Implementing Mindfulness Practices With Parents of Young Children in A Low-Socioeconomic Status Neighborhood
Implementing Mindfulness Practices With Parents of Young Children in A Low-Socioeconomic Status Neighborhood
Implementing Mindfulness Practices With Parents of Young Children in A Low-Socioeconomic Status Neighborhood
Fall 2019
Corresponding Author
Andrew T. Roach (aroach@gsu.edu)
Recommended Citation
Roach, Andrew T.; Mhende, Josephine; Barger, Brian A.; and Roberts, Douglas A. (2019) "Implementing
Mindfulness Practices With Parents of Young Children in a Low-Socioeconomic Status Neighborhood,"
Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association: Vol. 7 : No. 2 , Article 6.
DOI: 10.20429/jgpha.2019.070206
Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/jgpha/vol7/iss2/6
This original research is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Digital Commons@Georgia
Southern. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association by an authorized
administrator of Digital Commons@Georgia Southern. For more information, please contact
digitalcommons@georgiasouthern.edu.
Roach et al.: Implementing Mindfulness Practices With Parents of Young Children in a Low-Socioeconomic Status Neighborhood
Original Research
Implementing Mindfulness Practices With Parents of Young Children in a Low-
Socioeconomic Status Neighborhood
Andrew T. Roach, PhD1, Josephine Mhende, MPH1, Brian A. Barger, PhD1, and Douglas A. Roberts, MEd1
1
Center for Leadership in Disability, School of Public Health, Georgia State University
Corresponding Author: Andrew T. Roach 75 Piedmont Avenue Suite 514, Atlanta, GA 30303 (404) 413-1339 aroach@gsu.edu
ABSTRACT
Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether instruction in mindfulness practices would results in improved
self-reported mindfulness and reduced depression, anxiety, and family stress in parents of young children living in a low
socioeconomic status (SES) neighborhood.
Methods: The study utilized a pretest-posttest group design to evaluate the effectiveness of the Mindfulness Ambassador
Council-Interactive curriculum with attendees in a parent support program. Participants (n=15) were recruited from families with
young children who received support from a community-based organization in one low-SES neighborhood in Atlanta. Mental
health assessments, measures of family stress and parenting competency, and a demographic questionnaire with non-identifying
questions were administered to all participants during the first and last session of the 8-week mindfulness program.
Results: Participants reported increased mindfulness and decreased levels of anxiety and depression. Parent reports of family
stressors were relatively stable across the two time points, while self-reported parenting competence decreased.
Discussion: Based on the parents’ reports of program acceptability and the impact on their well-being, mindfulness training
appears to be a promising strategy for addressing the stressors experienced by parents of young children.
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/jgpha/vol7/iss2/6
DOI: 10.20429/jgpha.2019.070206 50
Roach et al.: Implementing Mindfulness Practices With Parents of Young Children in a Low-Socioeconomic Status Neighborhood
interactions are critical for child brain development. For 3. Will participation in the MAC Interactive program lead
example, Siegel and Payne Bryson (2015) reported that the to reductions in family stress and improvements in
way parents interact and respond during moments of stress parenting competence as reported by participants?
and conflict greatly influences their children’s cognitive and 4. Do participants view mindfulness training an acceptable
social-emotional development. This is especially true for and useful component for inclusion in parenting
toddlers and preschoolers, whose brains and behavioral education programs?
repertoires are developing rapidly. Parents who are taught
mindfulness practices may be better able to handle difficult This study utilized a pretest-posttest group design to address
interactions with their children as they arise, modeling these questions and determine the effectiveness and
emotional regulation and problem solving for their children. acceptability of an integrated mindfulness-parenting
education program.
