“AN ANALYTICAL STUDY ON

INCOME TAX ACT, 2058”

Submitted to:
Office of the Dean
Faculty of Management
TRIBHUVAN UNIVERSITY
In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirement for the
Master of Business Studies (M.B.S)

Submitted by:
Sunita Agrawal
T.U. Regd. 7-1-205-51-2000
2nd Year Exam Roll No. 392

Kankai Adarsha Awasiya Campus

Birtamode, Jhapa
Nepal
October, 2009

1
 RECOMMENDATION

This is to certify that the thesis:

Submitted by
SUNITA AGRAWAL
Entitled
“An Analytical Study on Income Tax Act, 2058”
has been prepared as approved by this Department in the prescribed format of
Faculty of Management. This thesis is forwarded for examination.

…………………… ………………………… …………………………

Supervisor Head, Campus Chief,
Mr. Shekhar Sharma Research Committee Kankai Adarsha Awasiya Campus
Mr. Raju Kafle Mr. Suresh Kr. Chapagain

Date: ………………………

2
 VIVA-VOCE SHEET

We have conducted the Viva-Voce examination of the thesis presented by

SUNITA AGRAWAL
Entitled
“An Analytical Study on Income Tax Act, 2058”
and found the thesis to be the original work of the student and written according
to the prescribed format. We recommend this thesis to be accepted as partial
fulfillment of the requirements for Master of Business Studies (M.B.S.)

VIVA-VOCE COMMITTEE

Chairperson, Research Committee: ………………………………

Campus Chief, Kankai Adarsha Awasiya Campus: ………………………………
Member (Thesis Supervisor): ……………………………....
Member (External Expert): ………………………………

Date:…………………

TRIBHUVAN UNIVERSITY
FACULTY OF MANAGEMENT
KANKAI ADARSHA AWASIYA CAMPUS
Birtamode, Jhapa, Nepal

3
 DECLARATION

I hereby declare that the work reported in this thesis entitled “An
Analytical Study on Income Tax Act, 2058” submitted to Kankai Adarsha
Awasiya Campus, Tribhuvan University is my original work. It is done in the
form of partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Business Studies
(M.B.S.) under the supervision and guidance of Mr. Shekhar Sharma.

………………………
SUNITA AGRAWAL
Researcher
Kankai Adarsha Awasiya Campus

Date:…………………

4
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

With my sincere obligation I express my deep sense of gratitude to all

those who have helped me by extending and sharing valuable time, efforts, views
inspection etc in course of completing this work in the present form.
At the onset, I express deep indebtness to my supervisor Mr. Shekar
Sharma, Mr. Raju Kafle, Head of Research Committee, Tribuvan University for
their invaluable supervision, constructive comments and suggestions, which gave
the final shape of this thesis.
I am grateful to Mr. Suresh Kumar Chapagain , Campus Chief of Kankai
Adarsha Awasiya Campus, Birtamode who has helped in many ways. My
acknowledgements are also due to Mr. Mahendra sir and to staffs of Library.
I am also very grateful to Krishna Prasad Parajuli, Dhurba Pokhrel,
Prakash Gautam, Tax Officer, IRD, Bhadrapur who provided their valuable
suggestions during my project period. My special acknowledgements are due to
Mr. Bir Bhadur Shrestha, Mr. Robin Adhikari, Mr. Ramesh Dahal, Mr. Raj Balla
Puri, Mr. Toya Sapkota, Mr. Shankar Khanal, Mr. Ganesh Pokhrel, Miss Ranjana
Karki, Miss Bidya Rai and Mr. Tika Shrestha for their valuable time and
suggestions. Similarly, my acknowledgements are also to Mr. Damber Bhandari,
Mr. Sushil Agrawal, Mr. Bimal Agrawal and Miss Binita Agrawal for their help
on one form or the other in the preparation of this study in spite of their busy
schedules.
Last, but not the least, the talented staffs of M/S. Pallvi Travells, Birtamode
deserve praise for their nice computer service and also for their patience in the last
minute modifications.

Sunita Agrawal

5
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page No.
Recommendation i
Viva-voce Sheet ii
Declaration iii
Acknowledgement iv
Contents v
List of Table ix
List of Figure xiii

CHAPTER – 1
INTRODUCTION 1-12
1.1 Background Information 1
1.2 Focus of the Study 7
1.3 Statement of the Problem 8
1.4 Objectives of the Study 9
1.5 Significance of the Study 10
1.6 Limitation of the Study 11
1.7 Research Methodology 11
1.5 Organization of the Study 11

CHAPTER-II
REVIEW OF LITERATURE 13-31
2.1 Concept of Income Tax 13
2.2 Income Tax in the International Context 26
2.3 Historical Background of Income Tax in Nepalese Context 28

6
CHAPTER-III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 32-35
3.1 Introduction 32
3.2 Research and Design 32
3.3 Population and Sample 33
3.4 Nature and Sources of Data 33
3.5 Data Gathering Procedure 34
3.6 Data Processing Procedure and Analysis of Data 34
3.7 Weight of Choice 35

CHAPTER-IV
PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA 36-97
4.1 Tax Structure of Nepal 36
4.1.1 Composition of Total Revenue 36
4.1.2 Composition of Total Tax Revenue 40
4.1.3 Contribution of Various Taxes as Percent to GDP 43
4.1.4 Composition of Indirect Tax 46
4.1.5 Composition of Direct Tax 49
4.1.6 Contribution of Direct Tax 52
4.1.7 Contribution of Income Tax in Nepal 54
4.1.8 Composition and Trend of Income Tax 56
4.2 Analysis of Income Tax Act 2058 with reference to Income Heads 60
4.2.1 Income from a Business 60
4.2.2 Income from an Employment 61
4.2.3 Income from an Investment 63
4.2.4 Business Exemptions, Exempt Amounts and Other Concessions 64
4.2.5 Deductions Allowed 68
4.2.6 Deductions Not Allowed 77
4.3 An Empirical Analysis 79
4.3.1 Introduction 79

7
 4.3.2 Income Tax as a Suitable Means of raising Domestic Resources 81
4.3.3 Division of Income Heads 83
4.3.4 Appropriateness of a Current Income Tax Exemption Limit 84
4.3.5 Specific Goal of Income Tax in Nepal 86
4.3.6 Weaknesses Associated with Income Tax Act, 2058 87
4.3.7 Provision of Self-Assessment 89
4.3.8 Tax Paying Habit of Nepalese people 90
4.3.9 Problems and Weaknesses Associated with Nepalese
Administration 92
4.3.10 Methods of Increasing tax Consciousness 93

CHAPTER-V
MAJOR FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATION 98-109
5.1 Major Findings 98
5.2 Conclusions 105
5.3 Recommendations 106

BIBLIOGRAPHY

8
 LIST OF TABLE
Page No.

Table No. : 4.1.1 Composition of Total Revenue 37

Table No. : 4.1.2 Contribution of Direct and Indirect Tax to Total
Tax Revenue 41
Table No. : 4.1.3 Contribution of Various Taxes as Percent to GDP 45
Table No. : 4.1.4 Major Source of Indirect Tax and Their Percentage
to Indirect Tax 47
Table No. : 4.1.5 Components of Direct Tax and Their Percentage
to direct Tax 50
Table No. : 4.1.6 Contribution of Direct Tax 53
Table No. : 4.1.7 Contribution of Income Tax on Different Revenue
Heads 55
Table No. : 4.1.8 Components of Income Tax 57
Table No. : 4.1.9 Composition of Income Tax 58
Table No. : 4.3.1 Groups of Respondents and Code Used 80
Table No. : 4.3.2 Income Tax as a Suitable Means for Raising Domestic
Resources 81
Table No. : 4.3.3 Reasons for the Suitability of Income Tax in Raising
Domestic Resources 82
Table No. : 4.3.4 Division of Income Heads 83
Table No. : 4.3.5 Appropriateness of Current Income Tax Exemption
Limit 84
Table No. : 4.3.6 Exemption Limit for an Individual 85
Table No. : 4.3.7 Exemption Limit for a Family 86
Table No. : 4.3.8 Specific Goal of Income Tax in Nepal 87
Table No. : 4.3.9 Weaknesses Associated with Income Tax Act, 2058 88
Table No. : 4.3.10 Provision of Self-Assessment 89

9
Table No. : 4.3.11 Self-Assessment as a good measure of Collecting
Income Tax 90
Table No. : 4.3.12 Tax Paying Habit of Nepalese People is Poor 90
Table No. : 4.3.13 Major Problems and Weaknesses of Nepalese Tax
Administration 92
Table No. : 4.3.14 Methods of Increasing Tax Consciousness 93
Table No. : 4.3.15 Calculation of Correlation of Coefficient 95

10
 LIST OF FIGURES
Page No.

Figure No. : 4.1.1 Composition of Total Revenue 39

Figure No. : 4.1.2 Composition of Total Tax Revenue 42
Figure No. : 4.1.3 Composition of Major Indirect Tax 48
Figure No. : 4.1.4 Components of Direct Tax 51
Figure No. : 4.1.5 Composition of Income Tax 59

11
 CHAPTER – 1
INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background Information

In the present world, a government has to spend a lot of money to fulfill its
responsibility towards its people. The responsibility may be either for security or
for health or education or other development activities. In order to accomplish its
responsibility, government requires adequate financial resources that may take a
form of taxes, charges or borrowings. Taxes and charges are withdrawn from the
private sector without leaving the government with liability to the payee.
Borrowing involves a withdrawal made in return for the government's promise to
repay at a future and to pay interest in the interim.1 Borrowing has produced bitter
experience as well as mixed consequences in developing nations. The repayment
of principal and interest is providing to be a net burden for many of them. It can
almost occupy only a marginal and dwindling importance in the financing of
development.

In broad sense, public revenue includes all the income and receipts received by
the government. But in narrow sense, in includes only income received from
taxes.2 In normal circumstances, taxation seems to be the most effective and
perhaps the least harmful ways of mobilizing internal resources. The government
imposes tax on people to repay external debt as a consequence of which they
cannot save enough money.

Nowadays every countries of the world whether developed or developing

have income tax system. Income tax more or less affect on production and
growth, economic activities of the government, reduction on foreign debt,

1
Musgrave, R.A. & Musgrave, P.B.; Public Finance in theory & Practice, McGraw-Hill
Book Company, Singapore 1989.
2
Joshi, Dr. Shyam; An introduction to Nepalese Economy, Nabin Prakashan, Bhotahity
Kathmandu 2064.
12
 development of various small and cottage industries, activities and growth of
corporate enterprises, allocation of resources, distribution of income, employment,
inflation and deflation etc. Tax is the main source of financing government
activities. In every country, the largest part of government revenue is raised
through taxation. Taxes on income may be levied on individual as well as
business firms. The former is known as personal income tax and the later is
known as corporate tax. A proper tax system should be able to generate the
required amount of revenue. Taxes are emphasized in all countries developed as
well developing, because they have the potential for increasing the yield of tax
system and achieving a system of taxation that satisfies the demand for equity and
social justice.3

But when the agriculture sector is large, accounting standards are poor, the level
of literacy is low, the most economic activity takes place in small establishment,
and the effective taxation of personal income is difficult. As a result income tax is
less important in Nepal than in many developing countries.4 Tax policies must
reflect the national development goals and aspiration of a nation. They must aid
and compliment the accomplishment of such goals. Tax policies are not only
being looked upon as effective tool for raising revenue but also increasingly being
used for the regulation of the economy and for providing new direction to it. As
the nations goals and policy objectives change, so should change the tax policy.
The broad objective of tax policy in developing nations is the promotion of
development process for meeting the minimum needs of the masses and
improving the quality of life.

Income tax is a personal tax imposed on the net income of individual and
corporation. By this method of taxation, such burden i.e., in accordance with the
tax paying ability of the individual may be called for the blending of various
personal deductions with progressive rate. Although not completely neutral, it

3
Singh, S.K.; Public Finance in Developed & Developing Countries, S. Chand & Co. Ltd.
New Delhi.
4
Khadka, Rup Bh.; Nepalese Taxation: A path for Reform, Marburg, Marburg Consult
for Self-help Promotion,1994.
13
possesses a number of economic advantages. It is widely accepted that an income
base represents the most appropriate single measure of taxable capacity. If
properly constructed, it ensures equal taxation of persons with equal ability and
increasing taxation of persons with higher income (Govinda Ram Agrawal:
Resources Mobilization for Development: The Reform of Income tax in Nepal,
CEDA 1978).

Tax is compulsory contribution imposed by public authority using the right

given by law. Tax is compulsory contribution imposed by public authority using
the right given by law. Taxpayers do not expect any return for his tax paying. It
is neither an exact amount nor a penalty for any legal offence. The chief function
of taxation is that it ensures collective saving for the purpose of public investment
and at the same time provides incentives for promoting private investment.5 Thus
its importance cannot be ignored on the overall policy scheme of the government
of the developing economy. Taxes are not voluntary purchase payments but
mandatory impositions, payable in line with whatever tax statute has been
legislated.6

Tax may be classified into two types. They are direct and indirect. Direct tax is
that tax which is really paid by a person on whom it is legally imposed. Some of
the direct taxes are income tax, property tax, interest tax, death tax, vehicle tax
etc. Indirect tax is that tax which is imposed on one person but paid partly or
wholly by another. Some of the indirect taxes are sales tax, entertainment tax,
passenger tax, hotel tax, export and import duty, excise duties, VAT etc.

Income tax is one of the most popular direct taxes. It is charged on person
income according to the law of nation. Income includes all the income, which are
received from business, investment and employment. Income tax is superior to

5
Mathew, T.; Tax Policy; Some Aspects of Theory and Indian Experience, Kalayani
Publishers, Delhi,1975.
6
Musgrave, R.A. & Musgrave, P.B.; Public Finance in Theory & Practice, McGraw-Hill
Book Company, Singapore 1989.

14
indirect tax because it is imposed on the basis of paying capacity of the taxpayer.
People whose income is below the taxable income are free from the obligation of
income tax.

The contribution of income based taxes is smaller to the total revenue for
developing countries in comparison to developed countries and is likely to remain
same for sometime to come despite the efforts over the years of many least
developed countries to raise more revenue. There are mainly four reasons as why
income tax yields less in developing countries as compared to the developed ones.
They are problems of defining income, problems of assessing and measuring it,
the choice of rates, allowances and deductions, and difficulties of tax collection.7
But the importance of taxation in the under developed countries cannot be under
estimated because saving in such a country do not always take the forms in which
resources suitable for economic development are set free. Domestic saving which
may be mainspring of economic development may often go into wasteful and
unproductive channels which abstracts economic development rather than feed it.
Such examples are the hoarding of precious metals, holding of foreign currency,
investment in real estate, speculations etc. Savings in these forms are either
useless or positively harmful to economic development. The forms have to be
changed so the savings can be mobilized for economic development. In this
regard taxation can play important role by directing resources from these channels
into useful capital formation.8

The taxation has been taken as an instrument of redistribution and stability. But
experience has revealed that the developing countries have placed more emphasis
on the role of taxation as an instrument of resources mobilization in the initial
stage of their development and its role as an income redistribution has been
given a subordinate importance. Tax system is the subsystem of the total
economy. Tax policy is changed with the change in the economic policy of a

7
Prest, A.R.; Public Finance in Developing Countries, George Weodenfeld & Nicolson
ltd., London,1985.
8
Tripathy, R.N.; Public Finance in Underdeveloped Countries, The World Press Private
Ltd. Calcutta, 1968.
15
country. Change in world economic policy and advancement in information
technology has a vast impact on Nepalese economy too. Small economies like
Nepal have to adopt the economic policy followed by World Bank, International
monetary Fund, Asian Development Bank and other international agencies.
Especially, after 1990s, there is reemergence of the liberalization, globalization
and privatization system that focuses on the minimum intervention of the state on
private economic matters. The 1950s concept of ‘high incentive, high tax rate’ is
changed to the concept of ‘low rate, wide net’. This tends in tax system is
followed by most of the countries of the world. Nepal is also not an exception in
this respect and Nepalese administrators and policy makers too have tried to
change the tax policy of the country. Income Tax Act 2058 is the result of the
change in all these matters.9 Before this act, Income Tax Act, 2031 was enacted.
Since 19th Chaitra 2050, Income Tax Act, 2058 has been introduced in Nepal.
This act was brought in Nepal to avoid the following defects of Income Tax Act,
2031.

a. Narrow base of tax.

b. Taxing only the income originated in Nepal
c. Dispersion of tax related acts i.e. income tax related provisions were given
in different acts.
d. Low penalty to tax evaders.
e. Incompatible to self assessment system, and
f. Unsuitable to modern economy.10

As the new income tax act has been enacted to overcome the demerits of the
previous act and to modify and integrate tax laws in Nepal, it has got many
features
. One of the main features is that it has complied all of the income tax related
provisions within it. Before the implementation of Income Tax Act, 2058 the
provision related to the income tax were scattered in different laws such as
9
Khandel, Pushpa Raj: Tax Laws and Tax Planning in Nepal, Buddha Academic
Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd., Nepal, 2003.
10
Ibid
16
Industrial Enterprises Act 2049, House and Land Tax Act, 2023, Foreign
Investment and Technology Transfer Act, 2049 etc. The previous act has
classified income into five heads: income from business, profession, or vocation,
income from investment, income from employment, income from House and land
rent and income from other sources. But the present act has classified income into
three heads: employment income, business income and investment income. It
attempts to bring all the incomes into the tax net including capitals gains and
dividend income. Earlier, retirement related incomes were out of the tax net, but
the new act has included the retirement related incomes and fund related to
retirement within the tax net. The new act has made the provision for income
returns and self tax assessment. Every tax payer is required to fill up the returns
of the income in the prescribed format and file to the concerned internal revenue
office within three months after the expiry of the income year. The procedure,
place and other provisions about the submission of return of income are clearly
mentioned in the laws. The act has made a provision of relaxing the submission
of income returns by a person who doesn't have to pay tax or who has received
income only as final withholding payments. Income Tax Act, 2031 has made the
provision of setting off and carry forward of business losses only for three years
from the same sources of income. That means, it had only the intra head recovery
provision of three years.

Income Tax Act, 2058 is liberal in this respect than the previous tax act. It has
made the provision of inter-head adjustment for one year and intra-head
adjustment for four years to ordinary forms of business. For financial sector and
long-term contract, the provision is more liberal providing the facility of
recovering the losses from previous five years' profit also. This act has prescribed
the method and base of tax accounting. It has clearly indicated the cash basis for
employment income and investment income and accrual basis for a company.
The accounting of business run by natural person can be kept either on cash basis
or accrual basis.

17
 Income Tax Act, 2031 had accumulated provisions related to depreciation. The
assets categorizes for depreciation purpose were around 3 dozens. Different rates
were allocated to different types of assets. The result was the confusion relating
to the rate of depreciation. Accordingly, previous tax act had given alternatives to
industries to select one depreciation method: straight line or diminishing balance.
However, the rate allowed for both methods were not equivalent. The rates
allowed for diminishing balance method were more attractive than the rates
allowed for straight line method. To avoid this chaotic situation, new tax has tried
to minimize the rooms to play. It has specified diminishing balance based on pool
system with 5 categories as assets as the system of depreciation to be used by the
business communities. The fines and penalties for the defaulters in old tax act
were not as secure as they are in new act. Income Tax Act, 2058 has made the
provision of fine and penalty more stringent. It has made over the provision up to
3 years.

1.2 Focus of the Study

The study mainly focuses on the Income Tax Act, 2058. In other words, it is a
study of current income tax in a concise manner. It attempts to focus on the
different aspects of income tax such as income types, exemptions and deductions,
loss recovery provisions, provision for self assessment, penal provisions, tax rates
etc. It has also tried to analyze whether the division of incomes: business income,
investment income and employment income is justifiable or not. It has also tried
to analyze whether the problems and difficulties faced due to Income Tax Act,
2031 has been overcome by the Income Tax Act, 2058 or not. The study has also
focused on up to what level the current Income Tax Act has been succeeded in
increasing the government revenue. Further more the problems and difficulties
arisen during the implementation of the Income Tax Act, 2058 has also been
studied. Thus, it attempts to clarify those problems and weakness associated with
income tax. Likewise, the study also focuses on the contribution of income tax to
the total revenue and total government revenue.

