Carnivoran Ecology The Evolution and Function of Communities Steven W Buskirk 2 Full Chapter
Carnivoran Ecology The Evolution and Function of Communities Steven W Buskirk 2 Full Chapter
Carnivoran Ecology The Evolution and Function of Communities Steven W Buskirk 2 Full Chapter
Steven W. Buskirk
Professor Emeritus, University of Wyoming
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Steven W. Buskirk 2023
The moral rights of the author have been asserted
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2022944176
ISBN 978–0–19–286324–9
ISBN 978–0–19–286325–6 (pbk.)
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192863249.001.0001
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
Preface
This book arose from my several decades of interest a small part of our growing understanding of
in and research on carnivorans. Like many young what limits the distributions and abundances of
people with naturalist tendencies, I was particu- carnivorans.
larly intrigued by my early encounters with wild During those early years, I depended on the stan-
carnivorans—their rarity, elusiveness, and implicit dard academic references of the day: journal arti-
threat to my well-being. I vividly recall seeing my cles, monographs, book chapters, theses, disserta-
first bear track on a solo backpacking trip in the tions, and R. F. Ewer’s (1973) The carnivores. Ewer’s
Sierra Nevada of California, followed by a sleep- monograph was the definitive source for carnivo-
less night spent contemplating my fate. I recall the ran biology—especially paleontology and behavior.
horror of my older sister when I asked her to stop Writing the current account nearly fifty years on,
our parents’ car so that I could retrieve a road-killed I benefitted from a wealth of high-quality material
domestic cat and add its skull to my collection. In facilitated by the revolution in publishing—a prolif-
the summers of my college years, working as a tour eration of journal titles, many of them open access,
guide in Mount McKinley (now Denali) National expanded opportunities for scientists in develop-
Park, Alaska, I observed regular interactions involv- ing countries to publish their work, and many more
ing wolves, caribou, brown bears, moose, red foxes, women working and publishing as scientists. The
and other species. Some of these observations were period since 2000 has offered unprecedented oppor-
dramatic and photogenic, but curious as well. Why tunities to write a book such as this, and the pan-
did 150-kg brown bears invest so much effort to demic of 2020–22 gave my isolation and focus new
capture 200-g ground squirrels? Why did wolves purpose.
give birth in the same dens for decades on end, What qualifies me to write a book about all car-
even though they were well known and prone nivorans? I am not the most prolific author of car-
to human disturbance? Why were coyotes deathly nivoran papers, nor the one with the broadest geo-
afraid of being anywhere near wolves, while red graphic experience. Others have spent more time
foxes merely stayed out of their grasp? in the field, or are more quantitative than I. How-
My PhD research and subsequent faculty ever, my interests extend in multiple directions,
appointment in Zoology and Physiology at the all of which relate to how carnivorans succeed or
University of Wyoming gave me opportunities fail in the wild. I am as intrigued by answers to
to pursue these kinds of questions. While most big ecological questions as by solutions to specific
carnivoran research of that time gravitated to conservation problems. I am as satisfied by under-
intraspecific and predator–prey interactions, standing of some ecological puzzle as by watching
my interests ranged more widely. My research a large carnivore stalk an ungulate. I appreciate new
addressed various mechanisms by which car- discoveries in natural history as much as I do stud-
nivorans might be limited: thermal energetics, ies of functional genomics. I also value those who
allometry, tooth morphology, fasting endurance, study carnivorans and share their findings with sci-
genetic variability, and interspecific competition. entists and the public. This group overlaps strongly
I learned that predator–prey interactions were with those committed to assuring the presence and
vi P R E FA C E
Many people supported and aided me in writing Van Valkenburgh, Lars Werdelin, and Andrzej
this book. My wife Beth encouraged me at every Zalewski. Collectively, the reviewers corrected
stage and tolerated many interruptions to our rou- errors of fact, identified important omissions, pro-
tine so that I could spend time writing. Close col- vided more pertinent or more recent references,
leagues Dennis Knight and Carlos Martinez del Rio and improved the organization and presentation.
were reliable discussants and sources of encour- Without their help the project would not have been
agement early in the conception and early writing possible.
phases. Hannah Sease produced all graphic arts The illustrations strengthen the narrative
work, keeping pace with my requests throughout throughout, and some of the finest artwork and
her graduate studies in graphic arts. photography were contributed gratis or licensed
The William Robertson Coe Library at the Univer- at reduced rates. I particularly thank Justin Binfet,
sity of Wyoming provided outstanding support, fill- Darin Croft, Walton Ford, Stan Gehrt, Don Gutoski,
ing scores of requests for materials, and the J. Cloyd Esperanza Iranzo, Jeffrey Kerby, Janet Kessler,
Miller Library at Western New Mexico University Débora Kloster, Susan McConnell, Chris Mills,
provided additional assistance. My academic home, Larissa Nituch, Velizar Simeonovski, Alejandro
the Department of Zoology and Physiology at the Travaini, Juan Zanón, the Philmont Scout Ranch,
University of Wyoming, provided office space and and Kasmin Gallery. Although I have tried to
other support for most of duration of the project. select photos taken under natural conditions, I
I benefitted from reviews by over thirty scien- cannot assure that none was staged or in some way
tists, eight of them commissioned by Oxford Uni- contrived.
versity Press, and others solicited by me, who The staff of Oxford Press were most support-
generously reviewed chapters or shorter sections: ive and encouraging. Ian Sterling was immediately
Benjamin Allen, Rudy Boonstra, Jeff Bowman, receptive when I approached him with my pro-
Joseph Bump, Emiliano Donadio, Jacob Goheen, posal, and consistently improved my presentation
Henry Harlow, Dennis Knight, Serge Lariviere, as well as my understandings of how the book could
Paul Leberg, Jason Lillegraven, Carlos Martinez be made most useful. Charlie Bath provided excel-
del Rio, Sterling Miller, Robert Naiman, Richard lent suggestions on draft chapters, and Katie Lakina
Ostfeld, Jonathan Pauli, James D. Rose, Oswald shepherded the project through the editorial and
Schmitz, John Schoen, Qian-Quan Sun, Blaire production processes.
Contents
2 Functional morphology 11
2.1 The skull 11
2.1.1 Dentition 12
2.2 Post-cranial skeleton 15
2.2.1 Fossorial movement 16
2.2.2 Running and walking 16
2.2.3 Climbing 17
2.2.4 Swimming and deep diving 18
2.3 Other adaptations to aquatic living 19
2.4 Gut morphology 20
2.5 The integument 20
2.6 The major ecomorphotypes 22
2.6.1 Scansorial ecomorph 23
2.6.2 Dog-like ecomorph 23
2.6.3 Cat-like ecomorph 23
2.6.4 Scavenger ecomorph 24
2.6.5 Semi-fossorial ecomorph 24
2.6.6 Semi-aquatic ecomorph 24
2.6.7 Marine ecomorph 25
2.6.8 Intermediate and unique ecomorphs 25
Key points 25
References 26
4 Physiological ecology 49
4.1 Digestion 49
4.1.1 Soluble carbohydrates 50
4.1.2 Gut passage 51
4.2 Dietary requirements 52
4.2.1 Amino acids and fatty acids 52
4.2.2 Macronutrients 53
4.3 Metabolism and growth 53
4.3.1 Metabolism 53
4.3.2 Growth 55
4.4 Body temperature and torpor 55
4.4.1 Body temperature 55
4.4.2 Torpor 56
4.5 Energy storage and fasting 56
4.6 Osmoregulation and kidney function 58
4.7 Detoxification and self-medication 60
4.8 Reproduction 61
4.8.1 General patterns 61
4.8.2 Embryonic diapause 61
4.8.3 Induced ovulation 63
4.9 Scaling physiology to populations 64
Key points 65
References 65
6 Community ecology 87
6.1 Nutrient cycling and transport 87
6.2 Direct effects on soil 90
CONTENTS xi
9 Cascades 153
9.1 Ecological cascades 153
xii CONTENTS
Glossary 259
Index 263
CHAPTER 1
Order Carnivora represents one of the most species- emotions are stronger when we imagine ourselves
rich, phenotypically diverse, widely distributed, or animals we own as prey. As a result, we have long
and ecologically influential mammalian lineages. imbued carnivorans with spiritual powers to match
Its extant members live on all continents and in their impressive physical abilities, and our ances-
all oceans and range from vole-sized (c. 30 g) tors represented carnivorans in some of the earliest
to larger than a rhinoceros (c. 4,000 kg). They figurative art (Figure 1.3) (Hart and Sussman, 2008;
eat diverse foods including leaves, fruits, insects, Azéma, 2015). Today, we continue to use carnivo-
honey, marine invertebrates, and mammals larger rans to symbolize wildness, ferocity, and indepen-
than themselves. Some species live below ground dence in visual and literary arts. Every pocket and
for weeks at a time, a few live mostly in the fold of most human cultures—languages, parables,
forest canopy, and others live at sea for months spiritual beliefs, and symbols—is rich with carnivo-
on end. Many are wilderness dwellers, wary of ran references.
humans and their activities, while some non-
domestic species thrive in major cities, largely
1.1 “Carnivoran” vs. “carnivorous”
dependent on humans for food, shelter, or protec-
tion from larger, wilder carnivorans. No other mam- The terms “mammalian predator,” “mammalian
malian order approaches Carnivora in the breadth carnivore,” and “carnivoran” are not precisely syn-
of adaptive suites shown and ecological niches onymous. Predators are animals that kill and con-
occupied. sume multicellular animals (Taylor, 1984), whether
Humans have always been keenly interested in one at a time, or filtered from water by the thou-
carnivorans. Our hominin ancestors were preyed sands. Eagles, dragonflies, and blue whales are
on by carnivorans and competed with them for predators. By contrast, a carnivore consumes the
food. Both species hunted the same prey and drove flesh of animals, whether it kills or scavenges it; vul-
each other away from prey carcasses (Figure 1.1) tures, snakes, and Venus fly traps are carnivores and
(Espigares et al., 2013). Paleolithic humans con- carnivorous. Carnivorans, the subject of this book,
verted a potential competitor, the wolf, to a partner. are exclusively mammals in Order Carnivora—a
The resultant dog was the first domesticated animal, branch of the tree of life. Species in the order
and became essential to human lives, providing a may pursue and kill vertebrates, eat termites exca-
food source, vigilance against intruders, transport vated from soil, or subsist entirely on plant parts
of possessions, and assistance in hunting and herd- (Figure 1.4). “Hypercarnivore” sometimes indicates
ing (Figure 1.2). Dogs became so important to early a species with a diet exceeding some threshold level
humans that they are credited with shaping human of vertebrate prey, typically killed rather than scav-
evolution as much as humans shaped theirs (Pierotti enged. Most members of the cat family, the Felidae,
and Fogg, 2017). are considered hypercarnivores. Other terms, such
The life-or-death nature of predation elicits strong as “mesopredator,” “apex predator,” and “keystone
human emotions—either the predator eats and predator,” have imprecise meanings that I parse as
lives, or the prey escapes and survives. These they arise in the book.
