Tack 2015
Tack 2015
Tack 2015
CURRENT
OPINION Gastroparesis
Jan Tack, Florencia Carbone, and Alessandra Rotondo
Purpose of review
This review summarizes recent progress in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and treatment of
gastroparesis.
Recent findings
The relationship between delayed gastric emptying and symptom pattern in gastroparesis and, related to it,
its separation from functional dyspepsia remains an area of controversy and uncertainty.
Pathophysiological studies have focused on the role of pyloric resistance and duodenal motility in
generation of symptoms. In diabetic patients, glycemic control did not determine short-term changes in
gastric emptying rate in type 2 diabetes, but poor glycemic control was a major risk factor for long-term
development of gastroparesis in type 1 diabetes. At the cellular level, diabetic gastroparesis is
characterized by loss of interstitial cells of Cajal (ICCs), and this is inversely correlated to the number of
CD206þ macrophages, which are thought to have a protective effect on ICCs. Treatment trials have
focused on dietary factors and a nasal spray formulation of metoclopramide. A meta-analysis of prokinetic
studies found no association between symptom improvement and enhancement of gastric emptying in
gastroparesis. Two controlled studies showed no benefit of tricyclic antidepressants (nortriptyline,
amitriptyline) in idiopathic gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia with delayed emptying.
Summary
The relationship between delay in gastric emptying, symptom pattern, and response to prokinetic therapy in
gastroparesis is poor. In diabetes, gastroparesis is characterized by loss of ICCs, and this is inversely
correlated to the number of CD206þ macrophages. Dietary interventions may help to alleviate symptoms.
Tricyclic antidepressants do not provide symptomatic benefit to patients with idiopathic gastroparesis.
Keywords
diabetes, functional dyspepsia, gastroparesis, prokinetic, tricyclic antidepressant
0267-1379 Copyright ß 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-gastroenterology.com
intestinal motility to the symptom pattern in gastro- emptying. These findings argue, at least in type 2
paresis [14]. In addition to the traditional WMC diabetes, against the widely held belief that better
parameters of gastric retention time and small glycemic control will improve gastric emptying.
bowel/colonic transit time, the authors also quanti- However, as the patients in this study did not report
fied antral and duodenal contractions from the major gastrointestinal symptoms, the implications
manometry tracing as area under the curve (AUC) for treatment of gastroparesis symptoms remain
&
as well as motility index and contraction frequency, unclear [19 ].
respectively, 1 h before and 1 h after emptying from
the stomach. The authors found a moderate corre- Neuropathy and glycemic control in type 1
lation between symptom severity and duodenal, diabetes
but not antral AUC (Pearson correlation R ¼ -0.42, Softeland et al. [20] studied gastric emptying (using
P ¼ 0.02). The gastroparesis cardinal symptom index radiopaque markers), rectal multimodal sensitivity
(GCSI) [15] also correlated with the duodenal con- (heat, mechanical distension, and electrical stimu-
traction frequency and the motility index (all lation), and autonomic cardiac innervation in 20
R < -0.55, all P < 0.01), indicating that duodenal, diabetic patients with gastroparesis symptoms and
rather than antral motility, correlates with symp- 16 healthy controls. Delayed gastric emptying was
toms [14]. found in 60% of the patients, and this was inversely
associated with symptoms of nausea and vomiting
(i.e., less symptoms with more delayed emptying).
PATHOGENESIS Compared with controls, patients were hyposensi-
tive to thermal, mechanical, and electrical rectal
Autoantibodies stimulation, and showed signs of autonomic neuro-
The mechanisms through which gastric motor con- pathy (reduced heart-rate variability). Rectal ther-
trol processes are affected in diabetic and idiopathic mal hyposensitivity was correlated to gastric
gastroparesis are incompletely elucidated. Autoim- retention and to reduced heart-rate variability.
