Depositions
Depositions
Depositions
Prior to the discovery procedures discovery modes of discovery rests upon the
provided under the Rules, a party The purpose of discovery sound discretion of the court.
would learn about the opponent’s procedures is to permit mutual
evidence only during trial proper. knowledge before trial of all It is the duty of the courts to
relevant facts gathered by both examine thoroughly the
Definition of Discovery parties so that either party may circumstances of each case and to
Discovery is a device employed compel the other to disgorge determine the applicability of the
by a party to obtain information facts whatever he has in his modes of discovery, bearing
about relevant matters on the possession. always in mind the aim to attain
case from the adverse party, in an expeditious administration of
preparation for the trial. Nature of Application of the justice.
Rules on Modes of Discovery
REFUSAL TO COMPLY WITH the aim to attain an expeditious party obtaining the order; (Rule
MODES OF DISCOVERY (RULE administration of justice. 29, Sec. 3[a]);
29) (5) Prohibition on the refusing
The application of the rules on Sanctions: party to produce evidence,
modes of discovery rests upon the (1) Those which are sought to be support or oppose the
sound discretion of the court. In the established are deemed designated claims or defenses
same vein, the determination of the established (Rule 29, Sec. 3[a]); (Rule 29, Sec. 3[b]);
sanction to be imposed upon a (2) Contempt; (Rule 29, Sec. 2) (6) Striking out pleadings, order
party who fails to comply with the (3) Payment of reasonable fees the dismissal of the action, or
modes of discovery rests on the (Rule 29, Sec. 1[4]) stay the action until compliance,
same sound judicial discretion. It is (4) The matter regarding which or to render judgment by default
the duty of the courts to examine the questions were asked, (Rule 29, Sec. 3[c]); and
thoroughly the circumstances of character or description of land, (7) Order the arrest of the
each case and to determine the et al., be taken to be in refusing party except in case of
applicability of the modes of accordance with the claim of the physical and mental examination
discovery, bearing always in mind (Rule 29, Sec. 3[d]).
Refusal Effects
Refusal to
answer any (a) The court, upon proper application, shall order the deponent or refusing party
question upon to answer the question or interrogatory (Rule 29, Sec. 1).
oral
examination. A refusal to answer after being directed by the court may be considered as a contempt of
court (Rule 29, Sec. 2)
If the refusal is unjustified, the court may order the deponent, a party, or the counsel advising
the refusal, or both of them, to pay the proponent the amount of reasonable expenses
incurred in obtaining the order, including attorney’s fees (Rule 29, Sec. 1).
(b) If the application for an order to compel a deponent to answer is denied
because of the absence of a substantial justification, the court may require the proponent or
the counsel advising the application, or both of them, to pay to the refusing party or deponent
the amount of reasonable expenses incurred in opposing the application, including attorney’s
fees (Rule 29, Sec. 1).
Refusal to
answer (a) The court may order that the matters regarding which the questions were
designated or asked shall be taken as established for purposes of the action in accordance with the claim of
particular the party obtaining them (Rule 29, Sec. 3[a]).
questions or
refusal to (b) The court may issue an order refusing to allow the disobedient party to refuse
produce or support designated claims or defenses or prohibiting him from introducing in evidence
documents or designated documents or things or items of testimony, or from
thing or to
submit to introducing evidence of physical or mental condition (Rule 29, Sec. 3[b]).
physical or
mental (c) The court may issue an order striking out pleadings or parts thereof, or staying
examination further proceedings until the order is obeyed, or dismissing the action or proceeding or any
part thereof, or rendering a judgment by default against the disobedient party (Rule 29, Sec.
3[c]).
(d) The court may direct the arrest of any party or agent of a party for disobeying
any of the orders of the court, except an order to submit to a physical or mental examination
(Rule 29, Sec. 3[d]).
Refusal to be A refusal of a party to be sworn after being directed by the court may be considered as
sworn contempt of court (Rule 29, Sec. 2).
Refusal to If a party refuses to admit the genuineness of any document or the truth of any matter of fact
admit and serves a sworn denial thereof and if the other party later on proves the genuineness of
the document or the truth of such matter of fact, the court upon proper application, may order
the former to pay the
reasonable expenses in making such proof, including attorney ‘s fees (Rule 29, Sec. 4).
Failure to The court may:
attend (1) strike out all or any part of the pleading of that party, or
depositions or (2) dismiss the action or proceeding or any part thereof; or
to serve (3) enter a judgment by default against that party, and in its discretion;
answers to (4) order him to pay reasonable expenses incurred by the other, including attorney‘s fees
interrogatories (Rule 29, Sec. 5).
The consequences under Sec. 5 of Rule 29 will apply if a party refuses to answer the whole
set of written interrogatories, and not just a particular question. Where the party upon whom
the written interrogatories is served, refuses to answer a particular question in the set of
written interrogatories and despite an order compelling him to answer the particular question,
still refuses to obey the order, Sec. 3(c) of Rule 29 will apply (Zepeda vs. China Banking
Corporation, G.R. No. 172175, October 9, 2006).