum. So, the
curriculum (either explicitly or implicitly) should go along with current global realities
on effective citizenship (Maduewesi, 2007; Ajibola 2008).

But then how can a curriculum be conceptualised? It is the entire learning interactive
activities holistically planned for learners in the civic classroom to develop citizenship
norms (Offorma 2005; Maduewesi 2007; Ekweme et al, 2009). In another context, it
entails the whole learning experiences the school guides learners to engage in to attain
behavioural change. As such, civic curriculum goes beyond the usual discrete school
subject and is one integrating abstract and practical knowledge of issues for learners to
acquire in the school. The curriculum focuses on civic contents learning which helps
teachers collaborate with learners to examine citizenship issues in order to construct new
knowledge. Also, the curriculum should engage learners in extra-curricular activities to
obtain experiential learning through school clubs, community projects, inter alia. This

74
involves, inter alia, community-school affairs using community experts such as Non-
Governmental Organizations (NGOs) as resource persons to discuss pressing citizenship
issues.

Above conceptualisations suggest narrow and broad civic curriculum perspectives. The
narrow view limits civic learning to classroom instructions which excludes activities
outside the civic classroom such as moral/ethical and religious issues occurring in the
school and beyond. Also, it sees the civic teacher as mere implementer of the planned and
prescribed civic curriculum. The teachers’ guide citizenship content knowledge via a
process of depositing facts in learners (Graham-Jolly, 2003; Carl, 2005; Kelly, 2009).
Civic teachers merely implement prescribed curriculum thus restricting teachers’
professional impacts in developing knowledge, dispositions and skills (Johnson, 1993;
Smyth, 2010).

The broad civic curriculum comprises all the opportunities for learning provided by a
school. That is, integrating classroom learning and extra-curricular activities both implicit
and explicit, formal and informal, planned and unplanned learning occurring in the
school. This presents holistic views of diverse citizenship norms and subsequent learning
experiences involving skills, knowledge and dispositions developed by learners via the
school civic curriculum implementation (Graham-Jolly, 2003). This study adopts the
broad view of civic curriculum due to its holistic traits which integrates citizenship norms
to develop effective citizenship.

3.5:2 Civic Curriculum Implementation in Nigeria

Nigerian studies agreed that civic curriculum programme implementation, as in other

developing democracies, is a major issue. Most curricula implementation has been mere
declamatory without actual impact on the school, young learners and society. This is due
to the lacuna between policy intents/objectives and actual classroom implementations due
to bureaucratic barriers affecting our overall development (Denga, 2000; Okiy, 2004;
Ikoya & Ikoya, 2005; Edukugho, 2006; Obanya 2007; Ejere, 2011; Bolaji, 2014).

Implementing civic curriculum documents within the school context involve classroom
interactive activities. The civic teacher (as facilitator) translates formally approved
contents (a syllabus) into schemes of work and lessons notes to guide learners to construct
knowledge and develop skills and dispositions (Mkpa, 1987; Chikumbi and Makamure

75
2000; Obanya, 2004; Garba, 2004; Onyeachu, 2008). The implementation process
involves turning civic curriculum objectives and content into practice through a process
starting from the civic teacher designing the civic scheme of work, instructional materials,
pedagogical methods and conducive classroom interactive setting and ending with
learners acquiring and constructing (via the intended curriculum) concepts, skills, and
dispositions aimed at effective participation in society. This makes civic learners the basic
stakeholders in the civic curriculum implementation process. However, effective
implementation of civic curriculum should shift from the intended to learned curriculum
when civic learners reflect traits of effective citizenship (Okebukola, 2004; Ivowi, 2004;
Obanya, 2007).

Yet, the general policy implementation issues pari-pasu (side by side) with the classroom
implementation process discussed above justified exploring translation of civic
curriculum as a school subject into classroom/school actualisation.

3.5:3 Civic Education Curriculum as a School Subject in Nigeria

In Chapter 2, I conceptualised civic education as a field of research and its impacts on

effective citizenship components. Here, I discuss civic education re-emergence as a
school subject in Nigeria by discussing the objectives and content which are translated
into classroom implementation.

Civic education re-emerged in the Nigerian formal school curriculum due to a dynamic
interplay of both external and internal influences dictated by the new educational reforms.
Externally, citizenship issues were articulated at international conferences such as the
Jomtien Education for All Conference (1990), International Conference on Population
and Development in Cairo (1994), the Beijing Women Conference (1995), and the
Copenhagen World Summit for Social Development (1996) (Ogunyemi, 2011). These
conferences were intended to refocus human development towards developing apposite
citizenship norms in learners by participating governments using whatever suitable styles
(Russell, 1977; Mansaray & Adeyemi, 2004). Also, attaining the goals of Education for
all (EFA) agreed in Thailand between 5th – 9th March, 1990, and the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) by 2015 led to the re-emergence of civic education in
Nigeria.

76
There was also the remote influence of the international network for civic education
(Civitas International). This is a global public policy network intended to enhance
effective citizenship development in young learners among nascent democracies.
Similarly, the International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement
(IEA) influence on Nigerian scholars led to developing more interest in civic education
conceptualisation and practice. These efforts reinforced the return of civic education into
the formal school system (Cogan & Derricott, 1998, 2000; Westherimer & Kahne, 2004;
Ogunyem, 2011; Ogundare, 2011).

Besides the external influence, there were national issues and problems leading to the re-
emergence of civic education as a school subject. As stated in Chapter 1, social studies
was designed as an integrated curriculum, to develop learners' effective citizenship.
However, its unwieldy scope aimed at tackling citizenship issues inter alia, led to its
failure. Therefore, the concern for developing and transforming Nigerian youths into
effective citizens which social studies failed to tackle led to disarticulating citizenship
issues to become a distinct subject called Civic Education (NERDC, 2007, p.v; Federal
Ministry of Education, 2007, p. v). Historically, civics was offered at both primary and
secondary schools, but integrated into general knowledge and later subsumed into social
studies in 1971. The1991 curriculum review included citizenship education in the
secondary and teacher education programme as citizenship content of the social studies
curriculum. Eventually, civic education was returned in 2006 for children between 7 to
16 years (primary, basic and Senior School (SS) levels) with the objectives stated below
(Udoh, 2000; Ogunyemi, 2010; Ogundare, 2011).

The Civic curriculum return indicates government intent and readiness to remedy the
tragedies of the past, by utilizing civics to correct such mistakes. This perception is
substantiated by the late American President J.F. Kennedy that ‘only with complete
dedication by us all to the national interest can we bring our country through the troubled
years that lie ahead’. Thus, civic education returned to equip young learners with skills
to examine current and future national issues via dedication to nation building (Kennedy,
1961 cited in Abdou Moumouni, 1968).

Unfortunately, literature shows that developing effective citizenship through civic

education could be a difficult task because programme implementation issues which
plagued social studies still run in our educational system. One such issue includes

77
producing certificated conscious young learners who only need to read and write mainly
to pass examinations. They earn a certificate mostly by reading through past question
papers and memorising model answers. The educational system does not develop learners
to solve citizenship problems outside the classroom but only inculcate large amounts of
incoherent knowledge difficult to practice (Cookey, 1969; Adaralegbe, 19; Okam, 2008;
Ogunyemi, 2010). Nigeria’s educational system breeds young learners whom Alexander
Pope described as bookful blockheads who ignorantly read, with loads of learned lumber
in his [sic] head. This reflected the failure of social studies in particular and the
educational system as a whole to develop effective citizenship among Nigerians (Cookey,
1969; Adaralegbe, 1970).

3.5:4 Objectives of Civic Education

The objectives of civic education at both junior and senior levels involve
(i) acquiring and learning to use the skill, dispositions, knowledge and values which
prepare learners to be competent and responsible citizens throughout their lives;
(ii) attaining the Millennium Development Goals and the need to implement the critical
element of National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategies;
(iii) creating awareness on the provisions of the Nigerian constitution and the need for
democracy;
(iv) creating adequate and functional political literates among Nigerians;
(v) sensitising Nigerians on the functions and obligations of government;
(vi) Inculcating in the child the spirit of self-discipline, hard work, cooperation and
respect for authority;
(vii) promoting the understanding of the inter-relationship between man/woman, the
government and the society;
(viii) highlighting the structure of government, its functions and the responsibilities of
government to the people and vice-versa;
(ix) Enhancing the teaching and learning of emerging issues;
(x) Inculcating in students their duties and obligations to society (NERDC, 2007).

3.5:5 Civic Education Curriculum Content

The civic education curriculum content contains issues germane to developing effective
citizenship as indicated in the National curriculum for Junior and senior Secondary
School. The content covers ten themes involving:

78
(i) values

(ii) citizenship

(iii) national consciousness and national unity

(iv) human rights and rule of law

(v) representative democracy

(vi) duties and obligations of citizens

(vii) Nigerian constitution

(viii) social issues

(ix) peace and conflict resolutions

(x) National economic life (NERDC, 2007).

The above content is a multi and inter disciplinary, learner-centred, interactive,

activity/issues–based curriculum. Young learners are to be exposed to total learning
experiences which reflect depth, appropriateness, and inter-relatedness of knowledge.
That means citizenship issues are presented in logical and sequential order of themes
which ensures continuity of citizenship issues. Moreover, the curriculum shows flexibility
by enabling the civic teacher to introduce creativity and adaptability into civic content.

3.6 Conclusion

I examine policy documents and studies on Nigeria's civic education implementation in

this chapter. In doing this, I discussed educational trends from the colonial period to post-
independent Nigeria. I found inconsistencies in policy design throwing the sector into
crisis due to, mainly, education politicisation and implementation issues. The national
goal of developing effective citizenship as stated in policy documents is contrary to
present realities depicted by extant studies/literature. As a teacher educator interested in
the impact of translating civic intents into classroom implementation, I specifically
examine classroom factors like civic objectives, school resources and teaching styles.
Studies reveal current school practice is contrary to envisaged statutory goals stated in
policy documents on the three civic education implementation factors. These civic
curriculum factors and effective citizenship form the basis of my research methodology
examined in the next chapter.

79
 Chapter Four:
Research Methodology

4.0 The Introduction

In this study, I explore the translation of civic objectives into effective citizenship
development via classroom implementation. As discussed in my literature review, I
observe that school resources and pedagogical practices (teaching styles) affect civic
content to develop effective citizenship. Thus, it is crucial to examine stakeholders' (civic
experts, teachers and learners) perceived impacts through the following: I look at the
possibility of civic objectives developing learners' knowledge, dispositions and skills
components in effective citizenship. Also, I examine the classroom implementation of
civic curriculum content in developing learners' effective citizenship components.
Moreover, I find out the classroom implementation of school resources and pedagogies
impact on content in basic and senior secondary learners’ effective citizenship
development components. I then translate the above issues into the research questions
stated in Chapter 1. However, my overarching question is whether stakeholders perceive
that the civic curriculum impacts on learners' effective citizenship development
components. These research questions, derived from the literature appraised in Chapters
2 and 3, guide my epistemological stance, data collection methods and research analyses.

I examine in this chapter relevant (basic) research elements like the philosophical and
methodological stances of this study. This leads to my use of multimethod research design
and multimethod concurrent and sequential explanatory design involving questionnaire
and focus group discussion, data collection and analysis. I also discuss below other
research design elements like study variables, sampling strategies, instruments, data
collection procedures and ethical considerations and issues.

4.1 Epistemological Stance: Social Constructionism or Social Constructivism

In this section, I view epistemology as the study of knowledge and from this import arose
two epistemologies (constructivism and constructionism) which researchers often but
wrongly construed as the same and thus used them interchangeably. To correct this view,
I intend to distinguish between these two epistemological concepts in the discussion
below and accordingly opt for social constructivism as the relevant epistemology for this

80
study. I then justify my choice of social constructivism as well as expound on the social
constructivism pedagogy and link it to the modernisation theory

One of the traits of a reflective research is examining the methodological/epistemological

foundation upon which the research is premised (Evans, 2002). Epistemology is a branch
of philosophy which forms the basis, types and means of developing knowledge.
Epistemology reflects the nature of the nexus between the knower/would-be knower and
what can be known by offering a philosophical grounding to decide on the kind of
knowledge which is possible and how we ensure its adequacy and legitimacy (Crotty,
1998; Guba & Lincoln, 1998; Marsh & Furlong 2002). In other words, epistemology is
the knowledge which explores the constructions or meaning that people attribute to
perceptible experiences which, in this study, involves the nexus between the researcher,
effective citizenship knowledge and participants (Lee, 2011; Moriarty, 2010;
Guba,1990). Epistemology depicts the perspective of the known realities and the process
of knowing such realities, that is, how to know what we know.

Accordingly, this study, basically identified certain epistemological paradigms which

involved the objectivist/positivist and interpretivist/constructivist epistemologies which
depict distinctive insights about the process by which we know what we know (Crotty,
1998; Guba & Lincoln, 1998). These paradigms explain the process of knowing the reality
of effective citizenship via inquiry to ascertain the status to be ascribed to the perception
and understanding we have (Crotty, 1998). Thus, I argue that knowledge about effective
citizenship could be tacitly derived via ascribed individual/social meanings or
constructions.

The objectivist/positivist epistemology, common in quantitative research, avowed that

meaning that is meaningful reality, is distinct from the operation of any perception. Also,
the researcher remains distant and independent of the object of study (M. Crotty, 1998).
One can perceive events as they happen and understand such in the absence of any
engagement, thereby denying any reality. This means that objectivity is possible. Also,
positivists believe that the results are generalizable and replicable even as they attempt to
explain the behaviour instead of the meaning (Marsh & Furlong 2002). Conversely, the
interpretivist/subjectivist epistemology suggests that there are multiple realities in
relation to social events and issues. This paradigm further posits that realities regarding
events and issues can only be socially constructed since these events and issues depend
on how they are construed (Marsh & Furlong 2002). Impliedly, societal dictates are

81
known via interpretative inquiry by groups/individuals who are constantly streamlining
social realities (Kvale & Brinkmann, 2009). The goal is to understand and interpret
multiple social realities initiated through social interactions and such interpretations are
determined by the personal, cultural and historical experience of the researcher
(Minichiello et al, 2000; Creswell, 2007).

However, scholars have identified constructivism which is used interchangeably with

constructionism, as an epistemology of the interpretivist paradigm (Crotty, 1989; Guba
& Lincoln, 19889). Nevertheless, constructivism is not a single nor unified epistemology.
Instead it is perceived from multiple perspectives, amongst which is social constructivism
which scholars also perceived as erroneously synonymous with social constructionism
(Yilmas, 2008; Healy, 2011; Hyde, 2015). Notwithstanding, I discuss constructionism,
social constructionism constructivism and social constructivism regarding their similarity
and differences and which is relevant for this study and the reasons for the choice.

4.1(a) Constructionism and Social Constructionism

Constructionism is based on the view that meaning is constructed, thus reality is socially
constructed via interactions among individuals, in which meanings are shared in discourse
thereby initiating new knowledge (M. Crotty, 1998). In other words, a constructionist
view of the world submits that meaning is not discovered, but constructed during
individual interaction. “Before there were shared perception capable of interpreting the
world, which hitherto held no meaning at all” (M. Crotty, 1998, p. 43). Social
constructionism which emerged from sociology and communication is an anti-realist,
relativist link to the post-modern era in qualitative research. Social constructionism
entails knowing the nature of reality in terms of developing a jointly constructed
understanding of the world. Social constructionism is basically an epistemological stance
which contends that social and interpersonal factors are the bases of human existence. It
explores socio-cultural factors on communal and individual life (Gergen, 1985;
Hammersley, 1992; Andrews, 2012; Galbin, 2014). Also, social constructionism entails
a group of individuals constructing meaning in the course of experiencing the reality
being construed, and sharing such construction in the community. Social constructionism
is concerned with the collective generation [and transmission] of meaning. Crotty (1998)
identified the concept of social constructionism to explain that beings construct meaning
as they encounter the world they are interpreting, and they share these interpretations in
the community. Social constructionism suggests that all meaningful reality is socially

82
constructed and that the social world and the real world are not to be seen as separate
worlds.

4.1(b) Constructivism and Social Constructivism

Conversely, constructivism refers to knowledge which is individually constructed based

on the social context of learning. The constructivist researcher intends to interact with
key actors involved in the study, in order to reduce the lacuna (gap) between the
researcher and participants (Burns, 1997). This concern has to do with how individuals
construct meaning. However, each individual’s way of making sense of the world is valid
and worthy of recognition (Crotty, 1998) and each individual can develop and share
perceptions about the world. As stated above, constructivism is characterised by multiple
perspectives and thus particular reference is made to cognitive and social constructivism
briefly discussed below. Cognitive constructivism asserts the existence of reality which
is knowable to the individual through accurate (re) constructions based on personal
experience. Moreover, a cognitive constructivist posits that meaning construction of
issues is personal, exclusive and subjective or imposed on reality, thus stressing that the
knowledge construction process is due to the person’s action and interaction in the world
individually (Crotty, 1998; Doolittle & Hicks, 2003).

Social constructivism involves the process whereby individuals collectively create

meaning of reality within a social context. Such reality is constructed via interactions and
consensus among groups of people to develop new knowledge (Buchanan, 2007; Healy,
2011). It stresses traits involving social interactions, action regulation and historical
change. Social constructivism recognises multiple realities which differ with the
perception and stance of the individual. In accordance with the social constructivist
stance, I am convinced that a core tenet of a social constructivist perspective involving
multiple realities can be in operation concurrently within a given context with a view to
drawing from the learners’ perspectives (Krane & Bird, 2005).

Social constructivism asserts the existence of realities which is knowable through shared
social experiences which lead to consensual (agreed) meanings. There is the conviction
that knowledge has subjective meaning initiated and reconstructed by individuals due to
new encounters. Thus, knowledge is created discretely via mutually contextualised
learning (Packer & Goicoechea 2000; Doolittle & Hicks, 2003; Hyde, 2015).

83
However, some scholars suggest that both social constructionism and social
constructivism are the same and use them interchangeably. To them, social
constructionism, as an epistemology, begins from constructivism which asserts that
individuals construct meaning within their context and then progresses to the
constructionist stance which involves discoursing individual meaning constructed to co-
create and develop new meaning through consensus (Burns, 1997; Buchanan 2007;
Yilmaz, 2008; Healy 2011; Hyde 2015). Also, social constructionism is perceived as
complementary to social constructivism because individuals/groups collaborate to
construct knowledge involving realities. However, the two epistemologies differ based
on the fact that social constructionism engages in creating artefacts via group social
interactions while social constructivism engages in group knowledge construction for
learning due to the interactions.

4.1(c) Rationale for the Choice of Social Constructivism

Having distinguished between these two epistemologies, especially regarding the

difference alluded to above, I am convinced that social constructivism is the appropriate
epistemology underpinning my assertions to knowledge in this study. Social
constructivism epistemology is more appropriate and relevant to explore issues involved
in this study since it engages in group knowledge construction mainly for learning, among
other reasons alluded to below.

Moreover, this epistemology perceives reality as subjective; that is, individual

experiences could lead to grasping the world inhabited. Also, it perceives reality as
relative and uncertain since truth is based on a person’s creation of meaning (Baxter &
Jack, 2008; Crotty, 2003). Social constructivism, as an epistemology recognises that there
are multiple realties merged to create multiple theories which developed from
individuals’ induced meanings of experience (Guba & Lincoln, 1994). Accepting this
reality entails grasping the beliefs and perceptions held by people involved in setting the
world view instead of assuming an outsider view (Guba & Lincoln, 1994; Rodwell, 1998).
This makes social constructivist realities relative and human creation of meaning subject
to the individual (person’s) outlook.

Thus, this research is premised on the notion that realities involve how young learners
individually and collectively, through social interactions and consensus, construct their
effective citizenship knowledge. Also, social constructivism asserts that social creation

84
of reality involves close cooperation and teamwork between me and the participants who
are able to convey their views (Searle, 1995; Crabtree & Miller, 1999). The participants’
perceptions depict their understanding of reality which mediates the researcher’s in-depth
insights of the participants’ world view and actions. In other words, the individual
acquires common, socially constructed realities which enables them to function (as
collaborators) co-operatively. From this perspective, a joint sense of reality is the basis
and prevalence of social interaction made most apparent in the form of human language.
Individuals are engaged in communal construction of realities which enables them to
function collaboratively. Consequently, a common sense of reality is the basis of social
interaction made most obvious via the form of human language. The participants’ views
depict their grasp of reality which mediates the researcher’s in-depth insights of the
participants’ world view and actions (Lather, 1992; Robottom & Hart, 1993).

Though social constructivism alluded to multiple realities, however, these realities differs
with the view and stance of the observer. Thus, reality is relative as well as socially
negotiated. This means that meaning is neither constant nor measurable in objective
terms, rather meaning (truth) originates due to collective immersion into the realities in
the milieu. Thus knowledge, as reflective reality, is subject to human norms and practices
created due to links among people within their milieu and as such acquired and circulated
within a social context.

My choice was influenced by different factors including my research questions, in

conjunction with the literature reviewed on civic education and social studies in Chapters
2 and 3. Also, being a lecturer and researcher in social/citizenship education enabled me
to read literature and past studies on constructivist methodological thoughts and
pedagogy. This boosted my beliefs to help learners construct their own views of realities.
Thus constructivism empowers my deep insight on developing effective citizenship from
stakeholders’ views of these realities.

This research was also influenced by the beliefs that knowledge (perception) of the world
is relative, transactional and subjective. In addition, learners’ effective citizenship
perceptions depend on their individual and group interpretations of experiences based on
the context of different previous encounters, social interactions and consensus; and values
which invariably affect their construction of new effective citizenship knowledge. This
implies that there is no independent truth to be proven considering the diversity of
interpretations and analysis which can be used (Hugly and Sayward, 1987; Savill-Smith,

85
2001). Also, effective citizenship knowledge (truths) evolves from interactions between
learners during civic exposures which has an effect, not only on these interactions, but
the individual construction of realities (Berlin, 1987). Finally, knowledge entails
recognizing a stakeholder's subjective view of citizenship realities which means the
notion of effective citizenship has to be constructed as the respondents perceive it in order
to ascertain multiple realities (Ratner, 2008).

In accordance with the social constructivist stance, I am convinced that there can be
multiple realities in operation concurrently within a given context with a view to drawing
from the perspectives of learners (Krane and Bird, 2005). Thus, the research is premised
on the notion that realities involve how young learners individually and collectively
through social interactions and consensus construct their effective citizenship knowledge.

This epistemology posits that people give meaning to phenomena and understand this via
their interactions and experiences - personal epistemology (Feucht & Bendixen, 2010).
Teachers who interact with learners within their setting have experiential knowledge. This
is basic to exposing the dilemmas facing them giving the need to know the truths as
experienced by participants. These issues are the basis of why this research aligned with
constructivism.

From the above, a multifarious sequence of interactions is revealed involving the learners,
schools, civic teachers, and the regulatory bodies (Al-Zyoud, 2011). So, engaging with
the perceptions of civic learners and teachers can be realised through the use of surveys
but cannot be significantly recognised and expressed by traditional positivist
methodologies. This is because numeric data will only serve as guide to social realities,
and is inefficient in terms of grasping innate contextual aspects of citizenship issues thus
the rationale for focus group discussions. Instead, an epistemological underpinning
premised on constructivism (with particular reference to both cognitive and social
constructivism) appears to be the most suitable means of appreciating all the issues
involved and the data collected. Cognitive constructivism asserts the existence of reality
which is knowable to the individual through accurate (re) constructions based on personal
experience. Social constructivism asserts the existence of reality which is knowable
through shared social experiences leading to consensual (agreed) meanings (Doolittle &
Hicks, 2003). Applying this stance implies an assumption by me that there are multiple
realities (Denzin & Lincoln, 2000) and to interact with my participants as they construct

86
their realities, make sense and draw meaning from these realities in order to value their
judgement, and to describe these experiences in the context of my academic experience
(Hatch & Cunliffe, 2006 cited in Al-Zyoud, 2011).

4.1(d) Social Constructivism and Modernisation Theory

Modernisation, as a socio-political theory, underlines the strong nexus between education

(formal school) system and effective citizenship development. That is, formal education
involving the school system should be a tool to transform young people to become
competent adult citizens with capacity building to articulate personal and national
interests as against tribal sentiments. Schools as the agents of society are established to
develop learners with a modern outlook to engage in the political system, due to
knowledge and skills acquired in the school system (Apter, 1963; Almond & Verba). The
school civic curriculum should help young learners construct new citizenship knowledge
and skills and alter existing dispositions as a way to strengthen citizenship transformation.
This could be attained by engaging and developing citizenship principles and practices in
learners, individually and collectively. Undoubtedly, the contemporary school system
could be a vital tool for learners’ emancipation through citizenship practices as a form of
empowerment. Since citizenship is constructed and reconstructed based on citizens’
behaviours then learners require diverse skills, care, consensus ad idem regarding
citizenship norms and values and good judgment to transform their community (Van
Gunsteren, 1998). Although the school inculcates obedience to the state, structure of the
political systems and also rights and responsibilities (Anderson, et al, 1997; Brophy,
1990) yet it must mediate reflective (critical) citizenship to help question existing
practices in the political system (Anderson, et al, 1997). Modernisation theory depicts the
school as agent to impart any of the above citizenship perspectives as outlined in the state
designed curriculum for learners’ transformation (Barr, Barth and Shermis, 1977; Banks,
2008).

Attaining learners’ civic transformation needs interactive/participatory learning theory

like social constructivism (2.5:1) to foster reflective knowledge construction involving
interactions to generate new ideas (Lambert et al, 1995; Maclellan and Soden 2004;
Glasersfeld 1995). This theory requires the school to mediate learners’ appropriate skills
acquisition whereby learners can construct their own knowledge of citizenship practice.
Each learner is expected to disclose past experiences, views based on their socio-cultural
histories and world perspectives into the interactive learning process in order to construct

87
new knowledge (Kamii, Manning, and Manning, 1991). Through collaboration (joint
interactions) with their teachers and other more knowledgeable peers, young learners are
acquainted with their peers’ thinking processes and this makes learning a collective
endeavour instead of individualised learning.

The social constructivist classroom initiates interactive collaborative activities via a

pedagogy of conversations (dialogic interaction) involving young learners talking
themselves through to solve citizenship problems. Through dialogic discourse learners
and teachers participate in classroom learning by collaborating to build on their own and
each other’s' knowledge and ideas to develop coherent thinking. This is because
knowledge and understanding emanates from exploring and analysing citizenship issues
and not being indoctrinated by teachers’ ideas and values. Such constructivist pedagogy
of conversation develops the critical and independent reflective thinking capacity for
learners to construct knowledge and intellectual and participatory skills to engage in the
polity (Giroux, 1989; Ukpokodu, 1994, 1997; Reich, 2002 Woolman, 2001). These point
to the nexus between modernisation theory, constructivist epistemology (4.1) and
pedagogy (2.3:2 & 2.5:1). Therefore, social constructivist learning is relevant to the
modernisation theory because it mediates transformation of learners’ identity which
involves total engagement of learners’ cognitive, dispositional and skills domains in the
civic classroom learning process (Biesta & Miedema, 2002; Alexander, 2006).

From the epistemological perspective, social constructivism explores the diverse realities
of civic teachers and learners’ deeds towards developing effective citizenship in their
diverse contextual settings. This requires multiple realities existing in the form of multiple
concepts (Guba & Lincoln, 1994). Thus, this study is intended to reveal multiple realities
of civic implementation being explored to have a clearer view and also for participants to
state their stories on the realities innate in civic curriculum implementation. Participants
will also identify ways to surmount implementation issues (Denzin & Lincoln 2000;
Robottom & Hart, 1993, Baxter & Jack, 2008). The study’s broad goal is exploring related
multiple concepts from diverse contexts to grasp stakeholders’ views on effective
citizenship development in the context of civic education classroom learning (Sherwood,
2010).

Nigeria’s multi ethnic/religious nature is obvious in our school system. So, implementing
civic in the school should attract diverse views from participants. So, the social
constructivist stance should show personal insights by using focus group and

88
questionnaires. This depicts the flexibility of the nuances of dynamic interactive
processes (Mountain, 2004; Sherwood, 2010). This reveals that epistemology defines the
choice of method. Thus, social constructivism boosts thick interactions between me and
participants to assess diverse views on effective citizenship (Rodwell, 1998). So, my
social constructivist stance dictated using questionnaires to test constructs and focus
groups to discern patterns stated in literature (Guba & Lincoln, 1994; Shoqirat, 2009).
This shows fusing empirical and verbal details could reveal broad based issues built-in
civic actualisation of effective citizenship (WHO, 1998; Tone & Tilford, 2001). Studies
shows that social constructivism is proper to gather and probe data arising from a
multimethod study which uses empirical studies (tables, charts, figures) and verbal (texts)
details to explain the research issues (Sechrest & Sidani, 1995; Sandelowski, Voils, &
Knafl, 2009).

Through social constructivism, participants’ diverse views are obtained and utilised in a
way that focus groups explain questionnaire data (Creswell, 2003; Mackenzie & Knipe,
2006). Pragmatically, I used what works to answer the research questions and to combine
insights offered by both research methods as outlined in the research design below
(Greene, 2007; Morgan, 2007). Then, the methods required to create multiple constructs
relevant to effective citizenship development are outlined in the research design table in
the next section.

89
4.2 Research Design

Table 1 Summary of the Various Aspects of the Research Methodology and the Research Timeline: May 2012 to February 2013
Data Collection Methods Justification/Rationale Link to Sample Size Data Analyses Method Links to other methods
RQs

1 (a) Questionnaire: open To assess the suitability of civic 1a Social studies/citizenship Quantitative (descriptive) To discover if the objectives of civic
and closed questions education objectives to guide education experts in analysis & qualitative education are congruent with other elements
learners’ knowledge construction, colleges of education and (thematic) analysis of the curriculum
develop dispositions and skills. universities

1 (b) Questionnaire closed Explore civic learners’ perceived 1b Civic learners in junior Quantitative: Descriptive Findings from this instrument were used for
questions impact of civic content on their and senior secondary Analysis focus group discussions (ii)
effective citizenship development schools

2 Questionnaire closed Explore civic teachers’ perceived 2 Civic teachers in junior and Quantitative: Descriptive Findings from this instrument were used
questions availability, adequacy and impact senior secondary schools Analysis for discussion
of school resources civic
instructions

3 Questionnaire closed Explore civic teachers’ perception 3 Civic teachers in junior and Quantitative: Descriptive Findings from this instrument were used for
questions on which teaching practices have senior secondary schools Analysis discussion
impact on civic instructions

4(i) Focus Group Collect more data to augment 1b Civic students in junior and Open questions using To provide in-depth explanation on the
Discussion /elaborate questionnaire responses senior secondary schools qualitative (thematic) questionnaire findings above.
analysis

4(ii) Focus Group Collect more information to 2&3 Civic teachers in junior Open questions using To provide in-depth explanation on the
Discussion augment/elaborate questionnaire and senior secondary thematic analysis questionnaire findings above.
responses. To give more details on schools
the questionnaires

90
Table 1 above, depicts that the research design entails employing quantitative and
qualitative methods to test and discover constructs regarding developing effective
citizenship via civic education classroom implementation in schools. Using the
quantitative method facilitates collection of broader information, involving numerical
data which enables me to ascertain disparities among variables which have large samples
for broader inferences and information (Seale, 2004; Silverman, 2005). However, data
collected via quantitative means lacks the depth required to explain implementation issues
involving effective citizenship development. Survey questionnaires alone may not
provide the in-depth views, experiences, values and outlooks of participants (Clough &
Nutbrown, 2002; Byrne, 2004). However, the quantitative method is combined with
qualitative design to offer in-depth information to clarify and explain for a better grasp of
issues about the implementation of civic education to develop effective citizenship.

4.3 Quantitative and Qualitative Research Typologies

Literature depicts methods involving quantitative and qualitative data gathering and
analysis in the context of a single study as either mixed method, mixed model or
multimethod research designs. Mixed-method research involves at least a quantitative and
qualitative method; but the two methods are not innately tied to a specific research
paradigm. It involves collecting or analysing quantitative and qualitative data discretely
in a single study. Mixed model research entails integrating qualitative and quantitative
data by transforming, in most cases, qualitative data into quantitative data thus merging
the two sets of data collected (Caracelli and Green 1993; Onwuegbuzie & Teddlie 2003;
Byrne et al, 2007). However, this model occurs in more than one phase of a single study
which includes the research questions, research methods, data gathering, data analysis
and the interpretation or inference process (Byrne et al, (2007). Multimethod design
entails using quantitative and qualitative studies which are relatively complete on their
own and afterwards applied together to form a basic part of a particular research. Each
study is planned and conducted to answer the same research questions; data collections
undertaken separately from the same participants while the results are triangulated to form
a comprehensive whole (Greene, Caracelli, & Graham 1989; Tashakkori & Teddlie,
1998; Morse, 2003; Creswell, Clark, Gutmann & Hanson, 2003; Creswell & Clark 2007;
Driscoll et al, 2007). Since literature and studies have shown lack of consensus on the
distinct pattern of conducting mixed methods, I used multimethod design to answer the
research questions within the limits of this study context (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 1998;
Johnson & Onwuegbuzie 2004).

91
4.3:1 Multimethod Research Design

Multimethod is used in a research program when a series of projects are connected within
a broad issue and so designed to solve an overarching research problem. It has been
variously defined in the literature as involving collecting figures to test hypotheses and
integrating information gathered to give detailed descriptions, contexts and account of the
trends explored (Morse 2003; Stange et al, 2006). Also, it is a research process which
uses more than one method or worldview, that is, the researchers apply both qualitative
and quantitative theoretical stance or paradigm (Tashakkori & Teddlie, 2003). Also,
Morse (2003) says multimethod entails a methodical and thorough conduct of both
quantitative and qualitative tasks completed in themselves and the findings (results) of
both methods triangulated (merged) at the discussion phase to develop into a
comprehensive study.

I used multimethod design as a process for collecting, analysing, and merging

questionnaire and focus group discussion data in this study. Using this design was due to
my epistemological stance as explained in 4.1 above, knowledge of past citizenship
studies using similar methods (Bowling and Ebrahim, 2005; Jones, 2006; Dismore, 2007)
and the need to aptly answer the research questions for this study in order to have a better
grasp of research issues (Tashakkori and Teddlie 2003; Creswell 2005). Doing this
requires diverse instruments and methods to explore the intricacies in the various
citizenship domains realities-cognitive, affective and skills developed in learners
(Dismore, 2007). Thus, constructivism tests these realities by obtaining participants'
views via questionnaires and focus group discussions.

Past studies revealed that citizenship is very complicated for a single method to portray a
true reflection of the issues involved especially when there is a lack of existing
instruments with which to conceptualise their various perspectives. More so, the data
collected involved examining knowledge, dispositions and skills development of
learners’ effective citizenship. Thus, collecting data which presents detailed accounts of
issues on these components dictated combining methods (Silverman and Subramanium,
1999; Jones, 2006; Dismore, 2007).

From the above discussion, I used relevant methods to collect data to reflect the different
citizenship components' realities. Applying questionnaires and focus groups should not
be seen as adopting two contrary methods but as part of the data collection means of this
study (Snape & Spencer, 2003). Also, I adopted multimethod because my research

92
questions involved both adults and young learners who could be induced to participate by
diverse methods (James et al, 1998; David et al, 2001). This is because stakeholders’
diverse dispositions and skills in reacting to questions and discussing issues must be
considered. For instance, school children were more disposed to discussion than filling in
questionnaires. Also, I combined (survey questionnaire and focus group) methods due to
the realisation that more information would be collected from stakeholders (Garbarino &
Stott, 1992).

Combining both questionnaire and focus groups helped me to draw from the strengths,
(thus reducing the limitations) inbuilt in the two methods (Creswell, 2003; Creswell &
Plano-Clark, 2007). For instance, it may be difficult for a qualitative-minded reader of
this study to grasp the outcome of my questionnaire findings and vice versa (Creswell &
Plano-Clark, 2007). Thus, multimethod was to answer research questions which seem
hard for a single method depending on whether a qualitative or quantitative researcher
reads the study outcome. Through multimethod generalizations, vital details of
participants’ ideas are sequentially explained.

From the above, multimethod enabled me to validate (triangulation in 4.3:2) data and
results of questionnaire and focus group data to ascertain new or opposing issues which
require more inquiry. As stated above, quantitative and qualitative methods are not
incompatible, then integrating the two methods mediates testability and context into this
study (Van Maanen 1983; Kaplan & Duchon 1988; Tashakkori and Teddlie 1998).
Collecting questionnaire and focus group data using diverse methods from civic teachers
and learners inter alia offers a broad variety of analysis which depicts a broad image of
civic curriculum implementation and learners’ effective citizenship (Bonoma 1985).

The multimethod procedure has developed in diverse research fields to further improve
research process and findings regarding policy issues. Literature depicts this design as a
veritable practical mechanism to appraise educational policy/programmes like civic
curriculum (Morse 2003; Almarsdottir et al, (2009). It is a skilful process of reviewing
civic curriculum components in order to develop reliable interpretations. By this,
policymakers are guided to ascertain the functionality of civic curriculum as well as those
aspects which are impractical and to understand reasons for such non-functional areas
and so propose practical reforms (Sanderson, 2002; Granger, 1998; Campbell, 1988).

93
In order to answer this study’s research questions, I adopted Morse’s principles to guide
linking quantitative and qualitative methods (Morse, 2003; Byrne & Humble, 2007).
These principles are outlined and discussed in relation to this study below.

Multimethod design adopts a particular epistemology to underpin the whole study. Thus,
this study adopts constructivism discussed above (4.1) as the underpinning epistemology.
Also, the use of multimethod design provides several options regarding the
dominance/priority given to either quantitative or qualitative tasks in a study. However,
this study gives equal emphasis to both quantitative and qualitative collection and analysis
of data, that is, both quantitative and qualitative data are to complement each other
(Morse, 2003; Morse & Niehaus, 2009). Also, two types of multimethod designs are
applicable in the data collection stage of this study. This study employed simultaneous
(concurrent) and sequential data collection processes as discussed below (4.3:2) (Morse,
2003; Byrne & Humble, 2007). Also, this study’s multimethod design entails merging
questionnaire (numeric) data with focus group (texts) data. Both data results are reported
jointly in the discussion chapters (5-7) of this study. In the report, I present the
questionnaire statistical results first and subsequently merge it with the focus group
themes to explain and elaborate on the quantitative results as a form of triangulation
discussed in 4.3:2 below (Sandelowski, Voils, & Knafl, 2009).

4.3:2 Multimethod Concurrent and Sequential Explanatory Design

This study majorly entails multimethod sequential explanatory design. However, I used
open and closed questionnaires to collect and analyse data from civic experts (4.6:1) for
a detailed report of the civic education implementation impact on developing learners'
effective citizenship.

Applying multimethod sequential-explanatory design involves first collecting and

analysing questionnaire data after which focus group data were collected and analysed to
answer the same research questions tested at the questionnaire stage data (Ivankova,
Creswell, & Stick, 2006). In this sequence, the focus group data collected was to elaborate
and expound on questionnaire findings obtained in the first phase. Thus, the focus group
discussions stage complemented and underpinned the initial questionnaire stage.

The rationale for applying this design was because the questionnaire data I collected and
the consequent analysis merely gave a common understanding of the research problem.
That is, (as stated above), numeric data only served as a guide to citizenship realities, but

94
could not expound innate contextual citizenship problems. The focus group data and its
analysis process could further clarify statistical results by examining participants’ views
extensively (Rossman & Wilson 1985; Tashakkori & Teddlie 1998; Creswell 2003).

In line with sequential explanatory design, the research gave equal priority/weight to both
the questionnaire and focus group discussions data collected and analysed. The
implementation involved administering the questionnaire for data collection and analysis
with the intent of answering the research questions through empirical analysis. This was
followed by using the already prepared open ended questions to collect and analyse focus
group discussion (FGDs) to elaborate on the empirical (questionnaire data) findings
(Ivankova, Creswell, & Stick 2006; Oremus et al, 2010).
My questionnaire and focus group results were merged when discussing the entire study
so that my study could gain broader insights into the issues (Creswell & Tashakkori,
2008). Applying this design in my research revealed its strengths and limitations
(Creswell, Goodchild, & Turner 1996; Green & Caracelli 1997; Creswell 2003, 2005;
Moghaddam, Walker & Harre 2003). This seems easy for me to operate and mediate
detailed analysis of the research questions. In addition, it enhanced my explanation of the
underlying factors behind my quantitative results. Conversely, it takes much time in terms
of data collection and analyses and is equally expensive in terms of logistics. Hence, I
needed to consider the feasibility of resources required to collect and analyse both data
types.

In this study, concurrent multimethod involved collecting and analysing open and closed
questionnaires from social studies/citizenship education lecturers in Colleges of
Education and Universities across Nigeria. I used concurrent multimethod design for
lecturers due to their geographical spread across Nigeria and academic freedom. These
factors make it difficult to engage them in individual interview or bring them together for
focus group discussion.

4.3:3 Triangulations

I used methodological triangulation to boost the accuracy, validity and to have a broad
insight into civic implementation issues; but its use was not without limitations in this
research.

Triangulation involves using questionnaires and focus groups to gather and test data about
the experiences of civic teachers and learners on diverse representations of citizenship

95
realities (Denzin, 1994; Miles & Huberman 1994; Green & Caracelli 1997; Green et al,
1989; Tashakkori & Teddlie 1998; Foss & Ellefsen, 2002). It implies finding the multiple
perspectives of civic education developing effective citizenship through using
questionnaires and focus groups (Denzin & Lincoln, 2000). I reasoned that combining
methods balanced the depth and breadth of my study because triangulation offered in
depth explanation of the issues involved in this research (Denzin & Lincoln, 2001).

It is crucial to state that investigating civic education was a complex area with many
connecting factors to consider. For example, the literature reviewed on citizenship issues
in Nigeria revealed that the subject touches on various strata of nation building involving
individuals and groups within the socio-political, economic and moral spheres. Thus,
diverse factors involved make it difficult to use one research method to explain the issues
in-depth.

International literature has proved the efficacy and robustness of triangulation. Therefore,
applying both methods contributes to more informed recommendations as stated by
Williamson (2005) who offered some reflections into the usefulness of triangulation:
“Triangulation forced me to look at the data in the widest possible manner and subject
analyses to critical scrutiny… instead of simply accepting findings from one
methodological paradigm [which could result in eliciting less credible conclusions]”
(p.17).

As shown above, using methodological triangulation allowed me to examine teachers’

and learners’ views from various angles ensuring consistent and credible data. For
instance, do teachers’ school resources impact perceptions in the focus group data (FGD)
correlate with questionnaire findings and also does learners’ FGD correlate with the
questionnaire findings? Triangulation was applied as a self-checking function to increase
the level of confidence in the results and to complement the strengths of each and thus
reduce the inherent inadequacies in the combined methods (Foss & Ellefsen, 2002;
Williamson, 2005).

Confirmation in triangulation research means finding the faults and strengths of each data
collection method used for necessary correction thus minimizing the threat of low validity
(Shih, 1998; Bowling, 2005; Aled & Bugge, 2006). This is evident in my questionnaire
findings which could be alleged to be superficial while my focus group discussions results
may be alleged to lack generalisability (Morgan, 1997). The weakness of my
questionnaire and the strength of my focus groups have been counterbalanced thus

96
bridging the gaps in each method. Nonetheless, I avow that confirmation was not the main
benefit of methodological triangulation in this research. Applying it does not imply that
the methods will confirm one another. My anticipation was that since each method is
complementary in this research they would help to solve the research problems (Denzin
and Lincoln, 2000).

4.3:4 Limitations of Triangulations

I am not unmindful of the fact that methodological triangulation as used in this study has
its alleged limitations. One of such involves different literature frequently relating
quantitative and qualitative styles to diverse and even contrary epistemological
(theoretical) stances. Yet, the use of both styles is informed by the constructivist stance
adopted in this research.

Blending inconsistent and contradicting epistemologies may be viewed as another

restraint in my application of triangulation in this research. This is viewing the research
from a parochial perspective (Phillips, 1988). As unequivocally discussed above, the
research is built on the constructivist epistemology which consistently asserts that the
world consists of multiple realities and that knowledge is relative, transactional and
subjective. To have a clearer view on these constructivist beliefs led to the application of
methodological triangulation. Applying both methods is to have insight into the
construction and conceptualization of citizenship realities by stakeholders to establish and
prove the constructivist beliefs.

Some data sets appear to be more appropriate to examine a specific research problem. For
instance, questionnaire administration is more appropriate to examine research problems
involving a large number of participants in contrast to the focus group. In practice, a
questionnaire will successfully embrace the totality of views of stakeholders while
conversely a focus group would provide a more comprehensive data set than the
questionnaire in terms of narrating and explaining how stakeholders construct citizenship
realities in the classroom.

All data obtained in this research endeavoured to give stakeholders accounts of classroom
experiences on issues relating to issues on developing effective citizenship. Thus,
findings of particular data were to complement other data in triangulation. This will be
more evident in the subsequent findings and discussion chapters.

97
4.4 Quantitative (Survey) Research

Table 2 on the Relationship between the Research Questions, Variables and

Questionnaires
SURVEY RESEARCH DESIGN
Research Questions RQ 1a RQ 1b RQ2 RQ3

Questionnaires Civic Experts’ Civic Learners’ Civic Teachers’ Civic Teachers

Questionnaire Questionnaire Questionnaire Questionnaire
Respondents Civic Experts Civic learners Civic teachers Civic teachers

Variables:
a) Demographic Gender, Gender, State, State,
Variables Institution, State, School School
Specialization, School location, location, location,
Designation, Class, Teaching Teaching
Years of Service Age Experience, Experience,
Ethnic Gender, Gender,
Background Qualifications, Qualifications,
Specialisation: Specialisation:

a) Independent 1) Learners’ 1) Teachers’

Variables Perceived Impacts Perceived Impacts
of Civic content _ of School
Resources
2) Learners’ 2) Teachers’
Perceived Impacts _ Perceived Impacts
of Classroom of Classroom
Pedagogies Pedagogies
Learners’ Learners’ Perceived
b)) Dependent Perceived Effective
Variables _ _ Effective Citizenship
Citizenship Development
Development
Analysis Descriptive Descriptive Descriptive Descriptive Statistic
Statistic Statistic Statistic
ANOVA ANOVA ANOVA ANOVA

I utilized survey research which comprised a cross sectional design involving collection
of data through questionnaires and a focus group to give detailed information about
stakeholders’ perceptions in this research (Rea and Parker, 2005, p. 5; Bryman, 2008).
This choice of research design was to make the data collected reflect a broad
representation of stakeholder populations consisting of civic experts, civic teachers and

98
civic learners. Also, I used it to collect a body of quantitative data in connection with
three variables (dependent, independent and demographic) which were examined to
discover any patterns of impact (Bryman, 2008). The sample of respondents selected was
used to generalize for the larger populations of the stakeholders (Bryman, 2008). In
relation to the research questions for this study, survey design was adopted to examine
the perceptions of civic experts, teachers and learners on different components
(demographic/independent variables) of the civic education curriculum such as
objectives, content and resources and pedagogies which served as possible impacts on
young learners’ effective citizenship (dependent variable) (Leary, 2001).

The questionnaires were sent to the respondents using their electronic-mail boxes, by post
and physically given to some of them.

In line with the sequential explanatory design, the survey questionnaire comes first in
order of data collection. The intention of the quantitative data collection was to identify
the potential impact, if any, between selected components of civic curriculum (objectives,
content, resources and pedagogical practices) as independent variables and learners'
effective citizenship as dependent variable. The instrument enabled me to explain
stakeholders' perceived impacts of independent on dependent constructs (Saunders et al.
2007).

In order to achieve the objectives of this research, survey items were developed to obtain
information on the perceived realities of selected variables (that is, whether school
resources and pedagogical practices have any impact on civic classroom implementation
to develop a change in learners' effective citizenship realities.

4.5 Variables in the Quantitative Analysis

I applied three sets of variables namely demographic, independent and dependent in this
study data collection and analysis. The target of my research was to discover the impact
of independent on dependent variables. This study is operating on the perceived belief of
impacts of one variable on the other (independent on dependent) variables.

The Dependent Variable (DV) is the variable that depends on the independent variables
(Black, 2003). It is the result or effect of manoeuvring independent variables (Leary,
2001). The dependent variable for this research is young learners perceived effective
citizenship development and it is divided into three components, namely, knowledge,

99
dispositions (attitudes/values) and skills (participatory/intellectual). Similar study was
conducted by Finkel & Ernst (2005) using school based civic instruction to assess
learners’ effective citizenship development. It is a categorical variable and will be used
to form categories (grouping variable) in both empirical and textual analyses.

The Independent Variable (IV) is the factor that can be changed in experimental study.
It is usually what influences or changes the dependent variable. In this research, there are
two independent variables, namely perceived school resources and classroom
pedagogical practices. The two variables have their different themes as stated below:

1) Perceived School Resources (PSR) is the first independent variable comprising the
following themes: recruitment of teachers, training, and instructional materials.

2) Perceived Classroom Pedagogical Practices (PPP). This is the second independent

variable comprising of Active Participatory Methods (APM) such as open classroom
discussions, group project presentation, simulation, dramatisation and role play.

Both the civic teachers and learners gave their perceptions on the impact of these two
selected independent variables on effective citizenship development discussed in their
different questionnaires below. Also, the independent variables are categorical variables
and could be used to form categories (grouping variables) in both empirical and textual
analyses.

Demographic variables

These are demographic information given by respondents which included age, class,
school location, years of teaching experience, state, etc. They could also become
independent and interest variables which may have a direct influence on the dependent
variable in order to help reveal the impact on the dependent variable. For instance, gender,
age, school location or even ethnic background could have impacts on young learners'
effective citizenship development. Thus, the need for this research to examine every
aspect of the study in order to reveal the overall impact, if any (Orlitzky, 2008).

4.6 Choosing the Population

The target population were selected on the basis of the research questions and participants
used in the study. Based on this, the target population was grouped into three, namely:

(1) All lecturers teaching social studies and citizenship education in colleges of

100
 education and Nigerian universities were used to test the first research question.

(2) All Junior Secondary Learners (now called Upper Basic students) and/or Senior
Secondary Students (SSS One) from two states in south-western Nigeria were
used to test the second research question.
(3) All students in (2) above and Civic education teachers at the Junior Secondary
and/or Senior Secondary class (SSS One) from two states in south-western Nigeria
were used to test the third research question.

The target population, for 2 and 3 above, were restricted to the south western region
because it is the region where I live which impacted on factors such as time constraints,
financial and logistical problems in terms of my distance from these regions and because
the other five regions are going through political or religious unrest which makes such
areas too volatile for research of this nature (The Nation Newspaper, 7th November, 2011).

Lagos and Ogun states were selected through stratified random sampling, that is, the six
states were classified on the bases of their heterogeneous (metropolitan and cosmopolitan
status) and homogenous nature. Lagos and Oyo states are heterogeneous (metropolitan
and cosmopolitan status) while the remaining four states Ogun, Osun, Ondo and Ekiti
states are homogenous. Thus, one state was selected from each of the two groups of states.
The three participants’ groups called stakeholders were civic experts, learners and
teachers.

4.6:1 Sample and sampling procedure

(a) Civic Experts

The research sample to examine RQ1 were the civic experts. The sampling frame for the
lecturers was derived from a comprehensive list of all registered members of the Social
Studies Association of Nigeria (SOSAN) based on the following inclusive criteria: (a)
lecturer 1 and above, (b) 6years of teaching experience and above and (c) a minimum
qualification of a PhD in a social sciences or related field. These criteria were used
because of their exposure to research related issues and involvement in curriculum design.
All lecturers who met these criteria were contacted for voluntary participation in this
study. 40 eligible respondents from the list were contacted, of whom 29 (72.5%) agreed
to participate by filling and returning the open ended and closed research questionnaires
emailed, sent through post or self-administered (see Appendix 1).

