Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Trial Before A Court of Session - Section 225 To 237

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 3

‭Trial before a Court of Session: section 225 TO 237‬

‭The code lays down the procedure for trial before a court of session as follows:‬

‭1.‬ ‭Parties (sec. 225):‬


‭●‬ ‭In a trial before a court of session, t‬‭he prosecution shall be conducted‬
‭by a public prosecutor.‬
‭●‬ ‭the accused has‬‭the right to hire a counsel of his choice‬‭and in case he‬
‭is unable to hire a lawyer, he will be assigned an attorney at the expense‬
‭of the State. Before the commencement of trial, it is required to provide‬
‭the accused with the copies of FIR, police report, etc.‬

‭2.‬ ‭Opening the case (sec. 226):‬


‭●‬ ‭The‬‭public prosecutor opens‬‭the case by describing the accusation‬
‭against the accused.‬
‭●‬ ‭He states‬‭briefly by what evidence, he proposes to prove the guilt.‬
‭●‬ ‭The prosecutor duty is not to secure a conviction but simply to lay the‬
‭facts of the case before the tribunal, which is to judge.‬

‭3.‬ ‭Discharge of the accused (sec. 227):‬


‭●‬ ‭After hearing from both parties‬‭if the court considers that there is‬‭no‬
‭sufficient ground‬‭to proceed against the accused,‬‭discharges‬‭him‬
‭and records the reason for doing so.‬

‭4.‬ ‭Framing of charge (sec. 228):‬


‭●‬ ‭After hearing from both parties‬
‭●‬ ‭if the court presumes that the‬‭accused might have committed the‬
‭offences:‬
‭i) frames a charge in writing, if the offence is exclusively triable by the‬
‭Court of Session.‬

i‭i) If the offence is not triable exclusively by the session’s court, it frames‬
‭charge and transfers the case to the Chief Judicial Magistrate.‬

‭CASE: Kanti Bhadra Shah & anr v. State of West Bengal:‬


‭It was held in the case that while exercising power under Section 228 CrPC, the Judge‬
‭is‬‭not required to record his reasons‬‭for framing the charges against the accused.‬
‭ hawna Bai v. Ghanshyam & Ors.:‬ ‭the Supreme Court held While framing charges,‬
B
‭only th‬‭e prima facie case has to be seen.‬‭At this stage, t‬‭he Judge is not required to‬
‭record a detailed order necessary to see whether the case is beyond reasonable‬
‭doubt .‬

‭5.‬ ‭Explaining the charge and enquiry about plea (sec. 228(2)):‬
‭●‬ ‭The contents of the charge have to be explained to the accused as to‬
‭enable him to plead guilty‬‭of the offence or claim to be tried‬

‭●‬ C
‭ ase:. In Banwari v. State of UP, the Court held that default in reading out‬
‭or explaining the charge to the accused would not vitiate the trial unless it‬
‭has been shown that non-compliance with Section 228 has resulted in‬
‭prejudice to the accused.‬

‭6.‬ ‭Conviction on plea of guilty (sec. 229):‬


‭●‬ ‭If the accused‬‭pleads guilty‬‭, the judge‬‭shall record the plea‬‭and may in‬
‭his discretion convict him thereon.‬
‭●‬ ‭It was held in‬‭Queen Empress v. Bhadu‬‭that the plea of guilty must be in‬
‭unambiguous terms otherwise such a plea is considered as‬
‭equivalent to a plea of not guilty.‬

‭7.‬ ‭Date for prosecution evidence (sec. 230):‬


‭●‬ ‭If the accused refuses to plead or does not plead or claims to be tried or‬
‭is not convicted under sec. 229,‬
‭●‬ ‭the judge‬‭shall fix a date for the examination or witness or may order‬
‭for the compelling appearance of any witness or production of a‬
‭thing/document.‬

‭8.‬ ‭Evidence for prosecution (sec.231‬‭)‭:‬‬


‭●‬ ‭It consists of two points:‬
‭●‬ ‭On the date so fixed as above, the‬‭judge takes all such evidence is‬
‭support of the prosecution.‬
‭●‬ ‭The judge may in his discretion,‬‭permit the cross examination of any‬
‭witness to be deferred(Postpone) until any other witness have been‬
‭examined or recall any witness for further cross examination.‬

‭9.‬ E
‭ xamination of the accused(313):‬‭It is to be made without administering oath.‬
‭It is to give an opportunity to him to explain the circumstances alleged against‬
‭him by prosecution.‬
‭10.‬‭Acquittal (sec. 232):‬‭After hearing from both parties if the‬‭judge considers‬‭that‬
‭the accused has‬‭not committed the offence‬‭,‬‭record an order acquitting the‬
‭accused.‬

‭11.‬‭Entering upon defence (sec. 233)‬‭:‬


‭●‬ ‭If the accused is not acquitted, he shall be called upon to enter on his‬
‭defence.‬
‭●‬ ‭The court may summon or examine at any stage any person as court‬
‭witness.‬

‭12.‬‭Final Arguments (sec. 234):‬‭see hand notes‬

‭13.‬‭Judgment of acquittal or conviction (sec. 235)‬‭:‬


‭●‬ ‭After hearing arguments from both the sides, the court delivers judgment‬
‭of acquittal or conviction.‬

‭●‬ S
‭ anta Singh v. State of Punjab: The Apex court held that‬‭the Judge‬
‭should‬‭first pass a sentence of conviction or acquittal. If the accused‬
‭is convicted he shall be heard on the question of sentence and only‬
‭then the Court shall proceed to pass a sentence against him.‬
‭14.‬‭Previous Conviction (sec. 236): .see hand written notes‬

‭ 5.‬‭Procedure of trial in case of defamation of public servants ( Sec 199(2) & Sec‬
1
‭237 of Code of Criminal Procedure):‬

‭●‬ A ‭ ny offence tried under Section 199(2) of CrPC by the Sessions Court shall be‬
‭tried with the same procedure as of warrant cases on pr before a magistrate.‬
‭●‬ ‭Trials under this section should be held before camera (only if court permits).‬
‭●‬ ‭In case of discharge or acquittal of accused by the court, the Judge can order‬
‭direct the petitioner in this case to compensate the accused person.‬
‭●‬ ‭The amount of compensation should not exceed Rs. 1000.‬
‭●‬ ‭Compensation awarded is similar to a fine imposed by the Court.‬
‭●‬ ‭Paying compensation does not exempt anyone from civil or criminal liability.‬
‭●‬ ‭The person who is asked to pay compensation has a right to appeal to High‬
‭Court. The petitioner is not bound to pay compensation before the period to file‬
‭appeal elapses.‬

You might also like