HHS Public Access
HHS Public Access
HHS Public Access
Author manuscript
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Author Manuscript
Suvanto, MD16, Sachiko Itoh, PhD17, Prof. Reiko Kishi, MD17, Judit Bassols, PhD18, Prof.
Juha Auvinen, MD19, Abel López-Bermejo, MD20, Suzanne J. Brown, BSc (Hons)21, Laura
Boucai, MD22, Aya Hisada, PhD23, Prof. Jun Yoshinaga, PhD24, Ekaterina Shilova, MD7,25,
Prof. Elena N. Grineva, MD5,7, Tanja G.M. Vrijkotte, PhD26, Prof. Jordi Sunyer, MD27,28,29,
Ana Jiménez-Zabala, PhD30,31, Isolina Riaño-Galan, MD29,32, Maria-Jose Lopez-Espinosa,
PhD29,33,34, Larry J. Prokop, MLS47, Naykky Singh Ospina, MD35,36, Juan P. Brito, MD36,
Prof. Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez, MD36,37,38, Prof. Erik K. Alexander, MD39, Layal Chaker,
MD3,4, Prof. Elizabeth N. Pearce, MD40, Prof. Robin P. Peeters, MD3,4, Prof. Ulla Feldt-
Rasmussen, MD12, Mònica Guxens, MD27,28,29,41, Prof. Leda Chatzi, MD42, Prof. Christian
Delles, MD10, Jeanine E. Roeters van Lennep, MD3, Prof. Victor J.M. Pop, MD8, Prof.
Xuemian Lu, MD11, Prof. John P. Walsh, MB21,43, Prof. Scott M. Nelson, MRCOG44, Tim
I. M. Korevaar, MD3,4,§, Spyridoula Maraka, MD1,2,46,§
Author Manuscript
1.Division
of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little
Rock, AR, USA.
Corresponding author: Spyridoula Maraka, MD, MS, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism,
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St., #587, Little Rock, AR 72205-7199, 501-686-5130 (phone),
smaraka@uams.edu.
*equal contribution
§equal contribution
Contributors
FJKT, AD, TIMK, and SM made the analysis plan, performed analyses, and were involved in writing of the manuscript. LP performed
the systematic search and FJKT and SM were involved in study selection. All other authors were involved in data collection and
provided substantial contributions to drafting of the work including critical revision for important intellectual content. TIMK and SM
verified the underlying data, supervised analyses, and directed the project.
Author Manuscript
Declaration of interests
EO reports grants from the National Institutes of Health. TGMV reports grants from the Netherlands Organization for Health Research
and Development. EKA reports consultancy with Roche Diagnostics. CD reports grants from the Chief Scientist Office (Scotland) and
the British Heart Foundation. SMN has received consultancy, speakers’ fees, or travel support from Access Fertility, Beckman Coulter,
Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Modern Fertility, Roche Diagnostics, and The Fertility Partnership. SMN also declares payments for
medical-legal work and investment in The Fertility Partnership. ENG received speaker’s fees and payment for expert testimony from
Merck and consulting fees from Brunel Rus LLC. PT reports a travel grant from Society for Endocrinology (leadership development
award). LC received travel support by Pfizer. SB declares consulting fees from Sonic Healthcare. JRVL declares grant or contract
support from the Dutch Heart Foundation and Amryt. TIMK reports lectureship fees from Berlin-Chemie, Goodlife Healthcare, IBSA,
Merck, and Quidel. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Data sharing
A protocol of this study is available at the PROSPERO website (CRD42019128585). Deidentified individual participant data are
available from the Consortium on Thyroid and Pregnancy. A data dictionary with details of the definitions of the variables used in the
study is available upon request.
Toloza et al. Page 2
2.Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and
Author Manuscript
Russia.
8.Departments of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
9.Department of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Clinical Pharmacology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary,
Glasgow, United Kingdom.
10.Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United
Kingdom.
11.Department of Endocrinology and Rui’an Center of the Chinese-American Research Institute
for Diabetic Complications, Third Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou,
China.
12.Department of Medical Endocrinology and Metabolism, Copenhagen University Hospital,
Author Manuscript
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 3
21.Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western
Author Manuscript
Australia, Australia.
22.Department of Medicine, Division of Endocrinology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center,
Weill Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
23.Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
24.Faculty of Life Sciences, Toyo University, Japan.
25.Departmentof Gynecology and Endocrinology, The Research Institute of Obstetrics,
Gynecology and Reproductology Named after D.O.Ott, Saint Petersburg, Russia.
