8602-1 M.Farhan
8602-1 M.Farhan
8602-1 M.Farhan
2022
Q. 1
Ans:
The role of the teacher is to instruct students, manage behavior, encourage student
learning and assess progress. The teacher is the leader in the classroom and
maintains responsibility for the students’ learning and safety throughout the school
day.
The teacher sets the tone in the classroom. She is responsible for creating an
environment that allows students to learn and grow. Teachers achieve this by
setting up a stimulating, appealing classroom with procedures and routines.
Before students get to the classroom, the teacher needs lesson plans. These plans
break down the steps for every lesson the teacher uses for instruction to ensure all
learning objectives are met. Lesson plans also help the teacher stay organized
while teaching. The lessons a teacher creates provide the framework for instructing
students and giving them practice on the new skills they learn.
Teachers also serve as role models for their students. A teacher encourages
learning by showing that she is still learning. She encourages students to use
creativity and use learning tools to expand knowledge.
Teachers play vital roles in the lives of the students in their classroom. There are 5
different range of teacher roles. These are: Assesor, Controller, Manager, Materials
Producer and Motivator. The role of an Assessor is important as the assessor will
need to monitor and assess the progress of students.
Now a days, I'm teaching "literary pedagogy" subject to my BS-4 students. I have
prepared a teaching program and have divided my few lectures into two-two
phases. In my last class, I involved my students into different works, including
group discussion to judge their capacity to work in team, leader participation to
judge their role as a leader, written task to evaluate their writing ability and critical
thinking.. as well as I focused on their minor grammatical mistakes in writing and
speaking etc. After one phase, I gave feedback to the works of my students. I gave
them scores on the basis of group discussion, leader participation, individual
participation and their critical thoughts.
As a teacher our role through assessing children is to raise the standards and
improve the child's learning. With appropriate training for teachers they will be
able to effectively produce reliable and valid judgments from their assessment
methods (Gardner, Harlen & Hayward, 2010).
Teachers need to make sure when doing assessments that they produce fair
assessments towards all children. To make reliable assessments is to observe
children on two different occasions to make sure that you get the same result on
both occasions. When approaching assessment as teachers we have to know that
we can't have bias approaches to assessment. It is unfair if we favour a child over
another or if you assess a child who 3 and is not so good at balancing against a
child who is almost 5 and is great at balancing and compare them both is an unfair
assessment. We also need to be culturally aware of the different cultures around us
and what they bring to the early childhood classroom, such as language issues and
different routines and ways of doing things. Once we gather information from
assessing we must then evaluate it and see what it tells us about the child's
learning (Krause, Borhner, Suchesne & MchMaugh, 2010). It is important to
include the child in the assessment progress. We need to be able to share the
information with children such as their portfolios in an early childhood setting,
invite them to ask questions and know how young children learn (Guddemi &
Case, 2004). By getting children to look at their portfolios, they see photos of
themselves doing certain activities and hopefully this will encourage them to
continue the good work and develop more skills (Krause, Borhner, Suchesne &
MchMaugh, 2010).
Q.2
Ans:
Course objectives are clear and concise statements that describe what you intend
your students to learn by the end of the course. The difference between course
objectives and learning outcomes—and the reason these terms are so often
conflated with each other—is the former describes an intended state (what you
hope your students will learn), whereas the latter expresses a present or observed
state (what your students actually learned). think first about what is essential that
students know or be able to do after the course or program – what students need to
know and could make powerful use of to enhance their lives and more effectively
contribute to society. We believe that such reflection will lead instructors to focus
on a broad synthesis of abilities that combine knowledge, skills and values into a
whole that reflects how people really use knowledge.” So, what’s a learning
outcome anyway? Mark Battersby, p. 1
Learning outcomes are statements that describe the knowledge or skills students
should acquire by the end of a particular assignment, class, course, or program, and
help students understand why that knowledge and those skills will be useful to
them. They focus on the context and potential applications of knowledge and
skills, help students connect learning in various contexts, and help guide
assessment and evaluation.
