Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Corneal Cross-Linking in Infectious Keratitis

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Tabibian et al.

Eye and Vision (2016) 3:11


DOI 10.1186/s40662-016-0042-x

REVIEW Open Access

PACK-CXL: Corneal cross-linking in


infectious keratitis
David Tabibian1,5*, Cosimo Mazzotta2 and Farhad Hafezi1,3,4

Abstract
Background: Corneal cross-linking (CXL) using ultraviolet light-A (UV-A) and riboflavin is a technique developed in
the 1990’s to treat corneal ectatic disorders such as keratoconus. It soon became the new gold standard in multiple
countries around the world to halt the progression of this disorder, with good long-term outcomes in keratometry
reading and visual acuity. The original Dresden treatment protocol was also later on used to stabilize iatrogenic
corneal ectasia appearing after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
CXL efficiently strengthened the cornea but was also shown to kill most of the keratocytes within the corneal
stroma, later on repopulated by those cells.
Review: Ultraviolet-light has long been known for its microbicidal effect, and thus CXL postulated to be able to
sterilize the cornea from infectious pathogens. This cytotoxic effect led to the first clinical trials using CXL to treat
advanced infectious melting corneal keratitis. Patients treated with this technique showed, in the majority of cases,
a stabilization of the melting process and were able to avoid emergent à chaud keratoplasty. Following those
primary favorable results, CXL was used to treat beginning bacterial keratitis as a first-line treatment without any
adjunctive antibiotics with positive results for most patients. In order to distinguish the use of CXL for infectious
keratitis treatment from its use for corneal ectatic disorders, a new term was proposed at the 9th CXL congress in
Dublin to rename its use in infections as photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis -corneal collagen
cross-linking (PACK-CXL).
Conclusion: PACK-CXL is now more frequently used to treat infections from various infectious origins. The original
Dresden protocol is still used for this purpose. Careful modifications of this protocol could improve the efficiency of
this technique in specific clinical situations regarding certain types of pathogens.
Keywords: Infectious Keratitis, Corneal cross-linking, Keratoconus, CXL, PACK-CXL, Corneal ulcer, Ultraviolet light A,
Riboflavin

Background treatment [1, 2]. Easy to perform and efficient after one
The management of corneal ectatic disorder was com- treatment, this technique became the benchmark for the
pletely transformed this past decade through the devel- treatment of progressive keratoconus. With this initial
opment and rise of the corneal cross-linking (CXL) success, the technique was later adapted to treat iatro-
technique in many academic and non-academic clinical genic corneal ectatic disorders [3, 4], bullous keratopathy
settings around the world. Originally developed in Eur- [5, 6], and melting corneal ulcerations [7]. Initially, only
ope, more precisely in Germany and Switzerland, CXL advanced cases of corneal keratitis were treated, but
proposed a new therapeutic alternative to patients with more recently, beginning infections are also responding
progressive keratoconus with the option of stabilizing positively to CXL (Fig. 1, a-d). The number of publica-
the disease through a one-time extra-ocular surgical tions reporting successful treatment of infectious kera-
titis with CXL is increasing. CXL could become a new
* Correspondence: david.tabibian@ngh.nhs.uk alternative to standard treatment of infectious keratitis
1
Laboratory for Ocular Cell Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland in the future.
5
Department of Ophthalmology, Northampton General Hospital,
Northampton, United Kingdom
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

© 2016 Tabibian et al. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Tabibian et al. Eye and Vision (2016) 3:11 Page 2 of 5

Fig. 1 Pre- and post-treatment peripheral infectious keratitis. a Anterior segment photography of a patient with early peripheral infectious keratitis
(arrow). b Anterior segment OCT of the lesion. c Anterior segment photography of the same patient 7 days after PACK-CXL (9 mW/cm2 irradiance for
10 min) with resolution of the peripheral infectious keratitis (arrow). d Anterior segment OCT of the lesion at day 7 after PACK-CXL

