Ebook Tactical Medicine Essentials 2Nd Edition John E Campbell Online PDF All Chapter
Ebook Tactical Medicine Essentials 2Nd Edition John E Campbell Online PDF All Chapter
Ebook Tactical Medicine Essentials 2Nd Edition John E Campbell Online PDF All Chapter
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-world-of-states-2nd-edition-
john-l-campbell/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/sarcopenia-2nd-edition-john-e-
morley/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/causation-in-psychology-1st-
edition-john-campbell/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/neonatology-for-primary-care-
deborah-e-campbell/
Mummies Magic and Medicine in Ancient Egypt 1st Edition
Campbell Price
https://ebookmeta.com/product/mummies-magic-and-medicine-in-
ancient-egypt-1st-edition-campbell-price/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/essentials-of-economics-9th-
edition-john-sloman/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/simon-says-2nd-edition-libby-
campbell/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/the-study-of-law-a-critical-
thinking-approach-5th-edition-katherine-a-currier-thomas-e-
eimermann-marisa-s-campbell-thomas-e-eimermann-marisa-s-campbell/
https://ebookmeta.com/product/cecil-essentials-of-medicine-cecil-
medicine-10th-edition-edward-j-wing-md-facp-fidsa-editor/
Tactical Medicine
ESSENTIALS
SECOND EDITION
Jones & Bartlett Learning books and products are available through most bookstores and online booksellers. To contact the Jones & Bartlett Learning Public Safety Group directly, call 800-
832-0034, fax 978-443-8000, or visit our website, www.psglearning.com.
Substantial discounts on bulk quantities of Jones & Bartlett Learning publications are available to corporations, professional associations, and other qualified organizations. For details
and specific discount information, contact the special sales department at Jones & Bartlett Learning via the above contact information or send an email to specialsales@jblearning.com.
Copyright © 2021 by Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC, an Ascend Learning Company
All rights reserved. No part of the material protected by this copyright may be reproduced or utilized in any form, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any
information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner.
The content, statements, views, and opinions herein are the sole expression of the respective authors and not that of Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC. Reference herein to any specific
commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement or recommendation by Jones & Bartlett
Learning, LLC and such reference shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. All trademarks displayed are the trademarks of the parties noted herein. Tactical
Medicine Essentials, Second Edition is an independent publication and has not been authorized, sponsored, or otherwise approved by the owners of the trademarks or service marks
referenced in this product.
There may be images in this book that feature models; these models do not necessarily endorse, represent, or participate in the activities represented in the images. Any screenshots in this
product are for educational and instructive purposes only. Any individuals and scenarios featured in the case studies throughout this product may be real or fictitious, but are used for
instructional purposes only.
The procedures and protocols in this book are based on the most current recommendations of responsible medical sources. The publisher, however, makes no guarantee as to, and
assumes no responsibility for, the correctness, sufficiency, or completeness of such information or recommendations. Other or additional safety measures may be required under particular
circumstances.
This textbook is intended solely as a guide to the appropriate procedures to be employed when rendering emergency care to the sick and injured. It is not intended as a statement of the
standards of care required in any particular situation, because circumstances and the patient’s physical condition can vary widely from one emergency to another. Nor is it intended that this
textbook shall in any way advise emergency personnel concerning legal authority to perform the activities or procedures discussed. Such local determination should be made only with the
aid of legal counsel.
03029-7
Production Credits
General Manager and Executive Publisher: Kimberly Brophy
VP, Product Development: Christine Emerton
Senior Managing Editor: Donna Gridley
Product Manager: Tiffany Sliter
Associate Development Editor: Ashley Procum
Editorial Assistant: Alexander Belloli
VP, Sales, Public Safety Group: Matthew Maniscalco
Project Specialist: Kathryn Leeber
Digital Project Specialist: Rachel DiMaggio
Director of Marketing Operations: Brian Rooney
Production Services Manager: Colleen Lamy
VP, Manufacturing and Inventory Control: Therese Connell
Composition: S4Carlisle Publishing Services
Project Management: S4Carlisle Publishing Services
Cover Design: Kristin E. Parker
Text Design: Kristin E. Parker
Senior Media Development Editor: Troy Liston
Rights Specialist: Maria Leon Maimone
Cover Image: Courtesy of Dr. John Wipfler and Dr. Lawrence Heiskell.
Part Opener/Chapter Opener Images: Courtesy of Dr. John Wipfler.
Printing and Binding: LSC Communications
Cover Printing: LSC Communications
LCCN: 2019020763
6048
23 22 21 20 19 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
BRIEF CONTENTS
Glossary
Index
CONTENTS
Glossary
Index
AUTHOR BIOGRAPHIES
John Emory Campbell, MD, FACEP Dr. Campbell passed away in 2018. Dr. Campbell was an excellent physician, innovator, pioneer, and
teacher with many outstanding achievements.
Dr. Campbell was known worldwide for his innovative and groundbreaking work in developing prehospital trauma education. In 1982, Dr.
Campbell founded the Basic Trauma Life Support (BTLS) program. It was the first course and curriculum dedicated to prehospital trauma
assessment and trauma care worldwide. He taught, alongside Colonel Jim Smith (his future co-author), and conducted the first BTLS course
in August of 1982. He wanted to teach paramedics the principles of advanced trauma life support (ATLS) to improve the care provided to
trauma patients. He partnered with the Alabama Chapter of ACEP to publish the first BTLS textbook in 1982. Basic Trauma Life Support has
since been renamed to International Trauma Life Support (ITLS) to better reflect its scope and mission, and it is now a global organization
offering 15 types of trauma courses and teaching over 30,000 students annually in over 40 countries.
“John did not set out to be an EMS leader,” said ITLS Editor-in-Chief Roy Alson, PhD, MD, FACEP, who has served on the editorial board
alongside Dr. Campbell for many years. “Thirty years ago, he developed a new trauma course and said, ‘Why aren’t we teaching this to
EMS?’ Along the way, he convinced countless doctors, nurses, and EMS, fire, and police personnel to share his vision. The legacy John
leaves is measured in the lives saved by those who have been ITLS trained. He will be missed.”
Dr. Campbell had a lifelong interest in the military and supported law enforcement throughout his life. Dr. Campbell, Chief Jim Smith, Dr.
Lawrence Heiskell, and Dr. John Wipfler worked together with over 120 contributors and reviewers to generate the first comprehensive
textbook on tactical medicine, Tactical Medicine Essentials, which was copyrighted and published in 2012. Endorsed by the American
College of Emergency Physicians, Dr. Campbell was able to contribute his extensive experience in the public safety prehospital arena to this
textbook. The first edition has sold over 6000 copies and is used in tactical medicine education worldwide. Dr. Campbell’s legacy lives on not
only in the form of ITLS, but also in the form of Tactical Medicine Essentials, Second Edition, written by his three co-authors.
Lawrence E. Heiskell, MD, FACEP, FAAFP Dr. Heiskell is the founder and medical director for the International School of Tactical
Medicine, the first and only state and federally approved tactical medicine school approved by the California Commission on Peace Officers
Standards and Training (POST) and the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS). Dr. Heiskell is residency trained and board
certified in emergency medicine and family practice and has been a practicing emergency physician for more than 32 years.
Prior to attending medical school, Dr. Heiskell spent 5 years with the United States Antarctic Research Program and served on three
expeditions to Antarctica and the South Pole. He was awarded the Congressional Antarctic Service Medal in 1979. He has 29 years of
experience as a SWAT team physician beginning as a reserve deputy with the Kern County Sheriff’s Department in Bakersfield, California.