101
The reasons for using these respondents was because: they train teachers on the secondary
school curriculum; are involved in curriculum planning and development and are experts
in curriculum research with regards to curriculum design and development. They act as
consultants to policy makers in government, providers of instructional material such as
textbooks among others and facilitators in workshops, seminars and symposia on
curriculum related issues and problems. (Ivowi, 2004).

(b) Civic Teachers and Young Learners

A total sample of 868 respondents comprising of civic teachers and learners were selected
from Lagos and Ogun states in the southwest of Nigeria. The respondents were selected
through probability sampling involving stratified and proportionate random sampling
techniques. The criteria used for sampling were gender, academic attainment and learners'
class (junior and senior secondary) (Fink, 2003). Each criterion was classified into
relevant groups and selection made from each group based on equal proportion. For
example, gender was divided into male and female. Civic teachers and learners are used
in this research because they are critical stakeholders (actors) in translating curriculum
objectives into classroom implementation (Okebukola, 2004). This was broken down as
follows:

(i) Civic Teacher

Civic Teachers consisted of a total of 298 respondents which was divided into 128 from
Lagos state and 170 from Ogun state. They were selected through the above sampling
techniques using the following criteria namely age of the teacher, years of experience,
gender, teaching qualifications and location of school (urban/rural), and the education
district. The choice of civic teachers was because, as the actual curriculum implementers,
the process of curriculum implementation begins when the teacher is handed the
curriculum. Thus, the civic teachers’ pedagogic content knowledge and teaching
experiences are part of the determinants of developing effective citizenship (Okebukola,
2004 p.2). (See Appendix 2 for the break down).

(ii) Civic Young Learners

Civic Students consisted of a total of 570 respondents divided into 225 for Lagos state
selected from five education districts and 345 from Ogun state selected from three
education districts. All the students’ samples were selected through the above sampling
techniques using the following criteria: gender, academic attainment, class, location of

102
school (urban/rural) and the education district. The choice of civic students was because
curriculum implementation ends with them when, as consumers, recipients and learners,
they have been exposed to the learning experiences prescribed in the curriculum. To know
whether the civic objectives have been achieved involved what young learners finally
inculcated regarding civic knowledge, dispositions and skill development (Okebukola,
2004). To measure this depends on the young learners' outcome behaviours matching the
anticipated outcome specified in the curriculum and that’s what this research intends
achieving.

4.7 Research Instruments

(a) Perceived Civic Experts Questionnaire (PCEQ)

The questionnaire consisted of open-ended and closed items divided into sections A-F.
Section A asked for demographic (biographical) data from respondents including gender,
institution, area of specialisation, designation, years of service and qualifications. Section
B consisted of questions on defining effective citizenship (adopted from Finkel et al,
2005). Sections C, D and E provided information on whether the objectives of Nigerian
Civic Education are appropriate to achieve each of the effective citizenship components,
namely knowledge, dispositions and skills. The final part (Section F) provided
information about whether these objectives are appropriate or need to be reviewed to
develop effective citizenship. Also, I asked respondents to suggest the strengths and
weaknesses of these objectives. In between the closed questions were open ended ones,
requesting reasons for further explanation on the closed responses. For example, asking
questions such as: specify the objective(s), if any, which you think is/are most appropriate
to develop civic dispositions in the learners from the list of the objectives above (see
Appendix 1).

(b) Perceived Civic Teacher’s Questionnaire (PCTQ)

This is a closed questionnaire designed to survey civic teachers' perceptions on the

impacts of school resources (SR) and classroom pedagogical practices (PP) on learners'
effective citizenship. This questionnaire elicited information on the perceived impacts of
these variables on civic education teaching resulting in effective citizenship. This
questionnaire was divided into three sections.

Section A consists of demographic information such as state, location of school,

educational district/zone, teaching experience, school, gender, qualifications and area of

103
specialization collected. Section B has four themes comprising of fourteen item
statements with two-point scale options (yes/no) designed to measure themes constituting
Perceived School Resources (variables). These themes are recruitment, training and
instructional materials. All these items requested the views of the participants on the
availability, adequacy and quality of civic teachers, training programmes, and
instructional materials like handbooks and textbooks to help teach the subject. It
requested to know the perceived impact of these constructs on young learners' effective
citizenship development whether applied or not.

Section C has four themes comprising of eleven item statements with two point scale
options (yes/no) designed to measure teachers’ application of classroom pedagogies
(variables) such as open classroom discussion, simulation, role play dramatisation and
group project presentation. All these items were adapted from criteria used to measure
democratic orientations in emerging democracies (Finkel et al, 2005). The civic teachers
were requested to answer whether they applied these themes in their classroom. For
instance, whether the teacher allowed learners to discuss i.e. express their views on civic
issues, or a group project presentation by dividing the learners into groups to make
presentations on civic problems. (See Appendix 2).

(c) Perceived Civic Learners’ Questionnaire (PCLQ)

This was a closed questionnaire designed to survey civic learners' perceptions on the
impact of exposure to civic (content) instructions using school resources and pedagogical
practices to develop their effective citizenship. To explore these issues the questionnaire
was divided into four sections. Section A has demographic information such as gender,
state, location of school, education district, class, age, school and ethnic background.
Section B has information defining effective citizenship as adopted from Finkel et al
(2005), and civic education objectives for the junior and senior secondary schools in
Nigeria as stated by NERDC (2007 and 2009). Section C has 11 items grouped into three
components involving civic knowledge, dispositions and skills. It used five-point Likert
scales in the order of strongly disagree (SD), disagree (D), neither (N), agree (A), strongly
agree (SA). These items asked for participants' views on whether civic content, as
presently implemented, has helped them to construct their own civic/political knowledge,
dispositions and skills. Section D involved seven sub-constructs (similar to sections B
and C of CTQ) with diverse scale options designed to measure the use of school resources

104
availability, adequacy, quality and pedagogical practices on their effective citizenship.
(see Appendix 3)

There were themes designed to measure how students perceived teachers’ applications of
classroom pedagogies adapted from Finkel et al’s (2005) study on democratic orientations
in emerging democracies. The civic learners were requested to answer whether these
themes were applied during their civic lessons.

4.8 Validity, Reliability and Pilot Study

Before the main research, both a reliability test and a pilot study were conducted. The
reliability test measured the degree of consistency and stability of the instruments. Also,
it assessed the predictability and dependability of the instruments in measuring what they
were meant for. The reliability testing of two of the instruments were deemed relatively
high with the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of each scale (variable) above or close to 0.7
(Heppner and Heppner, 2004). The third instrument had 0.556 Alpha Coefficient values
which also showed the reliability of the instrument (Ogunbiyi, 2007). In view of the
reliability of 0.556 some of the items were revised to improve the scales by modifying
their wordings to give the appropriate meaning of the items. With the pilot sample the
Alpha Coefficient values (greater than .50) for most of the scales revealed the internal
consistency of items in the questionnaire. The reliability for each scale is presented in
Table 4.

Table 3 Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of Instruments

Instruments Cronbach’s Alpha coefficient

Civic Experts Questionnaire .711
Civic Teachers Questionnaire .556
Civic Students Questionnaire .768

After the reliability test, there was a review panel comprising of experts in social studies
and educational measurement and evaluation and the English language from tertiary
institutions in Nigeria that examined all the items in the three questionnaires, in terms of
their appropriateness, organization of the scales, and the application of concepts and
issues to fit into the Nigerian educational context. All the three questionnaires
administered for the pilot study (CEQ, CTQ and CSQ) were improved upon leading to an
overall enhancement of data collection processes and resulting analyses. These included

105
changing some of the demographic information in the CTQ such as using educational
districts instead of administrative divisions; age of teachers was not relevant and was thus
removed; qualifications were stratified (1st degree, Post graduate and PhD); area of
specialisation was expanded to include social science, arts, languages, sciences, among
others.

After the reliability test and validity had been conducted, a group of lecturers, civic
students and teachers across schools and tertiary institutions were used to conduct a pilot
study and the data were used to confirm the reliability test earlier conducted. See the table
below.

Table 4 Participants for the Pilot Study

Instruments Respondents Institutions/Schools

Civic Experts Questionnaire (CEQ) 20 lecturers 6 colleges/Universities
Civic Teachers Questionnaire (CTQ) 30 civic teachers 20 schools
Civic Students Questionnaire (CSQ) 104 civic students 20 schools

The rationale for conducting a pilot study was due to the fact that the instruments used
newly designed scales for this research. Thus I needed to test run their reliability and
validity before administering the questionnaires to a larger group of respondents. Also,
the pilot study was essential to enhance and ratify the reliability and validity of the
questionnaires’ items in the Nigerian context.

The pilot study revealed, for example, the need to amend the content of the teachers’
questionnaire by changing the initial scale of three options to two for uniformity during
analysis. Also, the external factors item was split into two. The pilot study revealed the
need to shorten the amount of information on section B of the student questionnaire in
areas such as inculcation of political knowledge and developing civic dispositions and
having a simple and shorter definition of civic education. On the whole, the pilot study
revealed the need for separation of the closed items from the open questions.
Consequently, the open questions were used to collect qualitative data through the focus
group discussions.

106
4.9 Data Collection

As stated (4.3:1) above, the first part of data collection was questionnaire (open and close)
administration. This involved formal requests to local education districts in charge of
schools in both Lagos and Ogun States. I asked for approval to administer the
questionnaires to the civic teachers and students in schools within their jurisdictions and
approval was granted (see approval letters Appendix 4a-f).

Administration of the three sets of questionnaires for data collection was conducted by
myself and 3 research assistants. They helped me to administer questionnaires in some
schools while I was in other schools. They helped me in collating the questionnaires and
together (in a conference like format) coded the data into SPSS version 15 (which I later
changed into Brunel SPSS version 18 during data collection). Prior to the data collection
process, a briefing was conducted for research assistants to prepare them for questionnaire
administration. Also, I counselled them on the mode of conducting the survey and kept
in close communications with them during the process of administration.

Schools were visited to present letters to principals who passed us over to the subject
teacher(s) for further cooperation and interactions. This was an opportunity to meet with
the civic education teachers and acquaint them with the objectives of the research.
Through these exchanges with the administrators and subject teachers, I gathered some
information and experiences on the teaching mode of civic education which further
confirmed my earlier epistemological stance discussed in section 4.2:1.

The survey was conducted between May 15th and July 27th, 2012. As planned, the teachers
selected the 15 civic students based on stratified and proportionate sampling using criteria
such as academic attainment, that is, best five, middle five and the last five students. Also,
selection covered other criteria such as gender and classes involving junior and senior
classes. The civic teachers introduced us to the students and then explained the process
to them and further gave a copy of the information sheet explaining the research
objectives and a brief account of the questionnaire along with ethical considerations (see
Appendix 5) - before the students completed the questionnaire. We encouraged them to
ask questions about the survey especially concerning their rights in the research before
and during the questionnaire administration.

Issues of anonymity, confidentiality and informed consent stipulated by the research and
ethics committee of Brunel University London were strictly adhered to throughout the
research. Selected students were assured that their participation in the research would not

107
cause any harm or risk to them. That information given would be treated as confidential
and data given would be used in aggregate only. They were assured that their teachers
and principal would not have access to the data and that it had no relationship with their
academic attainment in civic education. They were informed of their right of withdrawal
from the questionnaire administration at any time without consequence throughout the
process of research.

The questionnaires were given to the selected students by their subject teacher(s) in
schools, but under the supervision and monitoring of either myself or the research
assistants. Each respondent took an average of 15 minutes to fill in the questionnaire. As
the respondents were completing the questionnaire the research assistants or I stayed to
explain any issues. Based on the reports from the research assistants, the questionnaire
administration did not suffer any major hitch. However, a few cases of students who were
not willing to participate (in accordance with their rights) were stated. Students who
participated were asked individually and collectively whether they understood the
questions and their response was in the affirmative showing that they comprehended the
questionnaire items. The copies of the completed questionnaire were immediately
collected from the students.

This same process was followed during the administration of the questionnaire to the civic
teachers. The questionnaire administration was conducted simultaneously to both the
teachers and students except in schools were the students were not used as respondents
but only the civic teacher(s) completed the questionnaire.

On the whole an average of 15 civic students to two teachers participated in the

questionnaire in schools where both students and teachers participated. A total of 580
students and 76 teachers from 38 schools (this is for schools where the survey was
administered on both students and teachers) from the two states participated. There were
a few cases of non-item-response for teacher and students.

For the third questionnaire involving the civic experts, I explained the purpose of my
research to the President of the Social Studies Association of Nigeria, the umbrella body
for all social studies and citizenship education lecturers in both colleges of education and
universities across Nigeria. The list of members in different institutions across Nigeria
was used, out of which forty were selected through stratified random sampling using
designation, gender, inter alia. Most of them were contacted by telephone regarding the

108
suggested mode of sending the questionnaire. However, only twenty-nine of the
questionnaires were returned and not all the sections were completed by the respondents.

4.10 Quantitative Data Analysis

To answer the research questions for this study, I analysed data collected through the
three sets of questionnaires administered on the various respondents to statistically show
the impacts of independent variables on developing effective citizenship via civic
instructions. Based on the literature reviewed in the earlier chapter (Chapter 3) on civic
curriculum objectives, content, school resources and pedagogical practices which might
affect the contents to develop effective citizenship (Finkel and Ernst, 2005; Falade, 2007).
I then stated hypotheses for each research question.

RQ 1: To what extent are the civic education objectives, presently implemented,

appropriate to develop effective citizenship in learners?

I hypothesized that the responses of the civic experts will signify that the objectives of
civic education, as presently implemented, are not appropriate to achieve citizenship
orientations in young learners. That is, the objectives of civic education, as presently
implemented may not develop knowledge, dispositions and skill in young learners. To
test this, the questionnaire scales and responses were scored from 3 – 1 for the items,
coded and analysed using descriptive statistics of frequency counts, means and standard
deviation. The frequency counts were used to determine the numbers of respondents who
either agreed, not sure or disagreed with the statements. The frequency counts were later
converted to percentages to permit meaningful descriptions of civic experts' general
dispositions on the suitability of civic objectives in developing effective citizenship. The
questionnaire’s open end section administered for this research question was analysed
using thematic analysis.

RQ 1b: To what extent do civic learners perceive their exposure to civic (content)
instructions has developed effective citizenship (if any) in them?

I hypothesized that the responses of civic students will not signify any impact of the civic
(content) instructions on the developing effective citizenship goals in young learners.
That is, the civic (content taught) instructions have not developed effective citizenship in
learners. To test this, the questionnaire scale was scored from 5 – 1 for positive items and
negative items reversely scored from 1-5. Also, items were grouped under a component
civic knowledge, dispositions and civic skills. Items under a component were summed up

109
and calculated as part of the dependent variable (effective citizenship). The descriptive
statistics helped to determine the number of respondents that either strongly agreed, or
agreed or were undecided, disagreed or strongly disagreed. The frequency counts of
responses were later converted to percentages in order to permit meaningful descriptions
of the general dispositions of the respondents on each theme.

RQ2 To what extent do civic teachers perceive any impact of school resources (SR)
on civic instruction to develop effective citizenship (EC) in learners?

I hypothesized that the responses of civic teachers will not signify any impact of SR on
civic instruction to develop EC. That is, TPSR will not have any impact on civic
instructions. To test this, the questionnaire scales and responses were scored from 0–1 for
the items, coded and analysed using descriptive statistics of frequency counts, means and
standard deviation. The frequency counts were used to determine the numbers of
respondents who either gave yes or no to the statements. The frequency counts were later
converted to percentages to permit meaningful descriptions of the general dispositions of
the civic teachers on the impacts of these three variables in developing effective
citizenship.

RQ3 To what extent do civic teachers and learners perceive any impact of
pedagogical practices (PP) on civic instruction to develop effective citizenship (EC)
in learners?

I hypothesized that the responses of civic teachers and learners will not signify any impact
of PP on civic instruction to develop EC. That is, TPPP will not have any impact on civic
instructions. To test this, the questionnaire scales and responses were scored from 0–1 for
the items, coded and analysed using descriptive statistics of frequency counts, means and
standard deviation. The frequency counts were used to determine the numbers of
respondents who either gave yes or no to the statements. The frequency counts were later
converted to percentages to permit meaningful descriptions of the general dispositions of
the civic teachers and students on the impacts of these three variables in developing
effective citizenship.

110
4.11 Qualitative Data Collection Process

4.11:1 Focus Group Discussions

Focus groups allowed stakeholders to explain in-depth the effects of civic education on
their citizenship development and explore why and how certain selected variables
(factors), tested in the first stage, were significant or non-significant predictors of
citizenship development in school-based civic education.

I organised the focus groups as a prudent discussion within a liberal setting to examine
the perceptions of stakeholders (civic teachers and students) on identified
variables/themes relating to whether citizenship development had been achieved through
civic education in young learners. I involved groups of civic teachers and learners selected
to share their various personal experiences in the implementation of civic education
(Krueger, 1994; Powell and Single 1996).

I used focus group discussions as evidence of the epistemological obligation of this

research to comprehend the perceptions of my respondents on the construction of multiple
realities (Morgan, 1997). In other words, this enabled the practitioners in the field of
education to reveal the multiple realities of issues involving their civic education teaching
and learning process.

The rationale for using focus groups was to facilitate in depth clarification which the
questionnaire could not provide on citizenship orientations through well formulated
questions (Stewart & Shamdasani, 1990). It encouraged discussion among respondents
on the predictors/causes of citizenship development in and out of civic lessons via group
activities and motivation. Respondents were induced to refer to personal experiences in
the classroom and to challenge each other’s submissions in order to get more clarification
(Krueger, 1994).

4.11:2 Sampling Strategies

Out of the 298 civic teachers and 580 students who completed the questionnaire in 2
states, 104 teachers tentatively agreed to participate by putting their phone numbers in the
questionnaires for follow-up. Out of this number, 20 civic teachers were selected for each
state through purposive stratified sampling. Selection by stratification was based on the
demographic criteria provided in the questionnaires such as years of teaching experience
and state of practice (employers), gender and education districts. Nevertheless, most of
the group members (teachers) knew each other as colleagues, acquaintances and friends.

111
For the students, those selected were in the Senior Secondary School class. The Senior
Secondary Schools (SSS) students were selected because, at the time of conducting the
focus group discussion, those students who filled in the questionnaires (then in junior
class) had transited into the senior class. The purposive stratified sampling used helped
to identify respondents who shared some common traits and differences. This facilitated
good rapport and interactions among them thereby producing robust and fruitful
discussions and information (Calder, 1977; Carey, 1994) due to the open-ended questions
on specially targeted or purposeful issues (Patton, 1990). In view of the purposive
stratified sampling employed, the qualitative sample was not random; therefore, the
findings may not be entirely representative of all the civic teachers and students in the
two states. Nonetheless, since more than one focus group discussion was conducted,
cross-discussion analysis could lead to theoretical rather than statistical generalisation.
Furthermore, the initial collection of data through the questionnaire in this research could
offset and compensate for the above limitation. In other words, this limitation can be
tackled by embedding the findings in the wider sample provided by the questionnaire and
by relating them to the research literature.

4.11:3 Participants

In the focus group discussions, I selected a sample size of 20 civic teachers each for Ogun
and Lagos states. For the civic students, 20 were selected for Lagos and 15 for Ogun state
(see table below). Although large, as Patton says, there are no rules governing sample
size in qualitative inquiry as sample size should be determined by what you want to know,
the objectives of the research, what is involved, benefits derivable and prudence in terms
of available time and resources (Patton 1990; Mclafferty, 2004). Also Merton et al,
recommended groups of 12–15, or even 15–20 respondents, that is, numbers of
respondents may vary from 4 to 20. Focus groups should not be so large ‘as to be unwieldy
or to preclude adequate participation by most members nor should it be so small that it
fails to provide substantially greater coverage than that of an interview with one
individual’ (Merton et al, 1990, p. 137; Powell et al, 1996).

112
Table 5 Breakdown of Participants for the Focus Groups in two States

States Teachers Students

M F Total M F Total
Lagos State 09 11 20 09 11 20
Ogun State 10 10 20 07 08 15
Total 19 21 40 16 19 35

Pragmatically, the large sample size was due to financial and logistical limitations. That
is, the number of respondents for the FGD was relatively large because I could not afford
to organise more than one session for the teachers and students in each state due to the
cost of transportation of respondents from different locations, rental of a venue for the
discussion (on an hourly basis) and provision of refreshments during the discussions for
the four groups.

The large number availed me with diverse views from respondents across the groups
which provided rich data and increased its validity and credibility (Krueger, 1994). In
Nigeria, focus group discussion is seldom used as a method of collecting data, and those
that use it involve large sample sizes (Oyetade, 2004; Falade, 2007).

The fact that few group members knew each other prior to the gathering meant good
interactions among them thereby producing robust discussions. Also, those that were
meeting for the first time appeared happy to participate after initial hesitation. After some
time, respondents became so engrossed in the discussion that their expressions were
becoming agitated, (not against themselves), which could be implied were based on their
experiences of the difficulties militating against the teaching and learning of civic
education. Just as some were reluctant to talk, others were ready to speak their minds in
the hope that such a forum would pass on the problems to the regulatory bodies
(government).

The civic teachers selected in the two groups reflected in their discussion their diversity
in experience and exposure. Some of the respondents showed high levels of confidence,
readiness and openness to discuss the questions. To this extent they were somewhat
assertive in terms of their perspectives of issues as well as responsiveness during the
discussion. Having realised this, as moderator, I made contributions to make other
respondents realise that such contributions were mere personal opinions which were
neither final nor authoritative. While some respondents were very active in the

113
discussions, some were lukewarm and thus needed some encouragement to contribute to
the discussion.

In contrast, the students, with fewer participants were easier to control, less rowdy and
more coordinated. Although one may be tempted to conclude that may be because they
were students, there was another group of 20 students from Lagos whose session was
almost like that of their teachers.

4.11:4 Procedures for Data Collection

For the focus groups, initial contacts with administrators at the local education districts
proved difficult. They wanted to be sure the discussion was for research purposes before
releasing the teachers and students. However, they gave consent when they were
convinced that the focus group was not only for research but also included a workshop to
develop civic teachers’ pedagogic content knowledge and further improve the students’
knowledge of civic issues. Thus, letters of approval (see Appendix 9) were issued. In view
of this, contacts were made with school principals and civic teachers to facilitate the
process of releasing them for focus group data collection.

The principals and parents were not willing to release students alone without the civic
teacher as guardian; therefore, my only choice was to select learners from the same
schools as the teachers selected.

4.11:5 Preparation and Issues for Discussion

The discussions took place at two different venues that were central to respondents in the
two states. The first discussion was held at a conference hall with a conducive
environment and adequate facilities to make respondents comfortable for the realisation
of the group activities in order to promote good rapport and discussion among all those
present (Ressel et al, 2002). The first two focus groups discussions were conducted for
civic teachers and students in Lagos state in October, 2012. While the second focus group
was arranged for civic teachers and students teaching in Ogun state three weeks later
(November, 2012).

Before the commencement of the focus group discussions, I explained the ethical
principles such as anonymity and confidentiality, and respondents were reminded of the
need to give their consent as was the case during the questionnaire administration and
were given a similar consent form to sign. The programme was divided into different

114
sessions involving the focus group discussions and workshop on the teaching of civic
education. The first session in the programme started with the focus group discussions
which the moderator formally introduced by explaining the objectives and procedures.

The format of discussions involved raising issues on the themes as stated in the open
questions which were separated from the closed questions. The questions raised were both
structured as stated in the open ended items and unstructured as issues emanated from the
open questions especially in relation to the findings from the various sections of the
questionnaires (see Appendix 6). Respondents were also encouraged to narrate their
personal experiences on each issue where necessary.

The discussions started with the civic teachers and that of the students followed. The
findings from the survey questionnaires were used in order to gather further and in depth
explanation. Therefore, I explained to the respondents each theme and what they stood
for in the research after which the findings on these themes were projected and
respondents were allowed to comment on each finding as questions were raised requiring
further clarification by explaining in-depth the possible rationale for each response. They
were asked whether they agreed or not with the finding and why. Then how will this
impact or not on the young learners’ citizenship orientation (Eckert, 2012).

The themes/issues included recruitment of qualified teachers, training of teachers,

availability and adequacy of instructional materials, the impact of active participatory
methods, among others. These are the issues generated from the civic questionnaires
which require further clarifications. After this, they were asked to explain what the
findings reflected and why it was so (Eckert 2012); specifically, issues for discussion
involved teachers’ knowledge of the civic content through exposure to in-service training
and application of participatory methods, among others. For instance, what is the impact
of recruitment in the teaching of civic education? Do you see recruitment being a cause
of or having an effect on the citizenship orientations of your students from your personal
experience as professionals?

In the course of the discussion, the researcher as moderator tried to encourage respondents
through some form of contributions on the issues raised. This enhanced the flow of
discussion on the issues from the respondents’ perspectives (Morgan, 1997). The research
assistants taking notes (minutes) read out contributions on each question for the
respondents to be sure that it was their views before moving to the next questions. This
was to ensure that I was not conveying my own views but that of the respondents and

115
especially where arguments ensued, the recorders were played back for them to be sure
of what they said.

Conversely, the large number of respondents was a cause for concern occasionally in the
course of the discussion. There were some side comments which led to distractions in the
discussions. Also, there was occasional disorderliness and non-compliance with rules
governing the discussions. I exercised minimal control to allow for free expression and
equally ensuring the coverage of relevant issues within the time allotted (Burns and
Grove, 2001).

Also, some respondents monopolised the group discussions, however, questions were
redirected on the issues for others to respond, thus ensuring continued interaction among
all respondents (for instance, “I wanted more contributions from other respondents on this
issue”). The discussions for each of the four groups were not more than 2 hours.

Various kinds of refreshments were served during the discussion in order to create a more
cordial, friendly and social rapport.

After the group discussions, two invited resource persons spoke to the respondents on the
content of and the use of active participatory methods in the teaching of civic education.

I audio taped and transcribed verbatim each of the four group discussions (Creswell
2005). I transcribed part of the group discussions from the voice and tape recorder in
order to get acquainted with the data. But in order to save time the services of one of the
research assistants during data collection was co-opted to complete transcribing of the
other focus group discussions.

4.11:6 Focus Group Discussions Trustworthiness

In 4.8 above, I conducted a reliability and pilot (study) test to measure the degree of
consistency, stability, predictability and dependability of the survey questionnaires. That
is, appraising the quality of quantitative study requires testing the validity of the research
regarding its internal and external validity, reliability and objectivity. A similar rigorous
test was conducted to measure the trustworthiness of the focus group discussions.

Conversely, assessing the validity of qualitative studies is a recurring task due to the
physical setting in which the study occurs. Qualitative study hardly focuses on broad
generalisability of results, rather it convinces the readers that the findings are worthwhile
by disclosing the trustworthiness of the study which involves ascertaining its credibility,

116
transferability, dependability and conformability (Lincoln & Guba, 1985; Lincoln, 1989;
Wiersma, 1995; Healy, 2011). To a constructivist, trustworthiness involves boosting the
acceptability of the study via the clarity of the inquiry processes and backing the findings
with literature to convince the readers of the credibility of the findings (Lincoln & Guba
1985; Denzin, 1998).

Credibility, (which is internal validity in a quantitative/positivist study), depicts an accord

between participants’ constructs and the researcher attesting that the study analysis results
and findings are trustworthy. This could be learnt after other scholars see the study
methods and findings as valuable. (Flick, 2006; Buchanan, 2007; Moriarty, 2010; Healy,
2011).

The first credibility check this study used involves prolonged engagement via constant
visit and referential adequacy (Lincoln & Guda, 1985). This entails regularly visiting
schools to become familiarised with the research context/location, which, though, time-
consuming was crucial to developing trust with the civic teachers and learners (Lincoln
& Guba, 1985). Prior to data collection between May and December, 2012, I spent time
interacting with teachers and learners involved in this study within the school. I was able
to develop such interactions with the teachers and learners because I was a secondary
school teacher for many years before moving to the higher education level as a teacher
educator. Also, I regularly visited schools to supervise my students during teaching
(practicum) practice annually, and more so, many of these teachers were former
undergraduates of my institution. Apparently, these prior links could have averted
potential biases which most studies at times are unable to surmount (Jackson, 1968;
Shoqirat, 2009; Likupe, 2011). Nonetheless, the interactions became more cordial when
local education district administrators gave me letters to principals. The Principals, in
turn, introduced me to the subject teacher(s) to discuss the modalities of the research. This
informal meeting gave me the chance to acquaint participants with the objectives of the
study. Also, I discussed ethical issues as it relates to the study, but devoid of providing
comprehensive information on the study methods and civic implementation issues. This
meeting was an opportunity to gather some information and experiences on the mode of
teaching civic education. Meeting and interacting with civic teachers and learners prior
to data collection within the school context enable me to fully appreciate the school’s
culture. It further develops the trust, cordiality, affinity, sincerity, honesty and
truthfulness expected from participants’ in their answers for more authentic construal of
their views (Gillis & Jackson, 2002). Thus, I argue that meeting with participants in the

117
school boosted the credibility of the focus group data analysed (Burns & Grove, 2001,
Polit et al, 2001; Shoqirat, 2009).

Also, I ascertain the focus group discussion credibility through referential adequacy
which entails documenting the focus group discussion data electronically. That is, I
employed audio tape-recording of the discussions to show the accuracy of the participants
account of the civic curriculum implementation issues. Notes on participants’
contributions on each question were read out to be sure that it was their views before
moving to the next question. This was to ensure that the actual views of participants and
not my own views were conveyed. This could enhance semantic validity since
participants could ascertain if the expressions used matched their own meaning. This is a
basic issue in this study because I am more familiar with the culture of schools in Lagos
state in contrast to Ogun state. This is a way of ensuring that participants’ responses were
not misconstrued thereby reducing the risk of low data credibility. This became a measure
by which the adequacy of subsequent data analyses could be verified (Eisner, 1975,
Buchanan, 2007).

The audio-tape recording was examined pari-pasu that of the notes taken while analysing
and interpreting the data on a particular issue. This gave me the chance to regularly check
the data analyses and interpretations with the original source in order to minimise the
chances of misinterpretations or misconceptions of data. Misinformation or
misinterpretation was vital due to the pre-existing rapport between the participants and
me (Bilmes, 1975). Also, in ensuring that my preconceptions were of lowest priority, I
analysed and categorised data via constant comparison with participants’ responses,
extant literature and discussion with experts (Glaser, 1998; Healy, 2011). Participants
were contacted to cross check (confirm) whether the responses transcribed were rightly
reported as a form of validation (Krueger and Casey, 2000; Bryman, 2008). Overall, I
tried to reflect participants’ actual thoughts and retorts on civic implementation within
the school context in Nigeria (Krueger & Casey, 2000; Shoqirat, 2009; Likupe, 2011).
But, this method may be faulty since participants can be either cautious or submissive if
they have developed affinity for the researcher (Bryman, 2008).

I moderated the focus group discussions and due to my training as a teacher educator and
researcher, I was able to establish cordiality and good rapport with participants and make
them more comfortable. I was cautiously attentive and noted participants’ reaction to
issues and did ask for explanation on ambiguous issues. As the moderator, I made

118
contributions to make other respondents realise that such contributions were mere
personal opinions which were neither final nor authoritative. While some respondents
were very active in the discussions, some were lukewarm and thus needed some
encouragement to contribute to the discussion. In line with qualitative literature, I present
a vivid explanation regarding my findings in this thesis. This entails providing a detailed
report of issues and methods noted in the course of the study. Also, I recorded
unanticipated issues which occurred during focus group discussions so that readers could
assess the applicability of the findings to other school contexts. If contextual comparisons
are delineated, then some degree of transferability would have been achieved.

Though I was unable to conduct a focus group pilot study due to logistic and financial
issues, however, the panel of experts used (4.8) above to examine quantitative
questionnaire items did the same for the focus group questions before being administered.
The goal was to establish the trustworthiness (reliability and validity) of the focus group
discussions regarding whether the issues raised could expound or elaborate further on the
quantitative questionnaire items (Krueger & Casey, 2000; Likupe, 2011). Based on the
experts’ review, some items were revised to enhance the quality and accuracy of the data
obtained from the participants. The focus group discussion questions were constructed
with inbuilt provisos to confirm participants’ views on civic curriculum implementation
to develop effective citizenship. It’s likely that schools’ civic implementation may differ
due to ecological and cultural factors thus it is vital that participants’ retorts are honest.
To this end, I asked another set of senior colleagues in social studies/citizenship education
skilful in qualitative research to verify the focus group data collected and analysed. I
briefed them on ethical issues such as confidentiality of the study data while required to
check for the moderator’s bias, if any, and analysis dependability (Mountain, 2004;
Likupe, 2011).

Moreover, triangulation assisted in ensuring the credibility and dependability by virtue

of the methodologies employed in the focus group discussions. This study’s methods
triangulation could mediate the confirmation of survey questionnaire and focus group
data merged. In other words, making inferences from the collection and analysis of data
on civic education implementation to develop effective citizenship requires integrating
data generated from survey questionnaire and focus group discussions. Methods
triangulation results in completeness as well as merging of data in the analysis process
thus differentiating authentic data from false data.

119
Finally, having complied with the above measures then I argue that the trustworthiness
of the focus group discussion has been utilised (Miles and Huberman, 1994, Polit et al,
2002).

4.11:7 Problems and Limitations of Focus Group Discussion

As with other methods of data collection, the focus groups conducted had their own
particular problems.

The large size of respondents was partly due to the interest shown by some teachers to
take part in the discussion, even when the principals were unwilling to release them. They
kept on sending text messages on their willingness and readiness to come at their own
expense in order to take part. Some that were not selected still got the information from
their colleagues and joined the transport to come for the discussion.

These group discussions were confronted with the problem of group influence in which
some respondents were consenting to a majority of opinions. This could have an adverse
effect on the validity of data collected. However, I believe that since all respondents were
given the opportunity to freely express their views through persuasion, then the issue of
group influence would have been reduced. More so, that the data collected were to be
analysed as the product of the various group discussion instead of a collection of
individual interviews. Then, this becomes a strength because it involved accessing the
collective negotiation of meaning as stated by Margaret Wetherell, Michael Billig etc.

Another limitation of these focus groups involved the inability to conduct a pilot study.
If one had been conducted, it would have been aimed at testing the questions that
respondents would have been asked. It would have discovered whether some of the
questions were vague or leading questions. Unfortunately, the focus group questions were
not pilot tested, because, it was not only time consuming, it was financially draining and
labour demanding to organise. The open ended questions were pilot tested with the closed
ended items and these (open ended items) were the questions applied for the focus group
discussions.

Also the results from the first focus group discussion were used, (instead of arranging
another), as pilot testing (Krueger and Casey, 2000). However, at the end of each focus
group respondents were asked if the questions were clear and if any of the questions could
be made clearer and the schedule was altered accordingly.

120
In accordance with the sequential explanatory design, qualitative data analysis was the
second stage of the data analysis. In this qualitative stage, thematic analysis was used.
This involved the use of filing and colour index method which enabled me to feel closer
to the data as adopted by other researchers (Dean and Sharp, 2006).

4.12 Thematic Analysis

The term theme refers to an element which occurs frequently in a particular manuscript
or transcript (van Manen, 1990). “Thematic analysis” involves the process of identifying
the theme(s) which are personified and produced in the evolving meanings and
descriptions of the research work (p.78). Therefore, thematic data analysis involved the
process of making a meaning of content involving the experiences which civic education
teachers and their students described. Making meaning out of these experiences entailed
construing the meanings and themes in the transcripts to ascertain the perceptions of the
causes of achieving (or not) citizenship orientations in the young by sharing their
experiences in the teaching and learning of civic education

The process of analysing the data involved transcribing each audio-recording of the civic
teachers’ and students’ discussions.

Also, the data were analysed through coding and re-coding using a priori categories and
themes drawn from the research questions and literature reviewed (see Chapter 3) which
were enhanced during analysis. In other words, codes and themes were sorted according
to their relationship with quantitative findings (Eckert, 2012). Example of themes include
instructional materials, training, recruitment, open classroom discussion and active
pedagogical practices.

Then data emanating from these separate discussions were examined in relation to the
identified themes which were developed to directly respond to the quantitative findings.
These themes were also assessed for relationship to quantitative findings either by
supporting or explaining or disproving (Eckert, 2012).

Theme isolation was conducted through selecting expressions which appeared revealing
about the issues discussed. This involved being immersed in the data to understand its
meaning and to maintain respondents’ opinion along with the issues under examination
(Moustakas 1990).

121
The themes mentioned above were identified in relation to quantitative findings as
follows:

 Categories were created for each transcript based on the categorical variables in
the research questions (PEC, PSR and PCPP) used for quantitative findings (see
4.5 above).

 In each category, themes were identified. For example, under ECD themes such
as civic knowledge, dispositions and skills were identified; under SR themes such
as recruitment, training and instructional materials were identified.

 On the whole, categories were identified, generated and linked accordingly to the
various issues discussed.

 Then the numbers of themes are being reduced, (where necessary), by integrating
(collapsing) themes with similar contents under those categories. (Brunard, 1991).

 Then the final form of categories identified and each of them examined within the
context of each question reported in the group discussion schedule and the
research questions as a whole.

Since the teachers were asked to respond directly to findings, then the results to be
presented will be organized such that the findings from quantitative analysis are stated
and then explained using the qualitative focus group data. This makes way for proper
integration of both the questionnaire and focus group discussions findings. Unrelated data
will be included in the analysis by creating another theme and if necessary category for
such and will be incorporated into the scope of this project (Dismore, 2007; Eckert, 2012).

4.13 The Roles of Research Assistants within the Study Context

In this study, I refer to research assistants, hence the need to offer some information
regarding their roles within the research, their contributions in the research process,
criteria for selection, their research experience and the training and support received
prior to data collection.

Apart from the reasons adduced (4.1 and 4.3) above for using quantitative research to
collect data in this study it could accommodate a large representative sample to offer
broader information and inference via statistical data analysis. Thus, I administered
survey questionnaires in fifty (50) basic and senior secondary schools in eleven

122
educations districts of Lagos and Ogun states. Doing this alone would involve tourin
many kilometres on the road which could be hectic and lead to burnout. Moreover, the
schools were about to go for the long summer break and my fieldwork had a stipulated
timeline. Therefore, it became imperative to co-opt three people as research assistants in
my questionnaire administration.

In selecting these people, I took into consideration criteria such as research experience,
prior training in the field of lecturing and research and the role expected of them in the
study.

Upon collecting permission letters from the local education districts, I visited schools to
informally interact with the principals and prospective teachers and learners so that I
ensured regular communication. The teachers were aware that either myself or research
assistants would conduct the questionnaire administration. The research assistants were
my colleagues with considerable lecturing and research experience and thus were
qualified to administer questionnaires in schools I could not get to. The colleagues are
listed below:

AA1 a lecturer, specialises in developmental economics with lecturing and research

experience of about 15 years and is now doctoral candidate in a Nigerian university.

BB2 a lecturer, specialises in Social studies educational research and methodology. With
extensive experience of over 10 years in teaching and research on citizenship methods
and now a doctoral candidate in a Nigerian university.

CC3 a lecturer, specialises in Nigerian politics and government, with teaching and
research experience of 5 years and presently a doctoral candidate in a Nigerian
university.

By virtue of their professional background, the three research assistants have received
adequate training in quantitative research procedures. However, prior to engaging them
in administering the questionnaire (data collection process), I conducted a roundtable
session for them. In this training, I acquainted them with the background information and
objectives of my study, ethical principles governing a Ph.D. project at Brunel University
London and statutory laws which govern research in the United Kingdom (Data
Protection Act 1998 (as amended)). Also, I explained the confidentiality and anonymity
rules regarding civic teachers, young learners and other vulnerable participants, if any.

123
Also, exceptions to the rules of anonymity and confidentiality were expounded and the
aftermath of the data when the project is complete. I showed them the Brunel Ethics forms
which I had completed and the approval given and the need to work within the laid down
research ethics such as giving participants the chance to read the information and consent
sheet prior to answering the questionnaire. In addition, I counselled them on the mode of
conducting the survey and kept in close communications with them and the teachers
during and after the process of administration.

While in the field, the research assistants’ practicalised the training session by providing
background and objectives of the study to prospective participants (civic teachers and
their learners). They ensured that the participant received full, clear information about the
research project in language they understood as a prerequisite to giving their informed
consent freely and that they could withdraw at any time. They helped me to hand over the
questionnaires to the subject teacher(s) who in turn distributed them to the selected
students in the schools, however, they supervised and monitored the exercise which took
an average of 15 minutes. Also, the research assistants stayed to explain any issues arising
after the participants completed the questionnaire. They submitted their reports which
indicated that the questionnaire administration did not suffer any major hitch except a few
cases of learners who were not willing to participate (in accordance with their rights).
Also, there were a few cases of non-item-response for teacher and learners.

Learners who participated were asked individually and collectively whether they
understood the questions and their response was in the affirmative showing that they
comprehended the questionnaire items. The copies of the completed questionnaire were
immediately collected from the students. This same process was followed while
administering the questionnaire to the civic teachers. The questionnaire administration
was conducted concurrently to the teachers and learners except in schools where only
civic teacher(s) were used. Also, the research assistants and myself did the collation of
the questionnaires together after data collection through a conference like format coding
the data into SPSS version 15 (which I later changed into Brunel SPSS version 18 for
data analysis).

4.14 Ethical issues and considerations

In this research, it was necessary to examine basic ethical issues involving a protocol
detailing the objectives of the research, methods of investigation and diffusion of the
results. This was sent to the Research Ethics Committee of the School of Sport and

124
Education, Brunel University, for consideration and necessary approval as a justified
investigation. The data collection was conducted in Nigeria thus the research obtained the
second approval letter from the local education districts in Nigeria. These approval letters
were given to the principals of selected secondary schools where data was collected.

All stakeholders (civic experts, teachers and students) that participated in the
questionnaire administration and/or focus group discussion were assured that their
identities would be kept confidential and anonymous. Therefore, their participation did
not attract or invoke any individual or collective risk.

The information sheet about the study was given to the respondents along with the
informed consent form to read before taking part in the research. I also informed them
that participation in the research was absolutely voluntary and they were free to withdraw
their participation at any point in the research. Consenting respondents signed the consent
form given to each of them.

Students were given the assurance that participation or not had no relationship with their
academic performance. They were informed of their rights to accept or reject the audio
recording of the focus group discussions. None of the respondents requested to listen to
the recordings while their confidentiality was assured through substituting their real
identities, (names) with codes. The respondents were told that the research was conducted
for the fulfilment of my PhD programme thus data generated was used for academic
purposes involving presentations at conferences and publication of articles in journals.

All the respondents were informed that the quantitative data collected would be analysed
using specific statistical tools while the qualitative data generated would be anonymously
analysed using themes and categories, therefore the identity of respondents would not be
revealed. Respondents were counselled not to write their names on the questionnaire to
preserve anonymity. I was the only one who had access to the completed questionnaire,
transcribed data and the digital recorder.

I am aware that some respondents may see the focus group discussion as an avenue to
express or reveal their grievances of some of the negative ordeals they have gone through
in relation to their teaching (Kvale, 1996). In actual fact, some respondents raised such
issues during the focus group discussions so that I should let the government know the
problems they were facing in the course of teaching the subject. Raising such grievances
was consistent with the view of Patton (1990) who emphasises that the purpose of such

125
discussion forum is primarily to collect data and not to entertain grievances nor to
mediate.

4.15 Conclusion

In this chapter I describe the methodological issues involving various segments which
could impact on the outcome of this research. This included the epistemological stance
(constructionism to develop multiple realities). Applying a constructivist stance
reasserted my conviction on knowledge relativity, transactional and subjectivity which
makes it imperative to explore the world to ascertain these realities. In view of this
methodological reflection, I tried to collect data through methods determined by the
research questions, the literature reviewed and constructivist stance. To achieve this, I
used a mixed-method approach involving questionnaire and focus group surveys
conducted using sequential explanatory design. This was to enable an in depth
comprehension of the group of evidence which connects school resources and classroom
pedagogical practices and effective citizenship in order to collect rich data from a large
representation and concurrently offer in depth explanation on issues involved from the
samples comprising of civic teachers and their learners. Lastly, I examined ethical issues
on the respondents’ rights to partake or not in the research. The next chapters will examine
extensively the two stages of analysis involving findings and results from the
questionnaire and focus group discussions conducted. I discuss the findings by linking
them to the various themes within the research questions and related literature reviewed
on civic education and effective citizenship. Specifically, the next chapter discusses the
results obtained from the instruments on the appropriateness of civic objectives and the
extent to which civic content have imbibed effective citizenship.

126
 Chapter Five

Perceived Civic Programme Objectives Knowledge Emphasis

5.0 Introduction

Chapter 4 described the research methodology procedures used to collect and analyse the
study data. This chapter (5) offers a discussion of study data involving the research
question; whether civic experts perceive civic curriculum objectives as appropriate to
construct civic knowledge, develop dispositions and skills in Nigeria’s young learners.
Discussing this issue requires exploring literature in relation to data on government intent,
in the context of an issue/activity based civic programme, its objectives, content and
pedagogy tools. This will ascertain whether civic curriculum components above can
develop knowledge, dispositions and skills to engage in political/governmental and
nongovernmental citizenship. Ascertaining the development of these issues entails
splitting the chapter into sections:

Section 5.1. discusses how the data results relate to the civic programme objectives’
emphasis on political and nongovernmental citizenship knowledge which sequentially
lead to developing dispositions and skills. The discussion, in relation to literature, show
that such knowledge offers adequate insights on both citizenship realms, but entails a
didactic pedagogy inducing learning by recall which echoes inbuilt political issues in the
objectives. The data also indicates a symbiotic link among civic components implying
that civic knowledge construction can lead to dispositions and skills development. For
such symbiosis to mediate active participation in political and nongovernmental
citizenship requires classroom interactive pedagogies entrenched in the learning theories
discussed in chapter 2 (2.5). But extrinsic factors can obstruct links amid the components.
Also, civic experts’ data showed narrow views of effective citizenship as involving just
political action thus barring nongovernmental citizenship participation.

Section 5.2 explores the data findings in relation to civic programme objectives as
valuable. However, in relation to literature, most past curriculum programmes having
good intention usually lack basic resources for implementation in schools.

Section 5.3 present the data reflecting civic content positive impact on political
knowledge transmission. However, such knowledge can lead to passivity and naivety as
hallmark of effective citizenship. It also reveals civic content has positive impacts on
developing knowledge, dispositions and participatory skills on nongovernmental

127
citizenship. Also, the data reveals relative community citizenship advocacy groups’
involvement in schools’ extracurricular programmes but does not show any evidence of
engaging knowledge through these extracurricular programmes to develop dispositions
and participatory skills for critical and practical citizenship.

5.4. The data shows control variables such as states and students’ level reflect more
impact in the significant test while gender and school locations reveal no such
significance.

5.1. Civic objectives over emphasising civic knowledge construction

5.1:1 Civic Objectives’ undue emphasis on knowledge (cognitive domain)

components

Survey data (6a) above disclosed that civic objectives overemphasised knowledge
transmission making the objectives more knowledge-based. In this study, knowledge is
perceived as the construction and recall of concepts via classroom instructional process.
During teaching and learning young learners construct concepts and gather facts on
diverse citizenship norms about Nigeria from socialising agents like the school (Mansaray
& Ogunyemi, 1994; Patrick, 2002; Dudley & Gitelson, 2003; Falade, 2007; Ifegbesan,
2008; Ahmad, 2011).

Underlining the data above, civic experts said: “…the objectives of civic
education…relevance to improve…knowledge of learners” (Part. 9). “The
knowledge…acquired would equip… young…citizens…” (Part. 11). “Civic attitudes
begins with civic knowledge…” (Part. 4). The civic experts perceived civic objectives
from its traditional school-based view of mediating knowledge transmission practiced in
the school system. The civic experts’ stance is justified since raising intellectual and
participatory engagement of civic learners should start with constructing knowledge in
order to enhance their social and personal inquiry skills to solve societal problems and
issues (NERDC, 2007pv; Tor, 2009). Also, it is vital that classroom civic curriculum
implementation starts from the position of constructing knowledge of citizenship issues
since such knowledge determines their grasping of/or engagement either as current
citizens or citizens in waiting ready to impact on the practice of citizenship (Supple 1998;
Osler & Starkey 2009, Larkin 2009; Ollas, 2013).

128
Table 6 a-c shows civic experts’ perceived appropriate/most appropriate civic objectives to develop civic knowledge, dispositions and participatory
skills
Civic Objective Items 6a Civic Knowledge 6b Civic Dispositions 6c Civic Skills

Appropriate Most App. Appropriate Most App. Appropriate Most App.

N % N % N % N % N % N %

A Attain the Millennium Development goals & the need to implement the critical element of National Economic 8 27.6 7 24.1 2 6.9 7 24.1 2 6.9
Empowerment & Development Strategies.
4 13.8

B Enhance the teaching & learning of emerging issues. 15 51.7 12 41.4 4 13.8 12 41.4 4 13.8
5 17.2

C Inculcate in students their duties & obligations to society. 17 58.6 18 62.1 7 24.1 18 62.1 7 24.1
9 31.0

D Highlight the structure of government, its functions & the duties of government to the people & vice-versa; 19 65.5 12 41.4 7 24.1 12 41.4 7 24.1
8 27.6

E Promote the understanding of the inter-relationship between man/woman, the government & society; 19 65.5 15 51.7 6 20.7 15 51.7 6 20.7
6 20.7

F Inculcate in the child the spirit of self-discipline, hard work, cooperation and respect for authority. 22 75.9 29 100 17 58.6 29 100
7 24.1 17 58.6

G Create adequate & functional political literates among Nigerians. 23 79.3 18 62.1 7 24.1 18 62.1 7 24.1
10 34.5

H Create awareness on the provisions of Nigerian constitution and the need for democracy. 25 86.2 17 58.6 5 17.2 17 58.6 5 17.2
12 41.4

I Sensitize Nigerians on the functions and obligations of government. 27 93.1 17 58.6 9 31 17 58.6 9 31
13 44.8

J Acquire and learn to use the skill, attitudes, knowledge and values that will prepare young learners to be competent 29 100 29 100 16 55.2 29 100 16 55.2
and responsible citizens throughout their lives.
19 65.5

Bold & Italicised= Appropriate Bold & Underlined = Most Appropriate

129
Achieving policy and programme objectives required an emphasis on knowledge
constructions as a basis to develop other components. Extensive civic literacy is basic to
developing dispositions and skills. Therefore, outlooks towards citizenship issues could
be defined by the constructed knowledge thereby making knowledge vital to developing
dispositions and skills (Mansaray, 1999; Ajiboye, 2002; Oyetade, 2003).

The ability of interactive learning theories to engage leaners in classroom civic learning
is well-discussed in 2.5. However, effective implementation of a knowledge -based civic
curriculum is problematic since these participatory pedagogies (social constructivist,
transformative among other theories) are implemented for learners to experience
classroom freedom as a hallmark of what to expect after they leave the education system
(Rudduck 2003; Osler & Starkey 2006; Covell et al., 2008). Nonetheless, I argue that this
issue also crucially affects the teachers who live in the world that learners will inhabit
after leaving the education system and thus are expected by that world to
reinforce/reproduce its values in their classrooms.

Undue focus on knowledge leads to didactic learning which promotes recalling

memorised concepts to pass examination as practiced in schools (Gbamanja, 2004).
Although Nigeria’s national policy underlines the importance of examination, such focus
involves assessing entire civic learning domains and not underscoring knowledge
construction at the cost of other components (NPE, 2004; Okam, 2008).