Carnivoran Ecology. Steven W. Buskirk, Oxford University Press. © Steven W. Buskirk (2023). DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192863249.003.0001
2 CARNIVORAN ECOLOGY
Figure 1.1 The first contact between humans and the saber-toothed Smilodon in America, interpreted by Velizar Simeonovski. Carnivorans have
been competitors with and potential predators of hominins from before we became humans through to today.
Painting: © Velizar Simeonovski.
I N T R O D U C T I O N TO C A R N I V O R A N E C O L O G Y 3
Figure 1.2 Lions (right) depicted on the walls of Salle du Fond in Chauvet-Pont d’Arc Cave, France, dating to 32,000–30,000 years ago. The lions
appear to be watching a rhinoceros on a distant panel. Carnivorans were subjects of some of the earliest figurative art. Vertical scratches in the
lower right and on the rhinoceros painting were made by cave bears trapped in deep chambers.
Photo: J. Clottes in Azéma (2015), CC 4.0.
As is often the case in biology, the defining traits defining the group, because all modern species have
of the Carnivora—the traits held by all members that trait, but some early carnivorans did not.
of the lineage, both living and extinct—are difficult Predatory placental mammals—those that pri-
to state without qualification. Traditionally, biolo- marily kill other animals for food—occur in several
gists have cited the presence of cheek teeth that have orders, including shrews and moles (Order Sorico-
shearing functions, comprising the upper fourth morpha), bats (Chiroptera), whales (Cetacea), pan-
premolar (P4 ) and lower first molar (M1 ). All living golins (Pholidota), and hairy anteaters (Pilosa). If
carnivorans have ancestors with this trait. However, we broaden our frame of reference to include mar-
living genets, bears, and seals have secondarily lost supial predators, several additional orders must
the shearing function of those teeth, and at least be included as mammalian carnivores. Even some
one species has lost those teeth completely. Some obligate herbivores, among them ungulates and
prehistoric linages of other carnivorous mammals rodents, prey on or scavenge vertebrates oppor-
had shearing cheek teeth, but they occupied other tunistically (Boonstra et al., 1990; Dudley et al., 2016).
positions in the tooth row, for example M1 and M2 . Finally, many extinct non-carnivoran lineages were
They were not homologous to modern carnassials, at least partially carnivorous. Clearly, Order Car-
and the lineages that exhibited them have no living nivora is not unique among mammals in killing and
descendants. The fused scaphoid and lunate carpal eating vertebrates. This book is about a mammalian
bones (the scapholunate) are sometimes regarded as lineage, not a foraging style or trophic niche.
4 CARNIVORAN ECOLOGY
Figure 1.3 Rock art in northwestern Saudi Arabia showing dogs resembling modern Canaan dogs assisting with lion hunting. Various glyphs
from this site include the earliest depictions of dogs on leashes, 12,000–10,000 years old. The upper image is shaded to show relief that is less
visible in the lower, unaltered image.
Photo: Guagnin et al. (2018, Figure 10) by permission.
I N T R O D U C T I O N TO C A R N I V O R A N E C O L O G Y 5
Herbivorous Carnivorous
mammals Carnivora mammals
1.2 The carnivorans—who and where? nearly cosmopolitan, found on all continents except
Antarctica and Australia before humans trans-
The approximately 287 extant species of carnivo-
ported them. On the other hand, the eight species
rans are organized into fifteen currently recognized
of Eupleridae occur only on Madagascar Island,
families (Appendix I) and occur on all continents, if
their common ancestor having rafted there from
we include seals that haul out on Antarctic beaches.
the African mainland around 20 million years ago
These numbers change as we learn more about
(Ma). The thirty-three extant species of seals, sea
how mammal lineages are related. For example, the
lions, and walrus make up the pinniped (ear foot)
neotropical olinguito recently has been identified as
group—a lineage comprising two or three families
distinct from other olingos, and the African golden
that arose from a single aquatic ancestor. “Fissiped”
wolf was judged a separate species from the golden
(split foot), on the other hand, denotes the remain-
jackal, (Gaubert et al., 2012; Helgen et al., 2013). On
ing, mostly terrestrial, non-pinniped carnivorans.
the other hand, the long-recognized red wolf of east-
ern North America is now regarded as an ancient
hybrid of the wolf and the coyote, with uncertain 1.3 The growth of knowledge
endangered species status (vonHoldt et al., 2016, but
Before 1900, understanding of carnivoran ecology
see Hohenlohe et al., 2017). At the level of taxo-
(as opposed to natural history) was limited, often
nomic families, the skunks and stink badgers were
based on lore and conjecture. Much of our knowl-
grouped with weasels and otters in the Mustelidae
edge of their genetics, behavior, and reproduction
before Family Mephitidae was recognized as war-
at that time resulted from observing domestic cats,
ranting recognition (Dragoo and Honeycutt, 1999).
ferrets, and dogs, and farmed minks and foxes
With each such discovery, our knowledge of car-
(Figure 1.5). Very little scientific knowledge about
nivoran classification becomes more reflective of
wild carnivorans existed, and most interest cen-
evolutionary history, as revealed through genetic
tered on the value of their furs or other body
and morphological studies.
parts and the threat they posed to agriculture. They
Carnivoran species are distributed unevenly
were difficult to study directly because of their low
across lineages and continents. Family Mustel-
densities, elusive behaviors, and constant persecu-
idae holds sixty species, whereas the Nandiniidae,
tion near humans. Well into the twentieth century,
Ailuridae, and Odobenidae hold a single species
the leading ecological questions about carnivorans
each. The Felidae, Canidae, and Mustelidae are
6 CARNIVORAN ECOLOGY
dealt with how many ungulates, waterfowl, and reported on genetic traits of cheetahs related to
other valued vertebrates they killed and how to mit- evolutionary or ecological processes. Genetic deple-
igate those losses (Leopold, 1933). In the late twen- tion in other carnivoran species became a research
tieth century, however, perspectives shifted, tools focus as well.
improved, and ecological research on this group The American mink is an example of a car-
surged. The number of scientific journal articles nivoran that has stimulated research as a result
indexed by Web of Science with “Carnivora” as a of the great ecological harm it causes. Introduced
topic increased by a factor of eleven from 1992 to to Europe and South America during the twen-
2016, compared with a factor of four for “mam- tieth century for fur production, it today poses
mal” and six for “Mammalia.” New understandings threats on both continents, spurring intensive study
of carnivoran biology, especially ecology, began to (Bonesi and Palazon, 2007; Crego et al., 2016). Over
unfold in the 1960s, when carnivorans gained signif- the past twenty-five years, published studies on
icance in conservation issues, either as threatened the ecology of invasive American minks outside
taxa or as agents of endangerment of other taxa of North America have greatly outnumbered those
or communities. For example, the severe contrac- conducted within the species’ native range.
tion in distribution and abundance of the brown This expansion of knowledge reflects that
bear in the contiguous United States from 1850 humans need to know much more about car-
to 1950 resulted in greatly expanded research in nivoran ecology than they did seventy years ago.
bear biology, broadly cast. Of 159 scientific jour- For example, public health planners now must
nal articles with the topics “grizzly bear + Yellow- consider whether the most rapidly emerging
stone” indexed by Web of Science, all but two were infectious diseases of humans are influenced by
published subsequent to the initial 1975 listing of the diversity and abundance of wild carnivorans
the Yellowstone population under the Endangered (Section 11.3.1) (Levi et al., 2012, Hofmeester et al.,
Species Act. Similarly, no articles indexed by Web 2017). The current incidence and severity of such
of Science dealt with the population genetics of the debilitating zoonoses as avian and swine influenza,
cheetah before the discovery by O’Brien and col- Lyme disease, and tick-borne encephalitis may
leagues (1983) that cheetahs exhibited low genetic be mediated by the presence and abundance of
variability. This finding had such strong conser- predators—many of them carnivorans—that kill
vation implications that 153 subsequent articles intermediate or alternate hosts (Thulin et al., 2015).
