Science of The Total Environment: Contents Lists Available at
Science of The Total Environment: Contents Lists Available at
Science of The Total Environment: Contents Lists Available at
H I G H L I G H T S G R A P H I C A L A B S T R A C T
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Editor: Manuel Esteban Lucas-Borja The deforestation of tropical forests raises environmental concerns worldwide. Removing the pristine forest impacts
the soil, consequently affecting the environmental services it provides. Within this context, the main goal of
Keywords: this study was to determine how the conversion of the tropical rainforest to pasture affects soil fertility across an
Pedodiversity extended range of soil heterogeneity, including different soil types. We sampled 13 sites, among forests, recent pastures
Amazonia
(≤7-year-old), and old pastures (≥10-year-old), on Acrisols, Ferralsols, Plinthosols, and Luvisols, across a ± 800 km
Bioindicator
Land-use change
geographical range in the Western Brazilian Amazon. Soils were classified taxonomically, and their superficial layer's
Land clearing chemical and physical properties (0–10 cm) were analyzed. Furthermore, we tested the sensibility of Actinobacteria and
Deforestation Proteobacteria to detect changes in these soil properties based on their ecological habitat. An inter-regional gradient of
soil fertility was observed, and the sampling sites were clustered mostly by soil type and associated land use than by
spatial distance. The Sum of bases, Ca + Mg, base saturation, Al saturation, and pH were consistently affected by
land use, increasing after conversion to pasture, at different degrees and with a more pronounced effect on oxidic
soils. The Sum of bases was the only property that increased significantly among the study sites (Radj = 0.860,
p < 0.001), being able to detect the effect of anthropic land use on a larger coverage of soil types. Finally, the
Actinobacteria:Proteobacteria ratio was also sensitive to the impact of forest-to-pasture conversion, with a higher ratio
⁎ Correspondence to: F.I. Rocha, Department of Soil Science, Federal Rural University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), Seropédica, RJ, Brazil.
⁎⁎ Correspondence to: E. da C. Jesus, Embrapa Agrobiologia, BR 465, km 7, s/n, Ecologia, Seropédica, 23891-000, RJ, Brazil.
E-mail addresses: fernando.igne@hotmail.com (F.I. Rocha), ederson.jesus@embrapa.br (E.C. Jesus).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158955
Received 31 July 2022; Received in revised form 18 September 2022; Accepted 19 September 2022
Available online 22 September 2022
0048-9697/© 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
F.I. Rocha et al. Science of the Total Environment 856 (2023) 158955
observed in pasture systems, and it was positively correlated with soil pH (rho = 0.469, p < 0.001). Our results con-
sistently show that the forest-to-pasture conversion leads to strong alterations in the soil environment, with varying
intensities depending on soil type.
2
F.I. Rocha et al. Science of the Total Environment 856 (2023) 158955
Fig. 1. Ordination of soil variables across Amazonian sites and their altered land uses by the forest-to-pasture conversion. A) Principal component analysis (PCA) including all
observations among study sites in the Brazilian Western Amazonia and (B–F) individual PCAs for each one of the study localities displaying the five most important variables
based on their contribution value. BUJ: Bujari/state of Acre, BAC: Boca do Acre/state of Amazonas, including BAC1 and BAC2 localities, MAN: Manicoré/state of Amazonas,
including MAN1 and MAN2 localities.
(SB = Ca2+ + Mg2+ + K+), base saturation index [BS% = 100 × SB/ taxonomy was assigned for each amplicon sequence variant (ASV),
total cation exchange capacity (T-CEC)], and Al saturation index [m% = assessing the Silva taxonomic training (database v132) (Quast et al.,
(mmolc (Al3+) dm−3 × 100)/(mmolc (effective CEC) dm−3)]. Finally, 2012). As explained below, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria sequences
the micronutrients Cu, Zn, Fe, and Mn were extracted with the Mehlich-1 were extracted from the dataset and used for further analyses. For details
solution (HCl 0.05 mol L−1 + H2SO4 0.0125 mol L−1) and determined about next-generation sequencing parameters, sequence datasets, accession
after the mechanical stirring of the filtrate solution for 5 min by spectrom- numbers, and bioinformatic pipelines, see Rocha et al. (2021). R packages'
etry of optical emission with inductively coupled plasma (ICP-OES). dada2' v.1.14.0 (Callahan et al., 2016) and ‘decipher’ v.2.14. (Wright et al.,
2012) were used in the R 3.6.1 environment (Team, 2018).