Review hypo-osmolaric riboflavin solution [12, 13]. This surgery


CXL for corneal ectasia has now been proven to be efficient in the long term
CXL was initially developed to treat progressing corneal with excellent results of disease stabilization over
ectatic disorders such as keratoconus. The idea is to arti- 10 years, and reduces the need of corneal transplant in
ficially strengthen the cornea biomechanically in order this population [13–17]. Further, it not only stops the
to stop the progression of the disease through the com- progression of the disease in adults and in children [18–
bination of ultraviolet light and a photo-reactant within 20], but also flattens the keratometry readings in some
the corneal stroma. The method was initially developed [1, 16]. Under certain circumstances, however, even CXL
by Theo Seiler, Eberhard Spoerl, and Gregor Wollensak. fails to stabilize the biomechanically weakened cornea,
Their first report tested this hypothesis ex vivo on i.e. in pregnancy [21].
porcine corneas and obtained good results, later con- This first accomplishment of halting the progression
firmed in vivo in rabbits and ex vivo on human cor- of keratoconus using CXL led to another application of
neas [2, 8–10]. The first clinical trial was published in this technology. CXL was used to treat iatrogenic cor-
2003 treating 23 eyes with CXL, stabilizing the dis- neal ectatic disorders developed after laser-assisted in
ease in all patients [1]. situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratec-
CXL was performed using the combination of ultravio- tomy (PRK) [3, 4]. In clinical trials, CXL stabilized Kmax
let light type A (UV-A) and vitamin B2 (also known as values, improved corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA),
riboflavin). The original Dresden protocol mentions that and proved to be an efficient treatment for those rare
the epithelium is mechanically removed, followed by ap- postoperative complications [3, 4, 22–24].
plication of a 0.1 % riboflavin solution [11]. Once the
corneal stroma is soaked with riboflavin, UV-A light A new field to explore
(365 nm) is used to irradiate the cornea for 30 min Very early in the history of CXL, another field was ex-
(3 mW/cm2 irradiance). Riboflavin is a photo-reacting plored where the concept of CXL could also be applied. In
molecule, which produces free radicals within the cor- 2000, Seiler and his team reported the use of CXL for ad-
neal stroma when photoactivated. These free radicals vanced non-infectious corneal melting [25]. This pilot trial
interact with the local collagen and proteoglycan mole- treated four patients with corneal melting of various non-
cules to create new covalent bonds and thus strengthen infectious origins [25]. The rationale was that an increase
the overall biomechanical resistance of the cornea. La- in covalent bonds amongst the collagen molecules might
boratory testing on human corneas reported an increase help stabilize the disease and avoid any à chaud corneal
in corneal rigidity by an average of 300 % after this surgery in these patients. Of four patients, three showed
protocol [2]. Some caution was taken when performing stabilization of the melting process after CXL, whereas the
this surgery as only cornea thicker than 400 μm without last patient continued to progress despite treatment. From
the epithelium were treated in order to avoid damage to this pilot data, it was concluded that CXL could, in some
the endothelium [11]. Specific protocols have since been cases, stabilize the cornea even though a pathological
developed to address the issue of thin corneas using a process had already modified its structure.
Tabibian et al. Eye and Vision (2016) 3:11 Page 3 of 5

