Mistakes in CT Scan and How To Avoid Them
Mistakes in CT Scan and How To Avoid Them
Mistakes in CT Scan and How To Avoid Them
A
bdominal CT (computed tomography) consistency (fluid versus necrotic tissue), as
is among the most common imaging this can influence management.
tests performed for the investigation of
acute abdominal pathology. There are many
pitfalls that clinicians and radiologists should Mistake 2 Performing a CT scan for acute
be aware of when requesting these studies gastrointestinal bleeding when the
and interpreting the findings. This article patient is clinically stable
covers ten mistakes frequently made with CT scans can be useful for evaluating the cause
abdominal CT, focusing on gastrointestinal of acute gastrointestinal bleeding, particularly
tract and hepatobiliary pathology. These small and large bowel sources that cannot be
mistakes and their discussions are based on reached via upper gastrointestinal endoscopy.
the available literature where possible and However, CT scans can only detect active bleed-
thereafter on our clinical experience. ing >0.3–0.5 mL/min, and so are best utilised in
patients who are haemodynamically unstable
(but not so unstable that transferring them to
the CT scanner would be dangerous).2 As such,
Mistake 1 CT scanning too early in (CBD) stones can be seen, although, overall, these patients will usually require a medical
patients with acute pancreatitis CT has suboptimal sensitivity for detecting escort to accompany them to the radiology
Acute pancreatitis can usually be diagnosed gallstones. CT scans should be performed after department. Scanning haemodynamically stable
accurately based on clinical features and intravenous contrast administration, ideally patients increases the risk of a false-negative
biochemical markers alone. There is a in dual phases—late arterial (35s) and portal result and should be avoided.
considerable risk that a CT scan performed venous (70s)—to help optimise detection of In addition, the scanning protocol for
within 72 hours of admission will be normal pancreatic necrosis and associated vascular suspected gastrointestinal bleeding must
or underestimate the degree of pancreatic complications. The lower abdomen and pelvis be optimised, using a triple-phase technique
necrosis (Figure 1), so early scanning should should be included to fully assess the extent of (unenhanced, arterial and portal venous
be avoided unless there is a high suspicion of free fluid and collections. phases). The unenhanced scan is used to
severe early complications.1 After 72 hours, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) is a identify dense luminal contents that may mimic
CT scanning is useful in cases of severe acute viable alternative to CT if available locally, and contrast extravasation on post-contrast images.
pancreatitis to assess the degree of necrosis is more sensitive for identifying mild changes The unenhanced scan is also best placed to
and presence of complications (e.g. pancreatic of pancreatitis. An MRCP (magnetic resonance identify intraluminal blood clots and intramural
duct disruption, pseudoaneurysm formation, cholangiopancreatography) sequence can haemorrhage. The arterial phase is used to
venous thrombosis, fat necrosis, peripancreatic be obtained at the same time to assess for identify the blush of active contrast extravasation
collections and bowel fistulation/ischaemia). pancreatic duct disruption and exclude ductal into the bowel lumen, and the portal venous
Occasionally, obstructing common bile duct gallstones. MRI is also useful for assessing phase helps increase sensitivity by allowing
more time for the extravasation (Figure 2). The
a b portal venous phase also helps differentiate
active bleeding from a pseudoaneurysm—active
bleeding changes morphology between the