munity is a key feature in the pathogenesis of type 1 These observations indicate that diabetic patients
diabetes, but may also be involved in type 2 diabetes have a widespread neuropathy, involving both auto-
as shown by the presence of autoantibodies. Singla nomic and sensory neuropathy, and including vis-
et al. [16] report antiglutamic acid decarboxylase but ceral hyposensitivity [20].
no antiislet cell or antiinsulin antibodies in six (five &
Bharucha et al. [21 ] also studied a cohort of type
type 1 diabetes) out of 16 diabetic gastroparesis 1 diabetes patients who were enrolled in multicenter
patients (12 with type 1 diabetes). There was no long-term follow-up studies of effects of improved
association with severity of symptoms or delay in glycemic control. Seventy four type 1 diabetes
gastric emptying, suggesting, therefore, that auto- patients from seven centers, with a diabetes history
antibodies are probably not key factors in the patho- of more than 400 months, underwent gastric emp-
genesis of diabetic gastroparesis. tying testing, and results were correlated to
parameters of glycemic control, diabetes compli-
Glycemic control in type 2 diabetes cations, and gastrointestinal symptom question-
Altered glycemic control has been implicated in the naires. Delayed emptying was present in 47% and,
pathogenesis of dysmotility in diabetes [17,18], and in multivariate analysis, this was associated with the
this is the basis to recommend improved glycemic presence of retinopathy, the duration of diabetes,
control for treating diabetic gastroparesis [2,3]. and glycosylated hemoglobin levels before and
&
Bharucha et al. [19 ] studied the impact of improved during the follow-up study. Gastrointestinal symp-
glycemic control on gastric emptying rate in 30 tom scores, assessed with PAGI-SYM and GCSI ques-
patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes (gly- tionnaires [12,14], did not differ between normal or
cosylated hemoglobin levels >9%). Baseline gastric &
delayed emptying [21 ]. This study shows that long-
emptying was abnormal in two-thirds of the term poor glycemic control is a risk factor for the
patients (delayed in 14, rapid in six), and higher development of gastroparesis, and was associated
fasting glucose was associated with more rapid emp- with increased prevalence of other diabetic compli-
tying. Patients were randomized to a repeat empty- cations, but the impact on gastrointestinal symp-
ing test one week later with administration of saline &
toms is limited [21 ].
or insulin. Although insulin improved glycemia,
gastric emptying rate did not differ from the saline Interstitial cells of Cajal and macrophages
group. All patients underwent 6 months intensive The studies discussed above have focused on func-
diabetes therapy, which significantly improved tional changes at the organ level in diabetic gastro-
glycosylated hemoglobin levels but not gastric paresis. Histological studies utilizing gastric resection
0267-1379 Copyright ß 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-gastroenterology.com 501
specimens show alterations of myenteric neurons, a to 4 h after meal ingestion [26]. Both high-fat meals
low-grade inflammatory infiltrate and, most consist- as well as low-fat solid meal were associated with
ently, loss of interstitial cells of Cajal (ICC) in human higher symptom burden. The total symptom score
gastroparesis [22]. Recent studies in mice models of was significantly elevated after the high-fat solid
type 1 diabetes demonstrate a protective effect of meal compared with all other meals. Nausea was
CD206-positive heme oxygenase-1 expressing M2 highest with the high-fat solid meal and lowest with
macrophages against the development of gastropa- the low-fat liquid meal. This provides support for
&
resis [23]. Bernard et al. [24 ] studied transmural recommending low-fat and more liquid meals in
gastric corpus biopsies from diabetic patients with gastroparesis to reduce symptoms, but longer term
and without gastroparesis, idiopathic gastroparesis diet studies are needed [26].
