CXL Thin Cornea
CXL Thin Cornea
CXL Thin Cornea
FARHAD HAFEZI, SABINE KLING, FRANCESCA GILARDONI, NIKKI HAFEZI, MARK HILLEN,
REYHANEH ABRISHAMCHI, JOSE ALVARO P. GOMES, COSIMO MAZZOTTA, J. BRADLEY RANDLEMAN, AND
EMILIO A. TORRES-NETTO
PURPOSE: To determine whether corneal cross-linking significant changes were found in CDVA (P [ .611),
(CXL) with individualized fluence (‘‘sub400 protocol’’) is sphere (P [ .077), or cylinder (P [ .915).
able to stop keratoconus (KC) progression in ultrathin CONCLUSIONS: The ‘‘sub400’’ individualized fluence
corneas with 12-month follow-up. CXL protocol standardizes the treatment in ultrathin cor-
DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. neas and halted KC progression with a success rate of
METHODS: Thirty-nine eyes with progressive KC and 90% at 12 months. The sub400 protocol allows for the
corneal stromal thicknesses from 214 to 398 mm at the treatment of corneas as thin as 214 mm of corneal stroma,
time of ultraviolet irradiation were enrolled. After epithe- markedly extending the treatment range. The DL depth
lium removal, ultraviolet irradiation was performed at 3 did not predict treatment outcome. Hence, the depth is
mW/cm2 with irradiation times individually adapted to unlikely related to the extent of CXL-induced corneal
stromal thickness. Pre- and postoperative examinations stiffening but rather to the extent of CXL-induced micro-
included corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), refrac- structural changes and wound healing. (Am J
tion, Scheimpflug, and anterior segment optical coherence Ophthalmol 2021;224:133–142. Ó 2020 Elsevier Inc.
tomography imaging up to 12 months after CXL. Outcome All rights reserved.)
measures were arrest of KC progression at 12 months post-
operatively and stromal demarcation line (DL) depth.
K
RESULTS: Thirty-five eyes (90%) showed tomographi- ERATOCONUS (KC) IS A CHRONIC PROGRESSIVE
cal stability at 12 months after surgery. No eyes showed ophthalmic disease that leads to bulging and thin-
signs of endothelial decompensation. A significant corre- ning of the cornea, resulting in increasing irregular
lation was found between DL depth and irradiation time astigmatism and, ultimately, poor vision. Because of a study
(r [ D0.448, P [ .004) but not between DL depth published in 1986 showing a prevalence of 0.05% in a sin-
and change in Kmax (r [ L0.215, P [ .189). On gle state of the US population, KC has been classified as a
average, there was a significant change (P < .05) in thin- rare disease.1 However, recent studies including modern
nest stromal thickness (L14.5 ± 21.7 mm), Kmax (L2.06 screening methods have demonstrated a prevalence 5 to
± 3.66 D) and densitometry (D2.00 ± 2.07 GSU). No 10 times higher in Western Europe and up to almost 100
times higher in certain regions of the Middle East compared
with the historic 1986 study.2,3
Supplemental Material available at AJO.com. First introduced in 2003, corneal cross-linking (CXL) is
Accepted for publication Dec 7, 2020. a treatment that can prevent KC progression.4,5 CXL has
From the Laboratory for Ocular Cell Biology, Center for Applied radically changed the visual prognosis of patients with
Biotechnology and Molecular Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich
(F.H., F.G., R.A., E.A.T.-N.); Department of Ophthalmology, ELZA KC and other ectasias, namely, postoperative ectasia and
Institute, Dietikon (F.H, F.G., N.H., M.H., R.A., E.A.T.-N.), pellucid marginal degeneration.4,5 CXL acts to halt KC
Switzerland; Department of Ophthalmology, USC Roski Eye Institute, progression by increasing the biomechanical stiffness of
University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California (F.H.),
USA; Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland the cornea.6 In the original standard CXL (‘‘Dresden’’) pro-
(F.H., E.A.T.-N.); Department of Ophthalmology, University of tocol, the corneal stiffening was achieved first by debriding
Wenzhou, Wenzhou, China (F.H.); Department of Information the corneal epithelial cells, saturating the corneal stroma
Technology and Electrical Engineering, Swiss Federal Institute of
Technology Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland (S.K.); Department of with riboflavin, and then irradiating the corneal stroma
Ophthalmology, Paulista School of Medicine, Federal University of Sao with ultraviolet (UV)-A light at 365 nm.6 The riboflavin
Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil (J.A.P.G., E.A.T.-N.); Department of in the stroma absorbs the UV energy, resulting in a photo-
Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena (C.M.);
Department of Ophthalmology, Siena Crosslinking Center (C.M.), chemical reaction that generates reactive oxygen species
Siena, Italy; Department of Ophthalmology, The Cole Eye Institute, (ROS). The ROS induce covalent bonds between the
