810-Article Text-3146-1-15-20220801
810-Article Text-3146-1-15-20220801
810-Article Text-3146-1-15-20220801
ABSTRACT
Biological control agents can be obtained from unicellular microbial exploration. Human
health and sustainable agriculture are the main reasons for using biological control.
Isolates microbes were tested for antagonistic potential against Colletotrichum capsici
the causal pathogen ofed anthracnose diseases. The Mmost potential antagonists was
identified based on the morphology, biochemical and molecular characteristics. That
microbe was also conducted to confirm the antagonist is no’t a pathogen into the plant.
Growth media extract was used as a material for this test. Extracts were filtered from
microbial liquid culture media using a microfilter of 0,0022 µm. Furthermore, extracts
were characterized using a Proteinase K and temperature. The most potential
antagonist was identified as Pseudomonas aeruginosa with the highest inhibition. The
active extract had no effect on Proteinase K and have an influence on the temperature.
P. aeruginosa did no’t hypersensitive and also did no’t have pathogenicity in plants.
Keywords: Colletotrichum capsici, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, biocontrol, biotechnology,
Pseudomonas flourescens
INTRODUCTION
Anthracnose disease is a dangerous chili disease. It causes by the fungal pathogen
Colletotrichum capsici. Anthracnose in chili is characterized by the appearance of small
circular black spots on the skin of the fruit that spread along the long axis so that it
becomes more or less elliptical in shape. The impact can cause crop failure. So it needs
proper control and prevention. The use of chemical pesticides has a negative impact on
humans and the environment. One alternative control with the use of biological agents.
Biological control can be done with unicellular microbe phylloplane.
Phylloplane unicellular microbes are microorganisms that live and live on the surface.
These microbes have various roles including as biological agents to prevent and control
plant pests and diseases. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct research to ascertain the
benefits of its use to control C. capsici.
Chili is an important commodity in Indonesia. However, chili cultivation often fails due to
several factors, one of which is pests and diseases. Anthracnose disease in chili plants
is the most common disease found and almost always occurs in every chili area.
Anthracnose other than result in a decrease in yield can also damage the aesthetic
value of chili. Anthracnose is a dangerous chili disease[1].This disease is caused by the
pathogenic fungus Colletotrichum capsici. Anthracnose disease is characterized by the
appearance of small black spots on the skin of the fruit that spread along the long axis
so that the shape is more or less elliptical. The impact can cause crop failure. So it
needs proper control and prevention. The use of chemical pesticides has a negative
impact on humans and the environment. One of the control alternatives is the use of
biological agents. Biological control can be done with unicellular microbial phylloplane.
Unicellular phylloplane microbes are microorganisms that live and live on surfaces.
Phylloplane microbes are a very diverse and ubiquitous group of microorganisms,
occurring on the surfaces of plant species in major terrestrial and marine habitats.
Hundreds of species of bacteria, mycelial fungi, yeasts, and protozoa have been
detected in the phyllosphere and phylloplane of plants during this time[2]. Many of them
play an important role in the life of the plant, being phytopathogens or pathogen
antagonists, and producing vitamins, phytohormones, antibiotics, or toxins[3]. These
microbes have various roles including as biological agents to prevent and control plant
pests and diseases. Since chitin is an important structural component of the fungal cell
wall, chitindegrading microorganisms can inhibit the development of fungal mycelium.
The opportunity to use chitinolytic enzymes against fungi causing plant diseases was
the first to attract researchers’ attention However, chitinolytic microorganisms inhabiting
the supraterrestrial parts of plants have remained virtually uncharacterized, although
these parts of the plants are also vulnerable to fungal diseases[4].