patients, and controls (n ¼ 10 age-matched females In a longer term dietary intervention study, 56
each). The number of ICCs was significantly lower in diabetic gastroparesis patients were randomized to a
idiopathic and diabetic gastroparesis specimens. The 20-week treatment with an intervention diet (small
&
number of CD45-positive immune cells, CD206- particle size) or a control diet (diabetes diet) [27 ]. All
positive macrophages, and inducible nitric oxide symptoms, measured by the PAGI-SYM question-
synthase-positive cells did not differ significantly naire [12] except for upper abdominal pain,
between groups, but a significant correlation was improved significantly with the intervention diet
found between the number of CD206-positive but not the control diet. The improvement in the
macrophages and ICC in diabetic patients with or three PAGI-SYM subscales that constitute the GCSI
without gastroparesis. These observations confirm [15] was significantly higher after the intervention
the finding of ICC depletion in gastroparesis, and diet, and the same was true for the heartburn/regur-
&
suggest that, similar to mice, CD206-positive cells gitation scale [27 ]. Based on this study, a diet with
may serve a protective role in preserving ICC. Other small particle size should be incorporated in the
pathways may be involved in idiopathic gastroparesis dietary management of patients with diabetic gas-
&
[24 ]. troparesis.
trial in 10 type 1 diabetes patients, is currently and interruption rate for adverse events was greater
undergoing phase 2 testing [33]. with nortriptyline [36].
It has been argued that efficacy of traditional The efficacy of antidepressants in patients with
prokinetics administered orally may be limited due dyspeptic symptoms, including those with delayed
to poor emptying from the stomach resulting in emptying, was also addressed in a placebo-con-
poor absorption from the duodenum. Parkman trolled multicenter trial using amitriptyline and
&
et al. [34] evaluated a metoclopramide nasal spray escitalopram [37 ]. In this study, 292 functional
(10 or 20 mg) and tablets (20 mg) q.i.d. in 89 diabetic dyspepsia patients were recruited from eight US
patients with symptoms suggestive of gastroparesis. centers and randomized to 12 weeks treatment in
Total symptom score improved with all three treat- the evening with placebo, amitriptyline 50 mg, or
ment modalities with the nasal spray showing better escitalopram 10 mg. Gastric emptying rate was
tolerance and similar or higher efficacy compared obtained at baseline and the study evaluated
with the tablet. In a placebo-controlled follow-up adequate relief of functional dyspepsia symptoms
trial, the metoclopramide nasal spray was studied in at weekly intervals. Responder rates, defined as
diabetic patients with a clinical diagnosis of ‘gastro- adequate relief during at least 5 of the last 10 weeks
paresis’, based on scores on a gastroparesis daily in the trial, were 40% for placebo, 53% for amitripty-
diary. In this US multicenter study, 285 diabetic line, and 38% for escitalopram (P ¼ 0.05). In the
gastroparesis patients (82.5% type 2 diabetes) were subgroup with ulcer-like dyspepsia symptoms (pain
randomized to 4 weeks of placebo, metoclopramide as the most bothersome symptom), amitriptyline
10 mg or 14 mg sprays t.i.d., 30 min before meals resulted in more adequate relief compared with
[35]. Symptom assessment used a modified Gastro- placebo and escitalopram (67% versus, respectively,
paresis Cardinal Symptom Index Daily Diary, which 39 and 27%, P ¼ 0.06), whereas no significant
assessed the severity of four symptoms (nausea, benefit was seen in motility-like dyspepsia (pain is
bloating, early satiety, and upper abdominal pain) not the most bothersome symptom) (46, 41, and
on a 0–5 scale. Both metoclopramide doses and 43%). Delayed gastric emptying at baseline was
placebo generated similar symptom improvement. found in 21% of the patients. In the group with
In a prespecified analysis by sex, female patients normal emptying, responses were similar to the
showed significantly greater symptom relief to total group, with higher response rates for amitripty-
metoclopramide than placebo nasal spray. Metoclo- line. In contrast, no difference in response between
pramide was generally well tolerated, although dys- the three treatment arms was seen in those with
&
geusia, headache, and dizziness occurred more delayed emptying at baseline [37 ].
frequently than with placebo [35]. As this trial did
not require documented delayed gastric emptying,
it remains unclear how many of these patients truly Surgery and endoscopic therapeutic
had gastroparesis and how many had dyspeptic approaches
symptoms with normal emptying. Furthermore, as Surgery is often considered the last resort in severe,
metoclopramide crosses the blood–brain barrier, medically refractory, gastroparesis, and few out-
the nasal spray formulation does not eliminate come studies are available [38]. A consecutive
the risk of extrapyramidal and other central nervous series of 35 patients (86% women) who underwent
system adverse events. laparoscopic total or near-total gastrectomy for
gastroparesis symptoms failing to respond to proki-
netic and antiemetic therapies was reported [39].