One area in need of further exploration is the effectiveness
of mindful practices with parents in low-SES communities
who may be at risk for higher levels of stress and METHODS
depression. Increasing parental mindfulness has been
hypothesized to allow parents to be more present during Institutional review board approval
daily activities with their child, resulting better moment-to- The research reported in this manuscript was reviewed and
moment parenting decisions and improving the quality of approved by the Georgia State University Institutional
parent-child interactions. It is important to demonstrate Review Board (IRB).
these effects when implementing mindfulness with parents
and children who may most at-risk for negative outcomes. Participants and setting
Mindfulness practices also may support parents of young Like many other communities locate within urban cores, the
children in interrupting the impact of adverse childhood neighborhood where we conducted the study has
experiences (ACEs) and other environmental stressors experienced entrenched, multi-generational poverty,
prevalent in low-SES communities (Bethell et al., 2016). elevated levels of crime and substance abuse, and
inadequate access to services and supports. The CBO where
The purpose of the current study is to investigate whether the study was conducted is located in the middle of this
mindfulness practices are useful in addressing feelings of neighborhood, making it a central meeting point for the
depression, anxiety, and stress in parents of young children families residing here. Based upon 2000-2016 data, this
living in low-SES neighborhoods. Based on neighborhood low-SES neighborhood has an area of approximately 0.464
parents’ feedback and requests, the community-based square miles with a population of under 3,000 people (City-
organization (CBO) that was providing A Great Start for data, 2016). Eighty-four percent of neighborhood residents
Parents & Children, a parent support program, decided to are African American and 45.7% of the population living
pursue including mindfulness in its offerings to address under the federal poverty level ($25,100 for
parents’ stress, build their social-emotional competence, and families/households of four people) (City-data, 2016). Lack
facilitate their effective parenting. The CBO reached out to of education and employment are significant neighborhood
researchers at GSU for assistance in including mindfulness problems; 32% of residents have less than a high school
training in the parent-focused offerings. The first and second diploma and 24.3% are unemployed. The neighborhood is
authors worked with CBO staff and a group of community considered “a food desert” (i.e. an area where access to
stakeholders to make small modifications to an existing fresh fruits and vegetables is limited), while accelerated
mindfulness curriculum to improve its alignment with the gentrification in surrounding areas of the city is leading to
needs of low-SES parents with young children. increased costs of living for neighborhood residents. More
than half of neighborhood households are cost-burdened
Implementation of the 8-week Mindfulness Ambassador when it comes to housing, using over 30% of their income
Council Interactive (MAC Interactive) program was to cover housing costs. The neighborhood also has a high
intended to (a) increase self-reported mindfulness, (b) crime-index, and it ranks third in Atlanta for the number of
decrease stress, anxiety, and depression, and (c) improve individuals incarcerated or returning from incarceration
participants’ sense of parenting competency. Data was (Participant Consulting, 2017).
collected and analyzed to address the following research
questions: The participants of this study were 15 parents and caregivers
1. Will participation in the MAC Interactive program lead of young children (birth to 5 years old) who expressed
to increased levels of mindfulness as reported by interest in a parent support group that was facilitated by the
participants? CBO as part of its services to neighborhood residents.
2. Will participation in the MAC Interactive program lead Parents were invited to participate in a mindfulness
to improved mental health for participating parents? curriculum, which was presented on the same evening as the
a. Will participation in the MAC Interactive existing parent support program. The average age of the
program lead to reductions in self-reported participants was 32.0 years old (SD = 9.7). Thirteen of the
anxiety? 15 participants (87%) were female. All participants (100%)
b. Will participation in the MAC Interactive identified as Black/African American. The average number
program lead to reductions in self-reported of children for each parent was 2.5 children (SD = 1.2).
depression? Thirty-three percent of participants were high school
Assessments and Measures respondents to report feelings of anxiety for the past month.
The following measures were administered to participants This inventory consists of 21 items with item response
following the first and eighth intervention session. options from 0 to 3, and a total possible score of 63 points.
In previous research, the BAI has demonstrated sufficient
The Five Facets of Mindfulness Questionnaire, Short Form internal consistence (α = .73) and test-retest reliability (.75)
(FFMQ-SF; Bohlmeiher et al., 2011) was used to assess as well as a moderate correlation (.51) with other measures
participants’ tendency to be mindful in their everyday lives. of anxiety (Beck et al., 1988).