5.1:2 Civic Objectives emphasising political (political) citizenship knowledge

As mentioned above, civic objectives echoed (overemphasised) political citizenship

knowledge as rightly observed by an expert: “most of the objectives lay…emphasis
on…political knowledge…” (Resp. 3). This overemphasis led another civic expert to
propose that: “the objectives…should be reviewed to remove duplication and watering
down of the seriousness of the issues that must be addressed thematically and within the
domain profiles” (Part. 7). Understandably, most civic experts perceived that emphasising
political knowledge was pertinent due to the low level of national consciousness: “A
functional citizenship is based on thorough grounding of the knowledge of what is needed
to be done in time and space. …so…positive values developed through…knowledge and
awareness…” (Part. 20). I think these issues involve effective political participation
which requires adequate literacy (knowledge) about Nigeria’s political system.

130
Political literacy becomes more imperative considering our experience of long years of
military dictatorship which has changed our attitude negatively to democratic culture.
Underpinning this, a civic expert said: “…since many Nigerians are political illiterates
with sensitization and political enlightenment we may move beyond some of these…”
(Part. 18) and the reason for such illiteracy was stated by another civic expert saying:
“Nigerians need to know the functions and obligations of government especially having
been under military rule for long” (Part. 4). These responses further justified the civic
experts’ position on civic objectives focusing more on political (knowledge) literacy. For
over twenty-seven years, Nigerians were under dictatorial rules and thus became socio-
political illiterates lacking the ability to critically participate in the affairs and governance
of our nation (Huckle, 1997; Aluko, 1998; Falade, 2007; Ogunyemi, 2011). Though
developing effective citizenship could require renewing learners’ knowledge on political
participation via the school civic programme, however, as stated in chapter 2, formal
schooling alone cannot develop effective citizenship unless the large society (other
socialising agents) leads by example by ensuring good governance, eradicate corruption,
ethnic and religious conflicts, advanced fee fraud (419) which Nigeria is notorious and
other vices which are beyond the scope of the school (Adamolekun & Kincaid, 1991;
Marizu, 1998; Akinyele, 2001; Ukiwo, 2003; Badmus, 2006; Ukiwo, 2007; Okeahialam,
2013).

However, having adequate political knowledge lead to gradual internalisation resulting in

developing dispositions to engaging in the current democratic dispensation. A civic expert
stated: “…Some of the objectives tend towards cognitive development and if the subject
will make much impact affective learning should be promoted” (Part. 18). Evidently,
evolving cognitive insight by offering more information on national political issues could
induce dispositions mentioned by the experts. But overemphasis could make learners
become passive recipients reflecting the classical era (Po, 2004; Bellamy, 2013).

Though exigency for knowledge of Nigeria’s political system was evident, without the
requisite internalisation to develop dispositions and participatory skills, effective
citizenship could be unattainable as a civic expert noted “Democratic culture demands
tripartite elements of knowledge, attitudes and values as well as skills. It is when citizens
have adequate knowledge, complementary attitudes and values as well as participation
skills…that the society…can be classified as getting nearer to Almond and Verba’s ideal
democracy of civic culture” (Part. 12). An expert said: “they…focused on building the
learners to become more politically literate…” (Part. 15). Yet another stated: “A

131
large…percentage of the objectives are…related to…political… knowledge” (Part. 12).
Evidently, civic experts perceived civic programme objectives, in achieving political
citizenship, needed to focus more on political literacy regarding national issues and
events, whereas participating in political citizenship required equal focus on the three
citizenship components (Schugurensky & Myers, 2003).

Overall, although the imperatives of knowledge-based civic education are patent, yet
undue focus on political literacy could undermine the development of dispositions and
skills essential for cognitive and intellectual engagement and the expression of views.
Supporting my stance, UNESCO proposed a curriculum shift from instilling patriotism,
obedience and loyalty (which takes Nigeria back to the classical statist citizenship lacking
the ability to discuss and absence of freedom for creativity but promotes service) to the
state to a rather more reflective citizenship which develops the ability to make rational
decisions for the public good (UNESC0, 2006; Ogunyemi, 2011) as well as developing
critical skills to question loyalty to the state. This is the crux of nongovernmental
citizenship discussed in chapter 2.

5.1:3(a) Emphasis on dispositions and participatory skills

Civic programme objectives could develop dispositions and participatory skills in young
learners to engage in nongovernmental citizenship (see Table 6b&c). A civic expert
stated: “The …objective is meant to enable learners acquire & demonstrate skills,
attitudes & values which help them to be responsible citizens” (Part. 7). Another said:
“The…objectives are what the young learners need in achieving…civic and political
skills, attitudes, values and knowledge … essential for…sustenance of democracy” (Part.
6). “Adequate knowledge… (awareness) will be created to develop…rights and
functional attitudes for…development of good citizenship” (Part. 26). Civic experts see
effective (responsible and good), citizenship participation solely from political
perspectives. Contrary to civic experts’ views, Verba, Scholzman & Brady (1997) see
political engagement as activities intended to impact on government policy and civic
participation involving collaborating with others to engage in nongovernment activities
intended for community good. Civic experts have a different notion of civic engagement,
however, citizenship participation requires learners’ active practice of the three
citizenship components (knowledge, dispositions and skills) discussed below.

132
5.1:3(b) Symbiotic Links among Citizenship Components

As stated above, the data disclosed that effective citizenship entails holistic integration
(discussed in chapter 2) of the three citizenship components which revealed links among
the areas discussed. Gradually internalising constructed knowledge could lead to
fostering dispositions and participatory skills in learners. Participating in a citizenship
programme requires constructed knowledge that should be internalised to express
predispositions: and this sequentially enhances participatory skills. Such internalisation
is a lifelong gradual process in learners’ personality via civic learning experiences
especially in school. (Heater, 1999; Tor, 2009). Underpinning the above statement, a civic
expert said: “Popular participation of the governed in their government and perception
of the symbiotic relationship between objectives…are critical elements of democratic
society” (Part. 18). “…politically literate citizenry, civic education should equip learners-
skill, attitudes, knowledge & values that will prepare young learners to be competent and
responsible citizens throughout their lives” (Part. 26). “…young learners need… civic and
political skills, attitudes, values and knowledge such as…hard work, cooperation and
respect…” (Part. 6). “The knowledge…and skills…acquired would equip…young Nigerian
citizens to deal with social and personal issues… grow as competent and vibrant
Nigerians” (Part. 11). Convincingly civic experts perceived that such symbiotic links
among the three citizenship components could lead to citizenship (socio-political)
participation. This showed a realisation that civic curriculum could be a veritable tool for
such symbiotic links to enable young learners to engage in social and personal activities
for community good and not just for political participation. However, for this study, I
view symbiotic links as integrating knowledge, dispositions and skills holistically to
develop political and nongovernmental engagements in learners as explained by Verba,
Scholzman & Brady, (1997) above. Therefore, symbiotic links entail holistically
integrating the three domains on political and nongovernmental citizenship for learners
to practice via experiential learning (discussed below) in our schools.

However, such symbiotic links could be impractical because not all constructed
knowledge is internalised and practiced just as the gradual development of dispositions
might not necessarily be due to practice because of the hostile setting for experiential
learning in some of our schools. Theoretically, though the three citizenship components
may have symbiotic links showing these components requires the interplay of other
factors within the school and larger society discussed above and in subsequent chapters.

133
5.1:3(c) Participating in nongovernmental citizenship

Experts’ data (5.1:3b) shows civic objectives can develop in knowledge, dispositions and
participatory skills via symbiotic links to engage in nongovernmental citizenship. Also,
issues on nongovernmental citizenship are marginally built into the civic objectives to
show Nigeria subscribing to global realities by using an issue and activity based civic
curriculum to engage learners in citizenship participation (NERDC, 2007; Ogunyemi,
2011).

The nongovernmental citizenship in the civic objectives (see Table 5.1:1) examines issues
from diverse sectors of nongovernmental activism evolving from local to cross-national
boundaries. This citizenship type provides literacy and develops values (advocated by
transnational bodies) on human rights education, peace and conflict resolution, social
justice, ecological issues, HIV/AIDs education, gender equality, eradicating human and
drug trafficking, poverty, Millennium Development Goals (MDG), and Nigeria’s
National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategy (NEEDS), among others
(Johnson et al, 2009; Ogunyemi, 2011). These issues were to develop global
interdependence on diverse sectors of human life which resonated in various international
conferences on effective citizenship (Hicks, 2003; Ogunyemi, 2011).

The broadness of the two objectives shows the multi and inter disciplinary nature of
citizenship development. A civic expert said: “Objective ‘B’ on MDG needs to be made
more specific with the aspect that is really concerned with effective citizenship” (Part. 2).
This revealed civic experts’ perceived narrow view of civic curriculum developing
effective citizenship from the political view. This could have induced their negative
attitudes to the objectives on nongovernmental citizenship below.

The civic experts’ data (Table 6) sees the two objectives as irrelevant to developing
effective citizenship. Underpinning the survey data, a participant said: “The A & B
objectives…MDG goals realization and…emerging issues might be difficult to achieve
because… civic education curriculum…does not cover…these areas…” (Resp. 4).
Another said: “Objective B has no relevance in the civic education curriculum. Achieving
citizenship (value) reorientation through civic education is almost impossible” (Resp. 3).
Civic experts viewed this subject from the usual politically based curriculum. As evident
in the objectives, the curriculum was to foster diverse citizenship engagement like
political, ecological and social justice as a hallmark of effective engagement in civic and
political affairs. (Green, 1990; Johnson & Morris, 2009; Schugurensky & Myers, 2003;

134
Ogunyemi, 2011). Engaging in the above activities through the civic curriculum requires
more than the narrow classroom teaching and learning perspective of most experts. But,
a contrary view grasps the need to engage larger community: “I believe civic values and
attitudes are better promoted through activities and programmes…drawn from
happenings in the society to promote positive behavioural change” (Part. 10). From this,
developing nongovernmental citizenship needs communities of learning via experiential
learning (Lave & Wenger, 1991; Votz & Nixon, 1999; Ogunyemi, 2011).

However, achieving both political and nongovernmental citizenship using an activity and
issue-based civic curriculum to develop young learners could contend with
implementation challenges within the school system discussed below.

5.2 Contending Implementation Issues within the school system

This section is to acquaint readers with possible issues which may impact on classroom
implementation of civic objectives discussed in the next section (5.3) and also, to act as
a prelude to full discussions of implementation gap in the next two chapters.

In my days as a teacher trainee reading through past studies on policy initiatives in

Nigeria, showed that implementation has been the bane of policy and programme
actualisation. Also, as a teacher educator, extant studies still show implementation as the
main challenge of actualising classroom curriculum programmes. Such implementation
issues start from improper planning due to inadequate data on the human and material
resources required for school and classroom teaching and learning. Regarding this a civic
expert said:

The major weakness of implementation will be…availability of both human and

material resources to execute these objectives… Availability of qualified,
competent and dedicated…motivated teachers. Availability of appropriate text
books and instructional materials and conducive (child-friendly) school
environment (Part. 2).
This typical response revealed implementation challenges perceived by both civic experts
and teachers indicating a lacuna between policy-programme and implementation leading
to lack of functionality regarding curriculum execution as observed by a civic expert:
“The problem is… a lacuna (gap) between application and what is stated. This has to do
with implementation. Our education must emphasize functionality” (Part. 12). Lack of a
functional curriculum could be due to schools experiencing deficiency regarding
resources such as teachers’ recruitment, training and teaching materials, knowledge of
relevant classroom interactive teaching practice and certainly not the advent of a new

135
subject as shown in chapters 2 and 3 (Ogunyemi, 2010; 2011). Thus, disarticulating civic
education from social studies could not be the reason for the above challenges within the
school system. Rather, I argue that these challenges have been compounded each year by
issues such as large enrolment without the required school resources (teacher recruitment,
training and re-training, adequate time) discussed in chapter 6 (Ivowi, 1998, 2004;
Okebukola, 2004; Ogunyemi, 2006).

Hence, initiating a civic curriculum should not be seen as further expanding an extant
educational problem instead it should be viewed as a victim of improper government
planning and poor implementation (discussed in 3.2:3c) which have mired school and
classroom curriculum actualisation as noted by a civic expert:

The major barrier to the acquisition of civic traits and values in the
learners is the problem of implementation with regards to…poor teaching
methods, lack of teacher education programme- in service-training, lack
of uniformity in the implementation among schools in some states and non-
implementation of the civic education programme in some parts of the
country (Part. 4).
Due to the above responses of civic experts and teachers on contending implementation
issues most Nigerian basic and senior school teachers were perceived as inexpert due to
the overwhelming presence of untrained and ill-prepared civic teachers as curriculum
implementers (Kosemani, 1984; Mkpa, 2005). In support of the statement above, a civic
expert said: “…teachers and schools lack knowledge, skills and materials to ensure their
attainment” (Part. 11). Also, some teachers said: “…its ordinary teaching, teachers must
go beyond ordinary teaching to develop skills to impact these things into the kids. For
example, we only teach, when we come to the cognitive domain” (Part. 3 Lag). In another
form, a teacher noted: “Majorly… teaching civic education…it’s based on my general
knowledge of…happening around me…” (Lag. Resp. 9). These responses showed a
general trend of teachers having the requisite knowledge and skills which further exposed
implementation issues impeding actualisation of the curriculum which requires
substantial classroom resources. As stated above, these responses were typical of most
civic teachers showing a lack of these school resources (discussed in chapter 6) inducing
classroom teaching focusing on a cognitive objective. Such cognitive focus fosters
teacher-centred methods which help concepts memorisation in the civic classroom instead
of focusing on using learner-centred interactive pedagogy rooted in the social
constructivist, reflective inquiry and transformative learning theories which are briefly
examined in the next section.

136
5.3 Civic content classroom implementation impact on knowledge transmission

Data shows an overemphasis on political citizenship knowledge construction above

developing dispositions and skills. This shows civic content focuses on constructing
knowledge more than developing dispositions and skills which mediate actual
engagement in citizenship. However, inculcating political knowledge of effective
citizenship leads to passive and naïve citizenship.

5.3:1 Transmitting political citizenship knowledge

This study data revealed young learners’ intellectual efficacy through the knowledge of
political citizenship issues transmitted by civic content in the classroom. Knowledge
construction was exhibited by conceptualising (defining) citizenship concepts: “civic
education…taught me to be patriotic. Patriotism means…you are loyal to your country…
civic education has taught me to be loyal to my country” (Resp. 3 Lag). Another learner
defined: “...nationalism is an act of having strong attachment for one’s
country…nationalists like…Awolowo …Azikwe…” (Resp. 4 Og.). “Civic education make
me know more about …these people… what they did in the past…” (Resp. 1 Lag.). Yet a
learner noted: “civic education…made positive impact in me concerning national
symbols. …in school, whenever…reading the National Anthem, we…be doing anything….
But since…taking civic education, we…be at attention… civic education…made strong
and positive influence on us…” (Resp. 2 Og). “A group of people having the same views
or objectives” (Resp. 2 Og). Also that: “It helped…to obey… law. …civic…taught me
about the need to cooperate” (Resp.14 Lag). Another said: “Civic education taught us
our rights as individuals and… rights of others...I have…not known… about it, but
since…taught ...I…gain something…” (Resp. 5 Lag).

137
Table 7 showing Perceived Civic Curriculum Content Impacts on Political Citizenship Knowledge
Strongly Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly Disagree Mean

Lagos Ogun Lagos Ogun Lagos Ogun Lagos Ogun Lagos Ogun Lagos Ogun

% % % % % % % % % %

a Nigeria's political history 5 1 3 1 3 3 39 36 51 60 4.29 4.54

b Obedience to the law 7 - 5 2 3 3 23 29 62 65 4.29 4.59

c Show love, respect and patriotism 7 2 5 2 3 2 22 28 67 65 4.42 4.57

d Change dispositions towards civic duties 5 1 6 .9 7 3 29 34 54 59 4.22 4.50

e Current political issues 28 1 6 1 6 6 34 46 27 45 4.02 4.33

f Membership of political party 34 2 11 7 14 10 25 36 17 44 3.43 4.15

138
Defining civic concepts above showed participating learners’ cognitive ability due to
civic content focusing mostly on knowledge of ethno-nationalistic citizenship involving
national identity, obedience and loyalty to the nation stated in the civic objectives (5.1:3).
Conceptualising civic issues above shows a civic classroom which involves inculcating
civic concepts based on teacher-learner talk in line with didactic and monologic
pedagogies. Such teachings impede open classroom talk which enable learners to,
individually and/or collaboratively, construct civic concepts as above. (Lyle, 2008)

This entails inculcating accumulated civic knowledge and understanding via teacher
questions designed to test or promote recall as well as prompt learning by memorising
pre-packaged knowledge (Lyle, 2008). Learners have narrow chances to examine civic
issues due to controlled, monitored and managed (direct) classroom interactive
instructions. Such pedagogic styles lack collaborative discursive patterns because the
teacher dominates the classroom. In fact, civic teachers lead classroom activities, as a
vital trait of the civic curriculum classroom implementation process (Mroz et al., 2000;
DfEE, 1997; Sinclair & Coulthard, 1975). This will be further discussed in the pedagogic
chapter (7).

Above knowledge transmission is due to the primary role of the school as state agent
created to initiate young learners into the existing ethno-nationalistic (political)
citizenship (Green, 1990; Etzioni, 1993; Schugurensky & Myers, 2003). So, the school is
regulated by pre-determined civic curriculum content, objectives and pedagogies which
restrict the pattern of classroom discourse. More so, Nigeria’s civic curriculum (like other
countries) mandates civic teachers to lead every aspect of classroom learning such as
discourse, assigning tasks among other activities. Generally, schools are engaged in pre-
determined, restricted, inflexible curriculum implementation which could be the reason
for young learners’ hatred and resistance of political/governmental citizenship
participation (Lehesvuori, 2013; Matusov 2011; Lyle, 2008).

Unsurprisingly, young learners were able to assert their literacy by eliciting citizenship
facts committed to memory due to teachers’ emphasis on above civic pedagogies to aid
their learning by recall which is the lowest form of learning within the cognitive domains.
This justifies a teacher who said: “…1we only teach, when we come to the cognitive
domain…, we only teach…knowledge level…the lowest level in teaching learning
process…” (Part. 3 Lag). From the above, it seems the civic teacher, as programme

1
Cited in 5.2 above

139
implementer, lacked the higher-order pedagogical knowledge and skills on interactive
learning like transformative or reflective inquiry, among other theories.

Notwithstanding the above, focus on knowledge could be because it is logical to think

that recalled political knowledge could be retained and gradually internalised to develop
dispositions and participatory skills (see 5.1:2) about national values and ideology which
induct them into the political culture (Marshall, 1998; Leung, 2006). Also, stressing
knowledge transmission could be due to the notion that informed citizens are more
equipped as catalysts to make the government receptive because articulating positions
and constructively expressing such could likely alter government decisions (Centre for
Information and Research, 2003). Also, such knowledge could propel future active
participation in the polity due to the belief that learners could actualise knowledge learnt
in school later in life to boost political development.

5.3:2 Problem of transmitting political citizenship knowledge

Transmitting knowledge accumulated on ethno nationalistic citizenship in the absence of

basic civic skills and dispositions could be ineffective for lifelong engagement in
Nigeria’s polity. This is because presenting only knowledge could be easily obliterated
by political happenings in the larger society. Events like inter-ethnic and religious clashes
and a low level of national consciousness and integration experienced by over 250 diverse
nationalities have led to most Nigerians showing loyalty first to their ethnic nationalities.
For instance, despite the civic knowledge content imparted in school, a young learner
from the northern part of Nigeria still favoured Boko Haram insurgency as narrated by a
civic teacher: “…we discussed the issue of Boko Haram while teaching “insecurity”. And
a boy…in my class…said…if I have the opportunity, I will join Boko Haram…he told
us…his family members, the elderly ones have made him to believe that the southerners
and Christians…have disallowed them to get education…” (Resp. 6 (Og). This scenario
could be an exceptional case yet it depicts the effects of other socialising agents like ethnic
affinity and family which has the tendency to exceed transmitted accrued classroom
knowledge. Thus, constructing knowledge alone could be adversely altered by out-of-
school citizenship experiences.

This justifies employing interactive/participatory styles like transformative, reflective

inquiry and social constructivist learning (discussed in the pedagogy chapter) which
studies posit are capable of guiding learners to practice civic content as a vital part of the
classroom learning process. Social constructivism induces active civic learners’

140
participation in constructing knowledge via interactions and consensus. Such
participations/interactions create the chance to express their views which lead to creating
common insights into civic issues during classroom interactions (Bodrova & Leong,
2012; Gauvain, 2008).

Civic objectives mandate civic teachers to lead learners define ethno-nationalistic ideas
evolving from the classical and civic republican citizenship (5.1:3). This models stressed
civic duties to the state, collective decision-making for collective (public) good,
exhibiting loyalty and obedience to state institutions and active participation (Oliver &
Heater, 1994; Pettit, 1997; Bellamy, 2000; Karta, 2002; Peña, 2003). This makes the
school a mere transmitter of ethno-nationalistic literacy which leads to passivity and
naivety as symbols of effective citizenship (Green 1990; NPE, 2004;
Zaman, 2006; Winton, 2007; Tor, 2009; Ogunyemi, 2011).

This could be the reason why some teachers felt they could not put an emphasis on critical
citizenship issues in civic classes. A teacher said: ““…discussing about…political issues
in the country…you are in soup. They don’t want to care whether these children are really
getting along with what you are impacting unto them...” (Part. 1 Lag). “…But I believe
that many teachers may not for political reasons. Only a few…of us who may be ready to
dare or face whatever comes to do that. But many teachers don’t do for political reasons”
(Part. 4 Og). As stated above, most civic teachers claimed that schools’ key duty is
enhancing learners’ knowledge about the structure and function of government,
obedience, and patriotism as a basis to engage in political citizenship (Meyer, 1977; Barr
et al., 1977; Zaman, 2006).

From the above, knowledge could be vital but teaching knowledge alone is inadequate to
achieve political participation. Political involvement requires knowledge coupled with
other components to change government policy or the choice of a political office holder,
inter alia. Thus the urgent need to use the interactive/participatory pedagogy. However,
the school could evolve a social constructivist classroom in which group interaction, as
the root of constructing knowledge, enables learners to experience and practice these
civic/citizenship duties within the contexts of their daily actions via extracurricular
programmes. That is, using interactive activities to engage in discussing citizenship issues
within the school/classroom milieu leads to knowledge construction, mediated by a more
knowledgeable person and/or peer group within their socio-cultural setting (Bakhtin,
1984; Prawat & Floden, 1994; Gergen, 1995; Vygotsky 1978).

141
5.4 Perceived Civic Content Impact on nongovernmental Citizenship

Similar to political citizenship above, data reveals civic content impacts more positively
on nongovernmental citizenship knowledge construction than disposition and skills
development. Although young learners claim dispositions and skills development, data
disclosed efficiency in practice of such knowledge in school via relevant classroom
pedagogies to foster more practical citizenship engagement to underpin extracurricular
programmes.

5.4:1 Critical citizenship via intellectual and participatory activities

The data shows young learners engage in critical citizenship involving student voices as
hallmark of intellectual and participatory classroom interactive activities with the intent
to impact on citizenship. This is a rejection of their prior role of knowledge consumers
and take on the active meaning-making role. Thus depicting civic content’s positive
impact on their discourse of current issues, engaging in human rights activism and
peaceful protests in the community as shown in the table (8) below.

Underlining this, a learner said: “civic education has given… right to know what
we…need … speak out, giving us the boldness and… courage…” (Resp. 1 Lag). Another
learner noted: “... people always want to show their views to government. Something that
are hurting inside... but our representatives are not really working... to tell them…our
views…. what to do is...participate in protest to express our views to…government that
what they are doing to us is very wrong” (Resp. 3 Lag).

The above focus group data suggests that learners exhibited civic content understanding
which fits into the current citizenship constructs. They showed knowledge and skills of
constructive citizenship which qualified them as current citizens within their own rights
and not citizens in waiting (Osler and Starkey 2009, Ollas, 2013). Civic classroom
implementation seems to have built on learners’ grasps and participation in citizenship
issues to make an impact on citizenship practice within the political system (Supple
1998).

The young learners showed the need to critically and independently examine issues based
on the belief that articulating views via student voices further induced more active
participation in their community (Tor, 2009). However, such intellectual articulation is
due to civic learning content exhibiting the symbiotic links among the domains (5.1:4b)
to allow active engagement in school educational activities and adult community

142
involvement (McLaughlin, 1992; Kerr, 1999; Po, 2004; McCowan, 2006; Ogunyemi,
2011; Kutu, 2013; Yu-le, 2004).

The positive impact of civic content above underpins civic classroom pedagogy based on
social constructivism and transformative learning, among other theories. However, these
learning theories manifest in diverse classroom pedagogies like open discussion,
simulations, dramatisation, inter alia (discussed further in subsequent chapters). These
pedagogies engage young learners in interactive discourse activities as a way of
experiencing democratic practices in their current lives as index for future interest outside
the school system (Rudduck, 2003; Osler & Starkey 2006; Covell et al 2008).
Focus group and questionnaire data confirmed extant literature depicting these
pedagogies tendency to increase learners’ content recall, higher conceptual
understanding, enhanced citizenship participation and change civic positive dispositions
towards civic duties and tolerance (Hahn, 1996; Aull 1998; Hess & Posselt, 2001).

Intellectual engagement entails discussing controversial public issues involving the state
of affairs of their polity such as corruption which a learner lamented thus: “Civic
education... taught me …government … should make the nation…first 10 richest nations.
Instead they have made it the first 15th corrupt nation” (Resp. Lag 1). Another said: “Yes,
civic education…changed my attitude to political apathy…a situation whereby citizens
shy away or felt unconcerned about the activities of the state. It…changed my attitude…”
(Resp. 7 Og). As stated above, this trend of student voice (engagement) discussions on
national issues illustrated young learners’ insights of critical citizenship issues and the
need to show interest in discussing such public issues inside and outside the school
(Levine, 2005). Young learners’ understanding of the citizenship issues were reflected in
their articulation of current citizenship practice within the context of their own lives. Also,
they revealed their skill to effectively undertake divers citizenship functions if given the
chance outside of the classroom as the focus group revealed. Such view involved
citizenship acts from the traditional (ethno-nationalistic) citizenship covering the
republican, communitarian models, which emphasised citizenship roles like voting,
obedience to authority, paying tax and loyalty.

143
Table 8 showing Perceived Civic Curriculum Content Impacts on Nongovernmental (Community) Citizenship Issues
Strongly Disagree Disagree Undecided Agree Strongly Agree Mean

Lagos Ogun Lagos Ogun Lagos Ogun Lagos Ogun Lagos Ogun Lagos Ogun

% % % % % % % % % %

a Participate in discussions on citizenship related issues 25 3 18 5 5 5 26 38 27 48 3.14 4.25

b Participate in human rights activities in the community 25 9 18 11 12 7 14 33 17 37 3.35 3.73

c Participate in Peaceful protest 37 5 50 25 13 10 18 33 17 44 3.18 4.07

d Collaboration to solve civic/ citizenship related issues 26 2 15 6 9 4 27 44 20 48 2.97 4.34

e Participate in community service 18 3 7 2 8 5 30 43 27 46 3.32 4.25

f Voting during elections 33 1 10 5 7 9 28 29 21 56 3.59 4.34

144
Civic content has the tendency to engage learners in liberal citizenship entailing
nongovernmental action like ecological, community voluntarism and human rights
protests (2.4:2) (Smith et al 2005; Ollas, 2013).

All these are made possible due to the above interactive classroom pedagogies which
mediate learners’ critical (higher-order) thinking, constructive citizenship efficacy and
boost participatory skills in polemic issues. Learners were able to discuss their citizenship
views as they relate to current events within the Nigerian political system. The open
classroom discourse mediates social constructivist, reflective inquiry and transformative
learning. This is because these interactive learning theories are characterised by critical
thinking via dialogue and reflection; interactions, among others (Ollas, 2013).

This data showed civic content impacting essential intellectual and participatory skills in
young learners to evoke critical citizenship traits (see 2.2:2b). This could foster analyses
of issues to challenge socio-political events adversely affecting their lives. Civic content
impacts the skill to discuss (as shown above) and act on diverse public issues (Ginsburg,
2001; Zaman, 2006). Accordingly, a learner said: “It depends on the type of leader.
If…is…good and well respected… knows what to give his state, I will have positive
attitude about him. But if he is…bad…only wants …tax and never pay…salary, I will have
a negative thinking” (Resp. 1 Lag). Young learners’ responses showed that our schools,
based on current global realities, are capable of performing the more complex role of
using civic pedagogies, discussed above, as a catalyst, to create an environment in which
young learners are empowered to comprehend, analyse and evaluate issues shown in this
data. This gives them the chance to have more control of their learning experiences via
collaborative interactive classroom dialogue (Sax, 1974; Green 1990; Falade, 2007;
Ogundare, 2010; Ollas, 2013). Using civic content to impact critical citizenship in
learners means developing individuals to exercise their right to think independently as the
liberals advocated in Chapter 2; by developing independent critical skills to operate
effectively within their community. Introducing the discussion of controversial issues via
civic education is a way of equipping them via relevant pedagogies to tackle lifelong
citizenship issues (Arthur & Davidson, 2000; Reich, 2002; Asimeng-Boahene, 2007;
Mukhongo, 2010; Ogunyemi, 2011).

However, for civic content to guide learners’ intellectual and participatory engagement
against undemocratic practices, paradoxes in government actions and citizenship

145
inequalities (see 2.2:3) requires an open classroom climate (Chapter 7) which inspires
free and critical dialogic pedagogy during civic learning process (Giroux, 1980;
Ginsburg, 2001; Lyle, 2008).

Although it appears interactive civic pedagogy mediated student voices via dialogic
learning, however, this might seem a difficult task for the school (5.3) as an institution
created, governed and state funded (Zaman, 2006). Even more so, some teachers were
reluctant to engage their young learners on dialogue relating to political issues which they
perceived as sensitive. Some civic teachers remarked thus: “No Political issue. The school
is very…sensitive about discussing political/civic issues. To a teacher teaching civic
education you may want…students to discuss political issue. …students telling their
parents what…happened in the classroom is a threat to teachers. Because of that teachers
may not always discuss current issues...” (Part. 6 Og). So it is a utopian idea to foster
critical citizenship under a milieu of serious result for teachers using open classroom
underpinned by dialogic teaching. Thus, as stated in 2.2:2d, inappropriate civic
pedagogies could hinder schools’ critical citizenship actualisation due to the political
class failure to provide school civic implementation strategies and resources in order for
learners to match school learning experience with their daily living (Okeahialam, 2013).

5.4:2 Developing nongovernmental Citizenship through Experiential Learning

Survey questionnaire data showed young learners engaged in individual and collaborative
community service and voting depicting civic content positive impact on their
dispositions and participatory skills as shown in table (8) above. However, focus groups
showed civic content impacted more on citizenship concept construction shown thus:
“Civic education…taught me…to cooperate…agreement between you and someone…like
a group agreement between you and peoples…cooperation improves…a
particular…community” (Resp.14 Og.). This depicts the civic content focus on
collaborative knowledge construction, a major trait of the social constructivist and
transformative learning. Collaborative inquiry through constant engagement in classroom
dialogue on controversial citizenship issues among learners results in constructing
knowledge based on consensus. However, such knowledge requires practice to develop
dispositions and participatory skills which gradually integrate learners into the larger
society. Such knowledge could be practiced via experiential learning using
extracurricular (out of classroom) civic activities in the school. As stated above, current

146
realities rooted in an activity-based civic curriculum requires collaborative learning
whereby learners engage in peer to peer interactions to form a consensus in the classroom
and during extracurricular programmes. Such interactions provide opportunity for
learners to express views from an individual perspective, and then to dialogue which
allows for reflections by the whole class before arriving at a decision. Through this
process, various citizenship ideas undergo critical (self) reflections in the civic classroom
(Lyle, 2008; Ollas, 2013).

Extracurricular civic learning are interactive activities planned by schools as an addition

to classroom civic learning to offer exposure and experience to perform tasks which
enhance community appreciation. It entails forming civic clubs operating outside the
normal classroom civic learning, and are structured towards citizenship change requiring
an interplay of the school and community (Holland & Andre, 1987; Tor, 2009). As stated
above, extracurricular activities require collaboration, interactions and critical thinking
and dialogue as rooted in the transformative, social constructivist and reflective inquiry
learning. These interactive learning theories mediate learners’ experience, team spirit,
confidence in problem solving, decision making, and taking responsibility (Reeves, 2008;
Burgess, 2009; Ollas, 2013).

In Nigeria, extracurricular (informal) civic programmes via civic clubs (press, literary and
debates, Jet clubs, inter alia) ought to be an integral part of school programmes. However,
implementation differs in the two states as stated by a civic expert2: “The major barrier
to the acquisition of civic traits and values by the learners is the problem of
implementation with regards to…lack of teachers…lack of uniformity in the
implementation among schools in some states and non-implementation of the civic
education programme in some parts of the country” (Part. 4). I posit that states lack equal
commitment to civic curriculum implementation due to disparities in financial, human
resources and political will.

For instance, comparatively, Lagos state lacked political will which led to poor
implementation involving, for example, a shortage of qualified civic teachers in schools.
This resulted in excess workload for the few available teachers (Chapter 6) thus
preventing them from engaging young learners in extracurricular programmes thereby
making civic clubs inactive. Also, due to the curriculum statist approach, some school

2
Focus group data cited in 5.2 above
147
heads barely allow extra-curricular programmes for fear of the government alleging
incitement of young learners by teachers on exercising their rights, (especially in a
volatile and heterogeneous state as Lagos). “No Political issue. The school is
very…sensitive about discussing political/civic issues. To a teacher teaching civic
education you may want…students to discuss political issue”3. However, Ogun state
schools, relatively, practices such civic content knowledge through extracurricular
activities using civic clubs.

I think involvement in civic clubs during extra-curricular programmes could guide young
learners to participate in activities that foster common aspirations which enhance
development of individual and collective interest in politics and non-governmental
activism (Verba, Schlozman& Brady, 1997; Lewis, 1995; Omoifo, 2003; Falade, 2007;
Tor, 2009).

The exigency of practicing citizenship knowledge via collaborative learning is imperative

considering these young learners’ conversations: “we don’t have the right to vote because
of…age. The rightful voter is…18years upward. So, we don’t have to know anything
about it” (Resp. 4 Lag). However, a dissenting participant said: “she said…due to our
age; we are not…to know anything about voting. …But, we have to know because a time
is coming when we… reach that age. So, it’s better…to know… now…our right … to
vote...” (Resp.5 Lag). Still, another, another participant reiterated thus: “It teaches us how
to vote. Though, they taught us how to vote but we need to practice it. If the government
can allow us….to practice voting, so…we…understand more” (Resp. Lag 7). Even young
learners realised that knowledge transmission requires opportunities to practice such
knowledge through civic duties such as voting. Therefore, learners constructing
knowledge without requisite practice is meaningless, thus civic learning process requires
reflective engagement using extracurricular activities effectively inside and outside
school (Sophocles, 400 B.C & George Santayana (n.d) cited in Gentry, 1990). Engaging
young learners in extracurricular (informal) activities like debating, voting and
community voluntary services could lead to developing greater participatory dispositions
and skills (Becks & Jennings, 1982; Holland & Andre, 1987; Verba, Schlozman & Brady,
1995).

3
Focus group data cited in 5.3b (i)
148
Thus, civic clubs and students’ associations could be induced to engage in elections of
their leaders, and the creation of other elective posts as class captains, school
representatives and prefects within the school system for learners to practice. Engaging
in voting via extracurricular activities helps to eliminate corrupt electoral tendencies
prevalent in the larger society. Unfortunately, extracurricular (informal) engagement,
statutorily, should be an integral part of civic curriculum enrichment in our school,
however, initiating other subjects further compounded the problem of lack of or
inadequate space on the school timetable for participatory/interactive extracurricular
implementation during school hours but after school hours when children are expected to
be at home (Ivowi, 1998, 2004; Okebukola, 2004; Falade, 2007; Ogunyemi, 2005, 2011).

The optimism is that engaging in school extracurricular activities could re-orientate our
young learners who have witnessed (and some engaged in under-age voting) elections
flawed by massive riggings, results manipulations and false declaration of results.
Besides, some of them are induced to vote due to poverty in places like Lagos as a
metropolitan and cosmopolitan state.

These negative trends in larger society oppose the ideal image which young learners are
exposed to in the civic classroom. A civic teacher expounded on this thus: “…I could
remember when teaching ‘electoral malpractice’…there are certain things I don’t know
about electoral malpractices, though…not up to voting age but they…saw a lot of thing
happening what their parents, their brothers and sisters engage in during the election…”
(Part. 1). Such negative experiences could be eased if schools regularly applies interactive
pedagogies for collaborative critical and dialogic teaching to avoid value conflicts
between the school and larger society.

Since extracurricular programmes involved an interplay between the school and

community, they often involved activities of citizenship advocacy groups. These non-
governmental organisations engage in dialogic talks to promote critical reflection on
citizenship issues linking school and community. Civic teachers commented on this:
“…some health… officials…came to our school to speak on HIV/AIDs and…gave…some
materials for this…” (Part. 2 Lag). Another teacher said: “…A kind of organization is
coming to our school to give a talk with the female students on sexual harassment” (Part.
5 Lag). A civic teacher noted: “…I invited some (youth) corpers to…talk about
cultism…Community leader around…talk about community development.

149
…And…teaching human rights” I invited a lawyer… to come and give talk about human
right to the students… (Part. 3 Og)”. Most civic teachers used this form of extracurricular
programme through the school morning assembly to engage in pedagogic teaching of
inducing young learners to engage in collaborative community activities. Collaborative
learning is a way of using extracurricular activities links school knowledge to meet the
needs of society, thus, shifting civic education pedagogy from the didactic/monologic
teaching to interactive-based learning foster effective citizenship development of
Nigeria’s young learners (Shugurensky & Myers, 2003; Ogunyemi, 2011). In other
words, such learners are adequately equipped knowledge, skills and dispositions in school
for problem solving and decisions making to transform the community. But, such skills
inter alia, could be difficult to practice in schools due to time deficiency, unfavourable
school settings and teachers’ excessive workload (Ogunyem, 2006; 2010).

5.5 Demographic/Control Variables’ Test of Significance

Table 9 shows the Test of Significant on young learners’ civic curriculum

knowledge
Variables Participants N Mean Std. df. t Sig.
Deviation

(1) States Lagos 176 25.1875 4.18215 508 8.550 .000

Ogun 28.0240 3.18772

(2) Gender Male 205 27.2585 3.53505 507 1.000 0.89

Female 304 26.9145 3.97674

(3) School Urban 491 27.0530 3.83928 508 .237 .187

Location
Rural 19 26.842 2.87254

(4) Students’ Junior 241 26.5382 4.0786 508 -2.961 .005

Level
Senior 261 27.5287 3.47022

Based on the discussion on demographic and control variables in Chapter 3, there is a

significant difference in political knowledge impact in the two states. Ogun learners
showed more impact of political knowledge than their Lagos counterparts. This could be
due to the legacy of political activism involving nationalists and statesmen in the forefront
150
of Nigeria’s political independence evolving from Ogun state. These nationalists have
become role models, not only to Ogun indigenes but to all Yorubas in south-western
Nigeria. However, this is contrary to Lagos which comprises diverse political interests
due to its heterogeneous status. At the students’ level, this study revealed a significant
difference in civic knowledge constructed by junior and senior civic learners. Thus, senior
civic learners depicted a higher level of knowledge construction contrary to the Junior
civic learners. Senior civic learners seems to have gradually developed the progression to
more complex, deeper and broader civic knowledge and could possibly connect civic
concepts to develop higher order thinking (Brough, 2007; Muller, 2000). Developing this
progression by the senior civic learners could be due to acquiring some content
knowledge through subjects like government and history, among others.

On gender, though most past studies indicated significant differences in favour of males,
however, this study revealed no such disparity thus showing a positive response to
feminist outcry through women (NGOs) advocacy groups opposing inequality, exclusion
and relegation of women in Nigerian politics and the need for the active participation of
women in society. Based on this, more Nigerian women are showing interest by aspiring
for top political offices involving national and states legislatures, governorship, inter alia.
This could possibly induce some impact on the civic knowledge of young female learners
who see the levels their female models could go in their political pursuit.

On school location, the stand of literature was not reflected in this study because there
was no significant difference in knowledge acquired among schools in the two locations.
However, the mean above showed emphasis on knowledge construction was more evident
in urban schools than rural counterparts which could be due to exposure to other
socialising agents mentioned above. Evidently, I implied that schools in the two locations
experienced lack of attention regarding resources discussed in 5.2 above and subsequently
in Chapter 6.

5.6 Conclusion

Nigeria’s educational philosophy intends to foster effective citizenship by developing

citizenship knowledge, dispositions and skills which in turn helps to engage in political
and nongovernmental citizenship. In consonance with this and current global realities, a
civic curriculum with activity and issue based objectives was designed. However, these
civic programme objectives focused more on knowledge construction than developing
151
dispositions and skills. Accordingly, civic content had more impact on constructing
political and nongovernmental citizenship knowledge than other components. This
revealed the traditional role of our schools as transmitters and conveyers with young
learners as recipients and consumers of passive citizenship. However, I consider
citizenship as a much more flexible concept that could be modified in consonance with
current concerns by the schools. The school as a social reformer could reshape the
implementation of civic content to involve extracurricular programmes which help young
learners practice knowledge, dispositions and skills. This would help them to engage in
both political and nongovernmental citizenship which, however, depends on
implementation resources (examined in the next chapters) available in our schools.

152
 Chapter 6

Perceived School Resources Implementation Impact

6.0 Introduction

Chapter 5 showed that the activity/issue based civic programme objectives revealed
Nigerian government intention to develop effective citizenship via civic/citizenship
knowledge, dispositions and skills. Despite this, the civic content mainly mediated
knowledge construction of political, and nongovernmental citizenship. However, via
knowledge construction, dispositions and skills were relatively developed. This was due
to the inadequacy of practicing knowledge construction using relevant classroom teaching
practice for experiential learning in the school. The question requiring an answer is why
the civic content stressed knowledge transmission more than dispositions and skills
during the classroom implementation process.

However, the last chapter (5.2), revealed certain issues contending against a successful
school and classroom civic programme implementation process. In this chapter, I
examine in detail these and other issues identified in the process of implementing civic
programme objectives. Implementation, in this context, is the process of providing school
resources (as stated in Chapter 3) to develop citizenship knowledge, dispositions and
skills as indices of effective citizenship development.

To examine this, I divide the chapter into four sections as follows: Section 6.1 discusses,
in this study context, school resources which entail human, material and training (see
Chapter 3) and how deficiency and lack of these resources leads to improvisation. Section
6.2 discusses evidence I found from the data of a problem with the recruitment and
availability of civic teachers leading to personnel improvisation as a stopgap. This, in
turn, results in ineffective civic content teaching due to excess workload and large class
size. Section 6.3 concerns data that reveals civic teachers lacking appropriate and relevant
insights regarding civic curriculum content due to inadequate in-service training. This
leads to civic teachers’ individual or group directed (initiated) training for academic and
professional renewal. In section 6.4, I discuss how data indicates the inadequate and low
quality of textbook provision and other instructional materials, thus necessitating
subsequent improvisation efforts by civic teachers in schools.

153
School resources are a vital aspect of curriculum reform because a nation's educational
system cannot rise above the quality of resources provided in the school. As stated in
Chapter 3, school resources essential for effective civic curriculum classroom
implementation can be classified into three: the recruitment of civic teachers, in-service
training and instructional materials. Inability to adequately provide these requisite
resources results in improvisation.

In this study, improvisation of resources (including personnel), refers to the substitution

of standard resources to fit into existing teaching and learning for better civic performance
(NTL, 2007; Ezeasor et al, 2012). That is, replacing the real resources with those designed
by school curriculum implementers like civic teachers to facilitate classroom instructions
(Kamoru and Umeano, 2006; Ihiegbulem, 2007). Improvising school resources was due
to inadequate educational funding resulting from general economic recession. This
impeded the recruitment of adequately trained civic teachers to implement relevant
interactive learning theories which manifest through different classroom teaching styles
to mediate civic learning (Omachi, 2000; Parker, 2011; Ollas, 2013).

6.2 Civic Education Teachers' Recruitment and Improvisation

6.2:1 Problem of Recruiting Qualified Civic Education Teachers

In this study, data revealed the problem of inadequate recruitment and provision of
qualified civic education teachers. Teachers with relevant academic and professional
certification to guide learners’ civic knowledge, dispositions and skills development
within the civic classroom instructional context were inadequate. Such inadequate
qualified civic teachers, revealed by the data, under the new education reform was evident
in the two states used for this study. A teacher said: “…there is a maxim ‘when the
desirable is not available, the available…becomes desirable’. …there are not enough
civic teachers in our secondary schools” (Og. Resp. 9). Another teacher4 noted:
“…government is not ready to appoint any teacher for civic education, because when the
subject was introduced to us…we are to…make use of those… teaching subjects that are
related to civic education… those…taking government or social studies are taking this
subject” (Lag. Resp. 4). These reflections which are typical of most participating teachers
showed that this reform lacked a proper implementation process regarding the provision

4
Cited in 5.2
154
of human resources. In fact, past educational reforms involving Universal Primary
Education (UPE) in 1955 and 1976 failed at the implementation stage due to the
recruitment problem inter alia. Studies showed there were attempts at teacher recruitment
to enhance the implementation process, however, consensus was that such recruitment
was inadequate and affects most states in Nigeria. Based on this problem, over half of
teachers in the education sector were unqualified and this was most evident in six states,
Bayelsa, Ondo, Katsina, Kwara, Plateau, and Gombe, with Kwara alone nearing the
benchmark of 1 teacher to 35 learners stated in the NPE (Adepoju & Fabiyi, 2007;
UKDID/ FGN, 2009; Tsafe, 2013).

In addition, while basic education in Nigeria required 966,308 teachers only 627,550 were
recruited and only 368,613 of these teachers (55.2%) were professionally qualified thus
the system still needed a total of 597,695 qualified teachers. including civic teachers
(FMoE, 2005; UBEC, 2009; Okoro, 2011). Therefore, consensus on deficient recruitment
above was shown in the data of this study (Table 6.1:1).

The inadequate recruitment and provision of qualified civic teachers was due to the non-
availability of accurate data for proper planning. Such inadequate planning commences
from the lack of an implementation plan which depends largely on the mechanisms of
administrative institutions. Also, inadequate planning could ensue from a reduction in
education budgets resulting in the underfunding of teacher training colleges and teacher
reward systems and bringing lack of motivation and extant inequality in working
conditions (salaries and promotion) between teaching and other professions (Global
Campaign for Education, 2006; Obayan, 2010; Bolaji, 2014). Looking for a way out of
the shortfalls of civic teachers led to government and school heads using ‘personnel
improvisation' as a makeshift solution.

A major implication of having unqualified civic teachers involves the inability to apply
appropriate and relevant classroom interactive teaching practice. According to Hardman
& Abd-Kadir (2010) unqualified civic teachers engaged mostly in expounding civic
issues via very complex question and answer classroom sessions. Such teachers use
monologic pedagogy which entails teachers probing of learners’ knowledge and grasp of
civic issues which only promotes the recall of civic facts. Most of the questions teachers

155
asked were of low cognitive level intended to direct learners’ reaction towards a vital
answer (Alexander et al, 1996; Galton et al, 1999).

156
Table 10 Recruitment of Qualified Civic Teachers

LAGOS STATE OGUN STATE

INS % NS % S % Ins % NS % s %
Items

Is recruitment of qualified civic 53 41.4 32 25.0 43 33.6 17 58.6 4 13.8 8 28

teachers sufficient?

Sufficiency of qualified civic 106 82.8 3 2.3 19 14.8 107 62.9 6 3.5 57 34
teachers?

Figure 1: Recruitment of Qualified Teachers Civic Teacher (Lagos and Ogun)

90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Is recruitment of qualified Is recruitment of qualified Sufficiency of qualified Sufficiency of qualified
civic teachers sufficient? civic teachers sufficient? civic teachers? (Lagos) civic teachers? (Ogun)
(Lagos) (Ogun)

INSUFFICIENT NOT SURE SUFFICIENT

157
6.2:2 Improvisations as a Stopgap Measure

Data revealed the drafting in of unqualified civic education teachers as a makeshift

improvisation. This is due to the civic teachers’ recruitment problem where both
government and school heads seconded or drafted teachers in with or without the requisite
academic specialisation or pedagogical skills to teach civic education. Teaching civic
education depended on a teacher’s availability instead of academic and professional
ability. Focus groups showed that drafting teachers in from other subjects was used by
school heads. A teacher said: “…introduction of civic education…in 2009… didn’t make
provisions… What you are…having is just improvisations. Somebody taking so so
subject…assist us just to see (fill) the gaps and… insufficiency…we are witnessing in
terms of professionalism (Og. (M) Resp. 9). This response makes one question not just
the implementation process but also the policy makers’ level of insight regarding policy
and programme intent and realisation. Recruiting teachers of an unrelated subject to teach
civic education without the requisite knowledge and skills means such programmes are
heading toward failure. A determinant factor of a successful programme depends on the
quality of the workforce (teachers) at the implementation level. In ameliorating a
deficiency of qualified civic teachers, personnel improvisation was adopted. This
involved accessing teachers hitherto recruited to teach related or unrelated subjects (in
the form of role substitution) e.g. using social studies teachers to teach civic education
(Weick, 1993; Onifade, 2004). This concept entails drafting other subject teachers to
teach civic content was used to cater for the deficit of civic teachers (Brown & Eisenhardt,
1998; Kao, 1996).

Improvisation was necessary due to the inability to offer civic education as a course of
study in the teacher education institutions in Nigeria. A possible makeshift solution was
to draft in social studies specialists who were perceived as possessing equivalent content
and pedagogical knowledge since civic education was disarticulated from hitherto social
studies education (Ogunyemi, 2011; NERDC, 2006). A participant said: “We…teaching
social studies…they gave civic education to teach. …because…social studies
teacher…should have knowledge to give these students…” (Resp. 7 Lag.). Another
participant said: “…government sees civic education as…part of social studies. So, while
complaining that the burden of social studies is enormous …we…have to take it together
because it’s part of social studies…in my school…the same teacher that… teaches social
studies teaches civic education.…it is … part of social studies…” (Lag. Resp. 3). A

158
teacher said: “truly …the way civic education looks at it...in practical to… (government)
…we still need professional skills. …the way you…teach government is different from
civic education. What you… say in social studies is different from what we are going to
say” (Resp. 8 Lag). This further shows the lack of insight by policy makers who failed to
realise that, though civic education was disarticulated from social studies, the two subjects
have diverse content knowledge and pedagogical skills. Thus, drafting social studies
teachers in to improvise implies that teaching civic education is just like teaching social
studies.

Seconding social studies teachers to teach civic education might lead to civic education
facing similar problems that social studies struggled with at inception. This involved
drafting in teachers of social science subjects to teach social studies without adequate
retraining. This resulted in educating young learners on citizenship norms out of the
Nigerian context where they were supposed to function effectively as citizens (Okam,
2008; Ogunyemi, 2010). So, teaching civic curriculum with improvised civic teachers
could lead to implementation failure (3.3) as was the case in prior reforms where
improvisation involved all components of school resources. Evidently, it shows policy
makers and curriculum planners lacked insight at the planning stage to make the necessary
provision for a preservice teacher training programme for civic education. Improper
planning has been the bane of Nigeria’s curriculum projects (Ivowi, 1984, 1998, 2004;
Ogunyemi, 2010, 2011).