18
1.3 Statement of the Problem

Economic development is the prime concern of the every nation of the world.
Thus, every nation of the world is accomplishing various activities to fulfill these
objectives. Nevertheless, underdeveloped countries are facing serous problem of
economic development. Nepal is also not an exception to this condition. It needs
huge amount of capital for economic development of Nepal. Despite the various
measure adopted by the government to boost revenue collection, there is still a
substantial resource gap between expenditure and revenue. The rate of
government expenditure is exceeding the rate of growth revenue almost every
year. In other word, Nepal has been facing persistent budget deficit from the
beginning of development phase. The budget deficit has been growing and this
may have a negative effect on the economy. External deficits, currency
depreciation, inflationary pressure, rising interest rates, which may cause
crowding out effect and reduction in economic growth are some of the negative
consequences of budget deficits. There is a need of analyzing and suggesting
means of resolving budget deficits.

To raise the government revenue, it is necessary to raise sources of revenue,

which helps to relive from serious bottleneck of resource gap in the proceeds of
economic development program. To bridge the gap between total resources
required and supply of the resources, income tax plays a vital role in government
revenue.

Income tax in developing nations has been regarded as an instrument of growth

and social justice. But experience in most of the developing countries including
Nepal have shown income tax has not succeeded in achieving either of these goals
because only a small part of total national incomes come under the purview of
income tax. In Nepal, indications are that income tax that has not played a
significant role in reducing the inequalities of income and wealth. However, the

19
prospect of mobilizing resources through taxation has been encouraging for the
developing countries like Nepal. Because it is not possible in these countries to
mobilize resources by curtailing the existing level of consumption as the
consumption of the people is too low.

Income tax evasion is a serious problem in Nepal and seems a national

character. Because of this, resources have not been mobilized efficiently and
resources gap is increasing each year in the Nepalese public finance. The practice
of tax evasion in Nepal has resulted in increased in burden of indirect tax and
unimproved share of direct tax. Poor tax paying habit of Nepalese people and
poor recording system of tax office are also the problem of economic
development of Nepal. Similarly, there is no integrated program for tax payer’s
education, assistance, guidance and counseling. The assessment procedure of
income tax is not effective, undue delay in tax assessment not only reduces the
total revenue, but also brings harassment to the taxpayers.11 However, the
problems can be stated in terms of the following questions.

1. Is it justifiable to divide income in three heads?

2. Is the exemption limit being provided sufficient?
3. What are the weaknesses of Income Tax Act, 2058?
4. What are the problems and weaknesses associated with income tax
administration?
5. What are the methods of increasing tax consciousness among the Nepalese
people?

1.4 Objectives of the Study

The main objective of the study is to gain an insight into the present income tax
and give appropriate suggestions for improvement. At the same time, it attempts
to increase the morale of Nepalese people so that they accept tax not as a burden
11
Agrawal, Govinda Ram; Resources Mobilization for Development; The reform of
Income Tax in Nepal, CEDA, T.U. 1978.
20
but as a responsibility towards national development. However, objectives of the
study can be pointed as follows:

a. To examine income tax in its historical perspective.

b. To review the income tax system of Nepal in context of its contribution on
the total tax revenue and the total government revenue.
c. An analysis of Income Tax Act, 2058 in reference to income heads.
d. To find out the ways and means for increasing tax consciousness among
the Nepalese people.
e. To provide suggestions and recommendation regarding the income tax of
Nepal.

1.5 Significance of the Study

Developing countries like Nepal requires higher magnitude of financial

resources for the development program. Domestic resources have more
significant role than the external resources for development program. Among the
domestic resources, income tax plays a significant role. In this context,
significance of income tax cannot be under estimated in the Public finance of a
nation. As per the need of the modern economy and to avoid all the defects of
previous income tax, Income Tax Act, 2058 has been introduced. The study helps
in better understanding of the act along with the problems and the weaknesses
associated with the current income tax. In addition, it suggests the ways of
increasing the awareness among the Nepalese people concerning the income tax,
which is an immediate need of today. In this context, need and significant of the
study can be known easily.

21
1.6 Limitation of the Study

As every study is followed by some limitations, this study is also not free from
limitation. The limitations of the study can be pointed as follows:

a. Both primary as well as secondary data are being used, but the reliability of
secondary data has not being examined.
b. Opinions of the respondents have been taken as a sense of truth, which may
not be correct, at all time due to the changing trends on people’s thinking.
c. The views of respondents are collected only from Jhapa District only.
d. Time constraints serve as a major limitation to the study.

1.7 Research Methodology

This study used both primary as well as secondary sources of data. The
secondary data includes act, rules, relevant books and pamphlets, thesis or
dissertations submitted to the central library of Tribhuvan University and books
published by CEDA etc. The primary source of data includes opinions survey
through questionnaire field visit and information received from the respondents.

1.8 Organization of the Study

The whole study has organized into five chapters. They are:
1) Introduction
2) Review of Literature
3) Research Methodology
4) Presentation and analysis of data
5) Summary, conclusion and recommendation

22
 The first chapter is about the introduction of research study. It includes
Background information, Focus of the study, Statement of the problem,
Objectives of the study, Significance of the study, Limitations of the study,
Research methodology, and Organization of the study.

The second chapter is about the Review of literature. Some books,

dissertations, reports and articles have been reviewed for this study.

The third chapter is concerned with Research methodology, which includes

research design, population and sample, nature and sample of data, data gathering
procedure, data processing procedure and analysis of data, weight of choice and
weight of respondents.

The fourth chapter is on the presentation and analysis of data. This is a major
part of the study. It aims to make a clear understanding of Income Tax Act, 2058
in reference to income heads.

The fifth chapter is mainly concerned with finding, summary, conclusion and
recommendation.

Appendix and bibliography have been presented in the last part of the study.

CHAPTER - II

23
 REVIEW OF LITERATURE

2.1 Concept of Income Tax

Income tax is considered as an important source of revenue in most of the

countries whether it is developed or developing countries regardless of its high or
low contribution. It is levied on the net income of individual and corporation.
Income tax is looked upon as a tool for achieving the social and economic
objectives. It has been recognized as a good financial lever to narrow the
disparities in income. Regional economic imbalances are being reduced by
providing incentive and concessions in income tax for starting new industries in
backward areas. Thus, besides being a source of revenue, income tax has become
an effective instrument to ensure balanced socio economic growth.12 Income tax is
personal tax imposed on the net income of individual and corporation. By this
method of taxation such burden that is in accord with the tax paying ability of the
individual may be called for by blending various personal deductions with the
progressive rates. Although not completely neutral, it possesses number of
economic advantages. It is widely accepted that an income base represents the
most appropriate single measure of taxable capacity. It appropriately constructed,
it ensures equal taxation of persons of equal ability and increasing taxation of
persons with higher income.13

For the purpose of obtaining taxable income it is necessary to deduct all

allowable expenses or deductions from the net income. Income Tax Act, 2058
has defined taxable income of a person for an income year is equal to the amount
as calculated by subtracting reductions, if any, claimed for the year under section
12 or 63 from the total of the person's assessable income for the year from each of

12
Lal, B.B.; Direct Taxes Income Tax, Wealth tax, Gift tax and Tax Planning; Konark
the following
Publishers income
Pvt. Ltd. Delhiheads:
1990.
13
Agrawal, Govinda Ram; Resources Mobilization for Development; The reform of Income
Tax in Nepal, CEDA, T.U. 1978.

24
 a) Business
b) Employment
c) Investment 14

According to tax economist, an income tax is levy imposed upon the income of
individual after the exemption limit. Only the taxable income is subject to tax,
otherwise the objectives and principles of taxation will not be fulfilled. Tax
levied on income is known as income tax. Every country has its own peculiar
system of taxing personal income. In case of personal income taxation, there is
great deal of differences between the two types of countries i.e. developed and
underdeveloped countries. First, there are problems of defining income. Second,
there are difficulties of assessing anyone individual's income, even if one knows
how to define income in general. Third, there are matters connected with fixing
of rates and allowances. Fourth, there are problems of assessment.15

The objective if income tax is to impose on income. It means money or

money's worth received from any income in such away that any receipt derived in
terms of cash or kind. Income may be received either in cash or kind in the form
of perquisites, which can be measured and valued in terms of money. In this case
income is not considered from the point of view of permanency temporary income
is also taxed. It would not make any difference whether the income is received in
installments or lump sum. Salary, fee and other income payable periodically
throughout the year, are taxable even if received only once during the previous
year.16 The main issue in taxation has been regarded as to collect revenue. The
government passes the acts for getting tax revenue and collects the tax as per the
act. Nepal gets a round 80% of the revenue from this source.17 The objective of
taxation, however, has been different for different epochs and for different nation.
14
Income Tax Act, 2058
15
Prest, A.R.; Public Finance in Underdeveloped Countries, Vikas Publishers, New Delhi,
1972.
16
The objective
Poudyal, Santoshadopted
Raj andin Timsina,
developing
Premcountries may notTaxbe insuitable
Prasad: Income Nepal, in the
Atharai
Enterprises, Kathmandu, 1990
17
Khandel, Pushpa Raj: Tax Laws and Tax Planning in Nepal, Buddha Academic
Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd., Nepal, 2003.

25
developed ones and vice versa. Likewise, in ancient time, the major objective of
taxation has been shifted from security perception to the economic development.
The modern objective of taxation is not only to maintain peace and security but
also to conduct development activities. Thus, the act has the objective of raising
revenue to have resource mobilization equal distribution of wealth and income in
the society, encouragement in production of certain products, encouragement in
employment, saving and investment, removal of regional imbalance and
enforcement of government policy.

In fact, income tax contributes the major source of revenue in most of the
advanced countries like U.S.A., U.K. etc. Underdeveloped countries too have
tried to tap this lucrative source. Income tax came into being as a result of
extending and broadening the tax base and in search of additional source of
finance either for waging a costly war or matching the nation building tasks.
Nepal, too, used this source in order to mobilize internal sources and raise the
revenue for economic development. Taxation is a major instrument of social and
economic policy having three major goals: to transfer resources from the private
to the public sector; to distribute the cost of government fairly by income classes
(vertical equity) and among the people in approximately the same economic
circumstances (horizontal equity); and to promote economic growth, stability and
efficiency.18 In fact, taxation can be taken as a matter of a cooperation between
the tax administration and the taxpayers.

A tax can be defined as any non penal yet compulsory transfer of resources
from the private to the public sector, levied on the basis of predetermined criteria,
and without receipt of a specific benefit of equal value in order to accomplish
some of a government's economic and social objective.19 Thus, income tax is an
important and significant source of revenue of the

18
A. Pechman, In
government. Joshep: Federal age
this present Tax its
Policy, The Brookings
importance Institution,
has increased much Washington
on accountD.C.
of
1976.
19
Sommerfeld, Ray M. and Others; HBJ Federal Tax Course; HBJ, U.S.A, 1986.

26
the policy of the government to bring about economic equality in the community.
The basic principle of income tax should be progressive, incidence in the rates of
payment with simplicity and efficiency in administration and collection.

The most widely grouping of a tax system is between direct and indirect taxes.
A direct tax, according to J.S. Mill, is "one which demanded from a very person
who, it is intended or desired, should pay it. Indirect taxes are those which have
been demanded in the expectation and intention that he shall indemnify himself at
the expense of another." Thus, the distinction is clearly based on phenomenon of
shifting. A tax, which cannot be shifted, is indirect. Direct taxes include income
tax, property tax, vehicle tax, interest tax, expenditure tax, death tax, gift tax etc.
Similarly indirect taxes include value added tax, sales tax, entertainment tax, hotel
tax, excise duty etc. A tax which is levied at the time when the income is earned
is known as direct tax. We pay the direct tax when we earned our income. On the
other hand an indirect tax is the one that is levied when the income is spent. The
tax that we pay in the shape of a higher price for a commodity that is taxed is an
indirect tax.20

The more the country is developed the less will be the use of indirect taxes and
vice versa. Underdeveloped countries receive their revenue more from indirect
taxes like sales tax, excise tax etc. In contrast to this, the developed countries
extract more revenue from direct taxes e.g.: income tax. That is why U.S.A, U.K,
Japan etc secure funds more from income tax, whereas Nepal still has not been
able to tap this source.21 Indirect taxes still play their predominant roles in the
development of Nepal. The biggest yielder of revenue in underdeveloped
countries are the taxes on commodities-import, export and excise duties. They are
easiest to collect, administratively, when commodities pas through the hands of a
few wholesalers in a small number of places.

20
Poudyal, Santosh Raj and Timsina, Prem Prasad: Income Tax in Nepal, Atharai
Nepal has
Enterprises, been able1990
Kathmandu, during the past few years to give added confidence in
21
Mahatta, Hari Prasad; Fundamentals of Nepalese Income Tax, Surya Prasad Mahatta
and Anand Prasad Khatioda, Nepal, 1970.

27
general, by its increased emphasis on direct taxes, even if their percentage yield
has not been substantial, as in any other developing country, and there has still
been dependence predominantly on commodity taxes.22

Both for development and developed nation there is no choice between to tax or
not to tax people because without taxing people no government activity can be
operated.23 According to Benjamin Franklin,” In this world nothing is certain but
death and taxes." Taxes are a portion of the produce of the land and labors of a
country placed at the disposal of the government: and are always ultimately paid
either from capital or from the revenue of the country. Income tax is a direct tax,
which enjoys a pride of place in the revenue of government all over the world. At
present, income tax is levied along with the other direct taxes like gift tax, wealth
tax etc which results the integrated tax structure aimed at bringing about
progressively in taxation and social justice in administration.24 The imposition of
income tax is meant, first to reduce the inequality distribution of wealth with
social justice, and secondly to create the tax paying habit of the people.25
Taxation serve as the major method for transferring resources from private to the
public sector.

Taxes should prevent and penalize the diversion of savings into land, buildings,
inventories, precious objects, jeweler, foreign exchange and other investment hold
or speculative gain or prestige purpose. Thus, tax policies should encourage
desired development activities and penalize undesirable activities.26 Taxes on
incomes are the most important single source of revenue for the government of
developed countries, though they at present produce for less revenue in most
22
Pant, Y.P.;Problems in Fiscal and Monetary Policy, Sahayogi Prakashan,
Kathmandu,1970.
23
Bhalta, Bhiv Dev & Shrestha, Rajendra Prasad; Revenue Adminstration in Nepal:
CEDA, Kathmandu, 1981.
24
Prasad, Bhagwati, Inocme Tax, Law and Practice, Wishwa Praksahan, New Delhi 2000.
25
Dhungana, Mr. Bhavani, Kayatha, Mr. Narendra Rai,Mr. Bal Pd.; An Analysis Of Tax
Structure
developingof Nepal, CEDA,
countries thanT.U., Kathmandu,1976.
custom duties and taxes on internal transactions. But
26
Agrawal, Govinda Ram; Resources Mobilization for Development; The reform of
Income Tax in Nepal, CEDA, T.U. 1978.

28
these taxes are emphasized in all countries, developed as well as developing
because they have potential for increasing the yield of tax system and achieving a
system of taxation that satisfies the demand for equity and social justice. Income
liable to tax generally fall into five categories, namely i) wages and salaries, ii)
interest on securities and dividends iii) profits of business or vocation, iv) income
from property and v) income from other sources.27 Generally an income tax is
considered to be a tax, which is levied on income and is paid out of income.
Every person who has taxable income is liable to pay tax. Income tax is an
effective instrument for keeping unequal distribution of wealth within limits. It is
more equitable in so far as it is based on the ability of payer to bear the burden of
tax. In progressive system taxation, its importance cannot be underestimated as a
source of public revenue for financing war or developmental plans. Being an
elastic tax, its rates can be increased according to the requirement of the state.28

Taxation policy in a developing country should include the following

objectives. First, it should help in promoting savings in the private sector, which
in generally found to be very much undeveloped and even in the process of the
elementary evolution. Secondly, it is desired to reduce the very large gap between
the incomes of the few rich and many poor. Thirdly, taxation should not have
undesirable inhibiting effects in terms of inflationary pressure, and thus it should
be counter-inflationary in its actions.29 Tax policy should be such as reducing the
unequal distribution of wealth among people so as to bridge the gap of income
disparity. For this purpose higher income group has to pay high tax and lower
income group has to pay less tax. In course of defining taxation, Seligman has
defined taxation as, “Taxation is the compulsory contribution from a person to the
government to defray expenses incurred in the common interest of all without
reference to special benefit conferred”.

27
Singh, S.K.; Public Finance in Developed and Developing Countries, S.Chand & Co.
Ltd., New Delhi, 1991.
28
Vanish
Thus, S; Illustrated
it has Income-Tax
been made Law,a Kitab
clear that tax isMahal, India, 1957.
a compulsory levy and those who are
29
Pant, Y.P.;Problems in Fiscal and Monetary Policy, Sahayogi Prakashan,
Kathmandu,1970.

29
taxed have to pay it without getting corresponding benefits of services or goods
from the government. The taxpayer does not have any right to receive direct
benefit from the tax paid. Tax is a liability to pay an amount to the state. The
basis for the payment is that they own certain tangible or intangible property or
that they carry on certain economic activities which have been chooses for
taxation. Thus, taxation has been a very essential element of a government from
the very beginning of the state system. The objective of taxation is not only to
raise government revenue but also to reduce income and wealth inequality with
social justice and to create the tax paying habit of the taxpayers. The three major
goals of taxation can be listed as follows:

1) To transfer resources from the private to the public sector.

2) To distribute the cost of government fairly by income classes and among
people in approximately the economic circumstances
3) To promote economic growth, stability and efficiency.30

Income tax in underdeveloped countries like Nepal plays an important role in

contributing to that natural revenue to carry out development plans, to handle day-
to-day administration, to maintain peace and security and to launch other public
welfare activities. The concept of income tax can be made clear from the
following point:

 A tax is a compulsory levy imposed by the government.

 Those that pay tax do not get corresponding benefits from the
government.
 Tax amount is spent for common interest of the people.
 Tax is collected from haves and spent for the interest of have rots in the
society.
 Tax is levied on person as per the prevailing laws.31
30
Bhattarai, Ishwor & Koirala, Girija Prasad ; Tax Laws and Tax Planning, Dhaulagiri
Books and Stationeries, Kathmandu, 2065.
31
Ibid.

30
 The previous income tax act i.e. Income tax act, 2031, had defined income as
income earned or received in cash or in kind from the following sources:

1) Employment
2) Agriculture
3) Industry, business, profession or vocation
4) Remuneration
5) House and land rent
6) Other sources.32

Income tax is chargeable on the net income of a person earned or received in the
kingdom of Nepal or such others income earned in foreign country and year of
income, after making appropriate deductions to which he is entitled under the act.
Similarly the present income tax act i.e. Income Tax Act, 2058 has defined
income as a person's income from any employment, business or investment and
the total of that income as calculated in accordance with this act. And tax means
income tax imposed as per the act.33

In spite of certain limitations and difficulties in the beginning year, today

taxation is accepted as a major method of promoting economic growth and of
achieving social goals. Many thesis/dissertations have been presented on the
study of income tax in Nepal. A review of some are presented below:

In 1976, Mr. Govind Lal Shrestha has presented a case study entitled "Income
Tax in Nepal." In this study, he has tried to give some general introduction of
income tax along with its historical background and some problems of income tax
in Nepal. He suggested that the income tax need more reform to make it more
scientific and systematic so as to be based on economic and social justice.

32 Mr. Narendra
Income Tax Act,Lal Kayastha in his dissertation entitled, "Taxation of Income and
2031.
33
Income Tax Act, 2058.

