10522-WJST Template (Full Article) - 53414-1-10-20210214
10522-WJST Template (Full Article) - 53414-1-10-20210214
10522-WJST Template (Full Article) - 53414-1-10-20210214
http://wjst.wu.ac.th https://doi.org/10.48048/wjst.2021.10522
Abstract
Tis study aimed to evaluate the embryo quality and embryo transfer rate of Thai crossbred goats fed
different levels of protein in total mixed rations (TMR) during the hot season. Twenty-four non- pregnant
Thai crossbred goats with an average body weight of 26±5.9 kg were assigned with a random complete
block design (RCBD). Dietary treatments contained 8, 13, and 18 % crude protein (CP) in TMR. The
feeding trial lasted for 42 days. Does (female goat) were scheduled to determine embryo quality by
surgical laparotomy and flushing. At the end of the feeding trial, the digestion trial was conducted by the
total collection method for a 5-day period. The results showed that the average total feed intake and feed
conversion ratio did not differ among all treatments (p ˃ 0.05), however, digestible protein intake had
increased from 70.39, 79.77 to 89.11 g/d in 8, 13, and 18 % CP group, respectively. Increasing CP levels
in TMR resulted in linearly increased goat final body weight (30.25, 28.75, and 32.00 kg), weight gain
(3.00, 4.00, and 4.25 kg), and average daily gain (ADG) (87.84, 114.87 and 121.63 g/d). Embryo quality
(1, 1, and 3.5 morular follicle state) and pregnancy of embryo transfer rate (25, 25, and 50 %) of the
animal received CP level at 8 and 13 % less than that 18 %. These results indicated that dietary protein
level during program superovulation regimen affected the good quality of an embryo and the pregnancy
rate in an embryo transfer in Thai crossbred goats.
Keywords: Embryo, Goats, Nutrition, Pregnancy rate, Reproduction, Superovulation
Introduction
Goat farming is practiced worldwide, with goat products having a favorable image [1,2]. The
number of goats has increased globally, even in countries with high and intermediate incomes, despite
major changes in agriculture due to industrial mergers, globalization, and technological advances in
developed countries [3,4]. There are 30 million heads of cashmere goats around the world [5]. Goat
production is one of the key elements contributing to the economy of farmers living in the arid and semi-
arid regions. [6,7]. The most important goat breeding continents are Asia and Africa [8]. In developing
countries, 96 % of the milk and meat producing goat populations are found and 4 % are found in
developed countries [9]. Increasing meat production using scientific, accurate, and precise selective
programs are one of the most important goals for the genetic improvement of goats [10]. This can be done
by identifying the genetic reproductive and productive traits of animals [11-13]. Moreover, ruminant
production is primarily based on locally available feed resources. Goat production is one of the most
popular ruminant animals due to its advantages in high reproductive performance and small land for
rearing. Goats are fed based on both natural forages and agricultural by-products. The does are small
ruminants which have a high potential to utilize low-quality roughage and can adjust well and consume
natural feedstuffs, most goats are raised in public fields alongside roads by smallholder farmers with an
average number of 26.3 head per household [14]. Thailand is located in the tropical region where high
temperature and high moisture contents can be met. Heat stress is well known to influence animal
production and reproduction. The heat stress demonstrates less the pregnancy rate in goats and has been
thought to be associated with early embryonic death. In vitro cultures have been more used for the
evaluation of effects of heat stress on oocytes, fertilization, preimplantation, and embryonic development
[15]. Nutrition is one of the most important and controllable management factors influencing
reproductions [16]. The effect of dietary protein on reproduction is complex, lacking protein intake
reduced reproductive performance [17]. More recently it has been found that reproductive performance
may be impaired if a protein is fed in amounts that greatly exceed the animal’s requirements. Over-
feeding of either as protein or urea has been associated with decreased pregnancy rates in female dairy
and beef cattle [18,19]. It appears that exposure to high levels of ammonia or urea may impair the
maturation of oocyte and subsequent fertilization or maturation of developing embryos. However,
supplying adequate energy for the excretion of excess ammonia or urea may prevent decreases in fertility
in dry cows or heifers [20]. Besides, not all studies have observed negative effects of elevated blood urea
nitrogen (BUN) concentrations on embryo quality or pregnancy rate [21]. Overfeeding protein during the
breeding season and early gestation, particularly if the ruminants receives an inadequate supply of energy
may be associated with decreased fertility [22]. This decrease fertility may result from decreased uterine
pH during the luteal phase of the estrous cycle in cattle fed high levels of degradable protein. The
interaction between nutrition and reproduction has long been known to have important implications for
reproductive performance [19].