Even the viral pandemic COVID-19 has been linked Because of my focus on community ecology, the
to transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus among reader will find only passing mention of some top-
various wild and domestic mammals—particularly ics central to carnivoran biology in the past. These
carnivorans—and humans. The carnivorans include include intraspecific behavioral interactions: social-
domestic dogs and cats, captive tigers, and Amer- ity, mating systems, parental care, and territoriality.
ican minks (Vinodh Kumar et al., 2020; Hammer These topics were at the forefront of carnivoran ecol-
et al., 2021). ogy during the 1970s—the heyday of interest in kin
At the same time, carnivorans are credited selection—but they are peripheral to community
with performing valuable ecological services not interactions. Ecological systems are complex, with
understood decades ago. In Chapter 6 I show indistinct boundaries between components. Preda-
that bears are recognized for transporting marine- tion relates to competition, and competition affects
derived nutrients in salmon carcasses from spawn- population growth. Population density affects dis-
ing streams to neighboring forests along the North persal, which, in turn, drives colonization and bio-
Pacific Rim. Leopards and pumas protect some geography. This complexity makes ecology difficult
plants from overuse by herbivores. Fruit-eating car- to compartmentalize, and my chapter organiza-
nivorans transport seeds away from parent plants, tion requires the reader to navigate specific topics
in some cases more effectively than birds or her- via the index, in addition to the table of contents.
bivorous mammals. Leopards in India even receive For example, the reader interested in population
credit for reducing human fatalities inflicted by feral biology will find carnivoran-induced changes in
dogs, although leopards themselves kill a small prey populations covered in Chapter 8, but the
number of humans. Each of these functions and demography of carnivorans themselves is treated in
services has been recognized or better understood Chapter 10. Dental adaptations are mostly covered
recently, contributing to a much richer and more in Chapter 2, but some other aspects of digestive
nuanced picture of how carnivorans affect human morphology fit better in Chapter 4, the chapter on
lives and well-being. physiology. The responses of prey species to car-
nivorans can be behavioral, physiological, demo-
1.4 Purpose and organization graphic, or have uncertain mechanisms, and these
processes are covered in various sections, best
of the book
located via the index. Chemical defenses against
This book is intended as a text for a college course carnivorans by prey and other carnivorans, and by
in community ecology or predation ecology, and plants against herbivores, as well as detoxification
as a reference for students (academic or otherwise) of venoms by carnivorans, are each treated sepa-
of ecology who have some background in biolog- rately, in sections best located in the index. Habitat
ical concepts and vocabulary. It emphasizes docu- ecology is a traditional and highly diffuse topic that
mented, mechanistic explanations for the ecology of permeates wildlife biology. Scarcely a section of this
carnivorans and species they interact with. Impor- book does not have habitat aspects. However, no
tantly, I do not review all biological knowledge that aspect of carnivoran habitat ecology seems unique
applies to the Carnivora—only those aspects that to the order, so I fold discussions of habitat in with
set carnivorans apart; many aspects of carnivoran others.
biology resemble those of other mammalian orders. This account is based almost entirely on the peer-
For example, the vibrissae of carnivorans are well reviewed scientific literature. I use both primary
developed and important for tactile sensation, but and secondary sources, relying on community-level
the primary research model for this organ has been analyses, meta-analyses, or reviews where possible.
the laboratory rat, not a carnivoran. An analogous I have tried to be comparative throughout, contrast-
situation exists for gut fermentation—it is rare in the ing carnivoran families with each other and car-
Carnivora and is better understood from studies of nivorans with other vertebrate carnivores, includ-
other mammalian orders. To help with vocabulary ing marsupials, reptiles, and birds. I have tended
issues, I provide a glossary of technical terms. to prefer mechanistically based studies to those
8 CARNIVORAN ECOLOGY
based only on correlative results or modeling and have caused the group to radiate into an astonish-
have favored widely accessible publications to more ing range of phenotypes. Trophic niche determines
obscure ones. dentition, digestive process, and gut passage. Size of
While I have tried to enhance the geographic and prey species affects hunting behavior, frequency of
taxonomic diversity of the case studies that I cited, predation events, and competitive interactions with
I recognize that the literature is biased toward stud- scavengers. Context lies at the intellectual core of
ies from developed countries and on high-profile carnivoran ecology, and I have embraced it fully.
or endangered carnivorans. Therefore, my presen- Conservation also is an applied arena in which
tation no doubt includes cultural biases that affect context is all-important. Carnivorans are widely
the generality of my conclusions. In some cases regarded as one of the most threatened mammalian
where examples support a generalization and mul- lineages, with severe challenges to species, sub-
tiple published examples illustrate the point, I have species, and populations across Earth. On the other
tended to cite a study from a region or ecosys- hand, carnivorans also cause or exacerbate con-
tem that is less well represented in the literature, servation problems for other species that are rare
rather than an equally illustrative study from North or threatened. Further complicating the picture,
America or western Europe. humans have benefited some carnivoran species (or
Some unifying themes connect the various facets stopped persecuting them), and others are reoccu-
of carnivoran ecology, and I return to them fre- pying their former geographic ranges with or with-
quently. These factors explain much of the great out human assistance. Carnivore conservation does
diversity of form and function across the Carnivora, not merely represent a sad list of decline, dysfunc-
as well as many of the differences between car- tion, and disappearance, but examples—admittedly
nivorans and other mammalian orders. The most anomalous—of restoration and independent recov-
important are body size, metabolic rate, and trophic ery. Ecological and socio-economic context deter-
level. Allometry is the study of body size and its mine how carnivorans are faring in the modern
consequences, and the reader will note the recur- world. All told, the biology of the Carnivora is an
ring importance of allometry in many processes at extraordinarily rich subdiscipline, full of pattern,
physiological and community levels (Calder, 1984). nuance, contingency, and relevance to human cul-
Metabolic rate is a function of body size, body ture and livelihoods.
temperature, and mitochondrial density, and has
strong explanatory power in carnivoran ecology.
Trophic level is correlated with these factors; car-
1.6 Nomenclature
nivorans that eat large mammalian prey exemplify
the constraints imposed and benefits conferred by For the current scientific nomenclature of carnivo-
high metabolic rate and large bodies—high foraging rans, I have modified Wilson and Reeder (2005)
costs and maintenance costs—but food availability to reflect recent taxonomic revisions (Appendix I).
that is more seasonally consistent than for herbi- Common names are more problematic, because all
vores or predators of ectotherms. By watching for are local or regional, and using one requires select-
the recurring mention of body size, metabolic rate, ing from among those used by various indigenous
and trophic level, the reader can appreciate how groups or colonizing nations, or the native tongue
much carnivoran diversity arises from only a few of the original naming authority. Because I write in
principles. English, I default to my language, but I have tried
to use the common name applied most geographi-
cally broadly where the species occurs. For example,
Puma concolor occurs from Patagonia, South Amer-
1.5 Context in carnivoran ecology
ica to Yukon Territory, North America, with many
While I search for pattern in carnivoran ecology, locally used names over its range. However, the
I make scarcely a generalization about this group common name applied over most of the geographic
without a qualification or caveat. Contingencies range is “puma,” which I use here.
I N T R O D U C T I O N TO C A R N I V O R A N E C O L O G Y 9
References Hart, D. and Sussman, R.W. (2008) Man the hunted: primates,
predators, and human evolution. Expanded edn. Boulder:
Azéma, M. (2015) “Animation and graphic narration in the
Westview Press.
Aurignacian,” Palethnology, 7, pp. 256–79.
Helgen, K.M. et al. (2013) “Taxonomic revision of the olin-
Bonesi, L. and Palazon, S. (2007) “The American mink in
gos (Bassaricyon), with description of a new species, the
Europe: status, impacts, and control,” Biological Conser-
olinguito,”ZooKeys, 324, pp. 1–83.
vation, 134, pp. 470–83.
Hofmeester, T.R., Jansen, P.A., Wijnen, H.J., Coipan, E.C.,
Boonstra, R., Krebs, C.J. and Kanter, M. (1990) “Arctic
Fonville, M., Prins, H.H.T., Sprong, H., and van Wieren,
ground squirrel predation on collared lemmings,” Cana-
S.E. 2017. Cascading effects of predator activity on tick-
dian Journal of Zoology, 68, pp. 757–60.
borne disease risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B
Calder, W.A. III. (1984). Size, function and life history. Cam-
284:20170453.
bridge: Harvard University Press.
Hohenlohe, P.A. et al. (2017) “Comment on ‘Whole genome
Crego, R.D., Jiménez, J.E. and Rozzi, R. (2016) “A syn-
sequence analysis shows two endemic species of North
ergistic trio of invasive mammals? Facilitative inter-
American wolf are admixtures of the coyote and gray
actions among beavers, muskrats, and mink at the
wolf’,” Science Advances, 3, p. e1602250.
southern end of the Americas,” Biological Invasions, 18,
Leopold, A. (1933) Game management. New York: Charles
pp. 1923–38.
Scribner’s Sons.
Dragoo, J.W. and Honeycutt, R.L. (1999) “Systematics of
Levi, T. et al. (2012) “Deer, predators, and the emergence
mustelid-like carnivores,” Journal of Mammalogy, 78, pp.
of Lyme disease,” Proceedings of the National Academy of
426–43.
Sciences of the United States of America, 109, pp. 10942–7.
Dudley, J.P. et al. (2016) “Carnivory in the common hip-
O’Brien, S.J. et al. (1983) “The cheetah is depauperate in
popotamus Hippopotamus amphibius: implications for
genetic variation,” Science, 221, pp. 459–62.
the ecology and epidemiology of anthrax in African
Pierotti, R. and Fogg, B.R. (2017) The first domestication: how
landscapes,” Mammal Review, 46, pp. 191–203.
wolves and humans coevolved. New Haven: Yale Univer-
Espigares, M.P. et al. (2013) “Homo vs. Pachycrocuta: ear-
sity Press.
liest evidence of competition for an elephant carcass
Taylor, R.J. (1984) Predation. New York: Chapman and
between scavengers at Fuente Nueva-3 (Orce, Spain),”
Hall.
Quaternary International, 295, pp. 113–25.