31
Property in Nepal" in 1974 has defined objectives of taxation of income and
property and its role in the process of economic development. He has given a
brief history of taxation of income and property in Nepal and discussed the
problem of income tax in Nepal along with the important recommendation and
suggestions. He analyzed the role of income and property taxation in the light of
their tax objectives of underdeveloped countries, namely the objectives of growth,
equitable distribution and stabilization. A proper tax structure should take into
account all these objectives but one and other objectives cannot go equally
together. Thus, the priority of these objectives depends upon the prevailing
condition of the economy.
The objective of growth is very important in the initial stages of development
but after gaining the momentum of growth, the objective of equitable distribution
comes to be important, and the objectives of stabilization is considered and
emphasized only in the unusual circumstances of inflation. He further adds that
for a development country like Nepal, the objectives of growth is the first and the
foremost objective with or mild dose of inflation and mildly progressive rate of
taxation in order to promote the rate of economic development.

He concludes that before 1951, Nepal did not have scientific economic policy,
which could facilitate the economic development of the country. There was high
resources gap. Thus, to tap the resources, in 1959/60 the tax structure was
diversified and many new taxes like salary tax, business tax, property tax etc were
introduced. Before it, the traditional taxes like land revenue tax, custom duties,
excise duties etc. were the main taxes. In 1962/63, introducing the comprehensive
income tax with a long-term motive, replacing other income tax under varied
headings, made a commendable beginning. Besides, urban property tax and
foreign investment tax are not successful tax; the later has been abolished as
separate tax and has been incorporated into income tax since the fiscal year
1968/69.
He further adds that despite all restraints, the Nepalese income and property tax

32
structure is striving hard to contribute to the economic to the economic
development by achieving the goals of growth. However, the contribution of
indirect taxes went on increasing both in absolute and relative terms in the overall
tax structure of Nepal. In spite of small contribution of income and property taxes
at present, it is obviously an encouraging trend from a longer angle.

Miss Rojalin Singh Suwal presented a dissertation entitled "Income Tax System
in Nepal" in 1981. In this dissertation, she has studied the problem of financial
resource gap in Nepal. She has also studied the resource mobilization and income
taxation in Nepal, direct and indirect tax along with their relative importance,
origin, definition and concept of income tax, importance of income tax on overall
tax structure and the role of income tax system in the process of economic
development. In the last chapter, she has given suggestion and recommendation.

According to her, the function of taxation is to direct the flow of resources of

the economy into productive and useful channels of investment and to raise the
productive capacity of the economy. A serious problem of financial resource gap
in Nepal requires an urgent need of domestic resource mobilization into
productive investment. In developing countries, taxation is the best instrument in
the drive of economic development. Developing nations can utilize more
resources into more productive channels by the taxation measure, thus can
promote a high rate of economic growth as whole. In Nepal, taxation policy
should play a major role in creation of a society free from exploitation.
She has concluded that the tax structure of Nepal has failed to make account of
the prevailing economic structure and pattern of income distribution. More
effective use of income tax is needed for structural changes and has to be
implemented and designed deliberately.
There are many problems regarding income tax in Nepal. Evasion of the tax is
the greatest problem of income tax in Nepal. The practice of evasion of tax must
be checked to contribute taxes to the economic growth of Nepal by channelizing

33
more resources.
A dissertation named,” Income Tax in Nepal" presented by Rosani Shrestha in
1986 has focused on the role of income tax in the process of economic
development, objectives of taxation in developing countries. She has explained
the historical background of income tax of Nepal and stressed the importance of
income tax on all tax structure. According to her, main objectives of tax policies
in developing countries like Nepal can be divided into three factors: growth
objective, equitable distribution and stabilization. The growth objective as one of
the taxation policy should be accumulated through adequate capital to finance
developmental projects and accelerate the pace of economic growth for economic
development of any country. The tax policy should be such as to encourage
people towards productive investment. So, in developing countries special tax
concession should be provided such as tax holidays and investment credit needed
for industrial development. Likewise, the second objective is equity objective on
taxation policy. Equity refers to taxation according to ability to pay. Equitable
distribution of income and wealth is directly related to the growth objective of
nation. So, the income tax should be more progressive to reduce the inequality of
income and wealth. In developing countries a mild dose of inflation is considered
to be essential in the process of economic development. So, the total tax structure
should be such that it will minimize the inflationary pressure and maximize the
growth rate.

"Analytical Study of Income Tax in Nepal" by Chudamani Shivakoti in 1992

has presented concept of income tax along with its historical perspective, role of
income tax in Nepal, income tax structure of Nepal, problems of income tax
administration in Nepal. He also explained that the taxation plays an effective
way of mobilizing internal sources adequately and firmly.
He further adds that taxation policy in a developing country should include
three objectives: it should promote saving in the private sector. Secondly, it
should reduce wide gap between income of few rich and poorer. Thirdly, it

34
should not have undesirable inhibiting effects in terms of inflationary pressures
and it should be or counter-inflationary in its action.

According to him, income tax plays a vital role for the development of the
country. It reduces the unequal distribution of wealth among people and is a
suitable method to collect funds. It can bridge the increasing gap of disparity of
income. For this purpose, higher income group has to pay more tax and lower
income group has to pay less tax.

In 1997, Mr. Raj Kumar Bhattrai has presented a dissertation named

“Effectiveness of Corporate Income Tax in Nepal”. He has descried the history of
income tax and corporate income tax, legal provision relating to income tax
administration aspect of income tax, tax structure and government mechanism.
He found that the share of the tax revenue of the total tax revenue was 78% in
average. Similarly, the share of direct tax to the total revenue was 20% in average
whereas the share of indirect tax to the total tax revenue was 80% in average and
the share of income tax to the total direct tax was 67% in average as substantial
share of income tax in total direct tax revenue. There was strong contribution of
corporate income tax in total tax revenue. He found that the government policy,
act, rules, regulations concerned with the corporate income tax were not effective
in increasing tax paying habit in Nepal. He has suggested to prepare to separate
corporate Income Tax Act, rules and regulations considering the elements of the
system and maintaining stability, designing and developing electronic information
and communication, networking among the government and non-governmental
organizations, encouraging tax payers through tax education and awareness
program, controlling the forward and backward shifting of corporate income tax
and making of tax officers more responsible and honesty.
In 2002, Bishwadeep Adhikari has published a book named “Income Tax Law:
Then and now”. He has explained the legal provision of new Income Tax Act;
2058.He has also described the decision made by Supreme Court about the

35
income tax. The book describes the legal provision with critical analysis. The
book is very useful to know the new Income Tax Act but does not mention the
role of income tax and income tax structure.

In 2003, Mr. Ishwor Bhattrai and Mr. Girija Prasad Koirala have published a
book named tax laws and tax planning. They have explained the legal provisions
relating to Income Tax Act, 2058 and Value Added Tax Act, 2052 with
illustrative examples. They have reviewed and emphasized important concept in
boxes entitled note to remember and key terms are given at the end of the chapter.
This book is very useful to know the idea of Income Tax, 2058 and Value Added
Tax, 2052. It gives general idea about tax planning.

In 2005, Mr. Daya Raj Tripathee presented a dissertation entitled “Income Tax
System in Nepal and Some Potential Areas for Reform.” where he has tried to
show the tax structure in Nepal, role of income tax in Nepalese economy, income
tax administration and tax evasion in Nepal along with reforms.

The tax revenue has occupied an important place in the government’s revenue.
About 80% of the total revenue is collected through taxation. The taxation in
Nepal is structured by different taxes such as custom, land tax, income tax,
vehicle tax, property tax and entertainment tax. The tax i.e. direct tax and indirect
tax contributed to the tax revenue. It is believed that when the national economy
begins to pace the path of progress the country automatically shifts from indirect
to direct taxation but in Nepal direct taxes have shifted to indirect taxation.
Hence, indirect tax has dominant role in Nepalese tax structure.

He further adds that the tax administration capability acts as the critical
constraint in the tax system of any country. The tax administration in Nepal is not
so old in the sense that in Nepal, the system of levying tax on income was begun

36
in 1959 for the first time. The tax administration of Nepal is not effective due to
many problems such as inadequate provisions in tax laws, lack of public
participation, shortage of income tax experts etc.

Lastly, he has concluded that beside revenue purposed, income tax may be used
as a device for minimizing the gap between haves and haves not so as to create the
social justice and equalitarian society. To encourage people towards income tax,
income tax system should be made legally justified and collected amounts should
be utilized appropriately for their benefit. Similarly, proper tax education should
be given to them to make them conscious about tax system. The environment
must be created for tax officials and tax payers to fulfill their corresponding
responsibilities. Income tax evasion may be minimized through sound
administration. It is a responsibility of all Nepalese citizens to participate in the
efforts made by the state for introducing Nepal as a developed, advanced and
powerful nation through better utilization or mobilization of international revenue
especially the taxation.

2.2 Income Tax in the International Context

Income tax was first introduced to Britain during the Napoleonic wars, bit it
only becomes a permanent feature of the tax system in 1842. It was introduced in
order to finance war with France. The main reason for the introduction of this tax
was that it was preferable as a substitute for customs and excise duties in raising
revenue.

In U.S.A. the first federal income tax was imposed in 1862 to finance civil war
expenditure. However, it becomes a permanent feature only in 1913 after the 16th
amendment to U.S. constitution. Income taxes of a sort were established in Italy

37
in 1864. New Zealand adopted income tax in 1891, Australia in 1915 and Canada
in 1917. After World War I, the income tax becomes an important source of tax
revenue in many developed countries. By 1939, it has become the most important
sources of revenue in most developed countries and had made appearance in a
number of developing nations.

In the beginning income tax was generally levied at a flat rate. The principle of
progressive was introduced in the United Kingdom and New Zealand in 1909.
The system applied in U.K. was the addition of progressive super tax on the
highest income. In U.S.A., a mild progression existed since, the beginning of
income tax. Today to meet the growing public expenditure of every nations of the
world requires large revenue. There are various sources of government revenue.
Among the various sources of government revenue, the most important revenue
source is taxation. Most of the developed countries of the world produce more
revenue from direct taxes. But in the context of developing countries, indirect
taxes produce more revenue than direct taxes.

Income tax developed rather slowly with many ups and downs. The growth
needs particularly during the war and national emergencies, and increasing
acceptance of the fiscal power of the government gave impetus to the income tax
movement. Development of markets, monetization of economy, widespread use
of banking facilities, adequate maintenance of records, and improved standards of
tax administration facilitated the introduction and establishment of this tax.

Now-a-day, every country of the world has become income tax. Income tax
was introduces due to the causes of war and national emergencies. Thus, the
second name of income tax is war tax. After the end of the war, the tax was
named income tax. The story of income tax, therefore, is the story of war, and the
storey of war taxes being retained even after the end of the war. Today, taxes are
looked upon as important policy instrument for wagging new form of war-the war

38
against poverty and inequality.

2.3 Historical Background of Income Tax in Nepalese

Context

Although there was tax system in Nepal in ancient time also, the concept of
income tax was brought only by the first budget. The budget introduced in 2008
BS stated about the introduction of income tax system in Nepal. However, it was
actually introduced only in 2017 when the Finance Act, 2016 and Business Profits
and Remuneration Tax Act, 2017 were enacted. At the beginning, equivalent tax
rates with progression and exemption limit were prescribed by the Finance Acts of
2017 and afterwards to all companies, private firms’ individuals and families.
The marginal rates of taxation prescribed by these acts were 25 percent. Since,
the income tax was imposed only on income from business profit and
remuneration; the tax act could not cover all the sources of income and so was
replaced by the Income Tax Act, 2019 in 2019. Income Tax Act, 2019 with 29
sections divided the heads of income into 9 parts covering business, profession
and occupation, remuneration, house and land rent, cash or kind investment,
agriculture, insurance business, agency business and other sources. The act was
amended in 2029 extensively. However, considering this act incapable of
fulfilling the needs of the time, it was replaced in 2031 by another act.

As stated, Income Tax Act, 2031 replaced income Tax Act, 2019 in 2031. This
act having 66 sections, classified the sources of income into 5, namely (1)
Agriculture, (2) Industry, business, profession or vocation, (3) Remuneration, (4)
House and Land rent and (5) Other sources.

Income Tax Act, 2031 was revised for 8 times in 1977, 1979, 1980, 1984, 1985,
1986, 1989 and 1992. Since, 19th Chaitra, 2058, Income Tax Act, 2058 has been
introduced in Nepal. This act was brought in Nepal to avoid following defects of

39
Income Tax Act, 2031:
a. Narrow base of tax,
b. Taxing only the income originated in Nepal,
c. Dispersion of tax related acts, i.e. income tax related provisions were given
in different acts,
d. Low penalty rate to tax evader,
e. Incompatible to self-assessment system, and
f. Unsuitable to modern economy.

The new income tax act has 143 sections. Income Tax Rules, 2059 is also
implemented under the provision of this act. The new act has many new
provisions in comparison to Income tax Act, 2031. The key features of Income
Tax Act, 2058 are:
 All income tax related matters are confined within the Act by abolishing all
tax related concessions, rebates and exemption provided by different Acts.
 The Act has broadened the tax base.
 The Act has introduced a pool system of charging depreciation.
 The Act has first introduced the taxation of capital gains.
 The Act has provided liberal loss set-off and carry forward/backward
provisions.
 The Act has first introduced a provision for administrative review to allow
the tax administration to correct mistakes made by tax administrators
internally.
 The Act has made provisions for a stringent fine and penalty for the
defaulters.
 Global incomes of a resident are made taxable.
 List of expenses are inclusive. All expenses relating to income have been
made admissible.
 The Act has made provision for international taxation. Foreign tax credit
has been introduced for the first time.
 The Act has separated administrative and judicial responsibilities by

40
 distinguishing civil liabilities of the tax payers from criminal liabilities.

The first slice of income has always been exempted from income tax. The
original level of statutory exemption limit was 2000. This limit has been
increased from time to time. The statutory exemption limit has been increased to
Rs. 65000 for an individual and Rs. 85000 for married couple or family in fiscal
year 2059/60, Rs. 80000 for an individual and Rs. 100000 for a married couple or
family in the fiscal year 2061/2062, Rs. 100000 for an individual and Rs. 125000
for a married couple or a family in fiscal year 2064/65 and Rs. 115000 for an
individual and Rs.140000 for a married couple or a family in the fiscal year
2065/66.

From the initial stages, the finance act is every year prescribed the progressive
tax rates with exemption limit to all companies, private firms, individuals and
families. Income tax rates were ranged between 5% and 25%. The highest level
of marginal tax is levied with two rates 15% and 25% while corporate income tax
is levied with a single or flat rate of 25%. However banks and financial
institutions are liable to pay income tax @30% of taxable income. The industrial
enterprise/company is liable to pay income tax only @ 20% of the taxable
income. The industries established and opened in backward districts are entitled
to certain facilities, concession and rebates in the income tax.

Agriculture income was kept outside the tax net except for few years through
finance acts. House and land rent and interest were included in the total income
during some years. Foreign investment was tax free from fiscal year 2016/17 to
fiscal year 2025/26 and was included in the total income from fiscal year 2026/27.
Several other sources of income including income of cooperatives, interest earned
by foreign investors, allowances provided to employees, dividends and exports
income were exempted from the income tax under different laws. These incomes,
however, have been brought into the income tax net from fiscal year 2057/58.
Income tax Act, 2058 has brought all the incomes, including capital gains into

41
income tax net.

The withholding tax system has been adopted from the very beginning. Initially
it was limited to salaries but it was made applicable to interest, dividends,
commission, bonus, imports and purchases. Income Tax Act 2058 has limited
withholding tax to some income viz. income from employment, royalties,
dividends, interest, rent, retirement payments and gains from investment (life
assurance) insurance. A specific relief is provided for resident individual
taxpayers running a small business. If such taxpayers have income exclusively
from a business having a source in Nepal, income and annual turnover do not
exceeds Rs. 120000 and Rs. 1200000 respectively and if they elect to apply this
provision for the year, they are imposed as a fixed amount that depends on the
area where the business is conducted in the fiscal year 2064/65. The annual tax
rate is Rs. 2000 for metropolitan or sub-metropolitan cities, Rs. 1500 for
municipalities and Rs. 1000 for anywhere else in Nepal.

Until fiscal year 5054/55, income tax was assessed on the income of previous
year. The concept of levying income tax on the current year income was
introduced in fiscal year 2055/56. Under this system, tax payers are required to
pay income tax in three installments on the basis of latest tax returns or the
estimated income of the current year, which ever is the highest. Initially, income
tax was assessed under the official assessment. In fiscal year 2048/49, a self-
assessment system was introduced for registered for public limited companies and
firms. It was applied to industry, trade and professional firms which had their
accounts audited by recognized auditors. The Income Tax Act, 2058 has made a
provision of a purely self-assessment system and tax official will make only an
amended assessment.

CHAPTER-III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

42
 This chapter is dedicated to research methodology applied in the study for the
achievement of desired objectives.

3.1 Introduction

A sound research study needs to follow a proper methodology in order to

achieve predetermined objectives. Research Methodology is a sequential
procedure and methods to achieve the objectives of the study. Primary as well as
Secondary data are used to fulfill the objectives of the study. Opinion survey
technique is adopted to collect the primary data about different aspects of income
tax. While conducting opinion survey, questionnaires were distributed to different
groups who are related to income tax. They are income tax payers, income tax
administrator, income tax experts, accountants, lawyers etc. Secondary data are
collected from the publication of different offices or organization.

The collected data are tabulated into the separate format and table. Some
statistical tools such as simple average and percentage are made where necessary.
The results are expressed in the form of descriptive and analytical.

3.2 Research Design

This research study attempts to analyze the present income tax where opinion of
30 respondents associated with the income tax viz. income tax payers,
administrators and experts are collected through questionnaire. The questionnaire
includes the problem of tax administration, weakness associated with the current
income tax, methods of increasing tax consciousness among the Nepalese people,
provision of self- assessment of tax, controlling tax evasion, exemption level etc.

43
Hence, the research methodology followed in this study can be learned as survey
cum descriptive research design.

3.3 Population and Sample

The population for this study comprises all the persons belonging to income tax
of Nepal. 30 samples from Jhapa district have been taken to fulfill the objective
of the study. The respondents have been divided into 3 groups. The following
table shows the groups of respondents and size of sample.

Group of Respondents and Size of Sample from Each Group.

Sample
S.N. Group of respondents
size
1. Income tax experts 10

2. Income tax administrators 10

3. Income taxpayers 10

Total 30

3.3 Nature and Source of Data

The data used for this study are both primary and secondary. The primary data
are collected from primary sources. The primary sources of data are the opinion
survey through questionnaire, filed visit and information received from the
respondents.
The secondary data are collected from secondary sources. The secondary
sources of data are information received from books, journals and articles

44
concerned with the study. The major sources of secondary data are as follows:

i. Economic survey of various years, Ministry of Finance, HMG, Nepal.

ii. Reports and records of Department of Taxation.
iii. Books related to income tax.
iv. Thesis and dissertations submitted at Central Library, T.U.
v. Research studies by Center for Economic Development and Administration
concerning the income tax.

3.5 Data Gathering Procedure

The data of this study are collected from two sources. Primary data collected by
using questionnaire method. A set of questionnaire was developed and distributed
to the selected respondents in order to get actual and accurate information. Some
of the information was also collected from interview with the respondents.
The secondary data are collected according to the organization of different
publications/books of different organizations.

3.6 Data Processing Procedure and Analysis of Data

Collected data from primary and secondary sources are firstly tabulated into
separate format in systematic manner. The data are tabulated into various tables
according to the subject in order. Then simple statistical analysis such as
correlation and rank are calculated where necessary and they have been presented
and analyzed in descriptive way. Graphs and charts are also presented to interpret
visually the findings of the study.

3.7 Weight of Choice

45
 The respondents are requested either to rank their answer or to give yes/no
response or to write their opinion. In the case of ranking the answer, the scale
varies from question to question. The scale is given according to the number of
probable answer. For e.g. if the probable answers are 5, the scale is given 1 to 5
where 1 stands most important and 5 least important. The total points get by each
choice are converted into percentage of total points available to all choice. The
choice having higher percentage is ranked as most important and the choice
having lowest percentage is ranked as least important.

CHAPTER - IV

46
 PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS OF DATA

4.1. Tax Structure of Nepal

Modern economic development of Nepal had started with the initiation of

first economic planning 1956. Since then, taxes have been used for the
achievement of national economic goals. So, taxes play vital role to the economic
development of Nepal. Tax structure of any country comprises both direct and
indirect taxes.