Like the original form of the same instrument (Baer et al.,
2006), the FFMQ-SF is comprised of five subscales that The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
correspond with distinct components of mindfulness: (a) (CES-D) is a 20-item assessment that asks respondents to
observing internal and external experiences, (b) describing report how often in the past weeks they have experienced
or labeling internal experiences with words, (c) acting with symptoms of depression. Responses are scored on a 4-point
awareness, which includes attending to one’s activities in scale ranging from 0 (rarely, none of the time) to 3 (most, or
the moment, (d) non-judging of inner experiences (i.e. all of the time). Total scores for this measure can range from
taking a non-evaluative stance to thoughts and feelings), and 0-60; higher scores indicate more depressive symptomology
(d) non-reactivity to inner experiences, including allowing (Radloff, 1977). The CES-D has demonstrated sufficient
thoughts to come and go without being carried away by internal consistency with both clinical (α = .85) and non-
them. The FFMQ-SF consists of 24 Likert scale items and clinical (α = .91.-.94) samples. The CES-D provides a cutoff
takes less than 5 minutes to complete. In initial validation of score (16 or greater) that indicates the possible presence of
the FFMQ-SF (Bohlmeiher et al., 2011), the scale clinical depression (Lewinsohn, Seeley, Roberts, & Allen,
demonstrated a similar factor structure to the original 39- 1997).
item form. Possible scores ranged from 24 to 120, with
possible item response options ranging from 1 (never or The Family Event Checklist (FEC; Oregon Social Learning
very rarely true) to 5 (very often or always true). In previous Center, 1985) is a 41-item instrument used for examining
research, all five subdomains demonstrated sufficient different components of familial stress. FEC items ask
internal consistency (α = .73 to .91) and higher scores on the respondents to report if an event occurred in their family
FFMQ-SF were associated with higher self-report positive during the previous week and, if it occurred, the severity of
mental health (r = .20 to .37) and lower reported anxiety and the impact of that event. Item response options range from 1
depression (r = -.02 to -25). (no, the event did not occur) to 4 (yes, the event did occur
and had a very negative effect on you). A single measure of
The Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI; Beck, Epstien, Brown, family stress is computed by summing respondents’ scores
& Steer, 1988) is a commonly used scale that asks
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/jgpha/vol7/iss2/6
DOI: 10.20429/jgpha.2019.070206 52
Roach et al.: Implementing Mindfulness Practices With Parents of Young Children in a Low-Socioeconomic Status Neighborhood
across the items. Total scores for the FEC range from 41- exception of the first session) began with an opening
164. mindfulness practice (e.g., breath observation). This was
followed by a council check-in, which provided facilitators
The Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC; (Gibaud- with an opportunity to “take the temperature” of the group
Wallston & Wandersman, 1978) is a 17-item measure of (e.g., participants were asked to share how they were feeling
two dimensions of parenting competence: parenting or something they had experienced since the last weekly
satisfaction and parenting efficacy. PSOC items have session). After council check-in, the group reviewed the
response options ranging from 1 to 6 resulting in a total home assignment from the last session, and had the
possible score of 102. Previous research with the PSOC has opportunity to share any challenges and or self-observations
resulted in varying factor structures across different from the home practice. A central feature of each session
samples. In light of this we used, the PSOC total scale score was council dialogue. During each session, participants
which has demonstrate acceptable internal consistency (α = were presented with videos and short readings that provided
.75-.88) in previous research (Ohan, Lueng, & Johnston, a prompt for deeper discussion of the instructional theme for
2000). that session (See Figure 1 for a list of themes and content
for each MAC session). After the video or reading was
The Mindfulness Ambassador Council (MAC) Student presented to the group, the facilitators posed council
Survey is a program-specific measure developed to evaluate dialogue questions and encouraged members to share
the effectiveness of the MAC curriculum. The MAC Student personal responses and insights (although members were
Survey consists of 11 Likert scale items with response reminded it was okay to pass and not to contribute to the
options ranging from 1 to 4, and a total possible score of 44 discussion).
points.
After the council dialogue, a second mindfulness practice
Procedures was presented with time for reflection and discussion.