Nevertheless, the first stopgap measure involved the government improvising with
teachers of related subjects to teach civic education. In fact, the majority of participants
were seconded from social studies. A teacher narrated: “… my school, I…taught civic
education … I was employed to teach social studies (Lag (F) part. 1). Yet another said: “I
was…to teach social studies…I was told to teach civic education (Lag (M) resp. 6).
Another teacher said: “I was a social studies teacher… then, the instruction was social
studies teachers should take…Civic Education (Lag (F) resp. 7). From these responses,
teachers with inadequate civic knowledge and teaching skills became stopgap civic
specialists as a way to offset teachers’ deficit. Unfortunately, these teachers were part of
the personnel improvisation which involved using post-secondary school leavers (para-
teachers) who underwent between 12-18-months Pivotal Teacher Training Programme
(PTTP) (Mangwat, 2001; Obinna, 2002).

159
Moreover, school administrators implemented another form of improvisation by
seconding teachers from unrelated subjects. That is, teachers possessing pedagogical
skills but lacking civic and citizenship related content knowledge were drafted in to teach
civic education. This scenario was revealed in the focus group data which indicated
schools where subject specialists in related areas were either lacking or inadequate; for
example drafted teachers were brought in from unrelated subjects like agricultural
science, business studies, and Christian religious studies to teach civic education. A
teacher said: “I was employed to teach social studies…because of the population in my
school, a colleague of mine…teaching …Agricultural Science was… to join me in
teaching civic education. (Lag (F) resp. 1). Another teacher noted: “When the burden is
too much they…introduced a teacher…taking Christian religious studies to join me…”
(Lag resp. 2). Again a teacher said: “In my school… a business education teacher is
teaching civic education (Og Resp. 5). Lastly, a teacher declared: “…in my school…….,
we have accounting teacher, commerce teacher taking civic and some of them
are…rejecting…reluctant…” (Og resp. 7). The teachers’ comments further indicated the
ineffective decisions of school administrators in the course of programme delivery and
implementation. Their inability to think properly regarding the best options in the
implementation process led to most schools engaging non-specialists teaching outside
their area of specialisation, particularly at a basic level where the foundation for effective
performance is laid. Most states lacking qualified teachers and often having to improvise
by compelling unqualified teachers to teach subjects other than their area of
specialisation, portend great danger for the future of effective citizenship. Literature
showed a state like Balyesa had 5,202 teachers in 2005 and only 2,246 (43%) were
qualified with a bachelor’s degree 592 (11%) and 1654 (31%) with NCE (the minimum
qualification) to teach at the basic school; others were improvised. Also, from the 575,068
basic school teachers, 282,000 lack either certification, or specialisation (or both) to teach
a particular subject (Theobald et.al, 2007; Sam, 2009). In fact, large numbers of basic
school (civic) teachers lack the required expertise regarding content knowledge. Only
25% of the surveyed school teachers in sub-Saharan Africa have teaching skills
(UNESCO, 2004, 2006). Evidently, implementing civic reforms at the basic school
involving many untrained civic teachers (lacking expert certification and/or content
knowledge) denotes a serious barrier to effective civic content teaching and learning.

160
6.2:3 Ineffective civic teaching as an aftermath of Personnel Improvisation
In this study, data revealed that using personnel improvisation could lead to ineffective
teaching and learning of the civic curriculum due to a shallow civic knowledge and/or
poor pedagogic skills displayed by such civic teachers. A teacher said: “…not...giving the
subject to the right teacher or professional to teach…” (Og (F) resp. 3). Moreover, a civic
expert (5.3) reiterated that actualising civic education objectives required specialist
teachers, among other factors.

From the participants’ reflections and attestations, personnel (teacher) improvisation for
civic classroom implementation results in ineffective teaching. This is attributable to three
major factors: teachers’ excess workload, large civic classroom size and lack of requisite
pedagogical (teaching practice) skills.

6.2:3(a) Teachers’ Excess workload

Teachers’ excess workload is the totality of duties allotted which is more than the
statutory proviso. Such workload covers teaching civic content (preparing lesson notes,
teaching and marking scripts), administrative and supervisory duties inter alia. Excess
workload has an adverse effect on teachers’ classroom teaching because lack of time leads
to modifying teaching practices in order to cope with other duties and thus being unable
to accomplish set objectives (Naylor & Malcomson, 2001).

In Nigeria, excess workload involved allocating more than the (twenty-five per week)
maximum teaching periods and other duties statutorily stated (Ikworayebe, 2005). Using
teachers as a form of personnel improvisation could be an additional burden to teaching,
considering the amount of periods (over thirty-five periods a week) and classes of over
one hundred students which teachers have to teach, manage and supervise. Civic teachers
(Part. 8 Og.) comment on this issue below. These duties could be unbearable and lead to
teachers’ ineffectiveness and hindrance to young learners’ academic performance
(Nwwikina & Nwanekezi, 2010; Osagie & Okafor, 2012). The focus group discussions
indicated that combining their subject(s) with civic education was burdensome,
overwhelming and problematic: “…5the same teacher that teaches social studies teaches
civic education. …when the burden was too much…” (Og (F) resp. 6).

5
Cited previously
161
6.2:3(b) Large Civic Classroom Size

Large class size relates to a classroom population explosion more than the required
statutory (policy) stipulation. The National Policy requires a normal class size to be
between 35-40 young learners (National Policy on Education, 2004). The rate of
interaction among young learners and teachers in a civic classroom size above policy
endorsement could be very demanding for the improvised civic teacher. Having over one
hundred young learners in a class leads to ineffective teaching and learning. Classroom
teaching and learning becomes rowdy and lesson presentation unwieldy for such teachers.
Due to large classes the teacher evades some statutory duties such as individual and group
instructions on class work and assignments in order to avert burn-out. As stated above,
participants claimed that the non-specialist teachers drafted were reluctant and were thus
rejecting the subject (Og (F) resp. 7). This could lead to overworking the teachers
resulting in inefficiency and low learners’ performance (Gbore & Daramola, 2013). A
teacher said6: “We have…a teacher…take 8 or 9 arms of 100 students in a class (Resp. 8
Og.). This civic teacher’s assertion was underpinned by local and international studies
and literature that young learners in smaller classes perform better by scoring higher in
tests, receive better grades, and display improvement in attendance. That is, a positive
link between a drop in class-size and young learners’ academic achievement (Finn and
Achilles, 1999; Nye, Hedges, & Konstantopoulos, 1999; United States Department of
Education. 2003; Adeyemi, 2008). Also, from teaching perspectives, class-size
significantly affects the quality of teachers' input and output at diverse levels of school.
Large classes are most likely to use didactic (lecture) pedagogy instead of learner-centred
(discussion) approach. This is because learners’ focus tends to drop off intensely after
some minutes of a class lesson (Penner, 1984; Verner and Dickinson, 1967). A focus
group participant (Og (F) resp. 3) above insisted on giving the subject to the right teacher
or professional to teach.

The data for this study evidently showed inadequate qualified civic education teachers in
schools within the two states resulting in personnel improvisations to offset civic
teachers’ deficit. However, it is crucial to know whether regular professional training was
provided for civic teachers (especially unrelated), who were drafted to teach the civic
curriculum.

6
Cited previously
162
6.2:3c Lack of Pedagogical (teaching practice) Skills
As stated above, effective teaching is vital to developing effective citizenship via an
issue/activity based civic curriculum. Such teaching requires creativity and innovation by
the teacher during the learning process. Civic teachers need relevant pedagogy skills
involving methods to mediate learners’ effective citizenship construction (Okebukola,
2004; Ivowi, 2004; Ogunyemi, 2006). Thus, drafting/seconding teachers (related and
unrelated) with excess teaching load, large class sizes, as discussed above, coupled with
inappropriate classroom teaching practice, unarguably, leads to ineffective civic learning.
As stated in Chapter 1, research evidence has shown faulty use of pedagogies in related
and unrelated school subjects where teachers were drafted in to teach civic education. In
social studies, for instance, inbuilt interactive pedagogies have been relegated in many
classrooms. Social studies hardly attract dialogic, exploratory, and collaborative teaching
practice, rather, most teachers conceptualise the content for recall purposes. Questions of
low cognitive level were asked to channel learners’ response towards a required answer.
Most classrooms are characterised by teachers’ asking questions which require learners
to report someone else’s perceptions instead of constructing their own views on the issues
(Okam, 2002; Hardman & Abd-Kadir, 2010). This limits emphasis on the cognitive
domain at the expense of affective development and skills acquisition (Ogundare, 2010).

In view of the above, it is pertinent to explore, in the next section, the efforts conducted
in empowering improvised civic teachers along the use of interactive pedagogies so as to
attain the civic education goals of developing learners’ effective citizenship.

163
Table 11 Regularity of in-service training for civic education teachers

LAGOS STATE OGUN STATE

% %
ITEM (S) NVR % NS % R % REG NVR % NS % R % REG

Regular in-service training for civic education 79 61.7 10 7.8 28 21.9 11 8.6 83 48.8 16 9.4 71 41.8
teachers - -

Figure 2: Regularity of In-service Training for Civic Education Teachers (Lagos and Ogun)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Regular in-service training for civic education Regular in-service training for civic education
teachers (Lagos) teachers (Ogun)

NEVER NOT SURE RARE REGULARLY

164
6.3 Relevant insights on civic education curriculum

Interactive learning theories discussed (2.5) above are seen as complex for classroom
practice since they entail the teacher not just having but also exhibiting a high degree of
civic knowledge, relevant pedagogical skills and insight into learners’ individual
differences as norm for critical and reflective thinking (Alexander 2005; Lehesvuori,
2013). Civic teachers need professional development training to implement these
classroom learning theories. However, the survey data reveals that civic teachers lack
appropriate and relevant insights regarding civic curriculum content due to inadequate or
a lack of in-service training. This led to civic teachers initiating individual or group
training to renew their content knowledge and pedagogical skills thus reducing using
general knowledge to teach civic curriculum.

6.3:1 Civic teachers’ dearth of curriculum insights

This study data showed civic teachers lacking appropriate and relevant civic curriculum
insights due to the lack of or irregular in-service training. Both survey (Table 11) above
and focus group data revealed an overwhelming presence of civic teachers (in the two
states) without adequate civic education insights due to the inability to engage in
professional upgrading via government in-service training.

In this study, I viewed civic curriculum insights as possessing the required content
knowledge and understanding, pedagogical skills and dispositions regarding civic
curriculum for effective classroom implementation. As school implementers, civic
teachers required regular hands-on training to acquire more insights on citizenship issues
and how to teach such issues to mediate efficiency and better performance.

The data revealed that civic teachers lacked regular curriculum knowledge and skills as
admitted by a civic teacher: “the need for civic teachers to be well informed,
unfortunately, most teachers are not well informed…” (Part. 5 Og). Confirming this
response, another teacher lamented thus: “…there has not been training in civic
education...” (Resp. 6 Og). Civic teachers, in junior and senior secondary schools in the
two states, are not informed via training on the civic curriculum regarding modern
pedagogic styles. The teachers either lacked the requisite skills, or are poorly trained on
pedagogies involving classroom interaction and their roles as mediators in social
constructivist, reflective inquiry and transformative learning theories.

165
Another teacher claimed: “In my school…no training…since last year. There is no
training for us” (Resp.1 Lag). Yet another one declared: “…I think… we supposed to go
for seminar… everybody teaching…civic education. But when there is no opportunity…”
(Resp. 3 Lag). A teacher reiterated: “Anyway…I think there is nothing like that. There is
nothing like organising seminar” (Resp. 9). Teachers’ responses depict a situation of
neglect and alienation on both pre and in-service teacher education. Refusal to empower
teachers with knowledge, skills and dispositions means the government viewed teachers
as superfluous to the civic curriculum implementation process and this could have
multiple impacts on young learners. Without a doubt developing effective citizenship
requires that major implementers like civic teachers possess the necessary literacy,
education and training.

The responses of teachers so far were consistent with literature showing serious
deficiency of in-service training especially for unqualified teachers and as such these
teachers were seen as curriculum illiterates. In the last sixteen years, government
commitments to teachers’ professional development were merely documentary and
rhetoric as efforts to train and retrain civic teachers in schools were extremely irregular if
not totally lacking. This undermines various changes initiated under the new activity and
issue based curriculum (Kosemani, 1984; UNESCO, 2001; USAID, 2001; Ayo, 2002,
2004; Mkpa, 2005; Mohammed 2006; Global Campaign for Education, 2006; Okoro,
2011).

This is why most civic classrooms still engage in pedagogy which mainly entails
knowledge transmission to learners and the teacher, sensu stricto, maintains firm control
of classroom activities towards achieving his/her goals (Bakhtin, 1981; Gutierrez, 1995;
Skidmore, 2000).

Government needs to understand that values of any classroom learning interaction among
learners and teachers as curriculum implementers lies on how well the classroom is
structured. To attain this, there is need for professional development (pre/in service
training) which creates classroom settings which challenges teacher-centred practices
whereby the teacher is a facilitator on the side and not an intellectual on the stage (Galton
& Williamson, 1992; Lyle, 2008).

Therefore, the task of bringing about changes in the citizenship development of young
learners involves innovative skills and knowledge on the part of the teachers. Regrettably,

166
negative attitudes of the government towards capacity building was contrary to
government required compliance with policy documents of enhancing teachers’ general
education and pedagogical renewal via constant in-service training among others
(Obayan, 2000; MoE, 1999).

167
Table 12 In Service Training Content Impacts

Lagos State Ogun State

Items
Yes % No % Yes % No %

Knowledge content of civic training 44 34.4 84 65.6 76 44.7 94 55.3

Pedagogical skills content of civic training 49 38.3 79 61.7 89 52.4 81 47.6

Figure 3: Content of Professional (In Service Training) Development of Teachers (Lagos and Ogun)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Knowledge Content of Civic Knowledge Content of Civic Pedagogical Skills Content of Civic Pedagogical Skills Content of Civic
Training (Lagos) Training (Ogun) Training (Lagos) Training (Ogun)

YES NO

168
6.3:2 Initiating curriculum insights within a deprived professional environment

Data showed a personal (self-directed) empowerment training programme was initiated

by civic teachers to make up for lack of curriculum insights within their deprived
professional setting. This initiative evolved due to the notion that “…most teachers do
not access the internet… Most of the topics at the senior level are contemporary issues.
Not all of them can be gotten from the textbooks. We need to be well informed” (Part. 5
Og). Therefore, “teachers must go beyond ordinary teaching to develop skills to impact…
It is the quality of the teacher training that can transform this…” (Part. 3 Lag). These
statements induced civic teachers to resolve to use their personal resources to acquire
knowledge and skills in-built into civic curriculum to ensure functionality, professional
survival and career development.

Civic teachers realise the importance of acquiring pedagogical skills to be able to grasp
and operate the various civic learning processes. They need awareness on different ways
of initiating and practicing interactive learning with a view to achieving civic goals.
Social constructivism reflective inquiry and transformative learning (discussed in 2.5)
should be incorporated into civic curricula. Thus, civic teachers require more knowledge
and understanding of collaborative inquiry, critical reflection and dialogic teaching as the
hallmark of interactive learning. Overall, teacher educators and pre/in service (civic)
teachers require more skills on how to use these different learning theories to develop
effective citizenship goals (Wegerif 2010; Lehesvuori,2013).
In realisation of the above, civic teachers organised a pattern of self-training which I
called ‘Teacher(s) Initiated Professional (Training) Empowerment’ (TIPE) as a makeshift
for prior lack of and irregular in-service training. In this process, civic teachers themselves
determine, initiate and design modes of knowledge and skills acquisition within a
deprived setting by “… go(ing) on Net because it’s a new thing” (Resp. 5 Lag). Another
participant said: “...we…sponsor ourselves through the school” (Resp. 7 Og). This depicts
teachers’ effort to raise civic content knowledge and pedagogy skill for classroom
practice by searching for supplementary materials. The goal is for the civic teacher to
foster higher order learning activities to probe and clarify issues. This alters the initial
practice whereby learners have few chances to explore, examine and analyse issues to
enhance their perception (DES, 1992). However, some civic teachers conducted a
personal and group training programme discussed below.

169
6.3:2(a) Group (Initiated) professional development

This involved the activities of a set of civic teachers in a particular school determined to
develop their teaching expertise with content knowledge and professional skills. They
used information and communication technology to acquire citizenship and civic related
information with the intention of self-development and better academic achievements for
young learners. To achieve this, teachers constituted a collaborative civic learning group
called ‘learning community of practice’. A teacher noted: “We normally go online to make
researches…We…meet regularly… (We are four) …training ourselves. Nobody…trained
us” (Resp. 3 Lag). Yet another said: “…in my school, me and colleagues, we…rub minds
together (Resp. 4 Lag.). They operated with a commitment to constantly improve their
expertise by challenging each other to make inquiries so as to enhance their professional
practice. This training is a very influential demonstration of teachers’ professional
empowerment for the purpose of pre-lesson planning and problem solving. It boosts
hugely teachers’ efficacy together. The teachers pinpoint aspects of the curriculum
requiring more knowledge and skills by enquiring and analysing civic information
collected via Information and Communication Technology (ICT) and relating such to
aspects of the civic curriculum content in order to construct new knowledge (NSDC,
2001; Karimi, 2011). Discussion by groups of teachers is a way of creating a genuine
teaching community based on their own personal inquiry. It is an effective starting point
for collaboration, critical reflection and dialogic development. Civic teachers used this
opportunity to develop and refine civic content knowledge and teaching practices in
collaboration with colleagues (Hopkins, 2002; O’Sullivan, 2004; Day & Sachs, 2005). It
is bottom-up teacher training that is required to bring about vital changes in the way
teachers interact with their learners. This initiative is against top down which has failed
to alter traditional pedagogies and give teachers a level of control of the process of school
development (Moyles et al., 2003; Dillon, 1994).

6.3:2(b) Individually (Initiated) Professional Development

Focus group data showed some civic teachers improvise training individually. That is, a
civic teacher constantly uses ICT to inquire and construct knowledge on civic and
citizenship related issues for academic and pedagogical empowerment (Mushayikwa &
Lubben, 2008). In support of this, a participant said: “the only thing I need is just for me
to go to the ICT Centre and brainstorm with the computer to get anything I want” (Resp.
2 Lag). Another participant said: “I had to go on Net because it’s a new thing. I kept on

170
reading, reading. I tried searching the more” (Resp. 5 Lag). Realising the deprived
academic context in which teaching and learning was taking place, these civic teachers
perceived self-initiated training as a way of shifting from depending on external expertise
to their own personal development. This induced the initiative to identify and be more
proactive in their desire to acquire new knowledge, practices, and skills on the new civic
curriculum (Sawyer, 2001; Van Eekelen, Vermunt, and Boshuizenn Eekelen, 2006). This
training transforms teachers’ views, competence, understandings, skills, and
commitments, via what they know and are able to do in their classroom practice with
regard to classroom civic implementation (O’Sullivan, 2006).

Acquiring civic knowledge content through the use of ICT showed the importance of
teachers’ interaction with modern technology as a veritable tool for academic and
pedagogic development. ICT was perceived as a form of intervention strategy enabling
civic teachers to facilitate their professional development as free agent learners (Preston,
2000; Mushayikwa & Lubben, 2008). From the focus group data, the desire for
individually initiated empowerment was due to civic teachers’ need to construct new civic
and citizenship knowledge in order to improve subject content knowledge delivery for a
better academic performance by young learners’ (Mushayikwa & Lubben, 2008). A
participant said: “I … say…it gave… more information…an idea of what I should teach…”
(Resp. 10 Og). Another participant claimed: “…they asked me to…look for…knowledge
… to provide some things to give these students” (Resp 4 Lag). The teachers showed a
desire to acquire more information through individual training which enhanced civic
knowledge and teaching skills (Mushayikwa & Lubben, 2008). A participant said: “…for
civic education we…need professional skills…. teach …civic education” (Resp. 8 Lag).

6.3:3 Perceived In-Service Training Impact

In-service training could not mediate effective citizenship teaching because not much was
done by the government for civic teachers to acquire relevant civic curriculum insights.
Both survey 6.3:1c below and focus group data for this study indicated a negative view
of in-service training by civic teachers on which might not on its own readily develop
effective citizenship in young learners.

171
 Table 13 Impacts of In-Service Training

STAFF DEVELOPMENT (IN SERVICE TRAINING LAGOS STATE OGUN STATE

ITEM
YES % NO % YES % NO %

Impact of in-service training on developing citizenship orientations in young learners 54 42.2 74 57.8 80 47.1 90 52.9

Figure 4: Impacts of In-Service Training (Lagos and Ogun)

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0
Impact of in-service training on Impact of in-service training on
developing citizenship orientations in developing citizenship orientations in
young learners (Lagos) young learners (Ogun)

YES NO

172
This was because the training content only provided civic teachers with general
knowledge of citizenship and civic issues and topics and experience about the immediate
community and not necessarily acquiring new content knowledge. A participant said:
“Majorly… teaching civic education…is based on my general knowledge of…happening
around me…” (Lag. Resp. 9). I expected government to use in-service training as a
necessary intervention tool for civic teachers to effectively engage in classroom activities
using diverse pedagogical practices rather than using general knowledge to teach civic
issues. This showed content knowledge was grossly inadequate and a possible reason
most civic teachers failed a test conducted on civic content knowledge which can be
attributed to a lack of prior training to provide initial literacy on civic content (Falade,
2011; Salami, 2011). Exposing civic teachers to training should be an imperative measure
towards enhancing effective classroom teaching practices (Hardman, 2009). Renewing
the content knowledge and pedagogical skills of civic teachers helps to develop the
critical thinking, problem-solving and communication skills of young learners (Loucks-
Horsley, Hewson, Love, & Stiles, 1998; National Commission on Teaching and
America's Future, 1996). This literature perspective was restated in policy documents that
in-service training could enhance the teaching of civic education to develop critical
citizenship.

However, other teachers felt the impact of in-service training could be hindered by factors
within and outside the school. One such factor was identified by a teacher who said in-
service training “…will help…only worry is the content of the training” (Resp. 7 Lag). I
believe that non-relevance of school civic curriculum content due to frequent review
could have adverse effects on in-service training and poor in-depth quality delivery of
content by civic teachers. Another factor which adversely affects knowledge and skills
acquired in training involved the implementation context. A participant stated: “Often
times, they send us for training and when we return, we are the same. We find them
difficult to implement because the classroom environment, most times, would not allow
us to use them… We…should look at the environment… the content will be delivered”
(Resp. 7 Lag). This depicted Nigeria’s school setting as hostile to learning thus increasing
failure rates and casting aspersion on the entire educational reform. Such hostile settings
include inadequate and congested classes with teacher-pupil ratios as high as 102 learners
per class resulting in lessons taking place outside (Theobald et al, 2007; Ikoya & Onoyase,
2008; Hardman et al, 2008).

173
However, this is not to view the school as the only barrier to teacher training. A teacher
said: “The school environment is just a minute factor…contributing to the impact…on a
child…” (Resp. 1 Og). This identified other factors beyond the scope of this study could
also have a negative impact. Yet, in-service training could impact on effective citizenship
given a proper implementation process (discussed in Chapter 3), adequate insight and a
conducive setting. Also, such teacher training could show its impact via a gradual process
proposed thus: “the training…will surely have a great impact…little by little, these things
(training) will surely have impact…” (Resp. 2 (Lag). That is, education reform outcomes
do not show instantly; but evolve gradually and with time. Thus a training could be a
potent tool to acquire basic knowledge and skills to tackle certain issues recognised thus:
“I view…a national problem…civic education…is an approach to arrest the deterioration
of…value of the society” (Resp. 8 Lag). Another said: “…a national problem… (to) be
corrected. We need to start somewhere…government… (Nigeria) is not good. What of
you as a Nigerian? Who are you? What have you been doing...?” (Resp. 2 Lag). Yet
another said: “Civic education has to do with the total life … design… to help children
live their lives” (Part.7 Lag). Teachers claimed that civic education could be a veritable
tool to solve citizenship issues and via in-service training teachers could be guided on
how to address them.

Overall, the school (classroom) is the most suitable means to improve civic learning via
in-service training. Thus, such in-service training is initiated to help teachers examine
their classroom practices so as to close the gap between theories and classroom practices.
Through this, the teacher is able to guide learners to participate in constructive and
creative classroom learning to induce and enhance meaning-making and knowledge
creation (Anderson, 2002; Hardman, 2009; Lehesvuori, 2013). Such training underpins
teachers’ understanding of the different ways of classroom community interaction
regarding the training impact on providing opportunities for learners to participate in the
learning process (Mercer & Littleton 2007; Gillies & Khan 2008).

174
Table 14 Quality of civic textbooks

LAGOS STATE OGUN STATE

Items
Yes % No % Yes % No %

Quality of civic teachers' hand book content of (s) 86 67.2 42 32.8 142 83.5 28 16.5
1

Quality of civic learners' textbook content 96 75.0 32 25.0 149 87.6 21 12.4
2

Quality of other instructional materials 58 45.3 70 54.7 104 61.2 66 38.8

3

Figure 5: Quality of Civic Textbooks (Lagos and Ogun)

100
80
60
40
20
0
Quality of civic Quality of civic Quality of civic Quality of civic Quality of other Quality of other
teachers' hand teachers' hand learners' textbook learners' textbook instructional instructional
book content book content content (Lagos) content (Ogun) materials (Lagos) materials (Ogun)
(Lagos) (Ogun)

YES NO

175
6.4 Mediating learning through Instructional Material:

6.4:1 Quality of civic textbooks

In line with the learning theories (2.5) above, young learners require an opportunity to
construct knowledge and acquire skills for problem solving and decision making.
Attaining this entails exploring, analysing and dialoguing using teaching aids which the
social constructivist calls mediation tools. In line with the above, civic teachers in this
study survey data revealed a near consensus that civic textbooks content was relevant and
of suitable quality. Also, some focus group teachers agreed with the survey data saying
the content of civic textbooks meets the needs and interest of young learners: “… we were
given textbooks…relevant to it” (Resp. 8 (Og). The other said: “it is
true…contents…were…relevant to…civic education. The textbook…topics …are fully
relevant and correspond with…curriculum…” (Resp. 10 Og). The social constructivist
(2.5:1(a)) above, stated that, classroom civic learning is aided by teaching materials which
make learning meaningful. Thus, civic textbooks are social constructivist mediation tools
to boost classroom interactive processes. This transform thoughtless actions into higher
cognitive engagement for effective civic actualisation.

Though not all the participating teachers supported the above view yet an activity/issue
based civic curriculum needs quality textbooks as a mediation tool to induce interactive
and participatory learning for quality content delivery. Moreover, this view from the data
contradicts literature which showed that civic education textbooks were generally of poor
quality, in disrepair, and lacking in relevance both in content and pedagogy (Theobald et
al, 2007).

This perceived lack in quality of government recommended textbooks resulted in teachers

patronising private authors’ textbooks which were also inconsistent with civic curriculum
content. A teacher said: “The one…government sent to my school... to develop…content
is a problem” (Resp. Resp. 3 Og). Another said: “... government keep on changing its
syllabus all the time. So the textbook is not relevant. Not all the topics are there” (Resp.
11 Og). Yet a teacher noted: “To some extent, the textbooks…on ground are not…
relevant…not comprehensive. What… teachers… need…is not there” (Resp. 14 Og). Both
government recommended and private authors’ civic textbooks were generally of low
quality.

176
This showed civic textbooks as lacking depth on citizenship issues to be discussed and
could be due to frequent changes in the curriculum content as claimed by literature and
teachers in this study. The poor quality of civic textbooks could result in low educational
quality, poor knowledge construction and applicability. This could hinder learners’ active
learning and teachers’ efficacy in the classroom which, in turn, could impede quality
implementation of civic education in schools. The evidence shows, teachers’ claim of low
quality textbooks agrees with the literature (Garuba, 2003; Kadzera, 2006; Abdo &
Semela, 2010; Jotia & Matlale, 2011).

6.4:2 Adequate Civic Textbooks Provisions

Data from this study revealed inadequate textbook provision despite being the most easily
available instructional material predominantly used in our schools. Also, the focus group
responses revealed no civic handbooks were provided by either federal or state
governments for civic teachers. A teacher noted: “In my…school, there is no… handbook
on civic education” (Resp. 1 Lag.). Another said: “Presently, there are no teachers’
handbooks. And…if there are…I don’t think that would be enough to create, impact
positively on the teaching of civic education (Resp. 11 Ogun). The reflections of civic
teachers portrayed the inefficiency of agencies accountable for the civic curriculum
implementation. Civic teachers lacking handbooks implies inadequate preparation by
teachers which could lead to ineffective teaching in terms of content delivery and
pedagogical practices. However, the reason for a deficiency in civic handbooks and
textbooks could be due to recurring revisions of approved text consequent on the new
curriculum and a poor textbook distribution policy. This inadequacy exposes and
questions the government’s free text and handbooks supply and equitable distribution
policy especially in core subjects which excluded civic education. Underpinning this
study data, the World Bank revealed that less than 1% of basic schools have adequate
textbooks with extreme disparities between urban schools with 80% of peri-urban schools
lacking textbooks. Specifically, 77% of civic learners in both urban and peri-urban
schools lack text books. Inadequacy of civic textbooks was further acerbated when the
Federal Government initiated an Intervention Fund in 2005 to provide textbooks in 4
subjects but excluded civic education (USAID, 2001; UBEC, 2006; Theobald et al, 2007;
Moja, 2008; Hardman et al, 2008; Okobiah, 2011).

177
Table 15 Adequacy of Civic textbooks

Lagos State Ogun State

Items
Yes % No % Yes % No %

Adequate civic education teachers' hand book(s) to teach the subject. 26 20.3 102 79.7 57 33.5 113 66.5
3

Adequate civic education students' text book(s) to teach the subject. 38 29.7 90 70 72 42.4 98 57.6
4

Figure 6: Adequacy of instructional (Text) material (Lagos and Ogun)

90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Adequate civic education Adequate civic education Adequate civic education Adequate civic education
teachers' hand book(s) to teach teachers' hand book(s) to teach students' text book(s) to teach students' text book(s) to teach
the subject (Lagos) the subject (Ogun) the subject (Lagos) the subject (Ogun)

YES NO

178
The focus group responses reiterated the above as teachers said: “…I heard it online,
that…civic…teachers and…student’s handbook/textbooks have been provided. In fact, we
discussed it in… school and…laughed…” (Resp. 1 Lag). Another noted: “…no provision
of textbooks for students in my…school” (Resp. 5 Og.). Yet, another said: “…In
my…school, they didn’t provide textbooks for…students” (Resp. 6 Og). The inadequacy
was further confirmed by other teachers saying: “Yes, government provided textbook
to…students. …textbooks provided… did not go round” (Resp. 2 Og). Again, a teacher
said: “…the textbooks didn’t go round. They have to share” (Resp. 7 Og). Inadequate
provision of civic teacher and student’s hand and text books, as depicted by teachers could
mar the effective actualisation of civic teaching and learning. It is unfortunate that young
learners could be starved of basic material like textbooks despite policy document
(Chapter 3) articulation that successful implementation of the junior and secondary school
civic programme hinges on instructional materials.

However, inadequate provision of books could be due to poor funding of education due
to a low budgetary allocation to education. However, such inadequacy, as studies showed,
could be a strong basis (among other factors) for undue focus on civic knowledge
construction (Heyneman & Jamison, 1980) and subsequent patronisation of private
authors by civic teachers.

6.4:3 Perceived alternative access to Civic Textbooks

Data revealed that most schools in this study experienced inadequate provision of civic
education text and handbooks. This resulted in civic teachers utilising private authors as
an alternative source of acquiring civic content knowledge. This was, in spite of
substantial investment by the government on provision of books, which however, was
still far below international benchmarks (UBEC, 2006; Theobald et al, 2007). More so
that available government civic text and hand books were perceived as being of low
quality in content. A teacher said: “7The one… sent to my school… is a problem” (Resp.
3 Og). Another teacher claimed: “…the textbooks…are not…relevant” (Resp. 14 Og).
Since recommended textbooks were of low quality and inadequate, civic teachers were
still searching for alternative sources of knowledge acquisition through textbooks due to
the perception of literature indicating that young learners showed positive ability in
subjects where textbooks are adequately provided in schools. Thus, textbook provision

7
Already cited
179
(with other indicators) could be a major cause of school achievement (Fuller & Clarke,
1993; Moulton, 1994). Underpinning the above evidence, a young learner said: “…we
were being given…textbooks to study that is how I know that civic education has really
helped me know more about the…system of… government. Not because I think so but
because of what it has impacted in me, the knowledge…” (Part.6 Lag).

Realising the importance of textbooks expounded the growth of self-publishing authors

of civic textbooks in Nigeria’s educational milieu. However, even, the self-published
civic textbooks had defects with scanty and incomprehensive content and omission of
vital issues and topics as noted by a teacher: “To some extent, the textbooks we have…are
not all that…comprehensive” (Resp. 14 Og). Another teacher said: “the contents are
relevant…There is no definition of civic education, introduction, there is none” (Resp. 9
Og). Another teacher claimed: “…the textbooks… content…very scanty and…are
repetition (Resp. 12 Og). From the teachers’ responses, these textbooks have diverse
deficiencies which could be due to regular revision of subject syllabus and curriculum
content which invariably makes existing textbooks outdated thus hindering students’
learning and teachers’ effectiveness. Moreover, the unregulated nature of this industry in
Nigeria allowed private authors to publish without proper supervision before getting to
schools. Noncompliance to rules on the content quality of textbooks showed politics of
interests on the part of government officials and the subject teachers. Apple (1993, 2000)
perceived the politics of textbooks as involving those who determine school curriculum
content as depicted in the text, however the politics and intrigues are peculiar to each
country. In Nigeria, textbook politics involved those publishers lobbying and influencing
government officials and subject teachers to promote textbooks despite irrelevant and low
quality and standards of content, yet they were recommended for schools by government
officials. Also, other self-publishing writers approach subject teachers to help promote
books outside the approved list. A teacher said: “I have been able to lay my hands on his
book … But the man…has done a lot of books…am not promoting him... But his book is
very, very …” (Resp. 7 Lag). Another teacher said: “…I use to show… them that this is
my own textbook. Most…teachers use to correct me, don’t… introduce any textbooks to
them” (Resp. 5 Og). This showed that as publishers mount pressures on government
officials such pressures were similarly mounted on subject teachers.

180
6.4:4 Perceived provision of other instructional Materials

Availability and utilisation of other relevant instructional materials for civic education
teaching in schools, as revealed in this study, were trivial and inadequate. This
inadequacy, especially in Lagos, might be due to the high cost of producing these
materials in a metropolitan and cosmopolitan state with high living costs. Also, the focus
group data confirmed the inadequate provision of other materials. A teacher said: “There
is …not enough other…materials. …the school bought some…we…don’t have
enough…materials…” (Resp.1 Og). Another teacher said: “So, when I…asked
for…materials, they asked me to…look for it myself…I should…provide some things…”
(Resp. 4 Lag). This could be due to an increase in school enrolment leading to converting
hitherto available resource rooms into classrooms.

Though the curriculum encouraged each civic teacher to enrich teaching and learning
with local materials, the lack of funding could hinder such improvisation. Despite this,
civic teachers in this study attempted to improvise these resources. A teacher claimed:
“…I improvise sometimes; I go on Net print a diagram… (on) the topic” (Resp. 5 Lag).
Another said: “when I…have to teach…voting…procedures so I lay my hands on these
posters used by INEC during the voting processes I brought it…to class and
showed…students” (Resp. 6 Lag). The reflection of the teachers revealed that provision
and utilisation of other instructional materials were deficient in the teaching of citizenship
related issues in most schools in this study.

This means materials like charts, diagrams, posters, pictures, maps, audio/video tape
recorders which could be used to practicalise civic content to enhance classroom
interaction and active participation were absent (Garuba (2003; Ogbondah, 2008;
Okobiah, 2011).

In view of this, civic teachers revealed their creativity and initiative through developing
alternative materials within the immediate locality. Local materials were adapted to
perform new roles depicting particular civic issue(s). These exposed learners to diverse
learning experiences either individually or in groups to enhance civic content
implementation. On improvisation a young learner said: “Provide…coat of arm…map of
Nigeria…national flag…identity cards” (Part. 6 Lag). Another young learner noted: “Our
teachers…brought…materials. When we were taught constitution, he brought Nigeria…
1999 Constitution. In fact, I did not know what the constitution looked like but when he
brought it, I know how it looked like” (Part. 7 Og).
181
Table 16 Perceived provision of other instructional Materials

Lagos State Ogun State

s/n Items Yes % No % Yes % No %

Provision of other instructional materials 58 45.3 70 54.7 104 61.2 66 38.8

5

Figure 7: Perceived Provision of Other Instructional Materials (Lagos and Ogun)

70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Provision of other instructional materials Provision of other instructional materials
(Lagos) (Ogun)

YES NO

182
Having these materials provided by the teachers helps to stimulate and reinforce
classroom interactions, efficiency and enrich the quality of civic lessons. A civic teacher
said: “…usage of instructional materials…complement the teaching and imparting of
civic education… it made the learning of the subject relatively permanent. …” (Part. 6
Og). However, I believe that a deficit in teaching aids to mediate civic content is a
common experience in developing countries like Malawi and Pakistan (Bolick et al, 2003;
Kadzera, 2006; Abdo & Semela, 2010; Jotia & Matlale, 2011). Absence of, or deficiency
in instructional material as mediation tools to underpin civic learning implies that learners
are denied opportunity to develop problem solving skills. Also, learners lack relevant
tools to improve learning experiences, basic competence and dispositions for self-directed
learning. Civic learning becomes unidirectional and has passive knowledge input,
lacking interaction among learners to co-construct civic knowledge (Stetsenko &
Arievitch, 1997; Kao, 2010). These tools rely on social interactions and joint activities
like dialogue among civic learners (Mitchell & Myles, 2004).

6.5 Conclusion

Implementation of the new civic reform within the school system had challenges
involving inadequate recruitment of civic education teachers, lack of or irregular in-
service training and inadequate provision of text and non-text instructional materials.
However, various efforts to alleviate these problems resulted in personnel improvisation
which involved drafting in teachers from either related or unrelated subjects to teach civic
education which led to ineffective teaching. Also, civic teachers adopted individual or
group initiated training development to renew their content knowledge and pedagogical
skills. Inadequate civic hand and text books and poor content quality resulted in civic
teachers patronising self-publishing authors who, due to frequent reviews of the civic
curriculum, produced textbooks lacking in-depth information. Also, due to lack of
funding, teachers were unable to adequately produce and use other instructional materials
for classroom teaching of civic education. The issues of school resources articulated
above makes it difficult to assume the development of effective citizenship in learners.
Yet, it is vital to know whether pedagogical classroom practices discussed in the next
chapter make up for inadequate school resources.

183
 Chapter 7

Classroom Pedagogical Practices Impacts

7.0 Introduction

In Chapter 6, I found the implementation process regarding school resources inadequate

resulting in improvising personnel, training and teaching aids. However, the civic mission
of developing effective citizenship through an issue/activity based civic curriculum
requires integrating school resources with hands-on (active) pedagogical practices to
achieve programme (civic) intents. As posited in 2.5:1, 2.5:2 and 2.5:3, civic education
pedagogy requires social constructivist, transformative and reflective inquiry
(interactive/participatory) learning theories and practices to engage young learners in
civic learning. But, these theories can manifest and/or be used to involve young learners
via different pedagogical styles in the classroom civic implementation. Yet, classroom
manifestation of these interactive learning theories is via pedagogical components like
group discussion, open classroom discussion, dramatisation, role play and simulation. As
a teacher educator and researcher, I know via research evidence that these (pedagogical)
components of the above learning theories can help learners to experience democratic
practices in the school system. Also, these components can mediate and enrich classroom
civic content actualisation; inducing a constructive outlook towards future participation
in the larger society (Osler & Starkey 2006; Covell et al, 2008; Ollas, 2013).

Despite the above submission, consensus among teacher development studies/literature

alluded to a possible lacuna (gap) between classroom realities, interactive learning
theories and development of social interaction. This can be due to predetermined and
encumbered civic curriculum objectives and content which barred the scope of learners’
freedom of classroom discussion. Also, teachers’ illiberalism depicts their strong cultural
and social perspective of knowledge as fixed, objective and detached from the learner. As
such, teachers perceived their statutory role to be knowledge transmitters to learners via
didactic pedagogies like rote-learning techniques (Sifuna & Kaime, 2007; Hardman &
Abd-Kadir, 2010). However, such illiberalism and the role of teachers as knowledge
transmitters also relate to the wider political and cultural climate which restricts the
activities and choices available to teachers. Thus, it is not a matter of choice by individual
civic teachers as to whether or not they apply the pedagogies discussed in this study. Thus,

184
this study discusses the impacts of civic teachers’ classroom implementation of these
pedagogical indices on learners.

Though the use of some pedagogical indices discussed in sections 2.5 and 3.4 revealed
positive impacts, others did not due to certain constraints which indeed, are a matter of
perception. Thus, discussing the findings in relation to literature entails dividing the
chapter into sections. Section 7.1 discusses, in relation to literature, whether an open
classroom climate, leading discussions and dramatisation, (as components of active
pedagogies in 2.5 above) were used and their impacts based on the survey and focus
groups data. Section 7.2, indicates the inability of civic teachers to use (practice) these
pedagogical indices (group classroom presentations, role play and simulations) due to
certain constraints which involve large class sizes and unconducive classroom settings
among others. This finding relates to literature (3.4:1) on the use of traditional (teacher)
based pedagogies. In 7.3, data shows significant differences in the use of these active
pedagogies in respect of participants’ civic teachers and learners and school locations.
However, gender and the teachers’ years of teaching experience are insignificant
determinants of the use of these active pedagogies.

7.1. Perceived Civic Education Classroom Interactive Pedagogical Practices

Studies agree with policy documents (3.4:3) that an activity/issue based civic curriculum
requires using interactive pedagogies (2.5) because learners construct knowledge by
engaging in live classroom democratic experiential processes. This study favours using
these civic pedagogical practices because it mediates discourse of resonant and complex
citizenship issues by young learners. Consistent with this, data showed pedagogical
components like open classroom, simulation, leading discussion and dramatisation are
popular and acceptable pedagogies. Their classroom practice reveals constructive impacts
in terms of collaboration among learners and teachers to dialogue on citizenship issues.
As argued (2.5:3) above, such collaboration (team work) entails learners exploring,
analysing and discussing citizenship issues with intent to solve problems and make
decisions. Common to the active pedagogies mentioned (2.5) above is the civic teacher’s
roles as guidance and facilitator of citizenship knowledge construction instead of coercing
a set of knowledge and skills into learners.

185
Table 17 Showing Acceptable and Popular Active Classroom Pedagogies

State Lagos/Ogun States

Response Indicators Percent (%) (No) Percent (%) (Yes)

Participants Teachers Learners Teachers Learners

Items

1 Operating open classroom discussion on citizenship issues during civic lessons 4.3 26.3 95.7 73.7

2 Adoption of dramatisation of citizenship issues during civic lesson 30.5 46.0 69.5 53.6

3 Adoption of role plays on citizenship issues during civic lesson 24.5 51.7 75.5 47.6

Figure 1 Acceptable and Popular Active Classroom Pedagogies

120
100
80
60
40
20
0
OCD (Yes) OCD (No) Dramatisation (Yes) Dramatisation (No) Role-Play (Yes) Role-Play (No)

Teachers Learners Column1

186
As stated in the literature, a constructive/transformative classroom perceived both teacher
and learners as active participants in an open classroom climate in which discussion of
content enhances their skills, knowledge and disposition as effective critical citizens
(Barr, 1977; Giroux, 1980).

7.1:1 Perceived Impact of Open Classroom Discussion as a Pedagogical Tool

Effective citizenship developing requires open classroom discussion which embraces a

free climate for young learners to participate in classroom discourse individually or via
group presentation. In line with this, survey data alluded to civic classrooms open for
dialogic interaction in the two states as depicted in Table 17 above. For this study, open
classroom discussion entails young learners’ active interactions through dialogue during
civic classroom learning. Such dialogic interaction entails a free classroom talk for
learners to state, observe, explain, analyse, explore, ask questions and also reflect on civic
issues emerging in the lessons individually or collaboratively via group discourse
(Alexander 2006; Mercer, Dawes & Staarman 2009).

As stated (2.5:1(a) i & ii) above, learners and teachers (as a more knowledgeable person)
engage in collaborative classroom (interactive) discourse and express views on
citizenship issues to foster an atmosphere via which learners construe their world.
Learners derive creativity and initiative via participation leading to civic knowledge
construction (Stetsenko & Arievitch, 1997; Palincsar, 1998; Wells, 1999; Larson, 2000;
Wendy, 2003)

The survey was underpinned by focus group data revealing the use of open classroom
discourse as stated by a teacher: “…allow them to express their views… you hear more
and you also learn from them’. He further said: ‘when…teaching electoral malpractices,
there are certain thing I do not know, but…allow(ing) them come and hear what they are
saying’ (Resp. 1 Lagos). In support of this, a learner said: “the more you express your
view, the more you learn more from others” (Resp. 4 Lag). From the participants’
reflection, young learners had the opportunity to present, explore, explain and question
ideas based on their prior experience of citizenship (electoral) issues within their milieu.
In line with social constructivist and transformative learning (2.5) above, civic learners
engage in constructive meaning-making based on the opportunity to participate. Engaging
in classroom dialogic interaction to explore, analyse and question citizenship issues helps

187
learners transform their own thinking since participants are exposed to new learning
experiences (Evans 2006b; Olla, 2013).

Giving young learners the opportunities to actively engage in classroom dialogues on

current citizenship issues reinforces citizenship learning outcomes as asserted by a young
learner saying open classroom discussion offers: ‘the ability to freely talk without being
ashamed or afraid’ (resp. 3 Lag). This participant reflects on the chance for learners to
regulate and control their learning guided by the teacher. Learners need to initiate issues
and contribute to shaping the discussion of such. This underlines the importance of social
learning in which teacher-learner and learner-learner collaborative (dialogic) activities
guide their co-construction of civic knowledge. This classroom interaction reflects the
creativity given by transformative, social constructivist learning theories (2.5) to equip
learners with skills to develop rational and reflective thinking. These learning theories are
used to guide learners clarify knowledge constructed for effective application in order to
develop effective citizenship (Biesta & Miedema, 2002; Olla, 2013). For Nigerian
learners to construct knowledge, develop dispositions and acquire skills required to
critically examine their own citizenship ideas in relation to that of others through
reflective inquiry (2.5:3) (Hans 2006; Hardman & Abd-Kadir, 2010; Olla, 2013).

From the above participants’ reflections, learners exercise their right to explore their
views and then, linked to citizenship issues, the teacher mediates the development of such
citizenship concepts as a way of engaging in transformative and social constructivism
pedagogies. This fosters critical deliberation of diverse citizenship issues confronting the
democratic process as discussed in Chapter 5. This could guide them to develop their
dispositions and skills to be active participants in the wider community. Thus the need to
develop teachers’ skills to intensify a transformative and social constructivist classroom
climate in order to prepare and improve young learners’ debating skills for future active
engagement is imperative.

The data showed learners-teacher interactive engagement in classroom civic learning

experience depicting an open classroom climate which enables young learners to gain
first-hand experience of what democratic practice entails within the school setting. Young
learners feel more engaged in school/classroom and are thus induced to learn as the
findings depicted in Chapter 5. Consistent with the findings in Chapter 5, such open
classrooms could possibly be responsible for young learners’ high conceptual insights by

188
increasing civic knowledge construction and content recall. Also, it could raise their sense
of civic duty which reinforces developing democratic dispositions and involvement in
political citizenship activities in and out of school. It could enhance their ability to inquire,
think freely and critically to make up their minds about citizenship issues (Kerr, 2005;
Hahn, 1996; Aull, 1998). Evidently, this finding reflects the import of collaborative
learning stressed by the social constructivist as well as applicable to transformative and
reflective inquiry learning (2.5) above. These learning pedagogies, in which both the
teacher and learners are active participants in the classroom learning, aid peer-to-peer
interactions and collaborative inquiry which promote problem solving opportunities and
the need for critical reflection when making decision (Ollas, 2013). Through these
pedagogies, discussion of content enhances their competences as effective critical citizens
(Barr, 1977; Giroux, 1980).

7.1:2 Perceived Impact of Dramatisation as a Pedagogical Tool

Apart from open classroom, this study showed dramatisation as another component of
learning (theories) pedagogies, discussed (2.5) above, which impacted on civic content
learning. Survey data showed most teachers engaged young learners actively in classroom
teaching via dramatising. Also, focus group data revealed the impacts of dramatisation
from the perspectives of the majority of young learners, typified by this response: “…it’s
not everybody that learns the same way. It depends on how you reason. If you reason
slowly, dramatizing…will be better. … I like people to dramatize…” (Part. 10 Og).
Another observed: “…without dramatizing, we would not understand what they are trying
to tell us. So they…dramatize it…so …we... understand. They… bring it to our level so
we can know…what they… teach us” (Resp. 5 Lag). From the young learners’ reflections,
dramatisation in the civic classroom learning induces transformative and reflective
inquiry learning. This is due to emphasis and interest in individual differences of young
learners hitherto isolated in civic classroom learning. Engaging in acting may nurture a
better grasp of citizenship issues and develop confidence and self-esteem (Idowu &
Hassan, 2005; Falade, 2007; Ogundare, 2010). Converting citizenship issues into acting
thus makes learning more interactive, collaborative, practical, and promotes critical
thinking. As stated above, young learners are empowered to take control of their own
learning experience through interactions with peers and teachers, who are more
knowledgeable thus acting as facilitators. This vitiates the power relations commonly
experienced by learners since teachers and pupils work as a team to build on their own

189
and each other’s knowledge and ideas to develop coherent thinking (Alexander, 2001;
Lyle, 2008; Ollas, 2013). Therefore, dramatisation inbuilt in these learning theories
induces interactive and participatory classroom activities which transform learners’
imagination, creativity, and character to make learning permanent (Oyetade, 2003;
Akinbote et al, 2004; Ogundare, 2010).

7.1:3 Perceived Impact of Game Simulation as a Pedagogical Tool

This section examines data on simulation game impacts in the implementation process of
civic education. Also, the beneficial and adverse effects of this interactive learning
component in the civic classroom, in this study’s context, are discussed. However, survey
data revealed the majority of young learners disagreed with most teachers on the practice
of game simulation for civic classroom teaching and learning. However, focus group data
revealed this interactive learning component has beneficial impacts on civic classroom
learning.

For this study, game simulation involves classroom activities capable of reflecting and
imitating real-life citizenship issues such as past events in a way that young learners learn
and appreciate more about such issues. (Mansaray, 1996; Idowu & Hassan, 2005;
Ogundare, 2010; Bodrova & Leong, 2012; Gauvain, 2008). Unlike in the developed
countries where simulation games are mostly technological based using internet, some of
the Nigerian simulation games are traditionally designed. Underpinning this, a teacher
said: “…I believe… a game like “Ayo” wherein the rules of the game…can help in
teaching students about election contest. How citizens…should…accept defeat in good
faith for development of democracy in our society” (Resp. 5). The response shows that
virtues of probity, honesty, integrity and fair play should be instilled in our young learners
by the school to engage actively in diverse sectors of our socio-political lives as a nation.
For instance, these virtues are much required in our electoral system which hardly reflects
any fair play among political actors (Gboyega & Aliyu, 1989; Aroge, 2012).

Also, a teacher noted that “…games…like… scrabble. I think…will help the students…
come across new words and definitely…know their meanings…” (Resp. 2). From this,
game simulation like Scrabble could enhance inquiry skills through which young learners
construct and have better insights of new knowledge for critical thinking, problem
solving, decision-making and develop personal independence advocated by liberals in
3.4:2.

190
From the above reflections on both data, developing knowledge, dispositions (virtues of
probity) and skills (inquiry skills) via simulation games entails activities that mediate
dialogic interactions among learners in the civic classroom. In the course of the classroom
lesson the game becomes an engaging tool to generate dialogue (talk) among learners
about the citizenship issues the game was created for. When playing this game, learners
engage in discourse and responses within the civic education classroom (Ollas, 2013).