4.1.1. Composition of Total Revenue

Total revenue in Nepal is composed of both tax revenue and non-tax revenue.
When the HMG of Nepal presented first national budget in 1951/52 the revenue
structure was typically that of traditional economy with 73% of government
receipts coming from non tax source and land tax, out of 73% the share of non tax
revenue was 43%. In 1960’s the share of non-tax revenue was declined
drastically because of the increasing contribution of indirect tax on foreign trade.

The table no. 4.1.1 shows the share of tax revenue and non-tax revenue in total
revenue. Moreover, it shows the tax and non-tax revenue as percent of total
revenue. We can also see that total revenue is increasing. But from the year
2003/04 there has been wide increment in total revenue. It was Rs. 10729.3
million in 1990/91 and now it has reached Rs. 107622.5 million in 2007/08. The
trend shows the total tax revenue is increasing consistently i.e. it was Rs. 8175.8
million in the fiscal year 1990/91 which has increased to Rs. 85155.5 million in
2007/08.
The composition of total revenue from the fiscal year 1990/91 to fiscal year
2007/08 is shown as follows:

47
 Table No. 4.1.1
Composition of total revenue
Figures in Rs. Million
Tax
Non-tax
revenue
Fiscal Total Tax Non-tax revenue as
as
Year Revenue Revenue revenue %of total
% of total
revenue
revenue
1990/91 10,729.30 8,175.80 76.20 2,553.50 23.80
1991/92 13,512.70 9,875.60 73.08 3,637.10 26.92
1992/93 15,148.40 11,662.50 76.99 3,485.90 23.01
1993/94 19,580.90 15,371.50 78.50 4,209.40 21.50
1994/95 24,605.10 19,660.00 79.90 4,945.10 20.10
1995/96 27,893.10 21,668.00 77.68 6,225.10 22.32
1996/97 30,373.50 24,424.30 80.41 5,949.20 19.59
1997/98 32,937.90 25,939.80 78.75 6,998.10 21.25
1998/99 37,251.30 28,752.90 77.19 8,498.40 22.81
1999/00 42,893.70 33,152.10 77.29 9,741.60 22.71
2000/01 48,893.90 38,865.10 79.49 10,028.80 20.51
2001/02 50,445.60 39,330.60 77.97 11,115.00 22.03
2002/03 56,229.70 42,587.00 75.74 13,642.70 24.26
2003/04 62,331.10 48,173.30 77.29 14,157.80 22.71
2004/05 70,122.70 54,104.70 77.16 16,018.00 22.84
2005/06 71,733.10 57,430.40 80.06 14,851.70 20.55
2006/07 87,711.20 71,127.00 81.09 16,584.20 18.91
2007/08 107,622.50 85,155.50 79.12 19,783.80 20.88

From the above table, it can be seen that the non-tax revenue is not
consistent as compared to tax revenue. It is fluctuating both in increasing and
decreasing trend. It was 23.80 percent in 1990/91 and has reached 20.88 percent
in 2007/08. The share of tax revenue to total revenue was 76.20 percent in

48
1990/91 which has reached 79.12 percent in 2007/08. The share of tax revenue as
percent of total revenue shows that the tax is the most viable source of increasing
government revenue.

The composition of total revenue shows that the tax revenue has occupied
about 3/4th portion of the total revenue. The composition of total revenue is
shown graphically as follows:

49
 Figure 4.1.1: Composition of Total Revenue

120,000.00

100,000.00

80,000.00
Rs. In Millions

60,000.00

40,000.00

20,000.00

-
1

8
/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0
90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07
19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20
Fiscal Years
Total Revenue Tax Revenue Non-tax revenue

50
4.1.2 Composition of Total Tax Revenue

Tax revenue is composed of direct and indirect tax. There has been
simultaneous increase in direct tax, indirect tax and total tax revenue in absolute
terms. In 1990/91 this amount was Rs. 1368.5 million, Rs. 6807.3 million and Rs.
8175.8 million respectively and during this twenty years period, this amount has
increased to Rs. 23087.8 million Rs. 62067.7 million and Rs. 85155.5 million
respectively. From this we can see that there has been a drastic change in
composition of tax revenue in this period of twenty year.

Despite, a huge increment of direct tax, its contribution to total tax revenue has
not increased in the same proportion. As for example, we can see in the table that
in the fiscal year 1990/91 the share of direct tax was only Rs. 8951.5 million but
its contribution to total tax revenue was 27 percent. But we take a look at the
fiscal year 2007/08 the direct tax is Rs. 23087.8 million but its percentage share in
the total tax revenue is only 27.11 percent.

The contribution of indirect tax in 1990/91 was 83.26 percent amounting to Rs.
3807.3 million and decreased to 72.89 percent amounting to Rs. 62067.7 million
in the year 2007/08. It implies the dominant role of indirect tax in total tax
revenue. As direct tax is considered regressive in nature, the tax structure of
Nepal is not justifiable on equity ground and progressiveness. From the given
table, we can see that there is greatest reliance on indirect tax making our tax
system regressive in nature and needs to shifts towards direct tax. The
composition of total tax revenue has been also shown graphically.

51
 Table No. 4.1.2
Contribution of direct and indirect tax to total tax revenue
(Rs. in Million)
% share of % share of
Total
Fiscal Total tax Total direct tax indirect tax
indirect
Year revenue direct tax to total tax to total tax
tax
revenue revenue
1990/91 8175.8 1368.5 16.74 6807.3 83.26

1991/92 9875.6 1595.2 16.15 8280.4 83.85

1992/93 11662.5 2036.2 17.46 9626.3 82.54

1993/94 15371.5 2855.3 18.58 12516.2 81.42

1994/95 19,660.00 3,849.30 19.58 15,810.70 80.42

1995/96 21,668.00 4,655.90 21.49 17,012.10 78.51

1996/97 24,424.30 5,340.00 21.86 19,084.30 78.14

1997/98 25,939.80 6,187.90 23.85 19,751.90 76.15

1998/99 28,752.90 7,516.10 26.14 21,236.80 73.86

1999/00 33,152.10 8,951.50 27.00 24,200.60 73.00

2000/01 38,865.10 10,159.40 26.14 28,705.70 73.86

2001/02 39,330.60 10,597.50 26.94 28,733.10 73.06

2002/03 42,587.00 10,105.80 23.73 32,481.20 76.27

2003/04 48,173.30 11,912.30 24.73 36,261.00 75.27

2004/05 54,104.70 13,071.90 24.16 41,032.80 75.84

2005/06 57,430.40 13,858.10 24.14 42,572.30 75.86

2006/07 71,127.00 18,980.29 26.69 52,146.43 73.31

2007/08 85,155.50 23,087.80 27.11 62,067.70 72.89

Source: Appendix III, Master Table

52
 Figure 4.1.2: Composition of Total Tax Revenue

90,000.00

80,000.00

70,000.00

60,000.00
Rs. In Million

50,000.00

40,000.00

30,000.00

20,000.00

10,000.00

-
1

8
/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0
90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07
19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20
Fiscal Year
Total tax revenue Total direct tax Total indirect tax

53
4.1.3 Contribution of Various Taxes as percent to GDP

The contribution of total revenue on GDP is increasing in slow motion. In

1990/91 it was 9.24 percent and now in 2007/08 it was 13.11 percent. There was
a vast increment in the contribution of total revenue on GDP in the year 2001/02.
But again it had a decreasing trend. The contribution of tax revenue on GDP is
increasing satisfactorily. In 1990/91 it was 7.04 percent and now in this period of
twenty years it was 10.37 percent in the year 2007/08.

Taxes are divided into two parts viz. direct tax and indirect tax. Moreover,
indirect tax has significant role in taxation which contributes about three folds
more than the direct tax. In 1990/91 the contribution of indirect tax and direct tax
was 6.62 percent and 2.40 percent respectively. But in 2007/08 it has reached to
7.56 percent and 2.81 percent respectively.

The contribution of income tax on GDP is increasing gradually. It has

contributed 2.06 percent in the year 1990/91 which has reached to 2.48 percent in
the year 2006/07. Income tax which is a direct tax plays a vital role in the
economy. Similarly, the contribution of land tax and house & land registration
tax in 1990/91 was 0.07 percent and 0.39 percent respectively. But now the land
tax is at zero level and house & land registration tax has reached to 0.43 percent.
Hence, income tax is in leading role among the direct tax.

Within, indirect tax the contribution of custom duty on GDP is higher than other
tax. In the year 1990/91 it was 2.44 percent and now in this period of twenty
years it has increased to 2.49 percent only. The contribution of sales tax/VAT is
also in an increasing trend. It has contributed 3.96 percent in the year 2006/07.
VAT as a substitute of sales tax is increasing in recent years. The contribution of
excise duties was 1.03 percent in 1990/91. But its contribution has decreased to a
certain extent but again from last few years it is increasing and it has reached to

54
2.20 percent in the year 2007/08. The contribution of contract tax was in an
increasing trend i.e. it was 0.15 percent in the year 1990/91 and it reached up to
0.26 percent in the year 1997/98 but after 1998 it started decreasing gradually and
reached to zero percent in the year 2002/03 and is still zero percent in the year
2007/08. The contribution of various taxes as percent to GDP is given in the
following tables.

55
 Table No. 4.1.3
Contribution of Various Taxes as Percent to GDP (Rs. In Million)
Total Sales House and
Tax Direct Indirect Custom Excise Contract Income Land
Year revenue tax Land
revenue tax tax duties duties tax tax tax
as % GDP VAT registration
1990/91 9.24 7.04 1.18 5.86 2.44 1.03 1.74 0.15 0.68 0.07 0.39
1991/92 9.32 6.81 1.1. 5.71 2.51 0.98 1.96 0.15 0.62 0.04 0.39
1992/93 9.16 7.05 1.23 5.82 2.01 0.88 2.08 0.18 0.73 0.04 0.41
1993/94 10.22 8.02 1.49 6.53 2.49 0.83 2.45 0.19 1.01 0.03 0.40
1994/95 11.72 9.36 1.83 7.53 2.94 79.00 2.87 0.24 1.36 0.02 0.43
1995/96 11.65 9.05 1.94 7.11 2.67 0.81 2.69 0.26 1.47 0.01 0.44
1996/97 11.27 9.06 1.98 7.08 2.69 0.85 2.64 0.23 1.56 - 0.37
1997/98 11.37 8.95 2.14 6.82 2.49 0.89 2.46 0.26 1.73 - 0.35
1998/99 11.29 8.71 2.28 6.44 2.44 0.90 2.39 0.19 1.91 - 0.30
1999/00 11.74 9.07 2.45 6.62 2.57 0.86 2.70 0.10 2.06 - 0.28
2000/01 11.95 9.50 2.48 7.01 2.66 0.92 2.94 0.07 2.23 - 0.15
2001/02 17.18 13.40 3.61 9.79 3.61 1.30 4.07 0.10 3.03 - 0.39
2002/03 12.81 9.70 2.30 7.40 2.60 1.09 3.07 - 1.81 - 0.32
2003/04 13.19 10.20 2.52 7.68 3.29 1.32 3.06 - 2.16 - 0.36
2004/05 13.91 10.73 2.59 8.14 3.11 1.28 3.75 - 2.24 - 0.36
2005/06 12.31 9.85 2.38 7.30 2.63 1.12 3.71 - 2.02 - 0.37
2006/07 13.08 10.61 2.83 7.78 2.49 1.38 3.96 - 2.48 - 0.43
2007/08 13.11 10.37 2.81 7.56 2.57 2.20 0.05 - 2.32 - 0.36
Source: Appendix-IV, Contribution of different source of revenue as percent of GDP

56
4.1.4 Composition of Indirect Tax

Nepalese tax structure is heavily dependent on indirect taxes, which contributed

72.89 percent in 2007/08. Nepalese tax revenue is dependent mainly on taxes on
international trade and sales tax/VAT on goods and services supplemented by
taxes on income and property to some extent.

The major components of indirect tax in Nepalese tax structure constitutes

custom duty, excise duty, sales tax/VAT and contract tax. Custom duty has been
classified mainly into import duty and export duty. Other components of indirect
tax like entertainment tax, hotel tax, air flight tax and other tax. The others of
indirect tax include Indian excise refund, road and bridge maintenance tax and
other taxes. The compositions if indirect taxes are given in the following table
and graph.

57
 Table No. 4.1.4

Major Sources of Indirect Tax and Their Percentage to Indirect Tax

(Rs. In Million)
Total Sales Entertai
Import Export Excise Hotel Contract Air
Year indirect % % % tax/ % nment % % % % Other %
duties duties duties tax tax tax
tax VAT tax
1990/91 6807.3 2752.6 40.44 78.5 1.15 1200.2 17.63 2026.1 29.76 39.4 0.58 115.6 1.98 173.3 2.55 173.4 2.55 248.2 3.65
1991/92 8280.4 2795.2 33.76 114.7 1.39 1414.3 17.08 2840.7 34.31 38.3 0.46 191.3 1.7 213.3 2.58 177.9 2.15 494.7 5.97
1992/93 9626.3 3178 33.01 140.7 1.46 1452.8 15.09 3438.2 35.72 53.1 0.55 223.4 2.32 293 3.04 250.7 2.14 641.4 6.66
1993/94 12516.2 4356 34.8 427 3.41 1592.5 12.72 4693.1 37.5 112.2 0.9 219.1 1.75 356.5 2.85 270.7 2.16 489.1 3.91
1994/95 15810.7 5,840.10 36.94 332.50 2.1 1,657.30 10.48 6031.7 38.15 91.10 0.57 229.10 1.45 505.20 3.19 278.20 1.76 845.50 5.35
1995/96 17012.1 6,246.50 36.72 149.90 0.88 1,944.30 11.43 6431.3 37.8 100.40 0.59 284.20 1.67 613.40 3.61 311.10 1.83 931.00 5.47
1996/97 19084.3 7,093.20 37.17 167.80 0.88 2,298.10 12.04 7126.5 37.34 114.00 0.58 301.10 1.58 621.30 3.25 314.20 1.65 1,048.10 5.49
1997/98 19751.9 7,019.40 35.54 217.10 1.09 2,885.80 14.61 4122.6 36.06 90.60 0.46 45.90 0.23 761.50 3.85 343.30 1.74 1,265.70 6.41
1998/99 21236.8 7,698.30 36.25 378.00 1.78 2,953.20 13.91 7882.2 37.11 23.50 0.11 1.50 0.01 618.00 2.91 240.70 1.13 1,441.40 6.79
1999/00 24200.6 8,989.90 37.02 432.50 1.79 3,127.60 12.92 9854.9 40.72 28.50 0.12 1.80 0.01 374.50 1.55 - - 1,420.90 5.87
2000/01 28705.7 10,391.90 36.20 492.60 1.72 3,771.20 13.14 12047.8 41.97 30.40 0.11 0.10 - 304.00 1.06 0.10 - 1,667.60 5.81
2001/02 28733.1 9,678.40 33.68 917.40 3.19 3,807.00 13.25 11964 41064 2.10 0.01 - - 301.20 1.04 - - 2,063.00 7.18
2002/03 32481.2 10,567.70 32.53 855.60 2.63 4,785.10 14.73 13459.7 41.44 - - - - - - - - 2,813.10 8.66
2003/04 36260.5 11,451.70 30.98 526.50 1.42 6,226.70 16.85 14478.9 39.17 - - - - - - - - 4,277.20 11.57
2004/05 41032.8 12,333.64 30.06 514.63 1.25 6,445.90 15.71 18885.4 46.03 - - - - - - - - 2,853.23 6.95
2005/06 42572.3 12,469.32 29.29 290.54 0.68 6,507.60 15.29 21610.7 50.76 - - - - - - - - 1,694.14 4.00
2006/07 52146.4 14,423.15 28.61 360.78 0.69 9,243.40 17.73 26558.9 50.93 - - - - - - - - 1,560.17 3.00
2007/08 62067.7 17,128.17 27.59 433.42 0.7 11,189.58 18.03 31154.6 50.19 - - - - - - - - 3,500.80 5.64

58
 Figure 4.1.3: Composition of Major Indirect Tax

35000

30000

25000
Rs. In Million

20000

15000

10000

5000

0
1

8
/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/9

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0

/0
90

91

92

93

94

95

96

97

98

99

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07
19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

19

20

20

20

20

20

20

20

20
Fiscal Year

Import duties Export duties Excise duties Sales tax/ VAT Contract tax

59
 The share of export duty in custom duty is very low as compare to the import
duty. It was 1.15 percent in 1990/91 and increased to 7.00 percent in 2007/08. At
the other hand, the share of import duty was 40.44 percent in the year 1990/91
which has decreased to 27.59 percent in the year 2007/08. From the above table it
is clear that the share of import duty is very high than export duty but the share of
import duty in recent years is not satisfactory as compare to previous years. The
sales tax/VAT has become an important source of overall tax revenue with an
increasing trend, which contributed 50.19 percent to indirect tax in 2007/08 as
compared to 29.76 percent in 1990/91. The share of excise duty was 17.63
percent in 1990/91 but it decreased to 10.48 percent in the year 1994/95. But
again it took up its position and rose to 18.03 percent in 2007/08.

The contribution of entertainment tax has decreased from 0.58 percent in

1990/91 to zero percent in 2002/03 and has remained the same till 2007/08.
Similarly, the share of hotel tax, contract tax and air flight tax was 1.98 percent,
2.55 percent and 2.55 percent respectively in 1990/91. But their contribution has
reached to zero percent in 2002/03 and has remained the same till present.

4.1.5 Composition of Direct Tax

The major components of direct tax comprise income tax, land tax and house &
land registration tax. The contribution of income tax to direct tax is higher than
other tax. The share of the major components of the direct tax is given in the
following table and graph.

60
 Table No. 4.1.5
Components of Direct Tax and Their Percentage to Direct Tax
(Rs. In Million)
Income House and
Year Direct tax % Land tax % % Others %
tax land reg.
1990/91 1,368.50 784.00 57.29 82.10 6.00 456.60 33.36 45.80 3.35
1991/92 1,595.20 897.30 56.25 64.80 1.06 571.30 35.81 61.80 3.87
1992/93 2,036.20 1,214.90 59.67 69.40 3.41 685.50 33.67 66.40 3.26
1993/94 2,855.30 1,929.60 67.58 61.00 2.14 772.20 27.04 92.50 3.24
1994/95 3,849.30 2,857.60 74.24 34.90 0.91 902.80 23.45 54.00 1.40
1995/96 46,655.90 3,518.60 75.57 18.20 0.39 1,048.40 22.52 70.70 1.52
1996/97 5,340.00 4,218.40 79.00 5.90 0.11 1,009.50 18.90 106.20 1.99
1997/98 6,187.90 5,008.80 80.95 3.60 0.06 1,000.60 16.17 174.90 2.83
1998/99 7,516.10 6,293.50 83.73 1.40 0.02 1,001.80 13.33 219.40 2.92
1999/00 8,951.50 7,539.10 84.22 4.60 0.05 1,011.30 11.30 396.50 4.43
2000/01 10,159.40 9,116.90 89.74 5.10 0.05 607.80 5.98 429.60 4.23
2001/02 10,597.50 8,906.00 84.04 0.80 0.01 1,131.00 10.67 559.70 5.28
2002/03 10,105.80 7,966.20 78.83 - - 1,414.30 13.99 725.30 7.18
2003/04 11,212.30 8,805.30 78.53 - - 1,697.50 15.14 709.40 6.33
2004/05 13,071.90 11,272.60 86.24 - - 1,799.20 13.76 - -
2005/06 13,858.10 11,787.00 85.05 - - 2,181.10 15.74 110.00 0.08
2006/07 18,980.30 16,608.10 87.50 - - 2,855.90 15.05 483.70 2.55
2007/08 23,087.80 19,077.81 82.63 - - 2,940.74 12.74 1,069.25 4.63
Source: Appendix- III

61
 Rs. In Millions

18000
21000

0
3000
6000
9000
12000
15000
19
90
/9
1
19
91
/9
2
19
92
/9
3
19
93
/9
4
19
94
/9
5
19
95
/9
6
19
96
/9
7

Income tax
19
97
/9
8

Land tax
19
98
/9
9

62
19
99
/0
0
Fiscal Years
20
00
/0
1
House and land reg.