Thulin, C.-G., Malmsten, J. and Ericsson, G. (2015) “Oppor-
Gaubert, P. et al. (2012) “Reviving the African wolf Canis
tunities and challenges with growing wildlife popula-
lupus lupaster in North and West Africa: a mitochondrial
tions and zoonotic diseases in Sweden,” European Jour-
lineage ranging more than 6,000 km wide,” PLoS ONE,
nal of Wildlife Research, 61, pp. 649–56.
7, p. e42740.
Vinodh Kumar, O.R. et al. (2020) “SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-
Guagnin, M., Perri, A.R. and Petraglia, M.D. (2018) “Pre-
19): zoonotic origin and susceptibility of domestic and
Neolithic evidence for dog-assisted hunting strategies
wild animals,” Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology,
in Arabia,” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 49, pp.
14, pp. 741–7.
225–36.
VonHoldt, B.M. et al. (2016) “Whole-genome sequence
Hammer, A.S. et al. (2021) “SARS-CoV-2 transmission
analysis shows that two endemic species of North
between mink (Neovison vison) and humans, Denmark,”
American wolf are admixtures of the coyote and gray
Emerging Infectious Diseases, 27, pp. 547–51.
wolf,” Science Advances, 2, p. e1501714.
CHAPTER 2
Functional morphology
Functional morphology considers how organ- and lateral motion of the mandible. The shearing func-
tissue-level structure and coloration are the basis tion of the carnassials occurs on one side at a time,
of function. At smaller physical scales, “histol- and the mandible shifts toward the shearing side
ogy,” “cell structure,” and “molecular biology” are for any single bite. More herbivorous carnivorans—
more common terms. Here I consider structure with the giant panda and spectacled bears—do not have
direct ecological relevance, important for locomo- shallower mandibular fossae as might be expected
tion, prey handling, crypsis, communication, and for the greater range of motion required for grind-
reproduction. “Ecomorphology” is a synonym, and ing leaves and stems. Instead, their fossae are even
living and fossil carnivorans are well represented deeper than those of more predaceous carnivorans
as subjects. The carnivoran-specific literature on and the mandible shifts laterally during a single bite
this subject focuses mostly on three morphological to achieve the grinding effect. This chewing motion
regions: the skull, the forelimbs, and the hindlimbs. differs from that found in all other herbivorous
The skull is significant because of the great range mammals.
of functions it performs and the spatial trade-offs The adaptive trajectory toward killing prey larger
between them. The forelimb is important because than the predator requires further modification to
its structure differs across locomotor and foraging the skull. This niche is occupied by large felids,
styles: swimming, digging through soil, sprinting, canids, some ursids, and some hyaenids. Canine
and climbing all leave strong adaptive signatures. teeth may seem remarkably uniform in shape across
To a lesser extent, the hindlimb also reflects adapta- extant carnivorans, but in fact show strong modifi-
tions to locomotor modes. cation for various roles. The single most biomechan-
ically challenging function of the skull and teeth is
applying jaw force to the tips of the canine teeth
2.1 The skull
while handling struggling large prey (Penrose et al.,
The skull is the bony structure with the most com- 2020). However, that task differs across carnivo-
plex design trade-offs and constraints of any ver- ran families. Slender, sharp canines are found in
tebrate body part. In carnivorans its components taxa (e.g. felids) that kill by quick stabs to the cer-
have key functions in display-defense, prey capture, vical region (dorsal spine or neck vessels). More
mastication, vision, hearing, balance, olfaction, cra- robust canines occur in predators that take longer
nial enervation, and endocrine function, as well as to kill prey that struggle, or that consume bony
housing the brain. The largest body of work dealing material. Canids tend to have more curved canine
with skull morphology—dentition aside—concerns teeth, plausibly to hold struggling prey for longer
how trophic specialization affects non-dental skull times (Pollock et al., 2021), and not only must the
features. Moore (2009, p. 197) explored how the canine teeth be stout, but also the jaw adductor
ancestral carnivoran jaw joint diverged in two tra- muscles and associated bony structures must be
jectories for dietary specializations. The jaw of most strengthened—otherwise, the braincase is vulner-
carnivorans features a deep mandibular fossa on able. These adductors, originating from the sagit-
the temporal (= “squamosal”) bone that limits the tal crest, the nuchal crest, and the zygomatic arch,
Carnivoran Ecology. Steven W. Buskirk, Oxford University Press. © Steven W. Buskirk (2023). DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192863249.003.0002
12 CARNIVORAN ECOLOGY
are especially powerful in predators of large prey. pair: P4 /M1 . This feature allows severing of muscle
The sagittal crest runs antero-posteriorly along the and connective tissue, so that parts of large car-
dorsal midline and is the site of origin for the tem- casses can be removed and either swallowed or con-
poralis muscle, the largest jaw adductor. It inserts sumed away from the prey carcass, thereby reduc-
on the coronoid process of the mandible and closes ing conflict. The earliest carnivorans had less promi-
the jaw. Tall and massive sagittal crests, resembling nent carnassial P4 /M1 structures than do modern
the sails of sailfish—are found in several carnivo- predaceous forms. All dental evolution involved
ran lineages: pinnipeds, hyaenids, ursids, and some changes in size and shape, as well as some tooth
mustelids. The masseter muscle, another powerful loss; no carnivoran lineage shows an increase in
jaw adductor, originates from the zygomatic arch tooth number. Incisors have undergone relatively
and inserts onto the lateral mandible. The nuchal little change in morphology or number, and the
crest, which follows the dorso-posterior margin of canines are retained even in species that do not use
the occipital bone, is the site of insertion of neck them to handle prey. This reflects the dual func-
extensor muscles that originate from the cervical tions of canines: prey handling and display-defense.
vertebrae, powering head movements used in sub- Aardwolves, bat-eared foxes, and pandas—none
duing large prey. Among carnivoran predators of of them primarily predators of vertebrates—have
large prey, all of these structures are large rela- canines similar in shape and only slightly smaller
tive to the floor of the braincase (Penrose et al., to those of vertebrate-killing relatives. In at least
2016). five predaceous mammalian lineages (two metathe-
The bony labyrinth is a complex structure that rian, three carnivoran), canine teeth became so elon-
reflects feeding and non-feeding forces. Encased gated that they extended outside the oral cavity.
in the temporal bone, it comprises organs of bal- Most of these taxa showed the saber-toothed con-
ance (the semicircular canals with ampullae) and dition, using canines for prey killing, whereas the
hearing (the cochlea). While not feeding structures oversized canines of walruses function primarily in
per se, the canals are key to maintaining equilib- display and defense.
rium and spatial orientation by measuring angu- Consistent with adaptive changes to the carnas-
lar acceleration in three planes. It is therefore an sials themselves, other tooth positions reflect the
important sense for mammals, especially carnivo- importance of killing large prey vs. other trophic
rans, with active locomotor and foraging styles. strategies (Figure 2.1). With specialization on preda-
That is, they must stabilize the head in order to tion and a meat diet came the reduction in size and
allow the brain to process visual inputs while pur- number of the post-carnassial teeth (M1−3 , M2−3 ). In
suing and subduing prey. Schwab and colleagues felids, the best extant examples, premolars P1−2 and
(2019) showed that all dimensions of the semicir- P1−2 are lost as well, because a diet of animal soft tis-
cular canals were larger in ambushing carnivorans sue requires little mastication before swallowing—
than in omnivores or pounce hunters. A strong duodenal lipases and peptidases are sufficient
phylogenetic signal was apparent as well. Other to initiate digestion. The second trajectory—a
skull features are closely tied to sensory modalities trend toward omnivory, frugivory, and folivory—
(Section 5.1.2). retained the post-carnassials and modified them
for grinding, giving them multi-cusped, rounded
(bunodont) shapes. Bunodont teeth crush inverte-
2.1.1 Dentition
brate exoskeletons and shells (e.g. in the walrus
Much study of modern and prehistoric diets of and otter), and coarsely grind plant material (e.g.
carnivorans and other carnivorous mammals has in bears). In the highly carnivorous spotted hyena,
concerned prey handling (gripping and killing) the pre-carnassial premolars are enlarged for bone
and masticating. Basal carnivorans had the primi- crushing—important for a scavenger of large ungu-
tive eutherian dental formula—I3 /I3 , C1 /C1 , P4 /P4 , late carcasses. Piscivorous pinnipeds tend to retain
M3 /M3 —and teeth in some of these positions large, sharp canines, but have lost the position-
evolved more quickly than in others. A landmark specific functions of ancestral cheek teeth, includ-
in carnivoran dentition is the carnassial (shearing) ing the carnassial pair (Box 2.1). Instead, they tend
FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY 13
(a)
M1
(b)
(c)
M1
Figure 2.1 Lower dentitions of the earliest and modern carnivorans, showing enlargement, reduction, and loss of cheek teeth with diverging
diets. A: Protictis (Viverravidae), an insectivore-carnivore of the Paleocene (M3 lost). B: Modern lion, a strict carnivore (M2–3 lost). C: Red fox, an
omnivore (M2 retained, bunodont, M3 vestigial). D: Giant panda, an obligate folivore (M2–3 bunodont). E: Aardwolf, an obligate termitivore (M2–3
variably vestigial or lost). F: California sea lion, an obligate piscivore (M2–3 lost, post-canines reduced and homodont).
14 CARNIVORAN ECOLOGY
(d)
M1
(e)
(f)
M1
toward generalized, nearly homodont cheek teeth 2016). Importantly, carnivoran dental specializa-
(Figure 2.1F), consistent with swallowing fish whole tions have tended to be irreversible over evolu-
or severing them into large pieces (Kienle and Berta, tionary time; they disappear via lineage extinction,
FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY 15
Several pinnipeds have evolved highly specialized cheek in the crabeater seal of the Antarctic Ocean, which eats
teeth that facilitate the filtering of aquatic invertebrates. The almost entirely finger-sized krill. The Baikal seal of Russia
water is gulped into the oral cavity and pharynx, then ejected shows a more moderate expression of the same trait—it
past the projections on the cheek teeth (Figure 2.2). The trait feeds heavily on freshwater amphipods (Watanabe et al.,
has arisen several times in the phocids and in both freshwa- 2020).
ter and marine forms. It reaches its most extreme expression
Figure 2.2 The cheek teeth of the filter-feeding crabeater seal, showing dental projections that filter krill from sea water.