Studies of the microbial community of the phylloplane of plants are of utmost
importance for understanding interspecies interactions in nature; from the practical point
of view, these studies provide the basis for a variety of biological pest control methods
aimed at increasing the productivity of agriculture, decreasing crop loss caused by
diseases and pests, etc[5]. We focused on study of the exploration, identification of
uncellular phylloplane microbe, and characterization of secondary metabolite under
various conditions may have considerable importance for development of methods for
biological control of phytopathogenic fungi. Therefore, it is necessary to conduct
research to ascertain the benefits of its use to control C. capsici.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
DNA Isolation
Method of DNA isolation referred to [7] Sambrook and Russell [16]. A total of 2 ml
of rich medium (NA) containing the antibiotic was injected with one colony of
transformed bacteria. Incubate the culture at 27oC with vigorous shaking with 1.5 ml of
culture stored in a microfuge tube. The centrifuge was carried out at maximum speed
for 30 seconds in a microfuge. Save unused parts of the original culture. After
centrifugation is complete, the media is removed by aspiration, allowing the bacterial
pellet to dry as much as possible. Resuspend the microbial pellet in 100 µl cold Alkaline
I lysis solution with strong vortex. Add 200 µl of freshly prepared Alkaline II lysis solution
for each microbial suspension. Close the jar tightly, and mix the contents by rapidly
inverting the jar five times. Keep the jar on ice. Add 150 µl of ice cold Alkaline III lysis
solution. Keep the jar on ice for 3-5 minutes. Microbial lysate centrifugation at maximum
speed for 5 minutes in a microfuge. Precipitate nucleic acid from the supernatant by
adding 2 volumes of ethanol. Collect the precipitated asic nucleic acid by centrifugation
at maximum speed for 5 minutes. Discard the supernatant by gentle aspiration. Add 1
ml of 70% ethanol to the pellet and invert the tube several times. Recover DNA by
centrifugation at maximum speed for 2 minutes. Again, removed all supernatant by
gentle aspiration. Discard any ethanol beads that form on the sides of the tube.
Dissolved the nucleic acid in 50 µl TE (pH 8.0) containing 20 g/ml DNAse-free RNAse
A. Vortex the solution slowly for a few seconds. Stored the DNA solution at -20oC. The
pellets obtained were tested for DNA quality and quantity using Nano-Drop (thermo
Nano-Drop 1000).Inoculate 2 ml of rich medium (NA) containing the appropriate
antibiotic with a single colony of transformed bacteria. Incubate the culture overnight at
27oC with rigorous shaking. Pour 1,5 ml of the culture into a microfuge tube. Centrifuge
at maximum speed for 30 seconds at microfuge. Store the unused portion of the original
culture. When centrifugation is complete, remove the medium by aspiration, leaving the
bacterial pellet as dry as possible. Resuspend the microbe pellet in 100 µl of ice-cold
Alkaline lysis solution I by vigorous vortexing. Add 200 µl of freshly prepared Alkaline
lysis solution II to each microbe suspension. Close the tube tightly, and mix the contents
by inverting the tube rapidly five times. Store the tube on ice. Add 150 µl of ice cold
Alkaline lysis solution III. Store the tube on ice for 3-5 minutes. Centrifuge the microbe
lysate at maximum speed for 5 minutes at microfuge. Precipate nucleic acids from the
supernatant by adding 2 volumes of ethanol. Collect the precipitated nucleid acis by
centrifugation at maximum speed for 5 minutes. Remove the supernatant by gentle
aspiration. Add 1 ml of 70% ethanol to the pellet and invert the closed tube several
times. Recover the DNA by centrifugation at maximum speed for 2 minutes. Again
remove all of the supernatant by gentle aspiration. Remove any beads of ethanol that
form on the sides of tube. Dissolve the nucleic acids in 50 µl of TE (pH 8.0) containing
20 µg/ml DNAse free RNAse A. Vortex the solution gently for a few seconds. Store the
DNA solution at -20oC. The obtained pellet was tested of quality and quantity of DNA
using Nano-Drop (thermo Nano-Drop 1000).