20
01
/0
2
Figure 4.1.4: Components of Direct Tax

20
Others

02
/0
3
20
03
/0
4
20
04
/0
5
20
05
/0
6
20
06
/0
7
20
07
/0
8
 Income tax occupies largest share in the direct tax and that the percentage share
of this component in the fiscal year 1990/91 was 57.29 percent amounting to Rs.
784.0 million which reached to 82.63 percent amounting Rs. 19077.81 million
in 2007/08.

Land tax contributed 6 percent of direct tax in 1990/91, which decreased

gradually and reached even zero percent in 2002/03 and was still the same in the
year 2007/08. The house and land registration is decreasing year by year. Its
share was 33.36 percent in 1990/91 and in 2007/08 it was 12.74 percent.

4.1.6 Contribution of Direct Tax

The most serious gap, which the tax structure exhibits, was in the share of direct
tax. Its share in tax revenue and total revenue was 27.11 percent and 21.45
percent respectively in 2007/08 as against 16.74 percent and 12.75 percent in
1990/91, which is given in the following table.

1
 Table No. 4.1.6
Contribution of Direct Tax
(Rs. In Million)
Direct tax DT as % of DT as % of DT as % of
Fiscal Year
(DT) total tax GDP total revenue
1990/91 1368.5 16.74 1.18 12.75
1991/92 1595.2 16.15 1.1 11.8
1992/93 2036.2 17.46 1.23 13.44
1993/94 2855.3 18.58 1.49 14.58
1994/95 3849.3 19.63 1.83 15.64
1995/96 4655.9 21.49 1.94 16.69
1996/97 5340 21.86 1.98 17.58
1997/98 6187.9 23.85 2.14 18.79
1998/99 7516.1 26.14 2.28 20.18
1999/00 8951.5 27 2.45 20.87
2000/01 10159.4 26.14 2.48 20.78
2001/02 10597.5 26.94 3.61 21.01
2002/03 10105.8 23.73 2.3 17.97
2003/04 11912.5 24.73 2.52 19.11
2004/05 13071.9 24.16 2.59 18.64
2005/06 13858.1 24.14 2.38 19.32
2006/07 18980.29 26.69 2.83 21.64
2007/08 23087.8 27.11 2.81 21.45
Source: Appendix - III

From the above table, it is clear that the contribution of direct tax on total tax
revenue was increased to 26.94 percent in 2001/02. But after that, it went on
decreasing for few years and than again it stood up back with 27.11 percent in
2007/08.

2
 The share of direct tax on GDP is very low. Its share in 1990/91 was only 1.18
percent. Despite low contribution, it was increasing steadily. But after 1997/98 it
took up its position and reached to 2.81 percent in 2007/08. In the other hand, the
share of direct tax on total revenue has remained from 11 percent to 22 percent.
Its share in 1990/91 was 12.75 percent and 21.45 percent in 2007/08.

4.1.7 Contribution of Income Tax in Nepal

Nepal has started practicing of income tax very late. The idea of introducing
income tax in Nepal originated along with the first budget on 1952. Finally in
1959, Business Profits and Salaries Tax Act1960, was introduced. At that time
income tax levied only on business profit and salaries. After about three years of
experience of income tax, the government replaced the prevailing tax act by
Income Tax Act, 1962. In 1974, Income Tax Act, 1974 (2031) was enacted.
However, this act is replaced by Income tax Act, 2002 (2058). The contribution
of income tax on various revenue is given in the following table.

Table No. 4.1.7

3
 Contribution of Income Tax on Direct Revenue Heads
(Rs. In Million)

IT as % of
Fiscal Income IT as % of IT as % of IT as % of
tax
Year tax (IT) direct tax total total GDP
revenue
revenue
1990/91 784.00 57.29 9.59 7.31 0.68
1991/92 897.30 56.25 9.09 6.64 0.62
1992/93 1,214.90 59.67 10.42 8.02 0.73
1993/94 1,929.60 67.58 12.22 9.85 1.01
1994/95 2,857.60 74.24 14.54 11.61 1.36
1995/96 3,518.60 75.57 16.24 12.61 1.47
1996/97 4,218.40 79.00 17.27 13.89 1.56
1997/98 5,008.80 80.94 19.31 15.21 1.73
1998/99 6,293.50 83.73 21.89 16.89 1.91
1999/00 7,539.10 84.22 22.74 17.58 2.06
2000/01 9,116.90 89.74 23.46 18.65 2.23
2001/02 8,906.00 84.04 22.64 17.65 3.03
2002/03 7,966.20 78.83 18.71 14.15 1.81
2003/04 8,805.30 73.92 18.28 14.13 1.86
2004/05 11,272.60 86.24 20.83 16.08 2.24
2005/06 11,787.00 85.05 20.52 16.43 2.02
2006/07 16,608.10 87.50 23.35 18.93 2.48
2007/08 19,077.81 82.63 22.40 17.73 2.32
Source: Appendix - III
Income tax was increased 24 folds in 2007/08 as against in 1990/91. Total
income tax in 1990/91 was 784 million and it increased to 19077.81 million in
2007/08. The share of income tax to total direct tax was 57.29 percent in 1990/91.
It was the lowest contribution during the study period. The share of income tax to
total direct tax is increased to 82.63 percent in 2007/08. The share of income tax
to total tax revenue was 9.59 percent in 1990/91, which increased to 23.46 percent
in 2000/01, after then it decreased to 18.28 percent in 2003/04. After 2004/05, it

4
has increased considerably and its contribution to the total tax revenue reached to
22.40 percent in 2007/08.

Similarly, the share of income tax on total revenue and GDP was 7.31 percent
and 0.68 percent respectively. After1992/93, its share increased sharply up to
study period. In 1192/93, its share was 8.02 percent of total revenue and 0.73
percent of GDP, which increased to 17.73 percent and 2.32 percent of total
revenue and total GDP in 2007/08 respectively.

From the above table, it can be concluded that the income tax is one of the
prime sources of direct tax in Nepal. But the contribution of income tax to total
tax revenue is still lower than the developed countries. Nevertheless, income tax
is most likely to increase in the future and be the major sources of revenue.

4.1.8 Composition and Trend of Income Tax

Until 1993/94, income tax revenue was divided into corporate income tax,
individual income tax and remuneration. After 1993/94, the income tax revenue
was divided into four group i.e. corporate income tax, individual income tax,
house & land rent tax and interest tax. Corporate tax is collected from
Government Corporation, public and private limited companies and partnership
firms. Individual tax is collected from remuneration, and industry business,
profession or vocation. Interest tax is collected from banks or finance companies
that pay interest on all types of deposits and the house rent tax is levied on income
obtained from renting house and land in urban areas. The composition and trend
of income tax is given in the following table.

Table No. 4.1.8

5
 Components of Income Tax
(Rs. In Million)
Source of
2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/0
income tax
Corporate
income tax:
-Government
5990 4371 3656 4839 5327
corporation
2930 1770 1252 2057 1332
-Public Ltd.
1930 1430 1236 1531 2468
company
1130 1171 1168 1251 1528
-Private Ltd.
company
Individual
income tax:
-
Remuneration 2400 3732 3177 3539 3872
-Industry, 600 832 1240 1392 1677
business, 1800 2897 1937 2148 2195
profession or
vocation

House and
260 348 382 403 496
land rent tax
Interest tax 460 468 848 733 757

Total 9110 8919 8060 9515 10453

Source: Annual reports of various years, Inland Revenue Department

From above table, it can be seen that the aggregate amount of corporate income
tax was Rs. 5990 in 2000/01 but after 2000/2001 it was gradually decreasing up to
2005/06. In 2006/07 the amount of corporate income tax was Rs. 11,516 million
which mean double amount of the 2005/06 and again decreased in 2007/08 to
some extent. Within corporate income tax, from 2000/01 to 2003/04 Government
Corporation had contributed to most to income tax but after 2003/04 public
limited company has highest contribution. Hence, Private limited company has

6
least contribution to the income tax. In overall, corporate income tax plays the
vital role in contributing income tax.

The contribution of individual income tax to the income tax was in an

increasing trend. But its contribution in 2006/07 has not been satisfactory as
compared to other previous years as its amount decreased to Rs. 2029 million.
Hence, again it had a very great increment in the year 2007/08 i.e. double amount
of the year 2006/07 Rs. 5971 million. Among the individual income tax,
remuneration is increasing in satisfactory level but the industry, business,
profession or vocation decreased to Rs. 481 million in 2006/07.

The contribution of house and land rent tax and interest tax is in an increasing
trend. These contributions were Rs. 260 million and Rs. 460 million in 2000/01
which increased to Rs. 627 million and Rs. 962 million in 2007/08 respectively.

Table No. 4.1.9

Composition of Income Tax
(Rs. In Million)
T % I % H % %
I
o C n o
n
t o o di o u o o
t
a r f vi f s f f
e
l p d e
Y r
o I u I i I
e e
I r n al n & n n
a s
n at c I c c c
r t
c e o n o L o o
o T m c m a m m
T
m a e o e n e e
a
e x m d
x
t e T t T

7
 T a T a r a a
a x a x e x x
x x n
t

t
a
x

2
0 6 2
9 5 2 2 5
0 5 6 2 4
1 9 4 . .
0 . . 6 6
1 9 0 8 0
/ 7 3 0 0
0 0 0 5 5
0 5 4
1
2
0 4 4
8 4 3 3 5
0 9 1 3 4
9 3 7 . .
1 . . 4 6
1 7 3 9 2
/ 0 8 8 8
9 1 2 0 5
0 1 4
2
2
0 4 3 1
8 3 3 4
0 5 9 3 8 0
0 6 1 .
2 . . 8 4 .
6 5 7 7
/ 3 4 2 5 4
0 6 7 9
0 6 2 8
3

8
2
0 5 3
9 4 3 4 7
0 0 7 4 7
5 8 5 . .
3 . . 0 3
1 3 3 2 7
/ 8 1 3 3
5 9 9 4 0
0 6 9
4
2
0 1 5 3
5 3 4 7
0 0 0 7 4 7
3 8 . .
4 4 . . 9 5
2 7 7 2
/ 5 9 5 6 7
7 4 4 4
0 4 6 1
5
2
0 1 4 3
5 4 4 6
0 0 9 8 5 7
3 2 . .
5 8 . . 0 5
9 3 6 9
/ 9 5 8 9 7
6 4 7 5
0 6 2 6
6
2
0 1 1 7 1
2 3 6
0 5 1 6 3 5 9
0 . .
6 1 5 . . 9 9
2 9 5
/ 4 1 0 4 9 6
9 6 8
0 0 6 6 0
7

9
 2
0 1 5 3
9 5 3 5
0 7 6 4 6 9
7 9 . .
7 3 . . 2 6
6 7 6 5
/ 2 3 4 7 2
8 1 2 5
0 8 7 6
8
Source: Annual report of various years, Inland Revenue Department.

The share of corporate income tax on total income tax was 65.75 percent in
200/01, which decreased to 45.36 percent in 2002/03. But it started to increase
and reached 76.06 percent in 2006/07 and again it decreased to 56.37 percent in
2007/08. Individual Income tax had contributed 26.34 percent in 2000/01 to total
income tax, which reached to 34.46 percent in 2007/08. The contribution of
house and land rent tax is between 2 to 5 percent. Its share in 2000/01 was 2.85
percent of total income tax, which reached to 3.62 percent in 2007/08. Similarly,
contribution of interest tax on total income tax was 5.05 percent in 2000/01,
which reached to 10.48 percent in 2002/03. But again it decreased to 5.55 percent
in 2007/08. The composition of income tax has been shown graphically as
follows:

Figure 4.1.5: Composition of Income Tax

10
 15000

12000
Rs. In Millions

9000

6000

3000

0
2000/01 2001/02 2002/03 2003/04 2004/05 2005/06 2006/07 2007/08
Fiscal Years

Corporate Tax Individual Income Tax House & Land rent tax Interest Tax

4.2 Analysis of Income Tax Act 2058 with reference to

Income Heads

Income Tax Act, 2031 is being replaced by Income Tax Act, 2058. Income Tax
Act, 2058 has classified the income into the following 3 heads:
1. Business
2. Employment and
3. Investment
The act has defined the income heads as follows:

1. Business: Business means any industry, a trade, a profession, or the like

isolated transaction with a business character and includes a past, present
or prospective business.
2. Employment: Employment includes a past, present, or prospective
employment.

11
 3. Investment: Investment means an act of holding or investing one or more
assets of a similar nature that are used in an integrated fashion but
excludes-
i. Act of holding of assets, other than non business chargeable assets,
primarily for personal use by the person owing the assets or investing
amount on such assets; or
ii. Employment or business.

4.2.1 Income from a Business

Income Tax Act, 2058, section 7, has clearly mentioned the incomes or
amounts, which are includable in computing the income from business. A
person’s income from business for an income year is the person’s profits and
gains from conducting the business for the year. While calculating a person’s
profit and gains from business, the following amounts derived by the person
during the year will be included which are as follows:
a. Service fees including commission, meeting management or technical
service fees.
b. Amounts derived from disposal of trading stock.
c. Net gains from the disposal of business assets or liabilities of the business.
d. Amounts treated as derived in respect of excess depreciation on the
disposal of the person’s depreciable assets of the business.
e. Gifts received by the person in respect of the business.
f. Amounts derived as consideration for accepting restriction on the capacity
to conduct the business.
g. Amounts derived that are effectively connected with the business and that
would otherwise be included in calculating the person’s income from an
investment.
h. Other amounts required to be included like change in accounting method,
transfer pricing, recovery of bad debts, compensation received etc.

12
Non-includable amounts on profit and gains of business:
The following amounts are excluded in calculating income from business:
a. Amounts exempt under section 10, 54 and 69.
b. Final withholding payments under section 92.

4.2.2 Income from an Employment

Income Tax Act, 2058 has specified the income from Employment. As per the
act, any type of remuneration from any employment is taxable income.
According to Section 8(2) of the act, the remuneration received by a person from
employment is the following payments made by the employer:
a. Any wages, salary, leave pay, overtime pay, fees, commission, prizes, gifts,
bonuses and other facilities.
b. Any personal allowance, including any cost of living, subsistence, rent,
entertainment, and transportation allowance.
c. Payments providing any discharge or reimbursement of costs incurred by
the individual or an associate of the individual.
d. Payments for the individual’s agreement to any condition s of the
employment.
e. Payments for redundancy or loss or termination of the employment.
f. Retirement contributions (i.e. provident fund, gratuity etc) including those
paid by the employer to a retirement fund in respect of the employee, and
retirement payments.
g. Other payments made in respect of the employment, and
h. Other quantified perquisites:

1. Availability of motor vehicle wholly or partly for private purpose.

i. 0.5%of salary in case of employees.
ii. 1%of market value of vehicle in case of other (i.e. Consultant).

13
 2. Provision of house to employees:
i. 2%of salary in case of employees
ii. 25% of actual rent (in case of leased building) or prevailing rate (in case
of own building) in case of other (i.e. consultant)

3. The amount of expenses incurred by the employer in making the provision

as reduced by any contribution made by the employer towards the
provision.
i. The services of housekeeper, chauffeur (driver), gardener or other
domestic assistant.
ii. Any meal, refreshment or entertainment.
iii. Drinking water, electricity, telephone and the like utilities in respect of
the employee’s place of residence.
4. In case where the interest paid by the employee during the year under the
loan is lower than the interest to be paid as per the prevailing interest rate,
the amount to the extent it is lower.

Non-includable amounts on employment income:

The following incomes are excluded in calculating the employment income of

an employee:

a. Amounts exempt from tax under section 10.

b. Final withholding payments under section 92.
c. Meals and refreshments provided to employees at business premises/work
site if provided to all employees under equal terms section 8(3).
d. Settlement by or reimbursement to an employee of expenses incurred
solely for the purpose of business section 8(3).
e. Payments by the employer for petty expenses relating to tea expenses,
stationeries, tips, prizes and emergency medical treatment up to Rs. 500 at

14
 a time whose accounting is not practical and administratively difficult
section 8(3).

4.2.3 Income from an Investment

Income Tax Act, 2058 has defined investment as an act of holding or investing
one or more assets. A person’s income from an investment for an income year is
the person’s profits and gains from conducting the investment for the year. While
calculating a person’s profits and gains from an investment, the following
amounts derived by the person during the year are included:

a. Any dividend, interest, natural resource payment, rent, royalty, gain from
investment insurance, gain from an unapproved retirement fund interest, or
retirement payment made by an approved retirement fund.
b. Net gains from the disposal of non-business chargeable asset of the
investments.
c. Amounts treated as derived in respect of excess depreciation on the
disposal of the person’s depreciable assets of the business.
d. Gifts received in respect of the investment.
e. Amounts derives as consideration for accepting restriction on the capacity
to conduct the investment, and
f. Other amounts required to be included as a result of tax accounting or
quantification or as specified by the Act.

Non-includable amounts on investment

However, the following are excluded in calculating income from
investment:

a) Amounts exempted from tax under section 10, dividends under section 54
and 69, and final withholding payments as per section 92 and

15
 b) Amounts that are to be included in the person’s income from employment
or business.

4.2.4 Business Exemptions, Exempt Amounts and Other Concessions

Income Tax Act, 2058 has mentioned the amounts, which are exempt and other
concessions. They are described in the following section.

1) Tax-Exempt Amounts:

The following amounts are exempt from tax as per section 10.
a. Amount derived by a person entitled to privileges under a bilateral or a
multilateral treaty concluded between the Government of Nepal and a
foreign country or an international organization.
b. Amount derived by an individual from employment in the public service of
the government of a foreign country provided that:
i. The individual is a resident person solely by reason of performing the
employment or is a non-resident person; and
ii. The amounts are payable from the public funds of the country.
c. Amounts derived from public fund of the foreign country by an individual
who is not a citizen of Nepal or by a member of the immediate family of
the individual.
d. Amounts derived by an individual who is not a citizen of Nepal from
employment by Government on terms of a tax exemption.
e. Allowances paid by Government to widows, elder citizens, or disabled
individuals.

16
 f. Amounts derived by way of gift, bequest, inheritance, or scholarship,
except as required to be included in calculating income under this Act.
g. Amount derived by an exempt organization by way of:
i. Gifts (Donation), or
ii. Other contributions that directly relate to the exempt organization’s
function, whether or not contribution is made in return for consideration
provided by the organization. For example, subscription fee received by
a club is exempt from tax.
h. Pension received by a Nepali citizen retired from the army or police
service of a foreign country provided the amounts are payable from the
public fund of that country.

2) Business Exemptions and Concessions:

Income Tax Act, 2058 has provided business exemptions and concessions in
section 11.
a. An agricultural income derived from sources in Nepal during an income-
year by a person, other than the income from an agriculture business
derived by a registered firm, or company, or partnership, or a corporate
body, or through the land above the land holding ceiling as prescribed in
the Land Act, 2021, is exempt from income tax.
b. Incomes derived by cooperative societies, registered under Cooperative
Act, 2048 (1991), from business mainly based on agriculture and forest
products such as sericulture and silk production, horticulture and fruit
processing, animal husbandry, diary industries, poultry farming, fishery,
tea gardening and processing, coffee farming and processing, herbiculture
and herb processing, vegetable seeds farming, bee-keeping, honey
production, rubber farming, floriculture and production and forestry
related business such as lease-hold forestry, agro-forestry, cold storage
established for the storage of vegetables and business of agricultural

17
 seeds, insecticide, fertilizer and agricultural tools (other than machine
operated)and rural community based saving & credit cooperatives are
exempt from tax. Dividends distributed by such societies are also exempt
from tax.
c. A natural person or an entity operating special industry* during the whole
income year is taxes as under:
i. If the industry is providing direct employment to 600 or more Nepalese
citizens throughout the whole year, 90%of the applicable tax rate is
applied for the year.
ii. The industry operating in remote, undeveloped and underdeveloped area
will have to pay 70%, 75% and 80% of the applicable tax rate
respectively up to ten income years commencing from and including the
year in which the operation commences.
d. Income of an industry is taxed as under:
i. An industry established in specified Special Economic Zone (SEZ) is
exempt from tax for the first 5 years of its operation and then after taxed
at 50% of the tax rate otherwise applicable.
ii. An IT industry established in specified IT Park by publishing notice in
Nepal Gazzette, is taxed at 75% of the tax of the tax rate otherwise
applicable.
iii. An industry established in remote area is exempt from tax for the first ten
years its operation.
iv. The provision of 2% exemption in tax rate given to a company listed in
Nepal Stock Exchange has been waived from fiscal year 2063/64.
e. If there is an agreement between a person and the Government of Nepal for
building and operating infrastructure, the person is entitled to enjoy all tax
related concessions prevalent at the time of agreement for a period covered
by the agreement irrespective of the provision in present Act.
f. The incomes received under business exemptions and concessions
including the income of an entity conducting petroleum business under

18
 Nepal Petroleum Act 2040 are required to calculate separately assuming
that these incomes are received by the separate person. That is, incomes
received under business exemptions and concessions should be separated
from other general business and investment incomes.
g. If more than one exemption is available to the same income, only one
exemption is available as per the selection made by the taxpayer.
h. If the assets used by the special industry were used previously by another
person operating the similar type of special industry the ten year for the
latter will be counted from the period of such use by the another person
previously.
* Special industry, in taxation means a manufacturing industry other than a
liquor or tobacco as categorized in section 3 of the Industrial Enterprises Act
2049.