He is currently a reserve police officer and tactical physician with the Palm Springs Police Department in Palm Springs, California.
Dr. Heiskell served on an 18-agency member tactical medicine coalition under the auspices of the California Commission on Police
Officer Standards and Training and California Emergency Medical Authority (EMSA) to create the State of California Tactical Medicine
Operational Programs and Standardized Training Recommendations.
He is a graduate of Riverside Sheriff’s Office (RSO) SWAT School, National Tactical Officers Association (NTOA) School, Heckler & Koch
SWAT School, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) SWAT School. Dr. Heiskell has lectured extensively in the United States and
abroad on tactical emergency medicine and has published over 70 articles and other publications on tactical medicine topics.
Dr. Heiskell has provided special operations emergency medical support for the FBI, Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and the
Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF).
Colonel Jim Smith, MSS, NRP, FABCHS, CPC, CLEE Colonel Smith currently serves as the public safety director for a rural community in
the United States. He has more than 45 years’ experience in public safety as a certified police chief and has served as a bureau commander
in a metropolitan police agency supervising an FBI certified bomb squad and a clandestine laboratory entry-assessment team, 911 center
serving more than 30 agencies, responded more than 300 bomb/incendiary incidents, and more than 100 clandestine laboratories. Smith has
served as the public safety coordinator for a university with multiple campuses. Smith has developed several classes for the university
environment addressing clandestine laboratories, emergency management, WMD, and crisis management. He has been a practicing
paramedic for more than 45 years and is a certified fire instructor. Smith has a master’s degree in science in safety from the University of
Southern California and a bachelor’s degree from Troy University. He has served as a paramedic in the tactical setting for many years and
teaches classes in this arena. Smith served as a task force officer on a federal joint terrorism task force and as a senior health physics
technician and radiochemist at an operating nuclear power facility for several years. He has written several textbooks including subject matter
on bombs and bombings, response to WMD events, EMS operations in the WMD setting, and crisis management. He also serves as a peer
reviewer for several textbook publishers and professional journals, and he has more than 100 peer-reviewed articles published. Smith has
conducted research on explosion and fragment suppression leading to the production of specialized equipment and a patent issued for the
process. Smith teaches criminal justice, homeland security, and terrorism classes for the University of Phoenix and Troy University.
E. John Wipfler III, MD, FACEP Dr. John Wipfler is a board certified attending emergency physician and a Clinical Professor of Emergency
Medicine at the University of Illinois College of Medicine. In medical school, he joined the armed forces starting in 1985 and retired at the
rank of Major, U.S. Army Medical Corps (Res) after 14 years of service. In 1994 as an academic emergency physician, he obtained training
and additional military experience (Panama, multiple military bases) and started volunteering as a tactical physician for several SWAT teams
in the Midwest. Gaining valuable experience over the past 25 plus years, he continues to serve as tactical physician and TEMS medical
director for three SWAT teams and multiple law enforcement agencies in central Illinois.
Since completing his internship in surgery and residency in emergency medicine, he teaches and practices medicine with the Department
of Emergency Medicine at OSF Healthcare Saint Francis Medical Center, a Level I Trauma Center in Peoria, Illinois. Dr. Wipfler co-founded
the first tactical EMS unit in the state of Illinois, the Special Tactical Assistance Trauma Team (STATT) in 1998. He is a sworn LEO, a
Sheriff’s Physician who has been involved in tactical operations for more than 220 SWAT callouts. The STATT Tactical EMS unit (five
physicians, one nurse, two paramedics) supports three law enforcement tactical teams: Central Illinois Emergency Response Team (CIERT),
Illinois Law Enforcement Alarm Services team (ILEAS region 6/7), and the Peoria City Police Department Special Response Team (SRT). He
also supports callouts and/or training with the United States Secret Service for regional presidential motorcade escorts, United States
Marshals Service (SOG), and the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA). He has flown SOG helicopter missions with the United States Marshals
Service Special Operations Group during high-risk prisoner transport.
As a certified firearms instructor who is also qualified expert in pistol, small-bore rifle, and high-power rifle marksmanship, Dr. Wipfler
routinely teaches firearms safety classes integrated with tactical medicine principles. He is certified by the Illinois State Police, and along with
his wife they have taught over 10 concealed carry courses. He has completed multiple military and civilian tactical/medical courses, including
the Chapman Academy (Basic and Advanced Pistol, Tactical Rifle), Combat Casualty Care Course, Counter Narcotics & Terrorism
Operational Medical Support (CONTOMS), Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site (REAC/TS) radioactive injury management
course, Heckler & Koch Basic and Advanced Tactical EMS courses, United States Army Medical Research Institute for Infectious Disease
(USAMRIID) Chemical and Biological Warfare School, Insights Training, and Strike Tactical Solutions close quarters combat courses.
Dr. Wipfler was instrumental in starting and served as medical director of the Region 2 RMERT disaster response team in central Illinois,
and has deployed on multiple real-world disasters including several large tornado strikes with mass casualties. Dr. Wipfler served with 12
others on the founding executive council for the sole state-wide disaster response agency in Illinois, the Illinois Medical Emergency
Response Team (IMERT). He served for 5 years as medical director of Life Flight, and has served as a flight physician for hundreds of air
medical rescues and transfers.
He has coauthored textbooks on emergency medicine and firearms safety, written chapters for textbooks—including the tactical medicine
chapter in the International Trauma Life Support (ITLS) text—as well as multiple tactical medicine and research papers. Dr. Wipfler lectures
internationally (Japan, Taiwan, Hong Kong, others) and teaches tactical medicine, disaster preparedness, bioterrorism/WMD response, and
advanced emergency ultrasound at the University of Illinois College of Medicine.
In 1999, Dr. Wipfler developed one of the first emergency medicine residency program tactical medicine elective rotations in the world.
This is a 2-week training session that over 90% of the EM residents at UICOMP/OSF St. Francis Residency Program complete during their 3-
year training program. Many have graduated and moved on to new communities where they now serve as tactical physicians throughout the
United States.
As the co-chair of the Illinois Tactical Officers Association (ITOA) tactical EMS committee, he has been involved in expanding TEMS in
the Midwest and instructing Tactical EMS with the Chief Jeff Chudwin and the ITOA and other law agencies, and he has co-chaired the
annual ITOA Tactical Medicine Conference for 6 years. He gained valuable experience by teaching with Dr. Heiskell at the International
School of Tactical Medicine in California for many years.
In 2005, Dr. Wipfler was asked by officials with the Department of Homeland Security to serve with an 18-agency member tactical
medicine coalition in California, representing the Illinois Department of Public Health Tactical Medicine Committee. This California committee
worked with the California Commission on Police Officer Standards and Training and California EMS Authority (EMSA) to create the State of
California Tactical Medicine Operational Program and Standardized Training Recommendations, approved in March 2010.
He continues to engage in firearm competition, 3-gun matches, advanced pistol courses, and other training, which help keep his skills
sharp. Dr. Wipfler recently competed in the 2018 U.S. National Patrol Rifle Competition in Novi, Michigan (LE only), where he scored in the
top 9 shooters of over 100 law enforcement officers. For hobbies, he enjoys scuba diving, fishing, and continues to engage in mountaineering
with friends and family, having summited the Matterhorn, Mount Rainier, Mount Shasta, Mount Baker, Long’s Peak, Hallet’s Peak, and
others. He and his wife are blessed and very proud of their six children and many travels and family adventures they have shared together.