Photo: © Te Papa Tongarewa Museum of New Zealand.
rather than by restoring lost tooth functions. This 2.2 Post-cranial skeleton
is similar to mammalian dental evolution gener-
No other mammalian order matches the range of
ally, but contrasts with that of squamate reptiles,
morphological adaptations for locomotion and for-
in which multiple tooth cusps arose to grind veg-
aging observed in the Carnivora. Several locomo-
etation. In some lineages, these cusps disappeared,
tor modalities are recognizable, and some species
and cheek teeth reverted to unicuspid form as diets
exhibit more than one. Basal carnivorans were
returned to carnivory (Lafuma et al., 2021).
16 CARNIVORAN ECOLOGY
locomotor generalists, walking, running, and climb- (gaits faster than a walk): coursing and sprint-
ing, but specializations arose early in several lin- ing. All carnivorans that run fast tend toward
eages. elongated metapodials and proximal phalanges,
which increase stride length. The long bones of
their limbs are as long as predicted from body
2.2.1 Fossorial movement mass (Figure 2.3) (Harris and Steudel, 1997), with
prey captured in the jaws or forelimbs. The clav-
The Mustelidae and Mephitidae include several
icle is lost, allowing scapular rotation along the
obligatory below-ground foragers, that is, they must
dorso-ventrally elongated ribcage, and the digiti-
move soil to forage. These include American bad-
grade stance further lengthens the stride. Coursers
gers, European badgers, honey badgers, hog bad-
such as the canids, wolverine, and spotted hyena
gers, ferret badgers, ferrets, polecats, and stink
trot, gallop, or bound long distances at sustained
badgers. Mustelids smaller than ferrets also for-
intermediate speeds, whereas sprinters, typically
age underground, but do not move soil. Fossorial
ambush predators, run fast in short bursts, typ-
forms have forelimbs modified for digging, includ-
ically while pursuing prey. Some coursers have
ing longer claws and elongated olecranon processes
limited hip and elbow rotation, which increases run-
of the ulna, which strengthened the digging stroke
ning efficiency at the expense of maneuvering and
(Rose et al. 2014). They also exhibit enlarged scapu-
manipulating prey. Distinct suites of adaptations
lar surfaces and shortened limbs to allow moving
are associated with coursing vs. ambushing. Cours-
in constricted spaces (Figure 2.3) (Van Valkenburgh,
ing species cover their home ranges at a walk or trot,
1987). The distal limbs tend toward the planti-
detecting prey via sight, hearing, or scent. Once a
grade condition, in which the podial-metapodial
prey animal is encountered, the courser may seize
joint touches the ground, as seen in the hind foot
and kill it with a bite (e.g. small canids), disable
of a bear. As well, the plane of the forefoot bends
it by exhaustion and blood loss, injure its cervi-
medially (supinates) in the American badger to
cal spine, or asphyxiate it by crushing the trachea.
allow excavated soil to pass beneath the abdomen
Their running muscles have high concentrations of
and between the hind legs. The clavicle is vestigial
myoglobin-rich, slow-oxidative fibers, with dense
or completely lost, allowing greater range of fore-
mitochondria, which are fatigue-resistant at sus-
limb motion. Domestic ferrets walk in tunnels by
tained intermediate speeds (see Goldspink, 1977
lowering and flattening the lumbar spine, which
for canid–felid comparison, Hill et al., 2012). These
serves to decrease the effective lengths of the limbs.
muscles tend to have high densities of capillaries
These adaptations allow ferrets to walk at the same
essential for sustained oxygen delivery (Sjøgaard,
speed along subterranean burrows as above ground
1982). Coursers cannot easily grasp prey with the
(Horner and Biknevicius, 2010). A slender snout in
forelimbs, having little elbow rotation and claws
some species facilitates seizing prey in tight spaces,
that cannot protract.
and the pinnae are reduced. In addition to burrow-
Sprinters, by contrast, traverse their home ranges
dwellers, several small and mid-sized mustelids
at a walk, lie in wait for longer periods, tend to
forage or occupy dens in talus fields, hollow tree
detect prey by vision rather than olfaction, and
boles or other confined spaces (Harris and Steudel,
capture them after brief pursuits, in other words,
1997). Many small canids, herpestids, and viver-
ambushing. Most felids are such predators, and are
rids occupy burrows for protection from enemies or
physiologically similar to coursers, but run faster for
weather, but not necessarily for foraging.
briefer periods and tire more quickly. Their running
muscles are mostly fast glycolytic and have higher
rates of contraction, less myoglobin, and fewer
2.2.2 Running and walking
mitochondria than do coursers. They metabolize
Most terrestrial carnivorans trot, bound, or run. anaerobically during peak exertion, accumulating
I distinguish between two patterns of cursation lactic acid in muscle cells. Cats and other ambush
FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY 17
1000
Maned wolf
Canada lynx
Geoffroy’s cat
European badger
Hind limb length (mm)
100
European polecat
Canidae
Least weasel Felidae
Hyaenidae
Mustelidae
Viverridae +
Herpestidae
10
0.05 0.5 5 50
Body mass (kg)
Figure 2.3 Hind limb length in relation to body mass for sixty-three terrestrial carnivoran species. Mustelids that excavate soil have proportionally
short legs. Canada lynx and boreal forest martens, which walk on snow in winter, have long legs.
Modified from Harris and Steudel (1997).
Figure 2.4 A caracal rotates an elbow to lick the plantar surface of a forefoot. Elbow rotation is important for grasping prey and for climbing
trees. The claws of the forelimb are normally retracted.
Photo: © four oaks/Canstock.
The latter trait is well developed in both species 2.2.4 Swimming and deep diving
of panda of and the kinkajou and is so well devel-
Mammals returned to the marine environment
oped in the giant panda as to suggest adaptation
seven times over their evolution, and of the five
for grasping bamboo during feeding or climbing
surviving marine lineages, three (pinnipeds, polar
(Gould, 1978). Climbing bears also have robust sub-
bear, and sea otter) are carnivoran (Uhen, 2007).
scapularis muscles, which insert along the posterior
Among pinniped families, we see the strongest
margin of the scapula and stabilize the shoulder
adaptations to swimming and deep diving in the
when bears pull themselves up by their forelimbs
Phocidae. Their hind limbs have lost all locomo-
(Davis, 1949). Among canids, only the scansorial
tor function on land but are effective propulsive
gray foxes have somewhat sharp and recurved fore-
organs in water. By contrast, the Otariidae and
limb claws, climbing mostly by hopping from limb
Odobenidae support their posterior bodies on hind
to limb, rather than by hoisting themselves. Smaller
limbs to walk awkwardly on land, and dive effec-
felids ascend trees by either branch-hopping or by
tively to shallower depths than do phocids. The
grasping the bole. In addition to various musteloids
less derived semi-aquatic forms include (in approx-
and procyonids, several Oligocene felids were
imately decreasing order of aquatic adaptation) the
in this group; the latter likely used trees for
sea otter, other otters, minks, the otter civet, the
escape, rather than for foraging (Van Valkenburgh,
aquatic genet, raccoons, and the fishing cat. Fishing
1987).
cats, jaguars, and raccoons forage by wading and
FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY 19
blood volume, high hematocrit, high O2 binding intestines—more like pinnipeds than terrestrial
of hemoglobin, and concentrated myoglobin in mustelids—that are long for their body sizes. The
somatic muscles. Most oxygen is stored in muscle adaptive value of small intestines of such length
and blood, rather than in air in respiratory pas- has long puzzled physiologists (Maxwell, 1967).
sages. Further, the spleen stores oxygenated red The current hypothesis suggests this result is due
cells, which are released into the general circulation to the redirection of blood away from the gut under
under hypoxia. In addition, long-duration divers anoxic diving conditions. This suspends digestive
experience bradycardia, increase their anaerobic processes for extended periods and lengthened
metabolism, and temporarily reduce blood flow to small intestines compensate for lost time when
organs not essential during dives. Blood supply to divers return to the surface and circulation to the
and aerobic metabolism in the head, adrenal glands, gut is restored (Duque-Correa et al., 2021).
and placenta are maintained (Bininda-Emonds et al.,
2001; Ponganis, 2015).