From the social constructivist perspective (2.5:1), knowledge, dispositions and skills
involving virtues stated above are constructed via social interactions and consensus. In
the course of playing the game learners are offered the chance to express their views, thus
creating common insights into the need for the above virtues and gradually transforming
into dispositions (Doolittle & Hicks, 2003; Williams & Chinn, 2009). Such knowledge
and the skills acquired induce discovery of new citizenship experiences via exploration,
analysis and discussion of such game (see 2.5:3).

This study avowed that increasing learners’ participation in game simulation requires new
attitudes on the use of this interactive learning component as a pedagogical tool for
learning. Thus, the need for educational (curriculum) reforms which focus more on game
simulation among other interactive learning components. Also, learners should be
involved in the games simulation tools preparation as a way of aiding learning experience
and belief to develop their skills, knowledge and understanding within the civic classroom
(Resnick 2002; Ollas, 2013).

However, a major adverse effect from Nigerian and international literature/studies on the
use of game simulation showed that learners’ focus on the competitiveness of this
pedagogy often overshadows major traits of social constructivist and transformative
learning theories which involve developing learners’ critical thinking and social
collaborative inquiry skills (Idowu & Hassan, 2005; Aroge, 2012; Ollas, 2013).

From the civic teachers’ submissions, there are extant administrative setbacks which
dissuade the teacher from integrating game simulation into their classroom pedagogy.
Absence of resources such as materials and funding expected by the civic teachers to
practise game simulation in the classroom constitutes a major issue. However,
preliminary preparation to integrate the resources as a mediation tool involves substantial
amount of time (Idowu & Hassan, 2005; Selwyn 2007; Ogundare, 2010; Ollas, 2013).

191
Also, games like Scrabble go with social status which could be complex for young
learners, especially for those in rural locations to practise (Olanrewaju, 1999; Akintunde,
2004; Falade, 2007). Also, game simulation often omits participating learners’ voice
because the interaction taking place involves the teacher dictating with trivial learners’
interaction. Also, 2.5:3 suggests that inadequate training of teachers on class organisation,
management and arrangements consistent with social constructivist and transformative
learning theories is a barrier to using this teaching style (Akinbote et al, 2004; Idowu &
Hassan, 2005; Ogundare, 2010).

Overall, these active pedagogies could actualise classroom civic content learning as
reiterated by a civic teacher: “I… so much believe...these methods could go a long way in
the achievement of the…educational content of civic education” (Part.6 Og.). From both
participants and literature (3.4:2) perspectives, teachers were convinced of the positive
impacts of these active pedagogies, however, implementation barriers make these
pedagogies, (discussed below), impracticable and so the easy practice involving
knowledge transmission by rote learning to induce memorising civic concepts is adopted
(Ango et al, 2003; Hardman et al, 2008; Akyeampong et al, 2009).

Integrating open classroom climate, dramatisation and game simulation pedagogies

(inbuilt into the interactive learning theories) into the civic classroom implementation
process was to engage young learners in the learning process. Employing these inbuilt
pedagogies proved that the civic education curriculum is meant to be a transformative
citizenship document to mediate life experience as earlier argued above. Based on these
component pedagogies young learners acquired genuine citizenship experience due to the
opportunity to participate in the classroom knowledge construction process. These
component pedagogies reflect active participation of learners via the open classroom,
dramatisation and simulation as stated by the participant teachers and their learners also,
in the focus groups discussions to collect their views as study participants (Veale 2005;
Gauntlett & Holzworth 2006; Ollas, 2013). A key tenet behind reflective inquiry, social
constructivist and transformative learning as interactive/participatory teachings entails
giving learners the chance to engage in collaborative inquiry, critical reflection and
dialogic interaction to stimulate learners’ knowledge construction.

192
7.2 Perceived impracticability of interactive classroom pedagogical tools

Findings from this study (7.1) above reveal that using certain active pedagogies could
have positive impacts on civic content classroom teaching. However, the introduction
section of this chapter alludes to the consensus among teacher development
studies/literature on the gap between classroom learning experiences, interactive learning
theories and development of social interaction. I argued that this is due to predetermined
and encumbered civic curriculum objectives and content which barred the scope of
learners’ freedom of classroom collaborative inquiry, critical reflection and dialogic
interaction. This is why literature (2.5:3) finds it difficult to ascertain the extent of using
these learning pedagogies in the Nigerian civic classroom context. In other words, can
one ascertain whether all the learning theories (2.5) are applicable in the Nigerian civic
classroom context.

Accordingly, data in this section shows that pedagogical (components) tools like leading
discussion, role-play and group (presentations) discussion are impracticable for civic
teachers due to the teacher’s dominance of classroom discussions along with other
classroom constraints which I argue are more cultural instead of a practical issue.

7.2:1 Civic Teachers directed (Leading) classroom discussion

Contrary to claims of an open classroom climate involving teacher-learners exchange of

ideas above, data showed the direction of such classroom discourse, as shown by
participants, is teacher-directed learning. A teacher said: “We treated poverty, I used
my…academic knowledge to analyse…poverty rate in Nigeria and I also, told them how
they can come out of poverty… I gave them some statistics” (Resp. 6). Another teacher
noted: “I discussed... the issue of insecurity. I allowed students to respond before I now
made corrections” (7 Og). This finding reflects civic teachers firmly in control of the
classroom teaching and learning activities which exclude genuine or authentic dialogic
exchanges. There is no effort or concern for collaborative meaning construction from the
learners’ perspectives. In other words, civic teachers engaged in monologic pedagogy in
which young learners are hardly afforded the chance to engage in substantial conversation
on the facts in issues among themselves since the classroom teaching is geared towards
achieving the teacher’s goal (Bakhtin, 1981; Skidmore, 2000).

As stated in literature (3.4) above findings depict a pedagogy which focuses on the
domain of qualification-whereby young learners acquired knowledge, skills, values and
193
dispositions. Also, the teachers’ dominance through lecturing advances the socialisation
(domain) of learners, that is, education which makes learners part of the existing ethno-
nationalistic citizenship traditions and ways of doing things. Also, it helps inculcate and
reinforce docility and passivity in relation to authoritarianism (Biesta, 2013).

Young learners’ free expression was restricted thus encumbering critical analysis of the
issues to help them make up their minds. This finding is consistent with literature (3.4)
showing that monologic/didactic pedagogy is a common classroom instructional practice
in the pre and post education reforms (including civic education) in Nigeria. For this
study, it entails discourse centred on the civic teachers initiating questions and also
explanation while young learners’ reply is based on factual transmitted knowledge. In this
pedagogy, young learners lacked the chance to participate in practical conversation
regarding citizenship issues (Hardman et al, 2008; Akyeampong et al, 2009; Hardman &
Abd-kadir, 2010). However, evidence of teacher centred pedagogy is further explored
through indices like leading discussion and classroom group presentation and discussions.

7.2:1(a) Who leads Classroom Discussion (LCD)?

There is often a misconception on open classroom (discussions) climate and teacher-led

recitation. In this study, data from the survey and focus group reveal civic teachers
initiated discussion on citizenship issues in civic classroom teaching and learning. When
the teacher expressed views, young learners were hardly afforded the chance to engage
in probing such issues or discussions from diverse perceptions.

Most (8) focus group participants/teachers reiterated leading discussions while just one
(1) disagreed with the approach. A teacher narrated: “…I was in…class taking integrity.
…I asked them to start naming people of integrity (Resp. 2 (Lag.). Another participant
said:” …I do…. on population …when I was handling this topic, based on my practical
experience…I was able to educate the students… (Resp. 5 (Og). This depicts a classroom
teaching focusing on the teacher supressing dialogic interactions involving the learners’
perceptions on integrity and population. This lacks space for collaborative inquiry and
critical reflection (as the hallmark of social constructivist, transformative and reflective
inquiry) between learners which challenges the uneven and distorted power relations
constructed by teacher-led teaching.

194
In line with literature (3.4:1) civic teachers regularly engage in recitation teaching pattern
which provides the basis for transmission of pre-packaged knowledge through direct
instruction to regulate and control classroom activities. This stresses the imbalance
between teachers and the taught as well as the epistemological dominance of the teacher.
The goal is to promote recall of citizenship issues or prompt learners to provide answers
from hints in the question due to the accumulation of knowledge arising from the teacher
questions. Teachers engaged in initiating issues which required succinct responses from
young learners and follow-up involving civic teacher’s feedback. The reflection of data
in this study confirmed extant literature (3.4) which showed teacher-led discussion was
most popular in social studies and civic education classes (Lyle, 2008; Hardman et al,
2008; Akyeampong et al, 2009; Hardman & Abd-kadir, 2010).

According to Ogundare, (2010) teacher led discussion, in an issue/activity-based civic

curriculum only leads to young learners recalling facts earlier memorised instead of
expressing their own perceptions of the issues (3.4:1). This hinders higher-order
intellectual interactions since learning to recall based on questions only focuses on low
cognitive growth. As the study literature (2.5:3) pointed out, learners are denied the
chance to explore, analyse and discuss citizenship issues with intent to solve problems
and make decisions. In consonance with the above literature a participant/teacher says
that: “...a good number of them (young learners) are not smart enough to key into where
you are leading them to”. The participant went further: “we hardly get students.......do
it... it’s almost a problem. They won’t be able to do it well” (Part. 1 Lag). This response
reflected the views of most teachers on young learners to justify their classroom
monologic teaching via leading questions. This is due to young learners’ lacking the
opportunity to engage in classroom interactive activities entailing examining and
questioning issues for constructive meaning-making. Classroom emphasis has been on
factual recall of civic issues instead of promoting higher order interactions involving
reasoning. Even the civic curriculum activities component prompt teachers to ask leading
questions. This could hinder learners’ thinking skills which require collective discourse
via speaking and listening. Therefore, civic teachers need to assume their mediation
responsibility of helping young learners attain a higher cognitive development (Corson,
1988; Myhill & Fisher, 2005).

According to literature (3.4:2), the teacher could be leading discussions due to a lack of
requisite skills (relevant training, teaching aids or teachers’ handbooks inter alia), by
sizable number of teachers, to teach an issue/activity-based civic curriculum for effective
195
classroom implementation process. This reflects literature (3.2:3b) above, which argued
that teachers hardly participated in any training which would acquaint them with the new
civic curriculum despite being sole implementers of the civic content (Thaman, 1988;
Schnidt & Pramwat, 2006; Oloruntegbe, 2011). As literature (3.2:3b) stated above, the
Nigerian government has done little to sensitise the citizens about diverse curricula
programmes. Lack of awareness and non-involvement of stakeholders in civic curriculum
planning and design means denying stakeholders the use of active civic pedagogy which
aligns knowledge transmission with acquiring discussion skills by learners to develop
effective citizenship (Eminue, 2005).

Also, the teacher leading discussions underlines more curriculum content instead of
engaging in participatory or interactive learning. A participant teacher said: “I don’t …do
that and my reason is…we have…syllabus… scheme of work. …And…deviating from
what…to treat for that week and…discussing about…political issues in the country
and…left out the topic…to teach… All they want…is writing of…note…in the class and
so on (Resp. 5 (Og). The civic teacher’s reflection on paucity of interactive learning depict
the influence of a National Civic Curriculum on civic teachers’ statutory duties. Nigerian
teachers are mandated to prioritise civic curriculum coverage at the expense of hands-on
classroom engagement. Consequently, this participant and others are driven by pre-
determined and overloaded curriculum objectives, content and limited periods on the
timetables. Civic teachers are under obligation to implement the civic curriculum based
on predefined goals and content which involve curriculum content coverage via
knowledge transmission. That is, teachers struggle with how interactive learning can
become a regular aspect of classroom teaching practice In this instance, the civic teacher’s
unilateral control of the classroom implementation process makes learning a passive
activity requiring feeding young learners with facts. This leads to civic classroom
teaching and learning becoming a boring process as well as denying creativity, higher
perceptions of citizenship issues and preparation to function effectively in the larger
society. Rigid adherence to curriculum coverage could be due to the intense
environmental impacts of didactic teaching methods on classroom teaching/learning
objectives (Cheng-man Lau, 2001; Kerr et al, 2002; Hardman & Abd-Kadir, 2010). This
rigidity denies learners opportunities to identify their goals, interests, abilities, and
resources to inquire into citizenship issues. I inferred from the literature (2.5) that learners
will be unable to acquire the ability to explore, analyse, solve problems and make
decisions as active constructors (instead of mere recipients) of knowledge. Apart from
196
leading discussions, a civic teacher could evolve other discussion formats like classroom
group discussions. As expressly stated in the curriculum that civic teachers are to lead
classroom activities means learners are to engage in restricted classroom learning.
Limited discourse and task assignment are the yardstick to measure quality of classroom
civic learning. Evidently, civic teaching entails more pre-determined, narrow, precise and
academic descriptions of issues in the school/classroom. The above problem is
compounded considering the disparity in resource distributions (discussed in Chapter 6)
and the exercise of power in schools. Teachers are required to determine the quality of
learner’s classroom interactive activities due to being vested with epistemological
authority. From this perspective, it seems these learning theories are too idealistic and
thus the need for a more realistic classroom teaching style in the schools (Lefstein, 2006;
Lyle, 2008; Lehesvuori, 2013). Alas, these attitudes can, in due course, lead to dislike
towards civic/citizenship education as a school subject (Lefstein, 2006; Lyle, 2008;
Matusov 2011).

7.2:1(b) Classroom Group Discussion (CGD)

In this study, another interactive learning component involves using classroom group
discussions. However, data from this study showed that engaging young learners in
classroom group discussions was not a popular teaching style. That is, most civic teachers
in this study did not encourage collaborative (team) inquiry using small or large groups
among young learners. For this study, classroom group discussions entails engaging
young learners in collaborative inquiry on civic/citizenship issues and discussing the
outcome via class round table talk or debate, inter alia. This involves dialogic interactions
which stimulates cooperative activities resulting in higher-order articulation of
citizenship issues through reflective inquiry (2.5:3). It engages young learners
(collectively) in scholarly activities to develop their communication skills and broaden
their knowledge and skills for logical presentation of issues (Tharp & Dalton, 2007;
Hardman & Abd-Kadir, 2010). This is in line with collaborative learning of the social
constructivist theory (2.5:1(a)i) which entails classroom interactive activities through
which learners create, initiate and construe activities which lead to civic knowledge
construction via consensus (Stetsenko & Arievitch, 1997; Palincsar, 1998).

Although young learners refuted most civic teachers’ claims of using this pedagogy, focus
group evidence revealed that this pedagogy was actually practised by teachers who noted:
“…We were on this topic “HIV/AIDs” So I …divide them into groups and…itemized their
197
points…like HIV causes, symptoms, and mode of transmission… I was calling…group
by group to be discussing each point. And they were saying something I never expected
them to say which is only making sense to the topic we are discussing. And I even though
forget to mention this mother-child transmission like breast feeding…so they really
perform beyond my expectation which I myself, learn one or two things…” (Part. 2 Lag).
Another participant said this style is “very good…the students would know…the
content…study it and prepare to present” (Resp. 1 (Lag). Applying group discussions
offers opportunity to engage in a social constructivism teaching and learning process
which entails young learners sharing their perspectives of citizenship issues leading to
constructing knowledge and understanding within their social context together. Making
meaning of the civic issue at stake is due to interactions among learners within their socio-
cultural milieu. Here, civic teachers engaged in peer collaboration inquiry pedagogy
(2.5:1(a)i) which underlines team/group interactive activities among learners. Young
learners develop reflective thinking abilities through interaction with other learners and
teachers alike. Teacher’s admission of learning from the group activities reflects how
learners’ backgrounds influence the creation and discovery of civic knowledge and
understanding attained during the learning process.

From the responses, I argued that group discussions could mediate more awareness of the
civic curriculum content and particular citizenship issue(s) for better problem solving and
decision making. This data was consistent with literature (2.5:3) suggesting that group
members could engage in concerted efforts through reflective inquiry to explore, analyse
and discuss citizenship problems with intent to acquire decision making competence
(Hahn, 1996; Hess & Posselt, 2001; Zaman, 2006; Ogundare, 2010). This position was
reiterated by a young learner saying: “the teacher divided them into groups to discuss
issues in form of debates” (Resp. 10 Lag).

198
Table 18 Impracticable Active Classroom Pedagogies

State Lagos/Ogun States

Response Indicators Percent (%) (No) Percent (%) (Yes)

Participants Teachers Learners Teachers Learners

Items

1 Operating classroom group discussions (CGD/P) on civic/citizenship issues during civic lessons 45.2 65.6 54.8 34.4

2 Teachers leading classroom discussion (TLD) on current citizenship issues during civic lessons 13.4 13.1 86.6 86.9

3 Adoption of simulation of citizenship issues during civic lesson 24.6 68.6 75.8 30.7

Figure 2 Impracticable Active Classroom Pedagogies

100

80

60

40

20

0
CGD/P (Yes) CGD/P (No) TLD (Yes) TLD (No) Simulation (Yes) Simulation (No)

Teachers Learners

199
Linked with peer collaboration above, the learner reflects on the import of dialogical
interactions as another trait of the social constructivist and other learning theories (2.5)
above. They stressed that dialogical meaning-making admits the learners’ active role in
developing an individual construction of knowledge and understanding of the civic
curriculum via dialogic interchange. Such dialogic talk occurs among learners in
collaborative settings which underpin the co-construction of meaning. The above
responses in group discussions are in line with the social constructivist perspective which
perceives that knowledge construction emanates from the social context whereby young
learners are able to relate with each other and their sociocultural setting. In fact,
individually constructed knowledge originates from interactive activities with peers and
their milieu prior to such knowledge being assimilated and applied (Vygotsky, 1978;
Roth, 2000; Lave & Wenger, 1991; Meter & Stevens, 2000; Eggan & Kauchak, 2004)

But, data from learners’ survey averring non-practice of role-play, inter alia, could be due
to learners lacking opportunities to explore, analyse, discuss and solve civic/citizenship
issues collaboratively (as a team) (2.5:1(a)i) during the civic class (Wendy, 2003;
Ogundare, 2010).

Also, such impracticability of role-play and other active pedagogies could not just be
because pre-service teacher education does not equip civic teachers with adequate
pedagogical knowledge and skills but more importantly, could be due to civic teachers’
inability to make effective use of their mother-tongue, as prescribed by the National
Policy document (stated in the preamble of 3.4) to communicate and practice these
pedagogies. A teacher noted: “I think there is no teacher that passed through College of
Education or Education (faculty) in the University that will not know…role-playing or
dramatization method… I speak Yoruba (‘language of the environment’) to them… so…
they… understand” (Resp. 3 (Og). The teacher reflects on a major determinant of
effective citizenship development in the context of civic curriculum implementation. The
policy of using former colonial languages as medium of classroom communication
(dialogic teaching), which in Nigeria, revolves round the use of English has serious
adverse effect on the learners. Unarguably, these interactive pedagogies require local
adaptations to allow teachers to implement the civic curriculum using materials and
content from the immediate milieu (NPE, 2004, p9; NERDC, 2007pv). Literature alludes
to the constructive impacts on the dialectical patterns existing in many of the civic
classrooms in Nigeria and other developing countries. Mother tongue (language of the
environment) as a mediational tool boosts whole class teaching as a more secure choice
200
since, dialectally, it is less challenging. Moreover, dialogic exchange based on the mother
tongue makes learners active partners with teachers in classroom implementation of civic
curriculum (Arthur & Martin, 2007; Hardman & Abd-Kadir, 2010).

Evidently, the teacher education curriculum could be repackaged to offer more practical
experience and exposure instead of its abstract and theoretical nature. This could justify
lack of relevant innovative teaching styles and new modes of delivery particular to civic
curriculum (Moja, 2000; Ango et al, 2003; Theobald et al, 2007).
Employing the mother-tongue as a matter of policy requirement could enhance the ability
of young learners to grasp citizenship issues effectively as stated by the civic teacher
(Resp. 3 (Og) above. Inducing teachers to adopt ‘language of the environment’ was based
on the 1968 Mombasa declaration which unequivocally rejected teaching through the
medium of foreign language (English). Such content was viewed as a legacy of the
colonial past which impedes civic learners’ classroom dialogue. Nigeria’s civic learners
lacked adequate grasp of citizenship issues due to stressing imported foreign languages
(2.4:3(b)). So, teachers’ arbitrary use of ‘language of the environs’ does inspire entire
class engagement to better appreciate and discuss citizenship issues. (NPE, 2004, p9;
Fafunwa, 2004; Hardman & Abd-Kadir, 2010).

As I explain in the next section, the impracticability of interactive learning components

explored in this study by some participants was due to some problems. This insight
conforms with literature which avowed that dialogic and other forms of teaching/learning
theories lack impact and relevance in the civic education classrooms of developing
countries like Nigeria due to limited mediational tools such as teaching/learning
resources, large classes and teachers lacking and/or inadequate training (Lyle, 2008;
Lehesvuori, 2013; Hardman & Abd-Kadir, 2010). Other factors discovered in this study
are hostile classroom settings (discussed in Chapter 6), inadequate space on the timetable,
rowdy and disorderly classes and politicisation of the civic classroom.

7.3 Constraints on the non-usage of active participatory/interactive pedagogies

In sections 7.1 and 7.2 above, I discussed active participatory teaching and learning styles,
practicable and otherwise in the course of the civic curriculum classroom implementation
process. However, focus group data revealed that impracticable active pedagogies were
due to some constraints regarding large class sizes, unconducive classroom settings as
discussed in Chapter 6.2:4, deficient timetable space, rowdy and disorderly lessons and
lack of interest.
201
7.3:1 Problem of School Timetable

A major challenge to the use of active pedagogies involved inadequate periods on the
school time-table. This was underpinned by teachers’ focus group data suggesting that
time on the school time table was utterly inadequate. “... as much as it is very
good…But… if we consider … the number of period per week...” (Resp. 1 (Lag). Another
participant reiterated that: “…I have not been grouping my student…based on the time
duration, the time given to periods and if I should say I want … my students… to present
or discuss... I have 100 students per class of 8 arms. So, I don’t know how that would be
possible unless I want to deceive myself. …” (Part. 7 (Og). This response reflected the
views of most teachers and participants on time allocation as a major barrier to the
implementation process. This data affirmed literature which opined that an issue and
activity-oriented civic curriculum requires substantial time allocation for civic teachers
to put in extra efforts on pre-lesson and actual classroom activities (Kerr et al, 2002;
Ogunyemi, 2010, 2011). A nonchalant attitude to civic curriculum time and periods on
the school time table could distance cynical young learners from having an interest in
civic education. Thus more periods and time for civic education is paramount to
successful classroom actualisation (Andrews & Mycock, 2007). Inadequate periods
depicted civic education as an elective subject whereas, officially, it should be a core
subject and therefore requires more time in the national curricula. Inevitably, this could
impair young learners’ intellectual and participatory skills development. (Vontz and
Nixon, 1999; Ogunyemi, 2006, 2011; NERDC, 2007, p.v).

Inadequate curriculum (period) time in schools was a common trend among countries
implementing civic and citizenship education. That is why dedicated curriculum time was
emphasised by the Citizenship Advisory Group in England and other countries (Po, 2004;
Crick, 2002; Miles, 2006). Curriculum planners should be emphatic by providing,
preferably, double periods on the school timetable for civic teaching and learning because
an activity and issue-based civic curriculum requires adequate time to apply active
pedagogies (Akinbote et al, 2004; Ogundare, 2010).

7.3:2 Rowdy/Disorderly Civic Classroom

Teachers found active pedagogies difficult to implement in the classroom due to the
rowdiness and disorder resulting from excitement created by the interaction and
participation of young learners. Such excitement could result from being lost in laughing
and clapping without realising the class has become rowdy and disorderly thus becoming
202
a nuisance to nearby classes. For instance, the competitive nature of game simulation
could induce hostilities and conflicts which can, in the process, openly hurt feelings of a
sensitive learner due to losing a game. Since we have congested civic classes, lessons
could be noisy, especially where teachers lack the requisite classroom organisational
skills.

A teacher said: “…a situation whereby you have a large class and…students are learning
under an environment that is not conducive. …some classes…in my own school…are not
floored at all. They are…using a shed. …exactly at 12 o’ clock…experience sun. …
Because every nook and cranny of your body will be wet before you leave the class”
(Resp. 8 (Og). Obviously, a teacher managing a classroom of 102 young learners could
experience rowdy and disorderly (noisy) civic lessons, especially when such teachers
lacks requisite classroom planning, management and organisational skills. Civic teachers
require management and organisational skills in the classroom civic learning
implementation process. Inability to use interactive and participatory learning pedagogies
could raise the failure rates among young learners. This shows the depth of the realistic
issues facing Nigeria’s education which has swallowed huge investment and still the
present condition is far from the expected international minimum standards (Nkwanga &
Canagarajah, 1999; Moja, 2000; Akinbote et al, 2004; Idowu & Hassan, 2005; Theobald
et al, 2007; Hardman et al, 2008). In fact, civic resource rooms which could have been
the most suitable place for such interaction are lacking in virtually all schools. A teacher
said: “…But when they are now being divide intentionally…will be…rowdy. They
might…be disturbing the next class …unless I…take them out…under the tree…
or…place…secluded” (Resp. 9 (Og).

7.3:3 Learners Lacking Interest in Active Pedagogical Classroom Participation

When preparing for a lesson, a major factor civic teachers need to consider involves
stimulating young learners’ interests in civic lessons. Being unmindful of this could result
in their lacking interest in civic learning. A teacher said: “…when we want to...we hardly
get students...do this… They don’t want to participate. And those who…want to
participate… they don’t have the…materials…relevant to the content of what you want
to pass to them. …it means taking time…to…plan…and deliver it. …disinterest…of the
students is a problem facing role playing as a method in…classes… And… then
basically.....there is not enough space in… the classrooms to be able to do some of these
things. So think that is why they are gradually dying off from use in the school system”
203
(Resp. 1 (Og). This reflects a civic teacher perceiving civic education as a work-based
package lacking creativity and initiatives in the implementation (of active pedagogies)
process. Implementing classroom pedagogies needs a guiding ethos involving resources
and a conducive setting to foster participation. Young learners become tools to be
manipulated in ‘the factory’ (civic classroom) to memorise concepts in order to mould
them into a predefined image. This showed teachers’ conservatism, rigidity and lacking
requisite skills to actualise an activity and issue-based curriculum using active pedagogies
to stimulate interest in civic learning. As discussed in 7.1.1 above, some teachers could
not change their usual teaching styles due to the strong socio-cultural impact which views
civic implementation as a one-way knowledge transmission via recalled learning for
examination purposes (Cheng-man Lau, 2001; Ogundare, 2010; Hardman & Abd-Kadir,
2010).

Also, teachers identified the huge pre-lesson planning efforts required to use these
pedagogies. A teacher said: “it means taking time off to really plan it and deliver it” (Part.
1 Og). Another teacher noted: “…I do not use role-playing…the main reason is…in the
lesson plan, teacher has activities” (Part. 4 Og). The curriculum was perceived as an
objectivist product based on which the teacher follows activities specified to achieve
learning outcomes and lacking autonomy on how to achieve desired civic goals. However,
these pre-lesson activities failed to incorporate young learners, the actual implementers,
at every stage of these pedagogical practices. Teachers should see the classroom as a
workshop for young learners’ active engagement in the lesson by contributing to the
format of classroom activities and interactions which commenced prior to classroom
teaching and learning. The misconceptions that active pedagogies (role-play, simulation,
etc) require elaborate activities like memorising scripts, rehearsals and acting real life
situations could create apathy in young learners. These delusions could be due to a lack
of requisite knowledge and skills of classroom pedagogical practices.

7.4 Developing Effective Citizenship through the Interactive Learning Theories

As stated in the introduction to this chapter, civic education classroom pedagogy requires
social constructivist, transformative and reflective inquiry (interactive/participatory)
learning theories. These theories manifest via different inbuilt pedagogical styles like
open classroom, dramatisation, simulation, role play and group discussion to engage
young learners in civic learning. Conversely, consensus among teacher development
studies/literature alluded to the gap between classroom learning experiences, interactive
204
learning theories and development of social interaction. This, in effect, makes it difficult
to ascertain whether these learning pedagogies were used in the Nigerian civic classroom
context. Effectively, this study showed that the inbuilt components of the learning
theories were practicable in certain scenario and impracticable under other circumstances.
However, this study views these interactive learning components as creating opportunity
for learners’ (dialogical) meaning-making via active engagement in developing
individually constructed understanding of civic facts in issue via the classroom. They are
vital to exploring the impacts of interaction which occur within collaborative settings as
a basis for co-construction of meaning. Multiplicity of learners’ voices in the classroom
has impact on social interaction which leads to learners’ knowledge construction (Lyle,
2008). Moreover, social constructivist, transformative and reflective inquiry classrooms
enables civic teachers, (as more knowledgeable person/facilitator) and learners
collaborate to construct individual ideas which are collectively reflected on. Knowledge
is constructed through dialogic interaction involving exploring and analysing citizenship
issues, instead of unquestioningly adopting teachers’ perspectives of issues. Learners are
induced to examine their thought processes, contributions and responses to reflect their
cognitive development as a way of contesting teachers’ epistemological dominance. This
fosters in young learners the confidence, independence and sense of responsibility to
engage in classroom collaborative inquiry, reflective thinking and dialogic interaction
(Alexander, 2006). Young learners lack the opportunity to engage in classroom
interactive activities entailing examining and questioning issues for constructive
meaning-making. Classroom emphasis has been on factual recall of civic issues instead
of promoting higher order interactions involving reasoning.

7.5 Active Pedagogical Practices and Test of Significant Difference

As a teacher educator, I focus on school and classroom factors impacting on young

learners’ effective citizenship development. However, studies show that individual traits
as well could mediate or intervene in effective citizenship (Wendy, 2003; Tor, 2009).
Considering this, I examined data on likely significant differences among specific traits
like gender, states, school locations and years of teaching experience in relation to the use
of active pedagogies. The data showed participants (civic teachers and learners) and
school locations showed significant differences while gender and teachers’ experience
were insignificant.

205
7.5:1 Participants (Civic Teachers/ Learners) and Active Pedagogical Practices

Table 19 shows the Test of Significant on participants’ perceptions of active

pedagogical practices

States/Participants N Mean Std. df. t Sig.

Deviation

Civic Teachers 299 4.8294 1.61512

Civic Young 579 3.2763 1.19885 876 -14.669 .000

Learners

The data for this study found significant differences between civic teachers and young
learners (in the two states) on perceived usage of active pedagogical practices explored
in this study. Table 7.4:1above reveals that teachers agreed more on their use of these
pedagogical practices than young learners. As stated above, young learners’ perceived
non-usage could be due to their non-involvement in both pre-lesson planning and actual
lesson participation (Ogundare, 2010). Civic teachers could have misconceptions on what
active pedagogical (learner-centred) practices entail due to inadequate skills consequent
upon lack of training (Chapter 6). The focus group responses above showed most teachers
were imperious in their civic classroom teaching and learning through engaging more in
didactic and recitation instead of teacher and students or student and student classroom
interactions.

7.5:2 Participants’ School Location and Active Pedagogical Practices

Table 20 Test of Significant on school locations and active pedagogical practices

School Locations N Mean Std. df. t Sig.

Deviation

Teachers/Urban 203 11.0443 1.0041

Teachers/Rural 94 10.3511 1.27598 295 4.796 .004

Young 551 3.2668 1.63473 576 -631 .020

Learners/Urban

Young 28 3.4643 1.17006

Learners/Rural

206
Table 7.4:2 above revealed a significant difference in perceived usage of active
pedagogical practices among the participating young learners in rural and urban schools
in the two states. Although the mean values showed young learners in rural schools agreed
more on their teachers’ using active pedagogies than counterparts in urban schools this
could be due to an inability to differentiate between the teacher and the learner based
teaching and learning activities. This was contrary to urban young learners who opposed
their teachers’ perceived usage of active pedagogical practices due to non-involvement in
classroom activities. Lack of exposure and experience by learners on active involvement
in classroom teaching could result from using unqualified teachers and lack of
instructional materials.

Also, the table indicated a significant difference in perceived usage of active pedagogies
among participating civic teachers from rural and urban school locations in the two states.
The mean values in Table 7.4:2 discloses that civic teachers in urban schools agreed more
on the use of these pedagogies than counterparts in rural schools. Since, research evidence
above showed dramatisation was the only active participatory method used, it implies that
urban civic teachers could possibly have adopted just dramatisation in contrast to their
counterparts in rural schools. In the Nigerian context, rural location is synonymous to
rejected or neglected locations as regards the provision or availability of educational
facilities including school resources (Olanrewaju, 1999). Schools in rural locations were
hardly provided with learning resources thus deterring more qualified teachers from going
there (Akintunde, 2004). Because of this, young learners in rural schools lacked requisite
socio-political and media interactions and exposure through school civic clubs, radio,
television, videos and other sources of interaction which could foster effective citizenship
development. Due to lack of school resources, young learners in rural locations could not
face the same civic and citizenship challenges as their counterparts in urban schools
(Falade, 2007).

7.5:3 Participants’ Gender and Active Pedagogical Practices

Females used to perceive anything about socio-political issues as the exclusive domain
of males and this seems to have degenerated to the school level. However, females are
now showing a moderate interest in participating in Nigeria’s political process and this
was reflected in the classroom teaching of civic issues using diverse pedagogical styles.

207
Table 21 Test of significant on gender’s perceptions of active pedagogies

States/Participants N Mean Std. df. t Sig.

Deviation

Male Teachers 82 10.8537 1.24843

Female Teachers 216 10.8148 1.18241 296 249 .331

Male Young 227 3.2555 1.56734 576 -318 .103

Learners

Female Young 351 3.2991 1.64020

Learners

In contrast to the other two variables above, data reveals in Table 7.4:3a lack of significant
difference regarding gender. Both male civic teachers and learners and female civic
teachers and learners (in the two states) claimed that active pedagogical practices were
applied in the civic classrooms. The table (mean) above revealed that male teachers
agreed more while male learners agreed less on the use of these pedagogical practices
than female teachers and learners. Thus, the mean values for female civic teachers and
their learners depicted their desires for more usage of active pedagogical practices. In
Nigeria, various women’s NGOs were championing more female interest and
participation through diverse advocacy and literacy programmes to attract females into
civic and political activities. This advocacy and literacy campaign led to (as stated in
Chapter 5), the relative involvement of more women in the Nigeria’s political process
could inspire the need for more knowledge and requisite dispositions and participatory
skills through school and classroom pedagogical practices (Mansaray, 1999; Ajiboye,
2002; Falade, 2007). This study perceived that appropriate and relevant active teaching
styles could induce male and female young learners to exhibit citizenship and civic traits.

7.5:4 Teachers’ Years of Teaching Experience and Active Pedagogical Practices

Table 22 Teachers’ Years of Teaching Experience and Active Pedagogies

Year of Teaching Experience N Subset for alpha = .05

31 YEARS AND ABOVE 8 10.1250
21 - 30 YEARS 30 10.5333
11 - 20 YEARS 88 10.5795
10 YEARS AND BELOW 17
11.0349
2
Sig. .081

208
 Figure 3 Teaching Experience and Active Pedagogies
11.20

11.035

11.00

10.80

Mean of TRATM
10.58
10.60 10.533

10.40

10.20
10.125

10.00

10 YEARS AND 11 - 20 YEARS 21 - 30 YEARS 31 YEARS AND

BELOW ABOVE

YEAR OF TEACHING EXPERIENCE

Similar to Table 22 above, Table and Chart 10 shows lack of significant difference among
the groups. However, the mean value of teachers with the least teaching experience (10
years and below) revealed their claims to more usage of active pedagogical practices.
This could be due to the new education reforms which commenced in the last 16years.
This reform has witnessed rapid curriculum review involving an activity/issue/value-
oriented civic curriculum at the basic and senior levels in accordance with current global
realities (NPE, 2004). As a teacher educator, I am aware of curriculum innovations
regarding teaching our pre-service teachers’ knowledge and skills about new pedagogies.
Evidently, these sets of teachers (10 years and below) could have received such
knowledge and skills on these active pedagogies and possibly implemented them in the
civic classroom. However, it still remains to be seen whether such pedagogies are
effectively practised in the civic classroom. It should be noted that pre-service knowledge
and skills could be outdated, thus, the need for regular in-service training for civic
teachers irrespective of school locations, experience and gender, is a necessity.

7.6 Conclusion

This study revealed an eclectic classroom implementation process regarding active

pedagogies. While pedagogies like open classroom discussions, dramatisation and
simulation showed positive impacts, others such as classroom group discussions, role-
play and leading discussions resulting in recitation were impracticable. Such
impracticability was not just due to classroom implementation constraints but also
teachers’ curriculum implementation perspectives involving either objectivist or
interactive and participatory perspectives. The objectivists rigidly focused more on
curriculum coverage which entails tight control of the classroom teaching and learning
process and the interactive and participatory engage learners in more creative activities.
These constraints could be due to lack of hands-on continuous teacher education
209
(preservice and in-service trainings) which induce cooperative (both teacher and learner)
classroom activities and higher-order perceptions of civic issues via active pedagogies.
Effective practice of these pedagogies in the civic classroom enhances young learners’
inquiry skills since discovery leads to retention. Also, to guide young learners to define
issue(s) within the context of their experiences and relate citizenship issues to their daily
activities with the intent to find solutions to problems is vital. Moreover, it induces easy
and permanent recall of facts learnt which is consistent with the maxim ‘What I hear, I
forget; what I see, I recall and what I do, I know.’

210
 Chapter 8:

Strengths, Limitations, Recommendations and Conclusions

8.0 Introduction

In this chapter, I discuss the findings and outcomes of this study on whether civic
curriculum objectives are attainable through classroom civic curriculum implementation.
Also, I examine whether implementing this curriculum content is underpinned by
adequate school resource provision and which classroom pedagogies are practiced. Doing
this involves giving a synopsis of the study regarding the goals, research questions and
major findings. I highlight implications of the study, contributions to knowledge,
recommendations from the findings, strengths and limitation, areas of further study and
conclusions.

8.1 Synopsis (Overview) of the Study

This study was to discover how civic curriculum content was implemented in the
classroom to develop learners' knowledge, dispositions and skills. I started with exploring
whether civic curriculum objectives were appropriate for knowledge construction,
developing skills and dispositions. Also, I examined school resource provision and which
pedagogies were used to teach civic (issues) content. I recognised that disparity in civic
teachers' academic and professional training could lead to diverse teaching practices in
the classroom. This makes it expedient to grasp how these affected their classroom
activities to mediate learners' civic concepts constructions and its internalisation to
develop skills and dispositions. From these a pertinent question to answer is: ‘whether
classroom teaching of civic content was supported by adequate school resources and
relevant pedagogies to achieve civic objectives?’ These issues were translated into the
following research questions to guide my investigation:
1a. Do civic experts perceive civic curriculum intents (objectives) as appropriate to
construct civic knowledge, and develop dispositions and skills in young learners? (open
and closed questionnaire)
1b. Do young learners perceive civic curriculum content impacts on their civic
knowledge, dispositions and skills development? (questionnaire and focus group)
(Chapter 5)
2. Do civic teachers perceive school resources as adequate to develop civic knowledge,
dispositions and skills in young learners? (questionnaire and focus group) (Chapter 6)

211
3. Which classroom pedagogies do civic teachers employ to develop civic knowledge,
dispositions and skills in young learners? (questionnaire and focus group) (Chapter 7)

In answering the research questions, I used mixed methods research involving open and
closed questionnaire surveys and focus group discussions to collect data from which I
deduced my findings. I collected data from civic teachers (curriculum implementers) and
young learners (curriculum consumers) in Lagos and Ogun States, a southwest geo-
political zone in Nigeria and citizenship (experts) lecturers who participate in curriculum
planning, design and teachers' training. I should state that the qualitative (open-
questionnaire and focus groups) responses were distinct from the quantitative (closed
questionnaire survey) findings. The findings were meant to give an in depth account of
participants perceived multiple realities of the survey questionnaire.

8.2 Summary of the Findings

From each research question, I deduced the following key findings:

1(a) Do civic experts perceive civic curriculum intents (objectives) as appropriate to
construct civic knowledge, develop dispositions and skills in young learners?

I found that civic objectives were designed to transmit political citizenship knowledge
which is a common practice in our schools. Most civic experts claimed the objectives
were designed to guide learners to construct knowledge on politically-based issues like
the constitution, governmental roles, rights, inter alia. These experts underlined political
knowledge because functional citizenship was imperative after prolonged military rule
which has turned many Nigerians into political illiterates. Political literacy could develop
positive dispositions which nurture national consciousness for effective political
participation. Apart from political literacy, civic experts claimed that the objectives could
trivially develop skills and dispositions required for democratic practice and sustenance.
Overall, this study found a symbiotic link among knowledge, dispositions and skills
which signified that developing effective citizenship requires guiding learners to imbibe
the three citizenship components. This entails holistic development which involved
gradually internalising knowledge via experiential learning in schools to acquire skills
and dispositions.
1b Do young learners perceive that civic content actually develops those components
regarding political and/or nongovernmental citizenship?

212
This study, also showed that civic content transmitted political citizenship knowledge as
evident in learners' display of (cognitive) ability to define citizenship concepts. However,
defining concepts like nationalism, patriotism, apathy, inter alia, is the lowest level of
cognition in the teaching and learning process. Interestingly, learners showed the
capability to engage in practical citizenship by expressing views on political issues,
thereby showing confidence to discuss with their representatives on issues like
governance, human rights, corruption and if required partake in peaceful protests instead
of showing apathy. Also, this study proved that civic content had a trivial impact on
learners' dispositions and skills to nongovernmental citizenship activities. Such impact
was due to the use of the civic extracurricular programme to practice knowledge
constructed, especially in Ogun as against Lagos schools. Also, the schools'
extracurricular activities integrated the community into classroom civic learning.

Findings on demographic variables showed significant difference in the civic content

impact on conventional knowledge of learners from Ogun as opposed to learners in
Lagos. Similarly, civic content revealed more impact on civic knowledge of senior
secondary in contrast to junior learners. Senior learners constructed more complex
concepts and connected such concepts to develop higher order thinking. Conversely, there
is a lack of significant difference regarding civic content impact on the gender and school
locations of participants. Civic content had equal positive impacts on both boys and girls
as well as between urban and peri-urban schools. But focus on knowledge was more
evident in urban schools than rural counterparts because urban learners were more
exposed to better school resources and pedagogies.

2 Do civic teachers perceive school resources were adequate for classroom

implementation of civic content? (questionnaire and focus group)

The study revealed that though teachers were recruited the recruitment of qualified
teachers was inadequate. Thus, a stopgap used for inadequate teachers' recruitment was
personnel improvisation which entails seconding related and unrelated subject teachers
to teach civic education. The government’s improvisation plan was to use subject teachers
sharing similar content with civic education but actual practice showed schools
improvising with unrelated subject content teachers like agricultural science, commerce,
accounting, business studies and religious studies. Also, this study showed that personnel
improvisation made civic curriculum classroom teaching ineffective because teachers

213
displayed poor civic content knowledge and teaching skills though contending with
excess teaching loads and large class size.

I found an overwhelming presence of civic teachers without in-service training or

retraining to renew content knowledge and teaching skills. Teachers felt neglected,
alienated and superfluous to the civic curriculum implementation process. However,
exhibiting commitment led to initiating individual or group empowerment training within
their deprived professional setting to renew content knowledge and pedagogical skills.
Teachers used their personal resources to research information on identified citizenship
issues via the internet to ensure functionality, professional survival and career
development. Albeit, the study indicated that in-service training attendance lacked impact
on civic classroom teaching because it only offered teachers general knowledge and also
the school setting is hostile to learning due to congested classes.

There was lack of consensus among teachers on the quality of civic textbook content.
While some teachers see the textbooks as relevant and suitable, others viewed these
textbooks as lacking in quality to teach civic content. Also, the study revealed that
available civic hand/textbooks were inadequate to make a positive impact in teaching core
subjects like the civic curriculum. Thus, civic teachers lacking handbooks could not make
adequate pre-lesson preparation which led to poor pedagogical practices and content
delivery. Therefore, lack of quality and inadequate provision of civic textbooks led to
civic teachers patronising private authors of civic textbooks. Also, availability and
utilisation of other relevant instructional materials like charts, diagrams and maps to
implement civic education in schools were trivial and inadequate. Thus, teachers had to
improvise these materials since schools lacked instructional resource rooms. This led
civic teachers to develop alternative materials within their immediate locality to show
their creativity and initiative.

3) Did civic teachers apply active or didactic pedagogies during classroom teaching
of civic content? (questionnaire and focus group)
This study showed eclectic classroom pedagogical practices among participating civic
teachers. They applied diverse pedagogical styles like open classroom discussion,
dramatisation, simulation and didactic (recitation). These pedagogies mediated active
dialogues high content recall, sense of civic duties and possible involvement in
citizenship activities. However, open classroom discussion was dominated by civic

214
teachers through recitation which barely afforded learners a chance to probe or discuss
citizenship issues from diverse perspectives during classroom teaching and learning.

Conversely, civic teachers found methods like role-play and classroom group discussion
impracticable in the classroom because pre-service teacher education was more
theoretical and abstract. More so, teachers could not use their mother-tongue to practice
these pedagogies. Also, these pedagogies were impracticable due to large class sizes,
unsuitable and hostile classroom setting, inadequate timetable periods, rowdy and
disorderly lessons and learners lacking interest.

On the test of significance, I found a significant difference between civic teachers and
learners perceived use of active pedagogical practices. Civic teachers agreed more on
their use of these pedagogical styles in contrast to learners. Also, I found a significant
difference in perceived usage of active pedagogical practices regarding school locations
(rural and urban). However, learners in rural schools agreed more on their teachers’ use
of active pedagogies than urban schools. My findings showed a lack of significant
difference regarding gender. Both male civic teachers and learners and female civic
teachers and learners claimed that active teaching styles were applied in the civic
classrooms. The male teachers agreed more while the male learners agreed less on the use
of these pedagogical practices than female teachers and female learners. This result
reflected that female civic teachers and their learners desired more usage of active
pedagogical practices. I found a lack of significant difference among teachers regarding
their years of teaching experience. Young teachers claimed more usage of active
pedagogical practices. This could be due to the self-empowerment programme of young
civic teachers to cope with the challenges that an activity and issue-based civic curriculum
at basic and senior levels posed to these teachers. Evidently, these young teachers
received such knowledge and skills on these active pedagogies and used them in the civic
classroom.

8.3 Implications of Research Findings

This study revealed that actualising the civic curriculum was difficult due to the exclusion
and non-sensitisation of teachers and learners as main stakeholders and actors in Nigeria's
education sector. This led to the misconception of aspects of the civic education
objectives as imposing foreign citizenship norms despite claiming that the curriculum is
designed to mediate Nigeria's socio-political values. The civic experts viewed the
objectives on MDGs and emergent contemporary issues as post-colonial citizenship
215
legacy inbuilt to dissociate learners from their historical, geographical and political
milieu. Most civic experts in this study found these imported foreign ideas as lacking
relevance to the immediate socio-political milieu. Arguably, these participants perceived
civic curriculum from a narrow (traditional) perspective of mediating political citizenship
issues. However, the lesson learnt is when policy and programme actors and stakeholders
like teachers and learners lack adequate insight and awareness on civic curriculum goals,
methods and expected outcomes, then ignorance and indifference to such programmes
could lead to poor implementation.

As stated in the findings above, civic experts and learners' data showed that civic
curriculum objectives and content focused more on guiding learners to construct
knowledge. This depicts that civic curriculum implementation focused on impacting
'education about citizenship' in our learners. This is a traditional school driven civic
programme which guides learners to memorise information and facts about Nigeria's
political and constitutional development, governmental structures and functions, rights
and duties, inter alia. This denied learners the chance to develop 'education through
citizenship' and 'education for citizenship' traits which underpins the practice of
knowledge constructed through experiential learning. Evidently, learners lacked exposure
to community-based socio-political activities which could have enabled them develop
other citizenship components such as skills and dispositions due to a lack of school
extracurricular programmes.

This study revealed as part of its findings personnel improvisation which involved
drafting in of teachers of unrelated and related subjects to teach civic curriculum. These
teachers' lack of relevant content knowledge and pedagogical skills resulted in the failure
of the curriculum to attain its objectives. The study showed that some unqualified civic
teachers used general knowledge of political happenings within their milieu to teach
citizenship issues. At best, such teachers focus more on knowledge inculcation applying
didactic pedagogies to induce learning by recall or memorisation. Also, using unqualified
teachers induces over-reliance on textbooks content learning whether relevant or not.

Moreover, unavailability of the relevant and appropriate instructional materials like

teachers' and learners' hand/textbooks, charts, inter alia, leads to ineffective teaching in a
country where textbooks are viewed as the most readily available instructional material

216
(Okobia, 2012). Obviously, teachers lacking content knowledge will depend on
hand/textbooks as the main learning resources (Idowu & Hassan, 2005; Mezieobi, 2008;
Sofadekan, 2012). To such teachers a lack of civic textbooks is a barrier to effective
content delivery which leads to non-realisation of civic goals. This explains why some
teachers patronised private authors for textbooks not approved by government. Though it
has been shown that relevant subject textbooks could aid learners effective citizenship,
yet promoting inapt textbooks could undermine effective implementation of the civic
curriculum. Even more so studies have shown that current civic education textbooks are
not from reputable specialists/authors, (DuBey (1980) cited in Sofadekan, (2013)).
Personnel improvisation could make it possible for unrelated subject teachers to author
civic textbooks based on general knowledge. Undue reliance on civic textbooks makes
civic classroom implementation one-way traffic that is developing a restricted style of
imparting civic content to learners.

My findings showed that related and unrelated subject teachers used for classroom
implementation of civic education lacked adequate government-sponsored training.
These teachers were ill-prepared to teach the subject due to poor pre/in-service teacher
training. Nigerian civic classrooms are filled mostly with 'curriculum illiterates' who are
inexpert and unqualified civic curriculum implementers and guides (Kosemanin, 1984;
Mkpa, 2005; Ogunyemi, 2010, p5). This makes ineffective various civic curriculum
developments and creativity initiated towards achieving civic education objectives.
Without doubt a teacher lacking continuous professional development will be textbook
obsessed, didactic-driven and knowledge-oriented. This (see 3.4:2 (ii) (b)) triggers
teachers' lack of commitment, passion and enthusiasm required during classroom
implementation to effectively impact positive change in learners' citizenship
development.

Though this study found eclectic pedagogical practices, yet civic teachers' classroom
practices focused more on didactic and recitation methods. These methods expose and/or
transmit civic information for memorisation and thus make it impossible to develop
effective citizenship. An issue and activity based civic curriculum requires interactive and
participatory classroom teaching and learning which makes learners appreciate
themselves as the major instructional resources during a civic classroom lesson. Civic
teachers need to create a classroom setting where civic learners could simulate

217
community socio-political activities in the school through participatory, interactive and
activity based civic curriculum.

8.4 Implication for policy and practice

From my data analyses, I discovered a lacuna between civic education programme intent
and school and classroom implementation and practice in Nigeria. This requires
connecting the findings of this study to actual practice by outlining specific areas for
better implementation.

In this study, there are civic issues in the objectives which require more clarification
through curriculum review and enrichments. Objectives on MDGs and contemporary
emergent issues look too abstract and theoretical to show relevance to our immediate
realities and thus requires further simplification for curriculum implementers to
appreciate. Though these issues reflect Nigeria’s subscribing to global citizenship
realities, however, these realities should be made relevant to our immediate milieu so that
key curriculum stakeholders and implementers can imbibe and implement with zeal and
commitment. Such appreciation could be fostered though adequate training which
provides knowledge, resources and pedagogies appropriate for classroom learning and
practice through extracurricular learning.