When he initiated one of the first tactical medicine teams in the Midwest, he began teaching EM residents about tactical medicine. At that
time, in 1999, there was no formal textbook of tactical medicine, and so he was honored to serve as the lead author and join with three
trusted friends (Chief Jim Smith, Dr. Heiskell, and Dr. Campbell) to assemble a textbook that gathered the input and expertise of over 120
seasoned professionals in prehospital and tactical medicine, fire, law enforcement, disaster response, military operations, and other talented
individuals. Many members of the ACEP Section of Tactical Medicine were able to provide valuable expert input. The resulting textbook,
published by Jones & Bartlett Learning, was endorsed by ACEP, and is now used to help educate students internationally. This new second
edition was enhanced even further by additional expert reviewers and with updated information. Dr. Wipfler considers it a true honor and a
privilege to medically support the brave men and women in blue and camo uniforms.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Special Thanks
The authors would like to extend a very special thanks to the following individuals who generously gave their talents, time, and extensive
knowledge to the formation and enhancement of this book:
Reviewers
Paul Abdey, Dip IMC RCS (Ed), Paramedic
Tactical Medicine Unit Manager
Kent Police
Maidstone, Kent, United Kingdom
Jeff W. Adams
Lieutenant (ret), Special Response Team Commander
Peoria Police Department
Peoria, Illinois
Sean Benson
Firearms Tactical Advisor, Bronze Commander, and Trainer
Firearms Training and Development Unit
Rotherham Police Station
Rotherham, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Dale Carrison, DO
Professor of Emergency Medicine
Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine
University of Nevada School of Medicine
Las Vegas, Nevada
Matthew Clark
State Registered Paramedic
Police Specialist Firearms Officer
United Kingdom
Jeff Chudwin, JD
President, Illinois Tactical Officers Association
Chief of Police (ret), Olympia Fields Police Department
Olympia Fields, Illinois
Tony Damiano
Tactical Medic
Polk County Sheriff Department
Bartow, Florida
Chris Dinsdale
Senior Lecturer, Prehospital Medicine
Tactical Medicine Specialist
Sheffield Hallam University
Sheffield, South Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Franco Dillena
Training Officer
Miramar Police Department
Miramar, Florida
George Z. Hevesy, MD
Chair, Department of Emergency Medicine
Attending Emergency Physician, OSF Healthcare Saint Francis Medical Center
Clinical Associate Professor of Emergency Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine
Tactical Physician (ret), Special Tactical Assistance Trauma Team (STATT)
Auxiliary Deputy Sheriff (ret), Peoria County Sheriff’s Office
Peoria, Illinois
Neil Jones
Firearms Instructor
Tactical Firearms Unit
Sussex Police
Lewes, Sussex, United Kingdom
Terry G. Kaufman
Tactical Medic, Lafayette Police Department
Manager, Flight Safety, Petroleum Helicopters, Inc.
Lafayette, Louisiana
Jacqueline E. Krajecki, RN, BSN, MSNA, EMT-LP, CEN, CCRN, CFRN, CRNA
Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetist
The Anesthesia Group of Sarasota
Sarasota, Florida
Justin M Lemieux, MD
Clinical Assistant Professor, Stanford Emergency Medicine
EMS/Disaster and Tactical Medicine
Medical Director/Field Physician San Mateo Regional Tactical EMS
Instructor, International School of Tactical Medicine
Medical Team Manager FEMA US&R CA-TF 3
Mountain View, California
David Q. McArdle, MD
Attending Emergency Physician, Georgia Emergency Associates, South East Georgia Medical Center, Brunswick, Georgia
Occupational Medicine Physician, Defense Support Systems LLC, Greenville, South Carolina
Federal Law Enforcement Training Center, Glynco, Georgia
Reserve Officer/Tactical Physician, University of Colorado Police at Boulder, Colorado
Affiliate Faculty Department of Criminology & Homeland Security, Regis University, Denver, Colorado
President, TacMedMD LLC
Medical Director, ColoradoSTAR
Centennial, Colorado
Kevin Olver
Police Tactical Firearms Trainer
Cleveland and Durham Police Tactical Training Centre
Stockton-on-Tees, Cleveland, United Kingdom
Lee Raube, DO
Attending Emergency Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine
Clinical Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine
University of Illinois College of Medicine
Tactical Physician, Special Tactical Assistance Trauma Team (STATT)
Deputy Sheriff, Woodford County Sheriff’s Office
Peoria, Illinois
Andrew Smith
Medical Emergency Response Team Paramedic
Royal Air Force
Chippenham, Wiltshire, United Kingdom
Chuck Soltys
Special Agent/EMT-B
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA)
Chicago, Illinois
Dan Toomey
Training Program Services
Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training
West Sacramento, California
Kenneth Whitman
Senior Law Enforcement Consultant, California Commission on Police Officer Standards and Training
Project Manager, POST Tactical Medicine Core Competencies Program, Sacramento, California
Lieutenant, Rocklin Fire Department
Rocklin, California
Erik Wright, MD
Chief Resident, Emergency Medicine Residency Program
OSF Healthcare Saint Francis Medical Center
Department of Emergency Medicine
University of Illinois College of Medicine
Tactical Physician, Special Tactical Assistance Trauma Team (STATT)
Deputy Sheriff, Woodford County Sheriff’s Office
Peoria, Illinois
Special thanks to the excellent men and women, and administrative support of: Palm Springs Police Department, California EMSA, California
Police Officer and Standards Advanced Medical Transport of Central Illinois, Peoria Police Department, Peoria County Sheriff’s Office,
Central Illinois Police Alarm System Region 6 team, Palm Springs Police Department, U.S. Marshals Service, U.S. Secret Service, Illinois
State Police Tactical Response Team, Sisters of the 3rd Order of Saint Francis in Peoria, Illinois, OSF Saint Francis Medical Center, Life
Flight/OSF Saint Francis Medical Center, Department of Emergency Medicine, Sister Judith Ann Duvall, Keith Steffen (CEO) and
administrative officers, OSF Saint Francis Medical Center.
FOREWORD
As we approach the 30th anniversary of Tactical Emergency Medical Support (TEMS), we see this essential specialty area in continued
evolution based on changing complex threats, which we collectively call “all hazards.” We also note that what started out as an aspiration 30
years ago is now a national standard for law enforcement teams involved in high-risk operations. We are grateful that since the inception of
the TEMS concept, many other tactical medicine programs have come forward to further our profession. These include but are not limited to
Counter Narcotics Tactical Operations Medical Support (CONTOMS), International School of Tactical Medicine (ITMS), International Tactical
EMS (ITEMS), Committee for Tactical Emergency Casualty Care (C-TECC), Committees of the National Association of EMS Physicians, the
American College of Emergency Physicians, and the American College of Surgeons.
TEMS, like our EMS systems, is largely a product of the rapid evolution of military medicine in combat, which then transfers the newly
acquired intellectual property, technology, and equipment to the civilian sector. From the earliest times of civilization, we see historical
artifacts demonstrating how Greek and Roman armies attempted to triage, transport, and care for injured soldiers. During the Napoleonic
wars of the very early 19th century, we also see how Baron Larrey implemented rapid transport of the combat injured via the first ambulances
who took the injured to definitive care. And, during our Korean and Vietnam wars, we began to see trauma registries, true field care through
well-trained medics, rapid transport, and the first trauma centers.