identify and describe the political, religious, economic, and social uses of art
in Italy during the Renaissance
identify a range of works of art and artists
analyze the role of art and of the artist in Italy at this time
analyze the art of the period according to objective methods
link different materials and types of art to the attitudes and values of the
period
evaluate and defend their response to a range of art historical issues
Both course objectives and learning outcomes are distinct from learning goals,
which are more broadly conceived. For an excellent overview of the distinctions
between goals, objectives and outcomes. In 2012, DePaul’s faculty council and
provost approved six university-wide learning goals and related outcomes. Even
though you are not required to, you should explicitly state your course objectives
and/or student learning outcomes in your syllabus.
more easily align objectives with course content and evaluation methods;
allow both you and your students to self-evaluate based on stated expectations;
The most useful learning outcomes are specific and measurable. According to
Diamond (1998), they should contain the following three things:
Diamond further proposes a very simple way to write good outcomes: take on the
role of your student and ask yourself, “What do I have to do to convince you that
I’m where you want me to be at the end of this lesson, unit or course?”
Much confusion exists about the definition of goals, objectives, and learning
outcomes. Part of the confusion results from the fact that the terms are often
conflated, even in the literature. Our accrediting agencies now require and SF State
policy now requires that faculty include learning outcomes on all course outlines
and in their syllabi, so it’s important to understand the differences in these terms.
Goal
•Students will know how to make connections among apparently disparate forms
of knowledge.
Objective
A course objective describes what a faculty member will cover in a course. They
are generally less broad that goals and more broad than student learning outcomes.
•Student will read and analyze seminal works in 20th Century Indian literature.
Objectives describe the goals and intentions of the professor who teaches the
course.
Objectives, often termed the input in the course, state the purpose and goals of the
course.
Objectives focus on content and skills important within the classroom or program.
Objectives may describe what the staff and faculty will do.
Objectives can often be numerous, specific, and detailed. Assessing and reporting
on each objective for each student may be impossible.
Here is a list of specific, measurable verbs you can use when writing learning
objectives for each level of the revised Bloom's Taxonomy:
Outcomes
Student Learning Outcomes catalog the overarching "products" of the course and
are the evidence that the goals or objectives were achieved.
Learning Outcomes are statements that describe or list measurable and essential
mastered content-knowledge—reflecting skills, competencies, and knowledge that
students have achieved and can demonstrate upon successfully completing a
course.
Outcomes express higher-level thinking skills that integrate course content and
activities and can be observed as a behavior, skill, or discrete useable knowledge
upon completing the course.
Outcomes are exactly what assessments are intended to show -- specifically what
the student will be able to do upon completing the course.
Outcomes are clear and measurable criteria for guiding the teaching, learning, and
assessment process in the course.
3. Students will think about applications of course material (to improve thinking,
problem solving, and decisions)
Learning Outcomes
Learning Outcomes are statements that describe or list measurable and essential
mastered content-knowledge—reflecting skills, competencies, and knowledge that
students have achieved and can demonstrate upon successfully completing a
course.
2. Students will be able to use and explain the meaning for factual knowledge
(terminology, classifications, methods, trends)
3. Students will be able to apply the basic principles to scientific problem
solving.
(1) Learning outcomes, if set out appropriately, are intuitive and user friendly.
They can be used easily in curriculum planning, in teaching and learning and in
assessment.
(2) Learning outcomes are broad statements and are usually designed round a
framework of 8-12 higher order outcomes.
(3) The outcomes recognize the authentic interaction and integration in clinical
practice of knowledge, skills and attitudes and the artificiality of separating these.
(4) Learning outcomes represent what is achieved and assessed at the end of a
course of study and not only the aspirations or what is intended to be achieved.
(5) A design-down approach encourages ownership of the outcomes by teachers
and students.
