Failure Analysis of A Modern High Performance Dies
Failure Analysis of A Modern High Performance Dies
Failure Analysis of A Modern High Performance Dies
Research Article
Failure Analysis of a Modern High Performance
Diesel Engine Cylinder Head
Copyright © 2014 Bingbin Guo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License,
which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
This paper presents a failure analysis on a modern high performance diesel engine cylinder head made of gray cast iron. Cracks
appeared intensively at the intersection of two exhaust passages in the cylinder head. The metallurgical examination was conducted
in the crack origin zone and other zones. Meanwhile, the load state of the failure part of the cylinder head was determined through
the Finite Element Analysis. The results showed that both the point of the maximum temperature and the point of the maximum
thermal-mechanical coupling stress were not in the crack position. The excessive load was not the main cause of the failure. The large
cooling rate in the casting process created an abnormal graphite zone that existed below the surface of the exhaust passage (about
1.1 mm depth), which led to the fracture of the cylinder head. In the fractured area, there were a large number of casting defects (dip
sand, voids, etc.) and inferior graphite structure (type D, type E) which caused stress concentration. Moreover, high temperature
gas entered the cracks, which caused material corrosion, material oxidization, and crack propagation. Finally, premature fracture
of the cylinder head took place.
Element Test engine designation Cycle hours at failure (hours) Mode of failure
Engine A 150 Cracked cylinder head
Engine A 189 Piston ring failure
Engine A 268 Cracked cylinder head
Durability assessment tests
Engine A 398 Turbocharger failure
Engine B 262 Cracked cylinder head
Engine B 419 Cracked cylinder head
3.2. Microstructure. The microstructure observations on the 3.3. Chemical Composition of the Cylinder Head Material. The
samples taken from the fractured end were conducted by chemical composition of the failed cylinder head material was
(a) (a)
(b) (b)
Figure 3: Typical microstructure of the cylinder head material: (a) Figure 5: Microstructure of the normal graphite: (a) low magnifi-
low magnification; (b) high magnification. cation; (b) high magnification.
Table 2: Chemical composition of the gray cast iron used in the failed cylinder head (wt%).
C Si Mn S P Cr O Fe
Piece A 4.09 2.07 1.03 0.12 0.08 0.38 3.21 Balance
Piece B 5.24 2.05 1.01 0.07 0.08 0.44 0.08 Balance
(a)
(a)
(b)
(b)
Figure 7: Two cracks are derived from casting defects: (a) voids; (b)
Figure 6: Microstructure of the abnormal graphite: (a) low magni- dip sand.
fication; (b) high magnification.
(a)
(b)
(c)
NT11 NT11
+3.816e + 02 +3.816e + 02
Cracking site
+3.553e + 02 +3.553e + 02
+3.290e + 02 +3.290e + 02
+3.027e + 02 +3.027e + 02
+2.765e + 02 +2.765e + 02 Cracking site
+2.502e + 02 +2.502e + 02
+2.239e + 02 +2.239e + 02
+1.976e + 02 +1.976e + 02
+1.713e + 02 +1.713e + 02
+1.451e + 02 +1.451e + 02
+1.188e + 02 +1.188e + 02
+9.249e + 01 +9.249e + 01
+6.620e + 01 +6.620e + 01
(a) (b)
Figure 12: Temperature field: (a) a sectional view; (b) exhaust crossing.
+1.397e + 02 6
+1.174e + 02
+9.501e + 01
4
+7.265e + 01
+5.029e + 01
2
+2.793e + 01
+5.574e + 00
0
Figure 13: Thermal-mechanical coupling stress field.
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4
Strain
20∘ C, 1 400∘ C, 2
20∘ C, 2 500∘ C, 1
400∘ C, 1 500∘ C, 2
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests
regarding the publication of this paper.
References
[1] “Gray cast iron metallography,” China Standard GB 7216, 2009.
[2] X. Xu and Z. Yu, “Failure analysis of a diesel engine cylinder
head,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 13, no. 7, pp. 1101–1107,
2006.
[3] T. Seifert and H. Riedel, “Mechanism-based thermomechanical
fatigue life prediction of cast iron. Part I: models,” International
Journal of Fatigue, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 1358–1367, 2010.
[4] F. J. Espadafor, J. B. Villanueva, and M. T. Garcı́a, “Analysis
of a diesel generator crankshaft failure,” Engineering Failure
Analysis, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 2333–2341, 2009.