26.Departmentof Public Health, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public
Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
27.ISGlobal, Barcelona, Spain.
Author Manuscript
40.Section
of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine,
Boston, MA, USA.
41.Departmentof Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre,
Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
42.Department of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Keck
School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 4
SUMMARY
Background—Adequate maternal thyroid function during pregnancy is important for an
Author Manuscript
uncomplicated pregnancy. Although multiple observational studies have evaluated the association
of thyroid dysfunction with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, the methods and definitions
of thyroid function test abnormalities were heterogeneous, and the results were conflicting.
We hypothesized that maternal thyroid dysfunction as a risk factor in pregnancy could be
due to an association between thyroid dysfunction and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy
such as gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. We performed a systematic review and
individual participant data meta-analysis to assess whether thyroid function test abnormalities
were associated with gestational hypertension and preeclampsia.
Methods—We searched MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Database of
Systematic Reviews from inception to December 27, 2019, for prospective cohort studies with data
on maternal thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), and/or thyroid peroxidase
Author Manuscript
(TPO) antibody concentrations and gestational hypertension and/or preeclampsia, and we issued
open invitations to study authors to participate in the Consortium on Thyroid and Pregnancy
and share the individual participant data. We excluded participants who had preexisting thyroid
disease, were taking medications which affect thyroid function, or had multifetal pregnancy.
The primary outcomes were documented gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Individual
participant data were analyzed using logistic mixed-effects regression models adjusting for
maternal age, body mass index, smoking, parity, ethnicity, and gestational age at blood sampling.
The study protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews,
CRD42019128585.
Findings—We identified 1 539 published studies, of which 33 cohorts met the inclusion
criteria and 19 cohorts were included after the authors agreed to participate. Our study
population comprised 46 528 pregnant women, of whom 39 826 women had sufficient data
Author Manuscript
(TSH and FT4 concentrations and TPO antibody status) to be classified according to their
thyroid function status. Of those, 1 275 (3.2%) had subclinical hypothyroidism, 933 (2.3%)
had isolated hypothyroxinemia, 619 (1.6%) had subclinical hyperthyroidism, and 377 (0.9%)
had overt hyperthyroidism. Subclinical hypothyroidism was associated with a higher risk of
preeclampsia (3.6% vs 2.1%; OR, 1.53 [95%CI, 1.09 to 2.15]) compared to euthyroidism.
Subclinical hyperthyroidism, isolated hypothyroxinemia, or TPO antibody positivity were not
associated with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. In continuous analyses, both a higher
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 5
and a lower TSH concentration were associated with a higher risk of preeclampsia (P=0.0001).
Author Manuscript
The FT4 concentration was not associated with the outcomes measured.
INTRODUCTION
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are some of the leading causes of maternal, fetal
and perinatal mortality worldwide, especially in middle- and low-income countries.1–3
Author Manuscript
overt hyperthyroidism, with odds ratios (ORs) ranging from 1.6 to 3.4,15,21–25 others did
not.26–30 Several factors, including the use of different definitions of thyroid function test
abnormalities, variable gestational age at thyroid function assessment, the lack of controlling
for potential confounders, and inadequate statistical power, may explain the considerable
heterogeneity and inconsistency in the results of previous studies. In an effort to overcome
these methodological issues and to better quantify potential risks, we performed a systematic
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 6
literature review and individual participant data meta-analysis to assess the association of
Author Manuscript
Potential studies eligible for inclusion were reviewed independently and in duplicate by two
of the authors (F.J.K.T. and S.M.) for inclusion and exclusion criteria, and any disagreement
Author Manuscript
was resolved by consensus. Investigators from each eligible study were invited to participate
in the study and join the Consortium on Thyroid and Pregnancy if they were not already
members. This consortium is a collaboration of birth cohorts that aims to study the
association of maternal thyroid function and autoimmunity with adverse pregnancy and
child outcomes. After participation approval, we requested the primary investigators to send
us individual participant data using a standardized codebook and the data were checked for
completeness, improbable values, and missing items. Study quality and risk of bias were
assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.33 All cohorts were approved by a local review
board and had acquired informed consent from participants or had been granted exemption
from it by the local ethics committee.
After obtaining individual participant data from the included cohorts and applying exclusion
Author Manuscript
criteria, all participants with data on TSH, FT4, or TPO antibodies, and gestational
hypertension or preeclampsia were included in the study. We excluded participants who
had preexisting thyroid disease, were taking medications which affect thyroid function and
those with multifetal pregnancy.