PCR Amplification
The primers used were 16S rDNA F (5’-AGA GTT TGA TCC TGG CTC AG-3’) and
R (5’-TAC GGC TAC CTT GTT ACG A-3’). The total volume of PCR was 12 µl,
consisted of, 2 µl of dH2O, 1 µl of Forward, 1 µl of Reverse, 5 µl of PCR mix, 3 µl of
DNA template. PCR was run at condition of pre-denaturation at 94 oC for 4 min. After
then, denaturation at 94oC for 1 min, annealing at 50 oC for 1 min and elongation at 72 oC
for 2 min, the steps was repeated 35 cycles. The last was post elongation at 72 oC for 3
min. The PCR product was stored at -20 oC.
Electrophoresis Process
Process of electrophoresis was using 2% agarose gel and the determination of
fragment length of 16s regions was using 1 µl DNA marker 1 kb DNA Ladder. Process
of electrophoresis running at voltage 65 volt for 30 min. Gel of electrophoresis result
was observed by using Dox XR gel (BIO-RAD) connected to the computer to see the
lambent of DNA bands of PCR product. DNA bands at gel of electrophoresis result was
purified using kit Wizard® SV gel and PCR clean-up system (Promega). The last
process in this yeast molecular identification was DNA sequencing by Applied
Biosystem 3100 from 1st Base Company.
Figure 1. Colony of C3C isolate A. macroscopically (1) on PDA media age of 1 days
after incubation (dai). B. morphology (2).
Biochemical identification aims to determine the character of bacterial strains in
response to various test media so that they can be compared with strains of the genus
Pseudomonas bacteria that have been studied previously. The test results are shown in
the following table quoted from the books of [8]Schaad et al. [18] and Garrity et al. [7][9].
The result of biochemical test had positive KOH test, gram negative, facultative aerob
and positive flourescens test on King’B media. Another biochemical characteristics
showed positive oxidase, negative motility, negative nitrate, positive lysine, negative
ornithine, positive H2S, negative glucose, negative mannitol, positive xylose, negative
ONPG, negative indole, positive urease, positive gelatin, negative malonate, negative
inositol, positive sorbitol, negative rhaminose, positive sucrose, negative lactose,
positive arabinose, negative adonitol, positive raffinose, negative salicin, and positive
arginine.
P. fluorescens
Characteristi Isolate P.
biovar I bv. bv. bv. bv.
c C3C aeruginosa
II III IV V
Oksidase + + + + + + +
Motility - TD TD TD TD TD TD
Nitrate - + + + + + -
Lysine + + + +D +D + +D
D D
Ornithine - + + + + +D +D
H2S + TD TD TD TD TD TD
Glukose - + + + + + +
Mannitol - + + + +D + +D
D D
Xylose + - + + + +D +D
ONPG - TD TD TD TD TD TD
Indole - TD TD TD TD TD TD
Urease + - - - - - -
V-P + TD TD TD TD TD TD
Citrate - TD TD TD TD TD TD
TDA + TD TD TD TD TD TD
Gelatin + + + + + + -
Manolate - + + + +D + +D
D D
Inositol - - + + + + +D
Sorbitol + - + + V + V
Rhamnose - - - +D +D - +D
Sucrose + - + + V + V
Lactose - TD TD TD TD TD TD
Arabinose + - + + V + +D
Adonitol - - + - +D - +D
Raffinose + TD TD TD TD TD TD
Salicin - TD TD TD TD TD TD
Arginine + + + + + + +
Pigmen + (blue- +(blue- TD TD TD - -
green) green) - - - TD TD
Tobacco HR - +D - - - - -
Growth at + + - - - - -
41OC
Growth at - - + + + + +
4OC
Description: +, 80% or more positive strain; +D, 80% or more delayed positive strain; V,
between 21-79% positive strain; -, 80% or more negative strain; TD, not determinate.