2.3. DNA extraction and sequencing analysis
2.4. Statistical analysis
We extracted soil DNA using the standard DNeasy PowerSoil kit proto-
col (MO BIO Laboratories Inc.). The amplification and sequencing of the A principal component analysis (PCA) on the correlation matrix was
16S rRNA gene were performed using barcoding DNA and the Illumina used to select the most important soil variables based on their component
MiSeq technology (Caporaso et al., 2012) at the Argonne National Lab loadings. We first performed a PCA using all sampling points and measured
Core Sequencing Facility, USA, following the Earth Microbiome Project variables. This PCA will be called “inter-regional PCA” since it compares
protocol. The sequence data were further processed, aligned, and catego- sites from the different sampled locations. Then, all variables with a contri-
rized using the DADA2 microbiome pipeline (https://github.com/ bution larger than the cutoff of 3.85 % [i.e., 100 × (1/26)] were selected
benjjneb/dada2) by recommended parameters with quality filtering of following Abdi and Williams (2010), where 26 is the number of considered
sequence length over 250 base pairs (Callahan et al., 2016). Further, the soil variables. The contribution of a variable for a given PC was obtained by
3
F.I. Rocha et al. Science of the Total Environment 856 (2023) 158955
Fig. 2. Trends in the gradient of soil fertility across land-use change profiles. A) Inter-regional (between sites) and land-use systems (within sites) comparisons; B) linear
correlation between PC1 scores for the overall PCA and total sum of bases (SB) (equation: y = −0.79 + 0.31x); localities were colored based in their site/municipality
(i.e., orange: BUJ, blue: BAC, gray: MAN). Statistical differences were determined by two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05). Significant by t-test at p < 0.001 (⁎⁎⁎), n.s. non-significant.
The fitted values for each model are represented by the black line and their standard errors are indicated by the shaded area. BUJ: Bujari/state of Acre, BAC: Boca do Acre/
state of Amazonas, including BAC1 and BAC2 localities, MAN: Manicoré/state of Amazonas, including MAN1 and MAN2 localities.
the ratio of the squared component loading of the variable by the eigen- BAC and MAN are predominantly Ferrasols, while other soil classes were
value associated with the PC. The variables of each study location with found in BUJ (Table S1). The PC1 scores for BUJ differed statistically in com-
the highest contributions to PC1 were merged into a single subset to be parison to the scores from other localities (Fig. 2A; χ2 = 37.59, p < 0.001),
further used in a two-way ANOVA to test for differences among sites and they were correlated with higher values of total sum of bases (Fig. 2B;
(inter-regional) and between land-uses within each site (intra-regional) Radj = 86 %, p < 0.001). Nevertheless, a clear land-use effect could be
after meeting the statistical assumptions for this analysis. The PCAs were observed within each of the studied localities (Fig. 1B to F). A higher fertility
conducted using ‘factoextra’ v.1.0.7 R package (Kassambara and Mundt, was observed in pasture soils (Figs. 1B to E; 2A), which has been demon-
2018). Finally, a heatmap was used to visualize possible clusters among strated for other pastures throughout the Amazonia region (Braz et al.,
samples within each factor (i.e., site, land-use, and soil classes) and 2013; Machado et al., 2017). A higher dissimilarity between pastures and for-
measured variables using ‘pheatmap’ v.1.0.12 R package. ests of low-fertility soils from BAC and MAN has also been observed, showing
To test their use as an ecological indicator, Actinobacteria and that the effects of forest-to-pasture conversion on soil fertility are more pro-
Proteobacteria had their abundances compared in STAMP v.3.0 (Parks nounced under this fertility level and, thus, dependent on the predominant
et al., 2014). The q-values were calculated using two-sided Welch's t-test soil type. Forest soils in BUJ have higher natural fertility, which shows the
with Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate corrections (Benjamini and clear influence of naturally fertile Luvisols. These soils are a patch of naturally
Hochberg, 1995). Spearman's rho test tested the correlations between the eutrophic soils (Bernini et al., 2013) and were formed predominantly from
relative abundances of these two phyla and between their ratio the weathering of sedimentary rocks generated by the Andean orogeny and
(Actinobacteria:Proteobacteria) and soil pH. the sediment flux into the lowland (Quesada et al., 2011). BAC and MAN
are predominantly covered with highly weathered soils, such as Acrisols
