Differences Between The PICS EU GMP Guidelines and WHO Guidelines - Final
Differences Between The PICS EU GMP Guidelines and WHO Guidelines - Final
Differences Between The PICS EU GMP Guidelines and WHO Guidelines - Final
In 1989, the European Union adopted its own GMP Guide, which – in terms of GMP
requirements – is equivalent to the PIC/S GMP Guide. Since that time, the EU and the
PIC/S GMP Guides have been developed in parallel and whenever a change has been
made to one, the other has been amended so that both Guides are practically
identical.
1. The expression “authorized person” is used in the PIC/s Guide (also used in the WHO Guide) while
the expression “Qualified person” is used in the EU Guide (the two terms are strictly equivalent).
2. References to the EU Directives and Regulations, as well as to Mutual Recognition Agreement
(MRA) have been deleted from the PIC/S Guide.
4. The EU first adopted the ICH Q7A GMP Guide on APIs as Annex 18 to the EU GMP Guide while PIC/S
adopted it as a stand-alone GMP Guide (PE 007). The Guide has now been adopted as Part II of the
PIC/S and EU GMP Guides. Part 1 includes the GMP requirements for medicinal products. The
change was necessary in order to make clear that all annexes are applicable to both medicinal
product manufacturers and API manufacturers.
5. Since not all Participating Authorities under the PIC/S Scheme are parties to the European
Pharmacopoeia Convention, the mention of “European Pharmacopoeia” in the PIC/S Guide has
been amended to read “European or other relevant Pharmacopoeia”.
24/11/2021 Proprietary + Confidential
What about the differences between
the PIC/S, EU GMP Guidelines and WHO
GMP Guidelines?
The following documents were compared:
1. The term “Quality Risk Management” (QRM) is mentioned several times in PIC/S and
EU GMP Guides while it appears only twice in WHO GMP Guide. Furthermore, there
are examples of the processes and applications of QRM in Annex 20 of PIC/S Guide and
ICH Q9 (ICH Q9 is reproduced in Part III of the EU GMP Guide). But WHO has other
guideline on Quality Risk Management that describes the WHO approach to QRM, using
the concepts described in ICH Q9 (see Annex 2, WHO Technical Report Series 981,
2013).
24/11/2021 Proprietary + Confidential
Sanitation and Hygiene
2. EU and PIC/S GMP Guides give more detail around cross-contamination than WHO
GMP Guide, especially regarding the appropriate organizational and technical measures
that should be taken to avoid cross-contamination.
3. WHO GMP Guide describes very briefly and superficially about validation and qualification. E.g.,
there is no mention of Factory Acceptance Testing (FAT) or Site Acceptance Testing (SAT) nor
User Requirements Specifications (URS). But WHO has another guideline on validation and
qualification (see Annex 3, WHO Technical Report Series 1019, 2019).
4. PIC/S and EU GMP Guides provide more detail on complaints and product recalls than WHO
GMP Guide. E.g., there is more information on investigation, root cause analysis, and corrective
and preventive actions.
24/11/2021 Proprietary + Confidential
Self-inspection, Quality Audits and
Suppliers’ Audits
Corresponding Chapter in Corresponding Chapter in EU GMP
WHO GMP Guideline
PIC/S GMP Guideline Guideline
Chapter 7 – Contract production, analysis and other activities Chapter 7 – Outsourced Activities
• General/ The contract giver/ The contract aceptor/ The contract • Principle/ General/ The Contract Giver/ The Contract Acceptor/ The Contract
Chapter 8 – Self-inspection, quality audits and suppliers’ audits and Chapter 9 – Self Inspection
approval • Principle
• Items for self-inspection/ Self-inspection team/ Frequency of
self-inspection/ Self-inspection report/ Follow-up action/ Quality
audit/ Supplier’s audits and approval
5. The information on self-inspection is the same in the PIC/S GMP Guide as in the EU
GMP Guide. However, the information in these guides does not match what is in WHO
GMP Guide. e.g.: frequency of self-inspection.
• “The frequency with which self-inspections are conducted may depend on company
requirements but should preferably be at least once a year.” (WHO Guide);
• “…should be examined at intervals following a pre-arranged programme…” (PIC/S and EU Guides)
6. WHO GMP Guide describes very briefly some topics, such as qualification of suppliers and
sampling of materials.
7. WHO GMP Guide has more detail on Qualified Person and batch release than chapter 2
(personnel) of EU and PIC/S Guides, however the EU has Annex 16 with particularities of this
issue (PIC/S will soon incorporate the Annex 16 into a PIC/S guideline).
24/11/2021 Proprietary + Confidential
Training
8. The training information are very similar in these Guides. The biggest difference is
found in the following paragraph:
PIC/S and EU GMP Guides mention that training programmes should be approved by either the head of
Production or the head of Quality Control, as appropriate. Besides that, both Guides also indicates that should
have basic training on the theory and practice of the quality management system.
24/11/2021 Proprietary + Confidential
Documentation
WHO GMP Guideline Corresponding Chapter in PIC/S GMP Guideline Corresponding Chapter in EU GMP Guideline
Chapter 15 – Documentation Chapter 4 – Documentation
• General/ Documents • Principle/ Required GMP Documentation (by type)/ Generation and Control of Documentation/ Good Documentation
required Practices/ Retention of Documents/ Specifications (specifications for starting and packaging materials, intermediate and
bulk products and finished products)/ Manufacturing Formula and Processing Instructions (Packaging Instructions,
Batch Processing Records and Batch Packaging Records)/ Procedures and Records (receipt, sampling, testing, other)
9. PIC/S and EU GMP Guides provide more detail on documentation than WHO GMP Guide. e.g.:
• Both PIC/S and EU indicate that documentation may exist in a variety of forms, including paper-based, electronic
or photographic media. Also introduces the term “hybrid form”, where some documentation elements exist as
electronic and others as paper based (WHO does not use this term).
• “Standard Operating Procedures, Work Instructions and Methods should be written in an imperative mandatory
style” – this information appears in the PIC/S Guides but does not appear in the WHO Guide.
11. Production: there is no information especially regarding product shortage due to manufacturing
constraints in WHO GMP Guide. E.g.:
• “The manufacturer should report to the Marketing Authorisation Holder (MAH) any constraints in manufacturing
operations which may result in abnormal restriction in the supply. This should be done in a timely manner to
facilitate reporting of the restriction in supply by the MAH, to the relevant competent authorities, in accordance
with its legal obligations” (PIC/S and EU Guides).
12. Quality Control: there is no information on technical transfer of testing methods in the WHO
GMP Guide. There are also insufficient details around on-going stability.
24/11/2021 Proprietary + Confidential
Final Remarks
✓ EMA and several of the Medicine’s Regulatory Authorities
are involved in the Pharmaceutical Inspection Convention
and Pharmaceutical Inspection Co-operation Scheme
(PIC/S), a close international cooperation between
pharmaceutical inspection authorities in the field GMP.
The Author:
About the Author: