Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 33 views

    Grade 6 Consolidated Report Bukmathix

    Uploaded by

    Rosemarie Garing
    This document contains data from the second quarter Bukmathix assessment of students at Don Carlos Central Elementary School. It includes the number of students enrolled and in remediation/reinforcement classes by section, their test results, and learning gains. A total of 384 students were enrolled across 9 sections. 144 students were initially under remediation, with the number dropping to 114 after the quarter. 152 students were in the reinforcement class, with most showing progress and gains of at least 80%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Grade 6 Consolidated Report Bukmathix

    Uploaded by

    Rosemarie Garing
    33 views13 pages
    This document contains data from the second quarter Bukmathix assessment of students at Don Carlos Central Elementary School. It includes the number of students enrolled and in remediation/reinforcement classes by section, their test results, and learning gains. A total of 384 students were enrolled across 9 sections. 144 students were initially under remediation, with the number dropping to 114 after the quarter. 152 students were in the reinforcement class, with most showing progress and gains of at least 80%.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    GRADE-6-CONSOLIDATED-REPORT-BUKMATHIX

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document contains data from the second quarter Bukmathix assessment of students at Don Carlos Central Elementary School. It includes the number of students enrolled and in remediation/reinforcement classes by section, their test results, and learning gains. A total of 384 students were enrolled across 9 sections. 144 students were initially under remediation, with the number dropping to 114 after the quarter. 152 students were in the reinforcement class, with most showing progress and gains of at least 80%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    33 views13 pages

    Grade 6 Consolidated Report Bukmathix

    Uploaded by

    Rosemarie Garing
    This document contains data from the second quarter Bukmathix assessment of students at Don Carlos Central Elementary School. It includes the number of students enrolled and in remediation/reinforcement classes by section, their test results, and learning gains. A total of 384 students were enrolled across 9 sections. 144 students were initially under remediation, with the number dropping to 114 after the quarter. 152 students were in the reinforcement class, with most showing progress and gains of at least 80%.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 13

    DIVISION OF BUKIDNON

    DON CARLOS CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL


    SECOND QUARTER BUKMATHIX ASSESSMENT ON LEARNING PROGRESS AND
    GAINS
    SY 2023-2024

    Number of
    ENROLMENT ENROLMENT IN REMEDIATION CLASS Learners REINFORCE
    Progress (Number of Moved to
    Pretest (Number of Learners Pretest (Number of Learners
    SCHOOL SECTION Learners who are still under Reinforce %
    Under Remediation) Under Reinforcement)
    Male Female Total Remediation) ment/Enah Decrease
    ncement
    Male Female Total Male Female Total Class Male Female
    ANDRES
    BONIFACIO 25 20 45 19 12 31 15 9 24 7 23% 3 6
    LAPULAPU 18 22 40 10 11 21 8 8 16 -5 24% 5 7
    MANUEL
    QUEZON 21 21 42 12 10 22 8 9 17 -5 23% 8 10
    EMILIO
    AGUINALDO 25 21 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 14 10
    APOLINARIO
    MABINI 16 29 45 6 7 13 5 6 11 -2 15% 7 11
    DON CARLOS
    CENTRAL ES GREGORIO DEL
    PILAR 25 18 43 13 3 16 9 2 11 -5 31% 7 14
    JOSE RIZAL 18 24 42 7 8 15 5 6 11 -4 27% 8 11
    JUAN LUNA 18 22 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0! 10 12
    MELCHORA
    AQUINO 23 18 41 16 10 26 15 9 24 -2 8% 4 5
    10 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
    11 0 0 0 0 #DIV/0!
    Total 189 195 384 83 61 144 65 49 114 -16 21% 66 86
    Number
    Number
    REINFORCEMENT CLASS ENHANCEMENT CLASS of
    of
    Learners
    Progress (Number of Learners Progress (Number of
    er of Learners Pretest (Number of Learners Added
    Learners who are still under Added Learners who are still under
    orcement) % Increase Under Enhancement) from % Increase GAINS
    Reinforcement) from Enhancement)
    Reinforc
    Remediat
    Total Male Female Total Male Female Total Male Female Total ement
    ion Class
    Class
    9 7 9 16 7 44% 3 2 5 3 2 5 0 0% 100%
    12 7 10 17 5 29% 3 4 7 3 4 7 0 0% 100%