3. Results and discussion and Ferralsols, developed from sandstones and claystones, and mainly
formed in remnants of ferralitic and convex plateaus (Shinzato et al., 2015;
3.1. Natural and anthropogenic factors build the inter and intra-regional gradient Souza et al., 2018). Thus, the soil fertility reflects both the inherent pedoge-
of soil fertility netic characteristics as well as the processes mediated by land-use conversion,
which increases the dissimilarity among variables related to soil acidity
The PCA with all sites explained 59.4 % of the data variability (Fig. 1A). (i.e., H+, H + Al, m%, Al) and those related to high soil fertility, i.e., pH,
Despite their geographical proximity, BUJ and BAC were ordered separately. base saturation (BS%), Sum of bases (SB), and total cation exchange capacity
BAC showed more similarities to MAN, a result highlighting the predominant (T-CEC). It is important to highlight that the pastures have never been limed
influence of pedogenetic soil characteristics over land use to determine the or fertilized, which also explains that natural soil conditions have a greater
fertility of the soil's superficial layer under the studied conditions. Soils in influence on determining fertility levels.
4
F.I. Rocha et al. Science of the Total Environment 856 (2023) 158955
Fig. 3. Correlation heatmap of soil variables. Horizontal dendrograms gather correlated soil classes, sites, and land-uses, based on the soil variables clustering in the vertical axis.
BUJ: Bujari/state of Acre, BAC: Boca do Acre/state of Amazonas, including BAC1 and BAC2 localities, MAN: Manicoré/state of Amazonas, including MAN1 and MAN2 localities.
Fig. 4. Comparison between forests and pastures for selected soil variables. Soil variables (0–10 cm) were extracted as important in the principal component analysis among
different study localities in Western Amazonia. Significant differences between each land-use were determined by two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05); Significant by t-test at
p < 0.001 (⁎⁎⁎), p < 0.01 (⁎⁎), p < 0.05 (⁎), n.s. non-significant. Error bars indicate the ± standard error (SE) (n = 5). BUJ: Bujari/state of Acre, BAC1 and BAC2: Boca
do Acre/state of Amazonas, MAN1 and MAN2: Manicoré/state of Amazonas.
5
F.I. Rocha et al. Science of the Total Environment 856 (2023) 158955
6
F.I. Rocha et al. Science of the Total Environment 856 (2023) 158955
Fig. 6. Influence of pasture age since forest conversion on soil fertility indicators in Amazonian localities. A) Bar plots between each pasture age and soil variables, error bars
indicate the ± standard error (SE) (n = 5); B) Standardized effect size for the model between pasture age and soil variables, coefficient estimates from linear models are
plotted with 95 % confidence intervals; Statistical differences were determined by two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05;, Significant by t-test at p < 0.001 (⁎⁎⁎), p < 0.01 (⁎⁎), p <
0.05 (⁎), n.s. non-significant; BUJ: Bujari/state of Acre, BAC1 and BAC2: Boca do Acre/state of Amazonas.
to return to their previous state (Juo and Manu, 1996; Palm et al., 1996). Overall, our results show that the relative abundance of Proteobacteria and
However, our old pastures (>10 years old) still have fertility levels like Actinobacteria are negatively correlated (rho = −44.2 %, p < 0.001),
those observed in recent pastures, highlighting a possible effect of soil with similar findings in most study locations. The discrepancy in the relative
type. In line with our results, Numata et al. (2007) in the state of Rondônia, abundances found in the MAN2 site is likely reflecting some of its inherent
also in the Brazilian Western Amazonia, did not find a significant influence characteristics, as seen in Fig. 4, since no statistical differences were found
of the land-use change on soil fertility when considering different pasture between its forest and pasture for the soil variables: C, H+, H + Al, P, T-
ages since the forest removal. Instead, the study also found that the magni- CEC, N, and Zn. Moreover, the highest content of the coarse sand fraction
tude of the effects varies significantly among soil types, with low amplitude associated with high levels of C:N ratio predominantly found in this locality
in Luvisols. Contrary to previous studies (de Moraes et al., 1996; Moreira (see Fig. 1A) can drive the reduced variability in the relative abundance of
et al., 2009), our results exhibit an overall standardized effect reflecting Actinobacteria between the land uses since this bacterial group is commonly
the soil pH increase over time since forest conversion. No statistical differ- correlated with copiotroph environments (Fierer et al., 2012).