The objectives of the present study were to investigate the effect of feeding diets that contained
different levels of crude protein (CP) during the estrus cycle on the quality embryos in program
superovulation of Thai crossbred goats and productive performance.
refusals, and feces were sub-sampled approximately 500 g from each goat. Samples were dried at 65 ºC
for 24 h and ground to pass a 1 mm screen using Wiley mill. The samples were stored at −21 ºC pending
further chemical analysis. The proximate chemical composition of feeds, feed refusals, and feces samples
contents of feeds were analyzed by a method described by AOAC [23].
The does were initially weighed at the beginning of the experiment and weighed monthly
throughout the experimental period. At the end of the experimental period, the average weight of the
individual animal was also recorded.
ovary was recorded. Each embryo was then flushing and evaluated based on morphology and categorized
as good or poor quality as previously described by [24]. After the end of the embryo transfer, all animals
have used ultrasound scanning at 45 days recheck pregnancy rate in goats.
Statistical analysis
All obtained data were subjected to the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) according to an RCBD
design. Means were statistically compared using LSD and orthogonal polynomial. The statistical model
was:
Where Yij was observed variable, µ was the overall mean, βi was the random effect of the ith block, τi was
the fixed effect of the jth treatment (i = 1, 2, 3) and Ɛijk was the residual error.
Effect of dietary protein level on feed intake and growth characteristics of goats
The effects of CP level in TMR on body weight gain, growth performance characteristics, and dry
matter intake of Thai crossbred goats are presented in Table 3. The average daily gain (ADG) of all
treatment was varied from 87.84 to 121.63 g during the experimental period. Dry matter intake (DM) of
13 and 18 % CP (4.00 and 4.25 %BW) were higher than 8 % CP group (3.00 %BW) but did not
significantly differ (p > 0.05) by dietary protein levels in TMR. The result of this study was consistent to
the report of [27], who found that there was no effect of different levels of CP in diets on DMI of either
Boer-Spanish crossbred or Spanish kids. This was, however, in contrast to the report of [28], who found
that increasing dietary levels of CP in diet had increased levels of DMI. It is possible that the difference in
feed ingredients and animal breed resulted in this dissimilarity. As expected, increased levels of dietary
protein level in TMR resulted in significantly increased CPI and digestible crude protein intake (DCPI) of
the animals. Increasing CP levels in TMR (8, 13, and 18 %) led to a linearly increased goat’s final body
weight and ADG. Growth performances of Thai indigenous goats from this study are consistent with the
performance of goats reported by [29], who reported that Saanen kids fed the minimum dietary CP levels
had the lowest ADG and the ADG significantly increased when the kids fed diets with higher levels of CP
diets. Furthermore, [30] reported that both Thai indigenous and crossbred kids received more CP resulted
in higher growth rates. Similarly, [31] found that the significant responses of final body weight, weight
gain, and ADG of Thai indigenous x Anglo-Nubian crossbred to increasing levels of dietary CP linearly.
This finding indicated that Thai indigenous goat responded well to the amount of CP intake.
Table 3 Effect of dietary protein levels on intake and growth characteristics of goats.