All of the aforementioned experiences have allowed us to develop the most sophisticated emergency medical and trauma care systems in
the world. Now a new iterative transformation is upon us due to complex evolving threats that inspire us to be innovative and disruptive as
these new threats required adjustments to our training, equipment, policies and procedures.
When we began TEMS in the late 1980s, we incorporated a military special operations model of medics being part of the operational
team since it made no sense that most SWAT teams then had little or no medical input for prevention, health, and safety, and, in fact, when
confronted with an injured suspect or officer in a tactical situation, they often had to call 911! The idea then, as it is now, is that the medic
provides scientifically sound advice to commanders on nutrition, exercise, selection of appropriate safety equipment, training and scope of
practices for TEMS incorporation, medical intelligence during operations, and when needed, scene medical care and coordination with local
EMS.
In the early TEMS days, most of our focus was on the most common missions at that time, warrant service, barricaded subjects, and an
occasional hostage rescue. Over the past three decades, we have once again witnessed the evolution of a set of new threats that include but
are not limited to domestic terrorism, mass casualty incidents, active shooters, the threats of global terrorism, and a propensity to see more
combat type casualties in a domestic urban environment. Hence, the “all hazards” domain continues to increase necessitating TEMS to
improve, modify, and adapt to these ever increasing and more complex threats.
From the ongoing Iraq and Afghanistan combat threats, we have learned the importance of “buddy care;” relearned the necessity for
tourniquet use; moved damage control surgery closer to the front; and advanced the science of fluid resuscitation, hemorrhage control, and
early management of head injuries.
Due to the Department of Defense Tactical Combat Casualty Care (TCCC) group chaired for over a decade by Dr. Frank Butler, we have
a global trauma registry that weekly captures all emerging data needed to guide us in our TEMS related practices. So unlike Vietnam, where
lessons learned took decades to translate to civilian EMS and emergency/trauma care practices, the TCCC has accelerated this translation
in real time in an unprecedented fashion. In addition, we have continued to see an increase in civilian TEMS-related academic and tactical
publications.
Our TEMS nomenclature, training, policies, and practices will continue to evolve as we incorporate TCCC data and mine our own data in
order to improve the health of our operators as well as decrease morbidity and mortality. Once again, we owe a debt of gratitude to our
authors who saw the need to revise the first edition due to the new threats and opportunities and to incorporate evolving contemporary
TCCC, national EMS and emerging new science data to generate cutting edge best practices.
Ron McCarthy
Los Angeles, California Police Department
Special Operations Team (LAPD SWAT) (ret.)
Los Angeles, California
Courtesy of Dr. John Wipfler and Dr. Lawrence Heiskell.
SECTION
1
CHAPTERS
1 History and Role of the Tactical Medical Provider
2 Safety and Wellness of the Tactical Medical Provider
3 Tactical Team Fundamentals
4 Equipment of the Tactical Medical Provider
5 Weapons Handling and Firearms Safety
6 Unconventional Weapons and Criminal Tactics
7 Medical Intelligence
8 Medical Response to Active Assailant Mass Casualty Incidents
9 Operational Tactics
10 Tactical Team Activations
Image credit FPO.
CHAPTER
1
OBJECTIVES
Define tactical medicine.
Define tactical emergency medical support (TEMS).
Discuss the history and evolution of TEMS.
Describe the civilian emergency medical system.
Describe the organization of and roles in law enforcement.
Discuss the history of Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) units.
Discuss the roles within the SWAT units.
List the roles and responsibilities of the tactical medical provider (TMP) before, during, and after a deployment.
Define bilateral command.
Describe the elements of TMP training.
Introduction
units are specialized law enforcement units that deal with a variety of critical (or high-risk) incidents including
Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT)
barricaded felony suspects, hostage rescue scenarios, perpetrators armed with military-style weapons, orga-nized crime, methamphetamine
laboratories with chemical and explosive threats, terrorist acts, bomb threats, dignitary protection, riots, and other hazards Figure 1-1 .
Tactical medicine is the services and emergency medical support needed to preserve the safety, health, and overall well-being of SWAT unit
personnel.
Tactical emergency medical support (TEMS) is the prehospital emergency care provided during SWAT unit training and deployment (critical
incidents and deployment). During training and deployment, SWAT unit personnel are accompanied by personnel trained in TEMS—known
as tactical medical providers (TMPs).
The mission of the TMP is to support the wellness of the SWAT unit and perform emergency medical care in the tactical environment for
any person in need, from SWAT unit personnel to suspect.
Training to become a TMP is challenging. The TMP often acts as the bridge between law enforcement and emergency medical services.
You will be challenged, both physically and mentally, during this course. You must keep your body in excellent condition so you can master
the skills needed to survive and provide medical care in a tactical environment. You must also remain mentally alert to cope with the various
conditions and stresses you will encounter.
This chapter discusses the history of tactical emergency medical support, the modern emergency care system, the roles in a SWAT unit,
the roles and responsibilities of a TMP, and the concept of bilateral command.
At the Scene
SWAT units are sometimes called by other names. Depending upon the local mission and other factors, SWAT units are sometimes assigned more general names such as special
response team (SRT) or emergency response team (ERT). SWAT unit personnel are referred to as SWAT officers or tactical officers.
The History of Tactical Emergency Medical Support
Napoleon Bonaparte and his surgeon, Dominique Jean Larrey, are recognized as having the first modern field medical evacuation system
integrated into combat units. Those wounded in Napoleon’s army were treated and evacuated by dedicated horse-drawn wagons and
medical personnel during battle. The availability and provision of battlefield medical care undoubtedly contributed to his army’s initial
success.
Later, during the American Civil War, Clara Barton helped show the benefits of providing medical stabilization of wounded soldiers before
and during transport from the battlefield. Her philosophy of treating soldiers as soon as possible was another step in the evolution of the
present day military and civilian prehospital emergency care systems.
World Wars I and II saw the development of ambulance corps to rapidly care for and remove injured persons from the battlefield to take
them to hospitals far from the front. But, during the 1950s and the Korean War, military medical researchers recognized that bringing the
hospital closer to the field would give patients a better chance of surviving Figure 1-2 . Helicopters, another new technology, brought patients
to Mobile Army Surgical Hospitals (M*A*S*H units) that helped thousands survive.
Figure 1-2 Temporary hospitals, such as this one in use during the Korean War, were set up to provide more rapid care for the injured.
Courtesy of the National Library of Medicine.
Over the years, US Special Forces teams such as Delta Force or SEAL, as well as international military and police special operations
teams such as the German GSG9 or the Russian Spetsnaz, have integrated personnel who were specifically trained and equipped for
special medical support during missions. Medical support has often contributed to the success of these missions. Over time, the evolution of
other special operations military teams occurred, and a majority of these included their own medical assets. A key principle was found to be
true: If a team cannot take care of injuries and illness, it is not a truly mobile, self-sufficient unit.