PACK-CXL for keratitis additional intervention after PACK-CXL. Healing rate


The treatment of advance corneal melting came back might be different when using PACK-CXL alone and
into clinical perspective 8 years later with a clinical trial further clinical trials are needed to study this issue. Re-
from Iseli and colleagues where therapy-resistant cases garding acanthamoeba keratitis, 10 out of 11 cases
of melting corneas were treated with CXL. This time, healed, five of them with retreatment. Although this
every case was of infectious origin [7]. In this small co- meta-analysis reports good healing rates for acanth-
hort study, five patients with advanced corneal melt of amoeba keratitis, caution should be taken in monitoring
infectious origin were selected. Two patients presented a patients as almost half of them needed retreatment [55].
fungal keratitis, whereas the other three were infected More complicated clinical situations were also addressed
with Mycobacterium spp. pathogen. Each patient pre- in few reports using PACK-CXL to treat combined
sented a disease unresponsive to full topical and sys- pathological situations with infectious keratitis such as
temic microbicidal therapy. They received CXL with the bullous keratopathy or late-onset infections of a corneal
standard Dresden protocol technique: 3 mW/cm2 CXL graft [56, 57].
for 30 min [2, 7]. After surgery, the melting process was Riboflavin and ultraviolet light have been used for de-
halted in four out of five patients. The last patient cades to kill pathogens, in combination or separately
showed a persistent corneal melt caused by an immune (surface and water disinfection, blood sterilization prior
reaction without any remaining active pathogen. This to transfusion, etc.). Therefore, the microbicidal effect of
study not only confirmed the previous results from Sei- CXL can be explained through the effect of these two el-
ler and colleagues from the year 2000, but also intro- ements. First, ultraviolet (UV) light itself has a strong
duced the concept that CXL might be efficient when antimicrobial activity as it directly damages DNA and
treating corneal melts from an infectious origin. Subse- RNA in microbes such as bacteria, but also viruses, and
quently, further clinical trials on advanced melting inhibits microbes from replicating [58–61]. Riboflavin
corneas, one meta-analysis, and multiple animal experi- also possesses its own microbicidal effect. When it is
ments confirmed those initial results [20, 26–53]. photoactivated, it releases reactive oxygen species (ROS)
The next step after treating therapy-resistant cases of that directly interact with the nucleic acids and cell
advanced infectious keratitis was to treat early cases with membranes of the microbe [62, 63]. The combined effect
CXL. Thus in 2011, Makdoumi and colleagues from of UV-A light and riboflavin has been shown to be su-
Sweden proposed a prospective non-randomized clinical perior than their separate effect, with a 10-fold increased
trial to investigate the efficiency of CXL as first line ther- cytotoxicity when compared to UV-A alone [58, 64].
apy in bacterial keratitis [35]. They recruited 16 patients With the increasing number of publications on CXL
clinically diagnosed with infectious bacterial keratitis to treat infectious keratitis, a new terminology regarding
who had not received any previous antibiotic (topical or this specific use was proposed at the 9th International
systemic) treatment. All patients were treated with Cross-Linking Congress in 2013. It aims to distinguish
standard CXL as mentioned in the Dresden protocol (3 CXL for infections from CXL for corneal ectasia in order
mw/cm2 for 30 min with 0.1 % riboflavin) [1]. Of 16 pa- to avoid confusion in scientific publications and proto-
tients, 15 showed complete epithelial closure and all cols. The term PACK-CXL: Photo-Activated Chromo-
showed signs of improvement and reduction of inflam- phore for Keratitis – Corneal Cross-Linking was
matory response to the bacteria. Nevertheless, two pa- adopted for CXL when treating infectious keratitis [31].
tients needed additional antibiotic therapy to treat their
disease [35]. The Swedish team uncovered the microbici- Conclusion
dal effect of CXL in early bacterial keratitis as a first-line CXL was initially developed to stabilize keratoconus.
treatment in this trial. The Dresden protocol was developed after abundant la-
CXL has been shown to be an efficient treatment sta- boratory research including animal trials. This protocol
bilizing not only advanced melting corneal ulcers, but was tailored to only treat cornea with an ectatic disorder
also early infectious keratitis of bacterial origin over a and to protect the endothelium, avoiding any other com-
10-year period [26, 37, 41, 44–47, 54]. Photoactivated plication. As a safe protocol it was used when applying
chromophore for keratitis-corneal collagen cross-linking CXL to other diseases in order to avoid any non-
(PACK-CXL) has a very good healing rate regarding bac- desirable postoperative effect, and most studies continue
teria (average 88 %) as reported in a recent meta- using it for PACK-CXL as originally established. Our
analysis and most of the clinical trials are reporting a group recently demonstrated that an optimization of the
successful treatment rate when using PACK-CXL in protocol’s parameters allows reducing the treatment
combination with standard antimicrobial therapy [55]. time without impairing its killing rate on bacterial
Regarding fungal infections, healing rates are also good strains [43]. Already in the literature, some report suc-
(average 78 %). Some of those infections healed with an cessful treatment of accelerated protocols in humans
Tabibian et al. Eye and Vision (2016) 3:11 Page 4 of 5