Quality and Quantity of DNA
In the molecular identification stage, the first step is to obtain DNA. This stage is
the isolation of DNA by destroying the bacterial cell membrane using a lysis buffer. The
buffer used to destroy the bacterial membrane is SDS. SDS has a function as a
detergent in destroying membrane proteins. In addition, it is necessary to add
cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) which aims to separate polysaccharides from
nucleic acids. Under salt conditions, the polysaccharides are bound to a cation
detergent called CTAB. Molecularly identified unicellular microbes were C3C isolates
that had the best inhibition and antibiosis power. The results of DNA isolation were
measured for quantity and quality using Nano-Drop.
From the nano-drop result, the DNA quality of the C3C isolate was good because
the 260/280 nm absorbance ratio was about 1,87. According to Seidmen and Moore
[20], the good quality of DNA ranged from 1.8-2. However, in PCR amplification, DNA
quality was not an absolute requirement. The result of DNA quantity measurement by
using nanodrop showed that C3C isolate DNA concentration was 449,01 nm/µl.
According to Sambrook And Russell [16], DNA concentration that could be used as a
mold during the PCR process should be at least 100nm/µl. The DNA quality
measurement showed that DNA concentration was adequate to be used in the PCR
process.
Table 2. Results of DNA isolation nano drops
Result of Electrophoresis
Electrophoresis results showed the good lambent of single DNA bands for C3C
isolate. Those single bands were 16S rDNA regions fragment amplified with PCR
method. Electrophoresis result showed that 16S rDNA regions amplification was
successfully carried out. The position showed on about 1500 bp. According to
Suryani[10] [24], the result of 16S rDNA was showed about 1500 bp.
M 1kb C3C
1500 bp C3C
Figure 3. Electrophoresis result of PCR product. It was 16s rDNA regions of C3C
isolate.
The results of the BLAST analysis (Table 3) show that the query cover value of
100% indicates the base percentage of the C3C sequence is very compatible with the
homologous strain. The maximum score represents a measure of the statistical
difference in alignment. The maximum value is equal to the total score indicating the
two sequences are the same or very similar. A very low E value (expectation value)
indicates that the two sequences are increasingly similar. The expected value of all
strains appearing in BLAST is zero, meaning that each test strain has a high similarity to
its homologous sequence.
After finding the sequence results similar to P. aeruginosa, then the phylogenetic
analysis was carried out to compare with the results of biochemical identification. This is
to determine the relationship between the studied bacterial strains with P. aeruginosa
and P. fluorescens species. The comparison nucleotide sequences were accessed from
GenBank on the NCBI site. Based on the results (Table 5) it was found that the C3C
strain was very similar and very compatible with its homologous strain with P.
aeruginosa compared to P. flourescens. P. flourescens did not match the homologous
strain because the cover query value was still very low. Although the expected value of
all strains appearing in BLAST is zero, it means that each test strain has a high
similarity with its homologous sequence. It's just that the percentage value of
identification of P. flourescens is still lower than that of P. aeruginosa.
Table 5. Comparation sequence result with Genbank data
Alignment results were analyzed using the BLAST program (Figure 8), it was found
that the homology level was very high with P. flourescens. There is a gap or dotted line
indicating the occurrence of a high mutation process in the form of insertions or
deletions. The bases that appear indicate identical nucleotides. Although there is still a
gap of 3%, it means that of the 641 bases that are aligned, only 25 are different from the
C3C strain. From the results of this alignment, it is known that the conservative regions
are regions in the sequence that have identical base sequences between species or in
different molecules produced by the same organism. Cross-species conservation shows
that certain nucleotide sequences may have been maintained by evolution even though
speciation is an evolutionary process that occurs even though new species have been
produced[10]. (Suryani, [25]).