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio (J.B.R.), USA. collagen fibers and the proteoglycans of the extracellular
Inquiries to Farhad Hafezi, ELZA Institute, Webereistrasse 2, 8953
Dietikon, Switzerland; e-mail: farhad@hafezi.ch matrix (EM).7,8 At the same time, the riboflavin acts to
measurements were performed by the same examiner and determine the patient’s individualized fluence require-
distances were measured at the thinnest point of the cornea. ment—per our published nomogram—aiming to obtain a
All subjects had corneal evaluations performed using a DL 70 mm above the corneal endothelium.12
rotational Scheimpflug system (Pentacam HR; Oculus, To facilitate the clinical application of individualized
Wetzlar, Germany) by the same trained individual. The fluence, irradiation intensity/irradiance was kept fixed at
standard resolution setting was used to capture images 3 mW/cm2, whereas treatment time was modified. A table
(25 images per scan), and the following parameters were was created depicting the individual fluence applicable to
recorded: thinnest corneal stromal thickness, anterior thin corneas in increments of 10 mm (Table 2). Then,
radius of curvature in the 3.0 mm zone centered on the CXL was performed at 365 nm using a commercially avail-
thinnest location of the cornea (ARC3 mm), maximum able CXL device (CXL-365; Schwind Eye-Tech-Solutions,
anterior keratometry (Kmax), total anterior densitometry Kleinostheim, Germany) at an intensity of 3 mW/cm2.
(AntDens), total central densitometry (CenDens), total Postoperatively, a bandage contact lens was placed, and
posterior densitometry (PostDens), and total average antibiotic and corticosteroid drops were administered. Pa-
densitometry (TotalDens). According to the Scheimpflug tients were re-examined at the slit lamp on postoperative
system’s standard parameters, AntDens corresponds to day 1, and daily until the epithelium was closed, as well
the 120 mm most superficial corneal layers and PostDens as after 1 month and 12 months after the procedure. The
corresponds to the 60 mm closest to the endothelium. contact lens was removed on day 4. Postoperative drops
included fourth-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotics
THE SUB400 PROTOCOL: Table 1 and Figure 1 summarize twice a day for 7 days, followed by 0.1% fluorometholone
the technical specifications and CXL surgical principles. drops twice a day for 12 weeks, and preservative-free artifi-
CXL was performed by mechanically removing the epithe- cial tears as needed.
lium over 9 mm of the central cornea. After de-
epithelialization, the cornea was soaked with sodium STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Statistical analysis was
edetate and trometamol-enriched riboflavin phosphate performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 25; SPSS,
0.1% hypotonic solution (Ricrolinþ; Sooft, Montegiorgio, Inc; FML Liquifilm;. Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA). The
Italy) for 20 minutes. Ultrasound pachymetry was Shapiro-Wilk test was used to test all variables for
performed every 5 minutes during soaking to monitor even- normality. In situations in which both variables were
tual changes in corneal stromal thickness (SP-1000; normally distributed, the t test (2-tailed) was used. In cases
Tomey, Nagoya, Japan). Guided by the preoperative where at least one of variables was not normally distributed,
Scheimpflug images, the intraoperative pachymetry mea- the related-samples Wilcoxon-signed rank nonparametric
surements were performed in the thinnest area of the test was used for further analysis. In cases of normally
cornea. As a routine, 10 measurements were taken in the distributed variables, the results were reported as mean 6
thinnest area and the lowest value was considered. At standard deviation, whereas in variables abnormally
the end of the soaking period, corneas were rinsed with distributed, they were reported as medians and interquartile
balanced salt solution to rinse off any surplus of riboflavin, ranges. Statistical analysis was performed with a confidence
and ultrasound pachymetry was performed to determine interval of 95%. Pearson or Spearman correlation tests
minimal stromal thickness. This intraoperative pachyme- were performed for normally and abnormally distributed
try measurement was performed at the end of the riboflavin variables, respectively. Correlations were considered signif-
instillation, as this corneal thickness value was required to icant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).
corneal thickness and the postoperative Kmax flattening tocol is based on a model taking into account the diffusion
(r ¼ 0.061, P ¼ .713). of oxygen and also correlations between CXL density and
experimentally determined amount of corneal stiffening,12
DENSITOMETRY: There was a significant increase from so that each cornea can receive an individual amount of to-
baseline at 12 months in AntDens (þ3.12 6 3.36 tal energy.