    18 9 11 20 2 10% 3 2 5 3 2 5 0 0% 100%

    24 8 12 20 -4 -20% 11 11 22 12 14 26 4 15% 100%

    18 8 11 19 1 5% 3 11 14 4 11 15 1 7% 100%

    21 12 13 25 4 16% 5 1 6 4 3 7 1 14% 100%


    19 10 13 23 4 17% 1 3 4 3 5 8 4 50% 100%
    22 7 8 15 -7 -47% 8 10 18 11 14 25 7 28% 100%

    9 5 6 11 2 18% 3 3 6 3 3 6 0 0% 100%
    0 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
    0 0 0 #DIV/0! 0 0 0 #DIV/0! #DIV/0!
    152 73 93 166 14 8% 40 47 87 46 58 104 17 16% #DIV/0!
    Prepared by: Noted by:

    _____________________________________ _____________________________________
    Grade Level Chairman/ICT Master Teacher I
    GRADE LEVEL ENROLMENT Pretest Results as of Second Quarter Pretest R
    NUMBER IDENTIFICATION AND REPRESENTATION (NIR) Counting and skip Counting of
    Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Nu
    GRADE proficiency level) profi
    SECTION
    LEVEL Grade District District
    Male Female Total District
    Level Proficienc Highly Not Total Proficienc
    MPS
    MPS y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient y Level Highly
    Proficient Proficient Proficient
    (90- (75-89%) (25% &
    (50-74%) (26-49%) (90-100%)
    100%) below)
    ANDRES BONIFACIO 25 20 45 40 5 45 39
    LAPULAPU 18 22 40 38 2 40 36
    MANUEL QUEZON 21 21 42 38 4 42 40
    EMILIO AGUINALDO 25 21 46 40 6 46 40
    APOLINARIO MABINI 16 29 45 41 4 45 41
    GREGORIO DEL PILAR 25 18 43 38 5 43 38
    JOSE RIZAL 18 24 42 42 42 42
    JUAN LUNA 18 22 40 35 5 40 28
    MELCHORA AQUINO 23 18 41 26 15 41 33
    10 0 0
    11 0 0
    Total 189 195 384 0 0 338 46 0 0 0 384 0 0 337
    Pretest Results Pretest Results as of Second Quarter Pretest Results as o
    Counting of Objects and Numbers (CON) Number Order and Discrimination and Sequencing (NODS Pattern and reading Aloud and
    ciency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Nu
    proficiency level) proficiency level) profi
    District District
    District District
    Not Total Proficienc Highly Not Total Proficienc Highly
    Nearly Low MPS MPS
    Proficient Proficient y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient y Level Proficient
    Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient
    (75-89%) (25% & (90- (75-89%) (25% & (90-
    (50-74%) (26-49%) (50-74%) (26-49%)
    below) 100%) below) 100%)
    6 45 32 13 45 22
    4 40 28 12 40 21
    2 42 32 10 42 26
    6 46 40 6 46 38
    4 45 41 4 45 37
    5 43 38 5 43 35
    42 42 42 16
    12 40 30 10 40 32
    8 41 28 13 41 22
    0 0
    0 0
    47 0 0 0 384 0 0 311 73 0 0 0 384 0 0 249
    esults as of Second Quarter PRETEST Results as of Second Quarter Pretest Results as o
    ng Aloud and Writing Numbers (PRAWN) Rote Learning and Mastery (RolMa) Performing Fundamen
    iciency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Nu
    proficiency level) proficiency level) profi
    District District
    District District
    Not Total Proficienc Highly Not Total Proficienc Highly
    Nearly Low MPS MPS
    Proficient Proficient y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient y Level Proficient
    Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient
    (75-89%) (25% & (90- (75-89%) (25% & (90-
    (50-74%) (26-49%) (50-74%) (26-49%)
    below) 100%) below) 100%)
    23 45 11 34 45 5
    19 40 7 33 40 4
    16 42 10 22 32 5