ences were observed between old and recently formed pastures for any Nonetheless, the Actinobacteria:Proteobacteria ratio was sensitive to rep-
indicator of soil fertility of BUJ, which is also explained by the buffering resenting the gradient of soil fertility across sites and land uses for most of
effect of its soils, which reduces the intensity of chemical transformations the evaluated localities, following a positive correlation with soil pH
in the topsoil. (rho = 46.9 %, p < 0.001). The soil environment intrinsically shapes
microbial communities, especially the topsoil, which encompasses the
3.2. Actinobacteria:Proteobacteria ratio as a biotic indicator of the gradient of rhizosphere activity, complex biological interactions, organic matter
soil fertility decomposition, and food webs, which drives the soil chemical complex
(Suleiman et al., 2013; Tripathi et al., 2018). Considering this, the present
A general trend found among the study locations shows that the pre- biological indicator may be helpful for microbial ecologists interested in
dominance of Proteobacteria in the forest system clearly reflects the natural measuring the fingerprints of land-use changes in tropical soil environ-
conditions of its topsoil, despite the differences found between the soil attri- ments. A similar approach has already been applied to phyla Acidobacteria
butes in the regions and soil classes covered in this study (Figs. 7, S4). In and Proteobacteria, which have been proposed as indicators of soil trophic
turn, despite their highest relative abundance among the evaluated level (Smit et al., 2001) and used as such in the tropical forest literature
pastures, Actinobacteria did not differ statistically (p > 0.05) between land (Nemergut et al., 2010; de Carvalho et al., 2016).
uses of BAC1, MAN1, and MAN2.
Petersen et al. (2019), in a metanalysis that coupled several tropical 4. Conclusions
systems under land-use change, found that soil pH is a critical variable in
driving changes in the soil microbiota after forest-to-pasture conversion. This study showed that the level of changes in soil fertility by forest-to-
Besides the increase in bacterial alpha diversity, they pointed out that the pasture conversion depends mainly on the soil type, which regulates how
relative abundance of Actinobacteria increases in converted pastures soil wide the difference will be. Properties related to base saturation and soil acid-
and that Proteobacteria is a representative group in tropical rainforests. ity were the most affected but with considerable site-specific influence.
7
F.I. Rocha et al. Science of the Total Environment 856 (2023) 158955
Fig. 7. Actinobacteria:Proteobacteria ratio as a biological indicator of land-use conversion. A) Significant differences were determined by two-way ANOVA (p < 0.05); Significant by
t-test at p < 0.001 (⁎⁎⁎), p < 0.01 (⁎⁎), p < 0.05 (⁎), n.s. non-significant; Error bars indicate the ± standard error (SE) (n = 5). Spearman's rho correlation between B) Actinobacteria
and Proteobacteria phyla, and C) Actinobacteria:Proteobacteria ratio and soil pH. The fitted values for each model are represented by the black line and their standard errors are
indicated by the shaded area. BUJ: Bujari/state of Acre, BAC1 and BAC2: Boca do Acre/state of Amazonas, MAN1 and MAN2: Manicoré/state of Amazonas.
Among the soil attributes, the sum of bases was the most sensitive to discrim- Acknowledgments
inate between forest and pasture under the different soil types. The
Actinobacteria:Proteobacteria ratio was sensitive to reflect the gradient in soil We acknowledge the USAID and the National Academies of Sciences,
fertility derived from the impact of land-use change, being a potential micro- Engineering, and Medicine of the United States (NAS) for funding our
biological indicator of forest-to-pasture conversion in tropical ecosystems. research under PEER project 4-299, USAID agreement AID-OAA-A-11-
Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi. 00012. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed
org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158955. here are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the views
of USAID or the NAS. We also thank CNPq, Brazil, for the research fellow-
CRediT authorship contribution statement ships provided to Ederson da Conceição Jesus (project 475168/2012-7)
and Fernando Igne Rocha (165571/2017-9). FIR was also supported by
AO, EJ, ID Conceptualization; FR, WT, JL, EA, AO Data curation; FR, AO CAPES, Brazil (PDSE call no 41/2018).