and animals [50, 65]. PACK-CXL follows the Bunsen- 9. Spoerl E, Huhle M, Seiler T. Induction of cross-links in corneal tissue. Exp Eye
Roscoe law of reciprocity and accelerated PACK-CXL Res. 1998;66(1):97–103.
10. Spörl E, Schreiber J, Hellmund K, Seiler T, Knuschke P. Studies on the
could be clinically efficient compared to the standard stabilization of the cornea in rabbits. Ophthalmologe. 2000;97(3):203–6.
Dresden protocol with careful modifications of the 11. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Wilsch M, Seiler T. Endothelial cell damage after
protocol regarding the pathogen type (bacteria, fun- riboflavin-ultraviolet-A treatment in the rabbit. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;
29(9):1786–90.
gus, amoeba) in order to maintain an appropriate kill- 12. Hafezi F. Limitation of collagen cross-linking with hypoosmolar riboflavin
ing rate [50, 65, 66]. solution: failure in an extremely thin cornea. Cornea. 2011;30(8):917–9.
PACK-CXL now needs further protocol modifications 13. Hafezi F, Mrochen M, Iseli HP, Seiler T. Collagen crosslinking with ultraviolet-
A and hypoosmolar riboflavin solution in thin corneas. J Cataract Refract
to tailor the treatment to a specific pathogen or clinical Surg. 2009;35(4):621–4.
situation. Adjustments of treatment parameters such as 14. Gkika M, Labiris G, Kozobolis V. Corneal collagen cross-linking using
irradiation duration, type of chromophore, and fluence riboflavin and ultraviolet-A irradiation: a review of clinical and experimental
studies. Int Ophthalmol. 2011;31(4):309–19.
used might help increase the microbicidal efficiency of 15. Kolli S, Aslanides IM. Safety and efficacy of collagen crosslinking for the
PACK-CXL depending on the type of pathogen. With treatment of keratoconus. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2010;9(6):949–57.
the possible development of PACK-CXL treating early 16. Raiskup F, Theuring A, Pillunat LE, Spoerl E. Corneal collagen crosslinking
with riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in progressive keratoconus: ten-year
keratitis and beginning infiltrates, the need for a more results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(1):41–6.
cost effective method will be necessary. Cheaper, lighter 17. Raiskup-Wolf F, Hoyer A, Spoerl E, Pillunat LE. Collagen crosslinking with
and smaller devices could support the use of PACK-CXL riboflavin and ultraviolet-A light in keratoconus: long-term results. J Cataract
Refract Surg. 2008;34(5):796–801.
for early infectious keratitis and help reduce the burden
18. Caporossi A, Mazzotta C, Baiocchi S, Caporossi T, Denaro R, Balestrazzi A.
of multi-drug-resistant pathogens and patient’s compli- Riboflavin-UVA-induced corneal collagen cross-linking in pediatric patients.
ance in those clinical situations. Cornea. 2012;31(3):227–31.
19. Chatzis N, Hafezi F. Progression of keratoconus and efficacy of pediatric
corneal collagen cross-linking in children and adolescents. J Refract Surg.
Competing interests
2012;28(11):753–8.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
20. Vinciguerra R, Rosetta P, Romano MR, Azzolini C, Vinciguerra P. Treatment of
refractory infectious keratitis with corneal collagen cross-linking window
Authors’ contributions absorption. Cornea. 2013;32(6):e139–40.
DT: drafting and critical revision of the manuscript. FH: critical revision of the 21. Hafezi F, Iseli HP. Pregnancy-related exacerbation of iatrogenic keratectasia
manuscript. CM: critical revision of the manuscript. All authors read and despite corneal collagen crosslinking. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(7):
approved the final manuscript. 1219–21.
22. Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Speck A, Schilde T, Sandner D, Pillunat LE. A new
Author details treatment of keratectasia after LASIK by using collagen with riboflavin/UVA
1
Laboratory for Ocular Cell Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. light cross-linking. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 2005;222(5):430–6.
2
Siena Crosslinking Center, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy. 3Department of 23. Mackool RJ. Crosslinking for iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK and for