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 7
preeclampsia in those cohorts with data on both preeclampsia and gestational hypertension
Author Manuscript
or studies that did not report individually on gestational hypertension and preeclampsia.
Exposures
We assessed the following exposure variables: thyroid function test abnormalities
(subclinical hypothyroidism, overt hyperthyroidism, subclinical hyperthyroidism, isolated
hypothyroxinemia), continuous thyroid function test measurements (TSH and FT4
concentrations), and TPO antibody positivity. We did not examine the association of
overt hypothyroidism with gestational hypertension or preeclampsia because treatment for
this disease entity is noncontroversial and because its low prevalence, in combination
with the relatively large number of women who were excluded because of pre-existing
thyroid disease, indicates that women with true overt hypothyroidism were only selectively
represented in the studies included. In contrast, overt hyperthyroidism was examined as this
Author Manuscript
was considered to be a biochemically defined entity without an indication for treatment with
antithyroid drugs (participants who were started on antithyroid treatment, presumably for
Graves’ disease, were excluded from this study). We defined thyroid function test reference
ranges using cohort-specific 2.5th and 97.5th population percentiles for TSH and FT4
concentrations after exclusion of TPO antibody positive women, therefore cohorts without
TPO antibody data were not included in analyses on thyroid function test abnormalities.
Euthyroidism was defined as TSH and FT4 concentrations within the reference range
(2.5th-97.5th percentile). Subclinical hypothyroidism was defined as a TSH concentration
above the 97.5th percentile and a FT4 concentration within the reference range (2.5th-97.5th
percentile). Overt hyperthyroidism was defined as a TSH concentration below the 2.5th
percentile and a FT4 concentration above the 97.5th percentile. Subclinical hyperthyroidism
was defined as a TSH concentration below the 2.5th percentile and a FT4 concentration
Author Manuscript
within the reference range. Isolated hypothyroxinemia was defined as a FT4 concentration
below the 2.5th percentile and a TSH concentration within the reference range. We defined
TPO antibody positivity according to cutoffs established by the manufacturer or cohort-
specific cutoffs. Serum values of TSH and FT4 for all cohorts were log-transformed and
then standardized to population-specific standard deviation scores (Z-scores) after removal
of outliers (±4 SD from the mean).
Statistical analyses
We studied the association of thyroid function test abnormalities (with euthyroid women
as the reference group), TSH and FT4 concentrations as continuous variables, and TPO
antibody positivity with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and the composite outcome
of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia using generalized logistic mixed models with a
Author Manuscript
random intercept for each cohort. Binomial distribution with logit link function was used
to fit generalized linear mixed model. The primary analyses were repeated with a 2-step
approach by using random effect models according to the Der-Simonian and Laird method
to pool estimates and the Firth bias reduction method in case of near or complete separation
in smaller cohorts.34,35 Heterogeneity across studies was assessed using the I2 statistic. To
evaluate potential publication bias, funnel plots and Egger’s tests were used.36 All analyses
were adjusted for maternal age, body mass index (BMI), smoking, parity, ethnicity and
gestational age at blood sampling. Results are reported as adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95%
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 8
confidence interval. Natural splines with 3 knots were used to assess non-linear associations
Author Manuscript
according to Type III Wald chi-square tests. We used multilevel multiple imputation for
missing data on covariates.37 Five imputed datasets were created and pooled for analyses
using Rubin’s rules.38 We performed prespecified sensitivity analyses to explore whether the
association of TSH and FT4 concentration differed according to differences in gestational
age at the time of blood sampling (≥24 weeks vs <24 weeks) or TPO antibody status. A
2-sided threshold for statistical significance of <0.05 was used. All statistical analyses were
performed using SPSS, RevMan and R version 3.6.2 (R Project for Statistical Computing).
author had full access to all the data and the final responsibility to submit for publication.
RESULTS
From the initial literature search, 1 539 published studies were identified, which included
79 publications involving cohort studies that were potentially eligible for inclusion based
on title/abstract review (Figure 1). There were no individual participant data meta-analyses
about this topic identified with our search strategies. After the evaluation of full text, a
total of 33 cohorts were identified and invited to participate in this meta-analysis. Finally,
a total of 19 cohorts from Denmark, Chile, the Netherlands, Spain, Finland, Greece, United
Kingdom, Russia, Japan, China, Australia, and the United States, with data collection dates
from July 1985 to December 2016, responded to the invitation and were able to participate.