    8 46 30 16 46 20
    8 45 28 17 45 18
    8 43 25 18 43 15
    10 9 4 3 42 3 17 14 6 2 42 18
    8 40 31 9 40 29
    19 41 9 32 41 8
    0 0
    0 0
    119 9 4 3 384 0 0 154 198 14 6 2 374 0 0 122
    esults as of Second Quarter Pretest Results as of Second Quarter Pretest Results as o
    ng Fundamental operations (PFO) Word Problem-Solving (WoPS)
    iciency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Nu
    proficiency level) proficiency level) profi
    District District
    District District
    Not Total Proficienc Highly Not Total Proficienc Highly
    Nearly Low MPS MPS
    Proficient Proficient y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient y Level Proficient
    Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient
    (75-89%) (25% & (90- (75-89%) (25% & (90-
    (50-74%) (26-49%) (50-74%) (26-49%)
    below) 100%) below) 100%)
    30 10 45 3 15 27 45
    27 9 40 4 12 24 40
    37 42 2 20 20 42
    16 10 46 5 18 23 46
    10 17 45 6 18 21 45
    12 16 43 5 14 24 43
    11 9 3 1 42 6 13 14 6 3 42
    11 40 3 19 18 40
    33 41 4 37 41
    0 0
    0 0
    187 71 3 1 384 0 0 38 166 171 6 3 384 0 0 0
    esults as of Second Quarter Pretest Results as of Second Quarter POSTTEST RESULT
    Matherials Mathnipulations and Knowing (MMK) NUMBER IDENTIFICATION
    iciency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Nu
    proficiency level) proficiency level) profi
    District District
    District District
    Not Total Proficienc Highly Not Total Proficienc Highly
    Nearly Low MPS MPS
    Proficient Proficient y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient y Level Proficient
    Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient
    (75-89%) (25% & (90- (75-89%) (25% & (90-
    (50-74%) (26-49%) (50-74%) (26-49%)
    below) 100%) below) 100%)
    0 3 10 32 45 42
    0 4 9 27 40 35
    0 3 4 35 42 39
    0 4 18 24 46 42
    0 5 19 21 45 43
    0 4 14 25 43 40
    0 10 11 10 9 2 42 42
    0 3 17 20 40 40
    0 4 37 41 31
    0 0
    0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 139 194 9 2 384 0 0 354
    T RESULTS as of Second Quarter POSTTEST RESULTS as of Second Quarter POSTT
    ENTIFICATION AND REPRESENTATION (NIR) Counting and skip Counting of Objects and Numbers (CON) Number O
    iciency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each
    proficiency level) proficiency level)
    District
    District District
    Not Total % GAIN Proficienc Highly Not Total % GAIN
    Nearly Low MPS MPS
    Proficient Proficient y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient
    Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient
    (75-89%) (25% & (90- (75-89%) (25% &
    (50-74%) (26-49%) (50-74%) (26-49%)
    below) 100%) below)
    3 45 0 42 3 45 0
    5 40 0 35 5 40 0
    3 42 0 38 4 42 0
    4 46 0 42 4 46 0
    2 45 0 43 2 45 0
    3 43 0 40 3 43 0
    42 0 42 42 0
    40 0 35 5 40 0
    10 41 0 35 6 41 0
    0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0
    30 0 0 0 384 0 0 0 352 32 0 0 0 384 0 0
    POSTTEST RESULTS as of Second Quarter POSTTEST RESULTS as of Second Quarter
    Number Order and Discrimination and Sequencing (NODS Pattern and reading Aloud and Writing Numbers (PRAWN)
    Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each
    proficiency level) proficiency level)
    District District