Ophthalmology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6):879. author reply 879.
4
EyeCare Laboratory Research Zurich Associates (ELZA) Institute, Webereistrasse 24. Salgado JP, Khoramnia R, Lohmann CP. Winkler von Mohrenfels C. Corneal
2, 8953 Dietikon, Switzerland. 5Department of Ophthalmology, Northampton collagen crosslinking in post-LASIK keratectasia. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(4):
General Hospital, Northampton, United Kingdom. 493–7.
25. Schnitzler E, Spörl E, Seiler T. Irradiation of cornea with ultraviolet light and
Received: 24 September 2015 Accepted: 24 March 2016 riboflavin administration as a new treatment for erosive corneal processes,
preliminary results in four patients. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2000;217(3):190–3.
26. Abbouda A, Estrada AV, Rodriguez AE, Alió JL. Anterior segment optical
References coherence tomography in evaluation of severe fungal keratitis infections
1. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-a-induced collagen treated by corneal crosslinking. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2014;24(3):320–4.
crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 27. Alio JL, Abbouda A, Valle DD, Del Castillo JM, Fernandez JA. Corneal cross
135(5):620–7. linking and infectious keratitis: a systematic review with a meta-analysis of
2. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Stress–strain measurements of human and reported cases. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2013;3(1):47.
porcine corneas after riboflavin-ultraviolet-A-induced cross-linking. J Cataract 28. Berra M, Galperin G, Boscaro G, Zarate J, Tau J, Chiaradia P, et al. Treatment
Refract Surg. 2003;29(9):1780–5. of Acanthamoeba keratitis by corneal cross-linking. Cornea. 2013;32(2):174–8.
3. Hafezi F, Kanellopoulos J, Wiltfang R, Seiler T. Corneal collagen crosslinking 29. del Buey MA, Cristóbal JA, Casas P, Goñi P, Clavel A, Mínguez E, et al.
with riboflavin and ultraviolet A to treat induced keratectasia after laser in Evaluation of in vitro efficacy of combined riboflavin and ultraviolet a for
situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(12):2035–40. Acanthamoeba isolates. Am J Ophthalmol. 2012;153(3):399–404.
4. Richoz O, Mavrakanas N, Pajic B, Hafezi F. Corneal collagen cross-linking for 30. Galperin G, Berra M, Tau J, Boscaro G, Zarate J, Berra A. Treatment of fungal
ectasia after LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: long-term results. keratitis from Fusarium infection by corneal cross-linking. Cornea. 2012;31(2):
Ophthalmology. 2013;120(7):1354–9. 176–80.
5. Ehlers N, Hjortdal J, Nielsen K, Søndergaard A. Riboflavin-UVA treatment in 31. Hafezi F, Randleman JB. PACK-CXL: defining CXL for infectious keratitis.
the management of edema and nonhealing ulcers of the cornea. J Refract J Refract Surg. 2014;30(7):438–9.
Surg. 2009;25(9):S803–6. 32. Hellander-Edman A, Makdoumi K, Mortensen J, Ekesten B. Corneal cross-
6. Hafezi F, Dejica P, Majo F. Modified corneal collagen crosslinking reduces linking in 9 horses with ulcerative keratitis. BMC Vet Res. 2013;9:128.
corneal oedema and diurnal visual fluctuations in Fuchs dystrophy. Br J 33. Li Z, Jhanji V, Tao X, Yu H, Chen W, Mu G. Riboflavin/ultravoilet light-
Ophthalmol. 2010;94(5):660–1. mediated crosslinking for fungal keratitis. Br J Ophthalmol. 2013;97(5):669–71.
7. Iseli HP, Thiel MA, Hafezi F, Kampmeier J, Seiler T. Ultraviolet A/riboflavin 34. Makdoumi K, Mortensen J, Crafoord S. Infectious keratitis treated with
corneal cross-linking for infectious keratitis associated with corneal melts. corneal crosslinking. Cornea. 2010;29(12):1353–8.
Cornea. 2008;27(5):590–4. 35. Makdoumi K, Mortensen J, Sorkhabi O, Malmvall BE, Crafoord S. UVA-
8. Spörl E, Huhle M, Kasper M, Seiler T. Increased rigidity of the cornea caused riboflavin photochemical therapy of bacterial keratitis: a pilot study. Graefes
by intrastromal cross-linking. Ophthalmologe. 1997;94(12):902–6. Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012;250(1):95–102.
Tabibian et al. Eye and Vision (2016) 3:11 Page 5 of 5