Formal analysis; EJ, ID, AO Funding acquisition; FR, EJ, WT, JL, EA, PM,
AB, ID, AO Investigation; EJ, WT, JL, EA, PM, AO Methodology; AO, EJ References
Project administration; EJ, ID, AO Resources; FR, AO Software; EJ, WT,
AO Supervision; AO, WT, JL, EA Validation; FR Visualization; FR, EJ, WT,
Abdi, H., Williams, L.J., 2010. Principal component analysis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput.
AO Roles/Writing – original draft; FR, EJ, WG, JL, EA, PM, AB, ID, AO Stat. 2, 433–459.
Writing – review & editing. Alfaia, S.S., Ribeiro, G.A., Nobre, A.D., Luizão, R.C., Luizão, F.J., 2004. Evaluation of soil fer-
tility in smallholder agroforestry systems and pastures in western Amazonia. Agric.
Ecosyst. Environ. 102, 409–414.
Data availability Alvares, C.A., Stape, J.L., Sentelhas, P.C., Gonçalves, J.D.M., Sparovek, G., 2013. Köppen's cli-
mate classification map for Brazil. Meteorol. Zeitschrift 22, 711–728. https://doi.org/10.
Data will be made available on request. 1127/0941-2948/2013/0507.
Aprile, F., Siqueira, G.W., Darwich, A.J., dos Santos, V.C., Ribeiro, A.A., 2013. Concentration
of nutrients in litter as a function of soil type, climate and forest composition in Amazon.
Declaration of competing interest Agric. Sci. Dev. 2, 59–66.
Béliveau, A., Davidson, R., Lucotte, M., Lopes, L.O.D.O.C., Paquet, S., Vasseur, C., 2015. Early
effects of slash-and-burn cultivation on soil physicochemical properties of small-scale
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial inter-
farms in the Tapajós region, Brazilian Amazon. J. Agric. Sci. 153, 205.
ests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the Benjamini, Y., Hochberg, Y., 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and pow-
work reported in this paper. erful approach to multiple testing. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 57, 289–300.
8
F.I. Rocha et al. Science of the Total Environment 856 (2023) 158955
Bernini, T.de A., Pereira, M.G., Fontana, A., Anjos, L.H.C.dos, Calderano, S.B., Wadt, P.G.S., Müller, M.M.L., Guimaraes, M.F., Desjardins, T., Mitja, D., 2004. The relationship between
Moraes, A.G.de L., Santos, L.L.dos, 2013. Taxonomia de solos desenvolvidos sobre pasture degradation and soil properties in the Brazilian Amazon: a case study. Agric.
depósitos sedimentares da Formação Solimões no Estado do Acre. 72. Bragantia, Ecosyst. Environ. 103, 279–288.
pp. 71–80. Nemergut, D.R., Cleveland, C.C., Wieder, W.R., Washenberger, C.L., Townsend, A.R., 2010.
Braz, A.M.S., Fernandes, A.R., Alleoni, L.R.F., 2013. Soil attributes after the conversion from Plot-scale manipulations of organic matter inputs to soils correlate with shifts in micro-
forest to pasture in Amazon. Land Degrad. Dev. 24, 33–38. bial community composition in a lowland tropical rain forest. Soil Biol. Biochem. 42
Callahan, B.J., McMurdie, P.J., Rosen, M.J., Han, A.W., Johnson, A.J.A., Holmes, S.P., 2016. (12), 2153–2160.
DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods Numata, I., Chadwick, O.A., Roberts, D.A., Schimel, J.P., Sampaio, F.F., Leonidas, F.C., Soares,
13, 581–583. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3869. J.V., 2007. Temporal nutrient variation in soil and vegetation of post-forest pastures as
Caporaso, J.G., Lauber, C.L., Walters, W.A., Berg-Lyons, D., Huntley, J., Fierer, N., Owens, a function of soil order, pasture age, and management, Rondônia, Brazil. Agric. Ecosyst.