4.2.5 Deductions Allowed

Chapter 5 of income Tax Act, 2058 has provided the provision relating to
expenses, which are allowed for deduction and not allowed for deduction. The
expenses allowed for deduction are discussed below:

1) General Deduction (Sec. 13):

Subject to Income Tax Act, 2058 for the purpose of calculating a person’s
income from any business or investment, there will be deductions of all expenses
to the extent incurred:
i. during the income year,
ii. by the person, and
iii. in the generation of income from business or investment.

2) Interest (Sec. 14):

19
i. The interest incurred during the year for the borrowed fund of the person is
allowed for deduction to the extent that: the borrowed money is used in
that year, if the money is borrowed for purchase of an asset and that asset is
used in that year, or in other case, the debt obligation is created in the
production of income from business or investment.
ii. If a resident entity pays interest to the controlling entity, the resident entity
may deduct the interest without exceeding the sum of (a) All interests that
are to be included in the entity’s taxable income, and (b) 50% of the
entity’s adjusted taxable income for the year calculated without including
any interest income and deducting any interest expenses.
iii. Portion of interest not deducted during the year because of the limitation
will be deducted in the next income year.
iv. For this purpose, the controlling entities are the following entities which
own or control the resident entities to the extent of 25% or more at any
time during the income year. (a) Exempt organizations or associates of
exempt organizations. (b) Persons or associates of persons getting business
concessions under sec 11. (c) Non-resident persons or associates of non
resident persons. (d) Any combination of a, b and c.

3) Cost of Trading Stock (Sec. 15)

i. Trading stock includes these stocks with a person: raw materials, work-in-
progress and finished goods. But it does not include stock in foreign
currencies.
ii. The cost of trading stock is derived as follows:

Cost of opening stock xxx

Add: Purchase or produced during the year xxx
xxx

20
Less: Cost of closing stock xxx
Cost of trading stock xxx

iii. The closing stock of last year will be the opening stock for this year.
Closing stock should be taken/valued at cost price or market price
whichever is lower.
iv. The person keeping accounts on a cash basis can adopt either the prime
cost or factory cost as basis for the valuation of trading stocks.
v. The person keeping accounts on an accrual basis must adopt factory cost
basis for valuation of trading stocks.
vi. In case of actual cost could not be derived for the particular trading stock;
either FIFO or Weighed Average Cost Method can be adopted.
vii. The prime cost is derived as follows:
Cost of raw materials consumed xxx
Direct labour cost xxx Factory variable overhead
xxx
Cost of trading stock xxx

viii. The factory cost is derived as follows:

Cost of raw materials consumed xxx
Direct labour cost xxx Factory overhead (Fixed + Variable)
xxx
Factory Cost xxx

4) Repair & Improvement Cost (Sec. 16)

i. The repair and improvement cost incurred during the year for the
depreciable assets owned and used by a person in generating income
from business or investment is deductible.

21
 ii. Eligible repair & improvement cost is 7%of depreciation basis of asset
pool at the end of the income year.
iii. The unabsorbed repairs is capitalized at the beginning of the next income
year in respective blocks (i.e. Blocks A, B, C and D).
iv. However, this repair and improvement limit is not applicable to airline
business for overhauling of aircraft according to the standards prescribed
by Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (CAAN).

In respect if repair and improvement expenses for assets acquired under lease or
hire, the allowability of such expenses will be governed by the terms and
conditions in lease agreement. Where the lease agreement clearly states that
repair and improvement expense will be borne by lessee, such expenses will be
deductible under Sec. 13 and 19 of ITA, 2058.

5) Pollution Control Cost (Sec. 17):

Pollution control cost means cost incurred by a person with respect to process or
an asset that seeks to control pollution or otherwise protect or sustain the
environment. Pollution control cost though are of capital nature are allowed for
deduction to an extent from taxable income of the person. Actual pollution
control cost, or 50% of adjusted taxable income from all businesses conducted by
the person, whichever is less is deductible. The portion of pollution control cost
not allowed as deduction will be capitalized at the beginning of the next income
year under Block ‘D’.

Government has allowed deduction of pollution control cost in order to control

pollution and protect the environment. But a standard limit for deduction has
been dissatisfying factor for business to use assets or process for pollution control
or protect/sustain the environment. So, it is not good symptom of pollution
control.

22
 6) Research & Development cost (Sec. 18):

R & D cost means cost incurred by a person for the purposes of developing the
person’s business and improving business products and process. However, it does
not include cost in respect of natural resource prospecting, exploration and
development incurred by a person in the production of the person’s income from a
business, which is treated as an outgoing for an asset used by the person in tat
production. Research and development cost though these are of capital nature are
allowed for deduction to an extent from taxable income of a person. Actual
Research & Development cost or, 50% of adjusted taxable income from all the
businesses whichever is less is deductible. The portion of Research &
Development cost not allowed as deduction will be capitalized at the beginning of
the next income year under Block ‘D’.

7) Bad Debts (Sec. 25.2):

Under the following conditions, bad debts can be written off:

i. If the outstanding loan of bank or financial institution has become a bad
debt in accordance with the standards prescribed by Nepal Rastra Bank.
ii. In other case, the person receiving payment believes that the amount could
not be recovered after taking reasonable steps (to recover the amount or
loan.) If any bad-debt deducted earlier is recovered, it should be included
in income under respective heads.

8) Depreciation Allowance (Sec. 19):

For the purpose of calculating a person’s income for an income year from any
business or investment, there shall be deducted in respect of depreciation of
depreciable assets owned and used by the person during the year in the production

23
of person’s income from the business or investment, the allowances granted to the
person for the year under schedule 2.
Depreciation is the depletion in the value of assets by wear and tear
obsolescence, or the passing of time. Depreciation at prescribed rate is allowed
on used depreciable assets owned by the person. The block wise details and rates
of depreciation are given in the following table:

Rate of Depreciation
Block Particulars of assets
(%)
Building, Structure, and
A similar works of a 5%
permanent nature
Computers, data
processing equipments,
B 25%
furniture, fixtures and
office equipments
Automobiles, bus and
C 20%
mini bus
Construction and earth
moving equipments,
portion of pollution
control cost and Research
D & Development cost and 15%
any tangible assets not
included in above blocks
(Plant and Machinery,
etc.)

24
 Rate in %
calculated as cost
divided by the
useful life of the
Intangible assets other
assets in the pool at
than not included in
E the time the asset is
block ‘D’ (Patent, Design,
most recently
Software, etc)
acquired by the
person and rounded
down to nearest
half.

Depreciation basis (pool-wise) is calculated as under:

Opening depreciation basis xxx
Add: Additional during the year (time-wise) xxx
xxx
Less: Disposal during the year xxx
Depreciation basis xxx

Depreciation = Depreciation rate applicable to that block X Depreciable basis.

These under noted entities are allowed an additional depreciation of 1/3rd of the
rate prescribed on the assets falling under Blocks A, B, C & D:

a. Entity engaged in building public infrastructure to transfer to the

Government of Nepal and any other entity engaged in power generation,
transmission or distribution of electricity.
b. Entity wholly engaged in operating special industry, operating road, bridge,
tunnel, ropeway or flying bridge constructed by the entity, trolley bus or
trams.

25
 c. Entity that earned income from export in an income year.

Addition during the year in any Block is divided into two parts: absorbed and
unabsorbed portion. Such division is based on the latter of the time the asset is
first owned/used or the cost is incurred. The table is given herewith to clarify the
position:

Absorbed Unabsorbed
Time
Portion Portion
Shrawan first to
3/3 Nil
Poush end
Magh first to
2/3 1/3
Chaitra end
Baishak first to
1/3 2/3
Ashad end

During the income year the absorbed portion of the addition is only considered
for calculating depreciation. The assets falling under block A, B, C, & D should
be included in respective blocks whereas in case block ‘E’, the individual assets
should be shown in Block ‘E’. If the block balance after depreciation during an
income year comes less than Rs. 2000, the whole amount is allowed as expenses
during the income year. Gains (loss) on disposal of pool of depreciable assets are
treated as normal revenue (expenses).

9) Losses from Business (Sec. 20):

For the purpose of calculating income from business for an income year from a
business or an investment, the following losses are allowed for deduction:

26
  Any unrelieved loss of the year incurred by the person from any other
business
 Any unrelieved loss of the previous four income years incurred by the
person from any business. However, in case of electricity projects
involving in building power station, generating and transmitting electricity
and the projects conducted by any entity so as to build public infrastructure
own, operate & transfer (BOOT) to the Government of Nepal, any
unrelieved loss of the previous seven years. Similarly, loss of an entity
conducting petroleum business under Nepal Petroleum Act 2040 can be
carried forward up to next 12 years.

Business loss, thus can be carried forward up to succeeding four income years
and offset against business or investment income. Loss from domestic business
can be offset against all types of income from any source (domestic or foreign).
Loss from foreign business can be offset against foreign business or investment.

While calculating the income of a person for an income year from an

investment, any unrelieved loss of the year incurred by the person from any other
investment is allowed for deduction. In other words, loss from investment cannot
be carried backward or forward. It is to be adjusted from the respective head only
in the year. Losses from a domestic investment can be deducted only against
investment income whether domestic or foreign. Losses from foreign investment
can be deducted from foreign investment income only.

Any unrelieved loss incurred in deriving non-taxable income is allowed for

deduction only against the person’s non-taxable income. Loss relating to business
with low tax rates can be adjusted only with the income of business with same tax
rate. Loss from a special industry getting concessions cannot be adjusted with the
income of normal business. Special industry is taxed at concessional rate as
compared to normal business.

27
 In case of long term contract, the Department may, by notice in writing, allow
the loss to be carried back to preceding income year to years; and treated as an
unrelieved loss of that year or years in an amount exceeding the amount by which
inclusions in calculating the income from business to which the long term contract
relates for that year or years exceed deductions relating to the contract.

A loss resulting from business or investment during the periods of full or partial
tax exemptions cannot be carried forward.
Adjusted of Losses under ITA, 2058
Loss incurred while deriving
tax-exempted income or
income with low tax rate
Loss from Loss from
business investment

Loss from Loss from Loss from Loss from

domestic source foreign source domestic source foreign source

Income from Income from Income from Income from

domestic source foreign source domestic source foreign source

Loss of tax exempt with tax

Income from exempt income and loss Income from
business with low tax with income investment
with low tax rate
Although, present provision of loss recovery is more liberal on comparison to
old one, it is not sufficient to encourage business for taking risk. Similarly, it
discriminates one type of activity favoring other types of activities. The loss
offsetting provision related to business is much attractive than the loss offsetting
provision related to investment. Accordingly, loss offsetting system for industry
is much tougher than the loss recovery system for financial activities.

28
4.2.6 Deductions Not Allowed:

For the purpose of calculating a person’s income for an income year from a
business, employment or investments, the following expenses are not allowed for
deduction under section 21 of Income Tax Act, 2058.

1) Personal or Domestic Expenses:

Expenses of a domestic or personal nature are costs incurred by individuals in
respect of themselves, which means that the individuals spend money for their
personal consumption to satisfy their personal needs. These expenses are not
deductible from any of the income heads – employment, investment or business.
Such expenses include:
a. Personal expenses of an individual:
 Costs for the provision of shelter as well as meals, refreshment,
entertainment or other leisure activities.
 Expenses incurred with respect to an individual commuting ‘between the
individual’s home and a place at which the business or investment is
conducted.
 Cloth expenses for the individual other than clothing that is not suitable
for wearing outside of work.
 Expenses for education and training of an individual.
b. If the taxpayer has borrowed money to bear expenses as mentioned above
and needs to pay interest for that, these interests are related to a
nondeductible expenses and therefore also not deductible.
c. The expenses of a domestic or personal nature also include costs incurred
by another person in respect of an individual. However, in the following
cases, such expenses are not treated as personal or domestic nature:
 If the payment is included in calculating the income of the individual.

29
  If the individual makes a return payment of an equal market value to the
person as a consideration of a payment.
 Payments for petty expenses related to tea, stationeries, tips, prizes and
emergency medical treatment up to Rs. 500 at a time whose accounting
is not practical or administratively difficult.
2) Tax payable under this Act. The term ‘tax’ also includes any amount
payable by way of interest and penalties. So, interest, fine and penalty paid
under ITA, 2058 are not allowed for deduction.
3) Fines and penalties paid to government or its local bodies for breach of any
law or regulations. Fines and penalties paid to corporate bodies like Nepal
Telecom, Nepal Electricity Authority etc, banks or financial institutions
can be deducted as finance or transaction costs. They are paid not for
violating a law but for not meeting contractual obligations.
4) Expenses incurred to derive the tax exempted amounts or final withholding
payments.
5) Cash payments over Rs. 50000 (except in certain circumstances) by an
individual or an entity with an annual turnover of more than Rs. 2 million.
The whole amount of cash payment (not only the excess amount) is
disallowed for deduction if it is more than Rs. 50000. However, the clause
of Rs. 50000 is not applicable in the following conditions:
 If the payment is made to the Government of Nepal, a constitutional body,
a corporation owned by the Government of Nepal, or a bank or financial
institution.
 If payment is made to a farmer or a producer producing primary
agricultural products.
 If payment is made to a retirement contribution or retirement payment.
 If payment is made to an area where banking services are not available. An
area having service means the area where there are not banking facilities
within the surrounding of ten kilometers.

30
  If payment is and must is necessarily be made in cash or on a day when
banking services are closed.
 If payment is made into a bank account of the payee.
6) Distribution of profits by an entity such as dividend, reserves, etc.
7) Capital nature expenditure. Capital expenditure is allowed only in the form
of depreciation. However, they are allowed for deduction while computing
capital gains. Expenses of capital nature mean the following expenses:
 Expenses incurred in respect of natural resource prospecting, exploration,
and development.
 Expenses incurred in the acquisition of an asset with a useful life exceeding
12 months.
 Expenses incurred on the disposal of a liability.
8) Foreign income tax. However, foreign tax credit not exceeding the average
rate of Nepal income tax can be claimed if the person has paid foreign
income tax with respect to the foreign assessable income.

4.3 An Empirical Analysis

4.3.1 Introduction

An empirical investigation has been conducted in order to find out various

aspects of income tax from the experience of real life situations. The major tool
used for this purpose is an opinion questionnaire, which was dispatched to 30
persons representing tax experts, tax administration and tax payers. (See the
format of questionnaire and the list of respondents in appendix II and V
respectively).

The questionnaire either asked for a yes/no response or asked for ranking
of choices according to number of alternatives where first choice was most

31
important and last choice was least important. For analysis purpose choices were
assigned weight according to the number of alternatives. If the number of
alternatives were four then the first preferred choice got four points and the
second preferred choice got three and the third choice got two points and the last
preferred choice got one. Any alternative, which was not ranked didn’t get any
point. The total points available to each choice were converted into percentages
in reference to the total points available for all choices. The choice with the
highest score of percentage was ranked as the most important choice and one with
the lowest percentage being ranked as least choice.

The following table shows the groups of respondents and code used to represent
them.

Table No. 4.3.1

Groups of Respondents and Code Used
Sample Code
S.N Groups of Respondents
Size Used
1. Tax Experts 10 A
2. Tax administrators 10 B
3. Tax payers 10 C
Total 30
Source: Opinion survey

4.3.2 Income tax as a suitable means of raising domestic resources

In order to know the respondent’s opinion on the suitability of income tax I

raising domestic resources, a question was asked, “In your opinion, is the income

32
tax a suitable means of raising domestic resources? The responses received from
the respondents are tabulated as follows:

Table No. 4.3.2

Income Tax as a Suitable Means for Raising Domestic Resources
Response Yes No Total

Respond N N N
% % %
ents o. o. o.

1 1
1 1
A 0 - - 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 1
B 0 - - 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 1
C 0 - - 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
3 3
Total 0 - - 0
0 0
0 0
Source: Opinion survey

The cent percent of respondents approved the income tax as a suitable means or
raising domestic resources. Hence, it can be concluded that there is no doubt in
the suitability of income tax for raising domestic resources.

In order to know the reasons of income tax as a suitable means for raising
domestic resources, the next question was asked “If yes, why it is a suitable means
for raising domestic resources?” The respondents were requested to rank their

33
responses from 1 (most important) to 4 (least important). The responses have
been tabulated below.

Table No. 4.3.3

Reasons for the Suitability of Income Tax in Raising Domestic Resources

Group Total
S.N. Reasons
A B C Points

It is harmful
to depend
1. fully on 26 25 26 77
external
sources
Among the
internal
sources,
taxation
2. 37 38 30 105
seems to be
the most
viable
method
It is not
possible to
cut the
3. consumption 16 15 20 51
level of
people as it
is already

34
 too low
Several
limitations
4. 21 22 24 67
of public
borrowing
Total 300 1
Source: Opinion Survey
In the above table, percentage was calculated according to the total points
obtained by each reason. For ranking purpose, percentage of each reason was
matched with each other and assigned first rank to the highest percentage. More
than 90 % of the respondents have given first preference to point no. 2 (i.e.
Among the internal sources, taxation seems to be the most viable method). In their
opinion income tax has high potentiality and moreover direct tax plays a vital role
in generating government revenue. Similarly, least preference has been given to
point no. 3 (i.e. it is not possible to cut the consumption level of people as it is
already too low).

In overall, it can be concluded that the income tax has the high potentiality and
strategic importance, which denotes its suitability in raising domestic resources.

4.3.3 Division of Income Heads

The new income tax i.e. Income Tax Act, 2058 has divided income into three
heads: business income, employment income and investment income. In order to
know the respondent’s view on the division of income into three heads, a question
was asked, “Income Tax Act, 2058 has divided income into three heads viz.
business income, employment income and investment income. Is it justifiable?”
The responses have been tabulated below:

Table No. 4.3.4

35
 Division of Income Heads
Response Yes No Total

Respond N N N
% % %
ents o. o. o.

1 1
1 1
A 0 - - 0
0 0
0 0
1 1
1 1
B 0 - - 0
0 0
0 0
1
9 1 1
C 9 1 0
0 0 0
0
1
2 9 3
Total 1 3 0
9 7 0
0
Source: Opinion survey

From the above table, it has been clear that 97 percent of the respondents
approved the division of income into three heads and only 3 percent of respondent
disagree with the division of income heads. In their opinion the Income Tax Act,
2058 is very ambiguous; division of income into three heads has made many of
their activities easier. As the source of income are of three types: capital, labour
and mix of capital and labour, it is justifiable to divide income into three heads as
income from investment, income from employment and income from business.

But one respondent disagree with this view. Thus, they were asked another
question, “If no, into how many heads should the income be divided. Please,
specify your views.” In response to this question the respondent preferred to add

36
“other income” as the income heads. There should be heads of “other income” in
order to place the income which is neither related with business, employment nor
investment. Thus, overall the conclusion can be drawn out that it is justifiable to
divide income into three heads.