The MAC Interactive curriculum was comprised of a total
of eight weekly lessons. Each week’s lesson (with the
1. Meeting One: Discovering Mindfulness
Mindfulness Practice: TAKE 5
2. Meeting Two: Mindfulness Basics
Mindfulness Practice: TAKE 5
3. Meeting Three: Paying Attention
Mindfulness Practice: TUZA
4. Meeting Four: Discovering Inside
Mindfulness Practice: TUZA
5. Meeting Five: Practicing Gratitude
Mindfulness Practice: mindful eating
6. Meeting Six: Noticing Emotional Triggers
Mindfulness Practice: TUZA
7. Meeting Seven: Exploring Open-Mindedness
Mindfulness Practice: body scan
8. Meeting Eight: Being the Change
Mindfulness Practice: pledge for mindful living
Mindfulness practices introduced during the MAC Interactive sessions
Take 5 involves slowly drawing five connected breaths. Participants are
instructed to focus on the sensation of the breathing.
Tuza is a breath awareness practice that involves attending to the breath for 3
to 4 minutes in order to develop mental focus and acceptance of self and
others.
Mindful Eating involves brings attention to the moment-to-moment
experience of eating. The intent is to slow down, take time to savor the taste
of each bite, and experience gratitude for having food to eat.
Body Scan involves paying attention to body sensations by placing attention
on different body parts in sequence. This guided meditation practice helps
participants develop greater sensitivity to body sensation and a feeling of
overall well-being.
Figure 1. Themes and content of Mindfulness Ambassador Council Interactive lessons
Table 2. Mean, Standard Deviation, and Effect Size for Measures of Participant Mindfulness
Pre-Test Mean (SD) Post-Test Mean (SD) Cohen’s d
5FMQ-SF Total
Pre/Post (n=10) 79.0 (7.9) 80.0 (14.0) .09
Retro/Post (n=9) 75.4 (8.2) 80.1 (14.5) .46
5FMQ-SF Non-Reactive
Pre/Post (n=10) 16.4 (2.6) 17.2 (5.9) .18
Retro/Post (n=9) 15.3 (3.8) 17.3 (6.2) .39
5FMQ-SF Observing
Pre/Post (n=10) 15.8 (2.9) 14.3 (3.9) --
Retro/Post (n=9) 13.9 (4.0) 14.6 (3.7) .18
5FMQ-SF Acting with Awareness
Pre/Post (n=10) 15.3 (3.7) 17.7 (3.1) .70
Retro/Post (n=9) 17.0 (5.0) 18.1 (3.1) .26
5FMQ-SF Describing
Pre/Post (n=10) 18.2 (3.0) 17.9 (4.6) --
Retro/Post (n=9) 15.7 (3.3) 18.0 (4.8) .56
5FMQ-SF Nonjudging
Pre/Post (n=10) 13.3 (3.0) 12.9 (3.8) --
Retro/Post (n=9) 13.5 (3.7) 12.9 (4.0) --
Note: No pre/post or retro/post comparisons (paired sample t tests) were statistically significant at p > .05.
In light of this limitation, we also calculated Cohen’s d in participants’ self-reported mindfulness demonstrated
effect sizes to assess the magnitude of the changes in small effects on the total FFMQ-SF (d = .09) and the Non-
mindfulness over the course of the MAC program. When Reactive subscale (d = .18) as well as a large effect size (d =
considering the traditional pre- and post-test data, changes .70) on the Acting with Awareness subscale. When the
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/jgpha/vol7/iss2/6
DOI: 10.20429/jgpha.2019.070206 54
Roach et al.: Implementing Mindfulness Practices With Parents of Young Children in a Low-Socioeconomic Status Neighborhood
Cohen’s d was calculated using the retrospective pre-test Among the study participants, there was a moderate to large
FFMQ-SF scores in place of the traditional pre-test data, decrease in self-reported anxiety (d = 0.77) and self-
participants demonstrated a moderate change (d = .46) in reported depression (d= 0.80).
overall self-reported mindfulness (i.e. the FFMQ-SF Total).