2.5 The integument
The adaptive value of fur color and markings has
2.4 Gut morphology
been considered for various species and multiple
In comparison with other mammals, and setting hypotheses exist, of which crypsis and aposema-
aside deep divers, the carnivoran digestive tract is tism are the most common. Various carnivorans, like
remarkable for its simple form. It has no volume- other mammals, feature pelage that matches their
enhancing chambers, sacculation, or structures to background—dark in forest environments (Gloger’s
house fermenting microbes (Figure 2.6). This is so rule), light tan on arid, sandy backgrounds, and
even for species that evolved obligate herbivory white in snowy habitats (Caro and Mallarino, 2020).
millions of years ago; phylogeny shows a stronger Some pinniped species whelp white neonates where
signal than diet in carnivoran gut morphology. Sev- they are born on snowy backgrounds, but dark ones
eral factors complicate comparisons, however. Most in caves or on predator-free islands. Four carnivo-
variation in gut length lies in the small intestine; rans, three of them Mustela spp., undergo seasonal
colon length varies little with diet. Mustelids have color changes to white in winter. Two of those
total intestinal (small + large) lengths about 1.4 species do so only in the parts of their ranges with
times that for terrestrial carnivorans generally, for winter-long snow cover. Crypsis is also suggested
unclear reasons. The carnivoran caecum is rudimen- as the adaptive purpose for bold black and white
tary (e.g. in Canidae and Felidae) or absent (e.g. patches of the giant panda (Nokelainen et al. 2021).
in Ursidae, Mustelidae, and Procyonidae), unlike Aposematic coloration has received special consid-
that of hindgut-digesting herbivores (e.g. rabbits, eration in Carnivora because defensive weapons are
horses, and elephants). Carnivorans that eat more so widespread (Section 7.7.5; Newman et al., 2005;
plant leaves and stems tend toward longer caecae, Howell et al., 2021).
but no substantial microbial fermentation has been Many mammals reduce thermal losses via adap-
reported. The curiously long caecum of the domes- tive fur traits, and fur affects buoyancy in aquatic
tic dog—but not of wild canids—is consistent with species. Among small and mid-sized semiaquatic
the increase in grains in the human diet during carnivorans, the fur is dense, but subcutaneous fat
the agricultural revolution, which coincided with is slight or intermediate. Dense fur traps air that is
dog domestication (McGrosky et al., 2016). This sug- insulative and retains its volume during the shal-
gests potential post-gastric fermentation, but how low dives made by minks, civets, and otters. The sea
the products could be absorbed downstream of the otter, the smallest marine carnivoran, has the dens-
caecum is not known. est underfur reported for any mammal (Figure 2.7),
Marine carnivorans represent a special case of with over 1100 hairs/mm2 (Fish et al., 2002). Sea
digestive morphology, having intestinal lengths otter fur is the most buoyant of any fur reported,
1.4–2.8 times that predicted from body size which is important for reducing the contact area
(Williams et al., 2001). Sea otters have small between the integument and water while resting on
FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY 21
10 cm
10 cm
10 cm
Figure 2.6 Digestive tract length varies highly across mammals, changing partly with diet. The Canada lynx has a shorter digestive tract than a
ruminant herbivore of comparable body size (e.g. dik-dik). Pinnipeds (e.g. California sea lion) have especially long digestive tracts, even accounting
for body size. Scale bar is for digestive tracts.
Modified from Stevens and Hume (1995) and McGrosky et al. (2016).
22 CARNIVORAN ECOLOGY
1200
1000
Hair density (hairs/mm²)
800
Fur
Wa
Pola
Pho
Sea
Bob
Red
Erm
Bro
Nor
Com
Eur
Nor
Sea
Am
buoyancy on water depth; deep divers
ope
lrus
wn
eric
th A
th A
sea
cids
ine
cat
otte
r be
lion
fox
mo
lose insulative effect of fur under high
ls
an m
an o
rat
s
mer
mer
ar
nm
r
ambient pressures. Values for pinnipeds
tter
ican
ican
usk
ink
are means of species means (phocids, n =
13; sea lions, n = 5; fur seals, n = 6). Data
r at
bea
otte
are from Liwanag et al. (2012, Table S4) and
ver
r
Fish et al. (2002, Figure 4).
the surface. This is especially so for females sup- to polar bears, and was considered a possible model
porting neonates on their torsos (Figure 2.8). Fur is for winter clothing design. However, Koon (1998)
a less-effective insulator for deep divers, because of pointed out that the scattering of light in the hair
gas compression at depth—the thickness of an insu- shaft was so great that little light travelled down a
lating air layer at 500 m depth is 2% what it is at single hair shaft to the skin. More recently, Khattab
the surface. The deepest pinniped divers have short, and Tributsch (2015) explained that the mechanism
stiff hairs, rather than air-trapping fur. In addition, observed in polar bears involves light transmis-
the largest marine carnivorans—elephant seals, sea sion via guard hair shafts collectively, not individu-
lions, and walruses—minimize mass-specific ther- ally, so that there is some radiation that makes its
mal losses via their large body sizes. Blubber is a way to the skin. However, the warming effect on
fair thermal insulator and has the added benefit an endotherm as large and well insulated as the
of energy storage and retaining its insulation and polar bear is modest. The fiber optic model has lost
buoyancy at depth (Liwanag et al., 2012). Subcu- explanatory power for how polar bears keep warm,
taneous fat is especially important for deep-diving and no longer inspires designers of cold-weather
pinnipeds, which spend a lot of diving time drifting apparel.
passively through the water column. Body condi-
tion (and therefore the blubber depot) affects drift
rates strongly. As elephant seals increase blubber 2.6 The major ecomorphotypes
depots, they become more buoyant but more hydro- Functional morphologists have tended to clump
dynamically resistant. The relationship is so strong fossil and living mammals into groups of dis-
that body condition can be estimated from drift crete types (“ecomorphs,” vs. “ecotypes”), an
rates, as recorded from pressure transducers (Biuw approach proposed by White and Keller (1984) and
et al., 2003). adapted to the Carnivora by Martin (1989). These
In the 1980s polar bears were proposed to rep- types are based mostly on locomotor and den-
resent a special mechanism of solar warming via tal traits and reflect major adaptive spaces. Exam-
translucent guard hairs that transmit visible and ples include species requiring burrowing vs. tree-
ultraviolet light down the length of the hair shaft, climbing, exhibiting dietary generalization vs. spe-
where it is absorbed by the darkly pigmented skin cialization, or ambushing vs. other means of prey
(Grojean et al. 1980). This “optical fiber” model of capture. Some of these suites of traits have appeared
solar heating held sway, was thought to be unique only once in the fossil record, whereas others have
FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY 23
arisen repeatedly. The strong marine adaptations of in peak running speeds, in climbing ability, in
the pinnipeds, specifically those for deep diving and maneuverability around obstacles, and in ability to
exposure to the open sea, arose only once in the Car- rotate the elbow (Anderrson and Werdelin, 2003).
nivora (Arnason et al., 2006). By contrast, the “saber- Early representatives included creodonts and some
toothed” condition of enlarged upper canines and amphicyonids (bear-dogs) of the Miocene (Viranta,
associated skull modifications appeared in multi- 1996). The most obvious extant representatives are
ple feliform lineages, none of which persisted to the canids and hyaenids, although the latter have inter-
present. mediate tails and limited cursorial abilities. The rise
of this type coincided with the appearance, at tem-
perate latitudes, of savannah beyond the margins
2.6.1 Scansorial ecomorph of moist riparian zones in the mid-Miocene. This
This small- to mid-sized ecomorphotype, the pre- major shift in temperate habitats initially produced,
dominant one in the earliest carnivorans, is associ- in temperate North America, woodland steppe,
ated with forested habitats, traveling on the ground followed by grass-dominated prairie by the early
or on tree branches, and eating small vertebrates, Pliocene. Steppe-like habitats provided the adaptive
insects, and soft mast. The body plan includes space for abundant large grazing herbivores, which
a somewhat elongated skull rostrum, long tail, promoted this carnivoran ecomorphotype (Webb,
elbows with intermediate rotation for climbing 1977; Janis et al., 2002).
and clamoring, and in highly frugivorous forms,
crushing cheek teeth. Modern representatives occur
among the Viverridae, Mustelidae, Procyonidae, 2.6.3 Cat-like ecomorph
and Nandiniidae (see Ercoli and Youlatos, 2016 for These animals occur in two discrete habitat types
discussion of the tayra). with associated adaptations. Forest-dwelling cats
have tended toward small bodies and forelimbs
with short, stout bones for climbing. By con-
2.6.2 Dog-like ecomorph
trast, open-country cats tend toward larger bodies,
Dog-like carnivorans have ranged in size from small longer, thinner bones and greater use of crouch-
to over 75 kg. They have had limbs of interme- ing and ambush (Schellhorn and Sanmugaraja,
diate length and long tails, and were coursers— 2015). Cat-like carnivorans have short rostra with
sustaining trotting for long durations, but limited strong binocular vision, variable tails, and recurved,
24 CARNIVORAN ECOLOGY
protractible claws. The elbow joint rotates well high speed. Its most distinctive features were cranial
for grasping prey and tree boles (Anderrson and and dental: powerful jaw musculature and large,
Werdelin, 2003). One extant exception is the chee- pyramidal premolars for cracking bones. Among
tah, which has reduced forelimb rotation and semi- extinct species, we see examples in the Borophag-
retractile claws, and uses longer chases to capture inae (Canidae), some creodonts, and some early
prey than do pure ambushers. Cat-like animals Laurasiatherian forms (Arctocyonia) that may have
have tended to be the largest-bodied carnivorans had ungulate or carnivoran ancestors. Australo-
in many fossil assemblages; small-bodied extant hyaena, a South American marsupial sparassodont,
species remain common (Van Valkenburgh, 2007). converged on the same ecomorph (Forasiepi et al.,
Prey can be larger or smaller than the predator, 2015). Among extant species, it is exemplified in
killed by either a bite to the dorsal cervical spine three species of hyaenids, the wolverine, and the
or (in the case of saber-toothed forms) laceration of ursids.