36. Mattila JS, Korsbäck A, Krootila K, Holopainen JM. Treatment of 60. Pileggi G, Wataha JC, Girard M, Grad I, Schrenzel J, Lange N, et al. Blue light-
Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis with combined corneal cross-linking and mediated inactivation of Enterococcus faecalis in vitro. Photodiagnosis
human amniotic membrane transplantation. Acta Ophthalmol. 2013;91(5): Photodyn Ther. 2013;10(2):134–40.
e410–1. 61. Tsugita A, Okada Y, Uehara K. Photosensitized inactivation of ribonucleic
37. Müller L, Thiel MA, Kipfer-Kauer AI, Kaufmann C. Corneal cross-linking as acids in the presence of riboflavin. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1965;103(2):360–3.
supplementary treatment option in melting keratitis: a case series. Klin 62. Goodrich RP, Edrich RA, Li J, Seghatchian J. The Mirasol PRT system for
Monbl Augenheilkd. 2012;229(4):411–5. pathogen reduction of platelets and plasma: an overview of current status
38. Panda A, Krishna SN, Kumar S. Photo-activated riboflavin therapy of and future trends. Transfus Apher Sci. 2006;35(1):5–17.
refractory corneal ulcers. Cornea. 2012;31(10):1210–3. 63. Kumar V, Lockerbie O, Keil SD, Ruane PH, Platz MS, Martin CB, et al.
39. Pot SA, Gallhöfer NS, Matheis FL, Voelter-Ratson K, Hafezi F, Spiess BM. Riboflavin and UV-light based pathogen reduction: extent and consequence
Corneal collagen cross-linking as treatment for infectious and noninfectious of DNA damage at the molecular level. Photochem Photobiol. 2004;80:15–21.
corneal melting in cats and dogs: results of a prospective, nonrandomized, 64. Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Reber F, Seiler T. Keratocyte cytotoxicity of riboflavin/
controlled trial. Vet Ophthalmol. 2014;17(4):250–60. UVA-treatment in vitro. Eye (Lond). 2004;18(7):718–22.
40. Pot SA, Gallhöfer NS, Walser-Reinhardt L, Hafezi F, Spiess BM. Treatment of 65. Famose F. Evaluation of accelerated collagen cross-linking for the treatment
bullous keratopathy with corneal collagen cross-linking in two dogs. Vet of melting keratitis in ten cats. Vet Ophthalmol. 2015;18(2):95–104.
Ophthalmol. 2015;18(2):168–73. 66. Famose F. Evaluation of accelerated collagen cross-linking for the treatment
41. Price MO, Tenkman LR, Schrier A, Fairchild KM, Trokel SL, Price Jr FW. of melting keratitis in eight dogs. Vet Ophthalmol. 2014;17(5):358–67.
Photoactivated riboflavin treatment of infectious keratitis using collagen
cross-linking technology. J Refract Surg. 2012;28(10):706–13.
42. Richoz O, Gatzioufas Z, Hafezi F. Corneal Collagen Cross-Linking for the
Treatment of Acanthamoeba Keratitis. Cornea. 2013;32(10), e189.
43. Richoz O, Kling S, Hoogewoud F, Hammer A, Tabibian D, Francois P, et al.
Antibacterial efficacy of accelerated photoactivated chromophore for
keratitis-corneal collagen cross-linking (PACK-CXL). J Refract Surg. 2014;
30(12):850–4.
44. Sağlk A, Ucakhan OO, Kanpolat A. Ultraviolet A and riboflavin therapy as an
adjunct in corneal ulcer refractory to medical treatment. Eye Contact Lens.
2013;39(6):413–5.
45. Said DG, Elalfy MS, Gatzioufas Z, El-Zakzouk ES, Hassan MA, Saif MY, et al.