S.M., Betley, J., Fraser, L., Bauer, M., Gormley, N., Gilbert, J.A., Smith, G., Knight, R., Environ. 118, 159–172.
2012. Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and Palm, C.A., Swift, M.J., Woomer, P.L., 1996. Soil biological dynamics in slash-and-burn agri-
MiSeq platforms. ISME J. 6, 1621–1624. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.8. culture. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 58 (1), 61–74.
Clivot, H., Pagnout, C., Aran, D., Devin, S., Bauda, P., Poupin, P., Guérold, F., Numata, I., Parks, D.H., Tyson, G.W., Hugenholtz, P., Beiko, R.G., 2014. STAMP: statistical analysis of tax-
Chadwick, O.A., Roberts, D.A., Schimel, J.P., Sampaio, F.F., Leonidas, F.C., Soares, J.V., onomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 30, 3123–3124.
Müller, M.M.L., Guimaraes, M.F., Desjardins, T., Mitja, D., Schaefer, C., Lima, H.N., Petersen, I.A.B., Meyer, K.M., Bohannan, B.J.M., 2019. Meta-analysis reveals consistent bacte-
Teixeira, W.G., Vale Junior, J.F., Souza, K.W., Corrêia, G.R., Mendonça, B.A.F., Amaral, rial responses to land use change across the tropics. Front. Ecol. Evol. 7, 391.
E.F., Campos, M.C.C., Ruivo, M.L.P., Hoorn, C., Wesselingh, F.P., Ter Steege, H., Ponge, J.-F., 2015. The soil as an ecosystem. Biol. Fertil. Soils 51, 645–648.
Bermudez, M.A., Mora, A., Sevink, J., Sanmartín, I., Sanchez-Meseguer, A., Anderson, Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., Peplies, J., Glöckner, F.O.,
C.L., Figueiredo, J.P., Quesada, C.A., Lloyd, J., Anderson, L.O., Fyllas, N.M., Schwarz, 2012. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and
M., Czimczik, C.I., Dias-Filho, M.B., Davidson, E.A., Carvalho, C.J.R., Wubie, M.A., web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596.
Assen, M., Demattê, J.A.M.L.I., Demattê, J.A.M.L.I., De Souza Braz, A.M., Fernandes, Quesada, C.A., Lloyd, J., Anderson, L.O., Fyllas, N.M., Schwarz, M., Czimczik, C.I., 2011. Soils
A.R., Alleoni, L.R.F., 1996. Fertilidade e sustentabilidade de solos Amazônicos. Agric. of Amazonia with particular reference to the RAINFOR sites. Biogeosciences 8,
Ecosyst. Environ. 118, 33–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00660-5. 1415–1440.
Cochrane, T.T., Sanchez, P.A., 1982. Land resources, soils and their management in the Am- Quesada, C.A., Lloyd, J., Schwarz, M., Patiño, S., Baker, T.R., Czimczik, C., Fyllas, N.M.,
azon region: a state of knowledge report. In: Hecht, S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the Interna- Martinelli, L., Nardoto, G.B., Schmerler, J., 2010. Variations in chemical and physical
tional Conference on Amazonian Agriculture And Land-use Research. Series 03E-382. properties of Amazon forest soils in relation to their genesis. Biogeosciences 7,
CIAT, Cali, Colombia, pp. 137–209. 1515–1541.
de Carvalho, T.S., Jesus, E.D.C., Barlow, J., Gardner, T.A., Soares, I.C., Tiedje, J.M., Moreira, Rocha, F.I., Ribeiro, T.G., Fontes, M.A., Schwab, S., Coelho, M.R.R., Lumbreras, J.F., da Motta,
F.M.D.S., 2016. Land use intensification in the humid tropics increased both alpha and P.E.F., Teixeira, W.G., Cole, J., Borsanelli, A.C., Dutra, I.dos S., Howe, A., de Oliveira,
beta diversity of soil bacteria. Ecology 97 (10), 2760–2771. https://doi.org/10.1002/ A.P., Jesus, E.da C., 2021. Land-use system and forest floor explain prokaryotic
ecy.1513. metacommunity structuring and spatial turnover in Amazonian forest-to-pasture conver-
Delgado-Baquerizo, M., Reich, P.B., Bardgett, R.D., Eldridge, D.J., Lambers, H., Wardle, D.A., sion areas. Front. Microbiol. 12, 657508. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2021.657508.