the neck vessels. The saber-tooted dentition evolved
twice outside of the Carnivora—in Machaeroides
2.6.5 Semi-fossorial ecomorph
(Creodonta) and Thylacosmilus (Sparassodonta)—
and multiple times within the Feliformia. Two These mostly small and mid-sized species either
major saber-toothed subtypes are recognized. The excavate burrows to forage or enlarge those made
scimitar-toothed feliforms had upper canines inter- by other species. I do not include the many species
mediate in length and elongated dorso-ventrally, of several families that use and modify under-
while flattened laterally. These teeth featured dis- ground dens or burrows to thermoregulate, avoid
tinct crenulations along their edges. Their legs were threats, or give birth. Among extinct forms, this
long and optic regions of the brain enlarged, adap- type was exemplified in several genera of Miocene
tive for bursts of speed and visually localizing prey. mustelids not ancestral to the modern analogues
By contrast, “dirk-toothed” animals had especially (Hochstein, 2007). In extant forms, it is more preva-
long upper canines, in Smilodon serrated along both lent among the Caniformia than in the Feliformia
margins. Their body plans featured shorter legs and and shows specific adaptations for either digging
enlarged olfactory bulbs in the brain in comparison or entering tight spaces: slender bodies, short legs,
with scimitar-toothed forms. Analyses of bone den- or elongated claws. Frontal sinuses tend to be lost
sity and stress modeling of the rostra of both sub- to conserve skull volume (Curtis et al., 2015). Asso-
types and modern lions have revealed differences in ciated with these characteristics are altricial young,
prey-killing styles (Figueirido et al., 2018). The dirk- geographic ranges that extend to high latitudes, and
toothed Smilodon seems to have used its shorter, invertebrate diets. Species that excavate their own
more powerful forelimbs to grasp prey while stab- burrows tend toward group denning, as opposed
bing the vascularized neck with its dirk-like canines. to group hunting (Noonan et al., 2015). Modern
Modern lions, with their much shorter and more examples include aardwolves, badgers, meerkats,
conical canines, are better suited to sustained multi- polecats, some Mustela spp., and some mephitids.
direction stresses experienced when they grasp and
hold struggling prey. Scimitar-toothed forms were
2.6.6 Semi-aquatic ecomorph
intermediate between Smilodon and modern lions
in their adaptations for stabbing vs. withstanding These are the otters of subfamily Lutrinae, which
lateral shaking. Some fossil feliforms combined ele- exhibit many standard aquatic adaptations: short-
ments of the two subtypes, featuring scimitar-like ened limbs and pinnae, elongated bodies, streamlin-
teeth, but stout, short limbs (Martin et al., 2000). ing, webbed digits, and dentition adapted for seiz-
ing and severing parts of fish, as well as crushing
the exoskeletons of invertebrates. Most swim pow-
2.6.4 Scavenger ecomorph
erfully and nimbly to depths of scores of meters,
This ecomorph was characterized by a robust skele- but return to land to rest, and all but the sea
ton adapted to trotting and running, but not at otter give birth in sheltered dens. European and
FUNCTIONAL MORPHOLOGY 25
American minks are less derived for aquatic living, represents a unique carnivoran phenotype: a bur-
eating slower-moving fish, some small mammals, rowing termite eater with locomotor adaptations
and intertidal or shallow-water invertebrates. similar to canids but derived from a lineage that
radiated into ungulate predators and bone-cracking
scavengers.
2.6.7 Marine ecomorph
The seals, sea lions, and walruses exhibit extreme
marine adaptations among the Carnivora: large, Key points
streamlined bodies, limbs modified as flippers for
• Functional morphology examines relationships
swimming at the expense of walking, and den-
between structure and various kinds of perfor-
tal modifications for seizing fish before swallow-
mance at the organ or tissue scale. The most active
ing them whole, or for crushing invertebrates.
areas of carnivoran research have concerned the
Adaptations to deep and long-duration diving are
skull, fore- and hind limbs, and gastrointestinal
extensive: skeletal morphology, streamlining, oxy-
tract.
gen storage systems, circulatory redistribution, and
• Dental adaptations to hunting and vertebrate car-
endocrine adaptations to deep or long-duration
nivory include refinement of the shearing func-
dives. The sea otter combines elements of the semi-
tion of P4 -M1 , hyper-elongation of the canines in
aquatic and marine ecomorphs, diving only to shal-
some extinct lineages, and reduction or loss of
low depths, but being more aquatic-adapted than
premolars and post-carnassials. The incisors have
other otters in other respects.
changed little through carnivoran evolutionary
history.
• Omnivory, folivory, and a diet of mollusks tend
2.6.8 Intermediate and unique ecomorphs
to select for rounded cheek teeth and loss of the
Some extant species do not fit neatly into only shearing function and retention of premolars.
one of these named categories, and we can assume • Locomotor derivations from the early carnivoran
that some extinct ones did not either. Among liv- condition include suites of adaptations for dig-
ing forms, the boreal forest martens (five species ging and fossorial foraging, coursing, ambushing,
of Martes) forage near the ground or on the snow climbing, swimming, and diving to great depths.
surface, investigating burrows (or subnivean access • The guts of carnivorans are short and simple,
points) by scent. However, they also can forage, and tend toward evolutionary conservatism, with
rest, and den in the forest canopy, and rely season- only slight adaptation to folivory in extant foliv-
ally on foods of aquatic or marine origin. Mustelids orous forms. Pinnipeds have long guts for their
are typically regarded as short-legged, but martens body sizes.
are among the longest-legged carnivorans for their • Cardiopulmonary and circulatory adaptations in
body size (Figure 2.3). Long limbs permit them deep-diving pinnipeds are dramatic and relate
to traverse home ranges that are large for their to two discrete issues: hypoxia resulting from
body sizes, even by carnivoran standards (Buskirk extended duration dives, and pressure-related
and McDonald, 1989), but flexible spines allow effects of dives to great depths.
them to traverse narrow passages and negotiate • Ecomorphotypes (ecomorphs) are groups of
tree branches. Raccoons (Procyonidae) alternate species that tend toward similar morphologies
between shallow-water and riparian environments and niches, based mostly on locomotor morphol-
for foraging omnivorously, but climb trees for soft ogy and dentition. For carnivorans, these types
mast, predator escape, and denning. Giant pandas comprise tree-climbing forms, dog-like coursers,
(Ursidae) and red pandas (Ailuridae) convergently ambushers of several types, scavengers, semi-
evolved specialized morphologies for bamboo her- fossorial forms, marine dwellers, and intermedi-
bivory and tree climbing. Finally, the aardwolf ates.
26 CARNIVORAN ECOLOGY
Liwanag, H.E.M. et al. (2012) “Morphological and thermal Schwab, J.A. et al. (2019) “Carnivoran hunting style and
properties of mammalian insulation: the evolution of phylogeny reflected in bony labyrinth morphometry,”
fur for aquatic living,” Biological Journal of the Linnean Scientific Reports, 9, p. 70.
Society, 106, pp. 926–39. Sjøgaard, G. (1982) “Capillary supply and cross-sectional
Martin, L.D. (1989) “Fossil history of the terrestrial Car- area of slow and fast twitch muscle fibres in man,”
nivora,” in Gittleman, J.L. (ed.) Carnivore behavior, ecol- Histochemistry, 76, pp. 547–55.
ogy and evolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, Stein, A.B., Bourquin, S.L. and McNutt, J.W. (2015) “Avoid-
pp. 536–68. ing intraguild competition: leopard feeding ecology and
Martin, L.D. et al. (2000) “Three ways to be a saber-toothed prey caching in northern Botswana,” African Journal of
cat,” Naturwissenschaften, 87, pp. 41–4. Wildlife Research, 45, pp. 247–57.
Maxwell, G. (1967) Seals of the world. Boston: Houghton Stevens, C.E., and Hume, I.D. (1995). Comparative physi-
Mifflin. ology of the vertebrate digestive system. Second edition.
McGrosky, A. et al. (2016) “Gross intestinal morphology Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
and allometry in Carnivora,” European Journal of Wildlife Udevitz. M.S. et al. (2013) “Potential population-level
Research, 62, pp. 395–405. effects of increased haulout-related mortality of Pacific
Moore, W.J. (2009). The mammalian skull. Cambridge: Cam- walrus calves,” Polar Biology, 36, pp. 291–8.
bridge University Press. Uhen, M.D. (2007) “Evolution of marine mammals: back to
Newman, C., Buesching, C.D. and Wolff, J.O. (2005) “The the sea after 300 million years,” Anatomical Record, 290,
function of facial masks in ‘midguild’ carnivores”, pp. 514–22.
Oikos, 108, pp. 623–33. Van Valkenburgh, B. (1987) “Skeletal indicators of locomo-
Nokelainen, O. et al. (2021) “The giant panda is cryptic,” tor behavior in living and extinct carnivores,” Journal of
Scientific Reports, 11, p. 21287. Vertebrate Paleontology, 7, pp. 162–82.
Noonan, M.J. et al. (2015) “Evolution and function Van Valkenburgh, B. (2007) “Déjà vu: the evolution of
of fossoriality in the Carnivora: implications for feeding morphologies in the Carnivora,” Integrative and
group-living,” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 3, Comparative Biology, 47, pp. 147–63.
p. 116. Viranta, S. (1996) “European Miocene Amphicyonidae—
Penrose, F. et al. (2020) “Functional morphology of the jaw taxonomy, systematics and ecology,” Acta Zoologica Fen-
adductor muscles in the Canidae,” Anatomical Record, nica, 204, pp. 1–61.
303, pp. 2878–2903. Watanabe, Y.Y., Baranov, E.A. and Miyazaki, N. (2020)
Penrose, F., Kemp, G.J and Jeffery, N. (2016) “Scaling and “Ultrahigh foraging rates of Baikal seals make tiny
accommodation of jaw adductor muscles in Canidae,” endemic amphipods profitable in Lake Baikal,” Proceed-
Anatomical Record, 299, pp. 951–66. ings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States
Pollock, T.I., Hocking, D.P. and Evans, A.R. (2021) “The of America, 117, pp. 31242–8.
killer’s toolkit: remarkable adaptations in the canine Webb, S.D. (1977) “A history of savanna vertebrates in the
teeth of mammalian carnivores,” Zoological Journal of New World. Part I: North America,” Annual Review of
the Linnean Society, zlab064, https://doi.org/10.1093/ Ecology and Systematics, 8, pp. 355–80.
zoolinnean/zlab064 White, J.A. and Keller, B.L. (1984) “Evolutionary stabil-
Ponganis, P.J. (2015) Diving physiology of marine mam- ity and ecological relationships of morphology in North
mals and seabirds. Cambridge: Cambridge University American Lagomorpha,” Carnegie Museum of Natural
Press. History Special Publication, 9, pp. 58–66.