Table 6. The similarity matrix of the 16S rDNA sequences
0.25
Wakt Wakt Wakt Wakt Wakt Wakt Wakt Wakt Wakt Wakt Wakt Wakt Wakt
u0 u4 u 8 u 12 u 16 u 20 u 24 u 28 u 32 u 36 u 40 u 44 u 48
0.08
a 0.59 1.54 1.78 2.04 2.20 2.29 2.18 2.04 1.62 1.37 1.09 0.89
v
e
r
a
g
e Time (Hour)
g
r
o
w
t
h
Based on the graph of unicellular microbial growth above, it shows that the log or
exponential phase occurs from around the 4th hour to the 20th hour. The stationary
phase occurs around the 20th hour to the 28th hour. [13]Dwijoseputro [6] stated that there
are factors that influence the growth of bacteria, namely the availability of nutrients such
as carbon sources in the media. Hydrocarbons are a source of carbon. Microorganisms
are able to meet their energy needs through oxidation, finding and using as electron
donors[14] (Siregar, [22]). In this study, the carbon source came from nutrients in NA
media in the form of meat extract and peptone.
Data on unicellular microbial growth of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates
decreased around the 28th hour to the 48th hour. Microbial cell death is a factor causing
the decrease in the number of isolated cells. This is because there are many cells
whose nutritional needs are not met, thus affecting the availability of nutrients in
insufficient media[13] (Dwijoseputro, [6]). The decrease in the number of Pseudomonas
aeruginosa isolate cells was caused by reduced levels of death (nutrients) in NA media,
therefore many cells died.
20.0
e
18.0
Percentage of Inhibition
16.0
14.0 d
12.0
10.0
c
(%)
8.0 b
6.0
a a a
4.0
2.0
0.0
0 8 16 24 32 40 48
Time Treatment (hour)
Figure 5. Effect of time extraction on the percentage of active compound P. aeruginosa
inhibition against C. capsici after 7 dai
Effect of Proteinase K and Temperature Active Compound against Antagonistic
Ability of Unicelluler Microbe
The active compounds that have the effect of antibiosis may include enzymes and
toxins. As for the other characters, namely the influence of temperature during storage.
Therefore, please note the character possessed by the active compound of P.
aeruginosa. The best time of the extract is based on test previous 48 hours. The
treatment is made by giving the effect of proteinase K and temperature.
From this experiment it can be seen that the active compounds of this type of
enzyme is not because there was no effect of the addition of proteinase K enzyme is a
large protein molecule that analyzing reactions in a living cell which, in any kind of
reaction catalyzsed by a specific enzyme. According[16] Abadi [1], if not the enzyme will
most likely antagonistic microbes secrete a chemical substance in the form of the toxin.
Toxins affect the function of protoplasts, changing the permeability of cell membranes
also function that can damage and kill the host cell.
18
16 b
Percentage of Inhibition (%)
14
12
b
10
4
a
2
0
Control Proteinase K Temperature
Treatment
A B
Figure 7. Morphology of Collectotrichum. capsici isolate A. Control or without active
compound of Pseudomonas. aeruginosa. B. With active compound of
Psedonomonas. aeruginosa.
Based on the microscopic C. capsici against antifungal effect, it is known inhibited
mycelial growth compared to controls. It is caused by P. aeruginosa exotoxin also have
a grub of active compounds that are excreted by the bacteria. Exotoxin if entry into host
cells and catalyze covalent modification of host cell components that can alter the
physiology of the host cell. According to [20]Barbieri [2], issued exotoxin A bacterium P.
aeruginosa is able to modify the ADP – ribosilation target elongation factor - 2 that can
inhibit protein synthesis and lead to cell death. Antibiotics that have a role in inhibiting
protein synthesis is generally included in a broad spectrum. That is because can bind to
the 30S subunit of the bacterial ribosome, prevent or hinder sticking 50S subunit that is
not fully formed. Additionally, these compounds can distinguish 70S ribosome
prokaryotic and eukaryotic 80S[21] (Hogg [9]).
A B
Figure 8. Hypersensitivity and pathogenicity test of P. aeruginosa. A. Result of
hypersensitivity test; B. Result of pathogenicity test.