Also, this study revealed an overemphasis on conventional (political) citizenship at the

expense of social and community citizenship. This overemphasis on political issues
depicts effective citizenship development from a narrow (traditional) outlook of coercing
young learners to be initiated into the political sphere. Current global civic learning and
practice is inducing participation in nongovernmental activities and Nigerian learners
should be induced to engage in such programmes since not everybody will become
politicians. Thus, civic objectives echoing political issues while giving marginal space to
nongovernmental issues require a review. Stressing multiculturalism, global social
cohesion and ecological activism, which depicted nongovernmental citizenship, in the
civic curriculum can help learners acquire dispositions and skills to induce national and
global peace, conflict resolution, integration, tolerance, cooperation and collaboration.

Overall, improving civic education implementation in schools requires continuous

professional development which adequately equip our teachers with current information

218
on the content and pedagogies. This study revealed that most of our teachers are stale,
even those that are engaged in self-development are restricted by resources available for
empowerment. Notwithstanding such self-development, government should rise up to its
statutory responsibility of organising in-service training on a regular basis for related and
unrelated teachers participating in the classroom implementation of civic education.

8.5 Research contributions

This research adds to existing studies on civic curriculum programme implementation in

Nigeria and globally. It explores whether civic objectives are appropriate to mediate
knowledge, dispositions and skills as well as the school resources provided and classroom
pedagogies used to teach civic content.

This study for the first time presents civic content implementation which viewed effective
citizenship to involve learners' participation in both nongovernmental (apolitical) and
political citizenship. This is evident in the proposed civic curriculum content which
integrates the two citizenship traits for learners' balanced participation. This study has
given a broader definition of what effective citizenship development entails as against
extant citizenship studies in Nigeria and globally. This is an improvement from the prior
narrow political view which initiated learners into the existing political setting by
instilling national identity, unity, loyalty, government roles, rights and duties, inter alia.

Also, the result of this study, for the first time, showed that holistic development of
citizenship traits needs experiential learning overlooked by prior studies. This allows
future research on civic content implementation to consider the imperative of school
extracurricular programmes impact to induce the practice of classroom knowledge
constructed.

Since civic education was reintroduced in Nigeria and in all my years as teacher educator
and researcher, this is possibly the first academic study which covers in one study key
stakeholders at every facet of the curriculum process in Nigeria. In this study, I used a
college of education/university lecturers who partake in curriculum planning,
development and teachers (curriculum implementers) training. Also, I used secondary
school teachers who are civic curriculum implementers and actors in the citizenship
socialisation process as well as learners who utilize the curriculum. These stakeholders

219
gave their perceptions regarding the diverse components of the civic curriculum which
hardly attracts the attention of previous studies. Also, this study developed an effective
citizenship scale which can now be included to the limited measurement scales existing
for further studies (Finkel & Enst, 2005; IEA, 2002).

Relatively few extant studies explored curriculum objectives due to its misconception as
abstract and its influence on other aspects of the curriculum. This makes it unattractive
for teacher education researchers to explore in contrast to other curriculum components.
Still, this study examined almost all curriculum components aside from evaluation which
I perceived as a well-researched area in Nigeria. Assessing these vital components using
key stakeholders in the education sector puts me in a proper position to advise policy
makers on the ways of developing sound and effective citizenship in Nigeria.

This study provides evidence that civic education, as presently implemented, focuses
more on mediating learners' knowledge construction. That is, most of the objectives
stressed knowledge construction than other citizenship components. Also, the study data
showed the objectives, marginally, touch on developing dispositions and skills. Stressing
these citizenship components revealed the symbiotic links among these citizenship
components making it possible for civic objectives to develop knowledge, dispositions
and skills holistically. Knowledge constructed could be internalised and practiced to
develop dispositions and skills. However, most extant Nigerian studies showed that the
curriculum objectives induce knowledge construction independent of other citizenship
components (Ogunyemi & Mansaray, 1994; Ifegbesan, 2008; Ahmad, 2011).

Prior extant studies only posit that most classroom teachers are unqualified to teach civic
education and other subjects. However, this study went further to evolve the concept of
'personnel improvisation' to explain teachers' role substitution process. This concept
entail drafting related and unrelated subject teachers lacking content knowledge and
pedagogical skills peculiar to teaching civic and citizenship content.
This study revealed civic teachers' academic diligence and inquiry skills by using personal
resources to engage in self and group directed empowerment programmes to renew their
content knowledge and pedagogical skills. This is despite the teachers operating in a
professionally deprived context whereby government refused to provide in-service
training and other resources required to effectively implement civic curriculum. This

220
finding differs from prior studies depicting teachers as academically indolent, lacking
passion, commitment, zeal and enthusiasm and engaging in unethical practices like
absenteeism, improper and inadequate planning and preparation for civic lessons
(Nacino–Brown et al, 1982; Abari, 2004).

Also, most international (ICCS/IEA and other) studies on civic and citizenship education
explored external(sociological/demographic) variables rather than school and classroom
factors to expound the disparity in learners' civic learning.However, Peterson (2010) and
Kerry (2010) posited that teacher educators should explore how classroom pedagogies
affect learners' civic learning. In response, this study deviated from the popular research
area to explore the relatively rare area regarding how classroom implementation of civic
curriculum is mediated by school resources and classroom pedagogies to achieve
curriculum objectives.

This study discovered a different dimension to classroom pedagogical practices by

revealing that classroom implementation of civic content was eclectic. That is, civic
teachers integrated open classroom discussions, simulation and dramatisation with
didactic methods. This is distinct from extant local and international studies with a general
consensus that pedagogy in Nigerian secondary education classrooms lacks modern
pedagogical practices by depending more on didactic methods like lecturing, memorising
and reciting teaching styles (Ango et al, 2003; Theobald et al, 2007; Hardman et al, 2008;
Sofadekan, 2012).

8.6 Theoretical Contribution

This study affirmed the role of schools in using the civic curriculum to mediate social-
political initiation and reformation as suggested in different theories. Thus, the study
reveals the relevance of MCowan’s (2006) and Winton’s (2007) postulations regarding
civic curriculum implementation by our schools to initiate learners into the existing socio-
political sphere. This study showed that Nigerian schools use civic content to teach
citizenship issues to infuse national unity, identity, loyalty and obedience to rules, as an
effective citizenship trait (Kerr, 1999; Lott, Jr, 1999; Schugurensky & Myers, 2003;
Husam, 2006; Cantoni, et., al 2014).

Also, the modernisation theory subsumed into citizenship theories (2.3:2 and 2.3:2(b)) is
relevant to this study because findings from focus group response (5.4:1) showed that
221
some teachers implemented/engaged civic curriculum to develop learners’ critical
citizenship skills to resist extant citizenship vices to depict citizenship transformation.
This was evident in the participating learners exhibiting their critical citizenship skills by
articulating issues of national interests (Benavot, 1996; Schugurensky & Myers, 2003;
Winton, 2007; Zaman, 2006). Learners' active engagement in citizenship initiation and
reformation classroom activities (see 7.2:1b) reflects the use of social constructivist,
transformative, inter alia, pedagogies (2.5 above) to teach civic issues. These learning
pedagogies depict learners’ engaging in dialogic interaction (5.4:1) to construct
knowledge as active meaning makers. So, using these learning pedagogies makes learners
active knowledge constructors instead of mere consumers. Their participation in focus
groups (5.4:2) showed that collaborative discussions create common insights into civic
issues during classroom activities. From the above, I argued that civic curriculum
pedagogy needs learning pedagogies mentioned above in order to engage learners in
dialogic interaction as a hallmark of active engagement which mediates knowledge
construction rather than as mere consumers.

8.7 Limitations and Strengths

8.7:1 Limitations

It should be noted that the limitation faced while conducting this study could possibly
impact on the results and findings. The study could not be generalised due to the limited
states (Lagos and Ogun) sampled. Sampling two states out of the six in the south-western
geo-political zone as well as using purposive sampling for focus group participants might
not adequately reflect a representation of the entire population to generalise the findings.
However, restricting the study to these two states was due to funding, logistic and
insurgencies in other geo-political zones directly or indirectly. Also, I restricted the study
to those directly involved in curriculum planning, design and more importantly
implementation. Thus the study lacked any contribution or input whatsoever from
bureaucrats and policy makers, school heads and parents. Their contributions to effective
civic implementation could be a subject of another study. Thus, the data represents the
perceptions of stakeholders directly involved in curriculum implementations in the two
states. Similarly, the study was restricted to school knowing that this is just an agency of
civic and citizenship socialisation and culture as stated in Chapter 2. However, I am not
unaware that other agents such as the family, religious and peer groups could impact on

222
these learners' citizenship knowledge, dispositions and skills and thus could limit the
degree to which this study could be generalised.

Also, the number of participants for each of the focus group discussions could be
perceived as too large. As noted by qualitative researchers, sample size is not governed
by any rules but depends on intents and expected study outcomes, benefits derivable and
prudence regarding available time and resources (Patton 1990; Mclafferty, 2004).They
(researchers) argued that participants' numbers may vary from 4 to 20. Focus groups
should not be so large as to be unwieldy to exclude adequate participation by most
members nor should it be so small that it fails to provide substantially greater coverage
than that of an interview with one individual’ (Merton et al, 1990, p. 137; Powell et al,
1996).

Still on the focus groups this study adopted, it is noteworthy that the dynamics of this
type of method raised particular limitations and corresponding strengths discussed below.
Some participants refused to offer detailed accounts of their experiences and feelings due
to collective (group) effect. That is, some participants did not reveal their personal
experiences and feelings adequately since their views conformed with those already
expressed. Thus, consensus of opinions could have been a major limitation to openness
to discuss some issues further in this study. Also, such lack of openness by some
participants or refusal of some participants to express their views could be due to possible
domination of the group discussions by some participants. Moreover, this setting
restricted some participants from expressing their feelings and experiences due to fear of
possible reprisal from their employers, since participants were mostly unknown to one
another (Merton et al, (1956); Catterall & Maclaren, 1997).

Not much relevant literature and studies were available on classroom implementation of
civic education objectives. This could be because civic education is a relatively new
subject in the school curricula and so not much research has been conducted on this
aspect. Consequently, I had to rely on few studies and literature in some cases to make
deductions, though the context might be different. Notwithstanding the above limitations,
the findings from this study should offer the elements required for future research
(proposed below) due to the strengths of the study as discussed below.

223
8.7:2 Strengths

In this study, a mixed methods research was applied to collect data used to examine the
research questions. The survey questionnaire was used to sample participants on the civic
objectives, school resources provisions and pedagogical practices. In other words, a
strength of this study is using focus group discussions involving civic teachers and
learners to provide in-depth explanations to justify or otherwise quantitative data.
Therefore, the data results from the focus group discussions were used to underpin survey
questionnaire data results. This attests to the claim that most qualitative methods could
validate and vice versa other methods. Since this research involved the success or failure
of civic curriculum programme implementation in the two states, I used focus group
discussions to unearth reasons for school resource inadequacy and pedagogical practices
from teachers’ and learners’ perceptions in the survey questionnaire. Thus, I used focus
groups and open questions to generate in-depth explanations for survey questionnaire
findings. Judiciously integrating these methods in this research has improved and
validated my findings.

Also, using focus groups in this study offers an interactive setting for some participants
to reveal their experiences and feelings on the school and classroom civic curriculum
implementations as feedback to policy makers in a secured, conducive and permissive
milieu. Focus groups helped me to obtain the true and sincere collective dispositions of
the participants showing the synergistic group (teachers and learners) effects. These
expressions were underpinned by participants' sense of security and openness through the
interactions which ensued among group members. Of course, there could be (as stated
above) a feeling of fear of reprisal, yet most participants were outspoken due to the
assurance given to them that their feelings and experiences would be of the group instead
of individuals. They realised that expressions are not attributed to a particular participant
(Hess, 1990; Gibbs, 1997; Stewart & Shamdasani, 1990). These focus groups close the
gap between curriculum planners and developers, policy makers, bureaucrat and
curriculum implementers (teachers) and consumers (young learners). These participants
offered clear perspectives regarding the realities of school resources provisions,
practicable pedagogies and otherwise as well as the impact of civic contents in achieving
civic curriculum objectives.

Another strength of this study is being able to involve so many civic education teachers
and learners partaking in civic curriculum classroom implementation in Lagos and Ogun

224
states, and lecturers from various universities and colleges of education across Nigeria.
Their responses gave diverse realities on the various aspects of civic education curriculum
explored to determine the extent to which effective citizenship was developed in learners.
Another strength of this study is the newly developed perception scale which can be an
addition to measurement scales (if any) on civic education classroom implementation.

8.8 Recommendations

This study revealed that effective civic education implementation in schools can achieve
stated objectives if policy makers and bureaucrats take the following drastic actions: -

Introduce mandatory curriculum content enrichment which emphasises an extracurricular

programme. Teachers and learners need to practice knowledge constructed in the
classroom through excursions, student (voices) debates, parliamentary simulations,
service learning and other programmes which can bring classroom knowledge alive.

Also, curriculum planning and design should be done by a body independent of

government control and influence. Such a body should include stakeholders like teachers
and learners who practice the curriculum daily. Also, monitoring and supervision should
be handled outside of government control. This is because the fear of victimisation and
intimidation prevents teachers from engaging in teaching issues that go against the
government in power.

Successful curriculum implementation requires adequate prior planning for teacher

recruitment and training based on accurate data. Such planning should include shifting
the teacher education programme from its abstract and theoretical orientation to engaging
trainees in practical pedagogies involving social constructivists, transformative and
reflective inquiry learning. Improvising with teachers from other subjects such as
religious studies, accounting, business studies, agricultural science, geography,
sociology, economics, political science without prior retraining is not the best for
effective citizenship development. Such planning should make regular in-service training
a priority for civic education teachers. Teachers need to be acquainted with new civic and
citizenship developments and how these can be incorporated into diverse aspects of
classroom civic curriculum implementation.

225
Schools should have resource rooms where instructional materials could be developed,
utilised and stored. Teachers’ creativity and initiatives can be enhanced when induced to
develop instructional materials which will meet immediate local needs of young learners.

Effective performance of schools' citizenship (socio-political) reformation through

developing critical citizenship in learners requires teachers enjoying immunity from all
forms of reprisal leading to loss of job (except for unethical practices) while performing
their statutory classroom duties of imparting curriculum content. If judges and legislators
enjoy immunities while performing their statutory judicial and parliamentary duties, then
teachers should be protected by relevant legislation from any form of persecution by
government and private school owners. If schools' effective citizenship development is to
shift from mere socio-political initiation and inequalities, then teachers should be free to
guide learners, as future leaders, to imbibe basic relevant critical and global perspectives
of citizenship issues.

8.9 Suggestions for further research

Considering the findings and limitations of this study, it is necessary to conduct further
studies to examine specific areas of civic education curriculum. Thus, issues like:
1) Exploring the perceptions of civic teachers on social and community citizenship in the
civic education curriculum objectives.
2) The impact of civic education content on developing the critical thinking of Nigeria's
learners;
3) The impact of civic content and experiential learning through a school extracurricular
programme

8.10 Conclusion

Poor implementation of Social Studies led to disarticulating citizenship issues from the
content to form civic education. The intent was to focus solely on developing Nigerian
learners' effective citizenship. However, the findings of this study showed that civic
curriculum classroom implementation mainly emphasised learners' knowledge
construction and trivially developed dispositions and skills. Knowledge construction
alone is inadequate to develop effective citizenship, and requires practice to develop other
citizenship components. Consequently, this study proposes that the civic curriculum is
unable to achieve the stated objectives due to its overemphasis on learners' knowledge.

226
Also, curriculum implementation in the classroom, though eclectic however depends
more on didactic/recitation which lacks community-based experiential learning. Thus, I
argue that civic and citizenship content learning can be stimulated if qualified teachers
are provided with adequate regular training and retraining on current active pedagogical
skills and practice to enhance classroom teaching and learning and extracurricular
activities in the school.

227
References

Abari, A. O. (2004) Personnel Sources of Students Poor Academic Performance: A

Comparative Look. In Noah, A.O.K. Shonibare, D. O. & Olajunwon, T. (Eds.)
Curriculum Implementation and Professionalising Teaching in Nigeria. Lagos, A-Triad
Associates.
Abdi, A. A. Shizha, E. & Bwalya, I. (2006) Recasting postcolonial citizenship through
civic education: Critical perspectives on Zambia. Youth and Children's Studies, 3, 47-64.
Retrieved from, http://scholars.wlu.ca/brantford_yc/
Abdo, M. & Semela, T. (2010) Teachers of poor communities: The tale of instructional
media in primary schools of Gedeo zone, Southern Ethiopia. Australian Journal of
Teacher Education, 35 (7), 78-92.
Ackerman, B. (1980) Social Justice in the Liberal State. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale
University Press.
Adams, S. A. (2008) Paul the Roman Citizen: Roman Citizenship in the Ancient World
and Its Importance for Understanding Acts 22:22-29. In Porter, S.E. (ed.), Paul: Jew,
Greek, Roman (PAST 5; Brill), 309-26.
Adaralegbe, A. (1969) A philosophy for Nigerian education. A report of the National
Curriculum Conference 8-12 September.
Adedipe, V. O. (1985) Education and politics. In Oyeneye, O. Y. & Shoremi, M. O.
(Eds.), Sociology of education: A book of readings (pp. 71-87). Ibadan: Ogunsanya
Press Publishers Ltd.
Adelabu, M.A. (2005) Teacher motivation and incentives in Nigeria. Retrieved March
16, 2009, from http://www.research4development.info/PDF/Outputs/PolicyStrategy/3
888Teacher - motivation-Nigeria.pdf
Adenipekun, O. (2006) Stakeholders’ Move to Block Gaps in National Education
Policy. Vanguard Newspaper (p.35).
Adeniran, T. (2010) Civic Education in Nigeria Rebrand cited in Jekayinfa, A. A.
Mofoluwawo, E. O. & Oladiran, M. A. (2011) Implementation of civic education
curriculum in Nigeria: Challenges for Social Studies teachers. Nigerian Journal of Social
Studies, Vol. XIV (1). P147-155.
Adepoju, A. & Fabiyi, A. (2007) Universal Basic Education in Nigeria: Challenges and
prospects. Retrieved February 18, 2009, from
http://uaps2007.princeton.edu~download.aspx?submissionId=7O8
Adesina, S. (1986) Planning and educational development in Nigeria. Ibadan, Education
Industries Nig. Limited.
Adeyemi, (2007). Teacher preparation and availability for achieving basic education in
Ondo State, Nigeria. Humanity & Social Sciences Journal, 2(2), 1 59- 168.
Adeyemi, B. (1998) The problems of junior secondary teachers of social studies in
Botswana. The Social Studies, 89(5), 232-235.

228
Adeyinka, A. A. & Koloi, S. (2007) Teaching Effectiveness in some Botswana
Secondary Schools. African Journal of Educational Research. 11(1&2), pp 48-70.
Adeyinka, A. A. (2001) The Role of the teacher in National development. In the
Proceedings of the Biennial Conference on Teacher Education. Gaborone: Ministry of
Education, Department of teacher Training and Development.
Aduwa-Ogiegbaen S. O. & Imogie, A. I. (2005) Instructional communication and
technology in higher education Ibadan. Stirling Hordon publishers (Nig) Ltd.
Advisory Group on Citizenship (1998) Education for citizenship and the teaching of
democracy in schools. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority
Afigbo, A. E. (1991) Background to Nigerian federalism: Federal features in the
colonial state. Publius, 21(4), 13-29.
Aguilar, L. & Mariana Filgueira Risso, M. F. (2013) Youth Participation in Latin
America: A Fraud or a Myth? Latin America Policy Journal (LAPJ) vol. 2,
Ahmed, S. T. (2011) An Analysis of the Junior Secondary School (JSS) Civic
Education Performance Objectives: Implications for Classroom Practices. Nigerian
Journal of Social Studies, Vol. XIV (1): 207-214.
Ajibola, M. A. (2008) Innovations and curriculum development for basic education in
Nigeria: Policy priorities and challenges of practice and implementation. Research
Journal of International Studies, 8, 51-58.
Ajiboye, J. O. (2002) Providing training in good governance for secondary school
student: Implications for nations building. Nigerian Journal of Social Studies, VI, (1 &
2), 219-227.
Akinbote, S. Oduolowu, E. & Lawal, B. (2004) Pre-Primary and Primary Education in
Nigeria: A Basic Text. Ibadan. Stirling Hordon publishers (Nig) Ltd.
Akintunde, S. A. (2004) Effects of structured and unstructured group interactions
patterns on learning outcomes of primary school students on some environmental
education concepts. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
Akyeampong, K. Sabates, R. Hunt, F. & Anthony, J. (2009) Review of Research on
Basic Education Provision in Nigeria. Centre for International Education, University of
Sussex.
Aled, J & Bugge, C. (2006) Improving understanding and rigour through triangulation:
an exemplar based on patient participation in interaction. Journal of Advanced Nursing.
55, (5), pp. 612-621.
Alexander, R.J. (2006) Towards Dialogic Teaching (3rd edn.) New York: Diálogos.
Alexander R (2003) Still no pedagogy? Principle, pragmatism and compliance in
primary education. Cambridge: University of Cambridge
Alexander, R.J. (2001) Culture and Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary
Education. Oxford: Blackwell.

229
Ali, M. D. (2004) Objectives as an important pivot in curriculum planning,
Development and Implementation. In Noah, A.O.K. Shonibare, D. O. & Olajunwon, T.
(Eds.) Curriculum Implementation and Professionalising Teaching in Nigeria. Lagos,
A-Triad Associates.
Almarsdottir, A. B. & Traulsen, J. M. T (2009) Multimethod research into policy changes
in the pharmacy sector - The Nordic case. Research in Social and Administrative
Pharmacy (5) 82–90 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
Almond, G. & Verba, S. (1963) The Civic Culture. Princeton NJ: Princeton University
Press.
Aluede, R. (2006) Universal basic education in Nigeria: Matters arising. Journal of
Human Ecology, 20(2), 97-101.
Aluko, F (1998) Nigeria in Search of a Leader. 1st Ed. Akure: Flocel.

Alwin, D. F. (2001) Taking time seriously: Studying social change, social structure and
human lives. In Phyllis M. Glen H. E. Jr. & Kurt L. (eds) Examining lives in context:
Perspectives on the ecology of human development. Washington DC: American
Psychological Association
Al-Zyoud, N. S. (2011) An Investigation into the Current Service provision for Students
with Learning Difficulties in Jordan: Teachers’ Perspectives. A thesis submitted for the
degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Sport and Education Brunel University.

Amadeo, J. A. Torney-Purta, J. Lehmann, R. Husfeldt, V. & Nikolova, R. (2002) Civic

knowledge and engagement: An IEA study of upper secondary students in sixteen
countries. Amsterdam: IEA.
American Psychological Association (2009). Civic engagement. Available at:
http://www.apa.org/education/undergrad/civic-engagement.aspx.
Anaduaka, U & Okafor, S. (2013) The Universal Basic Education (UBE) Programme in
Nigeria: Problems and Prospects. Basic Research Journal of Education Research and
Review Vol. 2(3) pp. 42-48 March 2013 Available online
http//www.basicresearchjournals.org Copyright ©2013 Basic Research Journal.
Anamuah M. J. & Erinosho, S. (2007) Teacher Education Beyond; University four
Walls- Unpublished paper presented at UNESCO Conference in Accra.
Anderson, A. P. Pederson, P. Smith, E. & Sullivan, J. (1997) Divergent perspectives on
citizenship education: A q-method study and survey of social studies teachers. American
Educational Research Journal, 34(2), 333-364.
Andrews, T. (2012) What is Social Constructionism? The Grounded Theory Review,
Volume 11, Issue 1.
Andrews, R. Cowell, R. Downe, J. Martin, S. & Turner, D. (2008) Supporting effective
citizenship in local government: Engaging, educating, and empowering local citizens.
Local Government Studies, 34(4), 489–507.
Andrews, R. & Mycock, A. (2007) Citizenship Education in the UK: Divergence within
a Multi- National State, Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 73-88

230
Ango, M. Chinyere, O. A. & Busari, T. (2003) Quality of Basic Education in Nigeria.
Educational Research Network for West and Central Africa, Lagos, Nigeria, 15 May
2003, p80.
Anyaegbu, R. Christman, D. E. & Jingpu, C. (2004) The challenges of rural education
in Nigeria: Potential lessons from China. Journal of teaching and learning in diverse
settings, 1(2), 16 0- 17 4.
Anyaoku, E. (2011) Nigeria at 50: The Challenges of Nationhood. A paper Presented at
the NIM distinguished management Lecture organised by the Nigerian Institute of
Management (Chartered) on 7th July.
Apter, D. (1963) Ghana in Transition New York: Atheneum,

Arendt, H. (2002) La condición humana. Barcelona: Paidós.

Arisi, R. O. (1998) The use of instructional materials by Social Studies teachers in

secondary schools in Oredo local government area of Edo State. Journal of Social
Studies, 1 (1), 76.
Aroge, S. T. (2012) Civic education as a panacea to electoral malpractices in Nigeria.
Business and Management Research, 1(1), 141-146.
Arons, A.B. (1989) What science should we teach? In The Biological Science
Curriculum Study (ed.), A BSCS Thirtieth Anniversary Symposium: Curriculum
Development for the Year2000 (pp. 13-20). Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.

Arthur, J. & Martin, P. (2006) Accomplishing lessons in postcolonial classrooms:

comparative perspectives from Botswana and Brunei Darussalam. Comparative
Education, 42 (2), 177 – 202.
Asimeng-Boahene, L. (2007) Creating strategies to deal with problems of teaching
controversial issues in social studies education in African schools. Intercultural
Education, 18(3), 231-242.
Aulls, M. W. (1998) Contributions of classroom discourse to what content students
learn during curriculum enactment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 56-69.
Awanbor. D. (1998) The teacher and education in Nigeria: What prospects to the next
millennium? A keynote address presented at the Nigerian Union of Teachers delegate
conference, Sabongidda-Ora, Edo State Nigeria.
Awokoya, S. O. (1981) Futuristic perspectives of the quantity and quality of Nigerian
education. Education and Development. 1(2), July, 80-89.
Awolowo, O. (1947) Path to Nigerian Freedom. 1st Ed. London: Faber and Faber

Ayo, G. (2002). A comparative analysis of primary school teachers' participation in

continuing education programmes in Cameroon and Nigeria. Unpublished Doctoral
Dissertation, University of Ibadan.

231
Ayo, G. (2004) Continuing education: an essential tool for teacher empowerment in era
of universal basic education in Nigeria. International Journal of Lifelong Education,
23(2), 191-203.
Babbie, E. R. (1998) The practice of social research (8thed.) Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
Publishing Company.
Bandura, A. (1 997) Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
Banks, J. A. (2001) Citizenship Education and Diversity: Implications for Teacher
education. Journal of Teacher Education 52(1), 5-16.
Barbour, R. S. & Kitzinger, J. (1999) Developing Focus Group Research: politics, theory
and practice, London: Sage.

Barr, R. D., Barth, J. L & Shermis, S. S. (1977) Defining the social studies. National
Council for the Social Studies, Bulletin 51.

Barrionuevo, A. (2011) Kirchner achieves an easy victory in Argentina presidential

election. New York Times, 23 October.

Bar-Tal, D., & Harel, A. S. (2002) Teachers as agents of political influence in the Israeli
high schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(1), 121-134.
Baxter, P. & Jack, S. (2008) Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and
implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559. Retrieved
from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR13-4/baxter.pdf.

Beck, J. (1998) Morality and Citizenship in Education. London, Cassell.

Beiner, R. (1995) Introduction: Why Citizenship Constitutes a Theoretical Problem in the

Last Decade of the Twentieth Century in Beiner, R. (ed.) Theorizing Citizenship, NY:
State University of NY Press, pp. 1-28.
Bell, B. & Gilbert, J. (1996) Teacher development: A model from science education.
London: Falmer Press.

Bellamy, R. (2000) Rethinking Liberalism, London: Pinter.

Bellamy, R (2013) The Theories and Practices of Citizenship: Critical Concepts, 4

Volumes, R. Bellamy & M. Kennedy-MacFoy, (eds), Routledge, 2014, Forthcoming.
Bellamy, R. & Greenaway, J. (1995) The New Right Conception of Citizenship and the
Citizen’s Charter. Government and Opposition, 30, 4, 469–91.
Bello-Imam, I. B & Obadan, M. I. (2004) Democratic Governance and Development
Management in Nigeria's Fourth Republic (1999-2003). In Imam, I. B. and Obadan, M.
I. (Eds) Democratic Governance and Development Management in Nigeria's Fourth
Republic (1999-2003). Ibadan: JODAD Publishers 1-14
Benavot, A. (1996) Education and political democratization: Cross-national and
longitudinal findings. Comparative Education Review, 40 (4), 377-403.

232
Bennett, W. L. (2007) Civic Learning in Changing Democracies: Challenges for
Citizenship and Civic Education. In Dahlgren P. (Ed.) Young Citizens and New Media:
Learning and Democratic Engagement. New York: Routledge.
Bennett, W. L. (2008) Changing Citizenship in the Digital Age. In Bennett, W. L. (Ed.)
Civic life online: Learning how digital media can engage youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press pp.1-24.
Bennett, W. L. Wells, C. & Freelon, D. (2011) Communicating Civic Engagement:
Contrasting Models of Citizenship in the Youth Web Sphere. Journal of
Communication. 61 (5), 835 – 856.
Berlin, I. (1969) Four Essays on Liberty, Oxford: Oxford University Press
Bernard, R. & Campbell, L. (2005) Socio-cultural theory and the teaching of process
writing: The scaffolding of learning in a university context. Retrieved September 15,
2010, from http://www.netlibrary.com.
Bernstein B (2000) Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. Lanham, MD: Rowman
and Littlefield.
Biesta, G, (2013) The Beautiful Risk of Education. London, Paradigm Publishers
Biesta, G. & Miedema, S. (2002) Instruction or pedagogy? The need for a transformative
conception of education? Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 173-181.

Bilmes, J. (1975) Misinformation in verbal accounts: Some fundamental

considerations. Man, 10, 60-71.

Bimber, B. (2003) Information and American Democracy: Technology in the Evolution

of Political Power (Communication, Society and Politics), England, Cambridge
University Press.

Birzea, C. (2000) Education for Democratic citizenship: A lifelong Learning

perspective. Strasbourg: Council for Cultural Co-Operation (CDCC).
Black, T. R. (2003) Doing Quantitative Research. London: SAGE Publications Limited.

Blaikie, N. (1993) Approaches to Social Enquiry, 1st edition, Polity Press, Cambridge.

Blankenship, G. (1990). Classroom climate, global knowledge, global attitudes, political

attitudes. Theory and Research in Social Education, 18, 363-84.
Bloomfield, P. (2003) Local and National and global citizenship. Education 3 (13), 59-
67.
Bodrova, E. & Leong, D.J. (2012) Tools of the mind: Vygotskian approach to early
childhood education, In: Rooparine, J. L. & Jones, J. Approaches to Early Childhood
Education (6th ed.), 241-260.

Bolaji S.D. (2011) Dewey’s philosophy and contemporary education in Nigeria:

Implication for democracy and education. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis submitted to

233
Department of Education Foundations, Faculty of Education, University of Lagos-
Akoka, Nigeria.

Bolaji, S D. (2014) Intent to Action: Overcoming Barriers to Universal Basic Education

Policy Implementation in Nigeria. A Doctoral Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the
requirements for Doctor of Philosophy at Edith Cowan University.

Bolaji, S. T. (2014) Fostering Democratic Education in Nigeria. A paper presented at

the New Researchers in Philosophy of Education Seminar at the University of Sheffield
10-12 October.

Bolick, C. Benson, M, M. Coutts, C & Heinecke, W. (2003) Technology applications in

Social Studies teacher education. A survey of Social Studies methods. Contemporary
issues in technology and teacher education 3 (3). [Online] Available:
http//www.citejournal.org. /vol3/iss3/social studies/article/. cfm

Bolman, L.G. & Deal, T.E. (2003) Reframing of organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-
Bass

Bonk C. J., & Cunningham, D. J. (1998). Searching for learner-centred, constructivist,

and socio-cultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In Bonk, C.
J. & King, K. S. (Eds.). Electronic Collaborators: Learner-centred Technologies for
Literacy, Apprenticeship, and Discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 25-50.

Bonoma, T. (1985) Case Research in Marketing: Opportunities, Problems and a Process.

Journal of Marketing Research, 2(2), pp. 199-208.

Bouchard, P. (1996) Towards an etiological model of self-directed professional

development. Quebec, Canada: Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of
Canada.

Bowles, S. & H. Gintis (1976) Schooling in Capitalist America. Education Reform and
the Realities of Economic Life. London: Routledge and Kegan.

Bowling A. (2005) Measuring Health. A Review of Quality of Life Measurement Scales,

(3rd ed). Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.

Bowling, A. & Ebrahim, S. (2005) Handbook of Health Research Methods:

Investigation, Measurement and Analysis. Open University Press.

Boyd, C.O. (2000) Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. In P.L. Munhall
& C.O. Boyd (Eds.), Nursing research: A qualitative perspective (2nd ed). 454-475.
Boston: Jones & Bartlett.

Branson, M.S. (1998) The Role of Civic Education: An Education Policy Task Force
Position Paper from the Communitarian Network, Washington, DC: Centre for Civic
Education. (Retrieved July, 2010 from http://www.civiced.org/articles_role.html).

234
Bratton, M. & Liatto-Katundu, B. (1994) A Focus Group Assessment of Political
Attitudes in Zambia. African Affairs 93 (373): 535-563.

Bratton, M. Philip, A. Georgia, B. & Joseph, T. (1999) The Effects of Civic Education
on Political Culture: Evidence from Zambia. World Development 27 (5), 807-824.

Brendan H. (2015) Confusion in the Field! Providing Clarity on Constructivism and

Constructionism in Religious Education, Religious Education, 110(3), 289-302.
Brockbank, A. & McGill, I. (2007). Facilitating reflective learning in higher education.
Open University Press.

Brophy, J. (1990) Teaching social studies for understanding and higher-order

applications. The elementary school journal, 90(4), 351-371.

Brown, R. G. (1999) Middle school social studies in the cognitive revolution. The
Clearing House. V72, 327-331.

Brown, S. L. & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1996) Product innovation as core capability: The art
of dynamic adaptation. Working paper, Department of Industrial Engineering and
Engineering Management, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

Bruer, J. T. (1993) The Minds' Journey from Novice to Expert. American Educator 17:
6-15 & 38-46.

Bruner, J.S., (1983). Child’s Talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.

Bruns, N. & Grove, S. (2001) The practice of nursing research: Conduct, critique and
utilization. (4th ed). Toronto: W.B Saunders Company.

Bryman, A. (1988) Quantity and Quality in Social Research, London: Routledge.

Bryman, A. (2008) Social Research Methods. Oxford University Press.

Buchannan, M. T. (2007) Management of curriculum change: an analysis of religious

education coordinators’ perspectives on the management of a particular curriculum
change in Catholic secondary schools in the Archdiocese of Melbourne. Unpublished
PhD thesis, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Buckingham, D. (2006) in MacArthur online Discussion on Civic Engagement, Digital
Media and Learning. Online discussion (http://groups.google.com/group/civic-
engagement/about/).

Burns, R. B. (1997) Introduction to research methods (3rd ed.). NSW, Australia:

Longman.
Burnard, P. (1991) A method of analysing interview transcripts in qualitative research.
Nurse Education Today 11 (6), 461–466.

Butts, R. F. (1989) The Civic Mission in Educational Reform: Perspectives for the
Public and the Profession. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.

235
Bybee, R.W. (1993) Reforming science education: Social perspectives and personal
reflections. New York: Teacher's College Press.

Byrne, B. (2004) Qualitative interviewing. In Researching society and culture, 2nd

edition, ed. C. Seale, 179–92. [DS]
Calder B.J. (1977) Focus groups and the nature of qualitative marketing research.
Journal of Marketing Research 14(August), 353–364.

Campbell, D. E. (2001) Civic education: Readying Massachusetts’ next generation of

citizens: Pioneer institute for Public Policy Research.

Campbell, D.T. (1988) The experimenting society. In: Overman E. S. (ed.) Methodology
and Epistemology for Social Science: Selected Papers. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press; p. 290–314.
Caracelli, V. J. & Greene, J. C. (1993). Data Analysis Strategies for Mixed-Method
Evaluation Designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 15(2): 195-207.
Carens, J. H. (2000) Culture, Citizenship, and Community. A Contextual Exploration of
Justice as Even handedness, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Carey M. (1994) The group effect in focus groups: planning, implementing, and
interpreting focus group research. In Morse J. (ed.), Critical Issues in Qualitative
Research Methods London, Sage Publications, pp. 225–241.

Carl, A. (2005) The “voice of the teacher” in curriculum development: a voice crying
in the wilderness? South African Journal of Education, 25 (4): 223-228.

Carr, W. (1991) Education for citizenship. British Journal of Educational Studies,

39(4), 373-384.

Caspi, G. Downey & M. Moorehouse (eds.) Persons in context: Developmental

processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cheng-Man Lau, D. (2001). Analysing the curriculum development process: three

models. Pedagogy, culture and society (Wallingford, UK), vol. 9, no. 1, p. 29-44.

Chernus, K. & Fowler, D. (2010) Integrating curriculum: Lessons for adult education
from career and technical education. National Institute for Literacy. Washinton DC 2006.

Chikumbi T.J. & Makamure, R., (2000) Curriculum Theory, Design and Assessment.
The Commonwealth of Learning, Module 13, www.col.int/stamp/module13.pdf
(Accessed 17 August, 2009).

Clarke, P. B. (1978) Islam, education and the developmental process in Nigeria.

Comparative Education, 14(2), 133-141.

Clough, P. & Nutbrown, C. (2002) A Student’s Guide to Methodology. London: Sage.

236
Cogan, J. (2000) Citizenship education for the 21st century: setting the context. In Cogan,
J. & Derricott, R. (Eds). Citizenship for the 21st C: an international Perspective on
education London: Kogan Page. pp. 1-21.
Cogan, J. & Derricott, R. (2000) Citizenship for the 21st Century: An International
Perspective on Education. London: Kogan Page Limited.

Cogan, J., Morris, P. & Murray, P. (Eds.) (2002) Civic education in the Asia-Pacific
region: case studies across six societies. New York: Routledge Falmer.

Cogill J (2008). Primary teachers’ interactive whiteboard practice across one year:
changes in pedagogy 1 and influencing factors. EdD thesis King’s College University
of London. Available at www.juliecogill.com.

Cohen, J., (1999). “Changing Paradigms of Citizenship and the Exclusiveness of the
Demos”, International Sociology, 14 (3): 245–268.

Colbert, J.A., Brown, R.S., Choi, S. & Thomas, S. (2008). An investigation of the
impacts of teacher-driven professional development on pedagogy and student learning.
Retrieved September 12, 2009, from http://~~~~.highbeam.com/doc/l G 1-19 1
766560.html

Collier, P. & Vincente, P. (2008) Votes and Violence: Evidence from a Field
Experiment in Nigeria. University of Oxford and BREAD Working Paper.

Comber, M. (2003) Civics curriculum and civic skills: Recent evidence. College Park,
MD. the Centre for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement
(CIRCLE).
Comber, M. K. (2005) The Effects of Civic Education on Civic Skills. CIRCLE Fact
Sheet. Medford, MA. The Centre for Information and Research on Civic Learning &
Engagement. Retrieved March 15, from www.civicyouth.org.
Community Service Volunteers (2003) Citizenship in the curriculum one year on.
London: Community Service Volunteers.
Community Service Volunteers (2004) Citizenship in the curriculum: two years on.
London: Community Service Volunteers.
Cookey, S. J. (1969) Keynote address. In A. Adaralegbe (Ed.) Report of the National
Curriculum Conference. 8-12 September.

Coombs, P. H. (1985) The world crisis in education: the view from the eighties. New
York: Oxford University Press.

Corson, D. (1988) Oral Language Across the Curriculum. Clevedon: Multilingual

Matters.

Cranton, P. (2002) Teaching for Transformation. New Directions for Adult and
Continuing Education, 93(Spring), 63-71.

237
Creed, C. (2001) The use of distance education for teachers. London: DFID:
International research foundation for open learning.

Creswell, J. W. (2003) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods

Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Creswell, J. W. (2005) Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating

quantitative and qualitative research. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson
Education, Inc.
Creswell, J. W. (2007) Qualitative Inquiry and Research design: Choosing among five
approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, C.A: Sage Publications

Creswell, J. W. (2007) Concerns voiced about mixed methods research. Paper presented
at the International Qualitative Inquiry Congress, University of Illinois, Champaign.

Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007) Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods
Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W. Plano Clark, V. L. Gutmann, M. & Hanson, W. (2003) Advanced Mixed

Methods Research Designs. In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural
Research. Tashakkori, A & Teddlie, C. (eds.) Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Pp. 619-637.
Creswell, J.W. & Tashakkori, A. (2008) Editorial: How do research manuscripts
contribute to the literature on mixed methods? Journal of Mixed Methods Research,
2(2), 115-120.

Creswell, J. W. Goodchild, L. F. & Turner, P. P. (1996) Integrated qualitative and

quantitative research: Epistemology, history, and designs. In Higher education:
Handbook of theory and research, Smart, J. C. (ed.) New York: Agathon Press. 90-136.

Crossan, M., & Sorrenti, M. (1997) Making sense of improvisation. In J. P. Walsh & A.
S. Huff (Eds.), Advances in strategic management, vol. 14: 155-180. Greenwich, CT:
JAI Press.

Crosswell, L. J. & Elliott, R. G. (2004) Committed teachers, passionate teachers: the

dimension of passion associated with teacher commitment and engagement. In AARE
2004 Conference, 28th November - 2nd December, Melbourne, Australia.

Crotty, M. (1998) The foundation of social research: meaning and perspective in

research, 2nd edition, London. SAGE Publications Ltd.

Csapo, M. (1983) Universal primary education in Nigeria: Its problems and

implications. African Studies Review 26(1), 91-106.

Cuban, L. (1991) History of teaching in social studies. In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook

of research on social studies teaching and learning: A project of the National Council
for the Social Studies. (pp. 197-209). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Curzon, L. (1990) Teaching in Further Education: An outline of Principles and

Practices. 4th edition, London: Red Woods Books Limited.

238
Dahar, M.A. & Faize, F.A. (2011) Effect of the availability and the use of instructional
materials on academic performance of students in Punjab (Pakistan). Middle Eastern
Finance and Economics Issue 11.

Dahrendor, R. (1994) The Changing Quality of Citizenship. In Bart van Steenbergen

(1994) (ed.) Condition of Citizenship- (Politics & Culture Series) London, SAGE
Publications

Daily Sun Monday, October 12, 2009, p. 16.

Dalton, R. J. (2008) Citizenship Norms and the Expansion of Political Participation.

Political Studies, Vol. 56, 76–98.

Dalton, R. J. (2008) The Good Citizen: How a younger generation is reshaping

American politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Dan, B. (2010) Application of the Integrated Approach in Teaching Social Studies in

Ibandan PTC and Selected Primary Schools in Ibandan District. Unpublished Master of
Education Degree, Graduate School, Social Sciences and Arts, School of Education,
Makerere University.

Danmole, B.T (2011) Emerging Issues on UBE Curriculum in Nigeria: Implication for
the Science and Technology Component. Med-well Journals, Pakistan Journal of Social
Sciences Vol. 8(1): pp 62-68.

Darling Hammond, L. (1999) Teacher Quality and Student Achievement: A Review of

State Policy Evidence. Seattle, WA: Centre for the Study of Teaching and Policy,
University of Washington.

Darling Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of

state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archive, 8(1).

Darling Hammond, L. (2006) Assessing teacher education. Journal of Teacher

Education, 57(2), 120-138.

David, M. Edwards, R. & Alldred, P. (2001) Children and School Based Research:
‘informed consent' or educated consent'? British Educational Research Journal, 27(3),
347-365.

Dean, A. & Sharp, J (2006) “Getting the most from NUD*IST/NVivo” The Electronic
Journal of Business Research Methods Volume 4 Issue 1, pp 11 - 22, available online at
www.ejbrm.com

Delli Carpini, M. X. & Keeter, S. (1996) What Americans know about politics and why it
matters? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Denver, D. & Hands, H. (1990) Does studying politics make a difference? The political
knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions of school students. British Journal of Political
Science, 20, 63–88.
239
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research : Sage
Production, Inc. USA.

Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials.

London: Sage.

Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000) Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.).

Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

De Vaus, D. A. (1995) Survey in Social Research (4th ed.). New South Wales,
Australia: Allen & Unwin Pty Ltd.

Dillman, D. A. (2007) Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method (2nd
ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Dewey, John. (1938) Experience & Education. New York: Touchstone.

Dewey, J. (1996). In L. A. Hickman (Ed.), The collected works of John Dewey: The
electronic edition. Charlottesville, VA: Intelex Corporation.

Dewey, J. (1997) [originally published 1916]). Democracy and education. An

introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Free Press.

Dibbon, D (2004) It’s About Time. A Report on the Impact of Workload on Teachers
and Students. Faculty of Education, Memorial University of Newfoundland.

Dietz, M. (1992) “Context is All: Feminism and Theories of Citizenship” in Mouffe, C.

(1992a) (ed.) Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community,
London: Verso, pp. 63-85.

Dietz, M. G., (1998) [1987], “Context is All: Feminism and Theories of Citizenship”, in
Feminism and Politics, A. Phillips (ed.), Oxford and New York: Oxford University
Press, 378–401.

Dismore, H. (2007) The Attitudes of Children and Young People towards Physical
Education and School Sport, with particular reference to the transition from key stage 2
to key stage 3. A thesis submitted to the University of Kent at Canterbury for the degree
of Doctor of Philosophy.

Dobson, A. (2003) Citizenship and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford, University Press.

Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In: Lantolf, J. P.

(ed.) Vygotskian approaches to second language research. London: Ablex Publishing,
33- 56.

Doolittle, P. E. & Hicks, D. (2001) Constructivism as a theoretical foundation for the

use of technology in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Studies.

Dore, R. P. (1976) The Diploma Disease. Berkeley: University of California Press.

240
Dowling, L. (2012) Effective professional learning for religious educators: Some
preliminary findings. Journal of Religious Education 60 (3): 54–66.
Dressel, P. (1958) The Meaning and Significance of Integration. In Nelson B. (ed.) The
Integration of Educational Experiences. 57th Yearbook of the National Society for the
Study of Education. Henry. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958, 3-25.

Driscoll, D. L. Appiah-Yeboah, A. Salib, P. & Rupert, D. J. (2007) "Merging Qualitative

and Quantitative Data in Mixed Methods Research: How to and Why Not. Ecological and
Environmental Anthropology (University of Georgia). Paper 18.
http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdmeea/18
Dubey, D. L. & Barth, J. L. (1980) Social Studies: The inquiry method approach Lagos:
Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd.

Dudley, R. L & Alan, R. G. (2002) Political Literacy, Civic Education, and Civic
Engagement: A Return to Political Socialization? Applied Developmental Science 6 (4):
175-182.

Dudley, R. L. & Gitelson, A. R. (2003) Civic education, civic engagement and youth
civic development. PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(2), 263- 267.

Dworkin, R. (1978) “Liberalism” in Hampshire, S. (ed.) Public and Private Morality,

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 113-143.

Dworking, J. B., Larson, R., & Hansen, D. (2002). Adolescents’ accounts of growth
experiences in youth activities. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 32(1), 17-26.

Eckert, S. A. (2013). What do teaching qualifications mean in urban schools? A mixed

methods study of teacher preparation and qualification. Journal of Teacher Education,
64(1), 75-89.
Eddy, E.N. & Akpan, M.E. (2009) The Prospect of UBE Programme in Akwa-Ibom
State, South-South Nigeria; International NGO Journal. 4(2):46-49. Retrieved on 3rd
March, 2009 from http//www.academicjournals.org/INGOJ.

Ehman, L. H. (1980) The American school in the political socialization process. Review
of Educational Research, 50, 99–199.

Ehman, L.H. (1980). Change in high school students’ political attitudes as a function of
social studies classroom climate. American Educational Research Journal, 17, 253-65.

Ehrlich, T (2000) Civic engagement – commentary on measuring up 2000: The state-

by- state report card for higher education, from the National Centre for Public Policy
and Higher Education,
htt://measuringup.highereducation.org/2000/articles/ThomasErhlich.cfm (retrieved: 20
July, 2005).

Eisner, E. W. (1975). Can educational research inform educational practice? Phi

Delta Kapan, 65, 447-452.
241
Ejere, E. I. (2011) An Examination of Critical Problems Associated with the
Implementation of the Universal Basic Education (UBE) Programme in Nigeria.
International Education Studies Vol. 4, No. 1.

Ekpo, C. M. (2001) Strategies for managing school curriculum and resources for
national building. Nigerian journal of curriculum and instruction, 10(1), 51.

Ekwueme, L. Dorothy, O. Uchegbu, C. N. Anyikwa, B. & Nkemdirim, M. (2009) A

Critical Appraisal of the Mode of Implementation of Nigerian Secondary School
Curriculum: Towards Socio-economic Empowerment of Youth. Education Research
Network for West and Central Africa (ERNWACA).

Ellis, C. (1991) “Sisters and Citizens” in Andrews, G. (ed.) Citizenship, London:

Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 235-242.

Ellison, N. (1997) Towards a new Social Politics: Citizenship and Reflexivity in late
Modernity. Sociology, 31 (4) 697-717.

Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Princeton, NJ,

U.S.A.: Princeton University.

ESSPIN. (2009). School Infrastructure and Maintenance Review. Abuja: Education

Sector Support Programme in Nigeria, Pp. 1-36.

Etuk, G. R. Ering, S. O. Ajake, U. E. (2012) Universal Basic Education (U.B.E.) Policy:

A Sociological Analysis. American International Journal of Contemporary Research
Vol. 2 No. 7, 179-183.

Etzioni, A. (1993). The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities and the

communitarian agenda. New York: Crown Publishers.

Evans, L. (2002) Reflective Practice in Educational Research. London: Continuun:

Evans, M., (2006b). Educating for Citizenship: What teachers say and what teachers do.
Canadian Journal of Education, 29(2), 410-435.

Evans, P. G. & Rose, P. (2007) Education and Support for Democracy in Sub-Saharan
Africa: Testing Mechanisms of Influence. Working Paper No. 75.

Eya, P. E. (2003). Citizenship education and civic responsibility. Nigerian Journal of

Curriculum and Instructions, 11 (1), 83-88.

Ezegbe, M. O. (1994) Social Studies curriculum and instruction. In Joof, G.W & Amadi,
H.C (Eds). Social Studies in schools: teaching methods, techniques, approaches and
perspectives. Onitsha, Nigeria, Outrite publishers.
Fadeiye, J. O. (2005) A social studies textbook for colleges and universities part 2.
Ibadan: Akin-Johnson Press and Publishers.

Fafunwa, A. B. (1991) History of education in Nigeria (New Ed.). Ibadan: NPS

Educational.
242
Fafunwa, A. B. (2004) History of education in Nigeria. Ibadan, Nigeria: NPS

Falade, D. A. (2007) Developing a participatory civic education programme for

secondary schools in Ondo state. Unpublished PhD Thesis, submitted to Department of
Teacher Education, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.

Falade, D. A. (2011) Civic Knowledge and Attitude of Primary School Teachers in

Osun and Ondo States, Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Social Studies, Vol.XIV (2): 163-
174.

Falola, T. & Heaton, M. M. (2008) A history of Nigeria. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Farayola, J. A. (2007) Kantian idea of autonomy and democratic education in Nigeria

Unpublished PhD Thesis, submitted to Department of Teacher Education, University of
Ibadan, Nigeria.

Faulks, K. (2000) Citizenship, London: Routledge.

Faulks, K. (2006) Education for citizenship in England's secondary schools: a critique

of current principle and practice. Journal of Education Policy. Volume 21, Issue 1,
pages 59-74.