    District
    Proficienc Highly Not Total % GAIN Proficienc Highly Not Total
    MPS
    y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient
    Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient
    (90- (75-89%) (25% & (90- (75-89%) (25% &
    (50-74%) (26-49%) (50-74%) (26-49%)
    100%) below) 100%) below)
    37 8 45 0 28 17 45
    33 7 40 0 25 15 40
    37 5 42 0 26 16 42
    42 4 46 0 40 6 46
    43 2 45 0 39 6 45
    40 3 43 0 37 6 43
    42 42 0 20 12 5 3 2 42
    37 3 40 0 28 12 40
    30 11 41 0 24 17 41
    0 0 0
    0 0 0
    0 341 43 0 0 0 384 0 0 0 267 107 5 3 2 384
    er POSTTEST RESULTS as of Second Quarter POSTTEST RESULTS as of Second Qu
    WN) Rote Learning and Mastery (RolMa) Performing Fundamental operations (PFO)
    Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each
    proficiency level) proficiency level)
    District District
    District District
    % GAIN Proficienc Highly Not Total % GAIN Proficienc Highly
    MPS MPS
    y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient
    (90- (75-89%) (25% & (90- (75-89%)
    (50-74%) (26-49%) (50-74%) (26-49%)
    100%) below) 100%)
    0 15 30 45 0 8 30 7
    0 10 30 40 0 7 25 8
    0 12 30 42 0 7 25 10
    0 31 15 46 0 20 17 9
    0 30 15 45 0 19 12 14
    0 28 15 43 0 15 14 14
    0 4 22 10 5 1 42 0 20 12 7 1
    0 15 25 40 0 8 25 7
    0 10 31 41 0 9 32
    0 0 0
    0 0 0
    0 0 0 155 213 10 5 1 384 0 0 0 113 192 76 1
    Second Quarter POSTTEST RESULTS as of Second Quarter POSTTEST RESULTS as o
    ations (PFO) Word Problem-Solving (WoPS)
    s under each Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Number of lea
    proficiency level) proficiency leve
    District District
    District District
    Not Total % GAIN Proficienc Highly Not Total % GAIN Proficienc Highly
    MPS MPS
    Proficient y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient y Level Proficient Proficient
    Proficient Proficient
    (25% & (90- (75-89%) (25% & (90- (75-89%)
    (50-74%) (26-49%)
    below) 100%) below) 100%)
    45 0 5 18 22 45 0
    40 0 4 16 20 40 0
    42 0 4 15 23 42 0
    46 0 5 19 22 46 0
    45 0 6 20 19 45 0
    43 0 5 15 23 43 0
    40 0 9 15 14 2 2 42 0
    40 0 5 18 17 40 0
    41 0 4 37 41 0
    0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0
    0 382 0 0 0 47 173 160 2 2 384 0 0 0 0 0
    ULTS as of Second Quarter POSTTEST RESULTS as of Second Quarter
    Matherials Mathnipulations and Knowing (MMK)
    el (Number of learners under each Proficiency Level (Number of learners under each
    proficiency level) proficiency level)
    District
    District
    Not Total % GAIN Proficienc Highly Not Total % GAIN
    Nearly Low MPS
    Proficient y Level Proficient Proficient Nearly Low
    Proficient
    Proficient Proficient Proficient Proficient
    (25% & (90- (75-89%) (25% &
    (50-74%) (26-49%) (50-74%) (26-49%)
    below) 100%) below)
    0 0 5 13 27 45 0
    0 0 4 14 22 0 0
    0 0 4 10 28 0 0
    0 0 4 18 24 0 0
    0 0 5 19 21 0 0
    0 0 4 14 25 0 0
    0 0 12 10 11 8 1 0 0
    0 0 5 13 22 0 0
    0 0 4 37 0 0
    0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 47 148 180 8 1 45 0

    Prepared by: Noted by:

    ___________________________________ ___________________________________
    Grade Level Chairman/ICT Master Teacher I

    You might also like