Unfortunately, emergency care of the injured and ill for civilians did not progress to a similar level. As late as the early 1960s, emergency
ambulance service and care across the United States varied widely. In some places, it was provided by well-trained advanced first aid
personnel who had well-equipped, modern ambulances. In a few urban areas, it was provided by hospital-based ambulance services that
were staffed with interns and early forms of prehospital care providers. In many areas, the only emergency care and ambulance service was
provided by the local funeral home using a hearse that could be converted to carry a cot. In other places, the police or fire department used a
station wagon that carried a cot and a first aid kit. In most cases, these vehicles were staffed by a driver and an attendant who had some
basic first aid training. In the few areas where a commercial ambulance was available to transport the ill, it was usually similarly staffed and
served primarily as a means to transport the patient to the hospital.
Many communities had no formal provision for prehospital emergency care or transportation. Injured persons were given basic first aid by
police or fire personnel at the scene and were transported to the hospital in a police or fire officer’s car. Sick patients were transported to the
hospital by a relative or neighbor and were met by their family physician or an on-call hospital physician who assessed them and then
summoned any specialists and operating room staff that were needed. Except in large urban centers, most hospitals did not have the same
emergency department staff available today.
The emergency medical services (EMS) system as we know it today had its origin in 1966 with the publication of Accidental Death and
Disability: The Neglected Disease of Modern Society, known more commonly as “The White Paper.” This report, prepared jointly by the
Committees on Trauma and Shock of the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, revealed to the public and Congress the
serious inadequacy of prehospital emergency care and transportation in many areas. As a result, Congress mandated that two federal
agencies address these issues. Funding sources and programs were created to develop improved systems of prehospital emergency care.
In 1969, Dr Eugene Nagel began training fire fighters from the Miami Fire Department with advanced emergency skills such as cardiac
monitoring and IV therapy. Dr Nagel also developed a telemetry system that enabled fire fighters to transmit a patient’s electrocardiogram to
physicians at Jackson Memorial Hospital and to receive radio instructions from the physicians regarding what measures to take.
In 1973, the Emergency Medical Services System Act defined the required components of an EMS system, with emphasis on regional
development and trauma care. The act provided a structure and uniformity to the EMS system that came out of pioneering programs in
Miami, Seattle, and Pittsburgh, and the Illinois Trauma System.
Many cities set up individual advanced EMS training, and regions added their own spin to what they thought was the essential standard of
care. In 1977, the first National Standard Curriculum for paramedics was developed by the US Department of Transportation, based on the
work of Dr Nancy Caroline.
Through the 1980s and 1990s, EMS continued to evolve and the number of trained personnel grew. Federal funding and staff were
reduced, and the responsibility for funding EMS was transferred to the states. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
developed “10 System Elements” in an effort to sustain EMS systems. The rapid advancement slowed greatly after this change in
responsibility, primarily because of funding issues. Although it was made clear that the federal funding being provided was just “seed money”
and that long-term local funding strategies needed to be developed, many states believed that the federal dollars would not go away.
Unfortunately, federal funding of EMS did become obsolete.
Civilian Emergency Medical Services
The emergency medical services (EMS) system of today consists of a team of health care professionals who, in each area or jurisdiction, are
responsible for and provide emergency care and transportation to the sick and injured. Each emergency medical service is part of a local or
regional EMS system that provides the many prehospital and hospital components required for the delivery of proper emergency medical
care. The standards for prehospital emergency care and the individuals who provide it are governed by the laws in each state and are
typically regulated by a state office of EMS.
In most states, individuals who work on an ambulance are categorized into four training and licensure levels: emergency medical responder
(EMR), emergency medical technician (EMT), advanced EMT (AEMT), and paramedic. An EMR has very basic training and provides care before the
ambulance arrives. EMRs may also perform in an assistant role within the ambulance. An EMT has training in basic life support, including
automated external defibrillation, use of airway adjuncts, and assisting patients with certain medications. An AEMT has training in specific
aspects of advanced life support (ALS), such as intravenous (IV) therapy and the administration of certain emergency medications. A paramedic has
extensive training in ALS, including endotracheal intubation, emergency pharmacology, cardiac monitoring, and other advanced assessment
and treatment skills.
Each EMS system has a physician medical director who authorizes the emergency medical provider in the service to provide medical care in
the field. The appropriate care for each injury, condition, or illness that the emergency medical provider encounters in the field is determined
by the medical director and is described in a set of written standing orders and scope of practice. Scope of practice is a comprehensive guide
delineating the emergency medical provider’s scope of practice. Standing orders are part of scope of practice and designate what the EMT is
required to do for a specific complaint or condition.
The medical director provides the ongoing working liaison between the medical community, hospitals, and the emergency medical
providers in the service. If treatment problems arise or different procedures should be considered, these are referred to the medical director
for his or her decision and action. To ensure the proper training standards are met, the medical director determines and approves the
continuing education and training that are required of each emergency medical provider in the service.
Law Enforcement Overview
Law enforcement officers—frompolice officers to SWAT officers—are empowered to enforce the law and preserve order. Law enforcement
officers are armed and authorized to use negotiation and physical force under certain conditions when carrying out their duties to prevent,
protect against, detect, investigate, and prosecute criminal behavior. Law enforcement organizations consist of many levels (ranks) and
positions. The names of these positions may vary throughout the United States, but the basic job description still applies. Positions in law
enforcement include:
Patrol officers. Patrol officers are the “eyes and ears” of law enforcement and are the largest component of a department. Patrol officers
usually patrol within assigned areas while in uniform as they tend to the immediate needs of the community. They are usually the first
responders on the scene.
Detectives (investigators). These officers have been promoted from patrol and conduct detailed follow-up investigations of assigned
cases (such as arson, rape, child abuse, homicide) with the goal of developing a case suitable for prosecution by the legal system of the
criminal offender.
Supervisors (sergeant, lieutenant). These officers coordinate and manage a group of personnel, such as patrol officers or detectives.
Chief executive officer (sheriff, chief of police, commissioner, marshal). This officer leads, coordinates, guides, and manages all
units and all personnel within the agency on a daily basis.
Specialized units. These law enforcement units are made up of officers with specialized training, including SWAT, internal affairs,
training, and detention.
The History of SWAT Units
Before 1966, few law enforcement agencies utilized SWAT units for calls involving high-risk conditions, such as barricaded suspects carrying
weapons. Regular patrol officers, who were often inadequately prepared, trained, and equipped, usually responded to these high-threat
assignments and resolved them with what they had on hand.
A series of significant historic events led to an increased interest in specially trained units for law enforcement agencies in the United
States. In 1965, the Los Angeles Watts Riots left over 1,000 wounded and 34 dead. The University of Texas clock tower shooting occurred
when an ex-soldier used several guns to kill 14 people and wound 32 others on August 1, 1966. Civil unrest and multiple riots in the mid-
1960s shook law enforcement agencies nationwide and forced them to consider how they would react to these violent acts in their own
jurisdictions.
In 1967, the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) was among the first to organize full-time SWAT units specifically trained to handle
high-risk incidents and has deployed paramedics with the SWAT unit since its inception. Over the past few decades, an increasing number of
SWAT units have incorporated the TEMS philosophy. In addition, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Hostage Rescue Team (HRT)
and other government special operations teams routinely deploy with a TEMS component.
The Beginnings of TEMS Units
Law enforcement agencies in the United States have become increasingly aware of the value and benefits of a TEMS program. On a
national level, there were meetings in 1989 and 1990 that further explored ideas and concepts of providing emergency medical support to
SWAT units. In 1991, the first abstract and presentation speaking to this issue was delivered at the National Association of Emergency
Medical Services Physicians meeting. In January 1993, a Subcommittee on Tactical Emergency Medicine was formed within the California
Chapter of the American College of Emergency Medicine. The first National SWAT Physicians Conference took place in March of 1993.