GSU, P < .05), CenDens (þ1.97 6 2.09 GSU, P < Currently, many corneas with advanced KC that would
.05), PostDens (þ0.90 6 1.47 GSU, P < .05), and Total- likely benefit from undergoing CXL cannot be treated
Dens (þ2.00 6 2.07 GSU, P < .05). Although a signifi- with the Dresden protocol because of a stromal thickness
cant increase in densitometry was observed as expected, of less than 400 mm. This initiated the development of
all patients remained within the typical clinical pattern modified techniques aiming to increase corneal stromal
of mild opacity after CXL. No patient had ‘‘deep stromal thickness artificially. However, such alternatives have lim-
haze’’20 or scarring in the evaluated period, as seen in itations that create variable outcomes and often reduce
Figure 5, showing representative OCT images of corneas efficacy.
with the highest degrees of flattening observed in our The first approach, first published in 2009 by Hafezi and
study. associates, was preoperative swelling of the cornea with
hypo-osmolaric riboflavin.9,21,22 The authors reported on
20 eyes treated with this technique. There were no cases
of endothelial cell loss, and keratectasia was stable at the
DISCUSSION 6-month postoperative follow-up.9 Another approach was
the CA-CXL proposed by Jacob and associates,10 where a
THE RESULTS OF THIS STUDY DEMONSTRATE THAT INDIVID- contact lens soaked in iso-osmolaric riboflavin is used to
ualized CXL with the sub400 protocol was able to success- ‘‘increase’’ the effective thickness of the cornea. A third
fully prevent KC progression of ultrathin keratoconic approach was a customized epithelial debridement
corneas in 90% of cases after 1 year of follow-up. This study approach called ‘‘epithelial island cross-linking’’ proposed
introduces for the first time the concept of individualizing by Mazzotta and colleagues.11 This approach spared epithe-
total energy during CXL, according to intraoperative lial cells around the thinnest point of the cornea; the
pachymetry. The individualized CXL with the sub400 pro- riboflavin-soaked island attenuates the UV-A energy. As
a potential consequence, the edge of the epithelial island linking reaction: besides modification of stromal thickness,
would refract the UV-A energy into the intermediate modification of riboflavin concentration would allow us to
stroma, potentially increasing the cross-linking effect in control the amount of chromophore present in the anterior
an undesired manner.11 layers of the stroma. The more riboflavin reacts with the
In essence, each of these approaches has its limitations, photons provided by the UV-A light in the anterior cornea,
because the modifications introduced to ‘‘increase’’ corneal the less energy is available in the deeper layers of the
thickness interfere with some of the fundamental key fac- stroma, making the CXL reaction shallower. In practice,
tors involved in the cross-linking reaction. The swelling such an approach would require a multitude of riboflavin
approach with hypo-osmolaric riboflavin leads to a stiff- solutions with different concentrations, which is not
ening effect similar to CXL using iso-osmolaric riboflavin feasible in daily clinical practice.
in a 400 mm cornea. However, the swelling effect of Another consideration is rather than modifying stromal
hypo-osmolaric riboflavin is variable: some corneas swell thickness or riboflavin concentration, the total irradiation
massively, whereas other corneas have little reaction.9,23 (fluence) could be adapted to the corneal thickness of the
This variability makes this swelling approach highly unpre- individual patient. This approach seems to be the most
dictable. The second approach is CACXL. The greatest logical because it would require just a single type of ribo-
stiffening effect of cross-linking is observed in the anterior flavin solution. Practically speaking, the treating surgeon
cornea.24 Biomechanical stress-strain measurements, ther- would reduce irradiation time to meet the fluence required
mal shrinkage tests,25 and Brillouin microscopy24 have in the individual cornea.