Reed, S.C., Plaza, C., Png, G.K., Neuhauser, S., 2020. The influence of soil age on ecosys- Santos, R.D., Lemos, R.D., Santos, H.D., Ker, J.C., Anjos, L.D., Shimizu, S.H., 2005. Manual de
tem structure and function across biomes. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–14. descrição e coleta de solo no campo. Sociedade Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, Viçosa,
de Lima, R.A.F., Oliveira, A.A., Pitta, G.R., de Gasper, A.L., Vibrans, A.C., Chave, J., Ter p. 15.
Steege, H., Prado, P.I., 2020. The erosion of biodiversity and biomass in the Atlantic For- Schaefer, C., Lima, H.N., Teixeira, W.G., Vale Junior, J.F., Souza, K.W., Corrêia, G.R.,
est biodiversity hotspot. Nat. Commun. 11, 1–16. Mendonça, B.A.F., Amaral, E.F., Campos, M.C.C., Ruivo, M.L.P., 2017. Solos da região
de Moraes, J.F.L., Volkoff, B., Cerri, C.C., Bernoux, M., 1996. Soil properties under Amazon Amazônica. Pedol. dos biomas Bras. Viçosa, MG Soc. Bras. Ciência do Solo, pp. 111–175.
forest and changes due to pasture installation in Rondônia, Brazil. Geoderma 70, 63–81. Serrão, E.A.S., Falesi, I.C., de Veiga, J.B., Teixeira Neto, J.F., 1979. Productivity of cultivated
Dias-Filho, M.B., Davidson, E.A., Carvalho, C.J.R., 2001. Linking biogeochemical cycles to cat- pastures on low fertility soils in the Amazon of Brazil. In: Sanchez, P.A., Tergas, L.E.
tle pasture management and sustainability. Biogeochem. Amaz. Basin. Oxford Univ. (Eds.), Pasture Production in Acid Soils of the Tropics, pp. 195–226.
Press, New York, pp. 84–105. Shinzato, E., Teixeira, W.G., Dantas, M.E., 2015. Principais classes de solos. Embrapa Solos-
dos Santos, H.G., Jacomine, P.K.T., Dos Anjos, L.H.C., De Oliveira, V.A., Lumbreras, J.F., Capítulo em livro científico.
Coelho, M.R., De Almeida, J.A., de Araujo Filho, J.C., de Oliveira, J.B., Cunha, T.J.F., Smit, E., Leeflang, P., Gommans, S., van den Broek, J., van Mil, S., Wernars, K., 2001. Diversity
2018. Sistema brasileiro de classificação de solos. Embrapa, Brasília, DF 2018. and seasonal fluctuations of the dominant members of the bacterial soil community in a
Farella, N., Davidson, R., Lucotte, M., Daigle, S., 2007. Nutrient and mercury variations in wheat field as determined by cultivation and molecular methods. Appl. Environ.
soils from family farms of the Tapajós region (Brazilian Amazon): recommendations for Microbiol. 67 (5), 2284–2291.
better farming. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 120, 449–462. Smyth, T.J., 1996. Manejo da fertilidade do solo para a produção sustentada de cultivos na
Fierer, N., Lauber, C.L., Ramirez, K.S., Zaneveld, J., Bradford, M.A., Knight, R., 2012. Compar- Amazônia. ALVAREZ VENEGAS, VH; FONTES, LEF; FONTES, MPF O solo nos grandes
ative metagenomic, phylogenetic and physiological analyses of soil microbial communi- domínios morfoclimáticos do Brasil e o desenvolvimento sustentado. Viçosa: SBCS/
ties across nitrogen gradients. ISME J. 6, 1007–1017. UFV, pp. 71–94.
Giardina, C.P., Sanford, R.L., Døckersmith, I.C., Jaramillo, V.J., 2000. The effects of slash Souza, J.L.L.de S., Fontes, M.P.F., Gilkes, R., Costa, L.M.da, Oliveira, T.S.de, 2018. Geochem-
burning on ecosystem nutrients during the land preparation phase of shifting cultivation. ical signature of Amazon tropical rainforest soils. Rev. Bras. Ciênc. Solo 42.