Phytopathogenic unicellular microbes induce the formation of oxygen species
active as Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2), Oxygen (O2) and hydroxyl radicals (OH-) can be
involved initiate of hypersensitivity reactions. Cell membrane permeability plants are
changed through fat peroxidation, resulting in electro lyteleakage and the ion exchange
reaction takes place where K+ out and H+ enter. Impact from an ion exchange reaction
is an increase in the pH of the apoplast fluid during an infection. Reaction
hypersensitivity causes cell death and inhibits growth[22] (Keppler et al.,[11]).
The principle of the pathogenicity test is almost the same as the hypersensitivity
test only using the plant part where the isolate originated. The method is used by
bacterial inoculation into and the surface of chilies. After treatment, the chili is placed in
a sterile box covered with a moist tissue for 7x24 hours to maintain the viability of
unicellular microbes and provide optimal conditions for the pathogenicity process. P.
aureginosa does not cause any symptoms to the chili tested. This can P. aureginosa
may be a saprophytic or endophytic fruit Red chili pepper. This is reinforced by the
statement of Schaad [8] that P. aureginosa is an opportunistic microbial plant and
animal pathogen.
CONCLUSION
The molecular identification suggested that the C3C isolate was P. aeruginosa.
Based on the pattern resulting from the antagonistic test, it was suggested that the
active compound(s) was actively produced by P. aeruginosa on 48th hours incubation of
C. capsici. The active compound was aeffected temperature but did not affect
Proteinase K.
Acknowledgments
Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology of Indonesia this study was
supported
REFERENCES
[1] S. K. Sudirga, “Isolation and Identification of Fungi Colletotrichum spp. Isolate PCS
Caused The Anthracnose Desease of Chili Fruit (Capsicum annuum L.) In Bali,” J.
Metamorf., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 23–30, 2019.
[2] G. M. and D. G. Z. Zenova, Raznoobrazie aktinomitsetov v nazemnykh ekosistemakh
(The Diversity of Actinomycetes in Terrestrial Ecosystems). Moscow, 2002.
[3] S. E. Lindow and M. T. Brandl, “MINIREVIEW Microbiology of the Phyllosphere,” Society,
vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 1875–1883, 2003.
[4] T. I. Chernov, A. D. Zhelezova, N. A. Manucharova, and D. G. Zvyagintsev, “Monitoring
of the chitinolytic microbial complex of the phylloplane,” Biol. Bull., vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 527–
532, 2013.
[5] and G. M. Z. Zvyagintsev, D.G., Dobrovol’skaya, T.G., 23. Zvyagintsev, D.G.,
Dobrovol’skaya, T.G., and G. M. Zenova 1999. Structural and functional organization of
microbial communities, in Ekologiya v Rossii na rubezhe 21 veka (Ecology in Russia at
the Turn of the 21st Century). Moscow, 1999.
[6] and L. S. Tanzil, A. I., S. Djauhari, “Potency Microbial Unicellular Filoplan Chili and Its
Inhibitory to Collectotrichum capsici Causal Antraknose Disease on Chili (Capsicum
annum L.),” J. Pertan. Trop., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 152–156, 2020.
[7] J.F. Sambrook and D.W. Russell, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd ed., Vols
1,2 and 3. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2001.
[8] J. B. J. and W. C. N. W. Schaad, “Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic
Bacteria, Third Edition.,” Plant Pathol., vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 812–814, 2001.
[9] J. A. B. and T. L. Garrity, G. M., Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology 2nd Ed Vol.
2. USA: Springer, 2005.
[10] L. Suryani, Karakterisasi Bakteri Penyebab Penyakit Layu dan Hawar Daun pada
Tanaman Jagung dengan Teknik Biokimia, Fisiologi dan Molekuler. Malang: Universitas
Brawijaya, 2012.