4.3.4 Appropriateness of a Current Income Tax Exemption Limit

Finance Act of Nepal yearly prescribes the tax rates and exemption limit of
income. From the very beginning of income tax, exemption limit are changing
year to year. The exemption limit has been increased to Rs. 115000 for an
individual and Rs. 140000 for married couple or a family in the fiscal year
2064/65 against Rs. 100000 and Rs. 125000 for individual and married couple or
family respectively in the fiscal year 2063/64. To know the respondent’s view
about the current exemption limit, a question was asked, “The exemption limit has
been increased to Rs. 115000 for an individual and Rs. 140000 for married couple
or a family. Is it appropriate”. The responses were as follows:
Table No. 4.3.5
Appropriateness of Current Income Tax Exemption Limit

Responde Tot Percenta

A B C
nts al ge
Responses
Yes 4 3 1 8 27
No 6 7 9 22 73
1 1 1
Total 30 100
0 0 0
Source: Opinion survey

From the above table, it is clear that the current income tax exemption limit is
inappropriate. About 77 percent of the respondents were against the

37
appropriateness of current exemption limit where as 23 percent of the respondents
were for the appropriateness of current exemption limit. Respondents who were
against the Appropriateness of current exemption limit were asked a question, “If
no, how much the exemption limit should be for an individual?” The responses
were as follows:

Table No. 4.3.6

Exemption Limit for an individual

Responden Tot Percenta

A B C
ts al ge
Responses
Rs. 150000 2 1 1 4 18
Rs. 200000 4 6 3 13 59
Rs. 250000 - - 5 5 23
Other (if
any - - - - -
specify)
Total 6 7 9 22 100
Source: Opinion survey

On the response about the exemption limit of an individual, it was found that 18
percent favour Rs. 150000, 59 percent of the respondent suggested that the
exemption limit should be Rs. 200000 and 23 percent of the respondents
suggested for Rs. 250000. From the above table, it is clear that the exemption
limit for an individual should be Rs. 200000.

38
 Similarly, a question was raised on the topic of exemption limit for a family as,
“How much exemption limit should be for a family?” The responses were in the
following table.

Table No. 4.3.7

Exemption Limit for a Family

Responden Tot Percenta

A B C
ts al ge
Responses
Rs. 200000 1 1 - 2 9
Rs. 250000 3 4 4 11 50
Rs. 300000 2 2 5 9 41
Other (if
any - - - - -
specify)
Total 6 7 9 22 100
Source: Opinion survey

From the above table, it is clear that most of the respondents (i.e. 50%)
suggested for Rs. 250000 as exemption limit for a family. 41 percent of the
respondents suggested for Rs. 300000 and only 9 percent of the respondent
favored Rs. 200000 as exemption limit for a married couple or a family.

4.3.5 Specific Goal of Income Tax in Nepal

39
 Income tax is imposed on person’s income in order to achieve some specific
goal. As regard to specific goal of income tax in Nepal, respondents were
requested to rank their answer from 1(most important) to 4 (least important). The
question was “What should be the goal of income tax in Nepal?” Table 4.3.8 gives
the breakdown of response.

Table No. 4.3.8

Specific Goal of Income Tax in Nepal
Group T
o
t
a
l R
S
a
. Goals of income tax %
A B C P n
N
o k
i
n
t
s
1 Increase the revenue of the 2 3 3 8 3
1
. government 5 1 2 8 0
2 Reduce the gap between poor 2 2 2 7 2
3
. and rich 6 8 4 8 6
3 Promote private sector 2 2 2 8 2 2

40
 . investment 8 6 8 2 7
4 2 1 1 5 1
Reduce in unemployment. 4
. 1 5 6 2 7
3 1
Total 0 0
0 0
Source: Opinion Survey

As we can see in the table above that about 30 percent of the respondent has
favored that the main goal of taxation in Nepal is to increase the revenue of the
government. So, it is ranked first. Similarly, promoting the private sector
investment is ranked second. It is also an important factor to reduce the gap
between poor and rich which in turn will reduce unemployment.

4.3.6 Weaknesses Associated with Income Tax Act, 2058

In the course of development and modernization of income tax system the new
“Income Tax Act, 2058” has been enacted to overcome the weaknesses and
problems associated with previous income tax i.e. Income Tax Act, 2031.
Although, the Income Tax Act, 2058 has been designed and developed according
to the need of modern economy, it is not free from some weaknesses and
problems. In order to know the respondent’s view on the weaknesses associated
with the new act, question was asked, “What are the weaknesses associated with
Income Tax Act, 2058?” The respondents were requested to rank their answer
from 1 to 4. The responses received from respondent are tabulated below:
Table No. 4.3.9
Weaknesses Associated with Income Tax Act, 2058
S Group T R
Weakn
. ot % a
esses A B C
N al n

41
 P k
oi
nt
s
Ambigu
ous
1 3 2 2 8 2
provisio 2
. 7 8 1 6 9
n of the
act
Structu
re of
exempti
on
riddled
with
2 2 3 3 9 3
loophol 1
. 5 6 5 6 2
es
which
may
encoura
ge tax
evasion
Unclear
ified
system
3 of 1 1 2 5 1
4
. calculat 8 4 0 2 7
ing
depreci
ation

42
 Unjusti
fiable
loss
offsetti
ng
system
discrim
inating
4 one 2 2 2 6 2
3
. type of 0 2 4 6 2
activitie
s
favouri
ng
other
types of
activitie
s
3 1
Total 0 0
0 0
Source: Opinion Survey

It can be concluded from above result that in the opinion of the respondents,
there exist weaknesses in the income tax act, which need to be removed. Most of
the respondents agree that the major weakness associated with the current act is
structure of exemption riddled with loopholes which may encourage tax evasion.
There are also some other weaknesses prescribed by the respondents besides the
available alternatives such as lack of simple language in the act, complicated
administrative procedure.

43
 In course of personal discussion with the respondents, most of the respondents
suggested that a simple and clear language should be used in the act. It results in
better understanding of the act encouraging effective implementation of the act.

4.3.7 Provision of Self-Assessment

Self-assessment tax system is regarded as a best measure for collecting revenue

and encouraging taxpayers in the payment of tax. A self-assessment system was
introduced in the fiscal year 2048/49 for registered public limited companies and
firms. It was also applied to industry trader and professional firms which had
made a provision of a purely self-assessment system and tax officials will make
only an amended assessment. Thus, to know the opinion of respondents on the
provision of self-assessment, a question was asked, “Income Tax Act, 2058 has
made provision of self-assessment for every taxpayer. Is it good measure of
collecting income tax?”
Table No. 4.3.10
Provision of Self-Assessment

Responde Tot Percenta

A B C
nts al ge
Responses
1
Yes 9 9 28 93
0
No 1 1 - 2 7
1 1 1
Total 30 100
0 0 0
Source: Opinion survey

44
 From the above table, it is clear that self-assessment of tax is a good measure of
collecting income tax. Most of the respondents i.e. 93 percent accepted self-
assessment as an effective measure in motivating and encouraging tax payers in
the payment of tax resulting increment in collection of income tax.

In order to know the reason of accepting self-assessment tax system as a good

measure of collecting income tax, next question was asked, “If yes, why it is good
measure of collecting income tax?” The respondents were requested to rank their
answer from 1 (most important) to 4 (least important). The responses have been
tabulated below:
Table No. 4.3.11
Self assessment as a good measure of collecting income tax
Group T
o
t
a
l R
S
a
. Reasons %
A B C P n
N
o k
i
n
t
s
1 Encourage taxpayers in 3 3 3 9 3
1
. the payment of tax 2 3 0 5 4
2 Helps the taxpayers to 3 2 2 8 3
2
. know their own liability 0 6 7 3 0
3 Helps to maintain their 2 1 1 5 1
4
. books of accounts 2 4 4 0 7

45
 4 Helps to reduce additional 1 1 1 5 1
3
. impact or boredom of 6 7 9 2 9
taxpayers Total 2 1

Source: Opinion Survey 8 0

0 0 tax
It can be concluded that in the opinion of respondents, the self-assessment
system helps in a collection of income tax by encouraging the taxpayers in the
payment of tax helping them know their liability.
4.3.8 Tax paying habit of Nepalese people
To know the tax paying habit of Nepalese people, a question was asked, “Do
you think that the tax paying habit of Nepalese people is poor?” The responses
have been tabulated below:
Table No. 4.3.12
Tax Paying Habit of Nepalese People is Poor
Response Yes No Total

N % N % N %
Respond
o. o. o.
ents
A 1 1 - - 1 1
0 0 0 0
0 0
B 1 1 - - 1 1
0 0 0 0
0 0
C 8 8 2 2 1 1
0 0 0 0
0
Total 2 9 2 7 3 1
8 3 0 0
0
Source: Opinion survey

46
 Since 93 percent of the respondents were agreed that the tax-paying habit of
Nepalese people is poor, and 7 percent of the respondents argued that there is poor
tax paying capacity, which is the reason for not paying tax. Thus, it is clear that
the tax paying habit of Nepalese people is poor.

In order to know the reason for poor tax paying habit, a question was asked,
“What are the reason for poor tax paying habit?” the reasons given by tax experts,
tax administrators and tax payers are presented below on priority basis of each
respondent.

Tax Experts
i. Lack of tax awareness.
ii. Tax avoiders are enjoying more freedom.
iii. Higher tax rate.
iv. Inefficient tax administration.

Tax Administrators
i. Poor enforcement of law.
ii. Lack of tax awareness.
iii. Tax evasion culture.
iv. Poverty and poor mentality.

Tax Payers
i. Lack of awareness about the benefit of tax payment.
ii. Improper utilization of revenue by Government Department.
iii. Lack of reward and motivational factor to high tax payer.
iv. Improper assessment at tax by tax officer.

47
4.3.9 Problems and weaknesses associated with Nepalese tax
administration

To know the causes of problems and weaknesses of Nepalese administration, a

question was asked, “What are the problems and weaknesses associated with
Nepalese tax administration?” The respondents were requested to rank their
answer from 1 (most important) to 4 (least important). The responses have been
tabulated below:

Table No. 4.3.13

Major Problems and Weaknesses of Nepalese Tax Administration
Group T
o
t
a
l R
S
a
. Problems and Weaknesses %
A B C P n
N
o k
i
n
t
s
1 3 2 2 8 2
Lack of trained employees 1
. 4 1 6 1 7
2 2 1 3 7 2
Increased corruption 4
. 6 4 0 0 3
Ambiguous provision
3 2 3 1 7 2
under the Nepalese income 3
. 1 5 5 1 4
tax laws

48
 4 Lack of cooperation in tax 1 3 2 7 2
2
. administration 9 0 9 8 6
3 1
Total 0 0
0 0
Source: Opinion Survey

The major problems and weaknesses associated with the Nepalese tax
administration were ranked in order of performance of the respondents as follows:
(see table for details)
1. Lack of trained employees.
2. Lack of co-operation in tax administration.
3. Ambiguous provision under the Nepalese income tax laws.
4. Increased corruption.
In the personal discussion with the respondents, most of the taxpayers said that
increased corruption is the major problem and weakness of Nepalese tax
administration. From the above ranking, on overall, it can be conclude that the
major problems and weakness of Nepalese tax administration is lack of trained
employees.

4.3.10 Methods of Increasing Tax Consciousness

Tax consciousness in public is the essential of an effective tax system.

Taxpayer’s service and assistance in tax offices can go a long way in crating the
tax consciousness in public. To know the opinion of respondents on the methods
of increasing tax consciousness, a question was asked, “What are the methods of
increasing tax consciousness among the Nepalese people?” The respondents were
requested to rank their answer from (most important) to 5 (least important). The
responses have been tabulated as follows:
Table No. 4.3.14

49
 Methods of Increasing Tax Consciousness
S Methods Group T % R
A B C
. o a
1 Encouraging tax payers 2 2 2 7 1
N t4 5
n
. involvement in tax policies 5 4 5 7
a k
2 Educating and counseling 3 3 3 1 2
1
. taxpayers on a regular 7 8 4 l
0 4
3 Rights
basis and duties of 3 3 3 1
9 2
2
. taxpayers should be 2 5 3 0
P 2
4 Encouraging self- and
specified in certain 2 2 3 8
0 1
o 4
. assessment
clear terms tax system 6 5 1 2 8
i
5 Good cooperation between 3 2 2 8 1
n 3
. taxpayers and tax 0 8 7 5 9
t4 1
administrators Total
s5 0
Source: Opinion Survey
The methods of measuring tax consciousness among the Nepalese0people were
0

ranked in order of the preference of the respondent’s which are as follows: (see
above table for details)

1. Educating and counseling taxpayers on a regular basis.

2. Rights and duties of taxpayers should be specified in certain and clear
terms.
3. Good co-operation between taxpayers and tax administrators.
4. Encouraging self-assessment tax system.
5. Encouraging taxpayer’s involvement in tax policies.

There are also some other methods stated by the respondents such as more
investigation and reconciliation of bills and documents of taxpayers, informing
taxpayers through various media such as radio, T.V. and news paper about the tax
policies. Some also suggested to have control corruptions and train employees.

50
 Thus, it can be concluded from the above results that in the opinion of the
respondents, tax consciousness can be increased through regularly educating and
counseling taxpayers and by making the rights and duties of taxpayers clear.

To assist the comparative analysis of the above view of the tax administrations
and taxpayers (keeping the view of tax experts constant), we can test by rank
correlation coefficient (r) and probable error (Pr).

Hypothesis

Here, we have a hypothesis that there is no significant relationship between the

views of tax administrations and taxpayers with respect to the methods of
increasing tax consciousness among the Nepalese people.

We have formula,
6 d 2
r  1
n(n 2  1)

(1  r 2 )
Pr  0.6745
n

Table No. 4.3.15

Calculation of Correlation of Coefficient

T R T R Dif S
o e o e fer q
S
t - t - en u
. Methods
a r a r ce a
N
l a l a of r
p n n ra e

51
 o k p k nk o
i R o d= f
n 1 i R R1- R
t n 2 R2 1

s t -
x s R
2

y d
2

Encouragin
g taxpayers
1 2 2
involvement 3 5 -2 4
. 8 5
in tax
policies
Educating
and
2 counseling 3 3
1 1 0 0
. taxpayers 8 4
on a regular
basis
Rights and
duties of
taxpayers
3 3 3
should be 2 2 0 0
. 5 3
specified in
certain and
clear terms
4 Encouragin 2 5 3 3 2 4

52
 . g self- 4 1
assessment
tax system
Good
cooperation
between tax
5 2 4 2
payers & 4 0 0
. 5 7
tax
administrati
ons
n=5
Source: Table 4.3.13
Note: x refers to tax administrators and y refers tax payers

Substituting the value we have,

6(8)
r  1
5(5 2  1)

= 0.60

Pr  0.6745
 1  (0.6) 2 
5
= 0.19

Here, r is greater than Pr. It is 3.16 times greater. The relation is not significant
because relationship, r should be 6 times greater than Pr. However, the value of r
is not so small and it is more than 0.5, so there exist some relationship between
the views of tax administrators and tax payers. Hence, our null hypothesis is
rejected. Therefore, we can conclude that methods of increasing tax
consciousness among the Nepalese people are for both groups of respondents.

53
Findings of Empirical Investigation:

a. It is cent percent true that the income tax is a suitable means for raising
domestic resources. As direct taxes have strategic importance and is best
sources of tax revenue, the suitability of incomes tax cannot be ignored in
course of raising domestic resource.
b. Most of the respondents agree with the division of income heads into three.
As there is three sources of income: labour, capital and mix of labour and
capital, the division of income into three heads as employment income,
investment income and business incomes is purely justifiable.
c. Current exemption limit is not appropriate. Most of the respondents
suggested providing Rs. 150000 for an individual and Rs. 250000 for a
married couple or family.
d. The main goal of income tax in Nepal is to increase the revenue of the
Government. Similarly, other goals are promoting private sector
investment; reduce the gap between poor and rich.
e. Most of the respondents agree that the structure of exemption of the current
act is riddled with loopholes which may encourage tax evasion. Moreover,
the current act has ambiguous provision, which creates problems and
difficulties in its implementation. Thus, the language uses should be
simple and in a clear way for its successful implementation.
f. The self-assessment tax system can be accepted as a good measure for
collecting revenue. It encourages taxpayers in the payment of tax by
helping them know their own liability. And also, it reduces administrative
costs.
g. Tax paying habit of Nepalese people is poor, 93 percent of respondents
approved it. The major reasons for poor tax paying habit are poverty, poor
mentality, lack of tax awareness etc. Some respondent also said that
people want to escape from taxation; they think government tax system is
difficult which is the reason for poor tax paying.

54
 h. Main problems and weakness of Nepalese tax administration are lack of
trained employees, lack of cooperation in tax administration, lack of
transparency and accountability and lack of motivation by administration.
i. Tax consciousness in public is the essential of effective tax system. Tax
consciousness among the people can be increased by educating them in a
regular basis and clarifying their rights and duties in a specified terms.
Other methods such as informing taxpayers through various media such
as radio, T.V., newspaper about the tax policies etc can be used.

CHAPTER – V
MAJOR FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND
RECOMMENDATION

5.1 Major Findings

On the basis of preceding chapters some important findings can be drawn. The
major findings of this research study are summarized below:

1. The Nepalese government revenue is the composition of external revenue

and internal revenue. Internal revenue includes both tax and non-tax
revenue. Among tax and non-tax revenue, there is dominant share of tax
revenue in Nepalese government revenue. It has contributed 80.28 percent
in 1983/84 on total revenue but it was decreased to 73.08 percent in
1991/92. Again it has rose to 81.09 percent in 2006/07 and again

55
 decreased to 79.12 percent in 2007/08. So it has both increasing and
decreasing trend.
2. Tax revenue is the composition of direct and indirect tax in the Nepalese
tax revenue. The contribution of direct and indirect tax revenue to total tax
revenue was 16.74 percent and 83.26 percent respectively in 19990/91
which has reached to 27.11 percent and 72.89 percent in 2007/08. There is
dominant role of indirect tax in Nepalese tax revenue.
3. Among the various sources of indirect tax the major taxes are import
duties, export duties, sales tax/VAT, excise duty, entertainment tax, hotel
tax, contract tax, air tax and other tax. The contribution of import duties,
export duties, sales tax/VAT, excise duty, entertainment tax, hotel tax,
contract tax, air tax and other tax to indirect tax was 40.44 percent, 1.15
percent, 29.76 percent, 17.63 percent, 39.4 percent, 1.98 percent, 2.55
percent, 2.55 percent and 3.65 percent respectively in 1990/91 which has
become 27.59 percent,7 percent, 50.19 percent, 18.03 percent
(Entertainment, Hotel, Contract, Air tax contribute zero percent) , 5.64 by
other tax in 2007/08 respectively.
4. Direct tax revenue is the composition of income tax, land tax, house and
land registration tax and other tax. The share of income tax, land tax,
house and land registration tax and other tax to direct tax was 57.29
percent, 6.00 percent, 33.36 percent, 3.35 percent respectively in 1990/91
which has reached to 82.63 percent, (Land tax contributed Zero percent),
12.74 percent, 4.63 percent respectively in 2007/08. The contribution of
income tax to government revenue is in increasing trend.
5. Income tax has been considered as a suitable source for mobilizing internal
resources. It can be used as appositive instrument to boost government
revenue collection, to develop the economic conditions of Nepalese people
and promote distributive justice and to cure resource gap problem.
6. The tax/GDP ratio of Nepal is not found satisfactory. In 1990/91, the
tax/GDP ratio was only 7.04 percent and 10.37 percent in 2007/08. The

56
 direct tax/GDP ratio was 1.18 percent in 1990/91 which has reached to
2.81 percent in 2007/08. Similarly, in 1990/91 indirect tax/GDP was 5.86
percent and has become 7.56 percent in 2007/08. It indicates the
increasing trend in a slower pace.
7. Within income tax, there is the dominant role of corporate income tax but it
is in decreasing trend, which was 67.26 percent in 200/01 but it decreased
to 51.20 percent in 2007/08. The contribution of individual income tax is
in second position, which is in an increasing trend.
8. All income of an individual cannot be treated as taxable income because
the minimum cost required for subsistence cannot be taxed. So, from the
very beginning of income tax in Nepal, some extents of income amounts
are exempted from income tax. This is called exemption limit. Income tax
exemption limit in Nepal has been changed on the basis of time and
income condition. In the recent year, the exemption limit provided for an
individual and a family or couples was Rs. 115000 and Rs. 140000
respectively. The exemption limit is not provided for partnership firm
corporations and non-residents. The exemption limits provided to income
taxpayers are not sufficient and it needs increment.
9. The income Tax Act, 2058 has divided income into three heads as business
income, investment income and employment income.
10. Some exemptions granted to achieve certain objectives are not effective.
Tax incentive (concession) is one of the examples of this. Tax concessions
encourage establishment of industries in certain areas but they vanish or
change names, ownership or place of the business when the tax concession
facility expires.
11. Income Tax Act has clearly mentioned the organizations, which are tax-
free and is called tax exempt organization. Act has exempted a social,
religious, educational or charitable organization of a public character
registered without having profit motive.