Psychotropic agents The primary symptoms were reflux, followed by
Based on the assumption that visceral hypersensi- nausea and abdominal pain. Remarkably, 46%
tivity contributes to symptom generation, psycho- had previously undergone pyloromyotomy, 54%
tropics, especially tricyclic antidepressants, are fundoplication, and 23% gastric electrical stimu-
often used to treat gastroparesis, although convinc- lation treatment. Total gastrectomy with esophago-
ing evidence of their efficacy is lacking [1,2]. The jejunostomy was performed in six, and subtotal
issue was addressed in a placebo-controlled trial gastrectomy with gastrojejunostomy in the others.
with nortriptyline in idiopathic gastroparesis, in Surgical anastomotic leak, requiring reintervention,
which a total of 130 patients from nine tertiary care occurred in 17%. No questionnaires were used, but
centers were randomized to 15 weeks treatment at quantification based on clinical reporting with a
bedtime with placebo or nortriptyline in increasing median follow-up of 6 months, showed that surgery
dose every 3 weeks (10, 25, 50, and 75 mg in case of resulted in major improvement of nausea, bloating,
good tolerance). Symptom outcomes were not sig- and belching while no significant effect was
nificantly different between both treatment arms, obtained for pain [39]. Although significant weight
0267-1379 Copyright ß 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-gastroenterology.com 503
loss was the rule after surgery (median BMI glycemic control in determining abnormal gastric
decreased from 32 to 26), all patients were able to motility in type 2 diabetes is less clear. In type 1
resume or maintain oral feeding. Although this diabetes, loss of ICCs, perhaps mediated through a
study shows that some patients may improve after lack of M2 macrophages, may be a key event at the
near-total gastrectomy, the patient group is unusual cellular level. Studies with the ghrelin agonist
with a high rate of previous surgical pyloromyoto- TRP-102 in diabetic gastroparesis and with tricyclic
mies and fundoplications. Moreover, the manu- antidepressants in idiopathic gastroparesis failed to
script lacks details on gastric emptying rate of show benefit. The role of dietary therapy is being
solids and liquids (may be rapid after vagus lesions, explored, and case series of favorable outcome
e.g., with fundoplication or pyloromyotomy). Man- with surgical or endoscopic interventions have been
cini et al. [40] reported a retrospective analysis on published.
the outcome of pyloroplasty in 46 patients with
refractory gastroparesis. During follow-up of up to Acknowledgements
one year, both the GCSI and gastric emptying rate None.
were significantly improved compared with pre-
operative results. Financial support and sponsorship
These surgical studies report favorable out- This work is supported by Methusalem grant from
comes, but in an uncontrolled setting, with rela- Leuven University to Prof. Jan Tack.
tively short follow-up. Taking into account older
literature, the surgical option in gastroparesis Conflicts of interest
should be considered with caution, and temporary
J.T. institution has received lecture fees from Abbott,
nasointestinal tube feeding can be used to evaluate
Almirall, Aptelis, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Menarini,
tolerance of nutrients rapidly entering the small
Novartis, Shire, and Zeria; he is a consultant for Alfa-
bowel [38]. A number of case series of gastric elec-
Wasserman, AstraZeneca, Danone, Ironwood, Janssen,
trical stimulator insertion for refractory gastropare-
Menarini, Novartis, Rhythm, Shire, Sucampo, Takeda,
sis were also published, with response rates of up to
Theravance, Tsumura, Yuhan and Zeria. Dr Tack is also
60% [41–43]. However, these uncontrolled case
a board member of the Rome Foundation and has
series should be considered cautiously, as the two
received grant support from Novartis, Shire, Tsumura
most recent controlled trials with gastric electrical
and Zeria. F.C. and A.R. have no conflicts of interest.