Several tactical medicine training programs also began in the early 1990s.
Today, training courses and tactical medicine conferences occur with increasing frequency. TEMS is an evolving specialty that is
increasingly utilized by law enforcement agencies to save lives and ensure that SWAT units have the ability to resolve critical incidents as
safely as possible.
Roles Within the SWAT Unit
SWAT units around the world have a similar organization of duties. Each SWAT unit member has a special area of expertise, such as
assault, arrest, rescue, negotiations, and/or TEMS. Many SWAT officers are cross-trained and are able to fill in for several positions outside
their specialties if needed. During deployment (or a mission), each SWAT officer is assigned a specific role or position Figure 1-3 .
Figure 1-3 During a deployment (or mission), each SWAT officer is assigned a specific role or position.
Courtesy of John Wipfler.
The following SWAT unit positions are usually deployed during a deployment:
Incident commander. Typically an upper-level law enforcement administrator who supervises the entire operation from the incident command
center.
Tactical operations leader.
Usually assumed by a mid-level law enforcement lieutenant who has extensive tactical experience. The tactical
operations leader directs the details of the deployment from either the incident command center or from a separate but nearby tactical
operations center (TOC).
Team leader. Directs the SWAT unit personally when entering buildings and is often located in the middle of the entry team line.
Immediate reaction team. A group of five to seven SWAT officers and at least two TMPs who stand ready to immediately respond while
detailed tactical plans involving the entire SWAT unit are being created.
Marksmen (snipers). Located in a hidden position close to the criminal suspects, usually two or more marksmen observe and provide
information, security, and precision long-range threat neutralization Figure 1-4 .
Figure 1-4 Marksmen are positioned in a hidden location that allows them to observe suspects and provide immediate neutralization of
threats.
Courtesy of Lawrence Heiskell.
Observer. Deploys with the marksmen to assist and provide area security.
Point man. Guides the entry team to the deployment area and enters the building or other structure first, equivalent to the point of a spear.
Breacher. Carries a heavy metal battering ram and other tools (eg, crowbars, explosive entry devices, and hydraulic rams) to force open
doors or walls Figure 1-5 .
Figure 1-5 Explosive devices may be used by the breacher to gain entry into the structure.
Courtesy of Lawrence Heiskell.
Entry team. Usually four to eight SWAT officers are part of an entry team. The entry team is responsible for finding and arresting criminal
suspects and clearing the building. Depending upon the deployment, the entry team may be responsible for rescuing hostages or clearing
and securing specific rooms.
Gasman. If the situation calls for it, the gasman may shoot or throw chemical agents into a building with the goal of forcing the criminal
suspect(s) to leave the building.
Rear guard. Provides rear security for the entry team.
Tactical medical providers. TMPs provide medical support before, during, and after SWAT deployment. They may be organized as a
subunit within a SWAT unit in order to provide comprehensive coverage. Tactical emergency medical care can also be provided by
designated SWAT officers with ALS training.
In addition to the previously mentioned positions, there are several additional personnel who may play a significant role in a SWAT
callout, depending upon the callout. The following positions are deployed on a case-by-case basis, and are not common among all SWAT
units:
Negotiations team. A group of law enforcement officers with special training in crisis negotiations and psychology. The negotiations teams
help resolve a large percentage of SWAT incidents and are an integral part of SWAT units.
K-9 officer. A law enforcement officer who trains and deploys dogs used to search a building, apprehend a fleeing subject, and sniff for
drugs and explosives.
Rescue team. A backup team of SWAT officers that is designated to stand by, ready to come to the aid of or supplement the primary entry
team. It will ideally contain TMPs.
Perimeter security team. Composed of additional, uniformed patrol officers and undercover patrol officers who are usually needed to provide
an outer-perimeter security ring, to help ensure that no criminal suspects leave the callout site, and to prevent bystanders from entering
the high-threat inner perimeter.
Bomb squad. Composed of specially trained law enforcement officers and specialists who have unique equipment and protective gear to
assist in recognition and inactivation or neutralization of explosive threats.
Roles and Responsibilities of the Tactical Medical Provider
The specific responsibilities of the TMP vary depending upon the type of deployment and the level of care that the TMP is authorized to
provide, from BLS (EMR and EMT levels) to ALS (AEMT and paramedic levels) Figure 1-6 . The primary responsibility of the TMP is to
provide emergency care inside or near the inner perimeter. The secondary responsibility is to optimize the health and safety of the SWAT
unit.
Figure 1-6 The TMP has key roles before, during, and after deployment. Here, the SWAT unit and TEMS unit are participating in a
premission briefing.
Courtesy of John Wipfler.
Figure 1-7 A TEMS unit conducting officer down drills during training.
Courtesy of Lawrence Heiskell.
Identifying and preparing for any preexisting medical conditions of SWAT officers
Making recommendations to optimize internal policies related to TEMS and general law enforcement health issues
Serving as a resource for any medical concerns that affect the law enforcement agency
During deployment, the TEMS unit is responsible for:
Remaining available to provide emergency medical care for those in need (ideally remaining close enough to respond within a 30-second
response time for all injured SWAT officers)
Participating in mission planning, preparing an assessment of medical threats, and providing appropriate advice while keeping the
mission appropriately confidential to avoid any information leaks that would jeopardize the SWAT unit
Preplanning and arranging emergency medical evacuation and transportation pertinent to the mission, including methods of transport,
appropriate selection and notification of hospitals, and route planning
Providing appropriate preventive and immediate medical care to SWAT officers, other law enforcement officers, and public safety
personnel
Providing secondary emergency care and triage for those in need, including bystanders, suspects, or others on site at the discretion of
the SWAT unit leaders
Providing “assessment and clearing” of suspects prior to incarceration as directed by the SWAT unit leader or commander
Advising the command staff of developing medical concerns, and remaining available for medical consultation to the SWAT unit
leadership
Performing remote assessment of any downed victims in exposed areas and then advising the incident commander about the likely
viability of the victims (their chances for survival)
Improving SWAT unit performance and morale by the presence of immediate medical support, which has positive psychological benefits
Functioning as a liaison with the local EMS system, hospitals, and officials from other public safety and law enforcement agencies
After a mission, the TEMS unit is responsible for:
Participating in postincident debriefing and review, assisting command staff with analysis of the operation/training event and any medical
care delivered, and making improvements to the TEMS unit, policies, and procedures as needed
Reviewing and documenting all medical treatment and records relevant to operational or training missions
Appropriately optimizing treatment, rehabilitation, and mental health for injured SWAT officers through involvement with hospitals,
physicians, family, and police department officials, while maintaining HIPAA/patient confidentiality regulations
Incorporating “lessons learned” into future unit training and preparedness, thus assisting with preventive medicine efforts and the
improvement of care
Bilateral Command
Typically, TMPs operate under the daily direction of the EMS medical director. During a tactical operation, however, the involved law
enforcement agency is usually in charge of the overall scene. In situations where the TEMS unit is made up of emergency medical care
providers from both law enforcement and civilian public safety agencies, a bilateral command exists. It is important to determine who is
actually in control of the TEMS unit before training and callout missions.