Of those, all cohorts had data on TSH concentration, one cohort did not have data on
Author Manuscript
FT4 concentration but had data on FT4 index, three cohorts did not have data on TPO
antibody status, and five cohorts did not have data on either gestational hypertension [three]
or preeclampsia [two].
After applying the exclusion criteria, the final study population comprised 46 528
participants with a mean maternal age of 29.1 years (SD 5.2) and median gestational age
at blood sampling of 12.5 weeks (95% range 7.0–39.7) (Table 1). Gestational hypertension
and preeclampsia occurred in 1 717/43 082 (4.0%) and 809/38 147 (2.1%) pregnancies,
respectively. The composite outcome occurred in 1 963/34 973 (5.6%) pregnancies.
Discrepancies between the composite outcome with the sum of its individual components
are explained by the way the composite outcome was defined (please refer to participants
and methods section) and because women who developed both gestational hypertension and
Author Manuscript
Of the entire population, 39 826 women had sufficient data (TSH and FT4 concentrations,
and TPO antibody status) to be classified according to their thyroid function status. Of those,
1 275 (3.2%) had subclinical hypothyroidism, 933 (2.3%) had isolated hypothyroxinemia,
619 (1.6%) had subclinical hyperthyroidism, and 337 (0.9%) had overt hyperthyroidism
(appendix p 4). Additionally, 3 005/39 736 (7.6%) were TPO antibody positive (appendix
p 6). Cohort-specific population characteristics, cohort-specific number of participants
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 9
with available thyroid function measurements, data quality assessment by the Newcastle-
Author Manuscript
Ottawa Scale, missing data on specific covariates and cohort-specific percentile cutoffs for
thyroid function test abnormalities are shown in the appendix (appendix pp 5-10). Data
on covariates were missing for participants [and cohorts] as follows: maternal age: 1.1%
[0 cohorts], gestational age at the time of blood sampling: 0.6% [0 cohorts], parity: 7.1%
[1 cohort], smoking status: 3.1% [0 cohorts], and BMI: 29.8% [2 cohorts] (appendix p 7).
Pregnant women who were not included due to missing outcome data had a similar mean
TSH and FT4 concentrations to those who were included (0.02 SD vs −0.0008 SD; P =0.38,
and 0.016 SD vs −0.0006 SD; P =0.47, respectively), but had a higher proportion of TPO
antibody positivity (9.9% vs 6.5%; P < .001) (appendix p 11).
Compared with euthyroidism, subclinical hypothyroidism was associated with a higher risk
of preeclampsia (3.6% vs 2.1%; OR, 1.53 [95%CI, 1.09 to 2.15]), but not with gestational
hypertension (5.7% vs 4.2%; OR, 1.18 [95%CI, 0.91 to 1.53]) (Figure 2). Subclinical
Author Manuscript
hypothyroidism was also associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome (8.9%
vs 5.6%; OR, 1.45 [95%CI, 1.14 to 1.85], appendix p 14). Overt hyperthyroidism was
not associated with gestational hypertension (6.0% vs 4.2%; OR, 1.59 [95%CI, 0.97 to
2.60]) or preeclampsia (2.9% vs 2.1%; OR, 1.43 [95%CI, 0.70 to 2.92]), but was associated
with a higher risk of the composite outcome (9.3% vs 5.6%; OR, 1.90 [95%CI, 1.21
to 2.99]) (Figure 2 and appendix p 14). Neither subclinical hyperthyroidism nor isolated
hypothyroxinemia were associated with the outcomes evaluated (Figure 2 and appendix p
14).
When TSH and FT4 were examined as continuous variables, there was a U-shaped
association of TSH with preeclampsia (P=0.0001; Figure 3) and the composite outcome
(P<0.0001; appendix p 15). When this analysis was restricted to TSH within the reference
Author Manuscript
range, the association of a lower TSH with a higher risk of preeclampsia (Figure 3) and the
composite outcome persisted (appendix p 15). There was no association of FT4 with any
of the outcomes evaluated, neither when the full range nor the normal range was assessed
(Figure 4 and appendix p 15).
The results of the primary analyses were similar using a 2-step approach (appendix pp
17-21), except that in a two-step analysis subclinical hyperthyroidism was associated with
Author Manuscript
preeclampsia (OR 2.02, [95%CI 1.14 to 3.59]. Neither the funnel plots or Egger’s tests
indicated relevant publication bias (all P values for the tests for asymmetry ranged from 0.06
to 0.85) and the I2 values were less than or equal to 7%.