Faulks, K. (2006) Education for citizenship in England's secondary schools: a critique

of current principle and practice. Journal of Education Policy. Volume 21, Issue 1,
pages 59-74.

Federal Government of Nigeria, (2000) Implementation Guidelines for the Universal

Basic Education (UBE) Programme. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Education.

Federal Ministry of Education, (1999) Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria

Blue Prints on Basic Education. Abuja: Federal Ministry of Education.

Federal Ministry of Education, (2005) Nigeria education sector diagnosis: a condensed

version. Federal Ministry of Education: Education sector analysis unit.

Federal Republic of Nigeria. (2004) National Policy on Education (4th Edition). Lagos:
NERDC Press.

Ferguson, P. (1991) Impacts on social and political participation. In Shaver, J. P. (Ed.),

Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 385–399). New
York: Macmillan.

Fern E.F. (1982) The use of focus groups for idea generation: the effects of group size,
acquaintanceship, and moderator on response quantity and quality. Journal of
Marketing Research 19(February), 1–13.

Feucht, F. C. & Bendixen, L. D. (2010) Exploring Similarities and Differences in Personal

Epistemologies of U.S. and German Elementary School Teachers. Cognition &
Instruction, 28(1), pp.39-69.

243
Field, J. (2005) Social Capital and Lifelong Learning. Bristol: The Policy Press.

Finkel, S. E. & Smith, A. E. (2011) Civic Education, Political Discussion, and the Social
Transmission of Democratic Knowledge and Values in a New Democracy: Kenya.
American Journal of Political Science, 55(2): 417–435
Finkel, S. E. & Ernst, H. (2005) Civic Education in Post-Apartheid South Africa:
Alternative Paths to the Development of Political Knowledge and Democratic Values.
Political Psychology, 26 (3): 333–64.

Finkel, S. E. (2002) Civic Education and the Mobilization of Political Participation in

Developing Democracies. The Journal of Politics 64 (4): 994-1020.
Finley, M. (1983) Politics in the Ancient World, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Firestone, W. A. (1996) Images of teaching and proposals for reform: A comparison of

ideas from cognitive and organisational research. Educational Administration
Quarterly, 32(2), pp.209-235.

Fitzpatrick, J. (1939) The Writings of George Washington from the Original

Manuscript Sources, vol.30. Washington: Government Printing Office.

Flanagan, C. & Sherrod, L.R. (1998) Youth political development: An introduction.

Journal of Social Issues, 54, 3, 447-456.

Flick, U. (2006) An introduction to qualitative research, 2nd ed, London: SAGE

Fosnot C.T. (2005) Constructivism: Theory, Perspectives and Practice (2 nd ed.). New
York: Teachers College press.

Foss, C. & Ellefsen, B. (2002) The value of combining qualitative and quantitative
approaches in nursing research by means of method triangulation. Journal of Advanced
Nursing, 40(2), 242-248.

Fowler, F. J. (2002) Survey Research Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage
Publications.

Frazer, N. & Gordon, L. (1998) Contract versus charity: Why is there no social
citizenship in the United States? In Shafi, G. (Ed.) The citizenship debates (pp. 113-
130): University of Minnesota Press.

Fuller, B. & Clarke, P. (1994) Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local
conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rules, and pedagogy. Review of
Education Research, Vol. 64, No. 1 (Spring), pp. 119-157

Fuller, B., (1987) What school factors raise achievement in the third world? Review of
Education Research, 57(3), pp. 255-272.

Galbin, A. (2014) An Introduction to Social Constructionism Social Research Reports,

vol. 26, pp. 82-92 online version: www. researchreports.ro

244
Galston, W. A. (1991) Liberal Purposes: Goods, Virtues, and Diversity in the Liberal
State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Galston, W. A. (2001) Political Knowledge, political engagement, and civic education.

Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 4(1), 217-234.

Gana, J. (1987) Report of the Political Bureau. Directorate for Social Mobilisation.
Abuja, Federal Government Press.

Garba, M. (2004) The critical role of education resource of curriculum implementation.

In Noah, A. O. K. Shorribare, D. O. Ojo, A. A. & Olujuwon, T. (Eds). Curriculum
implementation and professionalizing teaching in Nigeria. Lagos: Central Education
Services.

Garbarino, J. & Stott, F. (1992) What Children Can Tell us: eliciting, interpreting, and
evaluating critical information from children. New York: Jossey-Bass.

Garuba, A. (2003) Teachers and teaching in Nigeria. A paper presented at the 11th
biennial conference of international study association for teachers and teaching (ISATT)
Leiden Netherlands [Online] Available: http://www\isatt.org.

Gauntlett, D. & Holzworth, P. (2006) Creative and visual methods for exploring
identities. Visual Studies, 21(1), 82-91.

Gauvain M. (2008) Vygotsky's sociocultural theory, Encyclopedia of infant and Early

Childhood Development, 3, 404-413.

Gboyega, A.Y & Aliyu, Y. (1989) Nigeria since Independence: The first 25 years
Public Administration Vol. III: Ibadan: Heinemann Educational Books (NIGERIA) Ltd

Gearon, L. (2003) How Do We Learn to Become Good Citizens? A Professional User

Review of UK Research Undertaken for the British Educational Research Association.
Nottingham: BERA

Gelaneh, B. J. (2012) The Role of Civics and Ethical Education in the Development of
Students’ Behaviour: The Case of Kokebe Tsibiha Secondary and Preparatory school.
Unpublished M. A Thesis, Institute of Educational Research, Addis Ababa University,
Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

Gentry, J. (1990) Guide to business gaming and experiential learning. London:

Nichols/GP.

Gergen, K. J. (1995) Social construction and the educational process. Constructivism in

Education. Pp. 17-39.

Gidden, A. (1994). Beyond left and right: The future of radical politics. Cambridge,
England: polity Press.

245
Giddens, A. (1982) Class division, class conflict and citizenship rights. In Giddens, A.
(ed.) Profiles and critiques in social theory. London: Macmillan, pp. l64-180.

Gillis, A & Jackson, W. (2002) Research for nurses: Methods and interpretation.
Philadelphia: F.A Davis Company.

Giroux, H. A. (1980) Critical theory and rationality in citizenship education. Curriculum

Inquiry, 10(4), 329-366.
Giroux, H. & McLaren, P. (eds) (1989) Critical Pedagogy, the State, and the Struggle
for Culture. Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press.
Glaser, B. (1998) Doing grounded theory: Issues and discussions. Mill Valley,
California: Sociology Press.

Glasersfeld, E. (1995) A Constructivist Approach to Teaching.” In Constructivism in

Education, ed. Steffe, L. P. & Gale, J. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 3–
15.

Gleiber, D. W. (2003) Emergent political participation among university students.

Paper presented at the International Conference on Civic Education Research. Retrieved
12th July, 2007 from http://civiced.indiana.edu/papers/2003/1053051436.pdf.

Global Campaign for Education, (2006) Teachers of or all: what governments and
donors should do? Global Campaign for Education: policy briefing.

Goldhaber, D.D. & Brewer, D.J. (2000) Does Teacher Certification Matter? High
School Teacher Certification Status and Student Achievement. Educational Evaluation
and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129-145.

Goodman, N. Bastedo, H. LeDuc, L. & Pammett, J. H. (2011) Young Canadians in

2008 Presidential elections. Using facebook to probe perceptions of citizenship and
participation. Journal of political science, 44(4),859-881.

Graham, K. C. (1996). Running ahead: Enhancing teacher commitment. Journal of

Physical Education, Recreation and Dance, 67(1), pp.45-47.

Graham-Jolly, M. (2003). The nature of curriculum. In Gutlig, J. Hoadley, U & Jansen,

J. (Eds). Curriculum from plans to practices. Reader. Oxford University Press.
www.oup.com P.21-31).

Granger, R.C. (1998). Establishing causality in evaluations of comprehensive community

initiatives. In: Fulbright-Anderson, K. Kubisch, A.C. & Connell, J.P. (eds.) New
Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives. Theory, Measurement and Analysis,
Vol. 2. Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
Gray, J. (1995) Liberalism. 2nd Edition. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Greckhamer, T. & Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2005) The erosion of a method: examples from

grounded theory‟, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18 (6), pp.
729-750.
246
Gredler M. (2008) Vygotsky’s Cultural-Historical Theory of Development, In Sialkind,
N.J. (ed.), Encyclopaedia of Educational Psychology, 1, 1011-1014.

Green, A. (1990) Education and state formation: The rise of education systems in
England, France and the USA. London: Macmillan.
Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.

Greene, J. C. & Caracelli, V.J. (1997) Advances in mixed-method evaluation: The

challenges and benefits of integrating diverse paradigms. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V.J. & Graham, W.F. (1989) Toward a Conceptual Framework
for Mixed-method Evaluation Designs, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis
11(3): 255–274.
Griffiths, I. (1986). The scramble for Africa: Inherited political boundaries. The
Geographical Journal, 152(2), 204-216.
Grundy, S. (1987) Curriculum: product or praxis. London: Falmer Press.

Guba, E. G. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In
Denzin, N. K. & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research London: Sage,
(pp. 105-117).
Guba, E. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1998) Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research, in: N.
K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (eds), The Landscape of Qualitative Research: Theories and
issues (Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications), pp. 195–220.

Haas, C. (1996) Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy, Mahwah, N J:

Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Habermas, J. (1994) The structural transformation of the public sphere (T. Burger & F.
Lawrence, Trans.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Habermas, J. (1994) Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of
Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT.
Hahn, C. (1996) Research on issues-centred social studies. In R. W. Evans & D. W.
Saxe (Eds.), Handbook on teaching social issues (Vol. NCSS Bulletin 93, pp.25-41).
Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.

Hahn, C. (1998) Becoming political: comparative perspectives on citizenship education.

New York, State University of New York.

Hammersley, M. (1992) What's Wrong with Ethnography? Routledge, London.

Hais, M. & Winograd, M. (2008) It’s official: Millennial realigned American politics.
Huff Post Politics, 17 November.

Halpern, D. (2005) Social Capital. Cambridge: Polity Press.

247
Hans, S., (2006). 'Weak Ontology' as a way of reenchanting citizenship in the social
studies - A memo with some random notes. In Richardson, G. H. & Blades, D., W.
(Eds.), Troubling the Canon of CE. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

Hardman, F. & Abd-Kadir, J. (2010) Classroom discourse: towards a dialogic

pedagogy. In D. Wyse, R. Andrews & J. Hoffman (eds.) The International Handbook
of English, Language and Literacy, pp. 254 – 264) London: Routledge, Taylor &
Francis.

Hardman, F. Abd‐Kadir, J. Agg, C. Migwi, J. Ndambuku, J. & Smith, F. (2009)

Changing pedagogical practice in Kenyan primary schools: the impact of school‐based
training, Comparative Education, 45:1, 65-86, DOI: 10.1080/03050060802661402

Hardman, F. Abd-Kadir, J. & Smith, F. (2008) Pedagogical renewal: Improving the

quality of classroom interaction in Nigerian primary schools. International Journal of
Educational Development, 28, 1, 55-69.

Harland, J. & Kinder, K. (1997). Teachers’ continuing professional development:

framing a model of outcomes. Journal of In-service Education, 23(1), 71–84.

Hatch, M. J. & Cunliffe, A. L. (2006). Organization theory: modern, symbolic, and

postmodern perspectives, 2nd edition, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

Healy, H. (2011b). Implementing curriculum change in religious education: A study of

the perceptions of primary school religious educators in the Archdiocese of Hobart.
Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Australian Catholic University, Australia.
Healy, H. (2011). Implementing curriculum change in religious education: A study of the
perceptions of primary school religious educators in the Archdiocese of Hobart.
Unpublished PhD thesis, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Heater, D. (1990) Citizenship: the civic ideal in world history, politics and education.
London: Longman.
Heater, D. (1991). What is citizenship? Citizenship, 1(2), 3-5.

Heater, D. (1999). What is Citizenship? Malden, Mass: Polity Press.

Held, D. (1991) “Between State and Civil Society: Citizenship” in Andrews, G. (ed.)
Citizenship, London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 19-25.
Held, D. (1995) Democracy and the Global Order: From the Modern State to
Cosmopolitan Governance, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heppner, P. P. & Heppner, M. J. (2004) Writing and Publishing Your Thesis, Dissertation
& Research. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole-Thompson Learning.
Hess, D. (2001). Teaching to public controversy in a democracy. In Patrick, J. J. and
Leming, R. S. (eds.), Principles and practices of democracy in the education of social
studies teachers: civic learning in teacher education. Vol 1. Indiana, ERIC, 111-131.

248
Hess, D., & Posselt, J. (2001) How students experience and learn from discussing
controversial public issues in secondary social studies. Paper presented at the American
Educational Research Association annual meeting, Seattle, Washington.
Heyneman, S. & Jamison, D (1980) Student learning in Uganda: Textbook availability
and other factors. Comparative Education Review, 24(2), pp. 206-220.
Heyneman, S. & Loxley, W. (1983) The effect of primary-school quality on academic
achievement across twenty-nine high and low-income countries. The American journal
of sociology, 88(6), pp. 1162-1194.
Heyneman, S. P. Farrell, J. P. & Sepulveda-Suardo, M. A. (1978) Textbooks and
achievement: What we know. The World Bank Staff Working Paper No. 298
Hicks, D. (2003) We need solutions not just problems. Times Educational Supplement,
Get Global Special Supplement, 7 November, 2-3.
Ho, L. & Alviar-Martin, T. (2010) Between self and state: Singapore social studies
teachers’ perspectives of diversity. Journal of International Social Studies, 1(1), 20-33,
Fall.
Hochschild, J. & Scovronick, N. (2000) Democratic education and the American dream.
In McDonnell, L. Timpane, M. & Benjamin, R. (Eds.), rediscovering the democratic
purposes of education. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Hochschild, J. L. & Scovronick, N. (2003) The American Dream and the Public Schools.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Hoskins, B. & Crick, R. D. (2008) Learning to learn and civic competence: Different
currencies or two sides of the same coin? Ispra, Italy: European Commission, Joint
research Centre, Institute for the Protection and security of the citizen, Centre for
Research on lifelong learning (CRELL).
House of Commons International Development Committee (2008) DFID's Programme in
Nigeria. Eighth Report of Session 2008–09 Volume I.
Huberman, M. (1993) The Lives of Teachers (J. Neufeld, Trans.). London: Cassell
Villiers House.

Huckle, J., (1997). “From development education to citizenship education, p. Starting the
definition debate”, available at, p.
Education%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20in%20the%20Schools%20Sect
or.do, retrieved May 25, 2008.

Hugly, P & Sayward, C. (1987) Relativism and Ontology. The Philosophical Quarterly,
Vol. 37, No. 148, pp. 278-290 Published by: Wiley for The Philosophical Quarterly
Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2220398. Accessed: 16/05/2013 19:43

Hughes, A.S. & Sears, A. (2006) The Sound and the fury: Rhetoric and reality in
Canadian Citizenship Education. In 2nd Annual Citized International Conference.
Oxford, 1-30.

249
Humphreys, A. (1981) Interdisciplinary Methods: A Thematic Approach. Santa Monica,
CA: Goodyear Publishing.

Humphreys, A. Post, T. & Ellis, A. (1981) Interdisciplinary Methods: A Thematic

Approach. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear Publishing Company.
Huntley, R. (2006) The world according to Y: Inside the new adult generation. Allen &
Unwin.
Hyde, B. (2015). Confusion in the Field! Providing Clarity on Constructivism and
Constructionism in Religious Education, Religious Education, 110:3, 289-302,
Idowu, S. O. (2001). Basic Issues in Social Studies Education for students of Higher
Institutions. Ijebu-Ode, Fembol Integra (Nigeria Limited) Publication.
Idowu, S. O. & Hassan, A. K (2005) Methods and Techniques for Teaching Social
Studies. In Adebayo, A. A. & Idowu, S. O. (eds.) Trends in Teaching Methodologies in
the Arts and Social Sciences. Vol. 1, Lagos, Lolaid Enterprises.
Ifegbesan, A. (2008) A critical analysis of Nigerian Social Studies Curriculum Content
for Democratic Citizenship Education. Nigeria Journal of Social Studies. Vol. XI (1), 83-
98.
Ignatieff, M. (1991) Citizenship and Moral Narcissism. In Andrews, G. (ed.)
Citizenship, London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 26-36.

Ignatieff, M. (1995) The myth of citizenship. In Beiner, R. (Ed.) Theorizing citizenship

(pp.53-78). Albany: State University of New York Press.

Ijaduola, K. O. (1998). Education in Nigeria: An historical perspective. Ijebu-Ode,

Nigeria: Lucky Odoni (Nig.) Enterprises.

Ike, C. (2004) Book Publishing in Nigeria. An online document retrieved 26 January,

2007 from http://www.sabre.org/publications/publishing-in-nigeria.pdf.
Ikerionwu, J. C. (2000) Importance of aids and resources in classroom teaching. In
Oyeneyin, A.M. (ed). Perspectives of Classroom Teaching. Abuja: Martmonic
Investment Ltd.
Ikoya, P. O. & Onoyase, D. (2008) Universal Basic Education in Nigeria: Availability of
Schools’ Infrastructure for Effective Implementation. Educational Studies 34, Pp. 11-24.
Illo, C. O. & Bolaji, S. D. (2007) Historical Perspectives on Nigeria education. Ibadan:
Joytal Educational Publishers.
Inglehart, R. (1990) Culture shift in advanced industrial society. Princeton; Princeton
University press.
Inglehart, R. (1997) Modernization and Post modernization. Princeton NJ: Princeton
University Press.
Inglehart, R. & Welzel, C. (2005) Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy: The
Human Development Sequence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

250
Interstate New Teacher Assessment & Support Consortium. (1995). INTASC core
Standards. Retrieved February 13, 2009, from
http://develop.ccsso.cybercentral.com./htm.
Inyang-Abia, M. E. (1992) Cultural dimension in curriculum materials: A study of
Longman Social Studies series for junior secondary classes. Nigerian journal of Social
Studies review (1), 96 – 103.
Ivankova, N. V. Creswell, J. W. & Stick, S. L. (2006) Using mixed-methods sequential
explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20.
Ivowi, U. M. O. (1984) Curriculum studies in Nigeria. In PAI Obanya (Ed.), Curriculum:
In theory and in practice. Ibadan: Faculty of Education, University of Ibadan, pp. 341-
357.
Ivowi, U. M. O. (2004). Curriculum implementation: Implication for school
administration. In A. O. K. Noah, D. O. Shorribare, A. A. Ojo, & T. Olujuwon, (Eds);
Curriculum implementation and professionalizing teaching in Nigeria. Lagos: Central
Education Services.
Iyamu, O. S. & Otole, C. O. (2003). Education and Civic Responsibility: can the schools
compensate for the Nigerian society? Nigerian Journal of Curriculum and Instructions,
11 (1), 31-36.
Jackson, P. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Wilson.
Jaiyeoba, A.O. (2007) Perceived Impact of Universal basic education on national
development in Nigeria. International Journal of African & African- American Studies,
6, (1) 48-58.
James, I. J. (2011) Problems of the Book Publishing Industry in Nigeria: The Onibonje
Publishers Experience after 50 Years. PNLA QUARTERLY Volume 75, number 3 Spring
James, A. Jenks, C. & Prout, A. (1998). Theorising Childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Janoski, T. (1998) Citizenship and Civil Society: A Framework of Rights and Obligations
in Liberal, Traditional and Social Democratic Regimes. Cambridge, England, Cambridge
University Press.
Janowitz, M. (1983) The reconstruction of patriotism. Education for civic consciousness.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jekayinfa, A. A. (2007) Appraisal of government preparedness in the provision of
primary school teachers for the universal basic education in Nigeria. Ilorin Journal of
Education, 27, 69-79.
Jimoh, M. E. (2009) The use of instructional materials in teaching Social Studies at the
secondary schools of Kabba Bunu Local Government area of Kogi State [Online]
Available: http://www.docstoc.com.
Johnson, G. & Edelson, R. J. (2003) The Integration of Mathematics and Music in the
Primary School Classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics, 30 (1), 3-19.
Johnson, L & Morris, P. (2009) Towards a framework for critical citizenship.
Unpublished manuscript, University of London.

251
Johnson, L. & Morris, P. (2010) Towards a framework for critical citizenship education.
The Curriculum Journal, 21(1), 77-96.
Johnson, N.A. (1993) Reconsidering curriculum development: a framework for
cooperation. Interchange, 24 (4): 409-433.
Johnson, R. B. & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004) Mixed-methods research: a research
paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

Jomtien World Conference on Education for All. (1990). The Jomtien World Declaration
on education for all.
Jones, K. R (2006) Understanding Teenage perceptions towards breastfeeding: a study
of college students using focus group and questionnaires. Dissertations submitted to the
university of Chester for the Degree of Master of Science in partial fulfilment of the
Modular Programme in Health promotion.
Jones, S. R. & Abes, E. S. (2004) Enduring influences of service-learning on college
students’ identity development. Journal of College Student Development, 45(2), 149-166.
Jotia, A. L & Matlale, O. J. (2011) Use of instructional materials in social studies: Impact
on students’ performance in primary school leaving certificate examinations in Botswana.
European Journal of Educational Studies, 3(1), 111-122.
Kadzera, C. M. (2006) Use of instructional technologies in Teacher Training Colleges in
Malawi. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State
University, USA.
Kahne, J., & Middaugh, E. (2008) High quality civic education: What is it and who gets
it? Social Education, 72(1), 34–39.
Kamii, C., Manning, M. & Manning, G. (1991) Early Literacy: A Constructivist
Foundation for Whole Language. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association
Professional library.
Kanaev, A. N. (2000) Civic Education in Central Asia: Re-conceptualization of
Citizenship in Newly Independent States. Stockholm University: Institute of International
Education.
Kao, L.P. (2010) Examining second language learning: Taking a sociocultural stance.
ARECLS, 7, 113-131. Retrieved January 24, 2014, from http://www.research.ncl.
ac.uk/ARECLS/vol7_documents/kao_vol7.pdf 1), pp. 175-183.19: 749-779.
Kaplan, B. & Duchon, D. (1988) Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in
Information Systems Research: A Case Study. MIS Quarterly, pp. 571-586.
Karimi, M. N. (2011) The effects of professional development initiatives on EFL
teachers’ degree of self-efficacy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(6), 50-62.
Kartal, F. (2001/2002) Liberal and Republican Conceptualizations of Citizenship: A
Theoretical Inquiry. Turkish Public Administration Annual, 27–28.
Kelly, A.V. (2009) The curriculum: theory and practice. 6th Ed. SAGE publication.

252
Kelly, G. P. (1979) The relation between colonial and metropolitan schools: A structural
analysis. Comparative Education, 15(2), 209-215.

Kennedy, K. J. (2010) Teaching Practices in Civic Education: A Comparison of Selected

National Perspectives and the Views of Hong Kong Teachers. Paper prepared for the
Hiroshima Conference on Evaluating Teaching Practices for Citizenship Education,
Hiroshima, 23-26 September.
Kerr, D, Lines, A. Blenkinshop, S. & Schagen, I. (2002) England’s Results from the IEA
International Citizenship Education Study: What Citizenship and Education mean to 14
Year Olds. National Foundation for Educational Research. Research Report RR375
Kerr, D. (1999) Citizenship education: An international comparison. London:
QCA/NFER.

Kerr, D. (2003). Citizenship Education in England- Listening to Young People: New

Insights from the Citizenship Education Longitudinal Study International Journal of
Citizenship and Teacher Education Vol.1 No. 1.
Kerr, D. (2005) Citizenship education in England – listening to young people: new
insights from the citizenship education longitudinal study, International Journal of
Citizenship and Teacher Education, 1(1), 74-96.

Kerr, D. Ireland, E. Lopes, J. Craig, R. & Cleaver, E. (2004) Citizenship Education

Longitudinal Study: second annual report- first longitudinal survey, Making Citizenship
Education Real (Research Report RR531). Nottingham: Department for Education and
Skills.

Kerr, D. Lines, A. Blenkinsop, S & Schagen, I. (2002) What Citizenship and Education
Mean to 14-year-olds. England’s Results from the IEA citizenship Education Study: the
views of students, teachers and schools
Killen, R. (2006). Effective teaching strategies: Lesson from Research and Practice (4th
ed.) New Castle: Thompson.

Kimani, G. N. Kara, A. M. & Njagi, L. W. (2013) Teacher Factors Influencing Students’

Academic Achievement in Secondary Schools in Nyandarua County, Kenya.
International Journal of Education and Research (1) 3, 1 – 14.
Kimchi, J. Polivka, B. & Stevenson, J. S. (1991) Triangulation: Operational definitions.
Nursing Research, 40(6), 364-366.
King, D. & Waldron, J. (1988) Citizenship, Social Citizenship and the Defence of Welfare
Provision. British Journal of Political Science 18, pp 415–43.
Kira, E. & Bukagile, G. (2013) Perceptions of Education Stakeholders on the
Implications of Textbook Liberalization Policy in Tanzania. Journal of Education and
Practice, Vol. 4, No.1

Kirlin, M. (2003) The role of civic skills in fostering civic engagement. From
http://www.civicyouth.org/popUps/Workingpapers/WP06Kirlin.pdf (Retrieved 6
September, 2008).

253
Klineberg, O. & Zavalloni, M. (1965) Nationalism and tribalism among African students:
A study of social identity. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton et Cie.
Kohlberg, L. (1992) Psychology of moral development, Bilbao, Desclée de Brouwer.

Kosemani, J.M. (1984) Teachers, the missing link in the Nigerian curriculum process, in
Pai Obanya (ed.), Curriculum: In theory and in practice (Papers in memory of Peter
Olatunde Okunrotifa), Educational Research and Study Group, Faculty of Education,
University of Ibadan, Ibadan, pp. 138-152.
Krane, V. & Bird, S. M (2005) Using Ethnography in Applied Sport Psychology. Journal
of Applied Sport Psychology, 17 (1), pp. 87-107.

Krueger R. (1994) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 2nd edn. Sage
Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 36–45.
Krueger, R.A. & Casey, M. A. (2000) Focus Groups: a practical guide for applied
research, 3rd Edition, London: Sage Publications.

Kuenzi, M. (2005) The Role of Non-Formal Education in Promoting Democratic

Attitudes: Findings from Senegal. Democratization 12 (2): 223-243.
Kurtz, K. Rosenthal, A. & Zukin, C. (2003) Citizenship; A Challenge for All Generations.
National Conference of State Legislatures. http://www.ncsl.org.
Kutu, M. O. (2013) Feminist Perspectives on Integration, Progression and Infusion as
Principles of Curriculum Design in Life Orientation. Unpublished Degree Master of
Education (Curriculum Development), Potchefstroom Campus, North-West University.
Kuye, F. O. & Garba, K. A. (2009) Nisi Dominus Frustra: A history of the C. M. S.
Grammar School, Lagos (1859-2009). Lagos, Nigeria: Black Ivory.
Kvale, S. (1996) Interviews: an introduction to qualitative research interviewing,
London: Sage.
Kymlicka, W. (1990) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction, Oxford:
Clarendon Press.

Kymlicka, W. (2000) Citizenship in Culturally Diverse Societies: Issues, Contexts,

Concepts. In Kymlicka, W. Norman, W. (eds.) Citizenship in Diverse Societies, Oxford:
Oxford University Press, 1–41.
Kymlicka, W. (2002) Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. 2nd Edition.
Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kymlicka, W. (2008) Liberal Nationalism and Cosmopolitan Justice. In Benhabib, S. &
Post, R. (eds.) Another Cosmopolitanism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 128-44
Kymlicka, W. & Norman W. (1994) Return of the Citizen: A Survey of Recent Work on
Citizenship Theory”, Ethics, 104, pp. 352-381.
Lambert, L. D. Walker, Z. J. D. Cooper, P. E. Lambert, M. D. Gardner, M. E. & Slack,
P. J. (1995) The Constructivist Leader. New York: Teachers College Press.

254
Langton, K. & Kent, J. M. (1968) Political socialization and the high school civics
curriculum. American Political Science Review, 62, 852–867.
Lantolf, J.P. (Ed.). (2000) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford,
UK: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. (2009) Introducing sociocultural theory. In Lantolf, J. P. (Ed.). Sociocultural
theory and second language learning (pp.1-26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. (2009) Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Lantolf, J. P. & Thorne, S.L. (2006) Socio-cultural theory and the genesis of second
language development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Larson, T. D. A. (2001) Comparison of fifth grade children receiving both traditional and
technology based means of instruction in Social Studies. Unpublished master dissertation,
Johnson Bible College Knoxville, USA.
Larson, R. W. (2000). Toward a psychology of positive youth development. American
Psychologist, 55(1), 170-183.

Lat, M. D. (1998) The place of instructional materials and resources for effective
classroom work in Social Studies: A study of selected schools in Pankshin LGA, Plateau
State. An Unpublished M. Ed Thesis, Faculty of Education, University of Jos, Jos.
Lather, P. (1992). Critical frames in educational research: Feminist and post-structural
perspectives. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 87-99.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation.
Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Leach, J. & Moon, B. (Eds) (1999) Learners and Pedagogy. London: PCP.

Leary, M. R. (2001) Introduction to Behavioural Research Methods. Maryland:

Needham Heights.

Leca, J. (1992) Questions on Citizenship. In Mouffe, C. (ed.) Dimensions of Radical

Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community, London: Verso, pp. 17- 32.
Lee, C. G. (2011) Reconsidering constructivism in qualitative research. Educational
Philosophy and Theory, 44(4), 403-412.

Lee, W. O. (1999) Controversies of civic education in political transition: Hong Kong. In

Torney-Purta, J. Schwille, J. & Amadeo, J. A. (Eds.), Civic education across countries:
Twenty-four national case studies from the IEA civic education project (pp. 313-340).
Amsterdam: The International Association for the Evaluation of Educational
Achievement.
Lefstein, A. 2006. Dialogue in schools: Towards a pragmatic approach. Working Papers
in Urban Language and Literacies 33, 1-16.

255
Lehesvuori, S. (2013) Towards Dialogic Teaching in Science: Challenging Classroom
Realities through Teacher Education Jyväskylä: A PhD Thesis submitted to the
University of Jyväskylä, (Jyväskylä Studies in Education, Psychology and Social
Research

Leonard, S. T (1999) Pure Futility and Waste: Academic Political Science and Civic
Education. Political Science and Politics Vol. 32, No. 4, Page 749 of 749-754.
Leung, Y. W. (2006) How Do They Become Socially/Politically Active? Case Studies of
Hong Kong Secondary Students Political Socialisation. Citizenship Teaching and
Learning Vol. 2, No. 2, http://www.citized.infocitizED
Levine, P. (2005) Education for democratic citizenship. Paper Presented at the Congreso
Internacional de EducaRed III. Retrieved 5 August 2008, from
http://www.peterlevine.ws/mt/archives/000707.html
Lewis, A. (2007). Word Web Dictionary 5.2. Princeton University: GDI Hook
Technology.
Lewis, L. (Ed.) (1987) Social education on political literacy. Monograph Series
No.3.Melbourne: Social Education Association of Australia.
Leydet, D. (2006) Citizenship. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopaedia of
Philosophy.

Likupe, G, (2011). Motivations, Migration and Experiences of Black Africa Nurses in the
United Kingdom. Being A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in
the University of Hull

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Lipset, S.M. (1959) Some social requisites of democracy: economic development and
political development. American Political Science Review, 53, 69-105.
Lipset, S.M. (1994). The social requisites of democracy revisited. American Sociological
Review, 59, 1-22.
Lister, R. (2003) Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives, 2nd edition, Palgrave.

Lister, R. (2007) Inclusive Citizenship: Realising the Potential, Citizenship Studies

11(1): 46-61.

Little, J.W. (1993) Teachers' professional development in a climate of educational reform.

Educational evaluation and policy analysis. 15(2), 129-151.
Loader, B. D. (2007) Young citizens in the digital Age: Disaffected or Displaced? In
Loader, B.D. (Ed.) Young citizens in the Digital Age: Political Engagement, Young
People and New Media (pp. 1-7). New York, N. Y. Routledge
Lopez, M. H. Levine, P. Both, D. Kiesa, A. Kirby, E & Marcelo. K (2006) The Civic and
Political Health of the Nation: A Detailed Look at How Youth Participate in Politics and
Communities. Centre for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement.
www.civicyouth.org.

256
Louis, K. S. (1998) Effects of teacher quality of work life in secondary schools on
commitment and sense of efficacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(1),
pp.1-27.
Lu, X. (2005) Teacher quality and teacher preparedness in public secondary schools:
Evidence from SASS 1999-2000. Doctoral thesis submitted to the Department of
Education, Western Michigan University.
Lyle, S. (2008). Dialogic Teaching: Discussing Theoretical Contexts and Reviewing
Evidence from Classroom Practice. An international Journal of Language and Education
Vol. 22, No. 3.

Mackenzie, N. & Knipe, S. (2006). Research dilemmas: Paradigms, methods and

methodology. Issues in Educational Research, 16(2), 193-205.
http://www.iier.org.au/iier16/mackenzie.html

Maclellan, E., and R. Soden. 2004. “The Importance of Epistemic Cognition in Student-
centred Learning.” Instructional Science 32: 253–268.
Maduewesi, E.J. (2007) Universal basic education: issues, problems and prospects. Benin
City: Dasylva Influence Enterprises.
Magnusson, D. (2001) Individual development: A holistic, integrated model. In Moen, P.
Glen H. Elder, Jr. & Lüscher, K. (eds.) Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the
ecology of human development. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Magolda, B. (2000) Interpersonal maturity: Integrating agency and communion. Journal
of College Student Development, 41, 141-156. Retrieved from
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3752/is_20003/ai_n8882139

Makinde, M.A. (1979) Integrated Social Studies: a handbook of social studies for
teachers. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Mangvwat, S.E. (2001) An appraisal of the quality of primary school products. Journal
of Educational Issues, 1(I), 40-45.

Mann, M. (1987) Ruling class strategies and citizenship. Sociology, 21 (3), 339-354.

Mansaray, A. (1996) The National Social Studies Curricula and the Provision of
Appropriate Social experiences. The Beagle 1(1&2), pp 17-24.
Mansaray, A. (1999) Community-based participatory population education programme
for an African inner-city: focus on Ibadan. Published project 42.

Mansaray, A. & Adeyemi, S. B. (2002) Citizenship Education for Conflict Management:

A Mandate for Social Studies. Nigerian Journal of Social Studies Vol. VI (1&2). P 155-
166.
Mansaray, A. & Ajiboye, J. O. (2000) Developing a participatory model in informal civic
education for secondary students in rural and peri-urban area in Nigeria. A Technical
Report Submitted to USAID/OTI, Nigeria.

257
Mansaray, A. & Ogunyemi, S. A. (1994) Nigerian Teachers’ Perceptions of the Curricular
Objectives of Social Studies. Studies in Education, Vol. 1(1), 38-45.
Marsh, D. & Furlong, E. (2002). Ontology and Epistemology in Political Science’ in
Marsh,
Marsh, D. & Stoker, G. (eds.) (2002) Theories and methods in political science. 2nd
edition, Basingstoke, UK, Palgrave, 384pp.
Marshall, G (1998) Dictionary of Sociology (2nd ed). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Marshall, T. H. (1950) Citizenship and Social Class, Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.

Marshall, T. H. (1965) Citizenship and Social Class. In Lipset, S. M. (ed.) Class,

Citizenship, and Social Development: essays with an introduction. NY: Anchor Books.
Maslow, A. H. (1 954) Motivation and personality. New York: HarperCollins.

Matusov, E. (2011). Authorial teaching and learning. In White, E.J. & Peters, M. (Eds.)
Bakhtinian pedagogy: Opportunities and challenges for research, policy and practice in
education across the globe. New York: Peter Lang Publishers, 21-46.

McCowan, T. (2006) The foundations of critical questioning in citizenship education.

Curriculo sem Fronteiras, 6(2), pp. 196-210.
McDermott, L.C. (1990) A perspective in teacher preparation in physics and other
sciences: the need for special science courses for teachers. American Journal of Physics,
58.

McGregor, D. (1 960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Mclafferty I. (2004) Focus Group Interviews as a Data Collecting Strategy. Journal of

Advanced Nursing 48(2), 187–194.

McLaughlin, T. H. (1992) Citizenship, diversity and education: A philosophical

perspective. Journal of Moral Education, 21(3): 235-250.
McPherson, K. & Leydon, G. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative methods in UK health
research, now and …? European Journal of Cancer Care. 11, pp. 225-231.
Meek, C. K. (1960) The Niger and the classics: The history of a name. Journal of African
History, 1(1), 1-17.
Mehan, H. (1979) Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge,
MA: Harvard University Press.
Mellor, S & Elliot, M. (1996) The pedagogy of civics and citizenship education.
Australian Council for Educational Research.
Mendonça, D. Jefferson, T. & Harrald, J, (2007) Collaborative Adhocracies and Mix-and-
Match Technologies in Emergency Management Communications of the ACM, Vol. 50,
No. 3

258
Mendonça, M.C. & Fernandes, L.H. (2007) Rhynchocyrtus gen. nov. (Collembola,
Entomobryidae) from the Southeast and Northeast Brazilian regions. Zootaxa, 1660, 45–
51.

Mercer, N. & Littleton, K. (2007) Dialogue and the development of children's thinking:
a sociocultural approach. London, UK: Routledge.

Meron, T. (2006) Civic Education & Students of Higher Learning: A Case Study.

Merton R.K. Fiske, M. & Kendall, P. L. (1990) The Focused Interview: A Manual of
Problems and Procedures, 2nd edn. Free Press, New York.
Meter, V. P. & Stevens, R. J. (2000) The Role of Theory in the Study of Peer
Collaboration. Journal of Experimental Education, 69, 113-129.
Mezieobi, K. A. (1993) Social Studies curriculum. Owerri: Whyte and Whyte.

Mezirow, J., (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative

and emancipatory learning. San Francisco CA: Jassey Bass
Miles, S. (2006) Citizenship Education: An Examination of the Relationship between the
Crick Report and Policy Implementation in the UK. In Ross, A. (ed) Citizenship
Education: Europe and the World. London: CiCe, pp713-720.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage.
Minichiello, V. Aroni, R. Timewell, E. Alexander, L. (2000) In depth Interviewing (2nd
ed.) Sydney, NSW, Australia, Pearson Education Australia.
Minick, N. (1987) The development of Vygotsky’s thought: An introduction. In Rieber,
R. & Carton, A. (Eds.) The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky 1, pp. 17-36). New York:
Plenum Press.
Mitchell, E. S. (1986) Multiple triangulations: A methodology for nursing science.
Advances in Nursing Science, 8(3), 18-26.
Mitchell, R. & Myles, F. (2004) Second language learning theories. Oxford, UK: Oxford
University Press.
Mkpa, M. A. (2005) Curriculum development. Owerri: Total Publishers.

Moghaddam, F. M. Walker, B. R. & Harre, R. (2003) Cultural distance, levels of

abstraction, and the advantages of mixed methods. In Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (Eds.),
Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioural research (pp. 111-134). Thousand
Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Mohammed, A. M. (2006) Creating opportunities for continuing professional
development of teachers: The national teachers' institute experience. Paper presented at
the 1" National conference of the faculty of education, university of Abuja. Retrieved
February 26, 2009, from
http://www.ntinigeria.org/doc/AddressCreating~Opportunies~for-Continuing-Prof.-
Development of Teachers pdf

259
Moja, T. (2000) Nigeria education sector analysis: An analytical synthesis of
performance and main issues. World Bank Report, 2000. Retrieved from: worldbank.org.
Momoh, S. (1980) A study of the relationship between Instructional Resources and
Academic Achievement of Students in Ilorin Local Government Kwara State. An
Unpublished M. Ed Thesis.

Moorman, C. & Miner, A. S. (1998b) Organizational Improvisation and Organizational

Memory. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 698-723.

Morduchowicz, R. Catterberg, E, Niemi, R. G. & Frank, B. (1996) Teaching Political

Information and Democratic Values in a New Democracy: An Argentine Experiment.
Comparative Politics 28(4):465–476.

Morgan, D. L. (1997) Focus Groups as Qualitative Research, London: Sage

Publications.
Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms lost and pragmatism regained: Methodological
implications of combining qualitative and quantitative methods. Journal of Mixed
Methods Research, 1(1), 48–76.

Moriarty, M. (2010) An investigation of the spirituality of children in Victorian state

primary schools. Unpublished PhD thesis, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne,
Australia.

Moronfola, B. (1982) Effects of Instructional Resources on the Academic Achievements

of Secondary School Students in Ilorin Local Government of Kwara State. Unpublished
M. Ed Research Thesis.
Morris, P. (1997) Civics and citizenship education in Hong Kong. In Kerry, K. (Ed.)
Citizenship education and the modern state, (pp.107-125). London: The Falmer Press.
Morse, J. M. & Niehaus, L. (2009). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures.
Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.

Moshavi, D. (2001) “Yes and . . .”: Introducing Improvisational Theatre Techniques to

the Management Classroom. Journal of Management Education 2001 25: 437 The
online version of this article can be found at:
http://jme.sagepub.com/content/25/4/437.

Moulton, J. (1994) How Do Teachers Use Textbooks and Other Print Materials? A
Review of the Literature. South Africa, Improving Educational Quality (IEQ) Project.
Mountain, V. (2004) Investigating the meaning and function of prayer for children in
selected primary schools in Melbourne Australia. Unpublished PhD thesis, Australian
Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.
Moustakas, C. (1990) Heuristic Research: Design, methodology and applications.
London: Sage Publications

Mroz, M. Smith, F. & Hardman, F. (2000) The discourse of the literacy hour.
Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(3), 379-390.

260
Mugimu, C. B. & Nakabugo, M. (2009) Back to the Future? The Indigenous Education
Curriculum in Uganda. Department of curriculum teaching and media, School of
Education, Makerere University. Kampala.
Muijs, D. & Reynolds, D. (2001) Effective Teaching: evidence and practice. London:
Paul Chapman Publishing.
Mukhongo, A. (2010) Citizenship Education in Kenya: A Content Analysis of State-
Sponsored Social Studies Instructional Materials. Unpublished Ph.D thesis submitted to
the Graduate School of Clemson University. South Carolina, USA
Musa, J. M. (2005). The implementation of progressivism in Nigerian education: An
assessment. Unpublished Ph. D thesis, University of Jos, Nigeria.
Mushayikwa, E. & Lubben, F. (2009) Self-directed Professional Development-Hope for
teachers working in deprived environments? Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3),
375-382.

Muyanda-Mutebi & Matovu. Y. (1994). Social Studies Curriculum and Teaching

Resource Book for Africa. ASESP. Nairobi-Kenya.

Muyanda-Mutebi, P. (1994). “The African social and environmental studies programme”.

Conference brochure of the 3rd International Social Studies Conference on “Social
Studies Education Challenges and Opportunities in a World of Rapid Change” held at
Hotel Inter- Continental and Nairobi Hilton Hotel, Kenya, June 27-29.
Myhill, D. & Fisher, R. (2005) Informing practice in English: A review of recent research
in literacy and the teaching of English. London: Her Majesty's Inspectorate.

Nacino-Brown, R. Oke, F. E. & Brown, D. P. (1982) Curriculum and Instruction. An

Introduction to Methods of Teaching. London and Basingsoke: The Macmillan Press
Limited.

National Alliance of Civic Education (2003) Civic Education Defined.

http://www.cived.net/tioce.html (accessed on 21st June, 2010.

National Assessment of Educational Progress in Civics (NAEP) (1998) Civic Framework

for the Assessment of National Educational Progress. Washington, DC: National
Assessment Governing Board.

National Council for Social Studies (NCSS) (1992) Social Studies Education: Challenges
and Opportunities in a World of Rapid Change. The 3rd International Social Studies
Conference held at Hotel Inter-Continental and Nairobi Hilton Hotel, Kenya, June 27-29.
Naylor, C. & Malcolmsom, J. D. (2001) A study of workload of English teachers in B.C.
secondary grades. BCTR Research Report. RT01-0036 pp 16-17.

Newby, P. (2009) Research methods for education. Pearson Education. Oaks, CA: Sage
Nemerow, L. G. (1996) Do classroom games improve motivation and learning?
Teaching and Change, 3(4), 356–366.
261
Newman, F. & Holzman, L. (1993) Lev Vygotsky: Revolutionary scientist. London:
Routledge.
Newman, I. & McNeil, K. (1998) Conducting Survey Research in the Social Sciences.
Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Nias, J. (1981) Commitment and Motivation in Primary School Teachers. Educational
Review, 33(3), pp. 181-190.
Nie, N.H. Junn J. & Stehlik-Barry K. (1996) Education and Democratic Citizenship in
America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Niemi, R. G. & Chapman, C. (1998) The civic development of 9th- through 12th-grade
Nigeria. Centre for the Study of African Economies Working Paper Series.
Niemi, R. G & Junn, J. (1998). Civic Education: What Makes Students Learn. New
Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (2007). 9-Year Basic
Education Curriculum – Civic Education for upper basic education (JS 1-3). Lagos,
Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council NERDC Press.
Nigeria Educational Research and Development Council (2009) Civic Education
Curriculum for Senior Secondary School (SSS 1-3). Federal Government Press. Abuja.
Nina, E. (1998) Avoiding Politics: How Americans Produce Apathy in Everyday Life.
New York, Cambridge University Press.
Nkwanga, E. & Canagarajah, S. (1999) Nigeria: Consultations for Improved Primary
Education, A World Free of Poverty, The World Bank Group, No. 130, March 1999.
Nozick, R. (1974) Anarchy, State and Utopia. Oxford: Blackwell.
Nuthall, G. A. (2000) The anatomy of memory in the classroom: Understanding how
students acquire memory processes from classroom activities in science and social studies
units. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 247-304.
Nwikina, L. & Nwanekezi, A. (2010) Management of job-related teacher burnout in Nigerian
schools. Report and Opinion, 2(8), 8Article 7. Retrieved from
http://www.sciencepub.net/report/report0208/07_3607report0208_36_43.pdf

Nwogu, J. E. & Akinde, T, A. (2007). Author, Publisher and Bookseller: A Tripartite

Synergy in Nigerian Book Industry. Continental Journal of Information Technology 1:
25 - 34, 2007

Nystrand, M. Gamoran, A. Kachur, R. & Prendergast, C. (1997) Opening dialogue:

Understanding the dynamics of language and learning in the English classroom. New
York: Teacher College Press.

Obanya. P. (2004) The Dilemma of Education in Africa, Ibadan: Heinemann

Educational Books Nigeria Plc.

262
Obanya, P. (2007) Thinking and Talking education, Ibadan: Evans Brothers (Nigeria
publishers) Ltd.

Obayan P. (2000) National Press Briefing on the Universal Basic Education (UBE)
Programme Lagos. (1)

Obayan, P. (2010) Planning and Managing Meaningful Access to Education: The

Nigerian Experience. Department of Education Open Seminar Series: Centre for
International Education, University of Sussex.

Obebe, J. B. (2007). Social studies as a catalyst in innovation and change. Lead paper
presented at the 8th Annual National Conference of Social Studies Association of
Nigeria (SOSAN) held at the Kwara State College of Education, Ilorin, November 21,
2007.

Obinna, M.E. (2002) Nigeria and curricular change from Universal Primary Education
(UPE) to Universal Basic Education (UBE). Dialogue & Universalism, 12(1/2), 103-11
0.

Ocitt, J. P. (1994) An Introduction to Indigenous Education in East Africa. Adult

Education Supplement 42. Makerere University.

Odetoyinbo, B.B. (2004). Evaluation of the Nigerian Integrated Science Programme in

Junior Secondary Schools in Oyo State. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Department of
Teacher Education Ibadan, Faculty of Education, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
Offorma, G.C. (2005). Curriculum for Wealth Creation, Paper presented at the seminar
of the World Council for Curriculum and Instruction (WCCI), held at the Federal College
of Education, Kano, Nigeria.
OFSTED (2005c). Initial teacher training for teachers of citizenship 2004/05, HMI 2486.
London, Ofsted.
Ogunbiyi, J. O. (2007) Effects of Value Clarification Strategy on in-service teachers’
environmental knowledge and attitudes in selected secondary schools in Abeokuta, Ogun
State. African Journal of Educational Research 2(1&2).
Ogundare, S. F. (1984). Investigation-oriented instructional approaches of the Nigerian
primary schools Social Studies Teachers. Nigerian Journal of Curriculum Studies. 2(2)
67-74.
Ogundare, S. F. (2010) Invitation to Fundamentals of Teaching Social Studies. Ibadan,
Franco-Ola Publishers

Ogundare, S. F. (2011). Reflections and Lessons from the International association for
the Evaluation of Educational Achievement’s Globalisation of Civic education. Nigerian
Journal of Social Studies, Vol. XIV (2), 105-122.
Ogunyemi, B. (1998). Social studies curriculum under the 6-3-3-4 system: Conceptual
and implementation issues revisited. Nigerian Journal of Curriculum Studies, Special,
88-95.

263
Ogunyemi, B., (2005). “Mainstreaming sustainable development into African school
curricula, p. Issues for Nigeria”, Current Issues in Comparative Education (On-line, 2),
available at www.tc.edu/cice); retrieved September 18, 2009.

Ogunyemi, B., (2006). Curriculum implications of the decade of education for sustainable
development for primary school social studies. Nigerian Journal of Curriculum Studies,
(13) 1, pp. 175-183.
Ogunyemi, B. (2009) Human security, p. Some conceptual issues and interface with
social studies. Lead Paper presented at the 25th Annual National Conference of the Social
Studies Association of Nigeria held at the Michael Otedola College of Primary Education,
Noforija,

Ogunyemi, B. (2010). Curriculum politics in the changing fortunes of Nigerian social

studies. International Journal of Education, 2(2), 1-12.
Ogunyemi, B. (2011). A Clash of Past and Present: Citizenship Education in Nigeria’s
Junior Secondary School Curriculum. European Journal of Social Sciences. 18(3), pp
378-385.
Okam, C. C. (1996). What is social about Social Studies education? In Oyetunde, T. O.
(Ed.) Innovative Approach to Education and Human Development. Jos: Lecaps
Publishers.
Okam, C. C. (2002). Readings in new development in Nigerian education issues and
insights. (A collection of curriculum papers). Jos: DEKA Publishers.
Okam, C. C. (2005). Democracy and federalism. Nigerian Journal of Social Studies. 8,
(1) 14-20.

Okam, C. C. (2008). Social Studies as a Catalyst and an Innovative Curriculum Design

for Cultivating Citizenship Virtues Amongst Students. Nigeria Journal of Social Studies.
Vol. XI (1), 99-117.
Okam C. C. & Lawal, H. (2011). Exploring civic education for effective citizenship in
the task of nation building. Nigeria Journal of Social Studies, Vol. XIV (1).
Okeahialam, U. P. (2013) An Analysis of the Effectiveness of Secondary School Civic
Education on the Attainment of National Objectives in Nigeria. Unpublished PhD
dissertation University of Colorado, Colorado.
Okebukola, P. (2004) Curriculum implementation in Nigeria: Strategies for the 21st
Century. In Noah, A. O. K. Shorribare, D. O. Ojo, A. A. & Olujuwon, T. (Eds),
Curriculum implementation and professionalizing teaching in Nigeria. Lagos: Central
Education Services.
Okecha, R.E. (2008) Teachers' perception and perceived contributions towards the
success of the Universal Basic Education (UBE) programme. College Student Journal,
42(2), 554-564.
Okin, S. M. (1991) Gender, the Public, and the Private. In Phillips, A. (ed.) Feminism and
Politics, A. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 116–142.
Okin, S. M. (1992) Women, Equality, and Citizenship. Queen's Quarterly 99 (1): 57–72.