Rose, J. et al. (2014) “Functional osteology of the forelimb Williams, T.M. (1999) “The evolution of cost efficient
digging apparatus of badgers,” Journal of Mammalogy, swimming in marine mammals: limits to energetic opti-
95, pp. 543–58. mization,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society
Rose, K.D. (2006) The beginning of the age of mammals. Balti- of London B: Biological Sciences, 354, pp. 193–201.
more: Johns Hopkins University Press. Williams, T.M. et al. (2001) “A killer appetite: metabolic
Schellhorn, R. and Sanmugaraja, M. (2015) “Habitat adap- consequences of carnivory in marine mammals,”
tations in the felid forearm,” Paläontologische Zeitschrift, Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A, 129,
89, pp. 261–9. pp. 785–96.
CHAPTER 3
The major processes of evolution above the species extinct forms to infer phylogeny to estimate diver-
level—macroevolution—are basic to understanding gence times. Regions of the genome that change
the structure and function of modern carnivoran rapidly, including those that do not code proteins
ecology. Some modern carnivorans occupy similar and are under weak (or no) selective pressure,
ecological niches to those of the earliest members of change rapidly enough that populations—or even
the order. Others are highly derived, having mor- individuals—of the same species can be discerned.
phological traits or ecological functions that arose— Other regions, which code for the basic architec-
in some cases multiple times across lineages—over ture of form and function, evolve slowly. If a focal
the course of carnivoran evolution. Competition branch of the tree of life has modern descendants
structured past carnivoran communities as it does that provide undegraded DNA, divergence times of
modern ones, although the inferential processes branches can be estimated. The combination of fos-
used by ecologists vs. paleoecologists differ. Here, sil and molecular evidence is a powerful tool for
I consider phylogenetic differentiation at the levels telling the evolutionary history of the Carnivora,
of subclass and family and the importance of geog- but the two lines of evidence can paint contradictory
raphy in producing the diversity and distributions pictures (Gura, 2000). Published phylogenies based
of carnivorans we see in fossil and modern forms. on molecular evidence are now calibrated to fossil-
based divergence dates, so that dated trees reflect
both kinds of evidence (e.g. Dornburg et al., 2012;
3.1 Evidence for mammalian phylogeny
Nyakatura and Bininda-Emonds, 2012). This is the
A major consideration in the reconstruction of car- current gold standard for vertebrate phylogenies.
nivoran evolutionary history is the inferential utility
of fossil vs. genetic evidence. Fossils provide evi-
3.2 Early mammals
dence of morphology, geographic location, and geo-
logical context. The morphology of preserved body The first mammals, as partially defined by a jaw
parts—particularly teeth, skulls, and long bones— joint in which the dentary bone of the lower jaw
provides information on how the animal lived, articulates with the squamosal (temporal) bone of
particularly its diet and style of locomotion. The the cranium, have been identified from the Late
geological contexts of fossil deposits provide esti- Triassic Period, around 205 Ma (Figure 3.1). They
mates of minimum ages of various lineages and descended from and strongly resembled an amniote
their relatedness. However, fossil representation lineage that began to display mammalian traits—
of past vertebrate diversity declines with increas- heterodont dentition, two occipital condyles, and
ing age, and phylogenetic relatedness can be con- distal limbs oriented antero-posteriorly—over the
fused with trait convergence. As a result, divergence previous 100 million years. These traits arose mul-
times and inferred relatedness of early carnivoran tiple times in the nearest non-mammalian lin-
lineages are less reliable than for those that are eage, Cynodontia, only one branch of which gave
more recent. Genetic methods, particularly since rise to mammals. The earliest mammals persisted
1990, have used DNA from living and recently until eutherian mammals, recognized in fossils by
Carnivoran Ecology. Steven W. Buskirk, Oxford University Press. © Steven W. Buskirk (2023). DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780192863249.003.0003
30 CARNIVORAN ECOLOGY
Epoch Epoch
Age 66 Present HOLOCENE
(Ma) 2.6 PLEISTOCENE
PLIOCENE
5.3
Last Creodonta
CRETACEOUS MIOCENE
23
Pinniped divergence
145 OLIGOCENE
33.9
JURASSIC
EOCENE
201
55.8
TRIASSIC
PALEOCENE Caniformia-Feliformia
divergence
252 66
Mesozoic Cenozoic
Figure 3.1 Geologic time scales for the Mesozoic and Cenozoic eras, with key events in carnivoran evolution.
Ma = million years before present. The boundary between Mesozoic and Cenozoic eras, formerly denoted the K–T (Cretaceous–Tertiary) boundary, is now called the
K–Pg (Cretaceous-Paleogene) boundary.
their forelimb bones and, except in the earliest Land mammals held ecologically minor roles com-
forms, absence of epipubic bones, diverged from pared to land reptiles, the latter being larger-bodied,
the metatherian lineage that led to marsupials about more diverse, and more abundant. The predaceous
160 Ma (Luo et al., 2011). The earliest eutherian for dinosaurs likely caused mammals to remain small,
which we have well-preserved skull and postcra- nocturnal, and rare.
nial bones had five upper and four lower incisors These ecological circumstances changed abruptly
on each side, single upper and lower canines, and at the Cretaceous–Paleogene (K–Pg, formerly K–T)
five premolars and three molars in each jaw (I5 /I4 , boundary, about 66.5 Ma, when an extraterrestrial
C1 /C1 , P5 /P5 , M3 /M3 ). Its three-cusped cheek teeth bolide struck the coastline of modern Yucatan, Mex-
were consistent with a diet dominated by insects; ico. The resulting pulse of heat, lasting mere hours,
it had the limb joints of a scansorial tree-climber killed nearly all forms of terrestrial vertebrate life
and was mouse-sized. Eutherians remained rare that could not shelter in water, in underground
and small-bodied for the remainder of the Meso- burrows, or in caves, over most of the planet
zoic Era. Most were omnivores no larger than rats, (Robertson et al., 2004). How many mammalian lin-
although descriptions exist of badger-sized preda- eages survived the event is unclear, but molecular
tors that ate small dinosaurs (Hu et al., 2005). tools have identified four major continental centers
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
Hysterical contracture, like hysterical paralysis, may assume a
variety of forms: it may be hemiplegic, monoplegic, paraplegic,
alternating, or local, as of the ocular muscles, the facial or neck
muscles; laryngeal, pharyngeal, or œsophageal; of the fingers or of
the toes.
Very few observations in cases of hysteria have been made with the
ophthalmoscope, and probably little is to be learned in this way. In
one of Charcot's patients, however, Galezowski saw an infiltration
and capillary reddening of the disc with fusiform dilatations of the
artery.
Perversions of the senses of smell and taste are among the rarer
phenomena in the sensory sphere in hysteria. These may be of three
kinds: the senses may be completely obtunded; they may be
hyperacute; or they may show peculiar perversions. To some
individuals of the hysterical temperament certain smells are almost
unendurable, and these may be odors which to others are
particularly pleasant. In like manner, certain articles of food or drink
may be the source of great discomfort or absolute suffering. It is one
of the oldest of observations that hysterical and morbid cravings for
disagreeable or disgusting substances sometimes exist.
The affection which has come down to us from ancient times under
the name of clavus hystericus is an acute boring pain confined to a
small point at the top of the head, and is sometimes described as
resembling the pain which would be produced by driving a nail into
the head; hence the term, from clavus, a nail. It may last for hours,
days, or even weeks. Instead of clavus hystericus, hemicrania,
occipital headache, or nape-aches may be present. On the whole,
aches and pains of the head in hysterical cases are more likely to be
localized to some point or area than to be general. Hysterical
patients, however, not infrequently complain of constricting,
contracting, or compressing sensations in the head.
On the other hand, it has been claimed that a true hysterical fever
never occurs or is extremely rare. Admitting this view, several
explanations may be given of the rise of temperature observed. It
may be due to intercurrent affections, as typhoid or intermittent fever,
or some local inflammatory disorder. It may be secondary fever, the
result of muscular effort or some similar cause. Lastly, and most
probably, it may be due to ingenious fraud, as to friction of the bulb,
pressure, or tapping with the finger, dipping the instrument into hot
water, connivance with the nurse, etc. Du Castel93 has reported a
trick of this kind. An hysterical girl, convalescent from an attack of
sore throat, displayed remarkable alternations of temperature. One
day the thermometer reached 163.4° F.! By carefully watching the
patient it was found she had learned the trick of lightly tapping the
end of the thermometer, which caused the mercury to ascend as far
as she wished. In the case of chronic hysterical insanity of which the
details have been given the temperature in the axilla on several
occasions reached 102°, 103°, and even 105° F.
93 Revue de Thérapeutique méd.-chir., No. xi., 1884.
Some wasting does not negative the idea of hysteria, but this
wasting a not associated with changing the electrical reaction.
A lady fell off her chair backward. She was not rendered
unconscious, but became nervous, and began to have considerable
pain and soreness in the sacral region and about the right sacro-iliac
juncture. She had no palsy, nor spasm, nor anæsthesia, nor
paræsthesia, and had no difficulty in her bladder, but nevertheless
was helpless in bed for many weeks, supposing herself unable to
stand. She recovered promptly, under treatment with electricity, as
soon as a favorable prognosis was given in a very positive manner.
A man fell on the ice and struck his back, but was able to go on with
his usual occupation, although complaining of his limbs. Two months
afterward, while recovering from typhoid fever, he fell from a chair,
and was unable to raise himself, and found that he had lost control of
his legs and arms. During the attack he was not unconscious. He
was bed-ridden for two months, but did not lose control of his
bladder and bowels. He was put on his feet by a little treatment and
much encouragement.