In prespecified sensitivity analyses, the association of TSH and FT4 or thyroid function
test abnormalities with gestational hypertension, preeclampsia or its composite outcome
did not differ according to the gestational age at blood sampling, parity or TPO antibody
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 10
status (appendix pp 12-13). Out of all subsequent stratified analyses (selected based on P
Author Manuscript
for interaction ≤0.15), those with a clinically relevant point estimate indicated a higher risk
of preeclampsia for high TSH and a higher risk of the composite outcome of gestational
hypertension or preeclampsia especially towards later pregnancy (e.g., 24 weeks vs 12
weeks), but these analyses lacked adequate statistical power (appendix p 22).
DISCUSSION
In this individual participant data meta-analysis, maternal subclinical hypothyroidism was
associated with a higher risk of preeclampsia. Additionally, both subclinical hypothyroidism
and overt hyperthyroidism during pregnancy were associated with a higher risk of the
composite outcome of gestational hypertension or preeclampsia. In contrast, there was no
association of subclinical hyperthyroidism, isolated hypothyroxinemia, or TPO antibody
positivity with any of the studied outcomes. Additionally, both a higher and lower maternal
Author Manuscript
This study shows that subclinical hypothyroidism was associated with a higher risk of
preeclampsia. Various mechanisms, which can be extrapolated from experimental studies
on the effects of thyroid hormones on vascular function and placental formation, could
explain how a (relative) lack of thyroid hormones, as is likely reflected by subclinical
hypothyroidism, might influence the development of pregnancy-induced hypertension.
Hypothyroidism has been associated with endothelial cell dysfunction likely secondary
to decreased production of vasoactive substances (e.g., nitric oxide) which leads to
impaired vasorelaxation, increased sympathetic tone, and vascular resistance and finally
hypertension.18,20,39,40 Critical processes during placental formation, such as decidual cell
Author Manuscript
hypothyroidism45 and similar results were obtained in a cross sectional study.46 As such,
rather than subclinical hypothyroidism increasing the risk of preeclampsia, it may be that the
anti-angiogenic profile that arises already in early stages of preeclampsia adversely affects
thyroid gland vascularization, as demonstrated in animal studies.47 Further evidence in favor
of reverse causation is the lack of any signal that levothyroxine treatment of subclinical
hypothyroidism reduces the risk of preeclampsia,48–51 while potential overtreatment of
women with a normal thyroid function could increase the risk of preeclampsia.48 Further
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 11
studies on these underlying mechanisms are required to understand the clinical relevance of
Author Manuscript
The higher risk of preeclampsia in women with overt hyperthyroidism identified in this
study may depend on the underlying etiology. Overt hyperthyroidism during pregnancy
Author Manuscript
In the current study, we also identified that pregnant women with the lowest and highest
concentrations of TSH had a higher risk of preeclampsia, even within the reference range.
The current findings indicate that women with a TSH concentration in the middle of the
TSH reference range have the lowest risk of preeclampsia. Given the lack of clinical trials
on the effects of different levothyroxine treatment targets on adverse pregnancy outcomes,
optimal TSH treatment targets can only be extrapolated from observational studies. In
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 12
line with other observational studies62,63, our data indicate that an optimal TSH treatment
Author Manuscript
target could be in the middle of the reference range, which highlights the relevance of
follow-up of thyroid function tests during pregnancy in women treated with levothyroxine
to avoid under- or overtreatment. It has been described that hyperthyroidism in otherwise
healthy women or those overtreated with levothyroxine (e.g., iatrogenic hyperthyroidism
or treatment for a gestational TSH 2.5–4.0 mIU/L, especially in TPO antibody negative
women) was associated with a higher risk of preeclampsia, preterm delivery, gestational
diabetes, small for gestational age, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and behavioral
problems.48,64 Additional studies that assess how the changes in thyroid function in patients
on pharmacological therapy during pregnancy could be translated to clinical benefits or
harms are needed.
Finally, we did not identify any association of TPO antibody positivity with any of
the outcomes assessed, which is consistent with results from previous studies 10,28,54,65
Author Manuscript
Furthermore, studies in specific subgroups that did not meet the inclusion criteria for the
current study, such as women with previous pregnancy losses, showed similar results.66
A synergistically higher risk of TPO antibody positivity with thyroid function test
abnormalities and preeclampsia67 as well as other adverse pregnancy outcomes68–70 has
been previously described. However, in the current study we did not identify any evidence of
a synergistic risk between TPO antibody positivity and high TSH.