shown that CACXL results in a 30% reduction of the stiff- As logical as this ‘‘sub400’’ approach might seem, it was
ening effect compared with the epi-off Dresden protocol, impossible to implement it back in 2009 because too little
most probably due to a reduction in available oxygen.25,26 was known about the CXL reaction. Specifically, riboflavin
Custom-shaped small-incision lenticule extraction lenti- diffusion and kinetics was unknown at that time, and oxy-
cules have also been used in a similar capacity to the con- gen as a central element of the CXL process had not even
tact lens.27 Finally, the ‘‘epithelial island’’ approach been identified.26,31 The ‘‘sub400’’ protocol is based on a
exhibits an unequal DL between epithelialized and de- published algorithm that accounts for stromal riboflavin,
epithelialized areas,11 where areas of the intact epithelium oxygen, and UV availability during the cross-linking pro-
cause not only UV attenuation but also oxygen restriction cedure.26,31 It is based on estimating diffusion of riboflavin
and further biomechanical loss.28,29 In addition, it appears and oxygen by Fick’s law of diffusion and UV energy by the
that the cross-linking effect is shallower in areas under the Lambert-Beer law of light absorption. The presence of
epi-on region (150 mm) than in the epi-off regions these 3 factors determines the speed and amount of the
(250 mm).30 induced photochemical reactions (types I and II). It is
All current CXL techniques for thin corneas aim to in- assumed that the amount of singlet oxygen (Soxy) produced
crease stromal thickness. In theory, other measures should during the treatment interacts with the available EM and
also be considered like controlling the depth of the cross- thereby forms the relevant cross-links. The concentration
of those additionally induced cross-links [CXL] can then be It is important to emphasize that the pachymetry consid-
estimated from. ered to calculate the irradiation dose of the sub400 protocol
8 9 is based on intraoperative pachymetry, after the riboflavin
> >
<
kRFH2ox
$½EMð1ekEMox Dt
=
Þ ; soaking. Despite this, we have also assessed the preopera-
½CXL ¼ ½CXL0 þ Soxy $ 1 e kEMox tive Scheimpflug data of all eyes. Whereas the cornea
>
: >
;
with the thinnest stromal thickness was 214 mm (intraoper-
atively measured with an ultrasound pachymeter, without
where [.] denotes concentration of riboflavin, Dt indicates
the epithelium), the thinnest cornea included showed a to-
the calculation time step, and kRFH2ox and kEMox are the re-
tal thickness of 325 mm (preoperatively measured with
action rate constants for RFH2 oxidation and EM oxida-
Scheimpflug tomography, with the epithelium). Therefore,
tion, respectively. [CXL0] represents the CXL
clinically, a cornea that presents with a Scheimpflug assess-
concentration at the previous time step. This model per-
ment of 325 mm total thickness (with the epithelium) or
mits the prediction of not only the amount of biomechan-
more can be treated with the sub400 protocol.
ical stiffening achieved after CXL but also the duration of
This study has some limitations. Although the vast ma-
UV irradiation required to achieve a CXL concentration
jority of eyes in this study had preoperative progression
that corresponds to the threshold of keratocyte apoptosis
documented by differential corneal imaging maps, a frac-
(when applied to clinical protocols) and as such to predict
tion (15%) of the eyes were from patients over 40 years
the penetration depth of a modified CXL treatment. The
and thus would be less likely to progress naturally. There-
accuracy of the theoretical model has been verified previ-
fore, one would think that they would not progress despite
ously in preclinical experiments, where the predicted
CXL: interestingly, all of these eyes had confirmed preoper-
CXL concentration did strongly correlate (R2 ¼ 0.95)
ative progression, and despite CXL 2 of these eyes showed
with the biomechanical stiffening in porcine, murine,
postoperative progression and were considered to be fail-
and lapin corneas.12 These experimental data suggest that
ures. In other cases, the extreme corneal shape in far-
sub400 can be used to individualize UV-A irradiation dura-
progressed ectasias made Placido-based topography and
tion with standard CXL lamp settings.
Scheimpflug imaging less reproducible. Also, primary ecta-
Based on this algorithm,12 the present study introduces a
sias in children or adolescents were primarily treated.13 A
standardized epithelium-off CXL method for the treatment
further limitation, not inherent specifically to this study,
of corneas with a stromal thickness of less than 400 mm:
are the metrics used to assess the CXL effects. Currently,
rather than artificially modifying corneal thickness, the
there is no clinical consensus on ideal metrics.32 Therefore,
sub400 protocol adapts the total UV-A energy to the
besides using Kmax, like the majority of studies, we have also
patient’s individual stromal thickness. The present study
evaluated the anterior radius of curvature in a 3.0 mm zone.
verified and confirmed that CXL with individualized
Using these 2 indices, we were able to demonstrate that
fluence was able to stop KC progression of corneas as thin
CXL was able to at least halt KC progression. Interestingly,
as 214 mm with 90% of success at 1 year after CXL.