Nutrients digestibility
Nutrients digestibility of dietary treatments in Thai crossbred goats is shown in Table 4. DM, OM,
and ADF digestibility of 18 % CP (78.07, 80.45 and 54.19 %, respectively) were highest, however, those
were not significantly different (p > 0.05) goats from 8 % (72.02, 73.51 and 45.37 %, respectively) and 13
% CP group (71.33, 73.80 and 41.55 %, respectively). Moreover, CP and NDF digestibility was
significantly affected (p < 0.05) by dietary protein levels, with quadratically increased (p < 0.01)
according to increase inclusion levels of CP in TMR. Protein and NDF utilization levels increased due to
improvement in the efficiency of microbial capture of the available N supply. Our finding was consistent
with the report of [29]. These authors found that goats fed with diet ad libitum (54.2 g/BW0.75/d, DMI)
had CP digestibility of 80.8 %, and the CP digestibility was significantly decreased when the goats were
fed with a lower amount of feed or CP. This study was consistent with the report of [28], who reported
that Saanen kids with diet CP levels ad libitum had CP digestibility of 80.8 % and the CP digestibility
was significantly decreased when the goats were fed with a lower amount of feed or CP. NDF
digestibility was improved (p < 0.05) in goats fed 18 % CP compared with goats fed 8.0 and 13 % CP. It
implied that more protein available for microbial growth in the rumen, enhancing the degradation of
nutrients including fiber content. The data from [32] reported that microbial growth is strongly positively
related to voluntary feed intake, increasing the level of feed intake increased the digestible of organic
matter in the rumen and supplied more nutrients for microbial crude protein synthesis (MCP). The
literature states that the most microbial population in the rumen are fibrolytic and have the high
proteolytic capacity [33], then improved CP and NDF digestibility in the high protein diet group.
Table 4 Nutrient digestibility (%) of different levels of crude protein in total mixed rations.
Table 5 Effect of dietary protein level on pH, ammonia nitrogen (NH3-N), and blood urea nitrogen
(BUN) concentration.
for microbial growth and minor rates of ruminal degradation improved efficiency of MCP synthesis due
to the better holding of releasing N by rumen microbes [32]. However, it is proposed that the capture of
rumen degradable protein is not completed, when the ammonia amount is large due to the extensive
degradation of the proteins, the surplus of ammonia is absorbed through the lining of the tract. Later, it is
turned into urea in the liver, to reduce its toxicity to the animal, and lead high amount of BUN. The BUN
may be recycled to the rumen as non-protein nitrogen [33] and leading to a higher level of NH3-N prior
feeding of high CP group (9.18 mg%) than others (6.58 and 7.58 mg%, respectively).
Effect of dietary protein level on pregnancy rate in embryo transfer and quality of an embryo
Laparotomy of the donor was performed at d 7 after AI, then the number of embryos and CL were
recorded. The mean recovery of an embryo in donors fed different protein levels of 8, 13, and 18 % were
10, 5, and 10.25, respectively (p > 0.05). The embryo quality was evaluated by using state of embryo in
goats receiving protein level at 18 % and was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the goats fed protein
level at 8 % and 13 % as shown in Table 6. In recipients, the result of number (6, 5, and 6, respectively)
and the pregnancy rate in embryo transfer in fed high levels of protein (50 %) were higher than the lower
groups (25 and 25 %, respectively). In females of small ruminant species, nutritional supplementation
stimulates envelopment of the small follicle population [31], growth rate and size of the ovulatory follicle
[34], ovulation rate [35], and litter size [36]. In this research, results belonging to CP level and utilization
in diets, in ruminants, low protein diets resulted in low BUN, whereas high BUN was associated with
high protein diets or excessive protein breakdown. Inadequate protein intake showed a lower BUN
concentration and negative effect on conception rate, fetal reabsorptions, premature parturition, and weak
offspring [37], however, exceeds BUN concentrations has been negatively associated with reduced
conception rates and increased early embryonic death. The effects of urea on embryo quality are likely to
be due to alterations in the oviduct environment or deleterious changes in the follicle, rather than changes
in the uterine environment [38,39]. Depending upon protein quality and composition, serum
concentrations of progesterone may be lowered, the uterine environment altered, and fertility decreased
[40].
Table 6 Effect of dietary protein levels on pregnancy rate in embryo transfer and quality of an embryo.
Conclusions
Average total feed intake was not different, while ADG was significantly different fed level protein
group. However, the fed level 18 % protein-induced compensatory growth on embryo quality, follicular
development greater than 8 and 13 % group. Thus, the results indicated that reproductive management in
pubertal and pre-gestation periods using the different fed level protein regimen affected fertility
improvement in Thai-native crossbreed goats.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Nakhon Ratchasima A.I. and Biotechnology Research Center and
Nakhon Ratchasima E.T center, and staff members of HHU Phakchong Nakhon Ratchasima. We would
also like to express our sincere thanks to the Rajamagala University of Technology Isan for facilities
support.
References
[1] FG Gooki, M Mohammadabadi, MA Fozi and M Soflaei. Association of biometric traits with
growth hormone gene diversity in Raini Cashmere Goats. Walailak J. Sci. Tech. 2019; 16, 499-508.