This study included 19 prospective, population-based birth cohorts from 12 countries with
detailed data on thyroid function tests in early pregnancy, adverse pregnancy outcomes
and potential confounding factors. The analysis of individual participant data allowed
standardization of thyroid function test abnormalities and consistent statistical analyses
across cohorts. One of the main limitations of this study derives from the observational
Author Manuscript
of pregnancy based on the gestational age at the time of onset (i.e., early vs late), which
may have influenced the identification of a clinically meaningful difference in the effects of
thyroid function test abnormalities across gestation or new insights into the pathophysiology
underlying thyroid hormones and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.71,72
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 13
to the total body of evidence on the risk of adverse maternofetal outcomes of thyroid
Author Manuscript
dysfunction during pregnancy and indirectly informs on the optimal TSH treatment target in
women treated with levothyroxine during pregnancy, which needs to be assessed in future
interventional studies.
Supplementary Material
Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.
Acknowledgments
SM was supported by the Arkansas Biosciences Institute, the major research component of the Arkansas Tobacco
Settlement Proceeds Act of 2000, and by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services
Research & Development Service of the VA Office of Research and Development, under Merit review award
number 1I21HX003268-01A1. UFR’s research salary was supported by an unrestricted grant from Kirsten and
Freddy Johansen’s Fund. SB was supported by a grant from Sygesikring Danmark. NSO was supported by the
Author Manuscript
National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number K08CA248972. PT was
supported by the British Thyroid Foundation and the Association of Physicians of Great Britain and Ireland.
EO was funded by the US National Institutes of Health (R01 HD034568, UH3 OD 023286). PVP’s research
was supported by the Ministry of Health Care of Russian Federation: Governmental funding research №
121031100288-5, governmental research topic № 39. AD, RPP and TIMK were supported by the Netherlands
Organization for Scientific Research (grant 401.16.020). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and
does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, Department of Veterans Affairs
or the United States Government. Cohort-specific grants appear in appendix pp 23-24.
Funding
Arkansas Biosciences Institute and Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (grant 401.16.020).
REFERENCES
1. American College of O, Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice B-O. Gestational Hypertension
Author Manuscript
and Preeclampsia: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 222. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 135(6): e237–e60.
[PubMed: 32443079]
2. Khan KS, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gulmezoglu AM, Van Look PF. WHO analysis of causes of maternal
death: a systematic review. Lancet 2006; 367(9516): 1066–74. [PubMed: 16581405]
3. Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, et al. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis.
Lancet Glob Health 2014; 2(6): e323–33. [PubMed: 25103301]
4. Tranquilli AL, Dekker G, Magee L, et al. The classification, diagnosis and management of the
hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A revised statement from the ISSHP. Pregnancy Hypertens
2014; 4(2): 97–104. [PubMed: 26104417]
5. Magee LA, von Dadelszen P, Bohun CM, et al. Serious perinatal complications of non-proteinuric
hypertension: an international, multicentre, retrospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2003;
25(5): 372–82. [PubMed: 12738978]
6. Hutcheon JA, Lisonkova S, Joseph KS. Epidemiology of pre-eclampsia and the other hypertensive
disorders of pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 25(4): 391–403. [PubMed:
21333604]
Author Manuscript
7. Haddad B, Deis S, Goffinet F, Paniel BJ, Cabrol D, Siba BM. Maternal and perinatal outcomes
during expectant management of 239 severe preeclamptic women between 24 and 33 weeks’
gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190(6): 1590–5; discussion 5–7. [PubMed: 15284743]
8. Rezk M, Gamal A, Emara M. Maternal and fetal outcome in de novo preeclampsia in comparison
to superimposed preeclampsia: a two-year observational study. Hypertens Pregnancy 2015; 34(2):
137–44. [PubMed: 25548836]
9. Ghulmiyyah L, Sibai B. Maternal mortality from preeclampsia/eclampsia. Semin Perinatol 2012;
36(1): 56–9. [PubMed: 22280867]
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 14
10. van den Boogaard E, Vissenberg R, Land JA, et al. Significance of (sub)clinical thyroid
dysfunction and thyroid autoimmunity before conception and in early pregnancy: a systematic
Author Manuscript
22. Wilson KL, Casey BM, McIntire DD, Halvorson LM, Cunningham FG. Subclinical thyroid disease
and the incidence of hypertension in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 119(2 Pt 1): 315–20.