Goals, aims, objectives and outcomes are terms that are often used in
educational settings. These are used to determine what is to be taught by the
teacher and what is expected of students at the end of the program. One of
the major reasons to use such terms is to determine if the course is
successful or if there are any changes that are required to the course to teach
it in any other way or any other methods that can be used to help make the
course more effective. Learning outcome and learning objective are two
terms that are often confusing for many people as they believe they refer to
the same things in learning. However, they are not. These are used to refer to
different things in learning.
Learning Outcome refers to the expectations kept from the student at the end
of the course. At the end of a course, many teachers take a test to determine
what the student has learned from the course syllabus. The outcome
determines how effective the course was in teaching the student and how
determined the student was to learn. It also helps uncover any glitches in the
learning program that can help the teacher understand how effective their
teaching method is. Learning outcomes are determined using tests and
projects. Tests help understand how much the student understood, while
projects help determine how well can the student apply the learning in real-
life scenarios. Learning outcomes is basically the outcome of the syllabus.
The outcome does not indicate the methodologies used by the professor to
teach the subject matter or what activities are undertaken by the students to
learn and understand the subject matter. It will only indicate at the end of the
course, how much the student understood from the subject matter. The
professor can also state the outcome expected at the beginning of the class.
Learning objective is described as what the student can expect from the
teacher at the end of the course. It is actually the opposite of the outcome. In
learning objective, the subject matter that will be covered during the
duration of course can be called as learning objective. It determines what the
course will have provided to the student. It can be described as what is the
‘added value’ of the teaching. Learning objective determine what the student
will be able to understand after the course is completed and what the teacher
will have covered in the duration of the course. Learning objectives are
specific, attainable, realistic and measureable. To many the terms are often
used interchangeably, however the above paragraphs state the small
difference that exists between the two. While, learning outcome is what the
student can expect from the course, objective is what the teacher will have
taught the student by the end of the course. Both of the terms are used
together to gauge the effectiveness of a course and how the course was
effective for the student. It helps determine what the student learned and
what the teacher taught.
Q.3
Ans:
Nearing the end of class 10 you will have to make an important decision about
your future, that is, deciding which stream to choose for class 11,
like science, commerce or humanities. This choice is based on many factors, such
as your interests, ability, and career goals. And when you are aware of your
strengths, you will start putting in more effort to accomplish your goals.
aptitude could be, that it is an innate or natural, learned or acquired ability to excel
in a particular area. It can be a special ability (talent) or a set of abilities that help
you succeed at specific tasks.
For instance, you may possess aptitudes like mathematical ability and logical
ability. These two aptitudes can help you excel in
subjects physics and mathematics.
Now that we have understood what is aptitude, let us define what is meant by an
aptitude test. An aptitude test evaluates your ability/potential to succeed in a
specific task, in which you have no prior training or knowledge. It also reflects
your mental aptitude for academic choices, vocational preferences, job profiles that
you may opt for in your life. For example, aptitude tests are used in schools to help
students choose the right stream in class 11 and what direction to take after class
12.
When we are talking about what is meant by an aptitude test, we must know the
common elements to most various aptitude and ability tests, which are:
Don't Miss-
These tests are administered in schools and colleges to assess talents, unlike
intelligence tests and achievement tests, which measure mastery of academic
concepts. The most commonly used aptitude test is the Differential Aptitude Test
(DAT) which assesses a variety of abilities, including spatial comprehension,
language skills, numerical ability, etc.
Educational aptitude tests also help in decision-making when you do not know
what kind of job you want or where you want to go next in your career. An
aptitude or assessment test can help narrow your options down so that you can
make a decision.
Many organizations conduct aptitude tests when they hire new employees. These
tests allow human resource personnel to learn more about prospective employees'
strengths and weaknesses. Organizational assessment tests can also be used to
make decisions about promotions within a company.
Students encounter a variety of aptitude tests throughout school as they think about
what they might like to study in college or do for as a career. High school students
often take several aptitude tests that are designed to help them determine what they
might want to study in college or pursue as a career.
These tests can sometimes give a general idea of what might interest students as a
future career. For example, a student might take an aptitude test suggesting that
they are good with numbers and data. Such results might imply that a career as an
accountant, banker, or stockbroker would be a good choice for that particular
student.