[11] T. Sugita, M. Takashima, T. Nakase, T. Ichikawa, R. Ikeda, and T. Shinoda, “Two new
yeasts, Trichosporon debeurmannianum sp. nov. and Trichosporon dermatis sp. nov.,
transferred from the Cryptococcus humicola complex.,” Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., vol.
51, no. Pt 3, pp. 1221–1228, May 2001.
[12] S. Holmes, “Bootstrapping Phylogenetic Trees: Theory and Methods,” Stat. Sci., vol. 18,
no. 2, pp. 241–255, 2003.
[13] D. Dwidjoseputro, Dasar-dasar Mikrobiologi. Jakarta: Djembatan, 2001.
[14] S. R. Siregar, Isolasi Dan Uji Potensi Khamir Pendegaradasi Minyak Solar Dari Air Laut
Belawan. Medan, 2009.
[15] M. Ongena, E. Jourdan, A. Adam, M. Schäfer, H. Budzikiewicz, and P. Thonart, “Amino
Acids, Iron, and Growth Rate as Key Factors Influencing Production of the Pseudomonas
Putida BTP1 Benzylamine Derivative Involved in Systemic Resistance Induction in
Different Plants,” Microb. Ecol., vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 280–292, 2008.
[16] A. L. Abadi, Ilmu penyakit tumbuhan II. Malang: Bayumedia Puslitbang, 2003.
[17] R. Saikia, R. Kumar, D. K. Arora, D. K. Gogoi, and P. Azad, “Pseudomonas aeruginosa
inducing rice resistance against Rhizoctonia solani: production of salicylic acid and
peroxidases.,” Folia Microbiol. (Praha)., vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 375–380, 2006.
[18] B. K. and G. D. Duffy, “Environmental factors modulating antibiotic and siderophore
biosynthesis by Pseudomonas fluorescens biocontrol strains,” Appl. Environ. Microbiol.,
vol. 65, pp. 2429–2438, 1999.
[19] E. T. Van Rij, M. Wesselink, T. F. C. Chin-A-Woeng, G. V. Bloemberg, and B. J. J.
Lugtenberg, “Influence of environmental conditions on the production of phenazine-1-
carboxamide by Pseudomonas chlororaphis PCL1391,” Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact., vol.
17, no. 5, pp. 557–566, 2004.
[20] J. T. Barbieri, “Exotoxins in The Desk Encyclopedia of Microbiology,” Houston: Elsevier
Inc., 2003, pp. 427–429.
[21] S. Hogg, Essential Microbiology, vol. 1, no. 1. England: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd, 2005.
[22] L. D. Keppler, “Active Oxygen Production During a Bacteria-Induced Hypersensitive
Reaction in Tobacco Suspension Cells,” Phytopathology, vol. 79, no. 9, p. 974, 1989.
Abadi, A. L. 2003. Ilmu Penyakit Tumbuhan 2. Penerbit Bayu Media. Malang. P. 13-21.
[1.] Barbieri, J. T. 2003. Exotoxins in The Desk Encyclopedia of Microbiology. Elsevier Inc.
Houston, USA. P. 427-429.
[2.] Bryan, A. H., C. A. Bryan and C. G. Bryan. 1970. Bacteriology Principles and Practice
6th Ed. National Book Store, Inc. Philippines. P. 20-21
[3.] Clifton, C. E. 1958. Introduction to the Bacteria. McGraw-Hill Book Company, INC. USA.
P. 272-273.
[4.] Duffy, B. K. And G. Defago. 1999. Enviromental Factors Modulating Antibiotic and
Siderophore Biosynthesis by Pseudomonas flourescens Biocontrol Strains. Appl.
Environ. Microbiol. 65: 2429-2438
[6.] Garrity, G. M., J. A. Bell and T. Lilburn. 2005. Bergey’s Manual of Systematic
Bacteriology 2nd Ed Vol. 2. Springer. USA. P. 323-379.