[2] M Khorshidi, MR Mohammadabadi, AK Esmailizadeh, A Barazandeh and OI Babenko.
Comparison of artificial neural network and regression models for prediction of body weight in
Raini Cashmere goat. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2019; 9, 453-61.
[3] FG Gooki, MR Mohammadabadi and MA Fozi. Polymorphism of the growth hormone gene and its
effect on production and reproduction traits in goat. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2018; 8, 653-9.
[4] S Shamsalddini, MR Mohammadabadi and AK Esmailizadeh. Polymorphism of the Prolactin gene
and its effect on fiber traits in goat. Russ. J. Genet. 2016; 52, 405-8.
[5] A Baghizadeh, M Bahaaddini, MR Mohamadabadi and N Askari. Allelic variations in exon 2 of
Caprine MHC class II DRB3 gene in Raeini Cashmere goat. Am. J. Agri. Environ. Sci. 2009; 6, 454-
9.
[6] A Barazandeh, SM Moghbeli, M Vatankhah and MR Mohammadabadi. Estimating non-genetic and
genetic parameters of pre-weaning growth traits in Raini Cashmere goat. Trop. Anim. Health Prod.
2012; 44, 811-7.
[7] M Moghadaszadeh, MR Mohammadabadi and AK Esmailizadeh. Association of exon 2 of BMP15
gene with the litter size in the Raini Cashmere goat. Genetics in the 3rd Millenn 2015; 13, 4062-7.
[8] MR Mohammadabadi and F Tohidinejad. Charachteristics determination of Rheb gene and protein
in Raini Cashmere goat. Iran. J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 2017; 7, 289-95.
[9] AVN Esmaeili, AE Koshkooieh, AM Aytolahi, MR Mohammadabadi, OI Babenko, M Bushtruk, S
Tkachenko, R Stavetska and N Klopenko. Comparison of genetic diversity of leptin gene between
wild goat and domestic goat breeds in Iran. Malays. Appl. Biol. 2019; 48, 85-93.
[10] SM Moghbeli, A Barazandeh, M Vatankhah and MR Mohammadabadi. Genetics and non-genetics
parameters of body weight for post-weaning traits in Raini Cashmere goats. Trop. Anim. Health
Prod. 2013; 45, 1519-24.
[11] MR Nassiry, FE Shahroodi, J Mosafer, A Mohammadi, E Manshad, S Ghazanfari, MR Mohammad
Abadi and GE Sulimova. Analysis and frequency of bovine lymphocyte antigen (BoLA-DRB3)
alleles in Iranian Holstein cattle. Russ. J. Genet. 2005; 41, 664-8.
[12] A Norouzy, MR Nassiry, FE Shahrody, A Javadmanesh, MRM Abadi and GE Sulimova.
Identification of bovine leucocyte adhesion deficiency (BLAD) carriers in Holstein and Brown
Swiss AI bulls in Iran. Russ. J. Genet. 2005; 41, 1409-13.
[13] MN Ruzina, TA Shtyfurko, MR Mohammadabadi, OB Gendzhieva, T Tsedev and GE Sulimova.
Polymorphism of the BoLA-DRB3 gene in the Mongolian, Kalmyk, and Yakut cattle breeds. Russ.
J. Genet. 2010; 46, 456-63.
[14] Department of Livestock Development. Goat farming statistic in Thailand since 1998 to 2009,
Available at: http://www.dld.go.th/ict/stat_web/yearly/yearly 52, accessed January 2019.
[15] S Miki. Effects of heat stress on bovine preimplantation embryos produced in vitro. Reprod. Dev.
2017; 63, 347-52.
[16] PL Senger. Review: Fertility factors in high producing dairy cows-which ones are really important.
Prof. Anim. Sci. 2001; 17, 129-38.
[17] PF Surai. Vitamin E in avian reproduction. Poult. Avain. Biol. Rev. 1999; 10, 1-60.
[18] T Blanchard, J Ferguson, L Love, T Takeda, B Henderson, J Hasler and W Chalupa. Effect of
dietary crude protein type. Am. J. Vet. Res. 1990; 51, 905-8.
[19] RD Smit and LE Chase. Nutrition and reproduction. Dairy Integrated Reproductive Management,
2010.