the reduction found in the point of maximum keratometry
but not in a 3 mm zone could suggest improvement of The fluence of 5.4 J/cm2 at a stromal thickness of 400 mm
corneal regularity after CXL. A further limitation is that that was originally established in the Dresden protocol rep-
we were unable to evaluate endothelial cell density. How- resents the baseline fluence used in our ‘‘sub400’’ protocol
ever, no cornea showed clinical signs of endothelial decom- and is then reduced in thinner corneas following our
pensation: the total fluence in our study never exceeded the published algorithm. Interestingly, recent assessments us-
5.4 J/cm2 used in the original Dresden protocol, and other ing 2-photon imaging tomography indicate that there is a
published studies used fluences up to 14 J/cm2, without discrepancy of a factor of 1.7 between the concentration
observing endothelial damage.33,34 of corneal riboflavin using the new 2-photon imaging tech-
Furthermore, experimental evidence suggests that the nology and the old theoretical estimates.38 This discrep-
actual threshold of endothelial damage might be tradition- ancy might allow for substantially higher baseline
ally overestimated.34 It is important to note that, despite fluences in the near future.39
(1) the aforementioned current indirect evidence of endo- Another technique for the treatment of thin corneas,
thelial security, and (2) that we have not observed any called the ‘‘M’’ protocol, was recently proposed by Mazzotta
signs of clinical decompensation throughout the present and colleagues.40 This ‘‘M’’ protocol gathers all published
study, decompensation would be just an end stage sign of and validated clinical data on the penetration depth of
endothelial compromise; thence, in light of the lack of various epi-off and epi-on CXL techniques that had been
endothelial count, subtle endothelial changes could not published over the years. The ‘‘M’’ protocol matched the
be verified. Finally, another limitation was that DL depths in vivo scanning laser confocal microscopy and OCT
demonstrated considerable variability preventing the iden- morphological data5 with the mathematical assessment of
tification of a systematic deviation from the predictions the cross-link concentration threshold according to the
with the limited number of patients included in this study. measured DL, assuming the Dresden protocol as bench-
However, it seems likely that the algorithm somewhat mark. It demonstrates that the maximum interaction be-
underestimated the demarcation depth, which could be tween UV-A, riboflavin, oxygen, and collagen-
overcome in the future by applying higher irradiances, or proteoglycans complex would be in the first 200 mm—
prolonging the irradiation time. where the 70% of riboflavin-UV-A interactions occur,
The ocular structures are particularly sensitive to light- whereas the remaining 30% of CXL photo-oxidative reac-
induced damage.35 The main reason why the Dresden tion would be dissipated in the deep stroma between 200
protocol imposed a stromal thickness of more than and 300 mm.41
400 mm was to protect the corneal endothelium. So, The CXL techniques include using continuous or pulsed
aiming to protect sensitive structures such as the corneal light, with and without iontophoresis, and a range of
endothelium, rough estimates of riboflavin concentration different intensities, ranging from 3 to 30 mW/cm2. In
were calculated before the introduction of CXL in contrast, the ‘‘sub400’’ protocol introduced here uses 1 sin-
2003.34,36,37 From such estimates, the ‘‘400mm rule’’ was gle intensity in an epi-off setting, based on our published
created and globally disseminated as the minimal required algorithm. Although both the ‘‘M’’ and the ‘‘sub400’’ proto-
stromal thickness for epithelium-off CXL. Excess exposure col may achieve similar results, the ‘‘sub400’’ protocol re-
of the corneal endothelium to UV irradiation (above a quires less sophisticated technology.
threshold of 0.35 mW/cm2) would lead to cell death by The ‘‘sub400’’ individualized fluence CXL protocol stan-
apoptosis,38 putting cornea homeostasis and transparency dardizes the treatment in ultrathin corneas and is able to
at stake. halt KC progression with a success rate of 90% at
ALL AUTHORS HAVE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED THE ICMJE FORM FOR DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST.
Funding/Support: This study was supported in part by separate unrestricted departmental grants from Research to Prevent Blindness, Inc to the USC Roski
Eye Institute, Los Angeles, CA (F.H.) and the Cleveland Clinic Cole Eye Institute (J.B.R.), grants from the Light for Sight Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland
(F.H.), the Velux Foundation, Zurich, Switzerland (F.H.) and grant from International Council of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, CA (E.T.N.). Financial
Disclosures: F.H. is the chief scientific and medical officer of EMAGine AG (Zug, Switzerland) and co-inventor of the PCT applications CH2012/0000090
and PCT2014/CH000075 regarding CXL technology. N.H. is CEO of EMAGine AG, a company producing a CXL device. The remaining authors have no
financial or proprietary interest in the materials presented herein. All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for authorship.