264
Okobia, E.O. (2011) Availability and Teachers’ Use of Instructional Materials and
Resources in the Implementation of Social Studies in Junior Secondary Schools in Edo
State, Nigeria. Review of European Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2.
Okobiah, O. S. (1985) The New National Policy on Education and and development of
social studies curriculum for the Nigerian schools, Nigerian Journal of Curriculum
Studies. 2 (2) 65-67.
Okobiah, S. (1986) The Major Components of Curriculum Studies in Curriculum.
Associateship Certificate in Education. Nigerian. Heinemann.
Okoro, M. O. (2011) Funding Teacher Education: A Catalyst for Enhancing the
Universal Basic Education in IMO State of Nigeria. Dissertations. Paper 436. Submitted
in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Education Seton Hall
University.
Okunrotifa, P. O. (1981) Evaluation in Social Studies. In Akinlaye, F, Kupolati, C. O,
Opawale, D. & Oshungbohun, T. (eds). The Concept and scope of Social Studies
Education for Schools and Colleges. A handbook for all teachers and Students of Social
Studies. An edited report on Social Studies Orientation Workshop Organised by Nigeria
Educational Research Council. Ibadan, Onibonoje Publishers, Nigeria Ltd.
Oladiti, A. A. (2011) Teachers’ view on the Potentialities of Civics Education in
Promoting Nation Building in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Social Studies, vol. xiv (2)
PP77-90.
Olanrewaju, M. S. (1999) Relative effects of environmental variables on students'
achievements in Yoruba in four selected schools in Egba area of Ogun state. African
Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 169-177.
Oldfield, A. (1990) Citizenship and community: civic republicanism and the modern
world. New York: Routledge.
Oliver, D. & Heater, D. (1994) The foundations of citizenship. New York; London:
Harvester Wheat sheaf.
Olla, V. (2013) An Enquiry into Citizenship Education curriculum and pedagogy: the role
of technology and student voice. Thesis submitted to the University of Nottingham for
the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
Ololobou, C. O. (2010) Methodological Approaches in Social Studies Education. Kano:
Jolayemi Graphics and General Enterprises.
Ololube, N. P. (2006) An Approach to Quality Improvement of Education in Nigeria
through EFQM Excellence Model. The African Symposium, June, 7-22.
Oluniyi, O. & Olufemi, O. (2013) Curriculum Integration in Social Studies as Predictor
of Academic Performance in Social Sciences. Journal of Education and Practice Vol.4,
No.7.
Oloruntegbe, K.O. (2011). Teachers’ Involvement, Commitment and Innovativeness in
Curriculum Development and Implementation. Journal of Emerging Trends in
Educational Research and Policy Studies (JETERAPS) 2 (6): 443-449

265
Omokhodion, J.O. (2008). Assessing the preparedness of Nigeria for her Universal Basic
Education Program. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences: 5(9), 866-870.
Omolade, Z. A. (2006). Nigeria culture and citizenship education. Ijebu-Ode: Lucky
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. & Teddlie, C. (2003) A Framework for Analysing Data in Mixed
Methods Research. In Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioural Research.
Tashakkori, A & Teddlie, C eds. Pp. 351-383. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Onwughalu, O. J. (2011). Parents’ involvement in education: The experience of an

African American immigrant community in Chicago. Bloomington, IN: Universe.
Onyeachu, J.A.E. (2008). Curriculum implementation at the primary education level
challenges for the 21st century. Multidisciplinary Journal of Research Development. 10
(1), 38 – 49.
Oremus, M. Raina, P. Eva, K. Lavis, J. Nair, K. Lo, A. & Smith, S. (2010) Impact of
clinician judgement on formulary committees' recommendations in Canada DOI:
10.1258/jhsrp.2009.009105 J Health Serv Res Policy 2010 15: 98
http://hsr.sagepub.com/content/15/2/98
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2010) Learning our
lesson: Review of Quality Teaching and learning International Report on Higher
Education: OECD-Institutional Management in Higher Education (IMHE).

Ormrod, J. E. (2004). Human learning. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Orukotan, A. F (2006) Theory and Practice of Curriculum in Nigeria. Ibadan, Joytal
Press.
Osagie, R. O. & Okafor, C. J. (2012) Relationship between Human Resources
Management Variables and Students’ Academic Performance in Secondary Schools in
Egor Local Government Area, Edo State, Nigeria. European Journal of Educational
Studies 4(1), 147 – 153.
Osakwe, E & Itedjere, P. (1993) Social Studies for tertiary students in Nigeria. Enugu:
New age publishers.
Oshungbohun, T (eds.). The concepts and scope of social Studies education for schools
and colleges. Ibadan, Onibonoje Publishers.
Osler, A. & Starkey, H. (2005) Education for Democratic Citizenship: A Review of
Research, Policy & Practice 1995-2005 (Unpublished paper submitted to British
Education Research Association). Retrieved on November 01, 2011 from http://www.
Bera. ac .uk/ pdfs/oslerstarkeyBera Review 2005.

Osler, A. & Starkey, H. (2003) Learning for Cosmopolitan citizenship: Theoretical

debates and young people’s experiences. Educational Review, 55, 3, 243–54.
Osler, A. & Starkey, H. (2006) Education for democratic citizenship: A review of
research, policy and practice 1995-2005. Research Papers in Education, 21(4), 433-466.

266
Osokoya, I. O. (2010) History and policy of Nigerian education in world perspective.
Ibadan: Laurel Educational Publishers.
Oster, A. and Starkey, H (2004). Education for Democratic Citizenship: A Review of
Research, Policy & Practice 1995-2005 (Unpublished paper submitted to British
Education Research Association). Fromhttp://www. Bera. ac. uk/ pdfs/osler starkey Bera
Review 2005. (Retrieved on November 01, 2011)
Osundare, N. (2011) We Still Do Not Have a Country Yet. The Guardian, 21st June,

Oyetade, E. M. (2003) Developing a participatory environmental education programme

for colleges of education student in Lagos state. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of
Ibadan.
Ozigboh, I. R. A. (1988) An introduction to the religion and history of Islam. Enugu,
Nigeria: Fourth Dimension.
Packer, M. J. & Goicoechea, J. (2000) Sociocultural and constructivist theories of
learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist 35 (4): 227–241.

Palincsar, A. S. (1998) Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning.

Annual Review of Psychology, 49, 345-375.
Pangle, L. S. & Pangle, T. L. (2000) What the American Founders Have to Teach Us
About Schooling for Democratic Citizenship. In Rediscovering the Democratic Purposes
of Education. PP. 21-46. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Pateman, C. (1989) The Disorder of Women. Democracy, Feminism and Political Theory,
Cambridge: Polity Press.
Patrick, J. J. (1997) The Framework for the National Assessment of Educational Progress
in Civics. ERIC Digest (Publication no: ED410179). Retrieved 20 August 2008 from
ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/Social Science Education.
Patrick, J. J. (2002) Defining, Delivering, and Defending a Common Education for
Citizenship in a Democracy. This paper was prepared for presentation to participants of
the "Summit on Civic Learning in Teacher Preparation." This "Summit" was conducted
at the Massachusetts State House, Boston on Wednesday, May 15, 2002.
Patrick, J. J. (2002) Improving civic education in schools. Retrieved from Social Studies
Development Centre: http://www.ericdigests.org/2003-3/civic.htm
Patrick, J. J. & Hoge, J. D. (1991) Teaching government, civics and law. In Shaver, J. P.
(Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning (pp. 427–436). New
York: Macmillan.
Patton, M. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (Pp. 169-186). Beverly
Hills, CA: Sage.
Peña, J. (2003) La ciudadanía. In Arteta, Andrés and others (eds.). Teoríapolítica: poder,
moral, democracia. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Pérez, B. (Ed.) (2004) Sociocultural contexts of language and literacy, Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 2nd edition

267
Peterson. (2010) Concluding comments. Paper presented at the International Conference
on Citizenship Education, The Campus Innovation Center in Tokyo on 15th - 21st
February.
Pettit, P. (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
Philip-Ogoh, A. (2011) Evaluation in Civic Education: Issues and Challenges. Nigerian
Journal of Social Studies, Vol. XIV (1): 168-182
Philips, A. (1991) Citizenship and Feminist Theory. In Andrews, G. (ed.) Citizenship.
London: Lawrence & Wishart, pp. 76-88.
Phillips, J. (1988) Research blenders. Nursing Science Quarterly. 1(1), pp. 4-5.

Pittin, R. (1990). Selective education: Issues of gender, class and ideology in Northern
Nigeria. The politics of education & cultural production. Review of African Political
Economy, 48, 7-25.
Po, Sum-Cho (2004) The role of civic education in developing a sense of national identity:
action research in a Hong Kong primary school, Unpublished PhD Thesis. University of
Durham, Durham, England.
Pocock, J. G. A. (1995) The Ideal of Citizenship since Classical Times. In Beiner, R
(ed.), Theorizing Citizenship, SUNY Press, 1995, pp. 29-52.
Pollit, D. F. Beck, C. T. & Hungler, B.T. (2001) Essentials of Nursing Research: methods,
appraisal and utilization, (5thEdition), Philadelphia: Lippincott.
Pollard, A. & Tann, S. (1987) Reflective Teaching in the Primary School. London:
Cassell.

Popoola, T.A. (1980) An investigation into the relationship between instructional

resources and students’ academic performance in Secondary Schools in Abeokuta Local
Government Area of Ogun State of Nigeria. An Unpublished M. Ed Thesis. University
of Ibadan, Ibadan

Porter, A. (Ed) (1993) Teaching political literacy: Implications for teacher training and
curriculum planning. Bedford Way Paper. London: Institute of Education, London
University.
Porter, A. (1996). The aims of education for citizenship. In Nai-kwai Lo, L. & Si-wai, M.
(Eds.) Moral and civic education (pp. l-9). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of
Educational Research, the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Posner, G. (2003) Models of curriculum planning. In Gutlig, J. Hoadley, U. & Jansen,
J. (Eds). Curriculum from plans to practices. Oxford University Press. www.oup.com
P.253-260).
Powell R. A. Single, H. M. & Lloyd, K. (1996) Focus groups in mental health research:
enhancing the validity of user and provider questionnaires. International Journal of
Social Psychiatry 42(3).
Pratte, R. (1988) Civic education in a democracy. Theory into Practice, Civic Learning,
27(4), 303-308.
268
Prawat, R. & Floden, R. (1994) Philosophical perspectives on constructivist views of
learning. Educational Psychology, 29(1), 37-48.

Priestley, M. (2009) Social Studies in Scotland’s school curriculum: a case for a more
integrated approach. Education in the North, 17. Online here
Print, M. (1999) Strategies for teaching civics and civil society. In Print, M. Brown, J.
E. & Baginda, A. R. (eds.), Civic education for civil society. London: ASEAN
Academic Press, 81 - 98.

Print, M. Ornstrom, S. & Nielsen, H. (2002) Education for democratic processes in

schools and classrooms: The case of Denmark. European Journal of Education, 37, 2,
193-210.
Proceedings of the fourth national conference in private higher education in Ethiopia.
Addis Ababa: St. Mary’s University College.
Qualifications & Curriculum Authority (2002b). Report on Monitoring Citizenship and
PSHE 2001-2002. London: QCA.
Qualifications & Curriculum Authority (2002c) Designing and timetabling the primary
curriculum: a practical guide for key stage 1 & 2. London: QCA.
Qualifications & Curriculum Authority (2005). Citizenship: 2004/5 annual report on
curriculum and assessment, QCA/05/2165. London, QCA
Quaynor, J. L. (2012) Citizenship education in post-conflict contexts: a review of the
literature. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 33-57.

Ratner, C. (2008) Cultural psychology and qualitative methodology: Scientific and

political considerations. Culture & Psychology, 14, 259-288.
Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Rawls, J., Kelly E. (ed.) (2001) Justice as Fairness: A Restatement, Harward University
Press.

Rea, L. M. & Parker, R. A. (2005) Designing and Conducting Survey Research: A

Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 193–206.

Rebore, R.W. (2007) Human Resource Administration in Education-A Management

Approach. Boston: Pearson.
Reich, R. (2002) Bridging liberalism and multiculturalism in American education.
Chicago: University of Chicago press.
Reimers, F. (2006) Citizenship, identity, and education: Examining the public purposes
of schools in an age of globalization. Prospects, 36(3), 275-294.
Resnick, M. (2002) Rethinking Learning in the Digital Age. In The Global Information
Technology Report: Readiness for the Networked Word. Oxford: Oxford University
Press, 32-37.

269
Ressel, L. B. Gualda, D. M. & Gonzales, R. M. (2002) Focus group as a method of data
collection in nursing research: An experiential report. International Journal of
Qualitative Methods, 1(2), Article 5.
Rice, M. L. & Wilson, E. K. (1999) How technology aids constructivism in the social
studies classroom. Social Studies. 90(1), 28-33.
Riutta, S. (2007) Empowering the Poor? Civic Education and Local Level Participation
in Rural Tanzania and Zambia. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, College of Arts and
Sciences Georgia State University.
Robottom, I. & Hart, P. (1993) Research in environmental education: Engaging the
debate. Geelong, Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Rodney, W. (1972) How Europe underdeveloped Africa. Washington, DC: Howard
University Press.
Rodwell, M. (1998) Social Work Constructivist Research. London. Garland.

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context.

New York: Oxford University Press.
Rokkan, S. (1974) Dimensions of State Formation and Nation Building. In Tilly, C. (ed.),
The Formation of National States in Western Europe, Princeton N.J.: Princeton
University Press, pp. 562-600.
Rossman, G. B. & Wilson, B. L. (1985) Numbers and words: Combing quantitative and
qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9, 627–
643.
Roth W.M. (2000) Authentic School Science: Intellectual Traditions. In McCormick, R.
& Paechter, C. (eds), Learning & Knowledge, London, UK: Paul Chapman Publishing:
6-20.
Rothbard, M. ([1962/1970] 2004) Man, Economy, and State: A Treatise on Economic
Principles—Power and Market: Government and the Economy. [Two books republished
in one file.] Auburn, Alabama: The Ludwig von Mises Institute.
http://www.mises.org/rothbard/mespm.PDF
Rotich, C. D. (2000) Textbook publishing in Kenya under a new Policy on School
textbook procurement. Publishing Research Quarterly, 16 (2), 60-72.
Rotich, C. D. (2004) The affordability of school textbooks in Kenya: Consumer
experiences in the transforming to a liberalising economy. Nordic Journal of African
Studies, 13(2), 175-187.
Russel, B. (1977) On education. London George Allen and Unwin Limited.

Ryan, Alan (1993) Liberalism. In Goodin, R. E. & Pettit, P. (eds.): A Companion to

Contemporary Political Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 291-311.
Salia Bao, S. K. (1981) African Social Studies Programme: A handbook for Social Studies
teachers in Africa. An Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Harvard University.
Sam, V. (2009) Federal Capital Territory (FCT) schools: few classes, many unqualified
teachers. Retrieved March 6, 2014, from http: www.punchng.com/Article.

270
Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Knafl, G. (2009) On quantitizing. Journal of Mixed
Methods Research, 3(3), 208–222.

Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence based policy making.
Public Admin 80(1):1–22.
Santcross, N. Hinchliffe, K. Williams. A. & Onibon, F. (2009) Mid-Term Evaluation of
the EFA fast track Initiative Country Case Study: Nigeria. Abuja: FTI-Nigeria Report
Document.
Saunders, M. Lewis, P. & Thornhill, A. (2009) Research methods for business students
(3rd ed.), London: Prentice Hall.
Schnidt, W.H. & Prawat, R.S. (2006) Curriculum coherence and national control of
education: issue or non-issue? Journal of Curriculum Studies 38(6), 641-658

School Curriculum & Assessment Authority (1996) Education for adult life: the spiritual
and moral development of young people. Discussion Paper No.6 School Curriculum and
Assessment Authority, London.
Schugurensky, D. & Myers, J. P. (2003) Introduction – citizenship education: Theory,
research and practice. Encounters on Education, (4, Fall), pp. 1-10.
Schultz, Wolfram & HeikoSibberns, (eds.) (2004) IEA Civic Education study technical
report. Amsterdam and Washington D.C.: International Association for the Evaluation of
Educational Achievement
Schulz, F. Ainley, L. & Kerr, (2008) International Civic and Citizenship Education Study
Assessment Framework. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational
Achievement.
Schwadel, P. (2002) Testing the Promise of the Churches: Income Inequality in the
Opportunity to Learn Civic Skills in Christian Congregations. Journal for the Scientific
Study of Religion, 41 (3) pp. 565-576.
Searle J.R. (1995). The construction of social reality. Simon and Schuster.

Sechrest, L. & Sidani, S. (1995) Quantitative and qualitative methods. Evaluation

Practice, 18 (1). 81-91.

Selwyn, N. (2007) Technology, Schools and CE: A fix too far? In Loader, B. (Ed.), Young
citizens in the digital age - political engagement, young people and new media. London
and New York: Routledge Taylor and Francis Group, 129-142.

Shah, D. Schmierbach, M. Hawkins, J. Espino, R. & Donavan, J. (2002) Non recursive

models of Internet use and community engagement questioning whether time spent online
erodes social capital. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 964–987.
Shanker, A. (1997) It's Content, Not Process That Counts. American Teacher (81) 5.

Sherwood, D. M, (2010) An Investigation into the Experience of Meeting the Special

Educational Needs of Pupils in Shift Primary Schools in Jamaica. A dissertation

271
submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy,
School of Sport and Education, Brunel University West London United Kingdom.
Shih, F. J. (1998) Triangulation in nursing research: issues of conceptual clarity and
purpose. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 28(3), 631-641.
Shoemaker, B. (1989) Integrative Education: A Curriculum for the Twenty-First Century.
Oregon School Study Council 33/2

Shoqirat, N. (2009) The Role of Jordanian Hospital Nurses in Promoting Patients’

Health. PhD thesis. Queen Margaret University. Accessed
from:http://etheses.qmu.ac.uk/137/

Sifuna, N. M. (2000) Education for democracy and human rights in African schools: The
Kenyan experience. Africa Development. 25(1&2), 213-239.
Sifuna, D.N. & Kaime, J.G. (2007) The effect of in-service education and training
programmes in mathematics and science on classroom interaction: a case study of primary
and secondary schools in Kenya. Africa Education Review, 4 (1), 104-126.
Silverman, S. (2005) Thinking Long Term: physical educations' role in movement and
mobility. Quest, 57, 138-147.

Silverman, S. & Subramanium, P. (1999) Student Attitude Toward Physical Education

and Physical Activity: a review of measurement issues and outcomes. Journal of
Teaching in Physical Education, 19, 97-125.
Simanu-Klutz, L. (1997). Integrated curriculum: A reflection of life itself. Pacific
Education and Learning. Briefing Paper, Pacific Resources for Education and Learning,
Honolulu, Hawaii.
Sinclair, J.M. & Coulthard, R.M. (1975) Towards an Analysis of Discourse Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
Singer, P. (1993) Practical Ethics, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Slabbert, J. & Hattingh, A. (2006) Where is the post-modern truth we have lost in the
reductionist knowledge? A curriculum’s epitaph. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 38 (6):
701718. Routledge pub.
Slepkov, H. (2008) Teacher professional growth in an authentic learning environment.
Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 41(1), 85-111.

Slomczynski, K. M. & Shabad, G. (1998) Can Support for Democracy and the Market Be
Learned in School? A Natural Experiment in Post-Communist Poland. Political
Psychology Vol. 19, No. 4 pp. 749-779.
Smith, A. (2003). Citizenship education in Northern Ireland: beyond national identity?
Cambridge, Journal of Education. 33, 1, 15-31.
Smith, C. & Bhuyan, R. (2012) Constructions of migrant rights in Canada: subnational
citizenship possible? Citizenship Studies16(2), 203-221.

272
Smyth, J. (2010) Banking concept of education. In Kridel, C. (Ed). Encyclopaedia of
curriculum studies. SAGE pub. P.70-71.
Snape, D. & Spencer, L. (2003) The Foundations of Qualitative Research. In Ritchie, J.
& Lewis, J. (Eds.), Qualitative Research Practice: a guide for social science students and
researchers (pp. 1-24). London: Sage.
Sockman, B.R. & Sharma, P. (2008) Struggling toward a Transformative Model of
Instruction: It's Not So Easy! Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(4), 1070-1082.
Sofadekan, O. S (2012) Social Studies Education in Nigeria: The Challenge of Building
a Nation. A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, School of Sport and
Education, Brunel University, London.
Somit, A. Tannenhous, J. Wilke, W. H. & Cooley, R. W. (1958) The effects of the
introductory political science course on student attitudes toward personal participation.
American Political Science Review, 52, 1129–1132.
Soule, S. (2000) Beyond communism and war: The effect of civic education on the
democratic behaviour and attitudes of Bosnian and Herzegovinian youth. Calabasas, CA:
Centre for Civic Education.
Special Interest Group (2000) A survey on the implementation of General Studies. Social
Sciences Department, Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Ssekamwa, J. C, (1997) Development of Education in Uganda. Kampala Fountain
publishers.

Stange, K. C. Crabtree, B. F. & Miller, W. L. (2006). Publishing multimethod research.

Annals of Family Medicine, 4, 292-294.

Steenbergen, B. V. (ed.) (1994) The condition of citizenship. In B. V. Steenbergen (Ed.),

the condition of citizenship. London: Sage Publications.
Steffy, B. E. (1987) How to develop a human development model. School Administrator,
44(5), 14–15.

Stetsenko, A. & Arievitch, I. (1997) Constructing and Deconstructing the Self:

Comparing Post-Vygotskian and Discourse-Based Versions of Social Constructivism.
mind, culture, and activity, 4(3), 159-172.
Stevens, D. (2007) Culture in education and development: Principles, practice and
policy. Oxford: Symposium Books.
Stewart D. & Shamdasani P. (1990) Focus groups Theory and Practice. Sage
Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
Stone, J. R. Alfred, C. & Pearson, D. (2008) Rigour and relevance: Enhancing high school
students’ math skills through career and technical education. American Educational
Research Journal, 45(3), 767-795.
Students in the United States: (1996) Statistical Analysis Report No. NCES 1999-131).
Washington, D.C: National Centre for Education Statistics.

273
Taiwo, C. O. (1980) The Nigerian education system, past, present and future. Thomas
Nelson (Nigeria) Limited.
Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998) Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and
Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2003) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and

Behavioural Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Taylor, N. (2003) Curriculum 2005: Finding a balance between school and everyday
knowledge. In: Gutlig, J. Hoadley, U. &. Jansen, J. (Eds). Curriculum from plans to
practices. Oxford University Press. www.oup.com P.85-97).
Teague, R. (2000) Social Constructivism and Social Studies. Retrieved from
http://moodle.org/pluginfile.php/401/mod_forum/attachment/112845/ SocialCo.pdf.
Thaman, K.H. (1988) Towards culturally inclusive teacher education with specific
reference to Oceania. International Education Journal, 2(5) 1-8.

Tharp, R.G. & Dalton, S. S. (2007). Orthodoxy, cultural compatibility and universals in
education. Comparative Education, pp. Vol. 43 (1), 53-70
The Nation Thursday, October 16, 2008 Pp. 17-32.

The Nation Newspaper, 7 November 2011

Theobald, D. Umar, A. Ochekpe, S. & Sani, K. (2007) Country Profile commissioned for
the EFA Global Monitoring Report 2008, Education For All by 2015: will we make it?
UNESCO: EFA for GMR.
Thorsen, D. E. & Lie, A. (ed.) (2006) What is neo-liberalism?
http://folk.uio.no/daget/What%20is%20Neo-Liberalism% 20FINAL.pdf

Tibbitts, F. & Torney-Purta, J. (1999) Citizenship Education in Latin America: Preparing

for the Future. A monograph developed under the auspices of the Education Unit of the
Inter-American Development Bank Published by Human Rights Education Associates
(HREA).
Tibenderana, P. K. (1983) The Emirs and the spread of Western education in Northern
Nigeria, 1910-1946. The Journal of African History, 24(4), 517-534.
Tiberondwa, A. K. (2001) Missionary Teachers as Agents of Colonialism in Uganda: A
study of their Activities 1877-1925. Kampala; Fountain publishers. The Government
White Paper on Education (1992), Education for National Integration and Development.
Kampala – Uganda.
Tobih, D. O Akintar, O.A & Osunlana, D. O (2013) Effect of Class Size Reduction on
Students’ Performance in Mathematics in JSSCE Examination in Ibadan Municipal.
International J. Educational Research 1 (4), pp165 - `178.
Tones, K & Tilford, S. (2001) Health promotion: effectiveness, efficiency and equity.
(3thrd edition). Cheltenham: Nelson Thomas Publishers Ltd.

274
Tor, G. H. (2009) Measuring youth civic development in Malaysia: conceptualization,
instrument development using the Rasch measurement model, and substantive outcome.
A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Murdoch University.
Torney-Purta, J. (1995) Psychological theory as a basis for political socialization
research. Perspectives on Political Science, 24, 1, 23-34.
Torney-Purta, J. (1999) Creating citizenship: Youth development for free and democratic
society. Background convening paper, presented at the creating citizenship: Youth
development for free and democratic society. Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Torney-Purta, J. (2002) Patterns in the Civic Knowledge, Engagement, and Attitudes of
European Adolescents: The IEA Civic Education Study. European Journal of Education
37 (2): 129-141.
Torney-Purta, J. Lehmann, R. Oswald, H. & Schulz, W. (2001) Citizenship and education
in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam:
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Torney-Purta, J. Schwille, J. Amadeo, Jo-Ann (Eds.), (1999). Civic Education across
Countries: Twenty-four National Case Studies from the IEA Civic Education Project.
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Amsterdam:
lEA.
Tsafe, A.K. (2013). A critical analysis of universal basic education and its
implementation so far. Scientific Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 2(1) 23-34.
Tsang, Wing-Kwong, T. (1996) Citizenship education, modernity and post modernity: a
sociological analysis. In Lo, Nai-kwai. L. & Si-wai M. (Eds.) Moral and civic education.
Hong Kong: Hong Kong Institute of Educational Research, the Chinese University of
Hong Kong. (Pp. ll-38).
Tsui, K. T. & Cheng, Y. C. (1999) School organisational health and teacher commitment:
A contingency study with multi-level analysis. Educational Research and Evaluation,
5(3), 249-268.
Turner, B. (1992) Outline of a Theory of Citizenship. In Mouffe, C. (1992a) (ed.)
Dimensions of Radical Democracy: Pluralism, Citizenship, Community. London: Verso,
pp. 33-62.
Turner, B. S. (1990) Outline of a theory of citizenship. Sociology, 24(2), 189-217.

Tyler, R. W. (1948) Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction: Chicago University,

Chicago University Press.
Udoh, E. N. (2000) Social Studies and Citizenship Education. In Ogundare, S. F.
Foundations of Social Studies. Ibadan: Adesesan Press.
Ukpokodu, N. (1997) Developing democratic citizens for emerging democracies in
Africa. Social Education, 61(2), 93-96.
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO) (2003)
United Nations Decade for Sustainable Development (January 2005-December 2014:
Framework for a Draft International Implementation Scheme. UNESCO, July 2003.

275
United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organisation (UNESCO)/ Education
for All. (2009) Global Monitoring Report. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO, (2001) Teacher education through distance learning. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO, (2004) Education for all: Global monitoring report. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO, (2005) Education for All: Global monitoring report. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO, (2006) Education for all: Global monitoring report. Paris: UNESCO.

United Kingdom / Federal Government of Nigeria (2009) Capacity for Universal Basic
Education in Nigeria. An Official Documentary of the DFID’s Programme in Nigeria
Eighth Report of Session 2008–09 Volume I
United Nations Development Programme (2004) Civic Education: Practical Guidance
Note: United Nation Development Programme-Bureau for Development Policy-
Democratic Governance Group.
United Nations. (2012) United Nations Secretary-General’s Global Education First
Initiative. 2 http://www.globaleducationfirst.org/files/GEFI_Brochure_ENG.pdf.
United States Department of Education. (2003) Identifying and implementing educational
practices supported by rigorous evidence: a user friendly guide. Retrieved on December
5th, 2011 from http://www.ed.gov/rschstat/research/pubs/rigourousevid.pdf
United Nations (1990). United Nations Convention on Rights of the child.

Unknown Author (2004). Enhancing your Teaching Effectiveness. Internet Paper

retrieved on 9 October 2014.
http://www.21c.uoguelph.ca/documents/13%20enhancing%20your%20teaching%20eff
ectiveness.doc
United States Agency for International Development (2001) Overview of United States
Agency for International Development Basic Education Programs in Sub-Saharan Africa
III, SD Publication Series, USAID, Technical Paper No. 106.
United States Agency for International Development (2002) Approaches to Civic
Education: Lessons Learnt. Technical Publication Series. Washington, DC: U.S. Agency
for International Development. Office of Democracy and Governance. Bureau for
Democracy, Conflict, and Humanitarian Assistance. June.
Van Eekelen, I. M. Vermunt, J. D. & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2006) Exploring teachers'
will to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 408–423.

Van Gunsteren, H. (1998). A theory of citizenship: Organizing plurality in

contemporary democracies. Boulder: Westview press.

Van Maneen, M. (1990) Researching Lived Experience. Human Science for an Action
Sensitive Pedagogy. The University of Western Ontario, Ontario.
Van Maanen, J. (1983) Reclaiming Qualitative Methods for Organizational Research. In
Van Maanen, Qualitative Methodology, (ed.), Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, pp.
9-18.

276
Van Zee, E. H. & Minstrell, J. A. (1997a) Reflective discourse: Developing shared
understandings in a physics classroom. International Journal of Science Education 19,
209-228.

Van Zee, E. & Minstrell, J. (1997b) Using questioning to guide student thinking. Journal
of the Learning Sciences, 6(2), 227-269.
Vanguard Thursday, February 12, 2009 P. 4.

Veale, A. (2005) Creative Methodologies in Participatory Research with Children. In

Greene, S. & Hogan, D. (Eds.), Researching children’s experience: methods and
approaches. London: Sage, 253-270.

Verba, S. Scholzman, K. & Brady, H. (1997) Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in
American Politics. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 30(2), 380-381.

Vincent, O. M (2012) The Impact of Corporate Environmental Responsibility on

Financial Performance: Perspective from The Multinational Extractive Sector. A Thesis
Submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Brunel Business School Brunel
University
Vonk, J. H. S. (Ed.). (1991) Becoming a teacher: Brace yourself. Singapore: Institute of
Education.
Votz, T. S. & Nixon, W. A. (1999) Reconsidering issue-centred civic education among
early adolescents, Project Citizen in the United states and abroad. In Bahmueller C. F. &
Patrick, J. J. (Eds.), Principles and Practices of Education for Democratic Citizenship:
International perspectives and projects, ERIC Adjunct Clearinghouse for International
Civic Education, USA, p, p. 141-162.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978) Mind in society: the development of higher psychological
processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.

Vygotsky L (1986) Thought and Language. Cambridge and London: MIT Press

Waldschmitt, L. (2010) Education and citizenship in urban Tanzania: A study of

secondary student conceptions of democracy and civic engagement. Unpublished M. Phil,
Institute for Educational Research, UniversitetetI Oslo.
Walzer, M. (1990) The Communitarian Critique of Liberalism. Political Theory, 18(1),
pp. 6-23.
Warren, M. (1992) Democratic Theory and Self-Transformation, American Political
Science Review 86(1): 8–32.

Watkins C & Mortimer P. (1999) Pedagogy: What do we know? In Mortimer P. (Ed)

(1999) Understanding pedagogy and its impact on teaching. (pp 1-19) London:
Chapman.
Watkins, C. Carnell, E. & Lodge, C. (2007) Effective Learning in Classrooms London,
Sage.

277
Wayne, A. J. & Youngs, P. (2003) Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains:
A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89-122.
Wegerif, R. (2010). What does it mean to teach thinking? Philosophy for Children as an
example of dialogic education. [DRAFT for ICPIC 2009 Conference Proceedings]
Weick, K.E. (1993a) Organizational redesign as improvisation. In Huber, G.P. & Glick,
W.H. (Eds.), Organizational Change and Redesign. New York: Oxford University Press,
pp. 346– 379.
Wells, G. (1999) Dialogic Inquiry: Towards a Sociocultural Practice and Theory of
Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Welzel, C. & Alexander, A. C. (2008) Measuring effective democracy: The human
empowerment approach. World Values Research 1(1):1-35.
Wendy, K. R. (2003) Connecting Political Discussion to Civic Engagement: The Role of
Civic Knowledge, Efficacy and Context for Adolescents. Unpublished PhD Thesis,
Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park.
Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Wertsch, J. V. (1985) Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, mass:
Harvard University Press.
Westbrook, J. Durrani, N. Brown, R, Orr, D. Pryor, J. Boddy J. & Salvi, F. (2013)
Pedagogy, Curriculum, Teaching Practices and Teacher Education in Developing
Countries. Final Report. Education Rigorous Literature Review. Department for
International Development.
Westherimer, J. & Kahne, J. (2004). What kind of Citizens? The politics of educating for
democracy. American Educational Research Journal 41(2) 237-269.
Westholm, A. Lindquist, A. & Niemi, R. (1990) Education and the making of the
informed citizen: Political literacy and the outside world. In Ichilov O. (Ed.), Political
socialization, citizen education, and democracy (pp. 177–204). New York: Columbia
University.
Wheeler, D. K. (1976). Curriculum Process. Great Britain Hoddern and Stoghnton
Education.
White, B. W. (1996). Talk about school: Education and the colonial project in French and
British Africa (1860-1960). Comparative Education, 32(1), 9-25.
Wiersma, W. (1995) Research Methods in Education: An Introduction (6th ed.). Boston,
MA Allyn and Bacon.
Wilen, W. W. & White, J. J. (1991) Interaction and discourse in social studies classrooms.
In J. P. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of research on social studies teaching and learning: A
project of the National Council for the Social Studies. (pp. 483-795). New York:
Macmillan Publishing Company.
Williams J. & Chinn S. (2009) Using 2.0 to Support the Active Learning Experience,
Journal of Information Systems Education, 20(2), 165-174.

278
Williams, L. (2008) Nigeria: The bradt travel guide (2nd ed.). Chalfont St Peter: Bradt
Publications.
Williams, M. & Burden, R. (1997) Psychology for language teachers, a social
constructivist approach. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Williamson, G. (2005) Illustrating triangulation in mixed-methods nursing research.
Nurses Researcher, 12(4), pp. 7-17.
Winton, S., (2007) Does character education really support citizenship education?
Examining the claims of an Ontario policy. Canadian Journal of Educational
Administration and Policy, (66, December), pp.
Wood D. Bruner J. Ross G. (1976) The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of
Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 89-100.

Woolman, D. C. (2001) Educational reconstruction and post-colonial curriculum

development: A comparative study of four African countries. International Education
Journal, 2(5), 27-46.
World Bank (2013) Countries and economies. Retrieved from: data.worldbank.org

World Bank. (2003) School education in Nigeria: Preparing for universal basic education.
Human Development III Africa Region. Retrieved from:
siteresources.worldbank.org/AFRICAEXT/Resources/no_53.pdf
World Health Organisation (1998) Regional health for target. http://www.who.int/en/.
[accessed on July 6th 2008].

Yadav, B. & Bhardwaj, P. (2013) Impact of In-service Teacher Education Programmes

on Classroom Transactions Educational Confab Vol. 2, No. 6.
Yaroson, L. K. (1998) An investigation into the attitudes of Social Studies teachers
towards continuous assessment in junior secondary schools in Plateau State. An
Unpublished M. Ed Thesis, Faculty of Education, University of Jos, Jos.
Yates, M. & Youniss, J. (1998). Community service and political identity development
in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 54, 3, 495-512.
Yilmaz, K. (2008) Constructivism: Its theoretical underpinnings, variations, and
implications for classroom instruction Educational Horizons, 86, pp. 161-172.

Yu, G. (2004) Perception, practice and progress: Significance of scaffolding and zone of
proximal development for second or foreign language teachers. Asian EFL Journal, 6(4).
Retrieved July 2010 from http://www.asian-efl-journal.com/december_04_YZ.php.
Yusuf, A. (n-d.) Professionalizing teaching for the development of the education sector.
Retrieved September, 30 20 10, from
http://www.musero.org/professionalisin~development - education-sector-pdf
Zaman, H. (2006). Teachers’ Perceptions of Citizenship and Citizenship Education: A
Comparative Study. A Doctor of Philosophy degree submitted to the Graduate Faculty,
School of Education, University of Pittsburgh.
279
Zarnbo, R. & Zarnbo, D. (2008) The impact of professional development in mathematics
on teachers' individual and collective efficacy: the stigma of underperforming. Teacher
Education Quarterly, 1 59- 168. Website
http//Honolulu.hawaii/guidebk/teachtip/enhance.html
Zukin, C. Keeter, S. Andolina, M. Jenkins, K. & Delli Carpini, M. X. (2006) A new
Engagement? New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

280
 Appendices

Appendix 1

Civic Experts Questionnaire (PCEQ) (1)

Specimen of Questionnaires

This questionnaire is part of the study to explore the impact of civic education curriculum towards
developing in learners’ effective citizenship as required by the national education policy.
Therefore, this questionnaire requires your assessment of the appropriateness, strengths and
weaknesses of civic education objectives, presently implemented, towards achieving this goal
(sound and effective citizenship) in young learners.

Section A

Please tick the correct option

Gender: Male [√] Female [ ]

Institutions: University [ √] College Of Education [ ] Polytechnic [ ]

Area of Specialization: Social Studies [ √ ] Political Science [ ] Sociology [ ] others (please

Specify)………………………………

Designation: Lecturer 1[ ] Senior Lecturer [ √ ] Principal Lecturer [ ] Reader/Associate

Professor [ ] Chief Lecturer [ ] Professor [ ]

Years of Service: 6-10 years [ ] 11-20 years [ √ ] 21 years and above [ ]

Qualifications: PhD [ √ ] Post Doctoral [ ]

Section B

This study uses the following effective citizenship development definitions: Developing effective
citizenship involves:

1. Constructing Conventional and Social/Community Knowledge: Young learners need to

know about subject-matter involving the political system- structure of the federal system
of government, constitutional issues, organs of government and the duties of government,
the political processes (roles of the government and citizens’ rights.

2. Developing Civic Dispositions: Young learners need to develop essential traits which will
promote citizenship values. These are traits of character and commitments such as respect
for the worth and dignity of each person, civility, integrity, self-discipline, tolerance,
compassion, and patriotism. Commitments include a dedication to human rights,
community participation for the common good,. Also traits such as social/community
obligation, self-discipline and respect for the worth and dignity of every individual; public
spiritedness, civility, respect for the rule of law, critical mindedness and willingness to
listen, negotiate and compromise are indispensable to democracy’s success.

3. Acquiring Civic Skills: For the young learners to participate in public socio-political life
requires the acquisition of civic skills such as giving meaning to socio-political
statements; communication (ability to write effectively and to deliver speeches or make
statements in a public forum); collaborative (group discussions) activities, community
281
 participation skills (understand issues from social/political perspectives, collective
decisions making) and news monitoring skills (to be aware of public events and issues,
know about current issues).

The questionnaire is asking you about your views on the objectives by indicating whether the
objectives stated below are appropriate to develop the three components of effective citizenship
development and to know what you think are the strengths and weaknesses of these objectives.

Objectives of civic education

According to the Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (2007), the objectives
of civic education at the junior secondary education level are to:

1. acquire and learn to use the skills, attitudes, knowledge and values that will prepare the
young learners to be competent and responsible citizens throughout their lives;

2. create an awareness of the provisions of the Nigerian constitution and the need for
democracy;

3. create adequate and functional political literates among Nigerians and the technological
knowledge to meet societal needs;

4. sensitize Nigerians on the functions and obligations of government;

5. inculcate in the child the spirit of self-discipline, hard work, cooperation and respect for
authority;

6. attain the Millennium Development Goals and implement the critical element of National
Economic Empowerment and Development Strategies.

The Nigerian Educational Research and Development Council (2009), stated the objectives of
civic education at the senior secondary education level as to:

1. promote the understanding of the inter-relationship between man/woman, the government

and the society;

2. highlight the structure of government, its functions and the responsibilities of government
to the people and vice-versa;

3. enhance the teaching and learning of emerging issues.

4. Inculcate in students their duties and obligations to the society.

Section C:

Please indicate whether you agree (A)/not agree (NA)/not sure (NS) that the
objectives listed in Section B are appropriate to construct knowledge by young learners at both

282
the junior and senior secondary levels. Such knowledge in this study involved those stated in
section B above.

Agree (A), Not agree (NA), Not sure (NS)

(1) STATEMENTS ON THE OBJECTIVES OF CIVIC EDUCATION A NA NS
A Acquire and learn to use the skill, attitudes, knowledge and values that will prepare √
young learners to be competent and responsible citizens throughout their lives.
B Attain the Millennium Development Goals and the need to implement the critical √
element of National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategies.
C Create awareness on the provisions of the Nigerian constitution and the need for √
democracy.
D Create adequate and functional political literates among Nigerians. √
E Sensitize Nigerians on the functions and obligations of government. √
F Inculcate in the child the spirit of self-discipline, hard work, cooperation and respect √
for authority.
G promote the understanding of the inter-relationship between man/woman, the √
government and the society;
H highlight the structure of government, its functions and the responsibilities of √
government to the people and vice-versa;
I enhance the teaching and learning of emerging issues. √
J Inculcate in students their duties and obligations to the society. √

(2a) Specify the objective(s), if any, which you think is/are most appropriate and relevant to
improve civic and political knowledge in the students from the list of the objectives above. (It is
acceptable to give the number of the objective.)

A, B, C and D

(2b) Please explain the reasons for your choice.

Learners acquire requisite knowledge, attitudes and skills in order to be

competent, responsible citizens.

Section D

Please indicate whether you agree (A)/not agree (NA)/not sure (NS) that the objectives listed
in Section B are appropriate and relevant to develop civic dispositions by learners at both the
junior and senior secondary levels. Such civic dispositions in this study involved those stated in
section B above.

Agree (A), Not agree (NA), Not sure (NS)

(1) STATEMENTS ON THE OBJECTIVES OF CIVIC EDUCATION A NA NS
A Acquire and learn to use the skill, attitudes, knowledge and values that will prepare √
the young learners to be competent and responsible citizens throughout their lives.
B Attain the Millennium Development Goals and the need to implement the critical √
element of National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategies.
C Create awareness on the provisions of the Nigerian constitution and the need for √
democracy.

283
 D Create adequate and functional political literates among Nigerians. √
E Sensitize Nigerians on the functions and obligations of government. √
F Inculcate in the child the spirit of self-discipline, hard work, cooperation and respect √
for authority.
G promote the understanding of the inter-relationship between man/woman, the
government and the society;
H highlight the structure of government, its functions and the responsibilities of
government to the people and vice-versa;
I enhance the teaching and learning of emerging issues.
J Inculcate in students their duties and obligations to the society.

(4a) Specify the objective(s), if any, which you think is/are most appropriate and relevant to
develop civic attitudes, values (reorientations), social and moral responsibility in the students
from the list of the objectives above. (It is acceptable to give the number of the objective.)

(4b) Please explain the reasons for your choice.

It spells out the right attitudes that civic education teach

Section E

Please indicate whether you agree (A)/not agree (NA)/not sure (NS) that the objectives listed
in Section B are appropriate for learners to acquire civic skills at both the Junior and senior
secondary levels. Such civic skills in this study involved those stated in section B above.

Agree (A), Not agree (NA), Not sure (NS)

(1) STATEMENTS ON THE OBJECTIVES OF CIVIC EDUCATION A NA NS
a Acquire and learn to use the skill, attitudes, knowledge and values that will prepare √
the young learners to be competent and responsible citizens throughout their lives.
B Attain the Millennium Development Goals and the need to implement the critical √
element of National Economic Empowerment and Development Strategies.
c Create awareness on the provisions of the Nigerian constitution and the need for √
democracy.
d Create adequate and functional political literates among Nigerians. √
e Sensitize Nigerians on the functions and obligations of government. √
f Inculcate in the child the spirit of self-discipline, hard work, cooperation and respect √
for authority.
G promote the understanding of the inter-relationship between man/woman, the
government and the society;
H highlight the structure of government, its functions and the responsibilities of
government to the people and vice-versa;
I enhance the teaching and learning of emerging issues.
J Inculcate in students their duties and obligations to the society.

284
(5a) Specify the objective(s), if any, which you think is/are most appropriate and relevant to
develop civic skills in the students from the list of the objectives above. (It is acceptable to give
the number of the objective.)

A, B and D

(5b) Please explain the reasons for your choice.

They explain what is expected of the citizens, what they should do to uphold democracy.

Section F

(Please tick)

6a Statement Yes No

Overall, do you think all these objectives are appropriate and relevant to achieve the three √
citizenship development (as explained above) in the learners?

6b) Please explain your reasons.

They all address knowledge, attitudes, behaviours, skills and practices

(Please tick)

7a Statement Yes No

Do you think that any of these objectives should be reviewed in order to achieve
citizenship development (as explained above) in the learners?

b) If yes, please explain your reasons.

None

8) What do you think are the strengths and weaknesses of the objectives of the civic education
curriculum in achieving citizenship orientations (as explained above) in the students?

285
 Appendix 2

Perceived Civic Teacher’s Questionnaire (PCTQ)

Civic Teachers Specimen Questionnaire

286
287
288
289
 Appendix 3

Civic Learners’ Questionnaire (PCLQ)

Civic Learner Specimen Questionnaire

290
291
292
293
 Appendix 4a-f

Local Education Districts Approval Letters

294
295
296
297
298
 Appendix 5

Brunel University, School of Education Ethics approval letters

Research Letters of Approval

299
 Appendix 6a
Focus Group Discussions questions
Civic Learners' Focus Group Discussion Questions
1. Civic Knowledge Constructions:
(a) Has civic education classroom teaching helped your knowledge construction on
Nigeria past and present political system, obedience to law, voting, political party
membership and peaceful protest? (b) Has it taught you about patriotism and loyalty to
Nigeria?
2. Civic Dispositions Development:
(a) Since you have started taking civic education, will you say that it is a waste of time
because it has not brought out about any good change in your thinking? (b) Is civic
education classroom teaching a waste of time because it has not changed your
dispositions and behaviour towards our political officeholders (politicians)? (c)
Whatever feelings you are having about them, has civic education teaching/learning
changed it?

3. Civic Skills Acquisitions

(a) Has civic education helped you to know your rights? to be conscious of human right
activities and to exercise/apply your right? (b) Has civic education taught you how to
engage in activities that would benefit your community? Such activities like
environmental sanitation or maybe you just feel like let me go to the front of my house
and clean it along with other people? (c) Do you agree that civic education has develop
in you the ability to participate in community service? (d) Did civic education help you
to discuss (debate) as you are doing because I am overwhelmed? Has civic education
helped to develop spirit of cooperation and collaboration in you?
4. Methods of teaching civic education
When your teachers are teaching you civic education, do they use dramatisation, role-
play or simulation games method or all of them? Do you think, all these methods, if they
use them can have impact in you and you want them to be using it?
5. Instructional Materials:
Do they give civic education textbooks in the schools? How many of you say you were
not given? Does civic education textbooks have any impact on your life? Does it change
your citizenship development? Or it is what your teacher teaches you without it in the
classroom?

External Factors:
(a) Does your teacher invite people from outside to talk on civic or political issues? (b)
Does your teacher take you out on excursion? Why do you think they do not do these?

Open classroom Discussion

(a) Does your teacher allow you to express your views on political or civic issues during
civic class? Does expressing yourself, (your opinion) during civic education class has any
impact in changing your citizenship development?

Other factors within and outside the school

300
 Apart from civic education, are there other factors within and outside the school which
helped you to learn about civic issues. Or is it only through civic education you have
learnt?

Appendix 6b

Civic Teacher’s Focus Group Discussion Issues/Questions

1. Recruitment:
The need for adequate recruitment of qualified teachers to teach civic education. (a) Were
qualified civic education teachers recruited when civic education was reintroduced? (b)
What were the possible impact of such recruitment on the teaching/learning of civic
education.
2. Teachers’ Continuous Professional Development
(a) How regularly do you (civic teachers) attend in-service training/retraining? (b) What
are the possible impact of such training/retraining (if any) on you to achieve civic
objectives?.
3. Instructional Materials:
(a) What is the quality and relevance of teachers/learners' text/hand books?. (b) How
adequate were the civic education hand/textbooks provided in your schools? (c) Are there
other instructional materials which you think can be used but were not provided? (d) Do
you think these materials have any impact on civic education curriculum
teaching/learning?
4. Open Classroom Discussion:
(a) As civic education teachers, do you operate open classroom discussion? (b) Who lead
discussions on citizenship issue being taught? (c) Do you think that when you lead these
discussion, it changes your young learners citizenship development? (d) Do you practice
group project presentation during civic classroom learning?
5. Teacher’s Qualities/Attributes:
(a) As a civic education teacher, do your citizenship views influence your learners
perceptions of citizenship development?
6. External influence:
(a) Do you bring real life situation into your classroom by inviting people from the
community or take your learners on excursion?
7. Methods of teaching civic education
(a) As a civic education teacher, do you practice active participatory/interactive teaching
method like role play, simulation, Games, inter alia?

8. Other factors within and/or outside the school

Apart from classroom civic education, are there other factors within and/or outside the
school which can impact (change) your young learners' citizenship development?

301
 Appendix 7a
Young Learners’ Information Sheet and Consent Form

Dear Learner,

I am conducting a research project about the impact of Civic Education Curriculum on

effective citizenship development of learners in both junior and senior secondary
education in Nigeria.

In view of this, you are invited to be involved in this research by exploring your
perceptions about the Civic Curriculum. if you agree to take part in the research, you will
be asked to complete a questionnaire on your views on whether Civic Education
Curriculum has developed effective citizenship in you. You will also be asked to
participate in a focus group discussion on similar topics.

All information from the questionnaire and focus group interviews will be completely
confidential. The focus groups will be carried out by me and my assistants. We will ask
for your permission to audio-record the discussion sessions. Your real names will not be
used in any reports, making it impossible for anyone to identify you.

You can withdraw at any time without consequences of any kind. You may also refuse to
answer any questions you do not want to answer and still remain in the group.

If you are happy to take part in this research we would be grateful if you would sign and
return the consent form below. If you have any questions at any point you can contact my
research supervisor, Dr Heather Mendick. By email at: heather.mendick@brunel.ac.uk.

Yours faithfully

Samuel Olayinka Idowu

I have read the information about the study and give my consent to participate.
Name __________________________________________________
Signed _____________________________________________

School of Sport and Education, Brunel University

302
 Appendix 7b

Perceptions and Attitudes of Key Stakeholders on the Impact of the Nigerian

Civic Education Curriculum on Citizenship Orientations
Teachers’ Information Sheet and Consent Form
Dear Teacher,

I am conducting a research project about the impact of Civic Education Curriculum on the citizenship
orientations of students in both junior and senior secondary education in Nigeria.

In view of this, you are invited to be involved in this research by exploring your perceptions and attitudes
about the Civic Curriculum. if you agree to take part in the research, you will be asked to complete a
questionnaire about your thoughts, views and dispositions on whether Civic Education Curriculum has
developed your citizenship orientations. You will also be asked to participate in a focus group discussion
on similar topics.

All information from the questionnaire and focus group interviews will be completely confidential. The
focus groups will be carried out by me and my assistants. We will ask for your permission to audio-record
the discussion sessions. Your real names will not be used in any reports, making it impossible foranyone to
identify you.

You can withdraw at any time without consequences of any kind. You may also refuse to answer any
questions you do not want to answer and still remain in the group.

If you are happy to take part in this research we would be grateful if you would sign and return the consent
form below. If you have any questions at any point you can contact my research supervisor, Dr Heather
Mendick. By email at: heather.mendick@brunel.ac.uk.

Yours faithfully

Samuel Olayinka Idowu

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
…………

I have read the information about the study and give my consent to participate.

Name __________________________________________________
Signed _____________________________________________

School of Sport and Education, Brunel University

303