Another student might find that they have strong language and verbal skills, which
might suggest that a career as an English teacher, writer, or journalist might be a
good choice.
Unlike achievement tests, which are concerned with looking a person's level of
skill or knowledge at any given time, aptitude tests are instead focused on
determining how capable of a person might be of performing a certain task.
Aptitude Tests Versus Intelligence Tests
So what exactly makes an aptitude test different from an intelligence test? Many
intelligence tests are designed to measure what is known as general intelligence, or
an underlying global mental capacity that affects performance in all areas.
Aptitude tests, on the other hand, are designed to measure a much narrower range
of abilities than IQ tests do. However, some aptitude tests might have a very
narrow focus that limits what they are able to predict. Other tests that look at
multiple domains are much more similar to intelligence tests.
In this case, the special aptitude test is designed to look at a very narrow range of
ability: how skilled and knowledgeable the candidate is at computer programming.
Multiple aptitude tests are designed to measure two or more different abilities. 2 In
some cases, such tests may even resemble intelligence tests in terms of their focus
and scope. The Scholastic Assessment Test (SAT) that high school students take
during their senior year is a good example of a multiple aptitude test.
Q.4
Ans:
As it needs very brief answer, does not result in bringing boredom and fatigue.
Leave a reply . Can cover lots of content areas on a single exam and still be
answered in a class period. Association between varieties of. In high schools and
disadvantages of each. below is a list of ielts sample essay questions for advantage
/ disadvantage essays in writing task
Search for jobs related to Advantages and disadvantages of airborne wind turbine
or hire on the world's largest freelancing marketplace with 21m+ jobs. Don't limit
your use of this format to recall of knowledge alone. Table 3: Sample Matching
Question; Type Example;
It might not always yield to accurate result as urine test using a test strip is time-
sensitive.
MATCHING-TYPE TEST
Q.5
How will you define relaibility of test? Also write its types.
Ans:
The types of tests that measure soft skills or innate qualities can be contrasted with
tests that measure acquired skills, or abilities that are learned over time. For
example, let’s think about a high school chemistry test. At the start of class, you
could be given a test about the periodic table and receive 20% as your score. Then
your teacher goes over the material for an hour, after which you’re given the exact
same test and receive 90%. These results are obviously inconsistent and lack
“reliability,” but that’s a good thing. The test in this example is evaluating you on
learned knowledge, so improvement is expected. It’s important to acknowledge
when it’s important that a test provides reliable results, and when it’s not.
Types of Reliability
Reliability tells you how consistently a method measures something. When you
apply the same method to the same sample under the same conditions, you should
get the same results. If not, the method of measurement may be unreliable.
There are four main types of reliability. Each can be estimated by comparing
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Test-retest reliability
Test-retest reliability measures the consistency of results when you repeat the same
test on the same sample at a different point in time. You use it when you are
measuring something that you expect to stay constant in your sample.
A test of color blindness for trainee pilot applicants should have high test-retest
reliability, because color blindness is a trait that does not change over time.
Test-retest reliability can be used to assess how well a method resists these factors
over time. The smaller the difference between the two sets of results, the higher the
test-retest reliability.
How to measure it
To measure test-retest reliability, you conduct the same test on the same group of
people at two different points in time. Then you calculate the correlation between
the two sets of results.
Interrater reliability
When designing the scale and criteria for data collection, it’s important to make
sure that different people will rate the same variable consistently with minimal
bias. This is especially important when there are multiple researchers involved
in data collection or analysis.
How to measure it
To measure interrater reliability, different researchers conduct the same
measurement or observation on the same sample. Then you calculate the
correlation between their different sets of results. If all the researchers give similar
ratings, the test has high interrater reliability.
Clearly define your variables and the methods that will be used to measure
them.
Develop detailed, objective criteria for how the variables will be rated,
counted or categorized.
If multiple researchers are involved, ensure that they all have exactly the
same information and training.