57
12. Donation given to exempt organization is allowed for deduction. But the
amount shall not exceed Rs. 100000 or 5% of the person’s taxable income
for the year which is less. This provision is not able to solve the voice of
people of transparency of donation amount given by businessmen to
political parties. In other hand, HMG may prescribe, by a notification in
the Nepal Gazette, as to allow full or partial deduction at the time of
assessing a person’s income of the expenses incurred for a special purpose.
But the act has not clarified “What is a special purpose?”
13. For the purpose of calculating the income of a person for an income year
from a business or investment, all interest are allowed for deduction. But
in case of an exempt controlled resident entity, it may deduct the amount of
interest but not exceeding the sum of all the interest derived by the entity
during the year that is to be included in calculating the entity’s taxable
income for the year and 50 percent of entity’s taxable income for the year
calculated without including any interest derived by the entity or deducting
any interest by the entity.
14. For the purpose of calculating a person’s income for an income year from
any business or investment, there shall be deducted all costs to the extent
incurred during the year in the respect of repair and improvement of
depreciable assets owned and used by the person during the year in
production of the person’s income from the business or investment. But
the deduction allowed should not exceed 7% of the depreciation basis of
the pool at the end of the income year and the deduction shall be allowed
with respect to cost in the order in which they are incurred. Any excess
cost, or a part thereof, for which a deduction is not allowed shall be added
to the depreciation basis prevailing in the beginning of the subsequent
income year, of the pool to which it relates.
15. All the expenses made on pollution control by a person during the year in
conducting the business are allowed for deduction. But the expenses shall
not exceed 50% of the person’s taxable income calculated without

58
 deduction for pollution control costs. Any excess cost, or part thereof,
which a deduction is not allowed, shall be capitalized and may be
depreciated in accordance with schedule 2. The objective of government
is to control pollution and protect environment. But a standard limit
being imposed for education has not succeeded in encouraging business to
use assets or process of pollution control. So, it is not a good symptom of
pollution control.
16. All the expenses made on research and developments by a person during
the year in conducting the business are allowed for deduction. Bit it shall
not exceed 50% of the person’s taxable income calculated without a
deduction for research and development costs. Any excess, or part there
of, which deduction is not allowed shall be capitalized and may be
depreciated in accordance with schedule 2. For successful industrial
development, research and development is more important and most be
expended on it. Expenses made on it must be approved and should be
allowed for deduction for tax purpose. But the provision of income tax has
not given full deduction on it. It is a myopic vision of government.
17. The act has classified assets into five categories along with the rates for the
purpose of depreciation. They are: A - 5%, B - 25%, C – 20%, D - 15%
and E - the cost divided by the useful life of the assets in the pool
calculated at the time the asset is most recently required by the person and
rounded down to the nearest half years. The act has special provision of
additional depreciation of 1/3 of the rate prescribed on the assets categories
engaged in building public infrastructure to transfer to HMG and other
infrastructure to transfer to HMG and other entity engaged in power
generation, transmission or distribution of electricity etc. Only the
entities engages in such activities are facilitated by special provision of
additional depreciated. Individuals even though engaged in similar
activities cannot enjoy such facilities. On the other hand, there is no any

59
 specific provision of deprecation of assets, which are taken in no lease and
installment payment basis. It shows a weak point of new income tax act.
18. The act has a provision of loss recovery from a business or investment.
But losses are treated differently depending on whether they result from
conducting a business or an investment and whether they are of domestic
or foreign nature. Losses from domestic business can offset against all
types and sources of income, whereas losses from a domestic investment
can be offset only against any type of investment income. Foreign losses
can be offset only against foreign income. Foreign business losses can be
offset against foreign business income or investment. Losses from
foreign investment can be offset against foreign investment income.
Unrelieved business losses of previous 4 years are allowed to carry
forward. But, in case of electricity project involving in building power
station, generating and transmitting electricity and the projects conducted
by any entity so as to build public infrastructure, own operate and transfer
to his Majesty’s Government, any unrelieved loss of previous 7 years are
allowed to carry forward. If a person incurs a loss for an income year
from any banking business, the person may carry back the loss and deduct
it in calculating the income from the business for any of the five preceding
income years. The loss recovery provision has not been justifiable one
type of activity favoring other type’s activities.
19. A person whose annual turnover for an income year exceeds Rs. 200000 is
not allowed a deduction for a cash payment in excess of Rs. 50000 incurred
at once other than in the given conditions.
20. The small business person (taxpayers) who are resident natural persons and
who derived income from Nepalese source only are entitled to presumptive
taxation. The threshold for presumptive taxation is Rs. 1200000 annual
turnover or Rs. 120000 income. It is levied at a rate of Rs. 2000 in
metropolitan or sub metropolitan cities, Rs. 1500 in municipalities and Rs.
1000 in other areas.

60
21. Income tax administration in Nepal is not efficient enough due to its
various weak points such as lack of trained employees, increased
corruption, ambiguous provision etc.
22. The opinion survey with tax experts, tax administrates and taxpayers
conducted for the income tax has drawn the following conclusions.
a. It is cent percent true that the income tax is a suitable means for raising
domestic resources. As direct taxes have strategic importance and is
best sources of tax revenue, the suitability of incomes tax cannot be
ignored in course of raising domestic resource.
b. Most of the respondents agree with the division of income heads into
three. As there is three sources of income: labour, capital and mix of
labour and capital, the division of income into three heads as
employment income, investment income and business incomes is purely
justifiable.
c. Current exemption limit is not appropriate. Most of the respondents
suggested providing Rs. 150000 for an individual and Rs. 250000 for a
married couple or family.
d. The main goal of income tax in Nepal is to increase the revenue of the
Government. Similarly, other goals are promoting private sector
investment; reduce the gap between poor and rich.
e. Most of the respondents agree that the structure of exemption of the
current act is riddled with loopholes which may encourage tax evasion.
Moreover, the current act has ambiguous provision, which creates
problems and difficulties in its implementation. Thus, the language uses
should be simple and in a clear way for its successful implementation.
f. The self-assessment tax system can be accepted as a good measure for
collecting revenue. It encourages taxpayers in the payment of tax by
helping them know their own liability. And also, it reduces
administrative costs.

61
 g. Tax paying habit of Nepalese people is poor, 93 percent of respondents
approved it. The major reasons for poor tax paying habit are poverty,
poor mentality, lack of tax awareness etc. Some respondent also said
that people want to escape from taxation; they think government tax
system is difficult which is the reason for poor tax paying.
h. Main problems and weakness of Nepalese tax administration are lack of
trained employees, lack of cooperation in tax administration, lack of
transparency and accountability and lack of motivation by
administration.
i. Tax consciousness in public is the essential of effective tax system. Tax
consciousness among the people can be increased by educating them in
a regular basis and clarifying their rights and duties in a specified
terms. Other methods such as informing taxpayers through various
media such as radio, T.V., newspaper about the tax policies etc can be
used.
5.2 Conclusions

Nepal is one of the least developed countries suffering from chronic social and
economic diseases. She is not being able to collect necessary government revenue
to cure such diseases. Due to poor performance on internal revenue collection and
mobilization, she has still depended on foreign grants and loans. The dependence
is increasing which is not desirable for any economy. Thus, remedy should be
made in due time by the country to run in the path of economic development.

To increase the government revenue, Nepalese government is trying to extract

money or valuable contribution from people through taxation. Income tax is one
of the most important resources of government revenue and is considered as a
good remedy to cure growing resources gap problem in Nepal.

62
 In Nepal, the history of income tax is not so long. It started only on late fifties.
Though, the percentage share of income tax to government revenue is in an
increasing trend at present but it is not regarded satisfactory in comparison to
other developing countries. Currently, income tax system of Nepal encompasses
four taxes i.e. corporate individual tax, individual income tax, house rent and
interest tax. Among them, contribution of corporate sector is higher.

At present income tax revenue is collected in Nepal according to the Income

Tax Act, 2058. The act has classified income into three heads: employment,
business and investment. It attempts to bring all the incomes into the tax net
including capital gain and divided income. The new act has made a provision of
self-tax assessment for every taxpayer to increase voluntary compliance by
taxpayers and to create fair, equitable, transparent and acceptable tax system.

Due to various problems related to income tax, revenue collection from income
tax is low in Nepal. It is charged that the act is ambiguous and the administration
is not efficient enough. Nevertheless, if we analyze the data relating to it we can
find out that it is neither bad nor worse but it is continuously increasing.
However, the act and the administration in Nepal are to be deeply scrutinized and
properly implemented. The provisions made on the act have to be mentioned
clearly and language has to be made clear and understandable. Some reforms in
tax administration are needed. If the problems related to income tax system in
Nepal can be solved and resources are effectively utilized then only the prospects
of revenue collection from income tax will be bright and the economic
development of Nepal will be achieved.

5.3 Recommendations

In the light of findings of the study, the following recommendations have been
made for the sound and effective income tax implementation:

63
1. The income tax policy should be formulated so as to match with the
economic policy of the country.
2. The members involved in formulating income tax policies must have deep
knowledge about income tax.
3. Timely revision and adjustment should be made in the matter of income tax
policy.
4. Laws relating to income tax should be clear, simple and comprehensive. It
should not contain any loopholes and ambiguity. Therefore it should be
reviewed frequently. The following suggestions are made for the
reformation of existing tax laws in Nepal.
 The language should be simple and clear. In spite of using the vague
meaningful words, clear-cut provision should be made.
 The definition made in Income Tax Act should be further classified and
well defined.
 The assessment and tax collection provisions should be made clear and
simple.
 The provision of fines, penalties and punishment should be made at a
higher rate for income tax evaders.
 The tax payers should be encouraged to pay tax voluntarily through
reward, price, incentive provisions rather than coercive measures.
 Special provision should be made in the act for research and
development.
 Micro level clarification should be given for the effective implementation
of the act.
 The performance, responsibilities, authorities and duties should be clearly
defined.
 Financial benefit and extra incentives should be provided to the personnel
to decrease corruption. Furthermore, tax officers should be selected on the
basis of secret ballot system in order to control corruption.

64
  Working environment of the tax offices should be improved by providing
necessary equipment, machinery and vehicles.
 Income tax experts/ profession should be increased in tax administration.
 Coordination between staffs and department must be established.
 Delays in assessment should be reduced as soon as possible.
 The cost of collection is one of the determinants of administrative
efficiency. So, the concerned authority should pay due attention on it.
 Tax education should be provided to taxpayers on a regular basis.
6. In Nepal, one of the most important reasons for unsound income tax
system is inefficient and unscientific income tax administration in Nepal.
 All the tax personnel should be given comprehensive training on various
aspects of taxation on a regular basis. For this, a separate training section
within tax dependent should be established.
 The performance, responsibilities, authorities and duties should be clearly
defined.
 Financial benefit and extra incentives should be provided to the personnel
to decrease corruption. Furthermore, tax officers should be selected on the
basis of secret ballot system in order to control corruption.
 Working environment of the tax offices should be improved by providing
necessary equipment, machinery and vehicles.
 Income tax experts/ profession should be increased in tax administration.
 Coordination between staffs and department must be established.
 Delays in assessment should be reduced as soon as possible.
 The cost of collection is one of the determinants of administrative
efficiency. So, the concerned authority should pay due attention on it.
 Tax education should be provided to taxpayers on a regular basis.
6. The present level of exemption limit is not appropriate. It should be raised
to Rs. 150000 for an individual and Rs. 250000 for a couple or family.

65
7. Self-assessment tax system should be encouraged for collecting income tax
and motivating taxpayers in the payment of tax. It also reduces the
administrative costs.
8. Tax consciousness is a must for a sound income tax system. It can be done
through various media such as radio, TV and newspaper by informing
taxpayers about the tax policies. Similarly, timely clarity over issues not
clear in the act by the Department is an effective measure in increasing tax
consciousness among the taxpayers.
9. Donation given to political parties registered with the election commission
is allowed for deduction. But it is unable to solve, the voice of people of
‘transparency’ of donation amount given by businessmen to political
parties-so such donation amount should be transparent.
10. The standard limit allowed for deduction in case of research and
development expense and pollution control expenses is not a good
symptom of effective tax system. Thus, whole amount spent on such
expense should be approved and allowed for deduction.
11. There should be specific provision of depreciation of assets, which are
taken on lease and installment basis. Act should not be silent on it.
Provisions made on depreciation allowances must generally
understandable by all people.
12. Retirement contributions are nothing else than the product of sacrifice of
present earnings. These are the bases for the living standard of oldness of
employees. So it should be excluded from income tax.
13. 10 percent of tax rebate should be provided to the taxpayers who submit
true income statement within the specified period of time.

66
 BIBLIOGRAPHY
A. Books/Reports:

A. Pechman, Joseph; Federal Tax Policy; The Brookings Institution, Washington

D.C.,1976.
Agrawal, Dr. Govinda Ram; Resource Mobilization for Development; The
Reform of Income Tax in Nepal; CEDA, T.U. Kathmandu, 1978
Agrawal, Dr. Govinda Ram; Resource Mobilization in Nepal; CEDA, T.U.
Kathmandu, 1980.
Amatya, Surendra Keshar & Others; Taxation in Nepal; M.K. Publisher and
Distributors, Kathmandu, 2004.
Bhattarai, Ishwor & Koirala, Girija Prasad; Tax Laws and Tax Planning,
Dhaulagiri Books and Stationeries, Kathmandu, 2004.
Bhatta, Bhiv Dev & Shrestha, Rajendra Prasad; Tax Laws and Tax Planning,
Dhaulagiri Books and Stationeries, Kathmandu, 2008.
Dhungana, Mr. Bhavani & Others; An Analysis Of Tax structure of Nepal;
CEDA, T.U., Kathmandu, 1976.
Joshi, Dr. Shyam; An Introduction to Nepalese Economy, Nabin Prakashan,
Bhotahity Kathmandu 2064.
Khandel, Dr. Pushpa Raj; Tax Laws & Tax Planning in Nepal; Buddha Academic
Publishers and Distributors Pvt. Ltd., Nepal, 2003.
Khadka, Rup Bahadur; Nepalese Taxation: A Path for Reform; Marburg, Marburg
Consult for Self-Help Promotion, 1994.
Lal, B.B; Direct Taxes (Income Tax, Wealth Tax, Gift Tax & Tax Planning);
Konark Publishers Pvt. Ltd., Delhi, 1996.
Magar, Dan Bahadur; Income Tax in Nepal: A Study of Exemptions and
Deductions, T.U. 2003.
Mathew, T; Tax Policy Some Aspects of Theory & Indian Experience; Kalyani
Publishers, Delhi, 1975.

67
Marhatta, Hari Prasad; Fundamnetals of Nepalese Income Tax; Surya Prasad
Marhatta & Anand Prasad Khatioda, Nepal, 1970.

Musgrave, R.A. & Musgave, P.B; Public Finance in theory & Practice, Mc Graw-
Hill Book Company, Singapore 1989.
Prest, A.R.; Public Finance in Developing Countries, George Weodenfeld &
Nicolson Ltd, London, 1985.
Pant, Y.P.; Problems in Fiscal and Monetary Policy, Sahayogi Prakashan,
Kathmandu, 1970.
Prasad, Bhagwati, Income Tax, Law and Practice, Wishwa Prakashan, New Delhi
2000.
Pant, Prameshwor, A Study on Income Tax Management in Nepal, T.U., 1996.
Regmi, Shambhu Nath; The Role of Income Tax in Nepal, T.U., 1986.
Singh, S.K.; Public Finance in Developed and Developing Countries, S. Chand &
Co. Ltd., New Delhi, 1991.
Shrestha, Govinda Lal; Income Tax in Nepal, T.U., 1967.
Suwal, Rojalin Singh; Income Tax System in Nepal, T.U., 1981.
Shivakoti, Chudamani; Analytical Study of Income Tax in Nepal, T.U. 1987.
Tripathee, Daya Raj; Income Tax System in Nepal and Some Potential Areas for
Reform, T.U., 1995.

B. Articles:
Ghimire, Banshidhar ; Principal of Direct Tax & Provision of Direct Tax:
Rajaswa, Year 13, Vol-2, 1993.
Kandel, Pushpa; Theory of Loss Recovery and Income tax Act,2002; The
Nepalese Management Review, Central Department of Management, T.U.,
Kirtipur, 2004.
Khong Wye Leog Roy & Others; Balancing Budget in Selected Asian Countries:
Tax Increases or Expenditure Decrease; The Economic Journal of Nepal,
25(4), CEDECON-T.U., 2002.

68
Nepal Shanker Prasad Nepal; Taxation of Income in Nepal; The Economic
Journal of Nepal, 26(3), CEDECON-T.U., 2003.
Thapa, Dr. Govinda Bahadur; Tax System and Its Reform: Business Age, Vol.- 4,
No. –12, 2002.

C. HMG Publications:
Annual Report of Inland Revenue Department of various years (from 2057/58 to
2064/65), Ministry of Finance, HMG/N.
Economic Survey of various years, Ministry of Finance, HMG/N.
Income Tax Act, 2058, Ministry of Finance, HMG/N.

D. Dissertations:
Acharya, Sanjay; Income Taxation in Nepal; A Study of Its Structure,
Productivity and Problems, T.U., 1994.
Baral, Shanti; Income Tax in Tax Structure of Nepal, T.U., 2063.
Bhandari, Hari Bahadur, Contribution of Income Tax to the Economic
Development of Nepal; T.U., 2004.
Kayastha, Narendra Lal; Taxation of Income & Property, T.U., 1974.
Kahrel, Shree Krishna; A Study on Self-Tax Assessment under the Income Tax
Act in Nepal; T.U., 1996.
Lamsal, Bhara Kumar; A Study on Contribution of Income Tax on Government
Revenue, T.U., 2002.
Magar, Dan Bahadur; Income Tax in Nepal: A Study of Exemptions and
Deductions, T.U., 2003
Poudel, Jayanti; Income Tax in Nepal: A Study of Its Structure and Productivity,
M.A. Dissertation (Economics), T.U., 2002.
Poudal, Balananda; A Study of Nepalese Tax Structure, M.A. Dissertation
(Economics), T.U., 1995..
Pant, Prameshwor; A Study on Income Tax Management in Nepal, T.U., 1996.
Regmi, Shambu Nath; The Role of Income Tax in Nepal, T.U., 1986.

69
Shakya, Krishna Kumar; Income Tax in Tax Structure of Nepal, T.U., 1995.
Shivakoti, Chudamani; Analytical Study of Income Tax in Nepal, T.U., 1987.
Shrestha, Rosani; Income Tax in Nepal, T.U., 1984.
Shrestha, Govinda Lal; Income Tax in Nepal, T.U., 1967.
Subedi, Purushottam; An Analytical Study on Income Taxation in Nepal, T.U.,
1982.
Suwal, Rojalin Singh; Income Tax System in Nepal, T.U., 1981.
Tripathee, Daya Raj; Income Tax System in Nepal and Some Potential Areas for
Reform, T.U., 1995.

70