In most circumstances, TMPs report directly to the law enforcement tactical operations leader (usually the lieutenant of the SWAT unit)
during a mission. However, the scope of practice and procedures surrounding medical care and medical decision making are ultimately left to
the EMS medical director. Therefore, this bilateral command structure, where law enforcement assumes command in the field while medical
direction is given remotely, exists in most tactical environments. If a TMP is employed by the fire department and is essentially on loan to the
police department, then the leadership structure and chain of command will be worked out by the involved agencies, but in most cases the
mission priorities of the law enforcement leadership involved will have priority.
At the Scene
In most agencies, the EMS medical director has ultimate control and authority over the TEMS unit. In some agencies, an additional physician may assume the medical direction for the
TEMS unit, providing off-line direction via procedures and scope of practice and providing online direction in person or over the radio. This additional physician may also assist with
maintaining the health of the TEMS and SWAT units.
At the Scene
If a group of medical providers (such as TMPs in a TEMS unit) enters into a mutual aid agreement or contract to provide medical support for another public safety entity or
government organization in a certain state, then that medical unit must function under the rules and regulations of the state EMS regulatory system.
TMPs rarely encounter discrepancies between on-scene command and medical direction because they should be trained in specific
tactical medical scope of practice taking into consideration each approach to the patient in the tactical environment. Furthermore, direct
online communication with medical control is often not possible or practical in the tactical environment. Thorough medical care is sometimes
tactically inadvisable; therefore, in the chaotic tactical environment, the effective leadership by SWAT incident commanders should be
followed to maximize unit safety. Medical procedures and patient assessment will be done only after the tactical environment has been
appropriately stabilized. Therefore, the bilateral command issue is more theoretical in practical application.
Online medical direction, communicated face-to-face, by radio, by cell phone, or by another device, should be sought whenever there is a
question about the most appropriate medical treatment option for a patient, or to receive advice in uncertain situations. For TMPs who
function as part of a regional, statewide, or nationwide SWAT unit, and whose callout territory may take them outside of their own EMS
region, the command structure differs. In this case, the medical direction should be arranged and provided to the TEMS unit by an EMS
physician with wider jurisdiction. Ideally, the provision of medical direction consists of pre-established scope of practice and policies modified
specifically for the tactical environment. Follow the scope of practice and policies of your agency.
At the Scene
In nearly all circumstances, TMPs are required to comply with the state-mandated EMS rules and regulations, which may be diverse and complex. In addition, unique medical tactics,
techniques, and procedures (TTP) may be specially permitted for the TEMS unit after appropriate EMS application and approval is given on an individual unit basis by the state EMS
agency.
Command Systems: LIMS and NIMS
The Law Enforcement Incident Management System (LIMS) is based upon the National Incident Management System (NIMS). NIMS is the
standardized incident management scope of practice used throughout the United States, which is now required in all law enforcement
operations. Under the LIMS system, there is a law enforcement incident commander (IC) who serves as command in most callouts Figure 1-
8 .
As in NIMS, under LIMS each law enforcement agency uses a similar scaleable incident management system but may elect to add or
remove various components, such as the operations or planning sections. If the incident is large and involves multiple agencies, this
framework may be included within a unified command with representatives from various agencies such as law enforcement, EMS, fire
service, public works, and elected officials serving as the commanders in a unified command structure. However, only law enforcement
managers command and direct law enforcement agency assets and operations.
Under LIMS, the safety officer and/or the TEMS unit can observe and report directly to the law enforcement IC any safety concerns, and
can halt operations if a substantial hazard is discovered that will endanger personnel and the success of the mission. The planning section
reports to the law enforcement IC and assists in providing viable plans to resolve the incident and intelligence on the suspects involved. The
logistics and finance/administration sections secure the needed personnel and material items to support the operation. Logistics is also
responsible for the staging of law enforcement, EMS, and other assets. The operations manager directly supervises tactical operations.
Usually the entry team, tactical marksmen, and the TEMS unit report to the operations manager, and it is usually necessary for the TMP to
interface through the external EMS system.
Tactical Medical Provider Training
Figure 1-9 Cooperative training exercises enable TMPs to provide effective medical care in the tactical environment.
Courtesy of Lawrence Heiskell.
The bottom line is that you must have a baseline understanding of law enforcement and the operational aspects of the SWAT unit. In
every unit, the primary role of the TMP is medical support, but, as in any uncontrolled environment, the unexpected sometimes occurs. You
must be prepared to make a split-second decision when faced with an armed and high-threat criminal suspect. There will be times when a
SWAT officer may not be immediately present to assist in resolving the situation. You should learn and know use of force, self-defense laws,
arrest and control techniques, and combat skills. Additional skills necessary in the tactical environment might include crowd control, weapon
retention, and use of less-lethal weapons Figure 1-11 .
If the TEMS unit is authorized to carry self-defense weapons, you must complete initial training and qualification, and ongoing
requalification weapons requirements. Most armed units require completion of training held to the same standard as a law enforcement
officer in basic police academy Figure 1-12 .
Figure 1-12 Armed TEMS units must complete all required weapons training.
Courtesy of John Wipfler.
Regardless of whether or not the medical personnel are armed, at a minimum all TMPs should learn and maintain skills in safe weapons
handling and unloading, as well as techniques for rendering weapons safe. Participation in routine marksmanship training is desirable, and
medical personnel should be familiar with all types of weapons used by the SWAT unit.
Unit Training
You will receive perhaps your most valuable education as you routinely participate with your own SWAT unit on a monthly basis. Most SWAT
units are part-time and practice once or twice a month for about 8 to 16 hours per month. Larger US cities may have a full-time SWAT unit
(eg, Los Angeles, New York City) who train and participate in high-risk warrant service and tactical deployment essentially every day. Tactical
training sessions offer a good opportunity to learn about and practice the unit’s tactics and tools. More importantly, training offers
opportunities to practice downed officer immediate action drills and other skills in order to perfect and maintain your own tactical medical
knowledge and skills.
Safety
Weapons training for TMPs must stress that, in the tactical environment, weapons should not be “fired and forgotten.” TMPs should maintain weapons-handling skills and always seek
to improve on their education.
Two components are necessary for effective routine TEMS training: TEMS unit and SWAT unit involvement. TEMS training should be
well-coordinated with routine SWAT training in order to ensure that all personnel (medical and nonmedical) are familiarized with each other’s
tools, techniques, and skills Figure 1-13 . Routine training for SWAT and TEMS personnel should include tactical law enforcement training for
TMPs, combat first aid training for SWAT officers, and training specific to unique hazards of the tactical environment (eg, hazardous
materials, bloodborne pathogens). Cross-training within the SWAT unit as well as with other agencies involved in responses is an important
consideration.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
climate, upon an equal soil, freely pasture his herds and flocks where
he pleases, and love his neighbor better than himself.
OUR FARMERS.
The test of profitable farming is the state of the account at the end
of the year. Under free trade the evidence multiplies that the English
farmer comes to the end of the year with no surplus, often in debt,
bare and discontented. Their laborers rarely know the luxury of
meat, not over sixteen ounces per week,[87] and never expect to own a
rood of the soil.
But under the protective policy the American farmer holds and
cultivates his own land, has a surplus at the end of the year for
permanent investments or improvements, and educates and brings
up his sons and daughters with the advantages and comforts of good
society. There are more American houses with carpets than in any
other country of the world. I believe it will not be disputed that the
down-trodden tillers of the soil in Great Britain are not well fed; that
they are coarsely underclad, and that for lack of common-school
culture they would hardly be regarded as fit associates here for
Americans who drive their teams afield, or for the young men who
start in life as laborers upon farms. The claim that free trade is the
true policy of the American farmer would seem to be, therefore, a
very courageous falsehood.