Collagen cross-linking with photoactivated riboflavin (PACK-CXL) for the
treatment of advanced infectious keratitis with corneal melting.
Ophthalmology. 2014;121(7):1377–82.
46. Shetty R, Nagaraja H, Jayadev C, Shivanna Y, Kugar T. Collagen crosslinking
in the management of advanced non-resolving microbial keratitis. Br J
Ophthalmol. 2014;98(8):1033–5.
47. Sorkhabi R, Sedgipoor M, Mahdavifard A. Collagen cross-linking for resistant
corneal ulcer. Int Ophthalmol. 2013;33(1):61–6.
48. Spiess BM, Pot SA, Florin M, Hafezi F. Corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) for
the treatment of melting keratitis in cats and dogs: a pilot study. Vet
Ophthalmol. 2014;17(1):1–11.
49. Tabibian D, Richoz O, Hafezi F. PACK-CXL: Corneal Cross-linking for
Treatment of Infectious Keratitis. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2015;10(1):77–80.
50. Tabibian D, Richoz O, Riat A, Schrenzel J, Hafezi F. Accelerated
photoactivated chromophore for keratitis-corneal collagen cross-linking as a
first-line and sole treatment in early fungal keratitis. J Refract Surg. 2014;
30(12):855–7.
51. Vazirani J, Vaddavalli PK. Cross-linking for microbial keratitis. Indian J
Ophthalmol. 2013;61(8):441–4.
52. Wong RL, Gangwani RA, Yu LW, Lai JS. New treatments for bacterial keratitis.
J Ophthalmol. 2012;2012:831502.
53. Zhang ZY. Corneal cross-linking for the treatment of fungal keratitis. Cornea.
2013;32(2):217–8.
54. Vajpayee RB, Shafi SN, Maharana PK, Sharma N, Jhanji V. Evaluation of
corneal collagen cross-linking as an additional therapy in mycotic keratitis.
Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2015;43(2):103–7.
55. Papaioannou L, Miligkos M, Papathanassiou M. Corneal Collagen Cross-
Linking for Infectious Keratitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Cornea. 2015;35(1):62–71. Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central
56. Labiris G, Giarmoukakis A, Larin R, Sideroudi H, Kozobolis VP. Corneal and we will help you at every step:
collagen cross-linking in a late-onset graft infectious ulcer: a case report.
J Med Case Rep. 2014;8:180. • We accept pre-submission inquiries
57. Kozobolis V, Labiris G, Gkika M, Sideroudi H, Kaloghianni E, Papadopoulou D, • Our selector tool helps you to find the most relevant journal
et al. UV-A Collagen Cross-Linking Treatment of Bullous Keratopathy
• We provide round the clock customer support
Combined With Corneal Ulcer. Cornea. 2010;29(2):235–8.
58. Martins SA, Combs JC, Noguera G, Camacho W, Wittmann P, Walther R, • Convenient online submission
et al. Antimicrobial efficacy of riboflavin/UVA combination (365 nm) in vitro • Thorough peer review
for bacterial and fungal isolates: a potential new treatment for infectious
• Inclusion in PubMed and all major indexing services
keratitis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49(8):3402–8.
59. Naseem I, Ahmad M, Hadi SM. Effect of alkylated and intercalated DNA on • Maximum visibility for your research
the generation of superoxide anion by riboflavin. Biosci Rep. 1988;8(5):485–92.
Submit your manuscript at
www.biomedcentral.com/submit

You might also like