stimulation failed to show significant differences in
the blinded periods with stimulator on or off
[44,45]. REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED
There are also recent case reports of endoscopic READING
pyloromyotomy, performed through a gastric sub- Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have
been highlighted as:
mucosal tunnel similar to the peroral endoscopic & of special interest
myotomy for achalasia, to provide symptom relief in && of outstanding interest
gastroparesis [46–48]. Although these establish 1. Parkman HP, Camilleri M, Farrugia G, et al. Gastroparesis and functional
feasibility, longer follow-up in larger series and, if dyspepsia: excerpts from the AGA/ANMS meeting. Neurogastroenterol Motil
2010; 22:113–133.
possible, comparative or controlled trial data are 2. Vanormelingen C, Tack J, Andrews CN. Diabetic gastroparesis. Br Med Bull
needed before implementation in clinical practice 2013; 105:213–230.
3. Stanghellini V, Tack J. Gastroparesis: separate entity or just a part of
at larger scale. dyspepsia? Gut 2014; 63:1972–1978.
4. Homko C, Zamora LC, Boden G, Parkman HP. Body weight in patients with
idiopathic gastroparesis: roles of symptoms, caloric intake, physical activity
and body metabolism. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26:283–289.
CONCLUSION 5. Janssen P, Harris MS, Jones M, et al. The relation between symptom
improvement and gastric emptying in the treatment of diabetic and idiopathic
The gastroparesis concept continues to struggle with gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108:1382–1391.
a lack of association of symptoms with emptying 6. Wong GK, Shulman RJ, Malaty HM, et al. Relationship of gastrointestinal
symptoms and psychosocial distress to gastric retention in children. J Pediatr
delay, and a meta-analysis showing no relationship 2014; 165:85–91; e1.
between enhancement of gastric emptying with 7. Tougas G, Eaker EY, Abell TL, et al. Assessment of gastric emptying using a
low fat meal: establishment of international control values. Am J Gastroenterol
prokinetics and symptom improvement. Other fac- 2000; 95:1456–1462.
tors involved in pathophysiology based on recent 8. Farré R, Tack J. Food and symptom generation in functional gastrointestinal
disorders: physiological aspects. Am J Gastroenterol 2013; 108:698–
studies include increased pyloric resistance and 706.
altered duodenal contractility. Pathophysiological 9. Heddle R, Collins PJ, Dent J, et al. Motor mechanisms associated with slowing
of the gastric emptying of a solid meal by an intraduodenal lipid infusion.
studies confirm the importance of neuropathy and J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1989; 4:437–447.
poor glycemic control as a long-term risk factor in 10. McMahon BP, Frøkjaer JB, Liao D, et al. A new technique for evaluating
sphincter function in visceral organs: application of the functional lumen
the pathogenesis of gastroparesis in type 1 diabetes. imaging probe (FLIP) for the evaluation of the oesophago-gastric junction.
At least in the shorter-term, the role of poor Physiol Meas 2005; 26:823–836.
11. Malik Z, Sankineni A, Parkman HP. Assessing pyloric sphincter pathophysiol- 28. Tack J. Prokinetics and fundic relaxants in upper functional GI disorders. Curr
ogy using EndoFLIP in patients with gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil Opin Pharmacol 2008; 8:690–696.
2015; 27:524–531. 29. Ejskjaer N, Dimcevski G, Wo J, et al. Safety and efficacy of ghrelin agonist TZP-
12. Rentz AM, Kahrilas P, Stanghellini V, et al. Development and psychometric 101 in relieving symptoms in patients with diabetic gastroparesis: a randomized,
evaluation of the patient assessment of upper gastrointestinal symptom placebo-controlled study. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2010; 22:1069–1281.
severity index (PAGISYM) in patients with upper gastrointestinal disorders. 30. Ejskjaer N, Wo JM, Esfandyari T, et al. A phase 2a, randomized, double-blind
Qual Life Res 2004; 13:1737–1749. 28-day study of TZP-102 a ghrelin receptor agonist for diabetic gastroparesis.