It is an unfortunate tendency of the age that nearly one-half of the
population of the globe is concentrated in cities, often badly
governed, and sharply exposed to extravagance, pauperism,
immorality, and all the crimes and vices which overtake mankind
reared in hot-beds. I would neither undervalue the men of brilliant
parts, nor blot out the material splendor of cities, but regret to see
the rural districts depopulated for their unhealthy aggrandizement.
Free trade builds up a few of these custom-house cities, where gain
from foreign trade is the chief object sought, where mechanics,
greater in numbers than any other class, often hang their heads,
though Crœsus rolls in Pactolian wealth, and Shylock wins his pound
of flesh; but protection assembles artisans and skilled workmen in
tidy villages and towns, details many squadrons of industry to other
and distant localities, puts idle and playful waterfalls at work, opens,
builds up, and illumines, as with an electric light, the whole interior
of the country; and the farmer of Texas or of New England, of Iowa
or of Wisconsin, is benefited by such reinforcements of consumers,
whether they are by his side or across the river, at Atlanta or South
Bend, at Paterson or at Providence. The farmers own and occupy
more than nineteen-twentieths of our whole territory, and their
interest is in harmony with the even-handed growth and prosperity
of the whole country.
There is not a State whose interests would not be jeopardized by
free trade, and I should like to dwell upon the salient facts as to
Missouri, Kansas, Indiana, Alabama, Illinois, and many other States,
but I shall only refer to one. The State of Texas, surpassing empires
in its vast domains, doubling its population within a decade, and
expending over twenty million dollars within a year in the
construction of additional railroads, with a promised expenditure
within the next fifteen months of over twenty-seven millions more,
has sent to market as raw material the past year 12,262,052 pounds
of hides, 20,671,639 pounds of wool, and 1,260,247 bales of cotton.
Her mineral resources, though known to be immense, are as yet
untouched. Her bullocks, in countless herds on their way to market,
annually crowd and crop the prairies from Denver to Chicago. But
now possessed of a liberal system of railroads, how long will the
dashing spirit of the Lone Star State—where precious memories still
survive of Austin, of Houston, of Rusk, and of Schleicher—be content
to send off unmanufactured her immense bulk of precious raw
materials, which should be doubled in value at home, and by the
same process largely multiply her population? With half as many in
number now as had the original thirteen, and soon to pass our
largest States, wanting indefinite quantities of future manufactures
at home, Texas should also prepare to supply the opening trade with
Mexico, in all of its magnitude and variety, and far more worthy of
ambition than in the golden days of Montezuma.
No State can run and maintain railroads unless the way-stations,
active and growing settlements and towns, are numerous enough to
offer a large, constant, and increasing support. The through business
of long lines of railroads is of great importance to the termini, and
gives the roads some prestige, but the prosperity and dividends
mainly accrue from the local business of thrifty towns on the line of
the roads. It is these, especially manufacturing towns, which make
freight both ways, to and from, that free trade must ever fail to do,
and while through freights, owing to inevitable competition, pay little
or no profit, the local freights sustain the roads, and are and must be
the basis of their chief future value. Without this efficient local
support, cheap and rapid long transportation would be wholly
impracticable.
The Southern States, in the production of cotton, have possibly
already reached the maximum quantity that can be cultivated with
greatest profit, unless the demand of the world expands. A short crop
now often brings producers a larger sum than a full crop. The
amount of the surplus sent abroad determines the price of the whole
crop. Production appears likely soon to outrun the demand. Texas
alone has latent power to overstock the world. Is it not time,
therefore, to curtail the crop, or to stop any large increase of it, while
sure to obtain as much or more for it, and to turn unfruitful capital
and labor into other and more profitable channels of industry? The
untrodden fields, where capital and labor wait to be organized for the
development of Southern manufactures and mining, offer unrivaled
temptations to leaders among men in search of legitimate wealth.
The same facts are almost equally applicable to general
agriculture, but more particularly to the great grain-growing regions
of the West. A great harvest frequently tends to render the labor of
the whole year almost profitless, whenever foreign countries are
blessed with comparatively an equal abundance. The export of corn
last year in October was 8,535,067 bushels, valued at $4,604,840,
but the export of only 4,974,661 bushels this year brings $3,605,813.
An equal difference appears in the increased value of exports of flour.
A much larger share of crops must be consumed nearer home, if any
sure and regular market is to be permanently secured. The foreign
demand, fitful and uncertain as it is, rarely exceeds one-twentieth of
even the present home requirements, and the losses from long
transportation, incident to products of great bulk, can never be
successfully avoided except by an adequate home demand.
Farmers do not look for a market for grain among farmers, but
solely among non-producing consumers, and these it is greatly to
their interest to multiply rather than to diminish by forcing them to
join in producing or doubling crops for which there may be an
insufficient demand. Every ship-load of wheat sent abroad tends to
bring down foreign prices; and such far-off markets should be sought
only when the surplus at home is excessive or when foreign prices
are extraordinarily remunerative.
The wheat regions of the West, superb as they undoubtedly are, it
is to be feared, have too little staying character to be prodigally
squandered, and their natural fertility noticeably vanishes in the rear
unless retained by costly fertilizers almost as rapidly as new fields
open in front. Some of the Middle States as well as the New England,
though seeking fertilizers far and near, already look to the West for
much of their corn and bread; and there is written all over Eastern
fields, as Western visitors may read, the old epitaph, “As we are now
so you may be.” It will take time for this threatened decadence, but
not long in the life of nations. The wheat crop runs away from the
Atlantic coast to the Pacific, and sinks in other localities as it looms
up in Minnesota, Nebraska, and Dakota. Six years of cropping in
California, it is said, reduces the yield per acre nearly one-half.
There was in 1880 devoted to wheat culture over thirty-five million
acres, or nearly double the acreage of 1875. In twenty-five years a
hundred million people will more than overtake any present or
prospective surplus, and we may yet need all of our present
magnificent wheat fields to give bread to our own people. Certainly
we need not be in haste to slaughter and utterly exhaust the native
fertility of our fields on the cheap terms now presented.
England, with all her faults, is great, but unfortunately has not
room to support her greatness, and must have cheap food and be
able to offer better wages or part with great numbers of her people. I
most sincerely hope her statesmen—and she is never without those
of eminence—will prove equal to their great trust and to any crisis;
but we cannot surrender the welfare of our Republic to any foreign
empire. Free trade may or may not be England’s necessity. Certainly
it is not our necessity; and it has not reached, and never will reach,
the altitude of a science. An impost on corn there, it is clear, would
now produce an exodus of her laboring population that would soon
leave the banner of Victoria waving over a second-rate power.
Among the nations of the world the high position of the United
States was never more universally and cordially admitted. Our rights
are everywhere promptly conceded, and we ask nothing more. It is
an age of industry, and we can only succeed by doing our best. Our
citizens under a protective tariff are exceptionally prosperous and
happy, and not strangers to noble deeds nor to private virtues. A
popular government based on universal suffrage will be best and
most certainly perpetuated by the elevation of laboring men through
the more liberal rewards of diversified employments, which give
scope to all grades of genius and intelligence and tend to secure to
posterity the blessings of universal education and the better hope of
personal independence.
Speech of Hon. J. D. Cameron, of Penna.