Plant Soil 220 (1), 247–260. Suleiman, A.K.A., Manoeli, L., Boldo, J.T., Pereira, M.G., Roesch, L.F.W., 2013. Shifts in soil
Hartemink, A.E., 2002. Soil science in tropical and temperate regions—some differences and sim- bacterial community after eight years of land-use change. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 36,
ilarities. Adv. Agron. 77, 269–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(02)77016-8. 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2012.10.007.
Juo, A.S., Manu, A., 1996. Chemical dynamics in slash-and-burn agriculture. Agric. Ecosyst. Team, R.C., 2018. R: A Language And Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation
Environ. 58 (1), 49–60. for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria Version 3.6.1.
Kaschuk, G., Alberton, O., Hungria, M., 2011. Quantifying effects of different agricultural land Teixeira, P.C., Donagemma, G.K., Fontana, A., Teixeira, W.G., 2017. Manual de métodos de
uses on soil microbial biomass and activity in Brazilian biomes: inferences to improve soil análise de solo. Embrapa, Rio Janeiro 573 pp.
quality. Plant Soil 338, 467–481. Tripathi, B.M., Stegen, J.C., Kim, M., Dong, K., Adams, J.M., Lee, Y.K., 2018. Soil pH mediates
Kassambara, A., Mundt, F., 2018. Factoextra: Extract And Visualize the Results of Multivariate the balance between stochastic and deterministic assembly of bacteria. ISME J. 12,
Data Analyses. 2017. R Packag. Version 1. 1072–1083.
Ketterings, Q.M., Bigham, J.M., 2000. Soil color as an indicator of slash-and-burn fire severity WRB, I.W.G., 2015. World reference base for soil resources 2014, update 2015: international
and soil fertility in Sumatra,Indonesia. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64 (5), 1826–1833. soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. World Soil
Krainovic, P.M., Bastos, R.P., de Almeida, D.R., Junior, A.F.N., Sampaio, P.de T.B., de Souza, Resour. Reports No. 106.
L.A.G., de Souza Falcão, N.P., 2020. Effect of rosewood plantation chronosequence on soil Wright, E.S., Yilmaz, L.S., Noguera, D.R., 2012. DECIPHER, a search-based approach to chi-
attributes in Central Amazonia. Geoderma 357, 113952. mera identification for 16S rRNA sequences. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 717–725.
Lips, J.M., Duivenvoorden, J.F., 1996. Regional patterns of well drained upland soil differen- https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.06516-11.
tiation in the middle Caquetá basin of Colombian Amazonia. Geoderma 72, 219–257. Wubie, M.A., Assen, M., 2020. Effects of land cover changes and slope gradient on soil quality
Machado, M.R., Camara, R., Sampaio, P.de T.B., Pereira, M.G., Ferraz, J.B.S., 2017. Land in the Gumara watershed, Lake Tana basin of North-West Ethiopia. Model. Earth Syst. En-
cover changes affect soil chemical attributes in the Brazilian Amazon. Acta Sci. Agron. viron. 6, 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-019-00660-5.
39, 385–391. Zu Ermgassen, E.K.H.J., Alcântara, M.P., Balmford, A., Barioni, L., Neto, F.B., Bettarello, M.M.,
Moreira, A., Fageria, N.K., Garcia y Garcia, A., 2011. Soil fertility, mineral nitrogen, and mi- De Brito, G., Carrero, G.C., Florence, E.D.A.S., Garcia, E., Gonçalves, E.T., Da Luz, C.T.,
crobial biomass in upland soils of the Central Amazon under different plant covers. Mallman, G.M., Strassburg, B.B.N., Valentim, J.F., Latawiec, A., 2018. Results from on-
Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 42, 694–705. the-ground efforts to promote sustainable cattle ranching in the Brazilian Amazon. Sus-
Moreira, F.M.de S., Nóbrega, R.S.A., Jesus, E.da C., Ferreira, D.F., Pérez, D.V., 2009. Differen- tainability 10 (4), 1301. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10041301.
tiation in the fertility of Inceptisols as related to land use in the upper Solimões river re-
gion, western Amazon. Sci. Total Environ. 408, 349–355.