13. Gourcerol G, Tissier F, Melchior C, et al. Impaired fasting pyloric compliance Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 25:e140–e150.
& in gastroparesis and the therapeutic response to pyloric dilatation. Aliment 31. McCallum RW, Lembo A, Esfandyari T, et al. TZP-102 Phase 2b Study Group.
Pharmacol Ther 2015; 41:360–367. Phase 2b, randomized, double-blind 12-week studies of TZP-102, a ghrelin
Study with control groups, establishing a role for increased pyloric resistance in the receptor agonist for diabetic gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013;
pathogenesis of gastroparesis symptoms. 25:e705–e717.
14. Barshop K, Staller K, Semler J, Kuo B. Duodenal rather than antral motility 32. Camilleri M, Acosta A. A ghrelin agonist fails to show benefit in patients with
contractile parameters correlate with symptom severity in gastroparesis diabetic gastroparesis: let’s not throw the baby out with the bath water.
patients. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27:339–346. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013; 25:859–863.
15. Revicki DA, Rentz AM, Dubois D, et al. Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom 33. Shin A, Camilleri M, Busciglio I, et al. The ghrelin agonist RM-131 accelerates
Index (GCSI): development and validation of a patient reported assessment of gastric emptying of solids and reduces symptoms in patients with type 1
severity of gastroparesis symptoms. Qual Life Res 2004; 13:833–844. diabetes mellitus. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013; 11:1453–1459; e4.
16. Singla R, Homko C, Schey R, Parkman HP. Diabetes-related autoantibodies in 34. Parkman HP, Carlson MR, Gonyer D. Metoclopramide nasal spray is effective
diabetic gastroparesis. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60:1733–1737. in symptoms of gastroparesis in diabetics compared to conventional oral
17. Oster-Jørgensen E, Pedersen SA, Larsen ML. The influence of induced tablet. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26:521–528.
hyperglycaemia on gastric emptying rate in healthy humans. Scand J Clin 35. Parkman HP, Carlson MR, Gonyer D. Metoclopramide nasal spray reduces
Lab Invest 1990; 50:831–836. symptoms of gastroparesis in women, but not men, with diabetes: results of a
18. Fraser RJ, Horowitz M, Maddox AF, et al. Hyperglycaemia slows gastric phase 2B randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2015; 13:1256–
emptying in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 1263; e1.
1990; 33:675–680. 36. Parkman HP, Van Natta ML, Abell TL, et al. Effect of nortriptyline on symptoms
19. Bharucha AE, Kudva Y, Basu A, et al. Relationship between glycemic control of idiopathic gastroparesis: the NORIG randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013;
& and gastric emptying in poorly controlled type 2 diabetes. Clin Gastroenterol 310:2640–2649.
Hepatol 2015; 13:466–476; e1. 37. Talley NJ, Locke GR, Saito YA, et al. Effect of amitriptyline and escitalopram
This study found no benefit of better controlling glycemia on gastric emptying rate & on functional dyspepsia: a multicenter, randomized controlled study. Gastro-
in type 2 diabetes. enterology 2015; 149:340–349; e2..
20. Søfteland E, Brock C, Frøkjær JB, et al. Rectal sensitivity in diabetes patients Controlled trial with escitalopram and amitriptyline in functional dyspepsia patients.
with symptoms of gastroparesis. J Diabetes Res 2014; 2014:784841. Patients underwent a gastric emptying study during run-in, which allows separate
21. Bharucha AE, Batey-Schaefer B, Cleary PA, et al. Diabetes control and analysis of the results in an idiopathic gastroparesis subgroup.