Using the retrospective pre-test, participants also reported Changes in parental competence and family stress
small to moderate changes on the Non-Reactive (d = .39), Participants also reported decreased parenting competency
Observing (d = .18), Acting with Awareness (d = .26), and as measured by the PSOC. Although the change in PSOC
Describing (d = .56) subscales. scores was in an unanticipated direction, it was not
statistically significant. There was also a slight (but not
Changes in self-reported anxiety and depression statistically significant) decrease in the FEC scores from
Comparison of pre- and post-test data (Table 3) resulted in time 1 to time 2. These also was a very small effect for
statistically significant decreases in scores on the measures familial stress (d =.07) as reported on the FEC, indicating
of parental anxiety and depression. In order to evaluate the the presences of stressors in participants’ family contexts
magnitude of the MAC Interactive program’s effect, we were relatively stable across the 8-week period.
calculated Cohen’s d for each of the variables of interest.
Table 3. Paired sample t test and effect size for measures of mental health, stress, and parenting
Pre-Test Post-Test t Sig. Cohen’s d
Mean (SD) Mean (SD) (2-Tailed)
. BAI (n=12) 15.8 (8.7) 8.5 (10.3) 2.9 .014 0.77
CES-D (n=12) 29.3 (8.4) 23.2 (6.9) 2.7 .020 0.80
FEC (n=12) 83.9 (23.0) 82.3 (24.2) .29 .776 0.07
PSOC (n=12) 49.3 (12.3) 42.3 (11.3) 2.1 .056 --
Note: Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI); Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D); Family Event Checklist (FEC); Parenting
Sense of Competency Scale (PSOC)
Acceptability and Utility of Mindfulness as a Component reactions when I am triggered” (pre/post ∆ = .7) and “I have
of Parent Education and Support Programs been taught effective ways to calm down and reduce stress”
The MAC Student Survey measured participant’s pre- and (pre/post ∆ = .6). Three out of the 11 items saw no change
post- program experiences with and understanding of in mean score from pre- to post-test, and three items saw a
mindfulness concepts and practices. Each item was scored decrease in mean score after program completion.
from 1 (Not at all true) to 4 (True all of the time). Table 4 Differences on the two items showing the biggest decreases
shows the mean scores and standard deviation for each (“I am mindful in my daily life” and “I consider other
survey item. There was an increase in mean score for five of peoples’ perspectives when they differ from my own”)
the 11 items following program participation, but no items might reflect participants’ improved understanding of
demonstrated statistical significant changes. The largest mindfulness and greater self-awareness following program
positive changes in mean scores were observed on two participation
items: “I have been taught effective ways to manage my
Pre-Test Post-Test
Item Mean (SD) Mean (SD)
1. I am mindful in my daily life. 3.3 (.9) 2.9 .(7)
2. I have been taught effective ways to focus my attention. 3.3 (.5) 3.2 (.8)
3. I am aware of my personal strengths and weaknesses. 3.6 (.5) 3.6 (.5)
4. I consider other peoples’ perspectives when they differ from my own. 3.2 (.7) 2.9 (.9)
5. I understand how to make responsible decisions. 3.4 (.5) 3.7 (.5)
6. I communicate effectively with others. 3.5 (.5) 3.5 (.9)
7. I am grateful in my daily life. 3.7 (.7) 3.8 (.4)
8. I have been taught effective ways to manage my reactions when I am 2.7 (.7) 3.4 (.7)
triggered.
9. I have been taught effective ways to set goals and take action to 3.5 (.5) 3.5 (.7)
support the future I want for myself.
10. I help others in my daily life. 3.4 (.7) 3.8 (.4)
11. I have been taught effective ways to calm down and reduce stress. 2.7 (.7) 3.3 (.8)
© Andrew T. Roach, Josephine Mhende, Brian A. Barger, and Douglas A. Roberts. Originally published in jGPHA
(http://www.gapha.org/jgpha/) October 25, 2019. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution
Non-Commercial No-Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original work ("first published in the Journal of the Georgia Public Health Association…") is properly
cited with original URL and bibliographic citation information. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on
http://www.gapha.jgpha.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/jgpha/vol7/iss2/6
DOI: 10.20429/jgpha.2019.070206 58