[PubMed: 22270283]
23. Medici M, Korevaar TI, Schalekamp-Timmermans S, et al. Maternal early-pregnancy thyroid
function is associated with subsequent hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: the generation R
study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2014; 99(12): E2591–8. [PubMed: 25157540]
24. Turunen S, Vaarasmaki M, Lahesmaa-Korpinen AM, et al. Maternal hyperthyroidism and
pregnancy outcomes: A population-based cohort study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2020; 93(6): 721–8.
[PubMed: 32657434]
25. Li MF, Ma L, Feng QM, et al. Effects of Maternal Subclinical Hypothyroidism in Early Pregnancy
Diagnosed by Different Criteria on Adverse Perinatal Outcomes in Chinese Women With Negative
TPOAb. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2020; 11: 580380. [PubMed: 33133023]
26. Cleary-Goldman J, Malone FD, Lambert-Messerlian G, et al. Maternal thyroid hypofunction and
pregnancy outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2008; 112(1): 85–92. [PubMed: 18591312]
27. Casey BM, Dashe JS, Wells CE, McIntire DD, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG. Subclinical
Author Manuscript
hyperthyroidism and pregnancy outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107(2 Pt 1): 337–41. [PubMed:
16449121]
28. Mannisto T, Vaarasmaki M, Pouta A, et al. Thyroid dysfunction and autoantibodies during
pregnancy as predictive factors of pregnancy complications and maternal morbidity in later life. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab 2010; 95(3): 1084–94. [PubMed: 20080846]
29. Lee SY, Cabral HJ, Aschengrau A, Pearce EN. Associations Between Maternal Thyroid Function
in Pregnancy and Obstetric and Perinatal Outcomes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2020; 105(5).
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 15
30. Hernandez M, Lopez C, Soldevila B, et al. Impact of TSH during the first trimester of pregnancy
on obstetric and foetal complications: Usefulness of 2.5 mIU/L cut-off value. Clin Endocrinol
Author Manuscript
37. Audigier V, White IR, Jolani S, et al. Multiple Imputation for Multilevel Data with Continuous and
Binary Variables. Statistical Science 2018; 33(2): 160–83, 24.
38. Rubin DB, Schenker N. Multiple imputation in health-care databases: an overview and some
applications. Stat Med 1991; 10(4): 585–98. [PubMed: 2057657]
39. Toft AD, Boon NA. Thyroid disease and the heart. Heart 2000; 84(4): 455–60. [PubMed:
10995425]
40. Vagn Nielsen H, Hasselstrom K, Feldt-Rasmussen U, et al. Increased sympathetic tone in forearm
subcutaneous tissue in primary hypothyroidism. Clin Physiol 1987; 7(4): 297–302. [PubMed:
3621867]
41. Silva JF, Vidigal PN, Galvao DD, et al. Fetal growth restriction in hypothyroidism is associated
with changes in proliferative activity, apoptosis and vascularisation of the placenta. Reprod Fertil
Dev 2012; 24(7): 923–31. [PubMed: 22935153]
42. Silva JF, Ocarino NM, Serakides R. Maternal thyroid dysfunction affects placental profile of
inflammatory mediators and the intrauterine trophoblast migration kinetics. Reproduction 2014;
Author Manuscript
subclinical hypothyroidism: US national assessment. BMJ 2017; 356: i6865. [PubMed: 28122781]
49. Casey BM, Thom EA, Peaceman AM, et al. Treatment of Subclinical Hypothyroidism or
Hypothyroxinemia in Pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2017; 376(9): 815–25. [PubMed: 28249134]
50. Lazarus JH, Bestwick JP, Channon S, et al. Antenatal thyroid screening and childhood cognitive
function. N Engl J Med 2012; 366(6): 493–501. [PubMed: 22316443]
51. Nazarpour S, Ramezani Tehrani F, Simbar M, et al. Effects of Levothyroxine on Pregnant Women
With Subclinical Hypothyroidism, Negative for Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol
Metab 2018; 103(3): 926–35. [PubMed: 29126290]
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 16
52. Millar LK, Wing DA, Leung AS, Koonings PP, Montoro MN, Mestman JH. Low birth weight and
preeclampsia in pregnancies complicated by hyperthyroidism. Obstet Gynecol 1994; 84(6): 946–9.
Author Manuscript
[PubMed: 7970474]
53. Aggarawal N, Suri V, Singla R, et al. Pregnancy outcome in hyperthyroidism: a case control study.
Gynecol Obstet Invest 2014; 77(2): 94–9. [PubMed: 24481256]
54. Karakosta P, Alegakis D, Georgiou V, et al. Thyroid dysfunction and autoantibodies in early
pregnancy are associated with increased risk of gestational diabetes and adverse birth outcomes. J
Clin Endocrinol Metab 2012; 97(12): 4464–72. [PubMed: 23015651]
55. Zhang Y, Li Y, Shan Z, et al. Association of Overt and Subclinical Hyperthyroidism During
Weeks 4–8 with Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019; 28(6): 842–8.