[20] R Funston. Nutrition and reproduction interaction. In: Proceedings of the Applied Reproductive
Strategies in Beef Cattle. Billings, Montana, 2007, p. 149-62.
[21] LC Kappel and S Zidenberg. Manganese: Present Knowledge in nutrition. In: ML Brown (Ed.).
International Life Sciences Institute Nutrition Foundation, Washington DC, 1999, p. 308.
[22] TG Dunn and GE Moss. Effects of nutrient deficiencies and excesses on reproductive efficiency of
Livestock. J. Anim. Sci. 1992; 70, 1580-93.
[23] AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists International (AOAC). Official Methods of
Analysis. 17th eds. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, 2000.
[24] ANMA Rahman, RB Abdullah and WE Wan-Khadijah. In vitro maturation of oocytes with special
reference to goat: A review. Biotech. 2008; 7, 559-611.
[25] SG Haddad. Effect of dietary forage: Concentrate ratio on growth performance and carcass
characteristic of growing Baladi kids. Small Rumin. Res. 2005; 57, 43-9.
[26] S Hwangbo, SH Choi, SH Kim, SW Son, DS Park, HS Lee and IH Jo. Effects of crude protein level
in total mixed rations on growth performance and meat quality in growing Korean black goats.
Asian Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2009; 22, 1133-9.
[27] I Prieto, AL Goetsh, V Banskalieva, M Cameron, R Puchala, T Sahlu, LJ Dawson and SW
Coleman. Effects of dietary protein concentration on postweaning growth of Boer crossbred and
Spanish goat wethers. J. Anim. Sci. 2002; 78, 2275-81.
[28] T Negesse, M Rodehutscord and E Pfeffer. The effect of dietary crude protein level on intake
growth protein retention and utilization of growing male Saanen kids. Small Rumin. Res. 2001; 39,
243-51.
[29] W Pralomkarn, S Saithanoo, S Kochapakdee and BW Norton. Effect of genotype and plane of
nutrition on carcass characteristics of Thai native and Anglo-Nubian X Thai native male goats.
Small Rumin. Res. 1995; 16, 21-5.
[30] K Intharak and J Saelim. Effect of crude protein concentration in total mixed rations on growth
performance of Ango-Nubian crossbred goats. Annual Research Report 2008, Animal Nutrition
Division, Department of Livestock Development, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperative, p. 246-
70.
[31] F Kanyinji, H Kumagai, T Maeda, S Kaneshima and D Yokoi. Effects of supplementary inosine on
nutrient digestibility ruminal fermentation and nitrogen balance in goats fed high amount of
concentrate. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 2009; 152, 12-20.
[32] AK Pathak. Various factors affecting microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Vet. World. 2008; 1,
186-9.
[33] A Bach, S Calsamiglia and MD Stern. Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen. J. Dairy Sci. 2005; 88, 9-
21.
[34] R Webb, B Nicholas, JG Gong, BK Campbell, CG Gutierrez, HA Garverick and DG Armstrong.
Mechanisms regulating follicular development and selection of the dominant follicle. Reprod.
Suppl. 2003; 61, 1-20.
[35] D Rondian, VJF Freitas, M Spinaci and G Galeati. Effect of nutrition on plasma progesterone levels
metabolic parameters and small follicles development in unstimulated goats reared under constant
photoperiod regimen. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2005; 40, 548-52.
[36] JA Downing and RJ Scaramuzzi. Nutrient effects on ovulation rate ovarian function and the
secretion of gonadotrophic and metabolic hormones in sheep. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1991; 43, 209-27.
[37] R Funston. Nutrition and Reproduction Interaction, University of Nebraska, West Central Research
and Extension Center, North Platte. In: Proceedings of the Applied Reproductive Strategies in Beef
Cattle, Rapid City, South Dakota, 2006.
[38] RJV Saun. Effect of nutrition on reproduction in llamas and alpacas. Theriogenology 2008; 70, 508-
14.
[39] J Fahey, MP Boland and DO Callaghan. Effects of dietary urea on embryo development in super
ovulated donor ewes and on embryo survival following transfer in recipient ewes. Proc. Annual
Meet. British Soc. Animal Sci. 1998; 1998, 182.
[40] WR Butler. Review: Effect of protein nutrition on ovarian and uterine physiology in dairy cattle. J.
Dairy Sci. 1999; 81, 2533-9.