[8.] Hogg, S. 2005. Essential Microbiology. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. England. P. 360-369.
[9.] Holmes, S. 2003. Bootstrapping Phylogenetic Tres: Theory and Methods. Statistical
Scie. 18 (2): 241-255.
[10.] Keppler, L. D., C. J. Baker and M. M. Atkinson. 1989. Active Oxygen Production during
a Bacteria-induced Hypersensitive Reaction in Tobacco Suspension Cells. Phytopath.
79:974-978.
[11.] Lu, C. G., W. C. Liu, J. Y. Qiu, H. M. Wang, T. Liu and D. W. Liu. 2008. Identification of
Antifungal Metabolites Produced by a Potential Biocontrol Actinomycetes Strain A01.
Brazilian Journal of Micribiology (2008) 39: 701-707
[12.] Ongena, M., E. Jourdan, A. M. Schafer, H. Budzikiewicz and P. Thonart. 2008. Amino
Acids, Iron, and Growth Rate as Key Factors Influencing Production of the
Pseudomonas putida BTP1 Benzylamine Derivative Involved in Systemic Resistance
Induction in Different Plants. Microb. Ecol. 55: 280-292.
[13.] Puspitasari, A. E., A. L. Abadi dan L. Sulistyowati. 2014. Potensi Khamir Sebagai Agens
Pengendali Hayati Patogen Collectotrichum sp. pada Buah Cabai, Buncis, dan Stroberi.
Jurnal HPT Vol. 2 (3): 92-101
[14.] Saikia, R., R. Kumar, D. K. Arora, D. K. Gogor and P. Azad. 2006. Pseudomonas
aeruginosa Inducing Rice Resistance Against Rhizoctonia solani: Production of Salicylic
Acid and Peroxidases. Folia Microbiol 51 (5): 375-380.
[15.] Sambrook, J. and D. W. Russel. 2001. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Reference. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River. 136p.
[16.] Sastrahidayat, I. R., S. Djauhari dan N. Saleh. 2013. Potensi Mikroba sebagai Agens
Hayati Pengendalian Penyakit Rebah Semai (Sclerotium rolfsii) pada Kedelai. UB Press.
Malang. P. 24.
[17.] Schaad, N. W., J. B. Jones, W. Chun. 2000. Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant
Pathogenic Bacteria. Third Edition. Gail Hoover, Maryland.
[20.] Shivaji, S. and G. S. Prasad. 2009. Antarctic Yeasts: Biodiversity and Potential
Applications Ch. 1. In: Yeast Biotechnology: Diversity and Applications. (Eds.)
Satyanarayana, T. and G Kunze. Springer Science+Business Media. P 4.
[21.] Siregar, S. R. 2009. Isolasi dan Uji Potensi Khamir Pendegradasi Minyak Solar dari Air
Laut Belawan. Universitas Sumatera Utara. Medan.
[22.] Sugita T, Takasima M, Nakase T, Ichikawa T, Ikeda R, Shinoda T (2001) Two new
yeasts, T. debeurmainnianum sp. nov. and T. dermatis sp. transferred from the
Cryptococcus humicola complex. inter. J. of Syst. and Evolution Microbiol. 51: 1221-
1228.
[23.] Sumarni, N. dan A. Muharam. 2005. Budidaya Tanaman Cabai Merah. Penerbit Balitsa,
Bandung. 34 p.
[24.] Suryani, L. 2012. Karakterisasi Bakteri Penyebab Penyakit Layu dan Hawar Daun pada
Tanaman Jagung dengan Teknik Biokimia, Fisiologi dan Molekuler. Tesis. Universitas
Brawijaya, Malang. P. 48-59.
[26.] Widodo dan Y. Sutiyoso. 2010. Hama dan Penyakit Tanaman (Deteksi Dini dan
Penanggulangan). PT. Trubus Swadaya, Depok. P 209-210.