& complications trial–epidemiology of diabetes interventions and complications 38. Tack J. The difficult patient with gastroparesis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastro-
research group. Delayed gastric emptying is associated with early and long-term enterol 2007; 21:379–391.
hyperglycemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Gastroenterology 2015; 149:330– 39. Bhayani NH, Sharata AM, Dunst CM, et al. End of the road for a dysfunctional
339. end organ: laparoscopic gastrectomy for refractory gastroparesis. J Gastro-
Long-term follow-up study in type 1 diabetes demonstrating a major role for poor intest Surg 2015; 19:411–417.
glycemic control in determining gastroparesis risk. 40. Mancini SA, Angelo JL, Peckler Z, et al. Pyloroplasty for refractory gastro-
22. Grover M, Bernard CE, Pasricha PJ, et al. Clinical-histological associations in paresis. Am Surg 2015; 81:738–746.
gastroparesis: results from the Gastroparesis Clinical Research Consortium. 41. Brody F, Zettervall SL, Richards NG, et al. Follow-up after gastric electrical
Neurogastroenterol Motil 2012; 24:531–539; e249. stimulation for gastroparesis. J Am Coll Surg 2015; 220:57–63.
23. Choi KM, Kashyap PC, Dutta N, et al. CD206-positive M2 macrophages that 42. Sun Z, Rodriguez J, McMichael J, et al. Surgical treatment of medically
express heme oxygenase-1 protect against diabetic gastroparesis in mice. refractory gastroparesis in the morbidly obese. Surg Endosc 2015;
Gastroenterology 2010; 138:2399–2409; 2409.e1. 29:2683–2689.
24. Bernard CE, Gibbons SJ, Mann IS, et al. NIDDK Gastroparesis Clinical 43. Panda H, Mitchell P, Curley M, et al. Prospective evaluation of gastric
& Research Consortium (GpCRC). Association of low numbers of CD206- neurostimulation for diabetic gastroparesis in Canada. Can J Gastroenterol
positive cells with loss of ICC in the gastric body of patients with diabetic Hepatol 2015; 29:198–202.
gastroparesis. Neurogastroenterol Motil 2014; 26:1275–1284. 44. McCallum RW, Snape W, Brody F, et al. Gastric electrical stimulation with
Histological study on resection specimens in gastroparesis, confirming loss of ICC Enterra therapy improves symptoms from diabetic gastroparesis in a pro-
and suggesting a role for CG 206-positive M2 macrophages in protecting these spective study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8:947–954.
cells. 45. McCallum RW, Sarosiek I, Parkman HP, et al. Gastric electrical stimulation
25. Wytiaz V, Homko C, Duffy F, et al. Foods provoking and alleviating symptoms with Enterra therapy improves symptoms of idiopathic gastroparesis. Neuro-
in gastroparesis: patient experiences. Dig Dis Sci 2015; 60:1052–1058. gastroenterol Motil 2013; 25:e636–e815.
26. Homko CJ, Duffy F, Friedenberg FK, et al. Effect of dietary fat and food 46. Khashab MA, Stein E, Clarke JO, et al. Gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy
consistency on gastroparesis symptoms in patients with gastroparesis. for refractory gastroparesis: first human endoscopic pyloromyotomy. Gastro-
Neurogastroenterol Motil 2015; 27:501–508. intest Endosc 2013; 78:764–768.
27. Olausson EA, Störsrud S, Grundin H, et al. A small particle size diet reduces 47. Shlomovitz E, Pescarus R, Cassera MA, et al. Early human experience with
& upper gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with diabetic gastroparesis: a peroral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (POP). Surg Endosc 2015; 29:543–551.
randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2014; 109:375–385. 48. Chaves DM, de Moura EG, Mestieri LH, et al. Endoscopic pyloromyotomy via
First controlled trial of dietary intervention in gastroparesis, showing symptomatic a gastric submucosal tunnel dissection for the treatment of gastroparesis after
benefit of a small particle size diet. surgical vagal lesion. Gastrointest Endosc 2014; 80:164.
0267-1379 Copyright ß 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved. www.co-gastroenterology.com 505