[PubMed: 30855205]
56. Li Y, Chen H, Tan J, Wang X, Liang H, Sun X. Impaired release of tissue plasminogen activator
from the endothelium in Graves’ disease - indicator of endothelial dysfunction and reduced
fibrinolytic capacity. Eur J Clin Invest 1998; 28(12): 1050–4. [PubMed: 9893018]
57. Barjaktarovic M, Korevaar TI, Chaker L, et al. The association of maternal thyroid function with
placental hemodynamics. Hum Reprod 2017; 32(3): 653–61. [PubMed: 28130433]
Author Manuscript
58. Cooper DS, Laurberg P. Hyperthyroidism in pregnancy. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2013; 1(3):
238–49. [PubMed: 24622372]
59. Glinoer D, de Nayer P, Bourdoux P, et al. Regulation of maternal thyroid during pregnancy. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 1990; 71(2): 276–87. [PubMed: 2116437]
60. Korevaar TI, Steegers EA, Chaker L, et al. The Risk of Preeclampsia According to High Thyroid
Function in Pregnancy Differs by hCG Concentration. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016; 101(12):
5037–43. [PubMed: 27648965]
61. Barjaktarovic M, Korevaar TIM, Jaddoe VWV, de Rijke YB, Peeters RP, Steegers EAP. Human
chorionic gonadotropin and risk of pre-eclampsia: prospective population-based cohort study.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 54(4): 477–83. [PubMed: 30834627]
62. Jansen TA, Korevaar TIM, Mulder TA, et al. Maternal thyroid function during pregnancy and
child brain morphology: a time window-specific analysis of a prospective cohort. Lancet Diabetes
Endocrinol 2019; 7(8): 629–37. [PubMed: 31262704]
63. Korevaar TI, Muetzel R, Medici M, et al. Association of maternal thyroid function during early
Author Manuscript
69. Liu H, Shan Z, Li C, et al. Maternal subclinical hypothyroidism, thyroid autoimmunity, and the risk
of miscarriage: a prospective cohort study. Thyroid 2014; 24(11): 1642–9. [PubMed: 25087688]
70. Ying H, Tang YP, Bao YR, et al. Maternal TSH level and TPOAb status in early pregnancy
and their relationship to the risk of gestational diabetes mellitus. Endocrine 2016; 54(3): 742–50.
[PubMed: 27423217]
71. Burton GJ, Redman CW, Roberts JM, Moffett A. Pre-eclampsia: pathophysiology and clinical
implications. BMJ 2019; 366: l2381. [PubMed: 31307997]
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 17
72. Aneman I, Pienaar D, Suvakov S, Simic TP, Garovic VD, McClements L. Mechanisms of Key
Innate Immune Cells in Early- and Late-Onset Preeclampsia. Front Immunol 2020; 11: 1864.
Author Manuscript
[PubMed: 33013837]
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 18
RESEARCH IN CONTEXT
Author Manuscript
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 19
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Figure 1.
Flowchart of the study and participant selections
Author Manuscript
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 20
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Figure 2.
Association of thyroid function test abnormalities with gestational hypertension and
preeclampsia
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 21
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Figure 3.
Association of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations with gestational
hypertension (HTN) and preeclampsia
Author Manuscript
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 22
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Figure 4.
Association of free thyroxine (FT4) concentrations with gestational hypertension (HTN) and
preeclampsia
Author Manuscript
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.
Toloza et al. Page 23
Table 1.
Maternal demographics
Age, years 46017 29.1 (5.2)a
Gestational age at blood sampling, weeks 46262 12.5 (7.0–39.7)
Body mass index 32665 23.8 (4.4)a
Parity
0 23759/43202 55.0
1 13279/43202 30.7
2 4036/43202 9.3
≥3 2128/43202 4.9
Smoking status
Author Manuscript
Outcomes
Author Manuscript
a
Expressed as mean (SD)
b
pmol/L: 13.1 (7.2–22.3)
c
Refers to either studies with data on both preeclampsia and gestational hypertension or studies that did not report individually on gestational
hypertension and preeclampsia. Studies with data only on preeclampsia or gestational hypertension are not included here.
Author Manuscript
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2023 July 01.